premise: A woman in black reviews a message as she walks to work.
hypothesis: The woman in black is not walking to work.
explanation_1: The woman cannot be both walking to work and not walking to work.
explanation_2: The woman in black either walks to work.or is not walking to work.
explanation_3: Either the woman walks to work or is not walking to work, but not both.
premise_logic: exists x1.(all x2.(n_message(x2) -> exists p1 s1 x3.(a_topic(x1) & exists e1 p2.(Topic(e1,p2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & exists e2.(Actor(e2,x1) & v_work(e2))) & as(x1,p1) & in(x1,x3) & for(x3,x2) & n_review(x3) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s1,x3))) & n_female(x1) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2.(n_woman(x1) & -exists e1 p1.(Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & exists e2.(Actor(e2,x1) & v_work(e2))) & in(x1,x2) & n_black(x2))
premise_sim: exists x1.(n_woman(x1) & n_female(x1) & all x2.(exists p1 s1 x3.(n_review(x3) & in(x1,x3) & for(x3,x2) & exists e1 p2.(v_walk(e1) & exists e2.(v_work(e2) & Actor(e2,x1)) & Topic(e1,p2) & Actor(e1,x1)) & as(x1,p1) & a_topic(x1) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s1,x3)) | -n_message(x2)))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_woman(x1) & n_black(x2) & in(x1,x2) & all e1 p1.(all e2.(-v_work(e2) | -Actor(e2,x1)) | -v_walk(e1) | -Topic(e1,p1) | -Actor(e1,x1)))