"trust" means a trust over which the court has jurisdiction under Article 5 of the Trusts (Jersey) Law 1984.
(j) an entity that is substantially similar to an entity mentioned in any of sub-paragraphs (a) to (h), but is established under the law of a jurisdiction other than Jersey.
(2) The Minister may by Order add sub-paragraphs to paragraph (1).
(ii) at least one governor is a natural person resident in Jersey, or is itself a Jersey entity by virtue of sub-paragraph (a).
(g) in any other case, any instrument or instruments (in whatever form) that establish the entity or give it any powers.
(e) in relation to an entity that is a body incorporated by (but not under) any other Law, that Law.
(d) in the case of any other entity, a purpose to which that entity's property may lawfully be applied, other than by virtue of an order of a court, in accordance with the powers of the entity as set out in its constitution (including on its winding up or other termination).
(e) in any other case, a person who, under the constitution of the entity, has the general control and management of the administration of the entity.
(ii) provides for the entity to have a management committee.
(b) a person is a governor whether that person has that general control and management alone or as one of a number of governors.
(vi) under the law of a jurisdiction other than Jersey, being an offence similar to any of those listed in clauses (i) to (v).
(1) There is established a corporation sole to be known as the Jersey Charity Commissioner.
(2) Schedule 1 makes further provision in respect of the Commissioner.
(g) any other function conferred on the Commissioner by this Law or by any other enactment.
(2) The Commissioner may do anything (other than acting as a governor of a charity or of an entity with charitable purposes) that is calculated to facilitate, or is conducive or incidental to, the performance of any of his or her functions.
(c) assist a body in any jurisdiction other than Jersey, that is equivalent to the Commissioner, or to the Attorney General, the court, the Comptroller or the JFSC, in the performance of that body's functions under the law of that jurisdiction.
(b) is proportionate as to the burdens imposed on, and supports the development of registered charities.
(b) in giving effect to those purposes, it provides (or, in the case of an applicant, provides or intends to provide) public benefit in Jersey or elsewhere to a reasonable degree.
(3) The Minister may by Order disapply paragraph (2) in relation to any entity or description of entity specified in the Order.
(4) The Commissioner must publish and maintain guidance on the determination of whether an entity meets the charity test.
(5) Any person, in determining whether an entity meets the charity test, must have regard to the guidance, and the Commissioner, the tribunal, a registered charity and a governor of a registered charity must have regard to the guidance when performing any other of their functions under this Law to which the guidance is relevant.
(b) publish a report on the Commissioner's views on the results of the consultation, and the reasons for the Commissioner's decision on the guidance in the light of those results.
(7) Within a reasonable time after issuing or amending guidance the Commissioner must provide to the Minister a copy of the issued or amended guidance and the report published under paragraph (6)(b).
(8) The Minister must lay a copy of the guidance and report so provided before the States as soon as practicable after the Minister receives the guidance and report.
(p) any other purpose that may reasonably be regarded as analogous to any of the purposes listed in sub-paragraphs (a) to (o).
(f) for the purposes of paragraph (1)(p), the advancement of any philosophical belief (whether or not involving belief in a god) is analogous to the purpose set out in paragraph (1)(c).
(b) add sub-paragraphs to paragraph (2) making explanatory provision in relation to any sub-paragraphs so added to paragraph (1).
(b) to alter the effect of paragraph (5).
(5) The purpose of advancing a political party or promoting a candidate for election to any office, whether in Jersey or elsewhere, is neither a charitable purpose nor a purpose ancillary or incidental to a charitable purpose, irrespective of whether it would otherwise fall within paragraph (1) or Article 5(1)(a)(ii).
(1) Paragraphs (2) and (3) apply to the Commissioner, the tribunal and the court when determining the question of whether an entity provides or intends to provide public benefit, for the purpose of Article 5(1)(b).
(b) if benefit is, or is likely to be, provided to a section of the public only, whether any condition on obtaining that benefit (including any charge or fee) is unduly restrictive.
(b) treat one particular natural person or a group of identified natural persons as being a section of the public, and accordingly must not treat an entity that benefits only such a person or persons as providing public benefit.
(4) The guidance published by the Commissioner under Article 5(4), must in particular give guidance on the determination of the question of whether an entity provides or intends to provide public benefit.
(1) The Commissioner must establish and maintain a register of charities.
(n) any other information prescribed by the Minister by Order.
(c) if neither sub-paragraph (a) nor (b) applies, the address in Jersey of one of the governors of the charity.
(e) such other matters as the Minister may prescribe by Order.
(d) any other document prescribed by the Minister by Order.
(d) any other element that may be prescribed by the Minister by Order.
(b) the applicant meets any other condition that may be prescribed by the Minister by Order, whether by reference to any other source of the entity's funds or on any other basis.
(c) may make provision under sub-paragraph (b) by reference to the exercise of discretion by the Commissioner, or in any other manner.
(b) supported by information and evidence to the satisfaction of the Commissioner.
(ii) that the charity should be treated as applying to be deregistered, on provision of any further information and evidence required for such an application.
(c) that there is no ground, prescribed under paragraph (3), on which the request must be refused or, in the case of a discretionary ground, on which the Commissioner considers the request should be refused.
(b) may proceed on the basis of the intention stated under paragraph (5).
(1) The Commissioner must make the public parts of the register available to the public on a website for inspection without charge.
(b) a charge determined and published by the Commissioner.
(4) Paragraph (5) applies if the Commissioner considers, in relation to a particular registered charity, that the safety or security of any person, property or premises would be significantly put at risk by public access to a matter entered on any section of the register in respect of that charity.
(5) The Commissioner may designate that matter as not being a public part of the register, in relation to that registered charity.
(1) An entity ("the applicant"), that wishes to have available to it the advantages of registration as a charity under this Law, may apply to be registered.
(ii) otherwise requested by the Commissioner in order to determine the application.
(b) make further provision as to the procedure for making an application.
(f) no other ground for refusal, prescribed under paragraph (7), applies or should be applied.
(5) If not so satisfied, the Commissioner must refuse to register the applicant.
(d) a registered charity, a governor of a registered charity, the tribunal and the court must have regard to the guidance when performing any of their functions under this Law to which the guidance is relevant.
(b) that a number or proportion of its governors are related to each other in prescribed ways.
(ii) applies to a prescribed description of applicant only subject to a modification prescribed by the Order, being a modification that appears to the Minister to give reasonable relief from the burden of that provision, having regard to the small size, or lack of resources or expertise of applicants of that description.
(b) on entering on the register a new or alternative registered name, under Article 12(5), issue a further such certificate confirming the new or alternative registered name and the date on which that name was entered on the register.
(b) request to be registered under that Law (by virtue of paragraph (11)).
(b) the JFSC must treat that request, with the information and documents, as an application for registration under that Law.
(b) allocate a number in respect of the registration, and enter that number ("the registration number") in the register.
(3) A registered charity may apply to the Commissioner for permission to change its registered name or to add an alternative registered name.
(4) The Commissioner must refuse permission if, in his or her opinion, any of the grounds in sub-paragraphs (a) to (d) of paragraph (1) applies in relation to the proposed name.
(5) If the Commissioner grants permission, and the registered charity notifies the Commissioner that it has changed or added the name accordingly, the Commissioner must enter on the register the new or alternative registered name.
(6) If a registered charity reports a matter relating to its registered name under Article 13(6)(b), the Commissioner may require the charity to apply to change its registered name under paragraph (3).
(ii) is not, in the opinion of the Commissioner, undesirable within the meaning of paragraph (1), in the context in which it is used.
(1) Paragraphs (2) to (4) apply while an entity is registered as a charity, and only cease to apply if the entity is deregistered.
(2) Any provision of the entity's constitution or constitutional Law is of no effect to the extent that it purports to permit an amendment of the purposes of the entity to include a purpose that is not charitable.
(b) obtaining the Commissioner's prior approval of the proposed amendment.
(b) if it requests the Commissioner's approval of a proposed amendment to that statement, provide evidence, to the satisfaction of the Commissioner, of a reason justifying that request.
(b) if, before it ceased to meet that condition, the Commissioner gave prior permission for it to remain entered in the restricted section on the basis of a different condition prescribed under that Article, that it meets that condition as specified in that permission.
(h) any other matter prescribed by the Minister by Order for this purpose.
(7) A registered charity must send an annual return to the Commissioner, containing information as to any matter falling within paragraph (6) arising during the year to which the return relates, and as to any other matter prescribed by the Minister by Order for this purpose.
(8) An Order under paragraph (7) may also make provision as to the format and timing of the annual return, the consequences of lateness, and the content of any entries to be made on the register in respect of the annual return.
(c) provide for the entry on the register by the Commissioner of the details included under sub-paragraph (a) in the charity's latest annual return, and of the statement provided under sub-paragraph (b).
(b) applies to a prescribed description of charity only subject to a modification prescribed by the Order, being a modification that appears to the Minister to give reasonable relief from the burden of that provision, having regard to the small size, or lack of resources or expertise of charities of that description.
(b) may apply to the Commissioner, with reasons, for permission to amend that statement.
(12) If the States make Regulations under Article 11(7), those Regulations may also make provision requiring a registered charity or its governors (or both) to avoid, or report and remedy, a situation arising at a time after registration, being a situation in which, if the charity were at that time applying for registration, there would be grounds under those Regulations to refuse that application.
(13) If a court-approved fidéicommis or an incorporated 1862 association becomes registered as a charity under this Law, paragraphs (2) and (3) do not apply to that registered charity to the extent that they are inconsistent with any order made, whether before or after registration under this Law, by the court under the Loi of 1862.
(b) that it is necessary or desirable to exercise the power for the purpose of protecting the property of the charity or securing a proper application of that property in accordance with the charity's registered charitable purposes and registered public benefit statement.
(2) The court may make any order that the court sees fit to remedy the misconduct, protect the property and secure its proper application.
(i) making such ancillary provision as the court thinks desirable.
(4) The court may, on the application of the Commissioner, the Attorney General, the registered charity or any person to whom the order was directed, amend or revoke any order made under this Article.
(b) despite anything in the constitution of the charity.
(6) The powers of the court under this Article are without prejudice to any power of the Commissioner to take any action under this Law in respect of any misconduct.
(1) An entity that is a registered charity may apply to the Commissioner to terminate the registration of the entity as a charity (to "deregister" the entity).
(2) An entity applying for deregistration must provide the Commissioner with any information or document requested by the Commissioner in relation to the entity's proposals for the continuation or winding up of the entity and for the application of any of its property remaining after deregistration.
(b) refuse to deregister the entity on grounds relating to the proposals mentioned in paragraph (2).
(d) any other circumstance prescribed by the Minister by Order applies.
(2) If the Commissioner is satisfied that an entity that is registered as a charity no longer exists, the Commissioner must, by written notice to any person purporting to be a governor of the entity or to be responsible for the winding up of the affairs of the entity, deregister the entity.
(b) must not assign the registered number of that entity to any other registered charity.
(d) determines that the deregistration should take effect retrospectively.
(3) The termination takes effect from the past date specified under paragraph (2)(c) for all purposes, including the purposes of any enactment relating to taxation, but subject to paragraph (4).
(4) An act, that occurred before the date of the giving of the notice under Article 16(1) or (2) is not rendered an offence merely by virtue of the operation of paragraph (3).
(5) Paragraphs (6) to (11) apply, after a charity is deregistered, if and so long as there remains any property of the charity that was acquired before it was deregistered (the "remaining property").
(6) The entity must continue to apply the remaining property for the purposes that were its registered charitable purposes immediately before deregistration (the "preserved charitable purposes"), and in accordance with the registered public benefit statement that was in effect immediately before deregistration (the "preserved public benefit statement").
(7) Despite any provision of the entity's constitution, or of the constitutional Law of the entity, the entity has no power to amend the preserved charitable purposes or preserved public benefit statement.
(8) The entity may apply to the court for an order amending the preserved charitable purposes or preserved public benefit statement, and the court may make such amending order, and any ancillary order, as it considers expedient to ensure that the remaining property continues to be applied for purposes that are, in the opinion of the court, charitable purposes and in a manner that, in the opinion of the court, provides public benefit.
(b) that it is necessary or desirable to exercise the power for the purpose of protecting the remaining property or securing a proper application of the remaining property for the preserved charitable purposes of the entity and in accordance with the preserved public benefit statement.
(10) A governor may not apply under paragraph (9) unless the governor has first given notice to the Attorney General of the governor's intention to do so and of the reasons for that intention.
(11) The Attorney General may at any time, by giving notice to the governor and the court, take over an application made by a governor under paragraph (9), and may then withdraw or proceed with the application as the Attorney General sees fit.
(b) complies with any direction, requirement, notice or duty imposed on it by or under this Law.
(b) observe the utmost good faith.
(3) The duties imposed by this Article apply despite any contrary provision in the constitution or the constitutional Law of the charity, except to any extent that such provision imposes a more onerous duty.
(ii) the governor actively conceals that misconduct or that intention, or fails within a reasonable time to take proper steps to protect or restore the property of the charity or to prevent the misconduct.
(h) falls within any other description that may be prescribed by the Minister by Order.
(2) A governor of an entity applying for registration, or of a registered charity, must report any reportable matter promptly to that entity or charity and to the Commissioner.
(3) A governor of an entity applying for registration must, if there is no reportable matter in relation to that governor, provide to the entity a declaration to that effect before the application is made.
(4) A governor of a registered charity must, if there is no reportable matter in relation to that governor, provide to the charity a declaration to that effect when notified by the charity that it is preparing its annual return.
(5) The entity must state in its application, and the registered charity must state in its annual return, that it has declarations from all of its governors who have not made a report under paragraph (2).
(6) An application for registration is not complete if the entity has not complied with paragraph (5).
(7) A registered charity that contravenes paragraph (5) must explain to the Commissioner the reason for the contravention.
(8) A person must not act as a governor of a registered charity at any time when the person is in breach of paragraph (2) or (4).
(ii) by notice in writing, entered in the register, give permission for the governor to act as a governor, either unconditionally or subject to any condition or time limit that appears to the Commissioner to be necessary.
(b) does so in either case in accordance with any condition on that permission.
(11) A person who without reasonable excuse contravenes paragraph (10) commits an offence and is liable to imprisonment for one year and to a fine.
(12) Paragraphs (10) and (11) are not to be construed as requiring an act to be treated as void or invalid merely by virtue of the act constituting a contravention of paragraph (10).
(13) If at any time the Commissioner suspects that a governor of a registered charity may have breached paragraph (2), the Commissioner may, without prejudice to any other of his or her powers, apply to the court to determine whether the governor is a fit and proper person to be a governor.
(f) any order ancillary to any such order.
(b) be made subject to any condition or time limit that appears to the court to be necessary or equitable.
(3) If it appears to the Commissioner or the Attorney General that it is or may be expedient in the public interest that a person should not, without the leave of the court, be a governor of or in any way whether directly or indirectly be concerned or take part in the management of a registered charity, the Commissioner or the Attorney General may apply to the court for an order to that effect against the person (a "disqualification order").
(b) the seriousness of a reportable matter in relation to the person.
(5) A disqualification order is to be for such period, not exceeding 15 years, as the court directs.
(6) A person who contravenes a disqualification order commits an offence and is liable to imprisonment for 2 years and to a fine.
(b) must not cause or permit another person to refer to the entity as being registered by the Commissioner.
(ii) to give to the entity any property or financial or other advantage.
(b) must not cause or permit another person to refer to the entity as a "charity".
(ii) to give any property or financial advantage to the entity.
(b) must not cause or permit another person to refer to the entity as a "charity" in connection with any of its activities in Jersey.
(7) Paragraphs (2), (4) and (6) apply whether or not the person making the reference is also the entity, and is referring to itself.
