premise: A man and three kids walk up a paved hill.
hypothesis: A man walks his children home from school.
explanation_1: Just because a man is walking with kids does not mean they are his children. You can walk up a hall and not be leaving school.
explanation_2: Just because a man and three kids walk does not mean they are his children.
explanation_3: A man with kids doesn't necessarily mean they are coming from school.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(up(e1,x3) & n_hill(x3) & a_paved(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_kid(x1) & card_eq_3(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(from(e1,x4) & n_school(x4) & Time(e1,x3) & n_home(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_child(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_walk(e1) & up(e1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2) & n_kid(x1) & n_hill(x3) & card_eq_3(x1) & a_paved(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_walk(e1) & of(x2,x1) & n_school(x4) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_home(x3) & n_child(x2) & from(e1,x4) & Time(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))