premise: The man with the cane is on a walk.
hypothesis: A man is on a walk.
explanation_1: Both subjects are on a walk
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_cane(x2) & n_man(x1) & exists x3.(on(x1,x3) & n_walk(x3)) & with(x1,x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2.(on(x1,x2) & n_walk(x2)) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2.(with(x1,x2) & n_man(x1) & n_cane(x2) & exists x3.(on(x1,x3) & n_walk(x3)))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2.(on(x1,x2) & n_walk(x2)))