premise: 3 ladies with numbers on their shirts running.
hypothesis: There are ladies running.
explanation_1: '3 ladies running' is established; therefore, there are [3] ladies running.
explanation_2: The ladies are running in both sentances
explanation_3: "3 ladies" shows that there are ladies.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & with(x1,x2) & on(x2,x3) & Actor(e1,x4) & v_run(e1) & (x3 = x4) & n_shirt(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_number(x2) & n_lady(x1) & n_date(x1) & a_date_day_03(x1) & a_date_day_03(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 e1 x2 x3.((x1 = x2) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_run(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_lady(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(x1,x2) & v_run(e1) & on(x2,x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_shirt(x3) & n_number(x2) & n_lady(x1) & n_date(x1) & a_topic(x1) & a_date_day_03(x1) & Actor(e1,x4) & (x3 = x4))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 e1 x2 x3.(v_run(e1) & n_lady(x2) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3) & (x1 = x2))