premise: A young man standing on one foot in colorful bowling shoes after throwing the ball.
hypothesis: A young man is standing on both feet barefooted.
explanation_1: The young man can't stand on one foot and both feet.
explanation_2: If a man is standing on two feet, then he is not standing on only one foot. If he is wearing bowling shoes, then he is not barefooted.
explanation_3: The man cannot be on one foot if he is standing on both feet. He cannot be barefooted if he is wearing colorful bowling shoes.
premise_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 s2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(n_ball(x6) & a_topic(x1) & after(e1,e2) & Theme(e2,x6) & Actor(e2,x2) & v_throw(e2) & in(e1,x4) & n_shoe(x4) & of(x4,x5) & n_bowling(x5) & a_colorful(s2) & Theme(s2,x4) & on(e1,x3) & n_foot(x3) & card_eq_1(x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_stand(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 e2 s1 x1 x2 x3.(n_foot(x3) & Actor(e2,x1) & v_barefoot(e2) & on(e1,x3) & Actor(e1,x2) & v_stand(e1) & (x1 = x2) & n_man(x1) & a_young(s1) & Theme(s1,x1))