premise: Women are sitting around a table at a restaurant chatting.
hypothesis: Women are knitting scarves for the homeless.
explanation_1: cannot sit at a restaurant table chatting while knitting scarves
explanation_2: One sentence talks about chatting, the other about knitting sweaters. It is fairly unlikely that these are both occurring simultaneously.
explanation_3: Women at a restaurant chatting and women knitting scarves for the homeless are two different scenarios.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(at(e1,x3) & n_chatting(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_restaurant(x4) & around(e1,x2) & n_table(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_homeless(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_knit(e1) & for(x2,x3) & n_scarf(x2) & n_woman(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_sit(e1) & of(x3,x4) & n_woman(x1) & n_table(x2) & n_restaurant(x4) & n_chatting(x3) & at(e1,x3) & around(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_knit(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_scarf(x2) & n_homeless(x3) & for(x2,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))