text:
< script>
The Teamwork Divide
Author : Nick Folger
This spring, at the NPA Annual Meeting, I recall Randy Riboudo telling a packed room full of PhD's and Postdocs that there are traits that employers give you full credit for, and those they worry about when it comes to highly trained technical people.
Don't worry about selling your technical skills, your intelligence, and your problem solving abilities, Randy intoned. Employers take one look at your resume and assume you have those.
for our Partner Institutions
Check your degree or Postdoc affiliation:
- None - Albert Einstein College of Medicine Arizona State University - Tempe Baylor College of Medicine Boston University Brandeis Brown Caltech Cardiff University Carnegie Mellon University Case Western Reserve University Catholic University of Leuven Catholic University of Louvain Cedars Sinai Chalmers University of Technology City University of Hong Kong City of Hope Colorado State University Columbia Cornell Delft University of Technology Duke University Ecole Normale Superieure - Paris Emory Erasmus University Florida State University Georgetown Georgia Institute of Technology Ghent University Gladstone Institutes Harbin Institute of Technology Harvard University Howard Indian Institute of Science Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur Indiana University Bloomington Iowa State University Joseph Fourier University (Grenoble 1) Karolinska Institute King's College London Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology Kyoto University Leiden University Lund University MD Anderson Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Mayo Medical School McGill University McMaster University Medical College of Wisconsin Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Michigan State Moffitt Cancer Center Moscow State University Mount Sinai NCI NEI NGRI NHLBI NIA NIAAA NIAID NIAMS NIBIB NICHD NIDA NIDCR NIDDK NIEHS NIGMS NIMH NINDS NIST Nagoya University Nanyang Technological University National Chiao Tung University National Taiwan University National Tsing Hua University New York U North Carolina State University - Raleigh Northwestern Oregon State University Osaka University Pennsylvania State University - University Park Pierre and Marie Curie University - Paris Pohang University of Science and Technology Polytechnic University of Turin Princeton University Purdue University Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Rice University Rockefeller University Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick Sanford Burnham Institute Scripps Seoul National University Shanghai Jiao Tong University Stanford State University of New York at Buffalo Stockholm University Stony Brook University Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne Technical University Munich Technical University of Denmark Technion-Israel Institute of Technology Tel Aviv University Texas A&M University - College Station The Australian National University The Chinese University of Hong Kong The George Washington University The Hebrew University of Jerusalem The Hong Kong Polytechnic University The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology The Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine The Johns Hopkins University The Ohio State University - Columbus The University of Alabama at Birmingham The University of Edinburgh The University of Georgia The University of Glasgow The University of Manchester The University of Queensland The University of Sheffield The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio The University of Texas at Austin The University of Tokyo The University of Western Australia Thomas Jefferson University Tohoku University Tokyo Institute of Technology Tsinghua University Tufts University U Maryland Baltimore U Miami U Penn U Texas, Med Branch U. Washington UC Denver UCLA UCSD UCSF UNC Chapel Hill UT Southwestern University College London University of Aarhus University of Alberta University of Amsterdam University of Arizona University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences University of Barcelona University of Basel University of Birmingham University of Bonn University of Bristol University of British Columbia University of California, Berkeley University of California, Davis University of California, Irvine University of California, Riverside University of California, San Diego University of California, Santa Barbara University of California, Santa Cruz University of Cambridge University of Central Florida University of Chicago University of Cincinnati University of Colorado at Boulder University of Copenhagen University of Delaware University of Durham University of Florida University of Frankfurt University of Freiburg University of Geneva University of Goettingen University of Hawaii at Manoa University of Heidelberg University of Helsinki University of Houston University of Illinois at Chicago University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign University of Iowa University of Kansas Medical Center University of Louisville University of Mainz University of Manitoba University of Maryland, College Park University of Massachusetts Amherst University of Massachusetts Medical School University of Medicine and Dentistry New Jersey University of Melbourne University of Michigan - Ann Arbor University of Milan University of Minnesota, Twin Cities University of Montreal University of Munich University of Nebraska Medical Center University of New South Wales University of Nottingham University of Oxford University of Paris Descartes (Paris 5) University of Paris Diderot (Paris 7) University of Paris Sud (Paris 11) University of Pisa University of Pittsburgh University of Rochester University of Sao Paulo University of Science and Technology of China University of Southampton University of Southern California University of Southern University University of Strasbourg University of Sydney University of Tennessee - Knoxville University of Toronto University of Tuebingen University of Twente University of Utah University of Virginia University of Wageningen University of Waterloo University of Wisconsin - Madison University of Wuerzburg University of Zurich Uppsala University Utrecht University VU University Amsterdam Vanderbilt Virginia Commonwealth University Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Wadsworth Wake Forest Washington University in St. Louis Weizmann Institute of Science Yale University Zhejiang University
Enter your Institution's name here if not found above:
Search over 1500+ listings for MS, PhD and MD holders
Discounted Career Tools customized for life science postgraduates
Attend Webinars to expose you to varieties of career paths, experts and peers
Be able to join the Bio Careers Blog, where you can ask your career questions and find bloggers going through the same job transitions
[email protected] 877 862 4656 x. 102
What they want to know is, can you work together with others, can you influence others, can you negotiate in the context of a long term relationship? They are concerned about whether strong, independent bench scientists can work in teams.
Clearly, these are questions that you need to address in your interviews and resume presentations. You need to have evidence that shows you are comfortable in a close interactive environment.
Having heard these arguments over the years, we at Bio Careers have been thinking of ways to quickly show employers that our talented community does have strong teamwork skills. One thought is to implement a voluntary Teamwork personality test.
Interested Jobseekers would take this online test, which measures their capacity for cooperation, self-confidence, patience, conscientiousness, and managerial capability—all elements essential to strong teamwork. Jobseekers would then review their results (shown as a percentile score) and decide whether they'd like them, and the test report, to be a part of their profile presented to employers.
My hope is that we can show some good, high rankings to allay the fears of employers.
What do you think about this idea? What would your concerns be? How could we improve our idea?
Other posts by
Nick Folger
Do you need a Job Search Mentor?
Another Successful Summit
Queuing at the Summit
Copyright 2019 Bio Careers®


This week includes positive aspects involving feisty Mars, expansive Jupiter, the sun, lovely Venus, and passionate Pluto. This lively blend could mean that you're more than ready to get moving with ideas, projects, and relationships. And the associations you create now could prove very valuable over the coming weeks and months. Inquisitive Mercury enters Capricorn on January tenth, which is excellent for planning. However, the weekend could also bring one or two unexpected distractions, so be prepared.


