premise: Two dogs are fighting and playing with each other while running through some grass.
hypothesis: Two dogs play in the grass.
explanation_1: The dogs are in the grass and are playing with each other, so they are playing in the grass.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2.(all x3.(n_other(x3) -> exists e3 x4.(while(e2,e3) & through(e3,x4) & n_grass(x4) & Actor(e3,x2) & v_run(e3) & with(e2,x3))) & Actor(e2,x2) & v_play(e2) & n_dog(x2) & card_eq_2(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_fight(e1) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(n_grass(x3) & a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x3) & n_play(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_dog(x2) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2.(v_play(e2) & v_fight(e1) & n_dog(x2) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_2(x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & all x3.(exists e3 x4.(with(e2,x3) & while(e2,e3) & v_run(e3) & through(e3,x4) & n_grass(x4) & Actor(e3,x2)) | -n_other(x3)) & Actor(e2,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(of(x1,x2) & n_play(x1) & n_grass(x3) & n_dog(x2) & in(x1,x3) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1))