premise: A jockey wearing a blue jacket is riding a dark brown horse in a gallop.
hypothesis: jockey wearing a green jacket is riding a dark grey horse in a trot.
explanation_1: A jockey can't be in a blue jacket and green jacket at the same time.
explanation_2: A green jacket is not a blue jacket.  A grey horse is not a brown horse.  A trot is the opposite of a gallop.
explanation_3: The horse in the first sentence in brown and the horse in the second sentence is grey.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(in(e2,x5) & n_gallop(x5) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_ride(e2) & n_horse(x4) & a_brown(s3) & Theme(s3,x4) & a_dark(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_jacket(x3) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_jockey(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(in(e2,x6) & n_trot(x6) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_ride(e2) & n_horse(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_grey(x5) & a_dark(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_jacket(x3) & a_green(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_jockey(x1))