text:
Facebook for Baltimore City Public Schools facebook
Twitter for Baltimore City Public Schools twitter
Instagram for Baltimore City Public Schools instagram
Vimeo for Baltimore City Public Schools
Close NavigationClose
Translate لترجمة Traducir 为了翻译 Traduire
BPS Primary
A-Z Directory of Topics
Close Navigation Artboard 1
Parent or Guardian
Looking for something? Search here Hide search
ESOL Toolkit for Staff
A growing number of our students and families speak primary languages other than English. Here are resources about English for Speakers of Other Languages, as well as tools and tips for serving families who are learning English.
Registering and identifying students
Where do families register students who are not native English speakers?
All families of English learners can come to the district's Welcome Center (200 E. North Avenue, Room 106; phone 443-642-4481; email WelcomeCenter@bcps.k12.md.us) to enroll students in any grade, get help with middle and high school choice, plan high school courses, and learn about community resources. Families of elementary and middle school students can also enroll at their neighborhood schools.
What documents do families need?
All families complete the registration form (English | Spanish) and provide the same documents when they register, including proof of required immunizations.
By law, families are not required to prove legal status in the United States and do not need to show social security cards or any immigration documents. School staff should not ask for these documents or inquire about a family's or student's immigration status. However, for refugee students, the I-94 visa can be used to confirm birth date if no birth certificate is available.
How does a school serve families that don't speak English?
All families are entitled to high-quality service in a language they understand. First, determine the language the family speaks; then use one of these supports.
Face-to-face interpretation. Bilingual staff assigned to ESOL sites can assist with interpretation as their schools, as their schedules allow. (They may also provide limited translation services and interpretation for family meetings, phone calls home, and other schoolwide events.) If a bilingual staff member is not available, submit an online request for an interpreter at least five days before the event.
Interpretation on the telephone. CTS Language Link can be called to provide interpretation over the phone. To schedule IEP meetings and other communication about special education services, please call 1-800-535-9250 and use access code 15868. All other interpretation services should be accessed at 1-877-963-7466 with access code 13015.
Translation. City Schools produces many printed documents in English and Spanish, and this website can be translated into Arabic, Chinese, French, and Spanish by clicking the "Translate" link at the top right of any page. In addition, the district has a contract with TransAct, which houses numerous school-related documents in multiple languages.
For additional resources on translation and interpretation, review this information sheet. When using our approved vendors, fill out the Interpreter Request Form below and submit it directly to the vendor.
Interpreter Request Form: PDF | spreadsheet
How are students identified for ESOL services?
The registration form includes a "home language survey." Based on the family's answers to the survey questions, a student whose primary language is not English is flagged in Infinite Campus for assessment of English language proficiency (Kindergarten W-APT or the WIDA Screener) and placement for ESOL services, if appropriate. If your school is an ESOL site, ESOL teachers will administer the assessment.
If your school is not an ESOL site, an assessment teacher will visit your school to talk to the child's family about transferring to the closest ESOL site or refusing service. Email esoloffice@bcps.k12.md.us to get the name of the assessment teacher assigned to your school.
Can families refuse ESOL services for their children?
Yes, after they are fully informed by the ESOL staff of the impact of their choice. The decision to waive services must be noted on the parent notification letter and filed in the blue EL folder, which becomes part of the cumulative record; it should also be recorded in Infinite Campus.
Students are still required to participate in the annual WIDA ACCESS, as mandated by the Maryland State Board of Education. Accommodations must also be provided for these students and documentation filed in their EL folder.
Do all students and parents from households where English is not the primary language receive language services?
No. Keep in mind that a student who does not speak English well may have a parent or guardian who is fluent in English; conversely, a student who is fluent in English may have parents or guardians who are not fluent. Students receive ESOL services based on their English proficiency determined by the Kindergarten W-APT or the WIDA Screener and the annual WIDA ACCESS. Parents and guardians must receive information related to their child's education in a language they understand, with interpretation or translation services as needed.
Academic scheduling, programming, and accommodations
How are ESOL services scheduled?
The ESOL teacher must schedule every student on her or his roster, with different service provided based on age, language proficiency, and academic background. Schedules must be approved by the principal, with approved schedules sent to the ESOL department (200 E. North Ave., Room 303). Because students may arrive at any time during the year, schedules should be updated accordingly and sent to the principal and ESOL department.
ESOL schedule template
Using the schedule template
How does scheduling change from elementary through secondary grades?
Pre-k. The diagnostic PreLAS is used to determine English proficiency and eligibility for ESOL service in pre-k. Type and frequency of ESOL support varies according to the time ESOL teachers have available. The Kindergarten W-APT is administered at the end of the year to determine eligibility for ESOL service the following year in kindergarten.
Elementary grades. Refer to the how-to guide for elementary scheduling.
High school. Review the guidelines for placement, assigning credits, and promoting students and refer to the high school course trajectory.
What instructional models are used in ESOL?
Models include integrated instruction, sheltered instruction, ESOL classes, and immersion. Read more here.
What supports ensure students can access daily instruction?
Pre-k and kindergarten instructional support worksheet
Supports to scaffold instruction for learners, grades 1 to 12
Supports for "reclassified" English learners (who have exited ESOL services within the past two years and are no longer eligible for accommodations, but continue to be eligible for instructional supports)
Providing equal access (from the U.S. Department of Education)
What accommodations can English learners receive?
English learners can receive direct linguistic support (e.g., human reader of selected sections or entire readings, text-to-speech software, bilingual dictionaries, scribe) or indirect linguistic support (e.g., responding on test books, extended time, schedule changes, graphic organizers, reducing distractions). They can also receive accommodations for end-of-year assessments (language and math), including extended time, word-to-word dictionary, scribe or speech to text, and directions read or clarified in the native language.
Limited accommodations are available on statewide tests for English learners (including those whose parent/guardians have waived services, but not for reclassified learners who have exited ESOL within the past two years). ESOL teachers and school testing coordinators can provide additional information; please also review the Maryland Accommodations Manual.
As with all students, English learners are eligible to receive accommodations under a 504 Plan or IEP.
Who determines and administers accommodations?
ESOL and general education teachers should collaborate to determine and administer appropriate accommodations. If the student has an IEP, the special education teacher must be part of the collaboration. ESOL teachers often have information about students that can help determine the best accommodations (e.g., whether the student has strong enough first language skills to benefit from the use of a bilingual dictionary). During standardized assessments, any certified teacher can provide the appropriate accommodations to students.
Are there special considerations regarding grading and promotion of English learners?
English learners are evaluated based on accommodations and supports and should not be penalized for not yet being fluent in English. Read more here.
Annual English language proficiency assessment
What assessment is used?
WIDA ACCESS is used to measure growth in listening, speaking, reading, writing, comprehension, and literacy. It is a primarily online test similar to PARCC and iReady, with some paper-based sections.
When and how is the test administered?
WIDA ACCESS is typically given during a five-week window in January and February. It is divided into several grade bands: K, 1, 2-3, 4-5, 6-8, and 9-12. As a result of the multiple groups and individual testing, completing the assessment is time consuming and often takes a significant portion of the testing window to complete.
Who is responsible for administering the test?
At ESOL sites, the school testing coordinator along with the ESOL teachers coordinate and administer the test. At non-ESOL sites, the school testing coordinator is responsible.
Can students practice before the test administration?
WIDA provides online training materials; a login is required. Additionally, students can use other online programs to practice speaking into a headset with a microphone.
What do test results show?
Students receive an overall proficiency score as well as individual scores for reading, writing, listening, speaking, comprehension (reading and listening), and literacy (reading and writing). Scores range from 1.0 to 6.0 (indicating proficiency levels, not grade levels). Students exit the ESOL program once they have received a 4.5 or greater for their overall proficiency score.
Note: English learners who achieve this proficiency score are designated as reclassified English learners for two years following their exit from ESOL services. They can continue to receive supports during this time, but are not eligible for accommodations.
The following are placed in the student's EL folder and considered part of the student's cumulative record:
Annual parent/guardian notification letter (parent/guardian signature required)
Accommodations and instructional supports documents (parent/guardian signature required on accommodations form)
Initial placement assessment score report (Kindergarten W-APT or the WIDA Screener)
Annual English language proficiency assessment score reports (WIDA ACCESS)
October work sample (if the student arrives after October, then obtain a work sample as soon as possible)
Who is responsible for maintaining the EL record?
The ESOL teacher of record, as recorded in Infinite Campus, is responsible for all documentation related to ESOL.
ESOL staff
ESOL positions are locked and funded centrally, with scope of work aligned to Title III requirements. Recruitment is a collaboration between the individual school and the ESOL department, and candidates are reviewed by the ESOL department to ensure that Title III requirements are met. Attendance at professional development provided by the ESOL department throughout the school year is expected for these staff members.
ESOL locked positions are provided for a basic, district required model of language support instruction and include the following.
ESOL educational associate: Supports planning, development, or administration of the ESOL program; provides systemic and school-based professional development; functions as a liaison between the ESOL department and schools; clarifies district policy guidelines and regulations; and supports ESOL teachers in best practices for instruction and assessment.
ESOL teacher: Provides English language instruction to English learners, using an instructional model based on student needs; assesses and maintains required data.
ESOL paraeducator and assistant: Supports parents through interpretation services; ensures parents are engaged in the school community; prepares and leads parent workshops; provides instructional support.
ESOL assessment teacher: Assesses and completes paperwork for students who have enrolled in non-ESOL sites across the district; works with administrators and staff at non-ESOL schools to complete assessment tasks, including gathering initial student data, scheduling of diagnostic and annual tests, completion of the ESOL accommodation forms, submission of transfer paperwork, filing of test score reports, and updating of student records.
If additional services are deemed necessary, the school must provide the funding for those positions.
For more information, review the staffing fact sheet.
Need ESOL support or information?
Content the ESOL department at 443-642-3990 or email esoloffice@bcps.k12md.us
200 E. North Avenue
Facebook for Baltimore City Public Schools
Twitter for Baltimore City Public Schools
Instagram for Baltimore City Public Schools
© 2020 Baltimore City Public Schools


