text:
Home » Soccer » Meet Michigan's newest playmaker: Nebojsa Popovic
Posted inSoccer
Meet Michigan's newest playmaker: Nebojsa Popovic
by Nicholas Stoll September 26, 2019 April 20, 2021
The Michigan men's soccer team has a new player this season who is lighting up opposing defenses. His name is Nebojsa Popovic.
The forward is a graduate transfer from Oakland University spending his last year of eligibility in Ann Arbor. Since stepping on campus, he's made an immediate impact, notching five goals and three assists in eight games.
The sports management program and overall academics at Michigan were paramount in his decision to play for the Wolverines.
"What I was looking for was to go to a school that had a higher education standard," Popovic said, "and Michigan was the best school."
So far, he's happy with his choice, enjoying the University and its students — debating which is his favorite.
"The campus and the facilities are beautiful, it's either that or the people," Popovic said. "I got to meet a kid who wrestles for the Serbian national team, and he just qualified for the Olympics in Tokyo in 2020. To me, that's crazy. I can't believe he's in my class."
On the pitch, he's loving the team and the game.
"I haven't enjoyed my soccer this much in, I can't remember," Popovic said in a team video. "I think this is the most fun I've had in a very long time."
"This is the most fun I've had in a very long time."
Nebojsa Popovic had one year left to play college soccer and chose to do it at a new school. So far, he's making every minute count. #GoBlue pic.twitter.com/Q75vTUAefz
— Michigan Men's Soccer (@umichsoccer) September 24, 2019
The graduate student attributes his enjoyment to his teammates and their talent.
"I'm around guys who are just as good as me, if not better, and I think that makes a big difference. You always want to be in those kind of situations because then you're going to grow as a soccer player and you're going to get to learn from them, and it's going to just make me better overall, and that's just enjoyable."
Popovic has connected with his teammates quickly, and fans watching the team can see the chemistry between the men up top.
But he believes the team is far from its peak.
"As we're getting to know each other more and getting to know what we each like," Popovic said. "I think that it is going to get better because then the communication aspect comes into it."
That may be a troubling prospect for opposing goalkeepers, with Popovic's offensive ability emerging as a top weapon for the Wolverines. With 9 matches still on the schedule, Popovic is on track to finish the season with 10 goals and six assists — staggering numbers for any forward, and collegiate career highs for Popovic.
Recognized for his combined two goals and one assist against Rutgers and Oakland, Popovic was awarded the Big Ten Offensive Player of the Week. It was the first of the season given out by the Big Ten — an impressive accolade to jumpstart his season. But the forward felt differently about the praise.
"I mean I think it's great, but that doesn't come without my teammates," Popovic said. "I think that's just a testament to how well we're playing together and I think if we keep that up, a lot of us will be getting those kind of awards … Soccer is not an individual sport at all. If the team doesn't do well none of us will flourish individually"
Still, while he appreciates the early accolades, Popovic only has one thing on his mind.
"I just want to win, that's all I care about," Popovic said. "I don't care how we win. I don't care if I score or assist or make a run that's off the ball to create space for us to score… I think that's the biggest thing for us right now, just to figure out how we can beat every opponent we play."
Michigan is currently 3-2-3 on the season and 0-0-2 in Big Ten play. Despite a tough schedule ahead, Popovic has confidence in the team's ability and knows what it needs to do.
"Just keep doing more of the same thing, getting the right preparation in before games, and then following the coach's gameplans to a T," Popovic said. "I think we still have a lot of potential that's not yet fulfilled, so I think it's only going to get better from here to be honest."
Why does he feel that way? To Popovic, it's simple. And it's his favorite part about the team.
"The way we play," Popovic said, "I love that style of play… I love to be a part of something like that, if we can keep that up, I'm just going to keep having more and more fun."
Carter Payne, former Michigan soccer player, killed in hit-and-run
Men's Tennis advances to singles semifinals and quarterfinals in Big Ten Singles and Doubles Championships
From gold medals to Big Ten Championships: Jayde Riviere's journey


text:
Government and ministries
Finnish Government
Ministry of Transport and Communications
Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment
Ministry of Education and Culture
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health
Ministry of the Interior
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
Ministry of the Environment
Search page »
Government formation talks 2019
State funeral of former President of the Republic Mauno Koivisto
Marin's Government
Minister of Finance
Minister for European Affairs and Ownership Steering
Minister for Foreign Affairs
Minister for Development Cooperation and Foreign Trade
Minister for Nordic Cooperation and Equality
Minister of the Interior
Minister of Defence
Minister of Local Government
Minister of Science and Culture
Minister of Agriculture and Forestry
Minister of Transport and Communications
Minister of Employment
Minister of Economic Affairs
Minister of Social Affairs and Health
Minister of Family Affairs and Social Services
Minister of the Environment and Climate Change
State Secretaries to the Ministers
Special Advisers to the Ministers
Government Programme
Government Communications Strategy
Division of responsibilities between ministers
Ministerial Committees
Ministerial working groups
Ministerial pay and allowances
Ministers and Parliament
Appointment and organisation
How does the Government work?
Chancellor of Justice
Activities of the caretaker government
Role of the Prime Minister
Informal government meetings and ministerial working groups
EU affairs and the Finnish government
The Government and Parliament
Governments and Ministers since 1917
Ministers in Finland by gender
Governments' term in office
Prime Minister's age on the date of appointment
Finland's youngest and oldest ministers
Government Programmes since 1917
Government Palace
House of the Estates
Government Banquet Hall
Prime Minister's Official Residence
Königstedt Manor
Request for personal data
Ministries Communication deparment contact
Front pageFront page
Current issues/
Article/
Countries in the boreal coniferous forest zone met in Haparanda
FI Valitse pääsisällön kieli SV Välj språk för huvudinnehållet EN
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 2.7.2018 10.48 | Published in English on 3.7.2018 at 12.05
Countries located in the boreal coniferous forest zone in the north, i.e. Canada, the USA, Russia, Sweden, Norway and Finland, held a ministerial meeting in Haparanda at the end of June. The themes on the agenda were the growing forest-based bioeconomy and the opportunities it offers to promote a low-carbon society, as well as climate change and its mitigation in the forest sector.
The Finnish delegation at the meeting was composed of State Secretary Jari Partanen and experts from the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and Natural Resources Institute Finland.
The talks among the forest researchers from different countries and those making decisions on forest policy were highly encouraging. Forests have an important role in climate change mitigation, and the ability of forests to adapt to the changing climate is a key issue for all countries in the boreal forest zone. However, the questions involved are quite complex. Among the challenges is to obtain large enough data for scientific research to draw conclusion on these vast areas. Because of the considerable variation in soil properties, small datasets are a problem e.g. when studying the sequestration of carbon in the soil or peat.
All stakeholders benefit from cooperation with partners who are trying to tackle the same problems in similar natural conditions. Those belonging to the network get more scientific information from each other, while also finding out about topics where there is not yet enough data.
Cooperation started in 2013
Countries in the boreal coniferous forest zone set up the network in 2013 to exchange ideas and experiences about the bioeconomy, climate change mitigation and adaptation and other similar topics, as well as strengthening research cooperation relating to these. The Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations FAO and the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE are also members of the network. Iceland has a growing interest in increasing its forest area, which is why the country was also present at the meeting.
Before the Boreal Summit (CB) in Haparanda on 26 June 2018 the network had maintained contacts with the public officials and researchers mainly by telephone meetings and discussions in connection with various seminars, meetings and conferences. Now the future of the network looks very promising, with decisions on future cooperation made at the ministerial meeting.
Inquiries at the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry:
Aulikki Kauppila, International Affairs, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, tel. +358 295 162 116, [email protected]
Teppo Säkkinen, Special Adviser to the Minister, tel. +358 516 2868, [email protected]
Aulikki Kauppila and Jari Partanen from the Finnish delegation
Photo: Peter Blombäck
boreal zone forests international cooperation
Facebook 0 Share on Facebook Twitter 0 Share on Twitter LinkedIn 0 Share on LinkedIn | Print Email
Valtioneuvosto | Statsrådet
Snellmaninkatu 1 A, Helsinki PO Box 23
FI-00023 Government, Finland

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


The reactions to Representative Rashida Tlaib's profanity and her calls for impeachment against the president have been mixed.
While most Republicans are in sync in their outrage over her comments, Democrats are further apart.
Some are cheering her on. Others fear she'll jeopardize long-term political and policy objectives. Some can't figure out which word upsets them more: her profanity or her rush to impeach before she's unpacked her boxes. And then there are the bigger questions about the value of civility and how race and gender influence reactions.
Also this hour: A record number of Americans want to leave America, er, permanently.
Lastly, we're taking your calls throughout the hour. How do you feel about Rashida Tlaib's comments? Are you ready to pack your bags for the climes of Canada?
Michael Wear - Chief strategist of The AND Campaign and author of Reclaiming Hope: Lessons Learned In the Obama White House About the Future of Faith in America.
Julie Ray - Managing Editor for World News at Gallup.
The 116th Congress is beginning its first session Thursday, and Democrats are now in control of the House of Representatives. Watch the first day of actions live, including the election for House Speaker, which Nancy Pelosi is expected to win, and debate on new House rules.


text:
The Guernsey Libraries Catalogue
Search the library catalogue More search options Advanced Search
Catalogue Search for "class:Adult" Historical fiction Audio
The lost sisters
By Hutchinson, Lindsey, author
CD. English.
Published Rearsby: Lamplight Audiobooks, 2019
Orpha Buchanan and Peg Meriweather had a very different start in life. Orpha surrounded by wealth and riches, Peg dumped on a doorstep as a baby with...
By Gregory, Philippa, author
Published Melbourne: Bolinda Audio, 2019
Midsummer's Eve, 1648, and England is in the grip of civil war between renegade King and rebellious Parliament. Alinor, a descendant of wise women, crushed...
By O'Connor, Joseph, 1963- author
Published Rearsby: Clipper Audiobooks, 2019
1878, The Lyceum Theatre, London. Three extraordinary people begin their life together, a life that will be full of drama, transformation, passionate...
An hour unspent
By White, Roseanna M., author
As England plunges into war, Barclay Pearce uses his skills as a thief to help his nation. But upon rescuing Evelina Manning from a mugging, he begins...
