premise: A skier speeds through the snow.
hypothesis: A skier races through a competition.
explanation_1: The second sentence states the skier is in a competition and not just skiing for recreation
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_snow(x2) & through(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_speed(e1) & n_skier(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & through(x1,x3) & n_competition(x3) & n_race(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_skier(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_speed(e1) & through(e1,x2) & n_snow(x2) & n_skier(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(through(x1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_skier(x2) & n_race(x1) & n_competition(x3) & a_topic(x1))