premise: Three military officials are battling a fire my a building.
hypothesis: There is a fire being fought.
explanation_1: Battling a fire in a building is fighting one.
explanation_2: Battling a fire is a rephrasing of fire being fought.
explanation_3: Battling a fire is the same as a fire being fought.
premise_logic: exists s1 x1.(all x2.(n_building(x2) -> exists e1 x3 x4.(Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_battle(e1) & for(x3,x2) & Time(x3,x4) & n_my(x4) & n_fire(x3))) & n_official(x1) & a_military(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 e1 x2 x3.((x1 = x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & v_fight(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_fire(x2))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1.(n_official(x1) & card_eq_3(x1) & all x2.(exists e1 x3 x4.(v_battle(e1) & n_my(x4) & n_fire(x3) & for(x3,x2) & Time(x3,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1)) | -n_building(x2)) & a_military(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 e1 x2 x3.(v_fight(e1) & n_fire(x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3) & (x1 = x2))