The glass woman
By Lea, Caroline, author
Published London: Penguin Audiobooks, 2019
Iceland, 1686. The brutal, lava-scarred landscape can swallow a man without so much as a volcanic gasp. Jón Eiríksson has just married his second wife...
Master of his fate
By Bradford, Barbara Taylor, author
London 1884: Queen Victoria is Empress of India and Britain at its peak of worldwide power. James Falconer, known as Jimmy, is a barrow boy working for...
Girls on the line: a novel
By Runyan, Aimie K., author
December 1917. As World War I rages in Europe, 24-year-old Ruby Wagner, the jewel in a prominent Philadelphia family, prepares for her upcoming wedding...
The encircling sea
By Goldsworthy, Adrian Keith, author
AD 100. Flavius Ferox, Briton turned Roman centurion, is charged with keeping Rome's empire intact. But from his base at Vindolanda on the northern frontier...
The blessed child
By Goodwin, Rosie, author
1865, Nuneaton. Nessie Carson will do anything to keep her family together after her mother is killed, her father abandons them and they are evicted from...
War of the wolf
By Cornwell, Bernard, author
Uhtred of Bebbanburg has won back his ancestral home but, threatened from all sides by enemies both old and new, he doesn't have long to enjoy the victory...
All Catalogues (93)
Guille-Alles Library (78)
Saga (12)
Fraser, Jamie (Fictitious character) Fiction (7)
Time travel Fiction (7)
From 2003 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 To 2003 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Gabaldon, Diana (9)
Cornwell, Bernard, 1944- (7)
Auel, Jean M (4)
Goodwin, Rosie (4)
Gregory, Philippa (4)
Mantel, Hilary, 1952- (4)
Audiobook (93)


The all new Teak Spyda ceiling fan from Ventair is a powerful ceiling fan that incorporates the latest True-Spin Technology™ technology.
This sleek and modern ceiling fan features three durable plastic alloy composite blades allowing high air movement while operating at a low noise level. The Teak Ventair Spyda 56" ceiling also includes Japanese steel bearings and is fully reversible for all year around operation.
For your added convenience the Ventair Teak Spyda 56"ceiling fan comes pre balanced with quick connect wiring and quick fix assembly.


The following is a guest post on how keepsake boxes can be used to organize 5 different paper piles from regular contributor, Morgan from Morganize with Me.
When helping my clients reorganize, downsize, and minimize, I come across A LOT of paper. So much paper that I've been curious how much paper is still floating around in our now mostly (from what it seems) digital age.
700 pounds! Ok, now I feel better. Not better because of the number but it makes more sense to me why so many people are still struggling with paper chaos and clutter.
Are you ready for an easy to implement paper solution? It's time to rethink the Keepsake Box. Let me explain.
A "Keepsake Box" has been traditionally used for child memories, all things childhood and school related. I set up one for each of my ABCs and they work fantastic to keep all of the memories contained and of course, organized. But guess what? This simple system would be perfect for so many other categories as well because it can be adjusted however necessary. I'm going to give you several different ways to implement Keepsake Boxes for all things paper organization.
Like I mentioned this is the "traditional" way I use them. You can print a free printable HERE (along with many other free printables) that lists a selection of file folder labels for your convenience. Setting up a box like this while your kids are young is such a great idea.
The number one paper struggle (from what I see) is managing the incoming and outgoing of bills, statements, and the like. Organizing a "Bill Box" would be a fantastic way to streamline the process. You could set up a file for each vendor or company you pay regularly and/or create file tabs for the payment due dates such as – week one, week two, week three.
You can go any direction with this theme. Whether working on a big project like a major house renovation, or helping your high school senior decide between their top 10 college picks, or even planning a wedding. A "Project Box" could be a life-saver and a way to help you keep a place for everything, and everything in its place.
While children certainly have many memories, so do we as adults. Setting up a "Life Box" would be an excellent way to better coordinate where you hold the things that you want to save. I personally keep things like this organized in our hope chest but having a file system for those items you want to save, such as treasured cards, special photos, articles, or information would be a great way to know where to put what where.
Looking for a place to keep all things holiday related? A "Holiday Box" could be just that! Have a favorite Valentine's Day cookie recipe? This could go in the Valentine's Day file. Want a place to tuck away your favorite Christmas cards that you've received? There could be a file for that too. All your Thanksgiving recipes in one place – check!
Never underestimate the power of a file box. But as I say this I also want to encourage you to keep a very BIG picture mind-set. Don't keep paper just to keep paper. Move digitally as much as you can. Be realistic about the time and energy you have to be able to sift and sort through things.
Remember, sometimes the most refreshing way to deal with unnecessary paper is to simply recycle it! Not sure where to recycle? Check out Earth 911.
When I first saw the title about "Keepsake Boxes" for "Paper Piles in Your Life" I pictured either cardboard bigger-than-a-photo-boxes, or maybe those 12 x 12-inch plastic craft storage boxes.
But am I correct that these are all ideas about filing –in individual file boxes rather than a tall, maybe 4-drawer file cabinet? I already [try to] use those to separate my own paperwork from that of an older relative whose finances I oversee.


Whistleblowers are key to exposing those crimes, including illegal dumping from ships, according speakers at a Tuesday webinar broadcast from Washington. The panel looked at the role private citizens and whistleblowers play in the detecting off-shore crimes, including those that violate a law known as the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships (APPS).
"Enforcing, let alone detecting violations on the open ocean– with how vast it is — is just inherently difficult," said Anton DeStefano, Lieutenant Commander of the U.S Coast Guard's environmental law division. He noted that we was speaking for himself, not the agency.
Continue Reading From cruise ships to tankers, big boats dump waste into the ocean. Whistleblowers can stop them.
In August 2015, Pineda filed a whistle-blower complaint. She wrote that the main investigator told her that the evidence showed that a woman could not have urinated in the boots, but that she heard that officers speculated that she urinated in them "for attention." In the complaint, Pineda said that "makes me want this investigation to be complete and legit to prove that I did not do this to myself." She added that she feared she could be forced to leave the guard.
On Friday, the Times reported that a third high-ranking officer in the Guard has been removed from his position in connection with the case. Earlier this month, the paper reported that the head of the California Air National Guard and one of its commanders had been removed in connection with the case.
Continue Reading Unprofessional leadership cited in Air National Guard whistleblower case. Now those leaders are out.
Continue Reading Don't die waiting for an IRS whistleblower award. Get better service on Capitol Hill?


text:
—Fastball/Changeup
Perspectives on baseball, sports, and life.
The Ground Rules
Author Archives: Ryan Rosso
The MLB Replay Argument
By Ryan Rosso
Extra Innings
Last year, we looked at the arguments for and against the implementation of instant replay in baseball. This year, Major League Baseball decided to make replay a part of the game, but as with any change, there have been some hiccups. These hiccups have led to some resistance and blowback, leading to contention about the system itself. Each failure of instant replay in its infant stage represents a chance for the entire system to come crashing down. Baseball should not let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
While many initially fought replay on the grounds that the new system was too complex or arbitrary, the list of rules agreed upon by MLB owners is very straightforward. A list of reviewable plays as reported by Jayson Stark at ESPN reports, can be seen below:
In addition to home runs, expanded replay was unanimously approved by MLB owners for the following plays:
• Ground-rule double
• Fan interference
• Stadium boundary calls
• Force play*
• Tag play
• Fair/foul in outfield only
• Trap play in outfield only
• Batter hit by pitch
• Timing play
• Touching a base (requires appeal)
• Passing runners
• Record keeping
*Except fielder's touching of second on double play
These plays provide little room for interpretation and instead place a burden of education on the managers and team staff, as is the case with all other baseball rules. It is the team's responsibility, as well as the announcers commentating on the game, to understand the possibilities of replay in order to effectively do their job.
Any critique of the new system on the basis of challengeable plays, such as those regarding the "neighborhood rule", which is the caveat to the force play listed above, are fair in order to examine possible improvements. Yet these arguments should be analyzed through the lens of player safety, which is another focus that MLB is attacking through new policies regarding catcher collisions, pitcher's padded hats, and now middle infielders.
Mark Ellis Needed Surgery to Save His Leg After a Double Play Slide Injury Last Season
Another large critique is that replay is still getting calls wrong. However, it should be understood that replay is not a method that eliminates mistakes; as football fans will attest. Instead, the goal of replay is to reduce the number of incorrect calls. And this is done through the requirement that a replay needs "indisputable video evidence" in order to overturn, which gives preference to the initial call, sometimes at the cost of the right call. Yet this type of system, as opposed to one that assumes skepticism toward the play, limits the umpire's ability to change a right call to a wrong call and will ultimately reduce the number of blown calls.
By no means is the system perfect, but it should be looked at with respect to what other negative effects replay could have imposed on the game. The current system does a good job of allowing for the possibility of taking a second look at close plays while limiting the possible nuances that could accompany play review. Currently replay rarely prolongs the game any more than a standard pitching change (average replay was just 1:39 in the first 13 games). It limits the possibility of over-challenging by invoking a negative penalty for poor challenges. And it gives GM's another tool that they can use to evaluate their coaching personnel with; is the manager challenging at the right time, or is the manager too quick to go to replay.
While replay has its flaws, the current system accomplishes its goal of reducing blown calls while working within current MLB policy focuses. Any critiques of the replay system should also be viewed and discussed with the acknowledgement of how they will influence the larger game of baseball. New technologies represent new ways to help improve the game, provided any changes are evaluated and implemented with an eye to existing rules. There is no reason for baseball to stick its head in the ground and reject all change. Its time to move forward and look towards ways to continue improving the game.
Democracy in the All Star Game
Extra Innings, The Politics of Baseball
Over the past decade, Major League Baseball has attempted to drum up support for the All Star Game with a new democratic selection process and a "This Time it Counts" ad campaign, the later of which was more of an apology for 2002 than a groundbreaking statement. One of the more popular reforms gave fans the ability to select the starting lineups through a voting process. Managers would still be in charge of filling out their respective lineups, but MLB put its belief in the fans ability to find the balance between the most worthy and most popular. The league also started giving home field advantage in the World Series to the side that won the All Star Game in an attempt to improve the game's meaning for the players and the fans. Ultimately, MLB sought to make the game more of a spectacle for the fans by empowering their control over the game.
