premise: A woman and two children in uniforms are walking in a park.
hypothesis: A woman and two children are walking in a park.
explanation_1: Both sentences state A women and two children are waling in a park while sentence 1 states the children are in uniforms.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(in(e1,x4) & n_park(x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & in(x1,x3) & n_uniform(x3) & n_child(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_woman(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(in(e1,x4) & n_park(x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_child(x3) & card_eq_2(x3) & n_woman(x2) & subset_of(x3,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_walk(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_woman(x2) & n_uniform(x3) & n_park(x4) & n_child(x1) & in(x1,x3) & in(e1,x4) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_walk(e1) & subset_of(x3,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_woman(x2) & n_park(x4) & n_child(x3) & in(e1,x4) & card_eq_2(x3) & Actor(e1,x1))