text:
Battlestar Galactica and Mormonism
Posted on February 12, 2006 by guest
The connection is hardly a secret. Many websites cover this (some of them are rather hostile towards the church, but others are friendly or neutral – the best one is here.)
But for those who came in late, I'll cover the basics and then move into deeper territory afterwards.
Keep in mind, I'm discussing the original 1979 series for the first part of this post. Also keep in mind that I have no idea about Glen A. Larson's current standing in the church. Some sources say he is an ex-Mormon, and others claim he is a current member. So I have no idea, although I suspect (based on the number of times I've seen Orson Scott Card called a former Mormon) that Larson is at least still on the roles of the church. But outside of intellectual curiosity and concern for his soul, his current standing in the church doesn't mean much. What does matter is that at one point in his life, before he created BSG, Larson was LDS.
Okay – basic connections:
1. Kobol is an anagram, when you solve it, you get Kolob. In LDS theology, Kolob is the star nearest unto the throne of God. In Battlestar Galactica, Kobol is a planet rather than a star, but the connection between the two ideas is rather clear. Also, a ship named the Star Kobol appeared briefly as the site for armistice talks between the Colonials and the Cylons.
2. The colonies are run by a council (sometimes referred to as a Quorum) of the Twelve, with a President. While a political body, the members also have religious responsibilities and duties.
3. Marriage is often referred to as sealing. Adama marries Apollo and Serina with the words: A union between this man and this woman not only for now, but for all the eternities. Although the marriage ceremony is public rather than in a temple requiring a recommend to enter, the wording and theology comes from Mormonism.
4. In the episodes "War of the Gods" parts 1 & 2, the angels from the ships of light declare that agency is supreme: We cannot interfere with freedom of choice. His, yours, anyone's. Count Iblis (the Satan figure who is at war with the angels in the Ships of Light) can only control those who had "freely given him dominion".
5. In the "War of the Gods", the highly advanced beings/angels on the Ship of Lights say "As you are now, we once were; as we are now, you may become." Do I even need to spell this one out? Fine. I think it was Lorenzo Snow who said "As man is, God once was; as God is, man may become."
6. In the episode "Experiment in Terra" John (an angel) says to Apollo "I have no physical body, as you know it." Apollo points at John and asks him "What do you call that?" John replies: "A reflection of intelligence. My spirit, if you will." That one is not as clear cut (since a spirit body is still a body) but the idea and wording of intelligence = spirit comes from Mormon sources.
Okay, that's the (non-exhaustive) list. But what does it all add up to? Mere window dressing? Pearls before swine? Or something much more daring than most viewers and fans have realized?
Well, here's what Orson Scott Card thought:
I found the Glen Larson approach both silly and offensive; I also found that most Mormon critics who have commented on my work and Larson's make the same self-contradictory mistake: They find Larson's approach – dropping in trivial LDS references – superficial, and then complain that because I don't do the same, I am denying/concealing/ignoring my Mormonism.
(page 159 of A Storyteller in Zion).
So, according to Card, BSG is superficially LDS. That seems to be the view of most viewers. But, Card is dead wrong. I don't blame him – after a promising series opener, BSG had a few odd episodes that involved such things as a shoot-out between Apollo and "Red-eye" (a damaged and reprogrammed Cylon) on a dime novel wild-west planet. Other such episodes seemed to render the initial promise of the series moot, and I really can't blame Card (and others) from deciding the LDS references added up to mere window dressing.
But the series began to pick up some steam, especially with the two-part episode "War of the Gods." This episode did more than just introduce a new threat in the form of Count Iblis, and new allies in the form of the beings from the Ships of Light. They set the basic metaphysical groundwork for the series. One major revelation retroactively changed the underlying concept behind the whole series: The Cylon Imperious leader had the same voice as Count Iblis. In essence, Satan created the Cylons.
Suddenly, for those paying attention, BSG was no longer about humanity fleeing for its lives from a superior force, hoping to find shelter on a mythical planet called Earth. It was about the battle for humanity's soul. The Cylons weren't just evil (if somewhat inept at shooting) robots – they were created for the specific purpose of becoming an army whose purpose would be to eliminate humanity. Iblis is at war with the being in the Ships of Light, and this war is reflected in the war between humanity and the Cylons. Humanity's survival wasn't just about genetic reproduction: It was about spiritual advancement: Humanity was meant to survive because its ultimate destiny is to become as advanced as the beings in the ships of light. The Cylons (and Count Iblis) meant to kill them all off (or at least corrupt them) before that could happen.
In fewer words: The basic metaphysical background of the original BSG was Mormon in character. The show was not superficially Mormon, as Card said. Instead, it was deeply, truly, inherently Mormon.
Unfortunately, the original BSG never got to explore this much further, with its cancellation and then pathetic resurrection as Battlestar 1980 (the less said about this, the better. Larson himself has written it off as "Starbuck's nightmare").
And how have the Mormon elements fared since then? Not well. In the few revivals that have occurred since then (not counting the new series on Sci-Fi), the creators have had a hard time dealing with these elements, either ignoring them or transmuting them into something else.
Maximum press did a comic book series that used time travel to rewrite most of the TV show's history. The "angels" became something more akin to uber-advanced aliens. While this series showed a knack for exploiting the folklore of BSG fandom, its radical character redesigns and bizarre storylines (including a time travel story arc that rewrote every BSG story ever) didn't endear it to fans. However, to my knowledge, these comic have the first appearance in any BSG media of humanoid Cylons. (CORRECTION: I have been informed that Human looking Cylons first appeared in Galactica 1980. I probably repressed the memory).
Maximum press itself became a victim of the comic book market collapse of the late 90s, so another comics company called Realm Press picked up the license. This series kept the religious elements in, even if they became more or less generic. Unfortunately, the publisher was unable to stick to a schedule and most of the storylines went unfinished, so it's hard to tell exactly where this batch of comics would have gone.
Around the same time as all of this, Richard Hatch (the actor who played Apollo on the original series and plays Zarek on the new series) began co-authoring a new series of BSG novels. From all accounts, Hatch is a nice guy – but these books are a weird mix of BSG, Hatch's own personal philosophies and borderline racist ideas. In them, Apollo becomes something of a lost Jedi. Because of his contacts with the Being of Light, he is able to tap into his mental reserves and perform all sorts of amazing mental feats. The Mormon elements of progression become something more like New Age ESP. Plus, it turns out only "pure blooded Kobollians" can tap this mental power (apparently somewhere between the fleeing of Kobol and the founding of the colonies, some humans somehow tainted the bloodlines, though this is never really explained). Also, a planet called Parnassus becomes the true font of humanity, with Kobol becoming only an ancient stopping point on the way to the twelve colonies that were introduced to us (and destroyed) in the first episode of BSG.
As for the new TV series? Well, I really don't know. They keep some of the terminology (Kobol, Council of the Twelve), but the underlying metaphysics of the new BSG series are still unclear. In the original series, Larson basically laid all his cards on the table with "War of the Gods."
In this new series, however, we have the idea that the colonies practiced a rather diverse, polytheistic, pluralistic and private religion. When asked if she "believed" Kara/Starbuck replied by stating "yes, not that it's any of your business" or something along those lines. This seems reversed from the open if highly informal religiosity of the colonials in the original series. The Cylons on the new series are clearly religious, although monotheistic. The colonials seem to have no serious, strict moral code, whereas the Cylons seems to know exactly what they should be doing. But I get the feeling the creators of the new show are holding back most of their cards. Once we finally figure out the religious/metaphysical grounding of this new series, I doubt it will be more than faintly LDS, but it should be interesting nonetheless.
In either case, the original BSG was a fun bit of television. The new BSG is, however, the best show on TV right now.
Okay. Comment away.
This entry was posted in Any by guest. Bookmark the permalink.
60 thoughts on "Battlestar Galactica and Mormonism"
Baptist-cum-Mormon [Visitor] on February 12, 2006 at 10:10 pm said:
"…best show on TV right now."
Wha? I would nominate "Arrested Development"–though I suppose since it's been cancelled it could be considered not to be "on TV right now."
clark [Visitor] on February 12, 2006 at 10:15 pm said:
I always found that quote from Card ironic given that he had a parallel universe series with Joseph Smith and a parallel universe series of the Book of Mormon. It seems Card did the Larson thing, only moreso.
I should add that while I missed the Mormon and Egyptian religious aspects of the old series I kind of dig the more Greek aspects of the new series. I've long wondered if the producer will invoke any Mormon aspects. He's used a lot of plots from the old series as inspiration.
Not to get off on a tangent. But do others find that the past few episodes have been weak compared to the first season and a half? I liked the one with "Scar" but thought most of the others were kind of disappointing. Partially because nothing has pushed the plot forward.
Ivan Wolfe [Member] on February 12, 2006 at 10:22 pm said:
Well, I loved Arrested Development (though I missed the last four episodes on Friday! Anyone tape them or know how I can legally download them?), but it's my #2 show – mainly because while I loved it, it isn't as accessible as the new BSG. There were too many in-jokes.
clark –
I don't want to defend Card on this point, but I imagine his defense would be that Larson was superficially LDS, but Card's works were deeply LDS at their core.
I, of course, argue both Card and Larson were deeply LDS in those particular tales.
harpingheather [Visitor] on February 12, 2006 at 10:36 pm said:
That reversal you mentioned worries me. I admit that I haven't seen the show and I don't know if I'm going to. (We can't afford cable.) I find it encouraging that you say it's the best show on TV right now but I don't like the tone that reversal sets up. It seems to me that they're completely turning the original theme on it's head. Now we have the "good colonists" as a "a rather diverse, polytheistic, pluralistic" group– sounds to me like how the liberal-minded like to think of themselves. The Cylons, still the baddies, are now monotheistic and "know what they should be doing"– sounds like how the liberal-minded seem to think of those of us who lean more to the right.
No, not a development that I think I'd like.
harpingheather –
it bothers me a bit too, but since the colonists have hardly been set up as paragons of virtue, I'm expecting the shows creators have a few more surprises up their sleeve in regards to religion. I just don't think they've told us everything yet, and that, in the end, there's going to be a significant reversal or twist to their treatment of religion.
Of course, the real solution is to have them hire me to write a script for the new BSG. 😉
Yes, while the show has its flaws, one of the interesting things that is brought out is how many of the Cylon critiques are true.
The show is very complex and doesn't offer easy answers.
Heli [Visitor] on February 13, 2006 at 12:01 am said:
I have to say Cards books that parallel the Book of Mormon were deeply LDS and very good in the beginning, but turned a bit strange about half way through the series. I never finished the series because the 3rd and 4th book went in too many directions that weren't compelling to me like the first two books were.
Geoff Johnston [Visitor] on February 13, 2006 at 12:15 am said:
I agree that the new BSG is the best show on TV right now. Every episode is easily better than most big budget movies I see these days. I haven't really been disappointed with the recent episodes either (for Clark). It's true that they haven't pushed the plot along much, but they are excellent stand-alone shows nevertheless, IMO.
I think Heather's take is right on, though (oddly since she hasn't seen the show). The Cylons are the devouly religious (monotheistically so) and morally single minded race while the humans are pluralistic, polytheistic, morally confused group. The view of the cylons really does come off as a liberal take on devout religionists, actually. But the truth is that the writers seem to be leading us toward taking an increasingly sympathetic view of the cylons. I suspect that the cylon/human mix in the baby Sharon carries is the key to future storylines.
Perhaps the show is so good because it is more about navigating moral ambiguities than anything else.
David McCabe [Visitor] on February 13, 2006 at 12:42 am said:
What I see in the new BSG is a very female oriented show. All the females are as tough or tougher than males and they spend the all the shows exploring the inner feelings of the characters. All these elements make the show most attractive to women. Give me the shootem' up action of the Stargates. That was the way the old BSG seemed to be and somehow it's more for real men.
I liked your history lesson about BSG. It was obviously well researched and very informative and right on.
VeritasLiberat [Visitor] on February 13, 2006 at 9:34 am said:
IMHO the entire premise of Battlestar Galactica is lifted from the Book of Mormon. A small group led by a prophet, fleeing the destruction of Jerusa… er, the Colonies, and traveling to a mythical Promised Land.
"The view of the cylons really does come off as a liberal take on devout religionists, actually."
