premise: A woman with big green glasses writing at a desk outside while looking confused.
hypothesis: A women is is confused about her writing.
explanation_1: One cannot conclude that the woman's writing is her own.
explanation_2: A woman who looks confused does not have to be confused about her writing.
explanation_3: The first sentence does not refer to the woman being confused about her writing.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 p1 s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & with(x1,x2) & while(e1,e2) & exists s4.(Theme(s4,x3) & a_confuse(s4)) & Topic(e2,p1) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_look(e2) & a_outside(s3) & Manner(e1,s3) & at(e1,x4) & n_desk(x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_write(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_glass(x2) & a_green(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & a_big(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_woman(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3.(about(e2,x3) & n_writing(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_female(x1) & Theme(e2,x1) & v_confuse(e2) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_be(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_woman(x1))