premise: Two little boys are playing on stairs that have a carpet runner going down them.
hypothesis: The children don't have any energy today.
explanation_1: Children who don't have any energy today would not be playing on stairs.
explanation_2: Boys have energy or they wouldn't be playing on stairs
explanation_3: The boys cannot be playing while they don't have any energy
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 e3 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(on(e1,x2) & Theme(e3,x4) & Actor(e3,x3) & v_have(e3) & a_down(s2) & Manner(e2,s2) & Theme(e2,x1) & Actor(e2,x6) & v_go(e2) & n_thing(x1) & (x4 = x6) & n_runner(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_carpet(x5) & (x2 = x3) & n_stair(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_boy(x1) & a_little(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1.(n_child(x1) & -all x2.(n_energy(x2) -> exists e1 x3.(Time(e1,x3) & n_today(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1))))