premise: A man and a child painting a post.
hypothesis: The two men are fighting.
explanation_1: If one person is a child, there cannot be two men. Painting and fighting are not the same thing.
explanation_2: A man and a child is different from the two men, and while the two men are fighting, the man and child are painting a post..
explanation_3: A man and a child are not two men. If they are painting, then they are not fighting.
premise_logic: exists s1 x1.(a_topic(s1) & all x2.(n_post(x2) -> exists x3 x4.(subset_of(x3,s1) & for(x3,x2) & n_painting(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_child(x4))) & subset_of(x1,s1) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_fight(e1))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1.(subset_of(x1,s1) & n_man(x1) & all x2.(exists x3 x4.(subset_of(x3,s1) & of(x3,x4) & n_painting(x3) & n_child(x4) & for(x3,x2)) | -n_post(x2)) & a_topic(s1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_fight(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))