text:
Victoria County History - Surrey
A History of the County of Surrey: Volume 3
Parishes: Mickleham
A History of the County of Surrey: Volume 3. Originally published by Victoria County History, London, 1911.
This free content was digitised by double rekeying. All rights reserved.
ADVOWSON
Michelham and Micelham (xi cent.); Mikeleham (xii cent.); Mikelham and Micheham (xiii cent.); Mykeleham (xiv cent.).
Mickleham is a small parish and village midway between Dorking and Letherhead, and 21 miles from London. It measures about 3 miles east and west and 2 miles from north to south, and contains 2,825 acres.
The village lies in the Mole valley, and the parish comprises the valley and the downs rising on either side of it, where the Mole makes its way in a deep depression through the chalk downs. The soil in the valley is river alluvium, calcareous rubble, sand, and Wealden Clay washed down by the Mole, and on either side is chalk, with some small patches of brickearth on the higher parts. The valley is peculiarly picturesque (see Frontispiece of Vol. II). On the west side the well-wooded slopes of Norbury Park rise in places steeply from the stream, and at its southern extremity on the east the side of Box Hill is almost precipitous in places, particularly 'The Whites,' overlooking Burford, which consists of loose chalk thickly overgrown with box and yew. Elsewhere it sweeps upwards in smooth, grassy slopes, studded with box, yew, and other darkfoliaged trees and shrubs. Amid thick woods of box, yew, and beech on the summit, overlooking Dorking, is a fort and magazine recently constructed, and still more recently abandoned. The well-known view from the top extends southward over the Weald, which, from that height, seems to drop away into a plain bounded by the South Downs, while to the southwest Redlands, and other hills near Dorking, covered with wood, rise to the greater height of Leith Hill. Ranmore Common and Norbury face the spectator from the east across the valley. The top of Box Hill is not more than 700 ft. above the sea, but the steep descents to the east and south, and the absence of any high ridge of sand immediately in front of it, give an impression of greater elevation. Dr. Burton, who in 1752 wrote in Greek of his travels through Surrey and Sussex, calls it, with pardonable exaggeration, the brow of a mountain.
On a spur of Box Hill, overlooking Juniper Hall, is a round tower, said to have been built by Mr. Thomas Broadwood.
It is in Mickleham chiefly that the River Mole burrows in the way which has suggested the popular etymology of its name. (fn. 1) From the foot of Box Hill at Burford to Norbury Park there are holes, called swallows, through which the water sinks, making its way by subterranean clefts in the chalk. Some of these swallows are in the bed of the stream, others in bays in the banks of the river, which only come into operation in times of flood. One of the largest of these latter is in Fredley Meadows, some 200 yards up-stream from the railway bridge, close to which, before the pathway from Dorking to Mickleham was diverted, stood the wooden 'Praybridge.' Near Thorncroft, in Letherhead, the water rises again in the bed of the stream. In normal summers the bed of the river for 3 or 4 miles is dry ground and stagnant water. In the grounds of Burford House and Fredley are hollows some way from the stream, in which the water rises when the river is full. The peculiarity of the river, that its whole volume normally ran underground for some miles, has been exaggerated. The Mole is well known by the notice of poets, Spenser and Drayton writing at length upon it, and Milton and Pope mentioning it. Miss Drinkwater-Bethune of Thorncroft privately printed a poem, 'The Mole or Emlyn Stream,' in 1839, with sensible topographical and antiquarian notes, which deserves to be better known.
In Norbury Park is a famous grove of giant yews of great age, known as the Druid's Walk, which no doubt mark part of the track which, leaving the main east and west road, called in modern times 'The Pilgrim's Way,' near Bagden Farm, crossed the river near the Priory, and thence led over Letherhead Downs to Epsom and London. Norbury is also noted for some giant beeches.
On Box Hill, and north of it upon Mickleham Downs, is a great deal of still open grass-land, though plantations and inclosures upon the downs have curtailed it greatly in recent years.
The main road from Dorking to London traverses the Mickleham valley. This was made a passable road in 1755. (fn. 2) Up to that time it was not available for wheeled traffic in bad weather, (fn. 3) and to judge from the traces of the old road it needed courage to drive along it at all. Till the bridge at Burford Bridge, together with the approach to it, was raised some twenty years ago, it was frequently overflowed by the Mole in time of flood.
The old west and east line of communication across the country by the chalk downs passed south of the village, past Bagden Farm and Chapel Farm, to a ford on the river south of Burford Lodge, at the foot of Box Hill.
The London, Brighton, and South Coast Railway line from London to Portsmouth also passes through the Mickleham valley. The line was completed in 1867. There is a station at West Humble in Mickleham, now called Box Hill and Burford Bridge, to distinguish it from Box Hill on the South Eastern line, more than a mile distant.
Mickleham is fairly rich in antiquities. In 1788 William Bray, the historian of Surrey, became possessed of some brass Roman coins of the later Empire, which had recently been ploughed up on Bagden Farm, (fn. 4) and neolithic flakes are not uncommon both about this place, near Norbury, and on Box Hill. The ancient road which, as the Roman Stone Street, runs from Sussex past Ockley to Dorking (q.v.) headed for the Mole valley through a gap in the chalk, though it does not appear that it has been actually traced between Dorking and Burford Bridge. A ford over the Mole is still visible at the place where Burford Bridge stands, and a little further north, at Juniper Hall, a lane leaves the present road on the right and ascends the downs. It is called Pebble Lane. At the point where it emerges upon the high ground it becomes a well-marked track carried on a causeway over declivities. Flints with cement clinging to them occur upon it, as farther south on the same road in Capel (q.v.). It is still a bridle road, and leads in nearly a straight line to Epsom race-course. After this point it is supposed to have led to the right, in a curve following the top of the downs, past Banstead to Woodcote. It probably represents a British trackway utilized by the Romans as the line of a small road, though the Roman way probably continued straight on at Epsom towards Ewell, and so to London. In 1780, when Juniper Hall was being built, two skeletons and a spear-head were found, called by Brayley 'exuviae of warfare,' (fn. 5) but were probably AngloSaxon interments, as at Fetcham (q.v.). At Chapel Farm, near West Humble, in Mickleham, are the very ruinous remains of part of the east, south, and west walls of a chapel. The history of its origin and decay is obscure. The priory of Reigate possessed a messuage and rents which were called the manor of West Humble, and the chapel has been supposed to have been built by the priory. But it more probably belonged to Merton, which held the manor of Polesden Lacy. In 1566 lands called Capel were held with this manor, (fn. 6) and these would appear to be Chapel Farm, close by which the remains stand. The building is about 48 ft. by 16 ft.; the greater part of the gabled west wall, a portion of the south wall, and part of the east wall still stand; the material is flint and sandstone. There are no architectural details left, excepting a small light in the head of the west gable, too much worn to be dated; it has one jamb, and part of what appears to have been a trefoiled head. Below it is a round hole, and in the east wall a gap formed by a single light, of which no dressings remain; also another gap in the south wall. The flints of the walling are not split, and are set in fairly even courses. The building probably dates from the 13th century.
Course of the River Mole, showing the Larger "Swallows."
The Running Horse Inn, in the days before the advent of railways, was a favourite stabling for horses racing at Epsom. On Mickleham Downs were, until recently, some training gallops.
At the beginning of the French Revolution Mickleham became the refuge of several distinguished French émigrés. M. de Narbonne, ex-minister of war, was the most celebrated among them, and Talleyrand also was here for a short time, and Madame de Staël. Juniper Hall had been taken by some of them, but several settled in other houses. Among them was M. d'Arblay, who married Fanny Burney, famous then as the authoress of 'Evelina.' M. and Madame d'Arblay, after a stay at Great Bookham, settled at a newly-built house in West Humble, which they named Camilla Lacey, because it was provided by the profits of 'Camilla,' her third novel. It is now occupied by Mr. Leverton Harris.
Fredley Cottage was the home of Mr. Richard Sharp, F.R.S., M.P., known from his talents as 'Conversation Sharp.' During his lifetime many celebrated men visited Mickleham. He died in 1853. On a tree in the garden are the initials W. W. carved in the bark by Wordsworth.
James Mill and his son John Stuart Mill lived for a time in a house behind the Running Horse Inn. Hazlitt stayed at the Burford Bridge Hotel; there also Keats wrote the latter part of 'Endymion,' and Nelson spent some of his last days in England. It was then called 'The Fox and Hounds' and has since been very much enlarged. The literary traditions of Mickleham were continued by Charles Mackay, who lived in a cottage at the foot of Box Hill, since destroyed, and by the residence of the late Mr. George Meredith at Flint Cottage, where he died in 1909. The Grove, the seat of Mr. Edward Arnold, on the border of Dorking and Mickleham, was once the residence of the Marquis Wellesley. But the old house has been pulled down.
Mickleham Hall is now the residence of Mr. H. H. Gordon Clark, J.P.; Norbury, of Mr. Leopold Salomons, J.P.; High Ashurst, of the Dowager Countess of Harrowby; Burford Lodge, with its famous collection of orchids, of Sir Trevor Lawrence, bart.; Juniper Hall, famous for its cedars of Lebanon, of Mr. George McAndrew; Juniper Hill, of Mr. L. Cunliffe; The Priory, of Mrs. Grissell; Fredley, of Mrs. Kay and Miss Drummond.
'The Old House,' now the residence of Mr. Gordon Pollock, is situated on the east side of the main road south of the church; it bears the date 1636. It is of two stories and an attic, and is built entirely of red brick. Its west front towards the road has a slightly projecting wing at each end with moulded strings and cornices and shaped gables, and there are two similar gables in the main block. The present entrance is in the south wing and is modern; the windows are square with modern wood frames and have moulded brick labels, those on the gables to the third story having pediments over them. The garden or east front is practically on one plane, with a gable head at either end and a small middle gable; each of the side gables has three shallow brick pilasters with moulded capitals formed by breaking the string-course or cornice at the foot of the gables round the pilasters. To the south of the building is a modern extension. The arrangement of the rooms has been somewhat altered since the house was built, and there is nothing of note inside excepting one original brick fire-place with moulded jambs and three-centred arch; this was discovered a short time ago. The original gateway of the grounds towards the road has some good posts with carved brick Ionic capitals.
In a deed of 1585–6 reference is made to Mickleham Common Fields. No Inclosure Act or Award seems to be in existence. Inclosure of waste on Mickleham Downs has taken place bit by bit.
Mickleham Village Hall was built by Mrs. and Miss Evans of Dalewood, in memory of the late Mr. David Evans.
The school, national, was built by subscription in 1844 and enlarged in 1872. There is a small infants' school at West Humble.
MICKLEHAM alias HIGH ASHURST alias LITTLEBURGH.—At the time of the Domesday Survey one of the two manors then called Mickleham was held of Odo, Bishop of Bayeux. (fn. 7) After his forfeiture under William II the manor was held of the king in chief, the tenant paying 12s. yearly on St. Andrew's Day for ward of Rochester Castle. (fn. 8)
Ansfrig had held Mickleham under the Confessor, and Nigel held it under the bishop, (fn. 9) but there is no trace of subsequent tenants until the Testa de Nevill, which under the heading of escheats gives Robert and Matthew de Micheham holding a hide in Mickleham by the grant of 'King Henry the Elder.' (fn. 10) This was the nucleus of the considerable property of the family in Mickleham in later reigns.
Documents of the time of Edward I show that Robert de Mickleham held a messuage, 20 virgates of land, 10 acres of pasture, and 2 acres of wood in Mickleham. (fn. 11) Robert's property descended to his son Gilbert, (fn. 12) who augmented it by his marriage with Alice daughter of Peter de Rival, with whom he received 30 acres of land and rent and services of John Adrian and others. (fn. 13) He and his wife were also conjointly enfeoffed by William de Bures of 4s. rent of assize. (fn. 14) He died in 1292 or 1293, (fn. 15) and was succeeded by his son John. In 1332 John conveyed the manor of Mickleham (certain premises afterwards known as the manor of Fredley excepted) to Roger de Apperdele. Roger son of Roger de Apperdele settled it on his son Richard to hold during his father's lifetime. (fn. 16) Richard evidently died without issue, as it came to his brother John, (fn. 17) who forfeited Mickleham when he was outlawed as a felon in 1366. (fn. 18) The king, having the manor as an escheat, granted it, first to Simon de Bradestede, (fn. 19) then to William Croyser. (fn. 20) Afterwards Roger de Apperdele appears to have tried to regain the manor by denying that he had made any grant to his sons. (fn. 21) Evidently he was not successful, as Edward III about that time granted it to William, Bishop of Winchester. (fn. 22) Before this date Fredley and West Humble (see below) had both been separated from the manor of Mickleham, which is now referred to as half, and sometimes as two thirds or two parts. In 1402 the bishop received pardon for alienating what is termed half the manor to Nicholas Wykeham (fn. 23) and five other clerks. (fn. 24) From these clerks the manor or portion of the manor passed to another clerk, John Brommesgrove, described as holding two parts of the manor. (fn. 25) Brommesgrove, in 1431, alienated it to Lawrence Doune, who is said to have held twothirds of the manor. (fn. 26) Half of this was bought from him by Ralph Wymeldon and Isabel his wife in 1464. (fn. 27) In 1481 Richard Wymeldon died seised of a third of the manor known subsequently as Littleburgh alias Mickleham. (fn. 28) He left a son Thomas, whose daughter Isabel married Thomas Stydolf. (fn. 29) The other part of the manor, which belonged to Laurence Doune, seems to have been acquired by William Ashurst, who held it in 1485. (fn. 30) Together with land which William Ashurst already held in Mickleham (fn. 31) it descended under the name of Mickleham alias High Ashurst to his son John. (fn. 32) In 1511 William brother of John Ashurst quitclaimed his right to Robert Gaynesford, whose son Henry in 1535 conveyed it to Thomas Stydolf. (fn. 33) From this time Littleburgh and Ashurst are sometimes treated separately and sometimes as different names for the same manor.
In 1538 Thomas Stydolf appears as owner of two parts of one part of the manor of Mickleham, formerly the land of John de Mickleham, Henry Burton and John Walk being trustees, to his use. (fn. 34) At his death in 1545 he is described as holding a third of the manor of Mickleham alias High Ashurst. (fn. 35) John Stydolf succeeded his father Thomas, being followed by his son, another Thomas, who was succeeded by his son, Sir Francis. (fn. 36)
Wymeldon. Argent a cheveron azure between three eagles sable.
Stydolf. Argent a chief sable with two wolves' heads razed or therein.
John Evelyn gives an account of a visit to Sir Francis Stydolf at Mickleham in August 1655. He says: 'I went to Boxhill to see those rare natural bowers, cabinets, and shady walks in the box copses: hence we walked to Mickleham, and saw Sir F. Stidolph's seate environ'd with elme-trees and walnuts innumerable, and of which last he told us they receiv'd a considerable revenue. Here are such goodly walkes and hills shaded with yew and box as render the place extremely agreeable, it seeming from these evergreens to be summer all the winter.' (fn. 37) This description is one that might have been written yesterday, for Surrey's lovely hill is still as fair in winter as in summer.
In the following century Sir Richard Stydolf left two daughters, Frances wife of James, Lord Astley, (fn. 38) and Margaret wife of James Tryon, and to the two sons of the latter, Charles and James Tryon, the Stydolf lands descended. (fn. 39) In 1705 the two sons made a partition of the property, the manor of Mickleham alias High Ashurst alias Littleburgh falling to James. (fn. 40) From James Tryon, according to Manning and Bray, the manor descended to his nephew, Charles Tryon, whose son Charles, in 1766, sold it to Anthony Chapman of London for £35,000. Chapman sold Mickleham Manor to Benjamin Bond Hopkins of Paine's Hill in 1775, and he in 1779 (fn. 41) sold it to Charles Talbot, afterwards a baronet. He died in 1798. His family held the manor till 1871, when the baronetcy being extinct the Misses Talbot sold it to Mr. R. H. Mackworth Praed, the present lord. Mickleham Hall, built by Sir C. H. Talbot, was bought at the same time by the late Mr. Gordon W. Clark, and is now the seat of his son, Mr. H. H. Gordon Clark. (fn. 42)
Talbot, baronet. Gules a lion in a border engrailed or with the difference of a crescent.
Meanwhile Ashurst had been separated, as a reputed manor, but bearing the name of Mickleham, and had been sold by Chapman in 1776 to Mr. Robert Botall. (fn. 43) From him it passed to George Morgan, (fn. 44) and in 1804 was conveyed by John Morgan to F. R. V. Villebois. (fn. 45) In 1817 it was bought by Mr. Andrew Strahan, the king's printer. In 1855 it was purchased from his nephew by Sir Henry Muggeridge; it passed in 1862 to Sir Richard Glass, and in 1872 to J. C. Wilson. It is now the seat of the Dowager Countess of Harrowby. (fn. 46)
