premise: Two males are staring at a chessboard.
hypothesis: Playing chess are two men, who are arguing with each other
explanation_1: People playing chess do not have to be arguing.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(at(e1,x2) & n_chessboard(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stare(e1) & n_male(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1.(exists e2 x2 x3.((x1 = x2) & all x4.(n_other(x4) -> with(e2,x4)) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_argue(e2) & (x2 = x3) & n_man(x2) & card_eq_2(x2)) & n_chess(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_stare(e1) & n_male(x1) & n_chessboard(x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & at(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_play(e1) & n_chess(x1) & exists e2 x2 x3.(v_argue(e2) & n_man(x2) & card_eq_2(x2) & all x4.(with(e2,x4) | -n_other(x4)) & Actor(e2,x3) & (x2 = x3) & (x1 = x2)) & Actor(e1,x1))