premise: A man in a black shirt painting a duplicate copy of another painting hanging in an art gallery.
hypothesis: The man is painting a copy of the Mona Lisa.
explanation_1: There is no reason to believe the painting he's copying is the Mona Lisa or any other specific painting.
explanation_2: We have no idea if he is painting the Mona Lisa, he could be painting any other piece of art.
explanation_3: Not all paintings in art galleries are the Mona Lisa.
premise_logic: exists x1.(all s1 x2.((n_copy(x2) & a_duplicate(s1) & Theme(s1,x2)) -> exists s2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x3) & of(x3,x5) & in(x5,x7) & n_gallery(x7) & of(x7,x8) & n_art(x8) & Time(x5,x6) & n_hanging(x6) & n_painting(x5) & -(x5 = x3) & n_painting(x3) & n_painting(x3) & for(x3,x2) & of(x3,x4) & n_shirt(x4) & a_black(s2) & Theme(s2,x3))) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(ne_geo_lisa(x3) & (x3 = x4) & ne_geo_mona(x4) & n_man(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_paint(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_copy(x2))