premise: A police officer standing on a train.
hypothesis: A man is standing on the train.
explanation_1: The man is a man because he is a police officer.
explanation_2: A police officer can be a man.
explanation_3: Making the assumption that the officer is a man, if the officer is standing on a train, then man is a less specific rephrasing of police officer.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & on(e1,x4) & n_train(x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_stand(e1) & (x1 = x3) & n_officer(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_police(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_train(x2) & on(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_stand(e1) & on(e1,x4) & of(x1,x2) & n_train(x4) & n_police(x2) & n_officer(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x1 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_stand(e1) & on(e1,x2) & n_train(x2) & n_man(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))