premise: Two guys are on skateboards in the woods.
hypothesis: Two guys are riding skateboards through the woods.
explanation_1: "guys are on skateboards" is synonymous with "guys are riding skateboards"
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x3.(n_wood(x3) & exists x2.(on(x1,x2) & in(x2,x3) & n_skateboard(x2)) & n_guy(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_wood(x3) & through(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1) & n_skateboard(x2) & n_guy(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x3.(n_wood(x3) & n_guy(x1) & exists x2.(on(x1,x2) & n_skateboard(x2) & in(x2,x3)) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_ride(e1) & through(e1,x3) & n_wood(x3) & n_skateboard(x2) & n_guy(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))