premise: The tattooed basketball player is about to dunk the ball.
hypothesis: The player has a tattoo that says mother.
explanation_1: Not all tattoos say mother.
explanation_2: Just because the player has a tattoo does not mean it says mother.
explanation_3: tattoos don't necessarily say mother
premise_logic: exists p1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(n_ball(x3) & n_player(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_basketball(x2) & a_tattooed(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & Topic(s2,p1) & Actor(s2,x1) & a_about(s2) & exists e1.(Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_dunk(e1)))
hypothesis_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_player(x1) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_have(e2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_say(e1) & n_mother(x4) & (x2 = x3) & n_tattoo(x2))