premise: A man is holding a child on his shoulders.
hypothesis: A child is going for a ride on that man.
explanation_1: The child is going for a ride on that man is implied when it was stated the child was on his shoulders.
explanation_2: Holding a child on his shoulders is the same as going for a ride on that man.
explanation_3: A man is holding a child on his shoulders means there is a child going for a ride on that man.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(on(e1,x3) & n_shoulder(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_hold(e1) & n_child(x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_man(x3) & for(e1,x2) & on(x2,x3) & n_ride(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_go(e1) & n_child(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_hold(e1) & on(e1,x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_shoulder(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_child(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_go(e1) & on(x2,x3) & n_ride(x2) & n_man(x3) & n_child(x1) & for(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))