premise: A speaker is talking with a TV in the background.
hypothesis: There is a live bear in the background.
explanation_1: Sentence 1 does not mention anything about a live bear being in the background. It only mentions that their is a TV in the background.
explanation_2: Not all TV's also have a live bear nearby.
explanation_3: There is a television in the background not a live bear.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_background(x3) & with(e1,x2) & in(x2,x3) & n_tv(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_talk(e1) & n_speaker(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x3.(n_background(x3) & exists s1 x2.((x1 = x2) & in(x2,x3) & n_bear(x2) & a_live(s1) & Theme(s1,x2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x2) & v_talk(e1) & n_tv(x2) & n_speaker(x1) & n_background(x3) & in(x2,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x3.(n_background(x3) & exists s1 x2.(n_bear(x2) & in(x2,x3) & a_live(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & (x1 = x2)))