premise: Man walking with tall buildings with reflections behind him.
hypothesis: The man was walking.
explanation_1: Man walking with tall buildings with reflections behind him is the the man was walking
explanation_2: from the sentences, it is inferred that the man was walking.
explanation_3: both statements mention a man walking
premise_logic: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & with(x1,x3) & with(x3,x4) & behind(x4,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_reflection(x4) & n_building(x3) & a_tall(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & n_walking(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(n_man(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1))