premise: Two young boys are sitting on a trampoline talking to each other.
hypothesis: Two boys talk to each other about sports.
explanation_1: Just because two young boys are sitting on a trampoline talking to each other does not mean it is about sports.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 x1 x2.(for(e1,e2) & all x3.(n_other(x3) -> to(e2,x3)) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_talk(e2) & on(e1,x2) & n_trampoline(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_boy(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(all x2.(n_other(x2) -> exists x3.(to(e1,x2) & about(x2,x3) & n_sport(x3))) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_talk(e1) & n_boy(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 s1 x1 x2.(v_talk(e2) & v_sit(e1) & on(e1,x2) & n_trampoline(x2) & n_boy(x1) & for(e1,e2) & card_eq_2(x1) & all x3.(to(e2,x3) | -n_other(x3)) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_talk(e1) & n_boy(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & all x2.(exists x3.(to(e1,x2) & n_sport(x3) & about(x2,x3)) | -n_other(x2)) & Actor(e1,x1))