text:
Episode 366 -Ticket to a Shower
In this episode of Awesome Etiquette
Welcome to Awesome Etiquette, where we explore modern etiquette through the lens of consideration, respect and honesty. On today's show we take your questions on the use of Dr. as a title in a formal invitation, appropriate neighborhood gossip, covid and weddings and kids, and a Jack'n Jill you purchase tickets to. For Awesome Etiquette Sustaining members your question is about sharing emergencies with your family. Plus your most excellent feedback, etiquette salute and a postscript where we conclude our interview with the author of Manners Will Take You Where Brains and Money Won't, Donald James.
Episode 366 transcript (AI generated)
Speaker 1: maybe it's just that you don't know how to use social, could you see that's old fashioned,
Speaker 1: Watch how busy post and then post to act as host and hostess. They know that courtesy means showing respect, thinking of the other person. Real friendliness.
Speaker 1: Hello and welcome to awesome etiquette where we explore modern etiquette through the lens of consideration, respect and honesty on today. Shall we take your questions on the use of doctor as a title and formal invitations, appropriate neighborhood gossip coded and weddings and kids and a jack and Jill you purchased tickets to for awesome etiquette sustaining members. Our question of the week is about sharing emergencies with your family plus your most excellent feedback etiquette salute and a post script. That's a continuation of our interview with etiquette author Donald James all that's coming up
Speaker 1: awesome etiquette comes to you from the studios of our home offices in Vermont and is proud to be produced by the Emily Post Institute. I'm lizzie post and I'm damn post sending because I got to tell you, I feel like such a dork. I'm really excited.
Speaker 1: Oh, I know all seasons. I was gonna say football season is starting this. Yeah, it's just like a hint of normal. I just feel like there's a routine, a fantasy football routine that's been part of my life for almost 20 years now and
Speaker 1: to have some version of that normalcy happening again. Just, it feels like a lifeline to me at the moment. I'm really enjoying it. I feel you on that. I'm actually going to go to the to the patriots Saints game on the 26 so I'm very excited. I know like talk about normalcy crowd, stadium,
Speaker 1: football live. I can't wait. I know Caravanning.
Speaker 1: I know it's, I'm really looking forward. I'm pretty, I'm pretty certain it was mentioned that we have like,
Speaker 1: I mean they're not like on the field tickets, but it's something like a front row type situation. So I'm very excited. First trip to Gillette stadium first. Yes, I believe so. I don't think the other team myself play was in Gillette. So yeah, I think so. But that will be fun. Still jealous. You had a bit of a return to normal this last weekend
Speaker 1: I want to share. Yeah, I do because it's also in some ways can act as a salute. Um, I got to go to a labor Day weekend getaway at my like one of my favorite places in the world. Martha's vineyard,
Speaker 1: family friends that I grew up with down there. Um their youngest daughter, I was same age as their middle son,
Speaker 1: but their youngest daughter invited me and a bunch of her other friends to come down and we stayed at both her parents house who lived down there all year round. So the parents were there and I'm very close with them. So it was like extra bonus to get to see them and then her sister's house was available and so half the crew stayed at the sister's house and half the crew stayed here with the parents and
Speaker 1: it was incredible. None of us had met each other before. We were all friends with Margo, that was our hostess and I feel like it was a love fest, like everybody fell in love with everybody, like we were all telling Margo how much we loved all the other people on the trip
Speaker 1: and how everyone was so incredible and that this was like the Best friends weekend getaway, anyone had been on,
Speaker 1: we did dan, we did so many things you're gonna love, we went to a big, big dinner out in town the first night, which was really fun dress up dinner. I did, I did, I did my hair and makeup and I wore some fancy pants
Speaker 1: um and an address top and we, we all went out and we did actually, one of the things that was pretty cool about this was that
Speaker 1: this wasn't just an adult's getaway. We had two kids, one of the gentlemen on the trip had two kids with us and they were
Speaker 1: so fun and so well behaved. It was like, you wouldn't want to do this weekend again without them, you know what I mean? Which I think is pretty incredible when you think about adults usually want to have like an adult's weekend and having them, there was incredible, but they came out to the big fancy dinner
Speaker 1: and then the next day we had a beach club day, so chappie beach club where they filmed a lot of jaws,
Speaker 1: but we got to go to go to the beach club for the day and we built sandcastles and swim in the water and then we did a big low country boil that night and we put lobsters and potatoes and clams and sausages and um sorry, sonny shaking in the background,
Speaker 1: what else was in there, said potato corn all into a big pot and let it cook away, and then we laid out newspaper down on the outdoor table, dumped the whole thing on the table, Everybody was just diving, eat whatever you want.
Speaker 1: It was incredible, you know, that, that is like one of my favorite ways to eat, like all hands, all mess, like let's just, let's just enjoy it, lots of seafood, lots of seafood, it was so good.
Speaker 1: Um oh my gosh, the lobster tails came out so like the, there were a couple, a couple clouds weren't quite cooked, but like the lobster tails were all outstanding. It was, it was just so delicious.
Speaker 1: And then the next day we went out to my beach out at our farm on the vineyard and it was
Speaker 1: glorious. We had this big, we, we went to a general store and bought like wiffle ball and bat and a football and Frisbees and a bunch of sandcastle making stuff, so there were more sand castles, there were multiple rounds of whiffle ball that we're all still talking about in our group chat right now.
Speaker 1: It was just a blast, We all went swimming. It was even though it was like kind of a cloudy day at the beach, it was still just an epic beach day
Speaker 1: and then we followed it up, I believe that night now I'm starting to get my days confused by tim, the father of the family of the household has a, you know, projector and an outdoor theater screen and so we called it Norton street all season theater and we watched jaws altogether and did kind of like a pizza and wings night
Speaker 1: and then the next day a lot was monday and a lot of people were headed home, so those that stayed just kind of did like some mexican takeout for dinner and had like a chill evening, but it was,
Speaker 1: it was such a perfect
Speaker 1: weekend, it was like, it was such a perfect weekend because it was so many points of etiquette to be had. Every single person there offered to do things like help pay for the food. We had a Venmo moment where one person paid the bill at the restaurant and then I don't have Venmo, but other ever, like a lot of other people did, I know right, a lot of other people did, so you know, I made sure to get cash at the a t m the next morning and gave it to the person who paid everything and
Speaker 1: um, a lot of people did, you know did their vencemos and wrote cheeky jokey things as to what they were enrolling people back for was in charge of the schedule. So the host guest here here, it's a great, great thing Margo, our hostess like ultimate hostess
Speaker 1: was really in charge of the schedule but she was wonderfully flexible. There were a number of things that we propose that we didn't do. There was like a, their family is part of the yacht club and there's this sailing race where um I can't remember, I think the theme, if the theme is to dress your boat like a movie and their boat was pink. So we were thinking things like legally blonde, pretty in pink, you know all these different movies that we might be able to do, but we just ended up not going to that. So
Speaker 1: there was like a flexibility around things,
Speaker 1: but for the most part everyone would kind of hear an idea and cheer for it basically. It was like, oh low country boil, that sounds delicious for dinner, oh day out at Baha gonna, yeah, we'd all love a day out at the farm beach, you know,
Speaker 1: and so it was really fun, it was flexible, it felt like there were always options and you never had to commit to anything. Like I mean just
Speaker 1: talk about an a plus hostess and that's that's what I told my parents, I was like Man, Margo really brought together the most amazing guest list along with it, we, it was, it was such a good, I'm going to take care of you but let you do your own thing too.
Speaker 1: And I've got to say her parents are just like that. I really think she learned it from watching her parents and just from this is who she is.
Speaker 1: Her mom for instance, I was one of the people who stayed monday night and her mom knew that she was going out to dinner and I was still staying at her house.
Speaker 1: So she had had made some offers to arrange things for me to do for dinner if I didn't want to just be on my own or if I didn't already have plans with the other couple of people who stayed monday night too.
Speaker 1: And that was really wonderful. If you could just see left right and center
Speaker 1: how easily these folks handle hosting and taking care of people and making them feel welcome. Everyone was offered rides to and from the airport or the ferry. I was blown away at the generosity of how can we help make your comings and goings for this trip so easy.
Speaker 1: It was really, I mean I can't describe it other than like a plus hosting on all fronts and a plus guesting to like I said, people were offering to clean up, they were offering to pitch in, they were, you know tossing each other money whenever they could because they knew someone else had bought them something. It was going with the flow to, you know, when the whole group says let's go to the beach. If you know, if someone didn't want to, they could have easily said, well hang back, but instead everyone came,
Speaker 1: it was just really, really an a plus weekend will definitely go down in my memory.
Speaker 1: I definitely feel like your host gets an early in the show and it gets salute. Oh yes, yes. No Margo Putnam Delaney and her parents tim Delaney and Kate Putnam both or all three. Excuse me get just huge kudos as amazing, excellent hosts.
Speaker 1: They always have been and it was great to be in a weekend where it really like it was just shining left, right and center. Well you came back like a kid who just went to summer camp and had the best time ever and has decided they never want to
Speaker 1: not be there ever again. No, it's really true. I like one of the, one of the women on the trip Melin. She and I became like instant best buds. Like we just, she said, I took one look at you and was like, I'm gonna like this girl and I was like, oh my God, as soon as I got in the car was like, she's really cool awesome. You know, it was like everyone was saying things like that about each other and he really did come away feeling like you had like, you know, 10 new best friends.
Speaker 1: Um, and I frankly I need that, I'm very alone as you know, up in, up in this corner of the world and even though I've got my family and stuff, the socializing with peers, people my age, it's a little bit harder. Things have still been really quiet on that front here in Vermont
Speaker 1: and uh, as we were headed into fall and winter as you know, august hit and I was starting to feel down like, oh my gosh, the chance to socialize is ending soon
Speaker 1: as we all hunker down in hibernate and this just made me feel like, nah, there's life and living out there, there's a big old world, it's gonna be just fine. Anyway, it was absolutely like I said a plus weekend and I couldn't be more grateful. I'm really hoping this crew all gets together again.
