premise: Two woman are walking up to a brightly painted fire hydrant.
hypothesis: Two women are walking.
explanation_1: The two women are both walking towards something.
explanation_2: Women up to a hydrant shows the women are walking.
explanation_3: Two women are walking and it is mentioned in both sentences.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(to(e1,x2) & n_hydrant(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_fire(x3) & a_painted(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & r_brightly(x2) & a_up(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_woman(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_woman(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(v_walk(e1) & to(e1,x2) & r_brightly(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_woman(x1) & n_hydrant(x2) & n_fire(x3) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_up(s1) & a_painted(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_walk(e1) & n_woman(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))