premise: An ATV rides over a vast sandy landscape.
hypothesis: The rider is following his friends in the sand.
explanation_1: You can not infer he is following his friends.
explanation_2: Seeing an ATV ride in the sand does not imply more than 1 rider or friends.
explanation_3: An ATV rider does not necessarily have to be following anyone.
premise_logic: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & over(x1,x3) & n_landscape(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_sandy(x4) & a_vast(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & n_ride(x1) & (x1 = x2) & ne_nam_atv(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_sand(x3) & n_friend(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_rider(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_follow(e1) & in(x2,x3))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(over(x1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & ne_nam_atv(x2) & n_sandy(x4) & n_ride(x1) & n_landscape(x3) & a_vast(s1) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(s1,x3) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_follow(e1) & of(x2,x1) & n_sand(x3) & n_rider(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_friend(x2) & in(x2,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))