premise: Two German sheperds snarling at each other.
hypothesis: Two animals are being held back by leashes.
explanation_1: The animals in question are not necessarily being held back by leashes just because they are snarling at each other.
explanation_2: Just because two animals are snarling does not mean they will always be held back by leashes.
explanation_3: Two Serman shepherds don't have to be held back by leashes.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(a_topic(x1) & all x3.(n_other(x3) -> at(e1,x3)) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_snarl(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_sheperd(x1) & a_german(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(Actor(e1,x2) & n_leash(x2) & a_back(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x1) & v_hold(e1) & n_animal(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(v_snarl(e1) & n_sheperd(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & all x3.(at(e1,x3) | -n_other(x3)) & a_topic(x1) & a_german(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(v_hold(e1) & n_leash(x2) & n_animal(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_back(s1) & Theme(e1,x1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x2))