text:
OPEN LETTER TO EU FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY ABOUT ASPARTAME
Dr. Betty Martini
Mission Possible World Health International
9270 River Club Parkway
Duluth, Georgia 30097
E-Mail: BettyM19@mindspring.com
To the European Food Safety Authority
Since Dr. Soffritti, lead Scientist in the 36 month aspartame study on rats rebutted EFSA's bizarre criticism of his impeccable work there has been nothing but silence. The Ramazzini study was peer reviewed by 7 world experts, who unquestionably know that respiratory disease is part of the normal dying process. Dr. Soffritti's rebuttal explains:
"As reported in a previous paper (Soffritti et al. 1999), one of the most important issues in environmental and industrial carcinogenesis is how to deal with diffused carcinogenic risks, to which most of the planet's population may be exposed. These carcinogenic risks are represented by a) agents that are slightly carcinogenic at any dose; b) low or extremely low doses of a carcinogenic agent of any kind; or c) mixtures of small doses of carcinogenic agents.
"Epidemiologic and experimental studies are fundamental in the identification and quantification of diffused carcinogenic risks, but they must be designed and conducted to be as powerful as possible with adequate methodology. In the case of experimental studies, it is not sufficient to follow the standard protocol used in ordinary experiments. Instead, it is necessary to conduct studies that may be defined as "mega-experiments," using a vast number of animals (at least 2001,000 per experimental group) in order to express a marked difference in the variation of effects, and exposing the animals in all phases of development to allow the agent to express its full carcinogenic potential.
"It is based on this rationale that the European Ramazzini Foundation performed a mega-experiment on 1,800 rats and demonstrated that, in our experimental conditions, aspartame is a multipotential carcinogenic agent (Soffritti et al. 2005; Soffritti et al. 2006).
"The results of our study (Soffritti et al. 2005; Soffritti et al. 2006) attracted the attention of the scientific community, consumer and industry associations, and the national and international agencies responsible for food safety. Among various comments, the opinion expressed on 5 May 2006 by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA 2006) and the general interpretation of an epidemiologic study conducted by the National Cancer Institute (NCI 2006) necessitate comment on our part.
"In examining the raw data of our study, the EFSA (2006) observed a high incidence of chronic pulmonary inflammation in males and females in both treated groups and in the control group. Based on this observation, it was concluded that "the increased incidence of lymphomas/leukemias reported in treated rats was unrelated to aspartame, given the high background incidence of chronic inflammatory changes in the lungs . . . ." In my opinion, this conclusion is bizarre for the following reasons:
"First, the EFSA (2006) overlooked the fact that the study was conducted until the natural death of the rodents. IT IS WELL KNOWN THAT INFECTIOUS PATHOLOGIES ARE PART OF THE NATURAL DYING PROCESS IN BOTH RODENTS AND HUMANS.
"Second, if the statistically significant increased incidence of lymphomas/leukemias observed were indeed caused by an infected colony, one would expect to observe an increased incidence of lymphomas/leukemias not only in females but also in males. The EFSA (2006) did not comment on this discrepancy in their logic.
"Finally, in support of the hypothesis regarding the safety of aspartame, the EFSA (2006) cited the negative results of recent carcinogenicity studies carried out in transgenic mice by the NTP; the ESFA did not mention that, because the NTP studies on genetically altered mice were performed using a new experimental model, the NTP subcommittee unanimously agreed "there is uncertainty whether the study possessed sufficient sensitivity to detect a carcinogenic effect" (NTP 2005).
"Interestingly, the same scrutiny applied to our study has not been applied to a recent abstract published by Lim et al. (2006) from the NCI diet questionnaire survey (NCI 2006) in which self-reported aspartame consumption showed no increases in either leukemia/lymphomas or in brain cancer. These results have been used by industry, the EFSA, and others to argue that aspartame is not a risk for humans, in spite of our animal study results. Without specific information on each individual's consumption rate and duration it is difficult to assess the power of the survey, in spite of the large number of participants. The second related issue is whether aspartame is an early- or late-stage carcinogen. If it is an early-stage initiator of cancer, then reporting the lack of effects in older individuals who have not consumed aspartame since early childhood would be expected to show little or no increased cancer (Hoel 1985).
"The safety-in particular, the noncarcinogenicity-of today's most widely diffused artificial sweeteners and their blends is largely based on studies conducted decades ago. I second Karstadt's nomination of acesulfame K for further study; however, I add that it should be evaluated using a long-term mega-experiment.
"The author declares he has no competing financial interests."
Morando Soffritti
Cesare Maltoni Cancer Research Center
European Foundation of Oncology and Environmental Sciences
"B. Ramazzini"
E-mail: crcfr@ramazzini.it
These are part of comments on a release on acesulfame potassium, another unsafe sweetener that triggered cancer and leukemia in original studies, that also summarize the Ramazzini Study, and the EFSA's bizarre rebuttal.
Dr. Koeter, your statement" "The expertise required [to judge any new study on whether aspartame causes cancer] almost inevitably means having a previous involvement." You also said, "Eliminate the scientists who had worked in the area before or who had worked for industry and there would be no scientists left. The panel had been "fully impartial." These statements are an abomination. You would try to make the world believe there are no independent researchers in Europe who are capable of reviewing an aspartame study?
If your statement had any basis for truth, which it doesn't, an impartial committee would look to researchers who had done "independent" research with no financial ties to aspartame manufacturers. Dr. Ralph Walton, for example, is an independent researcher who did a study on aspartame. It is titled: "Adverse Reactions to Aspartame: Double-Blind Challenge in Patients from a Vulnerable Population: http://www.mindfully.org/Health/Aspartame-Adverse-Reactions-1993.htm Monsanto said they would provide the aspartame and then refused. Obviously, they knew it was independent and they couldn't control it. You simply can't test a deadly addictive excitoneurotoxic carcinogenic drug like aspartame and not have adverse findings. And sure enough the institution had to stop the study after one man (administrator of the hospital) had a retinal detachment (lost his vision in one eye), one person had conjunctival bleeding, and others reported they were being poisoned. So when Dr. John Olney, one of the most renowned neuroscientists in the world today who founded the field of neuroscience called excitotoxicity, made world news on the aspartame brain tumor association, Dr. Walton appeared with him on 60 Minutes. He did research on scientific peer reviewed studies and funding. http://www.dorway.com/peerrev.html You will note that 92% of all independent scientific peer reviewed studies on aspartame show the problems. And Dr. Walton notes if you remove 6 studies the FDA had something to do with because of their controversy having to do with aspartame manufacturers and one pro-aspartame summary, 100% of scientific peer reviewed studies by independent studies show the problems aspartame causes. So what does that say about studies controlled and funded by aspartame manufacturers? To ask the question is to answer it. How do they fix the studies?
Scientific FAQs - Articles that detail toxicity effects from aspartame and why industry studies find no problems.
Heavily referenced articles.
http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame/abuse/methanol.html
http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame/abuse/seizures.html
http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame/abuse/migraine.html
http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame/abuse/parkinson.html
We expected the EFSA to sell out our health as predicted in 2005 by Mark Gold of the Aspartame Toxicity Center, http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame We've been seeing these sell-outs for a quarter of a century, standard aspartame manufacturers tactics.
"As part of a SCF 2002 review postscript I wrote late 2005, I stated the following:
"The European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) has stated that it will review the study linking aspartame ingestion to lymphomas and leukemias "...as a matter of high priority, in the context of the previous extensive safety data available on aspartame." If that quote doesn't give one a clue as to what the results of their review will be, I will be more clear: The review by EFSA (industry consultants) will find no problem with aspartame. That is a guarantee. You read it here first."
[ http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame/scf2002-postscript.htm ]
- Mark
We're talking about the health of the world, and what goes on with power of the aspartame manufacturers to keep this deadly chemical poison on the market. In fact, when the European Union was making a decision on aspartame safety I thought it was important enough to fly to Brussels to give them all the damning research. The first thing that happened was I locked up for 3 1/2 hours by Immigration asking me questions like "If we let you in England how many people will find out about the dangers of aspartame?" They confiscated everything on aspartame I had in my luggage but were forced to return it.
After doing many lectures throughout England I flew to Brussels to bring the European Union all the damning research on aspartame during a two hour meeting. I expected they would eliminate all the serious results and use industry fixed studies and propaganda. But they didn't know I was wired. Here is the rebuttal to their report:
http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame/scf2002.html
The FDA knew aspartame was a carcinogen a quarter of a century ago when Searle was caught excising brain tumors from rats, and then putting them back in the study, and when they died they resurrected them on paper. They were also caught filtering out neoplasms in an attempt for the FDA not to see them. See the Bressler Report or FDA audit on http://www.dorway.com Aspartame triggered brain, mammary, uterine, ovarian, testicular, pancreatic and thyroid tumors.
