premise: Two women, one walking her dog the other pushing a stroller.
hypothesis: There is a snowstorm.
explanation_1: The first sentence is about walking a dog and the second sentence is about a snowstorm.
explanation_2: A snowstorm would prevent the woman from walking her dog and the other woman from pushing a stroller.
explanation_3: Women would not be pushing a stroller or walking a dog in a snowstorm.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_other(x5) & for(e1,e2) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_push(e2) & n_stroller(x3) & Time(e1,x5) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_dog(x4) & of(x4,x3) & n_female(x3) & rel(x1,x2) & n_thing(x2) & card_eq_1(x2) & n_woman(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.((x1 = x2) & n_snowstorm(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_walk(e1) & v_push(e2) & rel(x1,x2) & of(x4,x3) & n_woman(x1) & n_thing(x2) & n_stroller(x3) & n_other(x5) & n_female(x3) & n_dog(x4) & for(e1,e2) & card_eq_2(x1) & card_eq_1(x2) & Time(e1,x5) & Theme(e2,x3) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_snowstorm(x2) & (x1 = x2))