premise: A barefoot child climbs at the jungle gym.
hypothesis: A barefoot child has shoes nearby.
explanation_1: A barefoot child does not imply shoes nearby.
explanation_2: Climbing at a jungle gym does not suggest there are shoes nearby.
explanation_3: Just because a barefoot child climbs at the jungle gym does not mean they have shoes nearby.
premise_logic: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_gym(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_jungle(x4) & a_topic(x1) & at(x1,x3) & n_climb(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_child(x2) & a_barefoot(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(a_nearby(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1) & n_shoe(x3) & n_child(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_barefoot(x2))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(of(x3,x4) & of(x1,x2) & n_jungle(x4) & n_gym(x3) & n_climb(x1) & n_child(x2) & at(x1,x3) & a_topic(x1) & a_barefoot(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_have(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_shoe(x3) & n_child(x1) & n_barefoot(x2) & a_nearby(s1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1))