premise: Two brown dogs are playing with each other in the snow.
hypothesis: The brown dogs are playing with each other
explanation_1: The brown dogs is a less detailed restatement of two brown dogs.  Playing with each other is a less detailed restatement of playing with each other in the snow.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x3.(n_snow(x3) & all x2.(n_other(x2) -> (in(e1,x3) & with(e1,x2))) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_dog(x1) & a_brown(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1.(n_dog(x1) & a_brown(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & all x2.(n_other(x2) -> with(e1,x2)) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x3.(v_play(e1) & n_snow(x3) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & all x2.((with(e1,x2) | -n_other(x2)) & (in(e1,x3) | -n_other(x2))) & a_brown(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1.(v_play(e1) & n_dog(x1) & all x2.(with(e1,x2) | -n_other(x2)) & a_brown(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))