premise: A man with a camera wearing a blue shirt and jeans stands between two tall buildings.
hypothesis: A man is near two buildings.
explanation_1: Sentence 1 states that a man is between two tall buildings so therefore it would make sense that sentence 2 follows because he is near both buildings.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(between(e2,x7) & n_building(x7) & a_tall(s2) & Theme(s2,x7) & card_eq_2(x7) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_stand(e2) & with(x1,x2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_wear(e1) & subset_of(x6,x4) & n_jeans(x6) & subset_of(x5,x4) & n_shirt(x5) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s1,x5) & (x2 = x3) & n_camera(x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2.(near(x1,x2) & n_building(x2) & card_eq_2(x2)) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(with(x1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & v_stand(e2) & subset_of(x6,x4) & subset_of(x5,x4) & n_shirt(x5) & n_man(x1) & n_jeans(x6) & n_camera(x2) & n_building(x7) & card_eq_2(x7) & between(e2,x7) & a_tall(s2) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s2,x7) & Theme(s1,x5) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2.(near(x1,x2) & n_building(x2) & card_eq_2(x2)))