premise: two samoyads play in the snow.
hypothesis: The Samoyads are eating their dinner.
explanation_1: The Samoyads are either play in the snow.or are eating their dinner.
explanation_2: If Samoyads play in the snow they are not eating their dinner.
explanation_3: Samoyads can't be eating dinner if they are at play in the snow
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_snow(x2) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_samoyad(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_dinner(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_samoyad(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_eat(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_play(e1) & n_snow(x2) & n_samoyad(x1) & in(e1,x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_eat(e1) & of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_samoyad(x1) & n_dinner(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))