Separation of Radioactive Ruthenium from Alkaline Solution: A Solvent Extraction and Detailed Mechanistic Approach

A solvent extraction-based technique has been utilized to study the separation of ruthenium from simulated alkaline solution using Aliquat 336 as the extractant and isodecyl alcohol (IDA) as the phase modifier in n-dodecane. The effects of various experimental parameters such as solution pH, mixing time, concentration of Aliquat 336 and IDA, role of citric acid as the aqueous phase modifier/complexing agent, and stripping agents have been evaluated. It was observed that with the increase in the solution pH, the extraction efficiency increases gradually. However, when citric acid was added into the aqueous solution, an overall increase (from ∼20 to 91%) in ruthenium extraction is observed. 20 min of the mixing time was found to be sufficient to reach the extraction equilibrium. Solution composition was optimized as 50% Aliquat 336 and 10% IDA in n-dodecane (v/v) for maximum extraction. The stripping of ruthenium from the loaded organic phase has been studied using HCl and HNO3. The result indicates that in the presence of 8 M HNO3, ∼73% of ruthenium can be back extracted to the aqueous phase in a single contact. The stripping efficiency of HNO3 was found to be higher than that of HCl. Active studies with 106Ru as the radiotracer were also performed and monitored using a HPGe detector. The same method was implemented for extraction studies with real waste solution in the presence of other radionuclides such as 137Cs, 90Sr, and 125Sb. The presence of the chemical species in aqueous as well as organic phase has been identified using UV–vis spectrophotometry, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy. Density functional theory-based quantum mechanical calculations have been performed in order to unravel the extraction mechanism with the present solvent system.


