premise: A boy and a girl in jackets gaze in a clothing store window.
hypothesis: Two kids are flying on a hovercraft.
explanation_1: Gaze in a clothing store window and flying on a hovercraft are two different activities not able to be done at the same time.
explanation_2: The kids would not be able to gaze in a clothing store window if they are flying on a hovercraft.
explanation_3: It is unlikely that kids flying on a hovercraft would be gazing into store windows, as those tend to be low to the ground and gazing is a stationary act, while flying implies motion.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(in(e1,x5) & n_window(x5) & of(x5,x7) & n_store(x7) & of(x5,x6) & n_clothing(x6) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_gaze(e1) & subset_of(x3,x1) & in(x3,x4) & n_jacket(x4) & n_girl(x3) & subset_of(x2,x1) & n_boy(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(on(e1,x2) & n_hovercraft(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_fly(e1) & n_kid(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))