premise: Five women wearing red shirts are leaning against a red car.
hypothesis: Everything in the photo is red colored.
explanation_1: It is not mentioned anywhere in sentence 1 that everything in the photo is red colored.
explanation_2: Everything in the photo is not necessarily red. The shirts and the car are red.
explanation_3: Not everything in the photo is necessarily red besides the shirts and the car.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(against(e2,x4) & n_car(x4) & a_red(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_lean(e2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_shirt(x3) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_woman(x1) & card_eq_5(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x2.(n_photo(x2) & all x1.(n_thing(x1) -> exists e1 s1.(for(s1,e1) & Theme(e1,x1) & v_color(e1) & Theme(s1,x1) & a_red(s1) & in(x1,x2))))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_wear(e1) & v_lean(e2) & n_woman(x1) & n_shirt(x3) & n_car(x4) & card_eq_5(x1) & against(e2,x4) & a_red(s2) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s2,x4) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x2.(n_photo(x2) & all x1.(exists e1 s1.(v_color(e1) & in(x1,x2) & for(s1,e1) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x1)) | -n_thing(x1)))