text:
Home Men's Shoes
Catalyst Arctic/Blk
5k, All Products, Bestsellers & New Favorites, Energize Everything, Fun, GWP Control, Gym/Fitness, Holiday Web Specials, M 10 / W 11.5, M 10.5 / W 12, M 11 / W 12.5, M 11.5 / W 13, M 12 / W 13.5, M 12.5 / W 14, M 13, M 3.5 / W 5, M 4 / W 5.5, M 4.5 / W 6, M 5 / W 6.5, M 5.5 / W 7, M 6 / W 7.5, M 6.5 / W 8, M 7 / W 8.5, M 7.5 / W 9, M 9 / W 10.5, Men's, Men's Shoes, Men's Test, Movement TEST, NEUTRAL, New For 2021, New Women's, shoe, Shoes, The Fusion & Catalyst, Under $135, Vegan Running Shoes, Walking, Web Specials!, Women's, Women's Favorites, Women's Shoes
Catalyst Blk/Blk
5k, All Products, Bestsellers & New Favorites, Energize Everything, Fun, GWP Control, Gym/Fitness, Holiday Web Specials, M 10 / W 11.5, M 10.5 / W 12, M 11 / W 12.5, M 11.5 / W 13, M 12 / W 13.5, M 12.5 / W 14, M 13, M 15, M 3.5 / W 5, M 4 / W 5.5, M 4.5 / W 6, M 5 / W 6.5, M 5.5 / W 7, M 6 / W 7.5, M 6.5 / W 8, M 7 / W 8.5, M 7.5 / W 9, M 8 / W 9.5, M 8.5 / W 10, Men's, Men's Shoes, Men's Test, Movement TEST, NEUTRAL, New For 2021, New Women's, shoe, Shoes, The Fusion & Catalyst, Under $135, Vegan Running Shoes, Walking, Web Specials!, Women's, Women's Favorites, Women's Shoes
Catalyst SE
5k, All Products, Bestsellers & New Favorites, Energize Everything, Fun, GWP Control, Gym/Fitness, Holiday Web Specials, M 10 / W 11.5, M 10.5 / W 12, M 11 / W 12.5, M 11.5 / W 13, M 12 / W 13.5, M 12.5 / W 14, M 5 / W 6.5, M 5.5 / W 7, M 6 / W 7.5, M 6.5 / W 8, M 7 / W 8.5, M 7.5 / W 9, M 8 / W 9.5, M 8.5 / W 10, M 9 / W 10.5, M 9.5 / W 11, Men 13, Men 14, Men's, Men's Shoes, Men's Test, Movement TEST, NEUTRAL, New For 2021, New Women's, shoe, Shoes, The Fusion & Catalyst, Under $135, Vegan Running Shoes, Walking, Web Specials!, Women's, Women's Favorites, Women's Shoes
Chicago Fusion Special Edition
All Products, Bestsellers & New Favorites, Energize Everything, Limited Editions, M 10.5 / W 12, M 15, M 4.5 / W 6, M 6 / W 7.5, M 6.5 / W 8, M 7 / W 8.5, M 7.5 / W 9, Men's, Men's Shoes, Men's Test, shoe, Shoes, Under $135, Web Specials!, Women's, Women's Favorites, Women's Shoes
Colorado Buffalo Special Edition
$135 to $165, All Products, GWP Control, Limited Editions, M 10 / W 11.5, M 10.5 / W 12, M 11 / W 12.5, M 11.5 / W 13, M 12 / W 13.5, M 12.5 / W 14, M 13, M 14, M 4.5 / W 6, M 5 / W 6.5, M 5.5 / W 7, M 6 / W 7.5, M 6.5 / W 8, M 7 / W 8.5, M 7.5 / W 9, M 8 / W 9.5, M 8.5 / W 10, M 9 / W 10.5, M 9.5 / W 11, Men's, Men's Shoes, Men's Test, shoe, Shoes, The Fusion & Catalyst, Women's, Women's Favorites, Women's Shoes
1/2 Marathon, 10k, 11, 11.5, 12, 12.5, 13, 14, 15, 5k, All Products, EXCEL TEST, GWP Control, Long Run, Marathon, Men's, Men's Performance Running Shoes, Men's Shoes, Men's Test, ML Test Collection, Over $185, Recovery Run, shoe, Shoes, Stable, Versatile
Holiday Sweater Fusion Special Edition
All Products, Bestsellers & New Favorites, Energize Everything, Gym/Fitness, Holiday Web Specials, Home Page, Limited Editions, Men 10 / Women 11.5, Men 10.5 / Women 12, Men 11 / Women 12.5, Men 4.5 / Women 6, Men 6.5 / Women 8, Men 9 / Women 10.5, Men 9.5 / Women 11, Men's, Men's Shoes, Men's Test, NEUTRAL, shoe, Shoes, Under $135, Web Specials!, Women's, Women's Favorites, Women's Shoes
Men's Distance Elite
$135 to $165, 11, 11.5, 12.5, 13, 14, 15, 6, 7, 7.5, 8, 9, All Products, Born to run, fast, GWP Control, Lightweight Speed, Men's, Men's Shoes, Men's Test, NEUTRAL, shoe, Shoes
Men's Distance S 11
1/2 Marathon, 10, 10.5, 10k, 11, 11.5, 12, 12.5, 13, 14, 5k, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5, All Products, Bestsellers & New Favorites, Born to run, Distance, fast, Firm, GWP Control, Holiday Web Specials, Ironman, Lightweight Speed, Lightweight Stability and Support, Marathon, Men's, Men's Performance Running Shoes, Men's Shoes, Men's Test, Responsive, shoe, Shoes, Speed Work, Sprint Tri, Stability, Stable, Under $135, Vegan Running Shoes, Web Specials!
Men's Distance+
$165 to $185, 1/2 Marathon, 10, 10.5, 10k, 11, 11.5, 12, 12.5, 13, 14, 15, 5k, 6, 6.5, 7, 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5, All Products, Bestsellers & New Favorites, Distance, Firm, Ironman, Lightweight Speed, Men's, Men's Shoes, Men's Test, NEUTRAL, Plus Models, Responsive, shoe, Shoes, Speed Work, Vegan Running Shoes, Versatile
Men's Gravity+
1/2 Marathon, 10, 10.5, 10k, 11, 11.5, 12, 12.5, 13, 14, 15, 5k, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5, All Products, Bestsellers & New Favorites, Born to run, Cushioned, Cushioned Training, Distance, fast, Firm, GWP Control, GWP TEST Collection, Ironman, Lightweight Speed, Men's, Men's Performance Running Shoes, Men's Shoes, Men's Test, ML Test Collection, NEUTRAL, New For 2021, Over $185, Plus Models, Responsive, shoe, Shoes, Spacious Forefoot Models, Vegan Running Shoes, Versatile


