premise: A group of female athletes are huddled together and excited.
hypothesis: They are huddled together because they are working together.
explanation_1: A group huddled together are not assumed to be doing so because they are working together.
explanation_2: Just because they are huddled together doesn't mean it is because they are working together
explanation_3: not all athletes are working together
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 p1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(Theme(e2,x3) & v_excite(e2) & of(x3,x4) & n_athlete(x4) & a_female(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & n_group(x3) & exists s3.(Theme(s3,x1) & a_together(s3)) & Recipient(e1,p1) & Topic(e1,x1) & v_huddle(e1) & of(x1,x2) & n_athlete(x2) & a_female(s1) & Theme(s1,x2) & n_group(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 p2 x1.(n_thing(x1) & n_thing(x1) & exists e2 s2.(a_together(s2) & Manner(e2,s2) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_work(e2)) & because(e1,p2) & exists s1.(Theme(s1,x1) & a_together(s1)) & Recipient(e1,p1) & Topic(e1,x1) & v_huddle(e1))