premise: A man rides a kicking bull in a bullpen.
hypothesis: The man is riding a sheep.
explanation_1: A man cannot ride a sheep and a bull at the same time.
explanation_2: If a man is riding a kicking bull they are not riding a sheep.
explanation_3: The man is riding a kicking bull show he is more of an rodeo man with high action in his activity. This shows more action than the man riding a sheep which is generally more calm. You cannot ride both at the same time. One infers a setting of a farm where the other infers a setting of a rodeo.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_ride(e2) & in(x2,x3) & n_bullpen(x3) & n_bull(x2) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_kick(e1) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_man(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1) & n_sheep(x2))