premise: Two men shining peoples shoes.
hypothesis: Two men fighting over ice cream.
explanation_1: Shining shoes and fighting over ice cream are two different activities that are not connected.
explanation_2: One cannot shine shoes while fighting over an ice cream.
explanation_3: Two men cannot be shining people's shoes and fighting over ice cream simultaneously.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_shine(e1) & n_shoe(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_people(x4) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & over(e1,x3) & n_cream(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_ice(x4) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_fight(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_shine(e1) & of(x3,x4) & n_shoe(x3) & n_people(x4) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_fight(e1) & over(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_man(x1) & n_ice(x4) & n_cream(x3) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))