text:
- Select year - 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2009
Key Developments: May 2012 – April 2013
In the run-up to the May 2013 elections, news outlets covering the opposition faced cyberattacks and content disruptions (see Violations of User Rights).
A legal amendment holding website owners liable for seditious comments posted by users took effect in July, despite civil society opposition (see Violations of User Rights).
A 2012 act on public security effective since 2012 may strengthen police surveillance powers (see Violations of User Rights).
Police charged a blogger for criticizing the Malaysian state of Johor's new Sultan in 2012 (see Violations of User Rights).
Toronto-based Citizen Lab found spyware sold only to governments on "a Malaysian election-related document" circulating before the polls (see Violations of User Rights).
The Malaysian government's encouragement of internet and mobile phone access has driven steady growth in new media since the first internet service provider (ISP) was inaugurated in 1992. By 2012, internet penetration was measured at 66 percent, among the highest in the region.
In May 2013 general elections, the Barisan Nasional coalition clung to power with just under 50 percent of the popular vote, having lost its two-thirds parliamentary majority in 2008 for the first time since 1969.[1] Its leader, Prime Minister Najib Razak, publicly promotes internet freedom.[2] Yet his government detained at least eight bloggers in the months following 2008 elections, many for sedition, or criticism of Malaysia's royalty, which includes the sultans who constitutionally rule nine of the country's 16 states and federal territories. In the past two years, with elections looming, officials reinforced commitments not to censor the internet, prosecuted fewer bloggers, and pledged legislative reforms.[3] When these reforms materialized in 2012, however, they fell short of international standards. One notorious security law was repealed, but its replacement allows the public prosecutor to intercept electronic communications without judicial oversight in security investigations. An amendment to the Evidence Act 1950 rendering intermediaries liable for seditious comments posted by users raised considerable civil society opposition in April, but went quietly into effect in July. Meanwhile, police launched two new investigations for online criticism of the Sultan of Johor; one blogger still faces charges.
Online mobilization was widely perceived as contributing to the opposition's 2008 electoral gains,[4] and elections this year were marred by attempts to manipulate online discourse. Internet users noted a palpable increase in the presence of "cybertroopers," commentators paid by political parties on all sides to attack their opponents. Other activity seemed to favor the government: Web news outlets covering the opposition faced cyberattacks in the lead-up to the polls, and some apparent filtering, though it was not clear if this was executed by the hackers or signaled a more formal intervention by officials or service providers. Online reporting—some from the past year—helped expose the government's multi-million dollar sponsorship of pro-Najib articles published by supposedly objective international blogs and news outlets since 2008. And in mid-2013, Toronto-based Citizen Lab reported that at least one electronic document containing election-related information in Malay appeared to be spreading spyware to recipients. The government is investigating online news portal Malaysian Insider for quoting international reports about that spyware, which could allow authorities to spy on citizens without their knowledge.[5]
Despite these challenges, citizens continued to communicate voraciously via social networks. News websites, once outliers, are now an indispensable part of Malaysia's information landscape. Internet users effectively documented police crackdowns on political protests in 2011 and 2012 that were downplayed by tightly-controlled traditional media, and police cooperated with organizers of a much more peaceful rally in January 2013. In October 2012, an appeals court ruling overturned an "irrational" home ministry ruling against Malaysiakini, an independent news website seeking a print publication license.[6] The ministry repeatedly refused to grant the outspoken outlet a license—the kind of decision which encourages self-censorship among print and broadcast owners, even though some licensing requirements were relaxed in 2012.[7] In characterizing Malaysiakini's right to publish a newspaper as fundamental, the judge took a step towards ensuring that Malaysia's vibrant internet culture will continue to have a powerful, positive impact on the nation's broader free expression restrictions. That vision was not shared by the home minister and the attorney general, who appealed the ruling.[8]
Internet penetration was measured at 66 percent in 2012, one of the higher rates in Asia;[9] officials pledged to increase it to 80 percent in 2013.[10] Malaysians can access the internet through home connections, workplaces, and mobile phones. In April 2012, Kuala Lumpur's municipal government even introduced a policy requiring businesses seeking food and beverage licenses to provide inexpensive Wi-Fi.[11]
Cybercafes also play an important role in bridging the digital divide, though one persists. More than 80 percent of internet users lived in urban areas as recently as 2010,[12] and penetration remains low in less populated states in East Malaysia, where most residents belong to indigenous groups.
The introduction of wireless WiMax technology in 2008 has helped bring broadband to regions that are difficult to reach via cable; four WiMax providers were in operation as of mid-2013. The government has also prioritized development of the broadband infrastructure. In 2010, a National Broadband Initiative introduced five programs to expedite broadband and mobile expansion, some in cooperation with Telekom Malaysia, the country's largest—and formerly state-owned—telecommunications company, which retains a monopoly over the fixed-line network.[13] By 2011, around 250 Community Broadband Centers were established nationwide and nearly 500,000 netbooks distributed to students and low income citizens in rural and suburban areas.[14] In 2012, the 1Malaysia Broadband Affordable package offered five states with lower penetration rates decent broadband speeds for under MYR 38 ($12) per month.[15]
Mobile phone usage surpassed the country's total population in 2011. By 2012, mobile penetration was at 141 percent, indicating that some individuals had multiple phone lines.[16] Mobile internet access is available, generally affordable and popular among young people. Approximately 20 percent of Malaysians aged 20-24 reportedly accessed the internet via their mobile phones in 2011.[17]
Regulation of the internet falls under the purview of the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC), which is overseen by the minister of information, communications, and culture. Both the MCMC and the ministry are guided by the 1998 Communication and Multimedia Act (CMA), which gives the information minister a range of powers, including licensing the ownership and operation of network facilities. This could serve as a means of control as it does for the traditional media, though no examples of this have been documented, perhaps because the 25 private ISPs often have government connections. The two largest ISPs are TMnet, a subsidiary of the privatized national phone company Telekom Malaysia, and Jaring, which is owned by the Ministry of Finance. The same is true for mobile providers. The largest, Maxis Communications, was founded by Ananda Krishnan, who also owns Malaysia's biggest satellite broadcaster and enjoys close ties to former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad.[18] Two new mobile phone providers, YTL Communications and Umobile, have joined the market since 2008. Though ostensibly unrelated to the government, observers believe they benefit from political connections.
In recent years, some local authorities have introduced restrictions on cybercafes to curb illegal online activities, particularly gambling, which is grounds for closure if detected on cafe premises. Select states have capped the number of cybercafe licenses available, making it difficult for legitimate new venues to open.[19]
The CMA provides for the ministry to appoint the MCMC chairman and three government commissioners, plus two to five commissioners from non-governmental entities; the current three are from the private sector.[20] Since 2008, the process for appointing members of the MCMC advisory board has become more transparent and participatory, involving consultations with diverse stakeholders and the inclusion of civil society members on the board. Yet the MCMC remains a driving force in efforts to curtail online speech, including investigations into online portals and bloggers.
Malaysian bloggers, though still practicing self-censorship on some issues, were an effective check on power in 2012. Though content manipulation increased in the run-up to elections, websites helped expose it, and also thwarted an apparent effort to block or throttle their content that coincided with coordinated cyberattacks. As they had in 2011, internet users braved a police crackdown to muster protesters in a massive demonstration in late April and early May 2012 that was barely reflected in traditional media reports. A more peaceful January 2013 rally benefitted from digital tools to ensure it went smoothly.
A provision of the CMA explicitly states that none of its wording "shall be construed as permitting the censorship of the Internet." The Multimedia Super Corridor, an information technology development project, includes a 10-point Bill of Guarantees that promises no censorship to member ICT businesses.[21]
While the Malaysian government blocks some websites for violating Malaysian laws, it has not systematically targeted political content in the past. In 2009, Information, Communications, and Culture Minister Dr. Rais Yatim sought to "evaluate the readiness and feasibility of the implementation of the Internet filter at [the] Internet gateway level," but backtracked due to opposition.[22] In mid-2013, officials said a total 6,640 sites had been blocked since 2008.[23]
Authorities also take administrative measures to restrict information. The MCMC can instruct websites to remove content, including some perceived as critical of the government. Issues such as Islam's official status, race, royalty, and the special rights enjoyed by bumiputera, who are ethnic Malays and other indigenous people, as opposed to the ethnic Chinese and Indian minorities, are also considered sensitive. Discussing them can lead to prosecution, so internet users do exercise self-censorship, levels of which appeared to remain constant in 2012 and early 2013.
Procedures for administrative requests are generally nontransparent and lack judicial oversight and avenues for appeal. In 2009, the MCMC directed Malaysiakini to take down two videos containing sensitive religious and political content. When Malaysiakini's Editor-in-Chief Steven Gan refused, the MCMC urged the attorney general to prosecute him. He still risks a potential fine of up to MYR 50,000 ($14,300) and up to one year in prison,[24] but in 2013 the attorney general had yet to pursue the case, which remains the only reported one of its kind. The MCMC also issues administrative requests to service providers. In 2011, ISPs blocked access to 10 file-sharing websites citing Section 263 of the CMA and copyright laws.[25] Google blocked access to the infamous anti-Muslim video, "Innocence of Muslims," at the MCMC's request in September 2012.[26]
Many government-linked companies and public universities internally restrict access to Malaysiakini and other sites perceived as politically sensitive, though online news outlets represent an increasingly serious challenge to traditional media. Malaysiakini was listed as the nation's 15th most popular website by one source in 2013.[27] This popularity, combined with the combative political reporting published by independent or opposition-aligned outlets, may have lead the government or its supporters to try and stop readers accessing them in the lead-up to 2013 elections, when a handful of news website technical staff discovered packets of information sent by their servers were not reaching readers, rendering their content temporarily inaccessible.[28] Some remained available on select ISPs. The platforms all fixed the problem within 48 hours, and at least two filed a complaint with the MCMC, which has yet to respond. The exact nature of the apparent blocking or throttling—which occurred while many of the sites were being targeted by hackers—remains unclear.
Despite these limits, expanded internet access has led to the emergence of a vibrant blogosphere. English and Malay are the dominant languages, and many civil society groups, including those representing ethnic minorities, have a dynamic online presence. Social networking is almost ubiquitous. One 2011 report said Malaysians over 15 spent approximately a third of their time online social-networking,[29] while a November 2012 article said Malaysians visited social media platforms a staggering 14 billion times a month.[30] Prime Minister Najib leads the way with his own blog and over a million followers on both Facebook and Twitter.[31] Other government representatives are embracing ICTs. The police force, for example, has Facebook and Twitter accounts where officers provide updates on policing activities and occasionally respond to accusations of abuse by members of the public.[32]
Some of this engagement is manipulative in nature, something that has become increasingly evident in the past three years. Both government and opposition figures privately acknowledge paying "cybertroopers," including bloggers and other online commentators, to generate favorable content on their behalf and denigrate their opponents.[33] Since traditional media restrictions caused opposition groups to embrace online platforms relatively early, the government's efforts to catch up have been costly—and so far, comparatively ineffective. The Barisan Nasional has a dedicated group of bloggers, Unit Media Baru, generating content on their behalf. Its members deny accepting payment for their efforts, which observers point out are deliberately misleading: they countered the well-established opposition news website Sarawak Report by creating a pro-government equivalent titled Sarawak Reports.[34]
The scale of these campaigns was exposed in 2012, when the government admitted paying international PR firm FBC Media MYR 83.8 million ($26.5 million) between 2008 and 2010 to boost Prime Minister Najib's image abroad after the BBC publicly apologized for airing programs with "inappropriate" sponsorship.[35] Sarawak Report also said Abdul Taib Mahmud, the chief minister of Sarawak State, had separately contracted FBC Media for online publicity campaigns.[36] FBC Media, which denied wrongdoing, collapsed in 2011.[37] In March 2013, the U.S.-based media company BuzzFeed revealed that U.S. lobbying firms working on behalf of the Malaysian ruling party or its associates funded a print and online campaign, "spanning May 2008 to April 2011," in American media outlets, much of it criticizing opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim.[38]
Despite this kind of intervention, online tools have been effective for political mobilization and exposing the government's grip on traditional media. Disparate groups united to quash a 2011 government proposal to expand the Printing Presses and Publications Act to online content,[39] and leaders subsequently pledged to abolish it altogether,[40] though in practice this resulted only in tepid reforms in 2012. The act, one of several that restrict traditional media, helped give their more aggressive online counterparts the edge when reporting on political issues.
Nowhere is this more apparent than during the political rallies for electoral reform, whose organizers, the Coalition for Free and Fair Elections, have leveraged online platforms to bring tens of thousands of supporters to the streets; even the name of the rallies—Bersih 2.0 in 2011 and 3.0 in 2012—is borrowed from the technology community. In 2011, while mainstream media downplayed reports of police brutality against the largely peaceful protesters, internet users circulated nearly 900,000 tweets and 1,600 videos documenting violence, and 200,000 Facebook users petitioned for Najib's resignation.[41] In 2012, that gap widened. More bloggers and online news portals weighed in to keep people informed about the rally and the security forces' methods to control it, which included beatings, tear gas and water cannons.[42] Yet print media coverage declined compared to the previous year to what the local Centre for Independent Journalism described as a "near blackout."[43]
Prior to the 2013 general elections, authorities changed tactics and allowed an opposition demonstration to go ahead without riot police. Organizers agreed to 27 conditions to obtain approval to gather under the new Peaceful Assembly Act which opposition leaders have criticized as a measure to restrict legitimate gatherings.[44] On January 12, 2013, 100,000 Malaysians participated in a People's Uprising Rally championing a change in government and various political reforms. While subsequent demonstrations were more restive, in this case at least, both police and organizers communicated effectively to inform the public about the event on social media.
Legal harassment remained a primary means for the authorities to intimidate critical bloggers in 2012 and 2013, with at least one blogger facing charges for criticizing the Sultan of Johor. A much-touted legislative reform package failed to check many existing laws used against internet users, and even amended one law to hold intermediaries liable for content posted by others. Though heavy jail terms are unusual, that threat—along with the risk of fines for defamation—still prevents many bloggers from taking full advantage of Malaysia's dynamic online environment. While one higher court supported Malaysiakini's right to a license to expand to print form, another decision disappointed internet freedom activists when a judge determined that the 2010 detention of a cartoonist and blogger was lawful. The May 2013 election also had an impact on user rights, as opposition news websites faced cyberattacks, and a list of candidates circulating online was discovered to contain spyware.
Malaysia's constitution provides citizens with "the right to freedom of speech and expression," but allows for limitations on this right. The government exercises tight control over online media—along with print and broadcast media—through restrictions on licensing and the use of laws including the Official Secrets Act and the Sedition Act. Violations of these laws are punishable by fines and several years in prison.
The government has also pursued prosecutions based on the CMA's broadly worded section 211, which bans content deemed "indecent, obscene, false, threatening, or offensive," and Section 233, when such content is shared via the internet.[45] Defamation is a criminal offence under sections 499-520 of Malaysia's penal code.[46] Media outlets benefit from stronger privileges under the Defamation Act 1957 if they can prove allegedly libelous content is accurate and was published without malice;[47] lacking this protection, bloggers risk punitive damages.
In April 2012, several important changes were made to the legal framework surrounding freedom of expression and national security. In the year's most troubling development, parliament passed an amendment to the 1950 Evidence Act that holds intermediaries liable for seditious content posted anonymously on their networks or websites.[48] This would include hosts of online forums, news outlets, and blogging services, as well as businesses providing Wi-Fi services.[49] The amendment also holds someone liable if their name is attributed to the content or if the computer it was sent from belongs to them, whether or not they were the author.[50] The legal change was pushed through hurriedly, but garnered significant public backlash after its passage, including online petitions; this failed to prevent it going into effect in July 2012.[51]
At the same time, the Internal Security Act—which allowed for infinitely renewable detentions without trial and had been used to hold bloggers,[52]—was abolished and replaced by the Security Offenses (Special Measures) Act (SOSMA). The new law provides several improved protections to detainees, requiring police to immediately inform a detainee's family and reducing the maximum amount of time they can hold a suspect without charge or trial.[53] It also includes a provision explicitly stating that "no person shall be arrested and detained…solely for his political belief or political activity."[54] Despite these improvements, the law also includes restrictive provisions absent in its predecessor. For example, it grants wide-ranging powers for the public prosecutor—and in emergency situations, the police—to intercept communications without the need for a court order in cases involving security offenses.[55]
The government also made changes to the penal code that could allow for punishment of political speech by classifying ill-defined "activity detrimental to parliamentary democracy" as a criminal offence. Civil society groups fear this could render criticism of government officials or policies punishable with jail time, although the law minister said the provision would only apply to violent activities.[56] Meanwhile, the legislative revisions failed to check other problems, like the use of sedition and official secrets charges to harass bloggers and internet users.
No bloggers were serving long-term jail sentences in 2013, though Malaysian authorities have a history of criminally prosecuting online content producers. Police charged at least eight internet users for criticism of the monarchy in 2009,[57] and questioned others.[58] Many prosecutions were dropped, but at least one defendant elected to pay a fine of RM10,000 ($ 2,700) rather than face the threat of trial.[59] Legal proceedings can be lengthy and uncertain, regardless of the outcome. Police continue to investigate Raja Petra Kamarudin, founder of the Malaysia Today blog, who fled into exile in 2009 to avoid sedition charges and continues to criticize the administration from overseas.[60] Sedition charges against another blogger, Khairul Nizam Abdul Ghani, dating from 2010 comments about the late Sultan of Johor, were only abandoned in June 2012.[61]
While the use of sedition laws against internet users declined in 2011,[62] police detained two critics of Johor's new Sultan on the charge in 2012. One Facebook user was arrested in November 2012 for posts considered insulting to the Sultan. When a judge declined to extend his remand after three days, police released and immediately rearrested him; he later told journalists he was questioned in solitary confinement for a total seven days before being released without charge.[63] In July, police briefly detained Syed Abdullah Syed Hussein al-Attas, who blogs pseudonymously as "Uncle Seekers," also on allegations that 64 of his posts insulted the Sultan under the Official Secrets Act.[64] Charges against him are still pending.
Politically-motivated defamation suits seeking damages disproportionate to the offense have become another threat to online expression since a landmark 2007 blogger prosecution by a government-linked newspaper.[65] In August 2012, a Kuala Lumpur court sentenced blogger and opposition People's Justice Party member Amizudin Ahmat to three months in jail for breaking a gag order relating to Dr. Rais Yatim, Malaysia's information and culture minister, resulting from one such case. In 2011, Ahmat was ordered to pay MYR 300,000 ($97,000) in damages for falsely accusing the minister of criminal actions in a blog post, even though he subsequently deleted and apologized for the content. An appeals court reduced additional costs Ahmat was required to pay for related legal expenses but upheld the ruling, which included an order not to blog further about the minister.[66] When Ahmat ignored this order in eleven subsequent articles, the high court found him in contempt; the jail term was deferred pending appeal. A suit brought by an opposition parliamentarian was less successful. In 2012, Nga Kor Ming sought 10 million MYR ($3,200,000) in damages over corruption allegations made by Ahmad Sofian Yahya on the blog Sekupangdua. Though Nga withdrew the claim, the blogger countersued when articles on the politician's website implied the court had ruled in Nga's favor; he, too, withdrew the suit.[67]
Another 2012 high court ruling disappointed free expression advocates. In September 2010, police arrested cartoonist Zulfiklee Anwar Ulhaque, better known as Zunar, and seized newly-published volumes of his cartoons—including many previously published on his blog—deemed insulting to the prime minister and his deputy. After they released him without charge,[68] Zunar and his publishing house sued the government for unlawful detention and loss of income.[69] In a ruling that missed the point that satirical content should not be criminalized, a judge ruled in July 2012 that the arrest was lawful, though confiscating the books was not.[70]
A small number of other criminal cases have involved religion.[71] One in particular may contribute to Malaysia's global reputation for negative intervention in online freedom of expression issues: In 2012, the authorities stopped Saudi Arabian journalist Hamza Kashgari at a Malaysian airport en route to seek asylum in New Zealand after his online comments about the Prophet Mohammed attracted death threats and government harassment in his own country.[72] Although his lawyer said he had filed a court injunction to prevent Kashgari from being deported, Malaysian authorities sent him home, saying they did not receive it in time.
