Cathepsin G Induces Cell Aggregation of Human Breast Cancer MCF-7 Cells via a 2-Step Mechanism: Catalytic Site-Independent Binding to the Cell Surface and Enzymatic Activity-Dependent Induction of the Cell Aggregation

Neutrophils often invade various tumor tissues and affect tumor progression and metastasis. Cathepsin G (CG) is a serine protease secreted from activated neutrophils. Previously, we have shown that CG induces the formation of E-cadherin-mediated multicellular spheroids of human breast cancer MCF-7 cells; however, the molecular mechanisms involved in this process are unknown. In this study, we investigated whether CG required its enzymatic activity to induce MCF-7 cell aggregation. The cell aggregation-inducing activity of CG was inhibited by pretreatment of CG with the serine protease inhibitors chymostatin and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. In addition, an enzymatically inactive S195G (chymotrypsinogen numbering) CG did not induce cell aggregation. Furthermore, CG specifically bound to the cell surface of MCF-7 cells via a catalytic site-independent mechanism because the binding was not affected by pretreatment of CG with serine protease inhibitors, and cell surface binding was also detected with S195G CG. Therefore, we propose that the CG-induced aggregation of MCF-7 cells occurs via a 2-step process, in which CG binds to the cell surface, independently of its catalytic site, and then induces cell aggregation, which is dependent on its enzymatic activity.


Introduction
Cathepsin G (CG) is a serine protease that is secreted from activated neutrophils and a subset of monocytes, and belongs to the chymotrypsin superfamily [1][2][3][4]. Human CG is synthesized as a 255-amino acid-long prepropeptide that contains a signal peptide (Met1-Ala18) followed by a dipeptide (Gly19, Glu20) both of which are removed from the prepropeptide in the endoplasmic reticulum [5]. The mature CG is stored in azurophil granules before degranulation. CG plays important roles not only in the hydrolysis of the extracellular matrix and microbicidal system but also in immune response, apoptosis, chemotaxis, and blood coagulation [1,[3][4][5][6][7]. During infection, CG and other serine proteases, such as neutrophil elastase and proteinase 3, act in conjunction with reactive oxygen species to help degrade engulfed microorganisms inside phagolysosomes [1,3,8]. In human leukemic NB4 cells, CG cleaves the protein highly homologous to the Drosophila protein "brahma" (brm), which regulates chromatin conformation and the nuclear matrix during apoptosis [9]. In rodent cardiomyocytes, CG promotes detachment-induced apoptosis via a proteaseactivated-receptor-(PAR-) independent mechanism [10]. In addition, CG is reported to facilitate and impede blood coagulation [6], and it can therefore be considered a regulatory factor in inflammatory and apoptotic reactions.
Dissemination of tumor cells from a tumor mass is the first essential step in metastasis [11][12][13]. The typical disseminating process in tumor metastasis occurs after multiple mutations and the acquisition of highly metastatic properties. These properties include lost capacity for homotypic adherence, gain of high motility, and expression of proteases 2 Mediators of Inflammation such as matrix metalloproteases (MMPs), which enable the tumor cells to infiltrate blood vessels and surrounding tissues [12]. Clinical and experimental observations suggest that tumor cells lose their capacity for adherence to the extracellular matrix and form multicellular aggregates, which results in the dissemination of tumor cells from the tumor mass [11,14]. Subsequently, the multicellular aggregates or spheroids escape from the primary tissues and form emboli in blood vessels or lymph nodes [15][16][17]. Therefore, it has been speculated that homotypic aggregation is also an important element in the first step of metastasis. However, the physiological factors that modulate the adherence capacity of tumor cells in a tumor environment are poorly understood.
Given that leukocytes, including neutrophils, infiltrate and accumulate in tumor masses [18][19][20][21], it is important to investigate leukocyte products that regulate the adherence capacity of tumor cells [22]. We previously identified CG as a molecule that induces mammary tumor MCF-7 cells to exhibit tight E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion following multicellular spheroid formation [23,24]. We propose that signal transduction events are involved in the reaction, because the guanylate cyclase inhibitor LY83583 had an inhibitory effect on CG-induced MCF-7 aggregation [24]. Moreover, further research is required to elucidate the molecular mechanisms involved in the induction and subsequent aggregation of tumor cells.
In this study, we show that CG binds to the cell surface of MCF-7 cells and that the MCF-7 cell aggregation-inducing activity of CG requires its enzymatic activity. Interestingly, our analyses of the purified CG protein from neutrophils indicate that the binding of CG to the MCF-7 cell surface is independent of its catalytic site. These results suggest that CG secreted from invading neutrophils may help cancer cells to metastasize via a 2-step mechanism.

