premise: A very dirty race car doing a burnout on some dirt.
hypothesis: A car that has no tires.
explanation_1: Car doing a burnout on some dirt cannot be the car that has no tires
explanation_2: the car cannot do a burnout with no tires.
explanation_3: If the car has no tires, then it can not be doing a burnout.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_do(e1) & on(x4,x5) & n_dirt(x5) & n_burnout(x4) & (x1 = x3) & n_car(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_race(x2) & a_dirty(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & r_very(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2.(a_topic(x1) & -exists e1 x3.(Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_have(e1) & n_tire(x3)) & (x1 = x2) & n_car(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_do(e1) & r_very(x1) & on(x4,x5) & of(x1,x2) & n_race(x2) & n_dirt(x5) & n_car(x1) & n_burnout(x4) & a_topic(x1) & a_dirty(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x1 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_car(x1) & all e1 x3.(-v_have(e1) | -n_tire(x3) | -Theme(e1,x3) | -Actor(e1,x2)) & a_topic(x1) & (x1 = x2))