premise: A woman wading through a pool in front of a waterfall.
hypothesis: The women was swimming in a pool of chocolate.
explanation_1: He refers to a single woman, not multiple women. She cannot be wading through a pool and swimming in chocolate simultaneously.
explanation_2: The women was ie either wading through a pool in front of a waterfall or swimming in a pool of chocolate.
explanation_3: A pool in front of a waterfall implies there is water in that pool and not chocolate.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & in(e1,x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_waterfall(x5) & n_front(x4) & through(e1,x3) & n_pool(x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wade(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_woman(x1) & in(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_chocolate(x3) & n_pool(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_swim(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_wade(e1) & through(e1,x3) & of(x4,x5) & n_woman(x1) & n_waterfall(x5) & n_pool(x3) & n_front(x4) & in(e1,x4) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_swim(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_woman(x1) & n_pool(x2) & n_chocolate(x3) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))