premise: Man in a blue shirt practicing karate.
hypothesis: There is a man outside.
explanation_1: Every Man in a blue shirt practicing karate need not be outside
explanation_2: A man practicing karate doesn't really need to be outside.
explanation_3: Man is practicing karate doesn't imply there is a man outside.
premise_logic: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & n_karate(x2) & of(x2,x4) & n_practicing(x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_shirt(x3) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.((x1 = x2) & n_outside(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_man(x3))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(of(x2,x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_shirt(x3) & n_practicing(x4) & n_man(x1) & n_karate(x2) & in(x1,x2) & a_topic(x1) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s1,x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(of(x2,x3) & n_outside(x2) & n_man(x3) & (x1 = x2))