premise: A person in an orange kayak navigates white water rapids.
hypothesis: A PERSON IS DRIVING A CAR.
explanation_1: The person is either in a car or a kayak not both.
explanation_2: A person in a kayak is not the same as a person in a car
explanation_3: A person cannot be driving a car and navigating a kayak,
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_navigate(e1) & n_rapid(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_water(x5) & a_white(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & in(x1,x2) & n_kayak(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_orange(x3) & n_person(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(s1) & ne_nam_car(s1) & (s1 = x4) & ne_nam_a(x4) & a_.(s2) & Theme(s2,s1) & (s1 = x3) & ne_nam_driving(x3) & (s1 = x2) & ne_nam_is(x2) & (s1 = x1) & ne_nam_person(x1))