premise: Two boxers are in the ring.
hypothesis: The boxers like to hit each other in the face.
explanation_1: the boxers may not be boxing and they may not like to hit each other in the face.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_ring(x2) & in(x1,x2) & n_boxer(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x3.(n_face(x3) & n_boxer(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_like(e1) & all x2.(n_other(x2) -> exists e2.(in(e2,x3) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_hit(e2))))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_ring(x2) & n_boxer(x1) & in(x1,x2) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x3.(v_like(e1) & n_face(x3) & n_boxer(x1) & all x2.(exists e2.(v_hit(e2) & in(e2,x3) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1)) | -n_other(x2)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1))