NORBURY was evidently the estate in Mickleham which in 1086 belonged to Richard son of Earl Gilbert; it was then assessed for two hides. (fn. 47) From Richard de Tonbridge the overlordship descended to the De Clares, Earls of Gloucester, (fn. 48) from them to the Despensers, (fn. 49) and in the reign of Henry VI belonged to their descendant Isabel, Countess of Warwick. (fn. 50) As her ultimate heir was Anne Beauchamp who married Warwick the King-maker, the overlordship must have fallen to the Crown after his death and attainder in 1471; but in the 16th century it was said to belong to the warden and scholars of Merton College, Oxford, and Norbury to be held as of their manor of Thorncroft; (fn. 51) this is evidently an error.
At the time of the Domesday Survey Norbury was held under Richard de Tonbridge by Oswold, who had formerly been the tenant under Edward the Confessor. The next holder of whom anything is known was Odo de Dammartin, who during the 12th century granted to the monks of St. Pancras a third of his tithe in Mickleham. (fn. 52) His daughter, Alice de Dammartin, held half a fee there, (fn. 53) and Margery widow of Odo de Dammartin had as her dower, among other lands, the manor of Mickleham. (fn. 54)
From the Dammartins the manor passed to William Husee, who in 1314 held 'the manor called Le North Bury' in Mickleham as half a knight's fee of Earl Gilbert de Clare. (fn. 55) He was granted free warren there by Edward II, (fn. 56) and had licence for an oratory in his manor between 1323 and 1333. (fn. 57)
In 1349 the manor was held by Isabel Husee, (fn. 58) and in 1376 by another William Husee. (fn. 59) The next holder of Norbury appears in Thomas Stydolf, who died seised of it in 1545. (fn. 60) He has been connected by Manning and Bray with William Husee, in direct descent. According to these historians Isabel daughter of William Husee married William Wymeldon, the grandchild of whose son Ralph, Isabel Wymeldon, married Thomas Stydolf who died in 1545. (fn. 61) The Stydolfs held Norbury with their other Mickleham manors until the latter half of the 17th century. (fn. 62) In 1705 the manor became the property of James Tryon, grandson of Sir Richard Stydolf. (fn. 63) According to Manning and Bray James Tryon devised Norbury to his nephew Charles Tryon, who settled it upon his wife. She lived at Norbury till 1764, and then granted her life interest to her son Charles, (fn. 64) who with his wife Rebecca, in 1765, levied a fine to Sewallis Shirley. (fn. 65) In 1766 the estate was sold (according to Manning and Bray) to Anthony Chapman, who sold it to William Locke in 1774. Mr. Locke built the present house. (fn. 66) In 1819 his son sold Norbury to Mr. E. R. Robinson, who, however, sold it again in 1822 to Mr. E. Fuller Maitland, who exchanged it with Mr. H. P. Sperling for Park Place, near Henley-on-Thames. Mr. Sperling made great improvements in the beautiful grounds. In 1848 he sold it to Mr. Thomas Grissell, whose family sold it in 1890 to Mr. Leopold Salomons. (fn. 67)
FREDLEY.—In 1336 John de Mickleham, after having granted the manor of Mickleham with the exception of a messuage, 120 acres of land, and 4 acres of wood, to Roger de Apperdele, granted the excepted premises, also under the name of the 'manor of Mickleham,' (fn. 68) to his son-in-law John Dewey, husband of Margery de Mickleham. (fn. 69)
In 1365 John Frychele or Fridlee alias Dewey settled a house, 80 acres of land, and 4 acres of wood in Mickleham on himself and his wife Joan, by Hugh atte Sonde, his feoffee. (fn. 70) The manor was held by his son and grandson John Dewey and Roger Dewey alias Fridlee. (fn. 71) Roger Fridlee granted the manor to James Janyn and Nicholas Glover, who enfeoffed John Wydoweson and Isabel his wife. (fn. 72)
In 1449 John Wydoweson was in possession of the manor then first called the manor of Fredley (Frydelees) in Mickleham, (fn. 73) and the following year he and his wife Isabel granted the manor (then simply styled Mickleham) to William Wydoweson. (fn. 74) A William Wydewson presented to the living in 1492, (fn. 75) so was perhaps still holding Fredley. He is buried in Mickleham Church, where his wife also was buried in 1513.
Nothing more is known of the manor till 1528, when Sir John Mordaunt granted a lease of land in it, (fn. 76) and in 1571 Lewis, Lord Mordaunt, his grandson, alienated the manor to William Lever or Leaver. (fn. 77) From William Leaver the manor of Fredley descended to his son and grandson, John and Thomas Leaver, the latter inheriting it in 1640. (fn. 78) Documentary evidence of the descent is wanting, but according to Manning and Bray Thomas Leaver left sisters, Mary and Joan Leaver, as his heirs. The former married Edward Arnold, (fn. 79) the latter Edward Turner. The Arnolds in 1682 sold their moiety to Mr. John Spencer of Dorking, who in 1691 purchased Turner's moiety. On the same authority Spencer devised to Margaret wife of Gilbert Parker. (fn. 80) They sold Fredley to Samuel Hawkes in 1721. (fn. 81) Hawkes, according to Manning and Bray, was succeeded by his nephew Samuel Lamb, by whom Fredley was again sold in 1762 to Cecil Bisshop, afterwards Sir Cecil Bisshop, and Susannah his wife. (fn. 82) Cecil Bisshop is distinguished for building the famous Juniper Hall on the site of the old Royal Oak Inn. This fine old house afforded a kindly shelter to French émigrés in troubled times. (fn. 83) Sir Cecil Bisshop died in 1779. Mr. David Jenkinson, a lottery agent, bought the property, and built Juniper Hill. In 1803, on the death of his son, the property was broken up. Mr. Worrall bought Juniper Hall and sold it in 1814 to Mr. Thomas Broadwood, from whom it was bought by Miss Beardmore. Her heir conveyed it in 1868 to Mr. F. Richardson, who in 1882 sold it to Mr. George McAndrew. Juniper Hill was bought by Sir Lucas Pepys, bart., M.P., who married the Countess of Rothes and took the name of Leslie. It passed through them and Colonel Lambton to Mr. J. H. Bryant in 1884, and in 1899 to Mr. Leonard Cunliffe.
A third portion was ultimately bought by Mr. Sharp, F.R.S., 'Conversation Sharp.' He left it to his adopted daughter, Mrs. Drummond, who built the house now called Fredley. It is the property of her daughter, Mrs. Kay.
As early as 1253 the priory of Reigate held a tenement in Mickleham of Robert de Watevile. (fn. 84) Their property, afterwards known as the manor of WEST HUMBLE, was augmented by the grant of John de Mickelham, who gave to the Prior and convent of Reigate a house and 1s. 8d. rent with the advowson of the church in Mickleham. (fn. 85) Licence for the alienation was granted by the king in 1345 at the request of Queen Philippa. (fn. 86) The priory held their land until the Dissolution. Before that event, earlier in the reign of Henry VIII, it had been leased by the priory, under the name of the manor of 'West Humble in Mikelham,' to Thomas Stydolf for 99 years. Stydolf's right in certain lands in Mickleham was contested by John Arnold, who declared that he had been unjustly ousted by Stydolf from the peaceful occupation of his land in Mickleham, leased to him, so he said, for 99 years, by the Prior of Reigate in the March of 1521. (fn. 87) He accused Stydolf of having set his servants to kill him, one of whom assaulted him with a sword and 'strake' him 'upon the raynes of his bak' and 'there cut his coot,' his enemies' intention being to cut his head off, and 'playe at the foteball therewith,' according to the admission of Stydolf's own daughters. Stydolf's reply was that the lease of the lands in question had been made to him in August 1516. (fn. 88) An audit of rents of the late priory of Reigate in 1537 shows three years' rent from Thomas Stydolf and John Stydolf his son for the manor of West Humble £15 15s. (fn. 89)
After the dissolution of Reigate Priory the Stydolfs remained as tenants of the manor, which they held of Lord William Howard and his successors, (fn. 90) to whom the lands of the dissolved priory were granted in 1551. (fn. 91) The lease seems to have been renewed at the end of the ninety-nine years, as in 1681 a rent of £6 3s. 8d. was still paid to the successors of the Howards. (fn. 92)
The Stydolfs now held the three manors in Mickleham—Norbury, High Ashurst, and West Humble— all Mickleham, in fact, except Fridley. As Norbury and Ashurst, so West Humble passed, in Anne's reign, to the grandson of Sir Richard Stydolf, (fn. 93) James Tryon, whose nephew, Charles Tryon, in the reign of George III, 1765, levied a fine of the same manor to Sewallis Shirley for purpose of sale. (fn. 94) According to Manning and Bray the manor was sold to Chapman in 1776, in 1780 to Hopkins, and in 1781 to Sir Francis Geary of High Polesden, who died in 1796, being succeeded by his son Sir William, who sold to Richard Brinsley Sheridan in 1809. In 1816, after Sheridan's death, it was sold to Mr. Thomas Hudson, along with Chapel Farm, which was in Polesden Lacy Manor. The manorial rights and part of the property were sold by Mrs. Hudson's trustees in 1874 to Mr. J. Leverton Wylie, by whom courts were held occasionally. He died recently, and his relative, Mr. F. Leverton Harris, is now lord of the manor.
In the reign of John the priory of Merton held land in Polesden, (fn. 95) later described as the manor of POLESDEN LACY. (fn. 96) At the dissolution of the monastery in 1538 the manor was granted by Henry VIII to William Sackvyle, who purchased the manor of Polesden Lacy and farms called Capelland and Bowetts. (fn. 97) William Sackvyle died in 1556. (fn. 98) His son in the same year had licence to alienate the manor and messuages and land called Capelland and Bowetts to Gilbert and Richard Sackvyle, (fn. 99) by whom it was sold to Henry Stydolf in 1564. (fn. 100) He died without male issue, (fn. 101) having settled the manor on a certain John Stydolf, with remainder to his brothers William and Thomas successively. (fn. 102) William died in seisin of it at the end of Elizabeth's reign; (fn. 103) Thomas himself, at his death in 1603, only possessed land in Polesden, which descended to his son Sir Francis Stydolf. (fn. 104)
William Stydolf, son of William, had Polesden Lacy in 1657. (fn. 105) His son Sigismund Stydolf in 1689 settled the manor on himself and his wife Margaret, daughter of Sir Francis Rolle, and at his death left it to his wife. (fn. 106) She married three times, her third husband being Thomas Edwin, upon whom she settled the manor after her death, in default of issue from the marriage. She died in 1734, and as she left no children Mr. Edwin became seised of the manor, which descended to his nephew Charles Edwin. (fn. 107) Charles Edwin bequeathed his estates to his wife Lady Charlotte, with remainder to his issue, in default to his sister Catherine Edwin and her male issue, and in default to his nephew Charles Windham. Lady Charlotte died in 1777, and Catherine Edwin being dead without issue, Charles Windham succeeded to the estates and took the name of Edwin. In 1784 he sold the manor to Admiral Sir Francis Geary, who held the manor of High Polesden in Great Bookham, after which the descent of the two manors is identical (q.v.).
The church of ST. MICHAEL consists of a chancel 28 ft. 9 in. by 16 ft. 9 in., with vestries on the north side and a circular organ-chamber on the south; a nave 42 ft. by 17 ft. 10 in., with a north aisle 30 ft. 6 in. by 15 ft. 6 in., at the east end of which is a chantry 16 ft. by 10 ft.; a south aisle 7 ft. 6 in. wide, and a west tower 16 ft. 7 in. by 14 ft. 2 in., having over its west doorway a porch 10 ft. 9 in. by 8 ft. 7 in.
The oldest part of the building is the west tower, dating from c. 1140, while the chancel is some forty years later. All the rest of the church except the west porch, a 15th-century addition, and the north chapel, which is of early 16th-century date, has been rebuilt in modern times—1872 and 1891—the north aisle having been widened at the latter date. A former north doorway was taken away in 1891, and has been set up in the grounds of Fredley, in the parish.
Plan of Mickleham Church
Parts of a large circular column with a scalloped capital, now in the tower, were found in excavating for the new arcade, and show that an aisle existed in the 12th century, evidently on the south side, as the north aisle was a very late addition, none existing when Manning and Bray wrote.
The chancel has a marked deviation to the south from the line of the nave and tower, and doubtless replaced a narrower building coeval with or older than the west tower. Its east wall is almost entirely modern, and contains three round-headed lights with a circular wheel-window over, in 12th-century style. The north and south walls of the chancel are for the most part old, and in each are two roundheaded windows, modern on the outside, but with old internal jambs having shafts at the angles with moulded bases and carved foliate capitals of several types, c. 1180.
The rear arches are semicircular, and have moulded outer orders with billet-moulded labels, which continue between the windows as a string-course. Below the sills of the windows is another string, being in section a keeled roll.
Mickleham Church: West Tower and Porch
Near the east ends of both walls are rectangular lockers with plain rebated jambs and square heads, fitted with modern doors; and between the two north windows is a modern doorway leading to the vestries, with moulded jambs and pointed arch.
At the west end of the south wall of the chancel is a modern opening to the organ-chamber in 12th-century style, and above it an open arcade of interlacing round arches.
The organ-chamber is circular on plan, lighted by four narrow round-headed windows, and by a series of small circular windows high in the wall. On the west side of the chamber is a tall narrow opening to the south aisle with a semicircular arch and scalloped capitals.
The chancel arch is semicircular, and is of three orders, the two inner ones being modern and having moulded edge rolls, but the outer order on the west face is a pretty piece of late 12th-century work, with a lozenge pattern with leaf-carving in the spandrels between it and the label, which has a line of dogtooth ornament on the chamfer. The jambs are of old stonework and quite plain, with modern scalloped capitals and corbels.
The north and south arcades of the nave are entirely modern, and are of four bays with semicircular arches and round columns having moulded bases and scalloped or carved capitals, with corbels to correspond at each end. The eastern bay on the north side opens to the north chapel, and instead of a column has a square pier to take the western arch of the chapel.
The chantry has an early 16th century east window of four cinquefoiled lights with a traceried fourcentred head and a moulded label, the inner jambs being worked with a large casement moulding, and on the north side of the window is a canopied niche, now without a base; the canopy has trefoiled ogee arches with crockets and finials and small crocketed pinnacles between. Manning and Bray note that in their time there was a corresponding niche on the south side. Two plaster figures of St. Peter and St. Paul, now in the vestry, are said to have stood in these niches.
Against the north wall of the chapel is a canopied tomb, which is described below; and to the west of it a plain contemporary doorway with a threecentred arch; while above it is a window of two cinquefoiled lights in a square head. The arch opening to the aisle is modern, and corresponds to the adjacent arches of the nave arcade.
The north aisle has two modern windows in its north wall, each having three cinquefoiled ogee lights under a square head; and at the west end of the aisle is a modern doorway.
The three windows of the south aisle are likewise modern, except the small west window, which is old work reset, its inner splayed jambs and rear arch being perhaps of 13th-century date.
The tower opens to the nave by a modern round-headed arch, and has in its north wall a modern twolight window of 12th-century design.
In the south wall of the tower near the west end is an old doorway, now leading into a cupboard in the wall, but originally intended to open to the stairs to the belfry.
The 12th-century west doorway in the tower has jambs of two square orders with engaged shafts having scalloped capitals and chamfered abaci; the arch is semicircular, and has a heavy roll between two plain orders. It opens to a porch with small loop-lights in each side wall, and a western arch with chamfered jambs and a modern moulded label.
The tower is low in proportion to its width, and has on the north, south, and west two small lights, one above the other, which have what seem to be 16th-century heads externally, but retain their 12th-century rear arches.
On the east face is one window of the same character just above the nave roof. The western angles of the tower are strengthened by pairs of deep buttresses, which have been largely rebuilt, but their internal angles have old stones; they are probably 15th-century additions, and the tower is finished with a low pyramidal roof from which rises a slender octagonal shingled spire. The roof of the nave and the west porch are covered with Horsham stone slabs, while the chancel and organ-chamber are tiled, and the aisles have lead roofs and stone parapets.
The fittings of the church are for the most part modern. In the pulpit are five panels carved in highrelief, representing scenes from the New Testament. At the angles are figures in canopied niches, and the moulded cornice has a form of acanthus-leaf ornament in low-relief.
In the north chapel is some panelling from St. Paul's School in London, c. 1680.
The font is of 13th-century date, and has a shallow square bowl with tapering sides ornamented with arcades in low-relief, and standing on a central and four angle shafts with moulded bases. Near the font is an old wooden eagle lectern fixed to a modern iron stem and base; and on the south wall of the chancel is the banner and helmet of Sir Francis Stydolf, who died in 1655.
