premise: A woman is walking her dog and using her cellphone.
hypothesis: The woman is playing a game on her cellphone.
explanation_1: You would not assume someone would be playing a game while walking their dog.
explanation_2: By using cellphone it can not be made out playing a game.
explanation_3: Just because a woman is walking her dog and using her cellphone does not mean she is playing a game.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_use(e2) & n_cellphone(x4) & of(x4,x1) & n_female(x1) & n_female(x1) & n_woman(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_dog(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_cellphone(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_female(x1) & n_woman(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & on(x2,x3) & n_game(x2))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_walk(e1) & v_use(e2) & of(x4,x1) & of(x2,x1) & n_woman(x3) & n_woman(x1) & n_female(x1) & n_dog(x2) & n_cellphone(x4) & Theme(e2,x4) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e2,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_play(e1) & on(x2,x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_woman(x1) & n_game(x2) & n_female(x1) & n_cellphone(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))