英文摘要 The dissertation is to explore the effective and beneficial methods in the acquisition of phrasal verbs in incidental reading contexts, where no explicit or direct instruction of the phrasal verbs is implemented. The fundamental consideration is that due to the unclear boundaries of phrasal verb (PV) structure (Bishop, 2004b), L2 learners constantly have difficulties to signal this verb- particle pattern when there is text-dependent condition (i.e. L2 learners read the words directly from written texts). In this sense, the current study investigates the effects of textual modification (a technique under focus on form approach), an effort to make the target item perceptually salient, and presumably to draw learners' attention via reading. The current study investigates the effects of textual modification entailing typographical enhancement and lexical elaboration on the acquisition of English phrasal verbs through reading by Taiwan EFL learners. It also sheds light on exposure frequency, which the target phrasal verbs occurred from one to five times on a number of written texts, on incidental acquisition of phrasal verbs.
Two hundred and ninety-eight pre-intermediate junior-college participants underwent a three-month experiment. Participants were exposed to 10 target PVs by reading one of six versions of five experimental written texts containing these PVs with one to five time exposures. Five reading texts were written by a native speaker of English with similar topic schemata. A typographical enhanced text contained all PVs set in boldface in order to increase learners' focal attention to the PVs while reading. Explicitly lexically elaborated texts had all PVs immediately followed by which means plus a synonym-or definition-type PV explanation, whereas the PVs in implicitly lexically elaborated texts were immediately followed by an appositive PV explanation only. The study adopted a two-way ANOVA with repeated measure analysis to examine the effects on textual modifications and exposure frequency on form-recognition and meaning-recognition posttests. The study as well employed a Hierarchical Linear Model (HLM) design in analyzing typographical enhancement with two levels (enhanced, unenhanced) and type of lexical elaboration with three levels (explicit, implicit, unelaborated) as well as exposure frequency on the performances of PV acquisition as measured by form-meaning recognition posttests.
The results of the study overall displayed that (1) both typographical enhancement and lexical elaboration had positive effects on the acquisition of phrasal verbs, but the effects perpetuated over time on form rather than meaning acquisition. (2) No differential effects were found in terms of explicit or implicit devices of lexical elaboration on acquisition of target PVs. (3) The more exposure to the target PVs, the more PVs L2 learners acquire, with the threshold of four to five time repeated encounters of such PVs, and the learning effect was particularly magnified with the employment of typographic cues. (4) L2 Learners benefits the most from reading written texts that were explicitly lexical elaborated and with the PVs boldfaced. Pedagogical implications were proposed accordingly with the experimental findings.
參考文獻 Adamopoulou, R. (2000). The equivalence of a computer-delivered and a paper-delivered yes/no vocabulary test (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Wales Swansea, UK.
Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 259-302). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
An, C. C. (2002). The effects of processing instruction on the acquisition of ser and estar. Hispania, 85(2), 308-323.
and acquisition of word knowledge. In B. A. Hutson (Ed.), Advances in reading/language research: A research annual (Vol. 2, pp. 231–256). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Arnaud, P. & Savignon, S. (1997). Rare words, complex lexical units and the advanced learner. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition (pp.227-248). Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Baddeley, A. (1997). Human memory: Theory and practice. Hove: Psychology Press.
Barcroft, J. (2003). Distinctiveness and bidirectional effects in input enhancement for vocabulary learning. Applied Language Learning, 13, 133-159.
Bauer, L., & Nation, I.S.P. (1993). Word families. International Journal of Lexicography, 6, 253-279.
Beck, I.L., Perfetti, C.A., & McKeown, M. G. (1982). Effects of text construction and instructional procedures for teaching word meanings on comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 506-521.
Beglar, D., & Hunt, A. (1999). Revising and validating the 2000 word level and university word level vocabulary test. Language Testing, 16, 131-162.
Bensoussan, M., & Laufer, B. (1984). Lexical guessing in context in EFL reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 7, 15-32.
Bialystok, E. (1983). Inferencing: Testing the "Hypothesis-Testing" Hypothesis. In H. W. Seliger & M.H. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 104-123). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Bialystok, E. (1994). Analysis and control in the development of second language proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 157-168.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., Finegan, E., (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371-405.
Bishop, H. (2004 a). Noticing formulaic sequence-A problem of measuring the subjective. LSO working paper in Linguistics, 4, 15-19.
Bishop, H. (2004 b). The effects of typographic salience on the look up and comprehension of unknown formulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt, & R. Carter, (Eds.), Formulaic sequences, acquisition, processing, and use (pp.227-248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Blau, E. K. (1982). The effect of syntax on readability for ESL students in Puerto Rico. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 517-528.
Bloomfield, L (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Bolinger, D.L. (1971). The Phrasal Verb in English. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.
Brewer, B. (2008). Effects of lexical simplification and elaboration on ESL readers' local-level perceived comprehension (Unpublished master's thesis). Brigham Young University, USA.
Brown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by Principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Brown, R. L. (1985). A comparison of the comprehensibility of modified and unmodified ESL reading materials (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, USA.
Brown, R., Waring, R., & Donkaewbua, S. (2008). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20, 136-163.
Bywater, F.V. (1969). A proficiency course in English. London: University of London Press.
Cappelle, B, Shtyrov, Y, Pulvermuller, F. (2010). Heating up or cooling up the brain? MEG evidence that phrasal verbs are lexical units. Brain & Language, 115, 189-201.
Carter, R. (1998). Vocabulary: Applied linguistic perspectives. London: Allen and Unwin.
Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's course (2nd ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle. pp. 424-441.
Chaudron, C. (1982). Vocabulary elaboration in teachers' speech to L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 4, 170-180.
Chaudron, C. (1985). Intake: On models and methods for discovering learners' processing of input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 1-14.
Chiang, Y. T. (2012). Integrating input enhancement and processing instruction in promoting acquisition of English phrasal verbs. Asian EFL Journal, 14 (1), 9-45.
Chun, D. H., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 183-198.
Chung, H. J. (1995). Effects of elaborative modification on second language reading comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, USA.
Coady, J., Magoto, J., Hubbard, P., Graney, J., & Mokhtari, K. (1993). High frequency vocabulary and reading proficiency in ESL readers. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary acquisition (pp.217-228). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Coady, J. (1997a). L2 vocabulary acquisition: A synthesis of the research. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 273-290). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coady, J. (1997b). L2 vocabulary acquisition through extensive reading. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 225-237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cobb, T. Web. Vocabprofile [ accessed June 2012 from http:// www.lextutor.ca/vp/], an adaptation of Heatley & Nation's (1994) Range.
Collins COBUILD English Dictionary. (Rev. ed). (1995). London: HarperCollins.
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied linguistics, 5(4), 161-169.
Cornell, A. (1985). Realistic Goals in Teaching and Learning Phrasal Verbs. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 23, 269-280.
Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press.
contrastive analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 73–79.
Darwin, C. M., & Gray, L.S. (1999). "Going After the Phrasal Verb: An Alternative Approach to Classification." TESOL Quarterly, 33, 65-83.
Davis, J. N. (1989). Facilitating effects of marginal glosses on foreign language reading. Modern Language Journal, 73, 41-48.
Day, E., & Shapson, S. (1991). Integrating formal and functional approaches in language teaching in French immersion: An enhancement study. Language Learning, 41, 25-58.
Day, R., Omura, C., & Hiramatsu, M. (1991). Incidental EFL vocabulary learning and reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 7, 541–551.
de Bot, K., Paribakht, T.S. & Wesche, M. (1997). Towards a lexical processing model for the study of second language vocabulary acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 309-329.
DeKeyser, R. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19 (2), 196-221.
de Ridder, I. (2002). Visible or invisible links: Does the highlighting of hyperlinks affect incidental vocabulary learning, text comprehension, and the reading process? Language Learning Technology, 6, 123-146.
Dixon, R. (1982). The grammar of English phrasal verbs. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 2, 1-42.
Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 207-257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (1998). Issues and terminology. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second langue acquisition (pp. 1-11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dupuy, B., & Krashen, S. (1993). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in French as a foreign language. Applied Language Learning, 4, 55–63.
Elley, W. B. (1989). Vocabulary acquisition from listening to stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 174-187.
Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18 (1), 91-126.
Ellis, R. (1985). Teacher-pupil interaction in second language development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 69-85). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 20 (1), 29-62.
Farch, C., & Kasper, G. (1986). The role of comprehension in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 7, 257–274.
Ferguson, C. A. (1975). Toward a characterization of English foreigner talk.
Fisher, D. L. & Tan, K.C. (1989). Visual displays: The highlighting paradox. Human Factors, 31, 17-30.
Flesch-Kincaid readability test. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved July 12, 2012, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flesch%E2%80%93Kincaid_readability_test.
Gairns, R., & Redman, S. (1986). Working with words: A guide to teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gascoigne, C. (2006a). Toward an understanding of input enhancement in computerized L2 environments. CALICO Journal, 147-162.
Gascoigne, C. (2006b). Explicit Input Enhancement: Effects on Target and Non-Target Aspects of Second Language Acquisition. Foreign Language Annals, 39(4), 551-564.
Gass, S. M. (1986). An interactionist approach to L2 sentence interpretation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8, 19-37.
Gass, S. M. (1988). Integrating research areas: A framework for second language studies. Applied Linguistics, 9, 198-217.
Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Gass, S. M. (1999). Discussion: Incidental vocabulary acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 319-333.
Gass, S. M., & Madden, C. G. (1985). Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (1994). Second language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gaston, G. (2004). Avoidance of phrasal verbs by Spanish speaking learners of English (Unpublished master's thesis). California State University Dominguez Hills, Dominguez Hills, California, USA.
Goudarzi, Z & Moini, M. R. (2012). The effect of input enhancement of collocations in reading on collocation learning and retention of EFL learners. International Education Studies, 3, 247-258.
Hakuta, K. (1974). Prefabricated patterns and the emergence of structure in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 287-297.
Hatch, E. (1983). Simplified input and second language acquisition. In R.W. Andersen (Ed.), Pidginization and Creolization as Language Acquisition, (pp.64-86). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Hammerly, H. (1987). The immersion approach: Litmus test of second language acquisition through classroom communication. Modern Language Journal, 71, 395-401.
a scientific understanding of consciousness. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 14, 27-50.
Hare, A. (2010). Incidental Phrasal Verb Acquisition through Second Language Reading (Unpublished master's thesis). Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Harley, B. (1993). Instructional strategies and SLA in early French immersion. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 245-260.
Hareley, B., & Swain, M. (1985). The interlanguage of immersion students and its implications for second language teaching. In A. Davies, C. Criper, & A.P.R. Howatt (Eds.), Interlanguage (pp. 291-311). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Heatley, A. & Nation, P. (1994). Range. Victoria University of Wellington, NZ. [ Computer program, available at http:// www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/].
Hill, J. (2000). Revising priorities: from grammatical failure to collocational success. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Teaching collocation: Further development in the lexical approach (pp. 47-69). Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
Hirsh, D., & Nation, I.S. P. (1992). What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure? Reading in a Foreign Language, 8, 689-696.
Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Meara, P. (1998). Beyond a Clockwork Orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in s Foreign Language, 11, 207-223.
