premise: Guy hitting a baseball in a field of grass outside.
hypothesis: A man is a professional baseball player.
explanation_1: There is no indication that he is a professional in the first sentence
explanation_2: Hitting a baseball in a field of grass doesn't mean you're a baseball player let alone a professional one.
explanation_3: A guy hitting a baseball on a field is not necessarily a professional player.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(ne_nam_guy(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_hit(e1) & in(x2,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_outside(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_grass(x5) & n_field(x3) & n_baseball(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists s1 x2 x3.((x1 = x2) & n_player(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_baseball(x3) & a_professional(s1) & Theme(s1,x2)) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_hit(e1) & of(x4,x5) & of(x3,x4) & ne_nam_guy(x1) & n_outside(x4) & n_grass(x5) & n_field(x3) & n_baseball(x2) & in(x2,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists s1 x2 x3.(of(x2,x3) & n_player(x2) & n_baseball(x3) & a_professional(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & (x1 = x2)))