INTRODUCTION
Ruthenium (Ru) belongs to the platinum group element in the periodic table. During the nuclear fission of 235 U in nuclear reactors, a large amount of fission products are formed among which ruthenium isotopes, 103 Ru (t 1/2 : 39.25 d, fission yield: 3.12%), 105 Ru (t 1/2 : 4.44 h, fission yield: 0.92%), 106 Ru (t 1/2 : 368 d, fission yield: 0.4%), and 107 Ru (t 1/2 : 3.8 m, fission yield: 0.17%), are well known. 1−6 Therefore, these ruthenium isotopes altogether contribute a significant yield which is a waste management-related concern at the back end of nuclear technology due to their high specific activity, radiological toxicity, and moderate to high aqueous solubility. Among all, ruthenium-106 is a troublesome nuclide in the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle due to its relatively long half-life and moderate fission yield. 7−9 Separation of ruthenium from either acidic high level liquid waste (HLLW) or alkaline intermediate level liquid waste (ILLW) is a long-term challenge to the separation scientists due to the existence of ruthenium in different oxidation states and variation in speciation in aqueous solution. 10−12 In a nitric acid solution, Ru can exist with many oxidation states from +3 to +8 with the major formation of various nitroso nitrate complexes with the general formula [Ru(NO)(NO 3 1,13 The complexes also get co-extracted in the organic medium along with other metal ions during extraction of U and Pu in the PUREX process when 30% tributyl phosphate (TBP) in ndodecane is used as the solvent. 14,15 The extraction and stripping behaviors of ruthenium are not predictable and therefore complicate the PUREX process. 16−18 This sometimes contaminates the final product streams of U and Pu. 19,20 On the other hand, the fully oxidized ruthenium tetroxide is highly volatile in nature and escapes to the vapor phase which is subsequently deposited as a black RuO 2 residue to the inner pipe, equipment used for the ventilations during HLLW evaporation and/or vitrification. 16 Many numbers of reports are available on the extraction and recovery of ruthenium from the acidic medium. Similarly, separation of ruthenium from a chloride medium has been well established by several researchers due to the propensity of formation of the anionic chloro complex in a chloride/HCl medium. 21,22 Various anion exchangers containing quaternary ammonium halide and trialkylamines as active functional groups were utilized to separate the anionic chloro complexes from the aqueous chloride medium. 23,24 Separation of ruthenium from aqueous nitric acid is more difficult, which makes the ruthenium separation very challenging at the nuclear back end cycle where the overall medium is 2−3 M HNO 3 . 25,26 Ruthenium tetroxide is found to be soluble in certain organic solvents such as CCl 4 . 27 The removal of ruthenium in the form of ruthenium tetroxide from the PUREX process waste stream has been reported with paraffin oil. The final product has been collected as ruthenium dioxide after filtration through an ordinary filter paper.
The separation of ruthenium from an alkaline medium is equally important as it is present in substantial quantity (∼2 × 10 −2 −2 mCi/L depending on fuel cooling period) in intermediate level liquid waste. 25−28 There are many sources of this waste which are as follows: (i) metallic decladding operation of spent nuclear fuel at the reprocessing site, (ii) evaporation and neutralization of process condensate during the evaporation of acidic HLLW to concentrate, and (iii) purification of degraded TBP solvent through carbonate washing. The ruthenium separation from this alkaline waste is more difficult than acidic HLLW because of alkalinity and high salt content. 29−31 For this reason, very limited literature is available on the Ru separation from alkaline ILLW. The total dissolved solid (TDS) in this type of waste sometimes reaches up to 20−30 gm/L, especially when any metallic clad other than the zirconium alloy is processed. In an alkaline medium, ruthenium exists mainly in the form of RuO 4 − and RuO 4 2− in the pH range of 9−13, especially in the oxidizing environment. 31−35 Therefore, most of the reports of ruthenium separation from alkaline waste streams are based on the ion exchange process. 36,37 Although a few reports are available on the recovery of ruthenium from an alkaline medium, no report is available on the recovery of ruthenium through liquid−liquid extraction using a liquid anion exchanger in the presence of any aqueous phase modifier. In a recent publication, a chromatographic separation/solid phase extraction of ruthenium from an alkaline medium using Aliquat 336 as the extractant loaded on Chromosorb W resin has been reported, where ruthenium is oxidized to RuO 4 2− using sodium hypochlorite as the oxidizing agent. 36 However, it is quite unlikely that Ru will be present with this type of oxidizing agent in an alkaline medium. Infact, there is always a chance of presence of various ruthenium nitrosyl nitrate complexes in most of the wastes related to the back end fuel cycle as mentioned already (vide supra). The formal oxidation state of Ru in these types of complexes is generally found to be +3. It is also reported that alkali addition to the ruthenium nitrosyl nitrate complexes systematically replaces the nitrite, nitrate, and water molecules from the Ru primary coordination sphere by hydroxide ions. 38−40 However, there is no emphasis on the extraction of this type of species from the alkaline medium, which is more practical in the nuclear industry.
In the present report, a liquid−liquid extraction method has been utilized for the separation of ruthenium from simulated alkaline intermediate level waste using Aliquat 336 as the extractant at pH ∼13. The effect of various experimental parameters such as solution pH, equilibration time, extractant concentration, and complexing agent concentration on extraction of ruthenium has been discussed. The speciation of ruthenium complexes in aqueous as well as in organic phases has been studied using various spectroscopic techniques. UV− visible spectrophotometry has been utilized for the characterization of ruthenium species after systematic addition of citric acid in the alkaline medium. Similarly, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometry has been used to characterize the complexation behavior of ruthenium with the organic phase. Furthermore, Raman spectroscopy is used for the determination of the nature of ruthenium complexes in aqueous as well as in organic medium under various chemical conditions. The stripping of ruthenium from the loaded organic phase has been studied using various concentrations of nitric acid and hydrochloric acid. With the optimized condition, the separation of ruthenium has been performed from actual intermediate level waste solution successfully. The organic phase was prepared by mixing Aliquat 336 and IDA at different proportions (v/v %) in n-dodecane as the diluent. Required amount of citric acid was added into the aqueous feed solution before performing the solvent extraction experiments.

Ruthenium Stock Solution.
The inactive stock solution of ruthenium (∼120 ppm) was prepared by diluting the requisite amount of ruthenium(III) nitrosyl nitrate solution in ultrapure water in a 50 mL glass beaker and pH of the solution was adjusted to ∼13 with the help of NaOH solutions. Concentration of ruthenium in feed and raffinate solution was measured using ICP−OES instruments calibrated with ruthenium standard solutions. For active experiments, 106 Ru radiotracer was added and measured by radioactive γ-counting using a HPGe detector connected with a multichannel analyzer.
For experiments with alkaline ILLW, actual waste was received and used as the stock solution with the following composition ( Table 1). As it can be seen that the 137 Cs content in the waste is so high (mCi/L level) with respect to 106 Ru (10 −2 mCi/L), 137 Cs was removed from the solution initially by passing the solution through a glass column filled with resorcinol−formaldehyde (RF) polycondensate resin preconditioned with 0.1 M NaOH solution. This is because in the presence of high 137 Cs, 106 Ru measurement was practically impossible due to the interference of large Compton continuum of 137 Cs (photo peaks at 661 keV) with 106 Ru γray photo peaks (511 and 621 keV). Due to the RF column run, the 137 Cs, 106 Ru, and 125 Sb activity was reduced to 0.12, 1.44 × 10 −2 , and 1.06 × 10 −2 mCi/L, respectively, in which 106 Ru estimation was possible with the addition of pure 106 Ru tracer externally to the waste solution to maintain the final concentration of 106 Ru at ∼0.25 mCi/L.

