text:
\subsection*{1. Preface}

In Vol. 1, p. 49 of
{\it Higher Transcendental Functions}  of the Bateman Project
\cite{Erdelyi HTF}
  we read
"Of all integrals which contain
gamma functions in their
integrands the most important ones are the so-called Mellin-Barnes
integrals. Such integrals were first introduced by S. Pincherle,
in 1888  \cite{Pincherle 88};
their theory
has been developed in 1910
by H. Mellin (where there are references
to earlier work) \cite{Mellin 10}  and they were used for a complete
integration of the hypergeometric differential equation
by E.W. Barnes \cite{Barnes 08}."
\newpage
\noindent
In the classical treatise on Bessel functions by
Watson \cite{Watson BESSEL}, p. 190, we read
"By using integrals of a type introduced by Pincherle and Mellin,
Barnes has obtained representations of Bessel functions ...."
\vsh\pni
Salvatore Pincherle  (1853 -- 1936)
was Professor of Mathematics at the
University of Bologna from 1880 to 1928.
He retired from the University just after the International
Congress of Mathematicians that he had organized in Bologna,
following the invitation received at the previous Congress
held in Toronto in 1924.
He wrote several treatises and lecture notes on Algebra, Geometry,
Real and Complex Analysis.
His main book related to his scientific activity is entitled
"Le Operazioni Distributive e loro Applicazioni all'Analisi";
it was written in collaboration
with his assistant, Dr. Ugo Amaldi, and
was published in 1901 by Zanichelli, Bologna.
Pincherle can be considered one of the most prominent
founders of the Functional Analysis, as pointed out by J. Hadamard
in his review lecture "Le d\'eveloppement et le
r\^ole scientifique du Calcul fonctionnel",
given at the Congress of Bologna (1928).
A description of Pincherle's scientific works requested from him
by Mittag-Leffler, who was the Editor of Acta Mathematica,
appeared (in French) in 1925 on  this prestigious
journal \cite{Pincherle TRAVAUX}.
A collection of selected papers (38 from 247 notes plus 24
treatises) was edited by Unione Matematica Italiana (UMI)
on the occasion of the centenary of his birth,
and published by Cremonese, Roma 1954.
Note that S. Pincherle was the first President of UMI, from 1922 to 1936.
Here we point out that the 1888 paper (in Italian)
of S. Pincherle  on the
{\it Generalized Hypergeometric Functions}
led him to  introduce the afterwards named Mellin-Barnes integral
to represent the solution of a
generalized hypergeometric differential equation  investigated
by Goursat  in 1883.
Pincherle's priority was
explicitly recognized by Mellin and Barnes themselves,
as reported below.
\vsh\pni
In 1907 Barnes, see p. 63 in \cite{Barnes 07},	wrote:
"The idea of employing contour integrals involving gamma functions
of the variable in the subject of integration appears to be due
to Pincherle, whose suggestive paper was the starting point of
the investigations of Mellin (1895)  though the type of contour
and its use can be traced back to Riemann."
In 1910 Mellin, see p. 326ff in  \cite{Mellin 10},
devoted a section (\S 10: Proof of Theorems of Pincherle)
to revisit the original work of Pincherle; in particular,  he wrote
"Before we are going to prove this theorem, which is a special case of a
 more general theorem of Mr. Pincherle, we want to describe more closely
 the lines $L$ over which the integration preferably is to be carried
 out." [free translation from German].
\newpage
\noindent
The Mellin-Barnes integrals are the essential tools
for treating the
two classes of higher transcendental functions known as $G$ and $H$
functions, introduced by Meijer (1946) \cite{Meijer 46}
and Fox (1961) \cite{Fox 61} respectively, so
Pincherle can be considered their precursor.
For an exhaustive treatment of the Mellin-Barnes integrals we refer
to the recent monograph by Paris and Kaminski
\cite{ParisKaminski BOOK01}.
\vsh\pni
The purpose of our paper is to let know  the community
of scientists interested in special functions the
pioneering 1888 work by Pincherle, that, in the author's
intention, was devoted
to compare two different generalizations of the
Gauss hypergeometric function due to Pochhammer and to
Goursat. Incidentally, for a particular case of the Goursat function,
Pincherle used an integral representation in the complex plane
that in future was adopted by Mellin and Barnes for their
treatment     of the {\it generalized hypergeometric functions}
known as $\,_pF_q (z)\,. $
We also intend to show,
in the original part of our paper,
that, by extending the original arguments
by Pincherle, we are able to provide
the Mellin-Barnes integral representation of the transcendental
functions introduced by Meijer (the so-called $G$ functions).
\vsh\pni
The paper is divided as follows.
In Section 2
 we report the major statements and
results of the	1888 paper by Pincherle.
In Section 3 we show how it is possible to originate from these
results  the Meijer $G$ functions by a proper
generalization of  Pincherle's method.
Finally, Section 4 is devoted to the conclusions.
We find it convenient to reserve an Appendix for recalling
some basic notions for the generalized hypergeometric functions
and the Meijer $G$ functions.

\subsection*{2. The Pochhammer and Goursat generalized hypergeometric
functions via Pincherle's  arguments}

