premise: A woman in a white shirt inspects a black garment while sitting in a chair at a festival.
hypothesis: A woman drinks a beer.
explanation_1: A woman who inspects a black garment cannot drink beer.
explanation_2: The first sentence refers to a woman inspecting a garment, while the second talks about a woman drinking beer. The two are likely not happening together
explanation_3: A woman inspects a garment while sitting in a chair at a festival is different from drinking a beer at the same.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(while(e1,e2) & at(e2,x5) & n_festival(x5) & in(e2,x4) & n_chair(x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_sit(e2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_inspect(e1) & n_garment(x3) & a_black(s2) & Theme(s2,x3) & in(x1,x2) & n_shirt(x2) & a_white(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: all x1.(n_beer(x1) -> exists x2 x3.(a_topic(x2) & for(x2,x1) & n_drink(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_woman(x3)))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(while(e1,e2) & v_sit(e2) & v_inspect(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_shirt(x2) & n_garment(x3) & n_festival(x5) & n_chair(x4) & in(x1,x2) & in(e2,x4) & at(e2,x5) & a_white(s1) & a_black(s2) & Theme(s2,x3) & Theme(s1,x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: all x1.(exists x2 x3.(of(x2,x3) & n_woman(x3) & n_drink(x2) & for(x2,x1) & a_topic(x2)) | -n_beer(x1))