premise: A crowd standing in a room with their backs to the camera.
hypothesis: The people in the room are avoiding the cameraman.
explanation_1: Standing with the backs to the camera does not mean that they are avoiding him.
explanation_2: the first sentence does not refer to the people avoiding the cameraman
explanation_3: A crowd can have their backs to the camera and not be avoiding the cameraman.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_camera(x5) & a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x3) & to(x3,x5) & with(x3,x4) & n_back(x4) & of(x4,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_room(x3) & n_standing(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_crowd(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_cameraman(x3) & n_room(x2) & n_people(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_avoid(e1) & in(x1,x2))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(with(x3,x4) & to(x3,x5) & of(x4,x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_thing(x1) & n_standing(x1) & n_room(x3) & n_crowd(x2) & n_camera(x5) & n_back(x4) & in(x1,x3) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_avoid(e1) & n_room(x2) & n_people(x1) & n_cameraman(x3) & in(x1,x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))