premise: Two guys are on skateboards in the woods.
hypothesis: Two men attempt to skateboard in the woods.
explanation_1: Just because the two guys are on skateboards does not mean they attempting to skateboard.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x3.(n_wood(x3) & exists x2.(on(x1,x2) & in(x2,x3) & n_skateboard(x2)) & n_guy(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(n_wood(x2) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_attempt(e1) & exists e2.(in(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_skateboard(e2)) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x3.(n_wood(x3) & n_guy(x1) & exists x2.(on(x1,x2) & n_skateboard(x2) & in(x2,x3)) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(v_attempt(e1) & n_wood(x2) & n_man(x1) & exists e2.(v_skateboard(e2) & in(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1)) & card_eq_2(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1))