(8) The States may by Regulations prescribe exceptions to the prohibitions in paragraphs (1) to (6).
(9) An entity or other person, that contravenes paragraph (2), (4) or (6), commits an offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term of 2 years and to a fine.
(10) An entity, that contravenes paragraph (1), (3) or (5), commits an offence and is liable to a fine of level 3 on the standard scale.
(1) For the purpose of Article 21, an entity is an excepted foreign charity if it meets both the condition in paragraph (2) and the condition in paragraph (3).
(b) entitled, under the law of that jurisdiction, to refer to itself in that jurisdiction as a "charity" (or by any equivalent term in a language other than English that is used in that jurisdiction).
(b) is not a registered charity.
(4) The Minister may by Order prescribe that a specified entity is not required to meet the first condition, despite sub-paragraphs (a) and (b) of paragraph (2).
(5) The States may by Regulations amend paragraph (1), (2) or (3) to make different provision as to the conditions that are to be met.
(b) must not cause or permit another person to refer to the entity as a "Jersey charity".
(c) is wholly or mainly managed or controlled in or from within Jersey.
(4) Paragraphs (1) and (2) are subject to any exception prescribed by the States by Regulations.
(5) Paragraph (2) applies whether or not the person making the reference is also the entity, and is referring to itself.
(6) An entity that contravenes paragraph (1) commits an offence and is liable to a fine of level 3 on the standard scale.
(7) An entity or other person, that contravenes paragraph (2), commits an offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term of 2 years and to a fine.
(1) The States may by Regulations make provision restricting the use, other than by a registered charity, of any relevant term in relation to the soliciting of donations from the general public or from any prescribed description of persons.
(2) The relevant terms are "charitable", "public benefit" and any related term (other than "charity") specified as such in the Regulations.
(c) may provide for the Commissioner to issue guidance as to the operation of the Regulations.
(4) The Regulations may make it an offence to contravene a restriction imposed by the Regulations, being an offence carrying a penalty no greater than a fine.
(1) The Minister may by Order prescribe statements that must be made (including the manner in which they must be made) by a registered charity in relation to its registration in prescribed descriptions of document or publicity.
(d) provision as to whether and how the requirement applies to web pages and websites, and the responsibility of the charity for those pages or sites.
(b) to attend at such place and time as may be specified in the notice and answer questions that the Commissioner reasonably requires the person to answer for that purpose.
(b) a governor or former governor of a registered charity or of an entity that was formerly a registered charity.
(3) If a person from whom provision of a document is required under paragraph (1) claims a lien on any such document, the provision is without prejudice to the lien.
(b) if the document is not provided, require the person to whom the requirement was directed to state, to the best of the person's knowledge and belief, where the document is.
(b) if within that period proceedings to which the document is relevant are commenced against any person, until the conclusion of those proceedings.
(6) A person who requires a document retained under paragraph (4)(a) for the purpose of the person's business, and who requests that document, must be supplied with a copy as soon as practicable.
(7) A person who without reasonable excuse contravenes a requirement imposed on the person under paragraph (1) or (4), commits an offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term of 3 months and to a fine of level 3 on the standard scale.
(8) Nothing in this Article is to be construed as requiring the disclosure or production by a person to the Commissioner of information or documents that the person would in an action in court be entitled to refuse to disclose or produce on the grounds of legal professional privilege.
(9) A statement made by a person in compliance with a requirement imposed under this Article may not be used by the prosecution in evidence against the person in any criminal proceedings except proceedings under paragraph (7) or (10).
(10) A person commits an offence, and is liable to imprisonment for a term of 2 years and to a fine, if the person provides information to the Commissioner, knowing that it is false in a material particular and intending it to be used by the Commissioner for the purpose of an application for registration or for the purpose of determining whether to serve a required steps notice.
(b) is provided under this Article or not.
(e) a registered charity has ceased to meet the requirements of Article 11(4)(c) or (d).
(2) The Commissioner may serve written notice on any one or more of the relevant persons, within the meaning of paragraph (3), requiring steps specified in the notice to be taken by that person in a time specified in the notice, being steps that in Commissioner's opinion are appropriate to remedy the matter prompting service of the notice.
(b) the governors of the registered charity.
(4) If the notice is served by virtue of paragraph (1)(c) or (d), the steps required may include (subject to Article 28) the suspension, removal or replacement of the governor referred to in that paragraph.
(5) The Minister may by Order make further provision as to the procedure for, and restrictions on, serving a notice under this Article.
(b) to be organized in such a way that the supervision and discipline of the governors of the registered charity, in relation to the activities of the registered charity in Jersey (whether or not also in relation to activities elsewhere), is adequate to justify the application of paragraph (3).
(iii) an entity in Jersey that is similar to such a designated religious charity or to such an institution.
(3) A required steps notice served on an organized religious charity, or on a governor of such a charity, is invalid to the extent that it purports to impose a requirement to suspend, remove or replace a governor of that charity.
commits an offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term of 2 years and a fine if he or she discloses the information without the consent of the person to whom it relates and (where sub-paragraph (b) applies) the person from whom it was received.
(c) in the form of a summary or collection of information so framed as not to enable information relating to any particular person to be ascertained from it.
(1) The Commissioner must disclose information to the Comptroller, if required by the Comptroller for the purpose of enabling the Comptroller to discharge any of his or her functions in relation to the taxation of registered charities or other entities with any charitable purposes.
(2) The Commissioner must disclose information to the JFSC, if required by the JFSC for the purpose of enabling the JFSC to discharge any of its functions under the Non-Profit Organizations (Jersey) Law 2008.
(f) in any other circumstances prescribed by the States by Regulations.
(1) There is established a tribunal to be known as the Charity Tribunal.
(2) The function of the tribunal is to hear and determine appeals under this Part.
(3) Schedule 2 makes further provision in respect of the tribunal.
(b) to refuse to register the applicant in the restricted section of the register.
(e) to refuse to approve an amendment, proposed under Article 13(4)(b), to the charity's registered public benefit statement.
(3) A person on whom the Commissioner serves a notice under Article 26 or a required steps notice may appeal against the decision of the Commissioner to impose a requirement contained in the notice.
(4) The Attorney General may appeal against any decision of the Commissioner.
(b) if the appellant has an interest in the registered name of the applicant, that name was undesirable under Article 12(1).
(1) An appeal may be made to the tribunal on the ground that the decision of the Commissioner was wrong or unreasonable on its merits, the facts or the law.
(b) consider evidence that was put to the Commissioner or accept other evidence.
(c) make any recommendation to the Commissioner, as to the performance of his or her functions in connection with the subject matter of the appeal, that appears to the tribunal to be called for in the circumstances of the case.
(1) A party to an appeal to the tribunal, or the Attorney General, may appeal from the decision of the tribunal to the court on the ground that the decision was unreasonable having regard to all the circumstances of the case.
(2) The court, on determining the appeal, may remit the decision to the tribunal or to the Commissioner, substitute the court's decision for that of the tribunal or that of the Commissioner, or dismiss the appeal.
(3) The tribunal may refer any point of law to the court for the court to give a ruling on the point.
(4) The court may make such interim order on an appeal or reference as it thinks fit.
(1) Nothing in this Part is to be read as limiting the Commissioner's power to reconsider his or her own decisions or the decisions of his or her staff, whether at the request of any person or on the Commissioner's own motion.
(b) make such provision as to the giving of notice of decisions by the Commissioner or the tribunal, or of notice of reasons for such decisions, as appears to the Minister to be expedient for the purpose of enabling appeals to be brought within any time limits.
(3) If the court or tribunal substitutes its decision for any other decision, it may order that the substituted decision is to take effect for all purposes from any date appearing to the court or tribunal to be appropriate, whether that date is before, on or after the date of the original decision or of the court's or tribunal's own decision.
(4) If the court or tribunal makes an order under paragraph (3) that a substituted decision is to take effect from a date before the date of the order, an act, that occurred before the date of the order, is not rendered an offence merely by virtue of the operation of the order.
the person is also guilty of the offence and liable in the same manner as the partnership or body corporate to the penalty provided for that offence.
(2) Where the affairs of a body corporate are managed by its members, paragraph (1) applies in relation to acts and defaults of a member in connection with the member's functions of management as if the member were a director of the body corporate.
The Minister may by Order make further provision as to the service of any notice under this Law.
(1) An Order or Regulations under this Law may contain such transitional, consequential, incidental, supplementary or savings provisions, other than an amendment of this Law, as appear to the Minister or the States (as the case may be) to be necessary or expedient for the purposes of the Order or Regulations.
(2) A power under this Law to amend, by Regulations, any provision of this Law includes the power to make such transitional, consequential, incidental or supplementary amendments to any other provision of this Law as appears to the States to be necessary or expedient.
(1) Nothing in this Law is to be read as derogating from any power or function of the Attorney General, the Bailiff, or the court, being a power or function that exists independently of this Law (under customary law or otherwise), in respect of charities or of acts for charitable purposes (whether as defined in this Law or otherwise).
(2) The States may by Regulations make such other saving provision as appears to the States to be necessary or expedient for the purposes of this Law.
(3) The States may by Regulations make such transitional provision as appears to the States to be necessary or expedient for the purposes of the bringing into force of this Law.
(d) in paragraph 7(a) of Schedule 2, for the words "any charity or ecclesiastical body" there are substituted the words "any registered charity (within the meaning of the Charities (Jersey) Law 2014) or ecclesiastical body".
(b) in paragraph 1A of Schedule 6, in the definition "use for a relevant charitable purpose", after the word "charity" there are inserted the words "(within the meaning of paragraph 5(2) of Schedule 5)".
" 'charitable purposes' has the meaning given by the Charities (Jersey) Law 2014;".
(c) any enactment relating to taxation.
(2) The States may by Regulations amend any relevant enactment, to make such provision as the States consider necessary or expedient to enable any supervisory body, the JFSC and the Comptroller to disclose information to the Commissioner for the purposes of this Law.
(b) amend any other enactment (not including this Law) to make such consequential provision as the States consider necessary or expedient, in relation to a reference (direct or indirect) in that other enactment to charities or charitable purposes or related terms.
(1) This Law may be cited as the Charities (Jersey) Law 2014.
(2) Parts 1 to 3, Articles 32, 38, 39, 40, 42 and 43, this Article and the Schedules come into force 7 days after registration.
(3) The remainder of this Law comes into force on such day or days as the States may by Act appoint.
(1) The Minister must appoint a person appearing to the Minister to be suitable to hold the office of the Commissioner.
(2) Before appointing a person as the Commissioner, the Minister must seek the views of the Jersey Appointments Commission, established by Article 17 of the Employment of States of Jersey Employees (Jersey) Law 2005, on the appointment (without prejudice to the powers of the States or the Jersey Appointments Commission under Article 15 of that Law).
(3) The Minister must, at least 2 weeks before appointing a person as the Commissioner, present to the States a notice of his or her intention to make the appointment.
(4) A person appointed as the Commissioner holds and vacates that office in accordance with the terms of his or her appointment, subject to this Law.
(5) When appointing a person as the Commissioner the Minister must determine the period of the appointment, being not more than 6 years.
(6) The Minister may re-appoint a person serving as the Commissioner (and references in this paragraph to appointment include re-appointment).
(7) The Minister must take all reasonable steps to ensure that at all times the office of the Commissioner is filled.
(8) Nothing in sub-paragraph (7) is to be construed as preventing the terms of a person's appointment from requiring the person to work under the appointment for only a limited number of days in a year or hours in a day.
(e) do anything reasonably necessary or expedient for or incidental to any of the Commissioner's functions.
(2) The Commissioner is independent of the States and the Minister.
(3) The terms and conditions of the appointment of the Commissioner must not be construed so as to create a contract of employment or agency between the States, or the Minister, and the person appointed.
(b) all fees and other sums received by the Commissioner in the exercise of his or her functions must be paid to the income of the States.
(c) his or her appointment expires under sub-paragraph (4).
(d) is otherwise unable or unfit to discharge the functions of the Commissioner.
(3) The Minister must, not more than 2 weeks after terminating the appointment, present to the States a notice that the Minister has terminated the appointment.
(c) the person completes 12 years (whether consecutive or in aggregate) of service as Commissioner.
(1) The Minister must make available to the Commissioner such number and descriptions of staff as the Minister considers are required for the proper and effective discharge of the Commissioner's functions.
(2) To the extent that any States' employee (within the meaning of the Employment of States of Jersey Employees (Jersey) Law 2005), while made available under sub-paragraph (1), performs a function under the direction of the Commissioner, the employee is to be treated as a member of the Commissioner's staff for the purposes of this Law.
(c) the decision under Article 16 on whether to deregister a charity.
(4) The Minister may designate a person as the relevant person for the purpose of sub-paragraph (5).
on a temporary basis until the Commissioner becomes able to act again or a new Commissioner is appointed under paragraph 1.
(6) The Minister must provide such accommodation and equipment as the Minister considers are required for the proper and effective discharge of the Commissioner's functions.
(7) The cost of providing staff, accommodation and equipment under this paragraph must be met out of the annual income of the States.
(8) The Commissioner must prepare and publish a report on the activities of the Commissioner in each calendar year.
(9) The Commissioner must provide the Minister with the report as soon as practicable after the end of the year to which the report relates, but in no case later than 4 months after the end of that year.
(10) The Minister must lay a copy of the report so provided before the States as soon as practicable after the Minister receives the report.
(11) The Minister may, by giving written notice to the Commissioner and publishing that notice, give directions to the Commissioner as to the content and form of the report.
(12) Directions under paragraph (11) must respect the independence of the Commissioner and, in particular, must not require the report to contain justification of any decision of the Commissioner in relation to individual charities, governors or applicants for registration.
(1) The Minister must appoint as members of the tribunal at least 4, and no more than 8, persons appearing to the Minister to be suitable for the position and to have appropriate experience to safeguard the interests of the public and the charitable sector in Jersey.
(2) Before appointing a person as a tribunal member, the Minister must seek the views of the Jersey Appointments Commission established by Article 17 of the Employment of States of Jersey Employees (Jersey) Law 2005 on the appointment (without prejudice to the powers of the States or the Jersey Appointments Commission under Article 15 of that Law).
(3) The Minister must, at least 2 weeks before appointing a person as a tribunal member, present to the States a notice of his or her intention to make the appointment.
(4) A person appointed as a tribunal member holds and vacates that position in accordance with the terms of his or her appointment, subject to this Law.
(5) When appointing a person as a tribunal member the Minister must determine the period of the appointment, being not more than 6 years.
(6) The Minister may re-appoint a person serving as a tribunal member (and references in this paragraph to appointment include re-appointment).
(7) The Minister must, among the members of the tribunal, designate one as the chair and another as the vice-chair.
(8) Service as a tribunal member is honorary, unless the Minister determines that the chair is, or all the members are, to be remunerated by the States as Minister sees fit.
(d) is otherwise unable or unfit to discharge the functions of a member of the tribunal.
(c) the person completes 12 years (whether consecutive or in aggregate) of service as a member of the tribunal.
(1) The Minister must make available to the tribunal such number and descriptions of staff and resources as the Minister considers are required for the proper and effective discharge of the tribunal's functions.
(2) The Minister must secure that there is available to the tribunal at least one member of staff to serve as the responsible officer, charged with assisting with the administration of (but not determinations by) the tribunal.
(3) The responsible officer must prepare a report on the activities of the tribunal in each calendar year.
(4) The responsible officer must provide the Minister with the report as soon as practicable after the end of the year to which the report relates, but in no case later than 4 months after the end of that year.
(5) The Minister must lay a copy of the report so provided before the States as soon as practicable after the Minister receives the report.
(c) if both the chair and vice-chair are absent, a tribunal member appointed for the purpose by the tribunal members present at the sitting.
(2) Subject to sub-paragraph (1), and to any Regulations under sub-paragraph (3), the tribunal may regulate its own procedure.
(j) such ancillary powers of the tribunal as the States think necessary for the proper discharge of its functions.


