premise: A woman sitting with a guitar talking to a man sitting with an umbrella.
hypothesis: A man is jogging.
explanation_1: The man in sentence one is sentence so he can not be jogging in sentence two
explanation_2: One cannot be a man and a woman at the same time.
explanation_3: In sentence 1 it is mentioned that the man is sitting with the umbrella but in sentence 2 man is jogging.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 e3 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(a_topic(x1) & with(e1,x3) & to(e2,x5) & with(e3,x7) & n_umbrella(x7) & Actor(e3,x6) & v_sit(e3) & (x5 = x6) & n_man(x5) & Actor(e2,x4) & v_talk(e2) & (x3 = x4) & n_guitar(x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_sit(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_jog(e1) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 e3 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(with(e3,x7) & with(e1,x3) & v_talk(e2) & v_sit(e3) & v_sit(e1) & to(e2,x5) & n_woman(x1) & n_umbrella(x7) & n_man(x5) & n_guitar(x3) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e3,x6) & Actor(e2,x4) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x5 = x6) & (x3 = x4) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_jog(e1) & n_man(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))