Horst, M. & Meara, P. (1999). Test of a model for predicting second language lexical growth through reading. The Canadian modern Language Review, 56, 308-328.
Howarth, P. (1996). Phraseology in English academic writing: Some implications for language learning and dictionary making. [Lexicographica, Series maior 75]. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer.
Hsieh, C.C. & Wang, J. (2013). Taiwanese read an average of two books per year: ministry. In Focus Taiwan News Channel. Retrieved March 21, 2013, from http://focustaiwan.tw/news/aliv/201303210025.aspx.
Hu, M. and Nation, I. S. P. (2000). Vocabulary density and reading comprehension, Reading in a foreign Language, 13 (1), 403-430.
Huang, T. L. (2001). 字彙與閱讀之探討與實踐研究。Proceeding from the 10th International Conference on English Teaching and Learning in R.O.C. (pp.446-445), Taipei: Crane Corp.
Huckin, T., & Coady, J. (1999). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language. A review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 181-193.
Huckin, T., Haynes, M., & Coady, J. (1993). Second language reading and vocabulary learning. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Hulstijn, J. H. (1992). Retention of given and inferred word meanings: Experiments in incidental vocabulary learning. In P. J. L. Arnaud & H. Bejoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp.113–125). London: Macmillan.
Hulstijn, J. H. (2003). Incidental and intentional learning. In C. J. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language research (pp. 349-381). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Hulstijn, J., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: the influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 327-339.
Irujo, S. (1986). A piece of cake: learning and teaching idioms. ELT Journal, 40(3), 236-242.
Irujo, S. (1993). Steering clear: Avoidance on the production of idioms. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 31, 205-219.
Issidorides, D.C., & Hulstijn, J. H. (1992). Comprehension of grammatically modified and non-modified sentences by second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 147-161.
Izumi, S. (2000). Promoting noticing and SLA: An empirical study of the effects of output and input enhancement on ESL relativization (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, USA.
Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study of ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541-577.
Jackendoff, R. (1997). Twistin' the Night Away. Language 73(3), 534-559.
Jacobs, G. M. (1994). What lurks in the margin: Use of vocabulary glosses as a strategy in second language reading. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 5, 115-137.
Jones, G. & Langford, (1987). Phonological blocking in the tip of the tongue state. Cognition, 26, 115-122.
awareness. Memory and Cognition, 20, 151-159.
Jourdenais, R. (1998). The effects of textual enhancement on the acquisition of the Spanish preterit and imperfect (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, USA.
Jourdenais, R., Ota, M., Stauffer, S., Boyson, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Does textual enhancement promote noticing? A think-aloud protocol analysis. In Richard Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learner (pp. 183-216). Honolulu, Hawai'i: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
Kameenui, E. J., Carnine, D. W., & Freschi, R. (1982). Effects of text construction and instructional procedures for teaching word meanings on comprehension and recall. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 367-388.
Kellerman, E. (2000). What fruit can tell us about lexicosemantic transfer: A non- structural dimension to learners' perception of linguistic relations. In C. Munoz (Ed.), Segundas Lenguas Adquisicion en La Aula (pp. 21-39). Barcelona: Ariel.
Kennedy, A.G. (1920). The modern English verb-adverb combination. Language and Literature, Vol. I, No.1. California: Stanford University Publications University Series.
Khatib, M. & Ghannadi, M. (2011). Interventionist (explicit and implicit) versus non-interventionist (incidental) learning of phrasal verbs by Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2 (3), 537-546.
Kim, Y. (2006). Effects of input elaboration on vocabulary acquisition through reading by Korean learners of English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 341-373.
Kincaid, J.P., Fishburne, R.P., Rogers, R.L., & Chissom, B.S. (1975). Derivation of New Readability Formulas. Automated Readability Index, Fog Count, and Flesch Reading Ease formula for Navy Enlisted Personnel. Research Branch Report, 8-75.
Knight, S. (1994). Dictionary, the tool of last resort: Effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities. Modern Language Journal, 24 (2), 168-196.
Koda, K. (1989). The effects of transferred vocabulary knowledge on the development of L2 reading proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 529-540.
Koda, K. (1991).Orthographic knowledge in L2 lexical processing: A cross-linguistic perspective. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 35-54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Krashen, S.D (1983). The Natural Approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. New York: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 440-464.
Krashen, S. D. (1992). The power of reading: Insights from the research. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Kweon, S.-O., & Kim, H.-R. (2008). Beyond raw frequency: Incidental vocabulary acquisition in extensive reading. Reading in a foreign Language, 20, 191-215.
Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension? In C. Lauren and M. Nordman (Eds.), Special Language: From Humans thinking to Thinking Machines (pp.316-323), Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Laufer, B. (1992). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In P.J. L. Arnaud & H. Bejoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 126-132). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Laufer, B. (1995). Beyond 2000: A measure of productive lexicon in a second language. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker, & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), The current state of interlanguage: Studies in honor of William E. Rutherford (pp. 265-272). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 20-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laufer, B. (2005). Focus on Form in second language vocabulary learning. In S.H. Foster-Cohen, M. Garcia-Mayo, & J. Cenoz (Eds.), Eurosla Yearbook, 5. A: Benjamins.
Laufer, B., & Eliasson, S. (1993). What causes avoidance in L2 learning: L1-L2 difference, L1-L2 similarity, or L2 complexity? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 35-48.
Laufer, B., & Hill, M. (2000). What lexical information do L2 learners select in a CALL dictionary and how does it affect word retention? Language Learning, & Technology, 3, 58-76.
Laufer, B., & Nation, I. S. P. (1999). A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16, 33-51.
Laufer, B. & Rozovski-Roitblat, B. (2011). Incidental vocabulary acquisition: The effects of task type, word occurrence and their combination. Language Teaching Research, 15(4), 391-411.
Laufer, B., & Sim, D. (1985). Measuring and explaining the threshold needed for English for Academic Purposes test. Foreign Language Annals, 18, 405-413.
Lawson, M. J., & Hogden, D. (1996). The vocabulary-learning strategies of foreign-language students. Language Learning, 46, 101-135.
Lee, S-K. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students' reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language Learning, 57, 87-118.
Leeman, J., Arteagoitia, I. Fridman, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Integrating attention to form with meaning: Focus on form in content-based Spanish instruction. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 217-258). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Leow, R. (1993). To simplify or not to simplify. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 333-355.
Leow, R. (1997). The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult L2 readers' comprehension and intake in second language acquisition. Applied Language Learning, 8, 151-182.
Leow, R. (1998). The effects of amount and type of exposure on adult learners' L2 development. Modern language journal, 82, 49-68.
Leow, R. (1999). Attention, awareness, and focus of form research: A critical overview. In J.F. Lee & A. Valdman (Eds.), Form and meaning: multiple perspectives (pp. 69-96). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Leow, R. (2001a). Attention, awareness and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 51, 113-155.
Leow, R. (2001b). Do learners notice enhanced forms while interacting with the L2? : An online and offline study of the role of written input enhancement in L2 reading. Hispania, 84, 496-508.
Leow, R., Egi, T. Nuevo, A., & Tsai, Y. (2003). The roles of textual enhancement and type of linguistic item in adult L2 learners' comprehension and intake. Applied Language Learning, 13, 1-16.
Leow, R. & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). To think aloud or not to think aloud: The issue of reactivity in SLA research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 35-57. doi: 10.1017/s0272263104261022.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking form Intention to Articulation. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1993). Language use in normal speakers and its disorders. In G. Blanken, E. Dittman, H. Grimm, J. Marshall, & C. Wallesch (Eds.), Linguistic disorders and pathologies. An international handbook (pp. 1-15). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Lewis, M. (2000). There is nothing as practical as a good theory. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Teaching collocation: Further development in the lexical approach (pp. 10-27). Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
Lewis, M. (2000). Language in the lexical approach. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Teaching collocation: Further development in the lexical approach (pp. 126-154). Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
Lewis, M. (2000). Learning in the lexical approach. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Teaching collocation: Further development in the lexical approach (pp. 155-185). Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
Liao, Y., & Fukuya Y. J. (2004). Avoidance of Phrasal Verbs: The Case of Chinese Learners of English. Language Learning, 54 (2), 193-226.
Lightbown, P. M. (1980). The acquisition and use of question by French L2 learners.
In S. Felix (Ed.), Second language development: Trends and issues (pp. 151-175).
Lightbown, P. M. (1984). Input and acquisition in second language classrooms. TESL Canada Journal, 1, 55-67.
Lightbown, P. M. (2001). Input filters in second language acquisition. In S. Foster Cohen & A. Nizegorodcew (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook. Volume I: 2001 (pp.79-97). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lipka, L, (1972). Semantic structure and word-formation: verb-particle constructions in contemporary English. Munchen: Fink.
Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction, and second-language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition (pp. 259-278). NY: The New York. Academy of Sciences.
Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/ non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126-141.
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.413-468). San Diego: Academic Press.
Long, M. H. (1997). Fossilization: Rigor mortis in living linguistic systems? Paper presented at Euro SLA7, Barcelona.
Long, M. H. & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26 (1), 27-56.
Long, M. H., & Richards, C. J. (1998). Series editor's preface. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.). Focus on form in classroom second langue acquisition (pp. xi -xii). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.). Focus on form in classroom second langue acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lorch, R. F. (1989). Text- signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 209-234.
Mackey, W. F. (1965). Language teaching analysis. London: Longmans.
McArthur, T. and Atkins, B. (1974). Dictionary of English phrasal verbs and their idioms. London & Glasgow, Collins.
McCarthy, M. & O'Dell, F. (2007). English phrasal verbs in use, Advanced. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McClure, G (1987). Readability formulas: Useful or useless. An interview with J. Peter Kincaid. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications, 30, 12-15.
McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Americans Idioms and Phrasal Verbs. (2002). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Meara, P. (1996). The dimensions of lexical competence. In G. Brown, K. Malmkjaer, & J. Williams (Eds.), Performance and competence in second language acquisition (pp. 35-53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meyer, A., & Bock, K. (1992). The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Blocking or partial activation. Memory and Cognition, 20, 715-726.
Milton, J. (2009). Measuring Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.
Mortimer, C. (1972). Phrasal verbs in conversation. London: Longman.
Nagy, W. E. (1997). On the role of context in first- and second-language acquisition. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp.64-83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nagy, W.E., Herman, P., & Anderson, R. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20 (2), 233-253.
Nagy, W.E., & Herman, P. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 237-270.
Nation, I.S.P. (1993). Measuring readiness for simplified material: a test of the first 1000 words of English. In M. L. Tickoo (Ed.), Simplification: Theory and Application (pp. 193-203), RELC Anthology Series, 31.
Nation. I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59-82.
Nation, I.S.P. & Coady, J. (1998). Vocabulary and reading. In R. Carter & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (pp. 97-110). London: Longman.
Nattinger, J. R. (1980). A lexical phrase grammar for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 337-344.
Nattinger, J. R. & DeCarrico, J.S. (1992). Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Neagu, M. (2007). English verb particles and their acquisition: A cognitive approach. RESLA, 20, 121-138.
Negari, G. M. & Rouhi, M. (2012). Effects of lexical modification on incidental vocabulary acquisition of Iranian EFL students. English Language Teaching, 5 (6), 95-104. doi:10.5539/elt.v5n6p95.
Oh, S.-Y. (2001). Two Types of Input Modification and EFL Reading Comprehension: Simplification versus Elaboration, TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 69-96.
Ostyn, P., & Godin, P. (1985). RALEX: An alternative approach to language teaching. Modern Language Journal, 69, 346-353.
