premise: There's cyclist in street.
hypothesis: There are Harley Riders on Sesame Street.
explanation_1: If there's a cyclist in the street, the cyclist is not a Harley Rider.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(in(p1,x2) & n_street(x2) & exists x3.((x1 = x3) & n_cyclist(x3)))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x4 x5.(ne_per_street(x4) & (x4 = x5) & ne_per_sesame(x5) & exists x2 x3.((x1 = x2) & on(x2,x4) & n_rider(x2) & (x2 = x3) & ne_org_harley(x3)))
premise_sim: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_street(x2) & in(p1,x2) & exists x3.(n_cyclist(x3) & (x1 = x3)))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x4 x5.(ne_per_street(x4) & ne_per_sesame(x5) & exists x2 x3.(on(x2,x4) & ne_org_harley(x3) & n_rider(x2) & (x2 = x3) & (x1 = x2)) & (x4 = x5))