Speaker 1: I'm so glad that you did decide to come back with the pose because
Speaker 1: the work goes on at Emily Post. I do, I have to come away from vacation at some point, don't I?
Speaker 1: I won't make too big a deal of it, but we do have some questions to get to, we do, let's do it, let's do it,
Speaker 1: awesome etiquette is here to answer your questions. You can email them to awesome etiquette at Emily Post dot com leave a voicemail or text at 802858 kind that's 8028585463 or reach us on social media
Speaker 1: on twitter. We are at Emily post inst on instagram we are at Emily Post institute and on facebook were awesome etiquette.
Speaker 1: Just use the hashtag awesome etiquette with your social media posts so that we know you want your question on the show.
Speaker 1: Our first question is about traditional invitations.
Speaker 1: Hello doing outer and inner envelopes for my very formal encore wedding invitations hashtag Covid Bride.
Speaker 1: The following guest outranks her husband for the outer envelope.
Speaker 1: Dr Christina Suzanne New and mr Chandler David knew
Speaker 1: is this correct?
Speaker 1: Do you write out her full name even though she took her husband's name
Speaker 1: for the inner envelope.
Speaker 1: Dr new and mr new, is this correct? Or would it be dr and mr new. Thank you Cameron Core dan. You know, we love a good technical question. It always forces us to look into the books.
Speaker 1: I feel like when I look at this and I see that outer envelope listed dr Christina. Suzanne New and mr Chandler David knew
Speaker 1: that looks correct to me. If you're choosing to use middle names, the adjustment I personally would probably make to it would be to remove the middle names and have it be dr Christina new and mr Chandler new
Speaker 1: but you do list her name first and you list her name in full in connection with her last name. Whether it is the same as her husband's or not.
Speaker 1: And that's that's sort of been so far the tradition with doctors
Speaker 1: when it comes to the inner envelope.
Speaker 1: This is where I start to get a little bit more like I often think of this as a more casual space. For instance on my sister's formal invitations. The outer envelope read mrs Patricia, see Colby, my grandmother's name. Full name.
Speaker 1: And then the inner envelope, red granny pat.
Speaker 1: So it's often a place where you would get more familiar. One of the things that I think would be really helpful in this particular case is to just double check that Christina Suzanne New actually uses doctor as a social title. I think that's a that's a really nice courtesy to give to doctors is to ask them whether they want to use their title socially.
Speaker 1: And that might also help you distinguish whether or not you would go a little more casual on that inner envelope or not.
Speaker 1: I'm curious about the difference between dr new and Mr new and dr and Mr new.
Speaker 1: My instinct would be to keep the titles
Speaker 1: separate and to use them each with a last name. Not to combine them dr and mr new but what is your thought on that lizzie. I agree with you and I regret that I don't have a hard and fast rule or reason for it other than I think it's just more commonly done this way.
Speaker 1: But I'm with you. I would rather see that inner envelope
Speaker 1: be reflected. Either the same as the outer envelope. So dr Christina new and mr Chandler new or the inner envelope might read the new. Now this is where this last name example gets a little tough, the inner envelope might read the news, the N E W. S meaning this is the couple. Um if Children were invited the news family would be another way to do that
Speaker 1: but I am with you I'd probably not go on the inner envelope either Doctor knew and mr new or dr and mr new.
Speaker 1: So for you it's more about whether or not you even use titles than how you're going to order them or whether it's
Speaker 1: title gets its own last name right? And I will say that typically when you've got a hetero couple and the woman is a doctor you tend to really try to separate her out and so the doing the doctor and mr new to me doesn't seem like the right, it doesn't instinctually feel like the right way to go
Speaker 1: if you were going to do this version that's been suggested for the inner envelope of
Speaker 1: only the last name and the title. I would lean towards the doctor knew and mr new but I personally wouldn't even do that. I would say you know Christina and Chandler or the news as we said before,
Speaker 1: I would try to find some way to make it a little bit more familiar on the inner envelope. Makes sense to me so glad, so glad
Speaker 1: Cameron, thank you so much for the question and congratulations on your wedding. We hope that even as a covid bride, it is an amazing smashing success everywhere you go. Your manners are with you
Speaker 1: and they leave their mark.
Speaker 1: They help you
Speaker 2: feel sure of
Speaker 1: yourself too and they make an impression on people on everyone you meet.
Speaker 1: Our next question is intriguingly titled, good gossip, verse gossip,
Speaker 1: dear lizzie and dan. I have a wonderful next door neighbor, Miss Eleanor.
Speaker 1: She has unfortunately had some health problems in recent years. Her adult sons who live out of state regularly alert me if she has been hospitalist so that I can visit her
Speaker 1: during one of her hospitalizations? Another neighbor caught me while I was walking the dog and asked about Miss Eleanor.
Speaker 1: I tried to give a vague answer, but he point blank asked me if she was in the hospital.
Speaker 1: I was caught off guard by the direct question and replied in the affirmative.
Speaker 1: Afterwards, I felt regret for doing so. This is someone else's personal health information which they may or may not want disclosed. I resolved to do better.
Speaker 1: It happened again this week
Speaker 1: while I initially gave general answers in the end, he pinned me down with another direct question. Clearly I need a better game plan. Do you have suggestions for some guidelines or a sample script. Would it be best to reply? You should reach out to her and ask. I appreciate any assistance you can provide. Best jenny.
Speaker 1: Oh, jenny, thank you so much for this question. There is so much going on here and I want to talk about all of it.
Speaker 1: I feel like there is a lot of classic etiquette in this question and I don't think it's one that we've addressed on this show before. So
Speaker 1: even though this is a very difficult situation, thank you for sharing it with us because it gives us a chance to talk about some things that are important dan. This is a really great question because in a lot of ways and we talk about this in some of our books, there's this sort of
Speaker 1: good gossip that happens when neighbors and family and friends let each other know when someone is going through a hard time, but it's such a delicate gray area. It is, it isn't a hard and fast line of exactly what you can say and exactly what you can't say. And it's why I, I almost think dan that jenny answered the question for us at the very end when she says you should reach out to her and ask because I think that is the best pivot point whenever you start to feel uncomfortable about being asked about someone else's life, no matter the topic,
Speaker 1: you know, oh boy, I know I'm helping her out right now, but you should, you should reach out and ask
Speaker 1: or you should reach out and get the story straight from her just so that you get it from the horse's mouth, so to speak from, from the direct person.
Speaker 1: And I think when we read that sentence, I was like, oh she nailed it, she nailed it.
Speaker 1: It's really hard though when you're in the spot, isn't it? No. And and one of the things that we know can be so helpful when you are on the spot is having a bottom line, having an escape hatch, having that sample script already and a little direction,
Speaker 1: reminding someone that if they're curious, they can always go to the source I think is
Speaker 1: the classic floor for any question about gossip, good or bad and
Speaker 1: what your ultimate parameters are. I was sort of proud of myself, I had an idea for another little sandwich. What have you got? What have you got could potentially come across less as saying, this is some action you should take and might bring the focus back on you a little bit.
Speaker 1: You can say something like, you know, I should really check before I say more o or I should really check before I say clapping, clapping, audience clapped. This is such a good sample script. You know, I should really check before I say more, I'm not comfortable answering all the questions I should, I should ask first before I do. I think that is brilliant because brilliant, lets you
Speaker 1: stop. If you've already started to walk down the path a little bit and you're starting to think that maybe you've gone too far or you can use it early on, but it's a sample script that takes the focus off them, keeps it on you. And
Speaker 1: also is a reminder that there's things that are private and that you probably shouldn't share unless you're
Speaker 1: pretty sure that it's okay. I wanted to take a great big
Speaker 1: reset and I wish we could sample in the sound of a tape deck rewinding really quickly. But I was also thinking about a general practice of when you get information like this, asking if it's okay to share or who it's okay to share with or how much you can share.
Speaker 1: Because if you've got that in your pocket, then you can be that agent of good that you were talking about at the start of this question. It might be
Speaker 1: really helpful for out of state family to have
Speaker 1: an ambassador on the street downtown who can let the church community No. Or the neighborhood No. Or whatever the group is, that might be supportive at a difficult time. And getting that word out
Speaker 1: is part of the way we support each other and help each other even when that word isn't
Speaker 1: good news. Absolutely. I know that in our hard Times chapter of the 20th edition, we make that specific suggestion of when you do find out difficult, hard or sometimes even interesting and wonderful news
Speaker 1: that it is really important to ask. Are we sharing? Am I allowed to share it with other people yet?
Speaker 1: I've certainly on both of your kids, I asked, I was like, are we, you know, you, you told me right away, but I would have asked, you know, are we sharing it? Is it, can I tell my family? Should I be the person telling them? Or do you all want to be the person telling them? And it does make such a big difference. It's also such a wonderful moment of being considered when you're the person who receives that question of could I share it with other people? You just think, oh wow, that is so nice that they asked first. You know, even if the answer is yes, of course, it's so nice that they asked for it because I think you have just nailed this question, you can't see it. But I'm taking about you should be the other end of this, make you should be, you should be had a final thought was I wanna just
Speaker 1: encourage jenny or say
Speaker 1: don't worry too much about it. I don't think those regrets need to haunt you. This is a judgment call decision and people make them all the time and I think
Speaker 1: you do your best. You think about the nature of the situation and sometimes you make a call, you don't know, you haven't asked ahead of time. But
Speaker 1: you know, this isn't that serious health issue. It's something that is connected to this other person. The curiosity is, is genuine. It might even, it might even result in them getting left a plate of cookies or something. It's not salacious gossip. You're not sharing negative news just for the thrill of it.
