premise: A thin man in a maroon shirt standing next to a pay phone.
hypothesis: A man is standing next to a payphone wearing a maroon shirt.
explanation_1: A man is standing next to a pay phone.
explanation_2: A man is standing next to a pay phone is the same as standing next to a payphone.
explanation_3: thin man is inferred as man  and in a maroon is inferred as wearing a maroon shirt.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & to(e1,x5) & n_phone(x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_pay(x6) & r_next(e1) & Actor(e1,x4) & v_stand(e1) & (x2 = x4) & n_shirt(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_maroon(x3) & n_man(x1) & a_thin(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(for(e1,e2) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_wear(e2) & n_shirt(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_maroon(x4) & to(e1,x2) & n_payphone(x2) & r_next(e1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & n_man(x1))