premise: A crowd of people are in a cafe.
hypothesis: People are at a mall.
explanation_1: A CAFE IS NOT A MALL
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(exists x3.(in(x1,x3) & n_cafe(x3)) & of(x1,x2) & n_people(x2) & n_crowd(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists x2.(at(x1,x2) & n_mall(x2)) & n_people(x1))
premise_sim: exists x1 x2.(of(x1,x2) & n_people(x2) & n_crowd(x1) & exists x3.(n_cafe(x3) & in(x1,x3)))
hypothesis_sim: exists x1.(n_people(x1) & exists x2.(n_mall(x2) & at(x1,x2)))