Speaker 1: Those are the places that people often times get in real trouble and
Speaker 1: it doesn't sound like you're in that kind of a situation here. So I also just wanted to say
Speaker 1: these are minor infractions, they're important things to think about. They can be really serious, but
Speaker 1: don't beat yourself up too much jenny. Big salute to you for being a person, a neighbor who can step in and give both the family and Miss Eleanor comfort during a difficult time and for being the type of thoughtful person who wonders How much should I how much should I share?
Speaker 1: Really, really, really great, great etiquette moments all across the board
Speaker 1: and we certainly hope that our answer helps.
Speaker 1: Now the gossip began to spread Bill Ellis colored it a little more and passed it on. Then Christine manners took over.
Speaker 1: Yes, gossip spreads like wildfire, especially with the help of girls like Christine and by the end of the day the harm was done jeans reputation was ruined.
Speaker 1: Our next question is a mathematical title. Covid plus weddings plus kids equals question mark, solve for X. Dear lizzie and dan before I get to my question, let me first congratulate lizzie on the new Emily post wedding etiquette book. My copy just arrived yesterday
Speaker 1: and second thank you and your whole team for the podcast.
Speaker 1: I started listening two years ago when a senior member of my organization recommended the podcast to our staff of about 500 people as we were embarking on a very stressful merger.
Speaker 1: I feel that you have helped me become more at ease, respectful and considerate, not only in my professional life but in my personal life as well.
Speaker 1: In short, I feel like you to have helped me become a better person and I can't say how grateful I am for this gift.
Speaker 1: Okay. Now for my question,
Speaker 1: I recently became engaged and my partner and I are now proceeding with the myriad wedding planning tasks and decisions.
Speaker 1: We are wondering how to approach the age old question of inviting younger Children with a newer twist related to COVID-19 safety and consideration for other guests.
Speaker 1: I have been distressed about this for weeks because most of my out of town adult cousins and many guests have Children that range from infants to 18 years. So by not inviting Children, we would potentially be putting a considerable burden on those guests who are parents of younger Children since attending the wedding would mean securing child care for the event and or the whole weekend.
Speaker 1: I worry that this would not sit well with my cousins and friends who all had Children at their weddings. In fact I was one of those Children for some of my older cousins.
Speaker 1: However, my partner and I are also very concerned about the health and safety of our other older guests who are at a greater risk of serious complications from COVID-19. Should they become sick?
Speaker 1: For some background? We lost my uncle last year to the disease and a close family member recently fell ill from a breakthrough infection even after being fully vaccinated.
Speaker 1: So I tend to err on the side of caution
Speaker 1: The idea that my wedding of 100 guests would become a covid super spreader event and lead to the illness or worse of a loved one frankly terrifies me.
Speaker 1: Would we be able to say that Children under age 12 who are not yet eligible for vaccination may not attend?
Speaker 1: It may be worth noting that our indoor only venue requires proof of vaccination or a negative COVID-19 tests to enter the building.
Speaker 1: Do you have recommendations for sample language? We might include on the wedding invitation
Speaker 1: or website to convey our preference to keep this as an adult only ceremony and reception
Speaker 1: and any tips on how to communicate the part about the requirement for vaccination or negative test.
Speaker 1: Again, let me _ how happy and relieved I feel to have the 2021 wedding etiquette book to help guide me through the rest of the wedding process.
Speaker 1: Kind regards fretting Fiance, fretting Fiance, I hope, I hope we can take the fretting out of out of that closure by the end of this. And I want to thank you for your kind words about the wedding etiquette book. Uh it came out a number of years ago and it was co authored with my sister anna Post and it's I actually had a very similar feeling recently about that book. I've started rereading it
Speaker 1: in order to prepare for doing our online wedding program for wedding professionals
Speaker 1: and that I read the very first section of that book and I put it down called dan and I said dan, we have such a good book. It was so well done.
Speaker 1: That was the best call as he post. You just called me up really happy with some work that was out there and it has been out there for help. Yeah, like I will put the full credit in my mother and my sisters shoulders. I was tacked onto that book project at the last minute. I was not
Speaker 1: um in the trenches, so to speak on it. So credit, credit where credit is due. But when I read it, I was just like, oh my gosh, as we prepare to maybe rewrite this book, I can't, I like I'm thinking I can't write this any better. This is a great book. So anyway, thank you for enjoying that title and letting us talk about it for a second.
Speaker 1: There are lots of things to consider in your question and the big overarching one that I love reminding couples about is that it's your day
Speaker 1: and you really do get to set the guest list the way you want and need to. And that's an important thing to remember. We talk in that edition uh, in the wedding etiquette book, the sixth edition about how it is perfectly ok to set age limits on Children. And that means there will be some families who are divided. They have a
Speaker 1: 13 year old and they have a 10 year old. The 13 year old could come the 10 year old couldn't
Speaker 1: I? Was that child? I was kept away from my, my aunt's wedding and my sister was a flower girl in it. And it's just a reality of sometimes how things are when it comes to weddings. I tend to think that your considerations about making sure you're adhering to the venues requirements
Speaker 1: is a good idea.
Speaker 1: While I understand that, that means that under 12 because they cannot be vaccinated, they might be able to just do the COVID tests. I could see for a family who's already experienced a loss that this is just a little scarier and you might take it a little even
Speaker 1: I don't want to say more seriously because I don't want to put down anyone who's also still taking it seriously. But doing this version of it, I would say that just people who are choosing to be extra cautious about it, I think it's fine for you to go the route of no Children under 12.
Speaker 1: I do think dan that communication then becomes key
Speaker 1: and we talk a lot about the invitation is kind of a, I don't want to call it sacred but a sacred place where you, you don't put too much direction other than just inviting the people to the event, letting them know that they are welcome to come, that you would be honored by their presence. And I think that that is really important. So I would not put adults only or only over 12 on the invitation. I would be certain that the invitations that go out state very clearly the exact members of the family who are invited. I might even very specific, I might even do something like, like let's say we have a split household of Children of age groups. I might send an invitation to the parents with their names on it
Speaker 1: and then send a second invitation
Speaker 1: to the Children who are coming who are being invited. And just, I know it sounds harsh and these things might be things you follow up with a phone call to let people know, hey, I know that that we've done a dividing line, there is a reason for it and we're trying to adhere to both our venue and our own sense of safety.
Speaker 1: We really hope
Speaker 1: that you will be able to come in any way that you can and we understand if you're not able to make it due to the restrictions we have to place on our event. And I think that communicating that verbally, especially to anyone who would be particularly sensitive to it is a very thoughtful way to go.
Speaker 1: I think that putting it on your wedding website, making sure that it gets spread via word of mouth, you know, encourage cousins to talk to each other, encourage aunts and uncles to make it clear with their adult Children who's invited and who's not. I think those are big helpful things when you're navigating something that's,
Speaker 1: that's a little delicate and a little complicated
Speaker 1: and is important and it's a very practical consideration. So the idea that someone would
Speaker 1: encounter a section of a wedding website that is about covid considerations or covid planning is something that people are
Speaker 1: expecting. If not it's something that people are ready for. If not expecting. At this point, I would even cause go so far as to title that section, please read in my head. I want it to be must read, but we're trying to be polite. So I think like a please read before making your plans where your spelling out that the venues requiring proof of vaccination or proof of a negative covid test
Speaker 1: Where you're, you know, re mentioning that due to the situation and people under 12 not being able to be vaccinated. We are making 12 are cut off and saying in that moment on the website that you are sad that this leaves out some people, but you had to make a couple of tough decisions. And this was one of them.
Speaker 1: I think a lot of people are very understanding at this time that this is a really tough thing to figure out and coordinate and and make happen. And it's all supposed to be in support of
Speaker 1: a really wonderful event. I don't want that to get lost either in all of the planning and all the care around making sure that it's a safe wedding. You want people to still feel excited. You still want to feel excited.
Speaker 1: And I think that the way that you choose to talk about it and the way that you choose to communicate with your guests can can help keep that spirit alive, even as you're delivering kind of tight restrictions,
Speaker 1: lizzie post, do you think there's any room here for
Speaker 1: this type of information to go on that
Speaker 1: insert that we talk about going with the invitation. I know it's a line, it's not on the invitation with it. It's a layer to back in the envelope. I think that that's actually another really great place to put it again, it's not on the invitation itself, but it's either on the packet that follows the invitation. You know, once someone has said they're coming or if you're not doing that type of a packet, then it does get included with the invitation, but never on the invitation. And I think that is a great idea. You want to catch people at as many points as you can and always as politely as you can, I'll confess for me the trick here got in how much explaining to do because in my head I said to myself, it's totally fine amount of kids at a wedding, you can make that choice. It's a choice a lot of people make.
Speaker 1: And
Speaker 1: as I read the question, I started to realize that
Speaker 1: even though it's a not uncommon choice that in this situation are fretting fiance is making it for a different reason. We're having, you know, kids wedding, but it's the covid thing and actually really would love to be there and love to have your kids there. And I remember good times when I was there
Speaker 1: and I don't know how much of that you need to get into that you might want to keep the focus on the important information that you're sharing and let those word of mouth conversations be the place where you can
Speaker 1: get into that fine tuning where you share more of your thoughts and feelings about the whole situation. Absolutely
Speaker 1: fretting fiance. We hope we are able to change your status. Too excited. Happy jubilant fiance. And we truly hope that your wedding is both a wonderful and safe event
Speaker 2: this
Speaker 1: year.
Speaker 1: Our next question is titled Jack and Jill shower with tickets. Hello dan and lizzie. I have a question about an upcoming Jack and Jill. My past dance teacher is getting married. I'm so excited for her and she has been through a lot over the years and he seems simply wonderful.