Some have derided the changes, claiming that the game is being made into a spectacle and popularity contest all while undermining the accomplishments of the higher seeded playoff teams. What seems to be the most striking is the lack of criticism for the undemocratic final vote competition.
After the lineups are set and the league managers fill their remaining spots, the manager decides on which five players will go before the fans in a vote for the final spot. The winners this year were Freddie Freeman (1B-Atlanta) and Steve Delabar (RP-Toronto). But days before the All Star Game, Freeman injured himself preventing him from participating in the festivities. Bruce Bochy, the NL manager, then appointed his replacement, an action that undermines the premise of voting for the final spot.
Anecdotally, Americans are most accustomed to voting in regards to political races. While there are many different rules regarding voting processes, we, as Americans, like to feel that our vote had a direct result in the eventual outcome. In single candidate races, it is expected that the top vote getter receive the position he was elected to. If, for whatever reason, he is unable to perform, then it is only fair for the second vote getter to step into his place.
In the NL MLB vote, Bochy superceded this process and selected someone who wasn't even part of the top five vote to begin with. As manager, Bochy should have authority over some roster moves, but he should not disregard the parameters that the MLB has set up in order to increase fan involvement.
If MLB wants to legitimize the impact that the fans have on the All Star Game, it must honor the democratic elements of the "fan-vote". Otherwise, the sport should recognize the limited amount of influence the fans actually do have over the rosters and rename the final man vote to a final man recommendation.
How Much is Too Much? – A Look at MLB's Possible Responses to the Biogenesis Scandal
The Fastball: Punish Them to the Full Extent
By: Ryan
Earlier this week, ESPN received word that Major League Baseball is planning to issues bans to over 20 players connected to Tony Bosch's steroid drive-thru, Biogenesis. If reports are true, suspensions of varying degrees will be issued, with Ryan Braun and Alex Rodriguez being banned for the rest of the season and then some.
One hundred games to be exact.
100 game suspensions are usually reserved for "second offense" punishments and if any player receives a ban of this length as a result of the Biogenesis scandal, it will mark the first time that MLB has issued a steroid related suspension without the evidence of a positive test. Not only are these suspensions justified, but any and all suspensions issued by MLB as a result of this case indicate a new proactive approach to ridding the game of performance enhancing drugs – a step that is emphatically taken with 100 game suspensions.
Bosch has been cooperative with the MLB Biogenesis investigation.
MLB always seemed to be 90 feet behind the steroid issue. Although home run numbers were growing just as fast as the muscles and foreheads of the players in the nineties, Baseball didn't implement a random drug policy until 2004, where a positive test would result in a 10 game suspension. The policy was updated in 2005 to its current ramifications, but only after Congress pressured the sport to do so. Even then, the PED policy appeared to do little to curb the use of steroids and other performance enhancing drugs in the game and seven suspensions were issued in 2012 alone.
The biggest black eye to the policy came in 2011 when MVP Ryan Braun found himself in his first PED scandal. At the end of that season, Braun was tested. His results showed an increased level of testosterone caused by performance enhancing drugs. But since his urine sample was not shipped via FedEx on the same day they were collected, Braun was able to escape without a suspension, dampening the legitimacy and strength of the MLB PED suspension policy.
A 100 game suspension issued to any player in the coming weeks would show exactly how serious MLB is taking the PED issue. This type of suspension would be the result of two factors, the linkage to the Biogenesis case and previous denials of usage to MLB officials. These two factors will more often than not go hand in hand, making 100 game suspension the norm and further disincentivizing the use and denial of PED's.
With this approach, MLB is able to sidestep the players union, which has been hesitant to incorporate any increase in severity of the PED policy. This might present an interesting legal battle for the league if they do issue penalties, but it is a fight worth having. The suspension, with an emphasis on its length, establishes the League as a legitimate advocate against steroids and validates the MLB's desire to use every piece of evidence possible to persecute offenders.
Unfortunately, giving Braun and A-Rod a 100 game suspension will not eradicate PED's from the game, but it will show that MLB is taking cheating seriously, a stance that it hasn't been willing to admit up to this point.
Uh-oh.
The Changeup: No More Technicalities
By: Matt
Major League Baseball deciding to go forward and suspend these 20 players is good for the sport. It is high time the league took a stand. When it comes to A-Rod and Ryan Braun, any suspension will be a good suspension. The league is considering making an example of the two former-MVPs since both lied about their PED use in the past and are now implicated again. However, by seeking the maximum 100-game suspension (50 games for cheating and 50 games for lying about it), Major League Baseball is making a mistake. Lots of money buys good lawyers, and the players association will probably bring a lot of its clout to the fight as well. In the same way that Al Capone finally went to jail for tax evasion, so too should the League be happy to suspend Braun for just the 50 games. Braun got off on a technicality last time, and the League cannot afford to let that happen again. The length of suspension is not important. What is important is putting these players on record as having cheated. It will tarnish their image with the fans, vacate their records in the eyes of Cooperstown, and be a deterrent to future would-be cheaters that the MLB is finally taking this issue seriously.
Capone was a baseball lover, but still ended up doing hard time.
For this to actually work though, what is needed is a full-scale demonization of PED use in the game. It is time for everyone to stop looking the other way. The league needs to do everything in its power to show that it is taking cheating seriously.
This means that these 20 or so players identified in the Biogenesis documents need to all be suspended and on record as cheaters. There are calls everywhere to make the penalties longer, from 50 games to 100 games for first time offenders, for instance. This increase in length of suspensions would be hard to do because of the agreements that the players association has with the league. The length of the suspensions is not as important as the suspension itself. Penalties themselves do not dissuade players from trying to get a leg up. Players by their nature will do everything they can to try and get a little better. The important thing will be in convincing players not to cheat. This will only come if the media, owners, and organizations agree to stop looking the other way when it comes to known cheaters.
Melky Cabrera, one of the players implicated in the Biogenesis documents, was suspended last year in the midst of his best year in the big leagues. The Giants moved on and refused to put him on the postseason roster even though he was eligible. In his contract year, he didn't receive the extension he was seeking, but did receive a lucrative 2 year, $12 million deal from the Blue Jays in the offseason. Bartolo Colon was suspended last year for PED use, but the A's decided to resign him anyways and he currently sits as both the ace of their staff and an All-Star. There are around 18 other players listed on the Biogenesis documents. This means that around half the organizations in baseball have decided to look the other way at their players PED use.
This cannot continue.
There are hundreds of young players that are toiling away in the Minor Leagues and doing everything right trying to make it to the show. The League needs to stop rewarding cheaters and keeping them around as it sends the wrong message. Minor Leaguers and even some college and high school players feel that they have to use PEDs to make it as well. PED use becomes both a feedback loop and self-fulfilling prophecy when gone unpunished or brushed aside. The League can get this right. The first step is going through with these suspensions and getting these players on the books. The second step will be up to everyone to decide if we can finally move forward as a sport.
Do the Pirates Have What it Takes?
The Pittsburgh Pirates are once again off to a hot start. The owners of a 53-34 record, good for second in their division, the Pirates are looking to finish 2013 in the style they hoped to finish 2012. If current trends are any indicator, Pittsburgh should have no problems locking up their first playoff birth since 1992.
PNC Park – Home of the Pittsburgh Pirates
The biggest strength that the Pirates have this year is pitching, although it wouldn't seem that way when looking at the starting rotation. Entering the season, Pittsburgh's starting rotation consisted of A.J. Burnett, Wandy Rodriguez, Francisco Liriano, Jeff Locke, and James McDonald. The first three names of that list are the most recognizable but also came with the most uncertainty at the beginning of the season. Burnett entered the season at 36 years old. Wandy Rodriguez is 34. And Francisco Liriano has always been known to have streaks of greatness that are perpetually stalked by an inability to throw strikes. McDonald was going to be a solid mid rotation guy, and Locke, with half a years experience, would attempt to fill out the back end.
Once the season got underway, all expectations were exceeded and the rotation proved to be a dominating force. Burnett showed that the Fountain of Youth filters out of the Allegheny River, pitching to a 3.12 ERA and 10 K/9 in 14 games. Wandy drank some of the same stuff and produced equally strong numbers. But the real stories went to both Francisco Liriano and Jeff Locke.
Even Russell Crowe is excited
Liriano was a high risk/high reward acquisition that many assumed would do far more damage to the team that dared take a flyer on him. But so far, he has been magnificent. Through 10 starts, Liriano has posted a 2.23 ERA and a 9.9 K/9. While the walk rate remains high on the higher end of the spectrum (3.41 BB/9), he is still well under he previous two seasons, which both had a BB/9 ration of 5. While it's hard to apply the decreased walk rate to any one thing in particular, Liriano will continue to be an asset to the Pirates if that walk rate stays down.
Locke, who has been equally as dominant this year, has a different set of concerns. While on the surface his 2.06 ERA and 7-1 record look remarkable, some of his other numbers raise some questions. So far this season, Locke has been very fortunate to strand a large amount of runners on base. He currently stands with a 85.6% strand rate, which is unsustainable for any big leaguer. Locke has also given up fewer home runs than his fly ball rate would support (8.2%), another reason for second half regression considering it is far under his career average. As both of these stats return to the norm, Locke will see his ERA climb closer to his xFIP of 4.11. Even with this regression though, Locke should continue to contribute to the Pirate rotation in a meaningful way.
Jeff Locke
There is no denying the strength of this rotation. The pitching staff that is 1st out of all major leagues when it comes to team ERA (3.11) and opponent batting average (.225), and third in baseball in WHIP (1.19). But strong rotations tend to get teams only so far before injuries and bullpens cost the team wins. The Pirates have already been faced with these challenges this year and have proved that they have depth, both in the minors and in the pen, which make up for the doubts within their rotation.
So far this season, the Pirates have had to fill their rotation after injuries left them with holes. First they turned to Jeanmar Gomez who after starting eight games, currently sits with a 2-0 record and a 2.76 ERA. They also were forced to turn to highly touted prospect Gerrit Cole, who started his career off 4-0.
The bullpen has also been one of the safest late inning bets in the MLB. Jason Grilli leads the NL in saves and is 27-28 in save opportunities. Before Grilli enters in the ninth, the Pirates have the best set-up men in the game. Mark Melancon has and ERA and WHIP just above 0.8 in 41 innings. The rest of the bullpen combines to have an ERA of 2.92 and an opponent batting average of .217. The strong bullpen helps to fill in for the starting rotation which averages just over 5 1/3 innings per start.
