premise: Two men on a raft with a sofa.
hypothesis: The two men are trying to move the sofa across a river and have chosen to take a raft.
explanation_1: Two men can be on a raft with a sofa and they may or may not be on water, it cannot be assumed that they are trying to move it across a river; similarly they may not have chosen to take a raft, it cannot be inferred that the raft was their decision.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & with(x1,x3) & n_sofa(x3) & on(x1,x2) & n_raft(x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e2 e1 p1 p2 x1 x2.(n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & n_sofa(x2) & Topic(e2,p2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_choose(e2) & exists e4 x4.(Theme(e4,x4) & Actor(e4,x1) & v_take(e4) & n_raft(x4)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_try(e1) & exists e3 x3.(across(e3,x3) & n_river(x3) & Theme(e3,x2) & Actor(e3,x1) & v_move(e3)))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(with(x1,x3) & on(x1,x2) & n_sofa(x3) & n_raft(x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e2 e1 p1 p2 x1 x2.(v_try(e1) & v_choose(e2) & n_sofa(x2) & n_man(x1) & exists e4 x4.(v_take(e4) & n_raft(x4) & Theme(e4,x4) & Actor(e4,x1)) & exists e3 x3.(v_move(e3) & n_river(x3) & across(e3,x3) & Theme(e3,x2) & Actor(e3,x1)) & card_eq_2(x1) & Topic(e2,p2) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))