premise: Two people are outside speaking to each other standing on a rug.
hypothesis: Some people are talking about politics.
explanation_1: Two people are outside speaking to each other standing on a rug does not indicate that they talking about politics.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x4.(n_standing(x4) & exists s1 x2.(all x3.((-(x3 = x4) & n_standing(x3)) -> exists x5.((x1 = x2) & to(x2,x3) & on(x3,x5) & n_rug(x5))) & n_speaking(x2) & a_outside(s1) & Theme(s1,x2)) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(about(e1,x2) & n_politics(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_talk(e1) & n_people(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x4.(n_standing(x4) & n_people(x1) & exists s1 x2.(n_speaking(x2) & all x3.(exists x5.(to(x2,x3) & on(x3,x5) & n_rug(x5) & (x1 = x2)) | -n_standing(x3) | (x3 = x4)) & a_outside(s1) & Theme(s1,x2)) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_talk(e1) & n_politics(x2) & n_people(x1) & about(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))