premise: The basketball player in the blue uniform is guarding the player in the orange uniform, who has the ball.
hypothesis: A orange uniform basketball player with ball is guarded by, a blue uniform opponent team player
explanation_1: If one is guarding then their opponent is being guarded.
explanation_2: This is a rephrasing of the previous sentence from a different point of view regarding which player has the ball, and who is being guarded.
explanation_3: If the blue player is guarding the orange player with the ball, then the orange player with the ball is guarded by a blue player.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(n_ball(x7) & n_uniform(x3) & n_uniform(x3) & of(x3,x5) & n_orange(x5) & n_player(x4) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & n_player(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_basketball(x2) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_guard(e2) & in(x4,x3) & Theme(e1,x7) & Actor(e1,x6) & v_have(e1) & (x3 = x6) & in(x1,x3))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8.(Actor(e1,x6) & n_player(x6) & of(x6,x8) & n_team(x8) & of(x6,x7) & n_opponent(x7) & a_uniform(s2) & Theme(s2,x6) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s1,x6) & Theme(e1,x1) & v_guard(e1) & with(x1,x5) & n_ball(x5) & n_player(x1) & of(x1,x4) & n_basketball(x4) & of(x1,x3) & n_uniform(x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_orange(x2))