premise: Five little boys are playing baseball.
hypothesis: A group of boys playing basketball.
explanation_1: The two sentences contradict each other because in the first phrase there is exactly five boys verse in the second sentence there is a group. They are also playing two different sports, baseball and basketball.
explanation_2: Basketball is not baseball.
explanation_3: The boys in the first sentence are playing baseball and the boys in the second sentence are playing basketball.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_baseball(x2) & n_boy(x1) & a_little(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_5(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_play(e1) & n_basketball(x4) & (x1 = x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_boy(x2) & n_group(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(v_play(e1) & n_boy(x1) & n_baseball(x2) & card_eq_5(x1) & a_little(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_play(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_group(x1) & n_boy(x2) & n_basketball(x4) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x1 = x3))