Intermolecular Interactions Drive the Unusual Co-Crystallization of Different Calix[4]arene Conformations

: Crystallization of 5,17-dibromo-11,27,23,25-tetraone-26,28-dipropoxycalix[4]arene results in the rare observation of two different calix[4]arene conformations (partial cone and 1,3-alternate) co-crystallized within the same single crystal X-ray structure. Analysis using 1 H and 13 C NMR spectroscopy revealed that only a single conformation (the cone) was present in solution, and in contrast to the structures of other reported calix[4]arenes and calix[4]quinones, both conformations of the compound present in this crystal structure have a “pinched” shape, drastically reducing Br-Br separation and associated cavity sizes.


Introduction
Calix[n]quinones are a class of macrocyclic molecules that are structurally related to the more widely recognised calix[n]arenes, the latter of which have been extensively studied as supramolecular hosts. While they have not been the recipient of the same level of attention as calix[n]arenes, calix[n]quinones have been investigated for their electrochemical properties [1][2][3], and potential applications such as cathodic materials in lithium-ion batteries [4]. In addition, calix[n]quinones are capable of forming complexes with alkali and alkaline-earth metal ions [5,6], and can be further modified to access a wide range of functionalised calix[n]arenes [7].
One property of calix [n]arenes that have long been the subject of study is their conformational flexibility, which arises due to the ease of rotation around the methylene bridges. For calix [4]arenes, four well-defined conformations can be described: these are the cone, partial cone, 1,2-alternate, and 1,3-alternate conformations ( Figure 1) [8]. These can be described by assigning each of the aromatic groups as projecting up (u) or down (d) relative to an average plane defined by the bridging methylene groups. For example, the cone conformation can be described as having all aromatic rings orientated upwards (uuuu) while the 1,3-alternate conformation is characterised as having an alternating sequence of upwards and downwards groups (udud). For simple calix [4]arenes featuring low degrees of substitution on the lower-rim, interchange between the four conformations occurs readily in solution [9]. However, it is possible to either slow this interchange by partial substitution, mainly by forming alkyl ethers on the lower-rim oxygen atoms, or completely supress it through exhaustive substitution [10]. Depending upon the reaction conditions selected for lower rim modification, it is possible to lock the calix [4]arene into one of these non-interconverting conformations, or atropisomers. In comparison to calix [4]arenes, the conformational flexibility of calix [4]quinones has not been as thoroughly investigated, although some studies have been performed. For example, calix [4]diquinones, which possess two quinone moieties on opposing sides of the molecule, are more flexible than structurally related 25,27-dialkoxycalix [4]arenes [11]. The synthesis of 5,17-dibromo-11,27,23,25-tetraone-26,28-dipropoxycalix [4]arene (1) has been previously achieved as shown in Scheme 1 [2], by oxidation of calix [4]arene C1 to the corresponding p-quinone using thallic nitrate [12,13], followed by bromination using N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) in butanone (MEK) [14]. However, its crystal structure and conformational behaviour in solution has not yet been reported. Herein we describe the crystal structure of 1, the asymmetric unit of which contains two distinct conformations of calix [4]diquinone, the partial cone (1a) and the 1,3-alternate (1b) conformations ( Figure 2). This can be contrasted with the solution state where NMR spectroscopic evidence suggests that only a single conformation, the cone conformation (1c), is present. Scheme 1. Synthesis of 1 using a method developed by Genorio [2]. The synthesis of 5,17-dibromo-11,27,23,25-tetraone-26,28-dipropoxycalix [4]arene (1) has been previously achieved as shown in Scheme 1 [2], by oxidation of calix [4]arene C1 to the corresponding p-quinone using thallic nitrate [12,13], followed by bromination using N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) in butanone (MEK) [14]. However, its crystal structure and conformational behaviour in solution has not yet been reported. Herein we describe the crystal structure of 1, the asymmetric unit of which contains two distinct conformations of calix [4]diquinone, the partial cone (1a) and the 1,3-alternate (1b) conformations ( Figure 2). This can be contrasted with the solution state where NMR spectroscopic evidence suggests that only a single conformation, the cone conformation (1c), is present. investigated, although some studies have been performed. For example, calix [4]diquinones, which possess two quinone moieties on opposing sides of the molecule, are more flexible than structurally related 25,27-dialkoxycalix [4]arenes [11]. The synthesis of 5,17-dibromo-11,27,23,25-tetraone-26,28-dipropoxycalix [4]arene (1) has been previously achieved as shown in Scheme 1 [2], by oxidation of calix [4]arene C1 to the corresponding p-quinone using thallic nitrate [12,13], followed by bromination using N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) in butanone (MEK) [14]. However, its crystal structure and conformational behaviour in solution has not yet been reported. Herein we describe the crystal structure of 1, the asymmetric unit of which contains two distinct conformations of calix [4]diquinone, the partial cone (1a) and the 1,3-alternate (1b) conformations ( Figure 2). This can be contrasted with the solution state where NMR spectroscopic evidence suggests that only a single conformation, the cone conformation (1c), is present. Scheme 1. Synthesis of 1 using a method developed by Genorio [2]. Scheme 1. Synthesis of 1 using a method developed by Genorio [2].

