premise: There are three lambs: one white, one black, and one spotted.
hypothesis: There are three mammals.
explanation_1: Lambs are a mammals, so both sentences are true. There are three in both sentences.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 s1 s2 s3 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9.((x1 = x2) & :(x2,x3) & rel(x3,x5) & subset_of(x8,x5) & Theme(s3,x9) & a_spotted(s3) & (x8 = x9) & n_thing(x8) & card_eq_1(x8) & subset_of(x6,x5) & Theme(s2,x7) & a_black(s2) & (x6 = x7) & n_thing(x6) & card_eq_1(x6) & Theme(s1,x4) & a_white(s1) & (x3 = x4) & n_thing(x3) & card_eq_1(x3) & n_lamb(x2) & card_eq_3(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.((x1 = x2) & n_mammal(x2) & card_eq_3(x2))
premise_sim: exists x1 s1 s2 s3 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9.(subset_of(x8,x5) & subset_of(x6,x5) & rel(x3,x5) & n_thing(x8) & n_thing(x6) & n_thing(x3) & n_lamb(x2) & card_eq_3(x2) & card_eq_1(x8) & card_eq_1(x6) & card_eq_1(x3) & a_white(s1) & a_spotted(s3) & a_black(s2) & Theme(s3,x9) & Theme(s2,x7) & Theme(s1,x4) & :(x2,x3) & (x8 = x9) & (x6 = x7) & (x3 = x4) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_mammal(x2) & card_eq_3(x2) & (x1 = x2))