SHARE THIS ARTICLE Share Tweet Post Email 
 
 WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was challenged by a U.K. judge to come out of his hiding place in the Ecuadorian embassy and face the arrest that he’s been avoiding for more than five years. 
 
 Judge Emma Arbuthnot on Tuesday refused to overturn a warrant that Assange blames for keeping him in the London apartment. The Australian appears to think he’s above the law and lacks courage, she said. 
 
 
 
 It’s the second time this month Arbuthnot refused to overturn the warrant issued after the 46-year-old failed to appear at a London court in 2012 for a Swedish sexual assault probe. 
 
 “He’s a man who wants to impose his terms on the course of justice,” Judge Emma Arbuthnot said. “Defendants on bail up and down the country, and requested persons facing extradition, come to court to face the consequences of their own choices. He should have the courage to do so too.” 
 
 Arbuthnot said she wasn’t convinced by the public interest arguments from Assange’s lawyer, which included that his time in the embassy had been punishment enough. Assange is free to use his computer, his cellphone and has access to a balcony, she said. She also judged he is in “relatively good physical health,” after 5 1/2 years in the office. 
 
 Arbuthnot dismissed another set of arguments a week ago by his team, which said the Swedish arrest warrant lost its purpose when the sexual-assault case was dropped. 
 
 One of Assange’s attorneys, Gareth Peirce, declined to give a view on the verdict, which could be reviewed by judges in the next three months. 
 
 ‘Surprised’ 
 
 “We are surprised,” Assange’s Twitter feed said. “The judge went outside what the parties presented in court. This seems to have led to the significant factual errors in the judgment.” 
 
 Assange walked into the Ecuadorian embassy in June 2012, after exhausting options in U.K. courts to avoid extradition over the allegations stemming from a 2010 trip to Sweden. He refused to return to the Scandinavian country for questioning, citing risks he would be extradited to the U.S. 
 
 He and WikiLeaks have become famous over the past decade for disclosing confidential documents about the U.S. government and politics. The website injected itself into the middle of the last U.S. presidential race by publishing hacked emails from Hillary Clinton’s campaign. 

 FILE - In this May 19, 2017 file photo, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange gestures to supporters outside the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he has been in self imposed exile since 2012. A British... (Associated Press) 
 
 FILE - In this May 19, 2017 file photo, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange gestures to supporters outside the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he has been in self imposed exile since 2012. A British judge on Tuesday Feb. 13, 20-18 is scheduled to quash or uphold an arrest warrant for WikiLeaks founder... (Associated Press) 
 
 FILE - In this May 19, 2017 file photo, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange gestures to supporters outside the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he has been in self imposed exile since 2012. A British judge on Tuesday Feb. 13, 20-18 is scheduled to quash or uphold an arrest warrant for WikiLeaks founder... (Associated Press) FILE - In this May 19, 2017 file photo, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange gestures to supporters outside the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he has been in self imposed exile since 2012. A British... (Associated Press) 
 
 LONDON (AP) — A British judge on Tuesday upheld an arrest warrant for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who has spent more than five years evading the law inside Ecuador's London embassy. 
 
 Judge Emma Arbuthnot rejected arguments by Assange's lawyers that it is no longer in the public interest to arrest him for jumping bail in 2012 and seeking shelter in the embassy to avoid extradition to Sweden, where prosecutors were investigating allegations of sexual assault and rape made by two women. He has denied the allegations. 
 
 Arbuthnot said Assange should come to court and make his case like any other defendant and did not mince words in leveling her decision at Westminster Magistrates' Court. She said that by jumping bail Assange had made "a determined attempt to avoid the order of the court," before rejecting each argument made by his attorneys. 
 
 "The impression I have ... is that he is a man who wants to impose his terms on the course of justice," she said. "He appears to consider himself above the normal rules of law and wants justice only if it goes in his favor." 
 
 Assange is able to appeal, but his lawyers don't yet know whether he will. 
 
 Swedish prosecutors dropped their investigation last year, saying there was no prospect of bringing Assange to Sweden in the foreseeable future. But the British warrant for violating bail conditions still stands, and Assange faces arrest if he leaves the embassy. 
 
 Assange's lawyers had asked for the warrant to be withdrawn since Sweden no longer wants him extradited, but the judge rejected their request last week. 
 
 Assange's attorney had gone on to argue that arresting him is no longer proportionate or in the public interest. Lawyer Mark Summers said that the 5½ years Assange has spent inside the embassy were "adequate, if not severe" punishment for his actions, and cited a report by a U.N. committee which said the 46-year-old was being arbitrarily detained. 
 
 He also claimed the Australian was justified in seeking refuge in the embassy because he has a legitimate fear that U.S. authorities are seeking to arrest him for WikiLeaks' publication of secret documents. 
 
 Summers also argued that Assange's actions had not stalled Sweden's legal case, because Assange had offered to be interviewed by Swedish prosecutors at the embassy. He said emails recently released after a freedom of information request showed that a British state prosecutor had advised Sweden "that it would not be prudent for Sweden to try to interview Mr. Assange in the U.K." 
 
 Some lawyers who have followed the case suggest the impasse will continue in the case. 
 
 Edward Grange, a partner at law firm Corker Binning, said the fact remained that Assange had chosen to enter the embassy to avoid arrest. 
 
 "It would be a dangerous precedent to set if the warrant could just be withdrawn on public interest grounds, because that would be seen as a reward for individuals who decide to avoid administrative justice," he said. 
 
 Assange suspects there is a secret U.S. grand jury indictment against him for WikiLeaks' publication of classified documents, and that American authorities will seek his extradition. Arbuthnot rejected that contention as well. 
 
 "I do not find that Mr. Assange's fears were reasonable," Arbuthnot said. 
 
 Another Assange lawyer, Jennifer Robinson, said the WikiLeaks chief was willing to face legal proceedings in Britain — if he receives a guarantee that he will not be sent to the U.S. to face prosecution. 
 
 "Mr. Assange remains ready to face British justice and to resolve any outstanding matters related to his seeking protection in the Ecuadorean embassy — but not at the risk of being forced to face American injustice for exercising the freedom to publish," Robinson said.
– A British judge on Tuesday upheld an arrest warrant for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who has spent more than five years evading the law inside Ecuador's London embassy. Judge Emma Arbuthnot—who Bloomberg reports last week rejected arguments made by his team—rejected new arguments by Assange's lawyers that it's no longer in the public interest to arrest him for jumping bail in 2012 and seeking shelter in the embassy to avoid extradition to Sweden, where prosecutors were investigating allegations of sexual assault and rape made by two women. He has denied the allegations. Arbuthnot said Assange should come to court and make his case like any other defendant and didn't mince words in leveling her decision at Westminster Magistrates' Court, reports the AP. "He appears to consider himself above the normal rules of law and wants justice only if it goes in his favor," she said. "Defendants on bail up and down the country ... come to court to face the consequences of their own choices. He should have the courage to do so, too." Swedish prosecutors dropped their investigation last year, saying there was no prospect of bringing Assange to Sweden in the foreseeable future. But the British warrant for violating bail conditions still stands, and Assange faces arrest if he leaves the embassy. Assange's attorney argued that arresting him is no longer proportionate or in the public interest, saying the 5½ years Assange has spent inside the embassy were "adequate, if not severe" punishment for his actions.