premise: A young overlooks a city street from a balcony.
hypothesis: There is no balcony.
explanation_1: It say they are looking from a balcony ,then that there is no balcony.
premise_logic: all x1 x2.((n_street(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_city(x2)) -> exists s1 x3 x4.(a_topic(x3) & from(x3,x4) & n_balcony(x4) & for(x3,x1) & n_overlook(x3) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x3)))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.-exists x2.((x1 = x2) & n_balcony(x2))
premise_sim: all x1 x2.(exists s1 x3 x4.(n_overlook(x3) & n_balcony(x4) & from(x3,x4) & for(x3,x1) & a_young(s1) & a_topic(x3) & Theme(s1,x3)) | -of(x1,x2) | -n_street(x1) | -n_city(x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.all x2.(-n_balcony(x2) | -(x1 = x2))