premise: A man in a white shirt riding a bike down the pavement.
hypothesis: A man is in a white shirt.
explanation_1: A man in a white shirt riding a bike down the pavement means the man is in a white shirt
explanation_2: The man is in a white shirt in both sentences.
explanation_3: The man is in a white shirt, therefore he is in a white shirt.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_pavement(x5) & a_topic(x1) & in(x1,x2) & down(e1,x5) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_ride(e1) & n_bike(x4) & (x2 = x3) & n_shirt(x2) & a_white(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(exists s1 x2.(in(x1,x2) & n_shirt(x2) & a_white(s1) & Theme(s1,x2)) & n_man(x1))