premise: Three traffic lights hang over Wilson Street.
hypothesis: Four traffic lights hang over Wilson Street.
explanation_1: The pieces of information that contradict each other is the number of Traffic lights mentioned as four against the three mentioned in first sentence.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(ne_per_street(x4) & (x4 = x5) & ne_per_wilson(x5) & a_topic(x1) & over(x1,x4) & n_hang(x1) & of(x1,x3) & n_light(x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_traffic(x2) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(ne_per_street(x4) & (x4 = x5) & ne_per_wilson(x5) & a_topic(x1) & over(x1,x4) & n_hang(x1) & of(x1,x3) & n_light(x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_traffic(x2) & card_eq_4(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(over(x1,x4) & of(x1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & ne_per_wilson(x5) & ne_per_street(x4) & n_traffic(x2) & n_light(x3) & n_hang(x1) & card_eq_3(x1) & a_topic(x1) & (x4 = x5))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(over(x1,x4) & of(x1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & ne_per_wilson(x5) & ne_per_street(x4) & n_traffic(x2) & n_light(x3) & n_hang(x1) & card_eq_4(x1) & a_topic(x1) & (x4 = x5))