premise: A child runs down an elevated walkway in a city.
hypothesis: A child runs in a city.
explanation_1: Sentence 2 simply takes out the extra details of sentence 1, "down an elevated walkway" without the sentence losing meaning.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(down(e1,x2) & in(x2,x3) & n_city(x3) & n_walkway(x2) & a_elevated(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1) & n_child(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(in(e1,x2) & n_city(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1) & n_child(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_run(e1) & n_walkway(x2) & n_city(x3) & n_child(x1) & in(x2,x3) & down(e1,x2) & a_elevated(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_run(e1) & n_city(x2) & n_child(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))