premise: Two people and a dog are in the snow.
hypothesis: Three dogs are in the snow.
explanation_1: Two people is not the same as three dogs.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_snow(x4) & in(x1,x4) & subset_of(x3,x1) & n_dog(x3) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_people(x2) & card_eq_2(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_snow(x2) & in(x1,x2) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(subset_of(x3,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_snow(x4) & n_people(x2) & n_dog(x3) & in(x1,x4) & card_eq_2(x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_snow(x2) & n_dog(x1) & in(x1,x2) & card_eq_3(x1))