premise: A woman plays guitar for tips.
hypothesis: there is no way one can learn music
explanation_1: Playing guitar contradicts than nobody can learn music.
explanation_2: plays doesn't mean learn
explanation_3: Since the woman plays guitar, she has learned music.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(for(e1,x3) & n_tip(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_guitar(x2) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.-exists p2 x2.((x1 = x2) & exists e1 p3 x3.(exists e2 x4.(Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_learn(e2) & n_music(x4)) & Topic(e1,p3) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_can(e1) & n_one(x3)) & that(x2,p2) & n_way(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_play(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_tip(x3) & n_guitar(x2) & for(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.all p2 x2.(all e1 p3 x3.(all e2 x4.(-v_learn(e2) | -n_music(x4) | -Theme(e2,x4) | -Actor(e2,x3)) | -v_can(e1) | -n_one(x3) | -Topic(e1,p3) | -Actor(e1,x3)) | -that(x2,p2) | -n_way(x2) | -(x1 = x2))