premise: These people are in uniform at a lacrosse type game.
hypothesis: There are people at a lacrosse game.
explanation_1: People are at a lacrosse game in both sentences.
explanation_2: Both sentences share a common subject (people), verb (at), and direct object (lacrosse game).
explanation_3: A lacrosse type game is lacrosse.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_people(x1) & at(p1,x2) & n_game(x2) & of(x2,x4) & n_type(x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_lacrosse(x3) & exists x5.(in(x1,x5) & n_uniform(x5)))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3 x4.((x1 = x2) & at(x2,x3) & n_game(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_lacrosse(x4) & n_people(x2))
premise_sim: exists p1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(of(x2,x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_type(x4) & n_people(x1) & n_lacrosse(x3) & n_game(x2) & exists x5.(n_uniform(x5) & in(x1,x5)) & at(p1,x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(of(x3,x4) & n_people(x2) & n_lacrosse(x4) & n_game(x3) & at(x2,x3) & (x1 = x2))