premise: lady smoking a cigarette walking
hypothesis: The lady is not a smoker.
explanation_1: Someone who is not a smoker would not be smoking a cigarette
premise_logic: all x1 x2.((n_walking(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_cigarette(x2)) -> exists x3 x4.(a_topic(x3) & for(x3,x1) & n_smoking(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_lady(x4)))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1.(n_lady(x1) & -exists p1 x2.((x1 = x2) & n_smoker(x2)))
premise_sim: all x1 x2.(exists x3 x4.(of(x3,x4) & n_smoking(x3) & n_lady(x4) & for(x3,x1) & a_topic(x3)) | -of(x1,x2) | -n_walking(x1) | -n_cigarette(x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_lady(x1) & all x2.(-n_smoker(x2) | -(x1 = x2)))