premise: There are two dogs playing with each other.
hypothesis: The dogs are chasing each other.
explanation_1: There are two dogs playing with each other does not necessary that they are chasing each other.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 e1 x2 x3.((x1 = x2) & all x4.(n_other(x4) -> with(e1,x4)) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_play(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_dog(x2) & card_eq_2(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1.(n_dog(x1) & all x2.(n_other(x2) -> exists e1.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_chase(e1))))
premise_sim: exists x1 e1 x2 x3.(v_play(e1) & n_dog(x2) & card_eq_2(x2) & all x4.(with(e1,x4) | -n_other(x4)) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_dog(x1) & all x2.(exists e1.(v_chase(e1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1)) | -n_other(x2)))