premise: A man in a suit speaking to a seated woman.
hypothesis: A man in a costume speaking to another man.
explanation_1: If he is in a suit talking to a woman, he is not in costume talking to a man.
explanation_2: If a man is speaking to a woman the man is not speaking to a man.  A man is not a woman.
explanation_3: A MAN AND A WOMAN CANNOT BE SAME
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & to(x2,x4) & n_woman(x4) & Theme(e1,x4) & v_seat(e1) & n_speaking(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_suit(x3) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists s1 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & to(x2,x3) & n_man(x3) & -(x3 = x1) & n_man(x1) & n_man(x1) & n_speaking(x2) & a_costume(s1) & Theme(s1,x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_seat(e1) & to(x2,x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_woman(x4) & n_suit(x3) & n_speaking(x2) & n_man(x1) & in(x1,x2) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x4))
hypothesis_sim: exists s1 x1 x2 x3.(to(x2,x3) & n_speaking(x2) & n_man(x3) & n_man(x1) & in(x1,x2) & a_topic(x1) & a_costume(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & -(x3 = x1))