premise: A man in action strikes a tennis ball.
hypothesis: The ball will fly over the net.
explanation_1: Although the man is striking a tennis ball there is no mention of a net and we are not told that the ball will fly over it.
premise_logic: exists x1.(all x2 x3.((n_ball(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_tennis(x3)) -> exists x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x4) & for(x4,x2) & n_strike(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_action(x5))) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_net(x2) & n_ball(x1) & over(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_fly(e1))
premise_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & all x2 x3.(exists x4 x5.(of(x4,x5) & n_strike(x4) & n_action(x5) & in(x1,x4) & for(x4,x2) & a_topic(x1)) | -of(x2,x3) | -n_tennis(x3) | -n_ball(x2)))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_fly(e1) & over(e1,x2) & n_net(x2) & n_ball(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))