premise: A man in all black clothes does a breakdancing move.
hypothesis: The man in all black is doing the tango.
explanation_1: The tango is not a breakdancing move.
explanation_2: Breakdancing and tango are two distinct forms of dancing.
explanation_3: Breakdancing and tango are very different, the man must be doing one or the other.
premise_logic: exists x1.(all s1 x2.((n_clothes(x2) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s1,x2)) -> exists e1 e2 x3.(Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_do(e2) & n_move(x3) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_breakdance(e1) & in(x1,x2))) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x3.(n_tango(x3) & n_man(x1) & all x2.(n_black(x2) -> exists e1.(Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_do(e1) & in(x1,x2))))
premise_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & all s1 x2.(exists e1 e2 x3.(v_do(e2) & v_breakdance(e1) & n_move(x3) & in(x1,x2) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x3)) | -n_clothes(x2) | -a_black(s1) | -Theme(s1,x2)))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x3.(n_tango(x3) & n_man(x1) & all x2.(exists e1.(v_do(e1) & in(x1,x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1)) | -n_black(x2)))