premise: Two people in hockey uniforms on the ice.
hypothesis: Hockey players competing for the puck.
explanation_1: There is no guarantee that just because two hockey players are on the ice, that they are competing for the puck.
premise_logic: exists s1 x1 x2 x3.(n_ice(x3) & a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & on(x2,x3) & n_uniform(x2) & a_hockey(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_puck(x4) & a_topic(x1) & for(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_compete(e1) & (x1 = x3) & n_player(x1) & (x1 = x2) & ne_nam_hockey(x2))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1 x2 x3.(on(x2,x3) & n_uniform(x2) & n_people(x1) & n_ice(x3) & in(x1,x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1) & a_hockey(s1) & Theme(s1,x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_compete(e1) & ne_nam_hockey(x2) & n_puck(x4) & n_player(x1) & for(e1,x4) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x1 = x3) & (x1 = x2))