premise: A person is sitting in front of three blue and white port-o-potties with a mop propped against them.
hypothesis: The person is using the toilet.
explanation_1: one who is sitting in front of three blue and white port-o-potties cant be inferred as using toilet
explanation_2: You cannot use the toilet while sitting in front of port-o-potties.
explanation_3: a person would either be out of port-o-potties or in a toilet.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(with(e1,x4) & against(e2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & Actor(e2,x5) & v_prop(e2) & (x4 = x5) & n_mop(x4) & in(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_port-o-potty(x3) & a_white(s2) & Theme(s2,x3) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & card_eq_3(x3) & n_front(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_person(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_toilet(x2) & n_person(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_use(e1))