premise: A man is walking in the street.
hypothesis: A buisness man is talking a walk on his lunchbreak.
explanation_1: Just because he is walking doesn't mean that he is on a lunchbreak.
explanation_2: The man is not necessarily a buisness man and might not be on his lunchbreak.
explanation_3: The man could be heading anywhere else and wouldn't have to be on his lunchbreak.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_street(x2) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(on(e1,x4) & n_lunchbreak(x4) & of(x4,x1) & n_male(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_talk(e1) & n_walk(x3) & n_man(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_buisness(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_walk(e1) & n_street(x2) & n_man(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_talk(e1) & on(e1,x4) & of(x4,x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_walk(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_lunchbreak(x4) & n_buisness(x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))