premise: The white dog with brown spots is walking through shallow water.
hypothesis: The dog is wading through water to get to his toy.
explanation_1: While both wading through water and walking through shallow water indicate that the dog is passing through water that is not deep enough to swim in, wading brings connotations of greater labor with it, indicating that the water is most likely deeper than a shallow puddle. Adding to get to his toy adds a purpose for wading through the water that is not indicated in the first sentence.
explanation_2: You can not infer the dog is wading.
explanation_3: Walking the water doesn't imply it is to get to his toy.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3.(n_dog(x1) & a_white(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & through(e1,x3) & n_water(x3) & a_shallow(s3) & Theme(s3,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & with(x1,x2) & n_spot(x2) & a_brown(s2) & Theme(s2,x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3.(n_toy(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_dog(x1) & Topic(e1,p1) & exists e2.(to(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_get(e2)) & through(e1,x2) & n_water(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_wade(e1))