premise: Child squirting paint onto a piece of spin-art.
hypothesis: The child has paint all over their hands.
explanation_1: Just because the child is painting does not mean he or she has paint on his or her hands.
explanation_2: Just because the child is squirting paint does not mean that it has gotten all over his or her hands.
explanation_3: Just because a child is squirting paint does not mean it is all over their hands.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(ne_nam_child(x1) & onto(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_spin-art(x4) & n_piece(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_squirt(e1) & n_paint(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_hand(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_child(x1) & r_all(e1) & over(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1) & n_paint(x2))