premise: A man in a red hat and shirt with gray shorts attempts to do the splits.
hypothesis: The man is a gymnast.
explanation_1: The man doesn't have to be a gymnast to do the splits.
explanation_2: A person doesn't need to be a gymnast to attempt to do the splits
explanation_3: Just because a man in a red hat and shirt with gray shorts attempts to do the splits, doesn't mean he is a gymnast.
premise_logic: exists p1 s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(n_splits(x6) & a_topic(s1) & subset_of(x3,s1) & with(x3,x4) & Topic(x4,p1) & exists e1.(Theme(e1,x6) & Actor(e1,x4) & v_do(e1)) & n_attempt(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_shorts(x5) & a_gray(s3) & Theme(s3,x4) & n_shirt(x3) & subset_of(x1,s1) & in(x1,x2) & n_hat(x2) & a_red(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_man(x1) & exists x2.((x1 = x2) & n_gymnast(x2)))