premise: A cyclist in a red and white uniform is biking across a garage full of people.
hypothesis: A cyclist is in a competition.
explanation_1: Cycling in uniform does not necessarily mean that you are in a competition.
explanation_2: Just because a cyclist is in a uniform and is biking does not mean he is in a competition.
explanation_3: Not all cyclists are in a competition.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(across(e1,x3) & of(s3,x5) & n_people(x5) & Theme(s3,x4) & a_full(s3) & (x3 = x4) & n_garage(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_bike(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_uniform(x2) & a_white(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_cyclist(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2.(in(x1,x2) & n_competition(x2)) & n_cyclist(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_bike(e1) & of(s3,x5) & n_uniform(x2) & n_people(x5) & n_garage(x3) & n_cyclist(x1) & in(x1,x2) & across(e1,x3) & a_white(s2) & a_red(s1) & a_full(s3) & Theme(s3,x4) & Theme(s2,x2) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & (x3 = x4))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_cyclist(x1) & exists x2.(n_competition(x2) & in(x1,x2)))