The Ramazzini Study just reaffirms what the FDA said themselves from the beginning. Since a lie was used as an excuse and since EFSA did not apologize you see the report to the International Court of Justice, United Nations and World Health Organization. World health is at stake with millions consuming a deadly carcinogen. We want it off the market and we want an apology from the European Food Safety Association for protecting industry instead of the people.
Dr. Koeter, after writing this I see you have now owned up to the politics involved in this article: "EU's food agency battles attempts to hijack science."
http://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/news/ng.asp?n=70720-efsa-health-claims-antibiotics
It says: "Science and politics make poor bedfellows. Just ask Herman Koeter, deputy executive director at the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), which has felt the push and pull of national politics ever since the agency began operating four years ago." Aspartame was mentioned when it said: "Hot decisions that had political repercussions included a review of a controversial aspartame study" .
Now do something about it. Simply admit the truth and have aspartame banned. It has been known that aspartame is a multipotential carcinogen since the beginning. Dr. Adrian Gross, FDA toxicologist, told Congress aspartame violated the Delaney Amendment, which says if a product causes cancer in animals it can't be put in food. He said further without a shadow of a doubt aspartame can produce brain tumors and brain cancer. Nothing has changed in a quarter of a century except millions have perished from the neurodegenerative diseases and cancers and other horrors outlined in Dr. Roberts medical text, Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic. Dr. Soffritti confirmed what the FDA already knew in one of the most precise studies ever done. An apology is owed to Dr. Soffritti and to the world.
Below my signature is the report.
Founder, Mission Possible Wolrd Health International
http://www.wpwhi.com
http://www.whno.net
http://www.dorway.com
Aspartame Toxiocity Center: http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame
REPORTING on The EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITYS LIES ABOUT THE RAMAZZINI ASPARTAME TOXICITY & CANCER STUDY
To The United Nations, International Court of Justice, World Health Organization, and Parliament:
I'm reporting gross conflicts of interest by the European Food Safety Authority using panel members connected to aspartame manufacturers to judge a study adverse to the chemical. Then EFSA lied to the world by declaring aspartame safe for human consumption.
In original studies aspartame was identified as a trigger of brain tumors and cancer, therefore the FDA Board of Inquiry revoked the petition for its approval. Don Rumsfeld, then CEO of aspartame producer G. D. Searle Co, became Reagan's Secretary of Defense, and the day after Reagan's inauguration a new FDA Commissioner was appointed who approved aspartame after years of FDA rejection. See the clip from the aspartame documentary, Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World.
http://www.wnho.net/fda_petition1.doc
Aspartame triggers mammary, uterine, ovarian, testicular, pancreatic and thyroid tumors. In Ramazinnis 3 year study on 1,800 rats only those fed the chemical developed malignant brain tumors. It further triggered leukemia, lymphoma, cancer of the kidney, urethra and bladder and peripheral nerves, especially cranial. In September of 2005 at a conference, Dr. Soffritti, Director, declared aspartame a multipotential carcinogen, confirming the basis for FDA rejection a quarter of a century before. After Rumsfeld manipulated to put it on the market the FDA reversed and has been the lackey of aspartame producers ever since, pushing pro-poison propaganda, disregarding thousands of consumer complaints...
We have a paper trail of official documents including the Bressler Report, an FDA audit exposing Searle's chicanery. FDA toxicologist Jerome Bressler declared the studies were so bad that FDA removed 20% of his report before releasing it. Between the FDA, the aspartame industry, their front groups hired members of the EFSA evaluating the toxicity of their chemical.
The Guardian on 5/15/06 quoted EFSA Executive Director of the EFSA, Dr. Herman Koeter: "Dr Koeter said, he wanted to clear up misunderstandings about "conflicts of interest" among his advisory panel overseeing the review. MEPs complained last month that the scientist who chairs the advisory panel, Dr Susan Barlow, works for the International Life Sciences Institute, a body funded by sweetener manufacturers and major aspartame users such as Coca Cola, PepsiCo and Nestle, and Monsanto.
EFSA's conflicts of interest: One scientist in the review had a research grant from Ajinomoto, the leading Japanese aspartame producer. Other panel members were linked to food processors using aspartame. But to say these scientists have conflicts of interest was misunderstanding, Dr Koeter explained to the Rome conference.
"The expertise required [to judge any new study on whether aspartame causes cancer] almost inevitably means having a previous involvement." Eliminate the scientists who had worked in the area before or who had worked for industry and there would be no scientists left, he said. The panel had been "fully impartial"
He insults our intelligence. Are we to believe there are no scientists in Europe capable of conducting this study except those paid the aspartame industry? The one thing Dr. Koeter didn't get from the advisory panel was impartiality. They could have mailed in their approval on the way to cash aspartame checks.
The panel blamed the Ramazzini cancers came from respiratory disease. Dr. Morando Soffritti responded: "CHRONIC PULMONARY INFLAMMATION IS COMMON IN THE NATURAL DYING PROCESS. MOREOVER, INFLAMMATION WAS OBSERVED IN BOTH ANIMALS WHO WERE TREATED WITH ASPARTAME AS WELL AS IN THE CONTROL GROUP.
"The European Ramazzini Foundation conducts what are known as lifespan mega-experiments, meaning that large groups of rodents are allowed to live out their natural lifespan and are examined for histopathological changes upon spontaneous death. This model is in contrast with most laboratories where rodents are sacrificed at 110 weeks of age (representing about 2/3 of the lifespan). The Ramazzini study design closely mirrors the human condition in which persons may be exposed to agents in the industrial and general environments from embryonic life under natural death. "Since 80% of cancer is diagnosed in humans over the age of 55, it is of paramount importance to observe how an agent affects laboratory animals in the last third of their lives."
Two European Parliamentarians petitioned WHO to declare sudden death a syndrome in order to track the cases. They couldn't understand why people are just dropping dead. Aspartame triggers an irregular heart rhythm, interacts with cardiac medication (all drugs for that matter), damages the cardiac conduction system and causes sudden death.
http://www.wnho.net/aspartame_msg_scd.htm
The European Food Safety Authority will never apologize for protecting the aspartame industry and convincing us to consume this carcinogen. Dr. Soffritti said, "Slides of previous carcinogenesis studies on aspartame were not reviewed by the AFC panel, ... this action should have been obligatory in light of the European Ramazzini Foundation's results, at the very least those involving haemopoietic and lymphoid organs and tissues." At the highest dose level tested in the Ramazzini study, 25% of female rats bore lymphomas-leukemias compared with 8.7% in the control.
"Because of the globalization of the industrialized diet and the ever-increasing use of artificial sweeteners among billions of people in both industrialized and developing countries, the European Ramazzini Foundation considers its work on sweeteners to be of the highest priority for the protection of public health, in particular the health of children and pregnant women who are among the most vulnerable populations."
Read the report to the Board of Inquiry of the FDA by world renowned neuroscientist, Dr. John Olney, on how aspartame destroys the brain of the fetus and children: http://www.wnho.net/dr_olney1.doc This explains why children all over the world are suffering from autism, ADD, ADHD and Tourettes, just for starters. Aspartame is an abortifacient and teratogen causing birth defects and mental retardation.
The Ramazzini study results show aspartame is a carcinogen, induces malignancies at dose levels lower than the current acceptable daily intake for humans (40 mg/kg of body weight in the EU, 50mg/kg of body weight in the US). Twenty years ago FFA toxicologist, Dr. Adrian Gross, testified to Congress that FDA should not have set an allowable dose because it causes brain tumors and cancer.
http://www.wnho.net/cancer_study_obligates_recall.htm
Ajinomoto has been slithering to hide the cancer issue from the beginning:
http://www.wnho.net/recipe_for_death.htm
Aspartame was once listed with the Pentagon in a list of potential chemical warfare weapons.
http://www.wnho.net/the_ecologist_aspartame_report.htm
A recent laughable campaign to discredit the flawless Ramazinni work proclaimed that a 10-year old "What Did You Eat Last Year" survey sent out by AARP that mentioned it once in 56 questions proves its safe. Mother Goose! It got tremendous press, after all who gets their advertising dollars?
http://www.mpwhi.com/project_recall_aspartame.htm
Three congressional hearings. Medical texts like Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic by H. J. Roberts, M.D., http://www.sunsentpress.com and Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills by neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D. explain in technical and irrefutable detail the symptoms of this global plague. Google has 3 million web sites, most exposing aspartame dangers.
The Idaho Observer has just released their dynamite Save our Children! Document for parents, educators, Boards of Education, Pediatricians & OB-GYN's exposing this deadly threat to our children's futures and survival on Aspartame Awareness Weekend, Sept 9th and 10th, and Save the Children. http://www.idaho-observer.com Aspartame Disease will be known as one of the great plagues in history with millions of unwarned innocent victims slowly and inevitably damaged and destroyed. It skews DNA, threatening our race. We ask you to help by distributing the school brochure to educators and public organizations in your area.
Herman Koeter and his comprised panel must resign. Demand the truth for yourself and the world. The 90 minute aspartame documentary is perfectly named: Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World.
Founder, Mission Possible World Health International


