premise: A closeup of a man that is rock climbing.
hypothesis: A man is rock climbing.
explanation_1: A man that is rock climbing is rock climbing.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & of(x1,x2) & exists x4 x5.((x3 = x4) & n_climb(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_rock(x5)) & (x2 = x3) & n_man(x2) & n_closeup(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2 x3.((x1 = x2) & n_climb(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_rock(x3)) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2) & n_closeup(x1) & exists x4 x5.(of(x4,x5) & n_rock(x5) & n_climb(x4) & (x3 = x4)) & a_topic(x1) & (x2 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2 x3.(of(x2,x3) & n_rock(x3) & n_climb(x2) & (x1 = x2)))