premise: a bmx rider gets a lot of air.
hypothesis: A person is sitting in the bleachers.
explanation_1: The two sentences are not talking about the same person. The bmx rider getting air is clearly not sitting in the bleachers.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_get(e1) & of(x3,x4) & n_air(x4) & n_lot(x3) & n_rider(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_bmx(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_bleacher(x2) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_person(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_get(e1) & of(x3,x4) & of(x1,x2) & n_rider(x1) & n_lot(x3) & n_bmx(x2) & n_air(x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_sit(e1) & n_person(x1) & n_bleacher(x2) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))