premise: A baby wearing a bib makes a funny face at the camera.
hypothesis: A baby spits up all over his bib.
explanation_1: if a baby spits up, he can't also be making a funny face at the same time
explanation_2: A baby spits on a camera.
explanation_3: The baby either spits up all over his bib or makes a funny face at the camera.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_camera(x5) & at(e2,x5) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_make(e2) & n_face(x4) & a_funny(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_bib(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_baby(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x3.(all x2.(n_thing(x2) -> exists e1 s1.(over(e1,x3) & a_up(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_spit(e1))) & n_bib(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_baby(x1))