premise: Women posing for a picture during a bicycle race on a bridge.
hypothesis: the woman is riding the bike.
explanation_1: A woman posing for a picture is not assumed to be riding the bike.
explanation_2: Just because women posing for a picture during a bicycle race doesn't necessarily mean that they are riding the bike.
explanation_3: There is no information about the position of the woman in sentence 1, and therefore it is not inferred she is riding the bike.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(a_topic(x1) & during(e1,x4) & on(x4,x6) & n_bridge(x6) & n_race(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_bicycle(x5) & for(e1,x3) & n_picture(x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_pose(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_bike(x2) & n_woman(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(v_pose(e1) & on(x4,x6) & of(x4,x5) & n_woman(x1) & n_race(x4) & n_picture(x3) & n_bridge(x6) & n_bicycle(x5) & for(e1,x3) & during(e1,x4) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_ride(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_bike(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))