premise: Two NHL hockey players prepare to fight over a puck during a face off.
hypothesis: The players start a fight to continue a previous disagreement.
explanation_1: They may be fighting for first time, not to continue previous disagreement.
explanation_2: The fight over a puck during face of does not necessarily imply they want to "continue a previous disagreement."
explanation_3: The two hockey players may not be fighting due to a previous disagreement.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3.(Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_prepare(e1) & exists e2 s1 x4 x5.(a_off(s1) & Manner(e2,s1) & during(e2,x5) & n_face(x5) & over(e2,x4) & n_puck(x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_fight(e2)) & n_player(x1) & of(x1,x3) & n_hockey(x3) & (x1 = x2) & ne_org_nhl(x2) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x4.(n_disagreement(x4) & n_player(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_start(e1) & Topic(x2,p1) & exists e2 x3.(Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x2) & v_continue(e2) & -(x3 = x4) & n_disagreement(x3)) & n_fight(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3.(v_prepare(e1) & of(x1,x3) & ne_org_nhl(x2) & n_player(x1) & n_hockey(x3) & exists e2 s1 x4 x5.(v_fight(e2) & over(e2,x4) & n_puck(x4) & n_face(x5) & during(e2,x5) & a_off(s1) & Manner(e2,s1) & Actor(e2,x1)) & card_eq_2(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x4.(v_start(e1) & n_player(x1) & n_fight(x2) & n_disagreement(x4) & exists e2 x3.(v_continue(e2) & n_disagreement(x3) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x2) & -(x3 = x4)) & Topic(x2,p1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))