premise: A man and woman sit at a cluttered table.
hypothesis: The table is neat and clean.
explanation_1: A cluttered table is not neat and clean.
explanation_2: Cluttered and neat and clean are opposite to each other.
explanation_3: One sentence says the table is cluttered, the other says the table is neat and clean
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(at(e1,x4) & n_table(x4) & a_cluttered(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_woman(x3) & n_man(x2) & subset_of(x3,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists s1 s2 x1.(n_table(x1) & Theme(s2,x1) & a_clean(s2) & Theme(s1,x1) & a_neat(s1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_sit(e1) & subset_of(x3,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_woman(x3) & n_table(x4) & n_man(x2) & at(e1,x4) & a_cluttered(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists s1 s2 x1.(n_table(x1) & a_neat(s1) & a_clean(s2) & Theme(s2,x1) & Theme(s1,x1))