Hirshfeld Surface Analysis
Crystal Explorer version 17.5 was used to generate Hirshfeld surfaces and the corresponding 2-D fingerprint plots [18]. The Hirshfeld surfaces of both conformations have been mapped over dnorm (range −0.3 Å to 3.6 Å) and curvedness. The red to blue colour scheme on the Hirshfeld surfaces mapped with dnorm highlights the shorter and the longer

Synthesis and Characterisation of 1
The synthesis of compound 1 has previously been reported by Genorio [2]. 1

Crystallography
A crystal was coated in paratone-N oil and mounted on a Mitigen cryoloop and mounted on a Bruker D8 Venture diffractometer. Data were collected using the Apex2 suite of programs. The crystal was kept at 100.0 K during data collection. Using Olex2 [15], the structure was solved with the SHELXT structure solution program using Intrinsic Phasing and refined with the SHELXL refinement package using Least Squares minimization [16,17].

Hirshfeld Surface Analysis
Crystal Explorer version 17.5 was used to generate Hirshfeld surfaces and the corresponding 2-D fingerprint plots [18]. The Hirshfeld surfaces of both conformations have been mapped over d norm (range −0.3 Å to 3.6 Å) and curvedness. The red to blue colour scheme on the Hirshfeld surfaces mapped with d norm highlights the shorter and the longer contacts, respectively. The Hirshfeld surface mapped with curvedness can be employed to examine the effect of weak intermolecular interactions in a crystal. The 2-D fingerprint plots illustrate the summary of the frequency of each combination of d e and d i across the Hirshfeld surface of a molecule, where d e is the distance of an atom external to the generated surface and d i is the distance of an atom internal to the surface. Different contributions of interatomic contacts are reflected with different colors, increasing contributions from blue to green to red. The intermolecular interaction energies are calculated in Crystal Explorer version 17.5 from a single point molecular wavefunction at the HF/3-21G level, using a cluster of 3.8 Å radius.

Structural Description
Compound 1 crystallises in the triclinic space group P-1 with two molecules present in the asymmetric unit ( Figure 3). One of these molecules adopts the partial cone conformation (1a), which is characterised by three of the aromatic rings pointing up and one group (more specifically, one of the p-benzoquinone moieties) pointing down ( Figure 4a). The other molecule in the asymmetric unit (1b) adopts the 1,3-alternate conformation, where the p-benzoquinone moieties both point in the same direction but in the opposite direction to the brominated aromatic rings ( Figure 4b). As the two molecules are simply conformational isomers, it was not surprising to find that there was little difference in the bond lengths found within 1a and 1b. contacts, respectively. The Hirshfeld surface mapped with curvedness can be employed to examine the effect of weak intermolecular interactions in a crystal. The 2-D fingerprint plots illustrate the summary of the frequency of each combination of de and di across the Hirshfeld surface of a molecule, where de is the distance of an atom external to the generated surface and di is the distance of an atom internal to the surface. Different contributions of interatomic contacts are reflected with different colors, increasing contributions from blue to green to red. The intermolecular interaction energies are calculated in Crystal Explorer version 17.5 from a single point molecular wavefunction at the HF/3-21G level, using a cluster of 3.8 Å radius.

