premise: A shirtless man skateboards on a ledge.
hypothesis: Everybody has a shirt
explanation_1: If everybody has a shirt there can not be a shirtless man.
explanation_2: The man cannot be shirtless if everybody has a shirt.
explanation_3: If a man is shirtless then not everybody has a shirt.
premise_logic: exists s1 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & on(x1,x3) & n_ledge(x3) & n_skateboard(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2) & a_shirtless(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: all x1.(n_person(x1) -> exists e1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1) & n_shirt(x2)))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1 x2 x3.(on(x1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_skateboard(x1) & n_man(x2) & n_ledge(x3) & a_topic(x1) & a_shirtless(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: all x1.(exists e1 x2.(v_have(e1) & n_shirt(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1)) | -n_person(x1))