premise: Two men are shopping for orange juice.
hypothesis: two men are shopping for pie
explanation_1: A pie is not the same as orange juice.
explanation_2: The first sentences explains the men and shopping for orange juice and the second sentence explains the men are shopping for pie.
explanation_3: The men cannot be shopping for only orange juice if they are only shopping for pie at the same time.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(for(e1,x2) & n_juice(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_orange(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_shop(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(for(e1,x2) & n_pie(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_shop(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_shop(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_orange(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_juice(x2) & for(e1,x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_shop(e1) & n_pie(x2) & n_man(x1) & for(e1,x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))