premise: Three men are working with their bikes in the shoulder of a road.
hypothesis: The men are talking to each other on the side of the rode about their wives.
explanation_1: You can not infer they are talking about their wives.
explanation_2: Just because three men are working with their bikes in the shoulder of a road, doesn't mean they are talking to each other on the side of the rode about their wives.
explanation_3: They are working on their bikes, not talking about their wives.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_shoulder(x3) & in(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_road(x4) & with(e1,x2) & n_bike(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_work(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_wife(x4) & of(x4,x3) & n_thing(x3) & n_rode(x3) & n_side(x2) & n_man(x1) & on(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & about(x3,x4) & all x5.(n_other(x5) -> to(e1,x5)) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_talk(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(e1,x2) & v_work(e1) & of(x3,x4) & of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_shoulder(x3) & n_road(x4) & n_man(x1) & n_bike(x2) & in(e1,x3) & card_eq_3(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_talk(e1) & on(e1,x2) & of(x4,x3) & of(x2,x3) & n_wife(x4) & n_thing(x3) & n_side(x2) & n_rode(x3) & n_man(x1) & all x5.(to(e1,x5) | -n_other(x5)) & about(x3,x4) & Actor(e1,x1))