premise: The man with the cane is on a walk.
hypothesis: a guy backflipped to the sun
explanation_1: A man with a cane is not likely to be doing backflips.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_cane(x2) & n_man(x1) & exists x3.(on(x1,x3) & n_walk(x3)) & with(x1,x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_sun(x2) & to(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_backflip(e1) & n_guy(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2.(with(x1,x2) & n_man(x1) & n_cane(x2) & exists x3.(on(x1,x3) & n_walk(x3)))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_backflip(e1) & to(e1,x2) & n_sun(x2) & n_guy(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))