Real-name registration is not required for participation in in Malaysia's blogosphere, nor is it required to use a cybercafe. Civil society groups have successfully resisted tentative efforts to implement registration, such as the 2011 Computing Professionals Bill that, if passed, would have required IT professionals working on Critical National Information Infrastructure projects to register with a government-appointed board.[73] Responding to critics, the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation said that registration would be voluntary, and the bill never made it to parliament.[74] Beginning in 2007, all mobile phone owners, including the roughly 18 million customers using prepaid service at the time, were required to register as part of an effort to decrease rumor mongering. [75] The rule appears to have been weakly enforced.
The extent of government surveillance of ICT content is not known, but privacy protections are generally poor in Malaysia.[76] In 2008, the MCMC formed a panel composed of representatives from the police, the attorney general's office, and the Home Ministry to monitor websites and blogs. Although it still appears to be active, it has not publicly intervened in internet freedom issues. Court documents indicate that police regularly gain access to the content of text messages from telecommunications companies, sometimes without judicial oversight. A 2011 government initiative to provide free email accounts to all citizens over the age of 18 prompted fears it would expand the government's ability to monitor people's online activities.[77] The project, which was designed to offer an "authenticated online identity through which the people can securely carry out their transactions with the government," had only 23,000 subscribers by March 2013.[78] SOSMA, which allows for the interception of communications without a judicial order in poorly-defined security investigations, also contains scope for abuse.[79]
The Malaysian Personal Data Protection Act 2010, which regulates the processing of personal data in commercial transactions, came into effect on January 1, 2013. The law makes it illegal for commercial organizations to sell personal information or allow third parties to use it, with penalties up to RM100,000 ($ 27,400) or one year imprisonment. Federal and state governments are exempted from the law, as is data processed outside Malaysia.[80]
In March 2013, the University of Toronto-based research group Citizen Lab reported detecting software known as FinFisher, described by its distributor Gamma International as "governmental IT intrusion and remote monitoring solutions," on 36 servers worldwide, including one in Malaysia.[81] The software potentially allows the server to steal passwords, tap Skype calls, or record audio and video without permission from other computers, according to Citizen Lab, which noted that the presence of such a server did not prove who was running it. The same month, the Malaysian Insider documented Fin Fisher's presence in Malaysia, based on a New York Times report.[82] In response, the MCMC launched an investigation into the report, which it described as "speculative and ill-researched," and threatened the site with a fine of up to RM 50,000 ($15,200) or one year imprisonment for false reporting under the CMA. No charges have been reported against the website or its staff. In May, however, Citizen Lab reported they had further identified "a Malaysian election-related document" they characterized as a "booby-trapped candidate list" containing surveillance spyware.[83] Because the spyware is only marketed to governments, "it is reasonable to assume that some government actor is responsible," the group concluded.
Physical violence, though less extreme than in many neighboring countries, still affects journalists reporting for traditional media in Malaysia, and their online colleagues are not immune: a Malaysiakini photojournalist was among several who reported security forces obstructing and beating them on the sidelines of the political rally Bersih 3.0.[84]
A graver threat to independent online news outlets and some opposition-related websites is distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, which force sites to crash by overloading the host server with requests for content, often at moments of political importance. Some observers believe such attacks are either sponsored or condoned by Malaysian security agencies, since they often align with government priorities. In March 2013, the new U.K.-based online radio station Free Malaysia Radio—which promised listeners content prohibited in traditional media—suffered DDoS attacks during its first program, an interview with opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim.[85] The online radio portal was inaccessible for some days. Malaysiakini, which has endured 35 DDoS attacks, was one of many sites reporting on the opposition which was subjected to an apparently coordinated assault in April 2013 before the elections.[86]
[1] In 1973, the Barisan Nasional, which translates as National Front, absorbed the Alliance Party coalition which had governed
Malaysia since 1957. "A Tawdry Victory," Economist (blog), May 6, 2013, http://www.economist.com/blogs/banyan/2013/05/malaysias-election-0.
[2] The government first pledged to keep Malaysia's internet free of interference in 1998. See OpenNet Initiative, "Country Profile—Malaysia," August 7, 2012, http://opennet.net/research/profiles/malaysia.
[3] Kal Kamel, "No Internet Censor, But Bloggers Must Know Where to Draw the Line: Malaysian Prime Minister," Grey Review, April 25, 2011, http://www.greyreview.com/2011/04/25/no-internet-censor-but-bloggers-must-know-where-to-draw-the-line-malaysian-prime-minister/.
[4] "Malaysia's Uneasy Dance with the Web," Asia Sentinel, August 17, 2010, http://asiasentinel.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2645&Itemid=178.
[5] The presence of the spyware in Malaysia does not reveal who is employing it, but it is marketed to governments. See Violations of User Rights.
[6] Hafiz Yatim, "Malaysiakini Wins Court Battle Over Print Licence," Malaysiakini, October 1, 2012, http://bit.ly/V5bcKG.
[7] Reporters Without Borders, "Media Freedom in Malaysia is Far From Assured, Open Letter Tells Prime Minister," May 15,
2012, http://en.rsf.org/malaisie-media-freedom-in-malaysia-is-far-15-05-2012,42628.html.
[8] Human Rights Watch, World Report 2013, Country Reports, "Malaysia," January 31, 2013, http://bit.ly/ZbdTes, 2.
[9] International Telecommunication Union, "Percentage of Individuals Using the Internet, 2000-2012," http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/stat/default.aspx; The Economic Transformation Programme Report 2012, 188.
[10] The Economic Transformation Programme Report 2012, 188, http://bit.ly/17l5Y0j.
[11] Choong Mek Zhin, "DBKL to Make it a Requirement for Restaurants to Provide Wi-Fi Services," Star Online, January 9, 2012, http://thestar.com.my/metro/story.asp?file=/2012/1/9/central/10210201&sec=central.
[12] ComScore, "Malaysian Internet Usage Driven Primarily by People in Central Region," press release, October 7, 2010, http://bit.ly/bQWgXU.
[13] Sira Habu and Shaun Ho, "RM 1 Billion Initiative to Promote High-Speed Broadband Usage," Star Online, March 25, 2010, http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2010/3/25/nation/5931577&sec=nation.
[14] Ministry of Information Communication and Culture Malaysia, "Rural Broadband Initiatives in Malaysia," September 21, 2011, http://www.scribd.com/doc/68533475/Rural-Broadband-Initiatives-in-Malaysia.
[15] "1Malaysia Broadband Affordable Packages for 5 States," Malaysian Wireless, September 8, 2012, http://www.malaysianwireless.com/2012/09/1malaysia-broadband-affordable-packages-for-5-states/.
[16] International Telecommunication Union, "Mobile-cellular Telephone Subscriptions, 2000-2012."
[17] "Malaysian Internet Usage Takes Off in 2010," Nielsen Wire (blog), April 25, 2011, http://bit.ly/fh3qMN.
[18] Colin Kruger, "Billionaire Eyes Australian Media," Sidney Morning Herald, May 28, 2011,
http://www.smh.com.au/business/billionaire-eyes-australian-media-20110527-1f81u.html.
[19] Peter Boon, "Cyber Cafe Licences Not Issued Anymore—Ministry," Borneo Post Online, October 15, 2012,
http://www.theborneopost.com/2012/10/05/cyber-cafe-licences-not-issued-anymore-ministry/.
[20] Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission Act 1998, available at: http://www.agc.gov.my/Akta/Vol.%2012/Act%20589.pdf.
[21] Multimedia Super Corridor, "MSC Malaysia 10-Point Bill of Guarantees," accessed August 2013, http://www.mscmalaysia.my/news/introducing-msc-malaysia-certified-solutions; MCMC, "Communications and Multimedia Act 1998," accessed August 2013, http://www.skmm.gov.my/Legal/Acts/Malaysian-Communications-And-Multimedia-Commission.aspx.
[22] Rebekah Heacock, "Malaysia Considers, Backs Down from National Internet Filter," OpenNet Initiative (blog), August 13,
2009, http://opennet.net/blog/2009/08/malaysia-considers-backs-down-national-internet-filter.
[23] "More Than 6,000 Websites Blocked for Violations Since 2008," Bernama, via Malay Mail Online, July 5, 2013, http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/more-than-6000-websites-blocked-for-violations-since-2008.
[24] One showed Muslim demonstrators desecrating the head of a cow—an animal Hindus consider sacred—to protest the relocation of a Hindu temple; the second showed a political speech. See Reporters Without Borders, "Malaysiakini Website Refuses to Bow to Censorship," news release, September 24, 2009, http://en.rsf.org/malaysia-malaysiakini-website-refuses-to-24-09-2009,34575.
[25] "Pirate Bay, MegaUpload and Others Blocked By Government Order," Torrent Freak (blog), June 9, 2011, http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-megaupload-others-blocked-by-government-order-110609/.
[26] Tashny Sukumaran, "Google Malaysia blocks 'Innocence of Muslims' video clip," September 17, 2012, http://www.thestar.com.my/story.aspx?file=%2f2012%2f9%2f17%2fnation%2f20120917111604.
[27] "Top Sites in Malaysia," Alexa Web Information Company, accessed January 29, 2013, http://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/MY.>
[28] Oiwan Lam and Leila Nachawati, "Malaysia: News Sites Face Attacks on Eve of Elections," Global Voices Advocacy, May 4, 2013, http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/2013/05/04/malaysia-news-sites-face-attacks-on-eve-of-elections/.
[29] ComScore, "Social Networking Accounts for One Third of All Time Spent Online in Malaysia," press release, October 17, 2011,http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2011/10/Social_Networking_Accounts_for_One_Third_of_All_Time_Spent_Online_in_Malaysia.
[30] "Malaysia Internet Usage Statistic," SEO Consultant (blog), November 24, 2012, http://www.seoconsultant.com.my/2012/11/malaysia-internet-usage-statistic/.
[31] Najib Razak's Facebook page, accessed July 19, 2012, www.facebook.com/najibrazak; Najib Razak's blog, "1Malaysia," accessed July 19, 2012, http://www.1malaysia.com.my/.
[32] Polis Diraja's Facebook page, http://www.facebook.com/PolisDirajaMalaysia.
[33] Joanna Yap, "PRS' Cyber-Troopers Ready for Coming Polls," Borneo Post Online, March 22, 2012, http://www.theborneopost.com/2012/03/22/prs-cyber-troopers-ready-for-coming-polls/; Lim Guan Eng, "Najib's New Army of Cyber Troopers with a History of Dirty Tricks is Proof that the 13th General Election Will be the Dirtiest Election Yet," DapMalaysia, November 21, 2011, http://dapmalaysia.org/english/2011/nov11/lge/lge1414.htm.
[34] Yu Ji, "Taking the Battle Online," February 8, 2012, http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/2/8/sarawak/10692418.
[35] Mariam Mokhtar, "Sorry No Cure, BBC," Free Malaysia Today, February 17, 2012, http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2012/02/17/sorry-no-cure-bbc/; "BBC's Worldwide Apology Exposes Malaysian Govt's Image," Harakah Daily, February 13, 2012, http://en.harakahdaily.net/index.php/berita-utama/4376-bbcs-worldwide-apology-exposes-malaysian-govts-image.html.
[36] "New Revelations Link FBC Media to BN's Dirty Tricks Blogging Campaigns—Latest Expose!" Sarawak Report, August 7, 2011, http://www.sarawakreport.org/2011/08/dirty-tricks-new-revelations-link-fbc-media-to-bns-blogging-campaigns/.
[37] Ian Burrell, "TV Company at Centre of Global News Fixing Row Goes into Administration," October 28, 2011,
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/tv-company-at-centre-of-global-news-fixing-row-goes-into-administration-2376943.html.
[38] "Govt Paid US Writers for Covert Campaign," FMT News, March 2, 2013, http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2013/03/02/govt-paid-us-writers-to-handle-covert-campaign/.
[39] "Publications Act to be Amended to Address Loopholes," Star Online, January 26, 2011, http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/1/26/nation/7873307&sec=nation.
[40] Committee to Protect Journalists, "CPJ Welcomes Malaysian Reform Vow," news alert, September 16, 2011, http://cpj.org/2011/09/cpj-welcomes-malaysian-reform-vow.php.
[41] Jerrenn Lam, "Malaysia: Bersih 2.0 Rally Rattles the Government," Global Voices, July 11, 2011, http://globalvoicesonline.org/2011/07/11/malaysia-bersih-2-0-rally-rattles-the-government/; Joshua Ongys, "Statistics on Bersih 2.0 Rally – Malaysia 9 July 2011," Joshuaongys, July 9, 2011, http://joshuaongys.com/2011/07/bersih-2-0-rally-malaysia-9-july-2011-online-social-media-statistics-youtube-facebook-twitter/.
[42] Jerrenn Lam, "Malaysia: Thousands Joined Bersih 3.0 Protest," Global Voices, April 30, 2012, http://globalvoicesonline.org/2012/04/30/malaysia-thousands-joined-bersih-3-0-protest/.
[43] Reporters Without Borders, "Major Protest Prompts Attacks on Journalists, Censorship and Missing Media Replaced by Civil Society," May 5, 2012, http://en.rsf.org/malaisie-major-protest-prompts-attacks-on-05-05-2012,42567.html.
[44] "100,000 Throng Stadium Merdeka for 'Uprising' Rally," Malaysiakini, January 12, 2013, http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/218741; Human Rights Watch, "Malaysia: Backsliding on Rights," press release, February 1, 2013, http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/02/01/malaysia-backsliding-rights.
[45] OpenNet Initiative, "Country Profile—Malaysia."
[46] Bhag Singh, "Criminal Offence," Star Online, July 29, 2008, http://bit.ly/1hfKwhc.
[47] Abdul Latiff Ahmad et al., "Regulating Blogs in Malaysia," The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, Vol. 16(3), 2011, http://www.innovation.cc/scholarly-style/latiff_ahamad_regulating_malasian_blogs16v2i11a.pdf.
[48] Eva Galperin, "This Week in Internet Censorship: Points system for Weibo, Activist Released in Bahrain, Censorship in Malaysia, Ethiopia, and More," Electronic Frontier Foundation, May 31, 2012, https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/week-internet-censorship-points-system-weibo-activist-released-bahrain-censorship.
[49] Teoh El Sen, "Pakatan Seeks to Halt New Evidence Act," Free Malaysia Today, June 28, 2012, http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2012/06/28/pakatan-seeks-to-halt-new-evidence-act/.
[50] Parliament of Malaysia, "Act to amend the Evidence Act 1950, 2012," http://www.parlimen.gov.my/files/billindex/pdf/2012/DR162012E.pdf.
[51] A. Asohan, "Govt Stealthily Gazettes Evidence Act Amendment, Law is Now in Operation," Digital News Asia, August 8, 2012, http://www.digitalnewsasia.com/digital-economy/govt-stealthily-gazettes-evidence-act-amendment-law-is-now-in-operation.
[52] "Malaysia Detains 'Dissent' Writer," BBC News, September 23, 2008, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7630789.stm.
[53] Parliament of Malaysia, "Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012," http://www.parlimen.gov.my/files/billindex/pdf/2012/DR152012E.pdf.
[54] Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012.
[56] Shahanaaz Habib, "A Matter of Trial and Error," Star Online, April 22, 2012, http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/4/22/nation/11153338&sec=nation.
[57] International Freedom of Expression eXchange, "Government Hounds Bloggers That Criticise Royalty," news alert, March 25, 2009, http://www.ifex.org/malaysia/2009/03/25/government_hounds_bloggers_that/.
[58] Centre for Independent Journalism, "Debate on Royal Powers Draws Attacks and Threats; Bloggers Ahiruddin Attan and Jed Yoong Questioned by Police," via International Freedom of Expression eXchange, March 4, 2009, http://www.ifex.org/malaysia/2009/03/04/capsule_report_debate_on_royal/.
[59] Centre for Independent Journalism, "Six People Charged with 'Insulting' Royalty Online," International Freedom of Expression eXchange, March 16, 2009, http://www.ifex.org/malaysia/2009/03/16/six_people_charged_with_insulting/.
[60] Teh Eng Hock, "Raja Petra Can't Be Tried in Britain," Star Online, May 26, 2010, http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2010/5/26/nation/6340987&sec=nation. K. Kabilan, "RPK: 1Malaysia Will Be Najib's Downfall," Free Malaysia Today, May 25, 2010, http://politicalwatchmalaysia.blogspot.com/2010/05/rpk-1malaysia-will-be-najibs-downfall.html; "Perkasa Makes Police Report Against Raja Petra," Malaysia Today, January 7, 2010, http://malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/newscommentaries/29452-perkasa-makes-police-report-against-raja-petra.
[61] "Malaysian Blogger Charged with Insulting Dead Sultan," China Post, January 31, 2010, http://www.chinapost.com.tw/asia/malaysia/2010/01/31/243065/Malaysian-blogger.htm; Sarban Singh, "Blogger pleads not Guilty to Insulting Johor Royals (Update)," Star Online, January 29, 2010, http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2010/1/29/nation/20100129170602&sec=nation.
[62] Only one blogger was held for 24 hours in March 2011. See, "Blogger 'Arrested' at Midnight Under Sedition Act," Malaysia Today, March 19, 2011, http://malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/from-around-the-blogs/38903-blogger-arrested-at-midnight-under-sedition-act.
[63] G. Vinod, "PAS Member: I Did Not Threaten to Kill Saiful," Free Malaysia Today, May 19, 2010, http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/fmt-english/news/general/5771-pas-member-i-did-not-threaten-to-kill-saiful; Nerea Rial, "Malaysian Arrested Over Facebook Insults," New Europe Online, November 5, 2012, http://www.neurope.eu/article/malaysian-arrested-over-facebook-insults; Susan Loone, "Ahmad Subjected to Daily Grilling of 8-9 Hours," Malaysiakini, November 10, 2012, http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/213941.
[64] Committee to Protect Journalists, "In Detaining Blogger, Malaysia Invokes Secrets Act," news alert, July 11, 2012, http://www.cpj.org/2012/07/in-detaining-blogger-malaysia-invokes-secrets-act.php.
[65] Soon Li Tsin, "Bloggers Sued for Defamation," Malaysiakini, January 18, 2007, http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/62257.
[66] International Freedom of Expression eXchange, "Opposition Blogger Ordered to Pay Exorbitant Damages to Minister," news alert, July 22, 2011, http://www.ifex.org/malaysia/2011/07/22/amizudin_defamation_suit/; http://en.rsf.org/malaysia-opposition-blogger-ordered-to-pay-20-07-2011,40659.html.
[67] "Blogger Sues DAP's Nga for Defamation," September 22, 2012, Bernama, via Malaysian Insider, http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/litee/malaysia/article/blogger-sues-daps-nga-for-defamation/.
[68] "Malaysian Cartoonist Goes into Hiding After Sedition Arrest," RFI English, September 28, 2010, http://www.english.rfi.fr/asia-pacific/20100928-malaysian-cartoonist-goes-hiding-after-sedition-arrest.
[69] K. Pragalath, "Partial Victory for Cartoonist Zunar," Free Malaysia Today, July 31, 2012, http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2012/07/31/partial-victory-for-cartoonist-zunar/; Tom Spurgeon, "CR Holiday Interview #7: Zunar," Comics Reporter, December 27, 2010, http://www.comicsreporter.com/index.php/cr_holiday_interview_7_zunar/.
[70] Reporters Without Borders, "Court's Ruling on Cartoonist's Suit Sets Disturbing Precedent for Media Freedom," July 31, 2012, http://en.rsf.org/malaisie-court-s-ruling-on-cartoonist-s-31-07-2012,43134.html.
[71] In August 2010, the right–wing group Perkasa lodged a complaint against blogger Helen Ang for authoring an article that questioned the position of Islam in Malaysia; as of 2013, the case was still pending, but observers felt it was unlikely the attorney general would pursue it. "Perkasa Lodges Report Against Blogger," Malaysian Insider, August 9, 2010, http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/perkasa-lodges-report-against-blogger/.
[72] Committee to Protect Journalists, "Malaysia Deports Saudi Arabian Columnist," news alert, February 13, 2012, http://www.cpj.org/2012/02/malaysia-deports-saudi-arabian-columnist.php.
[73] Lim Yung-Hui, "Malaysian IT Community Response to Board of Computing Professionals Malaysia Bill 2011: Where's the Beef?," Forbes, December 12, 2011, http://www.forbes.com/sites/limyunghui/2011/12/12/malaysian-it-community-response-to-board-of-computing-professionals-bill-2011-wheres-the-beef/; Vijandren Ramadass, "Computing Professionals Bill 2011 – Draft," Lowyat, December 9, 2011, http://www.lowyat.net/v2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5800&Itemid=2.
[74] "MCA: Computing Professionals Bill Will Stifle Talent Growth," New Straits Times, December 21, 2011, http://www.nst.com.my/latest/mca-computing-professionals-bill-will-stifle-talent-growth-1.22120.
[75] "Dec 15 Registration Deadline Stays: MCMC," Bernama, August 18, 2006, http://www.bernama.com/kpdnhep/news.php?id=214811&lang=en.
[76] Privacy International, "Privacy in Asia: Final Report of Scoping Project," November 2009, https://www.privacyinternational.org/issues/asia/privacy_in_asia_phase_1_report.pdf.
[77] Rebekah Heacock, "Malaysia: Government's Free E-mail Plan Met with Opposition," OpenNet Initiative (blog), April 26, 2011, http://opennet.net/blog/2011/04/malaysia-governments-free-e-mail-plan-met-with-opposition.
[78] Economic Transformation Programme Report 2012, 187.
[79] Mickey Spiegel, "Smoke and Mirrors: Malaysia's "New" Internal Security Act," Asia Pacific Bulletin, no. 167, East West Center (June 2012), http://www.eastwestcenter.org/publications/smoke-and-mirrors-malaysias-new-internal-security-act.
[80] Barry Ooi, "How the Personal Data Protection Act Impacts the Market Research Industry," December 29, 2012, http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/12/29/business/12511744&sec=business.
[81] Morgan Marquis-Boire et al., "You Only Click Twice: FinFisher's Global Proliferation," Citizen Lab, March 13, 2013, https://citizenlab.org/2013/03/you-only-click-twice-finfishers-global-proliferation-2/.
[82] The contested report: Boo Su-Lyn, "Malaysia Uses Spyware Against Own Citizens, NYT Reports," Malaysian Insider, March 14, 2013, http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/Malaysia-uses-spyware-against-own-citizens-NYT-reports. The original New York Times report: Nicole Perlroth, Researchers Find 25 Countries Using Surveillance Software," New York Times (blog), March 13, 2013, http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/13/researchers-find-25-countries-using-surveillance-software/.
[83] "Short Background: Citizen Lab Research on FinFisher Presence in Malaysia," Citizen Lab, May 2013, https://citizenlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/shortbg-malaysia1.pdf.
[84] Committee to Protect Journalists, "Journalists Assaulted, Detained During Rally in Malaysia," April 30, 2012, http://www.cpj.org/2012/04/journalists-assaulted-detained-during-rally-in-mal.php.
[85] "New Radio Station Under DDOS Attack, Free Malaysia Today, March 26, 2013, http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2013/03/26/new-radio-station-under-ddos-under-attack/.
[86] Human Rights Watch, "Malaysia: Violence, Cyber Attacks Threaten Elections," May 1, 2013, http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/05/01/malaysia-violence-cyber-attacks-threaten-elections. See also, Shawn Crispin, "Internet Opening is Shrinking," Attacks on the Press, Committee to Protect Journalists (Wiley: New York, February 2013), http://cpj.org/2013/02/attacks-on-the-press-internet-opening-is-shrinking.php.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Our RF-SOI substrates bring RF performance to front-end module devices and are key to supporting 3G, 4G/LTE, LTE-Advanced and future network (5G) requirements enabling faster and more reliable data transmissions.
Over the years, we have moved from simple text messages to live video transmission over our smartphones. Tomorrow with 5G, increased data speed will allow also vehicle to vehicle communication, virtual reality, smart home and more.
The front-end module plays a key role in reaching these performance levels.
Smartphones are integrating very diverse functions including radio emission and reception, digital processing, memory, audio, battery management, camera and display.
The front-end module enables RF signal transmission and reception between a cellular phone and a base station.
Each generation requires more devices and higher performance in the front-end module.
Because RF-SOI can bring better linearity and insertion loss at the best cost/performance trade-off, it enables higher data speeds, longer battery life and fewer dropped calls.
Our RF-SOI products have become a standard of the industry.
They are produced in high-volume manufacturing to manufacture ICs for RF front-end modules while matching chip makers' cost and performance requirements.
Our substrates enable high RF performance on silicon films compatible with standard CMOS processes, high linearity RF isolation and power signals, low RF loss, digital processing and power management integration.
Our product roadmap addresses the full spectrum of different performance requirements.
For devices with high linearity requirements.
RFeSI is our mainstream product line and typically targets LTE and LTE-Advanced specifications.
A trap-rich layer is added below the buried oxide to provide high RF performance.
RFeSI range of products addresses different performance requirements.
For devices with lower linearity requirements.
HR-SOI products typically target 2G and 3G specifications.
For devices with ultra-high linearity requirement.
The top layers of a CMOS processed wafer is transferred onto an high-performance RF substrate.
Compatible with a wide range of substrates including glass, AlN, fused silica, and more.


