premise: A young child is looking at a commuter train station from the train seat.
hypothesis: The child is playing baseball at home.
explanation_1: The child is not looking out the window while playing baseball.
explanation_2: TRAIN STATION CANNOT BE AT HOME
explanation_3: A child is either on a train looking at a train or playing baseball at home. The child cannot be doing both simultaneously.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(at(e1,x2) & from(x2,x5) & n_seat(x5) & of(x5,x4) & n_train(x4) & n_train(x4) & n_station(x2) & of(x2,x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_commuter(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1) & n_child(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_child(x1) & at(e1,x3) & n_home(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_baseball(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_look(e1) & of(x5,x4) & of(x2,x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_train(x4) & n_station(x2) & n_seat(x5) & n_commuter(x3) & n_child(x1) & from(x2,x5) & at(e1,x2) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_play(e1) & n_home(x3) & n_child(x1) & n_baseball(x2) & at(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))