premise: The man in colorful shorts is barefoot.
hypothesis: The man wears black pants and dress shoes.
explanation_1: Colorful shorts are not black pants. You can't be barefoot if you are wearing dress shoes.
explanation_2: Black is also a colour.
explanation_3: The man cannot be wearing colorful shorts and be barefoot while wearing black plans and dress shoes simultaneously.
premise_logic: exists p1 s1 x1 x2.(n_man(x1) & exists x3.((x1 = x3) & n_barefoot(x3)) & in(x1,x2) & n_shorts(x2) & a_colorful(s1) & Theme(s1,x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_man(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_wear(e1) & subset_of(x4,x2) & n_shoe(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_dress(x5) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_pants(x3) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s1,x3))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1 x2.(n_shorts(x2) & n_man(x1) & in(x1,x2) & exists x3.(n_barefoot(x3) & (x1 = x3)) & a_colorful(s1) & Theme(s1,x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_wear(e1) & subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & of(x4,x5) & n_shoe(x4) & n_pants(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_dress(x5) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))