We are busy and most of us don't have the time to dial up our health another notch. Here are four simple ways to help you on the journey to feeling your best without a huge time or resource commitment.
Go to bed 30 minutes earlier. Sleep may be the most important thing in our health arsenal. It plays a vital role in our physical and mental well-being. Getting an extra 30 minutes of sleep gives your body more time to heal, repair, and detoxify from the day and can revitalize your brain, allowing your brain to form new pathways and perform better the following day. Ongoing sleep deficiency has been linked to increased risk of heart and kidney disease, high blood pressure, diabetes, stroke, and obesity. To help you get to sleep earlier, try cutting your screen time short and unwind with light stretching, meditation, or a good book.
Drink more water. I know you hear this message a lot, but are you really drinking enough water given your activity level and lifestyle? The general rule of thumb for daily water consumption is to drink half of your body weight in ounces plus an additional eight to 12 ounces for each diuretic beverage you consume. Diuretics include juices, coffee (even decaffeinated), most teas including some herbal teas (i.e., peppermint), and alcoholic beverages. One way I've found to easily get in all that I need is by drinking at least 12 ounces of water right before bed, another 12 or so upon waking, and then splitting up the rest throughout the day, especially between meals. Carry a water bottle with you wherever you go and track how many times you refill it. Spruce up plain water with lemon (which is especially great served warm in the morning for better digestion), sliced cucumber, mint, or berries.
Chew your food longer. This one isn't entirely obvious but is so important. Chewing your food well not only ensures that the entire digestive process gets kicked off but also allows you to absorb more nutrients from your food. It makes digestion easier and reduces digestive issues like gas and bloating. Chewing slowly will also lead you to eat slower, providing your brain with the time it needs to register that you are starting to feel full. This simple act may keep you from overeating and help you to maintain your weight. As an added benefit, eating slower may actually allow you to enjoy your food and taste it better.
Incorporate more fermented foods into your diet. Many cultures around the world have been eating fermented foods for generations – think sauerkraut in Germany and kimchi in Korea. Studies have shown a strong link between probiotic-rich foods and overall health. Sadly, with advances in technology and food preparation, these traditional foods are not as prevalent in today's society. Not only are fermented foods rich in immune and gut-boosting probiotics, but they also contain beneficial digestive enzymes and a wide range of vitamins and minerals making them quite nutrient dense. Sauerkraut, for example, is rich in iron, vitamin C, vitamin A, and the lesser known vitamin K, which is essential for bone health. Aim to eat or drink something fermented 2–3 times per day as a condiment. Try my easy sauerkraut recipe to get started.


