premise: Two boys sand next to a drinking fountain in a park.
hypothesis: The boys are drinking water.
explanation_1: Just because two boys stand next to a drinking fountain in a park does not indicate that they are drinking water
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(a_topic(x1) & to(x3,x4) & in(x4,x6) & n_park(x6) & n_fountain(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_drinking(x5) & next(x1,x3) & n_thing(x3) & n_sand(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_boy(x2) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_boy(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_drink(e1) & n_water(x2))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(to(x3,x4) & of(x4,x5) & of(x1,x2) & next(x1,x3) & n_thing(x3) & n_sand(x1) & n_park(x6) & n_fountain(x4) & n_drinking(x5) & n_boy(x2) & in(x4,x6) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_drink(e1) & n_water(x2) & n_boy(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))