premise: There are children playing in the snow and one of them is making a snowball.
hypothesis: Children play in the snow.
explanation_1: Children playing in the snow definitely play in the snow.
explanation_2: Children playing in the snow and children play in the snow are equivalent as part of the total description of them making a snowball.
explanation_3: Playing in the snow means they play in the snow.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x6.(n_snow(x6) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_make(e1) & n_snowball(x3) & of(x2,x3) & n_thing(x3) & n_thing(x2) & card_eq_1(x2) & exists e2 x4 x5.((x1 = x4) & in(e2,x6) & Actor(e2,x5) & v_play(e2) & (x4 = x5) & n_child(x4)))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(n_snow(x3) & a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x3) & n_play(x1) & (x1 = x2) & ne_nam_children(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x6.(v_make(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_thing(x3) & n_thing(x2) & n_snowball(x3) & n_snow(x6) & exists e2 x4 x5.(v_play(e2) & n_child(x4) & in(e2,x6) & Actor(e2,x5) & (x4 = x5) & (x1 = x4)) & card_eq_1(x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(ne_nam_children(x2) & n_snow(x3) & n_play(x1) & in(x1,x3) & a_topic(x1) & (x1 = x2))