premise: Two men, without any shirts on, are playing table tennis
hypothesis: A child is climbing a tree.
explanation_1: its either two men or a child and one cant play table tennis and is climbing a tree at the same time.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_tennis(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_table(x3) & -all x4.(n_shirt(x4) -> exists s1 x5.(with(x1,x4) & Theme(s1,x5) & a_on(s1) & (x4 = x5))) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_climb(e1) & n_tree(x2) & n_child(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_play(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_tennis(x2) & n_table(x3) & n_man(x1) & exists x4.(n_shirt(x4) & all s1 x5.(-with(x1,x4) | -a_on(s1) | -Theme(s1,x5) | -(x4 = x5))) & card_eq_2(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_climb(e1) & n_tree(x2) & n_child(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))