premise: One man cutting through ice on a cold day.
hypothesis: The man cut the ice wrong.
explanation_1: You can cut ice right or wrong.
explanation_2: One man cutting through ice on a cold day doesn't imply the man cut the ice wrong.
explanation_3: You can not infer he cut the ice wrong.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & on(e1,x4) & n_day(x4) & a_cold(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & through(e1,x3) & n_ice(x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_cut(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_1(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(n_ice(x2) & n_man(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_cut(e1) & Theme(s1,x3) & a_wrong(s1) & (x2 = x3))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_cut(e1) & through(e1,x3) & on(e1,x4) & n_man(x1) & n_ice(x3) & n_day(x4) & card_eq_1(x1) & a_topic(x1) & a_cold(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_cut(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_ice(x2) & a_wrong(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & (x2 = x3))