premise: Two large brown dogs are playing in the grass.
hypothesis: The dogs are brothers.
explanation_1: It does not follow that because two dogs are playing that they must somehow be brothers.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2.(n_grass(x2) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_dog(x1) & a_brown(s2) & Theme(s2,x1) & a_large(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_dog(x1) & exists x2.((x1 = x2) & n_brother(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2.(v_play(e1) & n_grass(x2) & n_dog(x1) & in(e1,x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_large(s1) & a_brown(s2) & Theme(s2,x1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_dog(x1) & exists x2.(n_brother(x2) & (x1 = x2)))