premise: Two men are in a boxing match where a man in the red boxing trunks is hitting the man in the purple trunks.
hypothesis: The two men boxing are hispanic.
explanation_1: No one said the men were Hispanic.
explanation_2: Two men are in a boxing match doesn't imply they are hispanic.
explanation_3: There was no way to tell the race of the information presented in the first sentence. The fact that the men are hispanic is new information.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists p2 s1 x2 x3 x5.(in(x1,x2) & exists e1 s2 x4 x5.(Theme(e1,x1) & Actor(e1,x4) & v_hit(e1) & in(x1,x5) & n_trunk(x5) & a_purple(s2) & Theme(s2,x5) & in(x4,x5) & n_man(x4)) & n_trunk(x5) & of(x5,x3) & n_boxing(x3) & n_boxing(x3) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x5) & where(x2,p2) & n_match(x2) & of(x2,x3)) & n_man(x1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Theme(s1,x1) & a_hispanic(s1) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_box(e1) & (x1 = x2))
premise_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists p2 s1 x2 x3 x5.(where(x2,p2) & of(x5,x3) & of(x2,x3) & n_trunk(x5) & n_match(x2) & n_boxing(x3) & in(x1,x2) & exists e1 s2 x4 x5.(v_hit(e1) & n_trunk(x5) & n_man(x4) & in(x4,x5) & in(x1,x5) & a_purple(s2) & Theme(s2,x5) & Theme(e1,x1) & Actor(e1,x4)) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x5)) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(v_box(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_hispanic(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))