

E-text prepared by deaurider, Barry Abrahamsen, and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net) from page images generously made
available by Internet Archive (https://archive.org)



Note: Project Gutenberg also has an HTML version of this
      file which includes the original illustrations.
      See 57428-h.htm or 57428-h.zip:
      (http://www.gutenberg.org/files/57428/57428-h/57428-h.htm)
      or
      (http://www.gutenberg.org/files/57428/57428-h.zip)


      Images of the original pages are available through
      Internet Archive. See
      https://archive.org/details/petervischer00head


Transcriber’s note:

      Text that was in italics is enclosed by underscores (_italics_).

      The reader will encounter "[TN1]" once. [TN1] identifies an
      error in the original book: “ETSAXA” should have been “ET SAXA”.

      The reader will encounter [TN2] three times. [TN2] identifies
      a place where a character could not be reproduced and was
      replaced by an apostrophe (example: "PETR’[TN2]).





HANDBOOKS OF THE GREAT
CRAFTSMEN. EDITED BY
G. C. WILLIAMSON, LITT.D.

PETER VISCHER


------------------------------------------------------------------------

                   Handbooks of the Great Craftsmen.

                             --------------

    Illustrated Monographs, Biographical and Critical, on the Great
           Craftsmen and Workers of Ancient and Modern Times.

                  Edited by G. C. WILLIAMSON, Litt.D.

       Imperial 16mo, with numerous Illustrations, 5s. net each.

                      First Volumes of the Series

THE PAVEMENT MASTERS OF SIENA. Workers in Graffito. By R. H. HOBART
    CUST, M.A.

PETER VISCHER. Bronze Founder. By CECIL HEADLAM, B.A.

THE IVORY WORKERS OF THE MIDDLE AGES. By A. M. CUST.

                           Others to follow.

                             --------------

                      LONDON: GEORGE BELL AND SONS
                      NEW YORK: THE MACMILLAN CO.

------------------------------------------------------------------------


[Illustration: STEIN PHOTO.] [FROM A DRAWING IN POSSESSION OF T. A.
STEIN, NÜRNBERG

1. PORTRAIT OF PETER VISCHER]


PETER VISCHER

by

CECIL HEADLAM, B.A.

Formerly Demy of Magdalen College, Oxford; Author of
“The Story of Nuremberg,” etc.



[Illustration: Publisher’s Logo]






London
George Bell and Sons
1901

Chiswick Press: Charles Whittingham and Co.
Tooks Court, Chancery Lane, London.




------------------------------------------------------------------------




                                PREFACE


THE Germans have by nature the gift of working in metal, and, among
them, in the realms of bronze, Peter Vischer stands easily first. His
position as a craftsman may, in fact, be compared with that held by his
contemporary and fellow citizen, Albert Dürer, as an artist. The history
of his works and of those of his house, have a peculiar interest to the
student of art, inasmuch as they illustrate the gradual but easily
traceable passage of the German craftsmen from the style of late Gothic
to that of complete neo-paganism, and, from the school of the Northern
painters and sculptors to that of the great Italian masters
successively.

I speak of the works of Peter Vischer “and his house,” because, in
tracing this development, we have to take into consideration not only
his works but also those of his father Hermann and of his sons, Hermann
and Peter and Hans. The pendulum of criticism has indeed swung more than
once since the Emperor Maximilian used to visit Peter Vischer’s foundry
in Nuremberg, and the questions as to what are actually the works of the
Master and what position is to be assigned to him in the world of art,
have been answered in more ways than one. For many years, owing partly
to the ignorance of most people, and partly no doubt to the greed of the
few, the tendency was to attribute to this one famous craftsman the
works of many. At one time almost any work of art in bronze to be found
throughout the length and breadth of Germany was attributed to Peter
Vischer, just as a Talleyrand or a Sydney Smith has had witticisms of
every date and every quality fathered upon him.

