premise: A tree worker with a hard hat is cutting down a branch.
hypothesis: A ballerina is climbing a tree.
explanation_1: There can be either a tree worker or a ballerina. One cannot be cutting down a branch while climbing a tree.
explanation_2: Sentence one is explaining that a tree worker is cutting a tree, and the second states a ballerina is climbing a tree. These are two different people doing two different actions.
explanation_3: A ballerina can not be climbing a tree while a tree worker is cutting down a branch.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_down(s2) & Manner(e1,s2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_cut(e1) & n_branch(x4) & with(x1,x3) & n_hat(x3) & a_hard(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & n_worker(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_tree(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_climb(e1) & n_tree(x2) & n_ballerina(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(x1,x3) & v_cut(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_worker(x1) & n_tree(x2) & n_hat(x3) & n_branch(x4) & a_hard(s1) & a_down(s2) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e1,x4) & Manner(e1,s2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_climb(e1) & n_tree(x2) & n_ballerina(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))