premise: A shirtless man with his fishing boat.
hypothesis: The man doesn't like his fishing boat.
explanation_1: It cannot be that the man simultaneously doesn't like his fishing boat and is with his fishing boat
explanation_2: The first sentence talks about a man enjoying his fish boat. The second sentence talks about a man who does not enjoy his fish boat. He cant enjoy his fish boat and not like it at the same time.
explanation_3: One cannot dislike his fishing boat if he feels with it.
premise_logic: exists s1 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & with(x1,x2) & n_boat(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_fishing(x3) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_man(x1) & a_shirtless(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(n_boat(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_fishing(x3) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_man(x1) & -exists e1.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_like(e1)))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1 x2 x3.(with(x1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & of(x2,x1) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_fishing(x3) & n_boat(x2) & a_topic(x1) & a_shirtless(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(of(x2,x3) & of(x2,x1) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_fishing(x3) & n_boat(x2) & all e1.(-v_like(e1) | -Theme(e1,x2) | -Actor(e1,x1)))