text:
Canada's first IBM Watson IoT hackathon to be hosted by Toronto's Connected Lab
By Rose Behar
May 10, 20167:00 AM EDT
Toronto software company Connected Lab is hosting Canada's first hackathon on the IBM Watson IoT platform. The hackathon will focus on the development of conversational interfaces, or chatbots, for smart devices.
"People are excited about chatbots because they see the potential to interact with technology using conversational language," said Damian McCabe, vice president of engineering at Connected Lab in a press release issued today, noting that IBM Watson's AI capabilities add unique development opportunities.
"I'm excited about the potential of the IBM Watson's cognitive capabilities including natural language processing and machine learning," McCabe said.
Connected Lab emerged out of "stealth mode," in November, built by former Xtreme Labs employees who developed software for apps and platforms such as Uber, Facebook Messenger, BBM and Twitter.
In the release McCabe stated he believed bots were the way of the future: "People will always use a few standalone apps. But a lot of information and services can be more easily accessed through a conversational interface rather than hundreds of app icons on your home screen."
The "Watson-powered Chatbots for Smart Devices Hackathon," will be held the weekend of June 3 to June 5, 2016.
Related reading: Facebook bets on Messenger chatbots at F8 developer conference keynote
[source]CNW[/source]


text:
APRA measures push investors out, let first-home buyers in
APRA's efforts to clamp down on investor lending are taking effect, with the latest data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics showing that as investor lending declines, first-home buyers are increasing their presence in the housing market.
Malcolm Gunning, president REIA.
"The proportion of first home buyers, as part of the total owner-occupied housing finance commitments, increased to 17.4 per cent and is the highest proportion since November," said REIA president, Malcolm Gunning.
Source: CommSec.
However, Cameron Kusher, head of research with CoreLogic, noted that the number of first-home buyer housing finance commitments fell 1.1 per cent in NSW and 5.0 per cent in Victoria in September, following large increases during the previous two months.
"The value of investment housing commitments decreased by 0.5 per cent in September in trend terms, following falls in the previous four months and is well down from its 2015 peak," said Gunning.
The seasonally adjusted figures for the value of housing finance commitments to investors fell a whopping 6.2 per cent, the largest monthly fall since September 2015.
"Overall the figures for September 2017 show, in trend terms, that the number of owner-occupied finance commitments increased by 0.7 per cent," said Gunning.
"In trend terms, the number of established dwellings purchase commitments increased by 0.7 per cent while new dwelling construction increased by 0.4 per cent and the purchase of new dwellings increased by 1.4 per cent," said Gunning.
"It is pleasing to see the increased presence of first home buyers," said Gunning.
"The figures show that owner occupiers and first home buyers responding to more stable conditions and, in the case of first home buyers, state government incentives."
Click here to view the ABS housing finance data.
Read more about housing finance in Australia:
Affordability is improving, and first-home buyers are back in the market
First-home buyers are back in the market
First-home buyers at highest levels since 2013: REIA
Malcolm Gunning REIA Cameron Kusher CoreLogic first home buyer investor lending apra measures to contain investor lending


