premise: A motocross rider rides in the air over a bar.
hypothesis: The rider is in the air.
explanation_1: A motocross rider is the same rider in the air
explanation_2: If a rider rides into the air, then he is in the air.
explanation_3: The rider rides over a bar and so he is in air.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_air(x4) & a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x4) & over(x4,x5) & n_bar(x5) & n_ride(x1) & of(x1,x3) & n_rider(x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_motocross(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_air(x2) & n_rider(x1) & in(x1,x2))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(over(x4,x5) & of(x1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_rider(x3) & n_ride(x1) & n_motocross(x2) & n_bar(x5) & n_air(x4) & in(x1,x4) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_rider(x1) & n_air(x2) & in(x1,x2))