premise: Biker riding through the forest.
hypothesis: Man riding motorcycle on highway.
explanation_1: Forest and highway are two different locations
explanation_2: The man cannot be bike riding in the forest and on the highway.
explanation_3: A biker cannot be on the highway and in a forest simultaneously.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(n_forest(x3) & a_topic(x1) & through(x1,x3) & n_riding(x1) & (x1 = x2) & ne_nam_biker(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & on(x1,x4) & n_highway(x4) & n_motorcycle(x1) & of(x1,x3) & n_riding(x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(through(x1,x3) & ne_nam_biker(x2) & n_riding(x1) & n_forest(x3) & a_topic(x1) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(on(x1,x4) & of(x1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_riding(x3) & n_motorcycle(x1) & n_man(x2) & n_highway(x4) & a_topic(x1))