premise: A snowboarder with a maroon coat sails through the air.
hypothesis: A person is snowboarding.
explanation_1: A snowboarder is a person, and when a snowboarder "sails through the air" they are snowboarding, therefore a person is snowboarding.
explanation_2: A PERSON IS SNOWBOARDING THROUGH THE AIR
explanation_3: Sails is done by a person
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_air(x4) & through(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sail(e1) & with(x1,x2) & n_coat(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_maroon(x3) & n_snowboarder(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_snowboard(e1) & n_person(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(x1,x2) & v_sail(e1) & through(e1,x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_snowboarder(x1) & n_maroon(x3) & n_coat(x2) & n_air(x4) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_snowboard(e1) & n_person(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))