premise: A man in a business suit has just crossed the street.
hypothesis: The man is walking to work.
explanation_1: The second sentence explains the man is going to work and not some other destination
explanation_2: One can wear a business suit and not be going to work.
explanation_3: Only because a man in a business suit and crossed street doesn't necessarily mean he is working to work.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_street(x4) & a_just(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_cross(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_suit(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_business(x3) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1.(n_man(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & exists e2.(Actor(e2,x1) & v_work(e2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_cross(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_suit(x2) & n_street(x4) & n_man(x1) & n_business(x3) & in(x1,x2) & a_just(s1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1.(v_walk(e1) & n_man(x1) & exists e2.(v_work(e2) & Actor(e2,x1)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1))