premise: A man wearing a hat and carrying a bag
hypothesis: A man is carrying a bag full of bread.
explanation_1: Sentence two clarifies what exactly is in the bag. It could hold anything, but it specifies that it's holding bread.
explanation_2: The bag can be full of bread or other things or rather empty
explanation_3: Just because a man wearing a hat and carrying a bag does not mean the bag is full of bread.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & Theme(e2,x5) & Actor(e2,x4) & v_carry(e2) & n_bag(x5) & (x1 = x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_hat(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_carry(e1) & of(s1,x4) & n_bread(x4) & Theme(s1,x3) & a_full(s1) & (x2 = x3) & n_bag(x2) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_wear(e1) & v_carry(e2) & n_man(x1) & n_hat(x3) & n_bag(x5) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e2,x5) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x4) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x4) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_carry(e1) & of(s1,x4) & n_man(x1) & n_bread(x4) & n_bag(x2) & a_full(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & (x2 = x3))