premise: Motorcycle rider going over a bump.
hypothesis: Camel rider going over a bump.
explanation_1: They are riding a motorcycle, not a camel.
explanation_2: Camel and motorcycle are two completely different things
explanation_3: One sentence says the Motorcycle rider is going over bump the next one states the Camel rider goes over the bump.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & over(e1,x4) & n_bump(x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_go(e1) & (x1 = x3) & n_rider(x1) & (x1 = x2) & ne_nam_motorcycle(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & over(e1,x4) & n_bump(x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_go(e1) & (x1 = x3) & n_rider(x1) & (x1 = x2) & ne_per_camel(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_go(e1) & over(e1,x4) & ne_nam_motorcycle(x2) & n_rider(x1) & n_bump(x4) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x1 = x3) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_go(e1) & over(e1,x4) & ne_per_camel(x2) & n_rider(x1) & n_bump(x4) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x1 = x3) & (x1 = x2))