From unreasoning praise, again, men passed to equally undiscriminating
disparagement. Heideloff arose and wished the world to see in Peter
Vischer nothing but the mere craftsman who put into bronze the designs
and models of Adam Krafft or another. The admirable labours of Retberg,
however, and of Dr. Lübke have shown how little foundation there is for
this view, and, more recently, by the application of the principles of
more exact art-criticism, Dr. Seeger, in his minute and loving study of
Peter Vischer the younger, has vindicated the claim of the great
craftsman’s son to rank with, or even above, his father as the first and
greatest exponent of Renaissance plastic-work in Germany.

To the two latter authors I have been continually and especially
indebted whilst writing the present monograph. For the use of very many
of the illustrations forming the volume to which Dr. Lübke contributed
the text, my best thanks and acknowledgements are due to the publisher,
Herr Stein, of Nuremberg.

                                                                   C. H.


------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                CONTENTS


         CHAPTER                                            PAGE

                LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS                        ix

                BIBLIOGRAPHY                                 xi

             I. HERMANN VISCHER AND THE EARLY GERMAN          1
                  BRONZE-WORK

            II. PETER VISCHER: HIS LIFE                       9

           III. THE EARLY WORKS OF PETER VISCHER             20

            IV. THE SHRINE OF ST. SEBALD                     36

             V. THE TOMB OF MAXIMILIAN                       64

            VI. THE TUCHER MONUMENT AND THE NUREMBERG        72
                  MADONNA

           VII. THE MINOR WORKS OF PETER VISCHER THE         86
                  YOUNGER

          VIII. THE TOMB OF ELECTOR FREDERICK THE WISE,     101
                  AND THE RATHAUS RAILING

            IX. THE FALL OF THE HOUSE OF VISCHER            119

             X. THE IMPORTANCE OF THE WORKS OF THE          130
                  VISCHERS

                CATALOGUE OF THE WORKS OF THE VISCHERS      133

                Index                                       142


------------------------------------------------------------------------




                         LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS


          PLATE                                           PAGE

            1. PORTRAIT OF PETER VISCHER                Frontispiece

            2. PETER VISCHER, THE CRAFTSMAN St. Sebald,    13
                 Nürnberg

            3. TOMB OF ARCHBISHOP ERNST Cathedral,         23
                 Magdeburg

            4. TOMB OF ARCHBISHOP ERNST Cathedral,         27
                 Magdeburg

            5. ST. MAURICE Krafft House, Nürnberg          29

            6. MONUMENT OF COUNT HERMANN VIII. Church,     31
                 Römhild

            7. TOMB OF ST. SEBALD St. Sebald, Nürnberg     43

            8. ST. PETER St. Sebald, Nürnberg              46

            9. ST. SEBALD St. Sebald, Nürnberg             47

           10. ST. SEBALD PUNISHES AN UNBELIEVER St.       55
                 Sebald, Nürnberg

           11. ST. SEBALD HEALING THE BLIND MAN St.        57
                 Sebald, Nürnberg

           12. ST. PAUL St. Sebald, Nürnberg               59

           13. ST. BARTHOLOMEW St. Sebald, Nürnberg        61

           14. THEODORIC, KING OF THE GOTHS Tomb of        68
                 Maximilian, Innsbruck

           15. KING ARTHUR Tomb of Maximilian,             69
                 Innsbruck

           16. MEETING OF CHRIST WITH THE SISTERS OF       75
                 LAZARUS Cathedral, Ratisbon

           17. BEWEINUNG CHRISTI St. Ægidius, Nürnberg     79

           18. THE NUREMBERG MADONNA Museum, Nürnberg      81

           19. ORPHEUS AND EURYDICE Collection of M.       90
                 Dreyfus, Paris

           20. ORPHEUS AND EURYDICE Museum, Berlin         93

           21. EARTHLY LIFE (INKSTAND) Ashmolean           96
                 Museum, Oxford

           22. HEAVENLY LIFE (INKSTAND) Ashmolean          97
                 Museum, Oxford

           23. ELECTOR FREDERICK THE WISE                 103
                 Schlosskirche, Wittenberg

           24. THE RATHAUS RAILING Formerly at Nürnberg   109

           25. THE RATHAUS RAILING Formerly at Nürnberg   113

           26. BOY WITH BAGPIPES Museum, Nürnberg         120

           27. TOMB-PLATE OF DUCHESS HELENE VON           121
                 MECKLENBURG Cathedral, Schwerin

           28. THE APOLLO FOUNTAIN Rathaus Court,         126
                 Nürnberg


------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              BIBLIOGRAPHY


