premise: A football player kicks the ball.
hypothesis: A baseball player on the bench.
explanation_1: The pieces of information that contradict each other is the contrast in the sport of the player as in one being mentioned to be a football player as against the second being mentioned as a baseball player.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_ball(x3) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_kick(e1) & n_player(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_football(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(n_bench(x3) & a_topic(x1) & on(x1,x3) & n_player(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_baseball(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_kick(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_player(x1) & n_football(x2) & n_ball(x3) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(on(x1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_player(x1) & n_bench(x3) & n_baseball(x2) & a_topic(x1))