premise: A football coach guiding one of his players on what he should do.
hypothesis: The coach knows how to play football.
explanation_1: Coach guiding his players on how to play football.
explanation_2: Because the coach knows how to play football, he can guide other players about the game.
explanation_3: A coach is giving a training to his football players
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & exists e1 e2 p1 x6.(n_thing(x6) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_guide(e2) & of(x4,x5) & on(x5,x6) & exists e3.(Theme(e3,x6) & Actor(e3,x1) & v_do(e3)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_should(e1)) & n_male(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_player(x5) & of(x5,x1) & n_thing(x4) & card_eq_1(x4) & (x1 = x3) & n_coach(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_football(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_coach(x1) & Topic(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_know(e1) & n_manner(x2) & exists e2 x3 x4.(Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_play(e2) & n_football(x4)))