premise: A boy in goggles is swimming.
hypothesis: The boy is swimming in a pool.
explanation_1: Swimming implies that the boy is in a pool.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(exists x3.((x1 = x3) & n_swimming(x3)) & in(x1,x2) & n_goggles(x2) & n_boy(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_boy(x1) & in(e1,x2) & n_pool(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_swim(e1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_goggles(x2) & n_boy(x1) & in(x1,x2) & exists x3.(n_swimming(x3) & (x1 = x3)))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_swim(e1) & n_pool(x2) & n_boy(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))