premise: A football coach guiding one of his players on what he should do.
hypothesis: The player already knew what he was doing.
explanation_1: Are the players the same person?
explanation_2: If the coach has to be guiding a player then the player doesn't already knew what to do.
explanation_3: The coach wouldn't be guiding the player on something the player already knew.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & exists e1 e2 p1 x6.(n_thing(x6) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_guide(e2) & of(x4,x5) & on(x5,x6) & exists e3.(Theme(e3,x6) & Actor(e3,x1) & v_do(e3)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_should(e1)) & n_male(x1) & n_male(x1) & n_player(x5) & of(x5,x1) & n_thing(x4) & card_eq_1(x4) & (x1 = x3) & n_coach(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_football(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1.(n_male(x1) & n_player(x1) & exists e1 e2 s1 x2.(n_thing(x2) & a_already(s1) & Manner(e2,s1) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_know(e2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_do(e1)))