premise: Two little kids without shirts are sitting down facing each other.
hypothesis: Two children are sitting shirtless indoors
explanation_1: Two little kids without shirts are sitting down facing each other doesn't imply they are sitting indoors.
explanation_2: There is no indication in the first sentence that establishes the children are shirtless or indoors.
explanation_3: The two kids aren't necessarily indoors.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1.(all x3.(n_other(x3) -> exists e2.(for(e1,e2) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_face(e2))) & a_down(s2) & Manner(e1,s2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & -exists x2.(with(x1,x2) & n_shirt(x2)) & n_kid(x1) & a_little(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(Time(e1,x2) & n_indoor(x2) & exists s1.(Theme(s1,x1) & a_shirtless(s1)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_child(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1.(v_sit(e1) & n_kid(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & all x3.(exists e2.(v_face(e2) & for(e1,e2) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1)) | -n_other(x3)) & all x2.(-with(x1,x2) | -n_shirt(x2)) & a_little(s1) & a_down(s2) & Theme(s1,x1) & Manner(e1,s2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(v_sit(e1) & n_indoor(x2) & n_child(x1) & exists s1.(a_shirtless(s1) & Theme(s1,x1)) & card_eq_2(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & Time(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))