premise: The dog is in the snow in front of some trees.
hypothesis: A dog is in the snow.
explanation_1: a dog is in snow so he must be in front of some trees.
explanation_2: The dog in the snow, is the same phrasing as a dog in the snow.
explanation_3: A dog is a rephrasing of the dog.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_snow(x2) & n_dog(x1) & exists x3 x4.(in(x1,x2) & in(x2,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_tree(x4) & n_front(x3)))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_snow(x2) & in(x1,x2) & n_dog(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_snow(x2) & n_dog(x1) & exists x3 x4.(of(x3,x4) & n_tree(x4) & n_front(x3) & in(x2,x3) & in(x1,x2)))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_snow(x2) & n_dog(x1) & in(x1,x2))