premise: Men are playing rugby while covered in mud.
hypothesis: There is mud on the rugby players.
explanation_1: The people are covered in mud as they play rugby, making them rugby players
explanation_2: Rugby players are men.
explanation_3: Covered in mud implies that the mud is on the players.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & in(s1,x4) & n_mud(x4) & Theme(s1,x3) & a_cover(s1) & (x2 = x3) & n_rugby(x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x3 x4.(n_player(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_rugby(x4) & exists x2.((x1 = x2) & on(x2,x3) & n_mud(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_play(e1) & n_rugby(x2) & n_mud(x4) & n_man(x1) & in(s1,x4) & a_cover(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & (x2 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x3 x4.(of(x3,x4) & n_rugby(x4) & n_player(x3) & exists x2.(on(x2,x3) & n_mud(x2) & (x1 = x2)))