premise: A soccer player advances with the ball on a sunny day.
hypothesis: Some soccer players are going after the ball.
explanation_1: A soccer player can be advancing the ball by himself, the second sentence lets you know people are chasing him. So players are going after the ball tells you what is really happening.
premise_logic: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_ball(x4) & a_topic(x1) & with(x1,x4) & on(x4,x5) & n_day(x5) & a_sunny(s1) & Theme(s1,x5) & n_advance(x1) & of(x1,x3) & n_player(x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_soccer(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_ball(x3) & after(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_go(e1) & n_player(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_soccer(x2))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(with(x1,x4) & on(x4,x5) & of(x1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_soccer(x2) & n_player(x3) & n_day(x5) & n_ball(x4) & n_advance(x1) & a_topic(x1) & a_sunny(s1) & Theme(s1,x5))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_go(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_soccer(x2) & n_player(x1) & n_ball(x3) & after(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))