premise: Skiiers are walking through the snow near the mountains.
hypothesis: There are people and animals in the snow.
explanation_1: Skiiers walking threw the snow does not infer that they are with animals.
explanation_2: Skiiers are walking through the snow doesn't imply there are animals in the snow.
explanation_3: Just because there are people in the snow doesn't mean that there are animals, too.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_mountain(x3) & n_snow(x2) & through(e1,x2) & near(x2,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_skiier(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_snow(x2) & in(p1,x2) & exists x3 x4 x5.((x1 = x3) & subset_of(x5,x3) & n_animal(x5) & subset_of(x4,x3) & n_people(x4)))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_walk(e1) & through(e1,x2) & near(x2,x3) & n_snow(x2) & n_skiier(x1) & n_mountain(x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_snow(x2) & in(p1,x2) & exists x3 x4 x5.(subset_of(x5,x3) & subset_of(x4,x3) & n_people(x4) & n_animal(x5) & (x1 = x3)))