premise: Two women in tank tops are drinking.
hypothesis: Two women are on vacation getting drunk.
explanation_1: Every liquid that is drunk doesn not make the drinker drunk.
explanation_2: Sentence one does not explain where they are drinking, specifically not on vacation.
explanation_3: Not all women drinking get drunk. Not all women in tank tops are in vacation.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.(exists x4.((x1 = x4) & n_drinking(x4)) & in(x1,x2) & n_top(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_tank(x3) & n_woman(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(for(p1,e1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_get(e1) & n_drunk(x2) & exists x3.(on(x1,x3) & n_vacation(x3)) & n_woman(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(of(x2,x3) & n_woman(x1) & n_top(x2) & n_tank(x3) & in(x1,x2) & exists x4.(n_drinking(x4) & (x1 = x4)) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(v_get(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_drunk(x2) & for(p1,e1) & exists x3.(on(x1,x3) & n_vacation(x3)) & card_eq_2(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))