premise: two women walk down some stairs with intricate designs on the railings
hypothesis: The railings had designs.
explanation_1: Sentence 2 doesn't exactly follow sentence because it only mentions the railings and the designs, not even mentioning the two women walking down the stairs from sentence 1
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_railing(x4) & on(e1,x4) & down(e1,x2) & with(x2,x3) & n_design(x3) & a_intricate(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & n_stair(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_woman(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_railing(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1) & n_design(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(x2,x3) & v_walk(e1) & on(e1,x4) & n_woman(x1) & n_stair(x2) & n_railing(x4) & n_design(x3) & down(e1,x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_intricate(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_have(e1) & n_railing(x1) & n_design(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))