premise: Three men are sitting next to each other and the man in the middle is reading a book.
hypothesis: The middle man is reading to the other two men.
explanation_1: It cannot be inferred that the middle man is reading to the other men.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_middle(x2) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_read(e2) & n_book(x3) & in(x1,x2) & n_man(x1) & n_man(x1) & all x4.(n_other(x4) -> to(e1,x4)) & r_next(e1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1.(-(x1 = x1) & n_man(x1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_middle(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & to(e1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_read(e1))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_sit(e1) & v_read(e2) & r_next(e1) & n_middle(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_book(x3) & in(x1,x2) & card_eq_3(x1) & all x4.(to(e1,x4) | -n_other(x4)) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1.(v_read(e1) & to(e1,x1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_middle(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & -(x1 = x1))