premise: Two boys in front of a soda machine.
hypothesis: Two boys are going to purchase sodas.
explanation_1: Boys in front of a soda machine does not necessarily imply that they are going to purchase sodas.
explanation_2: We have no idea if they are going to purchase sodas, they could just be standing there.
explanation_3: Two people in front of a soda machine may not necessarily be about to purchase sodas.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_machine(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_soda(x4) & n_front(x2) & n_boy(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1.(Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_go(e1) & exists e2 x2.(Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_purchase(e2) & n_soda(x2)) & n_boy(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(of(x3,x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_soda(x4) & n_machine(x3) & n_front(x2) & n_boy(x1) & in(x1,x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1.(v_go(e1) & n_boy(x1) & exists e2 x2.(v_purchase(e2) & n_soda(x2) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1)) & card_eq_2(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1))