premise: A bicyclist wearing white sunglasses and a white and black helmet.
hypothesis: Nobody has sunglasses
explanation_1: Nobody refers to none, while it was mentioned that a bicyclist is wearing sunglasses.
explanation_2: in one scenario the person is wearing sunglasses in the other nobody is wearing sunglasses
explanation_3: a bicyclist wearing would either be with or without sunglass
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & subset_of(x5,x3) & n_helmet(x5) & a_black(s3) & Theme(s3,x5) & a_white(s2) & Theme(s2,x5) & subset_of(x4,x3) & n_sunglass(x4) & a_white(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & (x1 = x2) & n_bicyclist(x1))
hypothesis_logic: -exists e1 x1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1) & n_sunglass(x2) & n_person(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_wear(e1) & subset_of(x5,x3) & subset_of(x4,x3) & n_sunglass(x4) & n_helmet(x5) & n_bicyclist(x1) & a_white(s2) & a_white(s1) & a_topic(x1) & a_black(s3) & Theme(s3,x5) & Theme(s2,x5) & Theme(s1,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: all e1 x1 x2.(-v_have(e1) | -n_sunglass(x2) | -n_person(x1) | -Theme(e1,x2) | -Actor(e1,x1))