text:
Community Foundation adds team member to manage scholarships and education grants
READING, PA (December 13, 2021) – Berks County Community Foundation announced the appointment of Kim Sheffer as Lifelong Learning Program Associate. She manages the Community Foundation's funds that offer scholarships and education grants.
Most of Berks County Community Foundation's scholarships accept applications from January 1 until March 15 at http://bccf.link/scholarships.
Email Kim at kims@bccf.org.
Born and raised in Berks County, Kim is a graduate of Exeter Township Senior High and Alvernia University. After earning her Bachelor of Arts in early childhood education and elementary education, Kim was a teacher for five years. She then spent 10 fulfilling years on the staff of the Reading Public Library, first as a Children's Library Assistant, then as the Early Literacy Outreach Specialist, and finally as Senior Outreach Coordinator.
The addition of this position and the other recent addition of a Program Officer for Energy and the Environment are part of a long-term plan to support recent and ongoing growth at the Community Foundation.
"These developments are part of our strategy to ensure we remain effective as we pursue our mission to promote philanthropy and improve the quality of life for the residents of Berks County," said Heidi A. Williamson, the Community Foundation's Senior Vice President for Programs and Initiatives.
Kim Sheffer
Berks County Community Foundation is a nonprofit corporation that serves as a civic leader for our region by developing, managing and distributing funds to meet existing and emerging community needs. More information is available at www.bccf.org.
Contact: Jason Brudereck, Director of Communication, jasonb@bccf.org, 610.685.2223
Youth Volunteer Corps of Reading's S.T.A.R. Members Host Impactful Community Event for MLK Day
Applications for Scholarships are Now Available
Five Boyertown Area Nonprofits Awarded over $40,000 in Grants
Power of the Purse (POP) Kick Off Meeting and Applications Are Now Open!
Youth and Philanthropy Fund Applications are Now Open

