premise: Two men and a woman are having a conversation on the street.
hypothesis: They were taking a knap on the side of the road.
explanation_1: Sentence one further explains there are two men and a woman, and they are having a conversation Sentence two is more vague, only stating they, and that they were taking a nap
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_street(x5) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1) & on(x4,x5) & n_conversation(x4) & subset_of(x3,x1) & n_woman(x3) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_man(x2) & card_eq_2(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_road(x4) & n_side(x3) & n_thing(x1) & on(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_take(e1) & n_knap(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_have(e1) & subset_of(x3,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1) & on(x4,x5) & n_woman(x3) & n_street(x5) & n_man(x2) & n_conversation(x4) & card_eq_2(x2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_take(e1) & on(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_thing(x1) & n_side(x3) & n_road(x4) & n_knap(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))