premise: Handstand and splits on a railing with an amusement park in the background.
hypothesis: The park is closed and there is no one outside it.
explanation_1: If there is no one outside the park then the person couldn't be doing a handstand and splits with the park in the background.
premise_logic: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(n_background(x6) & ne_nam_handstand(x1) & a_topic(s1) & subset_of(x2,s1) & on(x2,x3) & with(x3,x4) & in(x4,x6) & n_park(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_amusement(x5) & n_railing(x3) & n_split(x2) & subset_of(x1,s1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 s1 x1 x2.(n_thing(x1) & n_park(x1) & -exists x3.((x2 = x3) & outside(x3,x1) & n_one(x3)) & Theme(s1,x1) & a_closed(s1))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(with(x3,x4) & subset_of(x2,s1) & subset_of(x1,s1) & on(x2,x3) & of(x4,x5) & ne_nam_handstand(x1) & n_split(x2) & n_railing(x3) & n_park(x4) & n_background(x6) & n_amusement(x5) & in(x4,x6) & a_topic(s1))
hypothesis_sim: exists s1 x1 x2.(n_thing(x1) & n_park(x1) & all x3.(-outside(x3,x1) | -n_one(x3) | -(x2 = x3)) & a_closed(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))