premise: A crowd is standing and cheering at a football game.
hypothesis: A woman takes a nap.
explanation_1: In sentence 1 a crowd is standing and cheering and in sentence 2 a woman is napping. These two statements are contradictory.
explanation_2: The subject is either standing and cheering or taking a nap.
explanation_3: The woman can’t be standing or cheering while she takes a nap.
premise_logic: exists e2 e1 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6.(at(e2,x5) & n_game(x5) & of(x5,x6) & n_football(x6) & Actor(e2,x4) & v_cheer(e2) & n_crowd(x4) & at(e1,x2) & n_game(x2) & of(x2,x3) & n_football(x3) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_stand(e1) & n_crowd(x1))
hypothesis_logic: exists e1 x1 x2.(Theme(e1,x2) & Actor(e1,x1) & v_take(e1) & n_nap(x2) & n_woman(x1))