premise: A man is playing with his skateboard on a street.
hypothesis: A man is able to use his legs.
explanation_1: Playing with his skateboard implies that he is able to use his legs.
explanation_2: skateboard is played only with legs. so he is able to use his legs.
explanation_3: Playing with his skateboard implies able to use his legs.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x2) & on(x2,x3) & n_street(x3) & n_skateboard(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 s1 x1 x2.(Topic(s1,p1) & Actor(s1,x1) & a_able(s1) & exists e1.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_use(e1)) & n_leg(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x2) & v_play(e1) & on(x2,x3) & of(x2,x1) & n_street(x3) & n_skateboard(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists p1 s1 x1 x2.(of(x2,x1) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_leg(x2) & exists e1.(v_use(e1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1)) & a_able(s1) & Topic(s1,p1) & Actor(s1,x1))