Ostyn,P., Vandecasteele, M., Deville, G., & Kelly, P. (1987). Towards an optimal programme of FL vocabulary acquisition. In A. M. Cornu, J. Vanparijs, M. Delaheye, & L. Baten (Eds.), Beads or bracelet? How do we approach LSP? (pp.292-305). Oxford: Oxford University press.
Overstreet, M.H. (1998). Text enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learner attention. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 229-258.
Overstreet, M.H. (2002). The effects of textual enhancement on second language learner reading comprehension and form recognition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.
Paribakht, T. S. & Wesche, M. (1996). Enhancing vocabulary acquisition through reading: A hierarchy of text-related exercise types. The Canadian Modern Language Review 52, 155-178.
Paribakht, T. S. & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: a rationale for pedagogy (pp. 174-200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paribakht, T. S. & Wesche, M. (1999). Reading and "incidental" L2 vocabulary acquisition: An introspective study of lexical inferencing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 195-224.
Parkinson, D. (2007). Oxford phrasal verbs dictionary for learners of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pawley, A. & Syder, A. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J.C. Richards and R.W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication (pp. 191-227). London: Longman.
Pellicer-Sanchez., A. (2012). Using psycholinguistic measures to research vocabulary: evidence from reaction time (RT) and eye-tracking. Theory and practice in vocabulary learning and teaching (conference talk). University of Reading, UK.
Petchko, K. (2011). Input enhancement, noticing and incidental vocabulary acquisition. Asian EFL Journal, 13, 228-255.
Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language acquisition? Language Learning, 44 (3).
Pigada, M & Schmitt, N. (2006). Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 18, 1-24.
Pitts, M., White, H., & Krashen, S. (1989). Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading: A replication of the Clockwork Orange study using second language acquirers. Reading in a Foreign Language, 5, 271–275.
Proctor, P. et al. (Eds.). (1995). Cambridge international dictionary of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehension grammar of the English Language. New York: Longman.
Raptis, H. (1997). Is second language reading vocabulary best learned by reading? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 566-580.
Rahmani, F. & Nasri, N. (2013). The effects of instruction type on vocabulary learning: A psycholinguistics study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 787-794.
Rassaei, E. & Karbor, T. (2012). The effects of three types of attention drawing techniques on the acquisition of English collocations. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 1, 1-14.
RFP Evaluation Centers. (2012, July, 14). Flesch Reading Ease Readability Score. Retrievehttp://rfptemplates.technologyevaluation.com/readability-scores/flesch-reading-ease-readability-score.html.
Riter, S., Tisdale, S. & Lee, F-T. (2006). Color your English with idioms. Taipei: LiveABC Interactive Corp.
Robinson, P. (1995). Aptitude, awareness, and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit second language learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 303-357). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Robinson, P. (1997). Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions. Studies in second Language Acquisition, 19, 223-247.
Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory during SLA. In C. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631-678). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Rosa, E., & O'Neill, M. (1999). Explicitness, intake and the issue of awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 511-556.
Rott, S. (1999). The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners' incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 589-619.
Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (2003). Word Power: Phrasal verbs and compounds: A cognitive approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rutherford, W. (1988). Second language grammar: Teaching and learning. London: Longman.
Rutherford, W. & Sharwood Smith, M. (1985). Consciousness-raising and universal grammar. Applied Linguistics, 6, 274-282.
Saragi, P., Nation, I.S.P., & Meister, G. F. (1978). Vocabulary learning and reading. System, 6, 72-78.
Schatz, E.K. & Baldwin, R. S. (1986). Context clues are unreliable predictors of word meanings. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 439-453.
Schmidt, D. (2004). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11-26.
Schmitt, N., Dornyei, Z., Adolphs, S., & Durow, V. (2004). Knowledge and acquisition of formulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences, (pp. 107-126). Philadelphia: John Benjamin's Publishing Company.
Schmitt, N., & McCarthy, M. (1997). Vocabulary: description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmidt, R. (1995). Attention and awareness in foreign language learning. Honolulu: University of Hawai'I at Mānoa.
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., Grabe, W. (2008). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics (AAAL), Washington, DC.
Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165-179.
Sharwood Smith, M. (1995). Input enhancement and the logic of input processing, Paper presented at the 6th EUROSLA, Nijmegen, June.
Shepheard, J. (2009). English Phrasal Verbs OK! Taipei: Bookman.
Shiffrin, R. M. & Schneider, W. (1984). Automatic and controlled processing revisited. Psychological Review, 91(2), 269-276.
Shook, R. (1977). Discourse structure in reading. TESL Reporter, 10, 1-15.
Shook, D. J. (1990). L2 reading and grammar acquisition: An input-processing perspective (Unpublished manuscript).
Shook, D. J. (1994). FL/L2 reading, grammatical information, and the input-to-intake phenomenon. Applied Language Learning, 5, 57-93.
Side, R. (1990). Phrasal verbs: Sorting them out. English Language Teaching Journal, 44 (2), 144-152.
Silva, A. D. (2000). Text elaboration and vocabulary learning (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, USA.
Sinclair, J. (1966). Beginning the study of lexis. In C.E. Bazell, J.C. Catford, M.A.K. Halliday & R.H. Robins (eds). In Memory of J. R. Firth (pp.410-430). London: Longman.
Threadgold (eds.), Language topics. Essays in honour of Michael Halliday (pp. 319-331). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sinclair, J. (1996). The search for units of meaning. TEXTUS 9 (1), 75-106.
Sinclair, J. (2005). The phrase, the whole phrase, and nothing but the phrase. In Cosme C., C. Gouverneur, F. Meunier & M. Paquot (eds.), Proceedings of the phraseology 2005 conference (p.19-22). Unversite catholique de Louvain-la-Neuve, 13-15 October 2005.
Sinclair, J., Hanks, P., Fox, G., Moon, R., Stock, P. (2000). Collins COBUILD English-Chinese Language Dictionary. Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers., Taipei: Tunghua Bookstore Limited.
Sinclair, J. & Moon, R. (1989). Collins COBUILD Dictionary of Phrasal Verbs: Helping learners with real English. Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers Limited.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Eds), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183-205). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 2, Theoretical issues (pp. 1157-1259). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Most vocabulary is learned from context. In M.G. McKeown & M.E. Curits (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 89-105). Hillsale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1989). Canadian immersion and adult second language teaching: What is the connection? Modern language Journal, 73, 150-159.
Tekmen, E. A. F. & Daloglu, A. (2006). An investigation of incidental vocabulary acquisition in relation to learner proficiency level and word frequency. Foreign Language Annals, 39 (2), 220-243.
Terrell, T., Baycroft, B., & Perrone, C. (1987). The subjunctive in Spanish interlanguage: A accuracy and comprehensibility. In T.R. Dvorak, J. F. Lee, & B. VanPatten (Eds.), Foreign language learning: A research perspective (pp. 33-51). New York: Newburry House.
Thibeau, T. J. (1999). English Prepositions in Phrasal Verbs: A Study in Second Language Acquisition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Arizona, USA.
Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. London: Longman.
Tomlin, R., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183-203.
Towell, R., & Hawkins, R. (1994). Approaches to second language acquisition. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
Toya, M. (1991). Learning vocabulary from different input: Elaboration vs. highlighting (Unpublished manuscript). University of Hawaii at Mānoa, USA.
Toya, M (1992). Form and explanation in modification of listening input in L2 vocabulary learning (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Hawai'i at Mānoa , USA.
Trebits, A. (2009). The most frequent phrasal verbs in English language EU documents-A corpus-based analysis and its implications. System, 37, 470-481.
Treisman, A. (1992). Visual attention and the perception of objects. International Journal of Psychology, 17, 13.
Tsang, W. K. (1987). Text modification in ESL reading comprehension (Unpublished scholarly paper). University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, USA.
Turkay, B. & İlkay, C. Y. (2004). Idiom processing in L2: through rose-colored glasses. The Reading Matrix, 4 (2), 105-116.
Tweissi, A. (1998). The effects of the amount and type of simplification on foreign language reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11, 191-206.
Ulijn, J. M. (1984). Reading for professional purposes: Psycholinguistic evidence in a cross-linguistic perspective. In A. K. Pugh & J.M. Ulijn (Eds.), Reading for professional purposed (pp. 66-81). London: Heinemann.
Ulijn, J. M., & Strother, J. B. (1990). The effect of syntactic simplification on reading EST texts as L1 and L2. Journal of Research in Reading, 13, 38-54.
comprehension and incidental vocabulary acquisition. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
Urano, K. (2000). Lexical simplification and elaboration: Sentence comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, USA.
van Lier, L. (1994). Language awareness, contingency, and interaction. AILA Review, 11, 69-82.
VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287-301.
VanPatten, B. (1994). Evaluating the role of consciousness in second language acquisition: Terms, linguistic features & research methodology. AILA Review, 11, 27-36.
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input Processing and Grammar Instruction: Theory and Research. Norwood, NJ: Albex.
VanPatten, B. (2004). Input processing in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary (pp. 5-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Vidal, K. (2003). Academic Listening: A Source of Vocabulary Acquisition? Applied Linguistics, 24, 56-89.
German and Italian students (Unpublished doctoral Dissertation). der Albert-Ludwigs-Universitat Freiburg i. Br, Germany.
Wallace, M. (1982). Teaching vocabulary. London: Heinemann.
Watanabe, Y. (1997). Input, intake, and retention: Effects of increased processing on incidental learning of foreign language vocabulary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 287-307.
Webb, S. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28, 46-65.
Webb, S (2008). The effects of context on incidental vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 232-245.
White, J. (1994). Input enhancement: some evidence form children. Paper presented at the 28th Annual convention of TESOL International, Baltimore, MD.
White, J. (1998). Getting the learners' attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.). Focus on form in classroom second langue acquisition (pp. 85-113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
White, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: The Input Hypothesis and the development of L2 competence. Applied Linguistics, 8, 95-110.
Widdowson, H. G. (1972). The teaching of English as communication. ELT, 27 (1), 15-19. Reprinted in Brumfit and Johnson (Eds) (1979)117-121.
Wible, D. (2008). Multiword expressions and the digital turn. In F. Meunier and S. Granger (Eds.), Phraseology in Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 163-181). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
William, J. (1999). Memory, attention, and inductive learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 1-48.
Williams, J. & Evans, J. (1998). What kind of focus and on which forms? In. C. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition (pp. 139-155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wong, W. Y. (2000). The effects of textual enhancement and simplified input on L2 comprehension and acquisition of non-meaningful grammatical form (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL.
Wong, W. Y. (2003). Textual enhancement and simplified input: Effects on L2 comprehension and acquisition of non-meaningful grammatical form. Applied Language Learning, 13, 17-45.
Wong, W. Y., & Simard, D. (1999). Textual enhancement as input enhancement in SLA: A state of the art review (Unpublished manuscript). The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Wood, D. (2002). Formulaic language acquisition and production: Implications for teaching. TESL Canada Journal, 20(1), 1-15.
Woolard, G. (2000). Collocation-encouraging learner independence. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Teaching collocation: Further development in the lexical approach (pp. 28-45). Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
Wray, A. (1998). Protolanguage as a holistic system for social interaction. Language & Communication, 18(1), 46-67.
Wray, A. (2000). Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice. Applied Linguistics, 21, 463-389.
Wray, A. & Perkins, M. R. (2000). The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language and Communication, 20, 1-28.
Yano, Y., Long, M., & Ross, S. (1994). The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning, 44, 189-219.
Yorio, C. (1989). Idiomaticity as an indicator of second language proficiency. In K. Hyltenstam & L. Obler (Eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan (pp. 55-72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
instructional practice? The Modern Language Journal, 83, 350-366.
Zahar, R., Cobb, T., & Spada, N. (2001). Acquiring vocabulary through reading: Effects of frequency and contextual richness. Canadian Modern Language Review, 15, 541-572.
Zimmerman, C. (1997). Do reading and interactive vocabulary instruction make a difference? An empirical study. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 121-140.


