premise: The skier is doing a flip through some trees
hypothesis: The skier is winning a competition.
explanation_1: Doing a flip does not imply winning.
explanation_2: The fact that the skier is doing a flip through some trees doesn't imply he is winning a competition.
explanation_3: We do not know if the skier is in a competition or if they are winning a competition.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_skier(x1) & through(e1,x3) & n_tree(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_do(e1) & n_flip(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_skier(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_win(e1) & n_competition(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_do(e1) & through(e1,x3) & n_tree(x3) & n_skier(x1) & n_flip(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_win(e1) & n_skier(x1) & n_competition(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))