premise: The man with the cane is on a walk.
hypothesis: a man is racing another man also with a cane
explanation_1: The fact that a man with the cane is on a walk doesn't imply racing another man also with a cane .
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_cane(x2) & n_man(x1) & exists x3.(on(x1,x3) & n_walk(x3)) & with(x1,x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x3) & n_cane(x3) & a_also(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_race(e1) & n_man(x2) & -(x2 = x1) & n_man(x1) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2.(with(x1,x2) & n_man(x1) & n_cane(x2) & exists x3.(on(x1,x3) & n_walk(x3)))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x3) & v_race(e1) & n_man(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_cane(x3) & a_also(s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1) & -(x2 = x1))