premise: A cute puppy fetches a yellow ring chew toy in the yard.
hypothesis: A new puppy is learning how to get the items it's owner wants.
explanation_1: WE have no idea if the puppy is new or not.
explanation_2: Sentence 2 lets us know that the puppy is new.
explanation_3: Just because a puppy fetches a toy does not mean it is learning or is what the owner wants.
premise_logic: exists p1 s1 s2 x1 x4.(n_yard(x4) & a_topic(x1) & exists e1 s3 x2 x3.(in(e1,x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_chew(e1) & n_toy(x3) & n_ring(x2) & a_yellow(s3) & Theme(s3,x2)) & that(x1,p1) & n_fetch(x1) & a_puppy(s2) & Theme(s2,x1) & a_cute(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x4.(n_thing(x4) & n_item(x4) & Topic(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_learn(e1) & n_manner(x2) & exists e3 e2 p1 x3 x5 x6.(Theme(e3,x4) & Actor(e3,x3) & v_get(e3) & Theme(e2,x6) & Actor(e2,x5) & v_want(e2) & (x4 = x6) & n_owner(x5) & exists x7.(x4 = x7)) & n_puppy(x1) & a_new(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))