premise: A man, wearing glasses, is rock climbing.
hypothesis: The man is not wearing glasses.
explanation_1: A man cannot be wearing glasses and said not wearing glasses at the same time.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3.(exists x4 x5.((x1 = x4) & n_climb(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_rock(x5)) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_glass(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & -exists e1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_wear(e1) & n_glass(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_wear(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_glass(x3) & exists x4 x5.(of(x4,x5) & n_rock(x5) & n_climb(x4) & (x1 = x4)) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & all e1 x2.(-v_wear(e1) | -n_glass(x2) | -Theme(e1,x2) | -Actor(e1,x1)))