premise: Two child share a swing in a playground.
hypothesis: Two children are swinging.
explanation_1: Saying that the kids share a swing implies that the children are swinging.
premise_logic: all x1.(n_swing(x1) -> exists x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x2) & in(x2,x4) & n_playground(x4) & for(x2,x1) & n_share(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_child(x3) & card_eq_2(x2)))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_swing(e1) & n_child(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: all x1.(exists x2 x3 x4.(of(x2,x3) & n_share(x2) & n_playground(x4) & n_child(x3) & in(x2,x4) & for(x2,x1) & card_eq_2(x2) & a_topic(x2)) | -n_swing(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_swing(e1) & n_child(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))