premise: Business attired man having a shoeshine on a busy street.
hypothesis: Businessman is having a shoeshine on a street.
explanation_1: The first sentence describes in deeper detail the business attired man, instead of just the business man, and they also describe the street as busy, omitting the extra details, you can just see it as some plain old business man on the street having a shoeshine.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(ne_nam_business(x1) & for(e1,e2) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_have(e2) & on(x3,x4) & n_street(x4) & a_busy(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & n_shoeshine(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_attire(e1) & n_man(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(ne_nam_businessman(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1) & on(x2,x3) & n_street(x3) & n_shoeshine(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_have(e2) & v_attire(e1) & on(x3,x4) & ne_nam_business(x1) & n_street(x4) & n_shoeshine(x3) & n_man(x2) & for(e1,e2) & a_busy(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & Theme(e2,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_have(e1) & on(x2,x3) & ne_nam_businessman(x1) & n_street(x3) & n_shoeshine(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))