premise: A sitting man is holding a partially carved stone in front a partially painted wall.
hypothesis: The man is a sculptor.
explanation_1: holding a partially curved stone while sitting in front of  a painted wall does not mean that the man is a sculptor.
explanation_2: The man may not be a sculptor but a guy asked to hold on to something.
explanation_3: Holding a partially carved stone doesn't mean the man is a sculptor.
premise_logic: exists e3 e2 e1 x1 x2.(all s1 x3.((n_wall(x3) & a_painted(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & r_partially(x3)) -> exists x4.(in(e3,x4) & for(x4,x3) & n_front(x4))) & Theme(e3,x2) & Actor(e3,x1) & v_hold(e3) & n_stone(x2) & Theme(e2,x2) & v_carve(e2) & r_partially(x2) & n_man(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2.((x1 = x2) & n_sculptor(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e3 e2 e1 x1 x2.(v_sit(e1) & v_hold(e3) & v_carve(e2) & r_partially(x2) & n_stone(x2) & n_man(x1) & all s1 x3.(exists x4.(n_front(x4) & in(e3,x4) & for(x4,x3)) | -r_partially(x3) | -n_wall(x3) | -a_painted(s1) | -Theme(s1,x3)) & Theme(e3,x2) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e3,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2.(n_sculptor(x2) & (x1 = x2)))