Cell Culture.
Human breast cancer MCF-7 cells were kindly provided by Dr. Hiroshi Kosano (Teikyo University, Japan). The MCF-7 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, USA) and 80 μg/mL kanamycin (Wako Pure Chemical, Osaka, Japan) as described previously [24]. The rat basophilic/mast cell line RBL-2H3 was purchased from the Riken Cell Bank (Tsukuba, Japan), and the cells were maintained in Eagle's minimum essential medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 80 μg/mL kanamycin. The cells were incubated at 37 • C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO 2 .

MCF-7 Cell Aggregation Assay.
To quantitatively assess the degree of spheroid formation, we quantified the cells that were tightly attached to the culture plate by staining with crystal violet as previously described [23]. MCF-7 cells (1 × 10 4 cells/well) were seeded in 96-multiwell plates and cultured for 24 h. The cells were seeded in RPMI 1640 medium containing 5% FBS and then washed with serum-free RPMI 1640 medium. The medium was then replaced with RPMI 1640 medium containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and diluted purified CG or lysates of RBL-2H3 cells overexpressing CG. After cultivation for 24 h, the plate was vigorously tapped on paper towels 10 times to eliminate the loosely attached cell spheroids. The remaining cells were then dried at room temperature and stained with 0.1% crystal violet in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 10 min. Following this, the plate was extensively washed with tap water. The plate was then dried at room temperature, and the crystal violet in the residual cells was lysed with 100 μL of 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). Optical density at 595 nm (OD 595 ) was measured with a microplate reader (Multiskan MS-UV; Labsystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the aggregation index was calculated as follows: aggregation index (%) = OD 595 without sample − OD 595 with test samples OD 595 without sample Although some calculated values for the aggregation index were slightly below zero, microscopic observation revealed that the cells were morphologically similar to nonaggregated control cells, and therefore the negative values are expressed as zero in the figures to avoid confusion.

Measurement of CG Enzymatic
Activity. The enzymatic activity of CG was measured using an established method [25], with N-succinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe pnitroanilide (Sigma) as a substrate. One unit represents the amount of enzyme that hydrolyzes 1.0 μmol of the substrate per minute at 25 • C at pH 7.5.

Construction of Expression Vectors.
The pEGFP-N3 and pcDNA3.1-Hyg (−) plasmids were purchased from Life Technologies Corporation (Grand Island, NY, USA). Human CG cDNA (Genbank Acc. BC014460) encoded in pENTR221 was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). The CG cDNA was amplified by PCR, and the cDNA fragment containing the open reading frame region of the CG gene was subcloned into the KpnI and EcoRI sites of pcDNA3.1. The primer sequences were 5 -AAA-AAGGTACCATGCAGCCACTCCTGCTTC-3 and 5 -AAA-AAGAATTCTACAGGGGGGTCTCCATCT-3 (start and stop codons are underlined). The CG S195G (chymotrypsinogen numbering, amino acid residue S201 of pre-proCG) mutant was generated using the PrimeSTAR mutagenesis basal kit (TaKaRa Bio, Shiga, Japan). The primer sequences used for mutagenesis were 5 -GGGGATGGCGGAGGC-CCCCTGCTGTGT-3 and 5 -GCCTCCGCCATCCCCCTT-GAAGGCAGCCTTCCG-3 (mutated bases are underlined). Sequences of the wild-type (WT) and S195G mutant CG cDNAs were confirmed by sequencing using an ABI3130 genetic analyzer (Life Technologies Corporation).

