premise: Man walking down a brick sidewalk in a business suit reading a paper and smoking a cigar with a woman wearing sunglasses walking behind him to his left.
hypothesis: The woman is a secret agent on mission to murder the man.
explanation_1: She could just be walking,  no reason to infer she is a secret agent on mission to murder the man.
explanation_2: A woman is walking behind a man doesn't necessarily mean that she is a secret agent on mission to murder the man.
explanation_3: Just because the woman wearing sunglasses is walking behind the man does not mean that she is a secret agent on a mission to murder the man.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x13.(all x8.(n_cigar(x8) -> exists e3 e4 x1 x9 x10 x11 x12.(to(e4,x13) & n_male(x1) & behind(e4,x1) & Actor(e4,x9) & v_walk(e4) & with(x9,x10) & Theme(e3,x12) & Actor(e3,x11) & v_wear(e3) & n_sunglass(x12) & (x10 = x11) & n_woman(x10) & for(x9,x8) & n_smoking(x9))) & n_left(x13) & of(x13,x1) & n_male(x1) & in(e1,x4) & Theme(e2,x7) & Actor(e2,x6) & v_read(e2) & n_paper(x7) & (x4 = x6) & n_suit(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_business(x5) & a_down(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_sidewalk(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_brick(x3) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 x1.(n_woman(x1) & exists s1 x2 x3 x4 x5.((x1 = x2) & on(x2,x3) & n_man(x5) & (x3 = x5) & to(x3,x4) & n_murder(x4) & n_mission(x3) & n_agent(x2) & a_secret(s1) & Theme(s1,x2)))