premise: A young boy in a black tee-shirt stands on the corner as two men parallel to him are engaged in some activity.
hypothesis: A boy is watching two men spar
explanation_1: the boy is standing there does not imply that he is watching them.
explanation_2: Watching two men spar can not by inferred by men being engaged in some activity as there are many other activities that they could be engaged in.
explanation_3: You can not infer they are going to spar.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 s3 s4 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(n_corner(x3) & in(e1,x6) & n_activity(x6) & Theme(e1,x1) & v_engage(e1) & in(x1,x2) & on(x2,x3) & to(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & Theme(s4,x5) & a_parallel(s4) & (x3 = x5) & as(x3,x4) & n_man(x4) & card_eq_2(x4) & n_stand(x2) & a_tee-shirt(s3) & Theme(s3,x2) & a_black(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & n_boy(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_watch(e2) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_spar(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_man(x2) & card_eq_2(x2) & n_boy(x1))