premise: Pedestrian checking his cellphone.
hypothesis: The person is a man
explanation_1: man implies that the pedestrian is an adult but this is not necessarily so.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_cellphone(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & ne_nam_pedestrian(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_check(e1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_person(x1) & exists x2.((x1 = x2) & n_man(x2)))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_check(e1) & of(x2,x1) & ne_nam_pedestrian(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_cellphone(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_person(x1) & exists x2.(n_man(x2) & (x1 = x2)))