premise: A man interviews a boy in a gathering of people.
hypothesis: A man interviews a boy.
explanation_1: A boy in a gathering of people is a type of boy.
explanation_2: Both man interviews a boy.
explanation_3: The second sentence reiterates the action described in sentence 1, which is that a man interviews a boy.
premise_logic: all x1.(n_boy(x1) -> exists x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x2) & in(x2,x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_people(x5) & n_gathering(x4) & for(x2,x1) & n_interview(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_man(x3)))
hypothesis_logic: all x1.(n_boy(x1) -> exists x2 x3.(a_topic(x2) & for(x2,x1) & n_interview(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_man(x3)))
premise_sim: all x1.(exists x2 x3 x4 x5.(of(x4,x5) & of(x2,x3) & n_people(x5) & n_man(x3) & n_interview(x2) & n_gathering(x4) & in(x2,x4) & for(x2,x1) & a_topic(x2)) | -n_boy(x1))
hypothesis_sim: all x1.(exists x2 x3.(of(x2,x3) & n_man(x3) & n_interview(x2) & for(x2,x1) & a_topic(x2)) | -n_boy(x1))