The tomb in the north chapel is a panelled Purbeck marble altar-tomb in a canopied recess, the panels being square with feathered quatrefoils inclosing shields, once painted, but now almost plain. The recess above has a four-centred head with tracery spandrels, and a cornice with a vine-trail and a Tudor flower cresting. On a brass plate in the recess is the following inscription: 'Here lyth the body of Wyllyam Wyddowsoun cytezein and mercer of londn & of ye parych of Mekyllham late patorne & also here lythe ye body of Jone hys wyfe the wyche dyssesyd the xxvii day of septebyr the vth yere of kyng hary the VIII on whoys soullys god have mercy ame.'
Above is the figure of a man in a long fur-trimmed cloak praying at a desk. A scroll issues from his mouth on which is the prayer: 'Dne deus miserere su[per] animabs.' To his right is a woman with a long head-dress and a tight-fitting dress with a loose waistbelt; on the scroll from her mouth is, 'Ihs xps miserere sup animabs.' Between the two figures is a brass shield on which are the arms of the Mercers' Company, and above are indents for other shields now lost.
There are two floor-slabs near the east end of the nave, one to Thomas Tooth, who died in 1685, and the other to Peter de Lahay, 1684. Near the west end of the nave is a mediaeval coffin-lid on which is the indent of a long cross with foliated ends. In the west porch are two marble coffin-slabs of the 14th century, with raised crosses, and edges which are twice hollow-chamfered. On one of them are remains of an inscription in Gothic capitals. . . . ICY DEU DALME EIT MERCI AMEN.
The tower contains three bells, the treble being by C. and G. Mears, 1850. The second has the inscription, 'Bryanus Eldridge me fecit 1624,' and the third has 'Wilhelmus Carter me fecit 1610' in Gothic capitals.
The plate is as follows: Two cups, one of 1666 and the other of 1870; two patens, one of 1701 and the other a year later; and two flagons, the first being of 1614 and the other of 1702. There is also an almsdish of 1700.
There are four books of registers, the first a long paper volume containing very irregular entries; first is a group of burials from 1612 to 1629, then there are baptisms from 1549 to 1629, and next come more burials from 1549 to 1605, and finally baptisms, marriages, and burials from 1634 to 1660. At the other end of the book are some briefs, churchwardens' accounts, &c. The second book, which is mostly a copy on parchment of the first, contains baptisms from 1549 to 1698, with a gap between 1658 and 1660; marriages from 1549 to 1713, with a gap between 1647 and 1663; and burials from 1549 to 1712, with a gap as in the baptisms. At the other end are accounts and tithe rents from 1637. The third book contains baptisms and burials from 1713 to 1812 and marriages from 1713 to 1753, and the fourth book continues the marriages from 1754 to 1812.
Mr. Samuel Woods, one of the founders of the London Institution, who lived in Mickleham, made an index to the registers.
The churchyard surrounds the church, and it is entered from the road at the north-west corner and by a lych-gate at the south-west corner.
A church at Mickleham is mentioned in the Domesday Survey. (fn. 108) At the time of the taxation of Pope Nicholas it was assessed at £18 13s. 4d. (fn. 109) The early owners and patrons of the church were the De Micklehams, John de Mickleham presenting in the 14th century. (fn. 110) He alienated the advowson in 1344 (fn. 111) to Reigate Priory that prayers might be daily sung in the priory church for the souls of his family, and the priors presented continuously until the Dissolution, with two exceptions, when Laurence Doune and William Wydoweson presented in the 15th century. (fn. 112) Wydoweson claimed the advowson, which he said John de Mickleham had alienated to John Dewey, from whose descendants it had passed to himself. (fn. 113) The owners of Fridley Manor had claimed some right in it in 1449, (fn. 114) and William Wydoweson presented in 1492. (fn. 115) Henry VIII after the dissolution of Reigate Priory granted the advowson of the rectory and parish church of Mickleham, with West Humble Manor, to Lord William Howard and Margaret his wife. (fn. 116) It passed by descent to Elizabeth, Countess of Peterborough. (fn. 117) Charles, Viscount Mordaunt of Avalon, her grandson, sold the advowson to John Parsons in 1681, (fn. 118) and in 1698 Sir John Parsons presented to the living. (fn. 119) The next presentation, in 1744, was made by Thomas Walton, merchant of London, hac vice. According to Manning and Bray, Parsons devised the rectory to his daughters, Sarah wife of James Dunn, and Anne, who married John Hynde Cotton, afterwards knighted. (fn. 120) Sir John Hynde Cotton presented in 1771, (fn. 121) and sold the advowson to Sir Charles Talbot in 1786, (fn. 122) and Lady Talbot, the widow of Sir Charles, presented in 1800 and 1802. In 1813 Mr. Henry Burmester presented his son, having bought the next presentation from Sir George Talbot. (fn. 123) It passed with the manor till 1899, when Mr. H. H. Gordon Clark of Mickleham Hall bought the advowson from Mr. Praed.
Smith's Charity is distributed as in other Surrey parishes. In 1586 Richard Woodstock left 5s. annually charged on land in Mickleham common fields for the repair of the church. It appears that the fields were by the river. After the parish was brought into the Dorking Union by the Poor Law of 1834 the old poorhouse at Bytom Hill became useless, and proposals were made for converting it into an almshouse. The matter was delayed till the old building fell down, and it was not till 1851 that the almshouses were actually opened, built chiefly by the generosity of Sir George Talbot, and endowed by Miss Talbot. They were burnt down in 1864, and were rebuilt by Mr. H. P. Grissell of Norbury, whose family further endowed them. They accommodate eight persons.
1. Perhaps the oldest form of the name known is Emlyn Stream (Emele aqua); Lansd. MS. 435, fol. 130a, in a grant of 1331. The name 'Mole' may come from 'Molinae Aqua'; compare the Welsh 'Melin.'
2. Act 28 Geo. II, cap. 45.
3. Manning and Bray, Surr. iii, App. p. lii.
4. Ibid. p. xlvii.
5. Op. cit. iv, 457.
6. See manor of Polesden Lacy.
7. V.C.H. Surr. i, 304.
8. Exch. Enr. of Inq. rot. 4, m. 7, 21 Edw. I; Testa de Nevill (Rec. Com.), 228; Chan. Inq. p.m. 21 Edw. I, no. 38.
10. Testa de Nevill (Rec. Com.), 228. Henry I is probably meant. Henry II is called in Testa de Nevill 'Henricus rex pater Domini Regis.'
11. Kirby's Quest, fol. 97. Besides his service to the king, he owed rent and suit at the court of Betchworth to 'Lord John de Berewyk,' and also rent to William Agulham for a certain tenement in the manor.
12. Exch. Enr. of Inq. rot. iv, m. 7.
13. Exch. Enr. of Inq. rot. iv, m. 11; Inq. p.m. 21 Edw. I, no. 129. His wife Alice apparently afterwards married William de Clyvedene (Inq. a.q.d. 1 Edw. II, no. 86).
14. Exch. Enr. of Inq. rot. iv, m. 11.
15. Chan. Inq. p.m. 21 Edw. I, no. 38.
16. Cal. Pat. 1348–50, p. 421; Chan. Inq. p.m. 21 Edw. III (2nd nos.), no. 48.
18. Chan. Inq. p.m. 40 Edw. III (1st nos.), no. 60.
20. Abbrev. Rot. Orig. (Rec. Com.), ii, 288.
21. Plac. in Canc. file v, Hil. 41 Edw. III, no. 5.
22. Chan. Inq. p.m. 43 Edw. III, pt. i, no. 21.
23. Cal. Pat. 1401–5, p. 227. Before this date conveyances were made to two of these clerks, Nicholas de Wykeham and Master John Campeden, by Roger de Friddele and John Apperdele son of John Apperdele of Letherhead, of 133 acres of land, 150 acres of pasture, 6 acres of wood, and 14s. rent in Mickleham (Feet of F. Surr. Trin. 14 Ric. II; Mich. 15 Ric. III). This is the same as the extent of the two thirds afterwards given, so that the fines were probably for assurance of title.
25. Chan. Inq. p.m. 10 Hen. VI, no. 43.
26. Chan. Inq. p.m. 9 Hen. VI, no. 12. The extent here given, viz. 133 acres of land, 150 acres of pasture, 6 acres of wood and 14s. rent is the same as that in the fines mentioned above; but in the inquisition taken after Brommesgrove's death the two parts were said to consist of 120 acres of arable land, 200 acres of pasture, and 15 acres of wood.
27. Cal. Pat. 1436–41, p. 545.
28. Chan. Inq. p.m. 20 Edw. IV, no. 71. He had acquired it from Isabel Wymeldon in 1464 (Fine R. 4 Edw. IV, m. 1; Cal. Pat. 1461–7, p. 321). Why it is called Littleburgh is unknown. There is no reason to connect it with Berge in Domesday.
29. Manning and Bray, Surr. ii, 651.
30. Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. 2), xx, 24.
31. a The Ashursts had land in Mickleham, called High Ashurst, of which there is record in 1439 and 1477 (Deeds quoted by Manning and Bray, Surr. ii, 656).
33. Manning and Pray, Surr. ii, 656.
34. Mem. R. (L.T.R.) East. 30 Hen. VIII, rot. 1.
35. Chan. Inq. p.m. 36 Hen. VIII, no. 89.
36. Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. 2), cclxxv, 69 (1 Jas. I); clxxv, 66 (18 Eliz.).
37. Evelyn's Diary, 27 Aug. 1655.
38. He died 1674 (monument at Mickleham).
39. Close, 4 Anne, pt. iii, no. 16.
41. In 1779, not 1780, as Manning and Bray say, for in 1779 Talbot, as owner, made an agreement with the parish about a right of way (Parish Books).
42. Private and local knowledge.
43. Com. Pleas D. Enr. Hil. 16 Geo. III, m. 133. Botall himself seems to have told Manning that he bought it from Hopkins.
44. Feet of F. Surr. East. 21 Geo. III.
45. Recov. R. Mich. 44 Geo. III.
46. Private and local information.
47. V.C.H. Surr. i, 317.
48. Testa de Nevill (Rec. Com.), 219, 220; Chan. Inq. p.m. 8 Edw. II, no. 68.
49. Ibid. 23 Edw. III (pt. 2, 1st nos.), no. 169.
50. Ibid. 18 Hen. VI, no. 3.
51. Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. 2), clxxv, 66. Thorncroft includes lands in Mickleham now, but not Norbury.
52. Cal. of Anct. Deeds, iii, A. 3978.
53. Testa de Nevill (Rec. Com.), 219. Robert de Mickleham also seems to have held half a fee (according to Testa de Nevill) of the honour of Clare.
54. Feet of F. Div. Co. 15 & 16 Hen. III, 89.
55. Chan. Inq. p.m. 8 Edw. II, no. 68.
56. Chart. R. 11 Edw. II, m. 9, no. 42.
57. Egerton MS. 2032.
58. Chan. Inq. p.m. 23 Edw. III (pt. 2, 1st nos.), no. 169.
59. Chan. Inq. p.m. 49 Edw. III (pt. 1, 2nd nos.), no. 46.
60. Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. 2), clxxv, 89.
61. Manning and Bray, Hist. of Surr. ii, 651. From deeds, apparently. The Visitation in Harl. MS. 1561, fol. 38b, also connects Thomas Stydolf with Husee in descent through the Wymeldons, but makes Isabel Wymeldon marry George Stydolf, their son being Thomas Stydolf.
62. Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. 2), clxxv, 66; cclxxx, 69; Feet of F. Div. Co. Trin. 14 Chas. I.
64. Manning and Bray, Hist. of Surr. ii, 652.
65. Feet of F. Surr. Hil. 5 Geo. III.
66. On the hill. The old house was near the river. Part of it was preserved and is now a farm-house.
67. Local and private knowledge.
68. Compare the common use of the name, the manor of Mickleham for Mickleham and Ashurst later.
69. Feet of F. Surr. Trin. 10 Edw. III; Abbrev. Rot. Orig. (Rec. Com.), ii, 108; Cal. Pat. 1334–8, p. 232. This 'manor' was subsequently held of the king by half of the original service owed by the manor of Mickleham. See Chan. Inq. p.m. 39 Edw. III (2nd nos.), no. 38.
70. Chan. Inq. p.m. 39 Edw. III (2nd nos.), no. 38.
71. De Banco R. Mich. 5 Edw. IV and 44 Hen. VI, m. 619.
73. Close, 27 Hen. VI, m. 109. He appears to have been enfeoffed by Richard Horton, who was probably a trustee, as were, doubtless, Janyn and Glover.
74. Feet of F. Surr. East. 28 Hen. VI.
75. Winton Epis. Reg. Courtney, 43a.
76. Deed in private hands. See also Exch. (L.T.R.) Memor. R. East. 29 Hen. VIII, rot. 6.
77. Pat. 13 Eliz. pt. xi.
78. Inq. p.m. (Ser. 2), ccxxvi, 150; ccccxcii, 54.
79. Edward Arnold, 'of Fridley,' was churchwarden in 1670. The Arnolds had farmed Fridley in the previous century. From 1549 to 1635 there are 68 baptisms of Arnold children.
81. Feet of F. Surr. Hil. 7 Geo. I.
82. Ibid. 12 Geo. III. A fine between John Matthews and Cecil Bisshop occurs in 1772.
83. Hill, Juniper Hall.
84. Feet of F. Surr. East. 37 Hen. III.
85. Inq. p.m. 17 Edw. III (2nd nos.), no. 86.
86. Cal. Pat. 1343–5, p. 526.
87. Ct. of Req. bdle. 11, no. 46.
89. L. and P. Hen. VIII, xiii (2), 1264.
90. Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. 2), clxxv, 66 (18 Eliz.); cclxxx, 69.
91. Pat. 33 Hen. VIII, pt. vii, m. 1; Margaret wife of Lord William Howard was succeeded by her son Charles, Lord Howard of Effingham, from whom the priory's lands descended to his granddaughter, Elizabeth wife of the Earl of Peterborough (Pat. 12 Chas. II, pt. xviii, no. 16). Charles II in 1660 made a grant of these lands to Viscount Mordaunt de Avalon, son of the Countess of Peterborough (Pat. 12 Chas. II, pt. xviii, no. 16), by whom they seem to have been conveyed, by fine, in 1681, to John Parsons (Feet of F. Surr. Mich. 33 Chas. II), who also, in the same year, levied a fine to Grace Pierpoint (Feet of F. Surr. Hil. 33 & 34 Chas. II).
92. Feet of F. Surr. Mich. 33 Chas. II.
95. Feet of F. Surr. 3 John; Abbrev. Plac. (Rec. Com.), 93.
96. Valor Eccl. (Rec. Com.), ii, 48; Mins. Accts. Surr. 29 & 30 Hen. VIII, no. 115, m. 7. It is probably what is meant at an earlier date by East Polesden; vide Feet of F. Surr. 13 Edw. II, no. 10 (Surr. Arch Coll. Vol. of Fines, 89).
97. Aug. Off. Partics. of Grants, 38 Hen. VIII, no. 972; Pat. 4 Edw. VI, pt. viii, m. 38.
98. Chan. Inq. p.m. 2 & 3 Phil. and Mary, cx, 148. He held the manor and woodlands called the Hooke Grove, the Lower Frunes, the Upper Frunes, Capell Grove, and Malbrydynge Coppice in Mickleham and Polesden, and messuages and tenements called Capellande and Bowetts.
99. Pat. 3 & 4 Phil. and Mary, pt. iv, m. 17; Com. Pleas D. Enr. East. 6 Eliz. m. 28 d.
100. Pat. 6 Eliz. pt. ix, m. 9: Com. Pleas D. Enr. East. 6 Eliz. m. 28 d.
101. Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. 2), clxxv, 66.
102. Mem. R. (L.T.R.) 10 Eliz. rot. 157.
103. Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. 2), cclxiv, 175.
104. Ibid. cclxxx, 69.
105. Recov. R. Trin. 1657, rot. 59.
106. Manning and Bray, Surr. ii, 657; Feet of F. Div. Co. Mich. 29 Chas. II.
107. Manning and Bray, Surr. ii, 658. The history of the tenure from the Stydolfs to the Edwins is identical with that of Headley (q.v.).
108. V.C.H. Surr. i, 304.
109. Pope Nich. Tax (Rec. Com.), 208.
110. Egerton MS. 2032.
111. Inq. p.m. 17 Edw. III (2nd nos.), no. 86.
113. De Banco, Mich. 5 Edw. IV; 44 Hen. VI, m. 619.
114. Feet of F. Surr. 28 Hen. VI, no. 30.
115. Vide supra under Fridley.
116. Pat. 33 Hen. VIII, pt. vii, m. 1; Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. 2), cxcvii, 75.
117. Pat. 12 Chas. II, pt. xviii, no. 16; Inst. Bks. (P.R.O.). She presented in 1669.
118. Feet of F. Surr. Mich. 33 Chas. II.
119. Inst. Bks. (P.R.O.). He levied a fine in 1681 to Grace Pierpoint.
120. Manning and Bray, Surr. ii, 659.
121. Inst. Bks. (P.R.O.).
122. Manning and Bray, Surr. ii, 659. (The date by a misprint is here given as 1766.) In 1788 a fine occurs between Daniel Vandewall and Sarah his wife and Lazarus Venables of the rectory of Mickleham.
123. Inst. Bks. (P.R.O.), and private information.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Registration: Participants have the option of enrolling for 1 credit as either an undergraduate or graduate student through the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Contact graduate representative for art education Rina Kundu at kundu@uwm.edu for further information. Registration is now closed. If you are interested in receiving information about the 2015 Summer Institute, please contact Prof. Rina Kundu at kundu@uwm.edu.
The UWM Art Education Institute at the Lynden Sculpture Garden welcomes K-12 teachers, community and museum educators, and docents with an interest in developing an interdisciplinary and integrated curriculum that explores the relationship between art and nature. Generalist teachers and those with expertise in science, language and social studies, as well as the arts, are encouraged to participate.
The idea of matter is central to physics, biology, and art. Even in the purely physical sense, we know that matter is never static, but mutable and relational. In this summer's institute, we will view the Lynden Sculpture Garden through the lens of Living Matter, exploring the idea that both the beholder and the works of art and nature that constitute the sculpture garden are situated, historical, physical bodies and because the boundaries among them are indefinite, they can affect and contaminate--even destroy--each other. By the end of the week, we will be thinking of Lynden less as an idealistic space showing an important collection of art in a natural environment, and more as a living and changing body.
Today's knowledge and skills are more frequently constructed through mediatized processes and abstract concepts, and less often through first-hand experiences. We are expected to become passive consumers, and to see objects as mere commodities. To the extent that we are removed from the material experiences of making and experimenting with the manipulation of matter, we have become less reflective about the uses, relations, processes and states of being that objects facilitate, and the ways in which objects create complex entanglements between humans and the world we inhabit. It is here that the concept of materiality connects with the concept of embodiment--how our bodies perceive, understand, and represent their relationships with the external world, their intertwining and enfleshment. Philosopher Evan Thompson (2007) describes this as "the relation between one's body as one subjectivity lives it and one's body as an organism in the world" (p. 244).
These concepts of embodiment and materiality in relation to places and objects will provide the underlying structure for the summer institute. A toolbox of art-based strategies will be developed that will be augmented by a participatory, outdoor artmaking experience with guest artists. Participants will undertake a larger research and/or curriculum development project that they will present on July 18.
We will spend our time among Lynden's sculptures, spaces and landscapes engaged in guided, art-based exercises centered on Merleau Ponty's (1962) concept of the world perceived as flesh and body, putting in practice strategies of material and spatial embodiment inspired by artists like Lygia Pape, Hélio Oiticica, Gabriel Orozco, Abbas Kiarostami and Richard Long.
We will reconvene to present our projects.


