premise: A closeup of an older man with glasses speaking.
hypothesis: The man is talking to himself.
explanation_1: You can not infer he is talking.
explanation_2: There is no reference in first sentence that the old man is talking to himself
explanation_3: Just because a closeup of an older man with glasses speaking doesn't mean he is talking to himself.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & of(x1,x2) & with(x2,x3) & Actor(e1,x4) & v_speak(e1) & (x3 = x4) & n_glass(x3) & n_man(x2) & r_more(s1) & a_older(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_closeup(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(n_male(x1) & n_man(x1) & to(e1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_talk(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(x2,x3) & v_speak(e1) & r_more(s1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2) & n_glass(x3) & n_closeup(x1) & a_topic(x1) & a_older(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x4) & (x3 = x4))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_talk(e1) & to(e1,x1) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))