premise: A curly-haired man is talking or possibly debating with a blond-haired man in front of a table.
hypothesis: A man gets into an argument after his waiter makes a mistake on his order.
explanation_1: Standing in front of a table does not mean they are in a restaurant, talking or debating is not necessarily an argument.  There is no indication that a  mistake was made or that one of the men is a waiter.
explanation_2: Talking or debating does not necessarily imply arguing nor that the person in front of the table is a waiter that has made a mistake.
explanation_3: Talking or debating does not mean engaging in an argument. A blond-haired man isn't always a waiter. Talking or debating does not mean one is taking an order.
premise_logic: (exists e1 s1 x1.(Actor(e1,x1) & v_talk(e1) & n_man(x1) & a_curly-haired(s1) & Theme(s1,x1)) | exists e2 s2 s3 s4 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_possibly(s4) & Manner(e2,s4) & with(e2,x3) & in(x3,x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_table(x5) & n_front(x4) & n_man(x3) & a_blond-haired(s3) & Theme(s3,x3) & Actor(e2,x2) & v_debate(e2) & n_man(x2) & a_curly-haired(s2) & Theme(s2,x2)))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x3 x5.(exists e2 x1 x4.(on(e2,x5) & n_male(x1) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_make(e2) & n_mistake(x4)) & n_order(x5) & of(x5,x1) & n_waiter(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & after(e1,p1) & into(e1,x2) & n_argument(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_get(e1) & n_man(x1))