premise: A man in a sports coat is talking into a microphone.
hypothesis: There is a microphone in front of a man
explanation_1: the man and microphone are rearranged in the following sentence without losing the meaning.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(into(e1,x4) & n_microphone(x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_talk(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_coat(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_sport(x3) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3 x4.((x1 = x2) & in(x2,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_man(x4) & n_front(x3) & n_microphone(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_talk(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_sport(x3) & n_microphone(x4) & n_man(x1) & n_coat(x2) & into(e1,x4) & in(x1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(of(x3,x4) & n_microphone(x2) & n_man(x4) & n_front(x3) & in(x2,x3) & (x1 = x2))