premise: A little boy in a red shirt and swim trunks plays at the beach.
hypothesis: The boy is playing at the beach.
explanation_1: Both sentences say a boy is playing at the beach, but with varying levels of detail.
explanation_2: A boy who plays at the beach is the same as the boy is playing at the beach.
explanation_3: The boy is wearing a red shirt near the beach
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(n_beach(x6) & at(e1,x6) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & in(x1,x2) & subset_of(x4,x2) & n_trunk(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_swim(x5) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_shirt(x3) & a_red(s2) & Theme(s2,x3) & n_boy(x1) & a_little(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_beach(x2) & n_boy(x1) & at(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(v_play(e1) & subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & of(x4,x5) & n_trunk(x4) & n_swim(x5) & n_shirt(x3) & n_boy(x1) & n_beach(x6) & in(x1,x2) & at(e1,x6) & a_red(s2) & a_little(s1) & Theme(s2,x3) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_play(e1) & n_boy(x1) & n_beach(x2) & at(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))