premise: A young child is looking at a commuter train station from the train seat.
hypothesis: The child is on a train seat.
explanation_1: The child is a more specific way to say a child.
explanation_2: from the train seat is inferred as  on a train seat.
explanation_3: The understanding is that the child is on a train seat if her or she is looking from it.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(at(e1,x2) & from(x2,x5) & n_seat(x5) & of(x5,x4) & n_train(x4) & n_train(x4) & n_station(x2) & of(x2,x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_commuter(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1) & n_child(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_child(x1) & exists x2 x3.(on(x1,x2) & n_seat(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_train(x3)))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_look(e1) & of(x5,x4) & of(x2,x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_train(x4) & n_station(x2) & n_seat(x5) & n_commuter(x3) & n_child(x1) & from(x2,x5) & at(e1,x2) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_child(x1) & exists x2 x3.(on(x1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_train(x3) & n_seat(x2)))