premise: An old man talks to a street performer wearing makeup with a pet monkey.
hypothesis: The man talks to his son the clown.
explanation_1: Just because a man is talking to a street performer does not mean it is his son. Just because the performer is wearing makeup does not mean he is a clown.
explanation_2: We cannot infer that the street performer is the man's son.
explanation_3: The clown was not implied to be his son.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(a_topic(x1) & to(x1,x3) & with(e1,x7) & n_monkey(x7) & a_pet(s2) & Theme(s2,x7) & Theme(e1,x6) & Actor(e1,x5) & v_wear(e1) & n_makeup(x6) & (x3 = x5) & n_performer(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_street(x4) & n_talk(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2) & a_old(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_son(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_talk(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2) & a_topic(x1) & n_clown(x4) & (x1 = x4) & to(x1,x3))