premise: Men playing basketball, the guy with the ball is attempting a layup.
hypothesis: Men are playing basketball as one guy wins the game by attempting a layup.
explanation_1: It cannot be assumed that the layup wins the game.
explanation_2: Attempting a layup may not be what wins the game.
explanation_3: Just because one man attempts a layup does not necessarily mean he would win the game.
premise_logic: exists e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(n_ball(x5) & n_guy(x4) & Theme(e1,x6) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_attempt(e1) & n_layup(x6) & rel(x1,x4) & with(x4,x5) & n_basketball(x1) & of(x1,x3) & n_playing(x3) & of(x1,x2) & n_man(x2))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2 x4.(n_game(x4) & exists e3 e2 x3 x5.(by(e2,e3) & Theme(e3,x5) & Actor(e3,x3) & v_attempt(e3) & n_layup(x5) & Theme(e2,x4) & Actor(e2,x3) & v_win(e2) & n_guy(x3) & card_eq_1(x3)) & as(e1,p1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_play(e1) & n_basketball(x2) & n_man(x1))