premise: A view of bicyclists on a city street, riding in both directions, with red reflective safety cones dividing the two lanes.
hypothesis: Bumper to bumper automobile traffic clogs the street.
explanation_1: People driving automobiles are not bicyclists.
explanation_2: You would not be able to ride bicycle in both directions if bumper to bumper traffic clogged the street.
explanation_3: Bicyclists riding in both directions cannot be riding Bumper to bumper.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9.(n_lane(x9) & card_eq_2(x9) & n_direction(x6) & a_topic(x1) & of(x1,x2) & Theme(e2,x9) & Actor(e2,x7) & v_divide(e2) & with(e1,x7) & n_cone(x7) & of(x7,x8) & n_safety(x8) & a_reflective(s2) & Theme(s2,x7) & a_red(s1) & Theme(s1,x7) & in(e1,x6) & Actor(e1,x5) & v_ride(e1) & (x2 = x5) & on(x2,x3) & n_street(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_city(x4) & n_bicyclist(x2) & n_view(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 p1 x1 x2.(n_street(x2) & ne_nam_bumper(x1) & Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_clog(e1) & Topic(x1,p1) & exists e2 x3 x4.(Theme(e2,x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_bumper(e2) & n_traffic(x3) & of(x3,x4) & n_automobile(x4)))