premise: A little boy in a blue shirt holding a toy.
hypothesis: Boy dressed in blue holds a toy.
explanation_1: Wearing a blue shirt is the same thing as being dressed in a blue shirt. In both sentences they are holding a toy.
explanation_2: Having a blue shirt means one is dressed in blue.
explanation_3: A boy in a blue shirt holds a toy.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_hold(e1) & n_toy(x4) & (x2 = x3) & n_shirt(x2) & a_blue(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & n_boy(x1) & a_little(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(ne_nam_boy(x1) & in(e1,x2) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_hold(e2) & n_toy(x4) & (x2 = x3) & n_blue(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_dress(e1))