premise: This is a man and woman who are holding up a marriage certificate.
hypothesis: the man is not holding anything
explanation_1: The man is holding up a marriage certificate. So it is incorrect to say that the man is not holding anything.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_thing(x1) & exists e1 s1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.((x1 = x2) & a_up(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x6) & Actor(e1,x5) & v_hold(e1) & n_certificate(x6) & of(x6,x7) & n_marriage(x7) & (x2 = x5) & n_woman(x4) & n_man(x3) & subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2)))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & -all x2.(n_thing(x2) -> exists e1.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_hold(e1))))
premise_sim: exists x1.(n_thing(x1) & exists e1 s1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(v_hold(e1) & subset_of(x4,x2) & subset_of(x3,x2) & of(x6,x7) & n_woman(x4) & n_marriage(x7) & n_man(x3) & n_certificate(x6) & a_up(s1) & Theme(e1,x6) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x5) & (x2 = x5) & (x1 = x2)))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2.(n_thing(x2) & all e1.(-v_hold(e1) | -Theme(e1,x2) | -Actor(e1,x1))))