premise: Two people one in a brown shirt wearing a backpack and the other wearing a pick sweater and bike helmet are kneeling at a bicycle tire.
hypothesis: Nobody has a shirt on
explanation_1: If nobody has a shirt on, then someone can't be in a brown shirt
explanation_2: They are either wearing a shirt and a sweater, or they do not have a shirt on.
explanation_3: Either there is nobody that has a shirt on, or there is someone with a brown shirt and another person wearing a pink sweater.
premise_logic: exists e1 e3 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14.(n_other(x6) & at(e3,x13) & n_tire(x13) & of(x13,x14) & n_bicycle(x14) & Actor(e3,x1) & v_kneel(e3) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_wear(e2) & subset_of(x6,x4) & Theme(e1,x8) & Actor(e1,x7) & v_wear(e1) & subset_of(x11,x8) & n_helmet(x11) & of(x11,x12) & n_bike(x12) & subset_of(x9,x8) & Time(x9,x10) & n_sweater(x10) & n_pick(x9) & (x6 = x7) & subset_of(x5,x4) & n_backpack(x5) & (x1 = x3) & in(x1,x2) & n_shirt(x2) & a_brown(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_3(x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: -exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(a_on(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1) & n_shirt(x2) & n_person(x1))