premise: A man in a hard hat looks intimidated.
hypothesis: The man is the foreman of the construction site.
explanation_1: You can not infer the man is a foreman.
explanation_2: Just because a man is in a hard hat does not mean he is the foreman or that he is on a construction site.
explanation_3: Not all men in hard hats are foremen. Just because he wears a hard hat does not mean he is on a construction site.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 x1 x2.(exists s2.(Theme(s2,x1) & a_intimidate(s2)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_hat(x2) & a_hard(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_site(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_construction(x4) & n_foreman(x2) & n_man(x1) & (x1 = x2) & of(x2,x3))
premise_sim: exists e1 p1 s1 x1 x2.(v_look(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_hat(x2) & in(x1,x2) & exists s2.(a_intimidate(s2) & Theme(s2,x1)) & a_hard(s1) & Topic(e1,p1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(of(x3,x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_site(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_foreman(x2) & n_construction(x4) & (x1 = x2))