premise: Sexy young men stand on a balcony having a heated conversation.
hypothesis: The young men are in complete agreement.
explanation_1: People cannot be in a heated conversation and in complete agreement simultaneously.
explanation_2: conversation doesn't mean agreement
explanation_3: Having a heated conversation means that you are not in complete agreement.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(for(e1,e2) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_have(e2) & n_conversation(x4) & a_heated(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & on(e1,x3) & n_balcony(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & n_man(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & (x1 = x2) & ne_nam_sexy(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 s1 x1.(n_man(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1) & exists s2 x2.(in(x1,x2) & n_agreement(x2) & a_complete(s2) & Theme(s2,x2)))