premise: Two dogs sit in front of a man dressed in native American attire.
hypothesis: Huskies are pulling the iditarod sled.
explanation_1: When dogs sit they are inactive. When they are pulling a sled they are moving.
explanation_2: A dog cannot sit and be pulling a sled at the same time
explanation_3: The dogs that sits cannot be the ones pulling.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(in(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & in(e2,x5) & n_attire(x5) & a_american(s2) & Theme(s2,x5) & a_native(s1) & Theme(s1,x5) & Theme(e2,x4) & v_dress(e2) & (x3 = x4) & n_man(x3) & n_front(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_dog(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3.(n_iditarod(x2) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_pull(e2) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_sled(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_husky(x1))