premise: A man in a shirt and tie does the splits on a wood floor
hypothesis: The man is a gymnast.
explanation_1: Just because man does the splits does not infer that he is a gymnast.
explanation_2: Not every man that can do splits is a gymnast.
explanation_3: Being in a shirt and tie doesn't iply being a gymnast.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(n_splits(x5) & on(e1,x6) & n_floor(x6) & of(x6,x7) & n_wood(x7) & Theme(e1,x5) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_do(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_tie(x4) & n_shirt(x3) & subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2.((x1 = x2) & n_gymnast(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(v_do(e1) & subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & on(e1,x6) & of(x6,x7) & n_wood(x7) & n_tie(x4) & n_splits(x5) & n_shirt(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_floor(x6) & in(x1,x2) & Theme(e1,x5) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2.(n_gymnast(x2) & (x1 = x2)))