premise: A person is rock climbing.
hypothesis: A person is practicing climbing in a gym.
explanation_1: You cannot assume that a person rock climbing is practicing climbing in a gym, because there are many places to go rock climbing outside.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2 x3.((x1 = x2) & n_climb(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_rock(x3)) & n_person(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1.(exists e2 x2.(in(e2,x2) & n_gym(x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_climb(e2)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_practice(e1) & n_person(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1.(n_person(x1) & exists x2 x3.(of(x2,x3) & n_rock(x3) & n_climb(x2) & (x1 = x2)))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1.(v_practice(e1) & n_person(x1) & exists e2 x2.(v_climb(e2) & n_gym(x2) & in(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1))