premise: Two people with dreadlocks.
hypothesis: two hippies smoke weed
explanation_1: People with dreadlocks are not necessarily hippies. It is not implied that they smoke weed.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2.(a_topic(x1) & with(x1,x2) & n_dreadlock(x2) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1.(exists e2.(Theme(e2,x1) & v_weed(e2)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_smoke(e1) & n_hippie(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2.(with(x1,x2) & n_people(x1) & n_dreadlock(x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1.(v_smoke(e1) & n_hippie(x1) & exists e2.(v_weed(e2) & Theme(e2,x1)) & card_eq_2(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1))