premise: Two ladies looking for bread to purchase.
hypothesis: The women are eating bread.
explanation_1: the first sentence is the search for the bread, the second is them having the bread. searching for the bread came chronologically earlier, so cannot be happening at the same time as the second sentence.
explanation_2: If they are looking for bread to purchase, they typically would not be eating the bread already.
explanation_3: The women cannot be eating bread and looking for bread at the same time.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(to(e1,x3) & n_purchase(x3) & for(e1,x2) & n_bread(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1) & n_lady(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_woman(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_eat(e1) & n_bread(x2))