I think that perhaps a better parallel would be Cylons=Islamic terrorists. They've even got suicide bombers. The anti-military, pro-Cylon movement that was introduced a few episodes ago is somewhat reminiscent of our own current anti-war movement. (Adama as President Bush?)
Also, the colonists' religion does seem to have an overarching unity to it, even though it is practiced in different ways by different people. And I was pleased by how the storyline of President Roslin's prophecy turned out — she was RIGHT, and Adama's skepticism was not only misplaced, it ended up nearly destroying the fleet.
… or not so much destroying it as fragmenting it into smaller subgroups.
Tanya Spackman [Member] on February 13, 2006 at 12:10 pm said:
I have absolutely nothing of substance to add, but I just want to go on the record saying that BSG is the best show on TV right now 🙂
John C. [Visitor] on February 13, 2006 at 12:32 pm said:
Really, I am surprised that it took this long.
Anonymoose [Visitor] on February 13, 2006 at 12:40 pm said:
if these people use some sort of scripture, what do they call it, "The Book of Claptrap!" because I think that the writers have been smoking too much of that lately, but let's all remember that this is the best show on TV right now…NOT!!! American Idol is…
a random John [Visitor] on February 13, 2006 at 12:42 pm said:
The religion of the new show is less well defined but the characters seem more deeply religious. The president and the cylons are the prime examples of this. Baltar is sometimes.
It does seem that new show has Mormoness only in that it is based on the old show, and there is no deep understanding of anything LDS.
Anonymoose [Visitor] on February 13, 2006 at 1:11 pm said:
maybe if it will fail in the UK, then Sci-Fi can replace Big Stupid Goof-up with the latest BBC specialty, Dr. Who, another wonderful chaotic view of poor and tasteless historical re-tread TV!! They actually should try 'Coronation Street' a true Sci-Fi narcisistic melodrama!
Tanya Spackman [Member] on February 13, 2006 at 1:18 pm said:
Anonymoose, American Idol? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! If anything else is to be considered the best show on TV besides BSG, then Grey's Anatomy is it.
yes, Tanya, American Idol….(PAUSE)…..bahahahahahahaha, you're right there is nothing worse than American Idol!
a random John [Visitor] on February 13, 2006 at 1:54 pm said:
Tanya,
Grey's Anatomy jumped the shark last night. Big time.
arj, I totally disagree. I thought last night was one of their strongest episodes. The shower dream at the beginning of last week had me totally rolling my eyes, even though I knew they were doing it in an attempt to attract Superbowl viewers (do such stunts work?), but luckily it settled down to normal episode. But I loved last night's ep.
Ivan Wolfe [Member] on February 13, 2006 at 2:30 pm said:
I can confirm that I have absolutely no connection to Ron Moore whatsoever.
In fact, I was oppossed to this new BSG when I first heard about it. I watched it hoping (nay, praying) for a train wreck. I was so fracking upset that this new show wasn't a continuation of the original I had hate mail in my inboz ready to send off, insulting Moore, Bonnie Hammer and the Sci-Fi channel in general.
However, I was totally blown away and became a fan. The mini-series was good – but the regular series was even better. The first episode of the first season "33" was one of the finest hours ever in dramatic television. It had pathos, hubris, gravitas and depth. Hard choices were made in order to insure the survival of the fleet. There were no easy answers – there never are.
Clark Goble [Member] on February 13, 2006 at 8:56 pm said:
Editor's Note: Due to extensive spamming all comments from the spammer and comments directly about the spammer were removed at Ivan's request so as to continue the original discussion which had been derailed. My apologies if you felt something was deleted in error. Feel free to repost it if it relates to the thread.
Ivan,
I was no so much opposed to the new BSG as I was skeptical. I thought the idea of non-mechanical Cylons was lame to say the least. I didn't even watch the miniseries though we had cable at the time. Then people online started raving about the series when it was broadcast in the UK. I downloaded the first few episodes and was amazed by the intesity. It was like 24, but with more characters that mattered, and they didn't focus so much on being in space as they did on the interactions between the characters.
The intensity let off a bit after the first few episodes, but the characters remained compelling and the show really had a peak during the last two episodes of the first season.
I liked it enough to actually buy the miniseries. It wasn't as good as the better episodes of the show, but that isn't much of a criticism.
I've long been a fan of the old show and remember watching it on VHS in my freshman dorm pointing out all the Mormonisms to my friends, who were probably considering it a form of torture.
My current complaint is that they've pulled a lot of punches. After starting out with the destruction of a civilization they've been very reticent to kill major characters off. Several have been shot or injured but they're all back to normal now. Not killing the president off after building up to it for over a year seemed almost unfortunate.
Sometimes I wish that US television was more like TV in Latin America. Shows there have an endpoint in mind when they start. If they are popular they put more content in the middle but still get to the end. If they are not popular they skip quickly to the conclusion. In some ways that model leads to more compelling story telling. I guess that Ron has something in mind though given that DS9 had a story arc.
Clark Goble [Member] on February 13, 2006 at 10:51 pm said:
One problem with shows with an "endpoint in mind" is that they often get cancelled before they reach it. I worry about Lost, for instance, which is like that. It supposedly will take nearly 8 seasons (ideally) to finish up. One thing that BSG is trying to do is what XFiles did. That is have some relatively "stand alone" episodes and then some that are more "mythos." One complaint some (not me) have about Lost is that there are too many "mythos" episodes and nothing akin to the stand alone.
Having said that I do feel that the way the President was saved was a huge cop out and quite annoying. I also find the way Baltazar had his big "change" was a cop out as well – especially since he had just saved the President's life. I also found the terrorism (pro peace with the Cylons and wipe out the Cylons) a bit ridiculous, especially given all that's going on. So thus far this last "season" I've been kind of disappointed. Not Alias Season 3 level disappointment yet, but disappointed nonetheless. I think it's more apparent given how great all the other episodes were.
John C. [Visitor] on February 14, 2006 at 10:15 am said:
For the record, my comment was entirely about the spammer and should probably be deleted as I am not sure it makes sense without him. Although, people who would do such a thing are clearly the lackeys of Universal Pictures and part of their internet propaganda campaign.
Ivan Wolfe [Visitor] on February 14, 2006 at 10:31 am said:
Baltar is a confusing character – in both the original and new series (though in the new one especially).
He seems to change positions three or four times an episode.
I don't think, however, that the way the president was saved was a cop-out. Instead, it seemed to me to be a way to emphasize the importance of this new hybrid baby. The BSG advertising campaign has started to be centered around the cylon/human hybrid fetus. So by using its blood to save the President, we were getting a sign that "there is something more to this than the Cylons religous fanatacism – this is more important than we have realized."
But I do think that right now they seem to be vamping a bit too much.
However, I'm still not buying the idea that the colonials are just barely surviving and staying ahead of the cylons. I'm convinced that if the Cylons wreally anted to wipe them out and take a few hostage for breeding experiments, they could do it in a second. Right now it seems the Cyclons are waging psychological warfare.
Also – the most recent suicide bombers on the series have not been Cylons, but human peace activists. I think that renders the thesis "Cylons are Islamic fundamentalists" rather problematic.
a random John [Visitor] on February 14, 2006 at 11:38 am said:
Actually my great fear is that BSG becomes like X-Files, which lasted several seasons too long and could never really resolve even a small portion of the loose ends.
Also I should clarify about the endpoint model. Under this model when a show is cancelled, it gets to get to the predetermined end quickly. This might be hard to do in the US with the emphasis on seasons and getting cancelled over the summer. I am guessing that BSG probably will be around for a long time given the long life that Stargate has had (much of it on SciFi) and the general excellence of the show. However I do hope that there is some endpoint in mind that they are working towards, however long it takes to get there. Maybe they'll arrive at Earth circa 1980…
Clark Goble [Member] on February 14, 2006 at 11:52 am said:
John, I was never a X-Files fan. Too silly for my tastes. However I'm told most of the threads were wrapped up at the end of season 6. Then they kept the show going with nothing much more to go with it unless one decided to do something about the invasion. But they didn't go that direction. Instead they kept trying to go with the same vibe.
I think Alias had the same problem, although with that show it resolved things about half way through the second season and then had no where to go. Then it kept being "re-invented" with each reinvention being worse than the one before. (This season has been a waste)
Will this happen with BSG? I hope not. Although with the exception of the Scar episode the past few weeks haven't inspired confidence. Of course all series have weak episodes. There was a huge lull in the first season of 24 after they rescue the wife and kids, for instance. So I'm hoping that is what's going on.
Unlike X-Files and Alias, I think BSG could go longer without wrapping up without it becoming silly. It seems perfectly reasonable that they could be out there for years looking for Earth and dealing with the Cylons. However, in order to pull that off, they writing would have to continue to be quality, and they'd have to actually be able to come up with places to take the characters. That's hard to do.
X-Files seemed to have good writing all the way through (though I bailed the last two seasons, so I can't vouch for them), but Chris Carter had no idea where to take it. There was no point. Alias has a similar problem, but they just lost their point earlier on. Actually, I guess X-Files lost their point earlier, but we as viewers didn't realize it until several seasons in. And though JJ Abrams has said that Lost actually has an ultimate secret(s) to be revealed over time, and he knows where he wants to take it, I'm still wary after X-Files. However, BSG seems to be a slightly different type of series in that the grand overall thing isn't as big of a mystery. It is more of a straight-forward show. Therefore, continuing on for a long period of time won't necessarily be stringing people along without a point.
Ivan Wolfe [Visitor] on February 14, 2006 at 12:52 pm said:
Chris Carter said one problem with X-files was that if he left it, FOX would continue the series without him and he didn't want to see someone else mess up his mythology. It was still a mess. The last season wasn't worth much, and the last episode made little sense. And they killed off the Lone Gunmen just to spite the fans of the aborted spin-off series.
However, I felt it was a little daring for the creators in BSG to kill off the President's aide in the last episode. However, even Moore himself has expressed dissapointment with some recent episodes (such as Black Market).
I'm hoping the upcoming Cylon point of view episode "Downloaded" will give us some more answers.
Billy died a lame and meaningless death. They should have had him die from friendly fire rather than having Lee simply get shot but be ok.
It was meaningless, but primarily done because he was trying to out do Lee to impress the girl. There were plenty of foreshadowings through the episode.
But that's not what bugged me. What bugged me was that in a bar on a luxury ship like that there were no security cameras, no bouncers, nothing. Then the way the marines dealt with things was just stupid. Finally why on earth did Apollo go back in the way he did? It was bad enough plotting that I actually thought Glen A. Larson had done that episode. Overall the episode actually bugged me far more than the one where Apollo is visiting the prostitute.
I recognize that BSG doesn't want to focus on the science fiction aspects as much. That is all the science. But some things are necessary. I always hate it when a show throws out logic or how people actually behave so as to make some character point possible. That's what I felt happened in both this episode as well as the one about the blackmarketeers. (I also felt that about the one bad Lost episode: the one with the guy from LotRs and his "baptism" of the baby)
that's true. The Marines acted like idiots in that episode. Starbuck's whole reason for being in that show was so she could screw up – and she wasn't even drunk. If she had been drunk, that might have explained her behavior.
I still thought Billy's death was handled well, since his character arc has been an imporant (if background) part of the series. While it doesn't make us fell like "no one is safe" it does at least create the idea "none of the secondary or tertiary characters are safe."
I meant meaningless in terms of the overall plot of the series. Obviously it had some meaning in terms of the episode, but it seemed rather manufactured.
Apollo should have killed the guy in the bathroom silently, and then killed whoever they sent in to check on him, and then he should have gone out in a blaze of glory.
Either that or he should have done gotten out of the bar when he saw the gun and contacted someone.
John, all I could think while watching the mind numbingly bad Apollo decisions was "what would Jack Bauer do. . ."
Jack Bauer would end the Cylon threat and do it in 24 hours!
JWL [Visitor] on February 14, 2006 at 11:00 pm said:
I apologize that I can't retrieve the source and link to it, but I distinctly remember reading an interview with the producer/creator of the current BSG in which he indicated that he was fully aware of Glen Larson's use of Mormon "mythology" in creating the original series but would not continue those themes in the new show because he didn't know enough about Mormonism to carry it off. Instead he using the new series to explore the negative consequences of monotheism as exemplified by the monotheistic Cylons contrasted with the nice New Agey polytheistic humans. The "mythos" of the new BSG is the modern liberal idea that monotheism is bad because it leads to intolerance and war.
