premise: A man and his son riding bikes down the sidewalk.
hypothesis: the man and the boy were in town
explanation_1: It is not necessarily true they were in town.
explanation_2: Just because a man and his son riding bikes down the sidewalk, doesn't mean they were in town.
explanation_3: Riding down the sidewalk does not have to be in town.
premise_logic: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_sidewalk(x5) & a_topic(s1) & subset_of(x2,s1) & down(x2,x5) & n_bike(x2) & of(x2,x4) & n_riding(x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_son(x3) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & subset_of(x1,s1) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.(n_boy(x3) & n_man(x2) & exists x4.(in(x1,x4) & n_town(x4)) & subset_of(x3,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(subset_of(x2,s1) & subset_of(x1,s1) & of(x2,x4) & of(x2,x3) & of(x2,x1) & n_son(x3) & n_sidewalk(x5) & n_riding(x4) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_bike(x2) & down(x2,x5) & a_topic(s1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(subset_of(x3,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_man(x2) & n_boy(x3) & exists x4.(n_town(x4) & in(x1,x4)))