premise: Two hikers are climbing through a rocky and snowy passage in the mountains.
hypothesis: people hike to top of mountain
explanation_1: Two hikers in the mountains are not necessarily hiking to the top.
explanation_2: Just because two hikers are climbing through a rocky and snowy passage it does not mean they hike to the top of the mountain.
explanation_3: two hikers cannot be people
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(n_mountain(x3) & in(e1,x3) & through(e1,x2) & n_passage(x2) & a_snowy(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & a_rocky(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_climb(e1) & n_hiker(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(to(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_mountain(x3) & n_top(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_hike(e1) & n_people(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(v_climb(e1) & through(e1,x2) & n_passage(x2) & n_mountain(x3) & n_hiker(x1) & in(e1,x3) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_snowy(s2) & a_rocky(s1) & Theme(s2,x2) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_hike(e1) & to(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_top(x2) & n_people(x1) & n_mountain(x3) & Actor(e1,x1))