premise: A man walks down the alley talking on his cellphone.
hypothesis: A man is holding a cell phone and walking.
explanation_1: A man must be holding a cell phone to talk on it.
explanation_2: A man talking on a cellphone is holding a phone.
explanation_3: The man is a man. If he walks, he is walking. To be talking on his cellphone he would normally be holding it.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_cellphone(x4) & of(x4,x2) & n_male(x2) & n_alley(x2) & a_down(s1) & Manner(e2,s1) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_walk(e2) & on(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_talk(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_hold(e1) & subset_of(x5,x2) & n_walking(x5) & subset_of(x3,x2) & n_phone(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_cell(x4) & n_man(x1))