premise: Two men sitting and talking to each other.
hypothesis: Two people are chatting.
explanation_1: Although they are talking, it does not imply they are chatting.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & all x4.(n_other(x4) -> to(e2,x4)) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_talk(e2) & (x1 = x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_sit(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_chat(e1) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3.(v_talk(e2) & v_sit(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & all x4.(to(e2,x4) | -n_other(x4)) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e2,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x3) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_chat(e1) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))