premise: Three kids in a martial arts class are in a stance; each child has on a different color belt.
hypothesis: Three kids challenge each other in karate.
explanation_1: Just because the kids are in a martial arts class together doesn't mean they are challenging each other in karate.
premise_logic: exists p1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(all x5.(n_child(x5) -> exists e1 x6 x7 x8.(on(e1,x6) & -(x6 = x8) & n_belt(x8) & of(x8,x7) & n_color(x7) & n_belt(x6) & of(x6,x7) & Actor(e1,x5) & v_have(e1))) & exists x4.(in(x1,x4) & n_stance(x4)) & in(x1,x2) & n_class(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_art(x3) & a_martial(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_kid(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1.(all x2.(n_other(x2) -> exists e1 x3.(in(e1,x3) & n_karate(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_challenge(e1))) & n_kid(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1 x2 x3.(of(x2,x3) & n_kid(x1) & n_class(x2) & n_art(x3) & in(x1,x2) & exists x4.(n_stance(x4) & in(x1,x4)) & card_eq_3(x1) & all x5.(exists e1 x6 x7 x8.(v_have(e1) & on(e1,x6) & of(x8,x7) & of(x6,x7) & n_color(x7) & n_belt(x8) & n_belt(x6) & Actor(e1,x5) & -(x6 = x8)) | -n_child(x5)) & a_martial(s1) & Theme(s1,x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_kid(x1) & card_eq_3(x1) & all x2.(exists e1 x3.(v_challenge(e1) & n_karate(x3) & in(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1)) | -n_other(x2)))