poster="http://v.politico.com/images/1155968404/201701/491/1155968404_5278251702001_5278251376001-vs.jpg?pubId=1155968404" true Tillerson has a shaky show before skeptical senators Trump's secretary of state pick has a testy exchange with Republican Marco Rubio during his confirmation hearing. 
 
 Rex Tillerson had terse exchanges Wednesday with Republican Marco Rubio and other key senators during his confirmation hearing for the role of secretary of state, ducking questions on whether Russian leader Vladimir Putin is a "war criminal" or if the U.S. should sanction Moscow. 
 
 The former ExxonMobil CEO was at times astonishingly candid, even curt, at one point telling a senator “a little of both” when asked if he was refusing to answer a question or if he didn’t know the answer. Tillerson also struggled to clarify key issues, stating, for instance, that his company never lobbied against Russian sanctions, even though public records show the oil company repeatedly talked to lawmakers and the White House about the sanctions. 
 
 Story Continued Below 
 
 He hedged on questions about whether the governments in countries such as the Philippines and Saudi Arabia were human rights violators. And Tillerson would not say that he'd immediately back out of the nuclear agreement with Iran — a stance that puts him in opposition to some Republicans. 
 
 Tillerson’s shaky showing, and in particular his ugly clash with Rubio, did not bode well for his chance to get approval from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which has an 11-10 Republican-Democratic split, meaning even one GOP defection could spell trouble. Republican leaders could simply bring the nomination directly to the Senate floor, sidestepping the committee, but that would be a poor sign for his prospects. 
 
 Tillerson’s views on Russia, whose president he has known personally for many years, was a major focus of lawmakers from both parties. His appearance came as Republicans were reeling from unsubstantiated reports that Russia had gathered salacious, damaging material about President-elect Donald Trump. 
 
 Rubio, a hawkish Floridian who lost to Trump in the race for the GOP presidential nomination, pressed Tillerson on Russia's actions in bloody conflicts in Syria, Chechnya and beyond, as well as suspected Russian hacking and other interference in the U.S. election. 
 
 "Is Vladimir Putin a war criminal?" Rubio asked. 
 
 "I would not use that term," Tillerson replied. 
 
 Referring to the Russian-backed Syrian government's killing of civilians, Rubio at one point dismissed Tillerson's insistence that he didn't have the proper security clearance yet to have all the necessary information needed to draw conclusions about Russia's actions. And the two clashed over claims that Putin had ordered the killing of journalists and other opposition figures, with Tillerson snapping back at the senator. 
 
 The two also tangled on whether Saudi Arabia was a human rights violator due to its severe restrictions on women. Tillerson, who has frequently visited the oil rich Muslim kingdom, said the U.S. could do more harm than good by lobbing accusations against the Saudis, whose society he said was gradually seeing progress. 
 
 "Our interests are not different, senator, I share all the same values that you share," Tillerson told Rubio. "But I’m also clear-eyed and realistic about it." 
 
 On one area, however, Tillerson fell in line with Rubio: He said he'd urge Trump to veto any legislation that would lift the U.S. embargo on Cuba. 
 
 Rubio would not say whether the tough exchanges have made him more or less comfortable with Tillerson's nomination. 
 
 "We're going to discuss all that after the hearing. Let's let the hearing process conclude," Rubio said. "I'm not going to litigate a hearing in the press at this time." 
 
 But other Republicans told reporters they weren't nearly as worried about Tillerson's relative warmth to Putin. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said he believes it's an "asset" that Tillerson has a relationship with Putin. And Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Bob Corker, who got Tillerson to later clarify that he could potentially dub Putin a "war criminal" if he had access to classified information, said Tillerson was appropriately circumspect. 
 
 "If he had independent knowledge in classified sessions that the things that Rubio laid out were true, he would in fact consider that a war crime. So I think like any nominee you want to qualify your answers," Corker said. 
 
 In response to Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) Tillerson promised to “review” the Iran nuclear deal, but he didn’t say he’d want to immediately withdrawing from it. That will likely please the Obama administration, which considers the deal a key piece of its foreign policy legacy, though but Tillerson appeared skeptical overall of what the Islamic Republic’s long term goals are. 
 
 “The current agreement does freeze their ability to progress, but it does not ultimately deny their ability to have a nuclear weapon,” he said. 
 
 Speaking with a slow drawl, the 64-year-old Texan also declined to say whether he supported sanctions leveled against Russia by President Barack Obama's administration over its suspected meddling in the 2016 election. Trump himself has refused to accept the intelligence community's assessments that the Kremlin tried to turn the election in his favor. 
 
