premise: Two men in wrestling uniforms and gear are wrestling in an gym.
hypothesis: Wrestlers are inside the gym.
explanation_1: The two men that are wrestling are considered wrestlers and they do this activity inside a gym.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(in(e2,x6) & n_gym(x6) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_wrestle(e2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wrestle(e1) & n_gear(x5) & n_uniform(x4) & subset_of(x5,x3) & subset_of(x4,x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_gym(x2) & inside(x1,x2) & n_wrestler(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(v_wrestle(e2) & v_wrestle(e1) & subset_of(x5,x3) & subset_of(x4,x3) & n_uniform(x4) & n_man(x1) & n_gym(x6) & n_gear(x5) & in(e2,x6) & card_eq_2(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_wrestler(x1) & n_gym(x2) & inside(x1,x2))