premise: A man with glasses and a Hawaiian shirt is standing next to a dog while another man with a blue hat looks at them from the back.
hypothesis: Two men are following the actions of a dog, one stands next to the dog.
explanation_1: You can not infer they are following the dog.
explanation_2: The man standing next to the dog and the man looking at them from the back are not necessarily following the actions of the dog.
explanation_3: Answer: two men need not necessarily be following  the actions of a dog.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x8.(n_back(x8) & exists e2 s2 x6 x7.(from(e2,x8) & at(e2,x1) & Actor(e2,x6) & v_look(e2) & with(x6,x7) & n_hat(x7) & a_blue(s2) & Theme(s2,x7) & n_man(x6) & -(x6 = x1)) & n_thing(x1) & n_man(x1) & n_man(x1) & while(e1,p1) & to(e1,x5) & n_dog(x5) & r_next(e1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & with(x1,x2) & subset_of(x4,x2) & n_shirt(x4) & a_hawaiian(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_glass(x3))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3.(n_action(x2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_follow(e1) & of(x2,x3) & exists e2 x4.(to(e2,x3) & r_next(e2) & Actor(e2,x4) & v_stand(e2) & n_thing(x4) & card_eq_1(x4)) & n_dog(x3) & n_dog(x3) & that(x3,p1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))