premise: A snowboarder flies through the air above the snow.
hypothesis: The snowboard is on the ground.
explanation_1: In sentence one the snowboard is flying and in motion. In sentence 2 the snowboard is on the ground. The snowboard cannot do both actions at once which makes the information contradictory.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_snow(x3) & n_air(x2) & through(e1,x2) & above(x2,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_fly(e1) & n_snowboarder(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_ground(x2) & n_snowboard(x1) & on(x1,x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_fly(e1) & through(e1,x2) & n_snowboarder(x1) & n_snow(x3) & n_air(x2) & above(x2,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(on(x1,x2) & n_snowboard(x1) & n_ground(x2))