premise: Man chopping wood with an axe.
hypothesis: The man is chopping wood with a hammer.
explanation_1: You cannot chop wood with a hammer.
explanation_2: A man is chopping wood with an axe not a hammer.
explanation_3: man can't be chopping wood with hammer if he is chopping wood with axe
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & with(e1,x4) & n_axe(x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_chop(e1) & n_wood(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_man(x1) & with(e1,x3) & n_hammer(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_chop(e1) & n_wood(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(e1,x4) & v_chop(e1) & n_wood(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_axe(x4) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x3) & v_chop(e1) & n_wood(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_hammer(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))