premise: An elderly male is blowing air into an object.
hypothesis: An elderly male is blowing air inyto an object
explanation_1: He is blowing air into an object, who is elderly.
explanation_2: Inyto is a misspelling of into the sentences are otherwise identical
explanation_3: in both sentences an elderly man in blowing air into an object. into is misspelled in sentence 2.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(into(e1,x3) & n_object(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_blow(e1) & n_air(x2) & n_male(x1) & a_elderly(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists s1 x1.(all x2.(n_object(x2) -> exists e1 x3 x4.(Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_blow(e1) & for(x3,x2) & n_inyto(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_air(x4))) & n_male(x1) & a_elderly(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_blow(e1) & n_object(x3) & n_male(x1) & n_air(x2) & into(e1,x3) & a_elderly(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists s1 x1.(n_male(x1) & all x2.(exists e1 x3 x4.(v_blow(e1) & of(x3,x4) & n_inyto(x3) & n_air(x4) & for(x3,x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1)) | -n_object(x2)) & a_elderly(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))