premise: Three boys wearing life jackets are on top of innertube in the water.
hypothesis: Three boys are drowning.
explanation_1: Being on top of an inner tube is is not under water which is required to be drowning.
explanation_2: Boys that are wearing life jackets wouldn't be drowning.
explanation_3: The boys cannot be wearing life jackets and be on top of innertube and drowning simultaneously
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_water(x4) & in(p1,x4) & exists x5 x6.(on(x1,x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_innertube(x6) & n_top(x5)) & n_jacket(x1) & of(x1,x3) & n_life(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_wear(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_boy(x2) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_drown(e1) & n_boy(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_wear(e1) & of(x1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_water(x4) & n_life(x3) & n_jacket(x1) & n_boy(x2) & in(p1,x4) & exists x5 x6.(on(x1,x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_top(x5) & n_innertube(x6)) & card_eq_3(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_drown(e1) & n_boy(x1) & card_eq_3(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))