premise: A man and woman setup a camera.
hypothesis: A man and woman working on a washing machine
explanation_1: If the man and woman are working on a washing machine, it is wrong to claim that they are setting up a camera.
explanation_2: The man and woman either setup a camera.or are working on a washing machine.
explanation_3: The man and woman cannot setup a camera and work on a washing machine at the same time.
premise_logic: all x1.(n_camera(x1) -> exists x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x2) & for(x2,x1) & n_setup(x2) & of(x2,x4) & n_woman(x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_man(x3)))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(s1) & on(e1,x4) & n_machine(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_washing(x5) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_work(e1) & (s1 = x3) & n_woman(x2) & n_man(x1) & subset_of(x2,s1) & subset_of(x1,s1))
premise_sim: all x1.(exists x2 x3 x4.(of(x2,x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_woman(x4) & n_setup(x2) & n_man(x3) & for(x2,x1) & a_topic(x2)) | -n_camera(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_work(e1) & subset_of(x2,s1) & subset_of(x1,s1) & on(e1,x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_woman(x2) & n_washing(x5) & n_man(x1) & n_machine(x4) & a_topic(s1) & Actor(e1,x3) & (s1 = x3))