premise: Three hockey players struggle with the puck in front of the goal.
hypothesis: There are people on ice.
explanation_1: The hockey players are on ice struggling to get the puck in the goal.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_goal(x5) & n_puck(x3) & a_topic(x1) & n_struggle(x1) & with(x1,x3) & in(x3,x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_front(x4) & n_player(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_hockey(x2) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.((x1 = x2) & on(x2,x3) & n_ice(x3) & n_people(x2))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(with(x1,x3) & of(x4,x5) & of(x1,x2) & n_struggle(x1) & n_puck(x3) & n_player(x1) & n_hockey(x2) & n_goal(x5) & n_front(x4) & in(x3,x4) & card_eq_3(x1) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(on(x2,x3) & n_people(x2) & n_ice(x3) & (x1 = x2))