The Pirates second half will not be as good as their first half. The starting rotation will continue to be tested and there will be some regression for Locke and the questions with Liriano will remain. But the Pirates have proven that they have the depth to overcome any pitching problems that may arise.
The worst thing to happen to the Pirates this year
Mattingly Deserves More Credit
Extra Innings, Uncategorized
The Dodgers are currently in the midst of a hot streak. After splitting a series with the Padres, they went on to sweep the Giants and take two of three from the Phillies, leaving the team four games out of first place. There is a sense of optimism in Los Angeles; Nick Punto in an after game interview mentioned the p-word (playoffs), an unusual topic for teams who have been trapped in the cellar for the past month. A big part of this hopeful outlook is because of rookie phenom, Yasiel Puig. The 22 year old Cuban defector has maintained a .436 average in his first month in the big leagues. With 7 home runs and 4 stolen bases, Puig has produced a large chunk of the Dodger offense while removing much of the pressures from his injured and/or struggling teammates. As Puig garners more headlines, the rest of the team's struggles seem to fade from memory. Nobody is more pleased to have his name disappear from the papers than Don Mattingly, who appeared to already have his bags packed before the rookie was called up.
Mattingly has had a rough year, and while much of this is a result of the struggles of the heavy hitters on his team, he has done little to boost the confidence of LA fans or prove his competency at damage control. Mattingly has hear boos in Dodger Stadium this year get louder after he would take the field to pull Brandon League after another blown save. (It's hard to say that the jeers are entirely Mattingly's fault; if your GM decides to give a reliever seven million dollars a season, your hand is forced.) While Puig has helped damper the amount of Mattingly's boo's, the Dodger manager has not received enough credit for the work he has done with the lineup.
There has been quite a lot of noise in the sabermetric community about reinventing the traditional batting lineup. Usually, a manager will put the fastest guy first, a good sacrifice guy second and then the big and best hitters three and four, with the primary goal to manufacture runs in the first inning. The rest of the lineup descends in order of skill.
The sabermetric lineup focuses on the stats associated with each batting order position and adjusts accordingly with the focus being on the number two hole. The second batting position should be home to each teams best hitter. He reaches the plate the second most times in a game and more importantly, comes to bat 44% of the time with a runner on base. Mattingly has seemingly stumbled into a sabermetric lineup and it is one of the quietest reasons that the Dodgers have won eight of their last nine. (A more in depth reading of the entire sabermetric optimal lineup can be read here.)
After shuffling Puig around in the lineup during the first weeks of the rookie's call-up, Mattingly has settled him into the number two hole and been rewarded with great success. Most notably was game 1 of the recent Giants series. Puig homered in the first inning off of Bumgarner, which the giants countered in the second inning and the game remained tied until the eighth. Puig stepped into the batters box with two on and no out and singled to score the go-ahead run. The Dodgers went on to score again that inning, but they wouldn't need it as the team won 3-1.
Three nights later the Dodgers were losing to the Phillies by one in the seventh inning. The bases were loaded with two outs and Puig steps up to the plate. Sure enough, the rookie hits a single scoring two and handing the Dodgers the lead they would need to win the game.
Only a month into his career, it is fair to question whether Puig is the best hitting Dodger. He is adequately described as "raw", which is continually evident as he chases breaking balls low and away and currently sits with a 5:1 K to BB ratio. But there is no denying the fact that he has been the best hitting Dodger in June.
The lineup has also been built around Puig, with Gonzalez, Ramirez and Kemp hitting directly behind him in that order. As a result, Puig has scored six times during the last nine games, which has been vital since the team won by 2 or less runs in six of those games.
While there is no guarantee that Puig will find himself in (and producing in) these clutch situations as often as he has been, Mattingly should receive more credit for trusting the odds of the batting order and batting his best hitting Dodger second.
Does Replay Have a Place in Baseball?
Human Error is a Part of the Game
No play in baseball has lead to more outcry for the incorporation of expanded replay use by umpires than the blown Jim Joyce call which cost Armando Galarraga a perfect game in the bottom of the ninth. While baseball has been inching towards expanding the use of replay, many will soon find that while replay will solve some deficiencies in the game, it will merely adjust how these deficiencies surface.
The Runner was Called Safe.
It always seemed that a large reason that the game had resisted replay was because its fans believed in two axioms; 1. People make mistakes and 2. Umpires are people. Fans accepted that human error was part of the game and that the human element just another obstacle to overcome. This mentality stems from strike zone discrepancies with different umpires. The general rule is that anything over the plate from the letters to the knees is a strike, but anyone that's played baseball/softball knows that each umpire sees this zone differently. No other sport relies so heavily on the umpire to define the terms of the majority of the game. And since the game is so dependent on the umpire for balls and strikes, inconsistent "mistake" calls are inevitable. And it always seemed that because of this, we were willing to accept that umpire call were imperfect, even on the base paths.
But it's 2013, and people are less tolerant of mistakes at the professional level. The demand for expanded replay has grown when fans witness blown call after blown call on the base paths and with fair/foul balls. While the reasoning for expanded replay use has been well vocalized and developed, the ramifications of play review have not been equally evaluated, even though expanded replay will result in longer games, continual play discrepancies, and continual human error.
The most obvious unintended consequence is the lengthening of games. Baseball as a sport is already ragged on because the game "drags on." Currently, the average baseball game lasts just under three hours. Once umpires are allowed to review plays and consult, the game will see its average game time increase, just like basketball and football, making the baseball experience an even longer affair for non-diehard fans.
While many look for replay to remove the discrepancy that results from human interpretation, this won't necessarily be the case. When replay is used to determine that a foul ball down the line is actually fair, it will be up to the umpires to determine how many bases the player will be awarded, which can vary depending on the depth of the hit and park proportions. There is no clear cut determining factor, unlike the ground rule double, making awarding bases and runs entirely arbitrary and unrelated to the players skills. Umpires then become even more involved in the game, and can receive more backlash.
Additionally, umpires can still blow calls after looking at replay, an unfortunate event that already happened this year. Earlier in the season, the Athletics were visiting the Indians and were trailing 4-3 in the top of the ninth. Into the box steps Adam Rosales and he crushes a ball deep to left field. The ball looks like a homer but is ruled a double on the field. Due to this discrepancy, the umpires review the play. Fans at home watch the replay and A's fans rejoice because the hit is clearly a homer. The umpires come back out and rule to the contrary and put Rosales at second. A's then load the bases before grounding out to the pitcher and losing the game. The next day, the umpires and MLB admit that they botched the call, a call which cost the A's the chance forcing extra innings. Thus, while replay can reduce the number of botched calls, this problem is not eliminated and leaves umpires with little to no excuse for mistakes.
While instant replay appears to solve some of the problems that are present in the game, baseball will never be able to entirely eliminate human error and discrepancies.
The Case for Expanded Replay
Nothing in sports is an exact science, but considering the amount of time, money, and effort that goes into playing a baseball game, the league should be doing everything in its power to get a call right. Commissioner Selig has been wary of adding replay to the game for all the reasons that Ryan outlined above, and they are certainly valid, but we have come to a point with technology where no calls should be getting blown and no one should feel cheated or ripped off.
Below are some examples from this year showing that this is indeed a real problem in the game right now. Umpires miss calls. Like Ryan said: it happens, they are human.
Called safe. His foot looks on the bag to me.
Safe?
Missed the bag or didn't have possession of the ball. Take your pick.
Nice sales job by Segura, but it would have been easily overturned on review.
And my personal favorite:
Ruled Out at Third, Safe at First. Two blown calls on the same play.
In the Adam Rosales home run case from Ryan's article, the umpires got it wrong. MLB admitted that the call was blown and the A's ended up losing that game. But can we really fault the umpires for blowing the call when, according to NBC Sports, they were watching the footage on this?
Replay booth or arcade game? Photo: NBC Sports
There are many other examples of blown calls so far this year even though we aren't half way through the season yet. So, the problem exists, what should we do about it?
First off, MLB needs to upgrade the screens and televisions that umpires are using to review plays. It looks like the ones they currently use double as a way to check the weather during rain delays. There is no excuse for having umpires review on what looks to be a Pac-Man arcade game that has more pixels than the center field scoreboard.
Next, the MLB must expand their use of replay. The argument that review would slow down the game makes sense, but doesn't the game already get slowed down when a player argues with the umpire? And then the manager argues with the umpire? And then the manager gets tossed? And then the manager keeps arguing since he's already tossed and can say what he really feels now? And then the players bark at the umpire from the dugout and get tossed? I think you get my point, but think about all the extra time that bad calls currently soak up in a regular baseball game.
This could all be avoided with the introduction of a "challenge flag" system like the one practiced in the NFL. Certain plays would be deemed reviewable, and a manager could get 1-2 challenges per game. This of course would not work on balls and strikes. Since that is still sacred ground with umpires, and this Kickstarter failed. Umpires would be able to review a call and save face on a blown call by reviewing it and getting it right, and managers and players would be happy since they would no longer feel cheated out of an at bat, hit or run.
Now that wasn't so hard.
Baseball will never be perfect, but considering the expectations that we place on baseball players and management to do everything right all the time, that same expectation must be placed on its umpires. An expanded replay system will not only make sure that the umpires have the materials they need to get the call right as often as possible, but it will eliminate grudges and animosity between players, managers, and umpires. This will lead to fewer ejections and hurt feelings, and most importantly a better ball game.
Brawls in Baseball
In light of the recent Dodger/Padre brawl that left one player with a broken collarbone and one suspended for eight games, I felt it necessary to look at the ramifications of other brawls to determine the fairness of the most recent confrontation.
Surprisingly, there is little information on the history of bench clearing brawls in baseball. There isn't a list of players who have charged the mound. There isn't a ranking of the batters that have been suspended for fighting with pitchers. Instead, the focus is on ranking the best bench clearing brawls and the only suspensions people remain interested in are for performance enhancing drugs.
Duck. Dodge. Dip. Dive. and Dodge.
A cursory glace at recent mound fights show that Quentin has received the harshest punishment for charging the mound; 8 games. Before that, Nyjer Morgan and Coco Crisp held the record at seven games, which occurred in 2010 and 2008, respectively. It must also be noted, that this most recent brawl looked comparatively calm compared to those two, and had it not been for the broken collar bone, it would have been remembered that way. But while the Crisp/Morgan charges flirt with injury opportunities, the Greinke/Quentin fight finally revealed the damage that can result from a meaningless confrontation.