Shared experience is a common idea flowing through American history. People came together originally first as a military force, next as a political force, followed by economic forces and understanding and tolerating social forces, all reflected during events of the eighteenth century. Before the French Indian War, 1754-1763; social/economic and political protests until 1775; the Revolutionary War, 1775-1783; and the Constitutional period, 1783-1789.
grievances to each other through a language of shared experience.
It came to pass that during the Sixties provided a language of shared experience. Many youth and some older Americans understood the vocabulary. Shared experience and the language were the primary strengths of the time; the political opposition was weak or inept.
The primary difference between general revolutionary circumstances 200 years earlier, and the 1960s were individual Americans were economically secure in the Twentieth Century. Name recognition mean commercial opportunities – speaking fees, books, lectures, panels, TV appearances, advisory positions e.g. Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin. Most of those people began their commercial roll while trying to motivate Americans to revolution: Tom Hayden wrote two or three books during the 1960s; David Horowitz kept apace with his writing plus magazine work. No one in the 1760s or 1770s were participating to make a name or money.
Neither man was capable of writing anything authoritative or definitive. Each would have to be honest. They were street leaders, plotters, protest-arrangers and in some cases drug suppliers. In essence they filled the sorts of role that Samuel Adams had 200 years earlier. But after Independence and a successful war, Sam Adams was neglected. Other people wrote books, pamphlets and newspaper articles.
At the demise of the Sixties not many people could write about the decade: There were too many insights and sights, too many odd people, too many influences intense or disturbing, and as the decade lengthened many events crashed into the younger generation. The so-called leaders lost control. No one could capture it all for one city, for a region, or a decade.
Americans are left with TH Breen's The Marketplace of the Revolution, an excellent book about the political staging of the colonists before the American Revolutionary War. It seems natural that the war did not solve political problems between and among the thirteen states. After the War Americans acted appropriately and properly.
But the language of the shared experience from the Sixties, left Americans with people purportedly writing memoirs, and most of those are not pretty. No one tells much truth in an memoir or in an autobiography. But don't mind the liar. Don't mind the whiner. Don't mind the writer aggrandizing himself: I was a hero at this event. I spoke last. I turned the tide against the pigs during that riot. It's all entertainment. Hope you enjoyed it, because I was able to propagate the myths and make the buck.