How do I make a bid? – GolfLine, Inc.
To place a bid, just tap the Bid icon at the bottom of the screen.
Tell us what you want. – Define your parameters by selecting the geographic area where you want to play, the courses you're interested in (all or just your favorites), how many golfers are in your group, how many holes you want to play, whether you want to walk or ride, and what day and time window you want to play.
Place your bid. – Select the course and time period that you prefer and place your bid.


text:
Lori Loughlin Could Face a 'Substantially Higher' Sentence Than Felicity Huffman
Lauren Evans
Filed to:lori loughlin
Just because Felicity Huffman walked away with only two weeks of jail time for her role in the college admissions scandal doesn't mean that Lori Loughlin will necessarily get so lucky—especially if she doesn't plead guilty, the lawyer prosecuting the case said.
In an interview with WCVB's On the Record, attorney Andrew Lelling told the show's hosts that Huffman was "probably the least culpable of the defendants who we've charged in that case."
"She took responsibility almost immediately. She was contrite, did not try to minimize her conduct. I think she handled it in a very classy way and so, at the end of the day, we thought the one-month was proportional," he said.
Then there's Aunt Becky, who doesn't seem to have impressed Lelling quite so much. According to Yahoo,
"If she's convicted... we would probably ask for a higher sentence for her than we did for Felicity Huffman," Lelling said. "I can't tell you exactly what that would be. The longer the case goes, let's say she goes through to trial, if it is after trial, certainly, we would ask for something substantially higher. If she resolved it before trial, something lower than that."
So far, Loughlin and her husband, Mossimo Giannulli, have pleaded not guilty to money laundering and fraud charges. Unlike Huffman, who only paid $15,000 for the privilege of helping her daughter cheat on her SATs, Loughlin allegedly gave $500,000 to have her daughters designated as crew team recruits to USC, despite neither of them ever having rowed. Loughlin's next due back in court in January, which should give her plenty of time to consider Lelling's words under her crime visor.
How to DIY Your Own Sexy College Admissions Crime Mom Costume
Questions I'd Like Answered in Aunt Becky's Tell-All Book
Hedge Fund Billionaire Reportedly Donated $37.3 Million to Ensure His Kids Got Into Their Preferred Ivy League Schools
Night blogger at Jezebel


