Tea Botanics was looking for a brand identity and package design to launch their first product in a line of medicinal teas. Since hot flashes are rarely talked about in the open, the goal was to develop a package design that did not shy away from the topic yet embolden and empowered the individual. Using both an energetic and soothing color, the step gradient shows the relieving transition encounter upon using the product.


text:
Q: How can I add an option element in this select list? I want to add an option element to my select which has the value provided by the #quantite input. I want that when we click the button the GetValues() function adds the element. I tried this:
<input class="text" id="quantite" type="text" name="quantité" />
<select id="multiSelect" size="5" multiple="multiple">
    <option value="o1">Option 1</option>
    <option value="o2">Option 2</option>
    <option value="o3">Option 3</option>
    <option value="o4">Option 4</option>
    <option value="o5">Option 5</option>
    <option value="o6">Option 6</option>
</select>
<br />
<button id="btnGetValues" onclick="GetValues()">Get Values</button>

function GetValues() {
    // Get select object
    var myList = document.getElementById("multiSelect");

    //Create array to store selected values
    var Selectedelement = $("#quantite").val() ;

    myList.add(Selectedelement);
}
}

I get an error in javascript in mylist.add(Selectedelement);

A: You can create a new option element and use appendChild() to add it to the select. Try this:
function GetValues() {
    var myList = document.getElementById("multiSelect");
    var option = document.createElement('option');
    option.value = document.getElementById('quantite').value;
    option.innerText = 'New Option';
    myList.appendChild(option);
}

Example fiddle
Or for a purely jQuery solution:
<button id="btnGetValues">Get Values</button>

$('#btnGetValues').click(function() {
    $('#multiSelect').append('<option value="' + $('#quantite').val() + '">New option</option>');
});

Example fiddle

A: document.getElementById returns DOM element. You should use jQuery object. And you should also use append instead of add to add new element.  Try following.
function GetValues() {
     var myList = $("#multiSelect");
     var Selectedelement = $("#quantite").val();

     myList.append('<option value='+Selectedelement+'>'+ Selectedelement +'</option>');
}

A: You need yo append an option:
$("#multiSelect").append('<option value="anyValue"> '+$("#quantiCommande").val()+' </option>');

A: I prefer plain javascript.
Look this example, I create node element throw createElement API and setting OptionElement attributes.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
What Can and Can't a Judge do?
What Can and Can't a Judge do?
Friday, March 30, 2012, 1:29:06 PM
The Judiciary is responsible to "establish Justice"[4] exclusively by way of the fair and unbiased administration of "Due Process of Law."[5] A Judge has no AUTHORITY outside of Due Process of Law. Due Process of Law is a recognized comprehensive procedural and substantive protection for rights.
The first and most important function of any judge is to be judicial and defend We the People's rights against the obvious "cases of imaginary evils,"[6] vexatious[7] and calumnious[8] actions. A judge's first and most important JOB is to determine CREDIBLE probable cause and if a Judge can be swayed by personal bias, "cases of imaginary evils,"[9] "vexatious"[10] or calumnious[11] actions the constitutional protection of IV, V and XIV Amendments[12] are of NO VALUE.
Due Process of Law is a recognized comprehensive procedural and substantive protection for rights. