premise: Two dogs run together near the leaves.
hypothesis: The two dogs are running to play in the leaves.
explanation_1: Running together does not mean they are at play. They could be running out of fear.
explanation_2: Two dogs can run near leaves without having to play in them.
explanation_3: The dogs could have easily passed the leaves up as opposed to stopping to play in them.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(n_leaf(x2) & near(e1,x2) & a_together(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(n_leaf(x2) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & exists e2.(in(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_play(e2)) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(v_run(e1) & near(e1,x2) & n_leaf(x2) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_together(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(v_run(e1) & n_leaf(x2) & n_dog(x1) & exists e2.(v_play(e2) & in(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1)) & card_eq_2(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1))