text:
Personal injury solicitor appointed to the Isle of Man
Posted byPersonal Injury Solicitors September 27, 2010 November 14, 2010 Leave a comment on Personal injury solicitor appointed to the Isle of Man
Offshore legal firm Appleby recently announced the appointment of personal injury solicitor Mr Tim Swift to an associate position of its insolvency and litigation team located on the Isle of Man.
Mr Swift, an English accident solicitor who has now also become a Manx Advocate, possesses two and a half decades of experience in many different forms of civil court litigation in working for commercial, union, and also private clients during his career.
Mr Swift has been employed both as a member of a major insurance company and as a private legal practicioner, focusing on disputes revolving around financial services provisions.
While Mr Swift has experience across the broad spectrum of civil law, he has a specialty in personal injury claims and related matters, working as both a Deputy District Judge in Liverpool whilst operating a bustling private practice as well for the last ten years.
Mr Swift commented that Deputy District Judges, under the English legal system, are worked exceedingly hard, facing a relatively benign claim involving an instance of defective kitchen appliances one moment before turning to a quite serious personal injury claim the next that may involve a compensatory scheme of several thousand pounds.
Mr Swift also provided an explanation as to why he decided to leave both his judicial position and his private practice in Britain behind in order to assume a trainee advocate on the Isle of Man, sitting his first professional examinations he'd had to face in nearly three decades, stating that the lifestyle on the Isle of Man compares quite favorably to his old life in the UK, especially in light of the friendly residents and the beautiful landscape.
He also stated that the challenge of learning a completely set of laws and legal system in under a year, in addition to holding a full-time job down, was something that appealed to his nature, stating that his gluttony for punishment was most likely to blame on that front.
Posted byPersonal Injury Solicitors September 27, 2010 November 14, 2010 Posted inNational Law Firms, Personal Injury NewsTags: accident solicitor, National Law Firms, personal injury claims
No win no fee solicitors can help with claims against wasps!
Baby P clinic doctor files personal injury claim against NHS

