premise: A man is cooking pies in the oven.
hypothesis: The man cooking has oven mits on.
explanation_1: A man cooking pie does not imply that the man has oven mits on.
explanation_2: Wearing oven mits is not required to cook in an oven.
explanation_3: You can not infer his mits are on.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x3.(n_oven(x3) & exists s1 x2.((x1 = x2) & in(x2,x3) & n_pie(x2) & a_cooking(s1) & Theme(s1,x2)) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(n_cooking(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2) & a_on(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_oven(e1) & n_mit(x3))
premise_sim: exists x1 x3.(n_oven(x3) & n_man(x1) & exists s1 x2.(n_pie(x2) & in(x2,x3) & a_cooking(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & (x1 = x2)))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_oven(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_mit(x3) & n_man(x2) & n_cooking(x1) & a_on(s1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1))