Speaker 1: We don't get to see each other often, but we follow each other on social media where we are both active and often comment or like each other's postings this past week, she posted an invite on her social media page to her 1200-plus followers inviting them
Speaker 1: to their Jack and Jill In a few weeks,
Speaker 1: tickets will be sold for this event where there will be food, drink games and raffles in a local park. I'm not close enough to or to be on the wedding invite list by any means, but I would consider buying a ticket to the Jack and Jill to support and visit with them before the wedding.
Speaker 1: My question is this when a Jack and Jill involves buying tickets to the event and most likely buying raffle tickets at the event is a shower gift still expected and if so, should it be brought to the event or mailed to their home.
Speaker 1: Thank you for all your great etiquette advice over the years and especially during this past year and a half of new challenges to be navigated, best wishes to you both.
Speaker 1: Friendly acquaintance,
Speaker 1: friendly acquaintance. Thank you so much for the question. I'm going to bow out now. I have no idea what's going on anymore. The world is turned upside down. It's on its head and it's spinning. You need, you need some smelling salts because thanks some other people might do. I thought showers were small,
Speaker 1: relatively intimate events for friends and family to shower a guest of honor with gifts. So the gift flow goes that direction and
Speaker 1: to be invited,
Speaker 1: you pretty much have to for for a wedding shower be invited to the main event. Also, it's um
Speaker 1: pretty, pretty standard in my etiquette calculations that all of those things fall into line and maybe I'm misunderstanding because there's something being called a Jack and Jill, which I'm used to that being a jack and Jill shower. So twist on a tradition where both members of the couple being married attend the wedding shower.
Speaker 1: Help me out here.
Speaker 1: I have to tell you because the, the, the only way that I know about this particular type of Jack and Jill is because I was knocked over with a feather when a reporter told me that this is actually, I don't want to say fair, fairly common, but it is a regional practice
Speaker 1: and the Jack and Jill is, it's a party that the community, like it's really funny. The couple hosts the party, but the community is invited for the purpose of doing things like buying tickets, buying raffles and
Speaker 1: basically helping to fund the wedding and it was, I remember the first time I heard it, I was like that's, that's so not like it is so not what I'm familiar with as being a polite thing to do.
Speaker 1: But it turns out that there are some really wonderful communities out there where this has become a tradition
Speaker 1: and so much like much like I feel like a shower of the old days where you might not have been invited to the wedding, but all the people in the bride's town would get together to make sure she had enough things for her Trousseau or her dowry or whatever. The legends of how showers became, there's a couple different stories of them. But
Speaker 1: it reminds me a bit of that where those people probably weren't people who ended up at the actual service and and ceremony and reception afterwards.
Speaker 1: But they wanted to see this person celebrated well at this point. And so if this is something your community does participate and feel confident participating, this does not need to be labeled were different tacky grab for gifts. Any of the above. If this is how your community celebrates
Speaker 1: a couple that they really want to send off. Well, it often happens this way. I am going to use this moment to cause to say if you are part of a community that does this, will you please write into us and give us as many details about how these go down and where the good etiquette and we're the bad etiquette would be, were being asked by friendly acquaintance
Speaker 1: do I bring a gift? And I'm just gonna say, you can always bring a gift to a celebration
Speaker 1: whether it gets opened. Whether or not everyone else is bringing gives us a different matter. If no one else is bringing gift, you might give your gift a little more quietly on the side. Um, but you can always give someone a gift. It's never gonna be, I think a bad thing to give a gift. I'm sure we could find some situation, but it's, I don't think this is it.
Speaker 1: And that being said, I love the fact that this is something that you could participate in to support this person that you've cared about. And you still keep in touch with, as you say, as a friendly acquaintance overtime, lizzie, thank you for explaining that. And also thank you for going back to core principles. I appreciate the broad thinking about where a shower comes from, the purpose that it serves and you making that connection to the idea of community support for people who are going through important transitional times. And
Speaker 1: I'm seeing much more clearly that shower connection, even though the form,
Speaker 1: he is quite different and
Speaker 1: could be confusing. And I think for me that's where the etiquette would start to pop up, start to bubble up where the streams might get crossed
Speaker 1: that moment that I had that moment that you said you had, when you first got exposed to this type of thing. Well, and I had the same moment you do where I'm used to a Jack and Jill being a type of shower you do. And obviously in this case Jack and Jill for hetero couple, it would be that your, you know, both the men and the women are invited and everybody is going to be at the shower. You and pooch for instance. Well
Speaker 1: wait for your wedding. Did you guys have a Jack and Jill shower? No, we did. It was so much fun. You did know because it's for the baby was for the baby and baby. It's not really called a Jack and Jill shower, but the phrase Jack and Jill, I had only ever associated with weddings in that particular context to mean that men and women would both be at the party
Speaker 1: and I think most showers now a days are all gender inclusive and it's just kind of the style that the particular person being honored whether it's a baby shower, whether it's a wedding shower wants to experience. I had a ton of fun at the, it was, it was an all girls shower for puja. It was an absolute blast and we also had a really great time, anna's all girls shower. And so there have been some, some fun ones like that, but I'm a fan of opening it up to everybody, but that is not what this party is the Jack and Jill in this case refers specifically to this big community event where you just as it's written here, you buy raffle tickets, you buy tickets to the event and it all goes towards helping the couple.
Speaker 1: But yeah, I I still just want to put the call out here to anyone who experiences this particular type of Jack and Jill
Speaker 1: and to help us learn the etiquette around it.
Speaker 1: Friendly acquaintance. Your final question was about delivery of the gift and I would say think practically about it, bring it with you, look for a good opportunity, but if there's not an obvious place to receive it or a chance to connect with the couple,
Speaker 1: I think sending it directly as a way to be sure that it gets to them. Absolutely friendly acquaintance. We hope this event is awesome and that you have a lot of fun at it and thank you so much for giving us the opportunity to explore this particular type of Jack and Jill.
Speaker 1: Mm
Speaker 1: thank you for your questions. Please send us updates or feedback on our answers to awesome etiquette at Emily Post dot com. You can leave us a voicemail or text at 802858 kind. That's 8028585463. You can also reach us on social media on twitter. We are at Emily post inst
Speaker 1: on instagram, we are at Emily Post Institute
Speaker 1: and on facebook. We are awesome etiquette. Just use the hashtag awesome etiquette with your posts so that we know you want your question on the show.
Speaker 1: Yeah,
Speaker 1: if you love awesome etiquette, please consider becoming a sustaining member by visiting us at patreon dot com slash awesome etiquette. You'll get an ad free version of the show and access to bonus questions and content plus you'll feel great knowing that you helped keep awesome etiquette on the air and to those of you who are already sustaining members,
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for your support. Every time we see a new sustaining member or someone up their membership from like a $1 to a $5 dan and I do happy dances, we skip around, we get so excited so we just want to say thank you so much for bringing that into our lives.
Speaker 1: It's time for our feedback segment where we hear from you about the questions we answer in the topics we cover and today we have feedback from Shannon. Hey dan and lizzie just wanted to send a quick note with some feedback on episode 3 62 last name, Nuisance.
Speaker 1: I am so glad this question was asked on the show. I like your question, asked her also decided to keep my given name instead of taking my husband's family name.
Speaker 1: One idea, we had to communicate this to everyone at our wedding was to have our DJ announce us as we'd like to be addressed when we re joined our guests at the reception.
Speaker 1: When it came time for us to enter the hall, the DJ simply announced. Now for the first time as a married couple, the newlyweds, his full name and my full name or perhaps your officiant could also do this following the ceremony. It won't cover everyone of course, but we thought it was a great way to make it known.
Speaker 1: Also, just a word
Speaker 1: to a fellow bride. You will get asked the question plenty of times. So I wouldn't feel the need to correct someone directly unless someone has made the mistake multiple times. They will get it eventually through word of mouth from family members or friends. They will notice when you don't change your name on facebook or when you send out greeting cards and thank you notes.
Speaker 1: It's still a very normal assumption to make for heterosexual couples. But
Speaker 1: I think the one thing we can do to change the norm is actually to make a point of asking other women how they want to be addressed? I very much appreciate being asked in this way. How would you like us to address you when you are married as opposed to? So will you be taking johnny's last name?
Speaker 1: The difference in tone here made me feel like my choice was honored and respected.
Speaker 1: Ps I also love the idea of putting it on your wedding website. Great solution, all the best Shannon
Speaker 1: Shannon. Thank you so much for that feedback. We couldn't agree more. And it is so great to hear from someone who is living example of it. Thank you for sending us your thoughts and updates. Please please keep them coming. You can send us your feedback or update two awesome medicated Emily post dot com or leave us a voicemail or text message at 802858 K. I. N. D. That's 8028585463.
Speaker 1: It's time for our post group segment where we dive deeper into a topic of etiquette and today we're going to continue dan's interview with etiquette author and Nasa scientist Donald James,
Speaker 1: His new book manners will take you where brains and money won't is excellent. And if you haven't already listened to episode 3 65 with the first half of the interview,
Speaker 1: we highly recommend going back and giving a listen dan take us away.
Speaker 1: There's another concept in this book that I really loved that, I was hoping you would maybe talk about a little bit with us. And
Speaker 1: While I connected with the pink suits concept in a very personal way. Um when you talked about three mies, I found myself
Speaker 1: both connecting to it in a personal way, but also being really interested as someone who has written about etiquette and does a lot of thinking about
Speaker 1: human relationships and using human relationships as a measure for
Speaker 1: identifying good behaviors or as a way to
Speaker 1: decide what's the right thing to do or what you want to do in a given situation.
Speaker 1: And it can get really complicated when you're thinking about yourself through the lens of others.
Speaker 1: Could you help us out with that? Could you help me out with that and talk a little bit about the three knees?
Speaker 2: I have to confess. I'm like, oh, I hope he doesn't ask about the three meals because I tell you I have to reread that because it's really a challenging thing even for me to follow. But let me try.
