premise: A police officer is standing with his arms crossed.
hypothesis: A police officer is annoyed by the meddling children.
explanation_1: Just because the police officer is standing with his arms folded does not mean that the police officer is annoyed by the meddling children.
explanation_2: Arms crossed does not imply he is annoyed. There is no way of knowing meddling children were anywhere near the officer.
explanation_3: Just because a police officer is standing with his arms crossed doesn't mean he is annoyed
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(e1,x3) & Actor(e2,x4) & v_cross(e2) & (x3 = x4) & n_arm(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & n_officer(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_police(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(n_child(x3) & a_meddling(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Actor(e1,x3) & Theme(e1,x1) & v_annoy(e1) & n_officer(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_police(x2))