premise: Two dogs urinating on a red fire hydrant.
hypothesis: pets are smart enough
explanation_1: These sentence have nothing to do with one another. One sentence is explains two animals urinating while the other is explains that animals are smart.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & on(e1,x3) & n_hydrant(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_fire(x4) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_urinate(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists s1 s2 x1.(a_enough(s2) & Manner(s1,s2) & Theme(s1,x1) & a_smart(s1) & n_pet(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_urinate(e1) & on(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_hydrant(x3) & n_fire(x4) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists s1 s2 x1.(n_pet(x1) & a_smart(s1) & a_enough(s2) & Theme(s1,x1) & Manner(s1,s2))