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Henderson Field is the name of several airports:

 Henderson Field (Guadalcanal), a former military airfield on Guadalcanal Island in the Solomon Islands
 Henderson Field (Midway) (originally Naval Air Station Midway Islands), a former World War II airfield on East Midway Island
 Henderson Field (Midway Atoll) on Sand Island in Midway Atoll, an unincorporated territory of the United States.
 Henderson Field (North Carolina) in Wallace, North Carolina, United States.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
County fights Ho-Chunk Nation land-into-trust application
ho-chunk
Posted: Thursday, May 19, 2011
The board in Sauk County, Wisconsin, voted 23-4 to oppose the Ho-Chunk Nation land-into-trust application.
The tribe wants about 600 acres placed in trust. County officials say they will lose about $700,000 in tax revenue if that happens.
"We are looking at it from the way it will impact not only Sauk County but other taxing jurisdictions, and then ultimately how it affects individual taxpayers," county administrator Kathy Schauf told the board, The Baraboo News Republic reported.
The plans to use the land for an IMAX theater, restaurant, cultural heritage center, strip mall and RV park.
Board opposes Ho-Chunk plan (The Baraboo News Republic 5/19)
County officials worried about Ho-Chunk land-into-trust bid (5/11)
• Column: Tahnee Robinson striving to become a role model
• Former employee accused of stealing from Spokane Tribe


text:
https://feed.podbean.com/theanchormaine/feed.xml
Welcome to The ANCHOR Church Podcast // Know God. • Find Freedom. • Discover purpose. • Make a difference.
Tuesday Oct 23, 2018
Just To Know You
True, mature relationship seeks to know, not just to be served. What would it look like if we came to worship services, just to seek God? "Just to Know You" by Pastor Cameron Brice was recorded on Sunday, October 21, 2018, during service at The Anchor Church in Rockport, Maine. SERMON NOTES
Read sermon notes from other great sermons: https://theanchor.me/sermon-notes/
Subscribe to The ANCHOR Church podcast on iTunes to receive automatic downloads of new episodes and listen to previously recorded sermons. https://apple.co/2u1UBkj
Church: God's Design
Church was never meant to be an event. It was designed to be a community of people doing life together as family. "Church: God's Design" was recorded on Sunday, July 8, 2018, during service at The Anchor Church in Rockport, Maine. This episode features visiting pastors Josiah & Candace Carle and Cameron Brice from Covenant Love Church in Fayetteville, North Carolina as well as our own pastor Quinton Self. SERMON NOTES
Copyright © 2019 The Anchor Church. All rights reserved.


Preliminary post-mortem has indicated that she died of mild pneumonia.
Patricia's younger sister, Anita Miswa, told Nation that her sister had not indicated to either family or friends that she was sick.
She said she had spoken to her sister on New Year's eve and she didn't sense any changes with her.
Kenyans living in the US turned up in large numbers Saturday to raise money to ship home the body of a Kenyan college student who died in Minneapolis more than a week ago.
Patricia Anyango Ouma Miswa was found dead on January 4, 2018 in her hostel room in Mankato, Minnesota, in unclear circumstances, less than a year after leaving Kenya to pursue a master's degree in creative writing at the University of Mankato, in Minnesota.
Late last week, her family in Kenya sent out a passionate appeal to well-wishers to assist in mobilising resources to the send her remains back to Kiti in Nakuru for burial.


