premise: Three men are looking at a sign on a cross in a canyon.
hypothesis: Three men are at a canyon.
explanation_1: Men looking at a sign in a canyon must be at a canyon.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(at(e1,x2) & on(x2,x3) & in(x3,x4) & n_canyon(x4) & n_cross(x3) & n_sign(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2.(at(x1,x2) & n_canyon(x2)) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_look(e1) & on(x2,x3) & n_sign(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_cross(x3) & n_canyon(x4) & in(x3,x4) & card_eq_3(x1) & at(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2.(n_canyon(x2) & at(x1,x2)) & card_eq_3(x1))