premise: Three people are kayaking and two have crashed into each other.
hypothesis: Two people crashed their paddle boards together.
explanation_1: In sentence one, there are three people kayaking and two have them have crashed into each other, leaving one person unharmed. In sentence two, there are two people and they crash their paddle boards together. They are doing different activities and the number of people are different.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2.(all x3.(n_other(x3) -> into(e2,x3)) & Actor(e2,x2) & v_crash(e2) & n_thing(x2) & card_eq_2(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_kayake(e1) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(a_together(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_crash(e1) & n_board(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_paddle(x3) & of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2.(v_kayake(e1) & v_crash(e2) & n_thing(x2) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_3(x1) & card_eq_2(x2) & all x3.(into(e2,x3) | -n_other(x3)) & Actor(e2,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_crash(e1) & of(x2,x3) & of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_people(x1) & n_paddle(x3) & n_board(x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_together(s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1))