premise: A skateboarder glides down a railing of some stairs.
hypothesis: A girl rides her tricycle through the neighborhood.
explanation_1: A skateboarder wouldn't be riding a tricycle.
explanation_2: a skateboarder would not be riding a tricycle but a skateboard.
explanation_3: One cannot be a skateboarder who glides if they are a girl riding a tricycle.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(a_down(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_glide(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_stair(x3) & n_railing(x2) & n_skateboarder(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_neighborhood(x3) & through(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1) & n_tricycle(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_female(x1) & n_girl(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_glide(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_stair(x3) & n_skateboarder(x1) & n_railing(x2) & a_down(s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_ride(e1) & through(e1,x3) & of(x2,x1) & n_tricycle(x2) & n_neighborhood(x3) & n_girl(x1) & n_female(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))