premise: Three women sit at a table, taking notes from three identical magazines.
hypothesis: Three college women are studing.
explanation_1: They must not be studing simply because they are taking notes.
explanation_2: Just because three women sit at a table, taking notes from three identical magazines does not mean they are in college or are studing.
explanation_3: The three women may not be in college and they may not necessarily be studing [sic].
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(for(e1,e2) & from(e2,x4) & n_magazine(x4) & a_identical(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & card_eq_3(x4) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_take(e2) & n_note(x3) & at(e1,x2) & n_table(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_woman(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_stude(e1) & n_woman(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_college(x2) & card_eq_3(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_take(e2) & v_sit(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_table(x2) & n_note(x3) & n_magazine(x4) & from(e2,x4) & for(e1,e2) & card_eq_3(x4) & card_eq_3(x1) & at(e1,x2) & a_identical(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_stude(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_woman(x1) & n_college(x2) & card_eq_3(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))