A white dog runs over a snowy field or lawn, with a log in his jaws.
The log has ticks in it.
No where in the previous sentence did it state the log had ticks. That was a general assumption that does not make sense for these.
exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(with(e1,x3) & in(x3,x4) & n_jaw(x4) & of(x4,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_log(x3) & over(e1,x2) & (n_field(x2) | n_lawn(x2)) & a_snowy(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_run(e1) & n_dog(x1) & a_white(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
exists e1 x1 x2.(n_thing(x1) & n_log(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1) & in(x2,x1) & n_tick(x2))