Instrumentation.
All the UV−vis absorption experiments were carried out on a JASCO V-630 model spectrophotometer in duplicate. To a fixed concentration of ruthenium (2.00 mL of 0.984 × 10 −4 M), citric acid solution (0.1 M) was added in increments of 0.01−0.05 mL, and the absorption profile was recorded over the wavelength range of 300−600 nm. Both metal and ligand solutions were prepared in 0.1 M NaOH solution. The absorption data were analyzed using HypSpec programming 41 to estimate the species formed during the course of reaction and the respective stabilities. The program needs an initial input of probable species that could coexist under the present experimental condition with the approximate thermodynamic stabilities (log K values). Citric acid is a tribasic acid and thus can exist in different protonated (such as Cit-H, Cit-H 2 , and Cit-H 3 ) forms and as completely deprotonated form (Cit), which could potentially bind with ruthenium to form a variety of Ru−CitH n (n = 0−3) complexes. As the experiments were carried out with citric acid in 0.1 M NaOH solution, where it predominantly exist in the fully deprotonated form (Cit), the possibility of existence of Ru−CitH n (n = 1−3) species are ruled out. Thus, the speciation model consisted of 1:1 and 1:2 Ru/Cit species and was found to obey the convergence.
The FTIR spectra have been recorded using Bruker FTIR model V-70. The spectra were recorded at room temperature from 4000 to 500 cm −1 under vacuum conditions using Diamond ATR. The Raman spectra of complexes formed in aqueous and organic phases have been recorded using WITec Oxford Raman spectrometer, model: alpha300 R equipped with a 532 nm YAG laser. Each measurement was carried out in triplicate for a period of 120 s in the range between 100 and 2500 cm −1 .

Effect of Solution pH.
Determination of optimum solution pH is a very important parameter which will ascertain the working pH range of the solution under study. The experiments were conducted to evaluate optimum pH of the aqueous solution for maximum recovery of ruthenium (135 ppm) from aqueous media containing 0.5 M citric acid as the complexing agent using 50% Aliquat 336 and 10% IDA in dodecane. The results have been compared without the addition of citric acid. Figure 1 represents the variation of % extraction of ruthenium with pH of the aqueous feed solution for 30 min of equilibration time. With the increase in pH of the feed solution from 3 to 13, there is a continuous increase in % extraction of ruthenium from ∼8 to ∼20% in the absence of citric acid. A similar trend can be observed for the solution mixed with citric acid although with a much faster rate of increment and reaches the maximum extraction of ∼91% at pH 13. This clearly signifies that citric acid has a positive role in ruthenium extraction from the alkaline medium. For the subsequent stages of study, the pH of the aqueous feed solution was kept constant at 13. As per the literature report, [Ru(NO)(OH) 5 ] 2− is the predominant complex of ruthenium in an alkaline medium in the pH range of 9−13 when acidic Ru(NO)(NO 3 ) x (OH) y , x + y = 3 is made alkaline. 38−40 In the presence of citric acid, there is a chance of formation of various ruthenium citrate complexes [Ru−citrate] n− with varying anionic charges [vide infra, UV−vis spectroscopy and density functional theory (DFT) study].
[Ru(NO)(OH) 5 ] 2− and ruthenium citrates of [Ru− citrate] n− type are anionic complexes which may get extracted by anion exchanger Aliquat 336 according to the following equation (1) (2) The organic affinity of the ruthenium citrates are found to be more with respect to [Ru(NO)(OH) 5 ] 2− may be due to the higher anionic charges of ruthenium citrates [Ru−citrate] n− than dianionic [Ru(NO)(OH) 5 ] 2− , higher lipophilicity of citrates toward organic solvent, and lower charge density (lesser hydration energy) of the citrates. For this reason, an overall higher extraction of ruthenium is observed when citric acid is present in the aqueous solution (as complexing agent) prior to the extraction process.

