premise: Two hussars sit perched on horses, dressed in extravagant ceremonial wear, each holding a sabre in their right hand, reigns to the horse in their left.
hypothesis: There are professional riders at a ceremony.
explanation_1: Being dressed in ceremonial wear does not necessarily imply that they are at a ceremony.
explanation_2: Not all riders are professional riders.
explanation_3: The hussars could be wearing ceremonial wear without being at a ceremony. For example, they could be at a dress rehearsal.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 e3 s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4 x8 x9.(all x5.(n_thing(x5) -> exists e5 e4 x6 x7.(to(e5,x2) & in(x2,x9) & Actor(e5,x5) & v_reign(e5) & in(e4,x8) & Theme(e4,x7) & Actor(e4,x6) & v_hold(e4) & n_sabre(x7) & (x5 = x6))) & n_left(x9) & of(x9,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_horse(x2) & n_horse(x2) & n_hand(x8) & a_right(s3) & Theme(s3,x8) & of(x8,x1) & for(e1,e2) & on(e2,x2) & in(e3,x4) & n_wear(x4) & a_ceremonial(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & a_extravagant(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & Theme(e3,x3) & v_dress(e3) & (x2 = x3) & Theme(e2,x1) & v_perch(e2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_hussar(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1 s1 x2 x3.((x1 = x2) & at(x2,x3) & n_ceremony(x3) & n_rider(x2) & a_professional(s1) & Theme(s1,x2))