premise: Two men, wearing identical shirts look into a classic car hood.
hypothesis: Two people are working on their vehicle.
explanation_1: Just because they are looking into a classic car hood doesn't infer they are working on it or that it is theirs.
explanation_2: You can look into a car hood without working on the vehicle.
explanation_3: Men may look into a car for reasons other than working on it and it may not necessarily be their vehicle.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(into(e2,x4) & n_hood(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_car(x5) & a_classic(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_look(e2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_wear(e1) & n_shirt(x3) & a_identical(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(on(e1,x2) & n_vehicle(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_work(e1) & n_people(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))