premise: people are enjoying food at a crowded restaurant.
hypothesis: A lone person eats sadly at a truck-stop in the middle of nowhere.
explanation_1: There cannot be both a person and people, they are either enjoying or eat sadly but not both, and they cannot be at a restaurant and a truck-stop at the same time.
explanation_2: A lone person is not people.  Enjoying food is the opposite of eats sadly.
explanation_3: THE LONE PERSON EATING SADLY IS CONTRADICTORY TO PEOPLE ENJOYING FOOD
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3.(at(e1,x3) & n_restaurant(x3) & a_crowded(s1) & Theme(s1,x3) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_enjoy(e1) & n_food(x2) & n_people(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4.(n_middle(x3) & in(e1,x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_nowhere(x4) & at(e1,x2) & n_truck-stop(x2) & a_sadly(s2) & Manner(e1,s2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_eat(e1) & n_person(x1) & a_lone(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))