premise: Three teens are talking near a wall.
hypothesis: Teenager stand by a wall in silence.
explanation_1: We do not know that the teens are standing but we are told they are talking and therefore would not be in silence.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(near(e1,x2) & n_wall(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_talk(e1) & n_teens(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & by(x1,x3) & in(x3,x4) & n_silence(x4) & n_wall(x3) & n_stand(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_teenager(x2))
premise_sim: exists e1 x1 x2.(v_talk(e1) & near(e1,x2) & n_wall(x2) & n_teens(x1) & card_eq_3(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(of(x1,x2) & n_wall(x3) & n_teenager(x2) & n_stand(x1) & n_silence(x4) & in(x3,x4) & by(x1,x3) & a_topic(x1))