premise: A small puppy rungs towards the camera.
hypothesis: The small puppy is in the bathtub.
explanation_1: The second story implies that the puppy is in a bathtub, which contradict it being outside of one and running towards a camera.
premise_logic: exists s1 s2 x1 x2.(n_camera(x2) & a_topic(x1) & towards(x1,x2) & n_rung(x1) & a_puppy(s2) & Theme(s2,x1) & a_small(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 s1 x1 x2.(n_bathtub(x2) & n_puppy(x1) & a_small(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & in(x1,x2))
premise_sim: exists s1 s2 x1 x2.(towards(x1,x2) & n_rung(x1) & n_camera(x2) & a_topic(x1) & a_small(s1) & a_puppy(s2) & Theme(s2,x1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists s1 x1 x2.(n_puppy(x1) & n_bathtub(x2) & in(x1,x2) & a_small(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))