premise: A man in a restaurant having lunch.
hypothesis: The man is at a restaurant.
explanation_1: Having lunch in a restaurant implies you are at the restaurant
explanation_2: A man is having lunch in a restaurant.
explanation_3: A man in a restaurant is at a restaurant.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_have(e1) & n_lunch(x4) & (x2 = x3) & n_restaurant(x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2.(at(x1,x2) & n_restaurant(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_have(e1) & n_restaurant(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_lunch(x4) & in(x1,x2) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2.(n_restaurant(x2) & at(x1,x2)))