premise: A young woman with a knit cap stands against the wall of a Domino's Pizza.
hypothesis: The woman is leaning against a wall smoking a cigarette.
explanation_1: You can be standing against a wall while not leaning on it. Nothing about smoking a cigarette was brought up in first sentence. You wouldn't know she was smoking unless told.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(n_wall(x4) & against(e1,x4) & of(x4,x6) & ne_org_pizza(x6) & of(x6,x5) & ne_org_domino(x5) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & with(x1,x2) & n_cap(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_knit(x3) & n_woman(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(n_woman(x1) & all x2.(n_cigarette(x2) -> exists x3 x4.(against(e1,x3) & for(x3,x2) & n_smoking(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_wall(x4))) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_lean(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(with(x1,x2) & v_stand(e1) & of(x6,x5) & of(x4,x6) & of(x2,x3) & ne_org_pizza(x6) & ne_org_domino(x5) & n_woman(x1) & n_wall(x4) & n_knit(x3) & n_cap(x2) & against(e1,x4) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_lean(e1) & n_woman(x1) & all x2.(exists x3 x4.(of(x3,x4) & n_wall(x4) & n_smoking(x3) & for(x3,x2) & against(e1,x3)) | -n_cigarette(x2)) & Actor(e1,x1))