premise: A wakeboarder.
hypothesis: A man watches surfing on television.
explanation_1: If a man is watching surfing on television, he isn't a wakeboarder.
explanation_2: Wakeboarding and surfing are different. Watching surfing on tv is not performing the wakeboarding.
explanation_3: A wakeboarder cannot be watching surfing on the television the same time.
premise_logic: exists x1.(a_topic(x1) & n_wakeboarder(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1.(exists e2 x2.(on(e2,x2) & n_television(x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_surf(e2)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_watch(e1) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1.(n_wakeboarder(x1) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1.(v_watch(e1) & n_man(x1) & exists e2 x2.(v_surf(e2) & on(e2,x2) & n_television(x2) & Actor(e2,x1)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1))