premise: A man with a blue, collared shirt sits in front of another man.
hypothesis: a man sits in front of another man
explanation_1: Answer: A man sits in front of another man
explanation_2: They both have the same phrasing (front of another man) sentence 2 is just less specific.
explanation_3: All of sentence 2 ( a man sits in front of another man) is found inside sentence 1, the only difference is that sentence 1 describes the first man's appearance.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 s3 x1 x2 x3 x4.(in(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_man(x4) & -(x4 = x1) & n_man(x1) & n_man(x1) & n_front(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1) & with(x1,x2) & n_shirt(x2) & a_collared(s3) & Theme(s3,x2) & a_,(s2) & Theme(s2,x2) & a_blue(s1) & Theme(s1,x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3.(in(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_man(x3) & -(x3 = x1) & n_man(x1) & n_man(x1) & n_front(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_sit(e1))