When comparing Quentin's trip to the mound to both the Morgan and Crisp fights, the suspension seems fair; its right in line with the other two, yet slightly higher due to the unfortunate broken bone. However, this has not satisfied Dodger loyalty, and Mattingly even demanded that Quentin be suspended until at least Greinke gets back.
Currently, Greinke is in line to miss roughly ten starts, or a third of the season, as a result of the incident. This can prove to be disastrous for a team that some project to win the division by fewer than five games. Quality starting pitching is hard to come by, and $147 million arms are even harder to come by, making it difficult for the Dodgers to easily find replacements and putting their entire season into limbo. Should the Dodgers fail to make it to the playoffs and the gap be within a couple of games, fans will no doubt blame the season on Quentin.
As a Dodger fan, it's hard to disagree with Mattingly. But I would find it wildly random if players were to be suspended for seven games for charging the mound, and 60 if the pitcher is injured. Granted its easy to blame the batter for causing the fight, but it becomes harder to locate when, if and who causes the injuries occurred. Not all of these questions are easily answered and could make it hard to point the blame at one person. And the degree of injury is easily quantifiable in time missed, but these two shouldn't always be correlated.
As a result, this type of suspension opens itself up to debate. Not only to the amount of time a player should miss, but also because of the discrepancies that can present themselves in terms of skill level. In the Dodger's case, it's clear that the two players are of roughly the same skill level and importance to their team. But what happens when Nolan Ryan is charged by a young Robin Ventura, who hypothetically gets hurt? It wouldn't be fair, and it would actually incentivize teams to send their rookies out to the mound to throw up some fisticuffs against an ace.
Nolan Ryan and Robin Ventura.
Instead, MLB should just seek to drastically punish batters who charge the mound to the point that it becomes nonexistent.
But MLB done little to discourage players from charging the mound. Since 2006, MLB has added four games to the suspensions issued to mound chargers, and nobody really knows how much the undisclosed fine has increased. Although ESPN published Quentin's amounted at $3,000. Oh and did I mention that Brian Wilson was fined $1,000 in 2010 for wearing bright orange shoes in the World Series.
It must also be noted that there is little to gain out of allowing players to charge the mound. Sure, fans love watching the benches and bullpens clear, but there are far easier ways for MLB to sell tickets and gain youtube views. Fans get just as excited over managers getting tossed, and thats not even saying they are expecting that anyways. Most fans do not arrive at a baseball game expecting heavy hitting physical contact. This is especially true for contact that has no impact, other than a negative one, on the outcome of the game.
Baseball is not a contact sport, which is what makes it such a mental challenge. While it's easily mocked because of this (famously done by George Carlin), MLB should stop pretending that the game is something it isn't.
Presidential First Pitch Rankings!
With everything from standings to fantasy closers receiving its own rankings before the preseason, we here at fb/cu couldn't let the season get too far underway without creating a ranking that combines our two favorite pastimes; baseball and politics.
Tom, George, Teddy, and Abe
Every season, I eagerly await the time when baseball decides to incorporate politicians. Whether it be a first pitch or the Congressional Baseball Game, nothing is as comfortable as the edge of my seat. At some point during the summer, the President will stroll from the dugout to the mound to make the first pitch. While the President is probably just doing it for PR, I can't help rooting for the man leading the country to demonstrate his power on the mound. Regardless of party, I want the President to succeed. For America.
Politicians Can Play Baseball Too!
That happens to varying success. And as a result, I ranked the five best first-pitch Presidents.
Disclaimer: Clinton was the first president to throw out the first pitch from the mound. Before this, most presidents threw from the stands or the base of the pitchers mound. I only included President's that made throws from the field.
5. Barack Obama (L) – The President is known for his basketball skills, but his baseball skills remain little league at best. When your watching the video, you know its going to be bad when he struggles with his glove. And his form looks fresh out of the early 1900's, slight pre-windup windmill arms and tons of body movement. Then he makes the pitch, missing the batters box by feet. It's hard to justify him even making this list, but he squeaks in because, well, he's the President.
4. Ronald Reagan (R) – Ronald Reagan was from Illinois and a self-professed lifelong Cubs fan. What remains little known is that he worked for WHO radio as a play by play announcer for the Cubs. His knowledge of baseball translated somewhat to his baseball abilities. But his form remains suspect from time to time. Ultimately, it seems that Reagan would be a better Harry Carey than a Greg Maddux.
Reagan with Harry Carey in the Broadcasting Booth
Watch that Leg Mr. President
3. Bill Clinton (L) – Clinton took the mound in Baltimore in 1996. After tons of practice both before the game and during warm-ups in the bullpen, Clinton stepped to the rubber. Although he would later admit his nerves, it doesn't seem to come out in his pitch. The practice (or something else) worked as Clinton makes the first pitch look relaxed and easy. While he is no power pitcher, he accuracy is on point as he delivers a strike.
2. George H.W. Bush (L) – Even though there is little video of Bush Sr. thawing out the first pitch, the scouting on him alone warrants a number two ranking. Bush Sr. was captain of his high school baseball team, where he played first base. He later attended Yale, where he was also appointed captain and played in the first two College World Series. Although he decided to hang up his jersey after his schooling, he didn't do so before meeting Babe Ruth. No other President experienced this amount of baseball conditioning, and when combined with his left-handed abilities, we easily give Bush Sr. the #2 position on our countdown.
The Babe with the Future President
1. George W. Bush (R) – If there was a Cy Young award to be given out to Commander's in Chief, it would go to Bush Jr. He earned that award with one pitch on October 30, 2001. A little over a month after 9/11, Bush Jr. decided to head to Yankee Stadium to make the first pitch. In a city rich with history still looking for comfort, the President takes the field to a standing ovation in an FDNY jacket, camera crews lining up down the base paths. Reaching the mound, he turns to give a couple Presidential waves to the thousands of fans in attendance, giving little notice to the pinstripes stationed behind the plate. His face is stoic, no pre-celebratory smiles, and before you know it, he's in the stretch. His form is tight, and he releases a perfect strike. The decibels spike because the President just put the nation on his back! No other first pitch has meant as much to the country as this first pitch, and George W. Bush pitched a perfect strike.
And that concludes our Presidential rankings. We'll see you again in 2016!
Scott Boras' Critique of Free Agency
So Matt and I realized that there was more going on in the baseball world that isn't necessarily conducive to our normal fastball/changeup style. So in an effort to get some more posts out, we decided to create the "Extra Innings" portion of the blog to give us an opportunity to comment on other aspects of the league. We hope you enjoy!
Scott Boras' last major high profile client, Kyle Lohse, signed with the Milwaukee Brewers earlier this week, giving the notorious agent the ability to finally sound off over the new free agency rules.
Lohse with a Milwaukee M
Venting to FoxSports.com, Boras claimed, "When you have a system that does not reward performance, you know we have something corrupt in the major league process. You cannot have that in the major league system, because it's not rewarding performance." Boras later goes on to claim that the new process hurt Kyle Lohse and Adam LaRoche from locking down larger contracts.
But is it fair to call the new process corrupt?
During the offseason, MLB updated free agency procedures in yet another attempt to improve the competitive levels of small market teams. Previously, players were allocated a ranking by the Elias Sports Bureau. Players who had an A or B ranking and denied arbitration forced their new teams to give up a draft pick. While the new team had to forfeit the draft pick, they did not have to forfeit over the signing bonuses associated with those picks.
Under the new system, only players who are offered qualifying offers of $13.3 million are tied to draft picks. This pool of players is substantially lower than before, but when teams sign other free agents, they must also forfeit over the draft pick signing bonus, which ranges from $100,000 to $2.6 million (the first 10 picks are protected from being poached). This money reduces the total pool of dollars, which is regulated by the MLB based on draft pick slot values, and reduces the overall amount teams can offer to players as signing bonuses.
This changes how teams need to approach their draft picks, since they now will have to balance between building the current team and replenishing their farm system. The new system also creates different interpretations of draft pick value depending on when the team wants to be competitive and helps small market teams compete against the deeper-pocketed teams.
Under the old system, big market teams were able to poach big stars, and while they lost a draft pick, they could just roll over the bonus money associated with that pick to a larger signing bonus for a later pick. With money finally being sacrificed, small market teams are compensated for losing out on their players that they just can't afford to keep anymore, and can still offer appropriate signing bonuses to their additional draftees. The additional draft picks coupled with the additional draft pool money will help stack small market farm teams with top prospects. While there is risk associated with prospect development, a deep farm system reduces this risk, as seen with the 2012 A's. Strong seasons can then boost ticket sales, creating the additional revenue needed to keep homegrown talent.
Any system created to help increase the competitive level of the game can't be considered corrupt, but the "corrupt" claim implies that the system is broken with a certain party not receiving their fair share.
Boras is correct in claiming that it reduces the value of players who received qualifying offers. But, he doesn't seem to see that these players contracts are becoming more in line with their actual market value. Kyle Lohse couldn't find a home with teams looking to win now, and the contract Boras was after was too pricey for those looking to rebuild. As a result, Boras had to lower his normally-astronomically-high asking price to compensate for a lost draft pick. This resulted in less money for a pitcher who is on the backend of a career with one good season.
As one NL exec said, "If we really want the player and feel he can make the difference for us in having a championship club – or building toward a championship club – it's not a significant factor. Look, we all like picks and prospects, but even among the top 50 prospects in the game more than half of them never make it." Top free agents Josh Hamilton, who signed with the Angels, Nick Swisher, who signed with the Indians, and BJ Upton, who signed with the Rays, all signed huge contracts despite draft pick compensation, showing that the tradeoff is, in some situations, worth it.
Thus it becomes clear that the only people losing out on this new system are the agents pushing the value up for all MLB players. To quote MLB's top labor executive, "The fact that one Scott Boras client has not signed does not convince me that the system is broken." I can't help but agree.
It's ok Scotty, qualifying offers aren't that bad.
World Baseball Classic or World Baseball Flop?
The Fastball
Congratulations to the World Champion Dominican Republic, the best team in baseball! Ok, so no one actually believes that the WBC winner is the best team, but that doesn't mean that the Classic isn't good for baseball.
