premise: A man in a business suit strolls beneath a covered walkway.
hypothesis: The man is taking a jog.
explanation_1: Strolling does not involve taking a jog.
explanation_2: The man either strolls or jogs.
explanation_3: Strolls implies walking, while jog implies a form of running.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(beneath(e1,x4) & n_walkway(x4) & a_covered(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stroll(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_suit(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_business(x3) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_man(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_take(e1) & n_jog(x2))