Speaker 2: This came out of a Nasa training, you know, I'm a training junkie as I wrote about in the book, I took every training known to mankind, both inside and outside of Nasa and this is a training class and
Speaker 2: the invitation was with respect to understanding the three different mies, a kind of live in your world was
Speaker 2: what is it that you think other people think about you essentially. And so you write down all these characteristics and qualities and
Speaker 2: then
Speaker 2: uh, you had to write down your opinions about other people. So you actually got to collect and it was all anonymous, You didn't know who wrote what, but you got to see
Speaker 2: what other people said about you
Speaker 2: and what's interesting is that when you compare what you thought other people thought about you versus what they actually thought about you often it was different. It wasn't it wasn't really aligned. And so what did that tell me? So, first of all, told me that the narrative in my head about gee, I wonder what you know damn thinks about me, wonder what am I think, you know, what is really what I think about myself. And so so the trick is to really realize that you are assigning a narrative about yourself that may not be accurate. And I feel that the importance of getting that
Speaker 2: is to liberate yourself from this notion of what other people think about you. Like, you know, you know, in the book I wrote about, you know, Mama's rules, right? And one of her rules was what other people think about you is none of your business.
Speaker 2: And most people, when they talk about Mama's rules to me, they mentioned that one as the one that lands the most impactful lee to them, that they that that one really sticks
Speaker 2: because we are often paralyzed in our consideration about whether people think. And so
Speaker 2: the exercise is designed to point out that oftentimes you don't really have it, right? And more importantly, why does it even matter? You know, why why does it even matter? So this?
Speaker 2: I feel this is the pathway to authenticity where you can feel much more comfortable in your own skin with who you are because you're not
Speaker 2: overly sense about what other people are going to think now
Speaker 1: the challenge
Speaker 2: is that if you're in a professional environment, that's not an excuse to be ignorant of your manner in a professional environment because you think, well, since I don't care what they think,
Speaker 2: I'm just going to wear torn jeans and a tight I shirt to the formal dinner, because I just feel more comfortable in that
Speaker 2: that may be okay as long as you are also aware that
Speaker 2: people are going to think about what you're wearing and it may create a narrative in their head that could impact you late, Iran. So it's kind of a that this is why this is difficult because it's subtle, it's and it's and it's a gray area, but it can be very freeing because when you're with somebody who, you know, feels very authentic and very genuine and very comfortable in their skin, that can be very attractive. I mean, it's kind of like that, even if you don't particularly care for who they are, he said, well, he's his own man or is his own woman, that's what it is. So,
Speaker 2: you know, it's it's just recognizing what your mind is doing to you, I suppose, you know, your mind, you know, thinks you're a certain way and your mind thinks other people think a certain way and it turns out there it may not really be true. So, I, like I said, I literally go back and I reread that section to see if I can come up with a better way of
Speaker 2: articulating not only what that is, but why it's important. So, I challenge your readers and your listeners to go to that section and then maybe they can email me and tell me better what it means and how it affects them.
Speaker 1: Oh, do not sell yourself sure. You did a really good job with it. The
Speaker 1: the question of our perception and the limits of it and
Speaker 2: the
Speaker 1: unfortunate reality that we need to manage ourselves based on those limited perceptions is
Speaker 1: is something that great philosophers have spent many, many gallons of ink trying to describe, talk about, explain and figure out.
Speaker 1: It's it's really not easy. And I think that you did a really good job of
Speaker 1: keeping the focus appropriate for an etiquette book, which is on the implications for the way we manage our own
Speaker 2: behavior
Speaker 1: and very specifically the implications that
Speaker 1: our assumptions about what other people are thinking may or may not be true. And that while it's the best information that we have to go with, it's really up to us to use it
Speaker 1: in the best way that we can to moderate our own bank.
Speaker 2: I will add that one of the benefits of understanding that, you know, what other people's narratives are about. You may not be what you think they are,
Speaker 2: Is that in certain situations it could be catastrophic. So let me just give you an example, your listeners don't know this, but I'm African-American 64 years old. And as many of your listeners know, there's
Speaker 2: been a thing in our culture, in our society about what happens when black people are pulled over by
Speaker 2: police officers particularly who are caucasian. So let's say that I'm pulled over and I've got this narrative in my head that oh my God, this is a white cop and he thinks that I'm this kind of a person or that kind of a person.
Speaker 2: So I may construct this whole narrative about what the cop thinks about me, even though he doesn't know me
Speaker 2: right, we never met before, but I'm thinking that he's analyzing a situation, this is a black man and here's his car and this is what he was doing and whatever it is.
Speaker 2: So if I am so sure about what he thinks about me, even though he doesn't know me, it might cause me to behave in a way that may not go well.
Speaker 2: And so it's important to really understand the dynamic that's actually happening because it's just like when I'm walking down the street and I write about this in the book and I may come across a woman who then takes a glance at me and clutches her purse because you know, she might be afraid that I'm gonna steal her purse or whatever it is.
Speaker 2: I mean, I know
Speaker 2: that if the person knew who I was. You know, she might ask me out and say, let's go to dinner, You're a cool guy. But she doesn't know that she just
Speaker 2: makes up information based on what little data that she has and it causes her behaviour to reflect that. So I think the importance of getting this right is to understand how this can play out because how you respond is a manners matter. It's your manner, your manner is going to reveal
Speaker 2: the truth about what you're thinking and doing. And that could cause you to have a bad day.
Speaker 2: It's why black parents have the so called talk with their Children, especially their sons. The talk is this is how you keep yourself from getting killed when you encounter a policeman or somebody else who may not look at you as an individual, but look at you as a black person. That's what the talk is about. And if you ask any black
Speaker 2: man who has a son or a daughter and said, you know what this thing is about the talk, they'll say, oh yeah, you know, it's just not something that's talked about a lot, but it's true
Speaker 1: and it's complicated
Speaker 1: and about. The only thing that I can imagine that's more difficult than trying to wrap your head around it is
Speaker 1: the idea of trying to explain it to a young person. And that is another place where I
Speaker 2: I think
Speaker 1: that you're writing is just so successful. There is a quality throughout this book of
Speaker 1: parental wisdom being passed on and I know for you it's very direct. This book references your mother and all that she taught you.
Speaker 1: that information is then presented through the lens of your life experience applying
Speaker 1: those lessons. And
Speaker 1: I just think that you've done a really nice job of
Speaker 1: communicating that transference of wisdom. But
Speaker 1: doing it into a context that that is uh sort of definitional or or a metaphor for so many people for the future.
Speaker 1: It really does feel like in
Speaker 1: so many ways that your mother is really the heart of this book or is really at the heart of this book.
Speaker 2: I truly believe that I truly believe that that was true. It saved me and helped me.
Speaker 2: And so when I reflected on my career and you know, when I was asked a question by the young man and the talk that I write about who said, you know, well how would you advise yourself if you were my age and knowing what you know now that's why I talked about the importance of manners. I said, I think
Speaker 2: that made the biggest difference in the world. Now, that's not an excuse not to be good at what you're doing. As I say in the book, you know, you have to know how to fly the plane, right? American Airlines didn't hire my brother to be a pilot because he had good manners,
Speaker 2: right? He they hired him because he knew how to fly a plane.
Speaker 2: Exactly. But as my brother would say
Speaker 2: having great manners can be the tie breaker and he knows clearly pilots who applied for jobs who didn't get it because of how they showed up in the interview. So you can't just rely on your good manners to do certain jobs and have certain skills. But as I say also
Speaker 2: being smart isn't good enough right? Everybody in Nasa smart, right? You know I kind of snuck in, I got lucky but you can't go around that everybody is smart. You know, they got advanced degrees, I've got a lot of experience but being smart is not good enough.
Speaker 1: So speaking of smarts and smarts not being enough in life, you use a really interesting example of
Speaker 1: students deciding what kind of classes to take whether or not to take ap college level credit classes in high school as a way to examine questions about honesty and authenticity and
Speaker 2: right.
Speaker 1: It was kind of surprising advice for me to hear from someone talking about parental guidance and the significant lessons one can get from parental guidance. And
Speaker 1: I think superficially it was surprising advice but fundamentally it was really good advice because it addresses something that that lizzie and I both think is so important. In fact, fundamentally important to good etiquette which is honesty,
Speaker 2: I appreciate this part because I feel that if
Speaker 2: people can understand this and and then look at their own behaviors and manners accordingly that it's going to make a huge difference. You know, the reason I raised the connection with a PS and advanced placement, I have nothing against advanced placement classes, you know, in and of itself.
Speaker 2: But what I have come to appreciate from talking to many students and parents, particularly in my previous capacity at Nasa, which was running Nasa's education program,
Speaker 2: is that
Speaker 2: they were often
Speaker 2: desired as a way to get something else. You know, they were trying to,
Speaker 2: you know, spice up there, you know, academic resume because that, you know, it was going to look good for the admissions officers and colleges and things like that. And so, you know, I've been troubled by that because I felt that although I appreciate, you know, efforts that people take to get into colleges they want. I didn't feel that
Speaker 2: a lot of it was done authentically meaning that the person genuinely was interested in the topic and wanted to learn it. That's why I wrote about, well what happens if, you know,
Speaker 2: your classes didn't have Ap or honors. It was just, you know, chemistry 101 to 02 and all that stuff versus an option to take an honors Chemistry, you know, which would you choose right? And so if you choose the honors one and your reason as well because that's gonna look better,
Speaker 2: then it feels a little bit like pretending and feels a little bit like inauthentic not because you're generally interested in it.
