premise: Two children swinging on a tire swing.
hypothesis: Two kids are on a swing.
explanation_1: If kids are swinging on a swing then they are on a swing.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & on(e1,x3) & n_swing(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_tire(x4) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_swing(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_child(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2.(on(x1,x2) & n_swing(x2)) & n_kid(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_swing(e1) & on(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_tire(x4) & n_swing(x3) & n_child(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_kid(x1) & exists x2.(on(x1,x2) & n_swing(x2)) & card_eq_2(x1))