premise: A man talking into a microphone with a woman standing next to him.
hypothesis: Two people are standing beside each other.
explanation_1: You can not infer they are beside eachother.
explanation_2: People must witnessing something by standing beside each other.
explanation_3: The man could be sitting while the women is standing besides him.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & with(e1,x4) & to(e2,x1) & n_male(x1) & r_next(e2) & Actor(e2,x5) & v_stand(e2) & (x4 = x5) & n_woman(x4) & into(e1,x3) & n_microphone(x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_talk(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(all x2.(n_other(x2) -> beside(e1,x2)) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(with(e1,x4) & v_talk(e1) & v_stand(e2) & to(e2,x1) & r_next(e2) & n_woman(x4) & n_microphone(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & into(e1,x3) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e2,x5) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x4 = x5) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_stand(e1) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & all x2.(beside(e1,x2) | -n_other(x2)) & Actor(e1,x1))