premise: A man in an orange hat holds a ball.
hypothesis: A gentleman wearing an orange hat has a ball.
explanation_1: The man is a gentleman and is wearing a hat and holding a ball.
explanation_2: A man can be a gentleman.  A man has a ball.
explanation_3: In order for the gentleman to be holding the ball and be in the orange hat, he must have possession of the ball physically and be wearing the hat.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_hold(e1) & n_ball(x4) & in(x1,x2) & n_hat(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_orange(x3) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(Theme(e2,x5) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_have(e2) & n_ball(x5) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_hat(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_orange(x4) & (x1 = x2) & n_gentleman(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_hold(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_orange(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_hat(x2) & n_ball(x4) & in(x1,x2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_wear(e1) & v_have(e2) & of(x3,x4) & n_orange(x4) & n_hat(x3) & n_gentleman(x1) & n_ball(x5) & Theme(e2,x5) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))