premise: A bicyclist is in the air over a ramp.
hypothesis: the bicyclist is a performer
explanation_1: We don't know that he is a performer.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.(n_air(x3) & over(p1,x2) & n_ramp(x2) & in(x1,x3) & n_bicyclist(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_bicyclist(x1) & exists x2.((x1 = x2) & n_performer(x2)))
premise_sim: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.(over(p1,x2) & n_ramp(x2) & n_bicyclist(x1) & n_air(x3) & in(x1,x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_bicyclist(x1) & exists x2.(n_performer(x2) & (x1 = x2)))