premise: A man holding a picture of a small dog is painting a small dog in near life size on a white canvas.
hypothesis: The man holding the painting was watching tv
explanation_1: In sentence 1, he is painting. In sentence 2, he is holding a painting.
explanation_2: The man wouldn't be painting a small dog and watching tv at the same time.
explanation_3: Man can't be watching tv if he is painting
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 s3 s4 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8.(Theme(e2,x5) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_paint(e2) & in(x5,x6) & on(x6,x8) & n_canvas(x8) & a_white(s4) & Theme(s4,x8) & n_size(x6) & of(x6,x7) & n_life(x7) & a_near(s3) & Theme(s3,x6) & n_dog(x5) & a_small(s2) & Theme(s2,x5) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_hold(e1) & of(x3,x4) & n_dog(x4) & a_small(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & n_picture(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_painting(x3) & n_man(x1) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_watch(e2) & n_tv(x4) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_hold(e1) & (x1 = x2))