premise: A man working at the top of a telephone pole.
hypothesis: The guy is hunting in the woods.
explanation_1: There is no telephone pole in the woods. And one is working and the other is hunting.
explanation_2: If a man is working on a telephone pole he is not hunting in the woods.
explanation_3: He can't be both in the woods and on top of a telephone pole.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_top(x3) & a_topic(x1) & at(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_pole(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_telephone(x5) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_work(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_wood(x2) & n_guy(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_hunt(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_work(e1) & of(x4,x5) & of(x3,x4) & n_top(x3) & n_telephone(x5) & n_pole(x4) & n_man(x1) & at(e1,x3) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_hunt(e1) & n_wood(x2) & n_guy(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))