premise: Hikers walk along some tough terrain.
hypothesis: A mid-day tea party in a miniature house attracts these young girls.
explanation_1: There are hikers in the first sentence and three lil girls in the second. The first one is around rough terrain while the second one the girls are in a miniature house.
explanation_2: Young girls are unlikely to be hikers through tough terrain. A miniature house cannot be regarded as tough terrain. A mid-day tea party will not have hikers walking.
explanation_3: Hikers walk and a tea party attracts young girls are two separate statements. There is no contradiction.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2.(along(e1,x2) & n_terrain(x2) & a_tough(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_hiker(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(n_girl(x5) & a_young(s2) & Theme(s2,x5) & Theme(e1,x5) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_attract(e1) & in(x1,x3) & n_house(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_miniature(x4) & n_party(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_tea(x2) & a_mid-day(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))