premise: A dog drinking from a creek.
hypothesis: A dog is drinking.
explanation_1: Both sentences explain that a dog is drinking.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & from(x1,x3) & n_creek(x3) & n_drinking(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_dog(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2.((x1 = x2) & n_drinking(x2)) & n_dog(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2 x3.(of(x1,x2) & n_drinking(x1) & n_dog(x2) & n_creek(x3) & from(x1,x3) & a_topic(x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_dog(x1) & exists x2.(n_drinking(x2) & (x1 = x2)))