text:
Search News & Articles
Sign In | Become a Member | Contact Us
Editions North America | Europe | Magazine
Merger & Acquisitions
Special Reports and Research
Wide Format & Signage
Digital & Inkjet
Hogue Printing to Implement THE System from CRC Information Systems
Press release from the issuing company
SCOTTSDALE, AZ (September 25, 2002)–CRC Information Systems, Inc. (CRC) is pleased to announce that Mesa, Arizona-based commercial printer Hogue Printing has signed a deal to implement THE System - the finest in business management software for the graphic arts industry. Hogue Printing will implement a fully integrated software solution including THE System's Commercial Estimating module. "Ease of use features, such as system-wide drill downs, and operating on CRC's open Microsoft SQL Server database platform will undoubtedly offer us additional flexibility to access our data," said Hogue Printing's Accounting and Administration Manager, Karen Wolfe. "This will improve overall efficiency and help further reduce administrative costs while decreasing turnaround time on jobs." Hogue Printing specializes in sheetfed commercial printing, copy, design, and packaging. This 38 year old family-owned company was built on developing long-term relationships with their clients by offering unequaled services with competitive prices. About CRC Information Systems, Inc. CRC Information Systems, Inc. (CRC) has been developing fully integrated business management systems designed specifically for the graphic arts industry since 1983. THE System contains over 100 modules including sixteen industry-specific estimating modules. Other modules which comprise THE System handle such areas as job costing, shop floor data collection, financial accounting, and sales and marketing. THE System runs on the popular Microsoft Windows 2000 operating system using Microsoft's SQL Server 2000 database management system. Customers may also choose from a wide variety of Web-enabled, real-time modules designed to handle everything from on-line job tracking to on-line ordering of finished goods over the Internet. Over 300 graphic arts facilities throughout North America and the Caribbean, including the largest graphic arts company in the world, rely on CRC to handle their day-to-day business transactions. Pricing for THE System ranges from $25,000 to $400,000
Warren Werbitt Goes Printer to Printer with Press Emporium's Vernon Attles
Security Printing: A Tricky Business
Frank Catalogs Catalogs
Warren Werbitt Goes Printer to Printer with Willow Print Group's Jeff Ekstein
Frank Gets Lost in the Good Book
Renew membership, reset password, set email and notification preferences
Syndication and News Licensing
About WhatTheyThink
WhatTheyThink is the global printing industry's leading independent media organization with both print and digital offerings, including WhatTheyThink.com, PrintingNews.com and WhatTheyThink magazine versioned with a Printing News and Wide-Format & Signage edition. Our mission is to provide cogent news and analysis about trends, technologies, operations, and events in all the markets that comprise today's printing and sign industries including commercial, in-plant, mailing, finishing, sign, display, textile, industrial, finishing, labels, packaging, marketing technology, software and workflow.
© 2021 WhatTheyThink. All Rights Reserved.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Q: Restoring Win2K3 R2 server with Active Directory We have had a server in a data center for about 6 years now. A few days ago motherboard went bad. In order to get the services running back quickly, a tech team decided to place it on a new motherboard with a different processor (different HAL needed).
So, the steps that lead to the current state:

