premise: The man is doing stunts with his bicycle.
hypothesis: The man is skating backwards for the crowd.
explanation_1: The man doing stunts cannot be skating backwards at the same time.
explanation_2: A man cannot be on a bicycle and skating at the same time.
explanation_3: Skating is done with skates, not a bicycle.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_bicycle(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_man(x1) & with(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_do(e1) & n_stunt(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_crowd(x3) & n_man(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_skate(e1) & for(x2,x3) & n_backward(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x3) & v_do(e1) & of(x3,x1) & n_stunt(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_bicycle(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_skate(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_crowd(x3) & n_backward(x2) & for(x2,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))