premise: A man in sunglasses and shorts carrying a stick is walking.
hypothesis: A man is walking.
explanation_1: Walking is the same as walking
explanation_2: Sentence two confirms that the man, regardless of what he is wearing, is walking.
explanation_3: A man is walking in both sentences.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(Actor(e2,x1) & v_walk(e2) & in(x1,x2) & subset_of(x4,x2) & Theme(e1,x6) & Actor(e1,x5) & v_carry(e1) & n_stick(x6) & (x4 = x5) & n_shorts(x4) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_sunglass(x3) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_man(x1))