premise: The police officer riding a horse is talking to a man riding a bike.
hypothesis: The police officer talking to a man.
explanation_1: The police officer is talking to a man.
explanation_2: The officer talking to a man is talking to a man.
explanation_3: talking to a man riding a bike is inferred as  talking to a man.
premise_logic: exists e1 e3 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(n_officer(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_police(x2) & to(e2,x5) & Theme(e3,x7) & Actor(e3,x6) & v_ride(e3) & n_bike(x7) & (x5 = x6) & n_man(x5) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_talk(e2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_ride(e1) & n_horse(x4) & (x1 = x3))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_officer(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_police(x2) & a_topic(x1) & to(e1,x4) & n_man(x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_talk(e1) & (x1 = x3))