premise: A male sitting down enjoy his coffee at a coffee shop.
hypothesis: A man eats a doughnut with his coffee.
explanation_1: A man enjoying coffee at a coffee shop does not imply that he had a doughnut.
explanation_2: The man who eats a doughnut may not be the same man.
explanation_3: The man eats a doughnut with his coffee is not mentioned in sentence 1
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_enjoy(e2) & at(x3,x4) & n_shop(x4) & of(x4,x3) & n_coffee(x3) & n_coffee(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & a_down(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_sit(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_male(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(with(e1,x3) & n_coffee(x3) & of(x3,x1) & n_male(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_eat(e1) & n_doughnut(x2) & n_man(x1))