premise: A man and a woman having an intimate conversation in front a statue.
hypothesis: A couple are discussing vacation plans
explanation_1: No evidence that the man and woman are a couple. We also have no way to knowing the were discussing vacation plans. An intimate conversation makes you think it was something more personal.
premise_logic: exists s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(s1) & subset_of(x2,s1) & all x5.(n_statue(x5) -> exists e1 x6.(Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_have(e1) & in(x4,x6) & for(x6,x5) & n_front(x6))) & n_conversation(x4) & a_intimate(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & (x2 = x3) & n_woman(x2) & subset_of(x1,s1) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_discuss(e1) & n_plan(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_vacation(x3) & n_couple(x1))
premise_sim: exists s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(subset_of(x2,s1) & subset_of(x1,s1) & n_woman(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_conversation(x4) & all x5.(exists e1 x6.(v_have(e1) & n_front(x6) & in(x4,x6) & for(x6,x5) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3)) | -n_statue(x5)) & a_topic(s1) & a_intimate(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & (x2 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_discuss(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_vacation(x3) & n_plan(x2) & n_couple(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))