premise: Amy Winehouse wanna be look alike.
hypothesis: The woman likes Amy Winehouse.
explanation_1: the irst sentence seems like its a attack on the woman not clarifying she want to be like Amywhie house because she likes her
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 p2 x1 x2 x3.(exists s1.(Theme(s1,x1) & a_alike(s1)) & Topic(e1,p2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1) & Topic(x1,p1) & exists p3 x4.((x1 = x4) & n_thing(x4)) & n_wan(x1) & (x1 = x3) & ne_per_winehouse(x3) & (x1 = x2) & ne_per_amy(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(ne_org_winehouse(x2) & (x2 = x3) & ne_org_amy(x3) & n_woman(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_like(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 p1 p2 x1 x2 x3.(v_look(e1) & ne_per_winehouse(x3) & ne_per_amy(x2) & n_wan(x1) & exists x4.(n_thing(x4) & (x1 = x4)) & exists s1.(a_alike(s1) & Theme(s1,x1)) & Topic(x1,p1) & Topic(e1,p2) & Actor(e1,x1) & (x1 = x3) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_like(e1) & ne_org_winehouse(x2) & ne_org_amy(x3) & n_woman(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & (x2 = x3))