The 1888 paper by Pincherle is based on what he called
"duality principle",
which relates linear differential equations with
rational coefficients to linear difference equations with
rational coefficients.
Let us remind that the sentence "rational coefficients" means
that the coefficients are in general rational functions
(\ie ratio between two polynomials)
of the independent variable and, in particular, polynomials.
\vsh\pni
By using  this principle with polynomial coefficients,
Pincherle  showed that
two generalized  hypergeometric functions
proposed and investigated respectively by   Pochhammer (1870), see
\cite{Pochhammer 70}, and by Goursat (1883),
see \cite{Goursat CR83,Goursat ENS83},
can be obtained and related to each othe
\footnote{In fact, translating from Italian,
 the author so writes in introducing his paper:
 "It is known that to any linear differential
 equation with rational coefficients one may let correspond
 a linear difference equation with rational coefficients.
 In other words, if the former equation is given, one can immediately
 write the latter one and viceversa;
 furthermore, from the integral of the one,
 the integral of the latter can be easily deduced.
 This {\it relationship} appears to be originated by a sort of
 {\it duality principle} of which, in this note, I  want to treat
 an application concerning generalized hypergeometric functions."}.
\vsh\pni
  The generalized hypergeometric functions introduced by Pochhammer
and Goursat   considered by Pincherle are solutions
of linear differential equations of order $n$
with polynomial coefficients, that we report in Appendix.
As a matter of fact, the duality principle states the correspondence
between a  linear {\it ordinary differential equation} ($ODE$)
and a linear {\it finite difference equation} ($FDE$).
The  coefficients of both  equations are assumed to be
{\it rational} functions, in particular {\it polynomials}.
In his analysis \cite{Pincherle 88} Pincherle considered
the correspondence between the following equations,
$$
  \sum_{h=0}^m
\left} \def\r{\right( a_{h\,0} + a_{h\,1}\,\hbox{e}^{-t}
  + a_{h\,2}\,\hbox{e}^{-2t}	+ \dots + + a_{h\,p}\,\hbox{e}^{-pt}	  \r)
 \psi^{(h)} (t) =0, \eqno(2.1)$$
$$   \sum_{k=0}^p
\left} \def\r{\right[ a_{0\,k} + a_{1 \,k}   (x +k)
  + a_{2\,k}  (x +k)^2	+ \dots +  a_{m\,k}   (x +k)^m	  \r]
 f (x +k) =0,\eqno(2.2)$$
where $\psi(t)$ and $f(x)$ are analytic functions.
  These functions are required to be related to each other
 through a	Laplace-type transformation
$ \psi(t) \,{\leftrightarrow} \, f(x)$ defined by the formulas
$$ \hbox{(a)} \quad}	 \def\qq{\qquad
     f(x) = \int_l \hbox{e}^{-x t}\, \psi (t)\, dt\,,
\qq
\hbox{(b)} \quad}	 \def\qq{\qquad
 \psi (t)=\rec{2\pi i}\,\int_L \hbox{e}^{+x t}\, f (x)\,dx \,,
\eqno(2.3)$$
where $l$ and $L $ are	appropriate integration paths  in the
complex $t$ and $x$ plane, respectively.
\vsh\pni
The singular points of the $ODE$ are the roots of the polynomial
$$
  a_{m\,0} + a_{m\,1}\,z
  + a_{m\,2}\,z^2  + \dots +  a_{m\,p}\,z^p =0\,.
  \eqno(2.4)$$
whereas the singular points of the $FDE$ are the rots of
the polynomial
$$
 a_{0\,0} + a_{1 \,0}	z
  + a_{2\,0}  z^2  + \dots +  a_{m\,0}	 z^m = 0\,.
 \eqno(2.5)$$
For  the details of the above correspondence
Pincherle refers to the 1885 fundamental paper by Poincar\'
 \footnote{For an account of Poincar\'e's theorem upon which
Pincherle based his analysis the interested reader can consult
the recent book  by Elaydi  \cite{Elaydi DE99}, pp. 320-323.}
 \cite{Poincare 85},
 and his own 1886 note \cite{Pincherle 86}.
Here we limit ourselves to point out what can be easily seen
from a formal comparison between the $ODE$ (2.1) and the $FDE$ (2.2).
We recognize
that the degree $p$ of the coefficients in $\hbox{e}^{-t}$ of the $ODE$
provides the order of the $FDE$,  and that the order $m$
of the $ODE$  gives the degree in $x$
of the coefficients of the $FDE$.
Viceversa, the degree $m$ of the coefficients  of the $FDE$ provides
the order of the $ODE$, and the order $p$ of the $FDE$
gives the degree in $\hbox{e}^{-t}$ of the coefficients
of the $ODE$.
\vsh\pni
Pincherle's intention was to apply the above duality principle
in order to
compare the generalized
hypergeometric function introduced by Pochhammer and governed by
(A.7) with that by  Goursat governed by (A.6).
Using his words, he proved that the family of the Pochhammer functions
 (of arbitrary order $p$)  originates
from a linear $FDE$ (of  order $p$) whose coefficients are polynomials
of the first degree in $x\,,$
and that the family of the Goursat functions (of arbitrary order $m$)
originates from a linear $ODE$ (of order $m$) whose
coefficients are polynomials of the first degree in $x = \hbox{e}^{-t}\,. $
As a consequence of the duality principle there is a
mutual correspondence between the properties of the functions
belonging to one family and to the other.
\vsh\pni
For the Pochhammer function he started from
the $ODE$ of the first order
   $$ \qq \qq \left} \def\r{\right( a_{0\,0} + a_{0 \,1}\, \hbox{e}^{-t}
 + a_{0 \,2}\, \hbox{e}^{-2 t}
  + \dots  + a_{0\,p}\, \hbox{e} ^{-pt}    \r)  \,\psi(t) \qq\qq\qq\qq
						    \eqno(2.6)$$
$$ +  \left} \def\r{\right( a_{1\,0} + a_{1 \,1}\, \hbox{e}^{-t}
+ a_{1 \,2}\, \hbox{e}^{-2 t}
  + \dots  + a_{1\,p}\, \hbox{e} ^{-pt} \r)  \,\psi^{(1)}(t)
    = 0\,, $$
to be put in correspondence with the $FDE$
$$ \left} \def\r{\right( a_{0\,0} + a_{1 \,0} x\r) f(x)+
  \left} \def\r{\right[ a_{0\,1} + a_{1 \,1} (x+1)\r] f(x+1)+
  \left} \def\r{\right[ a_{0\,2} + a_{1 \,2} (x+2)\r] f(x+2)  \eqno(2.7)$$
$$ +  \dots  +	 \left} \def\r{\right[ a_{0\,p} + a_{1 \,p} (x+p)\r] f(x+p) =0\,.
$$
In this case Pincherle was able to show that the solution $f(x)$
of the $FDE$ (2.7), obtained through the  formula (a) in (2.3),
depends on $p$ parameters, whose logarithms are the singular
points of the $ODE$ (2.6). With respect to each of these
parameters, $f(x)$ satisfies a linear $ODE$ of the Pochhammer type
of order $p\,.$
\vsh\pni
For the Goursat function he started from a $FDE$ of the first order
$$ \qq \qq \qq \qq \left} \def\r{\right[ a_{0\,0} + a_{1 \,0}\, x    +  a_{2 \,0}\, x^2
  +   \dots  + a_{m\,0}\, x ^m	  \r]  \,f(x )\qq\qq\qq
 \eqno(2.8)$$
$$ + \left} \def\r{\right[ a_{0\,1} + a_{1 \,1}\,(x+1)  + a_{2 \,1}\,(x+1)^2
  +   \dots  + a_{m\,1}\, (x+1) ^m    \r]  \,f(x+1) =0\,,$$
to be put in correspondence to the linear $ODE$ of order $m$
$$\qq  \left} \def\r{\right( a_{0\,0} + a_{0 \,1} \hbox{e}^{-t}\r)\, \psi(t) +
 \left} \def\r{\right( a_{1\,0} + a_{1 \,1} \hbox{e}^{-t}\r)\, \psi^{(1)}(t) +
  \left} \def\r{\right( a_{2\,0} + a_{2 \,1} \hbox{e}^{-t}\r)\, \psi^{(2)}(t)
\qq \eqno(2.9)$$
$$ + \dots
+ \left} \def\r{\right( a_{m\,0} + a_{m \,1} \hbox{e}^{-t}\r)\, \psi^{(m)}(t) =0\,.
$$
Using a result of  Mellin, see \cite{Mellin 86,Mellin 87},
Pincherle wrote
the solution of the $FDE$ (2.8) as
$$ f(x ) = c^x	 \prod_{\nu =1}^m
     {\Gamma(x	-\rho _\nu )\over \Gamma(x -\sigma _\nu)}\,,
\eqno(2.10)$$
where
the $\rho _\nu$'s and $\sigma _\nu$'s are respectively the roots of the
algebraic  equations
$$\cases{ a_{0\,0} + a_{1 \,0}\, x
   + \dots  + a_{m\,0}\, x ^m  = a_{m\,0}\,
{\displaystyle \prod_{\nu =1}^m}
     (x  -\rho _\nu )= 0\,,\cr\cr
  a_{0\,1} + a_{1 \,1}\, (x +1)
  + \dots +  a_{m\,1}\, (x +1)^m =
 a_{m\,1}\, {\displaystyle \prod_{\nu =1}^m}
     (x  -\sigma  _\nu ) =0\,.
   \cr}
\eqno(2.11)
$$
and $c$ is a constant. If $a_{m\,0},\,a_{m\,1}$ are both
different from zero, we can assume $c = - a_{m\,0}/ a_{m\,1}\,.$
\vsh\pni
Pincherle showed that, by setting $z= c\,\hbox{e}^{t}\,,$
the $ODE$ of order $m$ (2.9) is nothing but
the Goursat differential equation (A.6).
\vsh\pni
Furthermore, in the special case $a_{m\,1} =0\,,$ he gave the following
relevant formula for the solution
$$ \psi(t) = \rec{2\pi i} \,\int_{a-i\infty} ^{a+i\infty}
 {\Gamma(x-\rho_1)\,\Gamma(x-\rho_2)\dots \Gamma(x-\rho_m)
 \over
 \Gamma(x-\sigma _1)\,\Gamma(x-\sigma_2)\dots \Gamma(x-\sigma_{m-1})}
\, \hbox{e}^{xt} \, dx \eqno(2.12)$$
where $a > \Re \{\rho _1, \rho _2, \dots, \rho _m\}\,. $
We recognize in (2.12) the first example in the literature
of the (afterwards named)  Mellin-Barnes integral.
\vsh\pni
The convergence of the integral was proved by Pincherle
by using his asymptotic formula for $\Gamma(a + i\eta)$
as $\eta \to \pm \infty
\footnote{We also note the priority of Pincherle in
obtaining this asymptotic formula, as outlined by Mellin, see {\it e.g.}\ } \def\ie{{\it i.e.}\
\cite{Mellin 91}, pp. 330-331, and  \cite{Mellin 10}, p.309.
In his 1925 "Notices sur les travaux"
\cite{Pincherle TRAVAUX} (p. 56, \S 16) Pincherle wrote
"Une expression asymptotique de $\Gamma(x)$ pour $x \to \infty$
dans le sens imaginaire qui se trouve dans
\cite{Pincherle 88} a \'et\'e attribu\'ee \`a
d'autres auteurs, mais M. Mellin m'en a
r\'ecemment r\'evendiqu\'e  la priorit\'e."
This formula is fundamental to investigate the convergence of the
Mellin-Barnes integrals, as one can recognize from the detailed
analysis by Dixon and Ferrar \cite{DixonFerrar 36}, see also
\cite{ParisKaminski BOOK01}.}.
So,  for a solution of a particular case of the Goursat equation,
Pincherle provided an integral representation
that later was adopted by Mellin and Barnes for their
treatment   of the generalized hypergeometric functions
$\,_p F_q (z)\,.$
Since then, the merits of Mellin and Barnes were so well recognized
that their names were attached to the integrals
of this type; on the other hand,
after the 1888 paper (written in Italian),
Pincherle did not pursue on this topic,
so his name was no longer related
to   these integrals and, in this respect, his 1888 paper
was practically ignored.