Extraction Kinetics.
The reaction kinetics of any extraction process takes a vital role and not only determines the optimum reaction time but also provides an idea about practical applicability of the process. The effect of equilibrium  time for liquid−liquid extraction of ruthenium from alkaline solution at pH = 13 containing 135 μg/mL of Ru was studied over a period of time in the presence of ∼0.5 M citric acid using 10% Aliquat 336 and 10% IDA in dodecane. The reaction was continued up to 2 h and the samples were collected at different time intervals after a settling period of 5 min for Ru estimation. Figure 2 shows the experimental results of % extraction of ruthenium with equilibration time. With the increase in two-phase extraction time, there is an increase in the extraction of Ru which reaches a maximum at 20 min. Further increase in extraction time does not alter the % extraction of Ru much with only few marginal variations. This may be due to the statistical uncertainty in analyses or error in sample aliquoting which altogether contributes 5−10% variation in results and admissible similar to any standard radiometric analysis. The result clearly indicates that the optimized reaction time can be considered as suitable from a practical application point of view for any solvent extraction method. Therefore, 30 min was set as the equilibrium/mixing time for all subsequent stages of experiments for Ru extraction from the alkaline medium using Aliquat 336.

Effect of Citric Acid Concentration.
Sometimes the addition of an aqueous phase modifier or complexing agent alters the metal speciation within the feed solution which in other way can change the properties and extent of metal ion extraction. The effect of citric acid in the aqueous phase on the extraction of ruthenium (139 ppm) from alkaline medium (pH = 13) has been studied using 50% Aliquat 336 and 10% IDA in dodecane as the organic solvent. Figure 3 shows the results of % extraction of ruthenium with the variation of citric acid concentration from 0.01 to 2 M at room temperature with 25 min of contact time. With the increase in citric acid concentration from 0.01 to 2 M there is an increase in ruthenium extraction initially which reaches a maximum at 0.5 M, beyond which there is a continuous reduction in ruthenium extraction up to 2 M citric acid concentration. This result suggests that the citric acid in the alkaline medium gets dissociated to form citrate anions which form stable anionic complexes with ruthenium ion of higher charges (vide infra). At pH = 13, all the carboxylic acid groups of citric acid molecules are ionized (pK a1 = 5.2, pK a2 = 9.3, and pK a3 = 12.1) and act as a tridentate chelating ligand. 42 The citrate anion at pH = 13 can replace the nitroso and nitrate groups from the primary coordination of Ru 3+ and form [Ru(NO)-(citrate) x (OH) y ] n− type of complexes (vide infra) of varying stoichiometry (1:1, 1:2, etc.). The reduction in extraction above 0.5 M citrate ion concentration is may be due to the competition between the anionic metal complexes with anionic citrate which comes into play above this concentration. Therefore, further experiments were carried out with 0.5 M citric acid concentration to optimize the other extraction parameters.

Effect of Aliquat 336 and IDA Concentration.
In the present study, Aliquat 336 and IDA are used as the ruthenium extractant and organic phase modifier, respectively. The organic solubility (n-dodecane as the diluent) of Aliquat 336 is very poor; therefore, some organic soluble additives should be added which have similar properties (like polarity) as the extractant used. This will increase the solubility of the extractant in the diluent as well as reduce the chances of third phase formation after metal extraction. In order to determine the effect of extractant as well as phase modifier (IDA) concentration in the solvent, we have systematically varied their concentrations and carried out the liquid−liquid extraction experiments. Figure 4 shows the % variation of ruthenium extraction upon the concentration of Aliquat 336 (with 10% IDA) and IDA (with 50% Aliquat). From the experiments, it can be noticed that there is a continuous increase in ruthenium extraction when Aliquat 336 concentration in the solvent was increased and reaches a maximum at around 50% (v/v) which became constant afterward. This observation is quite normal in the case of solvent extraction studies where at the lower extractant concentration there is a presence of free metal ions into the solution, which get  Similarly, IDA concentration is also increased systematically and conducted extraction experiments. The result indicates that with the increase in IDA concentration, there is a continuous decrease in ruthenium extraction in the organic phase. This may due to the higher aqueous solubility of IDA (polar molecule and may alter the metal speciation) at higher concentrations or difficulty in phase separation. Therefore, 50% Aliquat 336 and 10% IDA concentration was considered as the optimum concentration of the organic phase in the further studies.

