premise: A weimaraner dog runs through the woods wearing a red collar.
hypothesis: The dog is running through the woods.
explanation_1: The kid of dog that runs through the woods in no way impacts whether or not the dog is actually running in the woods, the fact that it is running there has been well established.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_wood(x3) & for(e1,e2) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_wear(e2) & n_collar(x4) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & through(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1) & n_dog(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_weimaraner(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_wood(x2) & n_dog(x1) & through(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1))
premise_sim: exists e2 e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_wear(e2) & v_run(e1) & through(e1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_wood(x3) & n_weimaraner(x2) & n_dog(x1) & n_collar(x4) & for(e1,e2) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_run(e1) & through(e1,x2) & n_wood(x2) & n_dog(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))