premise: A boy on a skateboard ramp.
hypothesis: The boy is doing a skateboard trick
explanation_1: Skating on a ramp does not imply the boy is performing a trick.
explanation_2: Just because a boy is on a skateboard ramp doesn't mean he is doing a trick.
explanation_3: Just because the boy is on a ramp with his skateboard does not imply he is doing a trick.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & on(x1,x2) & n_ramp(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_skateboard(x3) & n_boy(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_boy(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_do(e1) & n_trick(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_skateboard(x3))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(on(x1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_skateboard(x3) & n_ramp(x2) & n_boy(x1) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_do(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_trick(x2) & n_skateboard(x3) & n_boy(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))