premise: A couple is a standing together the woman is adjusting a flower on the man's lapel and they are dressed in wedding apparel.
hypothesis: People are naked.
explanation_1: The people can't be naked while wearing wedding apparel.
explanation_2: One cannot be naked if they are dressed.
explanation_3: There is no relation between two sentences. First sentences relates to a wedding function in which a couple is standing together and the woman is adjusting a flower on the man's lapel and they are dressed in wedding apparel which is contradict to the sentence 2.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 p1 x1 x2 x4 x6 x7.(n_lapel(x7) & of(x7,x6) & n_man(x6) & n_woman(x4) & in(e1,e2) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_wed(e2) & n_apparel(x2) & Theme(e1,x1) & v_dress(e1) & n_thing(x1) & exists p2 x3.((x1 = x3) & exists e3 x5.(Theme(e3,x5) & Actor(e3,x4) & v_adjust(e3) & on(x5,x7) & n_flower(x5)) & that(x3,p2) & r_together(x3) & n_standing(x3)) & n_couple(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists s1 x1.(Theme(s1,x1) & a_naked(s1) & n_people(x1))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x4 x6 x7.(v_wed(e2) & v_dress(e1) & of(x7,x6) & n_woman(x4) & n_thing(x1) & n_man(x6) & n_lapel(x7) & n_couple(x1) & n_apparel(x2) & in(e1,e2) & exists p2 x3.(that(x3,p2) & r_together(x3) & n_standing(x3) & exists e3 x5.(v_adjust(e3) & on(x5,x7) & n_flower(x5) & Theme(e3,x5) & Actor(e3,x4)) & (x1 = x3)) & Theme(e2,x2) & Theme(e1,x1) & Actor(e2,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists s1 x1.(n_people(x1) & a_naked(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))