premise: A bald man in a red shirt and khaki shorts buys something from a woman wearing a visor in a store.
hypothesis: A man in khaki shorts is buying a snack.
explanation_1: The man can buy anything from the store, may not be a snack.
explanation_2: Here we learn that, in the exaggerated and drawn out first sentence, the man is buying a snack.
explanation_3: Just because a bald man in a red shirt and khaki shorts buys something from a woman wearing a visor in a store does not mean he is buying a snack.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10.(Theme(e2,x6) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_buy(e2) & from(x6,x7) & in(e1,x10) & n_store(x10) & Theme(e1,x9) & Actor(e1,x8) & v_wear(e1) & n_visor(x9) & (x7 = x8) & n_woman(x7) & n_thing(x6) & in(x1,x2) & subset_of(x4,x2) & n_shorts(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_khaki(x5) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_shirt(x3) & a_red(s2) & Theme(s2,x3) & n_man(x1) & a_bald(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_buy(e1) & n_snack(x3) & in(x1,x2) & n_shorts(x2) & a_khaki(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_man(x1))