premise: A man crouches down next to a motorcycle.
hypothesis: A man stands near a fire hydrant.
explanation_1: A man that crouches down next to a motorcycle could not have been standing near a fire hydrant.
explanation_2: The man wouldn't be able to crouch by a motorcycle and stand by a hydrant at the same time.
explanation_3: If one crouches then they are not standing.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(to(e1,x2) & n_motorcycle(x2) & r_next(e1) & exists s1.(Theme(s1,x1) & a_down(s1)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_crouch(e1) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(near(e1,x2) & n_hydrant(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_fire(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(v_crouch(e1) & to(e1,x2) & r_next(e1) & n_motorcycle(x2) & n_man(x1) & exists s1.(a_down(s1) & Theme(s1,x1)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_stand(e1) & of(x2,x3) & near(e1,x2) & n_man(x1) & n_hydrant(x2) & n_fire(x3) & Actor(e1,x1))