premise: The dog is catching a treat.
hypothesis: the cat is not catching a treat
explanation_1: It's either a dog or a cat
explanation_2: The second sentence implies the dog is not catching the treat when he is.
explanation_3: The image is of a dog not a cat.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_dog(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_catch(e1) & n_treat(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1.(n_cat(x1) & -exists e1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_catch(e1) & n_treat(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_catch(e1) & n_treat(x2) & n_dog(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_cat(x1) & all e1 x2.(-v_catch(e1) | -n_treat(x2) | -Theme(e1,x2) | -Actor(e1,x1)))