premise: Four adults playing baseball, with a forest in the background.
hypothesis: With the desert in the background, four adults are telling stories about playing baseball.
explanation_1: Both sentences are consistent with four adults. One is talking about them playing baseball with a forest in the background. The second says they are telling stories about playing baseball with a desert in the background.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_background(x5) & a_topic(x1) & with(e1,x4) & in(x4,x5) & n_forest(x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_play(e1) & n_baseball(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_adult(x1) & card_eq_4(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(n_background(x6) & n_desert(x5) & with(e2,x5) & in(x5,x6) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_tell(e2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_play(e1) & n_baseball(x4) & (x2 = x3) & n_story(x2) & n_adult(x1) & card_eq_4(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(with(e1,x4) & v_play(e1) & n_forest(x4) & n_baseball(x3) & n_background(x5) & n_adult(x1) & in(x4,x5) & card_eq_4(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(with(e2,x5) & v_tell(e2) & v_play(e1) & n_story(x2) & n_desert(x5) & n_baseball(x4) & n_background(x6) & n_adult(x1) & in(x5,x6) & card_eq_4(x1) & Theme(e2,x2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3))