premise: The man is throwing a toy to a brown and black dog in the park.
hypothesis: A man and a dog are at a park.
explanation_1: The man and dog being "at a park," implies that they are, "in the park."
explanation_2: Sentence 2 is less descriptive. if the man and the dog a are playing with a toy in the park, then they are in the park.
explanation_3: A man and a dog in a park can be playing with a toy, as dogs like to play.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_park(x4) & n_man(x1) & in(e1,x4) & to(e1,x3) & n_dog(x3) & a_black(s2) & Theme(s2,x3) & a_brown(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_throw(e1) & n_toy(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.(exists x4.(at(x1,x4) & n_park(x4)) & subset_of(x3,x1) & n_dog(x3) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_man(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_throw(e1) & to(e1,x3) & n_toy(x2) & n_park(x4) & n_man(x1) & n_dog(x3) & in(e1,x4) & a_brown(s1) & a_black(s2) & Theme(s2,x3) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(subset_of(x3,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_man(x2) & n_dog(x3) & exists x4.(n_park(x4) & at(x1,x4)))