premise: A dog running through a lot of twigs.
hypothesis: A dog runs through twigs.
explanation_1: The two statements about this dog, and it's running activities, are very similar, almost verbatim, aside from the emphasis on the amount of twigs present.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & through(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_twig(x4) & n_lot(x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_run(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_dog(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(through(e1,x2) & n_twig(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1) & n_dog(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_run(e1) & through(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_twig(x4) & n_lot(x3) & n_dog(x1) & a_topic(x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_run(e1) & through(e1,x2) & n_twig(x2) & n_dog(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))