Did you ever notice how a profound hallway discussion can have an impact on your life?
Are the books of your life balanced?
Consider the problem as a triangle with Work on one side, Family on the second, and Self on the third. In the work bucket, client expectations, staff considerations, deadlines, career demands, training and travel dominate demands on time. Family represents time carved out for relationships–predominantly with spouse and children, but secondarily for parents and then extended family. The Self side of the triangle is to recharge your personal batteries. For me, this often takes the form of spiritual life and worship, serving as a volunteer, golf, beach vacations and reading. The solution is to find the proper balance for the triangle that achieves harmony in the expectations for my life over a long period of time. There are of course budget seasons, family illnesses, or week-long vacations that throw the triangle out of whack for a short duration. Keeping the triangle balanced over a long period is my personal work-life balance goal.
Allow me to address some ideas from two perspectives.
Model the behavior: If possible, avoid contacting your team outside of work hours. Respect their personal time and only reach out if it is absolutely necessary. If you are responding to e-mail late at night, on weekends and while on vacation, you are sending a message of expectations to the rest of your team that they are expected to do the same.
Provide for flexibility: If possible, allow alternative work arrangements and schedules. If an employee's job can be performed just as well at home, allow them the option to modify their schedules when necessary to do so.
Understand your priorities and ideal life: There are times when demands on your life will mean your triangle be out of whack. If you desire and value career success over family be prepared to work long hours. A personal or family illness may limit your work commitments. Assess your situation against your personal standards and take action if your personal triangle appears out of alignment with your priorities at that period of your life.
Disconnect: With today's technology, we are almost constantly linked to the world. There is always something to do, something urgent to address. Set strict limits on personal time versus work time. Leave the phone off when spending time with family. Find hobbies and personal fulfillment activities that are unrelated to work and do not involve technology.
Are the books of your life in balance? I'd love to hear your tips and advice for finding balance in your workplace and life.