\subsection*{3. The Meijer transcendental function via Pincherle's arguments}

In more recent times
other families of higher transcendental functions
have been introduced to generalize the hypergeometric function
based on their representation by Mellin-Barnes type integrals.
We especially refer to the so-called  $G$ and $H$  functions,
briefly recalled in the Appendix.
\vsh\pni
In this section (the original part of our paper)
we show that by extending the original arguments  by Pincherle
based on the duality principle	we are able to provide
the differential equation and the
Mellin-Barnes integral representation of the $G$ functions.
However, we note  that these arguments, being
based on equations with rational coefficients,
do not allow  us to treat the Fox $H$ functions,
since for them an ordinary differential equation
cannot be found in the general case.
\vsh\pni
Our starting point is still the "duality principle"
that involves a {\it $FDE$ of the  first order
as in Pincherle's approach for the Goursat function},
but, at variance of Eq. (2.8), we now allow
that the degree of the two
polynomial coefficients are not necessarily equal.
Setting $p, q$ the degrees of these coefficients,  our $FDE$
reads
$$\qq \qq \qq \qq \left} \def\r{\right[ a_{0\,0} + a_{1 \,0}\, x	  +  a_{2 \,0}\, x^2
  +   \dots  + a_{p\,0}\, x ^p \r]  \,f(x )\qq \qq \qq\eqno(3.1)$$
$$ + \left} \def\r{\right[ a_{0\,1} + a_{1 \,1}\,(x+1)  + a_{2 \,1}\,(x+1)^2
  +   \dots  + a_{q\,1}\, (x+1) ^q    \r]  \,f(x+1) =0\,.$$
We can prove after some algebra
that the associated $ODE$
turns out to be  independent of the
order relation between $p$ and $q$ and reads
$$
  \sum_{h=0}^p	 a_{h\,0} \, \psi^{(h)} (t)  +
    \hbox{e}^{-t} \,	 \sum_{h=0}^q  a_{h\,1}\,
 \psi^{(h)} (t) =0\,.\eqno(3.2)$$
As we have learnt from Pincherle's analysis,
the solution $\psi(t)$	of the $ODE$ (3.2) can
be expressed  in terms
of the solution $f(x)$ of the $FDE$ (3.1),  according to
the integral representation  (b) in Eq. (2.3).
\vsh\pni
Now, in view of Mellin's  results  used by Pincherle
(see also Milne-Thomson \cite{MilneThomson FDE51}, \S 11.2, p. 327),
we can write
the solution of (3.1) in terms of products and fractions
of $\Gamma$ functions.
Denoting  by
$\rho _j$ ($j=0,1,\dots ,p$) and $\sigma_k$ ($k=0,1,\dots,q$)
the roots of the
algebraic  equations
$$\cases{ a_{0\,0} + a_{1 \,0}\, x
   + \dots  + a_{p\,0}\, x ^p  = a_{p\,0}\,
{\displaystyle \prod_{j =1}^p}
     (x  -\rho _j )= 0\,,\cr\cr
  a_{0\,1} + a_{1 \,1}\, (x +1)
  + \dots +  a_{q\,1}\, (x +1)^q =
 a_{q\,1}\, {\displaystyle \prod_{k =1}^q}
     (x  -\sigma_k ) =0\,.
   \cr}
\eqno(3.3) $$
we can write the required solution as
$$ f(x) = c^x\,
    {\prod_{j =1}^p \Gamma(x-\rho_j)\over
     \prod_{k =1}^q \Gamma(x -\sigma_k)   }\,,
 \quad}	 \def\qq{\qquad c = - { a_{p\,0} \over a_{q\,1}}\,.
  \eqno(3.4)   $$
We note, by using the known properties
of the Gamma function,
that Eq. (3.4) can be re-written
in the following alternative form
$$ f(x) = c^x\,
    {\prod_{k =1}^q \Gamma(1+\sigma_k -x)\over
     \prod_{j =1}^p \Gamma(1 +\rho_j -x)      }\,,
 \quad}	 \def\qq{\qquad c =  (-1)^{p-q+1}\, { a_{p\,0} \over a_{q\,1}}\,.
  \eqno(3.5)   $$
Furthermore,
introducing the integers $m,n$ such that
$ \,0\le m \le q\,,$ $\, 0\le n \le p\,, $
we can combine the previous formulas (3.4)-(3.5)
and obtain the alternative form
$$ f(x) = c^x\,
    {\prod_{j =1}^n \Gamma(x-\rho_j)\,
     \prod_{k =1}^m \Gamma(1+\sigma_k -x)
	    \over
     \prod_{j =n+1}^p \Gamma(1+\rho_j -x)\,
     \prod_{k =m+1}^q \Gamma(x- \sigma_k)}  \,,  \eqno(3.6)$$
with
$$ c =	(-1)^{m+n -p+1}\, { a_{p\,0} \over a_{q\,1}}\,.
  \eqno(3.7)   $$
We note that Eq.  (3.6) reduces to the Pincherle expression (2.10)
by setting $\{n=p=q\,,\, m=0\}$, and  to Eqs (3.4), (3.5)
by setting $\{n=p\,,\,m=0\}$,
$\{n=0\,,\,m=q\}$,  respectively.
By adopting the form (3.6)-(3.7) we have the most general
expression for $f(x)$ which in its turn allows us to arrive
at the most general solution $\psi(t)$
of the corresponding $ODE$  (3.2) in the form
$$ \psi(t)
 =\rec{2\pi i}\,\int_L c^x  \,
 {\prod_{j =1}^n \Gamma(x-\rho_j)\,
     \prod_{k =1}^m \Gamma(1+\sigma_k -x)
	    \over
     \prod_{j =n+1}^p \Gamma(1+\rho_j -x)\,
     \prod_{k =m+1}^q \Gamma(x- \sigma_k)}  \,
  \hbox{e}^{xt}\, dx \,,
\eqno(3.8)$$
where  $L$ is an  appropriate integration path	in the
complex  $x$ plane.
\vsh\pni
Now, starting from  (3.2)  and (3.7)-(3.8) it is
not difficult to arrive at the general $G$ function
namely at  its $ODE$
and at its Mellin-Barnes integral representation,
both given in Appendix.
For this purpose we need only to carry out some algebraic manipulations
and obvious transformations of variables.
\vsh\pni
We first note that using (3.3) the $ODE$ (3.2) reads
$$ \left} \def\r{\right[ a_{p\,0}\, \prod_{j=1}^p
\left} \def\r{\right( {d\over dt} -\rho _j\r) +
 a_{q\,1}\,\hbox{e}^{-t}\,  \prod_{k=1}^q
\left} \def\r{\right({d\over dt} -\sigma_k -1\r)\r]\,\psi(t)=0\,. \eqno(3.9)$$
Then, putting
$$ z = c\, \hbox{e}^t\,, \quad}	 \def\qq{\qquad u(z) = \psi[t(z)]\,,
\quad}	 \def\qq{\qquad a_j= 1 + \rho _j\,,\quad}	 \def\qq{\qquad b_k= 1+ \sigma_k\,, \eqno(3.10)$$
and using (3.7), we get  from (3.9)
$$ \left} \def\r{\right[(-1)^{p-m-n}z
\prod_{j=1}^p\left} \def\r{\right(z{d \over dz}-a_j+1\r)-
\prod_{k=1}^q\left} \def\r{\right(z{d \over dz}-b_k\r)\r]
 u(z)=0 \,, \eqno(3.11)$$
which is just the $ODE$ satisfied by the Meijer $G$ function
of orders $m,n,p,q$, see (A.10).
Of course, at least formally, the Mellin-Barnes
integral
representation of the $G$ function (A.8)-(A.9)
is recovered as well and reads
(setting $s = x$)
$$ u(z) = \rec{2\pi i}\,
\int_L
{
 \prod_{k=1}^m \Gamma(b_k- s)\, \prod_{j=1}^n \Gamma(1-a_j + s)
\over
\prod_{k=m+1}^q \Gamma(1-b_k + s)\,\prod_{j=n+1}^p \Gamma(a_j- s)
}
\, z^s \, ds\,.\eqno(3.12)$$

\newpage
\subsection*{4. Conclusions}

We have revisited the 1888 paper (in Italian) by Pincherle
on generalized	hypergeometric functions,
based on the duality principle between linear differential
equations and linear difference equation with rational coefficients.
We have  pointed out the  pioneering contribution
of the Italian mathematician towards the afterwards named Mellin-Barnes
integral representation that he was able to provide
for a special case of a generalized hypergeometric
function introduced by Goursat in 1883.
By extending his original arguments
we  have shown	how to formally derive	the ordinary differential
equation and
the Mellin-Barnes integral representation of the
$G$ functions introduced by Meijer in 1936-1946.
 So, in principle,  Pincherle could have introduced
the $G$ functions much before Meijer if he had intended to
 pursue his original arguments in this direction.
Finally, we like  to point out that
the so-called Mellin-Barnes integrals are an efficient
tool to deal with  the higher transcendental functions.
In fact,  for a pure mathematics view point
they facilitate the representation
of these functions
(as formerly indicated by Pincherle),
and for an applied mathematics	view point
they can be successfully adopted to compute
the same functions.
In this respect we refer to the recent paper by
Mainardi, Luchko and Pagnini \cite{Mainardi LUMAPA01},
who have computed the solutions of diffusion-wave equations
of fractional order by using their Mellin-Barnes
integral representation.

\subsection*{Acknowledgements}
 \noindent
Research performed under the auspices of the National Group of Mathematical
Physics (G.N.F.M. - I.N.D.A.M.) and partially supported
 by the Italian Ministry
of University (M.I.U.R) through the Research Commission of the
 University of Bologna and by the National Institute of Nuclear
Physics (INFN)	through the Bologna branch (Theoretical Group).
The authors are grateful to Prof. R. Gorenflo for the  discussions
and  the helpful comments.

