premise: A boy toddler is holding a bat he is about to swing at a pinata.
hypothesis: A child is about to hit the panda with a stick.
explanation_1: The boy can't be about to hit a pinata while about to hit a panda.
explanation_2: A child would not hit a panda with stick if he were about to swing at piñata with bat
explanation_3: The child should either be holding a bat or a stick.
premise_logic: exists e1 p1 p2 s1 x1 x2 x3.(Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_hold(e1) & for(p1,s1) & Topic(s1,p2) & Actor(s1,x1) & a_about(s1) & exists e2 x5.(at(e2,x5) & n_pina(x5) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_swing(e2)) & exists x4.((x1 = x4) & (x3 = x4)) & n_male(x1) & n_bat(x3) & n_toddler(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_boy(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists p1 s1 x1 x2.(n_panda(x2) & Topic(s1,p1) & Actor(s1,x1) & a_about(s1) & exists e1 x3.(with(e1,x3) & n_stick(x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_hit(e1)) & n_child(x1))