premise: Two boys in front of a soda machine.
hypothesis: Two boys are at a machine.
explanation_1: two boys are in front of a soda machine which the same as being at a machine
explanation_2: The phrase "are at" is a less specific rephrasing of "in front of".
explanation_3: The boys are in front of a soda machine.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_machine(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_soda(x4) & n_front(x2) & n_boy(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2.(at(x1,x2) & n_machine(x2)) & n_boy(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(of(x3,x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_soda(x4) & n_machine(x3) & n_front(x2) & n_boy(x1) & in(x1,x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_boy(x1) & exists x2.(n_machine(x2) & at(x1,x2)) & card_eq_2(x1))