premise: A young boy wearing an orange uniform stands on the field near a colorful ball.
hypothesis: A boy is with a ball.
explanation_1: Sentence one describes a young boy with a colorful ball, sentence two supports the boy and a ball.
explanation_2: Answer: The boy is young and the ball is colourful.
explanation_3: If the boy stands near a ball then he is with the ball.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(n_field(x5) & on(e2,x5) & near(x5,x6) & n_ball(x6) & a_colorful(s2) & Theme(s2,x6) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_stand(e2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_uniform(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_orange(x4) & (x1 = x2) & n_boy(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2.(with(x1,x2) & n_ball(x2)) & n_boy(x1))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(v_wear(e1) & v_stand(e2) & on(e2,x5) & of(x3,x4) & near(x5,x6) & n_uniform(x3) & n_orange(x4) & n_field(x5) & n_boy(x1) & n_ball(x6) & a_young(s1) & a_colorful(s2) & Theme(s2,x6) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_boy(x1) & exists x2.(with(x1,x2) & n_ball(x2)))