premise: Two large black dogs are snarling at each other.
hypothesis: The dogs are snarling.
explanation_1: The dogs here refers to two large black dogs are snarling at each other.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1.(all x2.(n_other(x2) -> at(e1,x2)) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_snarl(e1) & n_dog(x1) & a_black(s2) & Theme(s2,x1) & a_large(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(n_dog(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_snarl(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1.(v_snarl(e1) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & all x2.(at(e1,x2) | -n_other(x2)) & a_large(s1) & a_black(s2) & Theme(s2,x1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_snarl(e1) & n_dog(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))