premise: A peloton is riding bikes through cobblestone.
hypothesis: People are standing around looking at art.
explanation_1: Although someone may ride a bike through a park and look at art, this statement contradicts because one can not stand around while riding a bike.
explanation_2: If people are riding bikes, they are not standing and looking at art..
explanation_3: People riding bikes through cobblestone cannot be standing around looking at art at the same time.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(through(e1,x3) & n_cobblestone(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1) & n_bike(x2) & n_peloton(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2.(around(e1,e2) & at(e2,x2) & n_art(x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_look(e2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & n_people(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_ride(e1) & through(e1,x3) & n_peloton(x1) & n_cobblestone(x3) & n_bike(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2.(v_stand(e1) & v_look(e2) & n_people(x1) & n_art(x2) & at(e2,x2) & around(e1,e2) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))