*

*Motherboard on the server goes bad.

*HDD's a moved to a different motherboard.

*Windows Server 2003 R2 CD doesn't allow a repair install for some reason.

*Windows Server 2003 R2 x64 CD on the other hand, allowed to proceed with repair install.

*x64 repair install restarts after Regional Setting and Key dialogs and after restart again prompts the same data.

Currently, the repair installation process can't finish.
But the HDD is intact and the data is accessible.
Can I transfer Active Directory to a new installation of windows with only access to files? If yes, please lead me to the guide on how to do it.

A: Are there any usable, recent backups? Because the short answer to your question is "No" and the simplest way to deal with this mess would be to build a new system (this can be a virtual system if drivers are a problem) and restore from a backup.
If this situation happens to you or anyone else reading this in the future then I'd suggest duplicating the disk (probably to a virtual disk) and running any repair operations on the duplicate.

A: Are there any usable, recent backups? Because the short answer to your question is "No" and the simplest way to deal with this mess would be to build a new system (this can be a virtual system if drivers are a problem) and restore from a backup.
If this situation happens to you or anyone else reading this in the future then I'd suggest duplicating the disk (probably to a virtual disk) and running any repair operations on the duplicate.

A: If you have system, DNS and AD database intact from the old system i see few possibilities here.
You could think to use some product to virtualize the system from your old hard drive.
You could try to use tools like storage craft or acronis to do it.
Then you could run your AD server on VM.
If however you want to put it back to some other hardware there would be also two possibilities:
The storage craft while you doing VM from hard drive would create an image non physical machine related that process is called: bare metal recovery of Windows servers.
You could rebuild on almost whatever machine you like from that image.
However I run in to some difficulty some times with this with some SCSI drives etc.
The other way would be to run your image as Virtual machine as primary AD (as i understand it is an primary server.
Then create secondary machine and transfer FSMO roles to it. Make it primary etc...

