premise: A young child is on all fours inside.
hypothesis: A youth is on hands and knees.
explanation_1: Young child and youth are synonymous. If you are on all fours then you must be on your hands and knees.
premise_logic: exists p1 s1 s2 x1.(a_inside(s2) & Manner(p1,s2) & all x2.(n_fours(x2) -> on(x1,x2)) & n_child(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2 x3 x4.(on(x1,x2) & n_knee(x4) & n_hand(x3) & subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2)) & n_youth(x1))
premise_sim: exists p1 s1 s2 x1.(n_child(x1) & all x2.(on(x1,x2) | -n_fours(x2)) & a_young(s1) & a_inside(s2) & Theme(s1,x1) & Manner(p1,s2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_youth(x1) & exists x2 x3 x4.(subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & on(x1,x2) & n_knee(x4) & n_hand(x3)))