premise: A fire burns in a barrel on the concrete floor while a man stands on a platform of scaffolding.
hypothesis: A man is standing on a platform.
explanation_1: There is a man standing on a platform.  Both sentences agree on that fact, but one gives more information, such as that there is a fire in a barrel and the platform is on a scaffolding.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(n_floor(x3) & a_concrete(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & exists e2 x4 x5 x6.(on(e2,x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_scaffolding(x6) & n_platform(x5) & Actor(e2,x4) & v_stand(e2) & n_man(x4)) & while(e1,p1) & on(e1,x3) & in(e1,x2) & n_barrel(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_burn(e1) & n_fire(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(on(e1,x2) & n_platform(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 p1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(while(e1,p1) & v_burn(e1) & on(e1,x3) & n_floor(x3) & n_fire(x1) & n_barrel(x2) & in(e1,x2) & exists e2 x4 x5 x6.(v_stand(e2) & on(e2,x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_scaffolding(x6) & n_platform(x5) & n_man(x4) & Actor(e2,x4)) & a_concrete(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_stand(e1) & on(e1,x2) & n_platform(x2) & n_man(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))