premise: Two children are in a sack race while a third child watches.
hypothesis: All three children are racing.
explanation_1: In sentence one there are only two children racing. All three are racing in 2.
premise_logic: exists p1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(while(p1,x2) & n_watch(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_child(x3) & a_third(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & exists x4 x5.(in(x1,x4) & n_race(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_sack(x5)) & n_child(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: all x1.((n_child(x1) & card_eq_3(x1)) -> exists e1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_race(e1)))
premise_sim: exists p1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(while(p1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_watch(x2) & n_child(x3) & n_child(x1) & exists x4 x5.(of(x4,x5) & n_sack(x5) & n_race(x4) & in(x1,x4)) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_third(s1) & Theme(s1,x2))
hypothesis_sim: all x1.(exists e1.(v_race(e1) & Actor(e1,x1)) | -n_child(x1) | -card_eq_3(x1))