Speaker 2: And we know what has happened with the extent to which students and parents will go to, to quote game the system. And we, and I talked about this where we saw in the news about, you know, the parents who,
Speaker 2: you know, were arrested because somehow they manipulated the system to get into schools and things like that. And so, you know, I just wanted to raise the question, I mean, if you're, you know, if you're in the middle of a crisis and you have to get medical care, I mean, do you really want your doctor to have gotten to where he or she is? Because they figured out how to gain the system to get there? And it turns out that they really didn't
Speaker 2: fully grasp the topic and the subject at hand because they genuinely loved it and now they're really good at what they do. So,
Speaker 2: you know, it causes a question about that. So, um, and I'm sure there's checks and balances to prevent that. I'm not saying that, you know, there are a lot of doctors to do that, but it's a concern that I have. And so
Speaker 2: I would like
Speaker 2: the pursuit of
Speaker 1: any study
Speaker 2: any element that you're interested in to be based on a genuine interest in in the topic. I'll give you a very deeply personal example, we talked about at the outset when you asked me about, you know, my title, you know, I do not have
Speaker 1: a PhD.
Speaker 2: Um I had an opportunity to get one based on the fellowship that I had received and I chose to start working instead
Speaker 2: and I said, well I'll go get one later if I wanted to. And then later in life when I started feeling like I was regretting not getting a PhD because many of my colleagues have doctorates and and I thought,
Speaker 2: you know, I should just go do this. But I realized that I would be doing it for the wrong reasons. I didn't have a genuine
Speaker 2: topic of interest that I wanted to pursue that. I was thinking about getting a doctorate just to be able to say that I got a doctorate just to be able to say I put that in my title. And so that would be an example of doing something that was not authentic because I was trying to look important,
Speaker 2: you know, because I did that as contrasted with writing the manners book, many people, I'm sure write books because they just like the idea of being an author and all of that. I know that I wrote this because after I answered that young man's question about how would I advise myself
Speaker 2: if I can go back in time knowing what I know now
Speaker 2: that this book is the longer answer to that question. My mission in life, my passion, our students and their transformative development for it. I and I I live that I have a lot of young mentees. Um, you know, my own Children have probably are sick of me, you know, uh things that I talked about and do, but they're they're really good. So I this is really what's important to me. So
Speaker 2: this book was
Speaker 2: emanated from my authentic desire to share what I think I've learned, even if I may be wrong. You know, this is not a work of scholarship or even if people disagree or they have different points of view, it is who I am and what I believe in. So
Speaker 2: that's a distinction for me personally about
Speaker 2: considering something to do, getting a doctorate that would be inauthentic because I was just trying to check a box versus something that I'm genuinely interested in. So I know that when I'm around people that I feel are authentically who they are, that they're not pretending to be someone else, are not putting on an act,
Speaker 2: right? You know, there I've interviewed a lot of people and I feel like many times people coming to the interview and they have this act called, I'm gonna be a great interviewer act and I and I appreciate that they do all the little things that, you know, we learned in interviewing one on one and all of that, but I often wonder whether or not when they
Speaker 2: leave the interview room
Speaker 2: are they the same person? Like, is that who I'm gonna see when we hire them in their at work every day? Um and so that's what I'm yearning for is that sense of
Speaker 2: authenticity and presence. The presence part of that, which I really learned a lot from Amy Cuddy who was from the Harvard business school and her work in this is
Speaker 2: that
Speaker 2: they're with me, they're just they're present their their connected. Um
Speaker 2: you know,
Speaker 1: the only way I can explain
Speaker 2: this is that I tell people that you know, when I talk on the phone with people,
Speaker 2: I don't do anything else. I sit down and I talked to people on the phone. Whereas my spouse, she can do three or four other things, you know, she's got her airpods on, she's working in the kitchen, she's reading a text and you know the conversation may be good and maybe affection and all that stuff. I can't do that because I feel so committed
Speaker 2: to being present for the conversation and the person
Speaker 2: that I have to sit down and and and block everything else out. So when I'm with somebody who I feel is present with me, even in conversations, you know, their eyes and their body language all says to me for this time in this moment I am with you and your what matters to me
Speaker 2: just gives me a
Speaker 1: profound sense of
Speaker 2: connection to that person.
Speaker 2: And so that's why I wrote the chapter in that is to invite people to look at how they can have a profound sense of connection with other people as not only a gift to them, but as a gift to yourself.
Speaker 1: I don't think I could do or say anything to wrap up our time together any better than that.
Speaker 1: Your passion for this material and you're the depth of your understanding really come through both in your writing and in talking to you. Thank you so much for writing this book and for spending a little bit of time with us today. I hope that we can
Speaker 1: rope you into coming back sometime and maybe answering some listener questions with lizzie and I
Speaker 2: thank you any time
Speaker 2: I would love to. This is
Speaker 2: I believe this is important work or our planet and for people and this is,
Speaker 2: I'll dare say it like this. I think the work that we're doing collectively really is the secret sauce for the
Speaker 2: you know, the improvement of the human condition. I honestly believe that um and I think it starts with our manners and um you guys have done incredible work in this area and
Speaker 2: um I hope to just be another voice, you know in this very important process. You know, this is
Speaker 2: this is the technology that we need. I believe that
Speaker 1: dan thank you so much for doing this interview with Donald James. I am certain that we will be hearing more from him in the future on this
Speaker 2: show.
Speaker 2: We
Speaker 1: like to end our show on a high note. So we turn to you to hear about the good etiquette you're seeing and experiencing in the world and that can come in so many forms. Today we have a salute from Christie.
Speaker 1: I would like to give an etiquette salute to our new uncle joe the triple A man who came to our rescue last weekend when we dropped our son off for his first year of college
Speaker 1: because he was moving so far away. We took his car to campus
Speaker 1: because the car is a bit older and was originally purchased just to go to and from high school and sporting events. My husband brother in law and son hold it there on a trailer.
Speaker 1: It worked perfectly when our son drove it onto the trailer before we left Arizona. But have it, it wasn't working when we arrived at our destination, a lovely but tiny town in Iowa.
Speaker 1: None of the local auto shops were able to help. That weekend Tripoli sent someone to our hotel and warned us there may be nothing there. Local person joe could do but help us tow the car to a shop.
Speaker 1: Well they apparently don't know joe not only did joe climb his way into the car bo duke style, the door couldn't open while on the trailer, he stayed with us all day through multiple starts and fails troubleshooting pushing the car up a small hill to pop the clutch
Speaker 1: tremendous ups and then disappointing down
Speaker 1: as things we thought had worked failed again. It was hot, it was muggy and for part of the day, we were in a retail auto parts parking lot.
Speaker 1: He let my husband and brother in law borrow his valuable tools while he ran to another appointment and he checked in with ideas frequently. His cheerfulness kept us from losing hope as our time to leave our son behind was rapidly approaching,
Speaker 1: joe was more than kind to us. He treated our son's problem like it was his son's problem. He treated us like family. I am so grateful
Speaker 1: and though we did not ultimately get the car running that day, we were able to diagnose the actual problem and get a referral to a reliable shop that can do the work soon.
Speaker 1: More than that. Our new uncle joe gave us peace of mind knowing we were leaving our son half a country away. But in very good hands.
Speaker 1: Thank you for all that you do. I love listening and learning through your books and the awesome etiquette podcast Christie Christie, thank you so much for that salute. Please raise your hand if you have ever met a joe in your life who has helped you just so well during a crisis, I feel like I've met this person before
Speaker 1: and they are just, they are the savior to the world around them in that moment. They really, really are and it's so awesome when you, when you cross paths with someone like this particular joke Christy, thank you so much for that salute
Speaker 1: Christy. Thank you so much. I just have to also add, we oftentimes here lizzie post tear up during I was, I was trying not to this one got me because I mean joe is great, but the connection of joe to making you feel good about the community that you're
Speaker 1: like launching your Children into the little parent and me just had this moment of thinking about letting go of my kids and feeling like that was okay because the world was going to take care of them.
Speaker 1: Thank you Christy.
Speaker 1: Thank you all for listening and thank you to everyone who sent us something and everyone who supports us on patreon, please connect with us and share this show with friends, family and co workers. However you like to share podcasts, you can send us here, next question feedback or salute by email. The awesome etiquette at Emily Post dot com. You can leave us a message or text at 802 a five a kind. That's 802585463 on twitter. We are at Emily post on instagram, we are at Emily Post institute and on facebook were awesome etiquette and be Emily post institute, please consider becoming a sustaining member if only so that dan and I can do more happy dances,
Speaker 1: You can do this by visiting Patreon dot com slash awesome etiquette. You can also really help out the show by subscribing to the ads version of our show on Spotify or your favorite podcast app. And please do consider leaving us a review because it helps our show ranking, which helps more people find awesome etiquette. Our show was edited by chris, Albertine and assistant produced by Brigitte Dowd. Thanks, Kris and Kris and Brigitte.
Speaker 1: Mhm.
Episode 381 - To Go Tipping


text:
Are modern chuch Latin and classical Latin different languages?
From a (probably now-deleted comment) elsewhere on SE:
[Church Latin and Classical Latin] are more or less the same languages. Some new words were added and the pronunciation changed over the years, but it is the same Latin language.
I must admit to not being an expert in linguistics, Latin, or the history of Latin, but I find it hard to believe that a language spoken today can be the same language as one spoken in the 1st century. Furthermore, I see the two assumed to be different (Are there any active Classical Latin users nowadays?) in many ways, even down to having separate wikipedia pages.
Are modern church Latin and classical Latin considered to be the same language? What word describes their relationship (dialect, ancestor, etc.)?
latin language-change evolution
JeutnargJeutnarg
You will find more Latin enthusiasts on the Latin Language site.
– jk - Reinstate Monica
My question is about the linguistics aspect. What are the criteria for distinguishing two related languages as different languages? How do Latin and Church Latin meet or fail to meet those criteria? That kind of thing. My specific question is about Latin, but I do still think it is more appropriate here.
– Jeutnarg
In linguistics, language-relatedness is not a well worked-out science with a clear taxonomy of relations (such as "language" vs. "dialect"), so this is one of those "it depends on how you define..." questions. If two language forms are not mutually intelligible to monolingual speakers, we generally say that they are different languages. Since there are no first-language speakers of any form of Latin, the mutual-intelligibility test is not clearly performable. Even if you draw only on "really good" speakers of Latin, it is highly unlikely that anyone learns one form of Latin without also learning a reasonable amount of the other form – there won't be any monolingual speakers, even if one person was trained mostly in Church Latin vs. Classical Latin.
