premise: This is a professional diver.
hypothesis: A person who looks like a diver
explanation_1: Sentence 1 presents a professional diver, so it stands to reason that they are a person who looks like a diver.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_thing(x1) & exists s1 x2.((x1 = x2) & n_diver(x2) & a_professional(s1) & Theme(s1,x2)))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & like(e1,x3) & n_diver(x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_look(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_person(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1.(n_thing(x1) & exists s1 x2.(n_diver(x2) & a_professional(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & (x1 = x2)))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_look(e1) & n_person(x1) & n_diver(x3) & like(e1,x3) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))