premise: A man in a blue jogging suit is running on the sidewalk in front of a painting.
hypothesis: A man is running on a sidewalk with no painting.
explanation_1: The man can't be running in front of the painting if there is no painting.
explanation_2: There is either no painting or the man jogs on the sidewalk in front of a painting.
explanation_3: If a man is running in front of a painting, it cannot be claimed that there is no painting.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(n_sidewalk(x4) & in(e1,x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_painting(x6) & n_front(x5) & on(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_suit(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_jogging(x3) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(-exists x3.(with(e1,x3) & n_painting(x3)) & on(e1,x2) & n_sidewalk(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(v_run(e1) & on(e1,x4) & of(x5,x6) & of(x2,x3) & n_suit(x2) & n_sidewalk(x4) & n_painting(x6) & n_man(x1) & n_jogging(x3) & n_front(x5) & in(x1,x2) & in(e1,x5) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_run(e1) & on(e1,x2) & n_sidewalk(x2) & n_man(x1) & all x3.(-with(e1,x3) | -n_painting(x3)) & Actor(e1,x1))