premise: The man and the lady are wearing glasses and sitting in red chairs talking to John McCain.
hypothesis: Two people are having coffee with John McCain.
explanation_1: WE have no idea if they are having coffee or anything else. It just mentions talking with not eating or drinking.
explanation_2: The fact that a man and a lady talking to John McCain doesn't necessarily mean that they are having coffee with John McCain.
explanation_3: Sitting in chairs doesn't imply that they are having coffee
premise_logic: exists e2 e3 e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11.(ne_per_mccain(x10) & (x10 = x11) & ne_per_john(x11) & n_lady(x7) & n_man(x6) & n_lady(x3) & n_man(x2) & in(e2,x8) & to(e3,x10) & Actor(e3,x9) & v_talk(e3) & (x8 = x9) & n_chair(x8) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x8) & Actor(e2,x5) & v_sit(e2) & subset_of(x7,x5) & subset_of(x6,x5) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_wear(e1) & n_glass(x4) & subset_of(x3,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(ne_per_mccain(x3) & (x3 = x4) & ne_per_john(x4) & with(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1) & n_coffee(x2) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))