premise: The man in white is playing basketball against the man in blue.
hypothesis: Two men are engaging in a sporting activity.
explanation_1: A man in white and a man in blue are two men while playing basketball must be a sporting activity.
explanation_2: Men playing basketball are engaging in a sporting activity
explanation_3: If there is one man in white and one man in blue there are two men and basketball is a sporting activity.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_man(x1) & n_man(x1) & against(e1,x1) & Theme(s1,x4) & a_blue(s1) & (x1 = x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_basketball(x3) & in(x1,x2) & n_white(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(in(e1,x2) & n_activity(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_sporting(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_engage(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_play(e1) & n_white(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_basketball(x3) & in(x1,x2) & against(e1,x1) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & (x1 = x4))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_engage(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_sporting(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_activity(x2) & in(e1,x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))