premise: Businessman walking as two arrows point to him.
hypothesis: A guy is jogging in a sweatsuit.
explanation_1: A man is either walking or jogging, and a businessman would not likely be wearing a sweatsuit.
explanation_2: Waking cannot be considered as jogging. A businessman must not be wearing sweatshirt.
explanation_3: Walking is not jogging.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & to(x1,x4) & n_male(x4) & as(x1,x3) & n_point(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_arrow(x4) & card_eq_2(x3) & n_walking(x1) & (x1 = x2) & ne_nam_businessman(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(in(e1,x2) & n_sweatsuit(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_jog(e1) & n_guy(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(to(x1,x4) & of(x3,x4) & ne_nam_businessman(x2) & n_walking(x1) & n_point(x3) & n_male(x4) & n_arrow(x4) & card_eq_2(x3) & as(x1,x3) & a_topic(x1) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_jog(e1) & n_sweatsuit(x2) & n_guy(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))