premise: Two men with paddles in the water.
hypothesis: Two men are paddling a boat through the water.
explanation_1: Two men may not be paddling, only one or possibly both are not
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(n_water(x3) & a_topic(x1) & with(x1,x2) & in(x2,x3) & n_paddle(x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_water(x3) & through(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_paddle(e1) & n_boat(x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(with(x1,x2) & n_water(x3) & n_paddle(x2) & n_man(x1) & in(x2,x3) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_paddle(e1) & through(e1,x3) & n_water(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_boat(x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))