\subsection*{Appendix: Some generalizations of the hypergeometric functions}

The purpose of this Appendix is to provide a survey of
some higher transcendental functions that have been proposed
for generalizing the
hypergeometric function.
In particular we shall consider the functions  investigated by Pochhammer
(1870) and Goursat (1883), that have interested Pincherle
in his 1888 paper, and	the $G$ functions introduced by Meijer
(1936-1946), since they are re-derived in our
present analysis  by extending the
arguments by Pincherle.
Our survey is essentially based on the classical  handbook
of the Bateman Project
\cite{Erdelyi HTF} and on the more
recent treatise by Kiryakova \cite{Kiryakova 94}.
\vsh\pni
Let us start by recalling  the classical  {\it hypergeometric
equation}.
If a homogeneous linear differential equation  of the second order
has at most three singular points we may assume that these
are $0, 1, \infty\,. $ If all these singular points are "regular", then
the equation can be reduced to the form
$$ z(1-z) \,   {d^2 u  \over dz^2} +
  [c-(a +b +1) z ] \, {d u  \over dz} - ab \, u(z)
=0\,,
\eqno(A.1)
$$
where $a,b,c$ are arbitrary complex constants.
This is the {\it hypergeometric equation}.
Taking	$c \ne 0,-1,-2,\dots\,,$
and  defining the Pochhammer symbol
$$ (\alpha )_n = {\Gamma(\alpha +n)\over \Gamma(\alpha )}\,,
\; \hbox{\ie} \;
(\alpha )_0=1,,\;
 (\alpha)_n =\alpha (\alpha+1)\dots (\alpha +n-1)\,,\; n=1,2,\dots$$
 then	the solution of Eq. (A.1), regular at $z=0\,, $
known as {\it Gauss hypergeometric function},
turns out to be
$$ u(z) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty
{ (a)_n\, (b)_n\over (c)_n n!}\, {\displaystyle z^n} := F(a,b;c;z)
\,.\eqno(A.2)$$
\vsh\pni
The above hypergeometric series can be generalized by introducing
$p$ parameters $a_1,\dots a_p$
(the numerator-parameters) and
 $q$ parameters $b_1, \dots, b_q$
(the denominator-parameters).
The ensuing series
$$  \sum_{n=0}^\infty
{ (a_1)_n\,\dots (a_p)_n\over (b_1)_n \dots (b_q)_n}
  \, {\displaystyle {z^n \over n!}}
 \, :=
\; _pF_q (a_1, \dots, a_p ; b_1, \dots, b_q ;z) \, ,\eqno(A.3)$$
 or, in a more compact form,
$$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}
{\Pi_{j=1}^p (a_j)_n \over \Pi_{k=1}^q (b_j)_n} \,
{\displaystyle {z^n \over n!}} \,:=
\; _pF_q \left} \def\r{\right[ (a_j)_1^p ; (b_k)_1^q ;z) \r]
  \eqno(A.3')$$
is known as the {\it generalized hypergeometric series}.
In general
  (excepting certain integer values of the parameters
for which the series fails to make sense or terminate
\footnote{If at least one of the denominator parameters $b_k$
($k =1,\dots, q$) is zero or a negative integer, Eq. (A.3) has no meaning
at all, since the denominator of the general term vanishes
for a sufficiently large index. If some of the numerator
parameters are zero or negative integers, then the series terminates
and turns into a {\it hypergeometric polynomial}.})
the series $\, _pF_q$	 converges for all finite $z$ if $p\le q\,,$
converges for $|z|<1$ if $p=q+1\,,$ and diverges for
all $z \ne 0$ if $p>q+1\,. $
The resulting {\it generalized hypergeometric function}
$u(z) =\, _pF_q$
will
satisfy a   {\it generalized hypergeometric equation}.
If we note that Eq. (A.1) satisfied by $u(z) =	F(a,b;c;z) =
\,_2F_1(a,b;c;z)   $
can be written in the equivalent form
(see {\it e.g.}\ } \def\ie{{\it i.e.}\  Rainville \cite{Rainville SF60}, \S 46, p. 75) :
$$ \left} \def\r{\right[z
\left} \def\r{\right(z{d \over dz}+a\r)\left} \def\r{\right(z{d \over dz} +b \r)-
z{d \over dz} \left} \def\r{\right(z{d \over dz}+c-1\r)\r]
u(z)=0 \,, \eqno(A.1')$$
we arrive at the  equation of order $n=q+1$ for $u(z)
=\, _pF_q \left} \def\r{\right[ (a_j)_1^p ; (b_k)_1^q ;z) \r]\,:$
$$ \left} \def\r{\right[z
\prod_{j=1}^p\left} \def\r{\right(z{d \over dz}+a_j\r)-
z{d \over dz}\prod_{k=1}^{q}\left} \def\r{\right(z{d \over dz}+b_k-1\r)\r]
u(z)=0 \,. \eqno(A.4)$$
The above equation containing the operator $z d/dz$ can be
written in a more explicit form by using $D = d/dz$,
see {\it e.g.}\ } \def\ie{{\it i.e.}\  \cite{Erdelyi HTF} \S 42, p.184.
Distinguishing between the cases $p\le q$
and $p=q+1\,, $ we get
 the following general equations
in $v= v(z)\,:$
$$ z^q D^{q+1} v +
\sum_{\nu =1}^q z^{\nu -1} (A_\nu  z - B_\nu) \, D^\nu v + A_0 v = 0\,,
 \quad}	 \def\qq{\qquad p \le q\,, \eqno(A.5)$$
$$  z^q (1-z)D^{q+1} v +
\sum_{\nu =1}^q z^{\nu -1} (A_\nu  z - B_\nu ) \, D^\nu  v
 + A_0 v  = 0\,,
  \quad}	 \def\qq{\qquad p =q+1\,, \eqno(A.6)$$
where $A_0, A_\nu, B_\nu$ are constants.
Eq. (A.5) has two singular points, $z=0, \infty$ of which
$z=0$ is of regular type, whereas
Eq. (A.6) has	three singular points, $z=0,1, \infty$ of
regular type, like Eq. (A.1).
An equation of the same type as  Eq. (A.6) was formerly introduced in
1883 by Goursat \cite{Goursat CR83,Goursat ENS83}
in his essay on hypergeometric
functions of higher order.
\vsh\pni
Another generalization of the Gauss hypergeometric  equation
was previously proposed in 1870
by Pochhammer \cite{Pochhammer 70}.
He
investigated  the most general homogeneous linear differential equation
of the order $n$ ($n>2$) of Fuchsian type, namely with only "regular"
singular points in  $\{a_1, a_2, \dots, a_n,\infty\}\,. $
The Pochhammer function thus satisfies a differential equation	of
the type
$$  \phi _n(z) \, {d^n w  \over dz^n} +
  \dots  + \phi _1(z) \, {d w  \over dz} +    \phi_0\, w(z) = 0\,,
\eqno(A.7)
$$
where the coefficients $\phi _\nu (z) $ ($\nu  = 0, 1 \dots, n$) are
polynomials of degree $\nu \,, $ with
$\phi _n(z) = (z-a_1)(z-a_2)\dots (z-a_n)\,. $
\vsh\pni
The $\,_pF_q\,$ functions  satisfying  Eqs (A.5)-(A.6)
and the Pochhammer functions satisfying  Eq. (A.7)
are not the only generalizations of the Gauss hypergeometric
function (A.2). In 1936  Meijer \cite{Meijer 36}
  introduced a new class of transcendental
functions, the so called $G$ functions, which provide
an interpretation of the  symbol  $\,_pF_q$ when
$ p >q+1\,. $  Originally, the $G$ function was defined in a manner
resembling (A.2). Later \cite{Meijer 46}, this definition was replaced
by one in terms of Mellin-Barnes type integrals.
The latter definition has the advantage that it allows
a greater freedom in the relative values of $p$ and $q$.
Here, following \cite{Erdelyi HTF}, we shall complete
Meijer's definition so as to include all values of $p$ and $q$
without placing any (non-trivial) restriction on $m$ and $n$.
One defines
$$   G^{m,n}_{p,q}
\left[ z \left\vert
{a_1, \dots , a_p\atop b_1, \dots , b_q}
 \right.
\right]=
G^{m,n}_{p,q}
\left[ z \left\vert
(a_j)_1^p \atop (b_j)_1^q
 \right.
\right] =
\rec{2\pi i}\,
\int_L {\cal{G}}^{m,n}_{p,q} (s) \, z^s \, ds\,, \eqno(A.8)$$
where
 $ L$ is a suitably chosen path, $z \neq 0\,,$
 $ z^s :=\hbox{exp} \left} \def\r{\right[ s(\ln |z| + i \, \hbox{arg} \,z)\r]$
with a single valued branch of $\hbox{arg}\, z$,
and  the integrand is defined as follows
$$ {\cal{G}}^{m,n}_{p,q} (s)=
{
 \prod_{k=1}^m \Gamma(b_k- s)\, \prod_{j=1}^n \Gamma(1-a_j + s)
\over
\prod_{k=m+1}^q \Gamma(1-b_k + s)\,\prod_{j=n+1}^p \Gamma(a_j- s)
}\,.\eqno(A.9) $$
In (A.9) an empty product is interpreted as 1, the integers
$m,n,p,q$ (known as {\it orders of the $G$ function}) are such that
$0\le m \le q\,,$
$\,0 \le n \le p\,,$ and the parameters
$a_j$ and $b_k$ are such that
no pole of $\Gamma(b_k-s), $   $k=1,\dots, m,$
coincides with any pole  of $\Gamma(1-a_j+s), $   $j=1,\dots, n.$
For the details of the integration path,
which can be of three different types,
we refer to \cite{Erdelyi HTF} (see also \cite{Kiryakova 94}
where an illustration of what these contours can be like
is found).
\vsh\pni
One can establish that the Meijer $G$ function $u(z)$
satisfies the linear ordinary differential equation of
generalized hypergeometric type,
see {\it e.g.}\ } \def\ie{{\it i.e.}\  \cite{Kiryakova 94}  [p. 316, Eq. (A.19)],
$$ \left} \def\r{\right[(-1)^{p-m-n}z
\prod_{j=1}^p\left} \def\r{\right(z{d \over dz}-a_j+1\r)-
\prod_{k=1}^q\left} \def\r{\right(z{d \over dz}-b_k\r)\r]
u(z)=0 \,. \eqno(A.10)$$
For  more details on the Meijer function and on the
singular points of the above  differential equation we
 refer to  \cite{Kiryakova 94}. Here we limit ourselves to
show how
the generalized hypergeometric function $\,_pF_q$
can be expressed in terms of a Meijer $G$ function
and  thus in terms of  Mellin-Barnes integral. We have
$$ _pF_q  ( (a)_p ;(b)_q ;z ) =
{\Pi_{k=1}^q \Gamma(b_k) \over
\Pi_{j=1}^p \Gamma(a_j)}
G^{1,p}_{p,q+1}
\left[- z   \left\vert
{\hfill (1-a_j)_{1}^{p} \hfill \atop
 \hfill 0,\, (1-b_k)_{1}^{q} \hfill}
 \right. \right] \,, \eqno(A.11)$$
$$ G^{1,p}_{p,q+1} =
 {1 \over 2 \pi i} \,\int_{- i \infty}^{+ i\infty}
{\Gamma(a_1+s) \cdots \Gamma(a_p+s)\Gamma(-s) \over
\Gamma(b_1+s) \cdots \Gamma(b_q+s)}
(-z)^s \, ds \,, \eqno(A.12) $$
$$ a_j \ne 0,-1,-2,\dots; \quad}	 \def\qq{\qquad j=1,\dots,p; \quad}	 \def\qq{\qquad
|\hbox{arg}(1-zi)|<\pi \,. \eqno(A.13)$$
Here the path of integration is the imaginary axis (in the complex
$s$-plane) which can be deformed, if necessary, in order to
separate the poles of $\Gamma(a_j+s)$, $j=1,\dots,p$
from those of $\Gamma(-s)\,. $
\vsh\pni
Though the $G$ functions are quite general in nature, there still
exist examples of special functions,
like the Mittag-Leffler and the  Wright functions,
which do not form their particular cases.
A more general class  which includes
those functions can be achieved by introducing the
Fox $H$ functions \cite{Fox 61}, whose representation in terms of the
Mellin-Barnes integral is a straightforward generalization of that
for the $G$ functions.
For this purpose we need to add to the sets of the  complex
parameters $a_j$ and $b_k$ the new sets of positive numbers $\alpha _j$
and $\beta _k$ with $j=1,\dots, p,$ $k=1,\dots,q,$
and modify in the integral of (A.8) the  kernel
$ {\cal{G}}^{m,n}_{p,q} (s)$  into
$$		 {\cal{H}}^{m,n}_{p,q} (s)=
{
 \prod_{k=1}^m \Gamma(b_k- \beta_k s)\,
 \prod_{j=1}^n \Gamma(1-a_j + \alpha _j s)
\over
\prod_{k=m+1}^q \Gamma(1-b_k + \beta_k	s)\,
\prod_{j=n+1}^p \Gamma(a_j- \alpha_j  s)
}\,.\eqno(A.14) $$
Then the Fox $H$ function turns out to be defined as
$$ H^{m,n}_{p,q}(z) = H^{m,n}_{p,q}
\left[z   \left\vert
{\hfill (a_j ,\alpha _j )_{j=1,\dots,,p} \hfill \atop
 \hfill (b_k,\beta _k)_{k=1, \dots,q} \hfill}
 \right.  \right]=
\rec{2\pi i}\,
\int_L {\cal {H}}^{m,n}_{p,q} (s) \, z^s \, ds\,.\eqno(A.15)$$
We do not pursue furthermore in our survey:
we refer the interested reader to the treatises
on Fox $H$ functions
by  Mathai and Saxena \cite{MathaiSaxena H},
Srivastava, Gupta and Goyal \cite{Srivastava H} and
references therein.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaArXiv


