premise: A BMX rider is in midair while on a dirt trail.
hypothesis: The BMX rider is riding a two wheeled vehicle.
explanation_1: A BMX rider in midair must be riding a two wheeled vehicle.
explanation_2: BMX rider is in midair implies BMX rider is riding.
explanation_3: A BMX rider always uses a bike which is a two wheeled vehicle.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(on(p1,x3) & n_trail(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_dirt(x4) & r_while(p1) & exists x5.(in(x1,x5) & n_midair(x5)) & n_rider(x1) & (x1 = x2) & ne_org_bmx(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(n_rider(x1) & (x1 = x2) & ne_org_bmx(x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1) & n_vehicle(x3) & a_wheeled(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & card_eq_2(x3))
premise_sim: exists p1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(r_while(p1) & on(p1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & ne_org_bmx(x2) & n_trail(x3) & n_rider(x1) & n_dirt(x4) & exists x5.(n_midair(x5) & in(x1,x5)) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_ride(e1) & ne_org_bmx(x2) & n_vehicle(x3) & n_rider(x1) & card_eq_2(x3) & a_wheeled(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & (x1 = x2))