premise: A dog is on the beach near a ball.
hypothesis: A dog is on the beach.
explanation_1: In both statements, the dog is on the beach.
explanation_2: A dog is near a ball.
explanation_3: A dog is on the beach is part of the description of the dog near a ball.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_beach(x2) & exists x3.(on(x1,x2) & near(x2,x3) & n_ball(x3)) & n_dog(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_beach(x2) & on(x1,x2) & n_dog(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_dog(x1) & n_beach(x2) & exists x3.(on(x1,x2) & near(x2,x3) & n_ball(x3)))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(on(x1,x2) & n_dog(x1) & n_beach(x2))