Back Extraction.
Back extraction is a very important property for any liquid−liquid extraction process because the complete recovery of the valuable species is possible after a successful back extraction in the aqueous phase. The effectiveness of a back extractant/stripping agent depends upon the nature of the species that gets extracted into the organic phase as well as the nature of the organic phase involved. The stripping of ruthenium from a loaded organic phase (50% Aliquat 336 and 10% IDA in dodecane) was studied to achieve the maximum recovery of Ru from the organic phase to aqueous phase with minimum quantity of stripping agent added to minimize secondary waste volume. Figure 5 represents the % back extraction (S) of ruthenium when two chemical agents viz. HCl and HNO 3 are used at two different concentrations. These are very common reagents and most suitable chemicals for further processing point of view with minimum interference in the process. The result indicates that between HCl and HNO 3 , nitric acid acts as a more powerful reagent to back extract ruthenium from organic phase to aqueous phase. The more effectiveness of nitric acid in the back extraction of ruthenium may be due to its more oxidizing power than hydrochloric acid. Moreover, with the increase in acid concentration for both the acids from 4 to 8 M, there is an increase in back extraction of ruthenium observed from 17 to 23% for HCl and 49 to 73% for HNO 3 . With 8 M nitric acid, ∼75% of Ru gets back extracted into the aqueous phase with a single contact.

Experiments with Active Tracer ( 106 Ru).
Active experiments were carried out to verify the performance of Aliquat 336-based organic solvents toward separation of ruthenium in the presence of active tracer 106 Ru. 106 Ru was added into 130 ppm inactive ruthenium solution in the form of ruthenium nitrosyl nitrate. 106 Ru was determined in the solution with the help of a HPGe detector fitted with a 4K multichannel analyzer. γ-energies of 511.7 and 621.6 keV were selected as two major γ energies of 106 Rh (always in radioactive equilibrium because of very short half-life of 30.1 s), the daughter product of 106 Ru. The γ abundance values of these two γ rays are 20.2 and 9.93, respectively.
In an experiment in the presence of 106 Ru radiotracer in the feed solution, the extraction by the Aliquat 336-based solvent showed that 106 Ru was extracted significantly into the organic phase with the optimized conditions. It can be seen from Figure 6, which exhibits the γ-spectrum of the feed and raffinate solution together. The photo peaks of 106 Ru/ 106 Rh at 511.71 and 621.64 keV were reduced to ∼20% of the initial intensity, while the 661.6 keV peak of 137 Cs remains almost unaltered which is in the detector background range. This clearly signifies the extraction of 106 Ru from the solution to the organic phase. Therefore, active experiments are also in line with the inactive experiments and validate the efficacy of the Aliquat 336-based solvent toward ruthenium extraction.

Ru Separation from Actual Waste Solution.
The actual waste solution contains 137 Cs, 90 Sr, 106 Ru, and 125 Sb as the major radionuclides as indicated in Table 1. The initial activity of 137 Cs was 2.2 mCi/L which is much higher than 106 Ru present (order of 10 −2 mCi/L) in the waste. 106 Ru estimation by HPGe in the presence of that much high concentration of 137 Cs was not possible due to the small γ peaks of 106 Rh (equilibrium with 106 Ru) at 511 and 621 keV was suppressed by the high Compton continuum due to 137 Cs. Therefore, 137 Cs was removed from the solution initially by passing it through a glass column filled with RF poly-  After passing the solution through the column, the 137 Cs content was reduced to 0.12 mCi/L. Then, after adding pure 106 Ru tracer, the solution was subjected to solvent extraction using 10−50% Aliquat 336 and 10% IDA in dodecane. The result (in Figure 7) indicates that with the increase in Aliquat 336 concentration, the % Ru extraction is continuously increased and reaches a maximum at 50% Aliquat concentration. It is also very interesting to note that the coextraction of 137 Cs and 125 Sb was always below 5% throughout the experiments, which indicates the selective separation of 106 Ru from this complex nature of waste solution. This result establishes the practical utility of the present liquid−liquid extraction method of Ru from alkaline solution.

