premise: A man with thinning hair looking into glasses through glasses.
hypothesis: A man with glasses is looking at drinking glasses.
explanation_1: Not every man is looking at drinking glasses.
explanation_2: Just because a man with thinning hair is looking into glasses through glasses doesn't necessarily mean that the glasses he is looking at are drinking glasses.
explanation_3: Not all glasses are drinking glasses.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(through(e2,x4) & n_glass(x4) & into(e2,x3) & n_glass(x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_look(e2) & with(x1,x2) & n_hair(x2) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_thin(e1) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(at(e1,x3) & n_glass(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_drinking(x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1) & with(x1,x2) & n_glass(x2) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(x1,x2) & v_thin(e1) & v_look(e2) & through(e2,x4) & n_man(x1) & n_hair(x2) & n_glass(x4) & n_glass(x3) & into(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(x1,x2) & v_look(e1) & of(x3,x4) & n_man(x1) & n_glass(x3) & n_glass(x2) & n_drinking(x4) & at(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))