premise: People are riding their bikes down a road.
hypothesis: No one is riding a bike.
explanation_1: There can’t be people riding a bike if no one is riding the bike.
explanation_2: People is not the same as no one.
explanation_3: People riding their bikes is not no one.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(down(e1,x3) & n_road(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1) & n_bike(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_people(x1))
hypothesis_logic: -exists e1 x1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1) & n_bike(x2) & n_one(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_ride(e1) & of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_road(x3) & n_people(x1) & n_bike(x2) & down(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: all e1 x1 x2.(-v_ride(e1) | -n_one(x1) | -n_bike(x2) | -Theme(e1,x2) | -Actor(e1,x1))