premise: A white duck is spreading its wings while sitting on the water.
hypothesis: The duck kept it's wings intact when it dived under the water to catch some fish.
explanation_1: The duck cannot be sitting on the water and diving under the water simultaneously.
explanation_2: A duck cannot be spreading it's wings while it also kept it's wings intact. It also cannot be sitting on the water when it dived under the water.
explanation_3: the duck can't be sitting on the water if he dove under it.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(n_water(x3) & while(e1,e2) & on(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_sit(e2) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_spread(e1) & n_wing(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_duck(x1) & a_white(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 p2 x1 x2 x5.(n_water(x5) & n_thing(x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_duck(x1) & exists e2 p3.(Topic(e2,p3) & exists e3 x6.(Theme(e3,x6) & Actor(e3,x1) & v_catch(e3) & n_fish(x6)) & under(e2,x5) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_dive(e2)) & when(p1,p2) & exists s1 x3 x4.((x1 = x3) & Theme(s1,x4) & a_intact(s1) & (x3 = x4) & n_wing(x3)) & Theme(e1,x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_keep(e1) & (x1 = x2))