premise: Two young boys are in a green kayak in the grass.
hypothesis: The boys are testing the kayak.
explanation_1: It cannot be assumed that the boys are testing the kayak.
explanation_2: Not everyone are testing a kayak on a grass.
explanation_3: Boys in the grass dont have to be testing the kayak.
premise_logic: exists p1 s1 x1 x3.(n_grass(x3) & exists s2 x2.(in(x1,x2) & in(x2,x3) & n_kayak(x2) & a_green(s2) & Theme(s2,x2)) & n_boy(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_kayak(x2) & n_boy(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_test(e1))