text:
« Symetra Hit With Class Certification In Structured Settlement Lawsuit Over Affiliate Factoring Operation | Main | United States Periodic Payment Assignment Company (USPPAC) Used to FACTOR Milestone Client's Structure »
3 Bair Related Entities in Coordinated Attempt to Factor Structure Written by Bair, Court Records Show
Milestone Related Factoring Life BEFORE the Crow Flew
The Great Dane-ish Watchdog
In a prior post of January 15, 2022, I brought readers' attention to a significant number of cases found in New York court records, where CrowFly, LLC, a self-described structured settlement transfer of payments originator and servicer of court approved structured settlement transfers, of which John T. Bair is the Managing Member and a principal owner (Source: Milestone Wealth Form ADV Part 2 Item 10, March 16, 2022), factored structured settlements placed by Mr. Bair.
It has since been discovered that long before establishment and active promotion of CrowFly, LLC, the structured settlement factoring origination firm and servicer in 2017 and joining the National Association of Settlement Purchasers in 2022, irrefutable evidence found in New York court records indicates that Milestone CEO John T. Bair displaying, used THREE RELATED ENTITIES to engage in the purchase (and/or attempts to purchase) MORE structured settlement payment rights from , clients sourced from the nation's trial lawyers at the same time he and/or Milestone maintained an insurance license and appointments with most structured settlement annuity issuers and placed similar annuitants into structured settlement annuities.
The Virgilio Case | Structured Settlement Established by Bair with MetLife in 2005
In 2005, John T. Bair was President and CEO of Forge Consulting, LLC. In one full page ad in the middle 2000s that was published in a state trial lawyers' publication which emphasized how much money his firm gave to the American Trial Lawyers Association (now AAJ), it's notable that buried in the ad is the statement that " Structured settlements provide the security that no lump sum can".
In 2005, John T Bair/Forge Consulting placed a structured settlement for Joseph N. Virgilio as part of the compensation for a wrongful death settlement. The structured settlement was funded with a structured settlement annuity issued by Metropolitan LIfe Insurance Company bearing MetLife certificate number 86291FOR.
As the result of the settlement of a claim against Wyeth Pharmaceuticals et al, the structured settlement was to pay Virgilio $11,250 per quarter, guaranteed for 10 years, beginning September 15, 2015, with a final quarterly payment due on June 15, 2015 of $1,000,000.00
The Virgilio Proposed Sale and Proposed Purchase by Seventh Amendment Holdings, LLC in June 2015
Astounding and notable is the "spaghetti junction" of related parties and no independent professional advice:
Seventh Amendment Foldings, LLC (as of 1/11/2022 MIlestone & Co, LLC), the holding company for two other involved Bair related companies was to be the originating purchaser of Virgilio's structured settlement payment rights
United States Periodic Payment Assignment Company (USPPAC) is an assignment company under the Seventh Amendment Holdings, LLC umbrella and it was to take part in the transaction. United States Periodic Payment Assignment Company (USPPAC) "is an independent assignment company formed in accordance with Section 18-201 of the Limited Liability Company Act of the State of Delaware", according to Milestone's marketing materials.
Milestone Consulting, LLC, another company under the Seventh Amendment Holdings umbrella, a company in which Bair was CEO at the time was selected by Virgilio to represent him according to the June 14, 2015 Structured Annuity Purchase Agreement with Seventh Amendment Holdings, LLC that it entered into with Virgilio. It's obvious that Virgilio did not prepare the document. Virgilio waived independent professional advice according to the filed documents. An admission that Milestone's advice was not independent? Who submitted that to the court? Read on.
On June 15, 2015 Seventh Amendment Holdings, LLC submitted a petition to the New York State Supreme Court in Erie County (Index 807286/2015) in a matter captioned " In the Matter of Seventh Amendment Holdings, LLC for Judicial Approval of the Sale and transfer of Structured Settlement Payment Rights", to buy the $1,000,000 lump sum from Mr. Virgilio in a sale and assignment of structured settlement payment rights.
Seventh Amendment Holdings LLC was to pay Virgilio $300,000 in cash (SAH would receive the $1,000,000 transferred from MetLife instead of Virgilio) together a fresh monthly payment stream for another 10 years in approximately the amount of $7,090.10 each, guaranteed by Seventh Amendment Holdings for 10 years, beginning January 15, 2016. The terms of the deal as stated in the petition include "that the final monthly benefit amount will be predicated and finalized based on pricing available in the market at the time of puchase".
using a combination of annuities and serviced structured settlement factoring payment streams (the latter from the structured settlement secondary market- servicing would not be necessary if it was a legitimate stuctured settlement annuity).
The Petition includes the sworn statement of John Bair acting in the capacity as President of Seventh Amendment Holdings, LLC, dated June 15, 2015, that he read the Verified Petition, knows the contents thereof; and that the same is true to his own knowledge with the exception of what is denoted as upon information and belief.
At all relevant times, Bair's Milestone Consulting was appointed with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company as an agency for the placement of structured settlement annuities.
The Virgilio Petition
Download 807286_2015_In_the_Matter_of_the_P_v_In_the_Matter_of_the_P_PETITION_1.
The Virgilio Affidavit
Download 807286_2015_In_the_Matter_of_the_P_v_In_the_Matter_of_the_P_EXHIBIT_S__9,
The Virgilio Structured Annuity Payment Purchase Agreement
Download 807286_2015_In_the_Matter_of_the_P_v_In_the_Matter_of_the_P_EXHIBIT_S__7 Structured Annuity Agreement
Can the Proceeds of a Structured Settlement Factoring Transaction be Used for a New Tax-Free Payment Stream?
For the Payee
From a tax perspective, this shouldn't affect the Payee. The payments received will still be made on the account of the physical injury. See IRS PLR 200918001.
For United States Periodic Payment Assignment Company (USPPAC)
But there's some concern that USPPAC would have significant and unexpected tax liability. Normally, in a qualified assigment, the assignment company doesn't owe any tax on the amount it receives and uses to buy an annuity. IRC Section 130. But here, the payment to be received by USPPAC isn't being used to buy an annuity. And the trarnsaction might not be treated as a "qualified assignment". That's because Seventh Amendment Holdings is assuming the liability from a party that probably wasn't "a person who is a party to the suit or agreement as required by IRC 130(1). I.R.C. To wit...§ 130 (c) (1) — if the assignee assumes such liability from a person who is a party to the suit or agreement, or the workmen's compensation claim
The above doesn't matter if United States Periodic Payment Assignment Company (USPPAC) was a foreign assignment company, But is it? It's a Domestic Limited Liability Company in the State of Delaware, according to Milestone's own marketing materials.
At the time of the Petition Bair had been in the structured settlement field for an estimated 17 years, yet the Petition includes the statement that 26 USC Section 103 is relevant to Met Life's responsibility to make payments provided for under the structured settlement that Seventh Amendment was seeking to purchase. [ Virgilio Petition #8] I happen to know that Bair is a pretty good golfer and won a longest drive contest or two, so it would not be apt to say it is "par for the course" but the fact remains that 26 U.S. Code § 103 refers to Interest on State and local bonds and is irrelevant as neither state and local bonds is an annuity or a serviced factored structured settlement payment right or a qualified funding asset.
To the extent that Virgilio's replacement payments are funded with factored structured settlement receivables (other people's structured settlement payments), he may not have any protection in the event the annuity issuer goes insolvent. 37 states, including Virgilio's resident state of Illinois leave investors S.O.L. in the event of insolvency following the state's adoption of the 2017 Revisions to the LIfe & Health Guaranty Association Model Act (#520). There's no grandfathering, the changes are retroactive upon the effective date of adoption by the state.
Who is Seventh Amendment Holdings, LLC
Before it was renamed recently, Seventh Amendment Holdings (SAH) was self-described" in MIlestone promotional materials as a suite of companies designed to provide guidance and support to plaintiffs and attorneys before, during, and after litigation". Through a range of entities that include a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, a settlement planning and consulting firm, a wealth management firm, and a financial tech start-up, SAH has said it is deeply committed to finding and providing the best financial solutions for individuals and families dealing with tragedy. Seventh Amendment Holdings LLC is a limited liability company (LLC) located at 737 Main St Ste 100 in Buffalo, New York Source: Cision Press Release attributed to Milestone October 21, 2021. Seventh Amendment Holdings, LLC was renamed Milestone & Co, Inc, effective April 1, 2022. Source: Open Corporates [ OpenGovus says the renaming was January 11, 2022, but who's counting?]
Who Owns Milestone & Co, LLC (f/k/a Seventh Amendment Holdings)
The Investment Adviser Public Disclosure for Milestone Wealth, LLC (f/k/a Monolith Advisors), states it is a registered investment adviser based in Buffalo, NY. Milestone has been offering advisory services since 2013. Milestone & Co., LLC is the sole owner of the firm. John Theodore Bair (John T. Bair) is the President and Chief Compliance Officer of the firm and the primary owner of Milestone & Co., LLC, according to the firm's most recent Form ADV Part 2, filed in March 2022. Source: Investment AFdviser Public Disclosure (IAPD)
Who Owns Crowfly, LLC, Bair's Current In House Structured Settlement Factoring Firm?
Bair is the majority owner of CrowFly, LLC according to the March 16, 2022 update of the Milestone Wealth Form Adv Part 2. [ Note added 10/14/2022 : In a late August 2022 Buffalo Business First article about the shuttering of CrowFly, Bair bemoaned the amount of money he plowed into the CrowFly until it reached the point where it had become unviable].
In addition to his responsibilities at Milestone, Wealth John T. Bair is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Milestone Consulting, LLC ("Milestone"), a consulting firm and insurance agency located in Buffalo, New York. A part of its services, Milestone provides clients with consultations regarding the appropriate investment options for court settlements resulting from personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits. Mr. Bair devotes approximately 60% of his time to his activities at Milestone and is directly compensated as an officer and employee of Milestone for his services. Ibid.
John T. Bair is the Managing Member and a principal owner Crowfly, LLC a structured settlement transfer of payments originator and servicer of court approved structured settlement transfers. Crowfly, LLC has developed an online platform directly connecting the sellers of annuities with qualified buyers. Occasionally, a seller of an annuity may invest the proceeds of the sale with Milestone. Additionally, in some instances, when a Milestone client is in need of a more secure income stream, Milestone may recommend an annuity that is listed through CrowFly to the client. Bair/Milestone admits in the Form ADV part 2, that these activities trigger a conflict of interest because Crowfly receives compensation for the transaction. Clients to whom the firm offers advisory services are informed that they are under no obligation to purchase annuities from Crowfly, LLC and may use the annuity brokerage firm of their choice. Client should also note that annuity guarantees are subject to the claims-paying ability of the issuing insurance company. Ibid.
The only thing is that factored structured settlement payments treams offered by CrowFly are not annuities. For example, under New York law, where Milestone & Co (Seventh Amendment Holdings) and CrowFly's main office is, "an annuity is a contract between a purchaser and an insurance company in which the purchaser agrees to make a lump sum payment or series of payments in return for regular disbursements, beginning either immediately (within 12 months) or at some future date" Source: New York Department of Financial Services"
Posted at 07:11 PM in Buffalo Structured Settlement Cash Now, Milestone Commentary, Settlement Planners Bought Clients' Structures, Settlement Planners Who Factor, Settlement Planners Who Own/Control Factoring Companies, Seventh Amendment Holdings Commentary, Seventh Amendment Holdings Factoring, Structured Settlement Watchdog®, USPPAC Commentary | Permalink


text:
Zendaya Maree Stoermer Coleman (Oakland, 1 september 1996), roepnaam: Zendaya, is een Amerikaanse actrice, zangeres, danseres en model.

Levensloop

1996–2008: jeugd en begin carrière
Zendaya is geboren op 1 september 1996 in Oakland, Californië als kind van Claire Stoermer en Kazembe Ajamu (Coleman). Toen ze nog op school zat, speelde ze in Once on This Island en Caroline, or Change. Ze volgde een toneelopleiding bij het California Shakespeare Theater en bij het American Conservatory Theater. Op het toneel speelde ze onder meer in Richard III, Twelfth Night en As You Like It.

Zendaya heeft drie jaar gedanst bij een dansgroep genaamd Future Shock Oakland, waar ze hiphop- en huladansen leerde.

2009–heden: doorbraak
Zendaya begon haar professionele carrière als model voor Macy's, Mervyns en Old Navy. Ook was ze te zien in een iCarly-speelgoedadvertentie samen met Stefanie Scott. Ze speelde van 2010 tot 2013 in de originele Disney Channelserie Shake It Up als Raquel "Rocky" Blue samen met Bella Thorne die de rol van CeCe Jones vertolkte.

Zendaya's eerste single "Swag It Out", gecomponeerd door Bobby Brackins en geproduceerd door Glenn A. Foster, werd online uitgebracht door iTunes en Amazon. In 2011 is Zendaya genomineerd voor een Shorty Award voor Beste Actrice. Zendaya's tweede single "Watch Me", waarin ook Bella Thorne te horen is, werd uitgebracht op 21 juni 2011. Deze is geproduceerd door Ben Charles, Aaron Harmon en Jim Wes. Dat nummer bereikte positie 63 in de Billboard Hot Digital Songs, nummer 86 in de Billboard Hot 100 en de 9e plaats in de Amerikaanse Top Heatseekers. De muziekvideo werd uitgebracht op 17 juni 2011 en geregisseerd door Lipo Chang.

Haar eerste filmrol was in Frenemies (2012) samen met Bella Thorne en Stefanie Scott. In februari 2012 is "Something to Dance For" uitgebracht als een single voor Live 2 Dance. Het nummer bereikte de 70e plaats in de Britse hitlijsten en de 24e in die van de Verenigde Staten.

Zendaya deed als destijds jongste kandidaat ooit mee aan Dancing with the Stars samen met professioneel danspartner Valentin Chmerkovskiy (ook wel Val genoemd). In de eerste aflevering (18 maart 2013) dansten ze zichzelf naar de hoogste score: 24 punten. Op 15 april behaalde Zendaya haar eerste tienen, door juryleden Carrie Ann Inaba en Bruno Tonioli en in week 8 (7 mei) kreeg ze de eerste topscore (30 van de 30 punten) met een salsa met gastdanser Gleb Savchenko. Zendaya stond in week 9 (de halve finale) met dansstijlen quickstep en haar vertrouwde hiphop. Zendaya is doorgestemd naar de finale die op maandag 20 mei en dinsdag 21 mei 2013 plaatsvond en is geëindigd op de tweede plaats.

Op 14 mei 2013 maakte Zendaya bekend dat haar eerste boek, Between U and Me, uit was. Ze heeft een overeenkomst met de Amerikaanse uitgever Hyperion Books. Het boek gaat over tienerproblemen die Zendaya zelf heeft meegemaakt en hoe ze die heeft opgelost. Het boek werd verwacht op 6 augustus 2013, maar werd vanwege een fout bij de uitgever officieel verplaatst naar 27 augustus 2013.

