premise: A hockey player in blue and red guarding the goal.
hypothesis: a hockey goalie earns his keep
explanation_1: You can not infer he earns his keep.
explanation_2: Just because the hockey player is guarding the goal does not mean he earns his keep.
explanation_3: Player guarding the goal as a goalie may not be earning his keep if he is not a good goalie.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(n_goal(x6) & a_topic(x1) & Theme(e1,x6) & Actor(e1,x5) & v_guard(e1) & (x1 = x5) & Theme(s2,x4) & a_red(s2) & (x1 = x4) & Theme(s1,x3) & a_blue(s1) & (x1 = x3) & n_player(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_hockey(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(Actor(e2,x1) & v_keep(e2) & Theme(e1,x4) & Actor(e1,x3) & v_earn(e1) & n_his(x4) & (x1 = x3) & n_goalie(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_hockey(x2))