premise: A woman in a red jacket walks down the street in the rain.
hypothesis: Women walks through the rain
explanation_1: A women in red jacket walks down the street in the rain
explanation_2: A woman who walks down the street in the rain walks through the rain.
explanation_3: Sentence two is in sentence 1 with more detail around it.  1 states a woman walks in the the rain, 2 states through the rain.  Both are accurate.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_rain(x4) & n_street(x3) & in(e1,x4) & down(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_jacket(x2) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_rain(x2) & ne_nam_women(x1) & through(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_walk(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_street(x3) & n_rain(x4) & n_jacket(x2) & in(x1,x2) & in(e1,x4) & down(e1,x3) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_walk(e1) & through(e1,x2) & ne_nam_women(x1) & n_rain(x2) & Actor(e1,x1))