premise: One man throws a flying kick at another man.
hypothesis: Karate champions spar in the Olympic finals.
explanation_1: Not all men who kick are karate champions. Throwing a kick at another man does not imply is it in the Olympic finals.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_throw(e2) & at(x2,x3) & n_man(x3) & -(x3 = x1) & n_man(x1) & n_man(x1) & n_kick(x2) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_fly(e1) & card_eq_1(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_final(x4) & (x4 = x5) & ne_nam_olympic(x5) & a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x4) & n_spar(x1) & of(x1,x3) & n_champion(x3) & (x1 = x2) & ne_nam_karate(x2))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_throw(e2) & v_fly(e1) & n_man(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_kick(x2) & card_eq_1(x1) & at(x2,x3) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & -(x3 = x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(of(x1,x3) & ne_nam_olympic(x5) & ne_nam_karate(x2) & n_spar(x1) & n_final(x4) & n_champion(x3) & in(x1,x4) & a_topic(x1) & (x4 = x5) & (x1 = x2))