premise: A pharmacist is at work filling prescriptions.
hypothesis: The pharmacist is playing on her phone.
explanation_1: It can't be assumed the pharmacist is female and filling prescriptions is not playing on a phone.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists e1 x2 x3.(at(x1,x2) & n_prescription(x2) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_fill(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_work(x3)) & n_pharmacist(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_phone(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_female(x1) & n_pharmacist(x1) & on(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1))
premise_sim: exists x1.(n_pharmacist(x1) & exists e1 x2 x3.(v_fill(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_work(x3) & n_prescription(x2) & at(x1,x2) & Actor(e1,x2)))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_play(e1) & on(e1,x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_phone(x2) & n_pharmacist(x1) & n_female(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))