premise: A man wearing glasses is vacuuming an architects model.
hypothesis: There is a man vaucuming
explanation_1: A man is vacuuming.
explanation_2: The word vaucuming is the mispelled version of vacuuming but still lets us know what the man is doing.
explanation_3: man vacuuming is shortening the sentence to make the point
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_vacuum(e2) & n_model(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_architect(x5) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_glass(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 e1 x2 x3.((x1 = x2) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_vaucume(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_man(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_wear(e1) & v_vacuum(e2) & of(x4,x5) & n_model(x4) & n_man(x1) & n_glass(x3) & n_architect(x5) & Theme(e2,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 e1 x2 x3.(v_vaucume(e1) & n_man(x2) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3) & (x1 = x2))