premise: An American wrestler in a purple singlet wrestlers an opponent.
hypothesis: There is only one person.
explanation_1: A wrestler and an opponent is two people, which is more than one person.
explanation_2: An American wrestler and an opponent are more than one person.
explanation_3: Wrestlers implies there's more than one person
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_wrestler(e1) & n_opponent(x3) & in(x1,x2) & n_singlet(x2) & a_purple(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & n_wrestler(x1) & a_american(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.((x1 = x2) & n_person(x2) & card_eq_1(x2) & r_only(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(v_wrestler(e1) & n_wrestler(x1) & n_singlet(x2) & n_opponent(x3) & in(x1,x2) & a_purple(s2) & a_american(s1) & Theme(s2,x2) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(r_only(x2) & n_person(x2) & card_eq_1(x2) & (x1 = x2))