premise: A solo cyclist is riding down a windy road.
hypothesis: The cyclist is not riding
explanation_1: Either the cyclist is riding or is not riding, you can't do both at the same time.
explanation_2: The cyclist is either riding or is not riding.
explanation_3: The cyclist can’t be simultaneously riding and not riding.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(a_down(s2) & Manner(e1,s2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1) & n_road(x3) & a_windy(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & n_cyclist(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_solo(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1.(n_cyclist(x1) & -exists e1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1)))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(v_ride(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_solo(x2) & n_road(x3) & n_cyclist(x1) & a_windy(s1) & a_down(s2) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e1,x3) & Manner(e1,s2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_cyclist(x1) & all e1.(-v_ride(e1) | -Actor(e1,x1)))