premise: A man in a shirt and tie speaks to a group as an older woman holding a cup of coffee looks on.
hypothesis: The man is wearing khakis.
explanation_1: Just because a man is wearing a shirt and tie doesn't necessarily mean that he has on khakis. The type of pants he is wearing can't be inferred.
explanation_2: A shirt and tie are not usually khakis.
explanation_3: Just because the man has on a shirt and tie does not mean he is wearing khakis.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(exists e2 e3 p2 s1 x6 x7 x8 x9.(exists s2.(Theme(s2,x6) & a_on(s2)) & Topic(e3,p2) & Actor(e3,x6) & v_look(e3) & Theme(e2,x8) & Actor(e2,x7) & v_hold(e2) & of(x8,x9) & n_coffee(x9) & n_cup(x8) & (x6 = x7) & n_woman(x6) & r_more(s1) & a_older(s1) & Theme(s1,x6)) & as(e1,p1) & to(e1,x5) & n_group(x5) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_speak(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_tie(x4) & n_shirt(x3) & subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_man(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_wear(e1) & n_khaki(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_speak(e1) & to(e1,x5) & subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_tie(x4) & n_shirt(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_group(x5) & in(x1,x2) & exists e2 e3 p2 s1 x6 x7 x8 x9.(v_look(e3) & v_hold(e2) & r_more(s1) & of(x8,x9) & n_woman(x6) & n_cup(x8) & n_coffee(x9) & exists s2.(a_on(s2) & Theme(s2,x6)) & a_older(s1) & Topic(e3,p2) & Theme(s1,x6) & Theme(e2,x8) & Actor(e3,x6) & Actor(e2,x7) & (x6 = x7)) & as(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_wear(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_khaki(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))