premise: An athlete executes a judo throw while a judge watches.
hypothesis: The athlete competes in front of the judges.
explanation_1: When a judo athlete competes in front of judges, he often often executes a throw.
explanation_2: Executes a judo throw is a forming of competes, and in front of the judges is a rephrasing of while a judge watches.
explanation_3: executes a judo throw while a judge watches is inferred as  competes in front of the judges.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 p1 x1 x2 x3.(exists e3 x4.(Actor(e3,x4) & v_watch(e3) & n_judge(x4)) & while(e2,p1) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_throw(e2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_execute(e1) & n_judo(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_athlete(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_judge(x3) & n_athlete(x1) & in(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_front(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_compete(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 p1 x1 x2 x3.(while(e2,p1) & v_throw(e2) & v_execute(e1) & n_judo(x3) & n_athlete(x1) & exists e3 x4.(v_watch(e3) & n_judge(x4) & Actor(e3,x4)) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_compete(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_judge(x3) & n_front(x2) & n_athlete(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))