premise: Two women wearing aprons and hairnets look at each other while they reach into metal canisters.
hypothesis: No one is wearing aprons.
explanation_1: If two women are wearing aprons, then it can't also be true that no one is wearing aprons
explanation_2: One sentence has women wearing aprons in the other one no one is wearing aprons
explanation_3: Two women would either be wearing aprons or not
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(exists e3 x7 x8.(into(e3,x8) & n_metal(x8) & Theme(e3,x7) & Actor(e3,x2) & v_reach(e3) & n_canister(x7)) & n_thing(x2) & while(e2,p1) & all x6.(n_other(x6) -> at(e2,x6)) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_look(e2) & subset_of(x5,x1) & n_hairnet(x5) & subset_of(x2,x1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_wear(e1) & n_apron(x4) & (x2 = x3) & n_woman(x2) & card_eq_2(x2))
hypothesis_logic: -exists e1 x1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_wear(e1) & n_apron(x2) & n_one(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(while(e2,p1) & v_wear(e1) & v_look(e2) & subset_of(x5,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_woman(x2) & n_thing(x2) & n_hairnet(x5) & n_apron(x4) & exists e3 x7 x8.(v_reach(e3) & n_metal(x8) & n_canister(x7) & into(e3,x8) & Theme(e3,x7) & Actor(e3,x2)) & card_eq_2(x2) & all x6.(at(e2,x6) | -n_other(x6)) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: all e1 x1 x2.(-v_wear(e1) | -n_one(x1) | -n_apron(x2) | -Theme(e1,x2) | -Actor(e1,x1))