premise: People work diligently on there computers at their desks.
hypothesis: The desk chairs were empty as the people lazily wasted the day away drinking.
explanation_1: The desk chairs cannot simultaneously be empty and have people working at their desks
explanation_2: People that work diligently cannot lazily waste the day.
explanation_3: People cannot be working at the desks and have empty chairs because people are drinking simultaneously.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(at(e1,x4) & n_desk(x4) & of(x4,x1) & n_thing(x1) & on(e1,x3) & a_diligently(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_work(e1) & n_computer(x2) & n_people(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_day(x4) & n_people(x3) & n_chair(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_desk(x2) & exists e1 s2 s3 x5.(a_lazily(s3) & Manner(e1,s3) & Time(e1,x5) & n_drinking(x5) & a_away(s2) & Manner(e1,s2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_waste(e1)) & as(s1,p1) & Theme(s1,x1) & a_empty(s1))