premise: Three men at work standing along a wall.
hypothesis: The men are at lunch
explanation_1: The men aren't necessarily at lunch just because they are standing along a wall.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & along(e1,x4) & n_wall(x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_stand(e1) & (x1 = x3) & at(x1,x2) & n_work(x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2.(at(x1,x2) & n_lunch(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_stand(e1) & n_work(x2) & n_wall(x4) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_3(x1) & at(x1,x2) & along(e1,x4) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x1 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2.(n_lunch(x2) & at(x1,x2)))