premise: A boy and dog are on the lawn outside of the house and in front of the flower bed.
hypothesis: A boy and his dog walk through the lawn looking for toys.
explanation_1: Sentence one never implies that they are walking or looking for anything.
explanation_2: The dog does not necessarily have to be owned by the boy. The dog and boy could be on the lawn for other reasons besides looking for toys.
explanation_3: A boy and dog can be on the lawn for other reasons without looking for toys.
premise_logic: exists p1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x6 x8 x9.(n_bed(x8) & of(x8,x9) & n_flower(x9) & n_house(x6) & n_lawn(x4) & exists x5 x7.(in(x1,x7) & of(x7,x8) & n_front(x7) & on(x1,x4) & of(x5,x6) & outside(x4,x5) & n_thing(x5)) & n_dog(x3) & n_boy(x2) & subset_of(x3,x1) & subset_of(x2,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(n_lawn(x4) & a_topic(s1) & subset_of(x2,s1) & through(x2,x4) & for(e1,x6) & n_toy(x6) & Actor(e1,x5) & v_look(e1) & (x4 = x5) & n_walk(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_dog(x3) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & subset_of(x1,s1) & n_boy(x1))