premise: A white dog in a jump, holding a plate in his mouth.
hypothesis: The dog is green.
explanation_1: One sentence 1 the dog is white, and in sentence 2 the dog is green. Dogs are never green, but they are different colors in each sentence which makes the information contradictory.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & in(e1,x5) & n_mouth(x5) & of(x5,x1) & n_male(x1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_hold(e1) & n_plate(x4) & (x2 = x3) & n_jump(x2) & n_dog(x1) & a_white(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists s1 x1.(n_dog(x1) & Theme(s1,x1) & a_green(s1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_hold(e1) & of(x5,x1) & n_plate(x4) & n_mouth(x5) & n_male(x1) & n_jump(x2) & n_dog(x1) & in(x1,x2) & in(e1,x5) & a_white(s1) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists s1 x1.(n_dog(x1) & a_green(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))