premise: A man with thinning hair looking into glasses through glasses.
hypothesis: A full haired man is looking a drinking glasses.
explanation_1: One cannot have thinning hair and full hair at the same time.
explanation_2: Full haired is the opposite of thinning hair.  A man can look through glasses not drinking glasses.
explanation_3: the man is either full haired or has thinning hair
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(through(e2,x4) & n_glass(x4) & into(e2,x3) & n_glass(x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_look(e2) & with(x1,x2) & n_hair(x2) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_thin(e1) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 s2 x1.(for(p1,e1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1) & exists x2 x3.((x1 = x2) & n_glass(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_drinking(x3)) & n_man(x1) & a_haired(s2) & Theme(s2,x1) & a_full(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(x1,x2) & v_thin(e1) & v_look(e2) & through(e2,x4) & n_man(x1) & n_hair(x2) & n_glass(x4) & n_glass(x3) & into(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 s1 s2 x1.(v_look(e1) & n_man(x1) & for(p1,e1) & exists x2 x3.(of(x2,x3) & n_glass(x2) & n_drinking(x3) & (x1 = x2)) & a_haired(s2) & a_full(s1) & Theme(s2,x1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))