Eind juli 2013 werd bekendgemaakt dat Shake It Up! tot een einde kwam na drie seizoenen. Ook werd vermeld dat Zendaya bij Disney bleef en in augustus begon met het filmen van DCOM (Disney Channel Original Movie) Boys Are Dogs. De naam 'Boys Are Dogs' veranderde later naar Unleashed. Nog een paar weken later werd de naam weer veranderd, naar Zapped.

Op 12 augustus 2013 maakte Zendaya via JustJaredJr de naam en cover bekend van haar debuutalbum dat op 17 september 2013 in de Verenigde Staten en Canada uitkwam. Het album is naar haarzelf vernoemd: Zendaya.

Een aantal weken nadat de opnames van Zapped gestopt waren, werd bekend dat Zendaya waarschijnlijk terug zou keren naar Disney Channel. Hier zou ze de hoofdrol in de Disney Channelserie Super Awesome Katy spelen. Het gaat over een erg slim meisje dat erachter komt dat haar ouders spionnen zijn. Haar ouders verwachten dat Katy dezelfde voetstappen volgt. Een aantal weken nadat het nieuws over Super Awesome Katy naar buiten kwam heeft Disney Channel bevestigd dat de show door zal gaan. Niet alleen zal Zendaya de hoofdrol spelen maar zal ze ook producent van de show zijn. De naam is nog niet zeker. "Zie ik eruit als een Katy?" vraagt Zendaya zich af. De productie begint in het voorjaar van 2014. De naam Super Awesome Katy is nu vastgesteld als K.C. Undercover.

Op 26 april 2014 trad Zendaya op met Replay tijdens de Radio Disney Music Awards (RDMA's) 2014 en won ze een Ardy voor best geklede artiest. Een jaar later, op 25 april 2015, was Zendaya de presentatrice van de RDMA's.

In 2017 was ze te zien als Michelle Jones-Watson in de film Spider-Man: Homecoming, waarna ze dezelfde rol vertolkte in het vervolg uit 2019: Spider-Man: Far From Home, en het vervolg uit 2021: Spider-Man: No Way Home.

In 2022 won ze een Emmy voor haar rol als Rue in Euphoria en was hiermee op 26-jarige leeftijd de jongste actrice ooit die 2 Emmy's heeft gewonnen. In 2023 won ze eveneens een Golden Globe Award voor de rol van Rue.

 Persoonlijk
Ze heeft een relatie met Tom Holland.

 Filmografie

 Discografie
 Albums
 Soloalbums

 Soundtrackalbums

 Singles

 Overige optredens

 Muziekvideo's

 Hitnotaties
 Singles

|-
|align="left"|Rewrite the stars||2017||-|||||| met Zac Efron /Nr. 71 in de Single Top 100
|}

|-
|align="left"|Replay''||2014||15-03-2014||tip93*||||
|}

Prijzen en nominaties

Privé

Naamverandering
Zendaya's ouders, Claire Stoermer & Kazembe Ajamu, hebben beide andere achternamen dan Zendaya. De reden hiervoor is dat Zendaya's moeder, Claire, haar achternaam niet veranderd heeft bij het huwelijk tussen haar en Zendaya's vader. (Toen nog) Samuel Coleman vond zijn naam niet bij zichzelf passen en heeft ná Zendaya's geboorte zijn naam veranderd in Kazembe Ajamu, waardoor Zendaya's achternaam dus nog Coleman is. Inmiddels zijn haar ouders gescheiden.

Amerikaans zanger
Amerikaans model
Amerikaans acteur
Amerikaans danser
Jeugdacteur


text:
This Is How PM Modi Is Aiming At Boosting Job Creation Via Social Sector Projects In Odisha
job opportunities 2018-12-26
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on 24th December 2018 announced several infrastructures and social sector projects in Odisha for generating job opportunities and living standards.
By Shahram Warsi Features Writer
Businesses that generate job and business opportunities are believed to be the best business sectors in modern India. The government is constantly collaborating with various firms in order to generate job and business opportunities for advanced and skilled India.
Recently, Prime Minister Narendra Modi on 24th December 2018 announced several infrastructures and social sector projects in Odisha for generating job opportunities and living standards. The project is estimated to be of worth around Rs 14,000 crore for which the work has commenced.
Focusing on Social Welfare Projects
The social welfare projects are designed in order to transform the quality of life in Odisha. The Prime Minister through these projects would be focusing on several social welfare projects like higher education, health, natural gas, and roads.
Prime Minister Modi shares, "These projects are designed to improve the quality of life in Odisha. The government is trying to give priority towards the balanced development of the country via focusing on such social welfare sectors."
Fulfilling the State's Demand
Every state has its own demands that the government or the private firms target for bettering the situation along with creating business opportunities.
The projects inaugurated included IIT Bhubaneswar, setting up a cost of Rs 1,260 crore that is expected to cater to the state's long-standing demand. Modi also announced that the work has already commenced for the Indian Institute of Science Education and Research.
Introducing New Health and Wellness Centers
The health and wellness industry is expanding rapidly nationally and internationally. India specifically is becoming a healthcare business hub where new and major wellness players could be seen playing an essential role in transforming the industry.
Modi says, "The government is planning to introduce 1,150 health and wellness centers in Odisha that could improve the missing connectivity in the state. This bridging of the gap would result in improving the trade and business activities for a developed India."
Paving the Way for Supply of Natural Gas
Modi also laid the foundation stone of the Bokaro-Angul section that is supposed to pave the way for the supply of natural gas for households, industries, and vehicles across 11 districts of in Odisha and Jharkhand.
This Rs 3,400 crore pipeline project is expected to transform the business and living standards in Odisha that is supposed to be completed by December 2020.
The pipeline is expected to give access to cooking fuel to many households and reduce vehicular pollution. It will also cater to the energy demands of steel and aluminum industries, among others.
active sales pipeline
invest in a franchise brand
Thank you for submitting your valuable comment.
Related opportunities
Wok Republic
About Us: Inspired by their sojourns across various countries in South..
Locations looking for expansion Delhi
Establishment year 2016
Franchising Launch Date 2019
Investment size Rs. 20lac - 30lac
Space required 700
Franchise Outlets -NA-
Franchise Type Unit
Headquater New delhi Delhi
Crazy Crush
About Us: Crazy Crush is the fastest growing Juice Bar Brand..
Space required 50
Patanjali Paridhan
About Us: Its a clothing company ..
Castle Grill
About Us: The finest fast food multi-cuisine restraint encompasses toothsome burgers,..
Locations looking for expansion Haryana
Headquater Chandigarh Haryana
Wellness Industry
Challenges In Wellness Industry..
"Women Entrepreneurship is a Rising Trend"..
"The Real Estate Business Is Here To Stay"..
how to start a beauty salon and spa
Strategies to gain Traffic at Beauty Salon..
Education franchise
Mind-Blowing Education Franchise Ideas..
Striving To Offer A Healthy Living..
Why Start-Ups Are Opting For Franchising..
Rise Of Wok Franchises..
Popularizing Korean Culture in India..
Franchise 100
Adding Value to Fashion via Franchising..
franchising as investment
Why Investing in Franchising is Profitable..
Tips To Build A Healthy Business Network..
Continue to next article
Marketing Ideas For New Year..
Thank you for Enquiry
Our Subscription team will get in touch with you shortly.
Insta-Subscribe to
The Franchising World
OR Click here to Subscribe Online
Submit your email address to receive the latest updates on news & host of opportunities
franchise ready
Is Your Business Franchise Ready..
Introduction of Quality Digital Literacy..
Artificial Intelligence In Special Education..
franchise in Nepal
All About Starting A Yoga Biz in Nepal..
Blurring the line between Tech & Health..
Current education system in India..
Turning Ambitions into Marketable Skills..
Business Opportunities in Bengaluru..
4 Stunning Outfit Ideas for the Upcoming Wedding S..
Tracking App Usage Limit..
Dr abdul kalam
Lessons From "The Missile Man" Of India..
Bringing The Change Via Collaboration..
preschool business
Importance of Early Child Education in India..
Want to Take Your Business Abroad?..
Revolutionizing the AdTech Industry..
young franchisors
Gen Next in Franchising..
India's No. 1 FRANCHISE Magazine
wellnessindia.org
educationbiz.com
franchisenepal.com
bradfordlicenseindia.com
franchiseindia.in
Copyright © 2009 - 2020 Franchise India Holdings Ltd.
The information contained herein is of generic nature only, and Franchise India is not, by means of this website or any part thereof, rendering professional advice or services. Before making any decision or taking any action that might affect your finances or business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. Your use of this website or any of its pages or links given, is at your own risk and you assume full responsibility and risk of loss resulting from your usage. With respect to use of the website, kindly visit www.franchiseindia.com/terms.
Domestic Brands
Franchise Insights
Low Cost Business Opportunities
Our Group website
Buy/Sell Existing Business