2.6.
Transfection. Transient overexpression of the CG gene in RBL-2H3 cells was achieved by electroporation. Briefly, the cells were harvested by treatment with PBS containing 0.53 mM EDTA and 0.25% trypsin (BD Difco, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). After digestion, the cells were washed once with PBS and twice with Opti-MEM (Life Technologies Corporation). The cells (1 × 10 6 cells) and plasmid (10 μg) were mixed and pulsed at 275 V for 3 ms using the CUY21 Pro-Vitro electroporation system (NEPAGENE, Chiba, Japan). These cells were used in the following experimental procedures at 24 h after transfection.

Western
Blotting. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and subsequent western blotting were performed as previously described [23]. The cell lysates were prepared by sonication in PBS after the addition of an equal volume of 2x sample buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8 containing 2% 2-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS, 40% glycerol, and 0.02% Coomassie Brilliant Blue) and boiled for 5 min. The samples were separated by SDS-PAGE using a precast 15% Tris-tricine gel (Atto Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and were transferred onto polyvinyl difluoride membranes (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). After blocking by incubation with Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T) and 5% ECL blocking agent (GE Healthcare) for 1 h, the membrane was reacted with an anti-CG goat polyclonal antibody at 4 • C and extensively washed with TBS-T. The membrane was then incubated with HRP-labeled secondary antibody (Santa Cruz), washed, developed by incubation with ECL detection reagents (GE Healthcare), and exposed to Hyperfilm ECL (GE Healthcare). CG expression levels were quantified using ImageQuant TL (GE Healthcare).
2.8. Immunohistochemistry. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 min followed by blocking in PBS containing 2% BSA (blocking buffer) for 1 h. The cells were reacted with anti-CG antibody (1 : 10) in blocking buffer overnight at 4 • C without permeabilization. The samples were washed 4 times with PBS and reacted with antigoat secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 568 (1 μg/mL; Life Technologies Corporation). The samples were then washed 4 times with PBS, and the immunoreactivity was observed under a fluorescent microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

Biotinylation and Purification of Cell Surface Proteins.
Biotinylation of cell surface proteins was performed as previously described [26]. MCF-7 cells (1 × 10 4 cells/dish) were treated with lysates of human CG-expressing RBL-2H3 cells on ice for 90 min and then biotinylated with 0.5 mg/mL EZ-Link NHS-biotin (Thermo Scientific Pierce, Waltham, MA, USA) in PBS at 4 • C for 1 h. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 25 mM L-lysine, and the harvested cells were extracted in a buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1% Triton X-100, and 100 mM NaCl. The extracts were incubated with avidin-agarose beads (Sigma), and the precipitated proteins were immunoblotted with anti-CG antibody.

Covalent Complex Formation between CG and AT
or ACT. CG purified from neutrophils (1.67 pmol) was incubated with AT (90.9 pmol) or ACT (1.5 pmol) in RPMI 1640 medium containing 1% BSA for 10 min at 4 • C. In addition, to measure the effect of an inhibitor on complex formation, CG was pretreated with chymostatin (661 pmol). Formation of the covalent complex in the mixture was determined by the presence of a heavier CG band on the western blot membrane.

Binding Assay Using 125 I-Labeled Serine Proteases.
Serine proteases were radiolabeled by chloramine Tmediated 125 I-iodination [27]. CG was dissolved in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer containing Na 125 I (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and was oxidized by the addition of 1 mg/mL chloramine T. Subsequently, the residual unreacted chloramine T was reduced with sodium pyrosulfite. For stabilization, 50 mM KI and 0.5% BSA were added to the 125 I-labeled CG solution. 125 I-CG was separated from the residual unreacted 125 I and concentrated using a D-Salt Excellulose desalting column (Pierce). The specific activity of 125 I-labeled CG was measured using a γ-counter (Aloka Auto well gamma system ARC-300; Hitachi Aloka Medicals, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and was approximately 1.25 × 10 6 Bq/μg. To measure the binding of the serine proteases to the MCF-7 cell surface, round-bottomed 96-well plates containing RPMI 1640 medium with 5% FBS were seeded with MCF-7 cells (2 × 10 4 cells/well). After washing with RPMI 1640 medium containing 1% BSA, the cells were incubated with 125 I-labeled serine proteases for 1 h on ice. Unbound serine proteases were removed by washing the cells thrice with RPMI 1640 medium containing 1% BSA and thrice with PBS. The radioactivity of the cell lysate, which was prepared using 0.1 M NaOH, was measured using the γ-counter. In the time course experiment, 20-μL aliquots of 125 I-labeled CG were added to the MCF-7 cells. The protein concentration was determined using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (Pierce) with BSA as a standard.

