premise: A man in a black shirt overlooking bike maintenance.
hypothesis: A man destroys a bike.
explanation_1: Overlooking bike maintenance does not lead to destruction of a bike.
explanation_2: One does not destroy a bike while overlooking its maintenance.
explanation_3: The man is either overlooking maintenance of the bike or is destroying it.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_overlook(e1) & n_maintenance(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_bike(x5) & (x2 = x3) & n_shirt(x2) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_destroy(e1) & n_bike(x2) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_overlook(e1) & of(x4,x5) & n_shirt(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_maintenance(x4) & n_bike(x5) & in(x1,x2) & a_topic(x1) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_destroy(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_bike(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))