premise: Two young men are inspecting a vat and pipes on a dock or harbor.
hypothesis: The men work at the docks.
explanation_1: The two men are inspecting on a dock or harbor but there is no indication that they are employees that work at the docks.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_inspect(e1) & subset_of(x4,x2) & on(x4,x5) & (n_dock(x5) | n_harbor(x5)) & n_pipe(x4) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_vat(x3) & n_man(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_dock(x2) & n_man(x1) & at(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_work(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_inspect(e1) & subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & on(x4,x5) & n_vat(x3) & n_pipe(x4) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & (n_harbor(x5) | n_dock(x5)))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_work(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_dock(x2) & at(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))