premise: Two children are looking through a telescope on a city street, and the boy is using a step ladder to see through the eyeglass.
hypothesis: Two children are looking at a city street through binoculars.
explanation_1: The children cannot be looking through a telescope on a street if they are looking through binoculars at a street.
explanation_2: telescope doesn't mean binoculars
explanation_3: A telescope is not the same as binoculars.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8.(n_eyeglass(x8) & n_boy(x5) & Theme(e2,p1) & Recipient(e2,x6) & Actor(e2,x5) & v_use(e2) & exists e3.(through(e3,x8) & Actor(e3,x5) & v_see(e3)) & Time(x6,x7) & n_ladder(x7) & n_step(x6) & through(e1,x2) & on(x2,x3) & n_street(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_city(x4) & n_telescope(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1) & n_child(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(through(e1,x4) & n_binoculars(x4) & at(e1,x2) & n_street(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_city(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1) & n_child(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))