premise: Man sits at the doorway of barber shop.
hypothesis: the man is standing in the roof
explanation_1: The man can not be siting and standing simultaneously.
explanation_2: STANDING IN THE ROOF IS DIFFERENT FROM SITTING AT THE DOORWAY
explanation_3: You cannot be standing and sitting simultaneously. There is no doorway on the roof.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_doorway(x2) & at(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_shop(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_barber(x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_roof(x2) & n_man(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_sit(e1) & of(x3,x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_shop(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_doorway(x2) & n_barber(x4) & at(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_stand(e1) & n_roof(x2) & n_man(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))