premise: Team member 39 waiting for the puck to come his way.
hypothesis: A man is jogging in the park.
explanation_1: He cannot be waiting if he is jogging.
explanation_2: A puck implies you are playing ice hockey in an ice rink and you cannot be also jogging in the park.
explanation_3: Playing a game with a puck is not the same as jogging.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_way(x5) & of(x5,x4) & n_male(x4) & n_puck(x4) & a_topic(x1) & for(x1,x4) & Topic(x4,p1) & exists e1.(Theme(e1,x5) & Actor(e1,x4) & v_come(e1)) & n_waiting(x1) & card_eq_39(x1) & of(x1,x3) & n_member(x3) & (x1 = x2) & ne_nam_team(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_park(x2) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_jog(e1) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists p1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(of(x5,x4) & of(x1,x3) & ne_nam_team(x2) & n_way(x5) & n_waiting(x1) & n_puck(x4) & n_member(x3) & n_male(x4) & for(x1,x4) & exists e1.(v_come(e1) & Theme(e1,x5) & Actor(e1,x4)) & card_eq_39(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Topic(x4,p1) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_jog(e1) & n_park(x2) & n_man(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))