premise: A man wandering in the desert as the clouds roll in.
hypothesis: A man and a camel wonder in the desert.
explanation_1: It isn't clear that there is a camel present as the man wanders.
explanation_2: A man doesn't need a camel to wander the desert. Just because someone is wandering doesn't mean they must be in a state of wonder.
explanation_3: Just because a man is wandering in the desert it does not mean there is a camel with him.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_roll(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_cloud(x5) & n_desert(x3) & a_topic(x1) & a_in(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & as(e1,x4) & in(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wander(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_desert(x4) & a_topic(s1) & subset_of(x2,s1) & in(x2,x4) & n_wonder(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_camel(x3) & subset_of(x1,s1) & n_man(x1))