premise: Two men wearing red jackets are looking out over some water and one man has yellow earphones on his ears.
hypothesis: Two women are staring at a mountain and neither has any headphones or jackets.
explanation_1: He refers to two men not two women. They cannot be looking out over some water and staring at a mountain simultaneously. If neither has any headphones or jackets then they cannot be wearing red jackets or have yellow earphones.
explanation_2: Women are not men.  Headphones are not earphones.
explanation_3: two men looking out over some water one man having yellow earphone is not same as two men staring at a mountain neither has any headphones
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 e3 s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(Theme(e3,x6) & Actor(e3,x5) & v_have(e3) & on(x6,x7) & n_ear(x7) & of(x7,x3) & n_male(x3) & n_earphone(x6) & a_yellow(s3) & Theme(s3,x6) & n_man(x5) & card_eq_1(x5) & a_out(s2) & Manner(e2,s2) & over(e2,x4) & n_water(x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_look(e2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_jacket(x3) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(-exists x3.(all x4.((n_headphone(x4) | n_jacket(x4)) -> exists e2.(Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_have(e2))) & n_thing(x3)) & at(e1,x2) & n_mountain(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stare(e1) & n_woman(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 e3 s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(v_wear(e1) & v_look(e2) & v_have(e3) & over(e2,x4) & on(x6,x7) & of(x7,x3) & n_water(x4) & n_man(x5) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x3) & n_jacket(x3) & n_earphone(x6) & n_ear(x7) & card_eq_2(x1) & card_eq_1(x5) & a_yellow(s3) & a_red(s1) & a_out(s2) & Theme(s3,x6) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e3,x6) & Theme(e1,x3) & Manner(e2,s2) & Actor(e3,x5) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_stare(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_mountain(x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & at(e1,x2) & all x3.(exists x4.(all e2.(-v_have(e2) | -Theme(e2,x4) | -Actor(e2,x3)) & (n_jacket(x4) | n_headphone(x4))) | -n_thing(x3)) & Actor(e1,x1))