premise: Two men talking to each other outside.
hypothesis: Two men are talking.
explanation_1: Men talking is a paraphrase of men are talking.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x4.(n_outside(x4) & a_topic(x1) & all x3.((-(x3 = x4) & n_outside(x3)) -> to(e1,x3)) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_talk(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_talk(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x4.(v_talk(e1) & n_outside(x4) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & all x3.(to(e1,x3) | -n_outside(x3) | (x3 = x4)) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_talk(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))