premise: A boy is standing in a pool getting splashed with water.
hypothesis: The boy is in swimming clothes.
explanation_1: A boy doesn't have to wear swimming clothes to stand in a pool getting splashed with water.
explanation_2: There is no information in Sentence 1 about the boys clothes.
explanation_3: A boy can stand by the pool without wearing swimming clothes.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 p1 x1 x2.(for(e1,e2) & exists e3 x3.(with(e3,x3) & n_water(x3) & Theme(e3,x1) & v_splash(e3)) & Topic(e2,p1) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_get(e2) & in(e1,x2) & n_pool(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & n_boy(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_boy(x1) & exists x2 x3.(in(x1,x2) & n_clothes(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_swimming(x3)))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 p1 x1 x2.(v_stand(e1) & v_get(e2) & n_pool(x2) & n_boy(x1) & in(e1,x2) & for(e1,e2) & exists e3 x3.(with(e3,x3) & v_splash(e3) & n_water(x3) & Theme(e3,x1)) & Topic(e2,p1) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_boy(x1) & exists x2 x3.(of(x2,x3) & n_swimming(x3) & n_clothes(x2) & in(x1,x2)))