premise: A child is in a harness with onlookers.
hypothesis: The child is in a carseat.
explanation_1: child in a harness not prove that he is in a carseat
premise_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2 x3.(in(x1,x2) & with(x2,x3) & n_onlooker(x3) & n_harness(x2)) & n_child(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_child(x1) & exists x2.(in(x1,x2) & n_carseat(x2)))
premise_sim: exists x1.(n_child(x1) & exists x2 x3.(with(x2,x3) & n_onlooker(x3) & n_harness(x2) & in(x1,x2)))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_child(x1) & exists x2.(n_carseat(x2) & in(x1,x2)))