premise: Two men boxing a ring while one boxer is hitting the other.
hypothesis: They are playing ring around the rosy.
explanation_1: Hitting is not playing.
explanation_2: BOXING RING IS DIFFERENT FROM PLAYING RING AROUND THE ROSY
explanation_3: There is no boxing or hitting involved in playing ring around the rosy.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x5.(n_other(x5) & a_topic(x1) & exists e2 x4.(Theme(e2,x5) & Actor(e2,x4) & v_hit(e2) & n_boxer(x4) & card_eq_1(x4)) & while(e1,p1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_box(e1) & n_ring(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_rosy(x3) & n_thing(x1) & around(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_ring(x2))