premise: A goalie tries to catch a ball during a soccer game.
hypothesis: a goalie is doing his job as a goalie.
explanation_1: A goalie job is to catch the ball.
explanation_2: The subject of both sentences is a goalie. A goalie's job is to catch the soccer ball so it doesn't go into the net.
explanation_3: Same goalie in both statements.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1.(Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_try(e1) & exists e2 x2 x3 x4.(during(e2,x3) & n_game(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_soccer(x4) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_catch(e2) & n_ball(x2)) & n_goalie(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_do(e1) & as(x2,x3) & n_goalie(x3) & n_job(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_goalie(x1))