premise: An african american runs with a basketball as a caucasion tries to take the ball from him.
hypothesis: The white basketball player tries to get the ball from the black player, but he cannot get it.
explanation_1: One player trying to get the ball from another does not imply that he cannot get it.
explanation_2: Just because he had a basketball does not necessarily mean that he was a basketball player. Also we know that he tries to take the ball from him but who's to say that he cannot get it.
explanation_3: The caucasian man tries to get the ball but he doesn't necessarily fail to get it.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 x1 x2 x4.(n_male(x4) & n_ball(x4) & exists e2 p2 x3.(Topic(e2,p2) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_try(e2) & exists e3.(from(e3,x4) & Theme(e3,x4) & Actor(e3,x3) & v_take(e3)) & n_caucasion(x3)) & as(e1,p1) & with(e1,x2) & n_basketball(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1) & n_american(x1) & a_african(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(n_thing(x3) & n_male(x1) & n_player(x1) & n_player(x1) & a_black(s2) & Theme(s2,x1) & n_ball(x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_basketball(x2) & a_white(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & -exists e3 p2.(exists e4.(Theme(e4,x3) & Actor(e4,x1) & v_get(e4)) & Topic(e3,p2) & Actor(e3,x1) & v_can(e3)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_try(e1) & exists e2.(from(e2,x1) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_get(e2)))