World Banana Champions
Putting baseball on a national stage is first and foremost the best part of the Classic. This year's tournament received record ratings in Japan and Puerto Rico and did a lot to showcase the international stars of the game.
74% of TVs on in Puerto Rico tuned in to final moments of PR's #WBC win over Japan Monday.
— MLB (@MLB) March 19, 2013
More important than ratings, though, is the passion the game creates. Baseball was eliminated as an Olympic sport in 2008, and since that time the Classic has stepped in to fill the void. The "World Series" is a bit of a misnomer, as American baseball only has one Canadian team. However, the best players from around the world want to play in the MLB because they get to face the best competition and get paid the most money. While many of the players on the non US teams looked familiar, that they were playing for national pride heightened the meaning for many. The best part about this event is the passion it inspired in both the fans and players. American baseball is not the only style played, and the Latin fans and players showed a passion for every at bat that I haven't witnessed in American baseball except in the playoffs.
I understand that the WBC doesn't have the best players, as some are afraid of injury or afraid that it will affect their normal routines in preparing for the season. This is the normal argument, but it just isn't true. Jayson Stark writes that players playing who played in the WBC were 1/2 as likely to suffer an injury as those that did not. With this knowledge, the best players have no excuse not to represent their country. If the US filled out a roster with Verlander, Kershaw, Trout and Posey you mean to tell me you wouldn't be waving the flag and cheering with everything you've got? That's a tournament I'd like to see.
The Changeup
Baseball is a great game that has a huge international presence. While it isn't anywhere near soccer in terms of world popularity, the sheer number of foreign born athletes in the MLB shows the ability for the sport to grow and develop players outside the United States. At the start of the 2012 season, 28.4% of players on Opening Day rosters were born outside the US. And with players like Roberto Clemente, Fernando Valenzuela, and Ichiro decorating the game's past, there is an incentive for Bud Selig to seek development of international talent, both for the betterment of the game and his pocketbook. With an excellent model in the World Cup, which even manages to get the US excited about soccer, and removal from the Olympic games, baseball can pull on the national pride of its fans to create a similar tournament. Yet the current setup is a disaster. The World Baseball Classic is a great idea that is horrendously executed.
The biggest and most obvious flaw within the WBC is its timing. Taking place only weeks after pitchers and catchers report, the WBC forces players to enter a playoff mentality without even getting accustomed to a regular season game. With rusty players, there is going to be a large discrepancy in player output. The March start time for the WBC also puts MLB teams in an awkward position. Teams want to respect their players' wishes to play for their home country, but at the same time they don't want to lose their stars to injury not even 30 days before the start of the season.
Unfortunately, this happened this year as the Mets lost their one remaining notable player, David Wright, to an injured rib cage. He is currently questionable for Opening Day. The Dodgers refused to let their ace, Clayton Kershaw, partake in the WBC this past year in an overprotective measure to prevent any residual inures from flaring up. With teams getting more protective of their players, a trend likely to increase in the future, less stars enter the tournament, leaving the WBC as an exhibition for teams to develop their AAA talent at something more competitive than Spring Training.
David Wright
If there's fewer stars, there's fewer fans, which could explain the struggling attendance. Recently, there was a China-Brazil game in Japan which brought in 3,100 people (at least that's what was announced). A similar attendance was present at the China-Cuba game a day earlier. While some might try to disregard these events since Japan wasn't playing in either of the games, the low turnout does speak against the execution of the WBC and lack of internationally relevent star power.
Can you find 3,000 people in this photo?
Another flaw within the WBC is its ability to go dormant for years at a time. Unlike the World Cup, where teams begin qualifying and playing together years before the tournament, national teams dissipate until the next WBC starts. Even if they are playing together, they lack the star presence that fills out the rosters once every four years. This leaves teams no time to develop chemistry, minimizing the chances of a cinderella story and essentially designating the winner as the team has the most raw talent. In other words, you don't get a Giants 2013 story in the WBC.
The WBC does little to encourage other countries from trying to qualify for the tournament. Every team who won one measly game in the 2009 WBC was guaranteed a berth in the 2013 tournament. The teams who didn't win were forced to duke it out in a qualifying round with other interested countries. Thus, between the rest of the world, two spots were up for grabs out of 16. This does little to stimulate competition and international excitement, unless you live in one of the "pre-selected" countries.
One final interesting tid-bit shows how out of touch the WBC is with the rest of the world. The Netherlands team is comprised predominantly of players from Curacao. Curacao is an autonomous territory that is part of the Netherlands, somewhat similar to Puerto Rico's relationship with the United States. However, Puerto Rico has its own team in the WBC, whereas Curacao is listed as the Netherlands. At least Curacao has its own World Cup team.
Curacao National Soccer Team
A lot needs to change in the WBC for it to accomplish what it was designed to do. Until then, we'll wait for Opening Day.
Predictions for the 2016 Season
2015 Playoff Predictions: World Series
2015 Playoff Predictions: Championship Series
2015 Playoff Predictions: Division Series
2015 Playoff Predictions: Wild Card Round
Daily Fantasy Sports, Pete Rose and Major League Hypocrisy
Predictions for the 2015 Baseball Season


Glad Tidings has been serving the Toronto Community since 1979. We are committed to touching and transforming lives in Rexdale and beyond. We do this by passionately serving youth at risk with our weekly programs and providing basic needs for families through our food bank and community programs and dinners.
We do this at no program cost to the community. We are excited to be apart of Coldest Night of the Year to increase our reach into the community, but we need your help.
10km walkers may walk the 5km twice. 2 km walkers will turn around at the 1km point.


text:
Board index ‹ Main Forum ‹ Movie News
Venom (Now with Tom F#$king Hardy!?!?)
All the dirt. All the top secret stuff. Anything that has to do with the process of getting us to sit and watch something projected on the big screen.
105 posts • Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
by King Of Nowhere on Wed May 14, 2008 6:07 pm
Yeah, this is kinda old news, but i came across it when Moo & I were discussing Marvel's "momentum" & couldn't find a thread about it here.
Dark Horizons, last july wrote:
Question: And the other thing of course is you haven't really left Marvel behind completely right? I mean you're still personally involved in Hulk and Iron Man ...
Arad: ..and Spiderman. And I'm making Venom.
IESB, back in February wrote:
IESB Exclusive: Venom Stand Alone Film Moving Forward!
Written by Robert Sanchez
Eddie Brock to get his stand alone film, Venom is coming back to the big screen!
One of the biggest disappointments from Spider-Man 3 was how they developed the villains, or actually how they didn't develop the villains, but between the three baddies that we had to contend with the biggest let down was Eddie Brock A.K.A. Venom.
Venom, by far one of the coolest villains in the Spider-Man universe, was played poorly by Topher Grace and was definitely one of the biggest let downs in the entire Spider-Man trilogy.
Not to say Topher Grace was the wrong man for the job, but with poor material and a badly put together movie, you just weren't going to get any stellar performances. I mean, asking God to kill Peter Parker is one of the lamest lines I've ever heard.
But Venom fans rejoice, Marvel is moving forward with a new stand alone film, yep you heard right, Venom is coming back to the big screen.
We've confirmed that "the studio" has met recently with several "A list writers" about a spin-off film.
Eight years ago, New Line Cinema held the theatrical rights to Venom. Since then, the rights have reverted back Marvel. But does Sony have complete control over the character since he was a part of Spidey 3 or does Marvel control the rights to the character with Sony only having distribution rights?
We have to assume that since there is movement and there has been recent meetings with writers this property must belong to Marvel since they have made an interim agreement with the WGA and proceed to develop projects during the current strike. Either way, one thing is for certain, Venom will get a second shot at the big screen.
Will it be a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde type of storyline or are we going to see other characters from the Marvel universe such as Scorpion or maybe even Carnage? Let the assumptions and speculation begin. We will try to get Marvel and/or Sony to go on the record early next week.
Here is more info on Venom:
Venom, or the Venom Symbiote, is the name given to the first symbiote life form to appear in the fictional Marvel Universe. The creature is a sentient alien with a liquid-like form. It requires a host, usually human, to bond around for its survival. In return the Venom creature gives its host enhanced powers. In effect, when the Venom Symbiote bonds with a human to form a super-villain, that new dual-life form itself is also often called Venom. The symbiote, with or without a host, is an arch-enemy of Spider-Man, who was the first host it merged with before its evil motives were clear. After Spider-Man rejected it, the symbiote went on to merge with other hosts and so began its popular reign as the villain known as Venom.
The Venom Symbiote first appeared in Secret Wars vol.1, #8 where Spider-Man first encountered it and unwittingly merged together. After Spider-Man rejected it the Symbiote merged with Eddie Brock, its most well-known host, in The Amazing Spider-Man #300 (April 1988). Its current host is Mac Gargan, the villain formerly known as Scorpion.
Originally, the Venom symbiote was portrayed as a mute and lonely creature craving the company of a host. More recently, it has been shown as increasingly abusive of its hosts, and having the powers of speech. Also the Venom Symbiote itself has no known name, as Venom is essentially the moniker it has adopted since its history with Spider-Man on Earth.
According to S.H.I.E.L.D., it is considered one of the greatest threats to humanity, alongside Magneto, Doctor Doom, and Red Skull.
The Venom symbiote also appears in the film Spider-Man 3 first merging to Spider-Man's suit and then to Eddie Brock.
So, erm, discuss.
THREE WOLF MOON GAME SIGNUP THREAD!!1eleven
King Of Nowhere
SPAM Killer!
by SooperPooperScooper on Wed May 14, 2008 6:13 pm
SooperPooperScooper
PRIMITIVE SCREWHEAD
Location: On film sets.
by AtomicHyperbole on Wed May 14, 2008 6:15 pm
Now, that's not fair at all. Venom was fucked from the start, it's not Topher Grace's fault at all, he coped admirably.
by doglips on Wed May 14, 2008 6:17 pm
AtomicHyperbole wrote:
Yeah Grace was good and IMO Venom was the only pay off for going to see No.3.
Last edited by doglips on Wed May 14, 2008 6:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
by Fried Gold on Wed May 14, 2008 6:17 pm
Venom was barely worthwhile in Spiderman 3 (Spiderman 3 being a barely worthwhile film).
Fried Gold
Location: ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
by buster00 on Wed May 14, 2008 6:18 pm
SooperPooperScooper wrote: No.
