premise: A woman with a beautiful dress and matching umbrella is walking down the street carrying a purse on her arm.
hypothesis: The woman is not carrying an umbrella.
explanation_1: On  the first sentence the woman has a matching umbrella while on the second sentence the woman is not carrying an umbrella.
explanation_2: One woman is with umbrella, the other is not carrying one.
explanation_3: If the woman is not carrying an umbrella then she can't have a dress and a matching umbrella.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8.(n_arm(x8) & of(x8,x6) & n_female(x6) & n_street(x6) & for(e1,e2) & Theme(e2,x7) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_carry(e2) & on(x7,x8) & n_purse(x7) & a_down(s2) & Manner(e1,s2) & Theme(e1,x6) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & with(x1,x2) & n_umbrella(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_matching(x5) & n_dress(x3) & subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & a_beautiful(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1.(n_woman(x1) & -exists e1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_carry(e1) & n_umbrella(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8.(with(x1,x2) & v_walk(e1) & v_carry(e2) & subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & on(x7,x8) & of(x8,x6) & of(x4,x5) & n_woman(x1) & n_umbrella(x4) & n_street(x6) & n_purse(x7) & n_matching(x5) & n_female(x6) & n_dress(x3) & n_arm(x8) & for(e1,e2) & a_down(s2) & a_beautiful(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Theme(e2,x7) & Theme(e1,x6) & Manner(e1,s2) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_woman(x1) & all e1 x2.(-v_carry(e1) | -n_umbrella(x2) | -Theme(e1,x2) | -Actor(e1,x1)))