Outside of linguistics and even inside linguistics, it is widely thought that English (as currently spoken) is one language. Yet various forms of English are on the borders of mutual unintelligibility, at least at the level that Spanish and Portuguese, or Danish and Norwegian are.
Mutual intelligibility is, as you would expect, not a clear yes/no distinction. It would be interesting to take sets of related languages and do controlled experiments with speakers so that we could say with some degree of precision how easily monolingual speakers of A can understand speakers of B.
With historical versions, a strong comparison might be made to modern romance languages. Portuguese (which almost is two languages these days) is mutually intelligible with Galician and Mirandese, which are mutually intelligible with Asturian, which is with Castilian, etc., but eventually you end up at Romanian and that clearly is not the same language as Portuguese.
– user0721090601
Church Latin and Classical Latin were quite different phonologically. Classical Latin was syllable-timed and had vowel length and predictable stress; Church (i.e, Medieval) Latin was stress-timed and had lost vowel length and stress was (therefore) unpredictable. My guess is that if a fluent speaker of one and a fluent speaker of the other had to discuss something they both knew about, they would each think the other's accent barbarous, but they would eventually be able to understand one another.
The issue is native speakers; there were many fluent speakers of one dialect or another of Medieval Latin over its 1500 or so years, but no native speakers born in a speech community. For the first 15 centuries of the Christian Era, anyone in Europe who read or wrote anything -- with very few exceptions -- read and wrote in Latin, whatever language they spoke natively. Thus, all fluent Latin speakers were literate, having learned the language in order to be able to read and write. This constituted a very small (but very important) proportion of the population. However, this is the case for Classical Latin as well.
By the time of J. Caesar, the language spoken in the streets of Rome was not the same as Classical Latin, since it was Vulgar Latin -- a quite different language, and busy turning into all the Romance languages (Modern Italian is basically the Tuscan dialect of Vulgar Latin with two millennia of age on it). The first thing that happened was a lot of sound changes, leading to a total restructuring of the grammar -- no cases and only two genders, for instance. So the fluent speakers of Classical Latin from early Imperial times were not native speakers of it, either. Diglossia was a prominent feature of European language communities, and still is in many places.
So, since the language was identical when written for 1500 years and could be spoken by many at any time (it was necessary for any serious work), though the pronunciations and word meanings changed, as necessary, when the cultures did. I'd say they were the same language, as much the same as Mexican Spanish and Peninsular Spanish, say.
jlawlerjlawler
The distinction between "stressed-timed" and "syllabie-timed" seems a bit iffy to me, because of things like Mark Liberman's arguments in this Language Log post: Another slice of prosodic sausage. Robert's answer to the linked question has convinced me that there may be some validity to the distinction (as a gradient), but Robert connects it to the idea of vowel reduction in unstressed syllables, which as far as I am aware is not a feature of Medieval Latin or Ecclesiastical/Church Latin.
– brass tacks
So a priori, I would expect Church/Ecclesiastical Latin to be classified as a "syllable-timed" language the same as modern Spanish and modern Italian, two similar languages. I'm not sure the use of stress-based poetry patterns is definitive, since my understanding is that stress is relevant in at least some types of Italian and Spanish poetry, but these languages are nonetheless classified as syllable-timed.
Take a look at, say, In Taberna for an example of stress relevance in poetry. Not to mention that Medieval Latin used end rhyme and Classical Latin didn't.
I think I understand the type of poetry you're talking about, but what I'm asking is, if stress being relevant in poetry (and the use of end rhyme) is considered evidence that a language is "stress-timed" rather than "syllable timed", why are modern Spanish and Italian considered to be "syllable-timed"? Both of them have poetry that makes use of stress patterns and end rhyme.
Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged latin language-change evolution or ask your own question.
What's the evidence for and against isochrony?
Are there any active Classical Latin users nowadays?
Are there creoles of three languages?
-anus vs. -inus in (Classical) Latin
Is the modern Latin lexicon productive?
Evolution in number of words from Greek to Latin to modern languages
Why are the Sinitic languages so different from the rest of Sino-Tibetan?
Why are Latin and Sanskrit called dead languages?
Is there a form descending from Latin genitive plural somewhere in modern Romance languages?

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


While it's easy to get caught up in the stress of the moments following a collision, it's important to contact State Farm as soon after an accident as possible. Of course, no one should ever delay medical treatment to do so, but after receiving the care you need, be sure to talk to an insurance adjuster.
When possible, State Farm will send an adjuster to the scene of the accident to take photos, videos and make notes about the crash. They will also likely interview you and other people involved in the wreck. Even if an adjuster does not come out to the scene, it's a good idea for anyone involved in an accident to snap a few photos themselves. State Farm offers a Pocket Agent smartphone app that allows users to quickly upload photos from the scene of an accident. These will come in handy when you file a claim.
Whether you choose to file online, via the app or over the phone, beginning the claims process is easy. Select your preferred method of communication and provide the required information, including details about the incident in which your vehicle was involved. If drivable, you may be asked to bring your car into their nearest office. If the car is not safe to drive, State Farm may tow the vehicle to a mechanic or send a claims adjuster to the scene, to your home or to the garage.
When initiating the claims process, the adjuster will ask you about the incident in which you were involved. It's important to be as honest as possible and never misrepresent what happened. State Farm may ask for documentation associated with the accident, including police reports and proof of medical examination. Based on their investigation, State Farm will determine if you were at fault for the damage caused by the incident.
State Farm customers may take their car to any mechanic they wish for repairs. If you are unsure of which to choose, or don't have a personal preference, State Farm's Auto Damage Service Program can assist you in selecting the perfect place. Once the car has been towed or driven to the chosen auto body shop, the claims adjuster will want to take photos and notes if they have not already done so.
In some cases, vehicles are totaled when involved in accidents. In such cases, State Farm may pay out the value of the vehicle to the policyholder, minus a deposit. If you do not feel the amount offered is fair, an attorney can help you negotiate a more reasonable sum. Because lawyers handle insurance company negotiations like this on a daily basis, it pays to have them go to bat on your behalf. Even the most skilled negotiator can benefit from having an experienced, knowledgeable car accident attorney by their side when talking with State Farm about compensation.
Which States Are No Fault?
Disclaimer: LawsuitInfoCenter.com is not an attorney referral service or a law firm. LawsuitInfoCenter.com does not provide legal advice of any sort. We are a free matching service, and all claim reviews will be performed by a third party attorney. We do not recommend, nor do we endorse any attorneys that pay to participate in our service. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you submit the form and you are under no obligation to retain an attorney who may contact you through this service.


text:
Q: Wrong auto-scaling controls with anchors on PageControl in VCL form I have problems with auto-scaling of controls on my form for different monitor DPI settings. Rad Studio 10.2 Tokio. "Enable high-dpi" is on. I set the form's PixelsPerInch to 96 at design time. I put TPageControl on a form, create a TTabSheet page in it, put some controls on a page and set their Anchor property to akRight (in addition to akLeft and akTop). When the program is run on a monitor with a resolution of 120 DPI right edge of those controls appear extended beyond the right boundary of PageControl, so that the right parts of controls are not visible. If I switch off the akRight, then the controls are scaled correctly. But I need those anchors to resize form correctly at run time. How to solve the problem?
PS The bug was fixed in Rad Studio 10.3

A: C++ Builder Help for TFont says:

The PixelsPerInch property affects printer fonts only and should not
  be modified.
To modify the size of a font, use the Size or Height properties.

A: I was facing the same problem with an application owning myriads of TPageControl's with TEdit's, TMemo's and other misaligned controls in high-dpi mode.
My first approach to solve this was an attempt to pass the TForm to a procedure called FixFormScaling(), where I intended to fix all buggy scaling stuff. But I failed greatly, due to having many different alignments of the contained controls, which I could not handle reasonably in one short procedure.
The second approach seems to work: On each TTabSheet, I am placing a TPanel with the following properties:
Align=alClient
BevelOuter=bvNone
Name=pnlDpiHelper<NameOfTabsheet>
ShowCaption=False

I am moving all other controls (TEdit, TMemo, etc.) onto that TPanel. The result in high-dpi mode is that everything seems to be scaled correctly now!

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Don't know what song's been playing on the radio? Use our service to find it! Our playlist stores a Radio RSG Deutsch Pop track list for the past 7 days.
03:33 CULCHA CANDELA - HAMMA!
Listen to Radio RSG Deutsch Pop on your smartphone for free with the Android or iOS application!


text:
Articles by region:
MENA Middle East North Africa
Southeast Asia and Pacific
High-income countries
Top Navigation EN
About D+C
Sustainable development requires
global awareness and local action
Hauptnavigation EN
Free PDF-Archive
This time, they must get it right
Structural adjustment is a term that was much used in the 1980s and 1990s. It stood for a mix of deregulation, privatisation and budget cuts that were supposed to make developing countries competitive in global trade. In view of escalating financial problems in Argentina and Turkey, the historical experience is highly relevant today.
is editor-in-chief of D+C/E+Z.
picture alliance/AP Photo Protests in May in Buenos Aires, Argentina, against President Mauricio Macri's decision to seek economic help from the International Monetary Fund.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank required countries to adopt structural adjustment policies in return for lending when those countries desperately needed funding in view of economic crisis. The idea was to liberate the private sector and trigger growth. The background was that, in the 1960s and 1970s, governments had tried to manage economies, but that approach had not delivered the desired development. Post-colonial governments, moreover, were often marked by corruption and state-capture by elites.
