premise: Man in brown and red checkered button up shirt and blue jeans makes a male and female laugh.
hypothesis: A couple at a club are laughing at a stand-up comedian dressed like a lumberjack.
explanation_1: The male and female aren't necessarily a couple and the stand-up comedian isn't necessarily dressed up like a lumberjack.
explanation_2: Just because the man in brown and red checkered button up shirt and blue jeans makes a male and female laugh doesn't mean they are laughing.
explanation_3: Male and female does not indicate couple all the time, and just because people are laughing does not necessarily mean they are in a club, and a man making people laugh may or may not be a comedian and finally, a brown and red checkered button up shirt can be worn by many people and not just by lumberjacks.  Further more lumberjacks could wear many other types of clothing and patterns of clothing.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 s3 s4 s5 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8.(Theme(e1,x6) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_make(e1) & n_laugh(x8) & a_female(s5) & Theme(s5,x8) & n_male(x7) & subset_of(x8,x6) & subset_of(x7,x6) & in(x1,x2) & subset_of(x5,x2) & n_jeans(x5) & a_blue(s4) & Theme(s4,x5) & subset_of(x3,x2) & up(x3,x4) & n_shirt(x4) & n_button(x3) & a_checkered(s3) & Theme(s3,x3) & a_red(s2) & Theme(s2,x3) & a_brown(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(at(e1,x3) & like(e2,x5) & n_lumberjack(x5) & Theme(e2,x4) & v_dress(e2) & (x3 = x4) & n_comedian(x3) & a_stand-up(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_laugh(e1) & at(x1,x2) & n_club(x2) & n_couple(x1))