premise: A person is climbing a cliff wall, over a rocky shore, using a rope.
hypothesis: A man climbs over treacherous rocks to reach the fishing hole.
explanation_1: The person could be a man or a woman and the rocks aren't necessarily treacherous per the first sentence. Also, it doesn't mention where the person is climbing.
explanation_2: A man can climb a cliff without necessarily going to a fishing hole.
explanation_3: The man may not be climbing to reach a fishing hole.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(for(e1,e2) & Theme(e2,x5) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_use(e2) & n_rope(x5) & over(e1,x4) & n_shore(x4) & a_rocky(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_climb(e1) & n_wall(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_cliff(x3) & n_person(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_hole(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_fishing(x5) & Topic(e1,p1) & exists e2.(Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_reach(e2)) & over(e1,x3) & n_rock(x3) & a_treacherous(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_climb(e1) & n_man(x2) & n_man(x1))