premise: A man laughing while at a restaurant.
hypothesis: A man laughing while at a restaurant eating.
explanation_1: By the statement that a man laughing while at a restaurant doesn't imply he is eating.
explanation_2: Just because a man laughing while at a restaurant does not mean they are eating.
explanation_3: A man can be at a restaurant without eating.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & at(e1,x3) & n_restaurant(x3) & r_while(e1) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_laugh(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & at(e1,x3) & n_eating(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_restaurant(x4) & r_while(e1) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_laugh(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_laugh(e1) & r_while(e1) & n_restaurant(x3) & n_man(x1) & at(e1,x3) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_laugh(e1) & r_while(e1) & of(x3,x4) & n_restaurant(x4) & n_man(x1) & n_eating(x3) & at(e1,x3) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))