premise: A woman fell in the water after riding a wakeboard.
hypothesis: A woman struggles to swim after falling into a strong current.
explanation_1: Just because she fell in the water doesn't mean she also struggles to swim, nor could one infer the conditions of the water itself being a strong current.
explanation_2: Just because she fell after riding the wakeboard doesn't mean she struggles to swim, I would think the opposite that she ws a strong swimmer to ride a wakeboard.
explanation_3: Just because the woman fell in does not mean she's struggling to swim. Also, there is no mention of a strong current.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_water(x2) & after(e1,e2) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_ride(e2) & n_wakeboard(x3) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_fall(e1) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1.(Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_struggle(e1) & exists e3 e2 s1 x2.(after(e2,e3) & into(e3,x2) & n_current(x2) & a_strong(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e3,x1) & v_fall(e3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_swim(e2)) & n_woman(x1))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_ride(e2) & v_fall(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_water(x2) & n_wakeboard(x3) & in(e1,x2) & after(e1,e2) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1.(v_struggle(e1) & n_woman(x1) & exists e3 e2 s1 x2.(v_swim(e2) & v_fall(e3) & n_current(x2) & into(e3,x2) & after(e2,e3) & a_strong(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e3,x1) & Actor(e2,x1)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1))