premise: two people walking in front of a building.
hypothesis: The people are walking.
explanation_1: Walking in front of a building is generalized by the phrase the people are walking.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & in(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_building(x4) & n_front(x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_walk(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(n_people(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_walk(e1) & of(x3,x4) & n_people(x1) & n_front(x3) & n_building(x4) & in(e1,x3) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_walk(e1) & n_people(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))