Thread over.
by Lord Voldemoo on Wed May 14, 2008 6:28 pm
Fried Gold wrote: Venom was barely worthwhile in Spiderman 3 (Spiderman 3 being a barely worthwhile film).
by barely worthwhile do you mean wholly unwatchable?
Then we agree!
It wasn't Topher's fault, tho...
Lord Voldemoo
He Who Shall Not Be Milked
Location: Pasture next to the Red Barn
Blame souly on director/studio issues on that one, methinks. Personally I feel that Raimi COULD'VE tried a bit harder, though, and not been such a nancy about Venom in the first place...
Lord Voldemoo wrote:
But then I don't hold any of those Spiderman films in the greatest of regards.
Fried Gold wrote:
Who died and made you Pacino?
Pacino died...earlier today...so I think your comments are entirely in poor taste.
by burlivesleftnut on Wed May 14, 2008 6:39 pm
No^8,000,0000,0000,0000,0000000,00000000
Fried Gold wrote: Pacino died...earlier today...so I think your comments are entirely in poor taste.
He just contacted me through a seance and told me to tell you you're trying too hard.
Seance? Too soon.
Is there a time window with these things?
We have until someone becomes interested in a Venom film.
by havocSchultz on Wed May 14, 2008 7:53 pm
If you look closely at the thread title you can see Venom...
by Chairman Kaga on Wed May 14, 2008 9:35 pm
I missed that first article last year. Why oh why couldn't Arad have left Marvel to go produce Bratz before Spider-Man 3?
This before a decent Man-Thing movie? Marvel hates us.
by Fried Gold on Thu May 15, 2008 8:51 am
Chairman Kaga wrote: I missed that first article last year. Why oh why couldn't Arad have left Marvel to go produce Bratz before Spider-Man 3?
To be fair, the Bratz film likely did a better job at pleasing it's target audiences than Spiderman 3 did.
Re: Venom
by Ribbons on Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:25 am
TheButcher wrote: From THR.com: Sony may bite on Spidey spinoff
With Heath Ledger's villainous Joker drawing attention and boxoffice dollars, Sony is moving forward with "Venom," a potential "Spider-Man" spinoff based on a bad guy.
The studio is developing the project, based on the gooey nemesis who appeared in "Spider-Man 3" and is hoping the character could serve as an antidote to the aging "Spider-Man" franchise in the way that Fox has used Wolverine to add longevity to its "X-Men" franchise.
But getting any spinoff off the ground, let alone one centered on a villain, can be tricky.
The studio had commissioned a draft of the script from Jacob Estes, a writer of the specialty film "Mean Creek," released several years ago by Paramount Classics. He's also attached to the Plan B drama "The Gifted."
But the studio is considering going in a different direction from Estes' script and is seeking writers for a new draft.
Mean Creek?! That movie was awesome!
I don't what's going on with this, but I'd be willing to guess, sight unseen, that if Estes wrote a draft, it's better than whoever they hired to replace him can come up with.
Re: Venom (Now w/ 100% More Bizarre Development News)
by bastard_robo on Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:19 pm
I have a horrible feeling this is going to end up as another CATWOMAN....
Nobody exists on purpose. Nobody belongs anywhere. Everyone is gonna die. Come watch TV
— Rick and Morty
bastard_robo
SCANK BARON
Location: Hello Kitty Adventure Island
by Tyrone_Shoelaces on Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:23 am
bastard_robo wrote: I have a horrible feeling this is going to end up as another CATWOMAN....
Complete with Benjamin Bratt, no doubt.
by TheButcher on Fri Aug 01, 2008 6:29 pm
From MTV: EXCLUSIVE: Venom's Creator And Writers Chime In On Rumored 'Spider-Man' Spin-Off
Introduced to the Marvel Universe more than twenty years ago, Venom has provided a variety of hosts with enhanced powers, always with devastating effects as it perpetrates a reign of terror. As one of the most villainous characters in the Marvel arsenal, could this pile of extraterrestrial goo really transition to leading man?
"I think Venom could headline a good movie on his own, but it would be tricky and would depend in large part on the script," Venom's creator David Michelinie told MTV News. As the "Amazing Spider-Man" writer behind the origin story depicted in Sam Raimi's "Spider-Man 3," Michelinie argues the film's success would depend most on who's inhabiting the suit.
In "Spider-Man 3," Venom fused with Eddie Brock (played by Topher Grace), but Brock's climactic and seemingly conclusive death scene leaves an open slot for the symbiote's host. "If Eddie's still dead from "Spider-Man 3," stated Michelinie," "the story and the success of the movie would depend almost entirely on the personality of the character who would combine with the symbiote: his motivations, his background, his methodology…his heart and soul."
Giving the film a heart will be one of the biggest factors towards a successful Venom film, said "Incredible Hulk vs. Venom" author Peter David. "The trick is making sure that there's a sympathetic character for the audience to identify with," he said. "In a Venom film, that could be anyone from whoever Venom's antagonist is to whomever the symbiote possesses."
Writer/artist Kaare Andrews, whose "Spider-Man: Reign" pitted Peter Parker against Venom in a shadowy future, calls the thought of a theatrical leap exciting. "I'm hoping this version of Venom will be the big beast of an alien from comics and not as wimpy and whiney as the last movie." Andrews, for his part, hopes Spider-Man remains the hero at the other end of the mutant battle. "They are so great as opposing forces, and as a fan I feel a little cheated from 'Spider-Man 3.'"
If a Venom film does move forward, one thing is clear. As the first superhero movie with a supervillain as its star, fans will expect a certain tone…and it's not sunshine and flowers. "It'd be cool if they made it the darkest and most disturbing 'Spider-Man' movie to date," mused "Spider-Man: Venom vs. Carnage" writer Peter Milligan. "A real journey into the dark side of the inhuman soul. But that won't happen."
And Sony has hired a pair of screenwriters to get going on the Spider-Man 3 spinoff movie Venom. Given that comic book artist/writer and action figure maker, Todd McFarlane, who is one of the creators of the Marvel villain, doesn't think a Venom movie could do well with a villain as the central character, my sources think Sony should let Topher Grace, even though he was blown up at the end of Spider-Man 3 (yet a portion of the Venom costume survived), stay in the role because the likeable actor could be a a sympathetic evildoer.
TheButcher
ZONE NEWS DIRECTOR
Location: The Bureau of Sabotage
by TheButcher on Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:21 pm
From THR.com:
Sony also has stepped up developing the "Spider-Man" spinoff "Venom," first recruiting writer Jacob Estes to draft a script and most recently bringing in scribes Paul Wernick and Rhett Reese, who penned "Zombieland" for the studio.
Topher Grace played Venom in "Spider-Man 3," but it's unclear whether Sony would cast him for the "Venom" feature or bring in new talent.
I vote for new talent.
Vin Diesel wants to be a villain. He hasn't said which one though.
http://splashpage.mtv.com/2008/08/27/vin-diesel-ready-to-suit-up-as-marvel-villain-but-which-one/
by TheButcher on Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:12 pm
Sony has officially confirmed a Spider-Man spin-off focusing on none other than Venom himself. Hired to helm the script is the writing team from Zombieland, Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick.
source: Latino Review
by Ribbons on Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:35 pm
Interesting. You'd think they might want to wait until after Wolverine comes out to commit to something like that though...
From Super Hero Hype: Reese and Wernick on the Venom Spin-Off
Edward Douglas wrote: A few weeks back, ComingSoon.net/Superhero Hype! had the privilege of visiting the set of Sony's upcoming horror comedy Zombieland, starring Woody Harrelson, Jesse Eisenberg, Emma Stone and Abigail Breslin. While we can't talk just yet about what we saw, we did get to spend a good 45 minutes with the film's co-writers and executive producers, Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick, both cool guys who are clearly fans of genre. With that in mind, it was exciting to know they were working on the first draft for Sony's planned "Spider-Man" spin-off movie Venom, and we had to try to get in a few questions about that.
The duo actually went to Sony with a pitch for their take for the popular Spidey villain, but couldn't really say too much about it due to the usual non-disclosure agreements anyone involved with such a high profile project for Marvel would probably have to sign.
"Venom is something that we're very fired up to be writing," Reese told us. "We have turned in a draft and are waiting to hear back, so it's early in the process. But it's a thrill to be writing 'Venom' for obvious reasons."
As far as what Marvel is looking for, Reese did say that they had to follow "certain parameters" or the "47 rules" as Wernick called them.
"Obviously, with a character like Venom there's a ton of stuff to draw from," Reese told us. "Then they had specific rules about the villain and the backstory and stuff like that, so there were certain things they wanted us... certain parameters they gave us. But largely we pitched them something and they liked it but they had changes, so we worked on the outline for a long time and then we wrote the script. So with Marvel and Sony and us it's definitely very, very collaborative."
They couldn't talk about whether they were going to ignore everything that happened with the character in Spider-Man 3 or start fresh for reasons mentioned above.
They're also working on a project with Universal called Earth vs. Moon, which also sounds like an exciting idea for a film. Reese told us a little bit more:
"It's a science-fiction epic war movie ala, I don't know, 'Braveheart.' It's sort of got a little 'Star Wars' in it, a little 'Braveheart,' a little '300' in it. It's like it's sort of exactly what the title suggests. It's big and crazy and it's gonna be awesome. It's a colony on the moon, and the colony on the moon is fighting Earth. We're very, very excited about it. We've also turned in a draft on that and are waiting to hear back, so we're in early stages on each of those."
Look for more about our visit to the set of Zombieland over on ComingSoon.net and ShockTillYouDrop.com sometime in the near future.
by Pacino86845 on Thu Apr 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Earth vs Moon sounds a bit like that Finnish space Nazi movie that we read about a while ago...
EDIT: Here's the space Nazi thread: Iron Sky
by RogueScribner on Thu Apr 09, 2009 5:00 pm
Venom sucked in Spidey 3 and he'll suck in his own movie, too.
by DerLanghaarige on Thu Apr 09, 2009 5:15 pm
Yeah, I gotta admit that I'm not really a Venom fan. I mean, he looks cool, but I don't think he's fascinating enough to carry a whole movie. (Which is one of the reasons why I'm less disappointed with Spidey 3 than the millions of angry fanboys on the web.)
