premise: A guy in a laundromat getting his things together.
hypothesis: A guy is folding his laundry at home
explanation_1: On the first sentence the guy is in a laundromat while on the second sentence the guy is at home.
explanation_2: A guy can not be in a laundromat and at home.
explanation_3: A guy cannot be at a laundromat and at home at the same time.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & a_together(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_get(e1) & n_thing(x4) & of(x4,x1) & n_male(x1) & (x2 = x3) & n_laundromat(x2) & n_guy(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(at(e1,x3) & n_home(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_fold(e1) & n_laundry(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_guy(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_get(e1) & of(x4,x1) & n_thing(x4) & n_male(x1) & n_laundromat(x2) & n_guy(x1) & in(x1,x2) & a_topic(x1) & a_together(s1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_fold(e1) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_laundry(x2) & n_home(x3) & n_guy(x1) & at(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))