Statistical Analysis.
For statistical analysis of the data, Student's t-tests were used. Data are expressed as mean (standard deviation (SD)), unless indicated otherwise. The data of the enzymatic activity assays in Figure 2 and the data of Figure 6(a) are single-point values.

Enzymatic Activity of CG Is Required for Its MCF-7 Cell Aggregation-Inducing Activity .
We have previously demonstrated that CG induces homotypic cell aggregation and the formation of multicellular 3D spheroids of MCF-7 cells [23,24]. To elucidate the molecular mechanism by which CG induced MCF-7 cell aggregation, we compared the cell aggregation-inducing activity of CG with that of chymotrypsin, because CG belongs to the chymotrypsin superfamily. Figure 1(a) shows that CG induced MCF-7 cell aggregation in a linear dose-dependent manner, whereas chymotrypsin was effective only at 80 nM. Both CG and chymotrypsin stimulated the cells to condense into similar multicellular spheroids (Figure 1(b)). Chymotrypsin induced less cell aggregation than CG, although chymotrypsin had a higher enzymatic activity (2370 U/mg) than CG (99 U/mg) when N-succinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe p-nitroanilide was used as the substrate. Next, we examined whether the enzymatic activity of CG was essential for cell aggregation by treating MCF-7 cells with various serine protease inhibitors. We have previously shown that the cell aggregation is inhibited by treatment with the serine protease inhibitors AT and ACT, which are members of the serine protease inhibitor (serpin) superfamily and are composed of 300-500 amino acid residues [3,23,28]. However, because AT and ACT irreversibly disrupt the CG conformation by forming a covalent complex with CG, the inhibition of CG-induced MCF-7 aggregation by AT and ACT results from both enzymatic inactivation and steric hindrance preventing interaction with the target molecule. To separate these effects, we used peptidic serine protease  Mediators of Inflammation inhibitors. The reversible inhibitor chymostatin (16.5 μM), which is a tetrapeptide analog of the CG substrate, slightly inhibited MCF-7 cell aggregation when incubated with 2.63-5.25 nM CG (Figure 2(a)). Treatment with another serine protease inhibitor Suc-Val-Pro-Phe P -(OPh) 2 , which is a moderately irreversible α-aminoalkylphosphonate diphenyl ester inhibitor, more potently decreased the cell aggregation (Figure 2(b)). To support these results, we used the lowmolecular-weight and irreversible serine protease inhibitor PMSF. To avoid PMSF-induced cytotoxicity, we used PMSFtreated CG, which was prepared by incubating CG with PMSF, followed by dialysis to remove the unbound PMSF. PMSF-treated CG (<167 nM) markedly inhibited the cell aggregation (Figure 2(c)).
To clearly and directly demonstrate the importance of enzymatic activity in cell aggregation, we prepared the recombinant S195G (chymotrypsinogen numbering; Ser201 residue of pre-pro CG) CG protein. The S195G CG protein, in which a serine of the catalytic triad is substituted with glycine, was prepared by overexpression in the rat basophilic/mast cell line RBL-2H3 [29]. RBL-2H3 cells can synthesize the mature CG protein because these cells express signal peptidase and dipeptidyl dipeptidase I for processing pre-proCG but not endogenous CG [3,30]. Western blot analysis using the anti-CG antibody revealed polypeptides of ∼26 kDa in cell lysates prepared from cells transfected with the WT CG-and S195G CG-expressing vectors (see Supplementary Figure 1(b) available online at doi:1155/2012/456462). The lysate from RBL-2H3 cells transfected with the empty vector did not contain the CG polypeptide. The estimated molecular weight of the pre-proCG peptide is 29 kDa, and, therefore, the recombinant CG synthesized in the RBL-2H3 cells had probably undergone posttranslational processing. We noted that the CG peptide in the transfected RBL-2H3 cell lysates migrated at a slightly higher position on the SDS-PAGE gel than the CG purified from human neutrophils (see Supplementary Figure  1(b)). The higher shift of the recombinant CG on the SDS-PAGE is because of incomplete cleavage of the C terminus, which does not influence the enzymatic activity [31,32].
Subsequently, we analyzed the enzymatic activity of CG in the lysates using N-succinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe pnitroanilide. The enzymatic activity, which was normalized to β-actin expression, was 73.4% and 70.1% in the lysates from S195G CG-transfected and control vector-transfected cells, respectively, compared to that in the lysate containing WT CG (see Supplementary Figures 1(a) and 1(c)). The relatively high enzymatic activity of the control vectortransfected cells may be derived from the intact RBL-2H3 cells, because these cells have been reported to express a chymotrypsin-like enzyme that hydrolyzes N-succinyl Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe p-nitroanilide [33][34][35]. Furthermore, RBL-2H3 cells express the chymotrypsin-type serine proteases rat mast cell protease (rMcp)-2 and rMcp3 but not chymase [35,36]. Therefore, we concluded that the recombinant WT CG protein was enzymatically active, whereas S195G CG was inactive.
Analyses of cell aggregation using lysates prepared from CG-expressing RBL-2H3 cells and MCF-7 cells revealed that the WT CG-expressing cell lysate induced cell aggregation in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 3). The resultant multicellular 3D-spheroids were morphologically similar to those induced by the CG purified from neutrophils (Figures 1(b) and 3(c)). By contrast, the lysates derived from S195G CGexpressing cells and vector-transfected cells did not induce cell aggregation. These findings indicate that the enzymatic activity of CG is required for CG-induced MCF-7 cell aggregation.

