premise: Four people sit on a subway two read books, one looks at a cellphone and is wearing knee high boots.
hypothesis: Multple people are using the subway to get to work.
explanation_1: It is not implied that the people are trying to get to work
explanation_2: We have no idea if they are going to work, the could be going anywhere.
explanation_3: There is no way to infer that the people on the subway are going to work.
premise_logic: exists e2 e4 e3 e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9.(Theme(e4,x8) & Actor(e4,x7) & v_wear(e4) & n_boot(x8) & a_high(s1) & Theme(s1,x8) & of(x8,x9) & n_knee(x9) & n_thing(x7) & card_eq_1(x7) & at(e3,x6) & n_cellphone(x6) & Actor(e3,x5) & v_look(e3) & n_thing(x5) & card_eq_1(x5) & on(e1,x2) & n_two(x2) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_read(e2) & n_book(x4) & (x2 = x3) & n_subway(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_4(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3.(n_subway(x3) & Theme(e1,p1) & Recipient(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_use(e1) & exists e2 p2.(Topic(e2,p2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_get(e2) & exists e3.(Actor(e3,x1) & v_work(e3))) & n_people(x1) & (x1 = x2) & ne_nam_multple(x2))