premise: The ground is covered in snow.
hypothesis: The ground is slippery.
explanation_1: Sentence one talks about ground covered in snow, it does not infer that the ground is slippery.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_ground(x1) & in(e1,x2) & n_snow(x2) & Theme(e1,x1) & v_cover(e1))
hypothesis_logic: exists s1 x1.(n_ground(x1) & Theme(s1,x1) & a_slippery(s1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_cover(e1) & n_snow(x2) & n_ground(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Theme(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists s1 x1.(n_ground(x1) & a_slippery(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))