premise: A solo cyclist is riding down a windy road.
hypothesis: A cyclist rides down a road
explanation_1: A cyclist rides down a windy road.
explanation_2: A cyclist rides down a road, the fact he is solo and the road is windy are extra information.
explanation_3: The person is a cyclist because the person is a solo cyclist.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(a_down(s2) & Manner(e1,s2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1) & n_road(x3) & a_windy(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & n_cyclist(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_solo(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(a_down(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1) & n_road(x2) & n_cyclist(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(v_ride(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_solo(x2) & n_road(x3) & n_cyclist(x1) & a_windy(s1) & a_down(s2) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e1,x3) & Manner(e1,s2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(v_ride(e1) & n_road(x2) & n_cyclist(x1) & a_down(s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1))