premise: Pedestrians use the crosswalks as traffic awaits their turn to drive through an intersection.
hypothesis: Traffic drives through the crosswalk.
explanation_1: is the traffic awaits then its not possible to say the traffic drives
explanation_2: It is not possible that traffic awaits and drives simultaneously.
explanation_3: DRIVING IS CONTRADICTORY TO THE AWAITING SCENARIO OF THE TRAFFIC FOR THE PEDESTRIANS
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x4.(n_turn(x4) & of(x4,x2) & n_thing(x2) & n_crosswalk(x2) & ne_nam_pedestrians(x1) & exists e2 p2 x3.(Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_await(e2) & Topic(x4,p2) & exists e3 x5.(through(e3,x5) & n_intersection(x5) & Actor(e3,x4) & v_drive(e3)) & n_traffic(x3)) & as(e1,p1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_use(e1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2 x3.(n_crosswalk(x3) & a_topic(x1) & through(x1,x3) & n_drive(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_traffic(x2))