premise: A female figure skater in costume is executing a routine.
hypothesis: A man is roller skating on a street.
explanation_1: He refers to a female not a man. They cannot be executing a figure skating routine and roller skating simultaneously.
explanation_2: A man and a female can't be skating at the same time.
explanation_3: A skater can not be a man and a woman at the same time
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_execute(e1) & n_routine(x4) & in(x1,x3) & n_costume(x3) & n_skater(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_figure(x2) & a_female(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists e1 x2 x3 x4.((x1 = x2) & on(e1,x4) & n_street(x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_skate(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_roller(x2)) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_execute(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_skater(x1) & n_routine(x4) & n_figure(x2) & n_costume(x3) & in(x1,x3) & a_female(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists e1 x2 x3 x4.(v_skate(e1) & on(e1,x4) & n_street(x4) & n_roller(x2) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3) & (x1 = x2)))