premise: Two men play lacrosse or field hockey.
hypothesis: Two guys are eating lunch.
explanation_1: One can not play lacrosse and be eating lunch simultaneously.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & (n_lacrosse(x2) | exists x3.(n_hockey(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_field(x3))) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_eat(e1) & n_lunch(x2) & n_guy(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_play(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & (n_lacrosse(x2) | exists x3.(of(x2,x3) & n_hockey(x2) & n_field(x3))))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_eat(e1) & n_lunch(x2) & n_guy(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))