premise: An gymnast is working the bar.
hypothesis: A gymnast is working hard.
explanation_1: IF the gymnast is working the bar, it follows that the gymnast is working hard.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_bar(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_work(e1) & n_gymnast(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1.(a_hard(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_work(e1) & n_gymnast(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_work(e1) & n_gymnast(x1) & n_bar(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1.(v_work(e1) & n_gymnast(x1) & a_hard(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1))