premise: A tennis player, wearing a yellow shirt, jumps to hit the ball to the other player, who is wearing black.
hypothesis: The two are playing in a very competitive game.
explanation_1: Not all games are necessarily competitive games.
explanation_2: two people hitting a ball back and fourth does not prove they are playing a game. Could be practice
explanation_3: Not all tennis games are competitive.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 p1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_ball(x5) & Topic(e2,p1) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_jump(e2) & exists e4 e3 p2 x6.(to(e3,x1) & exists s2.(Theme(s2,x6) & a_black(s2)) & Topic(e4,p2) & Actor(e4,x6) & v_wear(e4) & (x1 = x6) & Theme(e3,x5) & Actor(e3,x1) & v_hit(e3)) & -(x1 = x1) & n_player(x1) & n_player(x1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_wear(e1) & n_shirt(x4) & a_yellow(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & (x1 = x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_tennis(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1.(in(e1,x1) & n_game(x1) & a_competitive(s2) & Theme(s2,x1) & a_very(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_thing(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))