premise: There are handprints all over this mat.
hypothesis: A child's handprints.
explanation_1: the fact that there are handprints all over the  mat does not infer they are a child's handprints
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_mat(x2) & r_all(p1) & over(p1,x2) & exists x3.((x1 = x3) & n_handprint(x3)))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2.(a_topic(x2) & n_handprint(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_child(x1))
premise_sim: exists p1 x1 x2.(r_all(p1) & over(p1,x2) & n_mat(x2) & exists x3.(n_handprint(x3) & (x1 = x3)))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(of(x2,x1) & n_handprint(x2) & n_child(x1) & a_topic(x2))