premise: A man with his finger in his mouth is standing outside of an RV.
hypothesis: The man owns the RV.
explanation_1: You can not infer he owns the RV.
explanation_2: The man may not be who owns the RV.
explanation_3: A man can be near an RV even if someone else owns it.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(of(e1,x4) & n_rv(x4) & r_outside(e1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & with(x1,x2) & in(x2,x3) & n_mouth(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_finger(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(ne_org_rv(x2) & n_man(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_own(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(x1,x2) & v_stand(e1) & r_outside(e1) & of(x3,x1) & of(x2,x1) & of(e1,x4) & n_rv(x4) & n_mouth(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_finger(x2) & in(x2,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_own(e1) & ne_org_rv(x2) & n_man(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))