premise: A gentleman smiling and showing his reflective sunglasses.
hypothesis: A gentlemen sitting in a chair looking out a window.
explanation_1: There is no indication that the man is looking out of a window.
explanation_2: There is nothing to indicate he is looking out a window, just because he is showing his glasses.
explanation_3: Sitting in a chair looking out the window does not imply showing reflective sunglasses.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(Theme(e2,x5) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_show(e2) & n_sunglass(x5) & a_reflective(s2) & Theme(s2,x5) & of(x5,x4) & n_male(x4) & n_gentleman(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_smile(e1) & n_sunglass(x2) & a_reflective(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_gentleman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & for(e1,e2) & out(e2,x4) & n_window(x4) & Actor(e2,x2) & v_look(e2) & in(e1,x3) & n_chair(x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_sit(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_gentleman(x1))