premise: The two dogs are running through a field of flowers.
hypothesis: The dogs are running through a field of tulips.
explanation_1: There are only two dogs, but the revised sentence makes it seem as if there could be any number of dogs.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_dog(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & through(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_flower(x3) & n_field(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_dog(x1) & through(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_tulip(x3) & n_field(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_run(e1) & through(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_flower(x3) & n_field(x2) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_run(e1) & through(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_tulip(x3) & n_field(x2) & n_dog(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))