premise: An ATV rides over a vast sandy landscape.
hypothesis: The rider is outdoors.
explanation_1: Rider outdoors is on an ATV.
explanation_2: A rider is outdoors on an ATV.
explanation_3: The rider is outdoors because she is on an ATV riding a vast sandy landscape.
premise_logic: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & over(x1,x3) & n_landscape(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_sandy(x4) & a_vast(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & n_ride(x1) & (x1 = x2) & ne_nam_atv(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_rider(x1) & exists x2.((x1 = x2) & n_outdoors(x2)))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(over(x1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & ne_nam_atv(x2) & n_sandy(x4) & n_ride(x1) & n_landscape(x3) & a_vast(s1) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(s1,x3) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_rider(x1) & exists x2.(n_outdoors(x2) & (x1 = x2)))