premise: Three individuals are wearing tight blue nylon suits with one instructor in all black with a ponytail assisting them with putting on harnesses.
hypothesis: Three individuals are wearing tight blue nylon suits.
explanation_1: It is the same sentence, with less description, explaining the three individuals wearing suits.
explanation_2: Three individuals are wearing tight blue nylon suits is a part of earlier sentence.
explanation_3: Sentence two verbatim repeats the information from sentence one that three individuals are wearing tight blue nylon suits.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(all x8.(n_thing(x8) -> exists e3 s3 x9 x10.(for(e1,e3) & Theme(e3,x2) & Actor(e3,x1) & v_wear(e3) & with(x2,x10) & n_ponytail(x10) & in(x2,x8) & Theme(s3,x9) & a_black(s3) & (x8 = x9))) & with(x2,x7) & n_instructor(x7) & card_eq_1(x7) & n_suit(x2) & of(x2,x6) & n_nylon(x6) & a_blue(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & a_tight(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & with(e1,e2) & on(e2,x5) & n_harness(x5) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_put(e2) & n_thing(x4) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_assist(e1) & n_thing(x2) & n_individual(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_wear(e1) & n_suit(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_nylon(x3) & a_blue(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & a_tight(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_individual(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))