premise: Four laughing women sitting around a dining table.
hypothesis: One woman has told the others a joke.
explanation_1: Four laughing women does not infer that only one is talking. Laughing women can laugh at many things, not just jokes.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & around(e2,x3) & n_table(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_dining(x4) & Actor(e2,x2) & v_sit(e2) & (x1 = x2) & n_woman(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_laugh(e1) & card_eq_4(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x3.(-(x3 = x1) & n_person(x3) & all x2.(n_joke(x2) -> exists e1.(Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_tell(e1) & for(x3,x2))) & n_person(x1) & n_woman(x1) & card_eq_1(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_sit(e2) & v_laugh(e1) & of(x3,x4) & n_woman(x1) & n_table(x3) & n_dining(x4) & card_eq_4(x1) & around(e2,x3) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e2,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x3.(n_woman(x1) & n_person(x3) & n_person(x1) & card_eq_1(x1) & all x2.(exists e1.(v_tell(e1) & for(x3,x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1)) | -n_joke(x2)) & -(x3 = x1))