premise: Five women wearing red shirts are leaning against a red car.
hypothesis: The theme of the photo is red.
explanation_1: Women can all be wearing the same color without posing for a photo.
explanation_2: Just because there happen to be red shirts and a red car does mot mean there is a theme.
explanation_3: There may be no theme to the photo and just coincidence the car and shirts are red.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(against(e2,x4) & n_car(x4) & a_red(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_lean(e2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_shirt(x3) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_woman(x1) & card_eq_5(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists s1 x1 x2.(n_photo(x2) & n_theme(x1) & Theme(s1,x1) & a_red(s1) & of(x1,x2))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_wear(e1) & v_lean(e2) & n_woman(x1) & n_shirt(x3) & n_car(x4) & card_eq_5(x1) & against(e2,x4) & a_red(s2) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s2,x4) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists s1 x1 x2.(of(x1,x2) & n_theme(x1) & n_photo(x2) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))