text:
Q: SlowCheetah transforms for non-web app.config I am confused by the rapid pace and terrific work done by Sayed Hashimi and company on SlowCheetah, specifically whether or not SlowCheetah is able to transform files on Build instead of just Package and Publish.
I have SlowCheetah installed and am able to auto-generate the build configuration instances for app.config of a console application I am working with the development team to deploy. On build, a new "SlowCheetah" directory is created under the $(ProjectDir)\obj\x86\$(BuildConfig) directory. The obj\x86\STAGE\SlowCheetah directory, for instance, contains an app.config file with the transform completed as indicated when right clicking the STAGE transform and selecting "View Transforms".
The \bin\$(BuildConfig) directory, however, contains the untransformed app.config file as well as all of the templates for each of the $(BuildConfig) transformations - instead of replacing the app.config file in the bin\x86\STAGE directory with the one from SlowCheetah.
The build completes without error.
Is this the expected action, or is something still not working correctly?
@sayed-ibrahim-hashimi Each $(Configuration) has a transform. The transforms displays properly when viewing in Visual Studio, and is properly transformed in the \slowcheetah directory under the \obj directory tree. Examples of transforms are:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<!-- For more information on using transformations see the web.config examples at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=214134. -->
<configuration xmlns:xdt="http://schemas.microsoft.com/XML-Document-Transform
<connectionStrings>
<add name="Portal" connectionString="Data Source=transformtestserver.domain.local;Initial Catalog=TestDB;User Id=TestUser;Password=testpw1;" xdt:Transform="SetAttributes" xdt:Locator="Match(name)"/>
<add name="DictionaryDatabase" connectionString="Data Source=transformtestserver.domain.local;Initial Catalog=TestDB;User Id=TestUser;Password=testpw2;" xdt:Transform="SetAttributes" xdt:Locator="Match(name)"/>
<add name="LoggingDatabase" connectionString="Data Source=transformtestserver.domain.local;Initial Catalog=TestDB;User Id=TestUser;Password=testpw3;" xdt:Transform="SetAttributes" xdt:Locator="Match(name)"/>
</connectionStrings>
</configuration>

The problem may be related to the Nuget/solution configuration. The project I am working with is one part of a very large solution. I had a difficult time getting SlowCheetah installed and working - at one point finding Nuget said SlowCheetah was installed but the solution package directory did not contain SlowCheetah.
I setup a workaround in TeamCity to pickup the transformed app.config file from the \obj directory, but would really like to resolve the problem so I can rollout SC to the full development group. Is there a verbose log we can look at that might point out the details?

A: I faced with the same problem.
Local compilation in VS works great,
but on build Agent (TeamCity) the transformation magic not happend!
The solution I found relating to the location of the xml element in the proj file
  <PropertyGroup Label="SlowCheetah">
    <SlowCheetahToolsPath>$([System.IO.Path]::GetFullPath( $(MSBuildProjectDirectory)\..\packages\SlowCheetah.2.5.10.3\tools\))</SlowCheetahToolsPath>
    <SlowCheetah_EnableImportFromNuGet Condition=" '$(SC_EnableImportFromNuGet)'=='' ">true</SlowCheetah_EnableImportFromNuGet>
    <SlowCheetah_NuGetImportPath Condition=" '$(SlowCheetah_NuGetImportPath)'=='' ">$([System.IO.Path]::GetFullPath( $(MSBuildProjectDirectory)\Properties\SlowCheetah\SlowCheetah.Transforms.targets ))</SlowCheetah_NuGetImportPath>
    <SlowCheetahTargets Condition=" '$(SlowCheetah_EnableImportFromNuGet)'=='true' and Exists('$(SlowCheetah_NuGetImportPath)') ">$(SlowCheetah_NuGetImportPath)</SlowCheetahTargets>
  </PropertyGroup>

I have noticed is that when the PropertyGroup is above all ItemGroup`s ellements
MsBuild.exe at last did the Transformation

A: Look for duplicate SlowCheetahTargets section - I had an older version and a newer version and the older one was pointing to a location that no longer existed in the nuget packages directory.
Delete the whole property group for the older / duplicated SlowCheetahTargets section and that should fix it.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Top 4 Curated Venture Capital Weekly Update for 11Jan2023💰
Barbara Bickham January 11, 2023 — 3 minutes read
Photo by Sean Pollock / Unsplash
🗒 ChatGPT Creator OpenAI Discussing Offer Valuing Company At $29 Billion, Report Says
OpenAI logo seen on screen with ChatGPT website displayed on mobile seen in this illustration in Brussels, Belgium, on December 12, 2022. (Photo by Jonathan Raa/NurPhoto via Getty Images)NURPHOTO VIA GETTY IMAGES
Forbes: OpenAI—the artificial intelligence company behind the viral ChatGPT chatbot program—is in discussions to sell shares valuing the firm at $29 billion, according to the Wall Street Journal, after the launch of ChatGPT was lauded by many as a revolutionary advance in artificial intelligence despite some problems.
The Founders Fund and Thrive Capital venture capital firms are reportedly in talks to buy at least $300 million in shares.
The deal would more than double a 2021 tender offer for shares that valued the company at around $14 billion, according to the Journal.
OpenAI is not publicly traded, but many of the shares could reportedly be purchased from shareholders like employees.
OpenAI declined to comment or confirm the report
🗒 The Startup M&A Market Fell 94% Year over Year - But One Segment is Thriving
Tomasz Tunguz: The total quantity of acquisitions demonstrated greater resilience shrinking by 56%, while the median acquisition value tumbled from $81m to $22m (-72%).
A $22m median M&A price implies most of these transactions were acquihires - acquisitions that value a company for its team. There are 3 types of acquisitions: team ; team & technology ; team, technology & revenue.
During a down-market, young startups who face a radically more challenging fundraising market than six months ago more often choose a quick sale. M&A secures the team greater financial certainty within a more established & better capitalized business.
🗒 Black Founders in the US See Only 1% of Venture Capital Funding in 2022: Here's How to Fix the Disparity
StupidDope: Black founders in the United States faced significant challenges in 2022 when it came to raising venture capital, according to data from Crunchbase. In Q4 of 2022, Black startup founders raised just $264 million out of the total $33.6 billion in venture capital allocated, representing a mere 0.78% of the total. This is an increase from the $178 million, or 0.43%, that Black founders raised in Q3 of 2022.
While this represents a small increase quarter-over-quarter, the overall trend for Black founders in 2022 was not positive. In total, Black founders in the U.S. raised an estimated $2.254 billion out of the $215.9 billion in U.S. venture capital allocated for the year, a decline from the 1.3% raised in 2021.
This disparity in funding highlights the systemic barriers and biases that Black founders continue to face in the venture capital industry. It also highlights the need for more diverse representation in the venture capital community and for greater efforts to support and invest in Black-led startups. Without these changes, the gap between Black and non-Black founders in terms of access to funding is likely to persist.
🗒 U.S. VC investments and exits plummeted in 2022 | NVCA
Venturebeat: The deal count in 2022 for the full year was 15,852, down 14% from 18,521 in 2021. And deal value was $238.3 billion, down 30% from $344.7 billion a year earlier, according to a report by Pitchbook and the National Venture Capital Association (NVCA).
U.S. VC exit activity was 1,208 deals valued at $71.4 billion, down dramatically from 1,925 deals valued at $753.2 billion a year earlier
With each quarter the deal activity declined and that could foreshadow a slide in 2023, the report said.
On an annual basis, angel- and seed-stage deal activity remained relatively resilient in 2022, with $21.0 billion invested across an estimated 7,261 deals. However, the four consecutive quarters of declining deal counts could foreshadow a continued slide in 2023. Seed-stage deal sizes and pre-money valuations demonstrated notable growth over the 2021 figures due in part to a large number of actively investing micro-funds as well as the participation of nontraditional and crossover investors.
5 Computer Tips to Get More Done in Less Time
11 Awesome Facts About Quantum Computing 2023
Top 4 Curated Venture Capital Weekly Update for Dec 28, 2022 💰
Top 4 Curated Venture Capital Weekly Update for Dec 7, 2022 💰

