premise: Two wrestlers jump in a ring while an official watches.
hypothesis: Two wrestlers are in the ring.
explanation_1: Wrestlers are in the ring.
explanation_2: If someone jumps in the ring then they are in the ring.
explanation_3: the two sentences say the same thing: there are two wrestlers in the ring
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(exists e2 x3.(Actor(e2,x3) & v_watch(e2) & n_official(x3)) & while(e1,p1) & in(e1,x2) & n_ring(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_jump(e1) & n_wrestler(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_ring(x2) & in(x1,x2) & n_wrestler(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(while(e1,p1) & v_jump(e1) & n_wrestler(x1) & n_ring(x2) & in(e1,x2) & exists e2 x3.(v_watch(e2) & n_official(x3) & Actor(e2,x3)) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_wrestler(x1) & n_ring(x2) & in(x1,x2) & card_eq_2(x1))