premise: A grim looking man with sunglasses pilots a boat.
hypothesis: The hungover man drives his boat to work.
explanation_1: Just because man is grim looking does not mean he is hungover and know way to know he is driving to work.
explanation_2: People can be grim without being hungover.
explanation_3: Not all grim looking men with sunglasses are hungover. It's possible that the boat is being piloted elsewhere, not necessarily to work.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1.(all x2.(n_boat(x2) -> exists x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & with(x1,x3) & for(x3,x2) & n_pilot(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_sunglass(x4))) & n_man(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1) & a_grim(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_boat(x4) & of(x4,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_man(x1) & of(x1,x3) & n_hungover(x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_hungover(x2) & Topic(e1,p1) & exists e2.(Actor(e2,x1) & v_work(e2)) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_drive(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1.(v_look(e1) & n_man(x1) & all x2.(exists x3 x4.(with(x1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_sunglass(x4) & n_pilot(x3) & for(x3,x2) & a_topic(x1)) | -n_boat(x2)) & a_grim(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_drive(e1) & of(x4,x1) & of(x1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_hungover(x3) & n_hungover(x2) & n_boat(x4) & exists e2.(v_work(e2) & Actor(e2,x1)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1))