premise: A person swimming in a swimming pool.
hypothesis: A person enjoying the waters
explanation_1: You can not infer the person is enjoying the waters.
explanation_2: One can swim without enjoying the waters.
explanation_3: Not all people are enjoying swimming.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x3) & n_pool(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_swimming(x4) & Time(x1,x2) & n_swimming(x2) & n_person(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_waters(x3) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_enjoy(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_person(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(of(x3,x4) & n_swimming(x4) & n_swimming(x2) & n_pool(x3) & n_person(x1) & in(x1,x3) & a_topic(x1) & Time(x1,x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_enjoy(e1) & n_waters(x3) & n_person(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))