premise: A man on a scenic canoe trip.
hypothesis: No one is on a canoe.
explanation_1: If there is a man then there cannot be no one.
explanation_2: The man cannot be on a canoe trip is he is not on a canoe.
explanation_3: A man is a person, no one indicates the lack of a person.
premise_logic: exists s1 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & on(x1,x2) & n_trip(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_canoe(x3) & a_scenic(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: -exists p1 x1.(exists x2.(on(x1,x2) & n_canoe(x2)) & n_one(x1))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1 x2 x3.(on(x1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_trip(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_canoe(x3) & a_topic(x1) & a_scenic(s1) & Theme(s1,x2))
hypothesis_sim: all x1.(all x2.(-on(x1,x2) | -n_canoe(x2)) | -n_one(x1))