premise: The children are on a tire swing.
hypothesis: The child is on the slide at the park.
explanation_1: A tire swing is not a slide.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_child(x1) & exists x2 x3.(on(x1,x2) & n_swing(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_tire(x3)))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.(n_park(x3) & n_slide(x2) & n_child(x1) & on(x1,x2) & at(x2,x3))
premise_sim: exists x1.(n_child(x1) & exists x2 x3.(on(x1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_tire(x3) & n_swing(x2)))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(on(x1,x2) & n_slide(x2) & n_park(x3) & n_child(x1) & at(x2,x3))