premise: A man wearing an orange shirt and sunglasses jogging in a marathon with spectators spectating him.
hypothesis: A man sits at his computer sipping coffee.
explanation_1: A man can't sit at his computer while jogging in a marathon.
explanation_2: A man cannot sit and be jogging at the same time.
explanation_3: One cannot be jogging and sitting at the same time. If someone is sitting at a computer sipping coffee, then the person can't be running a marathon.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 e3 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7.(in(e2,x5) & with(x5,x6) & Theme(e3,x1) & Actor(e3,x7) & v_spectate(e3) & n_male(x1) & (x6 = x7) & n_spectator(x6) & n_marathon(x5) & Actor(e2,x4) & v_jog(e2) & n_sunglass(x4) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_wear(e1) & n_shirt(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_orange(x3) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3.(for(e1,e2) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_sip(e2) & n_coffee(x3) & at(e1,x2) & n_computer(x2) & of(x2,x1) & n_male(x1) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & n_man(x1))