premise: Couple in car look at something beyond the camera.
hypothesis: Two people are in a car.
explanation_1: The one sentence is stating that two people are in a car while the other sentence goes into detail that they look at something while in the car.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_camera(x5) & a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & at(x2,x4) & beyond(x4,x5) & n_thing(x4) & n_look(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_car(x3) & n_couple(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2.(in(x1,x2) & n_car(x2)) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(of(x2,x3) & n_thing(x4) & n_look(x2) & n_couple(x1) & n_car(x3) & n_camera(x5) & in(x1,x2) & beyond(x4,x5) & at(x2,x4) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_people(x1) & exists x2.(n_car(x2) & in(x1,x2)) & card_eq_2(x1))