premise: The tennis player spikes the tennis ball on the boundary line.
hypothesis: A boxer is kayaking.
explanation_1: A tennis player spiking a tennis ball isn't the same as a boxer kayaking.
explanation_2: Kayaking is done on water while a boundary line is on land.
explanation_3: The tennis player is doing what a tennis player does as he spikes the tennis ball, but a boxer is not doing what his profession is by kayaking.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_line(x4) & a_boundary(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & n_ball(x3) & of(x3,x2) & n_tennis(x2) & n_tennis(x2) & n_player(x1) & of(x1,x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_spike(e1) & on(x3,x4))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_kayake(e1) & n_boxer(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_spike(e1) & on(x3,x4) & of(x3,x2) & of(x1,x2) & n_tennis(x2) & n_player(x1) & n_line(x4) & n_ball(x3) & a_boundary(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_kayake(e1) & n_boxer(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))