premise: A man in a suit cheering in a library in front of children.
hypothesis: A lawyer is encouraging some children at a contest.
explanation_1: The man who is encouraging children just doesn't be a lawyer since he is in suit
explanation_2: Just because a man is wearing a suit does not mean he is a lawyer or at a contest.
explanation_3: A man wearing a suit does not mean he is a lawyer and cheering does not mean there was a contest.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & in(e1,x4) & in(x4,x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_child(x6) & n_front(x5) & n_library(x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_cheer(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_suit(x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(at(e1,x3) & n_contest(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_encourage(e1) & n_child(x2) & n_lawyer(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(v_cheer(e1) & of(x5,x6) & n_suit(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_library(x4) & n_front(x5) & n_child(x6) & in(x4,x5) & in(x1,x2) & in(e1,x4) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_encourage(e1) & n_lawyer(x1) & n_contest(x3) & n_child(x2) & at(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))