premise: A man in a blue shirt was arguing with a man in a green jacket and started to raise his fist in anger.
hypothesis: a man orders a mamosa for another man
explanation_1: One cannot be arguing and raise his fist in anger while ordering a mamosa.
explanation_2: You cannot be arguing with a man and ordering him a mamosa too.
explanation_3: A man arguing with another man and who has started to raise his fist in anger is highly unlikely to be busy ordering a mamosa.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 p1 s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(Topic(e2,p1) & Actor(e2,x5) & v_start(e2) & exists e3 x8.(Theme(e3,x7) & Actor(e3,x5) & v_raise(e3) & in(x7,x8) & n_anger(x8)) & n_fist(x7) & of(x7,x1) & n_male(x1) & in(x5,x6) & n_shirt(x6) & a_blue(s3) & Theme(s3,x6) & n_man(x5) & with(e1,x3) & in(x3,x4) & n_jacket(x4) & a_green(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & n_man(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_argue(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_shirt(x2) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: all x1.(n_mamosa(x1) -> exists x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x2) & for(x2,x4) & n_man(x4) & -(x4 = x3) & n_man(x3) & n_man(x3) & for(x2,x1) & n_order(x2) & of(x2,x3)))