premise: the dog barks at the toy.
hypothesis: The dogs are near a toy.
explanation_1: dog barks at the toy so there should be  dogs near a toy.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(n_toy(x3) & n_bark(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_dog(x2) & a_topic(x1) & at(x1,x3))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_dog(x1) & exists x2.(near(x1,x2) & n_toy(x2)))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(of(x1,x2) & n_toy(x3) & n_dog(x2) & n_bark(x1) & at(x1,x3) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_dog(x1) & exists x2.(near(x1,x2) & n_toy(x2)))