premise: There are two dogs playing with each other.
hypothesis: Two dogs attacked each other wildly.
explanation_1: The dogs cannot be playing with each other and then attacked each other widly.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 e1 x2 x3.((x1 = x2) & all x4.(n_other(x4) -> with(e1,x4)) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_play(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_dog(x2) & card_eq_2(x2))
hypothesis_logic: all x1.(n_other(x1) -> exists e1 x2.(r_wildly(e1) & Time(e1,x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & v_attack(e1) & n_dog(x2) & card_eq_2(x2)))
premise_sim: exists x1 e1 x2 x3.(v_play(e1) & n_dog(x2) & card_eq_2(x2) & all x4.(with(e1,x4) | -n_other(x4)) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: all x1.(exists e1 x2.(v_attack(e1) & r_wildly(e1) & n_dog(x2) & card_eq_2(x2) & Time(e1,x1) & Theme(e1,x2)) | -n_other(x1))