premise: Two older men in business attire are walking in a city, text graffiti is visible on the sidewalk.
hypothesis: Two older men walk down a defaced street
explanation_1: Walking in a city is rephrased as walk down a defaced street.
explanation_2: If a street has graffiti on it, then it can be considered defaced.
explanation_3: To older men walk down a street on the sidewalk.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x7.(n_sidewalk(x7) & in(e1,x4) & exists s2 x5 x6.(on(s2,x7) & Theme(s2,x5) & a_visible(s2) & n_graffitus(x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_text(x6)) & that(x4,p1) & n_city(x4) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_attire(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_business(x3) & n_man(x1) & r_more(s1) & a_older(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2.(down(e1,x2) & n_street(x2) & a_defaced(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_man(x1) & r_more(s1) & a_older(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & card_eq_2(x1))