premise: A snowboarder leaps through the air against a dark background.
hypothesis: A man is eating icecream.
explanation_1: A man eating ice cream is engaged in an activity completely different than leaping through the air.
explanation_2: A snowboarder could be a man or a woman.  The person is either leaping or eating ice cream.
explanation_3: if a snowboarder leaps through the air then you wouldnt physically be able to be eating ice cream
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(n_air(x2) & through(e1,x2) & against(x2,x3) & n_background(x3) & a_dark(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_leap(e1) & n_snowboarder(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists s1 x2.((x1 = x2) & n_icecream(x2) & a_eating(s1) & Theme(s1,x2)) & n_man(x1))