premise: A dirt bike rider riding through the woods over logs.
hypothesis: The dirt bike rider is riding a dirt bike.
explanation_1: A rider riding through the woods must be riding a dirt bike.
explanation_2: If the person is riding through the woods, he must be doing it on a dirt bike.
explanation_3: The dirt bike rider is riding through the woods.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(n_wood(x5) & a_topic(x1) & over(e1,x6) & n_log(x6) & through(e1,x5) & Actor(e1,x4) & v_ride(e1) & (x1 = x4) & n_rider(x1) & of(x1,x3) & n_bike(x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_dirt(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1) & n_bike(x3) & n_bike(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_dirt(x4) & n_rider(x1) & of(x1,x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_dirt(x2))