premise: A woman is walking her dog and using her cellphone.
hypothesis: The woman is using her cellphone.
explanation_1: "The woman is using her cellphone" is a simplified form of "a woman is walking her dog and using her cellphone."
explanation_2: Woman is walking her dog is a type of woman.
explanation_3: The woman is using her cellphone and it is mentioned in both the sentences.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_use(e2) & n_cellphone(x4) & of(x4,x1) & n_female(x1) & n_female(x1) & n_woman(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_dog(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_cellphone(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_female(x1) & n_woman(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_use(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_walk(e1) & v_use(e2) & of(x4,x1) & of(x2,x1) & n_woman(x3) & n_woman(x1) & n_female(x1) & n_dog(x2) & n_cellphone(x4) & Theme(e2,x4) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e2,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_use(e1) & of(x2,x1) & n_woman(x1) & n_female(x1) & n_cellphone(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))