CG Binds to the Surface of MCF-7 Cells Independently of Its Catalytic Site.
The target molecule(s) of CG in the induction of cell aggregation remain unclear. If the target molecule of CG localizes to the cell surface of MCF-7 cells, it is possible that CG tethers to the cell surface and proteolytically cleaves the target molecule. Accordingly, we next examined the binding of CG to the cell surface proteins of MCF-7 cells. To this end, biotinylated cell surface proteins prepared from MCF-7 cells pretreated with 209 nM purified CG were precipitated using avidin-conjugated beads. Western blot analysis showed that the precipitate contained the CG protein (Figure 4(a)). To determine whether the binding activity of CG also required its enzymatic activity, chymostatin, AT, or ACT was added to MCF-7 cells along with CG during the binding assay. AT and ACT, but not chymostatin, inhibited the binding of CG to the MCF-7 cell surface (Figure 4(a)). Immunohistochemistry yielded the same result (Figure 4(b)). Interestingly, inhibition of the binding by AT and ACT was blocked by the addition of chymostatin (Figure 4). We propose that this is due to the preferential binding of chymostatin to CG, which inhibits the formation of the AT-CG or ACT-CG complex. Indeed, covalent AT-CG and ACT-CG complexes were detected as 80-kDa polypeptides by western blot analysis using anti-CG antibody, and the formation of these complexes was inhibited by the addition of chymostatin (Supplementary Figure 2). Furthermore, WT and S195G recombinant CG proteins were also detected on nonpermeabilized MCF-7 cells by immunostaining with anti-CG antibody ( Figure 5). Thus, these results indicate that CG binds to the surface of MCF-7 cells independently of its catalytic site.
We next analyzed the binding of CG to the MCF-7 cell surface using 125 I-labeled CG. We confirmed that 125 I-labeled CG had cell aggregation-inducing activity equivalent to that of intact CG (data not shown). The sigmoidal binding curve and complete inhibition of the binding by the addition of 20fold excess of cold CG strongly suggested that CG bound to a specific site on the cell surface (Figure 6(a)). Unfortunately, sigmoidal binding curves prevent a precise estimation of the number of binding sites of a ligand using Scatchard plot analysis. Indeed, we were unable to estimate the number of CG-binding sites because the Scatchard plot of CG binding to MCF-7 cells exhibited a convex upward curve (see Supplementary Figure 4). The binding exhibited a positive cooperative effect, as CG binding increased concurrently with increasing CG concentrations. Hill plot analysis enables the assessment of cooperativity between a receptor and ligand, and when the slope of the Hill plot (n H ) is >1, the  Figure 3: MCF-7 cell aggregation is induced by wild-type (WT) CG, but not the enzymatically inactive S195G mutant. (a) MCF-7 cell aggregation assay using CG-overexpressing cell lysates. MCF-7 cells were cultured overnight in medium containing 5% FBS and incubated with lysates serially diluted in serum-free medium containing 1% BSA. After washing, the residual cells were quantified by crystal violet staining. The results are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3). When the bars are not shown, they are smaller than the size of the symbols. (b) Immunoreactivities of CG and β-actin in the lysates assayed in Figure 3(a). A 10-μL aliquot of the whole cell lysate was analyzed by western blotting using anti-CG or β-actin antibody. (c) Images of cells that were analyzed in Figure 3(a) at 24 h after incubation with the diluted lysates. Scale bar = 50 μm. receptor and ligand exhibit positive cooperativity [27,29]. The n H of our study was 2.6, indicating positive cooperativity (Figure 6(b)). The time course of CG binding demonstrated that the binding reached saturation after 2 h (Figure 6(c)). We also analyzed the binding of 125 I-chymotrypsin and 125 Itrypsin to MCF-7 cells. However, these serine proteases were unable to bind to the cells (Figure 6(d)). CG binding was not inhibited by the addition of the peptide inhibitors Suc-Val-Pro-Phe P -(OPh) 2 and chymostatin ( Figure 6(e)). These data suggest that CG is specifically bound to a cell surface protein via a catalytic site-independent mechanism.

