premise: Two boys in karate uniforms are sparring on a padded mat.
hypothesis: The boys are competing in a match.
explanation_1: It cannot be inferred that the boys sparring are competing in a match. It could be a practice or just for fun. It is unknown.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(on(e1,x3) & n_mat(x3) & a_padded(s2) & Theme(s2,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_spar(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_uniform(x2) & a_karate(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_boy(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_boy(x1) & in(e1,x2) & n_match(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_compete(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(v_spar(e1) & on(e1,x3) & n_uniform(x2) & n_mat(x3) & n_boy(x1) & in(x1,x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_padded(s2) & a_karate(s1) & Theme(s2,x3) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_compete(e1) & n_match(x2) & n_boy(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))