premise: An Asian guy working a loom.
hypothesis: The asian guy is resting.
explanation_1: In first sentence a guy is working but in a second sentence a guy is resting, these are different so it is contradict.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_work(e1) & n_loom(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_guy(x1) & a_asian(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1.(n_guy(x1) & a_asian(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_rest(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_work(e1) & n_loom(x3) & n_guy(x1) & a_topic(x1) & a_asian(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1.(v_rest(e1) & n_guy(x1) & a_asian(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))