premise: Three military officials are battling a fire my a building.
hypothesis: Three military officials sit by a lake and are fishing.
explanation_1: The military officials can not battle a fire by a building and sit fishing by a lake at simultaneously.
explanation_2: The officials can't be fishing and battling a fire at the same time.
explanation_3: A person can not be battling a fire and sitting by a lake fishing at the same time.
premise_logic: exists s1 x1.(all x2.(n_building(x2) -> exists e1 x3 x4.(Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_battle(e1) & for(x3,x2) & Time(x3,x4) & n_my(x4) & n_fire(x3))) & n_official(x1) & a_military(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_3(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(exists x4.((x3 = x4) & n_fishing(x4)) & n_official(x3) & a_military(s2) & Theme(s2,x3) & card_eq_3(x3) & by(e1,x2) & n_lake(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_official(x1) & a_military(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_3(x1))