premise: Three young men are watching a tennis match on a large screen outdoors.
hypothesis: Three young men watching a tennis match on a screen outdoors, because their brother is playing.
explanation_1: watching doesn't imply brother is playing
explanation_2: Men can watch tennis matches whether or not their brother is playing.
explanation_3: Watching a tennis match does not mean it is because their brother is playing.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(on(e1,x4) & n_outdoors(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_screen(x5) & a_large(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_watch(e1) & n_match(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_tennis(x3) & n_man(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(a_topic(x1) & exists e2.(Actor(e2,x7) & v_play(e2)) & n_brother(x7) & of(x7,x1) & n_thing(x1) & because(e1,p1) & on(e1,x5) & n_outdoors(x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_screen(x6) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_watch(e1) & n_match(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_tennis(x4) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_3(x1))