premise: Male crowd surfing at a concert.
hypothesis: A man is drunk at a concert.
explanation_1: A man crowd surfing at a concert doesn't mean his drunk
explanation_2: Not all men at a concert are drunk.
explanation_3: surfing doesn't imply drunk state
premise_logic: exists s1 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & at(x1,x3) & n_concert(x3) & n_surfing(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_crowd(x2) & a_male(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists s1 x1 x2.(at(s1,x2) & n_concert(x2) & Theme(s1,x1) & a_drunk(s1) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1 x2 x3.(of(x1,x2) & n_surfing(x1) & n_crowd(x2) & n_concert(x3) & at(x1,x3) & a_topic(x1) & a_male(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists s1 x1 x2.(n_man(x1) & n_concert(x2) & at(s1,x2) & a_drunk(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))