premise: A rodeo clown finds it's way in the action.
hypothesis: The rodeo clown is performing physical activity.
explanation_1: A rodeo clown is performing an action, which is a physical activity.
explanation_2: A rodeo clown is physically in the action.
explanation_3: Same rodeo clown in both statements
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3.(n_action(x3) & exists p2.(in(p2,x3) & exists x4.((x1 = x4) & n_way(x4))) & n_thing(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_find(e1) & n_clown(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_rodeo(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(n_clown(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_rodeo(x2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_perform(e1) & n_activity(x3) & a_physical(s1) & Theme(s1,x3))