premise: A woman is pulling a child on a sled in the snow.
hypothesis: A mother and child row a canoe.
explanation_1: A woman is pulling a child on a sled, or a mother and child row a canoe.
explanation_2: Just because a woman is pulling a child it does not mean she is a mother.  A sled is not a canoe.
explanation_3: sled doesn't mean canoe
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_snow(x4) & on(e1,x3) & in(x3,x4) & n_sled(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_pull(e1) & n_child(x2) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: all x1.(n_canoe(x1) -> exists x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x2) & for(x2,x1) & n_row(x2) & of(x2,x4) & n_child(x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_mother(x3)))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_pull(e1) & on(e1,x3) & n_woman(x1) & n_snow(x4) & n_sled(x3) & n_child(x2) & in(x3,x4) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: all x1.(exists x2 x3 x4.(of(x2,x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_row(x2) & n_mother(x3) & n_child(x4) & for(x2,x1) & a_topic(x2)) | -n_canoe(x1))