premise: The benches are in a long row with the silver round tables aligned neatly.
hypothesis: The benches and tables are broken.
explanation_1: The first sentence states there were tables and benches that were aligned while the second one observes that they were broken which is opposite views.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x3 x4 x5.(n_table(x3) & of(x3,x5) & n_round(x5) & of(x3,x4) & n_silver(x4) & n_bench(x1) & exists e1 s1 s2 x2 x6.(in(x1,x2) & with(x2,x3) & a_neatly(s2) & Manner(e1,s2) & Theme(e1,x6) & v_align(e1) & (x3 = x6) & n_row(x2) & a_long(s1) & Theme(s1,x2)))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_bench(x2) & Theme(e1,x1) & v_break(e1) & subset_of(x3,x1) & n_table(x3) & subset_of(x2,x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x3 x4 x5.(of(x3,x5) & of(x3,x4) & n_table(x3) & n_silver(x4) & n_round(x5) & n_bench(x1) & exists e1 s1 s2 x2 x6.(with(x2,x3) & v_align(e1) & n_row(x2) & in(x1,x2) & a_neatly(s2) & a_long(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Theme(e1,x6) & Manner(e1,s2) & (x3 = x6)))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_break(e1) & subset_of(x3,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_table(x3) & n_bench(x2) & Theme(e1,x1))