premise: A musician playing his violin.
hypothesis: The violinist is on stage with other musicians.
explanation_1: Not every musician playing a violin is a violinist . just because a musician is playing his violin doe snot mean that he is on stage, or that he is playing with other musicians.
explanation_2: The first sentence only speaks on the actions of the subject and not that he is playing on stage nor that he is playing with other musicians.
explanation_3: The musician could have been at home and not on a stage with other musicians.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_play(e1) & n_violin(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & (x1 = x2) & n_musician(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x4.(n_musician(x4) & n_violinist(x1) & exists x2 x3.(on(x1,x2) & with(x2,x3) & -(x3 = x4) & n_musician(x3) & n_stage(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_play(e1) & of(x3,x1) & n_violin(x3) & n_musician(x1) & n_male(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x4.(n_violinist(x1) & n_musician(x4) & exists x2 x3.(with(x2,x3) & on(x1,x2) & n_stage(x2) & n_musician(x3) & -(x3 = x4)))