premise: A woman in a blue jacket is drinking tea from a cup.
hypothesis: A woman is eating a donut.
explanation_1: Drinking tea is not eating a donut.
explanation_2: A women cannot be drinking tea and eating a donut at the same time.  She is only Blue jacket in one of them.
explanation_3: A woman who is drinking tea cannot be eating a donut.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(from(e1,x4) & n_cup(x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_drink(e1) & n_tea(x3) & in(x1,x2) & n_jacket(x2) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_eat(e1) & n_donut(x2) & n_woman(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_drink(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_tea(x3) & n_jacket(x2) & n_cup(x4) & in(x1,x2) & from(e1,x4) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_eat(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_donut(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))