premise: A little boy is eating pie without utensils.
hypothesis: A bot eats a pie.
explanation_1: That a boy eats a pie is the paraphrase of a little boy is eating pie without utensils
premise_logic: exists p1 s1 x1.(-exists x3.(with(p1,x3) & n_utensil(x3)) & exists s2 x2.((x1 = x2) & n_pie(x2) & a_eating(s2) & Theme(s2,x2)) & n_boy(x1) & a_little(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_eat(e1) & n_pie(x2) & n_bot(x1))
premise_sim: exists p1 s1 x1.(n_boy(x1) & exists s2 x2.(n_pie(x2) & a_eating(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & (x1 = x2)) & all x3.(-with(p1,x3) | -n_utensil(x3)) & a_little(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_eat(e1) & n_pie(x2) & n_bot(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))