premise: Eight tourists stand at a railing looking at an attraction.
hypothesis: The attraction drew the attention of the tourists
explanation_1: Looking at the attraction would require the attention of the tourists.
explanation_2: Sentence 2 is a simplification of sentence 1, looking at something is to pay attention to it.
explanation_3: looking at an attraction is inferred as attraction drew the attention
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(for(e1,e2) & at(e2,x3) & n_attraction(x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_look(e2) & at(e1,x2) & n_railing(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & n_tourist(x1) & card_eq_8(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_tourist(x3) & n_attention(x2) & n_attraction(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_draw(e1) & of(x2,x3))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_stand(e1) & v_look(e2) & n_tourist(x1) & n_railing(x2) & n_attraction(x3) & for(e1,e2) & card_eq_8(x1) & at(e2,x3) & at(e1,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_draw(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_tourist(x3) & n_attraction(x1) & n_attention(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))