premise: A man cooking kabobs on a barbecue in his backyard.
hypothesis: The man is have a cookout.
explanation_1: Now a days man is cooking better than the woman he is cooking kabobs on a barbecue .
explanation_2: The man is having a cookout because he his cooking on a barbecue in his backyard.
explanation_3: cooking kabobs in his backyard is inferred as cookout.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & on(x1,x4) & in(x4,x5) & n_backyard(x5) & of(x5,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_barbecue(x4) & n_kabob(x1) & of(x1,x3) & n_cooking(x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_man(x1) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_have(e2) & n_cookout(x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_be(e1) & (x1 = x2))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(on(x1,x4) & of(x5,x1) & of(x1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2) & n_male(x1) & n_kabob(x1) & n_cooking(x3) & n_barbecue(x4) & n_backyard(x5) & in(x4,x5) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_have(e2) & v_be(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_cookout(x3) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))