premise: Two men working in a bicycle shop.
hypothesis: Two men are fixing bikes for the kids.
explanation_1: The men could be working on anything, not necessarily fixing bikes. And can infer anything about the kids
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & in(e1,x3) & n_shop(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_bicycle(x4) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_work(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_kid(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_fix(e1) & for(x2,x3) & n_bike(x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_work(e1) & of(x3,x4) & n_shop(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_bicycle(x4) & in(e1,x3) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_fix(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_kid(x3) & n_bike(x2) & for(x2,x3) & card_eq_2(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))