premise: A group of people in red clothing with scooters ride down the hill on rollerblades.
hypothesis: Everyone is riding rollerblades.
explanation_1: A group of people is not the same as everyone.
explanation_2: Just because people are riding rollerblades does not mean everyone is riding.
explanation_3: Some of the people could have been riding scooters instead of rollerblades.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(n_hill(x5) & down(e1,x5) & on(x5,x6) & n_rollerblade(x6) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1) & of(x1,x2) & with(x2,x4) & n_scooter(x4) & in(x2,x3) & n_clothing(x3) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & n_people(x2) & n_group(x1))
hypothesis_logic: all x1.(n_person(x1) -> exists e1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1) & n_rollerblade(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(with(x2,x4) & v_ride(e1) & on(x5,x6) & of(x1,x2) & n_scooter(x4) & n_rollerblade(x6) & n_people(x2) & n_hill(x5) & n_group(x1) & n_clothing(x3) & in(x2,x3) & down(e1,x5) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: all x1.(exists e1 x2.(v_ride(e1) & n_rollerblade(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1)) | -n_person(x1))