premise: A man in a straw hat shades his phone while others walk on a busy sidewalk.
hypothesis: The man is sitting on the sidewalk as others walk by him.
explanation_1: There is no way of knowing why the man is sitting on the sidewalk.
explanation_2: Others could have walked past the man if he were standing or laying, the second sentence clarifies that he was sitting.
explanation_3: The man doesn't have to be sitting on the sidewalk.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(exists e2 s1 x5 x6.(on(e2,x6) & n_sidewalk(x6) & a_busy(s1) & Theme(s1,x6) & Actor(e2,x5) & v_walk(e2) & -(x5 = x1) & n_person(x5)) & n_person(x1) & while(e1,p1) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_shade(e1) & n_phone(x4) & of(x4,x1) & n_male(x1) & in(x1,x2) & n_hat(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_straw(x3) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_male(x4) & n_person(x4) & n_sidewalk(x2) & n_man(x1) & as(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x4) & Theme(e2,x5) & v_walk(e2) & (x3 = x5) & -(x3 = x4) & n_person(x3) & on(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1))