premise: A boy plays with a motorized car next to a dirty street lined with real cars.
hypothesis: no boy is outside in the streets playing.
explanation_1: If a boy plays next to a street, then he must be outside.
explanation_2: If a boy plays then it is not accurate that no boy is playing.
explanation_3: There cannot be both a boy and no boy.
premise_logic: exists e3 e2 e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(with(e1,x2) & to(x3,x4) & with(e3,x7) & n_car(x7) & a_real(s1) & Theme(s1,x7) & Theme(e3,x6) & v_line(e3) & (x4 = x6) & n_street(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_dirty(x5) & next(x2,x3) & n_thing(x3) & n_car(x2) & Theme(e2,x2) & v_motorize(e2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_boy(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x2 x3.(n_playing(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_street(x3) & -exists s1 x1.(in(s1,x2) & Theme(s1,x1) & a_outside(s1) & n_boy(x1)))