premise: Two men are wearing caps are looking at the ground with surprised expressions on their faces.
hypothesis: Two men are mud wrestling.
explanation_1: It is not necessarily true that they are mud wrestling.
explanation_2: The two men are not said to be mud wrestling in the first sentence.
explanation_3: Looking at the ground does not mean mud wrestling.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x4 x5.(n_ground(x4) & n_face(x5) & of(x5,x4) & n_thing(x4) & exists e2 s1 x2 x3.(for(e2,s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & a_surprised(s1) & at(e2,x4) & with(e2,x3) & on(x3,x5) & n_expression(x3) & Actor(e2,x2) & v_look(e2) & n_cap(x2)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_wear(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists s1 x2.((x1 = x2) & n_wrestling(x2) & a_mud(s1) & Theme(s1,x2)) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x4 x5.(v_wear(e1) & of(x5,x4) & n_thing(x4) & n_man(x1) & n_ground(x4) & n_face(x5) & exists e2 s1 x2 x3.(with(e2,x3) & v_look(e2) & on(x3,x5) & n_expression(x3) & n_cap(x2) & for(e2,s1) & at(e2,x4) & a_surprised(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e2,x2)) & card_eq_2(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists s1 x2.(n_wrestling(x2) & a_mud(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & (x1 = x2)) & card_eq_2(x1))