premise: A man with glasses is at the dentist.
hypothesis: A man is with a toothache is at the dentist.
explanation_1: There is nothing to indicate he is at the dentist because of a toothache.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.(n_dentist(x3) & at(x1,x3) & with(x1,x2) & n_glass(x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x4.(n_dentist(x4) & exists p2 x2 x3.(with(x1,x2) & at(x3,x4) & (x2 = x3) & n_toothache(x2)) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(with(x1,x2) & n_man(x1) & n_glass(x2) & n_dentist(x3) & at(x1,x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x4.(n_man(x1) & n_dentist(x4) & exists x2 x3.(with(x1,x2) & n_toothache(x2) & at(x3,x4) & (x2 = x3)))