premise: A woman sits in a market where she sells goods with her dog.
hypothesis: A dog sells a woman a hat.
explanation_1: The woman from the first sentence is the one who sells good, and in the second sentence it is the dog who sells hats.
explanation_2: If a woman is selling goods with a dog at her side, it cannot be claimed that the dog is selling something.
explanation_3: A woman is not a dog.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x4.(in(e1,x2) & exists e2 x1 x3.(with(e2,x4) & n_female(x1) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_sell(e2) & n_goods(x3)) & n_dog(x4) & of(x4,x1) & n_female(x1) & where(x2,p1) & n_market(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1.(all x2.(n_hat(x2) -> exists e1 x3.(Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sell(e1) & for(x3,x2) & n_woman(x3))) & n_dog(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x4.(where(x2,p1) & v_sit(e1) & of(x4,x1) & n_woman(x1) & n_market(x2) & n_female(x1) & n_dog(x4) & in(e1,x2) & exists e2 x1 x3.(with(e2,x4) & v_sell(e2) & n_goods(x3) & n_female(x1) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1)) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_dog(x1) & all x2.(exists e1 x3.(v_sell(e1) & n_woman(x3) & for(x3,x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1)) | -n_hat(x2)))