Worker Who Sent Hawaii False Alert Thought Missile Attack Was Imminent 
 
 Enlarge this image toggle caption Cory Lum/AP Cory Lum/AP 
 
 Updated 6:20 p.m. ET 
 
 A false ballistic missile alert in Hawaii was sent on Jan. 13 because an emergency worker believed there really was a missile threat, according to a preliminary investigation by the Federal Communications Commission. 
 
 The report finds that the false alert was not the result of a worker choosing the wrong alert by accident from a drop-down menu, but rather because the worker misunderstood a drill as a true emergency. The drill incorrectly included the language "This is not a drill." 
 
 The top two civilian officials at Hawaii Emergency Management Agency announced their resignations Wednesday, Reuters reports, and the employee who issued the alert was fired. In addition, the agency's military director told the wire service, a midlevel manager is being suspended. 
 
 The Associated Press reports that the fired employee had "confused real-life events and drills in the past, the state said in a report. His poor performance has been documented for years, and other members of the team say they were not comfortable working with him in any role." The AP says the state's internal investigation found that the employee was told to cancel the alert, but he "just sat there and didn't respond." Another employee eventually made the correction, as the worker "seemed confused." 
 
 According to a presentation by the FCC's Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, this is what happened: 
 
 At 8:05 a.m., the agency's midnight shift supervisor began a no-notice ballistic missile defense drill during a shift change by placing a call to the day shift warning officers, in which the shift supervisor pretended to be U.S. Pacific Command. The supervisor specifically decided to run a drill during a shift change to train officers for a challenging situation. 
 
 The midnight shift supervisor played a recording over the phone that includes the correct drill language "EXERCISE, EXERCISE, EXERCISE" — but also erroneously contained the text of an Emergency Alert System message for a live ballistic missile alert, including the language "THIS IS NOT A DRILL." The recording ended by saying "EXERCISE, EXERCISE, EXERCISE." 
 
 The day shift warning officers received this recorded message on speakerphone. While other warning officers understood that this was a drill, the warning officer at the alert origination terminal said he believed that this was a real emergency. In a written statement, the officer said he had heard "this is not a drill" but not "exercise, exercise, exercise." 
 
 At 8:07 a.m., the day shift warning officer responded, as trained for a real event, by transmitting a live incoming ballistic missile alert to the state of Hawaii. 
 
 In doing so, the officer selected the template for a live alert from a drop-down menu and clicked "yes" in response to a prompt that reads: "Are you sure that you want to send this Alert?" 
 
 The day shift warning officer received the alert on a mobile device a minute later. That alert, sent to mobile phones and blared across television stations in the state, said: "BALLISTIC MISSILE THREAT INBOUND TO HAWAII. SEEK IMMEDIATE SHELTER. THIS IS NOT A DRILL." 
 
 At 8:09 a.m., the agency alerted Hawaii Gov. David Ige that the false alert had been sent. 
 
 It took until 8:20 a.m. for the agency to post to its Twitter and Facebook accounts that there was no missile threat to Hawaii. The governor didn't retweet that notice of no threat until 8:24 a.m. — a delay Ige attributed to not knowing his Twitter password. 
 
 And it took even longer to issue a correction through the emergency alert system: That correction wasn't sent until 8:45, a full 38 minutes after it had sent the false alert. 
 
 In remarks at the FCC's open meeting on Tuesday about the false alert, FCC attorney adviser James Wiley said the worker who transmitted the alert has refused to speak with the commission. But Wiley said that the Hawaii Emergency Management Agency gave the commission information from a written statement by the worker made shortly after the incident, which has helped the FCC in its investigation of what went wrong. 
 
 "Because we've not been able to interview the day shift warning officer who transmitted the false alert," said Wiley, "we're not in a position to fully evaluate the credibility of their assertion that they believed there was an actual missile threat and intentionally sent the live alert (as opposed to believing that it was a drill and accidentally sending out the live alert). But it is worth noting that they accurately recalled after the event that the announcement did say 'This is not a drill.' " 
 
 The FCC public safety bureau attributed the false alert to a combination of human error and inadequate safeguards: There was no procedure in place to prevent a single person from mistakenly sending a missile alert to the state of Hawaii nor was there a procedure for recalling a false alert. 
 
 Since the debacle, the state emergency agency has implemented new safeguards. Two credentialed warning officers must validate every alert and test. Supervisors must receive advance notice of all drills. It has created a template for correcting false alerts. 
 
 And the agency has stopped running ballistic missile defense drills entirely, until its own investigation is complete. 

 Most troubling, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said, is that there was no safeguard preventing an employee from sending a false alert and no plan to immediately correct a one. | Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images FCC: Official who sent false Hawaii missile alert believed it was real 
 
 The employee with the Hawaii Emergency Management Agency who sent a false alert warning of a ballistic missile attack did not realize the message was part of a drill, the Federal Communications Commission said this morning. 
 
 The FCC's Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau presented a preliminary report finding that human error and inadequate safeguards led to the issuance of the false alert Jan. 13. It took 38 minutes to correct the error. The Washington Post, citing a state investigation that was made public Tuesday, reported that the employee, who has been fired, at least twice before had confused real-life events and drills. 
 
 Story Continued Below 
 
 "The panic and fear and heartache of those 38 minutes we now believe was due to human error but also deficient preparation and training," Republican Commissioner Brendan Carr said. "No one ever should have to go through moments like those — especially if basic competency would have prevented them." 
 
 Morning Cybersecurity A daily briefing on politics and cybersecurity — weekday mornings, in your inbox. Email Sign Up By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time. 
 
 Emergency officials were conducting a no-notice drill that morning of a missile attack that included a recording that said, "This is not a drill." The recording also identified the message as an exercise, but the warning officer apparently did not hear that part of the message, the FCC said. 
 
 Most troubling, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said, was that there was not a safeguard to prevent a single employee from sending a false alert, and that there was no plan in place to immediately correct a false alert. 
 

– At the root of the false ballistic missile alert in Hawaii were just three little letters: N-O-T. The FCC on Tuesday released the results of its preliminary investigation into the Jan. 13 mishap, and found that the issue was not that a worker mistakenly selected the incorrect item from a drop-down menu as earlier reported, but rather, believed there really was a missile threat, all because of a goof during a what Politico reports was a no-notice drill. NPR has the timeline. The drill kicked off during a shift change at 8:05am. The Hawaii Emergency Management Agency's (HI-EMA) midnight shift supervisor pretended to be US Pacific command and called day-shift warning officers and played a recording that correctly said "EXERCISE, EXERCISE, EXERCISE"—and, incorrectly, "THIS IS NOT A DRILL." Those warning officers correctly interpreted it as a drill, but the warning officer at the alert origination terminal did not. That officer is, as previously reported, not cooperating with the FCC, but the FCC said it was able to piece together the series of events using a written statement the worker provided to HI-EMA in the incident's aftermath. The Washington Post details some of the changes that will be made to the process going forward, including more heads-up before drills and more layers of approval needed to enable alerts.