premise: Three kids in a forest standing on a tree log.
hypothesis: Children chopping down tree in woods.
explanation_1: One cannot be standing one a tree and chopping down tree simultaneously
explanation_2: Chopping down trees is not the same as standing on tree logs.
explanation_3: Kids would not be chopping down tree if they were standing on a tree log
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & on(x2,x4) & n_log(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_tree(x5) & n_standing(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_forest(x3) & n_kid(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(ne_nam_children(x1) & a_down(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_chop(e1) & in(x2,x3) & n_wood(x3) & n_tree(x2))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(on(x2,x4) & of(x4,x5) & of(x2,x3) & n_tree(x5) & n_standing(x2) & n_log(x4) & n_kid(x1) & n_forest(x3) & in(x1,x2) & card_eq_3(x1) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_chop(e1) & ne_nam_children(x1) & n_wood(x3) & n_tree(x2) & in(x2,x3) & a_down(s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1))