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


For great Father's Day gift ideas, turn to Davie Flowers in Port Coquitlam, BC. Flowers aren't just for Mother's Day, surprise Dad with a Father's Day gift to brighten his whole week! We offer flower delivery to Port Coquitlam or nationwide!


text:
{% extends "detail.html" %}

{% block core_nav %}{% endblock %}

{% block mid_action_bar %}
    {% if object.domain %}
        View Domain
    {% endif %}

    {% if object.reverse_domain %}
        View Reverse Domain
    {% endif %}
{% endblock %}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


text:
Is Grilling Bad For Your Health?
Written by Laura Schwecherl on May 28, 2013
When it's too hot to turn on the kitchen stove, it can only mean one thing: It's grilling season. But before heading outdoors to prepare every meal, we may want to consider some hamburger health hazards. Cooking meat at high temperatures—like grilling, or even roasting and frying—can cause chemical reactions that release some nasty toxins in the air (and our bodies). But before opting for a raw food diet out of pure fear, there are some ways to keep on grilling while staying out of harm's way.
You're Grilling Me—The Need-to-Know
Throwing a sausage on the grill can cause some serious chemical reactions. The biggest worry is that many of the chemicals created have been linked to an increased risk of cancer. In fact, one large study on over 3,000 women found those who consumed a large amount of grilled meat over the course of a year had a 47 percent higher risk of developing breast cancer Cooked meat and risk of breast cancer–lifetime versus recent dietary intake. Steck, S.E., Gaudet, M.M., Eng, S.M., et al. Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. Epidemiology. 2007 May;18(3):373-82. . In order to learn more about what's actually causing these health risks, we examined the main chemical reactions that occur when meat meets grill, and what the potentially harmful products of those reactions can do.
AGEs: Fat plus protein plus heat may equal trouble. Cooking at high heat can produce a chemical reaction between the fat and protein in meat, creating toxins called advanced glycation end products, or AGEs. These toxins are linked to the imbalance of antioxidants in the body (aka oxidant stress), along with inflammation, which can lead to an increased risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease Advanced glycation end products in foods and a practical guide to their reduction in the diet. Uribarri, J., Woodruff, S., Goodman, S., et al. Division of Nephrology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY. Journal of the American Dietician Association, 2010 Jun;110(6):911-16.e12. Redefining oxidative stress. Jones, D.P. Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Whitehead Biomedical Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, 2006 Sep-Oct;8(9-10):1865-79. .
PAHs: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs, are a group of over 100 different chemicals found in the smoke emitted from cooking meat on a charcoal grill. PAHs are classified as carcinogens and have been linked to an increased risk of lung and bladder cancer Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and cancer in man. Mastrangelo, G., Fadda, E., Marzia, V. Institute of Occupational Medicine, Univeristy of Padova, Consorzio Padova Ricerche, Padova, Italy. Environmental Health Perspectives, 1996 Nov;104(11):1166-70. .
HCAs: Heterocyclic amines (HCAs) are carcinogenic chemicals produced when muscle meats (i.e. beef, pork, chicken, fish) are fired up on the grill Factors affecting human heterocyclic amine intake and the metabolism of PhIP. Knize, M.G., Kulp, K.S., Salmon, C.P., et al. Biology and Biotechnology Research Program, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA. Mutation Research, 2002 Sep 30;506-507:153-62. . They're formed whenamino acids (found in protein) and creatine (found in muscle) react at temps above 300 degrees F. Studies have found a connection between HCAs and prostate, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer in adults Reduction of aromatic and heterocyclic aromatic n-hydroxylamines by human cytochrome P450 2S1. Wang, K., Geungerich, F.P. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 2013 May 18. Meat intake and cooking techniques: associations with pancreatic cancer. Anderson, K.E., Sinha, R., Kulldorff, M., et al. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. Mutation Research, 2002 Sep 30;506-507:225-31 Grilled meat consumption and PhIP-DNA adducts in prostate carcinogenesis. Tang, D., Liu, J.J., Rundle, A., et al. Environmental Health Science, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2007 Apr;16(4):803-8. A large prospective study of meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: an investigation of potential mechanisms underlying this association. Cross, A.J., Ferrucci, L.M., Risch, A., et al. Nutritional Epidemiology Branch, Biostatistics Branch, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, Maryland. Cancer Research, 2010 Mar 15;70(6):2406-14. .
Top Chef—Your Action Plan
Unlike meat, veggies don't create carcinogens when cooked to a crisp. Still, there's no need to become a vegetarian or toss the grill completely. Try these safer ways to cook up a storm and stay safe in the process:
Go old school. Got spare ribs (and spare time?). Traditional BBQ methods are a safer route to take, since it involves slow cooking of meats over indirect heat.
Marinate wisely. Scientists have found marinades can make grilling safer by reducing the amount of carcinogenic compounds released in the air Effect of marinades on the formation of heterocyclic amines in grilled beef steaks. Smith, J.S., Ameri, F., Gadgil, P. The Food Science Inst., Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS. Journal of Food Science, 2008 Aug;73(6):T100-5. . (It's still unclear why exactly they help.) Try soaking some chicken breasts in one of these healthier options.
Nuke it. Pre-cooking meat in a microwave will kick-start the cooking process and lead to less time on the grill. Cooking meat in the micro for two minutes can reduce HCA content up to 95 percent Prevention of mutagen formation in heated meats and model systems. Kikugawa, K. School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Science, Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan. Mutagenesis, 2004 Nov;19(6):431-9. ! (Don't worry, microwaves are safe!)
Get a trim. When fat drips onto an open flame, flare-ups can spread nasty chemicals onto the meat. So remove the skin from chicken, and skip fatty meats like sausage and ribs. When food is burned, these chemicals stack up, so remove all charred or burned bits before eating, too The dietary charred meat carcinogen 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine acts as both a tumor initiator and promoter in the rat ventral prostate. Nakai, Y., Nelson, W.G., De Marzo, A.M. Department of Urology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan. Cancer Research, 2007 Feb 1;67(3):1378-84. . Flipping meat frequently at a lower temperature will also help avoid charring.
Use a thermometer. To prevent cooking at temps too high, use a thermometer to regulate how hot the grill gets. Steak should be cooked to 145 degrees F, hamburgers at 160 degrees, and chicken at 165 degrees. (To measure, place the thermometer in the thickest part of the meat, avoiding the bone, fat, and gristle.)
Clean the grill. Make sure the grill is nice and clean to avoid cooking on leftover grease and pieces of char. But heads up—cleaning with metal bristles could leave a few pieces of wire behind (to be accidently eaten later on!). The solution? Clean off the grill with a non-wire brush (or an onion!) instead.
Color it up. Try eating grilled meats with cruciferous vegetables (like broccoli). These superfoods contain fancy anti-inflammatory nutrients called isothiocyanates that change the way the body breaks down dangerous grilling chemicals, making the meat safer Factors affecting human heterocyclic amine intake and the metabolism of PhIP. Knize, M.G., Kulp, K.S., Salmon, C.P., et al. Biology and Biotechnology Research Program, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA. Mutation Research, 2002 Sep 30;506-507:153-62. .
Don't go well-done. Meat that's overcooked is associated with no-good chemicals and the health problems that can follow Formation and human risk of carcinogenic heterocyclic amines formed from natural precursors in meat. Knize, M.G., Felton, J.S. Biosciences Directorate, University of California, Lawrence Livermore National, Livermore, CA. Nutrition Reviews, 2005 May;63(5):158-65. . So follow the recommended temps for safe meat, but make sure not to eat meat that's too undercooked or raw either.
Leave the meat! The easiest solution to stay away from harmful chemicals is to say no thanks to meat. Luckily, there are many meat-free options that are great on the grill. (Ice cream, anyone?)
Grilling meat at high temperatures can release harmful chemicals into the air and our bodies. Luckily, there are ways to prepare meat safely without leaving the grill behind.
Article originally published August 2012. Updated May 2013.
Cardio and Core Reboot: The 19-Minute Workout for a Stamina and Strength Boost
Knock out a cardio workout and a core workout at the same time with this circuit routine that'll keep your heart rate elevated while strengthening…
Rest Assured: The 9 Best Queen Mattresses of 2021
Whether you prefer memory foam, hybrid, or innerspring, find your perfect queen mattress on this list of the 9 best mattresses of 2021.
Spooning Sex Tips: Make the World's Comfiest Position the Sexiest Too
Learn why people love to get frisky in everyone's favorite cuddle position, plus expert-approved tips for how to reach peak pleasure.
The Lowdown on Going Down: 23 Tips for Giving a Blow Job
Use this guide to help you navigate the waters below the belt, including how to use your tongue, lips, and hands and positions to try for optimal…
The Joy of Napping: Why Daytime Snoozes Are Going to Save Us In 2021
We — collectively, as a society — do not accept how productive naps can be in our lives. But I'm here, as a reformed non-napper, to tell you: Napping…
Fact or Fiction: Can Onion Juice Really Help Hair Grow?
There's a rumor floating around that adding onion juice to your hair is the boost your luscious locks need. Could this really to be true? We read the…
Eating Nordic Won't Turn You into a Viking, but It Might Transform the Way You Feel
The Nordic diet is based around complex carbs, lean proteins, and healthy fats, and light on processed foods. It's time to dig in.
Are Juice Shots Worth the Money? Here's What the Experts Think
Do these concentrated bursts of micronutrients actually do anything — or are they're just another modern-day snake oil?
My First Vibrator Totally Changed My Life
Sex toys may be no big deal to some people — but for someone who grew up being told masturbation was a sin — the idea of exploring sexuality and…
Calling All Collagen: The 17 Best Collagen Creams of 2021
Whether you're looking for the best collagen cream for wrinkles or a vegan collagen cream option, we've got you covered. We narrowed down the best…


