premise: A land rover is being driven across a river.
hypothesis: A sedan is stuck in the middle of a river.
explanation_1: A land rover and a sedan are different cars, so these sentences cannot be describing the same event.
explanation_2: The vehicle is either a land rover or a sedan.
explanation_3: There is no mention of a land rover, only a sedan.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(across(e1,x3) & n_river(x3) & Theme(e1,x1) & v_drive(e1) & n_rover(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_land(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_middle(x2) & in(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_river(x3) & Theme(e1,x1) & v_stick(e1) & n_sedan(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_drive(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_rover(x1) & n_river(x3) & n_land(x2) & across(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_stick(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_sedan(x1) & n_river(x3) & n_middle(x2) & in(e1,x2) & Theme(e1,x1))