premise: A woman in bridal wear embraces an individual.
hypothesis: The president takes the oath of office.
explanation_1: A woman is completely different than a president.
explanation_2: A woman in bridal wear is not consistent with the President taking the Oath of Office.
explanation_3: A woman that embraces an individual cannot be the president that takes an oath of office.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_embrace(e1) & n_individual(x3) & in(x1,x2) & n_wear(x2) & a_bridal(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_oath(x2) & n_president(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_take(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_office(x3))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_embrace(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_wear(x2) & n_individual(x3) & in(x1,x2) & a_bridal(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_take(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_president(x1) & n_office(x3) & n_oath(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))