premise: 2 little girls eating ice cream.
hypothesis: The girls are throwing mud at each other.
explanation_1: Does not say how many little girls in sentence 2 (2 in sentence 1). Eating ice cream is different than throwing mud; different activities performed by the girls
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_eat(e1) & n_cream(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_ice(x4) & (x1 = x2) & n_girl(x1) & a_little(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & n_date(x1) & a_date_day_02(x1) & a_date_day_02(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_girl(x1) & all x3.(n_other(x3) -> at(e1,x3)) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_throw(e1) & n_mud(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_eat(e1) & of(x3,x4) & n_ice(x4) & n_girl(x1) & n_date(x1) & n_cream(x3) & a_topic(x1) & a_little(s1) & a_date_day_02(x1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_throw(e1) & n_mud(x2) & n_girl(x1) & all x3.(at(e1,x3) | -n_other(x3)) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))