premise: A person swimming in a swimming pool.
hypothesis: a person is trying not to get wet
explanation_1: In order to swim, a person must get wet.
explanation_2: The person is either swimming in a swimming pool or trying not to get wet.
explanation_3: If the person is trying not to get wet, they could not be swimming in a swimming pool because the pool would have to have water in it for the person to be swimming and the water would make the person wet.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x3) & n_pool(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_swimming(x4) & Time(x1,x2) & n_swimming(x2) & n_person(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1.(-exists e1 p1.(Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_try(e1) & exists e2 p2.(exists s1.(Theme(s1,x1) & a_wet(s1)) & Topic(e2,p2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_get(e2))) & n_person(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(of(x3,x4) & n_swimming(x4) & n_swimming(x2) & n_pool(x3) & n_person(x1) & in(x1,x3) & a_topic(x1) & Time(x1,x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_person(x1) & all e1 p1.(all e2 p2.(all s1.(-a_wet(s1) | -Theme(s1,x1)) | -v_get(e2) | -Topic(e2,p2) | -Actor(e2,x1)) | -v_try(e1) | -Topic(e1,p1) | -Actor(e1,x1)))