premise: A boy at the beach runs through the surf towards three other people who are already in the water.
hypothesis: A boy can't swim so he didn't go to the beach with his family.
explanation_1: If the boy didn't go to the beach he cannot be at the beach.
explanation_2: The boy can't swim and didn't go to the beach so there is no way he could be running towards people in the water.
explanation_3: The boy either stayed at home or went to the beach with his family.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(n_water(x7) & n_people(x5) & n_surf(x3) & n_beach(x2) & towards(e1,x4) & a_already(s1) & Manner(p1,s1) & in(x6,x7) & (x4 = x6) & -(x4 = x5) & n_people(x4) & card_eq_3(x4) & through(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1) & at(x1,x2) & n_boy(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(n_beach(x2) & -exists e1 p1.(exists e2 p2.(exists x1.(-exists e3.(with(e3,x3) & to(e3,x2) & Actor(e3,x1) & v_go(e3)) & n_male(x1)) & so(e2,p2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_swim(e2)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_can(e1)) & n_family(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_boy(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 p1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(v_run(e1) & towards(e1,x4) & through(e1,x3) & n_water(x7) & n_surf(x3) & n_people(x5) & n_people(x4) & n_boy(x1) & n_beach(x2) & in(x6,x7) & card_eq_3(x4) & at(x1,x2) & a_already(s1) & Manner(p1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1) & -(x4 = x5) & (x4 = x6))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_family(x3) & n_boy(x1) & n_beach(x2) & all e1 p1.(all e2 p2.(all x1.(exists e3.(with(e3,x3) & v_go(e3) & to(e3,x2) & Actor(e3,x1)) | -n_male(x1)) | -v_swim(e2) | -so(e2,p2) | -Actor(e2,x1)) | -v_can(e1) | -Topic(e1,p1) | -Actor(e1,x1)))