premise: A woman is drawing with crayons and a mirror.
hypothesis: A woman is drawing with crayons and a mirror.
explanation_1: "A woman is drawing with crayons and a mirror" is identical to the first sentence.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(e1,x2) & subset_of(x4,x2) & n_mirror(x4) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_crayon(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_draw(e1) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(e1,x2) & subset_of(x4,x2) & n_mirror(x4) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_crayon(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_draw(e1) & n_woman(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(e1,x2) & v_draw(e1) & subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_woman(x1) & n_mirror(x4) & n_crayon(x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(e1,x2) & v_draw(e1) & subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_woman(x1) & n_mirror(x4) & n_crayon(x3) & Actor(e1,x1))