premise: Two construction workers are lounging against a rail.
hypothesis: Two workers are resting on their lunch break
explanation_1: Two construction workers are lounging against a rail does not necessary that they are resting on their lunch break
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(against(e1,x3) & n_rail(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_lounge(e1) & n_worker(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_construction(x2) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(on(e1,x2) & n_break(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_lunch(x3) & of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_rest(e1) & n_worker(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_lounge(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_worker(x1) & n_rail(x3) & n_construction(x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & against(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_rest(e1) & on(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & of(x2,x1) & n_worker(x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_lunch(x3) & n_break(x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))