premise: a biker jumps over a pile of dirt.
hypothesis: The man is swimming in the ocean.
explanation_1: The actions and subject contradict each other. One cannot be swimming in the ocean while also jumping over dirt.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(over(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_dirt(x3) & n_pile(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_jump(e1) & n_biker(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_ocean(x2) & n_man(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_swim(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_jump(e1) & over(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_pile(x2) & n_dirt(x3) & n_biker(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_swim(e1) & n_ocean(x2) & n_man(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))