premise: A downtown shot of a man on his cellphone under an awning.
hypothesis: A businessman calls his office to make sure that his secretary cancels his appointments.
explanation_1: The fact that man was on his cell phone it did not say what he was doing on his cellphone so we did not know he was cancelling his appointments.
explanation_2: A man does not mean businessman.  Being on the phone does not mean he is calling the office.  Nothing implies he is asking his secretary to cancel his appointments.
explanation_3: Not every man with cellphones is a businessman.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & under(x1,x5) & n_awning(x5) & on(x1,x4) & n_cellphone(x4) & of(x4,x1) & n_male(x1) & of(x1,x3) & n_man(x3) & n_shot(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_downtown(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(Topic(e1,p1) & exists e2 p2.(exists e3 p3.(Topic(e3,p3) & Actor(e3,x1) & v_sure(e3) & exists e4 x1.(Theme(e4,x5) & Actor(e4,x4) & v_cancel(e4) & n_male(x1))) & Topic(e2,p2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_make(e2)) & n_appointment(x5) & of(x5,x1) & n_secretary(x4) & of(x4,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_male(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_call(e1) & n_office(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_businessman(x2) & n_businessman(x1))