premise: A mountain biker rides up a hill on a red bicycle.
hypothesis: The biker rode up the hill.
explanation_1: The information that the biker is traveling up the hill is mentioned outright in both sentences.
explanation_2: The biker had to ride up the hill first in order for it to be said that the biker rode up the hill.
explanation_3: The mountain biker is riding up a hill on a bicycle which qualifies him as a biker going up a hill.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_up(s2) & Manner(e1,s2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1) & on(x3,x4) & n_bicycle(x4) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & n_hill(x3) & n_biker(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_mountain(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(n_hill(x2) & n_biker(x1) & a_up(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1))