premise: The people driving the tiny white car were nearly hit by the train, but it had fortunately stopped just in time.
hypothesis: The people driving the van were tailgating at the stadium.
explanation_1: Sentence one is about people driving the tiny car and how they were almost hit by a train but it stopped in time. The sentence in number two is talking about the people in a van who were tailgating at a stadium for an event.
explanation_2: The car is different from the van.
explanation_3: Is it a tiny white car or a van
premise_logic: exists e3 e1 e2 s1 s2 s3 s4 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_thing(x3) & n_train(x4) & n_car(x3) & a_white(s2) & Theme(s2,x3) & a_tiny(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & n_people(x1) & a_fortunately(s4) & Manner(e3,s4) & r_just(e3) & in(e3,x5) & n_time(x5) & Actor(e3,x3) & v_stop(e3) & a_nearly(s3) & Manner(e2,s3) & Actor(e2,x4) & Theme(e2,x1) & v_hit(e2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_drive(e1) & (x1 = x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_stadium(x4) & n_van(x3) & n_people(x1) & at(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_tailgate(e2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_drive(e1) & (x1 = x2))