premise: A man, and girl and two horses are near a contained fire.
hypothesis: The man is making sure the girl and horses don't get too close to the fire.
explanation_1: A man, a girl and two horses being near a fire does not imply that the man is making sure the girl and horses  don't get too close to the fire.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(exists e1 x6.(near(x1,x6) & n_fire(x6) & Theme(e1,x6) & v_contain(e1)) & subset_of(x5,x1) & n_horse(x5) & card_eq_2(x5) & subset_of(x2,x1) & subset_of(x4,x2) & n_girl(x4) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_man(x3))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_fire(x5) & n_horse(x4) & n_girl(x3) & subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_man(x1) & exists e2 p2.(-exists e3 p3.(exists s1.(to(s1,x5) & r_too(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & a_close(s1)) & Topic(e3,p3) & Actor(e3,x2) & v_get(e3)) & Topic(e2,p2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_sure(e2)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_make(e1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(subset_of(x5,x1) & subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_man(x3) & n_horse(x5) & n_girl(x4) & exists e1 x6.(v_contain(e1) & near(x1,x6) & n_fire(x6) & Theme(e1,x6)) & card_eq_2(x5))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_make(e1) & subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_man(x1) & n_horse(x4) & n_girl(x3) & n_fire(x5) & exists e2 p2.(v_sure(e2) & all e3 p3.(all s1.(-to(s1,x5) | -r_too(s1) | -a_close(s1) | -Theme(s1,x2)) | -v_get(e3) | -Topic(e3,p3) | -Actor(e3,x2)) & Topic(e2,p2) & Actor(e2,x1)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1))