premise: A man sits outdoors comfortably with his arms around a pale bear.
hypothesis: A man outdoor with his bucket.
explanation_1: A man who sits outdoors with his arms around a pale bear could only do so if the bear were trained and a pet, but this is not stated in the sentence. He could also be outdoors with his bucket. These are independent thoughts and there is no contradiction.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(e1,x3) & around(x3,x4) & n_bear(x4) & a_pale(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & n_arm(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & a_comfortably(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_outdoors(x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & with(x1,x3) & n_bucket(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_outdoor(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(e1,x3) & v_sit(e1) & of(x3,x1) & n_outdoors(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_bear(x4) & n_arm(x3) & around(x3,x4) & a_pale(s2) & a_comfortably(s1) & Theme(s2,x4) & Theme(e1,x2) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(with(x1,x3) & of(x3,x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_outdoor(x1) & n_man(x2) & n_male(x1) & n_bucket(x3) & a_topic(x1))