premise: two men are seen talking, one man wears pink and another is sporting a t-shirt for summer school 60th anniversary.
hypothesis: A man and a woman share a kiss during a candlelight dinner.
explanation_1: two men can't be inferred as man and women.
explanation_2: There are 2 men in he first sentence and a man and a woman in the second sentence.
explanation_3: Two men cannot be a man and a woman.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 e3 p1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8.(Theme(e3,x5) & Actor(e3,x4) & v_sport(e3) & for(x5,x6) & n_anniversary(x6) & a_60th(s1) & Theme(s1,x6) & of(x6,x8) & n_school(x8) & of(x6,x7) & n_summer(x7) & n_t-shirt(x5) & n_thing(x4) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x2) & v_wear(e2) & n_pink(x3) & n_man(x2) & card_eq_1(x2) & exists e4.(Actor(e4,x1) & v_talk(e4)) & Recipient(e1,p1) & Topic(e1,x1) & v_see(e1) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists s1 x1.(a_topic(s1) & all x2.(n_kiss(x2) -> exists x3 x4 x5 x6.(subset_of(x3,s1) & during(x3,x5) & n_dinner(x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_candlelight(x6) & for(x3,x2) & n_share(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_woman(x4))) & subset_of(x1,s1) & n_man(x1))