premise: Two men on a raft with a sofa.
hypothesis: The men are using a moving van.
explanation_1: The two men cannot be on a raft with a sofa as well as be using a moving van at the same time.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & with(x1,x3) & n_sofa(x3) & on(x1,x2) & n_raft(x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2.(n_man(x1) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_use(e2) & n_van(x2) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_move(e1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(with(x1,x3) & on(x1,x2) & n_sofa(x3) & n_raft(x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2.(v_use(e2) & v_move(e1) & n_van(x2) & n_man(x1) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2))