premise: A person in orange climbs a sheer cliff face covered in snow and ice.
hypothesis: The cliff is covered in ice
explanation_1: SHEER CLIFF AND THE CLIFF IS THE SAME AND BY THE FACE BEING COVER IN ICE MEANS THE CLIFF IS COVER IN ICE
explanation_2: A person who climbs a cliff that is covered in ice and is in orange, must be a rescue worker.
explanation_3: Ice is typically associated with snow, therefore, it is acceptable to summarize that a cliff covered in snow and ice is covered in ice and still portray the same image.
premise_logic: exists x1.(all s1 x3 x2.((n_face(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_cliff(x3) & a_sheer(s1) & Theme(s1,x2)) -> exists e1 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8.(in(e1,x6) & n_ice(x8) & n_snow(x7) & subset_of(x8,x6) & subset_of(x7,x6) & Theme(e1,x1) & v_cover(e1) & in(x1,x4) & for(x4,x2) & n_climb(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_orange(x5))) & n_person(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_cliff(x1) & in(e1,x2) & n_ice(x2) & Theme(e1,x1) & v_cover(e1))
premise_sim: exists x1.(n_person(x1) & all s1 x3 x2.(exists e1 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8.(v_cover(e1) & subset_of(x8,x6) & subset_of(x7,x6) & of(x4,x5) & n_snow(x7) & n_orange(x5) & n_ice(x8) & n_climb(x4) & in(x1,x4) & in(e1,x6) & for(x4,x2) & Theme(e1,x1)) | -of(x2,x3) | -n_face(x2) | -n_cliff(x3) | -a_sheer(s1) | -Theme(s1,x2)))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_cover(e1) & n_ice(x2) & n_cliff(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Theme(e1,x1))