premise: A man playing fetch with two brown dogs.
hypothesis: A man has two dogs playing.
explanation_1: A man playing fetch with two brown dogs definitely has two brown dogs playing.
explanation_2: Two dogs are playing fetch.
explanation_3: A man playing with two brown dogs in both sentences
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x3) & n_dog(x3) & a_brown(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & card_eq_2(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_fetch(e1) & n_play(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_have(e2) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_play(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_dog(x2) & card_eq_2(x2) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x3) & v_fetch(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_play(x1) & n_man(x2) & n_dog(x3) & card_eq_2(x3) & a_brown(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_play(e1) & v_have(e2) & n_man(x1) & n_dog(x2) & card_eq_2(x2) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3))