premise: A man windsurfing in the ocean.
hypothesis: A man is an experienced windsurfer.
explanation_1: Just because he is windsurfing does not necessarily mean he is experienced.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(n_ocean(x3) & a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x3) & n_windsurfing(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists s1 x2.((x1 = x2) & n_windsurfer(x2) & a_experienced(s1) & Theme(s1,x2)) & n_man(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(of(x1,x2) & n_windsurfing(x1) & n_ocean(x3) & n_man(x2) & in(x1,x3) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists s1 x2.(n_windsurfer(x2) & a_experienced(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & (x1 = x2)))