premise: Two men, one wearing a white hockey jersey and the other a red hockey jersey, playing hockey on an ice rink.
hypothesis: Two soccer players are sliding.
explanation_1: One cannot be playing hockey and sliding at the same time
explanation_2: The men are either playing hockey or soccer.
explanation_3: it would be either hockey players or soccer players who is playing
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9.(on(e2,x8) & n_rink(x8) & of(x8,x9) & n_ice(x9) & Theme(e2,x7) & Actor(e2,x5) & v_play(e2) & n_hockey(x7) & -(x5 = x3) & n_jersey(x3) & n_jersey(x3) & of(x3,x6) & n_hockey(x6) & a_red(s3) & Theme(s3,x3) & n_jersey(x5) & of(x5,x4) & n_hockey(x4) & n_hockey(x4) & a_red(s2) & Theme(s2,x5) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_wear(e1) & of(x3,x4) & a_white(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & rel(x1,x2) & n_thing(x2) & card_eq_1(x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_slide(e1) & n_player(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_soccer(x2) & card_eq_2(x1))