premise: A group of motorcycles wearing black.
hypothesis: Some motorcycles wearing white.
explanation_1: Some motorcycles wearing white contradicts the observation that the group is wearing black.
explanation_2: The motorcycles can't in white and black.
explanation_3: A group of motorcycles wearing black cannot also be wearing white.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & exists s1.(Theme(s1,x3) & a_black(s1)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_wear(e1) & (x1 = x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_motorcycle(x2) & n_group(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(a_topic(x1) & exists s1.(Theme(s1,x2) & a_white(s1)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_motorcycle(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3.(v_wear(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_motorcycle(x2) & n_group(x1) & exists s1.(a_black(s1) & Theme(s1,x3)) & a_topic(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x1 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(v_wear(e1) & n_motorcycle(x1) & exists s1.(a_white(s1) & Theme(s1,x2)) & a_topic(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))