premise: a man with a cigarette in hand is looking at a car in front of him.
hypothesis: Man smoking a cigarette is upset with the car in front of him.
explanation_1: Just because he has a cigarette in his hand does not mean he is smoking it.  Just because he is looking at a car does not infer that he is upset with it.
explanation_2: Just because a man with a cigarette in hand is looking at a car in front of him doesn't mean he is upset.
explanation_3: You cannot infer that the man looking at a car is actually upset with the car.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(at(e1,x4) & in(x4,x5) & of(x5,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_front(x5) & n_car(x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1) & with(x1,x2) & in(x2,x3) & n_hand(x3) & n_cigarette(x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x4.(n_male(x4) & n_car(x4) & all x1.(n_cigarette(x1) -> exists e1 x2 x3 x5.(with(e1,x4) & in(x4,x5) & of(x5,x4) & n_front(x5) & Theme(e1,x2) & v_upset(e1) & for(x2,x1) & n_smoking(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_man(x3))))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(with(x1,x2) & v_look(e1) & of(x5,x1) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_hand(x3) & n_front(x5) & n_cigarette(x2) & n_car(x4) & in(x4,x5) & in(x2,x3) & at(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x4.(n_male(x4) & n_car(x4) & all x1.(exists e1 x2 x3 x5.(with(e1,x4) & v_upset(e1) & of(x5,x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_smoking(x2) & n_man(x3) & n_front(x5) & in(x4,x5) & for(x2,x1) & Theme(e1,x2)) | -n_cigarette(x1)))