premise: Oklahoma University kicker, kicking the football
hypothesis: Nobody is kicking
explanation_1: The pieces of information that contradict each other is the mention of nobody kicking in second sentence as against the kicker kicking the football in the first sentence.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_football(x4) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_kick(e1) & n_kicker(x1) & (x1 = x3) & ne_org_university(x3) & (x1 = x2) & ne_geo_oklahoma(x2))
hypothesis_logic: -exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_kick(e1) & n_person(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_kick(e1) & ne_org_university(x3) & ne_geo_oklahoma(x2) & n_kicker(x1) & n_football(x4) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & (x1 = x3) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: all e1 x1.(-v_kick(e1) | -n_person(x1) | -Actor(e1,x1))