premise: A man wearing suspenders in standing on a train.
hypothesis: There is a man on the train.
explanation_1: sentence two removed the details of what the man was wearing and what he was doing on the train.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & in(e1,e2) & on(e2,x4) & n_train(x4) & Actor(e2,x2) & v_stand(e2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_suspenders(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x3.(n_train(x3) & exists x2.((x1 = x2) & on(x2,x3) & n_man(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_wear(e1) & v_stand(e2) & on(e2,x4) & n_train(x4) & n_suspenders(x3) & n_man(x1) & in(e1,e2) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x2) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x3.(n_train(x3) & exists x2.(on(x2,x3) & n_man(x2) & (x1 = x2)))