premise: a boy walks through the water.
hypothesis: A boy walks through water in a fountain.
explanation_1: The water the boy walks through does not have to be in a fountain.
explanation_2: Walking though water does not imply walking through a fountain.
explanation_3: Just because a boy is walking through water does not mean the water is in a fountain.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_water(x2) & through(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_boy(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(in(e1,x3) & n_fountain(x3) & through(e1,x2) & n_water(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_boy(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_walk(e1) & through(e1,x2) & n_water(x2) & n_boy(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_walk(e1) & through(e1,x2) & n_water(x2) & n_fountain(x3) & n_boy(x1) & in(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))