premise: Two men, one with goggles, are swimming next to each other.
hypothesis: A man eats a croissant on a bridge.
explanation_1: There are three men one with googles, one without googles swimming next to each other. while another man eats a  croissant on a bridge. Or there are two men swimming next to each other and only one of them ahs googles. and there is no manon the bridge eating a croissant on the bridge.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(all x4.(n_other(x4) -> to(e1,x4)) & r_next(e1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_swim(e1) & rel(x1,x2) & with(x2,x3) & n_goggles(x3) & n_thing(x2) & card_eq_1(x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(on(e1,x3) & n_bridge(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_eat(e1) & n_croissant(x2) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(with(x2,x3) & v_swim(e1) & rel(x1,x2) & r_next(e1) & n_thing(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_goggles(x3) & card_eq_2(x1) & card_eq_1(x2) & all x4.(to(e1,x4) | -n_other(x4)) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_eat(e1) & on(e1,x3) & n_man(x1) & n_croissant(x2) & n_bridge(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))