premise: Two men in polo shirts, reading the paper.
hypothesis: Two men argue with each other.
explanation_1: Men cannot be reading while they argue at the same time.
explanation_2: The two men cannot be reading and arguing simultaneously.
explanation_3: If they are reading the paper, that means they are not arguing with each other.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_paper(x5) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x5) & Actor(e1,x4) & v_read(e1) & (x1 = x4) & in(x1,x2) & n_shirt(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_polo(x3) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1.(all x2.(n_other(x2) -> with(e1,x2)) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_argue(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))