premise: A child in a maroon shirt playing next to a fountain.
hypothesis: The child is at play.
explanation_1: The child in a maroon shirt is playing.
explanation_2: A child is playing next to a fountain. Therefore the child is at play.
explanation_3: playing next to a fountain is inferred as child is at play.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & to(e1,x5) & n_fountain(x5) & r_next(e1) & Actor(e1,x4) & v_play(e1) & (x2 = x4) & n_shirt(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_maroon(x3) & n_child(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_child(x1) & exists x2.(at(x1,x2) & n_play(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_play(e1) & to(e1,x5) & r_next(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_shirt(x2) & n_maroon(x3) & n_fountain(x5) & n_child(x1) & in(x1,x2) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x4) & (x2 = x4))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_child(x1) & exists x2.(n_play(x2) & at(x1,x2)))