premise: A man is reading a newspaper in a car dealership.
hypothesis: A man is at a car dealership.
explanation_1: Reading in a car dealership implies being at the dealership
explanation_2: Man reading a newspaper is a type of man.
explanation_3: A man reading a newspaper in a dealership, then he is at the dealership.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(in(e1,x3) & n_dealership(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_car(x4) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_read(e1) & n_newspaper(x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2 x3.(at(x1,x2) & n_dealership(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_car(x3)) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_read(e1) & of(x3,x4) & n_newspaper(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_dealership(x3) & n_car(x4) & in(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2 x3.(of(x2,x3) & n_dealership(x2) & n_car(x3) & at(x1,x2)))