premise: Three runners run down a hill.
hypothesis: Runners are on a hill.
explanation_1: it is stating they are runners because they run down the hill and it states they are on a hill, so they mean the same thing, the runners are on a hill
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(a_down(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1) & n_hill(x2) & n_runner(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2.(on(x1,x2) & n_hill(x2)) & n_runner(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(v_run(e1) & n_runner(x1) & n_hill(x2) & card_eq_3(x1) & a_down(s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_runner(x1) & exists x2.(on(x1,x2) & n_hill(x2)))