premise: Workers wearing orange vests stand near rail tracks.
hypothesis: Workers are sitting and riding a train.
explanation_1: Workers could not be standing near the rail tracks and simultaneously sitting and riding a train.
explanation_2: The men can either stand near the rail tracks or be riding the train.
explanation_3: wearing not same as sitting, stand not same as riding
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(near(e2,x5) & n_track(x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_rail(x6) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_stand(e2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_vest(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_orange(x4) & (x1 = x2) & n_worker(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x2) & v_ride(e2) & n_train(x3) & n_worker(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_worker(x1))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(v_wear(e1) & v_stand(e2) & of(x5,x6) & of(x3,x4) & near(e2,x5) & n_worker(x1) & n_vest(x3) & n_track(x5) & n_rail(x6) & n_orange(x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_sit(e1) & v_ride(e2) & n_worker(x2) & n_worker(x1) & n_train(x3) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))