premise: Three men are working with their bikes in the shoulder of a road.
hypothesis: The men are driving cars.
explanation_1: The men cannot simultaneously be working with their bikes and driving cars
explanation_2: The men can't be working with their bikes and driving cars.
explanation_3: Men working with their bikes  cannot be driving cars at the same time.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_shoulder(x3) & in(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_road(x4) & with(e1,x2) & n_bike(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_work(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_man(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_drive(e1) & n_car(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(e1,x2) & v_work(e1) & of(x3,x4) & of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_shoulder(x3) & n_road(x4) & n_man(x1) & n_bike(x2) & in(e1,x3) & card_eq_3(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_drive(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_car(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))