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
android premium apk
BusyBox Pro for iOS Devices: Busy Box Pro Free Download
By admin | July 2, 2020
BusyBox Pro for iOS
BusyBox pro for ios is basically software, a high-end software that provides you with a large variety of stripped-down Unix tools. You get all these tools in a single executable file.
It is available for a number of platforms such as Linux, Android and FreeBSD but many of its tools are designed to work with Linux Kernel, or I should say its interfaces.
It was created for operating systems which have very less number of resources. Such types of operating systems are called embedded operating systems. This software is also called "The Swiss Army knife of Embedded Linux" because it replaces the basic functions of more than 300 commands. It is a free software according to GNU General Public License v2.
When it was developed, it was supposed to put a complete bootable system on a single floppy disk that will act as a rescue disk. It would also work as an installer for the Debian distribution.
When it was used, it saved substantial disk space and system memory also. It is because it combines approximately 200 programs together to save disk space. This was the reason why it was developed further.
BusyBox Pro for iOS:
BusyBox pro for ios can be customised to become a subset of over 200 utilities. There is a thing called SUS. It stands for Single Unix Specification. It is important because many of the utilities that BusyBox pro provides are specified in the SUS.
Busy Box pro is a complete Bootstrap system; it can be called as init on startup and mdev at hot plug time after some replacements.
There are a number of commands that are available to you on BusyBox pro.
The commands are- ash, awk, cat, chmod, cp, date, dd, df, dmesg, echo, egrep, fgrep, getty, grep, gunzip, gzip, init, kill, In, login, is, mdev, mkdir, more, mv, nc, mount, netstat, ntpc, ntpsync, nvram, pidof, ping, ps, pwd, rm, rmdir, rstats, rtcwake, runlevel, run-parts, runsv, runsvdir, rx, script, sed, setkeycodes, setlogcons, setsid, setuidgid, sh, sha1sum, sha256sum, sleep, start-stop-daemon, stat, strings, sty, su, sulogin, sum, sv, svlogd, swapoff, swapon, switch_root, sync, sysctl, syslogd, tac, tail, tar, taskset, tcpsvd, tee, telnet, telnetd, test, tftp, tftpd, time, timeout, top, touch, tr, traceroute, true, tty, ttysize, udhcpc, udhcpd, udpsvd, umount, uname, uncompress, unexpand, uniq, unix2dos, unlzma, unlzop, unzip, uptime, usleep, vconfig, vi, vlock, colname, watch, wc, wget, which, who, whoami, xargs, yes, zcat, zcip.
How to get BusyBox pro for iOS devices?
Android devices have a lot of flexibility and availability when it comes to downloading apps from other sources than Play store on Android devices.
You can just download the APK file for the Android platform, and you can install it on any version of Android. For this, you just have to give some minimal permissions only.
After that, you can install any app for free. Yes, on the internet, you can find any app for free on some websites. Then, you can download the APK file and install it. Very simple.
For iOS devices, just like APK file, there is an IPA file available on the internet. You can download it just like you download the APK file.
Just simply go to your browser and search for the required file in IPA format. Also for this, there is no requirement of a jailbroken iOS device to access this app. You can download it without jailbreaking, and you can install it, but you have to make some adjustments on your device. These are minute modifications, and you won't have any problem while doing that. We are going to discuss them below.
Before downloading:
First, you have to
Now you have to change your date to install the file in IPA format. Roll down the date to January 1, 2014, or before it. This is done for iOS version.
Busy Box pro-IPA Download.
Now, to download the IPA file, first, open your browser. You can go for any Browser that you have on your device.
Then, you have to search for "BusyBox pro-IPA Download". From that number of links that appear, choose one that is on top of the page. Open it and then download it. Click on that downloading button that isn't blinking and is looking authentic.
After downloading done, just install the app, like you install other apps on your iOS device.
Busy Box pro is now ready to run on your iOS device.
After downloading and installation, you can go to the "Date and Time", and now you can change the date and time to the current date and time.
If you somehow can't access internet on your iOS device, then you can download the IPA file on your computer and then transfer it to your device.
After that, just follow the installation steps.
Note that, for this step, you don't have to jailbreak your iOS device. This method is safe and easy to use. Jail-breaking costs you your device's warranty and also it is risky from Operating System point of view.
You can also get this app from Cydia App store on your iOS device but for that, you have to jailbreak your iOS device, and I won't recommend you to do jail-breaking. I recommend you to go with the first method because it is safe and also it is very much easy to use when compared to the jail breaking method.
BusyBox pro for iOS: In this article, we have seen about Busy Box pro, its features and commands and also how to download and install it on the iOS device.
You get approximately 200 commands in it which you can use. You basically get two methods to install it on your iOS device, and the first method that I have discussed is better.
It is good software, and you get a lot of options for customization. I recommend you to get this software if you like technical stuff and love to do some modifications on your phone. Rest is up to you.
Busy Box pro for iOS
Download Busybox Pro APK for Android Smartphone
TWRP recovery apk for android (No Root Required)
← Download Busybox Pro APK for Android Smartphone
Copyright © android premium apk 2020. All rights reserved.


text:
using JulieAI.Inputs;
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using Windows.Networking.Sockets;
using Windows.Storage.Streams;

namespace JulieAI.Outputs
{
    public class ShellOutput : IJulieOutput
    {
        ShellInput input;
        public ShellOutput(ShellInput shellInput)
        {
            input = shellInput;
        }
        Julie julie;
        public void Init(Julie owner)
        {
            julie = owner;
        }

        private StreamSocket socket;
        public void SetSocket(StreamSocket socket)
        {
            this.socket = socket;
            dw = new DataWriter(socket.OutputStream);
        }

        public void Communicate(string msg)
        {
            SendData(msg).Wait();
        }

        DataWriter dw;
        private async Task SendData(string msg)
        {
            var count = dw.WriteString(msg);
            await dw.StoreAsync();
        }

    }
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


It is most extraordinary that the ancient people, who by their language, their laws, their literature, their arts and sciences, and their great deeds, influenced their own and all subsequent ages more than any other one nation that ever existed, the world-famed Phoenicians, should be at the same time so well and so little known to us, and that their history and their institutions, of which we read on almost every page of ancient story, yet are a blank to us.
The Phoenicians were the great merchants of antiquity, in fact the greatest mercantile people of all time; the most enterprising race of explorers and navigators the world has ever known, not excepting even our own restless Anglo-Saxon race; the people from whom Greece and Rome derived the letters of their alphabet and the greater part of their civilization; and from whom through Greece and Rome, our own civilization has been derived; a people who sailed along all the shores of the Mediterranean and the Indian Ocean a thousand years and more before the Christian Era, who circumnavigated Africa ages before Vasco de Gama accomplished that great enterprise, who explored the Atlantic coasts of Europe from Cadiz to Iceland and Norway long before the foundations of ancient Rome were laid, and who, as it has with great plausibility been asserted, may have crossed the Atlantic Ocean itself more than two thousand years before Columbus achieved the daring deed, and who may have opened communication with the MoundBuilders of the Mississippi and Ohio valleys, if indeed they were not themselves the Mound-Builders, as by some writers has been asserted and argued.
Not only upon the sea, but inland also, the Phoenicians established their trade. They controlled the commerce by caravan through Central Asia. In Central Europe they established communication from the Black and the Adriatic seas across the continent to the Baltic. They worked the gold mines of Ophir in Southern Africa, the silver mines of Spain, and the tin mines of Cornwall in England; and they traded with the Baltic for amber, and with the islands of the Indo-Chinese seas for the spices and perfumes and other rarities for which they were then as now renowned. And not only were they the great merchants of the world; they were likewise its most noted artisans. They furnished architects and builders to King Solomon for his great temple; and many of the gigantic structures reared by the monarchs of Asshur were the work of their hands. They discovered the mode of manufacturing glass, and likewise the famous Tyrian dye; and they seem to have had the mariner's compass to aid them in their navigation. Above all, and greatest of all their contributions to human civilization, they either invented, or introduced to the world what possibly may have been the invention of others, the original let�ters of our Graeco-Roman Alphabet, our own letters of today with but slight modification - an invention of which we daily and hourly enjoy the benefit, and without which the remainder of our civilization would be comparatively valueless. But it would require many pages to narrate the achievements of the Phoenicians, whose fame in the ancient world was in inverse proportion to the size of the country, a narrow little strip of land along the eastern shores of the Mediterranean Sea, from 100 to 150 miles in length, and from about 5 to 20 miles in width, lying between the sea and the mountains of Lebanon. And yet, strangely enough, we know exceedingly little of their history, and almost nothing of their laws and social institutions.
They adjoined the territory of the Israelites and probably borrowed from the latter their republican institutions, which they transmitted to their numerous colonies; for a great many colonies they planted, in which to some extent they continued their national existence, among them, Crete, Rhodes, Boeotian Thebes in Greece, Carthage and Utica in Africa, Tartessus, Cadiz, and Lisbon in Spain and Portugal, and several on the shores of the Black Sea. Tyre, and Sidon, and Aradus, the principal cities of the parent country, by their great wealth, attracted the cupidity of the monarchs of Egypt, Asshur, and Babylonia; and they suffered much in frequent wars, and were several times besieged and captured. Sidon at last was destroyed by Artagerxes Ochus, King of Persia, in B.C. 351; and nineteen years later, in B.C. 332, Tyre suffered a similar fate at the hands of the famous conquerer, Alexander of Macedon. Carthage, the greatest and most renowned of all the Phoenician colonies, was utterly destroyed by the Romans, so that not one stone was left upon another; and, except in so far as its people came into contact or collision with the Romans, or with the Greek cities of Sicily, its history has absolutely perished.
We are, therefore, without any record whatever of Phoenician law, which necessarily must have been the most advanced code of law of the ancient world, inasmuch as their civil polity, their republican institutions, and the exigencies of their world-wide commerce, demanded legislation of the most liberal character; and it does not seem probable that any monumental ruins will ever be uncovered, like those of Egypt and Mesopotamia, to throw light upon the subject, unless, indeed, illumination may be derived to us from the excavation of the palace of Minos in Crete and the civilization thereby revealed, or from some yet undiscovered monument of Hittite civilization in Asia Minor.
Indirectly, however, and in a general way, the excellence of the Phoenician law is testified to by the tribute paid to it by the greatest of Greek philosophers, possibly the greatest philosopher of all time. In his work on Politics and Economics, or Political Economy, as we would now call it, Aristotle, referring to Carthage, stated that its institutions were in some respects superior to those of any of the Greek States (Aristotle, De Politica, Book II, Chap. 11). And by the term "institutions" he means not merely the governmental structure and organization, but more especially the tenor of the law. And inasmuch as it is universally conceded that the "institutions" were substantially identical with those of its parent state, Tyre, what the great Greek philosopher says about the one is equally applicable to the other. Carthage was yet standing and powerful in his day; Tyre had just fallen and been destroyed. Similarly, the legislation of Minos in Crete was undoubtedly of Phoenician origin, and was famous throughout all the ages of Grecian greatness, notwithstanding that it had perished long before Athens and Sparta rose to power.
There is another remarkable fact that may be mentioned. The maritime and admiralty law, as we call it, the law of all the civilized world today in respect of marine transactions, has been traced back through the Roman Civil Law to the laws of the little island and the city of Rhodes, in the Eastern Mediterranean, at the southwestern angle of Asia Minor, well known to have been a colony of Phoenicia; and while we can not trace the stream any farther than from Rhodes, it is most natural to infer that the fountain head was in Phoenicia.


