premise: A young woman performing a traditional dance.
hypothesis: A young woman watches TV.
explanation_1: While a woman can be performing a dance and watching TV simultaneously, sentence 1 is contradictory from sentence 2 because the first refers to the woman performing a dance and latter refers to the woman watching TV.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_perform(e1) & n_dance(x3) & a_traditional(s2) & Theme(s2,x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_woman(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_watch(e1) & n_tv(x2) & n_woman(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(v_perform(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_dance(x3) & a_young(s1) & a_traditional(s2) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(s2,x3) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(v_watch(e1) & n_woman(x1) & n_tv(x2) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))