premise: A man with a backpack and two children are on the beach.
hypothesis: A man does not have his children at the beach.
explanation_1: Two children cannot be at the beach if a man does not have his children there.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_beach(x4) & on(x1,x4) & with(x1,x2) & n_child(x2) & card_eq_2(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_backpack(x3) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(n_beach(x3) & -exists e1.(at(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1)) & n_child(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(x1,x2) & on(x1,x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_man(x1) & n_child(x2) & n_beach(x4) & n_backpack(x3) & card_eq_2(x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(of(x2,x1) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_child(x2) & n_beach(x3) & all e1.(-v_have(e1) | -at(e1,x3) | -Theme(e1,x2) | -Actor(e1,x1)))