premise: a man walks on the icy sidewalk.
hypothesis: The man almost slipped earlier.
explanation_1: An icy sidewalk does not imply that the man almost slipped earlier.
explanation_2: Just because a man is walking on ice does not mean he almost slipped earlier.
explanation_3: Not everyone almost slipped when they walk on ice.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_sidewalk(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_icy(x3) & on(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1.(n_man(x1) & a_almost(s2) & Manner(e1,s2) & a_earlier(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_slip(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_walk(e1) & on(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_sidewalk(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_icy(x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1.(v_slip(e1) & n_man(x1) & a_earlier(s1) & a_almost(s2) & Manner(e1,s2) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1))