Structural Description
Compound 1 crystallises in the triclinic space group P-1 with two molecules present in the asymmetric unit ( Figure 3). One of these molecules adopts the partial cone conformation (1a), which is characterised by three of the aromatic rings pointing up and one group (more specifically, one of the p-benzoquinone moieties) pointing down ( Figure 4a). The other molecule in the asymmetric unit (1b) adopts the 1,3-alternate conformation, where the p-benzoquinone moieties both point in the same direction but in the opposite direction to the brominated aromatic rings ( Figure 4b). As the two molecules are simply conformational isomers, it was not surprising to find that there was little difference in the bond lengths found within 1a and 1b. Figure 3. Asymmetric unit found in the single crystal X-ray structure of 1. Hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity. One lower-rim propoxy group is disordered over two positions and has been successfully modelled at partial occupancies. . Asymmetric unit found in the single crystal X-ray structure of 1. Hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity. One lower-rim propoxy group is disordered over two positions and has been successfully modelled at partial occupancies.
In both 1a and 1b, the p-benzoquinone moieties are not strictly planar, with the C=O bonds bending outwards, away from the calix [4]diquinone. For comparison, examination of the crystal structure of p-benzoquinone itself reveals that is almost completely planar, with less than 1 • deviation from a perfectly planar structure [19]. In 1a, the p-benzoquinone moiety that is orientated downwards exhibits significant deviation from a planar structure: the C24a-C1a-C25a-O3a and C1a-C24a  In both 1a and 1b, the p-benzoquinone moieties are not strictly planar, with the C=O bonds bending outwards, away from the calix [4]diquinone. For comparison, examination of the crystal structure of p-benzoquinone itself reveals that is almost completely planar, with less than 1° deviation from a perfectly planar structure [19]. In 1a, the p-benzoquinone moiety that is orientated downwards exhibits significant deviation from a planar structure: the C24a-C1a-C25a-O3a and C1a-C24a-C23a-O2a dihedral angles have values of 165.8(3)° and −170.7(3)° respectively. This deviation from planar is less in the other pbenzoquinone moiety in 1a (the group orientated upwards), where the O4a-C27a-C9a-C10a and O1a-C11a-C10a-C9a dihedral angles have values of 176.4(2)° and 176.1(3)° respectively. With 1b, both p-benzoquinone moieties exhibit similar deviations from planar. This is most apparent with the C10b-C9b-C27b-O4b torsion angle which has a value of −161.6°. The distortion of the p-benzoquinone structure is a common trait amongst calix [4]diquinone crystal structures. For example, a structurally similar calix [4]diquinone reported by Reddy et al. (YEHVIQ) also exhibits up to 17.0° deviation from being planar [20].
Although two conformations of 1 are present in the crystal structure, 1 H and 13 C NMR spectra (see supplementary materials) indicate that only a single conformation was present in solution. Based on the number of peaks present and the symmetry of the four possible conformations, both the partial cone and 1,2-alternate conformations could be ruled out as the single conformation present. Based on the peaks observed in the 13 C NMR, it was postulated that the cone conformation, 1c, was present [22,23], which is in line with previous conclusions drawn by van Loon et al. into a structurally similar calix [4]diquinone structure [13]. The presence of the two conformers 1a and 1b in the crystal structure, and 1c in solution would suggest that 1 can readily interconvert between the conformations, most likely by an oxygen through the annulus mechanism, [24] and that solid state effects drive crystallization in the present form. This solution phase flexibility is in line with previous reports that calix [4]diquinones are generally more flexible than structurally similar 25,27-dialkoxycalix [4]arenes [11]. An example of this is provided by further Unlike other calix [4]arene type structures, which generally have the para-substituent (see R group, Figure 1) orientated outwards, both 1a and 1b exhibit "pinching" of the bromine atoms towards each other. The intramolecular Br-Br distances in 1a and 1b (3.7851(6) and 3.9862(6) Å) are significantly less than in the analogous 5,17-dibromo-26,28di-n-propoxy-25,27-dihydroxycalix [4]arene, where the Br-Br distance is 8.9824(9) Å [21].
Although two conformations of 1 are present in the crystal structure, 1 H and 13 C NMR spectra (see supplementary materials) indicate that only a single conformation was present in solution. Based on the number of peaks present and the symmetry of the four possible conformations, both the partial cone and 1,2-alternate conformations could be ruled out as the single conformation present. Based on the peaks observed in the 13 C NMR, it was postulated that the cone conformation, 1c, was present [22,23], which is in line with previous conclusions drawn by van Loon et al. into a structurally similar calix [4]diquinone structure [13]. The presence of the two conformers 1a and 1b in the crystal structure, and 1c in solution would suggest that 1 can readily interconvert between the conformations, most likely by an oxygen through the annulus mechanism, [24] and that solid state effects drive crystallization in the present form. This solution phase flexibility is in line with previous reports that calix [4]diquinones are generally more flexible than structurally similar 25,27dialkoxycalix [4]arenes [11]. An example of this is provided by further comparison of 1 with the analogous 5,17-dibromo-26,28-di-n-propoxy-25,27-dihydroxycalix [4]arene (SITTOH), which shows that the latter adopts a single conformation both in solution and in the crystal structure [21].

