premise: Young Asian male child either smoking something or its an instrument.
hypothesis: A child is taking a nap.
explanation_1: The child that is smoking something or its an instrument could not have been taking a nap.
explanation_2: One cannot be smoking if there are taking a nap.
explanation_3: the first sentence is talking about the child is smoking something or having an instrument but in second sentence it is mentioned that child is taking a nap.
premise_logic: (exists s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & n_something(x1) & of(x1,x4) & n_smoking(x4) & a_either(s3) & Theme(s3,x1) & of(x1,x3) & n_child(x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_male(x2) & a_asian(s2) & Theme(s2,x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1)) | exists x5 x6.(a_topic(x5) & Time(x5,x6) & n_its(x6) & n_instrument(x5)))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_take(e1) & n_nap(x2) & n_child(x1))
premise_sim: (exists x5 x6.(n_its(x6) & n_instrument(x5) & a_topic(x5) & Time(x5,x6)) | exists s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4.(of(x1,x4) & of(x1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_something(x1) & n_smoking(x4) & n_male(x2) & n_child(x3) & a_young(s1) & a_topic(x1) & a_either(s3) & a_asian(s2) & Theme(s3,x1) & Theme(s2,x1) & Theme(s1,x1)))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_take(e1) & n_nap(x2) & n_child(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))