premise: A guy on Rollerblades, sliding across a rail.
hypothesis: The skateboarder rides the rail.
explanation_1: Both the skateboarder and rollerblader rides the rail.
explanation_2: A guy can be a skateboarder using rollerblades to ride on the rail.
explanation_3: Only the skateboarder uses a Rollerblade to rail
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(ne_org_rollerblades(x2) & a_topic(x1) & across(e1,x4) & n_rail(x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_slide(e1) & (x1 = x3) & on(x1,x2) & n_guy(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_rail(x2) & n_skateboarder(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_slide(e1) & on(x1,x2) & ne_org_rollerblades(x2) & n_rail(x4) & n_guy(x1) & across(e1,x4) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x1 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_ride(e1) & n_skateboarder(x1) & n_rail(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))