premise: A young boy, wearing a helmet, in shorts and a t-shirt and a pair of binoculars around his neck is playing outside.
hypothesis: The boy has nothing around his neck.
explanation_1: If the boy has nothing around his neck then he is not wearing a pair of binoculars around his neck.
explanation_2: a boy would either having a binoculars or nothing around his neck.
explanation_3: binoculars around the neck  cant be inferred as nothing around the neck
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11.(Theme(e2,x11) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_play(e2) & n_outside(x11) & rel(x1,x2) & subset_of(x6,x2) & subset_of(x8,x6) & of(x8,x9) & around(x9,x10) & n_neck(x10) & of(x10,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_binoculars(x9) & n_pair(x8) & subset_of(x7,x6) & n_t-shirt(x7) & subset_of(e1,x2) & in(e1,x5) & n_shorts(x5) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_wear(e1) & n_helmet(x4) & n_thing(x3) & n_boy(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x3.(n_neck(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_boy(x1) & -exists e1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1) & around(x2,x3) & n_thing(x2)))