premise: Three women sit together near woven walls.
hypothesis: The three bar tenders work hard pouring drinks.
explanation_1: Sitting and pouring drinks are two different actions.
explanation_2: three bar tenders can't sit together
explanation_3: Three people can not be sitting together and simultaneously working hard pouring drinks
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2.(near(e1,x2) & n_wall(x2) & a_woven(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & a_together(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_woman(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3.(n_tender(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_bar(x2) & card_eq_3(x1) & for(e1,e2) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_pour(e2) & n_drink(x3) & a_hard(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_work(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2.(v_sit(e1) & near(e1,x2) & n_woman(x1) & n_wall(x2) & card_eq_3(x1) & a_woven(s2) & a_together(s1) & Theme(s2,x2) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_work(e1) & v_pour(e2) & of(x1,x2) & n_tender(x1) & n_drink(x3) & n_bar(x2) & for(e1,e2) & card_eq_3(x1) & a_hard(s1) & Theme(e2,x3) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))