premise: Two fisherman walking to work by the pier.
hypothesis: Two fisherman are walking.
explanation_1: Two fisherman are walking.  shows that two fisherman walking.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.(n_pier(x3) & a_topic(x1) & Topic(x1,p1) & exists e1.(by(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_work(e1)) & n_walking(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_fisherman(x2) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_fisherman(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.(of(x1,x2) & n_walking(x1) & n_pier(x3) & n_fisherman(x2) & exists e1.(v_work(e1) & by(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1)) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Topic(x1,p1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_walk(e1) & n_fisherman(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))