premise: Several men at a bar watch a sports game on the television.
hypothesis: The men are at a baseball game.
explanation_1: Men at a bar cannot be at a baseball game simultaneously
explanation_2: Men are not likely to be at a baseball game while they also watch a sports game on television.
explanation_3: If they are at the game they can't also be at the bar
premise_logic: exists x5.(n_television(x5) & all x1 x2.((n_game(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_sport(x2)) -> exists s1 s2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x3) & on(x3,x5) & for(x3,x1) & at(x3,x4) & n_watch(x4) & a_bar(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & n_man(x3) & a_several(s1) & Theme(s1,x3))))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2 x3.(at(x1,x2) & n_game(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_baseball(x3)))
premise_sim: exists x5.(n_television(x5) & all x1 x2.(exists s1 s2 x3 x4.(on(x3,x5) & n_watch(x4) & n_man(x3) & for(x3,x1) & at(x3,x4) & a_topic(x3) & a_several(s1) & a_bar(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & Theme(s1,x3)) | -of(x1,x2) | -n_sport(x2) | -n_game(x1)))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2 x3.(of(x2,x3) & n_game(x2) & n_baseball(x3) & at(x1,x2)))