premise: Two men take photographs on either side of their car.
hypothesis: two people are walking
explanation_1: The action of walking is not identical to the action of taking a photograph.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x4.(all x3.(n_side(x3) -> exists e1.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_take(e1) & on(x2,x3) & of(x3,x4))) & n_car(x4) & of(x4,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_photograph(x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x4.(of(x4,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_photograph(x2) & n_man(x1) & n_car(x4) & card_eq_2(x1) & all x3.(exists e1.(v_take(e1) & on(x2,x3) & of(x3,x4) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1)) | -n_side(x3)))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_walk(e1) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))