premise: A man in a gray sweatshirt and blue jeans is pulling on a rope while a guy in a white shirt and black jeans watches him.
hypothesis: the man in the ray sweatshirt was pulling on a rope
explanation_1: A man pulling on a rope is equivalent to a man pulling on a rope.
explanation_2: Sentence 2 restates Sentence 1 with fewer details, one misspelling and a change in tense: the man in the ray (gray) sweatshirt was (is) pulling on a rope.
explanation_3: A MAN IN SWEATSHIRT PULLS ON A ROPE
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(exists e2 s3 s4 x5 x6 x7 x8.(Theme(e2,x1) & Actor(e2,x5) & v_watch(e2) & in(x5,x6) & subset_of(x8,x6) & n_jeans(x8) & a_black(s4) & Theme(s4,x8) & subset_of(x7,x6) & n_shirt(x7) & a_white(s3) & Theme(s3,x7) & n_guy(x5)) & n_male(x1) & while(e1,p1) & on(e1,x4) & n_rope(x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_pull(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_jeans(x2) & a_blue(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_sweatshirt(x3) & a_gray(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_sweatshirt(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_ray(x3) & n_man(x1) & on(e1,x4) & n_rope(x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_pull(e1) & in(x1,x2))