premise: The front of the cafe must remain free of trash if customers are to be enticed to enter.
hypothesis: The doorway to the cafe is littered with trash and debris.
explanation_1: You can not infer the cafe is littered.
explanation_2: Just because the front of the cafe must remain free of trash if customers are to be enticed to enter, doesn't mean the doorway to the cafe is littered with trash and debris.
explanation_3: It cannot be assumed that the doorway is littered with trash.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(n_cafe(x2) & n_front(x1) & all p2 x3 e2.((Topic(e2,p2) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_be(e2) & exists e3 p3.(Recipient(e3,p3) & Topic(e3,x3) & v_entice(e3) & exists e4.(Actor(e4,x3) & v_enter(e4))) & n_customer(x3)) -> exists e5 p4.(exists s1 x4.(of(s1,x4) & n_trash(x4) & Theme(s1,x1) & a_free(s1)) & Topic(e5,p4) & Actor(e5,x1) & v_remain(e5))) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_must(e1) & of(x1,x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_cafe(x2) & n_doorway(x1) & with(e1,x3) & subset_of(x5,x3) & n_debris(x5) & subset_of(x4,x3) & n_trash(x4) & Theme(e1,x1) & v_litter(e1) & to(x1,x2))