premise: A man is sitting in on the side of the street with brass pots.
hypothesis: a man does not have brass pots
explanation_1: Not to have something means to be without it, hence not with.
explanation_2: When a man is sitting with brass pots it cannot  be said that he does not have brass pots.
explanation_3: One cannot both have and not have brass pots at the same time.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_street(x3) & n_side(x2) & with(e1,x4) & n_pot(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_brass(x5) & on(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & a_in(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1.(-exists e1 x2 x3.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1) & n_pot(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_brass(x3)) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(with(e1,x4) & v_sit(e1) & on(e1,x2) & of(x4,x5) & of(x2,x3) & n_street(x3) & n_side(x2) & n_pot(x4) & n_man(x1) & n_brass(x5) & a_in(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & all e1 x2 x3.(-v_have(e1) | -of(x2,x3) | -n_pot(x2) | -n_brass(x3) | -Theme(e1,x2) | -Actor(e1,x1)))