premise: A shirtless man is walking through a tunnel of people.
hypothesis: There is a man without a shirt because he is homeless.
explanation_1: A shirtless man is walking through a tunnel of people man without a shirt because he is homeless.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(through(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_people(x3) & n_tunnel(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_man(x1) & a_shirtless(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 p2 x1 x4.(n_male(x4) & exists s1.(Theme(s1,x4) & a_homeless(s1)) & because(p1,p2) & exists x2.((x1 = x2) & -exists x3.(with(x2,x3) & n_shirt(x3)) & n_man(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_walk(e1) & through(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_tunnel(x2) & n_people(x3) & n_man(x1) & a_shirtless(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists p1 p2 x1 x4.(n_male(x4) & exists x2.(n_man(x2) & all x3.(-with(x2,x3) | -n_shirt(x3)) & (x1 = x2)) & exists s1.(a_homeless(s1) & Theme(s1,x4)) & because(p1,p2))