premise: A kid with his head shaved sitting and holding a lit cigarette.
hypothesis: Child eating a bowl of noodles.
explanation_1: The kid cannot simultaneously be eating noodles and holding a cigarette
explanation_2: Eating noodles and holding a cigarette are different actions.
explanation_3: A child does not usually smoke cigarettes.  People do not usually smoke a cigarette while eating.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(exists e2 e3 x3 x4.(Theme(e3,x3) & Actor(e3,x1) & v_hold(e3) & n_cigarette(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_lit(x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_sit(e2)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_shave(e1) & with(x1,x2) & n_head(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_kid(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_eat(e1) & of(x3,x4) & n_noodle(x4) & n_bowl(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_child(x1))