premise: Male nun smoking a cigarette.
hypothesis: Male nun is addicted to nicotine.
explanation_1: There is no such thing as a male nun. Smoking doesn't prove he's addicted.
explanation_2: Smoking doesn't necessarily mean that one is addicted to nicotine.
explanation_3: Smoking a cigarette does not necessarily mean addicted to nicotine.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_smoke(e1) & n_cigarette(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_nun(x1) & a_male(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 x1.(Recipient(e1,p1) & Topic(e1,x1) & v_addict(e1) & exists e2.(Actor(e2,x1) & v_nicotine(e2)) & n_nun(x1) & a_male(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))