CG-Induced MCF-7 Cell Aggregation Is Not Mediated by PAR-1, PAR-2, or PAR-4 .
We sought to identify the target protein of CG on MCF-7 cells. PARs belong to a novel subfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors that are proteolytically activated by the unmasking of an N-terminal tethered ligand sequence by serine proteases [37,38]. MCF-7 cells express trace amounts of PAR1 and low levels of PAR-2 and PAR-4. In addition, PAR-1 has been shown to inhibit the migration and invasion of MCF-7 cells, whereas PAR-2 and PAR-4 positively regulate these functions [39]. To determine the relationship between PARs and the MCF-7 These findings were supported by the observation that MCF-7 cell aggregation was not induced by thrombin, which is known to be a strong ligand for PAR-1, PAR-3, and PAR-4 (data not shown). Accordingly, we concluded that CG binds to the MCF-7 cell surface, independently of its catalytic site and enzymatic activity, and subsequently induces MCF-7 cell aggregation in an enzymatic activity-dependent manner. In addition, the CG-induced cell aggregation is not mediated by PARs.

Discussion
Previously, we showed that CG induces the formation of multicellular MCF-7 aggregates, as a result of increased cell motility and switching from cell-extracellular matrix adhesion to E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion [23,24]. We also demonstrated that the cell condensationinducing activity of CG is inhibited by treatment with the serine protease inhibitors AT and ACT; however, this observation is not direct evidence of a relationship between the enzymatic activity and the cell aggregationinducing activity of CG because AT and ACT are known to form covalent complexes with serine proteases, and the complex may prevent the interaction between CG and its target molecule on MCF-7 cells via steric hindrance.
In this study, we used a peptidic small molecule serine protease inhibitor and an enzymatically inactive mutant of the recombinant CG protein to clearly demonstrate that CG requires its enzyme activity for the induction of cell aggregation.
Although the substrate specificities of these serine proteases are similar [3,25,40], the binding and aggregationinducing characteristics of CG and chymotrypsin were different. CG induced MCF-7 cell aggregation in a linear dosedependent manner, whereas chymotrypsin required a concentration >80 nM. CG associated with MCF-7 cell surface proteins, whereas chymotrypsin did not. The specificities of CG and chymotrypsin are slightly different: chymotrypsin recognizes aromatic residues such as Phe, Trp, and Tyr at the P1 position as a substrate, whereas CG prefers aromatic or positively charged residues such as Phe, Tyr, Lys, and Arg. This difference in substrate specificity may be important for the CG-specific induction of cell aggregation.
It is important to identify the target molecule(s) and the CG signaling pathways in MCF-7 cells. Our results suggest that the target of CG is a receptor or an adhesion molecule. We had predicted that the PARs may be a candidate for the CG receptor. MCF-7 cells express trace amounts of PAR-1 and low levels of PAR-2 and PAR-4 [39]. CG activates PAR-4 in addition to thrombin to initiate thrombocyte aggregation [1,41]. In addition, CG recruits osteoclast precursors via the proteolytic activation of PAR-1 [42]. However, incubation with <150 μM ligand peptides that proteolytically cleave PAR-1, PAR-2, and PAR-4 failed to induce cell aggregation; thus, the CG target remains unidentified. In human neutrophils, CG functions as a ligand