premise: Two young boys have a conversation with one and other.
hypothesis: Two boys are laughing.
explanation_1: Laughing is not an integral part of a conversation.
explanation_2: Boys that are laughing cannot have conversation with each other.
explanation_3: Two boys conversing is not a must for laughing.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1) & with(x2,x3) & n_other(x5) & n_thing(x4) & card_eq_1(x4) & subset_of(x5,x3) & subset_of(x4,x3) & n_conversation(x2) & n_boy(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_laugh(e1) & n_boy(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(with(x2,x3) & v_have(e1) & subset_of(x5,x3) & subset_of(x4,x3) & n_thing(x4) & n_other(x5) & n_conversation(x2) & n_boy(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & card_eq_1(x4) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_laugh(e1) & n_boy(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))