premise: A young Asian child stands at the top of some steps and does n't seem to notice the person taking their picture.
hypothesis: A child notices his mom taking a picture.
explanation_1: The child cannot both notice that his mom is taking a picture while also not noticing the person taking the picture.
explanation_2: A child does not have to be young or Asian.  A person does not have to be a mom.
explanation_3: If a person doesn't seem to notice something they can't notice something too. Those things contradict each other.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 s3 s4 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x7.(n_picture(x7) & of(x7,x2) & n_thing(x2) & n_person(x5) & n_top(x2) & -exists e2 p1.(Topic(e2,p1) & Actor(e2,x4) & v_seem(e2) & exists e4 e3 x6.(Theme(e4,x5) & Actor(e4,x4) & v_notice(e4) & Theme(e3,x7) & Actor(e3,x6) & v_take(e3) & (x5 = x6))) & n_child(x4) & a_asian(s4) & Theme(s4,x4) & a_young(s3) & Theme(s3,x4) & at(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_step(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & n_child(x1) & a_asian(s2) & Theme(s2,x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 e2 x1 x2 x3.(for(e1,e2) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_take(e2) & n_picture(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_notice(e1) & n_mom(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_child(x1))