premise: Men are playing rugby while covered in mud.
hypothesis: The men are perfectly free of mud.
explanation_1: The men can't be covered in mud and perfectly free of mud simultaneously.
explanation_2: Covered in mud is opposite of free of mud.
explanation_3: Perfectly free of mud and covered in mud are exact opposites.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & in(s1,x4) & n_mud(x4) & Theme(s1,x3) & a_cover(s1) & (x2 = x3) & n_rugby(x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists s1 x1 x2.(n_man(x1) & r_perfectly(s1) & of(s1,x2) & n_mud(x2) & Theme(s1,x1) & a_free(s1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_play(e1) & n_rugby(x2) & n_mud(x4) & n_man(x1) & in(s1,x4) & a_cover(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & (x2 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists s1 x1 x2.(r_perfectly(s1) & of(s1,x2) & n_mud(x2) & n_man(x1) & a_free(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))