premise: A little boy in pajamas snuggles on a couch with a Santa hat.
hypothesis: The boy is not wearing a hat.
explanation_1: The phrase "with a santa hat" suggests the boy is wearing it, however the second sentence states that he is not wearing a hat
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(on(e1,x3) & with(x3,x4) & n_hat(x4) & (x4 = x5) & ne_org_santa(x5) & n_couch(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_snuggle(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_pajamas(x2) & n_boy(x1) & a_little(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1.(n_boy(x1) & -exists e1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_wear(e1) & n_hat(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(with(x3,x4) & v_snuggle(e1) & on(e1,x3) & ne_org_santa(x5) & n_pajamas(x2) & n_hat(x4) & n_couch(x3) & n_boy(x1) & in(x1,x2) & a_little(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & (x4 = x5))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_boy(x1) & all e1 x2.(-v_wear(e1) | -n_hat(x2) | -Theme(e1,x2) | -Actor(e1,x1)))