premise: A boy with no shirt is standing in water.
hypothesis: The boy is sitting on the couch.
explanation_1: A boy sitting on the couch can not be standing in water.
explanation_2: The boy cannot both be standing in the water and sitting on the couch.
explanation_3: a boy would either be in water or sitting on the couch.
premise_logic: exists x1.(-exists e1 x2 x3.(in(e1,x3) & n_water(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & with(x1,x2) & n_shirt(x2)) & n_boy(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_couch(x2) & n_boy(x1) & on(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1))
premise_sim: exists x1.(n_boy(x1) & all e1 x2 x3.(-with(x1,x2) | -v_stand(e1) | -n_water(x3) | -n_shirt(x2) | -in(e1,x3) | -Actor(e1,x1)))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_sit(e1) & on(e1,x2) & n_couch(x2) & n_boy(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))