premise: A man snowboards.
hypothesis: A man is drinking coffee at the cafe.
explanation_1: The man snowboards, not drinks coffee at the cafe.
explanation_2: Man would not be at café if he were on snowboards
explanation_3: The man must either be drinking coffee or on a snowboard.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2.(a_topic(x1) & n_snowboard(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_cafe(x3) & at(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_drink(e1) & n_coffee(x2) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2.(of(x1,x2) & n_snowboard(x1) & n_man(x2) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_drink(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_coffee(x2) & n_cafe(x3) & at(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))