premise: Two women stand in the street both wearing matching outfits with police like jackets that say Polotie.
hypothesis: Two women are dancing in the street wearing dresses.
explanation_1: You can be standing and not dancing, an outfit doesn't mean you are wearing dresses.
explanation_2: Sentence 1 says the women are standing, sentence 2 says they're dancing. Sentence 1 says they're wearing jackets, sentence 2 says they're wearing dresses.
explanation_3: DANCING AND STANDING IMPLIES A DIFFERENCE AND DRESSES IN GENERAL DO NOT INDICATE A POLICE DRESS.
premise_logic: exists e3 e2 e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(ne_geo_polotie(x7) & n_street(x2) & for(e1,e2) & with(e2,x4) & like(x4,x5) & Theme(e3,x7) & Actor(e3,x6) & v_say(e3) & (x5 = x6) & n_jacket(x5) & n_police(x4) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_wear(e2) & n_outfit(x3) & a_matching(s2) & Theme(s2,x3) & a_both(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & n_woman(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3.(n_street(x2) & for(e1,e2) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_wear(e2) & n_dress(x3) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_dance(e1) & n_woman(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e3 e2 e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(with(e2,x4) & v_wear(e2) & v_stand(e1) & v_say(e3) & ne_geo_polotie(x7) & n_woman(x1) & n_street(x2) & n_police(x4) & n_outfit(x3) & n_jacket(x5) & like(x4,x5) & in(e1,x2) & for(e1,e2) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_matching(s2) & a_both(s1) & Theme(s2,x3) & Theme(e3,x7) & Theme(e2,x3) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e3,x6) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & (x5 = x6))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3.(v_wear(e2) & v_dance(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_street(x2) & n_dress(x3) & in(e1,x2) & for(e1,e2) & card_eq_2(x1) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))