premise: toddlers playing with toys.
hypothesis: There is at least two children.
explanation_1: There's really nothing that can't be inferred here because toddlers would be more than one, so at least two. Toddlers also implies they're children so I think this one may be invalid.
explanation_2: Just because toddlers are playing does not mean there are at least two children.
explanation_3: There could be more than two children.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(a_topic(x1) & with(e1,x3) & n_toy(x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_play(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_toddler(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 s1 x2.(at(x1,x2) & r_most(s1) & a_least(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_child(x2) & card_eq_2(x2))