DerLanghaarige
Lohman's Wet Shirt
by TheButcher on Mon May 11, 2009 12:15 am
An MTV EXCLUSIVE: Are Spider-Man Villains Venom and Carnage Heading For A Big-Screen Blowout?
Venom vs Carnage
Giant CGI blob vs Giant CGI blob the movie!
From MTV: Todd McFarlane Sees Venom in 'Spider-Man 4,' Offers Sam Raimi Some Advice
Larry Carroll wrote: "I co-created Venom," artist/writer/entrepreneur Todd McFarlane told MTV News. "He was in the last 'Spider-Man' movie. And I think he might make an appearance here in the next one, too."
by Ribbons on Mon May 11, 2009 12:31 am
McFarlane told us that he watched closely as director Sam Raimi developed his alien symbiote character into a role for Topher Grace in the 2007 blockbuster; but as the filmmaker sought to draw a light/dark comparison between the similarly-built Grace and Tobey Maguire, he dropped the ball on a few of the character's key elements.
"He's one of the more popular villains of the last ten, fifteen years," McFarlane explained, offering his advice on the how Venom could be corrected for "Spider-Man 4," his own spin-off and beyond. "Given that I created him, I have a little bit of a bias."
"I would've done a few things different," McFarlane said of the shortcomings that hindered the movie version of Venom. "When I first created him, I made him huge. That would've been the first thing for me; I would've wanted somebody who looked like he was three times the size of Spider-Man, so it was almost like Spider-Man going against the Hulk. [I want] someone who is really formidable; whenever you have a skinny character against a big one it's like 'Woah, I'm going to have to work today.' But instead, the two of them were about the same size."
Furthermore, McFarlane offered: "I would've done something more dramatic. [I also would've increased] the nastiness; I never cared too much about the comics code. I always pushed the envelope until the editor said 'You'd better pull that back.'"
Among the many classic titles that McFarlane worked on over the years is Wolverine, and when he spoke with us, he insisted that the success of that character shows that audiences are ready for a big, bad, bloody Venom.
"I think one of the reasons why Wolverine is so popular is because he did stuff that Captain America or Batman would never do," McFarlane explained, hoping Venom is properly beefed-up and unleashed in the next "Spider-Man" film. "Today's generation, they can handle that stuff."
Wow. That sounds... absolutely horrible. Changing Eddie Brock from a musclebound goon to a Peter Parker doppelganger was one of the few things that Spider-Man 3 got right. Maybe Todd McFarlane should stick to comics.
JOSHUA (and/or MTV)'s got the Marvel Scoops...
by TheButcher on Fri Sep 25, 2009 11:29 pm
From MTV:
'Venom' Screenwriter Says Studio Has Script, Is 'Pushing Forward' With Film
by TheButcher on Sat Sep 26, 2009 12:07 am
From SciFiWire:
Venom movie takes the next oozing step toward reality
Re: JOSHUA (and/or MTV)'s got the Marvel Scoops...
by Tyrone_Shoelaces on Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:58 am
I'll be surprised if a Venom movie ever happens.
by TheButcher on Wed Oct 07, 2009 7:47 pm
From Heat Vision:
'Venom' to be written and possibly directed by Gary Ross
Borys Kit wrote: Gary Ross is writing "Venom," Columbia's "Spider-Man" spinoff based on one of the villains from "Spider-Man 3," as a potential directing vehicle. Ross is already writing "Spider-Man 4" for the studio.
In the comics, Venom is a gooey alien parasite that bonds with Peter Parker and later his newsroom rival, among other people, becoming one of more popular villains in "Spider-Man's" rogue gallery.
Topher Grace portrayed the character in the 2007 movie, which ended with both the human and the alien symbiote apparently destroyed in an explosion.
The studio had no comment on Grace's involvement nor on Ross writing the project.
Avi Arad and Marvel are producing the movie.
Ross, repped by CAA, hasn't directed a movie since 2003's "Seabiscuit."
From IGN:
Venom Likes Seabiscuit
'Spider-Man 4' Screenwriter To Rewrite And Direct 'Venom' Movie?
Ross To Helm "Venom"
Mike Fleming wrote: The relationship between Columbia Pictures and Gary Ross that began with his rewrite on "Spider-Man 4" is taking a "Venom"-ous turn.
I am hearing that the studio is in talks with Ross to helm the Spidey-spinoff "Venom," and rewrite the script.
Ross will begin writing the script as soon as he completes the "Spider-Man" film.
While Venom showed up in the last Spidey installment, the intention is to start from scratch. Topher Grace played him in the last picture but the role will likely be recast.
by TheButcher on Sat Oct 10, 2009 2:51 pm
Venom is the Dayman
Campion of the sun
Master of karate and friendship for everyone
Source: MTV's splashpage
Last edited by TheButcher on Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
by TheButcher on Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:11 pm
From Coming Soon:
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=61744
We were also able to chat with Topher Grace who plays the mysterious character named Edwin in "Predators." With talk of a new script for a Venom movie, has he been approached about being in the film?
Grace: I don't know. I haven't heard anything.
Q: There's been no talk?
Grace: No. I don't think so.
by TheButcher on Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:50 pm
Brian Michael Bendis Turned Down Venom Spin-Off Movie?
by TheButcher on Fri Oct 01, 2010 7:39 pm
Spider-Man vs. Venom: Too Soon?
We don't know what's worse: That there's a rumor about rebooting Venom so soon after his appearance in Spider-Man 3 or that Sony maybe wants Oscar winner Philip Seymour Hoffman to play him.
The internets delivered another story surrounding the top-secret Spider-Man reboot, this one centering on a possible return of Eddie Brock's symbiote alter ego, Venom. We're not sure exactly how this will play out, if at all - will this Venom be the one from Bendis' Ultimate Spider-Man run, a potential cure for cancer gone all awry?
From Deadline:
'Glee's Dianna Agron, Georgina Haig Tangled In Spidey Love Interest Web
It's a fluid situation, they might add another candidate or two, but these are the five main contenders. SPE and director Marc Webb might well take one for Gwen, and another for Mary Jane. All this should be wrapped up shortly and then we can get on to speculating about the villain. Early unconfirmed talk: they want to bring back Venom and they are looking at Philip Seymour Hoffman. Discuss!
by TheButcher on Wed Mar 07, 2012 4:16 am
From 24 Frames:
'Chronicle's' Josh Trank looks to spit some Venom
Steven Zeitchik wrote: EXCLUSIVE: With Sony's "The Amazing Spider-Man" looking to kick-start a Spidey resurgence this summer, the studio is taking a crack at another character associated with the superhero: Venom.
The studio is negotiating with Josh Trank, the hot director of this winter's found-footage hit "Chronicle," to take the reins of the Spidey spin-off, said a person familiar with the project who was not authorized to talk about it publicly. Sony was not immediately available for comment.
The film would center on the gooey villain who was a mainstay of the Marvel comics and was a nemesis, incarnated by Topher Grace, in the third "Spider-Man" picture in 2007. (The character attaches himself to a human host and becomes as powerful as the web-slinging superhero.)
A Venom film has been long-gestating at the studio, dating back at least to 2008 and preceding plans for this summer's Marc Webb-Andrew Garfield take on the character. Gary Ross negotiated to direct a Venom film back in 2009 but moved on to other projects, including the upcoming "Hunger Games."
Jacob Estes ("The Details") wrote a draft of a "Venom" script several years ago, but producers are seeking a new writer, said the source. (The Ross version was to craft Venom as less a villain than an antihero.) The film also would be seeking a new actor; Grace is not expected to reprise the role.
With "Venom," the 27-year-old Trank would not only return to superhero territory but would also bring a flair for shoe-leather storytelling that resonates with audiences: Despite an absence of stars as well as a modest budget, "Chronicle" has grossed more than $60 million since coming out last month.
by TheButcher on Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:50 am
From BC:
Venom Movie Set To Cross Over With The Amazing Spider-Man
'Venom' Movie May Tie into 'Amazing Spider-Man' Avengers-Style — EXCLUSIVE
by TheButcher on Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:35 am
Avi Arad wrote: The fans love Venom. He is the fan favorite. All Spider-Man readers love Venom
by TheButcher on Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:41 pm
Is this a calculated piece of misdirection, or is Amazing Spider-Man 2 a direct prequel to a Venom movie starring Dane DeHaan?
by TheButcher on Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:09 am
Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick Talk About Their VENOM Script, Which They Describe as "Dark and Soul Searchy"; Say It's Unlikely to Move Forward
Adam Chitwood wrote: When speaking with Reese and Wernick, Steve asked the duo if they did, in fact, tackle a script for a Venom movie:
Paul Wernick: We did. A long time ago, and it likely will not become a movie in that form. Too many things have happened in between now and then and different people have been involved, and it's just likely not to happen in the form that we wrote it, unfortunately.
Though their iteration of the script is unlikely to move forward, the two did talk about the tone of their take on the character:
Rhett Reese: [It was a] realistic, grounded, a little more dark take on the character.
Wernick: Yeah it was definitely kind of dark and soul search-y. We love it and we're proud of it.
Reese: Eddie Brock was a conflicted character, and so I don't think it could've been Peter Parker.
Reese and Wernick revealed that they actually pitched their own take on the story rather than having Sony dictate a specific Venom story that they had to use, and they teased an exciting sequence that was part of their script:
Wernick: Imagine a symbiote traveling across a city at some point in the movie, jumping from body to body as it goes, and each person that it inhabits ends up becoming really violent and striking someone else and then it jumps to the next person. There was a really cool sequence like that in there.
by TheButcher on Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:42 pm
Nuke The Fridge:
Guess Which Marvel Character Vin Diesel Might Portray?
MovieWeb:
Is Vin Diesel Black Panther? the Actor Takes a Meeting at Marvel
by TheButcher on Fri Jul 26, 2013 3:05 pm
Dane DeHaan Talks Possible VENOM Spin-Off And Harry Osborn's Friendship With Peter Parker
Marc Webb Says 'Amazing Spider-Man 4′ Might Be More Than a 'Spider-Man' Movie
by TheButcher on Wed Jul 31, 2013 7:24 am
Venom 'Truth in Journalism' Short Film Preview & Interview with Producer Adi Shankar
Producer Adi Shankar (Dredd) talks about his new Venom short film 'Truth in Journalism', a dark and violent comedy featuring 'True Blood's' Ryan Kwanten as Eddie Brock.
Return to Movie News