premise: A child and small dog running.
hypothesis: A man eats a carrot.
explanation_1: There is either a child and a dog or a man, both cannot be true
explanation_2: A MAN CANNOT BE A CHILD OR A DOG
explanation_3: There is  child  the first sentence and a man in the second sentence.
premise_logic: exists s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(s1) & n_running(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_dog(x3) & a_small(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & n_child(x1) & subset_of(x2,s1) & subset_of(x1,s1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_eat(e1) & n_carrot(x2) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(subset_of(x2,s1) & subset_of(x1,s1) & of(x2,x3) & n_running(x2) & n_dog(x3) & n_child(x1) & a_topic(s1) & a_small(s2) & Theme(s2,x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_eat(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_carrot(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))