premise: A team of people on a bike race.
hypothesis: The person in blue is winning.
explanation_1: No reason the believe person in blue is winning, the team still racing.
explanation_2: A person in blue is not mentioned. An entire team is mentioned.  It is definitely not mentioned that the person in blue is winning.
explanation_3: No way to know that the person in blue is winning.
premise_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & of(x1,x2) & on(x2,x3) & n_race(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_bike(x4) & n_people(x2) & n_team(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_person(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_win(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_blue(x2))