Back to base after the 2nd tranche of a 6-day trial. Managed to win against a scoundrel who lied through his teeth throughout the proceedings to confuse issues and fix my client. Sought indemnity costs but was given only standard costs. Appealing! 😊 https://t.co/NmN1oBQpXx
<a href="http://twitter.com/download/iphone" rel="nofollow">Twitter for iPhone</a>
Msc Law
[]
CECIL
['back', 'base', '2nd', 'tranche', '6', 'day', 'trial', 'managed', 'win', 'scoundrel', 'lied', 'teeth', 'throughout', 'proceeding', 'confuse', 'issue', 'fix', 'client', 'sought', 'indemnity', 'cost', 'given', 'standard', 'cost', 'appealing', '😊', 'https://t.co/nmn1obqpxx']
['base', 'scoundrel', 'indemnity', 'indemnity', 'scoundrel', 'scoundrel', 'proceeding', 'scoundrel', 'confuse', 'scoundrel']
back base after trial against scoundrel lied through teeth throughout confuse client sought indemnity given only standard appealing
back base 2nd tranche 6day trial managed win scoundrel lied teeth throughout proceedings confuse issues fix client sought indemnity costs given standard costs appealing
  [
    {"relatedness": False, "type": "none", "explanation": "This post does not relate to a maintenance report feedback to public flat house."},
    ]

It seems that the post does not mention anything related to maintenance report feedback for public flat houses. The language used in the post is also not consistent with the language used in maintenance report feedback. Therefore, I have marked the answer as "relatedness": False.