Crystal Packing and Hirshfeld Surfaces
In the extended structure of 1, both the two conformers 1a and 1b pack side by side along the a-axis direction with each independent conformer arranged in alternating layer and belongs to two different packing patterns ( Figure 5). A comparable phenomenon was noted for the cyclic alkoxy-organotellurium trihalides where two independent molecules belong to two different packing motifs [25]. The closest contact between molecules of There are also additional interactions between 1a and 1b through interaction of the propyl groups with the carbonyl groups, with the H31B---O3A distance of 2.928(5) Å. Furthermore, there are long range interactions involving the bromine atoms, varying in length from 3.119(3) Å for the Br2B---H14C contact to 4.354(3) Å for the Br1B---H14D interaction. Within the layer comprising conformers 1a, the calixarenes are involved in H-bonding between themselves through the adjacent propoxy chains with C33A-H33D---O6A distance measured at 2.60 Å while for layer comprising conformers 1b, the neighbouring calixarenes are engaged in the offset face-to-face interaction involving the phenyl rings with C---π (centroid) distance at 3.83 Å. In the direction of the a-axis, the extended structure is characterized by molecules of either 1a or 1b packing in an up-down antiparallel bilayer arrangement (Figure 6a,b) which is common for calix [4]arenes. Additionally, some protons are oriented towards the C=C bond plane (plane of the benzene ring) and form CH---π bonds with average distances of 2.75 ± 0.10 Å, coinciding with the CH---π bond distances as reported by Nishio [26].

