premise: Two kids in their pajamas.
hypothesis: Two children are wearing bright bathing suits at the ocean.
explanation_1: bathing suits are not pajamas
explanation_2: Answer: Either the kids wear a pajamas or bathing suits.
explanation_3: children can't be wearing bathing suites if they are in pajamas
premise_logic: exists x1 x2.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & n_pajamas(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_kid(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_ocean(x4) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_wear(e1) & at(x2,x4) & n_suit(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_bathing(x3) & a_bright(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_child(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2.(of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_pajamas(x2) & n_kid(x1) & in(x1,x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_wear(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_suit(x2) & n_ocean(x4) & n_child(x1) & n_bathing(x3) & card_eq_2(x1) & at(x2,x4) & a_bright(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))