premise: Three men on mountain bikes go over a sand hill.
hypothesis: Men on bikes go over a sand hill to get to the finish line.
explanation_1: The first sentence does not imply that the men on bikes are racing to get to the finish line.
explanation_2: Not all men who ride bikes are competing for a finish line.
explanation_3: Going on a mountain bike doesn't imply having to reach the finish line.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(over(e1,x4) & n_hill(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_sand(x5) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_go(e1) & on(x1,x2) & n_bike(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_mountain(x3) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8.(n_line(x7) & of(x7,x8) & n_finish(x8) & Topic(e1,p1) & exists e2.(to(e2,x7) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_get(e2)) & over(e1,x5) & n_hill(x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_sand(x6) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_go(e1) & on(x3,x4) & n_bike(x4) & n_man(x3) & on(x1,x2) & n_bike(x2) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_go(e1) & over(e1,x4) & on(x1,x2) & of(x4,x5) & of(x2,x3) & n_sand(x5) & n_mountain(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_hill(x4) & n_bike(x2) & card_eq_3(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8.(v_go(e1) & over(e1,x5) & on(x3,x4) & on(x1,x2) & of(x7,x8) & of(x5,x6) & n_sand(x6) & n_man(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_line(x7) & n_hill(x5) & n_finish(x8) & n_bike(x4) & n_bike(x2) & exists e2.(v_get(e2) & to(e2,x7) & Actor(e2,x1)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x3))