premise: Two dogs playing in the snow.
hypothesis: The dogs are playing catch with each other.
explanation_1: Two dogs can play without playing catch. Two dogs can play without playing with each other.
explanation_2: Just because the dogs are playing, doesn't mean they are playing catch.
explanation_3: Just because two dogs are playing in the snow doesn't mean they are playing catch.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_snow(x3) & a_topic(x1) & in(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_play(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_dog(x1) & all x3.(n_other(x3) -> with(e1,x3)) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_catch(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_play(e1) & n_snow(x3) & n_dog(x1) & in(e1,x3) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_play(e1) & n_dog(x1) & n_catch(x2) & all x3.(with(e1,x3) | -n_other(x3)) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))