premise: An orange on the floor next to a dog.
hypothesis: The fruit next to the dog is an apple.
explanation_1: The fruit cannot simultaneously be both an apple and orange.
explanation_2: An orange cannot be an apple.
explanation_3: An orange and an apple are different fruits.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_floor(x2) & a_topic(x1) & on(x1,x2) & to(x3,x4) & n_dog(x4) & next(x2,x3) & n_thing(x3) & n_orange(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.(n_dog(x3) & n_fruit(x1) & exists x4.((x1 = x4) & n_apple(x4)) & to(x2,x3) & next(x1,x2) & n_thing(x2))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(to(x3,x4) & on(x1,x2) & next(x2,x3) & n_thing(x3) & n_orange(x1) & n_floor(x2) & n_dog(x4) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(to(x2,x3) & next(x1,x2) & n_thing(x2) & n_fruit(x1) & n_dog(x3) & exists x4.(n_apple(x4) & (x1 = x4)))