premise: A child is thrown by a man in the swimming pool.
hypothesis: A man was teaching his boy to swim.
explanation_1: Throwing a child in the pool doesn't mean they are teaching them to swim, also the child could be a girl.
explanation_2: Not all children that are with a man are his boy.
explanation_3: The man may not be teaching the boy how to swim at all by throwing him in the pool.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_pool(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_swimming(x4) & in(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & n_man(x2) & Theme(e1,x1) & v_throw(e1) & n_child(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3.(Topic(e1,p1) & exists e2.(Actor(e2,x1) & v_swim(e2)) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_teach(e1) & n_boy(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_man(x2) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_throw(e1) & of(x3,x4) & n_swimming(x4) & n_pool(x3) & n_man(x2) & n_child(x1) & in(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x1) & Actor(e1,x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3.(v_teach(e1) & of(x3,x1) & n_man(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_boy(x3) & exists e2.(v_swim(e2) & Actor(e2,x1)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2))