premise: Two businessmen going to work.
hypothesis: Two men board the train to go to work.
explanation_1: That the men are going to work does not imply that that board a train to go to work.
explanation_2: The two men who are going to work are not necessarily boarding the train.
explanation_3: Answer: just because the  men board the train  it doesn,t necessarily men he is going to work
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(a_topic(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_go(e1) & exists e2.(Actor(e2,x2) & v_work(e2)) & (x1 = x2) & n_businessman(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & Topic(x1,p1) & exists e1 x4.(to(e1,x4) & n_work(x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_go(e1)) & n_train(x3) & (x1 = x3) & n_board(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(v_go(e1) & n_businessman(x1) & exists e2.(v_work(e2) & Actor(e2,x2)) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.(of(x1,x2) & n_train(x3) & n_man(x2) & n_board(x1) & exists e1 x4.(v_go(e1) & to(e1,x4) & n_work(x4) & Actor(e1,x1)) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Topic(x1,p1) & (x1 = x3))