premise: A bicyclist is in the mud walking their bicycle.
hypothesis: There is mud.
explanation_1: There is a bicyclist who walking their bicycle in the mud.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x4.(n_bicycle(x4) & of(x4,x2) & n_thing(x2) & n_mud(x2) & exists e1 x3.(in(x1,x2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_walk(e1) & (x2 = x3)) & n_bicyclist(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.((x1 = x2) & n_mud(x2))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x4.(of(x4,x2) & n_thing(x2) & n_mud(x2) & n_bicyclist(x1) & n_bicycle(x4) & exists e1 x3.(v_walk(e1) & in(x1,x2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3)))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_mud(x2) & (x1 = x2))