premise: A man sitting on the ground carving a green coconut with a large knife.
hypothesis: A man is sitting down.
explanation_1: In sentence 1, the man is sitting, which follows into sentence 2.
explanation_2: A man sitting on the ground must be sitting down.
explanation_3: He is sitting down because he is sitting on the ground.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(n_ground(x3) & a_topic(x1) & on(e1,x3) & Theme(e2,x5) & Actor(e2,x4) & v_carve(e2) & with(x5,x6) & n_knife(x6) & a_large(s2) & Theme(s2,x6) & n_coconut(x5) & a_green(s1) & Theme(s1,x5) & (x3 = x4) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_sit(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1.(a_down(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_man(x1))