premise: Two men outside of a restaurant.
hypothesis: Two men are sitting on the restaurant patio.
explanation_1: You can not infer they are sitting.
explanation_2: People can sit outside of a restaurant without it being a restaurant patio.
explanation_3: Two men being outside of a restaurant does not imply that they are sitting in the patio.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & of(x2,x3) & n_restaurant(x3) & outside(x1,x2) & n_thing(x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_patio(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_restaurant(x3) & on(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(outside(x1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_thing(x2) & n_restaurant(x3) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_sit(e1) & on(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_restaurant(x3) & n_patio(x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))