premise: A woman with a drink and a woman with a cellphone.
hypothesis: Two women are out shopping at a mall.
explanation_1: The women may not be at the mall just because they are shopping.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & with(x1,x2) & subset_of(x4,x2) & with(x4,x5) & n_cellphone(x5) & n_woman(x4) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_drink(x3) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2 x3.(out(x1,x2) & at(x2,x3) & n_mall(x3) & n_shopping(x2)) & n_woman(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(with(x4,x5) & with(x1,x2) & subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_woman(x4) & n_woman(x1) & n_drink(x3) & n_cellphone(x5) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_woman(x1) & exists x2 x3.(out(x1,x2) & n_shopping(x2) & n_mall(x3) & at(x2,x3)) & card_eq_2(x1))