premise: An indian man walks past a temple on his way to pray.
hypothesis: A man fell into the swimming pool.
explanation_1: If he walks past a temple, there is no way he fell into the swimming pool.
explanation_2: Walking past a temple and falling into a pool are two different actions
explanation_3: The man walks now and fell in the past. The actions can't happen simultaneously or it can't be the same person.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(past(e1,x2) & on(x2,x3) & Topic(x3,p1) & exists e2.(Actor(e2,x3) & v_pray(e2)) & n_way(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_temple(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_man(x1) & a_indian(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_pool(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_swimming(x3) & into(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_fall(e1) & n_man(x1))