premise: Two small boys dressed in tuxedos sitting on a red carpeted floor.
hypothesis: Two groomsmen sit on a carpet dressed in tuxedos.
explanation_1: The small boys are not necessarily groomsmen.
explanation_2: Boy does not imply groomsmen.
explanation_3: Just because they are boys and wearing tuxedos, you can't say they are groomsmen, especially as there is no wedding mentioned.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & in(e1,x3) & on(e2,x5) & n_floor(x5) & a_carpeted(s3) & Theme(s3,x5) & a_red(s2) & Theme(s2,x5) & Actor(e2,x4) & v_sit(e2) & (x3 = x4) & n_tuxedo(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & v_dress(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_boy(x1) & a_small(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(on(e1,x2) & in(e2,x4) & n_tuxedo(x4) & Theme(e2,x3) & v_dress(e2) & (x2 = x3) & n_carpet(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_groomsman(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))