premise: A biker wearing a white t-shirt is jumping over dirt hills.
hypothesis: A biker climbs a tree in a shirt.
explanation_1: Jumping is not the same as climbing.
explanation_2: The biker can't climb a tree and jump over dirt hills at the same time.
explanation_3: If the biker is jumping he cannot be climbing at the same time.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_over(s2) & Manner(e2,s2) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_jump(e2) & n_hill(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_dirt(x5) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_t-shirt(x3) & a_white(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_biker(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(in(e1,x3) & n_shirt(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_climb(e1) & n_tree(x2) & n_biker(x1))