premise: A group of runners are running towards two identical skyscrapers.
hypothesis: A group of mall walkers takes a smoke break.
explanation_1: Runners and mall walkers are not the same, plus one group is actively running and the other unhealthily taking a smoke break.
explanation_2: A group cannot be both running and taking a smoke break at the same time.
explanation_3: Runners are not walkers.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(towards(e1,x3) & n_skyscraper(x3) & a_identical(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & card_eq_2(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_runner(x2) & n_group(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_take(e1) & n_break(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_smoke(x5) & of(x1,x2) & n_walker(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_mall(x3) & n_group(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_run(e1) & towards(e1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_skyscraper(x3) & n_runner(x2) & n_group(x1) & card_eq_2(x3) & a_identical(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_take(e1) & of(x4,x5) & of(x2,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_walker(x2) & n_smoke(x5) & n_mall(x3) & n_group(x1) & n_break(x4) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1))