Crystal Packing and Hirshfeld Surfaces
In the extended structure of 1, both the two conformers 1a and 1b pack side b along the a-axis direction with each independent conformer arranged in alternating and belongs to two different packing patterns ( Figure 5). A comparable phenomeno noted for the cyclic alkoxy-organotellurium trihalides where two independent mole belong to two different packing motifs [25]. The closest contact between molecules and 1b caused by this arrangement involves strong hydrogen bonding between car O-atoms with adjacent H-atoms, C=O---HC: O11---H10A = 2.292 Å, O4A---H34E = Å; O3A---H34B = 2.516 Å, O2A---H24B = 2.679 Å; O1A and the protons H4B (C-H 2.495(3) Å) and H2BB (C-H---O = 2.892(3) Å). There are also additional interaction tween 1a and 1b through interaction of the propyl groups with the carbonyl groups the H31B ---O3A distance of 2.928(5) Å. Furthermore, there are long range intera involving the bromine atoms, varying in length from 3.119(3) Å for the Br2B---H14C tact to 4.354(3) Å for the Br1B ---H14D interaction. Within the layer comprising confo 1a, the calixarenes are involved in H-bonding between themselves through the ad propoxy chains with C33A-H33D ---O6A distance measured at 2.60 Å while for layer prising conformers 1b, the neighbouring calixarenes are engaged in the offset face-t interaction involving the phenyl rings with C---π(centroid) distance at 3.83 Å. In the dire of the a-axis, the extended structure is characterized by molecules of either 1a or 1b ing in an up-down antiparallel bilayer arrangement (Figure 6a,b) which is commo calix [4]arenes. Additionally, some protons are oriented towards the C=C bond (plane of the benzene ring) and form CH---π bonds with average distances of 2.75 Å, coinciding with the CH---π bond distances as reported by Nishio [26].  It is observed that the Hirshfeld surface analysis of 1a and 1b contains the highest proportion of H···H interactions (44.1% and 44.5%, respectively), as this is consistent with the high proportion of hydrogen atoms in the molecular structure (Figures 7 and 8). There is a form of pairwise O···H interaction present, comprising 20.1% and 22.9% of the Hirshfeld surface for 1a and 1b, respectively, and this results in the appearance of two It is observed that the Hirshfeld surface analysis of 1a and 1b contains the highest proportion of H···H interactions (44.1% and 44.5%, respectively), as this is consistent with the high proportion of hydrogen atoms in the molecular structure (Figures 7 and 8).
There is a form of pairwise O···H interaction present, comprising 20.1% and 22.9% of the Hirshfeld surface for 1a and 1b, respectively, and this results in the appearance of two spikes corresponding to both the donor and acceptor of C-H···O hydrogen bonds in the fingerprint plots delineated into O···H/H···O contacts. Intense circular depressions (red spots) are found on the Hirshfeld surfaces indicating hydrogen bond interactions (Figure 9). The smaller proportion of O···H interaction results in a larger proportion of H···Br interaction for 1a, however, the opposite trend was seen for 1b where H···Br interaction make up 11.5% of the Hirshfeld surface. The Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over d norm also shows the contribution of the medium range contact i.e., the donor and the acceptors intermolecular C-H···π contacts (C-H···π/π···H-C; often abbreviated as C···H/H···C), accounting for 11.8% and 12.1% of the surface for 1a and 1b, respectively. It is observed that the Hirshfeld surface analysis of 1a and 1b contains the highest proportion of H···H interactions (44.1% and 44.5%, respectively), as this is consistent with the high proportion of hydrogen atoms in the molecular structure (Figures 7 and 8). There is a form of pairwise O···H interaction present, comprising 20.1% and 22.9% of the Hirshfeld surface for 1a and 1b, respectively, and this results in the appearance of two spikes corresponding to both the donor and acceptor of C-H···O hydrogen bonds in the fingerprint plots delineated into O···H/H···O contacts. Intense circular depressions (red spots) are found on the Hirshfeld surfaces indicating hydrogen bond interactions ( Figure  9). The smaller proportion of O···H interaction results in a larger proportion of H···Br interaction for 1a, however, the opposite trend was seen for 1b where H···Br interaction make up 11.5% of the Hirshfeld surface. The Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over dnorm also shows the contribution of the medium range contact i.e., the donor and the acceptors intermolecular C-H···π contacts (C-H···π/π···H-C; often abbreviated as C···H/H···C), accounting for 11.8% and 12.1% of the surface for 1a and 1b, respectively. It is noteworthy that Hirshfeld surface analysis is extremely useful for identifying other interactions (notably relatively weaker interactions) apart from the conventional interactions such as C-H···O and C-H···π. We have carefully examined the halogen bond interaction and found that the halogen bond is very closely related to the type-II interaction with θ 1 ≈ 92 • (C17B−Br2B···Br2A) and θ 2 ≈ 160 • (C17A−Br2A···Br2B) as a consequence of close packing [27]. We note that although only 1.1% of the surface is assigned to Br···Br contact for both 1a and 1b, a bright streak is still visible at the top right of the fingerprint plot, circled in red in Figures 7 and 8. Interestingly, the presence of Br···Br contact is visible on the Hirshfeld surface when mapped over curvedness ( Figure 10). This relatively low percentage solely relates to the proportion of interactions within the crystal structure (given that there is only two Br per molecule, the contribution to the surface will generally be low) and does not reflect the strength of such interaction on the solid-state behavior. The remaining contributions to the Hirshfeld surface are from the Br···C (shortest contact at 3.65 Å for