premise: This picture is a strange combination of old times and present day.
hypothesis: The picture shows a futuristic city.
explanation_1: The pieces of information that contradict each other is a stark  difference in mention of the picture of a futuristic city as compared to the picture of a combination of old times and present day in the first sentence.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_picture(x1) & exists s1 s2 s3 x2 x3 x4 x5.((x1 = x2) & subset_of(x5,x2) & n_day(x5) & a_present(s3) & Theme(s3,x5) & subset_of(x3,x2) & of(x3,x4) & n_time(x4) & a_old(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & n_combination(x3) & a_strange(s1) & Theme(s1,x3)))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(n_picture(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_show(e1) & n_city(x2) & a_futuristic(s1) & Theme(s1,x2))
premise_sim: exists x1.(n_picture(x1) & exists s1 s2 s3 x2 x3 x4 x5.(subset_of(x5,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & of(x3,x4) & n_time(x4) & n_day(x5) & n_combination(x3) & a_strange(s1) & a_present(s3) & a_old(s2) & Theme(s3,x5) & Theme(s2,x4) & Theme(s1,x3) & (x1 = x2)))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(v_show(e1) & n_picture(x1) & n_city(x2) & a_futuristic(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))