premise: A little boy in a blue shirt holding a toy.
hypothesis: Boy dressed in red lighting things on fire.
explanation_1: The boy can't be dressed in a red shirt and a blue shirt at the same time, as well as he can't be holding a toy and lighting things on fire at the same time.
explanation_2: If the shirt is blue, it cannot be red.
explanation_3: Red and blue are contradictory colors. Holding a toy lacks initiative while lighting things shows initiative.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_hold(e1) & n_toy(x4) & (x2 = x3) & n_shirt(x2) & a_blue(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & n_boy(x1) & a_little(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(ne_nam_boy(x1) & in(e1,x2) & on(x2,x4) & n_fire(x4) & n_thing(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_lighting(x3) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_dress(e1))