premise: A referee is talking with a couple of soccer players in red jerseys.
hypothesis: The soccer players are being told what they did wrong.
explanation_1: Being told what they did wrong is not the only reason a referee would talk to players.
explanation_2: Referees don't just tell players what they did wrong.
explanation_3: A referee can talk to players without telling them what they did wrong.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(with(e1,x2) & in(x2,x5) & n_jersey(x5) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x5) & of(x2,x3) & n_player(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_soccer(x4) & n_couple(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_talk(e1) & n_referee(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3.(n_thing(x1) & n_player(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_soccer(x2) & what(e1,e2) & a_wrong(s1) & Manner(e2,s1) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_do(e2) & n_thing(x3) & Theme(e1,x1) & v_tell(e1))