premise: A child plays with her father's boots.
hypothesis: A child is playing with her mothers' shoe.
explanation_1: the child can not be playing with her mothers' shoe if she was playing with her father's boots in sentence one
explanation_2: The child is either playing with her father's boots or her mothers' shoe.
explanation_3: A father is not a mother. Boots are not a shoe.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x3) & n_boot(x3) & of(x3,x2) & n_father(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_female(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_child(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x3) & n_shoe(x3) & of(x3,x2) & n_mother(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_female(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_child(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x3) & v_play(e1) & of(x3,x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_female(x1) & n_father(x2) & n_child(x1) & n_boot(x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x3) & v_play(e1) & of(x3,x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_shoe(x3) & n_mother(x2) & n_female(x1) & n_child(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))