premise: Three children and two adults walk under large wooden beams.
hypothesis: Five adults walk under a stone bridge.
explanation_1: Three children and two adults under large wooden beams cannot also be five adults under a stone bridge.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(under(e1,x4) & n_beam(x4) & a_wooden(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & a_large(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & subset_of(x3,x1) & n_adult(x3) & card_eq_2(x3) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_child(x2) & card_eq_3(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & under(e1,x3) & n_bridge(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_stone(x4) & Theme(e1,x2) & v_walk(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_adult(x1) & card_eq_5(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_walk(e1) & under(e1,x4) & subset_of(x3,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_child(x2) & n_beam(x4) & n_adult(x3) & card_eq_3(x2) & card_eq_2(x3) & a_wooden(s2) & a_large(s1) & Theme(s2,x4) & Theme(s1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_walk(e1) & under(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_stone(x4) & n_bridge(x3) & n_adult(x1) & card_eq_5(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))