text:
Online Education Grows Up, And For Now, It's Free
By NPR Staff
Published September 30, 2012 at 2:41 PM PDT
Coursera founders Andrew Ng and Daphne Koller are computer science professors at Stanford University.
Online education isn't particularly new. It has been around in some form since the 1990s, but what is new is the speed and scale in which online learning is growing.
In barely a year, many of the most prestigious research universities in the world – including Stanford, Caltech, Oxford and Princeton — have started to jump onto the online bandwagon.
For the students who never, ever would have had access to this kind of quality education from a place like Penn or Princeton or Stanford, they now have access to something.
Those universities now offer classes through consortiums like Coursera, a tech company that's partnered with more than 30 of the top universities in the world to offer online classes from its course catalogue — for free. Other companies offering online courses include Udacity and edX.
Earlier this year in Kazahkstan, 22-year-old computer science student Askhat Murzabayev had a problem.
"The problem is our university is relatively small, it has about 2,000 students, and we didn't have [Artificial Intelligence] classes in the syllabus," Murzabayev says.
So Murzabayev went online to Coursera and enrolled in Stanford's Machine Learning class for free. He watched the lectures, did the quizzes, joined online discussions with students from around the world and then took the final exam. He passed, and when it was over he received a certificate that said he completed an online course at Stanford.
Murzabayev used that certificate to apply for jobs; offers started to pour in. One of those offers was from Twitter, and he now works for the company in the Kazakhstan's largest city, Almaty.
Opening Up Education
Murzabayev is now one of 1.5 million students who have enrolled in one of the classes offered by Coursera since it launched earlier this year. Initially, only about a dozen courses were available, but the site now lists close to 200 classes from 33 universities.
Coursera was founded by Stanford computer science professors Andrew Ng and Daphne Koller.
Koller tells Guy Raz, host of weekends on All Things Considered, that in five to 10 years, people are going to look back and wonder why universities ever crammed 500 students into an auditorium to listen to a lecture for an hour and a half. But she also says brick-and-mortar campuses will still have a place.
"I think it's important to also remember that the role of physical institutions will still be important," Koller says. "There's still certain aspects of that experience that we can't currently replicate in an online format."
While students aren't earning actual degrees through Coursera, Koller says they are getting an education that has value. She also says that education shouldn't just stop when you get a degree.
It also allows universities offering classes online to mold their face-to-face classes with less lecture time and more interaction, Koller says.
"If you can take the lecturing part and take it out of the classroom, all of a sudden you've opened up room for much more interactive engagement that can happen in the classroom," she says.
Coursera is a for-profit company with $16 million in venture capital behind it. Eventually, it will look to turn a profit for those investors. Koller says one way might be to charge a fee for certification. Another, she says, is to help employers and organizations to close skills gaps.
"Even though there is rampant unemployment in many parts of the world, there are still large numbers of jobs that are going unfilled because employers are having a hard time identifying people with the right set of skills," she says. "So by matchmaking, employers would basically help support this effort."
Where they are succeeding most, Koller says, is in improving the experience for all tiers of education: those in the university classrooms, students online and especially for those who would otherwise be without access to education.
"For the students who never, ever would have had access to this kind of quality education from a place like Penn or Princeton or Stanford, they now have access to something," she says. "It's not the same as the experience of the on-campus students, but it's a heck of a lot better than what they had before."
The Change In The Classroom
The University of Pennsylvania is one of Coursera's partner schools. Law professor Ed Rock, who also coordinates UPenn's online program, says he thinks everyone now realizes tech is going to change universities.
"The choice that faced Penn when we were approached by Coursera," Rock says, "was do you want to be part of that conversation; do you want to shape how technology is going to shape universities; or do you want to just hide your head and pretend it is not going to happen?"
Rock says that when you are used to teaching 50 or 100 students at a time, the idea that you can teach 30,000 students at a time is an intoxicating possibility.
"If we had tried to do this 10 years ago, there would have been major pushback," he says. "I think now everyone recognizes that the Internet changes everything, and the question is how does it work for us, how does it fit with the Penn mission?"
One goal of these online education consortiums is to democratize education to find the next Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg in rural India or sub-Saharan Africa. The other part of it is about money, and how to find a revenue stream for universities that can't possibly accommodate a million students at a brick-and-mortar campus.
Professor Michael Kearns teaches a popular class at the University of Pennsylvania called Networked Life. During a recent lecture, he used a tennis ball and the students in the class to demonstrate the idea of six degrees of separation.
Now there were only about 100 students in the class, but thousands of miles away, in any direction, more than 40,000 students are also taking the online version of Kearns' course.
The class is designed to be taken over a period of 10 weeks and the online lectures last on average about 12 minutes. There are readings and quizzes and online discussion boards, and once you've finished, you qualify for a certificate of completion that is already worth full course credit at the University of Helsinki in Finland.
This could, quite possibly, come to be seen as a calling card to better jobs in countries around the world and change the way universities operate 10 to 20 years down the road, Kearns says.
He says that it's unlikely that places like Stanford, Penn or MIT won't exist in another 10 to 20 years because of online content and education.
"[But] do I think access the access to courses taught by institutions will be widespread, pervasive and accessible to a much larger audience? Yes," he says.
Kearns says he thinks institutions will change the way they teach in the classrooms because of the availability of the content. He says those universities will still be around, but perhaps professors will spend much less time droning on at students in a passive way.
"Because why wouldn't you just as easily watch the video?" he says.
Right now, each course costs the universities about $50,000 to put online, and that includes a small stipend for the professors. But in the future, nominal fees could make these offerings a lucrative possibility.
Now there are still many kinks to be worked out, how to make sure no one is cheating, for one thing. Another is how to evaluate essays; right now, most of the testing is still multiple choice.
NPR Staff
See stories by NPR Staff


Äes is a real Finnish beard comb that is made from pure Finnish wood. All the work from designing to finishing touches is made in Finland and the focus on design has been practical use and rugged looks. Äes is always wrought with high quality oil which guarantees smooth usability. Once you order, you agree our terms and conditions.
If you are reading this, congrats! You have just got a Finnish beard comb, named Äes, into your hands. Each comb is unique because it is purely hand-crafted piece of wood. The comb gets its form in Häme in the hands of a seasoned carpenter. After that the comb gets combustion stamp and rest of the finishing touches. The comb is compact yet efficient even for longer beards. Äes finds its place from your bathroom cabinet or from the pocket of your suit. We make the combs from three different type of wood: maple, rowan and apple tree.
Ps. No forest or single wood has been cut down for our combs because we use wood that has been laying around at the carpenter's smithy, just waiting to be your beard comb.


Sales and Marketing Alignment Blog from Rod Sloane: Secret Tip to include in your Next Media/Press Release.
Secret Tip to include in your Next Media/Press Release.
Why is this on interest?
Where can I see it or buy it?
Now for my special tip, make sure to include a client or third party quote, it adds all the power to your message. If you cannot find a 3rd party quote then by ball means quote yourself.
Go on issue a press realease and issue it to the world. Search "free media release service" on Google and starting telling the world about your success. Remember to send a copy to clients.
Has decided to write to you the offer for business cooperation, as to a member of club.
Probably, I should write all over again to you to learn your opinion, but I risk, that it will be interesting to you or you will think up, as it is possible to use favourably.
I use automatic text translation from Russian on English, and I ask to forgive my computer for translation.
Everyone know, that during crisis many people have many problems, in affairs and in personal attitudes, there is a depression and a panic.
Almost nobody knows what to do further, therefore do even more mistakes.
My offer: To spend lectures on-line in Skype, for all comers.
To spend meetings on radio on-line with the astrologist.
I professionally am engaged in the astrological analysis in business, I predict situations, I model variants, I estimate psychology of attitudes in family, and I recommend the client the best decisions.
Because now it is necessary to combine a miscellaneous, that to have qualities as a result. I prepare for author's lectures for women to help them it is better to understand attitudes in family and with colleagues.
I use methods of numerology, an astrology and psychology.
Certainly, for dialogue with clients in the USA, it is necessary for me the help of the translator for simultaneous interpretation from Russian on the American English language.
I hope, you will think of using my opportunities professionally.


text:
Q: About the strange identity $\frac{\pi}{4}=\sum_{n\geq 0}\frac{(-1)^n}{2n+1}=\sum_{n\geq 0}\frac{(-1)^n}{2n+1}\cdot\frac{\zeta(4n+2)}{2^{2n+1}}$ I just wonder if this series
$${\pi\over 4}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}{(-1)^n\over 2n+1}\cdot{\zeta(4n+2)\over 2^{2n+1}}$$
Is equivalent to
$${\pi \over 4}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}{(-1)^n\over 2n+1}?$$
Can anyone have a method to verify these sums?