text:
Q: Launch workflow with custom action doesn't work properly I've created 3 custom actions (with the type "display ribbon") for one list.
I have 3 workflows and I want each action to launch one workflow.

I want "Nettoyer" to use the "Enlèvement_clean" workflow :

But I click "OK" and when I click on the custom action, the "enlèvement" workflow is selected :

And I tried for the 3 actions and that's the same thing. All 3 actions have "Enlèvement" even if I just put another workflow.
Thanks,

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
New Middletown plant effluent could spoil Buck Creek, some say
Opposition to a sewage treatment system in New Middletown has erupted largely out of fears the effluent would pollute nearby Buck Creek, described as a pristine waterway and one of Harrison County's most valuable resources.
'Buck Creek is just an unbelievably amazing resource in Harrison County,' Michael Bailey of Central told the Harrison County Council Monday night. 'My family lives in that creek in the summer.'
The former Congressional candidate and others urged county officials to withhold funding unless the treated water is rerouted, possibly into Little Indian Creek to the north. That creek, opponents said, already carries treated water from Lanesville.
Those and other comments were also made Saturday at a special session of the Harrison County Board of Commissioners.
At that meeting, the commissioners forwarded New Middletown's request for $533,000 to the council to allow it to apply for a $430,000 state grant, which must be completed by April 1. The action was not unanimous.
Commissioner James Goldman said he could not second Jim Heitkemper's motion to ask for the funds because sewage treatment at Milltown should be a higher priority.
'The old board (at Milltown) misguided us,' he said, adding that environmental officials have said the town's wastewater is improperly treated and the effluent is polluting Blue River. 'We are contaminating a river right now, but there is no documentation that we're polluting Binkley Cave,' Goldman said of the underground passage that's thought to run from Corydon to New Middletown and beyond.
'Milltown is ready to come in and ask for $700,000 to $1 million. I have to look at priorities,' Goldman said.
Heitkemper said Milltown may be in the planning stages, but New Middletown is ready to proceed. 'They are on the table,' Heitkemper said. 'I think we should do our part.'
Commission chair J.R. Eckart said, 'James' comments are well taken.' He said while Milltown has probably been in compliance just enough to 'get by,' now that there's riverboat revenue to work with, 'we're constantly juggling that back and forth.'
At New Middletown, Eckart said, 'The effluent needs to be addressed before we get to the construction stage.'
The discharge site can be changed later, when the time comes for regulatory permits, but first funding must be secured, Eckart said.
He seconded Heitkemper's motion to ask the council for the money.
That request was made at the council's planning session Monday night, but no action was taken. The request will be advertised for the March 14 meeting, Davis said.
Other residents besides Bailey who spoke in opposition to the plan at the Saturday or Monday meetings included Alton Haycraft, Larry Brown, Randy Brown, Jerry Hunter and Randy Hunter.
In addition to his comments, Randy Hunter submitted a petition against the project signed by 36 residents who are opposed to wastewater being discharged in Buck Creek.


Did you mean flights to Nuuk ?
Skyscanner is simple and fast. And it's free to use! Compare low cost flights then book your airline tickets from Nuuk directly by clicking through to agency and airline sites.
Browse through our flight offers below, or use the search box to enter your travel dates and let us find the cheapest flights from Nuuk to wherever you want to go.


copenhagen - The Danish Prince Consort Henrik loves the royal ceremony before seen. The 81-year-old husband of Queen Margrethe is as of January 1 officially retired, as announced Thursday by the Queen in her New Year's speech, which was broadcast live on TV.
,, The prince will have only very limited part in official events. I understand and respect his decision and thank him for all the support, help and inspiration he has given me all these years, Margrethe said.
Henrik, born in France as Henri Marie Jean André Count de Laborde the Monpezat, is known that he hated court life, because he felt like prince consort subordinate to his wife. He often held long holidays in France, including at his vineyard in the south of the country. The Danes never been entirely positive about the prince.


