premise: Two women having drinks and smoking cigarettes at the bar.
hypothesis: Two women are at a bar.
explanation_1: In both description, there are two women at a bar.
explanation_2: DRINKS AND SMOKING CIGARETTES CAN BE LEGALLY DONE ONLY IN A BAR
explanation_3: having drinks and smoking cigarettes at the bar so they are at bar
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(n_bar(x7) & a_topic(x1) & at(e1,x7) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_have(e1) & n_cigarette(x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_smoking(x6) & n_drink(x4) & subset_of(x5,x3) & subset_of(x4,x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_woman(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2.(at(x1,x2) & n_bar(x2)) & n_woman(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(v_have(e1) & subset_of(x5,x3) & subset_of(x4,x3) & of(x5,x6) & n_woman(x1) & n_smoking(x6) & n_drink(x4) & n_cigarette(x5) & n_bar(x7) & card_eq_2(x1) & at(e1,x7) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_woman(x1) & exists x2.(n_bar(x2) & at(x1,x2)) & card_eq_2(x1))