premise: A man wearing all white is using an orange chainsaw to cut down a thick tree next to his house.
hypothesis: A man is using an ax to chop wood outside of his home.
explanation_1: Chopping wood with an ax is not the same as using a chainsaw.
explanation_2: You can either use an ax or a chainsaw.
explanation_3: You don’t wear all white to chop wood
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x7.(Theme(e1,p1) & Recipient(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_use(e1) & exists e3 s1 s2 x6.(to(e3,x7) & r_next(e3) & a_down(s2) & Manner(e3,s2) & Theme(e3,x6) & Actor(e3,x1) & v_cut(e3) & n_tree(x6) & a_thick(s1) & Theme(s1,x6)) & n_house(x7) & of(x7,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_chainsaw(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_orange(x4) & all x5.(n_white(x5) -> exists e2.(Theme(e2,x5) & Actor(e2,x2) & v_wear(e2))) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x5.(Theme(e1,p1) & Recipient(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_use(e1) & exists e2 x3 x4.(Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_chop(e2) & of(x4,x5) & outside(x3,x4) & n_thing(x4) & n_wood(x3)) & n_home(x5) & of(x5,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_ax(x2) & n_man(x1))