premise: A man in a hat is riding a motorized skateboard.
hypothesis: The guy with a hat is using a skateboard.
explanation_1: A man is a guy and if he is riding a motorized skateboard then he is using a skateboard.
explanation_2: The man is wearing a hat while on his skateboard.
explanation_3: The man is the same as the guy with a hat riding a motorized skateboard.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_ride(e2) & n_skateboard(x3) & Theme(e1,x3) & v_motorize(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_hat(x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_guy(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_use(e1) & n_skateboard(x3) & with(x1,x2) & n_hat(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3.(v_ride(e2) & v_motorize(e1) & n_skateboard(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_hat(x2) & in(x1,x2) & Theme(e2,x3) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(with(x1,x2) & v_use(e1) & n_skateboard(x3) & n_hat(x2) & n_guy(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))