premise: Two people in the desert with a mountain in the background.
hypothesis: The two people visited the desert to look at the mountains in the background.
explanation_1: The fact that two people in the desert with a mountain in the background does not imply that they visited the desert to look at the mountains in the background.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_background(x4) & n_desert(x2) & a_topic(x1) & with(x1,x3) & in(x3,x4) & n_mountain(x3) & in(x1,x2) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_background(x4) & n_mountain(x3) & n_desert(x2) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & exists e2.(at(e2,x3) & in(x3,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_look(e2)) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_visit(e1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(x1,x3) & n_people(x1) & n_mountain(x3) & n_desert(x2) & n_background(x4) & in(x3,x4) & in(x1,x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_visit(e1) & n_people(x1) & n_mountain(x3) & n_desert(x2) & n_background(x4) & exists e2.(v_look(e2) & in(x3,x4) & at(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1)) & card_eq_2(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))