premise: A man and a boy ride a four wheeled vehicle.
hypothesis: A man and a boy are driving through the mud.
explanation_1: A man and a boy ride a four wheeled vehicle does not mean that they driving through the mud.
premise_logic: exists s1 x1.(a_topic(s1) & all s2 x2.((n_vehicle(x2) & a_wheeled(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & card_eq_4(x2)) -> exists x3 x4.(subset_of(x3,s1) & for(x3,x2) & n_ride(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_boy(x4))) & subset_of(x1,s1) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_mud(x4) & through(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_drive(e1) & subset_of(x3,x1) & n_boy(x3) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_man(x2))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1.(subset_of(x1,s1) & n_man(x1) & all s2 x2.(exists x3 x4.(subset_of(x3,s1) & of(x3,x4) & n_ride(x3) & n_boy(x4) & for(x3,x2)) | -n_vehicle(x2) | -card_eq_4(x2) | -a_wheeled(s2) | -Theme(s2,x2)) & a_topic(s1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_drive(e1) & through(e1,x4) & subset_of(x3,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_mud(x4) & n_man(x2) & n_boy(x3) & Actor(e1,x1))