premise: Two Olympic martial arts competitors go after each other in an international martial arts spectacle.
hypothesis: A man is cleaning and polishing a large candy dish.
explanation_1: To go after is not cleaning and polishing and a martial arts spectacle is not a candy dish.
explanation_2: The competitors aren't cleaning at their spectacle.
explanation_3: There can only be either two martial arts competitors competing in a martial arts spectacle or a man clean and polishing a large candy dish.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(all x4.(n_other(x4) -> exists s2 s3 x5 x6.(in(e1,x5) & n_spectacle(x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_art(x6) & a_martial(s3) & Theme(s3,x5) & a_international(s2) & Theme(s2,x5) & after(e1,x4))) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_go(e1) & n_competitor(x1) & of(x1,x3) & n_art(x3) & a_martial(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & (x1 = x2) & ne_nam_olympic(x2) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(Theme(e2,x5) & Actor(e2,x4) & v_polish(e2) & n_dish(x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_candy(x6) & a_large(s2) & Theme(s2,x5) & n_man(x4) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_clean(e1) & n_dish(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_candy(x3) & a_large(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_man(x1))