premise: A man in a staff shirt break-dancing.
hypothesis: A man is impressing other employees with his dancing.
explanation_1: the other employees may not be impressed. he may not be an employee.
explanation_2: The man may not be an employee of the company. He may just possess a staff shirt as an entertainer coming into the workplace. So we do not know how impressing his dance skills are.
explanation_3: A man wearing a staff shirt is not necessarily at work or with other co-workers.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & n_break-dancing(x2) & of(x2,x4) & n_shirt(x4) & of(x2,x3) & n_staff(x3) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_dancing(x4) & of(x4,x3) & n_male(x3) & n_employee(x3) & with(e1,x4) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_impress(e1) & -(x2 = x3) & n_employee(x2) & n_man(x1))