premise: Two fencers collide in a match with one deflecting.
hypothesis: Two fencers collide and one scores a point.
explanation_1: Two fencers collide in a match with one deflecting does not mean that one scores a point.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x3) & n_deflecting(x3) & card_eq_1(x3) & in(e1,x2) & n_match(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_collide(e1) & n_fencer(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists s1 x1 x2.(a_topic(s1) & all x3.(n_point(x3) -> exists x4.(subset_of(x4,s1) & for(x4,x3) & n_score(x4) & card_eq_1(x4))) & subset_of(x1,s1) & n_collide(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_fencer(x2) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x3) & v_collide(e1) & n_match(x2) & n_fencer(x1) & n_deflecting(x3) & in(e1,x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & card_eq_1(x3) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists s1 x1 x2.(subset_of(x1,s1) & of(x1,x2) & n_fencer(x2) & n_collide(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & all x3.(exists x4.(subset_of(x4,s1) & n_score(x4) & for(x4,x3) & card_eq_1(x4)) | -n_point(x3)) & a_topic(s1))