premise: There's cyclist in street.
hypothesis: In the street there are cyclists.
explanation_1: The cyclists remain in the street.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(in(p1,x2) & n_street(x2) & exists x3.((x1 = x3) & n_cyclist(x3)))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_street(x2) & in(p1,x2) & exists x3.((x1 = x3) & n_cyclist(x3)))
premise_sim: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_street(x2) & in(p1,x2) & exists x3.(n_cyclist(x3) & (x1 = x3)))
hypothesis_sim: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_street(x2) & in(p1,x2) & exists x3.(n_cyclist(x3) & (x1 = x3)))