premise: A group of men playing ball out in a field.
hypothesis: There are people playing in a field
explanation_1: Sentence 1 talks about a group of men playing ball on a field. Sentence 2 just says there were people playing on the field. It does not include what they were playing or that they were men. But this sentence wouldn't exist if the group of men weren't there. So sentence 2 is a consequence of sentence 1.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & of(x1,x2) & in(e1,x5) & n_field(x5) & r_out(e1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_play(e1) & n_ball(x4) & (x2 = x3) & n_man(x2) & n_group(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 e1 x2 x3 x4.((x1 = x2) & in(e1,x4) & n_field(x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_play(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_people(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(v_play(e1) & r_out(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2) & n_group(x1) & n_field(x5) & n_ball(x4) & in(e1,x5) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 e1 x2 x3 x4.(v_play(e1) & n_people(x2) & n_field(x4) & in(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & (x2 = x3) & (x1 = x2))