premise: Two strong men work to saw a log.
hypothesis: two strong men are having a beer
explanation_1: The men are either having a beer or they saw a log; they cannot do both at the same time.
explanation_2: To work to saw a log is not the same as having a beer
explanation_3: Two men working to saw a log cannot be said to be having a beer.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_see(e2) & n_log(x3) & a_to(s2) & Manner(e1,s2) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_work(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & a_strong(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1) & n_beer(x2) & n_man(x1) & a_strong(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(v_work(e1) & v_see(e2) & n_man(x1) & n_log(x3) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_to(s2) & a_strong(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e2,x3) & Manner(e1,s2) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(v_have(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_beer(x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_strong(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))