premise: A motorcyclist is flying through the air above a dirt path.
hypothesis: The motorcyclist is in the air
explanation_1: In the air is rephrasing flying.
explanation_2: Flying through the air is the same as being in the air.
explanation_3: Flying through the air is a rephrasing of in the air.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_air(x2) & above(e1,x3) & n_path(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_dirt(x4) & through(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_fly(e1) & n_motorcyclist(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_air(x2) & n_motorcyclist(x1) & in(x1,x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_fly(e1) & through(e1,x2) & of(x3,x4) & n_path(x3) & n_motorcyclist(x1) & n_dirt(x4) & n_air(x2) & above(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_motorcyclist(x1) & n_air(x2) & in(x1,x2))