premise: A man wearing red sunglasses is carrying two cameras.
hypothesis: The man likes taking pictures.
explanation_1: He could have been carrying the two cameras for his wife who likes to take pictures.
explanation_2: Simply carrying two cameras does not mean that a person likes taking pictures.
explanation_3: Just because the man is carrying two cameras does not mean he likes taking pictures.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_carry(e2) & n_camera(x4) & card_eq_2(x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_sunglass(x3) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1.(n_man(x1) & exists e2 x2.(Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_take(e2) & n_picture(x2)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_like(e1))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_wear(e1) & v_carry(e2) & n_sunglass(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_camera(x4) & card_eq_2(x4) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e2,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1.(v_like(e1) & n_man(x1) & exists e2 x2.(v_take(e2) & n_picture(x2) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1))