premise: Two skateboarders are on the road with a window full of flags in the background.
hypothesis: Skateboarders are skating past a decorated window.
explanation_1: If the skateboarders are on the road, it is logical that they may be skating.  A window full of flags is certainly decorated - by flags.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x6.(n_background(x6) & n_road(x2) & exists s1 x3 x4 x5.(on(x1,x2) & with(x2,x3) & of(s1,x5) & in(x5,x6) & n_flag(x5) & Theme(s1,x4) & a_full(s1) & (x3 = x4) & n_window(x3)) & n_skateboarder(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2.(past(e1,x2) & n_window(x2) & Theme(e2,x2) & v_decorate(e2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_skate(e1) & n_skateboarder(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x6.(n_skateboarder(x1) & n_road(x2) & n_background(x6) & exists s1 x3 x4 x5.(with(x2,x3) & on(x1,x2) & of(s1,x5) & n_window(x3) & n_flag(x5) & in(x5,x6) & a_full(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & (x3 = x4)) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2.(v_skate(e1) & v_decorate(e2) & past(e1,x2) & n_window(x2) & n_skateboarder(x1) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))