premise: A man in a red shirt is being filmed by another man on a sports field with a huge audience of people watching and cheering.
hypothesis: The man is being filmed by another man.
explanation_1: There is a man being filmed by another man in both sentences.
explanation_2: A man in a red shirt is a specific man.
explanation_3: A man (in a red shirt) is being filmed by another man is part of the total description.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 e3 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9.(with(e1,x6) & of(x6,x7) & Actor(e3,x9) & v_cheer(e3) & (x7 = x9) & Actor(e2,x8) & v_watch(e2) & (x7 = x8) & n_people(x7) & n_audience(x6) & a_huge(s2) & Theme(s2,x6) & on(e1,x4) & n_field(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_sport(x5) & Actor(e1,x3) & n_man(x3) & -(x3 = x1) & n_man(x1) & n_man(x1) & Theme(e1,x1) & v_film(e1) & in(x1,x2) & n_shirt(x2) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_man(x1) & n_man(x1) & Actor(e1,x2) & n_man(x2) & -(x2 = x1) & Theme(e1,x1) & v_film(e1))