premise: A woman is riding a blue bicycle in a park.
hypothesis: A woman jogging around the park
explanation_1: The woman riding a blue bicycle could not have been the one jogging because both activities cannot happen at the same time.
explanation_2: If a woman is riding a bicycle then she is not jogging.
explanation_3: riding doesn't mean jogging
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(in(e1,x3) & n_park(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1) & n_bicycle(x2) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_park(x3) & a_topic(x1) & around(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_jog(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_woman(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_ride(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_park(x3) & n_bicycle(x2) & in(e1,x3) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_jog(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_park(x3) & around(e1,x3) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))