premise: A blue uniformed rollerskater is struggling for the lead against a long-haired, tattooed and red uniformed rollerskater.
hypothesis: The rollerskaters are well informer.
explanation_1: Uniformed is different than informer. Doesn’t make sense.
explanation_2: If a rollerskater is struggling for the lead against another rollerskater, the two cannot be stated as being well informer.
explanation_3: The rollerskaters uniforms are blue and red, not well informer.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 s3 s4 s5 s6 s7 x1 x2 x3.(n_lead(x2) & for(e1,x2) & against(x2,x3) & n_rollerskater(x3) & a_uniformed(s7) & Theme(s7,x3) & a_red(s6) & Theme(s6,x3) & a_tattooed(s5) & Theme(s5,x3) & a_,(s4) & Theme(s4,x3) & a_long-haired(s3) & Theme(s3,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_struggle(e1) & n_rollerskater(x1) & a_uniformed(s2) & Theme(s2,x1) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists s1 x1.(n_rollerskater(x1) & r_well(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & a_informer(s1))