premise: A woman in a crown talking on the phone with a smile.
hypothesis: A man is on his tablet.
explanation_1: In sentence 1 is's a woman and in sentence two it's a man. Also in sentence one they are on a phone and in sentence two it is a tablet.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_phone(x4) & a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & with(e1,x5) & n_smile(x5) & on(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_talk(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_crown(x2) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(on(x1,x2) & n_tablet(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(with(e1,x5) & v_talk(e1) & on(e1,x4) & n_woman(x1) & n_smile(x5) & n_phone(x4) & n_crown(x2) & in(x1,x2) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(on(x1,x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_tablet(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_male(x1))