premise: The man is smoking in the picture.
hypothesis: This is a picture of a smoking man.
explanation_1: The man in picture smoking implies the picture is of a smoking man.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_picture(x2) & n_man(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_smoke(e1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_thing(x1) & exists x2 x3 x4.((x1 = x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_man(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_smoking(x4) & n_picture(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_smoke(e1) & n_picture(x2) & n_man(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_thing(x1) & exists x2 x3 x4.(of(x3,x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_smoking(x4) & n_picture(x2) & n_man(x3) & (x1 = x2)))