premise: Young boy smiles at the camera from the tire swing.
hypothesis: The little boy is playing video games
explanation_1: The boy is either on the tire swing or playing video games; he cannot be doing both things simultaneously.
explanation_2: A boy cannot be playing video games while on the tire swing.
explanation_3: If he smiles at the camera from the tire swing, he is not playing video games.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_swing(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_tire(x4) & n_camera(x2) & at(e1,x2) & from(x2,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_smile(e1) & n_boy(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(n_boy(x1) & a_little(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_game(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_video(x3))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_smile(e1) & of(x3,x4) & n_tire(x4) & n_swing(x3) & n_camera(x2) & n_boy(x1) & from(x2,x3) & at(e1,x2) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_play(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_video(x3) & n_game(x2) & n_boy(x1) & a_little(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))