premise: A man walks along with a can of soda in his hand.
hypothesis: A person walks along with a can of soda in his hand.
explanation_1: A person is a man.
explanation_2: A man walks along with a an of soda in his hand, and the man is a person therefore a person walks along with a can of soda in his hand.
explanation_3: A man is a person and he is walking with a can of soda in his hand.
premise_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_along(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & with(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & in(x3,x4) & n_hand(x4) & of(x4,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_soda(x3) & n_can(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_man(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 s1 x1 x2 x3 x4.(a_along(s1) & Manner(e1,s1) & with(e1,x2) & of(x2,x3) & in(x3,x4) & n_hand(x4) & of(x4,x1) & n_male(x1) & n_soda(x3) & n_can(x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_walk(e1) & n_person(x1))