premise: a man in pants dancing in a park.
hypothesis: A man is in a taxi.
explanation_1: The man cannot be simultaneously dancing and be in a taxi
explanation_2: You can't be dancing in a park and be in a taxi at the same time.
explanation_3: A man dancing in a park is not in a taxi.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & in(e1,x4) & n_park(x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_dance(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_pants(x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2.(in(x1,x2) & n_taxi(x2)) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_dance(e1) & n_park(x4) & n_pants(x2) & n_man(x1) & in(x1,x2) & in(e1,x4) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2.(n_taxi(x2) & in(x1,x2)))