premise: Boy in backpack crossing the street, Other people, all Asian, are all in crosswalk walking towards the boy.
hypothesis: The boy has no backpack on.
explanation_1: A boy that has no backpack on cannot be the Boy in backpack.
explanation_2: boy can't have backpack on if he is in backpack
explanation_3: If he has a backpack then he cannot possibly have no backpack.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8.(n_boy(x7) & -(x4 = x6) & n_people(x6) & n_people(x4) & a_,(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_street(x5) & ne_nam_boy(x1) & r_all(e2) & a_asian(s3) & Manner(e2,s3) & in(e2,x8) & n_crosswalk(x8) & a_all(s2) & Manner(e2,s2) & towards(e2,x7) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_walk(e2) & in(x1,x2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_cross(e1) & (x2 = x3) & n_backpack(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists x1.(n_boy(x1) & -exists e1 s1 x2.(a_on(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_have(e1) & n_backpack(x2)))