Clark Goble [Member] on February 15, 2006 at 1:07 am said:
It was in his blog. He also mentioned that Larson's primary Egyptian motif would be discarded. That actually makes sense although I do miss the quasi-Egyptian flight helmets of the old series.
"Instead he using the new series to explore the negative consequences of monotheism as exemplified by the monotheistic Cylons contrasted with the nice New Agey polytheistic humans. The "mythos" of the new BSG is the modern liberal idea that monotheism is bad because it leads to intolerance and war."
I'd really like to see a source for this.
Ivan Wolfe [Member] on February 15, 2006 at 9:10 am said:
Instead he using the new series to explore the negative consequences of monotheism as exemplified by the monotheistic Cylons contrasted with the nice New Agey polytheistic humans. The "mythos" of the new BSG is the modern liberal idea that monotheism is bad because it leads to intolerance and war
I couldn't find any such statements on Moore's blog. If those statements do exist, I'd like to know about them. They seem a bit too – convenient, since elsewhere on the blog he has said the mysteries behind the religions has yet yet to be revealed.
Not that part Ivan, the part about not following Mormon and Egyptian mythos.
I don't necessarily agree with the claim about monotheism and New Age. In various podcasts Moore's appeared to argue for something quite a bit more complex as well.
My personal suspicion (although I hope it won't be true) is that the humans will find the Gods and that Moore will do a riff of the later episodes of the classic series. Only the humans will find out that they were originally robots just like the Cylons are. i.e. a kind of weird doppleganger of Brigham Young's notion of deification.
yeah, I was aware of Moore's comments regarding Egyptian motiffs.
To paraphrase Woodsworth, the current BSG is "trailing clouds of Mormonism, from Larson who was its home."
or something.
JWL [Visitor] on February 15, 2006 at 1:25 pm said:
I may have been overstating Ron Moore's position on the use of the monotheism/polytheism distinction a bit, but see this quote from his interview on the BSG home page:
http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/bts/interviews/moore_QA.html
Q: Was the decision to make the Cylons monotheistic and the Colonials polytheistic a conscious choice? If so, was it done to challenge the audience's (at least subconscious) bias in favor of monotheist (Christian/Jewish) faiths by making the "bad guys" have a religion that more closely resembles our own?
Moore: It was a conscious choice I made during the development of the miniseries. I had included a line from Number Six where she said, "God is love," and that became the jumping off point for this entire aspect of the series. The fact that the Colonials already had Greco/Roman names and nomenclature made it a natural for saying that they were polytheistic. I think I realized that the clash of two civilizations with these beliefs would echo our own history as well as be an interesting inversion of the usual Pagan=Bad, Christian=Good dynamic and I thought that would be interesting to play around with.
JWL –
I think the key there is "play around with" since Moore has hardly made the Colonials beacons of virtues. Clearly the Cylons are bad, bad, bad – but like I said above, the suicide bombers have been humans more often then not. Humanity as a "flawed creation" seems to be the main point of the series in the last few episodes (even in the less than stellar Black Market: One could hardly imagine child prostitution [or any black market] among the Cylons, even if they had kids).
Hmmmm –
well, after tonight's episode, I might just start agreeing with those who see religion that actually demands something of its followers as the "bad guy" in BSG.
Beyond the utter predictability of everything that happened in the episode (my wife was able to guess the ultimate actions and fate of nearly evey character 20 minutes into the episode), the conservative Gemenons were the intolerant, unsympathetic ones, whereas the doctor was apparently some sort of hero for preforming covert abortions.
The issue had to come up at some point, I guess, but I find it hard to ignore the clear moral being preached by it. It was still good enough I'm not too disapointed, but overall, it was a let down.
Maybe someone else can convince me I'm reading too much into the episode?
At least the previews for next week (for the Cylon centered episode) look promising.
Ivan, why do you think that? Tonight's episode cleared some of the worry that several of the past episodes brought to mind. (in terms of complexity and quality) But I thought the way abortion was handled was rather complex. You had people viewing it in a myriad of ways and also the typical religious view (sex is significantly for reproduction) suddenly taking on a much more real and important stage. This to me was BSG at its best, dealing with religious issues in a very complex fashion.
Yes it was somewhat predictable, but most of them typically are. I might be too jaded. I can call most shows including Lost at 24 pretty quickly. What I enjoyed is how the plot developed. Plus they seem to have Baltazar back on track after some too out of character episodes.
I don't think it fair to merely say the Gemenons were intolerant and unsympathetic, given their position in prior episodes. But they were acting how typical pro-life folks work in politics. And Baltazar was acting how opportunistic pro-choice folks work. But Adama was the most interesting pro-life voice I thought. Further the President went along with the abortion ban.
This was the best episode thus far since the break IMO.
The one flaw was why there weren't air masks a plenty throughout the ship for doing repairs. It seems that air leaks would be a common occurance on a battleship in space. I understand why Moore simply ignores the technology issues in the show. I don't even mind everyone using Glocks for their guns and drive Hummers. But he frequently ignores technology in a way that would significantly affect the plot. I mentioned he did that last week as well.
Ivan Wolfe [Member] on February 18, 2006 at 10:07 am said:
perhaps my reaction was a tad hasty, but the episode was too predictable.
As for people viewing Abortion in a myriad of ways – well, the only ones actually oppossed to it on moral grounds were the Genoshans, who did little more that spout empty soundig platitudes. As far as they were concerned, the episode seemed to be saying: The president got a lot of power playing the religion card, now it's gonna bite her in the butt – the religous right is now going to make unreasonable demands of her.
I agree the show was more complex that it could have been – it was clearly complex – but the basic position seemed to be that the doctor was a hero (a Cider House Rules thing), the President's original position was the correct one and she is only changing it due to the extreme circumstances they are under, and that Genoshans are, rather than real allies, unreasonable annoyances.
But I admit I may be misreading the show. I have enough faith in the show (it's been excellent so far) that I may modify my reading depending on how future shows go.
Just found this comment here at the Corner that sort of sums up one problem I had with BSG last night.
Here's a bit of it (but read the whole comment):
Even more annoying is that the fight has to be between religious fundamentalists and lovers of freedom. This displays a profound lack of imagination in one of TVs most imaginative shows. Law & Order is "ripped from the headlines" in this way, BSG doesn't need to be.
I sure didn't get the impression that the Doctor was a hero. It seemed to me that Adama was pretty pissed about it all. Not to mention the security issues. Certainly the President was pro-choice. But I didn't get the impression that was the only position. Just that it was hers. Which wasn't surprising given her character. What's typically surprising is when she departs from a kind of secular liberalism. Which was why her being the prophet-like figure was so interesting.
I also don't think that the fight is between religious fundamentalists and lovers of freedom. Note how Rosalynde, who is a liberal, is the one fighting against abortion. And Baltazar, the traitor, is the one being the "lover of freedom." Further the key figure (to me) in it all was Adama who is a pragmatist and playing a very interesting take on the abortion issue one doesn't typically hear in the debates.
Likewise one has to put all of this in the context of the earlier attempted abortion of the Cylon baby where many crew members were fighting against it. Their cry? It's a baby.
hmmm. I see your point. On reflection, I realize my initial reaction was likely wrong.
I still stand by the assertion that the episode was too predictable overall. But it was better than "Black Market."
It was a darn site better than last week's also. In fact I'd say it's the best so far since the break. I was starting to get worried. Most of the episodes since the break didn't exactly excite me too much. I'm pretty interested in next week's take on the show from the Cylon POV.
Jeremy Pierce [Visitor] on March 13, 2006 at 10:15 pm said:
I didn't see any endorsement of any religious attitude in the new show, but that doesn' mean it's endorsing pluralism. Wha seems to be going on is a bunch of people with strong religious roots, who have by and large strayed from them and become secular with lip service to their deities. The faithful are there (Geminon). Some have come to see that there was more to their religion than they had thought, as he prophecies are coming true.
The Cylons are certainly pure and single-minded, but they were modeled on Al Qaeda. Of course, that's all changing now.
Scar was absolutely the worst hour of Galactica ever, including Galactica 1980. I was really mad that I'd stayed up to watch such complete drivel rather than getting some much-needed sleep. The whole episode could have happened in 15 minutes, they could have done some necessary exposition in the right order to fill up some of the rest of the hour, and then the rest of it could have been an interesting A-story to balance out the really lame B-story that was Scar. They really owed us a good episode after that, and the next few were only ok. They finally gave us one with Downloaded, though. That was probably the best hour of Galactica ever.
As for the story arc, there's clearly something they've got in mind that they haven't told, and I really hope it's more than X-Files had. They seemed to make it up as they went along, and it never went anywhere. Once you got past the fourth or fifth season, the conspiracy episodes starting dropping in quality, even when the show got better by breathing new blood into it when Duchovny left. But with BSG, we do have some indication that they're doing at least a whole season's worth at a time. Ideally it would be more than that. It really paid off with Babylon 5's five-year arc that had all been planned out from the beginning (though with some modifications necessary due to cast changes).
As for the negative consequences of monotheism, Moore never said any such thing on his blog. I've been reading his blog from the beginning, and that's been pretty far from anything he's said. He did say that he was modeling the Cylons on Al Qaeda. Where he seems to be taking the Cylons (and where the monotheistic Six and Baltar in each other's heads are going) doesn't seem to be the original terrorist direction anyway, and now we've seen an atheistic Cylon model. Also, Moore has come out admitting that the monotheism of the Cylons and polytheism of the colonials wasn't even his idea to begin with. He wasn't going to bring religion in at all until some higher-up suggested it, and I guess his good experiences with the religious aspects of DS9 attracted him to the idea.
I thought the handling of abortion was fine. They represented Geminon in pretty much the way the pro-life activists handle things in real life. They represented the president as the good secularist pro-choicer she is but who sees a new circumstance justifying a ban on abortion for very different reasons. They didn't seem to me to indicate that any one of the characters involved was in the right, but they did a good job of playing out the moral dilemma someone who had Roslin's views would face in such a situation. If there was any bad guy, it was Baltar, who manipulated Roslin into adopting that position so that he could come out as a the pro-choice good guy. I don't see how that's a negative portrayal of pro-life people and a positive portrayal of pro-choice people. It was an interesting situation with questions that many people would find tough but that would never arise in our current situation.
Ivan Wolfe [Member] on March 14, 2006 at 6:18 pm said:
For those who may stumble across this, Clark Goble picks up some of theses threads and goes in a slightly different direction here.
http://www.libertypages.com/clark/10732.html
Clark Goble [Member] on March 14, 2006 at 6:37 pm said:
I liked Scar. It was the episodes before and after that I thought were dreck and out of character.
Eric Patterson [Visitor] on February 13, 2007 at 9:03 pm said:
Re: Ivan's opening paragraph. I don't believe that Glen Larson has been formally ex-communicated, though I've been to his house many times (in L.A.) and had dinner with him, etc., and I can tell you personally he is LONG GONE from the Church. You couldn't quite call him an ex-Mormon, but you might as well. I didn't find him antagonistic or hostile toward the Church; he could basically care less.
Pingback: New, Improved Battlestar Galactica with restored Mormon-y goodness? | A Soft Answer
Pingback: Episode 38: Der Haifisch in Venedig | Overthinking It
Pingback: Battlestar Galactica and the Lost Ten Tribes | Main Street Plaza
Elizabeth Clark on March 27, 2011 at 2:42 pm said:
I am very much troubled regarding the upcoming election. Considering everything that is occuring in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Middle East (not to mention our own economy) we certainly should demand a skilled leader. I'm convinced that Barack Obama or any of the Republican candidates thus far have the experience or skills necessary to do the job the way it needs to be done. Being president of this country is an astonishingly challenging job. Is there any man or woman out there with the experience, skill, and moral conviction to do the job?
Pingback: TheoFantastique | A meeting place for myth, imagination, and mystery in pop culture.


