premise: Two boys are playing in a sprinkler.
hypothesis: The two boys are playing with a toy car.
explanation_1: The boys are playing in a sprinkler, not a toy car.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(in(e1,x2) & n_sprinkler(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_boy(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_boy(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & with(e1,x2) & n_car(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_toy(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_play(e1) & n_sprinkler(x2) & n_boy(x1) & in(e1,x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x2) & v_play(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_toy(x3) & n_car(x2) & n_boy(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))