premise: Two girls in bathing suits are in water.
hypothesis: Girls in swim suit attracting the guys through glamour
explanation_1: You can not infer they are attracting the guys.
explanation_2: Just because two girls in bathing suits are in water doesn't necessarily be attracting the guys. Not all girls have glamour.
explanation_3: Just becuase girls are in swimwear does not mean they are attracting the guys through glamour.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.(exists x4.(in(x1,x4) & n_water(x4)) & in(x1,x2) & n_suit(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_bathing(x3) & n_girl(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_guy(x4) & ne_nam_girls(s1) & a_topic(s1) & in(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_attract(e1) & through(x4,x5) & n_glamour(x5) & (x1 = x3) & n_suit(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_swim(x2))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(of(x2,x3) & n_suit(x2) & n_girl(x1) & n_bathing(x3) & in(x1,x2) & exists x4.(n_water(x4) & in(x1,x4)) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_attract(e1) & through(x4,x5) & of(x1,x2) & ne_nam_girls(s1) & n_swim(x2) & n_suit(x1) & n_guy(x4) & n_glamour(x5) & in(s1,x1) & a_topic(s1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x1 = x3))