i need some information for the avoidance of doubt in the evaluation of face-to-face tests.
(1) Who shall win a tie, when momentum and expertise don't determine a winner ?
(2) How big is the momentum of the winner ? Is there a netto momentum, meaning will the suc. of the looser cancel some suc. of the winner ? Or is it really an all or nothing approach ?
I hope for your answer and say thanks in advance.


Former Vice President Justin Malewezi says the current set of Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) is difficult to measure and achieve because they are too general.
Malewezi said this in an interview in Mzuzu on Thursday on the sidelines of a post-2015 regional validation workshop in his capacity as national champion of the post-2015 development agenda.
"We have learnt from the first set of the Millennium Development Goals that there were two main shortcomings. One was that the goals or targets were too general. Therefore, it is very difficult to measure on a generality," Malewezi said.
Malawi is currently consulting on the development targets that would be prepared after 2015, the year the current set of targets has to be achieved, and the Mzuzu consultative meeting was the first of three.
The meeting pulled together a number of stakeholders including District Commissioners, traditional leaders, representative of Civil Society Organisation (CSOs) and religious leaders.
Deputy Minister of Economic Planning and Development Khwauli Msiska said the development of the current targets was done without due consultation, stressing that would be the cause for failure to achieve them.
"Pronouncements were made without proper consultation. That has been realised and it is what we are trying to address under the United Nations arrangement," said Msiska. The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) is coordinating the process and was represented in Mzuzu.


