premise: Three pairs of women's underwear are hanging on a wire under an awning.
hypothesis: The underwear is laying on the floor.
explanation_1: Three pairs of underwear implies more than one underwear.  Underwear cannot be hanging on a wire and laying on the floor simultaneously.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(under(e1,x5) & n_awning(x5) & on(e1,x4) & n_wire(x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_hang(e1) & of(x1,x3) & n_underwear(x3) & of(x3,x2) & n_woman(x2) & n_pair(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_floor(x2) & n_underwear(x1) & on(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_lay(e1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_hang(e1) & under(e1,x5) & on(e1,x4) & of(x3,x2) & of(x1,x3) & n_woman(x2) & n_wire(x4) & n_underwear(x3) & n_pair(x1) & n_awning(x5) & card_eq_3(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_lay(e1) & on(e1,x2) & n_underwear(x1) & n_floor(x2) & Actor(e1,x1))