of the formyl Met-Leu-Phe peptide (fMLP) receptor and induces chemotaxis [43]. However, given that the addition of fMLP did not inhibit the CG-induced cell aggregation, we conclude that the fMLP receptor is not associated with cell aggregation (data not shown). We have unpublished data that CG has no effect either on cell detachment or on spheroid formation of human cervical adenocarcinoma HeLa cells and human fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells (data not shown). CG induces the detachment of E-cadherin-deficient human breast cancer MDA MB-231 cells, but not their aggregation (unpublished observation). 125 I-CG also binds to MDA MB-231 cells (unpublished observation). These results raise the possibility that the binding target(s) of CG and the signaling molecules are specifically expressed in at least several types of breast cancer cells, and the induction of cell aggregation depends on the presence of E-cadherin molecules.
In the present study, we have also demonstrated the binding of CG to the MCF-7 cell surface. Chymotrypsin did not bind to the cells. Membrane association of CG has been reported in human neutrophils [44]. The mechanism through which CG is associated with the outer surface of the plasma membrane of neutrophils mainly involves electrostatic interactions with the sulfate groups of chondroitin sulfate-and heparin sulfate-containing proteoglycans [45]. CG contains 17.3% basic amino acid residues and, therefore, is a highly cationic protein. Chymotrypsin contains 12.7% basic amino acid residues. If CG electrostatically interacts with these proteoglycans in MCF-7 cells, preincubation of CG with anionic molecules, such as sodium dextran sulfate and sodium heparin or cationic molecules, including lactoferrin, would be expected to inhibit the binding. Contrary to our expectations, pretreatment of 125 I-CG (83.4 nM) with 250 μg/mL sodium dextran, 250 μg/mL sodium heparin, or 20 μM lactoferrin did not inhibit CG binding to MCF-7 cells (data not shown). Our results indicate that the binding of CG is mediated by a receptor-like molecule.
The relationship between the concentrations of CG and inhibitory factors such as serpins in a tumor mass is very interesting. It is thought that a large portion of CG is inactivated by serpins in blood. CG is inhibited by serpins via a suicide substrate inhibition mechanism [3,28]. After cleavage, CG forms a covalent complex with the cleaved serpin peptide, and finally CG is denatured. Indeed, the cell aggregation-inducing activity of CG is inhibited by serpins such as AT or ACT. The human serum concentration of ACT is approximately 0.25 mg/mL (3.7 μM) and increases by almost 5-fold during acute inflammation [46]. Although the amount of serpins present in tumors is not known, approximately 80 μg (3.3 nmol) of CG is reported to be present in 10 8 human polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) [47,48]. Given that 1 nM CG weakly induces MCF-7 cell aggregation (Figure 1), the local concentration of CG may be sufficient to function in inflammation sites and tumor tissues where neutrophils accumulate and secrete proteases in azurophil granules. In vivo experiments are currently being designed to address these possibilities.
In conclusion, we propose that the molecular mechanism of CG-induced MCF-7 cell aggregation entails 2 steps: the interaction between CG and a cell surface molecule on MCF-7 cells and the proteolytic cleavage that induces cell aggregation. Further studies are underway in our laboratory to further elucidate these interactions.