premise: A boy hits a tennis ball on a court.
hypothesis: The boy is good at tennis.
explanation_1: Not everybody who hits a tennis ball is good at tennis.
explanation_2: One who bad at tennis can also hit ball, not good ones only
explanation_3: Just because he hit the tennis ball does not mean he is good at tennis.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(on(e1,x4) & n_court(x4) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_hit(e1) & n_ball(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_tennis(x3) & n_boy(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists s1 x1 x2.(n_boy(x1) & at(s1,x2) & n_tennis(x2) & Theme(s1,x1) & a_good(s1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_hit(e1) & on(e1,x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_tennis(x3) & n_court(x4) & n_boy(x1) & n_ball(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists s1 x1 x2.(n_tennis(x2) & n_boy(x1) & at(s1,x2) & a_good(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))