text:
package org.apache.sling.launchpad.karaf.testing;

import java.io.File;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.net.ServerSocket;

import javax.inject.Inject;

import org.apache.karaf.features.BootFinished;
import org.ops4j.pax.exam.Option;
import org.ops4j.pax.exam.karaf.options.LogLevelOption;
import org.ops4j.pax.exam.util.Filter;
import org.osgi.framework.Bundle;
import org.osgi.framework.BundleContext;
import org.osgi.framework.Constants;
import org.osgi.service.cm.Configuration;
import org.osgi.service.cm.ConfigurationAdmin;

import static org.ops4j.pax.exam.CoreOptions.maven;
import static org.ops4j.pax.exam.CoreOptions.mavenBundle;
import static org.ops4j.pax.exam.CoreOptions.options;
import static org.ops4j.pax.exam.CoreOptions.streamBundle;
import static org.ops4j.pax.exam.karaf.options.KarafDistributionOption.editConfigurationFilePut;
import static org.ops4j.pax.exam.karaf.options.KarafDistributionOption.features;
import static org.ops4j.pax.exam.karaf.options.KarafDistributionOption.karafDistributionConfiguration;
import static org.ops4j.pax.exam.karaf.options.KarafDistributionOption.keepRuntimeFolder;
import static org.ops4j.pax.exam.karaf.options.KarafDistributionOption.logLevel;
import static org.ops4j.pax.tinybundles.core.TinyBundles.bundle;

public abstract class KarafTestSupport {

    @Inject
    protected BundleContext bundleContext;

    @Inject
    protected ConfigurationAdmin configurationAdmin;

    @Inject
    @Filter(timeout = 300000)
    BootFinished bootFinished;

    public static final String KARAF_GROUP_ID = "org.apache.karaf";

    public static final String KARAF_ARTIFACT_ID = "apache-karaf";

    public static final String KARAF_NAME = "Apache Karaf";

    public KarafTestSupport() {
    }

    protected synchronized int findFreePort() {
        try {
            final ServerSocket serverSocket = new ServerSocket(0);
            final int port = serverSocket.getLocalPort();
            serverSocket.close();
            return port;
        } catch (Exception e) {
            throw new RuntimeException(e);
        }
    }

    // test support

    protected int httpPort() throws IOException {
        final Configuration configuration = configurationAdmin.getConfiguration("org.ops4j.pax.web");
        return Integer.parseInt(configuration.getProperties().get("org.osgi.service.http.port").toString());
    }

    protected Bundle findBundle(final String symbolicName) {
        for (final Bundle bundle : bundleContext.getBundles()) {
            if (symbolicName.equals(bundle.getSymbolicName())) {
                return bundle;
            }
        }
        return null;
    }

    // configuration support

    protected String karafGroupId() {
        return KARAF_GROUP_ID;
    }

    protected String karafArtifactId() {
        return KARAF_ARTIFACT_ID;
    }

    protected String karafName() {
        return KARAF_NAME;
    }

    protected Option addSlingFeatures(final String... features) {
        return features(maven().groupId("org.apache.sling").artifactId("org.apache.sling.launchpad.karaf-features").type("xml").classifier("features").versionAsInProject(), features);
    }

    protected Option karafTestSupportBundle() {
        return streamBundle(
            bundle()
                .add(KarafTestSupport.class)
                .set(Constants.BUNDLE_MANIFESTVERSION, "2")
                .set(Constants.BUNDLE_SYMBOLICNAME, "org.apache.sling.launchpad.karaf-integration-tests")
                .set(Constants.EXPORT_PACKAGE, "org.apache.sling.launchpad.karaf.testing")
                .set(Constants.IMPORT_PACKAGE, "javax.inject, org.apache.karaf.features, org.ops4j.pax.exam, org.ops4j.pax.exam.options, org.ops4j.pax.exam.util, org.ops4j.pax.tinybundles.core, org.osgi.framework, org.osgi.service.cm")
                .build()
        ).start();
    }

    protected Option[] baseConfiguration() {
        final int rmiRegistryPort = findFreePort();
        final int rmiServerPort = findFreePort();
        final int sshPort = findFreePort();
        final int httpPort = findFreePort();
        return options(
            karafDistributionConfiguration()
                .frameworkUrl(maven().groupId(karafGroupId()).artifactId(karafArtifactId()).versionAsInProject().type("tar.gz"))
                .useDeployFolder(false)
                .name(karafName())
                .unpackDirectory(new File("target/paxexam/" + getClass().getSimpleName())),
            keepRuntimeFolder(),
            logLevel(LogLevelOption.LogLevel.INFO),
            editConfigurationFilePut("etc/org.apache.karaf.features.cfg", "featuresBoot", "(aries-blueprint, bundle, config, deployer, diagnostic, feature, instance, jaas, kar, log, management, package, service, shell, shell-compat, ssh, system, wrap, eventadmin, webconsole, http, http-whiteboard)"),
            editConfigurationFilePut("etc/org.apache.karaf.management.cfg", "rmiRegistryPort", Integer.toString(rmiRegistryPort)),
            editConfigurationFilePut("etc/org.apache.karaf.management.cfg", "rmiServerPort", Integer.toString(rmiServerPort)),
            editConfigurationFilePut("etc/org.apache.karaf.shell.cfg", "sshPort", Integer.toString(sshPort)),
            editConfigurationFilePut("etc/org.ops4j.pax.web.cfg", "org.osgi.service.http.port", Integer.toString(httpPort)),
            mavenBundle().groupId("org.ops4j.pax.tinybundles").artifactId("tinybundles").versionAsInProject(),
            mavenBundle().groupId("biz.aQute.bnd").artifactId("biz.aQute.bndlib").versionAsInProject(),
            karafTestSupportBundle()
        );
    }

}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


The man's body keeps on moving and dancing, even when he is not moving his body's gestures through the strong muscles always suggest movements. For the past few years IB Putu Purwa is indeed enjoying presenting burly male figures that always move and dance with their unique gestures and body language. Purwa is a young artist from Sanur in Bali, restless with the various problems he sees around him. Through these male figures Purwa presents the problems he feels, using body language and gestures showing screams, sadness, fear, hunger for freedom and so on.


