premise: A man riding a bicycle down the street.
hypothesis: The man doesnt have a car.
explanation_1: Just because a man is riding a bicycle down the street does not mean he doesn't have a car. He might just be enjoying a Saturday morning bike ride with friends.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_street(x4) & a_topic(x1) & down(x1,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_ride(e1) & n_bicycle(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_doesnt(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1) & n_car(x3))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(v_ride(e1) & n_street(x4) & n_man(x1) & n_bicycle(x3) & down(x1,x4) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_have(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2) & n_doesnt(x1) & n_car(x3) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1))