premise: A man dressed in black and white is standing on the side of the street eating an ice cream cone.
hypothesis: The man is eating sushi in his bathtub.
explanation_1: A man could not be in his bathtub and standing on the side of the street simultaneously. Usually one would not eat ice cream and sushi at the same time.
explanation_2: Sushi is not ice cream.
explanation_3: The man eating an ice cream cone cannot be the same as the one eating Sushi.
premise_logic: exists e3 e2 e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9.(n_street(x6) & n_side(x5) & for(e2,e3) & Theme(e3,x7) & Actor(e3,x1) & v_eat(e3) & n_cone(x7) & of(x7,x9) & n_cream(x9) & of(x7,x8) & n_ice(x8) & on(e2,x5) & of(x5,x6) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_stand(e2) & Theme(e1,s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & a_white(s2) & Theme(e1,s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & a_black(s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & v_dress(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 x2.(n_bathtub(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_man(x1) & in(p1,x2) & exists s1 x3.((x1 = x3) & n_sushi(x3) & a_eating(s1) & Theme(s1,x3)))