premise: Many marathon runners on a stretch of path in a wintry park.
hypothesis: The runners are in the park
explanation_1: Sentence 2 can be inferred from sentence 1.  Or it cannot be inferred that the runner are currently in the park.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(a_topic(x1) & on(x1,x3) & in(x3,x5) & n_park(x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_wintry(x6) & of(x3,x4) & n_path(x4) & n_stretch(x3) & n_runner(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_marathon(x2) & n_quantity(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_park(x2) & n_runner(x1) & in(x1,x2))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(on(x1,x3) & of(x5,x6) & of(x3,x4) & of(x1,x2) & n_wintry(x6) & n_stretch(x3) & n_runner(x1) & n_quantity(x1) & n_path(x4) & n_park(x5) & n_marathon(x2) & in(x3,x5) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_runner(x1) & n_park(x2) & in(x1,x2))