premise: A guy is standing in front of a toilet with a coffee cup in one hand and a toilet brush in the other.
hypothesis: A man may have created a monster too unwilling to be flushed.
explanation_1: First subject is a guy is standing in front of a toilet.   The next is a man and he is unwilling.
explanation_2: One cannot have created a monster if they are standing.
explanation_3: both the situations are not linked with each other. In 1st sentence man is standing with coffee cup and toilet flush but in sentence 2 it is assumed that man created a monster which he did not want to flushed.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10.(n_other(x10) & with(e1,x4) & subset_of(x8,x4) & in(x8,x10) & n_brush(x8) & of(x8,x9) & n_toilet(x9) & subset_of(x5,x4) & in(x5,x7) & n_hand(x7) & card_eq_1(x7) & n_cup(x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_coffee(x6) & in(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_toilet(x3) & n_front(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & n_guy(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1.(exists e2 p2 s1 x2 x3.(Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_create(e2) & Topic(s1,p2) & exists e3 x4.(Theme(e3,x4) & v_flush(e3)) & Theme(s1,x3) & a_unwilling(s1) & (x2 = x3) & n_monster(x2)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_may(e1) & n_man(x1))