premise: Two children splash through the water, one is wearing a pink swim cap.
hypothesis: The children are playing in water.
explanation_1: Two children splash through the water, one is wearing a pink swim cap. which at the same time wouldnt be  The children are playing in water.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_water(x2) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_wear(e2) & n_cap(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_swim(x5) & a_pink(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & n_thing(x3) & card_eq_1(x3) & through(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_splash(e1) & n_child(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_child(x1) & in(e1,x2) & n_water(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_wear(e2) & v_splash(e1) & through(e1,x2) & of(x4,x5) & n_water(x2) & n_thing(x3) & n_swim(x5) & n_child(x1) & n_cap(x4) & card_eq_2(x1) & card_eq_1(x3) & a_pink(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_play(e1) & n_water(x2) & n_child(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))