premise: Two outdoorsmen stand by a stony edifice in a forest.
hypothesis: Two brothers are in a forest.
explanation_1: Two outdoorsmen are not necessarily brothers.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(by(e1,x2) & in(x2,x4) & n_forest(x4) & n_edifice(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_stony(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & n_outdoorsman(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2.(in(x1,x2) & n_forest(x2)) & n_brother(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_stand(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_stony(x3) & n_outdoorsman(x1) & n_forest(x4) & n_edifice(x2) & in(x2,x4) & card_eq_2(x1) & by(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_brother(x1) & exists x2.(n_forest(x2) & in(x1,x2)) & card_eq_2(x1))