premise: Two boys are playing in a sprinkler.
hypothesis: Two men are fighting over rights to a waterfall.
explanation_1: There are two boys, not two men. They are playing, not fighting over the rights to a waterfall.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(in(e1,x2) & n_sprinkler(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_boy(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(over(e1,x2) & to(x2,x3) & n_waterfall(x3) & n_rights(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_fight(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_play(e1) & n_sprinkler(x2) & n_boy(x1) & in(e1,x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_fight(e1) & to(x2,x3) & over(e1,x2) & n_waterfall(x3) & n_rights(x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))