premise: There are handprints all over this mat.
hypothesis: The prints are from the sticky hands of a child.
explanation_1: the handprints on the mat does not infer they are from sticky hands
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_mat(x2) & r_all(p1) & over(p1,x2) & exists x3.((x1 = x3) & n_handprint(x3)))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 s1 x1 x2.(n_hand(x2) & a_sticky(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_print(x1) & exists x3.(from(x1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_child(x3)))
premise_sim: exists p1 x1 x2.(r_all(p1) & over(p1,x2) & n_mat(x2) & exists x3.(n_handprint(x3) & (x1 = x3)))
hypothesis_sim: exists s1 x1 x2.(n_print(x1) & n_hand(x2) & exists x3.(of(x2,x3) & n_child(x3) & from(x1,x2)) & a_sticky(s1) & Theme(s1,x2))