 The secretary of state nominee said he needed to examine the details of the existing sanctions as well as newly proposed ones by lawmakers. He said that it was important to look at all facets involved, including how the U.S. partners with the country being targeted in areas such as trade. 
 
 "It is important that those be dealt with on a country-by-country relationship," Tillerson said. 
 
 Later, when pressed, Tillerson insisted he would support sanctions if the Trump administration decided they were the most effective course of action to penalize a country such as Russia. As far as Russian cyber-attacks go, “We are being attacked,” Tillerson said. “I don’t dispute that statement.” 
 
 Tillerson also claimed that ExxonMobil had not lobbied against sanctions, although public records seem to show otherwise. 
 
 "I have never lobbied against sanctions, personally," said, who only recently left the company in order to serve as secretary of state. "To my knowledge Exxon never directly lobbied against sanctions." 
 
 As POLITICO reported last year, Exxon officials lobbied against a bill, known as the STAND for Ukraine Act, which would have enshrined Obama’s sanctions against Russia into law — making it more difficult for Trump to overturn them. 
 
 Tillerson countered later in the hearing that Exxon didn't specifically lobby against the sanctions, arguing that the company "participated in understanding how the sanctions are going to be constructed." He said he later talked to the Obama administration about the effects of the sanctions. "The characterization that ExxonMobil lobbied against the sanctions is just not accurate," he said. 
 
 Tillerson is required by an ethics agreement to recuse himself from all matters involving ExxonMobil for a year and he reiterated several times that he will adhere to that requirement. But senators' efforts to pin him down on a much longer commitment to do so were fruitless. 
 
 Tillerson also shrugged off questions from Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.) about his tax returns, asking that his and his family’s privacy be respected. The foreign relations committee does not require a nominee's tax returns, though Democrats are seeking Tillerson's anyway. 
 
 "I’m mindful of privacy issues. I hope you’ll also respect the privacy of my and my family," Tillerson said. 
 
 Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Virginia) asked Tillerson if he had any knowledge of Trump’s personal or financial ties to Russia. Tillerson said he did not. 
 
 The senator managed to irk Tillerson by pressing him on allegations that ExxonMobil had misled the public and its investors about internal research on climate change. When Tillerson at one point dodged a question, Kaine asked: "Do you lack the knowledge to answer my question or are you refusing to answer my question?” 
 
 “A little of both,” Tillerson said. 
 
 In his prepared remarks, Tillerson said Russia needs to be held accountable when it is at odds with the United States but that an "open and frank dialogue" is necessary between the two countries, who could find common ground on issues such as fighting Islamist terrorism. 
 
 Russia, Tillerson added, poses a "danger" to the United States but "is not unpredictable in advancing its own interests." 
 
 America’s NATO allies have been worried about Trump’s seemingly shaky commitment to the military alliance. The Baltic countries are especially alarmed about potential Russian invasion or aggression against them. 
 
 Trump has said in the past that, regardless of NATO’s famous Article 5 provision, which states that an attack on one NATO member is an attack on all, that he may not come to a fellow NATO member’s aid if they have not been paying their fair share of the alliance’s defense budget. 
 
 But Tillerson took a more traditional view when asked about how the U.S. should react to an attack on states such as the Baltics. “The Article 5 commitment is inviolable and the United States is going to stand behind that commitment,” he said. 
 
 Tillerson also broke with Trump on the issue of nuclear proliferation, flatly saying "I do not agree," when asked to respond to a past Trump statement that U.S. allies Japan and South Korea may be better off having their own nuclear weapons. 
 
 On several occasions, Tillerson repeatedly declined to take a stand, saying he didn't have enough information. That included his responses to several senators as to whether he believed Rodrigo Duterte, the president of the Philippines, is committing human rights violations. 
 
 Under Duterte, thousands of people suspected in the drug trade have been killed extra-judicially. Tillerson, however, insisted he needed more facts about the situation, dismissing numerous news reports and chalking his approach up to his engineering background. 
 
 The aspiring secretary of state also expressed strong support for Israel, even though he also acknowledged that Palestinians have suffered due to the long-simmering conflict in that region. He said it might take another generation before the two sides achieve peace, but he pledged to stand up for Israel against other nations, including at forums like the United Nations. 
 
 Republican Sen. Todd Young of Indiana brought up Trump’s prolific, and erratic, use of Twitter, and asked Tillerson how he would react if the future president’s social media use undermined his diplomatic efforts. 
 
 “I don’t think I’m going to be telling the boss how he ought to communicate with the American people,” Tillerson said, before adding he would expect to be on the same page as Trump as far as policy goes. 
 
 And if there is a mix up? “I have his cell phone number,” Tillerson said. 

 “I would not use that term,” Mr. Tillerson said. 
 