text:
GOP seeks to loosen labor's grip
Legislation would require workers to reaffirm unions with votes every 3 years
Orrin G. Hatch
By Tim Devaney - The Washington Times - Sunday, January 29, 2012
In an effort to loosen labor's grip on workers, two GOP lawmakers want legislation that would require workers to re-affirm the existence of their unions with new votes every three years.
Sen. Orrin G. Hatch of Utah and Rep. Tim Scott of South Carolina are pushing the Employee Rights Act that also would place limits on strikes, how fast a union can organize and how membership fees may be used to support political candidates. The bill has yet to receive a committee hearing in either chamber.
"It's neither anti-union, nor pro-employer," Mr. Hatch told The Washington Times. "It's pro-worker."
The move comes as unions are showing new signs of a turnaround in growth. The number of members spiked by about 50,000 workers to nearly 14.8 million in 2011, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That follows two years of declining membership, during which unions lost nearly 1.4 million workers.
Conservative groups are joining in the fight to handicap unions. The Center for Union Facts recently started running a $10 million campaign to promote the bill. The advertisements are running in the District and were aired nationally on Fox News during the South Carolina presidential primary debate.
Supporters of the bill are taking a new approach. Rather than pitting unions against businesses, they are spinning it as unions against workers.
"There's not a single provision in this bill that will empower employers at the expense of the union," Mr. Hatch said. "The only parties whose position will be improved by the Employee Rights Act are employees."
They paint a picture of workers in the middle of a spectrum, surrounded by businesses on the right and unions on the left.
"It's about time we start worrying about the employees and the workers, rather than unions and management people," Mr. Hatch said. "It is fair to both employers and unions, and, far more importantly, it's fair to workers."
Secret-ballot elections, instead of card checks, would be the voting method of choice under the Employee Rights Act, which was introduced last August in both chambers.
Few workers - less than 10 percent of union members - vote to organize. Instead, most workers join an existing union as a condition of employment.
This bill, however, would give workers a chance to voice their opinions. Union officials would be up for re-election every three years. At that time, employees could decide whether to keep or eliminate their union.
"My goal is to make sure that employees of a company make the decision on joining unions," Mr. Scott said. "This just gives them an opportunity to say, 'Yes, I want to be a part of the union.' "
"Voters get to choose senators every six years, they decide on the president every four years, and on me every two years," he said. "To me, it makes sense that union members should decide on their leaders at least every three years."
Mr. Hatch agreed.
"I think the right of an individual to not join a union is just as essential as the right to unionize," he said.
In the instances of nonunion workplaces that want to organize, the bill would require a minimum of 40 days between the time a petition is filed and a vote is taken. That would give employees time to hear from both unions and employers before they decide.
This provision comes in response to the National Labor Relations Board's recent decision to speed up union elections, including in some cases to less than 10 days.
"Nobody has enough time in 10 days to decide the benefits and the negatives of joining a union," Mr. Scott said.
The bill would also combat strikes. It would streamline the federal process, requiring a majority of union members to approve a strike.
"Strikes can be damaging," Mr. Hatch said. "Employees lose work and may not get back to work. Shouldn't they at least have a chance to vote on whether to go on strike?"
He pointed out that strike funds, which provide financial assistance to union members during work stoppages, rarely pay more than 20 percent of an employee's salary. And they usually have to be actively involved in the strike, such as on the picket line, to get that money.
Unions also would be required to receive written consent from each member before donating portions of their membership fees to political candidates. This would be determined individually, member by member, so some members could agree to support a certain candidate, and others could decide against it. Their money would be split up.
Union membership is split fairly evenly between Democrats (49 percent) and Republicans (47 percent). But 93 percent of campaign contributions go to Democratic candidates.
"I'd like anyone who would oppose this provision to explain to me why it is fair to force workers to contribute to political campaigns at all, regardless of the party on the receiving end," Mr. Hatch told the Senate when he introduced the bill in August.
The penalities would also be updated, so unions that violate labor laws are held to the same disciplinary measures as businesses that do so.
"We've all heard the accounts of unions obtaining signatures through deception and intimidation," Mr. Hatch said.
The AFL-CIO and SEIU did not respond to requests for comment.


