premise: The boy is in the swimming pool.
hypothesis: The boy is swimming in the pool.
explanation_1: Just because the boy is in the pool, it doesn't mean he is swimming.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.(n_pool(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_swimming(x3) & n_boy(x1) & in(x1,x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_pool(x2) & n_boy(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_swim(e1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(of(x2,x3) & n_swimming(x3) & n_pool(x2) & n_boy(x1) & in(x1,x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_swim(e1) & n_pool(x2) & n_boy(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))