text:
The Trump administration may be subverting a new bipartisan chemical safety law
Celia Wexler,
Jul. 31, 2017, 10:08 PM
Last year, Democratic and Republican members of Congress congratulated each other for what they considered to be a miracle: passage of the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21 st Century Act.
The law, named after the late chemical safety crusader Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), was designed to strengthen the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), giving it more authority to regulate toxic chemicals.
It fixed many of the legal traps in the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act, which, over its 40-year history, had so blocked the EPA that it had banned or restricted only five chemicals— out of more than 80,000 chemicals currently on the market.
Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA), who initially opposed the proposal as too weak, ultimately made her peace with the bill. Even Trump EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, then Attorney General of Oklahoma who had sued the EPA 14 times, sent a letter to key senators praising the legislation.
The bill — a compromise with the chemical industry that resulted from years of negotiation — glided to victory in both House and Senate.
At the signing ceremony on June 22, President Barack Obama termed its passage a "really significant piece of business" that had been accomplished in an "overwhelmingly bipartisan fashion, as happened with those pillars of legislation to protect our air, and our water, and our wildlife." Obama predicted: "If we can make this bill work, it means that somewhere out on the horizon we can make our politics less toxic as well."
Enter the powerful chemical lobby
But in the ensuing months, the politics have grown more toxic. The Lautenberg law, safety advocates charge, is being actively undermined by the powerful chemical lobby. Robert Sussman told WhoWhatWhy that he suspects that the chemical industry, while paying "lip service" to the new law, which it publicly supported, is now trying to "slow walk implementation and avoid anything by the EPA that is truly threatening" to its bottom line. Sussman is an environmental lawyer and consultant who was a principal policy advisor to Obama's first EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson.
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
The EPA's policy reversals are unprecedented, George Wyeth, a 27-year EPA veteran who retired in January, told WhoWhatWhy. "This is not anything like the transition from Clinton to [George W.] Bush," Wyeth said. "The things that Pruitt has done go far beyond Bush's change of course. None of this is normal." Wyeth, who said he expected a "quiet academic life" after leaving the EPA now has joined about 100 former EPA officials "looking to do something to defend the EPA."
Both Sussman and Wyeth spoke at a July 19 conference on toxic chemicals hosted by the BlueGreen Alliance Foundation. Panelists tracked the various ways the Trump EPA is endangering the public, including its efforts to weaken the Lautenberg law.
The Toxic Beck Effect
How did the law get hijacked? The Lautenberg law gave the EPA "new tools, new authority and new responsibilities," Liz Hitchcock told WhoWhatWhy. Hitchcock is government affairs director for the Safer Chemicals Healthy Families coalition, representing more than 400 environmental and public health groups as well as businesses.
The EPA would have to meet certain deadlines and address thousands of chemicals on the market in a systematic way. It must focus on "high-priority" chemicals — those that likely are the greatest risk to health. If the agency lacked enough information to gauge that risk, it now had the power to ask chemical companies to disclose more data.
But Congress left many crucial decisions about its implementation to the agency.
Pruitt, who brought an anti-regulatory and anti-science approach to his new job as EPA administrator, named industry insider Nancy Beck to help oversee chemical safety at the agency. Beck assumed this post immediately after a five-year stint with the powerful lobby trade group, the American Chemistry Council (ACC), testifying before Congress on the chemical industry's priorities, and developing ACC comments that challenged proposed EPA regulations.
Currently the highest ranking political appointee in the chemical and pesticides program, Beck has left her fingerprints on the EPA's recent policies, critics charge, adopting positions that appear to contradict what Congress intended just last year, and to veer from the EPA's direction at the end of 2016.
EPA's current policies, Hitchcock charged, "tilt more in the direction of Beck's former employer than the public health community."
Change the process and you can control the outcome, advocates say. They contend that Congress intended that the new law directed the EPA to assess all the ways chemicals could affect people, from the way a chemical is produced, to its use, and its disposal, including the toxic byproducts that get into the air, water and soil. Hitchcock called it a "cradle to grave" assessment of a chemical.
But Beck recently claimed that this expansive approach to chemicals was not practical. "If you try to do everything," she told reporters, "you're going to end up doing nothing well."
In June, the EPA issued final rules that will give the agency the discretion to pick and choose what "conditions of use" it will consider when determining the risk a chemical poses. Hitchcock fears that this selective approach may mean that the EPA will fail to protect low-income African-American communities living near chemical plants, by not taking their toxic overload into consideration. The dangers of workplace exposures also might be minimized, she said.
The EPA also seems unwilling to use its power under the new law to require companies to provide more information about chemicals so that it properly identifies those substances most likely to cause harm.
The agency had initially proposed giving itself enough time to seek information from chemical manufacturers before beginning a formal assessment process that has tight deadlines, she explained. But the agency now has backtracked, no longer proposing a more workable system for gathering information.
If pressed for time, "we are concerned that the EPA won't be asking [chemical companies] for the information they need to efficiently prioritize and regulate chemicals," Hitchcock said.
Delays deadly to tens of thousands
Some threats to the public are more imminent, and result from the EPA actually using the new law to undermine regulatory work the agency had spent years preparing. The EPA now is signaling that it will delay crucial restrictions on three industrial chemicals used to remove paint and in dry cleaning — trichloroethylene, methylene chloride and n-methylpyrrolidone — until the EPA completes its risk assessments of all the ten chemicals the EPA designated late last year as high-priority.
House appropriators also have asked the EPA to delay the rules, Hitchcock said.
"You'd think these rules were a no-brainer," Sussman said. Rules that could protect the public now, he charged, "will be sitting on the shelf for six or seven years. The impacts will be real," he added. Workers using methylene chloride paint removers "are dying right now." These toxic exposures, he said, affect "tens of thousands" of workers.
When she was at ACC, Beck submitted comments that challenged these proposed rules. The EPA's revised approach "tracks the ACC comments almost to a tee," Sussman charged.
And there is no sign that the politicization of the chemical safety work is slowing down. On July 17, President Donald Trump nominated Michael Dourson to be Beck's boss and head the EPA's chemical and pesticides office.
Dourson, a toxicologist, is best known for his work as the founder of the nonprofit Toxicology Excellence and Risk Assessment (TERA), critiqued by environmental groups for its pro-industry positions and consulting work for companies.
The EPA did not respond to a request for comment on this story.
President Barack Obama, surrounded by members of Congress, signs bill H.R. 2576, the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act., Wednesday, June 22, 2016, during a ceremony at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House complex in Washington.
AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais
A ruinous tactic
Funding for the program may be another way to hobble it. Congress is not cutting the toxic program's funding directly. But House appropriators inserted an interesting directive in their spending bill for EPA. On page 58 of the 178-page bill report, House members raise concerns that the schedule for imposing fees on industry "may be too aggressive," and suggested that fees be levied more gradually.
The law required industry to pay fees to support the EPA's work in this area, up to $25 million a year. "Industry may be encouraging the EPA to slow down," Sussman said. "A significant delay in getting fees from industry would definitely be a problem."
These policy reversals are taking their toll on EPA staff. Staffers "are agonized," Sussman claimed. "Some intended to make a career at EPA. Do they stay where they are and not be able to contribute or cut their losses and leave? The effect of a mass exodus is the loss of expertise and institutional knowledge," he warned.
"The White House is already pursuing buy-outs" at the agency, said Kurt Vorndran, legislative representative for the National Treasury Employees Union, which represents 150,000 federal workers at 31 agencies. He expected that 1,000 EPA staffers will take them.
One departure that activists mourn: Wendy Cleland-Hamnett. Cleland-Hamnett, a career EPA professional, will retire August 24 as assistant administrator for chemical safety and pollution, increasing Beck's power over implementation of the new chemical safety law.
The Lautenberg law was passed after years of activist pressure, studies documenting the harm of toxic chemicals, and bad publicity for the chemical industry.
"On paper it was a pretty good law," said Sussman, who advised the Safer Chemicals coalition on the legislation. But making the law work in the real world, he insisted, requires a "commitment to impartiality, staying the course and going where the science leads."
"A year ago, I was pretty upbeat," Sussman confided. "I thought that the stars were aligning because industry felt threatened and came to the table."
His feelings are very different now. "In a few years," he concluded, "we may look at the law as a failure."
Read the original article on WhoWhatWhy. Copyright 2019. Follow WhoWhatWhy on Twitter.
SEE ALSO: 7 of 45 new EPA top staff come from the coal, oil, and chemical industries
More: Chemicals Pesticides Trump administration Scott Pruitt
Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act
American Chemistry Council


Representing the fourth-generation of RootCell development, the StrataCell developed in 2007 designed to support highly advanced engineering specifications.
The StrataCell provides a large module with more space for extensive root growth in large-canopy trees, bringing the tree-root system closer to the pavement surface yet still supporting maximum traffic loads.
Working in collaboration with other industry leaders, StrataCell structural soil cell was built upon successful trials and projects that were also aimed at reducing installation and transport costs, and improving the module's robust strength. Built to advanced engineering specifications to support greater vertical loads, StrataCell brings tree-root systems closer to pavement surfaces. Engineers have calculated that with only 300mm of granular pavement depth, a StrataCell matrix can support maximum pedestrian and sidewalk traffic loads. With vertical and lateral forces also considered in the engineering make-up of tree pits, StrataCell's well-designed matrix units lock together well, forming a monolithic framework with excellent modular strength. Highly secure connectors allow for StrataCell modules to click together fast and simply. Its open and skeletal structure provides an enormous growth zone for delicate root systems and storm water harvesting, with an excess of 94% of the soil volume allocated for tree-root growth. These high soil-volume tree pits are distinctly more advantageous, as optimum conditions for nature and nurture are recreated for trees to live and flourish. StrataCell apertures are built to generous specifications, permitting common conduits, service pipes and aeration mechanisms to be incorporated into the structure's design.


Two Guys SpaceVenture, a new adventure game from Space Quest creators Mark Crowe and Scott Murphy, has hit its Kickstarter goal of $500,000.
The Kickstarter for "Two Guys SpaceVenture," a new title from Space Quest creators Mark Crowe and Scott Murphy, has passed its goal of $500,000 today. Described as a "sci-fi comedy adventure game," it plans to pack puzzles alongside pop culture satire.
The Kickstarter ended at $539,767 spread among almost 11,000 backers. The point-and-click adventure title is aiming for PC, mobile, and tablet devices. You'll play as space plumber Ace Hardway and his robot dog Rooter, though you'll sometimes take control of the imaginary game hero and giant chicken Cluck Y'Egger.
The story will be carried by a pretty impressive list of voice talent, including Gary Owns (Space Ghost, Space Quest 4 and 6), Rob Paulson (Pinky and the Brain, Animaniacs), Robert Clotworthy (StarCraft 1 & 2), Ellen McLain (Portal 1 & 2), and John Patric Lowrie (Team Fortress 2).
The studio was formed in April, and opted to go the Kickstarter route in early May. It seems to have paid off, and another classic adventure series is getting a spiritual successor.
Steve Watts posted a new article, Two Guys SpaceVenture hits Kickstarter goal.


Founded by Jonathan Hallinan in 1995, BPM has been developing and building iconic, design driven multi-residential projects for 20 years. With an unparalleled track record, BPM is invested commercially and intellectually into the projects they develop and build on behalf of our community and culture.
Following a significant review of BPM's business, brand and communication strategies, 3 Deep were commissioned to reposition the brand and establish an integrated program of communications across all property and branded touch points. Challenging the existing property paradigm, the strategy created value in the BPM master brand while transferring that equity across all resulting products, experiences and services. The BPM customer journey has now expanded to be far more curated and far more enduring than ever before. The purchase of a BPM property is now only the starting point of an extraordinary lifelong engagement with the BPM world. A world underpinned by objects of desire and extraordinary experiences.
Located beyond the confines of quality, the BPM brand is distinguished by a commitment to emotion. Delivered through each of the brands signature touch points and experiences, the BPM brand identity amplifies BPM's luxury credentials while rendering the BPM World visible to their clients and patrons.
Every facet of the BPM World has been carefully considered in order to create a lasting memory of unparalleled attention, excellence and uniqueness – from the first encounter with the brand through to the purchase and interaction with each of the brands signature experiences such as Black Mist – BPM's Parfum D'Interior.
Underpinning the need to connect with a new generation of luxury consumers, an integrated program of communications helped solidify the purpose, vision and values of the brand while delivering a far more rewarding and intelligent form of social and cultural engagement.
Property purchasers are now more active in the luxury space then ever before – seeking the niche, the new and the next. They want to share their knowledge with peers and engage with brands and properties that truly reflect their own genuine attachment with design, culture and architecture.


