premise: A man stands on one hand in the street while a crowd watches.
hypothesis: The kid is standing on two hands in the street.
explanation_1: Man cannot be a kid
explanation_2: In one sentence there is a man, in the other a kid.  The man is on one hand, while the kid is on two hands.
explanation_3: man and the kid is different and they should be standing in either one hand or two hands.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3.(n_street(x3) & exists e2 x4.(Actor(e2,x4) & v_watch(e2) & n_crowd(x4)) & while(e1,p1) & in(e1,x3) & on(e1,x2) & n_hand(x2) & card_eq_1(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_street(x3) & n_kid(x1) & in(e1,x3) & on(e1,x2) & n_hand(x2) & card_eq_2(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3.(while(e1,p1) & v_stand(e1) & on(e1,x2) & n_street(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_hand(x2) & in(e1,x3) & exists e2 x4.(v_watch(e2) & n_crowd(x4) & Actor(e2,x4)) & card_eq_1(x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_stand(e1) & on(e1,x2) & n_street(x3) & n_kid(x1) & n_hand(x2) & in(e1,x3) & card_eq_2(x2) & Actor(e1,x1))