premise: Two men having an intense discussion over drinks.
hypothesis: A boy rollerblades at the skate park.
explanation_1: Two men having an intense discussion over drinks implies alcoholic drinks and would not involve a boy that implies a juvenile at a skate park.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_have(e1) & over(x3,x4) & n_drink(x4) & n_discussion(x3) & a_intense(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_park(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_skate(x3) & at(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_rollerblade(e1) & n_boy(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_have(e1) & over(x3,x4) & n_man(x1) & n_drink(x4) & n_discussion(x3) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1) & a_intense(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_rollerblade(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_skate(x3) & n_park(x2) & n_boy(x1) & at(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))