FTIR and Raman Analysis.
FT-IR spectroscopy is a valuable and common spectroscopic technique to identify various functional groups in organic compounds. The FTIR spectra of pure Aliquat 336 (spectra a), 50% Aliquat 336 diluted in 10% isodecanol and n-dodecane (spectra b), and organic phase after ruthenium extraction (spectra c) have been recorded for comparison ( Figure 8). The main vibrational stretching frequencies for different functional groups have been tabulated in Table 2.
The broad vibrational band at 3380 cm −1 may be assigned to the O−H stretching of water molecules present in all the FTIR spectra (spectra a, b, and c). This indicates that water molecules are present in Aliquat 336 and IDA as impurities. It can also be observed that, the intensity of the band is higher for c than both a and b. This signifies that, after contacting the Rucontaining aqueous solution with the organic phase it absorbs moisture. The intense and sharp peaks at 2922 and 2853 cm −1 are due to the CH 3 anti-symmetric stretching vibration. The peak at 1627 cm −1 is responsible for the O−H symmetric bending (scissoring) mode of vibration. In the case of spectrum of c, the additional peaks at 1722 and 1636 cm −1 can be assigned to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching of the C�O (COO − ) bond in citrate molecule. 43 The asymmetric stretching is due to the carboxylic group of the citrate bonded to the Ru metal ion. This observation supports the bonding of Ru with citrate molecules in the complexes which get extracted upon contact with the organic phase through ion-exchange. On the other hand, the fully ionized free

ACS Omega
http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf Article carboxylate group of citric acid is responsible for symmetric stretching, which is quite possible above pH 8 of the solution. The peaks at 1465 and 1378 cm −1 can be assigned to the CH 3 bending modes. All the peaks below 1378 and up to 500 cm −1 are due to the wagging and rocking modes of CH 2 groups, symmetric and anti-symmetric deformation, and rocking vibrational mode of CH 3 present in Aliquat 336, n-dodecane, and isodecanol molecules. This is very important to notice that there is no difference or shift in peak positions of the organic phase before and after the extraction of ruthenium. It clearly inferred that the ruthenium species are not covalently bonded with Aliquat 336 or isodecanol during ruthenium extraction and therefore a pure ion-exchange mechanism (anion exchange) is responsible for such extraction. Figure 9 represents the Raman spectra of the aqueous feed, pure, and Ru-loaded solvents, and raffinate solution (a−e).
The absorbance peak at ∼3430 cm −1 is due to the symmetrical and asymmetrical stretching vibration of water molecules present in the solvent (as impurities) as well as in the aqueous medium. As expected, this peak is more intense in the case of the feed and raffinate and Ru-loaded organic solvent contacted with aqueous feed. The strong bands between 2800 and 3100 cm −1 can be assigned as combined bands for the −CH 2 symmetric stretching, −CH 3 symmetric stretching, and −CH 3 antisymmetric stretching vibration of long chain alkyl groups. Unambiguously, these peaks are more eminent in the case of the organic phase which is made up with long chain alkyl groups than the aqueous phase. The overtone peaks of CH 2 and CH 3 scissors can be found at 2723 cm −1 in the Raman spectra. The stretching frequency of C�O observed at 1720 cm −1 is due to the presence of citric acid in the aqueous medium of the feed and raffinate solution. The Raman active peaks at 1447, 1302, 1120, and 1075 cm −1 are due to the CH 2 and CH 3 bending, CH 2 twisting, and symmetric C−C stretching mode, respectively, which are very common for linear alkanes. The broad bands between 800 and 900 cm −1 can be designated to the several bands due to C 1 −C 2 stretching, CH 3 rocking, and C−O stretching. No significant peak due to any Ru complex was observed either in the Ru feed and raffinate solution or the Ru-extracted organic phase. Therefore, we cannot anticipate any Ru complex at least from Raman spectra except ruling out some common Ru-specific peaks. The absence of peaks at 810−825 cm −1 (RuO sym stretch ν1), 848 cm −1 (ν3), and 770−780 cm −1 (RuO asym stretch) can eliminate the presence of RuO 4 2− in aqueous solutions at pH = 13 in the presence of citrate. 44,45 Similarly, the presence of RuO 4 also can be excluded in the Ru bearing solution from the absence of peaks at 883 cm −1 (ν1) and 918 cm −1 (ν3). 46 The absence of peaks at 1933−1893 cm −1 (nitrosyl stretch), 1530 cm −1 (nitrate asym stretch), 1420 cm −1 (nitrite asym stretch), 1336, 1318 cm −1 (nitrite sym stretch), 1280 cm −1 (nitrate sym stretch) is a direct indicative of exclusion of ruthenium(III) nitrosyl nitrate complexes in aqueous solution, 25 which is possible in the highly alkaline medium and presence of citrate (vide infra).
3.9. Speciation Studies. Speciation studies helps in understanding the strength and kind of interaction by a metal ion with a specified chelating agent. Aqueous speciation of ruthenium in the presence of citric acid was probed by absorption spectrophotometry. Nitrosyl−nitrate-bonded ruthenium species of the form [RuNO(NO 3 (where x + y + z = 5) are formed on the dissolution of spent nuclear fuel in nitric acid. 47 The addition of NaOH (increase in pH) alters the ruthenium coordination sphere by replacing the nitrato and aqua moieties by hydroxide ions and eventually results in the formation of [Ru(NO)(OH) 5 ] 2− species. 39−41 Literature reports showed that the broad absorption peak centered at 350 nm is an indicator for the existence of [Ru(NO)(OH) 5 ] 2− species. The present titration, where citrate is added to Ru at 0.1 M NaOH is carried out to understand the interaction of citrate with [Ru(NO)(OH) 5 ] 2− species. Citrate is a tribasic acid with three pK a values centered successively at 5.2, 9.3, and 12.1, respectively. 42 The present studies employed at 0.1 M NaOH (pH ∼ 13) allow the citric acid to get completely dissociated to be available as the triply negative charged anion form. Thus, the complexation is dominated by the replacement of OH or NO ions in [Ru(NO)(OH) 5 ] 2− by citrate ions. The absorption spectrum in the 300−600 nm range was recorded for each incremental addition of 10−50 μL of citrate into a fixed concentration of Ru at 0.1 M NaOH medium ( Figure 10). Hypspec programming is used to analyze the absorption data. The analysis of absorbance data showed the formation of 1:1 and 1:2 species by citrate with Ru, the latter being more thermodynamically stable (log β = 3.79 ± 0.07) than the former (log β = 1.21 ± 0.04). Thus, the addition of citrate results in the formation of 1:2 species preferably.

