premise: A young child, wearing a pink-polkadotted outfit, smiles at the camera as she lays on a white, shaggy rug.
hypothesis: the child is a modle.
explanation_1: Just because the child smiles at the camera doesn't mean she's a modle.
explanation_2: It is not necessary child is modle to pose for photo
explanation_3: A child does not have to be a model if she lays on a shaggy rug and smiles at the camera.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 p1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(n_female(x2) & n_camera(x2) & for(e1,e2) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_wear(e2) & n_outfit(x3) & a_pink-polkadotted(s2) & Theme(s2,x3) & exists e3 s3 s4 s5 x4.(on(e3,x4) & n_rug(x4) & a_shaggy(s5) & Theme(s5,x4) & a_,(s4) & Theme(s4,x4) & a_white(s3) & Theme(s3,x4) & Actor(e3,x2) & v_lay(e3)) & as(e1,p1) & at(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_smile(e1) & n_child(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_child(x1) & exists x2.((x1 = x2) & n_modle(x2)))