premise: The people ride down the road on sleds.
hypothesis: The people are on the bus going to the museum
explanation_1: The people cannot be on sleds and on the bus at the same time
explanation_2: The people can be either riding down the roads or they can be in the bus which is going to the museum
explanation_3: One sentence says the people are on the bus, the next states they are on sleds
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_road(x2) & n_people(x1) & on(e1,x3) & n_sled(x3) & down(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x4.(n_museum(x4) & n_bus(x2) & n_people(x1) & exists e1 x3.(on(x1,x2) & to(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_go(e1) & (x2 = x3)))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_ride(e1) & on(e1,x3) & n_sled(x3) & n_road(x2) & n_people(x1) & down(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x4.(n_people(x1) & n_museum(x4) & n_bus(x2) & exists e1 x3.(v_go(e1) & to(e1,x4) & on(x1,x2) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3)))