premise: A woman in a blue tank-top rides a blue bicycle in front of a crowd of meandering pedestrians.
hypothesis: A woman narrowly avoids hitting some pedestrians
explanation_1: Just because a woman rides a bicycle in front of a crowd doesn't mean she narrowly avoids hitting them.
explanation_2: Riding a bicycle in front of a crowd does not mean you narrowly avoid hitting someone or came close to hitting someone.
explanation_3: A woman can be riding a bike in front of a crowd without needs to avoids hitting some pedestrians.
premise_logic: exists x1.(all s1 x2.((n_bicycle(x2) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s1,x2)) -> exists e1 s2 s3 x3 x4 x5 x6.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x4) & of(x4,x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_pedestrian(x6) & Actor(e1,x6) & v_meander(e1) & n_crowd(x5) & n_front(x4) & in(x1,x3) & for(x3,x2) & n_ride(x3) & a_tank-top(s3) & Theme(s3,x3) & a_blue(s2) & Theme(s2,x3))) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 x1.(a_narrowly(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & exists e2 x2.(Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_hit(e2) & n_pedestrian(x2)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_avoid(e1) & n_woman(x1))