Br1B···C18A) at and O···C (shortest contact at 3.11 Å for O3A···C34B) contacts making up only 1.8% and 3.2% to the surface for 1a while 1.7% and 4.3% for 1b. Crystals 2022, 12, 250 8 of 12 It is noteworthy that Hirshfeld surface analysis is extremely useful for identifying other interactions (notably relatively weaker interactions) apart from the conventional interactions such as C-H···O and C-H···π. We have carefully examined the halogen bond interaction and found that the halogen bond is very closely related to the type-II interaction with θ1 ≈ 92° (C17B−Br2B···Br2A) and θ2 ≈ 160° (C17A−Br2A···Br2B) as a consequence of close packing [27]. We note that although only 1.1% of the surface is assigned to Br···Br contact for both 1a and 1b, a bright streak is still visible at the top right of the fingerprint plot, circled in red in Figures 7 and 8. Interestingly, the presence of Br···Br contact is visible on the Hirshfeld surface when mapped over curvedness ( Figure 10). This relatively low percentage solely relates to the proportion of interactions within the crystal structure (given that there is only two Br per molecule, the contribution to the surface will generally be low) and does not reflect the strength of such interaction on the solid-state behavior. The remaining contributions to the Hirshfeld surface are from the Br···C (shortest contact at 3.65 Å for Br1B···C18A) at and O···C (shortest contact at 3.11 Å for O3A···C34B) contacts making up only 1.8% and 3.2% to the surface for 1a while 1.7% and 4.3% for 1b.  It is noteworthy that Hirshfeld surface analysis is extremely useful for identifying other interactions (notably relatively weaker interactions) apart from the conventional interactions such as C-H···O and C-H···π. We have carefully examined the halogen bond interaction and found that the halogen bond is very closely related to the type-II interaction with θ1 ≈ 92° (C17B−Br2B···Br2A) and θ2 ≈ 160° (C17A−Br2A···Br2B) as a consequence of close packing [27]. We note that although only 1.1% of the surface is assigned to Br···Br contact for both 1a and 1b, a bright streak is still visible at the top right of the fingerprint plot, circled in red in Figures 7 and 8. Interestingly, the presence of Br···Br contact is visible on the Hirshfeld surface when mapped over curvedness ( Figure 10). This relatively low percentage solely relates to the proportion of interactions within the crystal structure (given that there is only two Br per molecule, the contribution to the surface will generally be low) and does not reflect the strength of such interaction on the solid-state behavior. The remaining contributions to the Hirshfeld surface are from the Br···C (shortest contact at 3.65 Å for Br1B···C18A) at and O···C (shortest contact at 3.11 Å for O3A···C34B) contacts making up only 1.8% and 3.2% to the surface for 1a while 1.7% and 4.3% for 1b. (a) (b) We have also used CrystalExplorer to calculate the intermolecular interaction energies using the CE-HF/3-21G energy model [18] to visualize the interaction topology in the crystal structures. The energy frameworks for electrostatic, dispersion, and total energy components are shown in red, green, and blue colored tubes, as shown in Figure 11. All the frameworks were adjusted to the same cylinder scale factor of 150. The relative strengths of the overall packing interaction energy are indicated by the cylindrical shapes where the radius of the rods is proportional to the magnitude of the interaction energy. The total intermolecular energy is the sum of electrostatic, polarization, dispersion, and exchangerepulsion energies [28] with scale factors of 1.019, 0.651, 0.901, and 0.811, respectively [29]. From the energy framework analysis, we found that the dispersion contribution dominates in the intermolecular interactions. The two alternating calixarene layers of different conformers give the parallel cylindrical tubes when viewed down the c-axis with a larger diameter for the total energy (−89.1 kJ mol −1 ) and dispersion (−57.0 kJ mol −1 ) components ascribed for the same type of conformer that self-interact strongly within themselves while the smaller tube diameter intersecting calixarene layers of different conformers illustrates the weaker contribution of the dispersion (−25.8 kJ mol −1 ) component yielding the total energy of −31.3 kJ mol −1 .  We have also used CrystalExplorer to calculate the intermolecular interaction energies using the CE-HF/3-21G energy model [18] to visualize the interaction topology in the crystal structures. The energy frameworks for electrostatic, dispersion, and total energy components are shown in red, green, and blue colored tubes, as shown in Figure 11. All the frameworks were adjusted to the same cylinder scale factor of 150. The relative strengths of the overall packing interaction energy are indicated by the cylindrical shapes where the radius of the rods is proportional to the magnitude of the interaction energy. The total intermolecular energy is the sum of electrostatic, polarization, dispersion, and exchange-repulsion energies [28] with scale factors of 1.019, 0.651, 0.901, and 0.811, respectively [29]. From the energy framework analysis, we found that the dispersion contribution dominates in the intermolecular interactions. The two alternating calixarene layers of different conformers give the parallel cylindrical tubes when viewed down the c-axis with a larger diameter for the total energy (−89.1 kJ mol −1 ) and dispersion (−57.0 kJ mol −1 ) components ascribed for the same type of conformer that self-interact strongly within themselves while the smaller tube diameter intersecting calixarene layers of different conformers illustrates the weaker contribution of the dispersion (−25.8 kJ mol −1 ) component yielding the total energy of −31.3 kJ mol −1 Figure 10. The Hirshfeld surface mapped over curvedness highlighting the weak Br···Br contact red arrows.