text:
Plans, Reports and Statistics
Where to find data
Right to Information and Routine Disclosure
Gifts and Benefits Register
Ministerial Portfolios
Teach, Learn, Live Tasmania
Family Violence and White Ribbon Workplace Accreditation
Australian Early Development Census (AEDC)
Belonging, Being and Becoming
Child and Family Centres
Early Childhood Intervention – ECIS
Launching into Learning – LiL
Aboriginal Education Services
Years 11 and 12
Years 11 and 12 Extension Schools
eLearning Programs
School-based Apprenticeships
School Health Nurse Program
Student Health Initiative
Sustainability Learning Centre
Swimming and Water Safety
Tasmanian eSchool
Supporting Student Need
Educational Adjustments Disability Funding
Quality Learning for All
Assessment Programs
Grandparents and Carers
National School Chaplaincy Program
Packages of Learning
Tas Secondary Colleges RTO
Student Carers
International Full Fee Paying Students
Temporary Resident Program
Student IT Resources
Eduroam WiFi
Canvas Resources
150 Years of Public Education
Education Ambassadors
How You Can Be Involved
Infostream
Partnering with External Organisations
Research in Government Schools
School Associations in Tasmania
Teachers Registration Amendment Bill 2019
Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse
Information about education and training after Year 10 and the increase in the minimum leaving requirements from 2020.
For all Tasmanian education and training providers:
Approved Learning Program: Requirements and Guidance for Youth Engagement in post-Year 10 Education and Training
For parents:
Year 10 Transition Statements and Education and Training After Year 10 – parent fact sheets
New Education and Training Requirements for Year 10 Students – school newsletter article
Anything Can Happen – why staying in education is so important and how many options are available to them.
On 10 July 2017, the Education Act 2016 (passed by Parliament in November 2016) commenced along with the legislative framework of the Education Regulations 2017, Ministerial Instructions and Secretary's Instructions detailing operational matters related to the Education Act:
Education Act 2016
Education Regulations 2017
Ministerial Instructions – apply to all school sectors
Secretary's Instructions – apply to Government Schools only.
This is a significant milestone, as the first time in more than 20 years that Tasmania has an updated Education Act, which provides a strong foundation for improving the education outcomes for all Tasmanians.
The Education Act provides every child and young person in Tasmania with the opportunity to continue to learn and reach their full potential, so they can live fulfilling lives and contribute positively to our community.
The Act is a contemporary and cohesive legislative framework that has been shaped by input from education stakeholders over two years of extensive consultation, including consideration of more than 1 000 responses from three rounds of consultation.
Thank you to everyone who has given their feedback throughout the Education Act Review, the consultation on the draft Bill and the work underway on implementation.
What does the Act mean for Tasmanian schools?
The Act provides schools with an up-to-date legal framework that better supports the high quality teaching and learning in Tasmania's schools, focused on supporting attendance, engagement, retention and attainment of Tasmania's students.
The implementation of the Act is a transitional and ongoing process, commencing on 10 July 2017 and continuing through to 2021.
For Tasmanian Schools, the implementation of the Act will mean that some existing policies and procedures will be updated.
Updated Government School policies and processes for respectful behaviour, student dress code and uniform, attendance and enrolment; including out-of-area enrolment, part-time enrolment of home educated students and dual enrolment for students with disability; have been developed and are now in use.
Information is available to explain the changes and what they mean for schools, parents and students, including updated parent fact sheets.
Work is ongoing towards the review of Government primary and combined school intake areas, with the initial consultation now complete and a further consultation period to occur in 2019, and an updated Government School Levies and Charges Policy supporting universal access to education.
2020 will see further changes come into effect including raising Tasmania's education and training leaving requirements to have Tasmanian students stay in education and training for longer and helping them to achieve a qualification that significant improves their life chances and choices.
2020 will also mark the commencement of Working Together for 3 Year Olds to facilitate the participation in quality pre-school programs for eligible three-year-old children.
The staged implementation and ongoing close consultation with schools, school communities and education stakeholders ensures we meet the needs of Tasmanian learners now and in the future.
To help answer common questions parents have about the implementation of the Education Act, there are Frequently Asked Questions for Parents.
What are the key changes from 10 July 2017?
Daily attendance: With consistent attendance at school being critical to achieving education outcomes and keeping students engaged in learning, there is a new limited set of circumstances in which a student can be authorised not to attend school – All school sectors.
Part-time attendance: To ensure that approval for a student to attend school on a part-time basis is in the best interests of the student and supported by relevant information and evidence, there is an updated process for parents or independent youths to apply for part-time attendance. See the Non-Government School part-time application and Government School part-time application – All school sectors.
Authorised Persons: Schools may nominate 'Authorised Persons' to investigate any suspected unauthorised absence of a student. This continues an existing power for Government Schools that is being extended to Non-Government Schools – All school sectors.
Enrolment:
Flexible enrolment: Recognising that flexible enrolment may be required to support a student's learning outcomes, there are increased and more flexible school enrolment options to facilitate access to schools for:
Part-time enrolment of home educated students as part of their home education program – All school sectors
Dual enrolment for students with disability enrolling at more than one school (both a specialised support school and another school) – All school sectors
Year 13 enrolments – Government Schools.
Exemption from enrolment: To ensure that exemption from attending school is in the best interests of the student and supported by relevant information and evidence, there is an updated process for parents or independent youths to apply for exemption from attending school – All school sectors.
Respectful behaviour to support a safe school environment:
Adult behaviour: To assist in managing adult behaviour in a school context, Principals are able to require an adult volunteer or visitor to leave the school premises or a school activity for unacceptable behaviour for a specified period. Government Schools outline behaviour expectations as part of their policy for school volunteers and visitors – All school sectors.
Suspension:Schools use a range of approaches including providing support to students and only apply behavioural responses that result in time away from school (eg suspension) as a last resort or when necessary to ensure the safety of students and staff at the school. To ensure that education provision is maintained, Government School Principals must arrange and ensure that any student who is suspended is provided with appropriate education during the period of suspension – Government Schools.
Requesting third-party information: To support a child's access to education and support students who may behave in a way that leads to a risk of harm to themselves or others, schools can request information about a student's behaviour from a third-party to enable the development and maintenance of strategies to better support the student – All school sectors.
Secondary education:
Leaving requirements: With evidence clearly demonstrating that students who stay at school have much better employment and life outcomes, students are required to continue to participate in education and training until they complete Year 12, attain a Certificate III, or they turn 17 years of age (whichever occurs first). The minimum leaving age increases to 18 in 2020 – All school sectors.
Year 10 Transition Statement: A Year 10 Transition Statement is issued to show a student has completed their education to Year 10 and has submitted a proposed Learning Program (for Non-Government Schools this is 'Eligible Options', for Government Schools this is a 'Transition Plan') to move into senior secondary or other further education. The statement acknowledges a student's commitment to continue working to reach their education goals with an ongoing education pathway – All school sectors.
Year 12 Completion Certificate: A Year 12 Completion Certificate is issued as formal notification that a student has fulfilled their entitlement to thirteen years of compulsory education. This is an important notification ahead of the increase in the minimum school leaving requirements from 2020. For Government Schools, the Year 12 Completion Certificate will be a letter mailed to students after the last day of Year 12 examinations – All school sectors.
Education Registrar:
Recognising that unauthorised absences of students from attending school can be for many complex reasons, the Office of the Education Registrar has been established to help resolve reasons for children's continued unauthorised non-attendance at school. Schools can refer continued unexplained non-attendance to the Registrar to begin the new compulsory conciliation conference process whereby students, parents and school Principals can discuss and agree what needs to happen to support children attending school – All school sectors.
The Registrar is also responsible for overseeing the registration of Non-Government Schools, working with the Non-Government Schools Registration Board and managing home education registration with advice from the Tasmanian Home Education Advisory Council – Non-Government Schools and home educators.
School Associations:
Recognising the important role that School Associations play in the operation of Government schools, School Associations automatically become incorporated under the Act – Government Schools.
Any School Associations undertaking any restricted activities will need to apply to the Secretary. This includes; employing persons, holding or dealing with property, borrowing or loaning money or entering into contracts of more than $5000. This reflects that under the Act they will have protection from legal liability – Government Schools.
Dress code and Uniform:
Government schools may continue to choose whether they wish to develop a dress code for their students, in addition to having school uniform for Prep to Year 10 students– Government Schools.
Religious education:
Government Schools may continue to provide non-compulsory religious instruction if they choose to. There is no requirement to offer religious instruction and it must not be compulsory. Schools will require parents to notify the Principal in writing whether or not their child is to attend and they may withdraw at any time – Government Schools.
What are the future Education Act changes?
From 2020, thirteen years of compulsory schooling (from Prep to Year 12).
From 2020, raising the education and training leaving requirements so that students must participate in education and training until they complete Year 12, attain a Certificate III, or they turn 18 years of age (whichever occurs first).
From 2020, the exemption from the requirement to participate in education and training for employment increases from 25 hours an week to 35 hours a week.
The Working Together for 3 Year Olds initiative will be available for eligible children with the greatest need, with access being guided by a set of criteria to include children who are three years old by 1 January in any year from 2020 (i.e. the year before Kindergarten)
Government School Intake Areas (home areas) to be determined by the Department of Education Secretary and published on a five year basis. Schools will be consulted on proposed changes to intake area boundaries. Enrolments from outside a school's intake area will continue where there is ability to take further enrolments at the school.
Education Act Implementation Project
An Education Act Implementation Project Team is supporting a change management, staged transition with ongoing consultation and support being provided to schools and areas impacted by the policy changes under the Act.
There will be regular updates on implementation of the Act and if you have any questions or feedback, contact edact@education.tas.gov.au
Proceed to Policy Library
The Department of Education is responsible for government education from the early years through to Year 12 as well as adult learning (Libraries Tasmania).
Address : GPO Box 169 Hobart TAS 7001
Email : ServiceCentre@education.tas.gov.au
Explore the Department
DoE Legislation
Staff Intranet [secure internal site]
Great Start – Early Years Site
Libraries Tasmania
Infostream Education Notices
Office of the Education Registrar
Office of Tasmanian Assessment, Standards & Certification
Teachers Registration Board of Tasmania

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Q: How do I install the Windows 7 boot loader? I have 2 hard disks, on first I have installed win xp. I boot into xp and run setup of win7 and installed it on second hard disk. Now the problem is that win7 bootloader is installed on first harddisk, so if I remove the first harddisk, I cannot boot into win7.
How I can move / install bootloader of win7 on second hard disk?

