premise: A child doing gymnastics
hypothesis: The child is eating lunch at the park.
explanation_1: The child can't be doing gymnastics while eating lunch.
explanation_2: The child cannot be eating lunch and doing gymnastics at the same time.
explanation_3: doing gymnastics  is different from eating lunch.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_do(e1) & n_gymnastics(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_child(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_park(x3) & n_child(x1) & at(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_eat(e1) & n_lunch(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_do(e1) & n_gymnastics(x3) & n_child(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_eat(e1) & n_park(x3) & n_lunch(x2) & n_child(x1) & at(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))