premise: Two men in orange uniforms stand before a train and do some work.
hypothesis: Nobody is working
explanation_1: The initial sentence suggests that two individuals are completing a task, while the second sentences indicates that no one is present.
explanation_2: men doesn't mean nobody
explanation_3: The two men are doing some work.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8.(Theme(e2,x8) & Actor(e2,x5) & v_do(e2) & n_work(x8) & in(x5,x6) & n_uniform(x6) & of(x6,x7) & n_orange(x7) & n_man(x5) & card_eq_2(x5) & before(e1,x4) & n_train(x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_uniform(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_orange(x3) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: -exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_work(e1) & n_person(x1))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8.(v_stand(e1) & v_do(e2) & of(x6,x7) & of(x2,x3) & n_work(x8) & n_uniform(x6) & n_uniform(x2) & n_train(x4) & n_orange(x7) & n_orange(x3) & n_man(x5) & n_man(x1) & in(x5,x6) & in(x1,x2) & card_eq_2(x5) & card_eq_2(x1) & before(e1,x4) & Theme(e2,x8) & Actor(e2,x5) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: all e1 x1.(-v_work(e1) | -n_person(x1) | -Actor(e1,x1))