A: Let's try automatic installation and if that doesn't work there is also a manual installation method;
 you may have problems with drive letter allocations after this, but that's not too bad to deal with.

*

*Boot from the Windows 7 Installation Medium.

*Click on Repair your computer or press ALT+R.

*Click on Startup Repair or press ENTER, let it repair and restart your computer.

*Don't forget to remove the installation medium.
If this doesn't work, try a manual installation (replace C: by your drive, X: by the medium):

*

*Boot from the Windows 7 Installation Medium.

*Click on Repair your computer or press ALT+R.

*Click on Command Prompt or press SHIFT+F10.

*Let's fix the Main Boot Record and place the Boot Sector back, enter this:
bootrec.exe /fixmbr
X:\boot\bootsect.exe /nt60 all /force

*Then ask it (nicely!) to try and rebuild your BCD data from scratch, enter this:
xcopy C:\boot\bcd C:\windows\justInCase /v /e /h /k /r /o /x /y
del C:\boot\bcd
bootrec.exe /rebuildbcd

*If you're lucky, this'll work and you'll see a message telling you everything went OK.

*Reboot your PC by closing all the dialogs, or enter this:
shutdown -r -t 0

*Don't forget to remove the installation medium.

*If you need to recover the BCD due to failure, repeat steps 1 - 3 and enter this:
xcopy C:\windows\justInCase C:\boot\bcd /v /e /h /k /r /o /x /y

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


AutoCAD is a good 2D drafting package. If you're going to learn to use a 3D package (Inventor, Solidworks, Pro-E, etc...) you need to learn the basics first.
I have heard that Comet Mcnaught is going to be brighter than expected.
How does using a filter make more light visible (Prominences are not visible in normal white light)? Are they blocked out by the intensity of the disk?
It doesn't. What the filter does is transmit (most of) the light emitted by the prominences, whilst absorbing or reflecting (almost all of) the light in the sky background - which is very bright indeed close to the sun.
hi,could you tell me if right ascention(ra) 0hrs starts in the northern sky throughout the year and does it move.


It's no secret that it's not always easy to get workers compensation settlements. Some cases are open-and-shut. Some employers' insurance companies don't fight you every step of the way. But even when everything goes smoothly, you may still have some surprises in store.
Whether your disability is partial or total, temporary or permanent.
How much time you have lost from work, day by day, hour by hour.
The sum total of all your related medical bills, which means it's critical to keep track of all your paperwork.
Whether you're willing to accept a lump-sum settlement or structured payments.
Pain and suffering, for yourself and your family.
You don't have to accept the first amount offered to you, but consider this: If negotiations fail and you proceed to litigation, there's a chance the judge won't see things your way and you'll wind up with nothing.
One of the stipulations of accepting working compensation settlements is often giving up the right to seek further compensation for the same injury later, if the symptoms linger.
If you're deep into the process and are worried that your employer hasn't offered any kind of a settlement at all, it may not be because they're hedging their bets or digging in their heels. Depending on what state you're in, there may be regulations that stipulate exactly when a settlement can be offered, and you simply haven't reached that point yet.
As mentioned above, once all parties involved agree on workers compensation settlements and have signed on the dotted line, you can't come back later and ask for additional money, even if you need more treatment for the same injury.
Make sure your case is done right the first time with a professional from the Law Offices of Pat Maloney. Contact us today.
Third-party insurance policies are something few people think about. It's something you'll be grateful to have — or wish you had — when something happens and you understand why they're necessary.
Home or other property insurance.
Third-party insurance policies are purchased by an individual (first party) from an insurance company (second party) to protect against the legal actions filed against you by someone else (third party) (definitions courtesy of Business Dictionary). A more familiar term for "third-party insurance" is liability insurance.
Employment practices insurance, which covers claims such as wrongful termination.
Homeowners and auto insurance policies generally contain elements of both first- and third-party policies.
What you know about third-party insurance policies can help you — and what you don't know can definitely hurt you.
You (the first party) are financially responsible for your own damages, which means if someone slips and falls on your property and you hurt your back helping them up, you still have to pay for your own treatment as you normally would. And it won't prevent the other person from filing a liability claim against you.
Even if you're not at fault in a car accident, you can be held liable. In this case, the liability part of your insurance policy can be invaluable.
Bodily injury coverage, which is required in all 50 states, protects you from financial ruin if you're found liable in an accident. This covers costs such as medical bills, loss of income, and legal costs.
In a car accident, third-party insurance also covers damage to property other than cars, such as trees, fences, or even buildings.
Do you rent your home or apartment? You still need a third-party insurance policy to cover the cost of your belongings if the dwelling is damaged or destroyed by events like fires or storms. It can also kick in if a visitor to your rented home is hurt while they're there.
There's usually a limit to how much a third-party insurance policy will pay, so it's important to read and fully understand it. You're on the hook for whatever the policy doesn't pay out.
Don't be caught unprepared and uninformed. We can ensure your third-party insurance company lives up to its obligations. Contact us today.
When the fault of the accident is contested. If the other driver or their insurance company does not admit or accept fault, you need someone to fight this battle for you in court. There is too much at stake for you to try to do it alone.
When you have paid a substantial amount of money out-of-pocket. If your medical expenses and loss of income begins to eat into your savings significantly, it is time to consult an attorney. An attorney can help speed along your case and prevent your losses from mounting further.
When you want to use an alternative dispute resolution method. An attorney can handle negotiations with the insurance company and the other party/parties involved in the accident. Your attorney can try to get a settlement for you without having to go through the courts or put you through any additional mental or emotional strain.
When you don't have more time to invest in settling your claim. If you have missed time from work, you are probably already out a substantial amount of money and simply cannot afford to spend any more time in court. If you turn your case over to an attorney, they can handle all the details so you can concentrate on life.
No one ever wants to be in a car accident. It is at best a nuisance and at worst a life-altering event. Having a San Antonio accident attorney on your side can help ease some of the distress you are experiencing. For more information, contact the Law Offices of Pat Maloney at (210) 226-8888.
An attorney can answer all of your questions. The period immediately following a construction accident can be a time of great confusion and uncertainty. At times like these, it is great to have someone you can trust that can answer your questions.
Injury attorneys can handle the insurance companies. While you are out of work recovering from your injuries, dealing with insurance is one of the least pleasant yet most critical chores. Your attorney can take care of these interactions on your behalf.
Attorneys can negotiate settlements. After an accident, recovering from your injuries and coping with emotional stress are first and foremost in your mind. When the time comes to settle your injury claim, your attorney will be the one negotiating the best settlement for you. They know what is realistic and fair.
Your attorney is your advocate. They will be by your side every step of the way. Filling out paperwork, making phone calls to insurance companies, and handling legal matters are just some of the ways your attorney advocates for you. Ultimately, they are your main ally, and will guide you through the difficult process.
Hiring a Texas construction accident attorney may be one of the best decisions you make. You will need someone on your side during this tumultuous period, someone who knows the ins and outs of the legal system. Your attorney is on your side! For more information, contact the Law Offices of Pat Maloney at (210) 226-8888.
Accidents happen every day and they can be devastating, not only physically, but also emotionally. If you or someone you know has been injured in an accident, it is important for you to be aware of your legal rights. Hiring a San Antonio Personal Injury Lawyer, it is arguably the best decision that can be made in handling your case.
1. Personal injury lawyers have built their practice on these types of cases, and they can tell you from the beginning whether to pursue legal action. If you are unlikely to win your case, an attorney will tell you beforehand, thus saving you time and expenses.
2. Usually, attorneys work with a team that has experience and expertise in specialized areas. The investigative team can spend the time and resources on your case that most people cannot afford to spend by themselves.
3. Lengthy and complicated trials are often not necessary to resolve a case. Having a lawyer handling your case opens up the possibility of an alternative dispute resolution (ADR).
4. Some San Antonio personal injury lawyers work on a contingency basis and do not collect any fees unless your case is won. However, without an attorney, you are responsible for certain expenses that are not related to attorney services (such as medical bills).
5. Attorneys are used to working directly with insurance companies, so they are more adept at understanding the workings of insurance corporations and will not be confused by their tactics nor will they feel pressured to settle for a less than satisfactory sum.
6. The desired result of a personal injury case is a settlement that will leave the injured person in a better position financially. Personal injury lawyers are especially skilled at negotiating the best settlements possible on behalf of their clients.
These are just some of the many benefits of hiring a San Antonio personal injury lawyer. If you are interested in more information, feel free to contact our offices at 210-226-8888 or by clicking here.
1. Don't admit fault. Never, ever, ever say "sorry," "oops," "my bad," or anything else that could be interpreted as you taking the blame. If you're implicated at all in causing the accident, it could significantly lower the car wreck settlement you can be awarded or, in some cases, it could negate it altogether. In which case, you'd end up footing the bill for a wreck you didn't really cause!
2. Don't give a recorded statement. After you've been in an accident, you will likely be contacted by representatives of the other driver's insurance company. They'll want to discuss the wreck with you, get your side of the story and, often, get a recorded statement from you. Ultimately, they are looking for you to slip up. They want to catch you in a lie, making an error, or doing something else that could prove you an unreliable witness. If they're successful, your settlement will be affected negatively.
3. Don't go it alone. A lawyer is crucial to getting a favorable car wreck settlement. They can gather evidence, file appropriate paperwork, and advise you on any statements to the insurance company. In fact, they can even handle all insurance communication altogether! In the end, this leads to a more successful claim and settlement.
4. Don't accept the first offer you get. Insurance companies don't want to pay out. In most cases, your first settlement offer is going to be a low-ball one. It won't be enough to cover your damages or hospital bills. Always run settlement offers by your lawyer before accepting them. They'll be able to ensure they're an adequate amount for your wreck.
5. Don't use their recommended service providers. Many insurance companies will try to force you to use their car repair shops, doctors, and other service providers. Little do you know, they have relationships with these providers, and they'll give you inaccurate or low-ball estimates in order to save the insurance company money. Always use your own providers – ones you know and trust.
Want a favorable car wreck settlement? Avoid these 5 don'ts and call an attorney at the Law Offices of Pat Maloney today!
If you're in an accident with an 18 wheeler, it's absolutely imperative you hire an attorney as soon as possible. These large trucks are often owned by freight companies and large corporations, and they typically have high-powered lawyers on their side. Those lawyers may attempt to pin the blame on you, so their employers don't have to cover your medical bills, car damages and other expenses. If you wantto stand a chance of fighting back and getting the money you're due, you'll need to hire an 18 wheeler accident lawyerfast.
1. Look at past case results. For any 18 wheeler accident lawyer you're considering, always ask to see their most recent case results. Be sure that the attorney you choose has a record of winning truck accident cases.
2. Check customer reviews. Take a look at online review sites and make sure past customers have been satisfied with the attorney's work before you hire them. If you can't find any reviews, ask the attorney if they can give you contact info for a past client, so you can ask about their experience yourself.
3. Meet them in person. Always meet a lawyer in person before you decide to hire them. Make sure the two of you communicate well, and that they seem ready and willing to take on the job.
4. Check their credentials. Do a quick background search and learn a little about the attorney. How much experience do they have? Where did they go to school? What is their Martindale-Hubbell rating? These can all give you insight into their abilities as a lawyer.
Need a reliable 18 wheeler accident lawyer? Then contact the Law Offices of Pat Maloney today. Our experienced team of attorneys can help.


