premise: A man with a large mustache watches the barber conduct his work through the mirror that faces him.
hypothesis: The two men are playing a game of football.
explanation_1: There is either two men or one  man.  He cannot be playing football while he watches the barber.
explanation_2: One man is not the same as two men and watches the barber is different that playing a game.
explanation_3: The man can't be playing a game while he watches the barber.
premise_logic: exists e3 e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(n_male(x4) & n_male(x4) & n_mirror(x6) & n_work(x5) & of(x5,x4) & n_barber(x4) & through(e2,x6) & Theme(e3,x4) & Actor(e3,x7) & v_face(e3) & (x6 = x7) & Theme(e2,x5) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_conduct(e2) & with(x1,x2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_watch(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_mustache(x2) & a_large(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & of(x2,x3) & n_football(x3) & n_game(x2))