text:
Murmurs continues to receive warm reviews in traditional newspapers and magazines as well as in social media posts and comments.
Collating a few here which delve deep into the book and its reading experience.
Murmurs: Silent Steals with Soumitra Chatterjee
A Special Book from Other Households in Mood, Morji
Review by Saroj Darbar
In his own writing, Soumitra Chattopadhyay once said, that those who buy his labor-acting, do not buy his desires, ideals etc. They do business their way by taking away his acting talents. As a result, a distance between his personality and his work is born. Which opens the door of separation in habit. This loneliness used to hurt him. The strong truth that lies within such feelings, is a great actor and consciously the peril that can cause contemporary modern people, is past our imagination. Yet he had to go through it for decades. Otherwise, in the context of actors and politics, it seems that an actor is basically the interpreter of the filmmaker's thoughts and philosophy. When acting is not an independent art, then it is useless to search for the actor or his life vision within acting. So where is the worth of an actor? He reaches the eternal consciousness of life, with joy, in its answer or resolution.
If we go beyond acting and search for that life vision of Soumitra Chattopadhyay, then we have to find the range where the actor's makeup is no longer relevant. Finding Ehen is not easy, and its support is – or what? Definitely his writings-prose and poetry. And, there may be interviews too. But nothing is printed on a measured newspaper; because, there are naturally many limitations. Rather, at different times, in different episodes of life, if someone writes the pure narration of his personal outlook towards life, then maybe we can find the person's psychology very insecure, irrelevant, irrelevant i.e. fundamentally. Amitabh Nag has done the same thing by quenching our thirst, in his newly published book.
This book is called a joint journey. Of course the writer's long introduction journey with Soumitrababu, externally. In intimacy, this book is of two times, a different view of life or can I say it is the companion of different experiences. Holding hands for a while. A Forest. He has shadow, he has illusion. There are two hidden rivers inside the Kasthal powder. The other, new sunshine in comparison. He has a sparkling mind, thirst, curiosity, doubts are vast. This sunny conversation with the Banaspati, gradually overcoming the idea of interviews tied to Q-A, touches the level of exposure on many levels. The field of self-visibility is ready.
The writer has brought here many moments found in the company of Soumitrababu
The writer has brought here many moments found in the company of Soumitrababu, they are not just traditional anecdotes, but can be called life shaking or similar philosophical molakat. The epidemic may get the hint of this — Rejection, Horizon, Pain, Care, No one escapes Death. Some intense questions come around. What is called success? As Soumitrababu's A-question pushes the writer towards his own answer, similarly this question is asked to Soumitrababu by his own question. A man who is the ultimate successful in our eyes, why do you put yourself in the face of this question? Wow, how does the horizon come to his idea? Or the rejection! Is he just a return of some rolls, or something else? Forest bows down near a deeper sensation; such a moment's collage is here on every page. Not an incident, not a frequency, but a lot of space within a little thing to happen, so that the silence between the two dialogues can spread throughout these episodes. And, much like movies, as if in the collage of some shots decorated with well-planned inconsistency we discover a man's thoughts capture the philosophy. What mortality cannot consume. Not a person, as if he becomes a man of thought or a poem at the end.
A lot of work has been done with actor Soumitra and will be done. The author of this book also analyzed several other notable characters of Soumitrababu apart from Apu in the past, writes the book. But the present book is from other households in mood, morji. And so maybe even more important. Apart from acting, talent, etc, there are some other components of legends based on oral words. To many people it is composed in different ways. Amitabh presented Soumitrababu who was near him in front of us or Soumitra has been built by finding a little bit of Soumitra for a long time. We, who are far away travelers, may feel a little closer to the stars in this range. But the bigger thing is that, another very known outsider Soumitrababu remained near the future, Soumitrababu remained like a cloud for a few moments, whose Hadith cannot be found in any way. That's why this book acquires its speciality. No biography, no discussion, no analysis, almost nothing wants to happen so this book finally becomes something special.
The publisher gifted a calendar with the book Blue Pencil; that is also excellent, informative.
The collector's edition calendar – tribute to Soumitra Chatterjee
Soul Searching Together, Holding Each Other's Hands
Review by Champa Srinivasan
When I received Murmurs: Silent Steals with Soumitra Chatterjee, as a gift from my daughter, I expected it to be another memoir of the legendary actor.
I have this habit of reading through a new book so that I can breathe in its freshness as I flip through the pages.
Afternoons, have been always my favourite time of the day. All my passionate readings, informal musings and imaginary conversations with the favourite fictional characters and real life idols had happened in the languid hours of late afternoon, when the sky begins to change its colour.
Today was no exception. I slouched in my study room with the new book, which had just arrived. On the cover of the book, stood the man, whom I had first seen on screen, twisting to the iconic, 'Jibone ki pabona, bhulechi se bhabona' , in a shiny red kurta.
As I started reading, I immediately got transported to the magic world, where words get merged with dreams, poetry seeping through the every little anecdote and conversation, self realisation dawning through the closing lines of each chapter.
Murmurs is not a memoir or a biography at all, it is as much about Soumitra Chatterjee, the complete artist and a hum
an being as it is about Amitava Nag, the author, whose words could be mistaken for lucid poetry, written in prose form, their journey together, in search of many meanings of life.
We all have read a lot of literature on Soumitra Chatterjee, specially after his passing away but this book is absolutely different from all that have been written on him, till now.
Amitava Nag, captures the nuances of Soumitra Babu's thoughts and dreams, his disappointments and happiness, meandering through the labyrinth of the mind of the legend and at times getting merged with it, in their passage of soul searching, together, holding each others hands.
This book is perhaps what could be aptly described as trying to search out the known among the unknown, 'janar majhe ajanare, korechi sondhan'.
We are bound to remain awake in wonder, for long, after completing the read, throbbing in an indescribable pain that this memorable journey ended so soon.
Soumitra Chatterjee with Amitava Nag
Click here to read all published episodes of Murmurs: Moments with Soumitra Chatterjee by Amitava Nag, that was released on 19th January 2021 to celebrate the legend's 87th birthday.
Foreword by Shyam Benegal
Special note by Atanu Ghosh
Pages : 84 + 8 photo pages
Available on Amazon, Flipkart and Blue Pencil
More to read on Soumitra Chatterjee
Soumitra Chatterjee – A Habit of Our Lives
Soumitra Chatterjee on Acting in Satyajit Ray's Films – Exclusive Interview (Part 1)
Why Feluda Works
Hope you enjoyed reading…
… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading and supporting our creative, informative and analytical posts than ever before. And yes, we are firmly set on the path we chose when we started… our twin magazines Learning and Creativity and Silhouette Magazine (LnC-Silhouette) will be accessible to all, across the world.
We are editorially independent, not funded, supported or influenced by investors or agencies. We try to keep our content easily readable in an undisturbed interface, not swamped by advertisements and pop-ups. Our mission is to provide a platform you can call your own creative outlet and everyone from renowned authors and critics to budding bloggers, artists, teen writers and kids love to build their own space here and share with the world.
When readers like you contribute, big or small, it goes directly into funding our initiative. Your support helps us to keep striving towards making our content better. And yes, we need to build on this year after year. Support LnC-Silhouette with a little amount – and it only takes a minute. Thank you
Support LnC-Silhouette
Whether you are new or veteran, you are important. Please contribute with your articles on cinema, we are looking forward for an association. Send your writings to amitava@silhouette-magazine.com
Tags: interview of Soumitra Chatterjee, Murmurs Moments with Soumitra Chatterjee, Murmurs Silent Steals with Soumitra Chatterjee, Soumitra Chatterjee, Soumitra Chatterjee book
Silhouette Magazine publishes articles, reviews, critiques and interviews and other cinema-related works, artworks, photographs and other publishable material contributed by writers and critics as a friendly gesture. The opinions shared by the writers and critics are their personal opinion and does not reflect the opinion of Silhouette Magazine. Images on Silhouette Magazine are posted for the sole purpose of academic interest and to illuminate the text. The images and screen shots are the copyright of their original owners. Silhouette Magazine strives to provide attribution wherever possible. Images used in the posts have been procured from the contributors themselves, public forums, social networking sites, publicity releases, YouTube, Pixabay and Creative Commons. Please inform us if any of the images used here are copyrighted, we will pull those images down.
LnC Silhouette Magazine (8 Posts)
Silhouette Magazine is a platform for gathering myriad views on film (and allied art forms) and to continue with the flux of discourse. The Silhouette publications are our attempt to achieve this goal.
acting in Satyajit Ray films Amitabh Bachchan Amitava Nag Amitava Nag book Asha Bhosle Beyond Apu: 20 Favourite film roles of Soumitra Chatterjee Bimal Roy Book on Soumitra Chatterjee Cinema of Satyajit Ray Dev Anand Dilip Kumar Geeta Dutt Gulzar Hemant Kumar interview of Soumitra Chatterjee Kishore Kumar Lata Mangeshkar madan mohan madhubala Majrooh Sultanpuri Manna Dey Meena Kumari Mohd Rafi Mrinal Sen Nabendu Ghosh Pather Panchali Rajesh Khanna Raj Kapoor Ray@100 RD Burman Sahir Ludhianvi Salil Chowdhury Satyajit Ray satyajit ray and apu satyajit ray films SD Burman Shailendra Shankar Jaikishan Soumitra Chatterjee Soumitra Chatterjee's films Soumitra Chatterjee interview Suchitra Sen Understanding Cinema Uttam Kumar Waheeda Rehman


