premise: A woman in black pants is looking at her cellphone.
hypothesis: a woman is looking at her phone
explanation_1: A cellphone is a type of phone, and as the woman is looking at it, the context implies that cellphone and phone must be the same thing
explanation_2: A woman looking at her phone (cellphone) is part of her description in black pants.
explanation_3: She is a woman because she is a woman in pants.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(at(e1,x3) & n_cellphone(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_female(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_pants(x2) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(at(e1,x2) & n_phone(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_female(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1) & n_woman(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_look(e1) & of(x3,x1) & n_woman(x1) & n_pants(x2) & n_female(x1) & n_cellphone(x3) & in(x1,x2) & at(e1,x3) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_look(e1) & of(x2,x1) & n_woman(x1) & n_phone(x2) & n_female(x1) & at(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))