premise: A young boy in a striped shirt is leaning against a tree while another child sits at a picnic table.
hypothesis: Two children are eating together at a fantasy fair.
explanation_1: At least one boy is standing and leaning against a tree, not sitting and eating together with another child.
explanation_2: If a child is leaning against a tree while another child sits at a picnic table, then it is incorrect to claim that the two are eating together.
explanation_3: if A young boy in a striped shirt is leaning against a tree while another child sits at a picnic table then they be eating together
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_child(x4) & exists e2 x5 x6 x7.(at(e2,x6) & n_table(x6) & of(x6,x7) & n_picnic(x7) & Actor(e2,x5) & v_sit(e2) & n_child(x5) & -(x5 = x4)) & while(e1,p1) & against(e1,x3) & n_tree(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_lean(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_shirt(x2) & a_striped(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & n_boy(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3.(at(e1,x2) & n_fair(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_fantasy(x3) & exists s1.(Theme(s1,x1) & a_together(s1)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_eat(e1) & n_child(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))