premise: Two dogs are urinating on the red fire hydrant.
hypothesis: No animals are urinating.
explanation_1: One sentence is about two dogs urinating while the other is about no animals urinating.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(n_hydrant(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_fire(x3) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & on(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_urinate(e1) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: -exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_urinate(e1) & n_animal(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_urinate(e1) & on(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_hydrant(x2) & n_fire(x3) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: all e1 x1.(-v_urinate(e1) | -n_animal(x1) | -Actor(e1,x1))