premise: A woman in black and white is on a bicycle.
hypothesis: The woman cannot ride a bike.
explanation_1: It can't be inferred that the woman can't ride a bike. Maybe she can.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(exists x5.(on(x1,x5) & n_bicycle(x5)) & in(x1,x2) & n_white(x4) & n_black(x3) & subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1.(n_woman(x1) & -exists e1 p1.(exists e2 x2.(Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_ride(e2) & n_bike(x2)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_can(e1)))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_woman(x1) & n_white(x4) & n_black(x3) & in(x1,x2) & exists x5.(on(x1,x5) & n_bicycle(x5)))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_woman(x1) & all e1 p1.(all e2 x2.(-v_ride(e2) | -n_bike(x2) | -Theme(e2,x2) | -Actor(e2,x1)) | -v_can(e1) | -Topic(e1,p1) | -Actor(e1,x1)))