premise: Two bicyclists race against each other.
hypothesis: Two women are racing.
explanation_1: Not all bicyclists are women.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2.(all x3.(n_other(x3) -> (a_topic(x1) & against(x1,x3))) & n_race(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_bicyclist(x2) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_race(e1) & n_woman(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2.(of(x1,x2) & n_race(x1) & n_bicyclist(x2) & card_eq_2(x1) & all x3.((against(x1,x3) | -n_other(x3)) & (a_topic(x1) | -n_other(x3))))
hypothesis_sim: exists e1 x1.(v_race(e1) & n_woman(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Actor(e1,x1))