premise: Man in a suit in Grand Central station.
hypothesis: The man is not in a suit.
explanation_1: The man is either wearing a suit or not wearing a suit.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & in(x2,x3) & n_station(x3) & (x3 = x5) & ne_geo_central(x5) & (x3 = x4) & ne_geo_grand(x4) & n_suit(x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & -exists p1 x2.(in(x1,x2) & n_suit(x2)))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(ne_geo_grand(x4) & ne_geo_central(x5) & n_suit(x2) & n_station(x3) & n_man(x1) & in(x2,x3) & in(x1,x2) & a_topic(x1) & (x3 = x5) & (x3 = x4))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & all x2.(-n_suit(x2) | -in(x1,x2)))