DFT Analyses.
DFT-based calculations were carried out using Turbomole programming 48 to understand the speciation in detail at a molecular level. An hybrid functional B3LYP at the TZVP level of theory 49   The binding and Gibb's free energy of formation (Table 3) also indicate higher strength of 1:2 complexes than 1:1 complexes, corroborating the experimental observation. The shorter Ru−O bond distances (Table 3) indicate a stronger interaction, and these values are relatively shorter for 1:2 complexes than 1:1 complexes. Thus, the DFT-estimated binding energies and bond distances further support the preferential 1:2 complex formation in the Ru−citrate system at 0.1 M NaOH.

CONCLUSIONS
Extraction of ruthenium from an alkaline medium has been studied through a liquid−liquid extraction method using Aliquat 336-based anion exchanger, IDA as an organic phase modifier, and n-dodecane as a diluent. 50% Aliquat 336 and 10% IDA in dodecane were found to be as an optimized solvent system. The maximum Ru extraction was possible with pH = 13 as aqueous phase pH and 20 min of equilibration time in the presence of 0.5 M citric acid which acted as an aqueous complexing agent or phase modifier. HNO 3 acts as an effective stripping agent which can back extract ∼75% loaded ruthenium in the aqueous phase in a single contact. Speciation studies using UV−vis, FTIR, and Raman spectroscopy indicate the formation of [Ru(NO)(citrate)(OH) 2 ] 2− and [Ru-(citrate) 2 ] 3− in the aqueous solution when citric acid is added into the feed solution. These complexes are found to be responsible for the anion exchange mechanism with the anionic liquid exchanger Aliquat 336. DFT-based quantum mechanical calculation inferred the preference of [Ru-(citrate) 2 ] 3− complexes in the feed solution than [Ru(NO)-(citrate)(OH) 2 ] 2− . The Gibb's free energy change for the formation of both the complexes is negative and exhibits their spontaneous formation. The above solvent system selectively separates ruthenium from an actual alkaline ILLW in the presence of 137 Cs, 90 Sr, and 125 Sb.