premise: A man is roller-skating down the wall next to some white steps.
hypothesis: A woman is paying for lunch.
explanation_1: In sentence 1 a man is doing an action, in sentence 2 a woman is doing an action
explanation_2: A woman is not a man.
explanation_3: The first sentence is about a man and the second sentence is about a woman.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_wall(x2) & a_down(s2) & Manner(e1,s2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_roller-skate(e1) & to(x3,x4) & n_step(x4) & a_white(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & next(x2,x3) & n_thing(x3) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(for(e1,x2) & n_lunch(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_pay(e1) & n_woman(x1))