 Mr. Rubio, outlining a list of grievous Russian offenses in Syria, said he hoped Mr. Tillerson might adjust his answer. 
 
 “Those are very, very serious charges to make, and I want to have much more information,” Mr. Tillerson said. 
 
 Mr. Rubio, saying there was plenty of public information — “the videos and pictures are there,” he noted — said that “it should not be hard to say that Vladimir Putin’s military has conducted war crimes in Aleppo.” 
 
 Mr. Tillerson did not budge. 
 
 “I find it discouraging, your inability to cite that,” Mr. Rubio said. 
 
 As the senator continued to cite the deaths of Mr. Putin’s opponents, Mr. Tillerson said he hoped to learn more once he could receive classified information on the matters. 
 
 “None of this is classified, Mr. Tillerson,” Mr. Rubio shot back. “People are dead.” 
 
 More questions, but no commitment, from Rubio 
 
 Photo 
 
 Mr. Rubio, in his second round of questioning for Mr. Tillerson, pursued a similar tactic, asking Mr. Tillerson for his views on human rights violations in China and Saudi Arabia. 
 
 He asked Mr. Tillerson if he believed China was “one of the world’s worst human rights violators.” 
 
 Advertisement Continue reading the main story 
 
 Mr. Tillerson hedged. “They certainly have serious human rights violations,” he said. 
 
 When Mr. Tillerson equivocated on Saudi Arabia as well and Mr. Rubio appeared prepared to chastise him again, Mr. Tillerson suggested that the two were not as far apart as it seemed. 
 
 “Our interests are not different, senator,” he said. “There seems to be some misunderstanding that somehow I see the world through a different lens. I do not.” 
 
 But Mr. Tillerson said he was “also cleareyed and realistic about dealing in cultures” that are unlike that of the United States. 
 
 Leaving the hearing after his third round of questioning, Mr. Rubio would not commit to supporting — or opposing — Mr. Tillerson, telling reporters that he was “prepared to do what’s right” even if fellow Republicans lined up behind Mr. Trump’s nominee. 
 
 Tillerson favored arms for Ukraine 
 
 Mr. Tillerson also told the committee that if he had been serving in office when Russia annexed Crimea in 2014, he would have recommended that the United States provide arms and intelligence support to the government of Ukraine, and said the Obama administration’s reaction was viewed in Moscow “as a weak response.” 
 
 Mr. Tillerson’s prescription came in the opening two hours of his confirmation hearing, where he went out of his way to portray himself as a hard-liner in confronting Russia — an effort to defuse questions about his business relationships with Mr. Putin. 
 
 But in doing so, he put himself in direct opposition to the position taken by Mr. Trump, who said in interviews with The New York Times last year that he doubted the utility of the sanctions the United States led against Russia. 
 
 Tethered to Trump 
 
 As the questioning wore on, some senators nodded at the lengthy — and, at times, rocky — proceedings. “I’m glad you came back after lunch, Mr. Tillerson,” joked Senator Jeanne Shaheen, Democrat of New Hampshire. 
 
 Advertisement Continue reading the main story 
 
 She thanked Mr. Tillerson for outlining his efforts to disentangle himself from Exxon Mobil while seeking a role in government. But she added that his approach “stands in stark contrast to what we heard from President-elect Trump today” about his own business conflicts, referring to the news that Mr. Trump will not divest himself of his business empire. 
 
 Newsletter Sign Up Continue reading the main story Please verify you're not a robot by clicking the box. Invalid email address. Please re-enter. You must select a newsletter to subscribe to. Sign Up You agree to receive occasional updates and special offers for The New York Times's products and services. Thank you for subscribing. An error has occurred. Please try again later. View all New York Times newsletters. 
 
 Ms. Shaheen also asked Mr. Tillerson to weigh in on some of Mr. Trump’s most explosive campaign positions, like calls for a ban on Muslim immigration. 
 
 “I think what’s important is that we are able to make a judgment about the people coming into the country,” he said. “I’m not supporting blanket-type rejection of any particular group of people.” 
 
 Pressed on Mr. Trump’s past calls for a national registry of Muslims, Mr. Tillerson said he “would need to have a lot more information around how such an approach would even be constructed.” 
 
 Tillerson does not oppose T.P.P. 
 
 Mr. Tillerson appeared to break, at least somewhat, with a signature campaign position of Mr. Trump: his vocal opposition to the Trans-Pacific Partnership. 
 
 Mr. Tillerson said he did not oppose the agreement, but added that he shared some of Mr. Trump’s concerns about whether the final version “serves all of America’s interests.” 
 
