premise: A man, wearing yellow, is riding a bike in the woods.
hypothesis: The man was curious to see what was in the woods.
explanation_1: You can not infer the man is curious.
explanation_2: Wearing yellow does not necessarily mean the man is curious
explanation_3: we do not know if the man was curious, he could ride his bike on the same path daily.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_wood(x5) & in(e2,x5) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_ride(e2) & n_bike(x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_yellow(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 s1 x1 x3.(n_wood(x3) & n_man(x1) & Topic(s1,p1) & Actor(s1,x1) & a_curious(s1) & exists e1 p2 x2.(n_thing(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_see(e1) & in(x2,x3)))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_wear(e1) & v_ride(e2) & n_yellow(x3) & n_wood(x5) & n_man(x1) & n_bike(x4) & in(e2,x5) & Theme(e2,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists p1 s1 x1 x3.(n_wood(x3) & n_man(x1) & exists e1 x2.(v_see(e1) & n_thing(x2) & in(x2,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1)) & a_curious(s1) & Topic(s1,p1) & Actor(s1,x1))