text:
Q: How to remove video black bands in videoView with LibVlcSharp? when I play a video with video, it presents black bands in the top and bottom part of the video, like in image in the URL
https://imgur.com/a/JiUv8rt. I'd like to remove the bands and display just the video in an absolute layout. how can I reach my goal?
<pages:PopupPage xmlns="http://xamarin.com/schemas/2014/forms"
             xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2009/xaml"
             xmlns:d="http://xamarin.com/schemas/2014/forms/design"
             xmlns:pages="clr-namespace:Rg.Plugins.Popup.Pages;assembly=Rg.Plugins.Popup"
             xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
             mc:Ignorable="d"
             xmlns:animations="clr-namespace:Rg.Plugins.Popup.Animations;assembly=Rg.Plugins.Popup"
             xmlns:shared="clr-namespace:LibVLCSharp.Forms.Shared;assembly=LibVLCSharp.Forms"
             x:Class="App.Pages.WebcamVideoPopUpPage"
             BackgroundColor="Transparent">
    <pages:PopupPage.Animation>
        <animations:ScaleAnimation
            PositionIn="Center"
            PositionOut="Center"
            ScaleIn="1.2"
            ScaleOut="0.8"
            DurationIn="400"
            DurationOut="300"
            EasingIn="SinOut"
            EasingOut="SinIn"
            HasBackgroundAnimation="True"/>
    </pages:PopupPage.Animation>

