These crawls are part of an effort to archive pages as they are created and archive the pages that they refer to. That way, as the pages that are referenced are changed or taken from the web, a link to the version that was live when the page was written will be preserved.Then the Internet Archive hopes that references to these archived pages will be put in place of a link that would be otherwise be broken, or a companion link to allow people to see what was originally intended by a page's authors.The goal is to fix all broken links on the web . Crawls of supported "No More 404" sites. 

 If the unicorn food trend isn't already making you throw up a little in your mouth, hold on—things have officially taken a turn for the worse. First, the notion of a rainbow-colored, Instagrammable, frothy drink was co-opted by corporate America in the form of the Unicorn Frappuccino Blended Crème. Now, a coffee shop in—where else?—Williamsburg, Brooklyn filed a lawsuit against Starbucks, claiming that it controls the trademark to the Unicorn Latte name and that Starbucks owes the coffee shop 10 million bucks for infringing said trademark. 
 
 
 
 Presumably, one could buy a real unicorn on the open market for a cool $10 mil. All of which brings us to ask these inevitable questions: Has our entire generation jumped the shark? Has everyone under the age of 35 become a cultural stereotype? Oh, and does anyone have any Lisa Frank memorabilia to sell? 
 
 The owners of The End, the Williamsburg coffee purveyors, claim that their customers now believe The End copied Starbucks, when it's really the other way around. Papers filed in federal court say The End started selling their rainbow-y concoction back in December and filed for a trademark on January 20; that application is still pending. Then—lo and behold—Starbucks began selling a blended drink that looks like a five-year-old's hopes and tears on April 17. The Starbucks drink was available for a limited time only and is no longer being sold. 
 
 The attorneys for The End believe their demands for big bucks are justified. They told MUNCHIES, "Our client created the Unicorn Latte, a successful product that our clients transformed into a social media sensation, developed a famous and valuable trademark, and took the appropriate steps to protect it. Starbucks, with its thousands of coffee shops, launched a competing product with a similar look and name, and marketed it in the same channels where our client's product became famous, severely damaging our client's mark. We brought this lawsuit to protect a local business from having its valuable intellectual property taken by a global corporation." 
 
 Oddly, neither drink has anything to do with coffee. The End's version contains "cold-pressed ginger, lemon juice, dates, cashews, blended with additional healthy, dried ingredients such as maca root, blue-green algae, and vanilla bean." Starbucks' iteration is composed of "milk, artificial sweeteners, color additives, and pinches of fruit juice concentrate." 
 
 The End's co-owner, Bret Caretsky, describes his establishment as a "wellness cafe" and insists that his beverage is no commercially produced Frankendrink. He told MUNCHIES, "We developed the Unicorn Latte as a healthy and delicious product. The Unicorn Latte has been the most popular product we've created to date, so we were shocked and disappointed when Starbucks came out with the Unicorn Frappuccino, which is similar to our product in name and appearance, but has none of its healthy ingredients." 
 
 Will The End's trademark claims stand up in court, given that unicorn foods and drinks are all over the place? Can the Brooklyn coffee shop establish that, as its complaint alleges, its co-owner invented the unicorn latte, the drink became identified with coffee shop, and that Starbucks' drink confuses customers about its "origin and affiliation"? Is The End's claim that "the size of and scope of Starbucks' product launch was designed so that the Unicorn Frappuccino would eclipse the Unicorn Latte in the market" justified—even though Starbucks is the world's largest coffee chain and The End only has one location? 
 
 Stay tuned. The unicorn wars have just begun. 
 
 Editor's note: Since publishing, Starbucks has provided us with the following statement: "We are aware of the claims and believe they are without merit. The Starbucks Unicorn Frappuccino blended beverage was inspired by the fun, spirited and colorful unicorn-themed food and drinks that have been trending in social media. The beverage was offered for a limited time in April and is no longer available in our stores." 

 NEW YORK (AP) — A Brooklyn cafe that created a "Unicorn Latte" is accusing Starbucks of "overshadowing" its health-conscious drink with the sugary Unicorn Frappuccino in a new lawsuit. 
 
 The End started selling its Unicorn Latte in December and has had a trademark on the drink name pending since January. 
 
 Starbucks launched the Unicorn Frappuccino in April as a limited-run item, and it enjoyed considerable media attention. 
 
 Both drinks are similar in that neither contains coffee, though they are on the opposite spectrum of healthy consumption. The End says the Unicorn Latte is made from ingredients like dates, ginger root and algae. The lawsuit says Starbucks' drink is made from milk and artificial sweeteners. 
 
 The cafe is seeking unspecified compensation and a public apology. 
 
 A spokesperson for Starbucks says the lawsuit is without merit.
– It seems unicorn-themed drinks aren't quite as rare as their namesake. Munchies reports a Brooklyn coffee shop is suing Starbucks for $10 million, alleging the coffee giant's Unicorn Frappuccino infringed on its trademark. The End started selling its Unicorn Latte in December and filed for a trademark in January. Starbucks' colorful drink was available for a few days in April. The End co-owner Bret Caretsky says the Unicorn Latte is "the most popular product we've created" and they were "shocked and disappointed" when Starbucks unveiled the Unicorn Frappuccino. The lawsuit claims customers now believe The End copied Starbucks' drink, and the shop has been further harmed by the "derision and ridicule" lobbed at the Unicorn Frappuccino, the New York Daily News reports. The lawsuit argues the Unicorn Latte was a "social media sensation" until Starbucks' "coordinated social media blitz" to make the Unicorn Frappuccino look like the only game in town. While neither drink contains coffee, the similarities—besides the bright coloring—end there, according to the AP. The End says the Unicorn Latte is a health drink containing things like dates, ginger root, and algae. The Unicorn Frappuccino is milk-based and has a lot of sugar. Starbucks says The End's lawsuit is "without merit," as unicorn-themed food and drinks are pretty much everywhere at this point.