premise: A player for the Oklahoma Sooners football team punts the ball during a game.
hypothesis: The football team was not alive.
explanation_1: The information in the second sentence stating the football team is not alive is starkly contradicting the mention of player who punts the ball in the first sentence.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(n_ball(x6) & n_team(x2) & of(x2,x5) & n_football(x5) & (x2 = x4) & ne_geo_sooners(x4) & (x2 = x3) & ne_geo_oklahoma(x3) & during(e1,x7) & n_game(x7) & Theme(e1,x6) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_punt(e1) & for(x1,x2) & n_player(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2.(n_team(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_football(x2) & -exists s1.(Theme(s1,x1) & a_alive(s1)))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(v_punt(e1) & of(x2,x5) & ne_geo_sooners(x4) & ne_geo_oklahoma(x3) & n_team(x2) & n_player(x1) & n_game(x7) & n_football(x5) & n_ball(x6) & for(x1,x2) & during(e1,x7) & Theme(e1,x6) & Actor(e1,x1) & (x2 = x4) & (x2 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(of(x1,x2) & n_team(x1) & n_football(x2) & all s1.(-a_alive(s1) | -Theme(s1,x1)))