premise: Two kickboxers compete in front of a live audience.
hypothesis: there is a competetion still going on
explanation_1: Kickboxers compete implies competetion.
explanation_2: The competition is still going on because the kickboxers are in front of a live audience.
explanation_3: There is a live competition of kickboxers
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(in(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_audience(x3) & a_live(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & n_front(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_compete(e1) & n_kickboxer(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 e1 s1 s2 x2 x3.((x1 = x2) & a_still(s2) & Manner(e1,s2) & a_on(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_go(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_competetion(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_compete(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_kickboxer(x1) & n_front(x2) & n_audience(x3) & in(e1,x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_live(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 e1 s1 s2 x2 x3.(v_go(e1) & n_competetion(x2) & a_still(s2) & a_on(s1) & Manner(e1,s2) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3) & (x1 = x2))