You're thinking about the holiday dinner, the guests who will be staying a few days in the extra room, the gifts you haven't bought yet. And it's all coming up – soon! It's easy to get caught in the hustle of the season and not be mindful of the things that might make the best memories.
Gift giving and receiving is part of the holidays, and it's important to concentrate on that part of the tradition. Mindfulness reminds you of what you already know: take care to select a gift that is meaningful to the person you give it to, and receive a gift graciously and with thanks. A special gift is not about the cost; it reflects thought, consideration and a bond between two people. Allow yourself to slow down (as much as possible) and reflect. Be grateful for the opportunity to give and to receive.
Gifts aren't supposed to be the only focus of the holidays, but it's OK to admit that they are important. A mindful approach helps you demonstrate your thoughtfulness — and gratitude — toward family and friends, while creating happy memories.


text:
Q: Error in Bamboo Specs while triggering build plan for master branch Default branch in Bamboo spec is master for the repository.
At the time of Auto deployment trigger, Bamboo specs deploying master branch only, but sometimes even if default branch is updated to feature branch, I want to trigger master only.
I am able to set any feature branch other than master.
But I am not able to set master branch explicitly in Pipeline.java file.
It gives Bamboo Specs error stating "Scheduled trigger: Can't find triggering branch 'master'"

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Q: How to go to detail of the pokemon with poke api in react I am listing pokemons with this api: https://pokeapi.co/api/v2/pokemon/ so when I click the pokemon I want to go to the page.
So for this in details screen:
const dispatch = useDispatch();
  const pokemonId = props.match.params.id;
  const pokemonDetails = useSelector((state) => state.pokemonDetails);
  const { loading, error, pokemon } = pokemonDetails;

  useEffect(() => {
    dispatch(detailsPokemon(pokemonId));
  }, [dispatch, pokemonId]);

And my action:
export const detailsPokemon = (pokemonId) => async (dispatch) => {
  dispatch({ type: POKEMON_DETAILS_REQUEST, payload: pokemonId });
  try {
    const { data } = await Axios.get(`https://pokeapi.co/api/v2/pokemon/${pokemonId}`);
    dispatch({ type: POKEMON_DETAILS_SUCCESS, payload: data });
  } catch (error) {
    dispatch({
      type: POKEMON_DETAILS_FAIL,
      payload:
        error.response && error.response.data.message
          ? error.response.data.message
          : error.message,
    });
  }
};

And my reducer:
export const pokemonDetailsReducer = (
  state = { pokemon: {}, loading: true },
  action
) => {
  switch (action.type) {
    case POKEMON_DETAILS_REQUEST:
      return { loading: true };
    case POKEMON_DETAILS_SUCCESS:
      return { loading: false, pokemon: action.payload };
    case POKEMON_DETAILS_FAIL:
      return { loading: false, error: action.payload };
    default:
      return state;
  }
};

But I am getting pokemon id undefined that's why I cannot go to the page.
export default function Pokemon(props) {
  const { pokemon } = props;
  return (

      <a href={`/pokemon/${pokemon.id}`}>

        <a href={`/pokemon/${pokemon.id}`}>

{pokemon.name}

        <Rating
          rating={pokemon.rating}
          numReviews={pokemon.numReviews}
        ></Rating>

  );
}


text:
Jeanne Augusta Félicienne Beeckman, aussi connue sous son nom d'épouse Jeanne-Émile Vandervelde, née le  à Buenos Aires en Argentine et morte à Lausanne en Suisse le , est une médecin, femme politique belge socialiste, féministe, pacifiste et anti-fasciste.

Biographie
Jeanne Beeckman est la fille d'Elise Beeckman, dite Lilly Pousset, journaliste féministe, et de Théophile Beeckman, juriste. Elle grandit en Argentine jusqu'à l'âge de 4 ans.

Études et exercice de la médecine
Elle entame des études de médecine à Bruxelles en 1908 et devient docteur en médecine en 1914, puis docteur en hygiène en 1921. Elle exerce tout d'abord comme médecin résident à l'hôpital Saint-Pierre puis Saint-Jean de Bruxelles, où elle soigne notamment des blessés durant la guerre, et y exerce jusqu'en 1923. Elle y rencontre le médecin Jean Thysebaert qu'elle épouse. Elle est attachée au service d'anthropologie pénitentiaire de Forest à partir de 1921 et jusqu'en 1949, et se spécialise en parallèle en neuropsychiatrie, en criminologie et en médecine sociale. Dans les années 1930, elle est également au service médical du magasin Le Bon Marché (Bruxelles).

Engagement politique
Son parcours politique est marqué à la fois par son engagement socialiste, féministe, en faveur des droits humains et contre le fascisme.

Carrière politique
Jeanne Beeckman épouse Émile Vandervelde, après avoir divorcé, le . Il l'introduit au sein du Parti ouvrier belge (POB). En 1936, elle devient chef de cabinet d'Émile Vandervelde, ministre de la Santé publique, qui meurt en 1938. Son essor politique débute plus particulièrement à la mort de son mari, elle est tout d'abord élue conseillère communale suppléante de Bruxelles en 1938, mais ne prend ses fonctions qu'à la Libération en 1944, et le reste jusqu'à sa mort. Durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, elle s'engage dans le parti socialiste clandestin. Élue au Sénat en tant que suppléante en 1946, elle devient sénatrice effective en 1948, succédant à Marius Renard, poste auquel elle est réélue jusqu'à sa mort.

Engagement socialiste et en faveur des droits humains
Lors des nombreux voyages qu'elle effectue avec Émile Vandervelde, elle étudie les systèmes sociaux et carcéraux. Elle défend notamment l'enseignement public, refuse la fermeture de l'Hôpital Brugmann comme membre de la Commission d'assistance publique, défend des lois comme sur le repos après l'accouchement pour les mères et l'assurance maternité pour les travailleuses.

Engagement féministe
Fille de la journaliste féministe Elise Beeckman, Jeanne Beeckman se déclare tout d'abord hostile au féminisme actif défendu par sa mère, dont elle qualifie le discours de victimaire. Elle est cependant influencée par Marie Derscheid-Delcourt qui fonde la Fédération belge des femmes universitaires (FBFU) et par la pratique de la médecine qui la pousse à adopter des convictions socialistes, dont elle fait découler ses convictions féministes. Sa carrière politique est marquée par ses engagements en faveur des femmes.

Elle devient adhérente en 1919 de la , pour laquelle elle participe à plusieurs congrès et devient présidente du Conseil national des femmes belges en 1934 après avoir été présidente de la commission hygiène. Elle fait également partie de Groupement belge de la Porte ouverte, association de défense du droit des femmes au travail. Elle s'implique dans la lutte contre les restrictions liées à l'accès à l'emploi des femmes mariées à travers des manifestations, avant de faire partie de la commission consultative portant sur le travail des femmes qu'elle préside entre 1936 et 1937. Elle défend également le droit de vote des femmes, la création d'un volontariat féminin dans l'armée, et l'accès des femmes à l'ensemble des professions. Après la Seconde Guerre mondiale, elle s'implique également après dans le mouvement du planning familial. Elle est faite membre d'honneur du comité de la Famille heureuse.

Décès
Elle meurt à Lausanne le  lors de la conférence de l'Union interparlementaire à laquelle elle assiste.
Elle est inhumée au cimetière de Bruxelles à Evere.

Fonds Jeanne et Pierre Beeckman

Décorations
 Médaille civique de la Première classe
 Chevalier de l'Ordre de Léopold II (1958)
 Chevalier de l'Ordre de la Couronne (1948)
 Médaille de la Résistance (1956)
 Chevalier de l'Ordre Polonia Restituta
 Commandeure de l'Ordre du Mérite de la République italienne

Notes

Sources
 Éliane GUBIN (dir.), Dictionnaire des femmes belges: XIXe et XXe siècles, Bruxelles, éd.Racine, 2006.

Féministe belge
Sénateur belge
Étudiant de l'université libre de Bruxelles
Personnalité du Parti socialiste (Belgique)
Naissance en décembre 1891
Naissance à Buenos Aires
Décès en avril 1963
Décès à Lausanne
Décès à 71 ans
Femme médecin du XXe siècle
Résistante belge
Médecin belge du XXe siècle


text:
net 0.33 1 9181 46 3
net worth of hunter biden 2019 0.8 0.2 3543 69
Apr 09, 2021 · In May 2019 Hunter married South African filmmaker Melissa Cohen. They married 10 days after meeting. Net Worth Summary: Clearly Hunter Biden has been a highly-paid consultant at various points in...
Oct 06, 2021 · Yale-educated attorney, Navy vet, and first son, his net worth is estimated to be a mere $1 million, according to Celebrity Net Worth . He's a …
Jan 12, 2022 · As of this year, Hunter has a net worth of around $4 million. According to reports, Hunter gained around $850,000 to $3 million during his time on Burisma Board. During his stay in Ukraine, he gained around $50,000 a month. Hunter is a smart individual. He has co-founded a lot of successful firms throughout his career.
Jan 13, 2022 · Hunter Biden's Net Worth © Provided by Suggest (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images) According to CelebrityNetWorth.com, Hunter Biden's net worth is $1 million. While we can only speculate ...
Dec 13, 2021 · From 2014 to 2019, he served on the board of Burisma Holdings. In 2019, former President Donald Trump claimed that Joe Biden sought the dismissal of a Ukrainian prosecutor. he was not under investigation, and no evidence was found. As of 2022, Hunter Biden's net worth is estimated to be roughly $1 million. How Does Hunter Biden Spend His Money? Age: 51 Country of Origin: United States of America Born: February 4, 1970 Source of Wealth: Lawyer