premise: a surfer is riding a surfboard on top of a breaking wave.
hypothesis: A surfer tans on the beach.
explanation_1: They could both be doing the same thing but one says that the surfer is riding the surf while the other does not mention any motion only tanning.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(on(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_wave(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_breaking(x5) & n_top(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1) & n_surfboard(x2) & n_surfer(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(n_beach(x3) & a_topic(x1) & on(x1,x3) & n_tan(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_surfer(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_ride(e1) & on(e1,x3) & of(x4,x5) & of(x3,x4) & n_wave(x4) & n_top(x3) & n_surfer(x1) & n_surfboard(x2) & n_breaking(x5) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(on(x1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_tan(x1) & n_surfer(x2) & n_beach(x3) & a_topic(x1))