premise: A cyclist dressed in black and white is pointing.
hypothesis: A cyclist dressed in black and white eats cheese.
explanation_1: The initial sentence indicates that the cyclist is pointing; however, the second sentence suggests that the cyclist is eating.  Both actions are two independent actions.
explanation_2: A cyclist is pointing not eating cheese.
explanation_3: One cannot be eating cheese and pointing at same time
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(Actor(e2,x1) & v_point(e2) & Theme(e1,s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & a_white(s2) & Theme(e1,s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & a_black(s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & v_dress(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_cyclist(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(in(e1,x2) & n_cheese(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_eat(x3) & a_white(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Theme(e1,x1) & v_dress(e1) & n_cyclist(x1))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_point(e2) & v_dress(e1) & n_cyclist(x1) & a_white(s2) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s2,x4) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Theme(e1,s2) & Theme(e1,s1) & Actor(e2,x1) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(v_dress(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_eat(x3) & n_cyclist(x1) & n_cheese(x2) & in(e1,x2) & a_white(s2) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s2,x2) & Theme(s1,x2) & Theme(e1,x1))