premise: A man holds up a tiny sign reading "I'm a photographer not a terrorist."
hypothesis: A man is at a protest.
explanation_1: The man must be in a partial state of mind because he is at a protest but still uses the word terrorist. It cannot be concluded based on prior information because it may be a publicity stunt.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 x1 x2.(for(e1,e2) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_read(e2) & -exists p1 x3 x4.(n_terrorist(x4) & Time(p1,x4) & exists x5.((x3 = x5) & n_photographer(x5)) & (x2 = x3)) & n_person(x2) & a_up(s2) & Manner(e1,s2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_hold(e1) & n_sign(x2) & a_tiny(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2.(at(x1,x2) & n_protest(x2)) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 x1 x2.(v_read(e2) & v_hold(e1) & n_sign(x2) & n_person(x2) & n_man(x1) & for(e1,e2) & all p1 x3 x4.(all x5.(-n_photographer(x5) | -(x3 = x5)) | -n_terrorist(x4) | -Time(p1,x4) | -(x2 = x3)) & a_up(s2) & a_tiny(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Theme(e2,x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Manner(e1,s2) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2.(n_protest(x2) & at(x1,x2)))