premise: A photographer snaps a midair action shot of a snowboarder.
hypothesis: The camera is on a tripod.
explanation_1: A photographer snapping a photo does not imply a camera is on a tripod.
explanation_2: It can not be inferred that the photographer is using a tripod to take pictures of a snowboarder.
explanation_3: A photographer can take a picture without a tripod. Having the tripod is implied.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_snap(e1) & of(x2,x5) & n_snowboarder(x5) & n_shot(x2) & of(x2,x4) & n_action(x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_midair(x3) & n_photographer(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_camera(x1) & exists x2.(on(x1,x2) & n_tripod(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_snap(e1) & of(x2,x5) & of(x2,x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_snowboarder(x5) & n_shot(x2) & n_photographer(x1) & n_midair(x3) & n_action(x4) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_camera(x1) & exists x2.(on(x1,x2) & n_tripod(x2)))