premise: Two adults on cellphones downtown.
hypothesis: The two adults have their cell phones.
explanation_1: We can deduce from sentence one that because the adults are on their phones, there also must be two of them on their cell phones.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & on(x1,x2) & n_downtown(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_cellphone(x3) & n_adult(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_phone(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_cell(x3) & of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_adult(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(on(x1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_downtown(x2) & n_cellphone(x3) & n_adult(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(v_have(e1) & of(x2,x3) & of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_phone(x2) & n_cell(x3) & n_adult(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))