premise: Two female football players attempt to deter the female football player with the ball.
hypothesis: the players are cheaters
explanation_1: When playing football as in sentence 1, the other players try to deter players on the other team. However, there is nothing in the first sentence to indicate that the two players are cheaters.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_ball(x5) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_attempt(e1) & exists e2.(Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_deter(e2) & with(x3,x5)) & n_player(x3) & of(x3,x2) & n_football(x2) & n_football(x2) & of(x3,x4) & n_female(x4) & n_player(x1) & of(x1,x2) & a_female(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_player(x1) & exists x2.((x1 = x2) & n_cheater(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 p1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_attempt(e1) & of(x3,x4) & of(x3,x2) & of(x1,x2) & n_player(x3) & n_player(x1) & n_football(x2) & n_female(x4) & n_ball(x5) & exists e2.(with(x3,x5) & v_deter(e2) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1)) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_female(s1) & Topic(e1,p1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_player(x1) & exists x2.(n_cheater(x2) & (x1 = x2)))