premise: A tennis player, wearing a yellow shirt, jumps to hit the ball to the other player, who is wearing black.
hypothesis: The couple eats dinner together.
explanation_1: Eats is a much different action compared to wearing or hit.
explanation_2: The subject cannot be a tennis player jumping to hit the ball and be a couple eating dinner simultaneously.
explanation_3: One cannot be engaging in the physical sport of tennis while also eating dinner.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 p1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_ball(x5) & Topic(e2,p1) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_jump(e2) & exists e4 e3 p2 x6.(to(e3,x1) & exists s2.(Theme(s2,x6) & a_black(s2)) & Topic(e4,p2) & Actor(e4,x6) & v_wear(e4) & (x1 = x6) & Theme(e3,x5) & Actor(e3,x1) & v_hit(e3)) & -(x1 = x1) & n_player(x1) & n_player(x1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_wear(e1) & n_shirt(x4) & a_yellow(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & (x1 = x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_tennis(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(n_couple(x1) & a_together(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_eat(e1) & n_dinner(x2))