premise: A man cooking food on the stove.
hypothesis: A man is cooking his wife a nutritious meal.
explanation_1: You can not infer he is cooking with his wife.
explanation_2: The man may be cooking, but it doesn't have to be for his wife or nutritious.
explanation_3: Cooking does not mean he is cooking for someone in particular.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_stove(x4) & a_topic(x1) & on(e1,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_cook(e1) & n_food(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x3.(all x2 s1.((n_meal(x2) & a_nutritious(s1) & Theme(s1,x2)) -> exists e1.(Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_cook(e1) & for(x3,x2))) & n_wife(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_cook(e1) & on(e1,x4) & n_stove(x4) & n_man(x1) & n_food(x3) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x3.(of(x3,x1) & n_wife(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & all x2 s1.(exists e1.(v_cook(e1) & for(x3,x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1)) | -n_meal(x2) | -a_nutritious(s1) | -Theme(s1,x2)))