premise: A man in a red shirt is walking towards a blue market stall.
hypothesis: The man is walking in a direction.
explanation_1: Walking towards is the same as walking in a direction.
explanation_2: The man is walking towards something so that is in a direction.
explanation_3: One must be walking in a direction to be walking towards it.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(towards(e1,x3) & n_stall(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_market(x4) & a_blue(s2) & Theme(s2,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_shirt(x2) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_man(x1) & in(e1,x2) & n_direction(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_walk(e1) & towards(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_stall(x3) & n_shirt(x2) & n_market(x4) & n_man(x1) & in(x1,x2) & a_red(s1) & a_blue(s2) & Theme(s2,x3) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_walk(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_direction(x2) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))