 C-suite and Foggy Bottom are different 
 
 Photo 
 
 Senator Benjamin L. Cardin of Maryland, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, got to the key critique of Mr. Tillerson in an opening statement that challenged the nominee to explain what additional sanctions he would advocate against Russia for its interference in the 2016 presidential election and its activities in Syria. 
 
 “Having a view from the C-Suite at Exxon is not at all the same as the view from the seventh floor of the Department of State,” Mr. Cardin said, referring to where the secretary’s office is. “And those who suggest that anyone who can run a successful business can, of course, run a government agency do a profound disservice to both.” 
 
 Mr. Cardin argued that “serving the narrow market-driven interests of Exxon shareholders is not the same as serving the national interests of all of the American people.” And he challenged Mr. Tillerson to indicate whether he “may ignore Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, his illegal annexation of Crimea and his intervention in Syria,” all of which President-elect Trump indicated, in an interview with The Times, were not high on his list of concerns. 
 
 Advertisement Continue reading the main story 
 
 Mr. Cardin added that he was “disappointed” that Mr. Tillerson’s prepared opening remarks included no mention of Russian hacking, adding that he also planned to press Mr. Tillerson on his prospective business conflicts. 
 
 A no on nuclear expansion 
 
 Presented with Mr. Trump’s past suggestion that it might not be a bad thing if countries like Japan, South Korea and Saudi Arabia acquired nuclear weapons, Mr. Tillerson replied, “I don’t think anyone advocates for more nuclear weapons on the planet.” 
 
 When Senator Edward J. Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts, reminded him that Mr. Trump had in fact said this, Mr. Tillerson responded, “I do not agree.” 
 
 Booker and Lewis testify against Sessions nomination 
 
 Photo 
 
 Senator Cory Booker, Democrat of New Jersey, broke with tradition by testifying against the nomination of a fellow senator, but said Mr. Sessions’s record left him no choice. 
 
 “In the choice between standing with Senate norms or standing up for what my conscience tells me is best for my country, I will always choose conscience and country,” Mr. Booker said. 
 
 Mr. Booker issued a scathing rebuke of Mr. Sessions’ opposition to immigration and criminal justice reform, and laws protecting gays. 
 
 “The next attorney general must bring hope and healing to the country,” he said, “and this demands a more courageous empathy than Senator Sessions’ record indicates.” 
 
 Representative John Lewis, Democrat of Georgia, said Mr. Sessions’ mantra of “law and order” had a familiar, and negative, ring for African-Americans, particularly from the South. 
 
 Advertisement Continue reading the main story 
 
 “Those who are committed to equal justice in our society wonder whether Senator Sessions’ call for law and order will mean today what it meant in Alabama when I was coming up back then,” said Mr. Lewis, who protested segregation alongside the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and was beaten severely during a march in Selma, Ala. “The rule of law was used to violate the human and civil rights of the poor, the dispossessed, people of color.” 
 
 Senatorial privilege 
 
 Photo 
 
 The Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky, took a break from his chamber’s march toward passing the framework to repeal the Affordable Care Act on Wednesday to introduce his wife, Elaine Chao, and it was clear he was enjoying himself. 
 
 Praising Ms. Chao as “incredibly capable,” Mr. McConnell cheekily endorsed Mr. Trump’s pick for transportation secretary. “She’s got really great judgment, on a whole variety of things,” he said. 
 
 That tone continued during gentle questioning of Ms. Chao, with all indications pointing to an easy confirmation.
– Sen. Marco Rubio and Rex Tillerson clashed over Russia during Wednesday's confirmation hearing for the would-be secretary of State. Tillerson, a former ExxonMobil CEO, has known Vladimir Putin personally for years, Politico reports. And Yahoo News notes he was even given the Order of Friendship by Putin. Rubio addressed that relationship immediately, asking Tillerson if he'd label Putin a "war criminal." When Tillerson replied that he "would not use that term," Rubio described the deaths of 300,000 Chechen Republic civilians in Putin-ordered bombings and the killing of civilians in Aleppo by Russia-backed Syria. Tillerson hedged, saying he'd need to see classified information first. "None of this is classified," the New York Times quotes Rubio as replying. "People are dead." Rubio said Tillerson's unwillingness to call Putin a war criminal was "discouraging." John McCain and Linsdsey Graham are also wary of Tillerson's ties with Russia, though other Republicans say Tillerson having a personal relationship with Putin is an "asset." Tillerson was evasive in other lines of questioning related to Russia. He said didn't know about any possible ties between Trump and Russia, but admitted it's a "fair assessment" to say that Russia was behind propaganda during the US election. He also said ExxonMobil never lobbied against Russian sanctions even though multiple discussions about sanctions between the company and the White House and lawmakers are part of the public record.