premise: Indian lady dancing in the middle.
hypothesis: An Indian lady eats lunch.
explanation_1: Assuming that one can not eat and dance at the same time, the fact that the lady is dancing in Sentence 1 implies that she can not also be eating.
premise_logic: exists s1 x1 x2 x3.(n_middle(x3) & a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x3) & n_dancing(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_lady(x2) & a_indian(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_eat(e1) & n_lunch(x2) & n_lady(x1) & a_indian(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
premise_sim: exists s1 x1 x2 x3.(of(x1,x2) & n_middle(x3) & n_lady(x2) & n_dancing(x1) & in(x1,x3) & a_topic(x1) & a_indian(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(v_eat(e1) & n_lunch(x2) & n_lady(x1) & a_indian(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))