premise: A guy is attempting to perform a skateboard trick while jumping over part of a white building in an attempt to land on the concrete outside.
hypothesis: The guy is a skateboarder.
explanation_1: The guy is attempting a skateboard trick, therefore he is a skateboarder
explanation_2: If a guy is attempting to perform a skateboard trick then he must be a skateboarder.
explanation_3: Skateboard  tricks only do in skateboard.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 s2 x1 x7.(n_outside(x7) & a_concrete(s2) & Theme(s2,x7) & Topic(e1,p1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_attempt(e1) & exists e3 e2 p2 s1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(while(e2,e3) & in(e3,x6) & Topic(x6,p2) & exists e4.(on(e4,x7) & Actor(e4,x6) & v_land(e4)) & n_attempt(x6) & over(e3,x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_building(x5) & a_white(s1) & Theme(s1,x5) & n_part(x4) & Actor(e3,x1) & v_jump(e3) & Theme(e2,x2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_perform(e2) & n_trick(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_skateboard(x3)) & n_guy(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_guy(x1) & exists x2.((x1 = x2) & n_skateboarder(x2)))