premise: Picture of a hotdog vendor in the street.
hypothesis: The vendor sells hotdogs in the arena.
explanation_1: The first sentence describes a picture that is being seen as where there is no description of that in the second sentence. If the hotdog vendor is selling hotdogs in the street, then they are not selling hotdogs in the arena.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_street(x4) & a_topic(x1) & of(x1,x2) & in(x2,x4) & n_vendor(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_hotdog(x3) & n_picture(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_arena(x3) & n_vendor(x1) & in(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sell(e1) & n_hotdog(x2))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(of(x2,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_vendor(x2) & n_street(x4) & n_picture(x1) & n_hotdog(x3) & in(x2,x4) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_sell(e1) & n_vendor(x1) & n_hotdog(x2) & n_arena(x3) & in(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))