Every second request to @Carousell seems to fail. Wonder if they properly capture this jarring UX.
<a href="http://tapbots.com/tweetbot" rel="nofollow">Tweetbot for iΟS</a>
East Region
[]
FRANKEL
['every', 'second', 'request', '@carousell', 'seems', 'fail', 'wonder', 'properly', 'capture', 'jarring', 'ux']
['jarring', 'capture', 'jarring', 'jarring']
every second request @carousell fail wonder they properly capture this jarring
every second request seems fail wonder properly capture jarring ux
  [
    {"relatedness": True, "type": "facility", "explanation": "broken facility (e.g. lift, window) requires maintenance"},
    {"relatedness": True, "type": "inconvenience", "explanation": "inconvenience (e.g. illegal parking) causes issues"},
    {"relatedness": False, "type": "none", "explanation": "This is not related to maintenance or public housing"}
    ]

The post relates to a maintenance report feedback for a public flat house, specifically mentioning a broken facility (e.g. lift, window) that requires maintenance. The use of the phrase "wonder properly capture jarring ux" suggests that the individual is experiencing an inconvenience or issue with the facility, which is a common reason for maintenance reports. Therefore, the answer is "True" for the "relatedness" field, and the "type" field is set to "facility" to indicate the nature of the issue.