premise: a boy runs through the puddle.
hypothesis: The boy feet are wet.
explanation_1: The boy feet are wet implies that he runs through the puddle.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_puddle(x2) & through(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1) & n_boy(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists s1 x1 x2.(n_foot(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_boy(x2) & Theme(s1,x1) & a_wet(s1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_run(e1) & through(e1,x2) & n_puddle(x2) & n_boy(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists s1 x1 x2.(of(x1,x2) & n_foot(x1) & n_boy(x2) & a_wet(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))