premise: A man wearing black pants rides along a concrete ledge on rollerblades.
hypothesis: The man may lose his balance.
explanation_1: Just because a man rides along a ledge does not infer that he is going to lose his balance.
explanation_2: Just because a man is on rollerblades on a ledge does not mean he may lose his balance.
explanation_3: Just because the man is on a concrete ledge does not mean he will necessarily lose his balance.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(along(e2,x4) & on(x4,x5) & n_rollerblade(x5) & n_ledge(x4) & a_concrete(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_ride(e2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_pants(x3) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(n_balance(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_man(x1) & exists e2.(Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_lose(e2)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_may(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_wear(e1) & v_ride(e2) & on(x4,x5) & n_rollerblade(x5) & n_pants(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_ledge(x4) & along(e2,x4) & a_concrete(s2) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s2,x4) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(v_may(e1) & of(x2,x1) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_balance(x2) & exists e2.(v_lose(e2) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1))