premise: A man in a hat is riding a motorized skateboard.
hypothesis: The skateboarder is taking a break by sitting on the bench.
explanation_1: The man is either riding or sitting but not both at the same time.
explanation_2: A person taking a break by sitting on the bench cannot be riding a skateboard at the same time.
explanation_3: The skateboard is not necessarily a man. If one is taking a break, one is not riding.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_ride(e2) & n_skateboard(x3) & Theme(e1,x3) & v_motorize(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_hat(x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_bench(x3) & n_skateboarder(x1) & by(e1,e2) & on(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_sit(e2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_take(e1) & n_break(x2))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_ride(e2) & v_motorize(e1) & n_skateboard(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_hat(x2) & in(x1,x2) & Theme(e2,x3) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_take(e1) & v_sit(e2) & on(e2,x3) & n_skateboarder(x1) & n_break(x2) & n_bench(x3) & by(e1,e2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))