premise: two hockey players are fighting for a puck
hypothesis: The hockey players are hitting each other.
explanation_1: Just because two hockey players are fighting for a puck does not show that they are hitting each other.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(for(e1,x3) & n_puck(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_fight(e1) & n_player(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_hockey(x2) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2.(n_player(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_hockey(x2) & all x3.(n_other(x3) -> exists e1.(Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_hit(e1))))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_fight(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_puck(x3) & n_player(x1) & n_hockey(x2) & for(e1,x3) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(of(x1,x2) & n_player(x1) & n_hockey(x2) & all x3.(exists e1.(v_hit(e1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1)) | -n_other(x3)))