premise: A man getting a group of children to move around and have fun.
hypothesis: A man sitting on a couch with children.
explanation_1: Generally you wouldn't be getting people to move around while sitting.
explanation_2: A man can not be moving around and sitting at the same time.
explanation_3: A man could be getting a group of children to move as he is sitting on a couch. These activities could be done simultaneously. I do not see a contradiction.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 e3 p1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8.(a_topic(x1) & Theme(e3,x5) & Actor(e3,x2) & v_get(e3) & Theme(e2,x8) & Actor(e2,x7) & v_have(e2) & n_fun(x8) & (x5 = x7) & of(x5,x6) & n_child(x6) & n_group(x5) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_get(e1) & Topic(x3,p1) & exists e4 p2.(exists s1.(Theme(s1,x3) & a_around(s1)) & Topic(e4,p2) & Actor(e4,x3) & v_move(e4)) & of(x3,x4) & n_child(x4) & n_group(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_topic(x1) & with(e1,x4) & n_child(x4) & on(e1,x3) & n_couch(x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_sit(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1))