premise: Man on bike in mountains
hypothesis: Nobody is on a bike
explanation_1: A man is on the bike, so it is wrong to say nobody is on the bike.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & on(x1,x2) & in(x2,x3) & n_mountain(x3) & n_bike(x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: -exists p1 x1.(exists x2.(on(x1,x2) & n_bike(x2)) & n_person(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(on(x1,x2) & n_mountain(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_bike(x2) & in(x2,x3) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: all x1.(all x2.(-on(x1,x2) | -n_bike(x2)) | -n_person(x1))