premise: A woman in a long-sleeved shirt checks her phone as a man in a leather jacket passes behind her.
hypothesis: The man is passing by on his way to the store.
explanation_1: You can not infer she is going to the store.
explanation_2: The man is not necessarily on his way to the store.
explanation_3: The first sentence gives no clues on where the man is going, so we can't know he was on his way to the store.
premise_logic: exists p1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & exists e1 x1 x5 x6 x7.(behind(e1,x1) & n_female(x1) & Actor(e1,x4) & v_pass(e1) & as(x4,x5) & in(x5,x6) & n_jacket(x6) & of(x6,x7) & n_leather(x7) & n_man(x5)) & n_phone(x4) & of(x4,x1) & n_female(x1) & that(x1,p1) & in(x1,x2) & n_check(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_shirt(x3) & a_long-sleeved(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(n_store(x3) & n_way(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_man(x1) & a_by(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & on(e1,x2) & to(x2,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_pass(e1))