premise: A group of people are walking through a city street.
hypothesis: A group of people are all matching.
explanation_1: Just because a group of people are walking through a city street doesn't imply they are all matching.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(through(e1,x3) & n_street(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_city(x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_people(x2) & n_group(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(all x3.(n_matching(x3) -> (x1 = x3)) & of(x1,x2) & n_people(x2) & n_group(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_walk(e1) & through(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & of(x1,x2) & n_street(x3) & n_people(x2) & n_group(x1) & n_city(x4) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(of(x1,x2) & n_people(x2) & n_group(x1) & all x3.(-n_matching(x3) | (x1 = x3)))