premise: A dog attacking a man wearing protective gear.
hypothesis: The man protected himself.
explanation_1: Answer: The man protected himself by wearing a protective gear.
explanation_2: Man wearing protective gear is a paraphrase of man protected himself.
explanation_3: The man protected himself because the dog was attacking the man.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5.(a_topic(x1) & Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x2) & v_attack(e2) & Theme(e1,x5) & Actor(e1,x4) & v_wear(e1) & n_gear(x5) & a_protective(s1) & Theme(s1,x5) & (x3 = x4) & n_man(x3) & (x1 = x2) & n_dog(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(n_male(x2) & n_man(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_protect(e1))