Going round chatting with and checking on fellow Singaporeans and our collection points. All 👍👍👍🇸🇬 @ Pasar Geylang Serai Singapura https://t.co/nG3HPitnKX
<a href="http://instagram.com" rel="nofollow">Instagram</a>
Central Region
[{'url': 'https://t.co/nG3HPitnKX', 'expanded_url': 'https://www.instagram.com/p/B8XmaIqlxy_/?igshid=g094ba65a5cu', 'display_url': 'instagram.com/p/B8XmaIqlxy_/…', 'indices': [131, 154]}]
GEYLANG EAST
['going', 'round', 'chatting', 'checking', 'fellow', 'singaporean', 'collection', 'point', '👍', '👍', '👍', '🇸', '🇬', 'pasar', 'geylang', 'serai', 'singapura', 'https://t.co/ng3hpitnkx']
['fellow', 'fellow']
going round chatting with fellow collection serai
going round chatting checking fellow singaporeans collection points pasar geylang serai singapura
  [
    {"relatedness": False, "type": "none", "explanation": "This post is not related to maintenance report feedback for public flat houses."},
    ]

The given Twitter post does not seem to be related to maintenance report feedback for public flat houses in Singapore. The post mentions "going round chatting checking fellow Singaporeans collection points pasar geylang serai singapura", which does not appear to be a specific issue or concern related to public housing. Therefore, the answer is "False" for the "relatedness" field, and the "type" field is left blank as there is no specific type of issue mentioned in the post. The "explanation" field provides a brief explanation for why the post is not related to maintenance report feedback.