premise: Two girls talk at an ice skating rink.
hypothesis: Two girls are near the ice.
explanation_1: There is ice in an ice skating rink.
explanation_2: If girls talk at an ice skating rink then there is ice and two girls are near the ice is a clear implication.
explanation_3: If people are at an ice skating rink, then the people are near the ice.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & at(x1,x3) & n_rink(x3) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_skate(e1) & of(x3,x4) & n_ice(x4) & n_talk(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_girl(x2) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_ice(x2) & near(x1,x2) & n_girl(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_skate(e1) & of(x3,x4) & of(x1,x2) & n_talk(x1) & n_rink(x3) & n_ice(x4) & n_girl(x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & at(x1,x3) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(near(x1,x2) & n_ice(x2) & n_girl(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))