premise: A man in a red shirt is rock climbing.
hypothesis: A man is rock climbing.
explanation_1: For a man in a red shirt to be rock climbing, the man must be rock climbing.
premise_logic: exists p1 s1 x1 x2.(exists x3 x4.((x1 = x3) & n_climb(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_rock(x4)) & in(x1,x2) & n_shirt(x2) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2 x3.((x1 = x2) & n_climb(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_rock(x3)) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1 x2.(n_shirt(x2) & n_man(x1) & in(x1,x2) & exists x3 x4.(of(x3,x4) & n_rock(x4) & n_climb(x3) & (x1 = x3)) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2 x3.(of(x2,x3) & n_rock(x3) & n_climb(x2) & (x1 = x2)))