premise: A man wearing an orange shirt is serving snow cones from an ice cream cart.
hypothesis: Nobody is selling shaved ice.
explanation_1: In the first sentence it states that there is a man that is selling snow cones while in the second sentence it says that no one is selling snow cones. The snow cones are either being sold or they are not, there isn't any median to the sentence.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9.(Theme(e2,x5) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_serve(e2) & from(x5,x7) & n_cart(x7) & of(x7,x9) & n_cream(x9) & of(x7,x8) & n_ice(x8) & n_cone(x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_snow(x6) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_shirt(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_orange(x4) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: -exists e1 e2 x1 x2.(Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_sell(e2) & n_ice(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & v_shave(e1) & n_person(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9.(v_wear(e1) & v_serve(e2) & of(x7,x9) & of(x7,x8) & of(x5,x6) & of(x3,x4) & n_snow(x6) & n_shirt(x3) & n_orange(x4) & n_man(x1) & n_ice(x8) & n_cream(x9) & n_cone(x5) & n_cart(x7) & from(x5,x7) & Theme(e2,x5) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: all e1 e2 x1 x2.(-v_shave(e1) | -v_sell(e2) | -n_person(x1) | -n_ice(x2) | -Theme(e2,x2) | -Theme(e1,x2) | -Actor(e2,x1))