《Winners of xnbakes Giveaway 》

.

.

.

chenvincent8 
.
abekkia89 
.
beautyvanitysg @ Singapore 新加坡 https://t.co/OrDgFXPkY9
<a href="http://instagram.com" rel="nofollow">Instagram</a>
Central Region
[{'url': 'https://t.co/OrDgFXPkY9', 'expanded_url': 'https://www.instagram.com/p/CDB_2qznhyk/?igshid=1un3bnrahgwi', 'display_url': 'instagram.com/p/CDB_2qznhyk/…', 'indices': [101, 124]}]
MARINA CENTRE
['《', 'winner', 'xnbakes', 'giveaway', '》', '.\n\n.\n\n.', 'chenvincent', '8', 'abekkia', '89', 'beautyvanitysg', 'singapore', '新加坡', 'https://t.co/ordgfxpky9']
['winner', 'winner', 'winner', 'winner']
giveaway
winners xnbakes giveaway chenvincent8 abekkia89 beautyvanitysg singapore
  [
    {"relatedness": False, "type": "none", "explanation": "This post is not related to maintenance report feedback for public flat house."},
    ]

It seems that the post you provided does not relate to maintenance report feedback for public flat house. The post mentions "winners xnbakes giveaway chenvincent8 abekkia89 beautyvanitysg singapore" which does not contain any information about maintenance report feedback for public flat house. Therefore, the answer is "False" for the "relatedness" field, and "none" for the "type" field, along with a brief explanation that this post is not related to maintenance report feedback for public flat house.