premise: There is not an image here.
hypothesis: There is an image here.
explanation_1: If there is an image present, it is impossible that there is not an image.
explanation_2: It is not possible for there to be both an image and not an image simultaneously.
explanation_3: Sentence 1 explains there is not an image and sentence 2 explains there is an image.
premise_logic: exists x1.-exists p1 s1.(a_here(s1) & Manner(p1,s1) & exists x2.((x1 = x2) & n_image(x2)))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 s1 x1.(a_here(s1) & Manner(p1,s1) & exists x2.((x1 = x2) & n_image(x2)))
premise_sim: exists x1.all p1 s1.(all x2.(-n_image(x2) | -(x1 = x2)) | -a_here(s1) | -Manner(p1,s1))
hypothesis_sim: exists p1 s1 x1.(exists x2.(n_image(x2) & (x1 = x2)) & a_here(s1) & Manner(p1,s1))