premise: Black dog looking at his reflection in the water.
hypothesis: The dog is looking out into the woods.
explanation_1: Sentence one the dog is described as black and is staring at his reflection Sentence two the dog is not described and is looking into the woods
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_water(x4) & at(e1,x3) & in(x3,x4) & n_reflection(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1) & n_dog(x1) & (x1 = x2) & ne_nam_black(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(n_wood(x2) & n_dog(x1) & a_out(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & into(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_look(e1) & of(x3,x1) & ne_nam_black(x2) & n_water(x4) & n_reflection(x3) & n_male(x1) & n_dog(x1) & in(x3,x4) & at(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(v_look(e1) & n_wood(x2) & n_dog(x1) & into(e1,x2) & a_out(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1))