A: The generating function for the values of the $\zeta$ function at even, positive integers is well-known:
$$ \frac{1-\pi x \cot(\pi x)}{2}=\sum_{n\geq 1}x^{2n}\zeta(2n) \tag{1}$$
and that is easy to prove by considering the logarithmic derivative of the Weierstrass product for the sine function. By applying a discrete Fourier transform to $(1)$ we get:
$$ \sum_{n\geq 1}x^{4n+2}\zeta(4n+2) = -\frac{\pi x}{12}\left(2\pi x+3\cot(\pi x)-3\coth(\pi x)\right)\tag{2} $$
and by termwise integration:
$$\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{x^{4n+2}}{4n+2}\zeta(4n+2)=\frac{1}{12}\left(-\pi^2 x^2+3\log\frac{\pi x}{\sin(\pi x)}-3\log\frac{\pi x}{\sinh(\pi x)}\right)\tag{4} $$
as well as:
$$\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{x^{2n+1}}{4n+2}\zeta(4n+2)=\frac{1}{12}\left(-\pi^2 x+3\log\frac{\pi\sqrt{x}}{\sin(\pi\sqrt{x})}-3\log\frac{\pi\sqrt{x}}{\sinh(\pi\sqrt{x})}\right)\tag{5} $$
To compute the first series given by the OP, it is enough to evaluate $(5)$ at $x=\frac{i}{2}$.
That ensures
$$ \sum_{n\geq 0}\frac{(-1)^n}{2n+1} = \frac{\pi}{4} = \sum_{n\geq 0}\frac{(-1)^n}{2n+1}\cdot\frac{\zeta(4n+2)}{2^{2n+1}}\tag{6}$$
as wanted.


Did they seriously make this many of these movies or are you making this up?
Everything up to the last one is real and exists.
The last one has yet to come out I believe.
They seriously made that many, I've seen all but the last two.
That's what I thought...but no, they are all real.
All the way to 100!


For a birthday week treat (and because I had been DYING to see the Yves St Laurent retrospective at the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts), my mom and I embarked on a day trip to Richmond, VA to explore and visit some of our favorite spots in the city. I've been going to and from Richmond for years now…my baby brother graduated from VCU and so for the past years we've been visiting and exploring different areas – signing up for the Monument Avenue 10K down the historic Monument Avenue district, going to new restaurants, art shows, science exhibits.
Just a quick two-hour drive from the DC area, this is the perfect weekend getaway for a change of pace or a fun day. Because my brother Elliot has since graduated college, I have less of an incentive to go visit but I always have a blast when I make it down.
After the Quirk, we made our way to the the VMFA for the the YSL exhibit. The exhibit alone was worth the drive. The complete retrospective of Saint Laurent's life includes each decade of work from his beginnings at Dior starting in the 50s to his own line from the 1960s onwards. Following along with each outfit was not only aesthetically incredible, but historically fascinating. The shift in trends and what was socially acceptable from the 1950s to the 1990s is breathtaking to see - not to mention the craftsmanship and design that has become so prevalent in every facet of what we define as present day fashion.
We ended our outing with a casual dinner at Kuba Kuba in the Fan district before driving home. Kuba Kuba is a Richmond mainstay and boasts a wonderfully massive menu full of Cuban food, huge portions, delicious flavors, all while being wallet and finicky eater friendly.
What a wonderful melding of people in a city that is truly unique. If you haven't been to Richmond yet, or haven't visited in a couple years, now is definitely the time to head back. Contact hannah@mccabeworld.com for any inquiries or more tips and happy travels!


text:
Sir LSG feat. Brian Temba & Kafele – All I Am (incl. DJ Spinna & Ben Moss remixes) (GOGO Music)
Label:	GOGO Music
Cat:	GOGO 058
Format:	mp3/WAV
Press-release: Sir LSG feat. Brian Temba & Kafele – All I Am – GOGO 058
GOGO Music proudly comes up with the second release of Sir LSG, after we presented you 'Sax In The City', which still was released under his former moniker 'Hood Natives' and became a smash-hit in 2011. This time Sir LSG teamed up with renown Soul-singer Brian Temba and Kafele who adds his distinctive trumpet lines. Remixes are contributed by DJ Spinna and Ben Moss to complete a splendiferous release.
Sir LSG has found his sound. Whether as a DJ or producer Lesego Sefako steadily progressed, since he won the DJ Battle competition of 2008 South African Music Conference. After producing 'Sax In The City' on his own, he split out of the group 'Hood Natives' and started releasing under his own artist name Sir LSG. It seems as if he detected his very own sound at the same time. Pushing the envelope with a stoic determination and a rare love for detail, his sound always contains a bit of Jazz and a big portion of Soul.
'All I Am' features Brian Temba, a venerated R&B singer from the motherland, who has shared the stage with the likes of Kenny Lattimore, Anthony Hamilton and Ne-Yo. His debut album 'Something Better' included the hit single 'Dominoes', which received two Channel O Awards nominations in South Africa in 2009, while the album itself earned him a SAMA (South African Music Award) for Best R&B/Neo Soul Album. In 2013 Brian's new album 'This is My Time' was nominated as Best R&B on the Metro FM awards. 'All I Am' is one of the few side trips of Brian Temba into House Music, and shows his great versatility.
In addition Kafele lends his talent on the trumpet to add another level of musicality to the beautiful song. The experienced Jazz musician became a household name in the House-scene, since his releases 'Above The Sky' and 'Complicated' on GOGO Music and meanwhile can look back on various successful releases on other labels as well.
Remix glories for the song come from DJ Spinna and Ben Moss. DJ Spinna surly does not need much of an introduction to music lovers. Since the start of his career, he left his indelible fingerprint in various musical categories. He produced legendary Hip Hop groups, remixed Pop Music icons and of course is at home in the House Music genre, in which he delivered countless titles which are considered classics nowadays.
Ben Moss finally returns to the label after a longer pause from music. Finishing his doctorate in Pharmacy was priority and did not leave him much time to produce music. But his mix clearly and imposingly shows that talent does not fade, if one takes a break. Back with a bang, we now hope to hear more from him soon.
This GOGO Music release has been in the works for quite some time, but it surely was worth the wait and efforts, as we now are able to present a well rounded package of a well written song –exactly our aim at GOGO Music.
GOGO Music … music it is and is it!
1 – Sir LSG Original Mix 6:36
2 – Sir LSG Original Instrumental 6:36
3 – DJ Spinna Galatic Soul Remix 7:57
4 – DJ Spinna Galatic Soul Instrumental 7.57
5 – Ben Moss Late Bounce Vocal 6:51
6 – Ben Moss Late Bounce Instrumental 6:51
BUY from JUNO Download


text:
Spanish master Salvador Dali visited Texas in the 1950s, when he was already a world famous artist, thanks to his experiments with surrealism starting two decades earlier. The Meadows Museum, nicknamed the "Prado on the Prairie," in Dallas is giving the public an opportunity to dream in technicolour again with a new exhibition that runs until December 9. The exhibition, "Dali: Poetics of the Small," looks at the first surrealist phase of Dali (1904-1989) through small-scale paintings that allow visitors to experience the artist's attention to detail and symbolism. In 1952, Dali attended a conference about art and mysticism organised by Southern Methodist University (SMU) in Dallas, where he discussed his signature style. The artist told the Dallas Morning News that he was enchanted by the light in Texas because it reminded him of his homeland and had been having dreams in technicolour, "the best dreams because they're uncommon, they don't even happen in New York." "Dali: Poetics of the Small" is made up of 21 works created between 1929-1936 no bigger than 30cm, in which the artist reveals his complex mental processes and the technical quality that gave him international recognition. Australian Associated Press
https://nnimgt-a.akamaihd.net/transform/v1/crop/frm/silverstone-feed-data/9a3f40b1-f5b0-4e49-89ef-677097f1be2e.jpg/r0_74_800_526_w1200_h678_fmax.jpg
US museum brings Dali's dreams to life
A new exhibit at a Dallas museum will feature Salvador Dali's lesser-known small scale paintings.
Spanish master Salvador Dali visited Texas in the 1950s, when he was already a world famous artist, thanks to his experiments with surrealism starting two decades earlier.
The Meadows Museum, nicknamed the "Prado on the Prairie," in Dallas is giving the public an opportunity to dream in technicolour again with a new exhibition that runs until December 9.
The exhibition, "Dali: Poetics of the Small," looks at the first surrealist phase of Dali (1904-1989) through small-scale paintings that allow visitors to experience the artist's attention to detail and symbolism.
In 1952, Dali attended a conference about art and mysticism organised by Southern Methodist University (SMU) in Dallas, where he discussed his signature style.
The artist told the Dallas Morning News that he was enchanted by the light in Texas because it reminded him of his homeland and had been having dreams in technicolour, "the best dreams because they're uncommon, they don't even happen in New York."
"Dali: Poetics of the Small" is made up of 21 works created between 1929-1936 no bigger than 30cm, in which the artist reveals his complex mental processes and the technical quality that gave him international recognition.
Road safety advocate Peter Frazer named local Australia Day ambassador
Rugby club deliver goods down south
Australia Day on the Hawkesbury: free family event at Governor Phillip Park
First student ambassadors to lead young people into STEM careers
Richmond Marketplace gets new solar panel installation
Hawkesbury Gazette