premise: The cyclist rides on a wooded path.
hypothesis: The cyclist rides with a companion on a wooded path
explanation_1: A cyclist can ride without a companion.
explanation_2: Riding on a wooded path does not imply the cyclist has a companion.
explanation_3: Just because the cyclist rides on a wooded path does not mean he is with a companion.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(n_cyclist(x1) & on(e1,x2) & n_path(x2) & a_wooded(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(n_cyclist(x1) & with(e1,x2) & on(x2,x3) & n_path(x3) & a_wooded(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & n_companion(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(v_ride(e1) & on(e1,x2) & n_path(x2) & n_cyclist(x1) & a_wooded(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x2) & v_ride(e1) & on(x2,x3) & n_path(x3) & n_cyclist(x1) & n_companion(x2) & a_wooded(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))