premise: Two men is separate canoes are in an area full of lillypads.
hypothesis: Two men are boogie boarding in the surf.
explanation_1: They cannot be boogie boarding in canoes. They are not in the surf if they are in an area full of lillypads.
premise_logic: exists p1 p2 x1 x2.(exists s2 x4 x5 x6.(in(x1,x4) & of(s2,x6) & n_lillypad(x6) & Theme(s2,x5) & a_full(s2) & (x4 = x5) & n_area(x4)) & exists s1 x3.((x2 = x3) & n_canoe(x3) & a_separate(s1) & Theme(s1,x3)) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_surf(x2) & in(p1,x2) & exists s1 x3.((x1 = x3) & n_boarding(x3) & a_boogie(s1) & Theme(s1,x3)) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_man(x1) & exists s2 x4 x5 x6.(of(s2,x6) & n_lillypad(x6) & n_area(x4) & in(x1,x4) & a_full(s2) & Theme(s2,x5) & (x4 = x5)) & exists s1 x3.(n_canoe(x3) & a_separate(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & (x2 = x3)) & card_eq_2(x1) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_surf(x2) & n_man(x1) & in(p1,x2) & exists s1 x3.(n_boarding(x3) & a_boogie(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & (x1 = x3)) & card_eq_2(x1))