premise: A man speaking with two women.
hypothesis: A man is giving two women directions at work.
explanation_1: Just because a man speaking with two women doesn't necessarily mean that the man is giving directions at work.
explanation_2: Just because a man is speaking with two women it does not mean he is giving women directions or that any of them are at work.
explanation_3: Just because a man is talking to women does not mean he is giving directions at work.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & with(x1,x3) & n_woman(x3) & card_eq_2(x3) & n_speaking(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(Recipient(e1,x4) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_give(e1) & n_woman(x4) & card_eq_2(x4) & at(x2,x3) & n_work(x3) & n_direction(x2) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(with(x1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_woman(x3) & n_speaking(x1) & n_man(x2) & card_eq_2(x3) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_give(e1) & n_work(x3) & n_woman(x4) & n_man(x1) & n_direction(x2) & card_eq_2(x4) & at(x2,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Recipient(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1))