premise: A girl and some ducks walk towards the water.
hypothesis: the ducks are following the girl to the pond
explanation_1: Sentence one says the girl and ducks walk. In sentence two it says the ducks are following. I doesn't imply that in the first sentence.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_water(x4) & towards(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & subset_of(x3,x1) & n_duck(x3) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_girl(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_pond(x3) & n_girl(x2) & n_duck(x1) & to(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_follow(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_walk(e1) & towards(e1,x4) & subset_of(x3,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_water(x4) & n_girl(x2) & n_duck(x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_follow(e1) & to(e1,x3) & n_pond(x3) & n_girl(x2) & n_duck(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))