premise: A male soccer player has his foot extended as if he has just kicked the soccer ball while the ball flies through the air.
hypothesis: The man has kicked the soccer ball towards the goal.
explanation_1: You can kick a ball and it not be towards the goal.
explanation_2: Just because a soccer player kicked the soccer ball doesn't necessarily mean that he has kicked the ball towards the goal.
explanation_3: Just because a man kicked a soccer ball that was flying through the air it does not mean he kicked it towards the goal.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(n_air(x7) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_have(e2) & exists e3 p2 s1 x6.(a_just(s1) & Manner(e3,s1) & exists e4.(through(e4,x7) & Actor(e4,x6) & v_fly(e4)) & n_ball(x6) & while(e3,p2) & Theme(e3,x6) & Actor(e3,x1) & v_kick(e3)) & n_ball(x6) & of(x6,x3) & n_soccer(x3) & n_soccer(x3) & n_male(x1) & n_male(x1) & as(e1,p1) & Theme(e1,x5) & v_extend(e1) & (x4 = x5) & n_foot(x4) & of(x4,x1) & n_player(x1) & of(x1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_male(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_goal(x4) & n_ball(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_soccer(x3) & n_man(x1) & towards(e1,x4) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_kick(e1))