premise: A man with no shirt sitting on a moped.
hypothesis: The man is not riding a unicycle.
explanation_1: A moped has two wheels while a unicycle has one; therefore, the man is not riding a unicycle.
premise_logic: exists x1.(-exists e1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & with(x1,x2) & on(e1,x4) & n_mope(x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_sit(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_shirt(x2)) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & -exists e1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1) & n_unicycle(x2)))
premise_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & all e1 x2 x3 x4.(-with(x1,x2) | -v_sit(e1) | -on(e1,x4) | -n_shirt(x2) | -n_mope(x4) | -a_topic(x1) | -Actor(e1,x3) | -(x2 = x3)))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & all e1 x2.(-v_ride(e1) | -n_unicycle(x2) | -Theme(e1,x2) | -Actor(e1,x1)))