premise: A woman doing the splits while doing a handstand on a bar.
hypothesis: The woman is a stripper.
explanation_1: There could be a few reasons why the woman is doing the splits while doing a handstand on a bar. It cannot be inferred that she is a stripper.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_splits(x3) & a_topic(x1) & while(e1,e2) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x2) & v_do(e2) & on(x4,x5) & n_bar(x5) & n_handstand(x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_do(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_woman(x1) & exists x2.((x1 = x2) & n_stripper(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(while(e1,e2) & v_do(e2) & v_do(e1) & on(x4,x5) & n_woman(x1) & n_splits(x3) & n_handstand(x4) & n_bar(x5) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e2,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x2) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_woman(x1) & exists x2.(n_stripper(x2) & (x1 = x2)))