premise: Three people, one sitting, two standing, are in a mall.
hypothesis: Three people are strolling through the park.
explanation_1: Three people cannot be strolling through a park while they are sitting in a mall.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(exists x5.(in(x1,x5) & n_mall(x5)) & rel(x1,x2) & rel(x2,x4) & n_standing(x4) & card_eq_2(x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_sit(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_thing(x2) & card_eq_1(x2) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_park(x2) & through(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stroll(e1) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_sit(e1) & rel(x2,x4) & rel(x1,x2) & n_thing(x2) & n_standing(x4) & n_people(x1) & exists x5.(n_mall(x5) & in(x1,x5)) & card_eq_3(x1) & card_eq_2(x4) & card_eq_1(x2) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_stroll(e1) & through(e1,x2) & n_people(x1) & n_park(x2) & card_eq_3(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))