premise: Two children are diving side by side into a river.
hypothesis: Two children are driving side by side in cars.
explanation_1: The children are diving side by side into a river, not driving, and so they also can't be in cars.
explanation_2: If they are driving into a river, they are not also in cars simultaneously.
explanation_3: Children driving in a river can not be in cars.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(into(e1,x4) & n_river(x4) & by(e1,x3) & n_side(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_dive(e1) & n_side(x2) & n_child(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(by(e1,x3) & in(x3,x4) & n_car(x4) & n_side(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_drive(e1) & n_side(x2) & n_child(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_dive(e1) & n_side(x3) & n_side(x2) & n_river(x4) & n_child(x1) & into(e1,x4) & card_eq_2(x1) & by(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_drive(e1) & n_side(x3) & n_side(x2) & n_child(x1) & n_car(x4) & in(x3,x4) & card_eq_2(x1) & by(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))