premise: A barefoot child climbs at the jungle gym.
hypothesis: A child is playing outside on a jungle gym.
explanation_1: The barefoot child and child are different words for the same child. The second sentence explains further first and thus follows.
explanation_2: Barefoot child is a child, and climbs implies playing.
explanation_3: A child that is barefoot is playing outside on a jungle gym.
premise_logic: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_gym(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_jungle(x4) & a_topic(x1) & at(x1,x3) & n_climb(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_child(x2) & a_barefoot(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(on(e1,x2) & n_gym(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_jungle(x3) & a_outside(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_child(x1))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(of(x3,x4) & of(x1,x2) & n_jungle(x4) & n_gym(x3) & n_climb(x1) & n_child(x2) & at(x1,x3) & a_topic(x1) & a_barefoot(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_play(e1) & on(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_jungle(x3) & n_gym(x2) & n_child(x1) & a_outside(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1))