premise: A woman dressed in a black shirt with purple bikini bottoms is playing volleyball in a fenced in area.
hypothesis: a woman with red bikini bottoms is playing volleyball
explanation_1: The part that contradicts sentence one and sentence two are the color of the shorts the women playing volleyball is wearing. Sentence two states that a woman with red bikini bottoms is playing volleyball while sentence one explains that a woman with a black short and purple bikini bottoms is playing in a fenced area.
explanation_2: The woman cannot be wearing red bikini bottoms and purple bikini bottoms at the same time.
explanation_3: She is wearing purple not red.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8.(in(e2,x7) & in(x7,x8) & n_area(x8) & n_fence(x7) & Theme(e2,x6) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_play(e2) & n_volleyball(x6) & in(e1,x3) & with(x3,x4) & n_bottom(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_bikini(x5) & a_purple(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & n_shirt(x3) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & v_dress(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_volleyball(x4) & with(x1,x2) & n_bottom(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_bikini(x3) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_woman(x1))