premise: two males and one female drinking beer sitting in chairs
hypothesis: People are napping.
explanation_1: Two males and one female is allot more specific than the statement of people, sitting in chairs contradicts napping.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(s1) & in(e1,x5) & n_chair(x5) & Actor(e1,x4) & v_sit(e1) & (s1 = x4) & n_beer(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_drinking(x3) & a_female(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & card_eq_1(x2) & n_male(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & subset_of(x2,s1) & subset_of(x1,s1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_nap(e1) & n_people(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_sit(e1) & subset_of(x2,s1) & subset_of(x1,s1) & of(x2,x3) & n_male(x1) & n_drinking(x3) & n_chair(x5) & n_beer(x2) & in(e1,x5) & card_eq_2(x1) & card_eq_1(x2) & a_topic(s1) & a_female(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & Actor(e1,x4) & (s1 = x4))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_nap(e1) & n_people(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))