premise: Horses jumping a hurdle in a race.
hypothesis: A lion is eating a huge slab of raw meat.
explanation_1: The lion can not be eating in sentence two if sentence one is about horses jumping
explanation_2: Horses and a lion are not the same animal and also disagree in being plural and singular. A jumping animal is unlikely to be eating at the same time. A hurdle in a race is completely different than a huge slab of raw meat.
explanation_3: Horses jumping a hurdle is a complete different thought than a lion eating a slab of raw meat.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & in(e1,x4) & n_race(x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_jump(e1) & n_hurdle(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_horse(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_eat(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_meat(x3) & a_raw(s2) & Theme(s2,x3) & n_slab(x2) & a_huge(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_lion(x1))