Structural adjustment has a terrible reputation today. It failed in far too many countries. Debt-burdens became excessive, and the international donor community had to reverse course in the late 1990s. It adopted debt-relief programmes that were linked to poverty-reduction policies.
According to leftist narratives, structural adjustment only exacerbated poverty. Indeed, typical downsides included worse public health care, less spending on schools and fewer jobs in the public sector. It is a myth, however, that the poor in Africa and Asia lost access to health care because of structural adjustment. The colonial powers had never built social infrastructures to serve all people, and after independence, health care was only nominally free. To actually get access, people typically had to bribe doctors, nurses or health-care administrators in urban-based institutions. In rural areas, there was hardly any modern health-care system.
The donor assessment of state agencies often being dysfunctional actually made sense. Nonetheless, the structural adjustment paradigm failed. It underestimated the indispensable role of government institutions: the state must ensure prudent regulation, build infrastructure and serve the common good. Prudent policy is needed to reduce poverty and inequality.
It is noteworthy, moreover, that structural adjustment did not play out in the same way everywhere. Small African countries were typically plunged into recessions, as state agencies' role in the economy was trimmed down. In the Asian crisis of the late 1990s, Indonesia suffered a brutal recession which was made worse by the conditions international finance institutions made for fresh lending. At the turn of the millennium, Argentina suffered a dreadful default after adhering to structural-adjustment orthodoxy for many years. Other countries, however, rebounded fast. Examples include India in the 1990s or Turkey, Brazil and Pakistan in the first decade of this millennium. In these cases, IMF achieved the desired results.
We need to understand what economic policies result in. Structural adjustment has not been a disaster everywhere. The international community must heed the lessons. Neither the global community nor any individual country can afford to lose yet another decade because of ill-designed loan conditions. After a long period of exceptionally low interest rates, however, central banks have begun to tighten monetary policy. Debt is becoming more expensive again. And since debt levels have risen in many developing countries and emerging markets, international financial institutions may soon be involved in crisis lending once more. This time, they must get things right. Indeed, the IMF granted Argentina a huge stand-by loan in June. When this briefing was finalised in early September, the country's financial woes were making headlines again nonetheless. Problems were similarly escalating in Turkey and Pakistan too, and it was expected that they would need IMF money soon. Other countries may soon be affected too.
Hans Dembowski is editor in chief of D+C Development and Cooperation / E+Z Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit.
euz.editor@fazit-communication.de
Tags (field_dd_article_tags)
Frank Swiaczny Sonja Haug Susanne Schmid Sabrina Gabel
Benefiting from falling numbers of children
How the pandemic promotes inequality
Peter Mulenga Chibvalo Zombe Charles Chinanda
Copper price determines economic fate
New money helps bail out bankrupt state
Susanne Neubert Miriam Holländer
How Generation Z is changing the world of work in development
Markus Rudolf
Ethiopia's fragile peace
Popular >
Marian Burchardt
Florian Stoll
Brain drain in Ghana's tech industry
Suparna Banerjee
The painful partition of India
Become part of the D+C Community
The first UN Sustainable Development Goal is to end poverty in all its forms everywhere.
Good education for everyone
Mexico wants to prevent teenage pregnancies
Libya lapses into Gaddafi nostalgia
In order to achieve gender equality, it is necessary to empower women and girls.
Menstruation justice in Mexico
Achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals will require good governance – from the local to the global level.
To protect life on earth, we must cooperate
The UN Sustainable Development Goals aim to transform economies in an environmentally sound manner, leaving no one behind.
Footer Main EN
Digital Monthly Archive
Subscribe to D+C print issue


text:
Home » Asia » Philippines DOH reports 3 month stockpile of Ebola PPE
Philippines DOH reports 3 month stockpile of Ebola PPE
The Philippines Presidential Palace reported the country's health department has at least three months of Ebola personal protective equipment (PPE) today. Presidential Spokesperson Edwin Lacierda said during a press briefing Nov. 15 (computer translated), "We have three months of PPE, PPE you use just once. The stockpile is good for 3 months".
Image/UNMC
Responding to criticisms that the protective gears available in the country are substandard, Lacierda explained that the protective equipment used for training are different from those used during an actual epidemic.
Local health workers were trained by the World Health Organization on how to handle the spread of the Ebola virus and they were briefed on the suitable protective gear, he said.
"The protective gear used in training … is not the same there in actual use in case of Ebola incident", he said.
He again emphasized the suits were disposable, only to be used once during an actual incident.
President Benigno S. Aquino III has previously assured that funds are available for use in case of an Ebola contagion in the country.
Related: Philippines: UN peacekeeper Ebola negative; still Ebola free


text:
#1 out of 36,231
Home/Cultural Preservation/#1 out of 36,231
#1 out of 36,231	admin	2018-10-24T19:35:24-06:00
Cultural Preservation
Mission Statement: For the increase and diffusion of knowledge.
Maximizing your PocketChange
For every dollar spent…
Impacts & Achievements:
Some of the highlights
CEO Salary: 0.05% of expenses
The Smithsonian is home to over 155 million artifacts that document the cultural past of all mankind.
Annually, the Smithsonian dedicates over a billion dollars to its programs that preserve, research and celebrate culture on a global scale.
The Smithsonian's strategic plan, which is set to be fully mobilized by 2022 aims to unify the institution, address complex global issues, digitally reach a billion people, thoroughly understand and impact 21st-century audiences, drive interdisciplinary collaboration, optimize shared use and assets and strengthen administration within the institutions.
In the US, the Smithsonian Institution runs 19 museums and galleries, reaching over 30 million people annually.
The Smithsonian works with over 200 affiliate facilities and organizations across the US, Puerto rico and Panama.
Featured Programs:
How the Smithsonian Institution is making a difference
International Cultural Preservation
The Smithsonian is an international force in researching, preserving and presenting culture and the cultural history of peoples all over the world. From music to toys to sciences to language and folklore to so much more, the Smithsonian is at the forefront of discovering, preserving and celebrating global culture and history.
The American Art Museum was the Nation's first collection of American art and captures the imagination of American people over three centuries. The diverse and extensive collection, including the National Portrait Gallery, as well as the Luce Foundation Center for American Art are housed in one of the oldest public buildings in Washington, D.C.
This museum is home to an extensive collection of artifacts documenting the rich history of the African American experience. It is a place where all people can learn how African Americans have impacted their own lives and shaped the United States of America.
Tracing the United States's cultural, social, technological, political and scientific history, the American History Museum offers over three million artifacts that present the American identity and its evolution.
Its two locations- in NYC and D.C.- share one of the world's most expansive collections of Native objects and documents from the entire western hemisphere. This collection celebrates and preserves the cultural history of Native populations while collaborating with tribes and communities to give visitors a true sense of Native America.


By most statistical measures, 2013 will be remembered as a respectable but not great year for the U.S. economic recovery. The gross domestic product grew by about 2.5 percent, which was slightly better than the nation has seen since the end of the Great Recession, and the number of jobs grew by about 200,000 a month.
But you wouldn't know that on Wall Street, which just wrapped up a year that was anything but average. By any standard, it was a monster year for stocks, one of the best of all time and a surprise to all the investment doomsayers.
How good was it? The Standard & Poor's 500 stock index was up 29.6 percent. The Dow Jones Industrial Average wasn't far behind, and one of the best performances was turned in by the Russell 2000 Index, the benchmark for small-cap equities, which was up by more than 31 percent.
In other words, an investor smart enough to put $10,000 in some plain vanilla index fund at the start of 2013 likely had about $13,000 by the year's close, and that's not counting dividends (or subtracting brokerage or mutual fund fees). That made it the best year on Wall Street since 1995, and it would take more than some short-term declines in stock prices as investors convert theoretical profits to the folding-money kind or even the inevitable downward market correction (the bursting of the proverbial bubble) to take the bloom of this particular rose.
While that's good news for all Americans, even those small investors who own stocks only through modest holdings in their 401(K) accounts or indirectly through pension funds, the triumphant year of the bull underscores the disconnect between Wall Street and Main Street. The top 10 percent of U.S. earners own about 80 percent of stocks, including the top 1 percent who control about 40 percent of equities.
That calls for a serious reexamination of U.S. economic policies, including the Federal Reserve's bond-buying program that has pumped hundreds of billions of dollars into the market. Assuming she is confirmed as the next Fed chair, Janet Yellen may want to accelerate the "taper" that has reduced the buy-back program to $75 billion this month.
Such purchases, along with near-zero interest rates, were meant to spur economic growth and jobs, not merely juice stock prices and Wall Street bonuses. After-tax corporate profits are at an all-time high as well, according to U.S. Commerce Department statistics, but that doesn't seem to have translated directly to the job market where the unemployment rate remains at 7 percent, a five-year low but still well above the target of around 5 percent.
Part of the problem may be that large investors can see the favorable economic circumstances that others can't. Consumer confidence is up to levels not found since 2008, but CEO confidence — the economic outlook from the proverbial corner office — was down significantly in the third quarter and likely tied to the uncertainty in Washington.
When the federal government is unable to set basic policies (or at least stick with them), approve a budget or even resolve to pay its bills by raising the debt limit, the nation's private sector leaders get worried. Washington can't run the economy, but it can certainly put a drag on it — and the inability of Congress to even keep government up and running full-time in 2013 does not exactly inspire confidence.
Meanwhile, the growing gap between rich and poor is only going to breed further discontent. When top-earners on Wall Street are busy shopping for exotic sports cars and second homes while unemployment and food stamp benefits are allowed to expire for the bottom tier, resentments are bound to fester no matter how hard the pitch for trickle-down economics.
It's highly unlikely that 2014 will be nearly as big a year for stocks, but it could be a good year for job growth if Congress will take action — invest more in badly-needed transportation and other infrastructure projects, approve immigration reform and tackle tax and entitlement reform. That large corporations and investors are currently rolling in profits should make some of these challenges a bit easier to swallow.