premise: A white man in a blue uniform is pushing away a black man in a red uniform while the two play soccer on a green field.
hypothesis: A man pushing away another man on the soccer field because he pushed him first.
explanation_1: There is no way of knowing that he pushed him first.
explanation_2: There is no way of knowing which man pushed the other first.
explanation_3: Sentence one does not give any explanation why the man in blue is pushing away the other man. We have no reason to assume from the sentence that it is because he was pushed first by the man in red.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 s3 s4 s5 s6 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(n_play(x5) & card_eq_2(x5) & on(e1,x7) & n_field(x7) & a_green(s6) & Theme(s6,x7) & Time(e1,x6) & n_soccer(x6) & while(e1,x5) & in(e1,x4) & n_uniform(x4) & a_red(s5) & Theme(s5,x4) & a_away(s4) & Manner(e1,s4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_push(e1) & n_man(x3) & a_black(s3) & Theme(s3,x3) & in(x1,x2) & n_uniform(x2) & a_blue(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & n_man(x1) & a_white(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_field(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_soccer(x5) & a_topic(x1) & exists e2 s2.(a_first(s2) & Manner(e2,s2) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_push(e2)) & n_male(x3) & n_male(x1) & because(e1,p1) & on(e1,x4) & a_away(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_push(e1) & n_man(x3) & -(x3 = x1) & n_man(x1) & n_man(x1) & (x1 = x2))