premise: A man is socializing with another man in the bar.
hypothesis: Two men talking in a bar.
explanation_1: Socializing involves at least two men.
explanation_2: Socializing implies talking.
explanation_3: Two men talking in a bar are socializing.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_bar(x3) & with(e1,x2) & in(x2,x3) & n_man(x2) & -(x2 = x1) & n_man(x1) & n_man(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_socialize(e1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & in(e1,x3) & n_bar(x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_talk(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x2) & v_socialize(e1) & n_man(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_bar(x3) & in(x2,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & -(x2 = x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_talk(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_bar(x3) & in(e1,x3) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))