premise: A chef explains different varieties of Tomatoes to consumers.
hypothesis: THe chef is eating fried chicken.
explanation_1: Explaining and eating are different actions, and tomatoes and chicken are different foods.
explanation_2: A chef cannot talk while eating.
explanation_3: Tomatoes and fried chicken are two different types of food.  One cannot explain something and eat at the same time.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_variety(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_explain(e1) & of(x2,x4) & to(x4,x5) & n_consumer(x5) & n_tomato(x4) & -(x2 = x3) & n_variety(x2) & n_chef(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_eat(e1) & n_chicken(x3) & a_fried(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & n_chef(x1) & (x1 = x2) & ne_nam_the(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_explain(e1) & to(x4,x5) & of(x2,x4) & n_variety(x3) & n_variety(x2) & n_tomato(x4) & n_consumer(x5) & n_chef(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & -(x2 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_eat(e1) & ne_nam_the(x2) & n_chicken(x3) & n_chef(x1) & a_fried(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & (x1 = x2))