text:
Ubisoft Forums > Assassin's Creed > Assassin's Creed - General Discussions > Assassin's Creed - Multiplayer > Multiplayer Loading times
View Full Version : Multiplayer Loading times
KevinFritz
Hey when I can get into a match, it's so insanely fun and I have a blast. But I have literally sat here for over 20 minutes waiting for another match. Every time it gets up to 6 players, it goes back down to 5. And then you get hopeful and think oh good here we go.....only to have your hopes dashed yet again. I want to play but you guys have got to look into what is making these connections so impossible. Is there not enough people playing the game or something? I can't see why cuz AC is like the best series of all time, next to God of War.
Kurrynt
I agree. I've been able to play for a few minutes but had to cut out early to run an errand. I came back and have been watching the loading screen for almost 30 minutes now...
same here...which system are you on? Im using the ps3 and it takes forever just to join one game.
christopher8263
Agreed I have been waiting 20min at the loading screen with 7 of 7 agents. What's up with that?
Im on the ps3 and the loading times are getting insane. My username is spartanwarrior2. Send me a friend request and we can set up a match with at least a few of us in a lobby.
And if I get kicked from the lobby due to server troubles one more time.......come on ubisoft you can do better than this, oh wait. Now im actually remembering the only other multiplayer game they had which was splinter cell conviction. Fun as hell but the disconnects got so bad I sold the game out of frustration. Especially since you lose all ur progress and xp due to thier inability to run a server.
KCizzll
If the top of the loading screen doesn't turn into a map once you have the 6/6 or 7/7 then I don't think it's ever going to work.
I've never waited more than 5 minutes in a loading screen with the map showing. If it's stuck on the animus "Waiting for Abstergo Agents" with 6/6 or 7/7 I leave and start another because it'll never go.
EDIT: I should say I don't NOW wait more than 5 minutes. The first day I waited it out but it never finishes. There's a bug in there somewhere.
Himbo123
also sometimes i never get a contract for like the whole game
Orion645
I'm also having problems like the ones mentioned abovelike waiting 10-30 minutes for a game, which is a shame because the multiplayer is fantastic.
@Himbo123
I've also had that problem. A whole game without a target or a pursuer
isiscft
I'm also having trouble getting into multiplayer games.
It just hangs at the waiting for 7/7 agents screen.
AeroElim
Anyone want to add each other on X360 and play together so we don't have to find people?
unformedbobbie
yeah I'm up for adding a few people so I can play some games. I haven't been able get into a match since I got the game and I wanna play it http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_frown.gif
My xbox gamertag is Unformedbobbie
tesmith31014
yeah, i'm having many of the same problems you guys are. you should add me if you wanna party up at times. it would possibly cut down the loading times and such.
Alk3Tsmith10
gamertag btw
Katasmurf
I have also problems with long loading times. Sometimes it takes only 1-5 minutes, especially when you have just completed a game then you have the six players the game needs fast.
But when i try to enter for the first time, it can run up to 20 minutes of waiting time cause there aren't enough players to find. It keep on 5/6 then goes to 4/6 again and when ur lucky it hits the 6 finally.
I think is isn't possible that there aren't enough players to find cause 100.000 of people are playing the online mode, but still most of the time i have to wait cause the server cant find any players. I hope they will make the searching better soon and I don't have to wait for sometimes 20 minutes to play.
Comixfan
The game needs to communicate more information to the player.
Instead of just saying "Waiting for Abstergo Agents", it should keep players up-to-date with what it's doing - looking for more players, loading a map, trying to connect players, etc etc.
As it is, "Waiting for Abstergo Agents" tells me nothing and just leaves me wondering why the hell its taking so long to load the game when, for example, it's at 8/8 Agents and showing a Wanted match on Venice map.
Also, once you manage to get into a game, select your character and your profile set, it also just says "Waiting for Abstergo Agents". It really should say waiting for all players to be ready, or waiting for <insert player name> to choose a character.
This would help alleviate things somewhat, but I agree that the matchmaking needs a *lot* of work so that we're not waiting 20-30 minutes to get into a game!
J_2_Me
Does where you live (NZ) matter with connecting to games? Apart from time zone differences and that. I had to wait over and hour and a half for 1 match!... http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-mad.gif
keiiykeii
I wait about 5 minutes then just exit and return and it usually loads a lot faster but the issue with not having a target or pursuer is very annoying, what are we wandering around doing in there if we don't have a target? wasting our time.. oh and money... 59.99 to sometimes get to play a full game? wth...
Jimmy2495
Having the same issues here. I managed to find a game fast today, but it usually takes +15 minutes.
Hope Ubi fix this soon, I want to play this awesome multiplayer...
obliviondoll

quote:

Originally posted by J_2_Me:
Does where you live (NZ) matter with connecting to games? Apart from time zone differences and that. I had to wait over and hour and a half for 1 match!... http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-mad.gif

I think it only matters in the sense of when games are available.
I haven't had long wait times when I played. Also in NZ.
pntbalr13
Let me say first of all, thank you Ubisoft for making an awesome multiplayer! In my opinion it is the funnest multiplayer I have ever played, very original and adrenaline pumping.
However, that is when it works. This Saturday I didn't have much going on, and so I wanted to play this game. Pre-ordered 59.99 for xbox 360.
I played exactly 15 ranked wanted matches in 16 hours. Wanted matches have a time limit of 10 minutes. So I played around 2 1/2 hours of those sixteen hours.
I get to the map screen and wait there for sometimes 5-10 minutes, but usually 20-1hour for a match. People join and leave as they get impatient, and I can't blame them.
Also, I don't enjoy waiting 7 minutes for a contract. (Although it is kinda funny having 2 or 3 pursuers on you when you have no contract)
Last thing is sometimes "ranked matches" aren't very well ranked. When I was a level six I was put in with levels 22-28? Now I'm level 18 and being put in with level 6-10? Not very fair.
ProfCroswell
This is purely ridonkulous. I always select Play Now because it claims to be the fastest way to go about it. But no! It takes nearly 35 minutes at times just to get to the character selection screen. About another 15 minutes waiting for everyone to select their character; that's if they choose one at all! I swear if I hear that ominous robot voice tell me she's "searching for other abstergo agents" one more time I'm going to throw my controller at my tv... btw as I'm typing this, my tv just dimmed and went it to power saver mode if that tells you anything. Ubisoft, I absolutely adore this game in every aspect, I put 26 hours of gametime into the story before I ever started multiplayer. It's too bad this couldn't have been nominated for game of the year. Because in my opinion, it's the best game in several years. Having said that--WTF!? I can't wait 45 minutes to an hour to play a game. Even if it is the most intense and most badass online game I've seen in a while.
JohnnyGFeenix
I've been trying to connect to a game for over an hour now with my PS3 as I type this. "Searching For Programmed Session" part. No map loads up, have even gotten 7 of 7 people ready for the session to start. Doesn't seem to trigger the next connection phase for whatever odd reason.
Have aborted the search, restarted, even restarted console. Has nothing to do with my internet or it's connection. Connection to games was working fine earlier on...
-> Editing my post here. I always play the Ranked/Wanted mode and this is where I'm having the game connection issues. I tried to connect to an Unranked/Wanted mode game and got in it immediately. After going back to the Ranked/Wanted search, I am back to square one. Connection issues continue. Very strange.
Yes, this is annoying. Needs to be fixed!


