premise: This is a heated hockey match at the goal line.
hypothesis: Tiger Woods gets a hole in one.
explanation_1: Tiger Woods does not play hockey.
explanation_2: Having a hockey match and golfing, are completely different activities.
explanation_3: Tiger Woods plays golf not hockey.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3.(n_line(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_goal(x3) & n_thing(x1) & at(p1,x2) & exists s1 x4 x5.((x1 = x4) & n_match(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_hockey(x5) & a_heated(s1) & Theme(s1,x4)))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(ne_per_woods(x1) & (x1 = x2) & ne_per_tiger(x2) & in(e1,x4) & n_thing(x4) & card_eq_1(x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_get(e1) & n_hole(x3))