premise: Two people look at two red motorcycles in a place where there are religious murals on the wall.
hypothesis: The two people are looking at cars.
explanation_1: The people cannot simultaneously look at motorcycles and cars
explanation_2: motorcycles are not the same as cars.
explanation_3: The people in the first sentence are looking  at motorcycles while the people in the second sentence are looking at cars.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x5.(n_wall(x5) & at(e1,x2) & in(x2,x3) & exists p2 x4.(on(p2,x5) & exists s2 x6.((x4 = x6) & n_mural(x6) & a_religious(s2) & Theme(s2,x6))) & where(x3,p1) & n_place(x3) & n_motorcycle(x2) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & card_eq_2(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_people(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & at(e1,x2) & n_car(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 p1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x5.(where(x3,p1) & v_look(e1) & n_wall(x5) & n_place(x3) & n_people(x1) & n_motorcycle(x2) & in(x2,x3) & exists p2 x4.(on(p2,x5) & exists s2 x6.(n_mural(x6) & a_religious(s2) & Theme(s2,x6) & (x4 = x6))) & card_eq_2(x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & at(e1,x2) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_look(e1) & n_people(x1) & n_car(x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & at(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))