premise: Three men are working with their bikes in the shoulder of a road.
hypothesis: The men's bikes broke.
explanation_1: Just because the men are working with their bikes does not mean the bikes broke.
explanation_2: Just because three men are working with their bikes in the shoulder of a road, doesn't mean their bikes broke.
explanation_3: Working with their bikes does not denote that the bikes are broke.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_shoulder(x3) & in(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_road(x4) & with(e1,x2) & n_bike(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_work(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_bike(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_man(x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_break(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(e1,x2) & v_work(e1) & of(x3,x4) & of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_shoulder(x3) & n_road(x4) & n_man(x1) & n_bike(x2) & in(e1,x3) & card_eq_3(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_break(e1) & of(x2,x1) & n_man(x1) & n_bike(x2) & Actor(e1,x2))