premise: A youth is kicking a soccer ball in an empty brick area.
hypothesis: Nobody is kicking.
explanation_1: The nobody is kicking contradicts the youth is kicking.
explanation_2: If nobody is kicking then the youth cannot be kicking a soccer ball.
explanation_3: A youth cannot be kicking a soccer ball when nobody is kicking.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_kick(e1) & in(x2,x4) & n_area(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_brick(x5) & a_empty(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & n_ball(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_soccer(x3) & n_youth(x1))
hypothesis_logic: -exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_kick(e1) & n_person(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_kick(e1) & of(x4,x5) & of(x2,x3) & n_youth(x1) & n_soccer(x3) & n_brick(x5) & n_ball(x2) & n_area(x4) & in(x2,x4) & a_empty(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: all e1 x1.(-v_kick(e1) | -n_person(x1) | -Actor(e1,x1))