premise: Two men, one in a blue shirt and one in a green shirt analyze a piece of paper in the middle of a workshop area.
hypothesis: The men are discussing their blueprints.
explanation_1: The paper could be anything. Doen't imply that it is their blueprints.
explanation_2: Not all piece of papers are blueprints.
explanation_3: A piece of paper in a workshop area does not constitute blueprints.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11.(n_middle(x9) & in(e1,x9) & of(x9,x10) & n_area(x10) & of(x10,x11) & n_workshop(x11) & Theme(e1,x7) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_analyze(e1) & of(x7,x8) & n_paper(x8) & n_piece(x7) & rel(x1,x2) & subset_of(x5,x2) & in(x5,x6) & n_shirt(x6) & a_green(s2) & Theme(s2,x6) & n_thing(x5) & card_eq_1(x5) & subset_of(x3,x2) & in(x3,x4) & n_shirt(x4) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s1,x4) & n_thing(x3) & card_eq_1(x3) & n_man(x1) & card_eq_2(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_blueprint(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_thing(x1) & n_man(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_discuss(e1))