premise: Woman standing at an ATM in a casino.
hypothesis: The woman was at the casino.
explanation_1: if she is standing at an ATM in a casino then she must be at the casino
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & at(x1,x3) & in(x3,x4) & n_casino(x4) & ne_org_atm(x3) & n_standing(x1) & (x1 = x2) & ne_nam_woman(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_casino(x2) & n_woman(x1) & at(x1,x2))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(ne_org_atm(x3) & ne_nam_woman(x2) & n_standing(x1) & n_casino(x4) & in(x3,x4) & at(x1,x3) & a_topic(x1) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_woman(x1) & n_casino(x2) & at(x1,x2))