premise: A group of men are riding a moving walkway.
hypothesis: A group of women are baking in a kitchen.
explanation_1: In sentence 1 it is a group of men riding a moving walkway while in sentence 2 it is a group of women baking in the kitchen.
explanation_2: A group of women are not a group of men.  Riding a moving walkway is not baking in a kitchen.
explanation_3: A group of men cannot be a group of women.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_ride(e2) & n_walkway(x3) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_move(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2) & n_group(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(in(e1,x3) & n_kitchen(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_bake(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_woman(x2) & n_group(x1))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_ride(e2) & v_move(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_walkway(x3) & n_man(x2) & n_group(x1) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_bake(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_woman(x2) & n_kitchen(x3) & n_group(x1) & in(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))