premise: Two hockey players battle against each other for the win.
hypothesis: There are players in the ground.
explanation_1: Two hockey players in the ground  battle against each other for the win.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x5.(n_win(x5) & all x4.(n_other(x4) -> (a_topic(x1) & for(x1,x5) & against(x1,x4))) & n_battle(x1) & of(x1,x3) & n_player(x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_hockey(x2) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_ground(x2) & in(p1,x2) & exists x3.((x1 = x3) & n_player(x3)))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x5.(of(x1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_win(x5) & n_player(x3) & n_hockey(x2) & n_battle(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & all x4.((for(x1,x5) | -n_other(x4)) & (against(x1,x4) | -n_other(x4)) & (a_topic(x1) | -n_other(x4))))
hypothesis_sim: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_ground(x2) & in(p1,x2) & exists x3.(n_player(x3) & (x1 = x3)))