premise: The children played on the four wheeler in the field.
hypothesis: The children are great riders.
explanation_1: playing on the four wheeler in the field is not an indication that the children are great riders.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_field(x3) & n_wheeler(x2) & card_eq_4(x2) & n_child(x1) & on(e1,x2) & in(x2,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_child(x1) & exists s1 x2.((x1 = x2) & n_rider(x2) & a_great(s1) & Theme(s1,x2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_play(e1) & on(e1,x2) & n_wheeler(x2) & n_field(x3) & n_child(x1) & in(x2,x3) & card_eq_4(x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_child(x1) & exists s1 x2.(n_rider(x2) & a_great(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & (x1 = x2)))