premise: Five children playing on a neighborhood street.
hypothesis: Children sitting on a street.
explanation_1: While children can be playing and sitting simultaneously, the two sentences are contradictory because sentence 1 explains the children are sitting and sentence 2 explains they are playing.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & on(e1,x3) & n_street(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_neighborhood(x4) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_play(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_child(x1) & card_eq_5(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & on(e1,x3) & n_street(x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_sit(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_child(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_play(e1) & on(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_street(x3) & n_neighborhood(x4) & n_child(x1) & card_eq_5(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_sit(e1) & on(e1,x3) & n_street(x3) & n_child(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))