    <AbsoluteLayout x:Name="AbsoluteLayoutWebcam"
                    HorizontalOptions="FillAndExpand"
                    VerticalOptions="FillAndExpand">

        <shared:VideoView x:Name="VideoViewWebcam"
                          AbsoluteLayout.LayoutFlags="All"
                          AbsoluteLayout.LayoutBounds="0, 0, 1, 1"
                          MediaPlayer ="{Binding MediaPlayer}"
                          MediaPlayerChanged ="VideoView_MediaPlayerChanged"/>

        <Label x:Name="DescriptionWebcam"
               AbsoluteLayout.LayoutFlags="All"
               AbsoluteLayout.LayoutBounds="0, 0, 1, .2"
               HorizontalOptions="Fill"
               VerticalOptions="Fill"
               Text="{Binding InfoWebcam}"
               FontSize="Large"
               TextColor="White"/>

    </AbsoluteLayout>
</pages:PopupPage>

UPDATE
I update at latest pre-release as @mtz suggested me, and I modified my code in the following way:
public partial class WebcamVideoPopUpPage : PopupPage
{
    public WebcamVideoPopUpPage()
    {
        var vm = App.Locator.WebCamVideoVM;
        this.BindingContext = vm;
        InitializeComponent();
        MediaPlayerWebcam.VideoView.MediaPlayerChanged += VideoView_MediaPlayerChanged;
        MediaPlayerWebcam.MediaPlayer.AspectRatio = "FitScreen";
    }

    protected override void OnAppearing()
    {
        base.OnAppearing();
        Messenger.Default.Send(new OnApperingVideoMessage());
    }

    private void VideoView_MediaPlayerChanged(object sender, LibVLCSharp.Shared.MediaPlayerChangedEventArgs e)
    {
        Messenger.Default.Send(new OnVideoViewInitializedMessage());
    }

    protected override void OnDisappearing()
    {
        base.OnDisappearing();
        MediaPlayerWebcam.MediaPlayer.Stop();
        MediaPlayerWebcam.MediaPlayer = null;

    }

}

My xaml:
<AbsoluteLayout x:Name="AbsoluteLayoutWebcam"
                HorizontalOptions="FillAndExpand"
                VerticalOptions="FillAndExpand">

    <shared:MediaPlayerElement x:Name="MediaPlayerWebcam"
                      AbsoluteLayout.LayoutFlags="All"
                      AbsoluteLayout.LayoutBounds="0, 0, 1, .4"
                      MediaPlayer ="{Binding MediaPlayer}"/>

    <Label x:Name="DescriptionWebcam"
           AbsoluteLayout.LayoutFlags="All"
           AbsoluteLayout.LayoutBounds="0, 0, 1, .2"
           HorizontalOptions="Fill"
           VerticalOptions="Fill"
           Text="{Binding InfoWebcam}"
           FontSize="Large"
           TextColor="White"/>

