premise: A little boy in a bathrobe sits on a bench near the shower in a bathroom.
hypothesis: The boy is in the shower.
explanation_1: It is not possible for the boy to both be in the shower and yet at the same time be sitting on a bench near the shower.
explanation_2: One can't be near and in the shower at the same time.
explanation_3: Being near something is different than actually be in something
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_shower(x4) & in(e1,x5) & n_bathroom(x5) & near(e1,x4) & on(e1,x3) & n_bench(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_bathrobe(x2) & n_boy(x1) & a_little(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_shower(x2) & n_boy(x1) & in(x1,x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_sit(e1) & on(e1,x3) & near(e1,x4) & n_shower(x4) & n_boy(x1) & n_bench(x3) & n_bathroom(x5) & n_bathrobe(x2) & in(x1,x2) & in(e1,x5) & a_little(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_shower(x2) & n_boy(x1) & in(x1,x2))