premise: A dirt bike rider riding through the woods over logs.
hypothesis: The dirt bike rider is running from someone.
explanation_1: You can not infer he is running from someone.
explanation_2: Just because a dirt bike rider riding through the woods over logs, doesn't mean the rider is running from someone.
explanation_3: Not all dirt bike riders are running from someone.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(n_wood(x5) & a_topic(x1) & over(e1,x6) & n_log(x6) & through(e1,x5) & Actor(e1,x4) & v_ride(e1) & (x1 = x4) & n_rider(x1) & of(x1,x3) & n_bike(x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_dirt(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_rider(x1) & of(x1,x3) & n_bike(x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_dirt(x2) & from(e1,x4) & n_person(x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(v_ride(e1) & through(e1,x5) & over(e1,x6) & of(x1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_wood(x5) & n_rider(x1) & n_log(x6) & n_dirt(x2) & n_bike(x3) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x4) & (x1 = x4))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_run(e1) & of(x1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_rider(x1) & n_person(x4) & n_dirt(x2) & n_bike(x3) & from(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1))