premise: Cook handling hot tray with food on it.
hypothesis: girl eats cotton candy
explanation_1: A cook handling hot tray with food cannot be a girl that eats cotton candy because candy is no food neither is it hot.
explanation_2: Either a cook or a girl, either is handling hot tray or eats cotton candy.
explanation_3: If the cook is handling the hot tray, that can't be the same as a girl who eats cotton candy.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(ne_per_cook(x1) & on(e1,x2) & n_thing(x2) & with(e1,x3) & n_food(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_handle(e1) & n_tray(x2) & a_hot(s1) & Theme(s1,x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_eat(e1) & n_candy(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_cotton(x3) & n_girl(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x3) & v_handle(e1) & on(e1,x2) & ne_per_cook(x1) & n_tray(x2) & n_thing(x2) & n_food(x3) & a_hot(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_eat(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_girl(x1) & n_cotton(x3) & n_candy(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))