premise: Two hockey players battling for the puck after a face off.
hypothesis: The hockey sticks are a natural color.
explanation_1: Hockey players battling doesn't mean they have their hockey sticks or that they are a natural color.
explanation_2: The hockey stick can have natural or artificial color
explanation_3: The actions of hockey players during a game don't determine the color of hockey sticks.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_puck(x4) & a_topic(x1) & after(e1,x5) & r_off(x5) & n_face(x5) & for(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_battle(e1) & (x1 = x3) & n_player(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_hockey(x2) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(n_hockey(x1) & exists s1 x3.((x1 = x3) & n_color(x3) & a_natural(s1) & Theme(s1,x3)) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_stick(e1) & (x1 = x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_battle(e1) & r_off(x5) & of(x1,x2) & n_puck(x4) & n_player(x1) & n_hockey(x2) & n_face(x5) & for(e1,x4) & card_eq_2(x1) & after(e1,x5) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x1 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_stick(e1) & n_hockey(x1) & exists s1 x3.(n_color(x3) & a_natural(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & (x1 = x3)) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))