premise: a man in a tan shirt is standing at the kitchen counter looking at food.
hypothesis: A man standing at a kitchen counter looking at food.
explanation_1: A man is in a tan shirt.
explanation_2: Man in a tan shirt is a type of man.
explanation_3: Sentence two lacks the noun shirt and adjective tan, they have the same subject IE the man standing at the counter is looking at food.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_counter(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_kitchen(x4) & for(e1,e2) & at(e2,x5) & n_food(x5) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_look(e2) & at(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_shirt(x2) & a_tan(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(a_topic(x1) & at(x1,x3) & at(e1,x6) & n_food(x6) & Actor(e1,x5) & v_look(e1) & (x3 = x5) & n_counter(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_kitchen(x4) & n_standing(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2))