premise: Two dogs are running through the surf.
hypothesis: a pair of dogs are playing poker
explanation_1: Dogs cannot be playing poker. Also, the dogs cannot be at the beach (suggested by the surf) and playing poker at the same time
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_surf(x2) & through(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_poker(x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_dog(x2) & n_pair(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_run(e1) & through(e1,x2) & n_surf(x2) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_play(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_poker(x3) & n_pair(x1) & n_dog(x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))