premise: A woman in a coat uses a cellphone.
hypothesis: A man in a phone booth.
explanation_1: The first sentence describes a man, the second describes a woman. One is using a cellphone, and the other is using a phone booth.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_use(e1) & n_cellphone(x3) & in(x1,x2) & n_coat(x2) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & n_booth(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_phone(x3) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_use(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_coat(x2) & n_cellphone(x3) & in(x1,x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(of(x2,x3) & n_phone(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_booth(x2) & in(x1,x2) & a_topic(x1))