premise: One child reading and one child resting in a room.
hypothesis: There is only one child in the room.
explanation_1: First sentence implies there are two children while the second sentence says there is only one
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(s1) & subset_of(x3,s1) & in(e1,x5) & n_room(x5) & Actor(e1,x4) & v_rest(e1) & (x3 = x4) & n_child(x3) & card_eq_1(x3) & subset_of(x1,s1) & n_reading(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_child(x2) & card_eq_1(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_room(x2) & in(p1,x2) & exists x3.((x1 = x3) & n_child(x3) & card_eq_1(x3) & r_only(x3)))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_rest(e1) & subset_of(x3,s1) & subset_of(x1,s1) & of(x1,x2) & n_room(x5) & n_reading(x1) & n_child(x3) & n_child(x2) & in(e1,x5) & card_eq_1(x3) & card_eq_1(x1) & a_topic(s1) & Actor(e1,x4) & (x3 = x4))
hypothesis_sim: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_room(x2) & in(p1,x2) & exists x3.(r_only(x3) & n_child(x3) & card_eq_1(x3) & (x1 = x3)))