premise: A crowd of people standing in front of statues.
hypothesis: The statue is actually a gargoyle and it came to life.
explanation_1: The two sentences contradict each other based on they do not have anything in common. A gargoyle simply cannot come to life espiecally while several tourists are looking at it.
explanation_2: Gargoyles are on the edge of a roof and statues are on the ground.  Statues also do not come to life.
explanation_3: Multiple statues cannot be a statue.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & of(x1,x2) & in(e1,x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_statue(x5) & n_front(x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_stand(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_people(x2) & n_crowd(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 x1 x2.(n_thing(x1) & n_statue(x1) & to(e1,x2) & n_life(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_come(e1) & a_actually(s1) & Manner(p1,s1) & exists x3.((x1 = x3) & n_gargoyle(x3)))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_stand(e1) & of(x4,x5) & of(x1,x2) & n_statue(x5) & n_people(x2) & n_front(x4) & n_crowd(x1) & in(e1,x4) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 s1 x1 x2.(v_come(e1) & to(e1,x2) & n_thing(x1) & n_statue(x1) & n_life(x2) & exists x3.(n_gargoyle(x3) & (x1 = x3)) & a_actually(s1) & Manner(p1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1))