premise: A solo cyclist is riding down a windy road.
hypothesis: The cyclist falls down the windy road
explanation_1: Riding down a windy road does not imply that the cyclist falls.
explanation_2: Windy road always do not make the cyclist falls down
explanation_3: Just because a cyclist rides down a windy road does not mean that he falls down.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3.(a_down(s2) & Manner(e1,s2) & Theme(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_ride(e1) & n_road(x3) & a_windy(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & n_cyclist(x1) & of(x1,x2) & n_solo(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(n_road(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_windy(x3) & n_cyclist(x1) & a_down(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_fall(e1))