premise: A man, wearing yellow, is riding a bike in the woods.
hypothesis: The man drives his car in the woods.
explanation_1: A man cannot be riding a bike and drive his car at the same time.
explanation_2: The man cannot be simultaneously riding a bike and driving his car.
explanation_3: You can’t be riding a bike and driving a car at the same time
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_wood(x5) & in(e2,x5) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_ride(e2) & n_bike(x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_yellow(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_wood(x3) & n_car(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_man(x1) & in(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_drive(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_wear(e1) & v_ride(e2) & n_yellow(x3) & n_wood(x5) & n_man(x1) & n_bike(x4) & in(e2,x5) & Theme(e2,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_drive(e1) & of(x2,x1) & n_wood(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_car(x2) & in(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))