premise: Two young boys playing lacrosse run for the lacrosse ball.
hypothesis: the boys are sitting under the ocean
explanation_1: playing requires movement, sitting requires being still, therefore cannot be both still and moving at same time, so the states are contradictory
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & for(e1,x5) & n_ball(x5) & of(x5,x4) & n_lacrosse(x4) & n_lacrosse(x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_play(e1) & n_run(x3) & of(x3,x4) & (x1 = x2) & n_boy(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_ocean(x2) & n_boy(x1) & under(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_play(e1) & of(x5,x4) & of(x3,x4) & n_run(x3) & n_lacrosse(x4) & n_boy(x1) & n_ball(x5) & for(e1,x5) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_young(s1) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_sit(e1) & under(e1,x2) & n_ocean(x2) & n_boy(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))