premise: Two men walking their canoe through the woods.
hypothesis: a couple of men eat cheese cake in the woods
explanation_1: The men cannot simultaneously be walking and eat cheese cake
explanation_2: Eating cheese cake is a separate activity than walking a canoe.
explanation_3: Eat cheese cake and walking their canoe are not the same action.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_wood(x4) & a_topic(x1) & through(e1,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_walk(e1) & n_canoe(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_thing(x1) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_wood(x5) & in(e1,x5) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_eat(e1) & n_cake(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_cheese(x4) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2) & n_couple(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_walk(e1) & through(e1,x4) & of(x3,x1) & n_wood(x4) & n_thing(x1) & n_man(x1) & n_canoe(x3) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_eat(e1) & of(x3,x4) & of(x1,x2) & n_wood(x5) & n_man(x2) & n_couple(x1) & n_cheese(x4) & n_cake(x3) & in(e1,x5) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))