premise: A young woman getting her haircut.
hypothesis: A woman giving a dog a bath.
explanation_1: Sentence 1 infers it is a young woman. Sentence 2 is just a woman, no age is specified. Sentence one has the the woman getting a haircut where Sentence 2 has a woman bathing her dog. One is a stationary activity amd the other is an action.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_get(e1) & n_haircut(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_female(x1) & (x1 = x2) & n_woman(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & Recipient(e1,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_give(e1) & n_dog(x4) & n_bath(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_woman(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_get(e1) & of(x3,x1) & n_woman(x1) & n_haircut(x3) & n_female(x1) & a_young(s1) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_give(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_dog(x4) & n_bath(x3) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Recipient(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))