premise: A man is walking in the same direction that a model airplane is flying in dried grassland.
hypothesis: The man is swimming in a pool.
explanation_1: The man cannot be walking and swimming simultaneously
explanation_2: A MAN CANNOT BE WALKING IN GRASSLAND AND SWIMMING IN A POOL AT THE SAME TIME.
explanation_3: A man can not be both walking and swimming.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 x1 x2.(n_direction(x2) & a_same(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & in(e1,x2) & exists e3 e2 x3 x4 x5.(in(e2,x5) & n_grassland(x5) & Theme(e3,x5) & v_dry(e3) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_fly(e2) & n_airplane(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_model(x4)) & that(x2,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_man(x1) & in(e1,x2) & n_pool(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_swim(e1))