Discussion
Following this analysis, the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.41, updated March 2020) [30] was searched for diametrically symmetrical calix [4]diquinones. This returned a total of 41 results, of which 29 were metal-calix [4]quinone complexes and lower-rim bridged calix [4]quinones. These are unsuitable for comparison with 1 because the metal binding/lower-rim bridges would dramatically influence the conformational flexibility of the calix [4]quinone. Of the remaining 12 structures, a total of seven hits had simple alkyl chains on the lower rim (NUPHUB, NUPHUB01, PETDOH, PETDUN, PET-FAV, VUSNED, and YEHVIQ) [11,20,31,32]. A common structural theme amongst these seven crystal structures and 1 was the deviation of the p-benzoquinone moieties from a Figure 11. Energy-framework diagrams for E ele , E dis and E tot for a cluster of molecules in the crystal structure of 1 along band c-axes.

Discussion
Following this analysis, the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.41, updated March 2020) [30] was searched for diametrically symmetrical calix [4]diquinones. This returned a total of 41 results, of which 29 were metal-calix [4]quinone complexes and lower-rim bridged calix [4]quinones. These are unsuitable for comparison with 1 because the metal binding/lower-rim bridges would dramatically influence the conformational flexibility of the calix [4]quinone. Of the remaining 12 structures, a total of seven hits had simple alkyl chains on the lower rim (NUPHUB, NUPHUB01, PETDOH, PETDUN, PETFAV, VUSNED, and YEHVIQ) [11,20,31,32]. A common structural theme amongst these seven crystal structures and 1 was the deviation of the p-benzoquinone moieties from a perfectly planar structure. Amongst these structures, the prevalent conformation was the partial-cone conformation, however, in each case, only a single conformation was present in the asymmetric unit. The best structural comparison to the 1 is provided by YEHVIQ, which differs structurally in that both bromine atoms are replaced with tert-butyl groups, with only the 1,3-alternate conformation present [20].
A wider examination of the CSD revealed that the occurrence of multiple conformations of calix [4]arene-type structures within a single asymmetric unit is extremely rare, but not unprecedented. A search for structures possessing the basic calix [4]arene skeleton with the additional criteria that more than one molecule must be present in the asymmetric unit (Z' > 1) yielded a total of 332 results. Any results that featured metal binding/lower-rim bridges or possessed multiple molecules with the same conformation were discounted, leading to only a single target structure (IWESAF) [33]. This crystal structure of 5,11,17,23tetra-t-butyl-26,28-dihydroxy-25,27-dimethoxycalix [4]arene featured both the cone and partial cone conformations within the asymmetric unit. Expanding the search to also include any atoms on the methylene bridge positions yielded a thiacalix [4]arene (CH 2 bridges replaced by sulfur atoms) as an additional structure (ALETEQ) [34]. Three molecules were present in the asymmetric unit of this structure, with two molecules adopting the cone conformation while the final one adopted the 1,3-alternate conformation.

Conclusions
In conclusion, the crystal structure of 5,17-dibromo-11,27,23,25-tetraone-26,28dipropoxycalix [4]arene, 1, is reported and exhibits the highly unusual feature of containing two different conformations, partial cone, and 1,3-alternate, of the same molecule within the asymmetric unit. A search of the CSD returns only two other calix [4]arene type structures exhibiting this property, showing that such observations are rare. The behaviour of 1 in the solid state varies drastically from that in solution, where only the cone conformation was found to be present. This also suggests that calix [4]diquinones are more conformationally flexible relative to their other structurally analogous calix [4]arenes, which would be locked into a single atropisomer. This may have a downstream impact in understanding how such molecules react in subsequent synthetic reactions, particularly in the solid state, and work in this area will be reported in due course.