premise: A dog drinks from a sprinkler.
hypothesis: A dog is inside on the couch.
explanation_1: The dog is inside on couch which is contradictory to the dog drinking from a sprinkler.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & from(x1,x3) & n_sprinkler(x3) & n_drink(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_dog(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 s1 x1 x2.(n_couch(x2) & a_inside(s1) & Manner(p1,s1) & on(x1,x2) & n_dog(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(of(x1,x2) & n_sprinkler(x3) & n_drink(x1) & n_dog(x2) & from(x1,x3) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists p1 s1 x1 x2.(on(x1,x2) & n_dog(x1) & n_couch(x2) & a_inside(s1) & Manner(p1,s1))