premise: A white-haired man in a white shirt looks at information in an orange-red binder.
hypothesis: A man is reading documents in a binder.
explanation_1: You can not infer he is reading the documents.
explanation_2: Just because a man looks at information it does not mean the man is reading documents in a binder.
explanation_3: just because he look at information in a binder doesn't mean he is reading the same color binder
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4.(in(e1,x4) & n_binder(x4) & a_orange-red(s3) & Theme(s3,x4) & at(e1,x3) & n_information(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_shirt(x2) & a_white(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & n_man(x1) & a_white-haired(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(in(e1,x3) & n_binder(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_read(e1) & n_document(x2) & n_man(x1))