premise: A group of female athletes are huddled together and excited.
hypothesis: The group of athletes all can breathe underwater.
explanation_1: Group of athletes cannot necessarily breathe underwater because they are huddled together.
explanation_2: BREATHING UNDERWATER AND HUDDLING TOGETHER IS DIFFERENT
explanation_3: Athletes are unlikely to huddle together underwater.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 p1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(Theme(e2,x3) & v_excite(e2) & of(x3,x4) & n_athlete(x4) & a_female(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & n_group(x3) & exists s3.(Theme(s3,x1) & a_together(s3)) & Recipient(e1,p1) & Topic(e1,x1) & v_huddle(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_athlete(x2) & a_female(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_group(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x2.(n_group(x2) & all x3 x1.(((x1 = x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_athlete(x3)) -> exists e1 p1.(exists e2 x4.(Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_breathe(e2) & n_underwater(x4)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_can(e1))))