premise: kids are walking across a field in red clothes.
hypothesis: The kids were walking across the field.
explanation_1: The first sentence states that the kids are walking across a field and the second sentence states the same thing, that the kids were walking across the field.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(in(e1,x3) & n_clothes(x3) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & across(e1,x2) & n_field(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_kid(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_field(x2) & n_kid(x1) & across(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_walk(e1) & n_kid(x1) & n_field(x2) & n_clothes(x3) & in(e1,x3) & across(e1,x2) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_walk(e1) & n_kid(x1) & n_field(x2) & across(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))