premise: A black and a white dog are going after a tennis ball.
hypothesis: The dogs are eating their dinner.
explanation_1: There is either one dog or multiple dogs, and going after a tennis ball or eating dinner, not both.
explanation_2: Dogs cannot be eating dinner and playing with a ball at the same time.
explanation_3: Dogs are either going after a tennis ball or eating their dinner.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(after(e2,x5) & n_ball(x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_tennis(x6) & Actor(e2,x4) & v_go(e2) & n_dog(x4) & a_white(s3) & Theme(s3,x4) & after(e1,x2) & n_ball(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_tennis(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_go(e1) & n_dog(x1) & a_white(s2) & Theme(s2,x1) & a_black(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_dinner(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_dog(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_eat(e1))