premise: A man in a bicycle on a street with a bridge.
hypothesis: A man is riding towards the bridge.
explanation_1: A man in a bicycle on a street with a bridge does not necessary that he is riding towards the bridge.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & with(x2,x4) & n_bridge(x4) & on(x2,x3) & n_street(x3) & n_bicycle(x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_bridge(x2) & towards(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(x2,x4) & on(x2,x3) & n_street(x3) & n_man(x1) & n_bridge(x4) & n_bicycle(x2) & in(x1,x2) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_ride(e1) & towards(e1,x2) & n_man(x1) & n_bridge(x2) & Actor(e1,x1))