premise: The man in white is playing basketball against the man in blue.
hypothesis: The team wearing white is winning the game.
explanation_1: Just because a man is playing, doesn't state the team wearing white is the winning team.
explanation_2: It cannot be predicted the white is winning the game
explanation_3: Playing basketball doesn't imply winning the game, and the first sentence doesn't say that there is a whole team wearing white.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_man(x1) & n_man(x1) & against(e1,x1) & Theme(s1,x4) & a_blue(s1) & (x1 = x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_basketball(x3) & in(x1,x2) & n_white(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3.(n_game(x3) & n_team(x1) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_win(e2) & a_white(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & (x1 = x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_play(e1) & n_white(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_basketball(x3) & in(x1,x2) & against(e1,x1) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & (x1 = x4))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_win(e2) & v_wear(e1) & n_team(x1) & n_game(x3) & a_white(s1) & Theme(e2,x3) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))