premise: People walk amongst a traffic jam in a crowded city.
hypothesis: The cars are zooming past the people.
explanation_1: In a traffic jam, there aren't zooming cars.
explanation_2: people doesn't mean cars
explanation_3: he refers to a traffic jam so there is no possibility of cars zooming.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(amongst(e1,x2) & in(x2,x4) & n_city(x4) & a_crowded(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & n_jam(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_traffic(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_people(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_people(x2) & n_car(x1) & past(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_zoom(e1))