premise: The young man is sitting on a couch smoking a cigarette.
hypothesis: A young man drinking a beer
explanation_1: Just because he is smoking does not mean his also drinking a beer.
explanation_2: Smoking is not always associated with drinking beer
explanation_3: You can not infer he is drinking beer.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1.(n_man(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & all x2.(n_cigarette(x2) -> exists x3 x4.(on(e1,x3) & for(x3,x2) & n_smoking(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_couch(x4))) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_drink(e1) & n_beer(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1.(v_sit(e1) & n_man(x1) & all x2.(exists x3 x4.(on(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_smoking(x3) & n_couch(x4) & for(x3,x2)) | -n_cigarette(x2)) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_drink(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_beer(x3) & a_young(s1) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))