premise: Three men drink at a reflective bar.
hypothesis: Men are drinking alcohol at a bar.
explanation_1: There is no indication that what they are drinking is alcohol.
explanation_2: Just because three men drink at a reflective bar, doesn't mean, the men are drinking alcohol.
explanation_3: Not all men drinking at a bar are drinking alcohol.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(at(e1,x2) & n_bar(x2) & a_reflective(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_drink(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(at(e1,x3) & n_bar(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_drink(e1) & n_alcohol(x2) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(v_drink(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_bar(x2) & card_eq_3(x1) & at(e1,x2) & a_reflective(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_drink(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_bar(x3) & n_alcohol(x2) & at(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))