premise: The man in the black and white shirt is running with a ball.
hypothesis: A referee is returning with the football.
explanation_1: Not every person wearing a black and white shirt is a referee. Just running with a ball doesn't mean the person is returning the ball. There are many kinds of balls other than football.
explanation_2: Just because the man in the black and white shirt is running with a ball does not mean a refer is returning with the football.
explanation_3: Just because the man is wearing black and white, does not necessarily mean he is a referee. Also the type of ball is not described and so it does not have to be a football
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(n_shirt(x2) & a_white(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_man(x1) & with(e1,x3) & n_ball(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1) & in(x1,x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_football(x2) & with(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_return(e1) & n_referee(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x3) & v_run(e1) & n_shirt(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_ball(x3) & in(x1,x2) & a_white(s2) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s2,x2) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(with(e1,x2) & v_return(e1) & n_referee(x1) & n_football(x2) & Actor(e1,x1))