premise: A man wearing a black coat is walking.
hypothesis: A man wearing a coat.
explanation_1: A man is walking wearing a coat.
explanation_2: Lack reasoning for statement of black coat and walking
explanation_3: A man wearing a black coat is walking as he is a lawyer.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(Actor(e2,x1) & v_walk(e2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_coat(x3) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_coat(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_wear(e1) & v_walk(e2) & n_man(x1) & n_coat(x3) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_wear(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_coat(x3) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))