premise: A man interviews a boy in a gathering of people.
hypothesis: A man slaps a little boy in front of a gather of people.
explanation_1: Conducting interviews does not involve slaps.
explanation_2: The man who slaps the boy in front of people  must be his father, where as if the man interviews a boy in a gathering of people then he must be working and is not any relation to the boy.
explanation_3: The man either interviews the boy or he slaps him.
premise_logic: all x1.(n_boy(x1) -> exists x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x2) & in(x2,x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_people(x5) & n_gathering(x4) & for(x2,x1) & n_interview(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_man(x3)))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_slap(e1) & in(x2,x3) & of(x3,x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_people(x5) & n_gather(x4) & n_front(x3) & n_boy(x2) & a_little(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: all x1.(exists x2 x3 x4 x5.(of(x4,x5) & of(x2,x3) & n_people(x5) & n_man(x3) & n_interview(x2) & n_gathering(x4) & in(x2,x4) & for(x2,x1) & a_topic(x2)) | -n_boy(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_slap(e1) & of(x4,x5) & of(x3,x4) & n_people(x5) & n_man(x1) & n_gather(x4) & n_front(x3) & n_boy(x2) & in(x2,x3) & a_little(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))