premise: Two men in polo shirts, reading the paper.
hypothesis: Two men reading the paper on their break.
explanation_1: You can not infer they are on break.
explanation_2: People can read the paper and not necessarily be on their break.
explanation_3: The two men may not be on their break at all while they read the paper.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_paper(x5) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x5) & Actor(e1,x4) & v_read(e1) & (x1 = x4) & in(x1,x2) & n_shirt(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_polo(x3) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_break(x4) & of(x4,x3) & n_thing(x3) & n_paper(x3) & a_topic(x1) & on(e1,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_read(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_read(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_shirt(x2) & n_polo(x3) & n_paper(x5) & n_man(x1) & in(x1,x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x5) & Actor(e1,x4) & (x1 = x4))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_read(e1) & on(e1,x4) & of(x4,x3) & n_thing(x3) & n_paper(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_break(x4) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))