premise: A man with blond-hair and tattoos strolls behind bleachers on the cellphone.
hypothesis: A man has an intimate conversation on a cellphone behind bleachers.
explanation_1: The conversation might not be intimate.
explanation_2: There is no way to know if this conversation is intimate.
explanation_3: Not every conversation on a cellphone is intimate.
premise_logic: exists s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_cellphone(x4) & a_topic(x1) & with(x1,x2) & behind(x2,x3) & on(x3,x4) & n_bleacher(x3) & n_stroll(x2) & a_tattoos(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & a_blond-hair(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1) & on(x2,x3) & behind(x3,x4) & n_bleacher(x4) & n_cellphone(x3) & n_conversation(x2) & a_intimate(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_man(x1))