7.6% illuminated Waxing Crescent. 🙂

Takahashi FS-60Q 60mm refractor | Canon EOS R | ISO 1600 | 13x1/200 sec | Registax | Lr &amp; Ps @ Singapore https://t.co/cQKvaXNEjm
<a href="http://instagram.com" rel="nofollow">Instagram</a>
Central Region
[{'url': 'https://t.co/cQKvaXNEjm', 'expanded_url': 'https://www.instagram.com/p/B9Mgj-Ol_rF/?igshid=7k7bzniu43un', 'display_url': 'instagram.com/p/B9Mgj-Ol_rF/…', 'indices': [146, 169]}]
MARINA CENTRE
['7.6', 'illuminated', 'waxing', 'crescent', '🙂', 'takahashi', 'f', '60q', '60mm', 'refractor', 'canon', 'eos', 'r', 'iso', '1600', '13x1', '200', 'sec', 'registax', 'lr', 'p', 'singapore', 'https://t.co/cqkvaxnejm']
[]
illuminated waxing crescent refractor canon
7 6 illuminated waxing crescent takahashi fs60q 60mm refractor canon eos r iso 1600 13x1 200 sec registax lr amp ps singapore
  [
    {"relatedness": False, "type": "none", "explanation": "This post does not relate to a maintenance report or feedback for a public flat house."},
    ]

It seems that the provided Twitter post does not contain any information related to a maintenance report or feedback for a public flat house. The post appears to be a description of a photograph taken with a camera, including the camera settings and location. Therefore, the answer is "False" for the "relatedness" field, and the "type" field is set to "none" because the post does not fit any of the other categories. The "explanation" field provides a brief explanation for why the post does not relate to a maintenance report or feedback for a public flat house.