premise: A man in a hat and an apron works on a bicycle.
hypothesis: the man is a cook
explanation_1: Just because the man wears a hat and apron doesn't mean that he is a cook.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(on(e1,x5) & n_bicycle(x5) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_work(e1) & subset_of(x4,x1) & n_apron(x4) & subset_of(x2,x1) & in(x2,x3) & n_hat(x3) & n_man(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2.((x1 = x2) & n_cook(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_work(e1) & subset_of(x4,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1) & on(e1,x5) & n_man(x2) & n_hat(x3) & n_bicycle(x5) & n_apron(x4) & in(x2,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2.(n_cook(x2) & (x1 = x2)))