A DIVISION OF " FRISKIES FOUNDATION (PVT) LTD"
Naturopathy is a drugless system of medicine evolved since ages. Naturopathy began with the beginning of life on earth. Its root lie in the five great elements of Nature: Earth,Water,Fire, Air and Ether. Naturopathy believes our body to be constituted of these five great elements and therfore treatment in Naturopathy comprises a holistic approach using each of these five elements.
Naturopathy is a great science of holistic healing in accordance to the principles of nature. In short naturopathy is a way of life , it is a discipline rather than a medicine.
Being an ancient system of healing it has the potential of healing the most hazardous ailments of modern era like Obesity, Diabetes Mellitus, Bronchial asthma, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Chronic pain syndromes(Fibromyalgia), Depression, headaches, Osteoarthritis and so on. All of the above diseases occur due to wrong lifestyle, lack of activity and over stress. Naturopathy aims at treating these disorders from its roots employing its holistic methodology. It has proved to be very beneficial in these diseases. However there is no sufficient documented evidence to support this statement, which calls for rigorous research in this subject.
Keeping this in mind, here we are to help you with the most authentic literature on Naturopathy which makes it more rational. Hereby you will find several reserach papers on different subjects of Naturopathy, also this site will guide you towards the methodology to be followed during carrying out a research project in Naturopathy.
Welcome to this versatile world of naturopathy research. We are here to help you find the most advanced perspectives of naturopathy research.


Innovative designs, a StS® shortened lift technology with a factor 6 gas jack that allows the arms Hospital-acquired infections are a real public health problem. There are nowadays in France, about 10,000 deaths per year of these infections contracted at the hospital. They represent a very heavy burden for society, from a human, economic and social point of view. As a result, medical computer trolleys have been designed to be disinfected in their totality and disinfection takes only a very short time for the hygienist (less than 10 minutes).
WHY KEEP THE SAFE SURFACES?
* Pathogenic microorganisms that enter the premises can survive on surfaces for long periods of time. periods of time.
* Microorganisms that settle on surfaces can then be transmitted to the hands.
* The germs of the hands can spread by contact, and be transmitted to other people and cause an infection.
* Clean or disinfect surfaces to reduce the risk of cross-contamination.
* Clean water may become contaminated if its container is not clean.
1. Chlorine-based (10% max solution) - Chlorox, Novalsan, etc.
2. Formaldehyde base - 37% formaldehyde solution, Vinco Formaldegen, etc.
3. Glutaraldehyde-based stock - Aldacide 200, Lysofume, Wavicide, etc.
4. Phenol stock base - Lysol IC, many, Magna Clean, Tek-Trol, etc.
5. Alcohol Based - CaviCide, Isopropyl Alcohol, Medicide (POL-0.3), etc.
6. Oxidants - Hydrogen Peroxide Solution 3%, VikronS, Lifegard series, etc.
7. Ammonium quaternaries - Roccal-D, Bacto-Sep, Ascend, Parvosol, etc.


text:
Olszanka (biał. Альшанка, ros. Ольшанка) – wieś na Białorusi, w obwodzie brzeskim, w rejonie pińskim w sielsowiecie Porzecze.

Według spisu ludności, 1 stycznia 1998 r. w miejscowości było 79 gospodarstw domowych i 145 mieszkańców. Olszanka leży 39 km od Pińska i 19 km od drogi republikańskiej R6 (Iwacewicze – Pińsk – Stolin).

Historia
 wieś wzmiankowana w 1495 r.
 koniec XVIII w. - posiadłość Skirmuntów, h. Przyjaciel;
 wieś królewska położona była w końcu XVIII wieku w starostwie niegrodowym łohiszyńskim w powiecie pińskim województwa brzeskolitewskiego.
 po III rozbiorze Polski w granicach Imperium Rosyjskiego (ziemie zabrane) - gmina Porzecze, powiat piński guberni mińskiej;
 w okresie międzywojennym w gminie Porzecze, w powiecie pińskim województwa poleskiego II RP;
 1928 r. w ramach reformy rolnej dokonano częściowej parcelacji gruntów;
 II wojnie światowej w granicach ZSRR: Białoruska Socjalistyczna Republika Radziecka;
 od 1991 r. w niepodległej Białorusi.

Charakterystyczne obiekty
 pomnik mieszkańców poległych w okresie wielkiej wojny ojczyźnianej

Linki zewnętrzne

 Pogoda w Olszance

Przypisy

Wsie w rejonie pińskim
Wsie królewskie I Rzeczypospolitej (województwo brzeskolitewskie)

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


The UNC Cancer Network is pleased to announce that Jon Powell has accepted the permanent role of Continuing Education Specialist, as of May 8, 2018. Jon served as Interim Continuing Education Specialist from December 2017 to May 8, 2018. His qualifications and hard work led him to earning the position on a permanent basis.
Jon will be directing many of the activities associated with professional education and North Carolina community college education. He comes to us from Campbell University, where he was an adjunct instructor. Jon's background includes experience with teaching at several institutions of higher education (including UNC at Chapel Hill) as well as project management and computer technology in the advertising and marketing sector. Jon is deeply committed to the field of education, and is excited about the opportunity he has to play a pivotal role in the education lectures. Jon reports to Tim Poe, Telehealth Director, and is located at ITS Manning. We are confident that Jon will be an excellent match for this position and a strong asset to the UNC Cancer Network. Jon will be located in ITS Manning, Room #3300 and can be reached at jonpowell@unc.edu.
Congratulations Jon! We are thrilled that you are a part of our team!
On May 15, 2018, the UNC Cancer Network Telehealth Team utilized some of their Community Service Leave to volunteer as a group at the Ronald McDonald House in Chapel Hill, NC. The Ronald McDonald House offers a variety of volunteer opportunities, encompassing everything from working directly with staff, providing dinner every night , and brunch on the weekends, light and deep cleaning, house repairs, outreach, planning events, providing a day of support, and administrative support around the office.
After going on a brief tour of the house, Caitlinn LaScala, Family Room and Volunteer Services Manager, provided a list of household tasks. The team worked in groups of two and vigorously cleaned the kitchen and library. They also organized the pantry, scrubbed baseboards, vacuumed, meticulously cleaned windows, sanitized tables, highchairs, and toys. "Volunteering at the Ronald McDonald House was an eye-opening experience. What the staff does, on a daily basis, to help families in need is incredible. It felt great assisting with whatever was needed, and being in such a warm and compassionate environment. We were honored to help in any way, "said Mary King, Operations Coordinator.
Special thanks to the Ronald McDonald House for their hospitality and for what they do for families in need of a soft place to land.