</AbsoluteLayout>

My viewModel:
public class WebcamVideoViewModel : BaseViewModel
{
    private LibVLC LibVLC { get; set; }

    private bool IsLoaded { get; set; }
    private bool IsVideoViewInitialized { get; set; }

    private Media Media { get; set; }

    private MediaPlayer _mediaPlayer;
    public MediaPlayer MediaPlayer
    {
        get { return _mediaPlayer; }
        set
        {
            _mediaPlayer = value;
            OnPropertyChanged();
        }
    }

    private string _InfoWebcam { get; set; }

    public string InfoWebcam
    {
        get { return _InfoWebcam; }

        set
        {
            _InfoWebcam = value;
            OnPropertyChanged();
        }
    }
    public WebcamVideoViewModel(INavigationService navigationService, IApiAutostradeManagerFactory apiAutostradeFactory) : base(navigationService, apiAutostradeFactory)
    {
        Messenger.Default.Register<InfoWebcamVideoMessage>(this, OnReceivedInfoWebcam);
        Messenger.Default.Register<OnApperingVideoMessage>(this, OnAppearing);
        Messenger.Default.Register<OnVideoViewInitializedMessage>(this, OnVideoViewInitialized);
        Task.Run(Initialize);
    }

    private void Initialize()
    {
        Core.Initialize();

        LibVLC = new LibVLC();
        MediaPlayer = new MediaPlayer(LibVLC);

    }

    private async void OnReceivedInfoWebcam(InfoWebcamVideoMessage msg)
    {
        var response = await ApiManager.GetVideoWebcam(msg.Mpr, msg.Uuid);
        if (response.IsSuccessStatusCode)
        {
            InfoWebcam = msg.T_Description_webcam;
            var stream = await response.Content.ReadAsStreamAsync();
            Media = new Media(LibVLC, stream);

            Play();
        }
    }

    public void OnAppearing(OnApperingVideoMessage msg)
    {
        IsLoaded = true;

    }

    public void OnVideoViewInitialized(OnVideoViewInitializedMessage msg)
    {
        IsVideoViewInitialized = true;
    }

    private void Play()
    {
        if (IsLoaded && IsVideoViewInitialized)
        {
            MediaPlayer.Play(Media);

        }
    }

}

Now i'm closer to solution because videoView is resizable with the button present at bootm, but I'd like to get at start the fill AspectRatio and I don't want anything expect the video(In other words, I'd want to remove seek bar and resize video button). Another problem is that after I close mediaPlayer, and I open again a new video, my app crashes. Any advice?

A: You need to change the aspect ratio to "fill the screen".
See how to here: https://github.com/videolan/libvlcsharp/blob/91b8f06ee1bedd9b3219a4e9ade0a9c44f59fda8/LibVLCSharp.Forms/Shared/PlaybackControls.xaml.cs#L926 or use the latest pre-release LibVLCSharp.Forms package that contains the MediaPlayerElement which has this feature built-in (soon in stable version).

A: What you just trying is to stretch the video. But remember it will effect video quality.
To remain simple, you can try this working and tested code:
MediaPlayerWebcam.MediaPlayer.AspectRatio = $"{MediaPlayerWebcam.Width.ToString()}:{MediaPlayerWebcam.Height.ToString()}";
MediaPlayerWebcam.Scale = 0;

A: My scenario is a fullscreen player, I do it with these codes refer to LibVLCSharp.Forms, hope it will be helpful. the code deal with fullscreen(commented) or fill screen with video.
    public void PlayerFullScreen()
    {
        //restore
        if (_isFullScreen)
        {
            RestoreDefaultWindowInfo();
            _isFullScreen = false;
            _mediaPlayer.Scale = _originalScale;   //reset
            _mediaPlayer.AspectRatio = _originalAspectRatio;
            //Mouse.Capture(null);
            playerBar.Visibility = Visibility.Visible;
        }
        else  // fullscreen(stretch video)
        {
            this.WindowStyle = WindowStyle.None;
            this.ResizeMode = ResizeMode.NoResize;
            this.Left = 0;
            this.Top = 0;
            this.Width = SystemParameters.VirtualScreenWidth;
            this.Height = SystemParameters.VirtualScreenHeight;
            //this.Topmost = true;
            _isFullScreen = true;
            _originalScale = _mediaPlayer.Scale;   // save original
            _originalAspectRatio = _mediaPlayer.AspectRatio;

            playerBar.Visibility = Visibility.Collapsed;

            MediaTrack? mediaTrack;
            try
            {
                mediaTrack = _mediaPlayer.Media?.Tracks?.FirstOrDefault(x => x.TrackType == TrackType.Video);
            }
            catch (Exception)
            {
                mediaTrack = null;
            }
            if (mediaTrack == null || !mediaTrack.HasValue)
            {
                return;
            }

            //get windows scale factor(DPI)
            PresentationSource source = PresentationSource.FromVisual(this);
            double dpiX=1.0, dpiY=1.0;
            if (source != null)
            {
                dpiX = source.CompositionTarget.TransformToDevice.M11;
                dpiY = source.CompositionTarget.TransformToDevice.M22;
            }

            var displayW = this.Width * dpiX;
            var displayH = this.Height * dpiY;
            var videoSwapped = mediaTrack.Value.Data.Video.Orientation == VideoOrientation.LeftBottom ||
                                        mediaTrack.Value.Data.Video.Orientation == VideoOrientation.RightTop;

            var videoW = mediaTrack.Value.Data.Video.Width;
            var videoH = mediaTrack.Value.Data.Video.Height;

            if (videoSwapped)
            {
                var swap = videoW;
                videoW = videoH;
                videoH = swap;
            }
            if (mediaTrack.Value.Data.Video.SarNum != mediaTrack.Value.Data.Video.SarDen)
                videoW = videoW * mediaTrack.Value.Data.Video.SarNum / mediaTrack.Value.Data.Video.SarDen;

            var ar = videoW / (float)videoH;
            var dar = displayW / (float)displayH;

            float scale;
            if (dar >= ar)
                scale = (float)displayW / videoW; /* horizontal */
            else
                scale = (float)displayH / videoH; /* vertical */

            //keep ratio of width/height, not fill the srceen
            //_mediaPlayer.Scale = scale;         // 这是保持视频宽高比的,视频不会变形
            //_mediaPlayer.AspectRatio = string.Empty;//这是保持视频宽高比的,视频不会变形

            //这是视频变形适配屏幕的情况(满屏)
            //fill all the screen by video,video is streched
            float xscale, yscale;
            xscale = (float)(displayW / videoW);
            yscale = (float)(displayH / videoH);
            _mediaPlayer.Scale = (xscale<yscale)? xscale:yscale;
            string aspectRatio = String.Format("{0}:{1}",
                    this.Width,this.Height);
            _mediaPlayer.AspectRatio = aspectRatio;

        }
    }

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


the sale of yourmedical information.
We will protect medical information as much as we can under the law.Sometimes state law gives more protection to medical information than federal law. Sometimes federal law gives more protection than state law. In each case, we will apply the laws that protect medical information the most.
Treatment: We will use and share medical information about you for purposes oftreatment. An example is sending medical information about you to your doctor or to a specialist as part of a referral.
Research:We may share medical information about you for research projects, such as studying the effectiveness of a treatment you received. We will usually get your written permission to use or share medical information for research. Under certain circumstances we may share medical information about you without your written permission. These research projects, however, must go through a special process that protects the confidentiality of your medical information.
Public Health: We may disclose your health information as required or permitted by law to public health authorities or government agencies whose official activities include preventing or controlling disease, injury, or disability. For example, we must report certain information about births, deaths, and various diseases to government agencies. We may use your health information in order to report to monitoring agencies any reactionsto medications or problems with medical devices. We may also disclose, when requested, information about you to public health agencies that track outbreaks of contagious diseases or that are involved with preventing epidemics.
Family Members, Personal Representative, and Others Involved in Your Care: Unless you tell us otherwise, we may share medical information about you with friends, family members, or others you have named who help with your care or who can make decisions on your behalf about your healthcare .
If you think your privacy rights may have been violated, you may contact the Dignity Health Compliance Office Hotline at 800-443-1986 or by email at privacy.office@dignityhealth.org. Finally, you may send a written complaint to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Civil Rights. Our Facility Compliance Office can provide you the address. We will not take any action against you for filing a complaint.
In subscribing to the My Health Newsletter, My Health Reminders, My Baby Expectations and/or My Health Links, (collectively, the "Service"), and in providing the information in the prior subscription webpage (the "Information"), I hereby authorize the use and disclosure of the Information to both Private Health News, Inc. ("PHN") and Dignity Health, the organization operating this website ("Medical Facility"). Medical Facility may use and disclose the Information in accordance with the Patient Privacy Notice. PHN will receive and use the Information to provide the Service. I understand that the Service is without cost to me and that Medical Facility will not receive remuneration from PHN or any third party for the use or disclosure of my Information. This authorization is voluntary and my refusal to provide the Information will not affect my right to receive health care at Medical Facility, but any refusal will affect my ability to receive the Service. I may revoke this authorization at anytime by unsubscribing from the Service. Any such revocation shall not have any effect on disclosures of the Information by Medical Facility to PHN occurring prior to the revocation and will not limit PHNs use of the Information. I understand that the Information I provided could be re-disclosed by PHN and such re-disclosure is in some cases no longer protected by federal confidentiality law (HIPAA) or by state law. I also understand that if I have any questions about this authorization, I may contact the Medical Facility's Privacy Office identified in the Patient Privacy Notice. Otherwise, all of my questions have been answered to my satisfaction and I fully understand the terms of this authorization form and have had the opportunity to print out a copy if I so desire. This authorization is valid as of today's date and shall expire when I unsubscribe from the Service.
The hyperlinks below are provided as notice to any physician and others who has been granted access via Dignity Health's Network (including its EMRs, and more particularly, through Cerner's Community View) to one or more electronic gateways and health information exchanges or receive the benefit of health data flowing through them (collectively, "Electronic Gateways"). Dignity Health has entered into contracts to have or permit access to such Electronic Gateways. Some of the contracts require specific compliance by not just Dignity Health but also by those physicians and others who use or benefit from the Electronic Gateways. Such contracts are available for your careful review at the hyperlinks below.
If you have any questions about these contracts, you may should use the online "Contact Us" forms also at the hyperlinks above.