premise: Picture of a hotdog vendor in the street.
hypothesis: A man is cooking a hamburger in a bathroom.
explanation_1: The first sentence is describing what is seen in a picture, but there is no reference to the picture in the second sentence. There is no proof that the hotdog vendor is a man. The hotdog vendor cooks hotdogs not hamburger and the hotdog vendor is in the street, not in a bathroom.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_street(x4) & a_topic(x1) & of(x1,x2) & in(x2,x4) & n_vendor(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_hotdog(x3) & n_picture(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(in(e1,x3) & n_bathroom(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_cook(e1) & n_hamburger(x2) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(of(x2,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_vendor(x2) & n_street(x4) & n_picture(x1) & n_hotdog(x3) & in(x2,x4) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_cook(e1) & n_man(x1) & n_hamburger(x2) & n_bathroom(x3) & in(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))