premise: A young boy walks on a pipe that stretches over water.
hypothesis: A boy is in danger of falling into water.
explanation_1: Just because the boy is walking on a pipe doesn't mean he is in danger of falling into the water.
explanation_2: There may not be any danger of falling into water.
explanation_3: Just because a  young boy walks on a pipe that stretches over water does not mean he is in danger of falling.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(on(e1,x2) & over(e2,x4) & n_water(x4) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_stretch(e2) & (x2 = x3) & n_pipe(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_boy(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists e1 x2 x3 x4.(in(x1,x2) & into(e1,x4) & n_water(x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_fall(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_danger(x2)) & n_boy(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_walk(e1) & v_stretch(e2) & over(e2,x4) & on(e1,x2) & n_water(x4) & n_pipe(x2) & n_boy(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e2,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & (x2 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_boy(x1) & exists e1 x2 x3 x4.(v_fall(e1) & n_water(x4) & n_danger(x2) & into(e1,x4) & in(x1,x2) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3)))