premise: This is a man walking near a busy street.
hypothesis: The man is walking because they don't have a car.
explanation_1: The man could be walking for a number of reasons that do not include they do not have a car.  Who  are they?  Only a man is mentioned.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_thing(x1) & exists s1 x2 x3 x4.((x1 = x2) & near(x2,x4) & n_street(x4) & a_busy(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & n_walking(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_man(x3)))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1.(n_thing(x1) & n_man(x1) & -exists e2 x2.(Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_have(e2) & n_car(x2)) & because(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1))
premise_sim: exists x1.(n_thing(x1) & exists s1 x2 x3 x4.(of(x2,x3) & near(x2,x4) & n_walking(x2) & n_street(x4) & n_man(x3) & a_busy(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & (x1 = x2)))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1.(v_walk(e1) & n_thing(x1) & n_man(x1) & because(e1,p1) & all e2 x2.(-v_have(e2) | -n_car(x2) | -Theme(e2,x2) | -Actor(e2,x1)) & Actor(e1,x1))