premise: A woman wearing an apron is working.
hypothesis: The women wearing an apron is a cook.
explanation_1: The fact that a woman is working while wearing an apron does not necessarily imply that she is a cook.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3.(Actor(e2,x1) & v_work(e2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_apron(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3.(n_woman(x1) & exists x4.((x1 = x4) & n_cook(x4)) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_apron(x3) & (x1 = x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3.(v_work(e2) & v_wear(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_apron(x3) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_wear(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_apron(x3) & exists x4.(n_cook(x4) & (x1 = x4)) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))