premise: Three men are walking down a road.
hypothesis: Three men walking to work.
explanation_1: because they are walking doesn't mean they are walking to work
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(down(e1,x2) & n_road(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(a_topic(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_walk(e1) & exists e2.(Actor(e2,x2) & v_work(e2)) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_walk(e1) & n_road(x2) & n_man(x1) & down(e1,x2) & card_eq_3(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(v_walk(e1) & n_man(x1) & exists e2.(v_work(e2) & Actor(e2,x2)) & card_eq_3(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))