premise: Three handicap bicyclist are racing against each other.
hypothesis: Three dogs are barking at each other.
explanation_1: Bicyclists are not dogs.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(all x3.(n_other(x3) -> against(e1,x3)) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_race(e1) & n_bicyclist(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_handicap(x2) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(all x2.(n_other(x2) -> at(e1,x2)) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_bark(e1) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_race(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_handicap(x2) & n_bicyclist(x1) & card_eq_3(x1) & all x3.(against(e1,x3) | -n_other(x3)) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_bark(e1) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_3(x1) & all x2.(at(e1,x2) | -n_other(x2)) & Actor(e1,x1))