premise: The players manuever for the soccer ball.
hypothesis: Bowlers are eating sandwiches.
explanation_1: Soccer is contradictory to bowling.
explanation_2: The players would not be maneuvering for a soccer ball while eating sandwiches.
explanation_3: players cannot be maneuvering  for the soccer ball and eating sandwiches simultaneously.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_ball(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_soccer(x4) & n_player(x1) & a_topic(x1) & for(x1,x3) & Time(x1,x2) & n_manuever(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_eat(e1) & n_sandwich(x2) & n_bowler(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(of(x3,x4) & n_soccer(x4) & n_player(x1) & n_manuever(x2) & n_ball(x3) & for(x1,x3) & a_topic(x1) & Time(x1,x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_eat(e1) & n_sandwich(x2) & n_bowler(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))