premise: Three young women pose for the camera at a parade.
hypothesis: The women went to the parade but no one took their picture.
explanation_1: posing for the camera implies someone took their picture. the actions are contradictory.
explanation_2: One sentence says that three women are posing for the camera, while the other says nobody took their picture.
explanation_3: Three women getting their pictures taken and no one taking their pictures are contradictory.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(n_camera(x2) & for(e1,x2) & at(x2,x3) & n_parade(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_pose(e1) & n_woman(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x4.(n_picture(x4) & of(x4,x2) & n_thing(x2) & n_parade(x2) & n_woman(x1) & -exists e2 x3.(Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_take(e2) & n_one(x3)) & to(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_go(e1))