premise: The tennis player spikes the tennis ball on the boundary line.
hypothesis: The tennis player is winning the game.
explanation_1: If a tennis player spikes the tennis ball on a boundary line, it is not necessarily true that they are winning the game.
explanation_2: By spiking the ball boundary line may not be winning moment.
explanation_3: We have no idea if the player is winning the game, they might be losing.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_line(x4) & a_boundary(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & n_ball(x3) & of(x3,x2) & n_tennis(x2) & n_tennis(x2) & n_player(x1) & of(x1,x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_spike(e1) & on(x3,x4))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_game(x3) & n_player(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_tennis(x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_win(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_spike(e1) & on(x3,x4) & of(x3,x2) & of(x1,x2) & n_tennis(x2) & n_player(x1) & n_line(x4) & n_ball(x3) & a_boundary(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_win(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_tennis(x2) & n_player(x1) & n_game(x3) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))