Pacific Fair would love your feedback and experience to help us plan and create shopping experiences that you would love to be a part of in future.
You will participate in an invite-only online community, together with about 80 other local shoppers to share opinions about the area you live in and discuss experiences at Pacific Fair. Together we will brainstorm how to create meaningful and engaging shopping experiences at Pacific Fair.


text:
Published On: Sun, Jan 27th, 2019
Movies | By Red Diogenes
'Dark Phoenix' photo centers on Michael Fassbender's battered Magneto, X-Men team
The much maligned Fox project X-Men: Dark Phoenix will finally arrive in theaters this summer and a new photo shows off the cast, particularly a battered looking Michael Fassbender.
Check out the photo below.
Sophie Turner returns as Jean Grey, whose transformation into the godlike Phoenix will spark a war between X-men and humanity. The new X-Men film is written and directed by Simon Kinberg and see the return of an all-star cast: Michael Fassbender's Magneto, Charles Xavier (James McAvoy), Beast (Nicholas Hoult), Nightcrawler (Kodi Smit-McPhee), Storm (Alexandra Shipp) as well as some new faces, including Red Lotus (Andrew Stehlin) and Selene (Kota Eberhardt).
Dark Phoenix also stars Jennifer Lawrence, Evan Peters, and Jessica Chastain, who has been billed as a protagonist.
Turner speaks to Chastain's role: "It's an interesting one and I don't want to spill too much about it but basically Jessica's character is very interested in this power that I've kind of acquired and this cosmic force that I have and she kind of wants that force to use it for her own — she has her own intentions with it and she kind of wants to use that. And she nurtures me in a way to make me kind of trust her."
Dark Phoenix hits theaters on June 7
Here is the official synopsis for Dark Phoenix:
In DARK PHOENIX, the X-MEN face their most formidable and powerful foe: one of their own, Jean Grey. During a rescue mission in space, Jean is nearly killed when she is hit by a mysterious cosmic force. Once she returns home, this force not only makes her infinitely more powerful, but far more unstable. Wrestling with this entity inside her, Jean unleashes her powers in ways she can neither comprehend nor contain. With Jean spiraling out of control, and hurting the ones she loves most, she begins to unravel the very fabric that holds the X-Men together. Now, with this family falling apart, they must find a way to unite — not only to save Jean's soul, but to save our very planet from aliens who wish to weaponize this force and rule the galaxy.
Red Diogenes -
Alexandra ShippAndrew StehlinDark Phoenix SagaEvan PetersJames McAvoyJennifer LawrenceJessica ChastainKodi Smit-McPheeKota EberhardtMichael FassbenderNicholas HoultSimon KinbergSophie TurnerX-MenX-Men Dark Phoenix


text:
Vacationers, migrants drive Italy's surge in COVID cases
by: FRANCES D'EMILIO, Associated Press
Posted: Aug 23, 2020 / 12:50 PM CDT / Updated: Aug 23, 2020 / 12:50 PM CDT
FILE – In this Aug. 17, 2020 file photo, a medical worker wearing protective gear collects a swab from a person sitting inside a car during Covid-19 tests at the the Santa Maria della Pieta' health center in Rome. Vacationers returning from Mediterranean Sea resorts abroad as well as on the Italian island of Sardinia have accounted for upward leaps in daily new case numbers. On Saturday, Italy registered 1,071 new cases, the highest daily number since mid-May, and only weeks after the nation had seen the number of day-to-day new infections plunge to about 200. (AP Photo/Riccardo De Luca)
ROME (AP) — With thousands of travelers being tested at Italy's airports and some ports, the nation where Europe's COVID-19 outbreak began registered a seventh straight day of increasing new infections Sunday, mostly driven by returning vacationers.
Sicily's governor, meanwhile, ordered all migrant residences on the Italian island to be shut down by Monday, part of a push-back by Italian regions alarmed by a steady climb in COVID-19 cases a few weeks before schools are to reopen.
But people coming in from Mediterranean Sea resorts abroad as well as from the Italian island of Sardinia have accounted for far more of Italy's new coronavirus infections lately than have migrants.
Italy registered 1,210 new cases Sunday, the highest daily number since May 12 and only weeks after it saw new infections plunge to about 200 a day.
The Lazio region, which includes Rome, and the hard-hit Lombardy led the nation in regional new caseloads Sunday. Thousands of returning travelers got tested at Rome-area airports and a port north of the capital, as well as at airports that serve Lombardy's main city, Milan. Other cities, like Turin, also have set up airport test facilities.
People arriving from Spain, Malta, Greece and Croatia must be tested within 48 hours of entering Italy, after those nations saw worrisome upticks in infections.
And many recent coronavirus clusters have been traced to people who vacationed on Sardinia. With many people taking ferries from Sardinia to the Italian mainland, Lazio set up a testing facility at the dock at Civitavecchia, so those driving vehicles off the ferries could line up for immediate testing.
Lazio Gov. Nicola Zingaretti appealed to the governor of Sardinia to test vacationers before they sailed or flew to the mainland, saying his region would do the same for travelers leaving for Sardinia, but there was no indication Sardinia would oblige.
Sardinia, which had been counting barely a handful of new daily cases in recent months, registered 81 new infections, compared to 44 a day earlier.
In Sicily, Gov. Nello Musumeci's order took effect on Sunday, requiring that all migrants who reach the island by sea be transferred off to combat the spread of COVID-19 and all centers housing migrants awaiting asylum applications must be shut down by Monday.
His order, effective through Sept. 10, also forbids any boat, including charity vessels, from bringing migrants to the island.
"I can't ask our people to keep a (safe) distance, wear masks and do other measures while the state amasses people in two rooms,″ Musumeci said, referring to the migrant centers.
But the national government is in charge of migrant policies and Musumeci acknowledged that his directive might be challenged in court. On Saturday, migrants accounted for 16 of Sicily's 48 confirmed new infections.
Although in past years, nearly all migrants reaching Italy by sea were rescued by humanitarian groups or ships, this year, nearly 80% have reached Italian shores on their own, most setting sail from Tunisia.
Many come ashore on the tiny island of Lampedusa, whose migrant residence is dangerously overcrowded. Italy has taken to quarantining the latest Lampedusa arrivals aboard chartered ferries offshore Sicily.
Gov. Vincenzo De Luca, who leads the Campania region including Naples, raised the possibility that if daily infections keep surging, he will ask the national government to reinstate travel restrictions between regions.
Some wrote off De Luca's warning as posturing before gubernatorial elections in September.
"What is he going to do, send in the Carabinieri (to block those outside his region from entering)?" Tuscany Gov. Enrico Rossi told the Corriere della Sera newspaper.
Follow AP's pandemic coverage at http://apnews.com/VirusOutbreak and https://apnews.com/UnderstandingtheOutbreak


Discography of American Historical Recordings, s.v. "Lew Shilkret (instrumentalist : piano)," accessed April 20, 2019, https://adp.library.ucsb.edu/index.php/talent/detail/54987/Shilkret_Lew_instrumentalist_piano.
Lew Shilkret (instrumentalist : piano). (2019). In Discography of American Historical Recordings. Retrieved April 20, 2019, from https://adp.library.ucsb.edu/index.php/talent/detail/54987/Shilkret_Lew_instrumentalist_piano.
"Lew Shilkret (instrumentalist : piano)." Discography of American Historical Recordings. UC Santa Barbara Library, 2019. Web. 20 April 2019.


I have a private practice in southern California developing custom professional learning for educators in both Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and Assistive Technology (AT). Diverse experiences from my own unique career path have resulted in my passion for UDL & AT. I create workshops on topics of current interest in the field offered at regional locations, open to everyone. As a life long learner I continue to find opportunities to meet and study with leaders in the field. I am a frequent speaker at conferences and wherever educators gather.
I grew up moving schools every year, because my father served in the military. Honestly, I hated school. Health issues that required taking a range of medications impacted my processing and working memory. That struggle to learn, especially to read, has enabled me to truly empathize with issues our students face.
My first job after college was teaching in a public school in Texas. My 4th graders were hearing impaired primarily using Total Communication. I loved the expression of sign language. That experience deepened my understanding of language development, working out ways to support the extensive needs of those students. This was the beginning of my journey to make learning truly meaningful.
A new opportunity to learn came when I joined a multidisciplinary team at Children's Hospital, Child Study Center in Oklahoma City. Our 10 member team assessed children from birth to age 5. I worked with a variety of disabilities and challenges including blind and visually impaired students providing 1:1 support. Working with our director who was a neurologist and the staff of OTs, PTs, Psychologists, Pediatricians, as well as other teachers afforded me a unique medical and educational foundation I never could have imagined.
Earning my M.Ed. in Teaching Blind and Visually Impaired Students took me to Boston College. I also became an Orientation and Mobility Specialist. Suffice it to say my experience with this population was fascinating. After earning my M.Ed. I began the journey to earn my Ph.D. continuing working with blind and visually impaired students. During this time I worked on research projects I taught at the college level.
Upon returning to California, my first position was the Director of Education and Blind Children's Center. Then I moved to become a Program Specialist overseeing the services of students who were Blind or Visually Impaired, Deaf and Hard of Hearing at a district serving about 30,000 students. I also served as special education administrator for a school for Severely Handicapped Students. Over the 12 years in that district I was given the opportunity to start and expand Assistive Technology (AT) Services. Since there were only a few ATs in the area I began teaching others how to assess AT needs.
My opportunities for learning continued, joining a multidisciplinary team at the California Department of Education, Diagnostic Center. Again I was able to work on multidisciplinary teams with some of the most challenging students in my career. There, I was able to develop workshops for teachers all around Southern California, including a certificate program for ATs. I supported teachers in their classrooms through special projects and began my journey of discovery to Universal Design for Learning (UDL). A highlight in my early UDL training was attending the Harvard UDL Summer Institute and being invited back as a teaching fellow.
I am comfortable working with a wide range of student needs. My years working on assessment teams at diagnostic center gave me a breadth experience to add to a rich background.
who struggle with curriculum access e.g. dyslexia, ADHD, autism, cognitive delays.
are among the students I am asked to consult in classrooms.


IT'S A TMBG VIDEO CONTEST!
with $1k going to two others!
and some will sell out momentarily.
Then we get on a jet plane!
new songs to premiere on your radio show!
their Dial-A-Song service in early 2018.
are sincerely invited to participate.
information to become part of it is here.


The ICON Bronco is a praise the lord beautiful vintage SUV that prides itself on its attention to design. ICON scours around for old Broncos and then strips it down, reverse engineers it and makes it better than it ever was. Look how gorgeous these SUVs are.
"Good design is considered. You should be able to point out anything on one of my trucks and I should be able to give you longer than you want, geek-out answers on why its there, why its made that way, how its machine, what the surface coating is."


text:
Q: Unable to associate bit bucket in OpenShift (Updating in 2 Places Now) I deployed an application in Openshift and now its running.
I have committed the changes to Openshift git repository (example:
  ssh://xxxx61@mydemo.rhcloud.com/~/git/mydemo.git/)
I have the project in bit bucket. Since not sure how to sync or authorize the bit bucket i have commited in the above.
I would like to sync or authorize bit bucket, so that whenever i check-in the changes in the bit bucket, the changes will be taken by the openshift.
Could you please help me on how to authorize or sync or associate the bit bucket project in openshift instead of committing in 2 places?
Thanks.

A: You will not be able to "sync" BitBucket with an OpenShit repo. You can however always push automatically (git push --all) to both places as you've mentioned.
If required, here's the topic on setting two remotes:
How can i connect openshift git repository to bitbucket

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange