premise: The skier is on the snow.
hypothesis: The skier can't wait to go skiing
explanation_1: This implies that the skier is not skiing on snow because the skier can't wait to go skiing
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_snow(x2) & n_skier(x1) & on(x1,x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1.(n_skier(x1) & -exists e1 p1.(exists e2 p2.(Topic(e2,p2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_wait(e2) & exists e3 x2.(Theme(e3,x2) & Actor(e3,x1) & v_go(e3) & n_skiing(x2))) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_can(e1)))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2.(on(x1,x2) & n_snow(x2) & n_skier(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_skier(x1) & all e1 p1.(all e2 p2.(all e3 x2.(-v_go(e3) | -n_skiing(x2) | -Theme(e3,x2) | -Actor(e3,x1)) | -v_wait(e2) | -Topic(e2,p2) | -Actor(e2,x1)) | -v_can(e1) | -Topic(e1,p1) | -Actor(e1,x1)))