  Baader. Beiträge zur Kunstgeschichte Nürnbergs.

  Bauer (Robert). Peter Vischer und das alte Nürnberg.

  Bergau (R). Peter Vischer, in Dohme’s Kunst und Künstler des
     Mittelalters, vol. ii.

  Bode. Geschichte der deutschen Plastik.

  Daun (Berthold). Adam Krafft und die Künstler seiner Zeit.

  Döbner (A. W.). Peter-Vischer-Studien.

  Edelberg (R. von E. von). Quellenschriften für Kunstgeschichte.

  Ephrussi (Charles). Albert Dürer et ses Dessins.

  Heideloff. Die Ornamente des Mittelalters.

  Jannsen. Geschichte des deutschen Volks.

  Lübke (Wilhelm). Peter Vischer und seine Werke.
  Lübke (Wilhelm). Renaissance in Deutschland.

  Mummenhoff (R. von). Das Rathaus in Nürnberg.

  Neudörffer. Nachrichten über Künstlern und Werkleuten Nürnbergs.

  Reicke (Emil). Geschichte der Reichstadt Nürnberg.

  Retberg (R. von). Nürnbergs Kunstleben in seinem Denkmalen
     dargestellt.

  Schönherr (David Ritter von). Geschichte des Grabmals Kaisers
     Maximilian I.

  Seeger (Georg). Peter Vischer der Jüngere.

  Sieghart. Geschichte der bildenden Künste in Baiern.

  Springer (Anton). Albrecht Dürer.


------------------------------------------------------------------------




               “A man of amiable conversation and, among
          natural arts (to speak as a layman), finely skilled
                              in casting.”

                                                      JOHANN NEUDÖRFFER.




------------------------------------------------------------------------




                             PETER VISCHER




                               CHAPTER I

            HERMANN VISCHER AND THE EARLY GERMAN BRONZE WORK


IT was in the middle of the fifteenth century, a little before the year
1450, to be precise, that there wandered into the streets of Nuremberg a
working man, a common coppersmith, one Hermann Vischer by name. He came
no one knows whence. He came one can easily imagine why. Like the father
of Albert Dürer, and in the same decade, he was attracted to that
beautiful, busy old town by the greed of gain, as Shakespeare was drawn
to London, and many another worker in other arts and crafts has been
drawn to many another town. For Nuremberg at this time was the shining
jewel of the Holy Roman Empire, the centre of trade and the meeting
place of the Arts. Her geographical position and the business energy of
her sons had combined to throw into her lap all the commerce of the east
and south, of Italy and the Levant, with the northern nations.

The days were near at hand when this proud, free city of the Empire,
this trading staple of the German world, was to win the still nobler
title of “Albert Dürer’s and Hans Sachs’ City.” For the merchant princes
of the place, the Patricians as they called themselves, whilst they grew
in wealth and power, waxed also in enthusiasm for the sciences and arts.
They strove to make their town a German Florence, and by their lavish
expenditure upon the adornment of public and private buildings, both
attracted foreign genius and encouraged native talent. Regiomontanus on
the one hand, the great mathematician, chose Nuremberg for his place of
residence because he found there all the peculiar instruments necessary
for astronomy, and because the “perpetual journeyings of her merchants”
enabled him to keep in touch with the learned of all countries. These
perpetual journeyings of the merchant princes and great explorers, like
Behaim, reacted also upon the artists of the town; they contributed to
give them a wider outlook upon life, and brought within their reach the
wonderful works of Italy.

