premise: A man in sunglasses and shorts carrying a stick is walking.
hypothesis: A man with a visual impairment is walking.
explanation_1: Someone who has sunglasses and a stick does not always mean they have a visual impairment.
explanation_2: Not all man carrying a stick while walking have visual impairment.
explanation_3: Just because a man in sunglasses carrying a stick is walking doesn't mean a man has visual impairment.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(Actor(e2,x1) & v_walk(e2) & in(x1,x2) & subset_of(x4,x2) & Theme(e1,x6) & Actor(e1,x5) & v_carry(e1) & n_stick(x6) & (x4 = x5) & n_shorts(x4) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_sunglass(x3) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & with(x1,x2) & n_impairment(x2) & a_visual(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(v_walk(e2) & v_carry(e1) & subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_sunglass(x3) & n_stick(x6) & n_shorts(x4) & n_man(x1) & in(x1,x2) & Theme(e1,x6) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x5) & (x4 = x5))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(with(x1,x2) & v_walk(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_impairment(x2) & a_visual(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))