premise: A dog standing near snow looking at water.
hypothesis: The dog is thinking about going to for a swim.
explanation_1: It cannot be inferred that the dog is thinking when he is standing.  If he is thinking, we cannot infer that he is thinking about swimming.
explanation_2: Just because a dog standing near snow looking at water doesn't mean the dog is thinking about going for a swim.
explanation_3: The dog may appear to be thinking about swimming.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(at(e1,x4) & n_water(x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1) & near(x1,x3) & n_snow(x3) & n_standing(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_dog(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_dog(x1) & about(e1,e2) & for(e2,x4) & n_swim(x4) & to(e2,x3) & n_thing(x3) & Actor(e2,x2) & v_go(e2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_think(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_look(e1) & of(x1,x2) & near(x1,x3) & n_water(x4) & n_standing(x1) & n_snow(x3) & n_dog(x2) & at(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_think(e1) & v_go(e2) & to(e2,x3) & n_thing(x3) & n_swim(x4) & n_dog(x1) & for(e2,x4) & about(e1,e2) & Actor(e2,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))