premise: A guy taking a nap in the back of a vehicle.
hypothesis: A man is driving a truck blindfolded.
explanation_1: The man cannot be taking a nap while driving. The man cannot be driving in the back of a vehicle.
explanation_2: The man can't be taking a nap and driving a truck at the same time.
explanation_3: You cannot drive a truck from the back.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_back(x4) & a_topic(x1) & in(e1,x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_vehicle(x5) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_take(e1) & n_nap(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_guy(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_drive(e2) & Theme(e1,x3) & v_blindfold(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_truck(x2) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_take(e1) & of(x4,x5) & n_vehicle(x5) & n_nap(x3) & n_guy(x1) & n_back(x4) & in(e1,x4) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_drive(e2) & v_blindfold(e1) & n_truck(x2) & n_man(x1) & Theme(e2,x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & (x2 = x3))