premise: A man wearing sunglasses is sitting in the passenger seat of a silver vehicle.
hypothesis: A boy is playing in a tree.
explanation_1: The two sentences don't talk about the same people. On sentence explains that a man is sitting in a vehicle, while the second sentence states that a boy is playing in a tree.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(n_seat(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_passenger(x5) & in(e2,x4) & of(x4,x6) & n_vehicle(x6) & of(x6,x7) & n_silver(x7) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_sit(e2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_sunglass(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(in(e1,x2) & n_tree(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_boy(x1))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(v_wear(e1) & v_sit(e2) & of(x6,x7) & of(x4,x6) & of(x4,x5) & n_vehicle(x6) & n_sunglass(x3) & n_silver(x7) & n_seat(x4) & n_passenger(x5) & n_man(x1) & in(e2,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_play(e1) & n_tree(x2) & n_boy(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))