premise: A man playing a guitar and a man playing drums
hypothesis: A man playing the guitar with a man who is also playing drums.
explanation_1: There is a man playing a guitar and a man playing drums in both sentences.  It is just worded differently with a man also paying drums.
explanation_2: man playing drums is inferred as man who is also playing drums.
explanation_3: The men are playing a guitar and drums.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_play(e1) & subset_of(x5,x3) & n_drum(x5) & of(x5,x7) & n_playing(x7) & of(x5,x6) & n_man(x6) & subset_of(x4,x3) & n_guitar(x4) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(n_guitar(x3) & a_topic(x1) & with(e1,x4) & a_also(s1) & Manner(e2,s1) & Theme(e2,x6) & Actor(e2,x5) & v_play(e2) & n_drum(x6) & (x4 = x5) & n_man(x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_play(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))