premise: The African American man protests against unlawful sex.
hypothesis: The man protests in something he doesn't believe in.
explanation_1: We have no idea he doesn't believe in what he protests, he could think anything.
explanation_2: The fact that a man protests against unlawful sex doesn't imply that he doesn't believe in it.
explanation_3: Just because a man protests does not mean it is something he doesn't believe in.
premise_logic: exists s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3.(n_protest(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2) & a_american(s2) & Theme(s2,x1) & a_african(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & a_topic(x1) & against(x1,x3) & n_sex(x3) & a_unlawful(s3) & Theme(s3,x3))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.(n_male(x1) & n_protest(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2) & a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x3) & -exists e1 s1.(a_in(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_believe(e1)) & that(x3,p1) & n_thing(x3))
premise_sim: exists s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3.(of(x1,x2) & n_sex(x3) & n_protest(x1) & n_man(x2) & against(x1,x3) & a_unlawful(s3) & a_topic(x1) & a_american(s2) & a_african(s1) & Theme(s3,x3) & Theme(s2,x1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.(that(x3,p1) & of(x1,x2) & n_thing(x3) & n_protest(x1) & n_man(x2) & n_male(x1) & in(x1,x3) & all e1 s1.(-v_believe(e1) | -a_in(s1) | -Manner(e1,s1) | -Actor(e1,x1)) & a_topic(x1))