premise: Group of guys sitting in a circle.
hypothesis: The group is made up of guys.
explanation_1: The first sentence only lists guys in the circle, therefore the group consists only of guys.
explanation_2: Group of guys was mentioned therefore the group is made up of guys.
explanation_3: A group which are guys are sitting in a circle.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(ne_org_group(s1) & a_topic(s1) & of(s1,x1) & in(e1,x3) & n_circle(x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_sit(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_guy(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1.(n_group(x1) & exists s1 x2.(of(s1,x2) & n_guy(x2) & Theme(s1,x1) & a_up(s1)) & Recipient(e1,p1) & Topic(e1,x1) & v_make(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_sit(e1) & of(s1,x1) & ne_org_group(s1) & n_guy(x1) & n_circle(x3) & in(e1,x3) & a_topic(s1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1.(v_make(e1) & n_group(x1) & exists s1 x2.(of(s1,x2) & n_guy(x2) & a_up(s1) & Theme(s1,x1)) & Topic(e1,x1) & Recipient(e1,p1))