premise: A person is walking a bicycle down a city street.
hypothesis: A person is walking.
explanation_1: A person walking a bicycle implies that the person is walking.
explanation_2: A person walking a bicycle implies something is wrong with the bicycle because the person is not riding the bicycle.
explanation_3: Walking a bicycle is a type of walking.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & down(x2,x3) & n_street(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_city(x4) & n_bicycle(x2) & n_person(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_person(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_walk(e1) & of(x3,x4) & n_street(x3) & n_person(x1) & n_city(x4) & n_bicycle(x2) & down(x2,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_walk(e1) & n_person(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))