premise: The children are on a tire swing.
hypothesis: The children are sitting on the tire swing.
explanation_1: you have to be sitting to be on a tire swing
premise_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_child(x1) & exists x2 x3.(on(x1,x2) & n_swing(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_tire(x3)))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_swing(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_tire(x3) & n_child(x1) & on(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1))
premise_sim: exists x1.(n_child(x1) & exists x2 x3.(on(x1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_tire(x3) & n_swing(x2)))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_sit(e1) & on(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_tire(x3) & n_swing(x2) & n_child(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))