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


1178 BC - Odysseus, legendary King of Ithaca, returns to his kingdom after the Trojan War. Cornellians giggle uncontrollably.
1855 - Abraham and Mary Todd Lincoln enjoy a night of mad passionate love; sloppy seconds are had after Mr. Lincoln keeps his promise that the South Shall Rise Again!
1867 - Queen Victoria considers ending her mourning phase, but continues on: "Why spoil a good time?"
1878 - Joseph Stalin is born.
1889 - Future German dictator, Charles Spencer Chaplin, is born.
1927 - A good day to be born if you are the leader of a world religion with the maddest gaze in human history.
1943 - The first "Annual Miss Stalin-Look-Alike" contest is held in the Soviet Union. Joseph Stalin wins unanimously.
1953 - Desi Arnaz slaps Lucille Ball, calling her an 'estupit beach' on national television.
1972 - At the age of 69, actress Sharon Stone gets a star on the Walk of Fame.
2007 - Donald Trump pardons the 2007 "Annual Miss Stalin-Look-Alike" contest winner for her objectable behavior.


There are as many different types of consumers of local food as there are different types of urban farmers and different types of food grown. Consumers with different needs can all benefit from urban farming. Three farms on the Kansas City Center for Urban Agriculture farm tour explain this perfectly. Kurlbaum's Heirloom Tomatoes, J-14 Agricultural Enterprises and the Troostwood Youth Garden and provide food for many different kinds of people.
Kurlbaum's heirloom tomatoes are sold locally at McGonigal's, Brookside Market, and many Kansas City restaurants including Michael Smith's in the crossroads, Café Trio in midtown and Webster House downtown. By selling to many different places Co-owner Liz Kurlbaum can have better control over the price and feed a larger group of people. While this urban farmer chooses to sell their product mostly to restaurants, Joe Jennings at J-14 Agricultural Enterprises has a different approach.
Jennings has developed a community based CSA where potential customers can pay 300$ for up to 500 pounds of produce. Extra food is taken to elderly community members, including some in nursing homes. Jennings also uses some of the food grown for his family.
The Troostwood Youth Garden is the only place that fresh vegetables are available in the busy Paseo Blvd. neighborhood in Kansas City. This local produce can be bought there Monday through Saturday before dark. Troostwood feeds the community as well as educates them about the importance of eating healthy and knowing where food really comes from.
These different urban farms show that everyone can eat well with the help of urban farmers. Whether someone is eating at a restaurant, buying a large supply of food for their family, or trying to find something fresh in a busy neighborhood, urban farming is helping people enjoy food that is local, healthy and delicious.


text:
To subscribe to Saudi Gazette, please contact:
+966 12 676 0000 Ext.2403, 2405, 5557
email: sgmarketing@saudigazette.com.sa
For a full technical spec including more detail on rich media formats, payment terms or any other questions you may have,
Please contactemail: sgadvertising@saudigazette.com.sa
advertise Subscribe E-paper
Tuesday January 21, 2020 / 26 , Jumada al-ula , 1441
Home Opinion > Editorial
Tunisia needs better elected politicians
Tunisia's revolution, the first and only surviving manifestation of the Arab Spring, faces a new test with the election next month of a successor to the late Beji Caid Essebsi followed by a general election in October.
These second free elections since the ouster of the Ben Ali regime in 2011 are notable for the number of independent candidates. Around a hundred people have cast their hats into the ring for the presidency. There is also a plethora of would-be legislators who are saying they are aligned to no particular party. This potentially chaotic situation is evidence of the perceived weakness of the current electoral laws, a weakness which last year the late president recognized. He established a team of experts to recommend changes and also examine the possibility of adjusting the constitution to give greater executive powers to the presidency.
Some 70 parties contested the first general election of which 21 succeeded in having members elected to the 217-seat National Assembly. Neither of the two largest parties, Nidaa Tounes with 86 seats and the moderate Islamic Ennahda Movement with 69 was capable of governing by itself. Moreover Nidaa Tounes then saw squabbles and defections, so that going into the new election, it only has 37 sitting members. A multi-party system ought not to be a problem. However, other countries which operate similar proportional representation electoral systems generally manage to negotiate and compromise to allow the legislature and government to function successfully. This has not so far been the case in Tunisia. All legislators, of course, claim to be acting in the best interests of the country, but not enough of them see that an effective parliament needs give and take. Sticking obdurately to political positions impedes the process of government and prevents it from tackling Tunisia's most pressing issues, particularly youth unemployment and rural poverty.
This stubbornness has been compounded by the unfortunate example of elected members failing to keep in touch with their constituents. Successive polls seem to show that Tunisians are fed up with their political leaders and have sharply declining faith in democracy, even though few favor a return to a Ben Ali-style dictatorship run by an elite kleptocracy. Yet remarkably, in the run up to these elections, the Independent Higher Elections Committee is reporting a surge of 1.5 million new voter registrations. In a country of 11.5 million, the electorate now numbers 6.7 million.
It would seem that though Tunisians are desperately disappointed in democracy, they still hope the next set of politicians they choose will be able to do better. A July poll showed that Ennahda, the only party that has shown parliamentary discipline, has an 8.6 percent approval rating, trailing behind the brand new party Heart of Tunisia with 20.8 percent.
Whatever the outcome of these elections, those who are entrusted with political power simply have to recognize that they have taken on a huge responsibility. Tunisians are fed up. They want effective and honest government. Parties may have widely differing interests but they ought to have one over-riding concern, which is the success of Tunisian democracy. Maybe it would be an idea to hang up a large sign in parliament reading: "Is what I am about to say or do going to make the running of my country better or worse?"
Turkey sending troops to Libya
Kidnapping hope
Private clinic owner should be a full-time Saudi doctor
Kyrgios shines for Australia after bushfire disaster
SaudiGazette - SaudiGazette
Tweets by Saudi_Gazette
Copyright © 2016 www.saudigazette.com.sa - All rights reserved
saudi arabia world opinion business technology sports life
about us Epaper contact us Advertise Social Media
Archive Subscribe


The dress is made-to-order, which means that it is made specially for your babies based on our standard sizes. All kids also have the option to customize your dresses. Please contact info@myedresshouse.com for more information.
If you are interested in a custom color of this gown, please contact us prior to placing your order to discuss options.
Layered Soft Mesh Elegant Baby Dress Luxury L..
Spaghetti Strap Oversized Bow For Special Occ..
Spaghetti Strap Adjust In Back For Special Oc..
Fullness Skirt Gathered Half Sleeves Luxury L..
Sleeveless Fitted Bodice Adjustable Back, Lye..
Adorable Tutu Style Dress With 3D Floral Appl..
Sweet Fun-Packed Tutu Dress Luxury Little Lad..
Floral Lace Appliques, Rainbow Layered Ruffle..