premise: two dogs run across the woods.
hypothesis: The canines run around in the forest.
explanation_1: Dogs are canines, and woods are the forest.
explanation_2: two dogs is inferred as canines, woods are inferred as forest
explanation_3: They are canines because they are dogs.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_wood(x2) & across(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(n_forest(x2) & n_canine(x1) & in(e1,x2) & a_around(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_run(e1) & n_wood(x2) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & across(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(v_run(e1) & n_forest(x2) & n_canine(x1) & in(e1,x2) & a_around(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1))