premise: A group in uniform marches carrying red signs with Chinese lettering on them.
hypothesis: a dog eats steak
explanation_1: A group in uniform is not the same as a dog, and the group carrying signs isn't anywhere near the same as eating a steak.
explanation_2: Dog do not carrying red sign and participate in marches.
explanation_3: While a group marches a dog eats steak. These are two thoughts independent of each other and no contradiction exists.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_carry(e1) & on(x4,x1) & n_thing(x1) & with(x4,x5) & n_lettering(x5) & a_chinese(s3) & Theme(s3,x5) & n_sign(x4) & a_red(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & (x2 = x3) & n_march(x2) & a_uniform(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_group(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_eat(e1) & n_steak(x2) & n_dog(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(with(x4,x5) & v_carry(e1) & on(x4,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_sign(x4) & n_march(x2) & n_lettering(x5) & n_group(x1) & in(x1,x2) & a_uniform(s1) & a_topic(x1) & a_red(s2) & a_chinese(s3) & Theme(s3,x5) & Theme(s2,x4) & Theme(s1,x2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_eat(e1) & n_steak(x2) & n_dog(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))