Self-leveling replacement guides for Wrought Iron patio furniture as well as some aluminum Winston or Woodard patio or pool furniture. Missing plastic glides can cause damage and scrapes to wood decks, leave rust marks from the furniture and damage the protective finish on your furniture. Replace old-fashioned cup-style glides with high-grade plastic for durability that lasts up to 10 times longer than conventional glides.
NOTE: These glides will have a slightly smaller diameter than 1.25" as they are held on via the double sided adhesive sponges included.
Includes feet inserts with the adhesive sponge for each.


Nut free. Choose a base: Basmati Rice, Brown Rice. Choose up to 2 proteins: Chicken, Chana (Chickpeas), Aloo (Potato), Paneer (Indian Cheese). Choose up to 2 sauces: Masala Sauce (Mild) (Contains nuts & dairy), Khorma Sauce (Mild) (Contains Nuts & Dairy), Dal Sauce (Mild) (Vegan), Tikkaway Sauce (Medium) (Vegan), Madras Sauce (Medium) (Vegan). Would you like veggies?: Cabbage, Would you like cold veggies?: Lettuce, Would you like chutney?: Mint Chutney.
Nut free. Choose up to 2 proteins: Chicken, Chana (Chickpeas), Aloo (Potato), Paneer (Indian Cheese). Choose up to 2 sauces: Masala Sauce (Mild) (Contains nuts & dairy), Khorma Sauce (Mild) (Contains Nuts & Dairy), Dal Sauce (Mild) (Vegan), Tikkaway Sauce (Medium) (Vegan), Madras Sauce (Medium) (Vegan). Would you like veggies?: Cabbage, Would you like cold veggies?: Lettuce, Would you like chutney?: Mint Chutney.
Basmati rice, chicken, chana (chickpeas), white onions, cabbage, carrots, masala sauce, lettuce, corn and cilantro. Contains nuts and dairy.
Whole wheat wrap, chana (chickpeas), aloo (potatoes), cabbage, carrots, beets, corn, red onions, cilantro, tamarind chutney and mint chutney. Nut free.
Made with lentils and vegetables. Nut free.
Rice pudding. Home style flavored with cardamom. Nut free.
Chilled coffee chicory blend with milk.


text:
How the Couch to 5K Running Plan Works
by Meredith Bower
Making the Most of the C25K
After a few weeks on the C25K Running Plan, you may notice how running relieves stress and improves your mood and confidence level.
Comstock/Thinkstock
Perhaps one of the main reasons people give up on a new exercise routine and return to the sofa is that they push themselves too hard, too soon. Their bodies rebel and they quit. The C25K plan understands the couch potato lifestyle and works to ease new runners past their initial discomfort and boredom to the point where they actually look forward to their workout.
To prevent dropouts, the plan discourages skipping ahead and encourages those who aren't ready to move on to repeat a week. The C25K plan works to keep new runners engaged so they can build strength and endurance. Once your muscles and bones become stronger and your stamina increases, you can work on speed.
While inexperienced runners shouldn't deviate from the C25K plan, you can help change your lifestyle and improve your overall health with a number of plan supplements:
Keep a running log to track your progress and motivate yourself to keep moving.
Remind yourself of the physical benefits of running, from fighting disease and reducing the risk of heart attack to raising good cholesterol and slowing the aging process.
Notice how running relieves stress and improves your mood and confidence level.
Focus on improving your nutrition by getting rid of unhealthy foods in your house and replacing them with healthy snacks.
Treat yourself to new, well-fitting shoes to reduce the risk of injury.
Set small, achievable goals.
People who successfully complete the C25K tend to continue running at the prescribed pace or ramp up their workout. Either option proves to former couch potatoes that they can accomplish seemingly impossible goals. If you can get in shape, boost your self-confidence and keep the motivation to get off the couch and move, who knows what you'll do next.
Keep reading for lots more information about the Couch-to-5K Running Plan.
With the Couch-to-5K Running Plan, keeping track of how far or how long you've run can be difficult unless you're using a treadmill that displays time and distance. Now there is an application available for the iPod and iPhone that can manage your workout from start to finish. Not only does the app provide audio and visual cues and track your progress, it also allows your playlists to run in the background. When you finish each workout, it even gives you the option to tell your friends on Twitter or Facebook [source: Kwok and Searles].
How Advanced 5K Training Works
How Intermediate 5K Training Works
How Interval Training Works
How Leg Workouts for Runners Work
How Pilates for Runners Works
How Swim Workouts for Runners Work
How to Train for Your First 5K
How to Avoid Overtraining in Running
Can I run when I have a cold?
Does running reduce stress?
How many calories does running burn?
Burfoot, Amby. "Should You Be Running Barefoot?" Runner's World. Aug. 2004. (Aug. 4, 2010)http://www.runnersworld.com/article/0,7120,s6-240-319--6728-0,00.html
Cairns, Graham. "Couch to 5K Metric Version." c25k.com. (Aug. 5, 2010)http://c25k.com/c25k_metric.html
Clark, Josh. "The Couch to 5K ® Running Plan." Cool Running. 2010. (Aug. 3, 2010)http://www.coolrunning.com/engine/2/2_3/index.shtml
Clark, Josh. "No Pain, No Pain: The 'Couch to 5K' and Humane Design." July 6, 2008. (Aug. 3, 2010)http://globalmoxie.com/blog/c25k.shtml
McDowell, Dimity. "How to Start Running Today." Women's Health. 2010. (Aug. 3, 2010)http://www.active.com/running/Articles/How-to-Start-Running-Today.htm
Kwok, Lucius and Kasten Searles. "Couch to 5K." Felt Tip, Inc. 2010. (Aug. 5, 2010)http://felttip.com/c25k/
Top 10 Training Tips for a 5k