premise: A woman walks next to a subway exit.
hypothesis: A woman walks next to a subway exit.
explanation_1: A woman walks next to a subway exit. Both of the sentences are the exact same.
explanation_2: A woman walks near a subway.
explanation_3: These are the exact same sentences the woman walks.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(to(e1,x2) & n_exit(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_subway(x3) & r_next(e1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(to(e1,x2) & n_exit(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_subway(x3) & r_next(e1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_woman(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_walk(e1) & to(e1,x2) & r_next(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_woman(x1) & n_subway(x3) & n_exit(x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_walk(e1) & to(e1,x2) & r_next(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_woman(x1) & n_subway(x3) & n_exit(x2) & Actor(e1,x1))