premise: A lady rows a canoe filled with things.
hypothesis: The woman is going to deliver the items to someone.
explanation_1: A lady who rows a canoe filled with things is not necessarily going to deliver the items to someone.
explanation_2: Rowing a canoe with things need to be for delivering to someone. Going doesn't mean that she is rowing. She might be walking.
explanation_3: A lady rowing a canoe filled with things doesn't imply that the woman is going to deliver the items to someone.
premise_logic: all x1.(n_canoe(x1) -> exists e1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x2) & with(e1,x5) & n_thing(x5) & Theme(e1,x4) & v_fill(e1) & (x2 = x4) & for(x2,x1) & n_row(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_lady(x3)))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(n_item(x2) & n_woman(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_go(e1) & exists e2 x3.(to(e2,x3) & n_person(x3) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_deliver(e2)))