premise: We can see the white underwear of the man wearing the red soccer jersey because he is pulling up his shorts.
hypothesis: People are looking at underwear.
explanation_1: Just because the underwear can be seen does not mean that people are looking at underwear necessarily.
explanation_2: The people might not be looking at the underwear.
explanation_3: The people may not be looking at underwear.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(n_shorts(x6) & of(x6,x4) & n_male(x4) & n_male(x4) & n_jersey(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_soccer(x5) & a_red(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & n_man(x3) & n_underwear(x2) & a_white(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_person(x1) & exists e2 p2.(exists e3 p3.(exists e4 s3.(a_up(s3) & Manner(e4,s3) & Theme(e4,x6) & Actor(e4,x4) & v_pull(e4)) & because(e3,p3) & Theme(e3,x4) & Actor(e3,x2) & v_wear(e3)) & Recipient(e2,p2) & Actor(e2,x1) & Topic(e2,x2) & v_see(e2) & of(x2,x3)) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_can(e1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(at(e1,x2) & n_underwear(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_look(e1) & n_people(x1))