premise: A boy in goggles is swimming.
hypothesis: A boy is playing in the water.
explanation_1: Playing in the water doesn't denote swimming only
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(exists x3.((x1 = x3) & n_swimming(x3)) & in(x1,x2) & n_goggles(x2) & n_boy(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_water(x2) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_boy(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_goggles(x2) & n_boy(x1) & in(x1,x2) & exists x3.(n_swimming(x3) & (x1 = x3)))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_play(e1) & n_water(x2) & n_boy(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))