premise: Three boys sit on a wet basketball court.
hypothesis: Nobody is sitting.
explanation_1: Nobody sitting totally contradicts with the boys sitting on a wet basketball court.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(on(e1,x2) & n_court(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_basketball(x3) & a_wet(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_boy(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: -exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_person(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(v_sit(e1) & on(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_court(x2) & n_boy(x1) & n_basketball(x3) & card_eq_3(x1) & a_wet(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: all e1 x1.(-v_sit(e1) | -n_person(x1) | -Actor(e1,x1))