premise: The man in colorful shorts is barefoot.
hypothesis: The man has shorts but no shoes.
explanation_1: Being barefoot is the same as having no shoes.
explanation_2: no shoes is a rephrasing of barefoot.
explanation_3: The man is in shorts but is barefoot, which means he has no shoes.
premise_logic: exists p1 s1 x1 x2.(n_man(x1) & exists x3.((x1 = x3) & n_barefoot(x3)) & in(x1,x2) & n_shorts(x2) & a_colorful(s1) & Theme(s1,x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_man(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1) & -exists x4.(subset_of(x4,x2) & n_shoe(x4)) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_shorts(x3))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1 x2.(n_shorts(x2) & n_man(x1) & in(x1,x2) & exists x3.(n_barefoot(x3) & (x1 = x3)) & a_colorful(s1) & Theme(s1,x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_have(e1) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_shorts(x3) & n_man(x1) & all x4.(-subset_of(x4,x2) | -n_shoe(x4)) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))