premise: The man is doing stunts with his bicycle.
hypothesis: The crowd is astonished.
explanation_1: A man doing stunts does not imply that there is a crowd or that the crowd is astonished.
explanation_2: We have no idea if there is a crowd, there could be no none there. We have no idea if they are astonished, they could be feeling anything.
explanation_3: There is no mention of an astonished crowd looking on while the man is doing the stunts.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_bicycle(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_man(x1) & with(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_do(e1) & n_stunt(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(n_crowd(x1) & Theme(e1,x1) & v_astonish(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x3) & v_do(e1) & of(x3,x1) & n_stunt(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_bicycle(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_astonish(e1) & n_crowd(x1) & Theme(e1,x1))