premise: A man and a woman with bikes at a park.
hypothesis: A man and a woman are outdoors.
explanation_1: It makes sense that if the man and woman were on bikes at the park that they were outdoors.
premise_logic: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(s1) & subset_of(x2,s1) & at(x2,x4) & n_park(x4) & with(x2,x3) & n_bike(x3) & n_woman(x2) & subset_of(x1,s1) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.(exists x4.((x1 = x4) & n_outdoors(x4)) & subset_of(x3,x1) & n_woman(x3) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_man(x2))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(x2,x3) & subset_of(x2,s1) & subset_of(x1,s1) & n_woman(x2) & n_park(x4) & n_man(x1) & n_bike(x3) & at(x2,x4) & a_topic(s1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(subset_of(x3,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_woman(x3) & n_man(x2) & exists x4.(n_outdoors(x4) & (x1 = x4)))