premise: A guy is rock climbing.
hypothesis: A man is outdoors.
explanation_1: Rock climbing can be done outdoors.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2 x3.((x1 = x2) & n_climb(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_rock(x3)) & n_guy(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2.((x1 = x2) & n_outdoors(x2)) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1.(n_guy(x1) & exists x2 x3.(of(x2,x3) & n_rock(x3) & n_climb(x2) & (x1 = x2)))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2.(n_outdoors(x2) & (x1 = x2)))