premise: Two females and one male looking at various merchandise.
hypothesis: Two girls and one man are destroying merchandise.
explanation_1: The people cannot be both looking  at merchandise and destroying merchandise.
explanation_2: The two women and one man looking at merchandise or in the second destroying it.  It cannot be both.
explanation_3: Looking at something and destroying it are two different actions.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(at(e1,x4) & n_merchandise(x4) & a_various(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1) & n_male(x3) & card_eq_1(x3) & n_female(x2) & card_eq_2(x2) & subset_of(x3,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_destroy(e1) & n_merchandise(x4) & subset_of(x3,x1) & n_man(x3) & card_eq_1(x3) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_girl(x2) & card_eq_2(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_look(e1) & subset_of(x3,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_merchandise(x4) & n_male(x3) & n_female(x2) & card_eq_2(x2) & card_eq_1(x3) & at(e1,x4) & a_various(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_destroy(e1) & subset_of(x3,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_merchandise(x4) & n_man(x3) & n_girl(x2) & card_eq_2(x2) & card_eq_1(x3) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1))