premise: Two men confront each other indoors.
hypothesis: Two men are talking.
explanation_1: The two men are confronting each other and thus they are talking.
premise_logic: exists x1 x3.(n_indoor(x3) & all x2.((-(x2 = x3) & n_indoor(x2)) -> exists e1.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_confront(e1))) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_talk(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x3.(n_man(x1) & n_indoor(x3) & card_eq_2(x1) & all x2.(exists e1.(v_confront(e1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1)) | -n_indoor(x2) | (x2 = x3)))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_talk(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))