premise: A van with writing on it driving in front of a store.
hypothesis: A broken-down van in front of a shopping mall.
explanation_1: A van that is driving in front of a store cannot been broken-down.
explanation_2: A broken down vehicle cannot be driven. A store can be free standing, not always in a shopping mall.
explanation_3: One is driving and other one is broken-down.
premise_logic: exists e1 e3 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(r_.(e1) & for(e2,e3) & in(e3,x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_store(x5) & n_front(x4) & Actor(e3,x3) & v_drive(e3) & with(e1,e2) & on(e2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_write(e2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_event(e1) & n_van(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_mall(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_shopping(x4) & n_front(x2) & n_van(x1) & a_broken-down(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))