The broad culture of a Pirkheimer exercised an undoubted influence upon
the many-sided genius of Dürer, whilst the liberal atmosphere engendered
by travel made the citizens of Nuremberg ready to welcome in their midst
foreign artists like the elder Dürer, the elder Vischer and Veit Stoss,
and rendered the local artists themselves susceptible to the excellence
of foreign art. Not that the Nuremberg artists lack the local note. But
they readily accepted the ideas of Flemish realism and again of the
Italian Renaissance, and translated them into the terms of their own
speech. Albert Dürer, for instance, in spite of his wide experience,
always speaks in his art like his master Wolgemut, in the Nuremberg
dialect. The intense patriotism and the deep religious feeling which
formed so intimate a part of the lives of the citizens are reproduced in
their art and literature, giving the greatest examples of them the added
charm of locality. The religious spirit in which they worked lent a
great humility to these craftsmen. Sculpture and painting had indeed
been applied with splendid results to the adornment of domestic and
public life, results so splendid that the traveller Æneas Sylvius was
obliged to confess that the mansions of the burgesses seemed to have
been built for princes, and that the kings of Scotland would gladly be
housed as luxuriously as the ordinary citizen of Nuremberg. But the
chief work of men like Adam Krafft and Peter Vischer was given to the
beautifying of the churches. And, working as they did in a deeply
religious spirit, it is noticeable that when they represent themselves
in paint, bronze, wood or stone, they give themselves the humble pose of
suppliants, choosing always the lowliest place, and often, like Krafft
in the tabernacle in the Church of St. Lorenz, or Vischer in the
Sebaldusgrab in the Church of St. Sebald, they appear in their working
clothes, tools in hand, in the attitude of servants.

There, in a niche of the beautiful shrine he had wrought, with his
workman’s cap on his head and a large leather apron round his waist, and
in his hand hammer and chisel, the signs of his calling, stands
thick-set and full-bearded Peter Vischer, the modest, pious labourer,
whose reputation had spread beyond the limits of Germany, and whose
bronze work, the chronicler tells us, once filled Poland, Bohemia,
Hungary, and the palaces of princes throughout the Holy Roman Empire.
(Ill. 2.)

When Hermann Vischer came to Nuremberg the bronze industry had long been
pursued in Germany, and it had been pursued with some success. The
individuality of this indigenous art had been in early times
uninfluenced by foreign inspiration. While Venice had to go to
Constantinople for the bronze gates of St. Mark’s, and Rome was
acknowledging the supremacy of Byzantine ideals in the presence of the
gates of S. Paolo, in Germany, as Lübke points out, such works as the
doors of the Cathedrals of Hildesheim and Augsburg, the tomb-plates at
Magdeburg and Merseburg, or the great altar at Goslar, prove the
existence, albeit in a very crude and undeveloped state, of a native art
in bronze. The twelfth century saw the German foundries supplying many
an important font or cathedral door. The work of Lambert Patras von
Dinant (1112), the fonts in the cathedral at Osnabrück, the lions at
Brunswick and the doors of St. Sophia at Novgorod, exhibit indeed a very
considerable advance both in execution and design. The increasing use of
bronze for the sacred vessels and ornaments of the Church extended the
scope of the craftsmen, and the hey-day of the early Gothic period saw
no lack of tomb-plates, candelabra, and fonts from the German foundries.
The workmanship of these is good but undistinguished as it is
uninspired. It seldom even approaches in artistic merit the splendid
tomb of Konrad von Hochstaden in Cologne Cathedral, or the later,
vigorous equestrian statue of St. George in the cathedral at Prague,
wrought by Georg and Martin von Clussenbach in 1373.

Nuremberg, in spite of her wealth and commercial importance, had not, at
the time of the coming of Hermann Vischer, given birth as yet to any
great work of art in bronze. Almost the only old piece of bronze