premise: A well built black man stands in the subway, listening to headphones.
hypothesis: A man with headphones on is standing in a subway.
explanation_1: A man is listening to headphones in the subway.
explanation_2: A man with headphones on is implied to be listening to them.
explanation_3: both sentences have a man using headphones
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_subway(x3) & a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x3) & to(e2,x5) & n_headphone(x5) & Actor(e2,x4) & v_listen(e2) & (x3 = x4) & n_stand(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Theme(e1,x1) & v_build(e1) & r_well(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(in(e1,x4) & n_subway(x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & with(x1,x2) & Theme(s1,x3) & a_on(s1) & (x2 = x3) & n_headphone(x2) & n_man(x1))