premise: A man is in midair, skiing.
hypothesis: There is a man skiing.
explanation_1: Both sentence are talking about man skiing.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2 x3.(in(x1,x2) & rel(x2,x3) & n_skiing(x3) & n_midair(x2)) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.((x1 = x2) & n_skiing(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_man(x3))
premise_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2 x3.(rel(x2,x3) & n_skiing(x3) & n_midair(x2) & in(x1,x2)))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(of(x2,x3) & n_skiing(x2) & n_man(x3) & (x1 = x2))