premise: The man is smoking in the picture.
hypothesis: The woman in the picture is smoking.
explanation_1: man is contradictory to woman
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_picture(x2) & n_man(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_smoke(e1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_picture(x2) & n_woman(x1) & exists x3.((x1 = x3) & n_smoking(x3)) & in(x1,x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_smoke(e1) & n_picture(x2) & n_man(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2.(n_woman(x1) & n_picture(x2) & in(x1,x2) & exists x3.(n_smoking(x3) & (x1 = x3)))