In the largest watershed study of its kind, MSU researchers samples 64 rivers in Michigan for human fecal bacteria. Credit: MSU The notion that septic tanks prevent fecal bacteria from seeping into rivers and lakes simply doesn't hold water, says a new Michigan State University study. 
 
 Water expert Joan Rose and her team of water detectives have discovered freshwater contamination stemming from septic systems. Appearing in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the study is the largest watershed study of its kind to date, and provides a basis for evaluating water quality and health implications and the impact of septic systems on watersheds. 
 
 "All along, we have presumed that on-site wastewater disposal systems, such as septic tanks, were working," said Rose, Homer Nowlin Chair in water research. "But in this study, sample after sample, bacterial concentrations were highest where there were higher numbers of septic systems in the watershed area." 
 
 Until now, it was assumed that the soil could filter human sewage, and that it works as a natural treatment system. Discharge-to-soil methods, a simple hole dug in the ground under an outhouse, for example, have been used for many years. Unfortunately, these systems do not keep E. coli and other pathogens from water supplies, Rose said. 
 
 "For years we have been seeing the effects of fecal pollution, but we haven't known where it is coming from," she said. "Pollution sources scattered in an area - called non-point - have historically been a significant challenge in managing water quality." 
 
 The researchers used source-tracking markers, a novel method Rose calls "CSI (Crime Scene Investigation) for water," to sample 64 river systems in Michigan for E. coli and the human fecal bacteria B-theta. Advances in source-tracking allow water scientists to track down the origin of non-point pollution more accurately than ever before. 
 
 Michigan, Florida and South Carolina, as well as resort areas near lakes all across the United States, rely heavily on septic tanks for human sewage. Though each state regulates septic tanks differently, more needs to be done in order to ensure humans are not contaminating surface waters by using septic tanks. 
 
 Continuing to use long-trusted methods of waste disposal systems may come at a hefty price, added Rose. The Environmental Protection Agency's latest survey for capitol improvement identifies the need to invest $298 billion over the next 20 years on wastewater and stormwater infrastructure to meet the Clean Water Act public safety goals of swimmable and fishable waters. 
 
 "This study has important implications on the understanding of relationships between land use, water quality and human health as we go forward," she said. "Better methods will improve management decisions for locating, constructing and maintaining on-site wastewater treatment systems. It's financially imperative that we get it right." 
 
 Explore further: Scientist studies septic systems' effect on water quality 
 
 More information: PNAS www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1415836112 
 
 

 New microbial source-tracking tools can be used to elucidate important nonpoint sources of water quality degradation and potential human health risks at large scales. Pollution arising from septic system discharges is likely more important than previously realized. Identifying these sources and providing reference levels for water quality provides a basis to assess water quality trends and ultimately remediate degraded areas. 
 
 Abstract
– In the largest watershed study of its kind, Michigan State University researchers have sampled 64 river systems in the state for E. coli and the human fecal bacteria B-theta and found that, in a nutshell, septic tanks aren't working. At least not as well as experts thought. The researchers say that "sample after sample" shows bacterial concentrations are "highest where there were higher numbers of septic systems in the watershed area," water expert Joan Rose tells Phys.org. Freshwater contamination from septic tanks stems from one key miscalculation, the team reports in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: soil filtration. It's long been assumed that soil filters human sewage, acting as a sort of natural treatment system, and thus so-called "discharge-to-soil" methods like digging holes in the ground beneath outhouses has long been common. But these methods clearly aren't keeping pathogens from water supplies, at least not as well as hoped. "For years we have been seeing the effects of fecal pollution, but we haven't known where it is coming from," Rose says. Her team was able to harness advances in source tracking in what she calls "CSI for water." Now that we know the source, she adds, states like Michigan, Florida, and South Carolina, not to mention resorts near lakes throughout the US, need to rethink how heavily they rely on septic tanks for human sewage. It's "imperative," she warns, "that we get this right." (On the subject of poo: Here are 5 ways to poop better.)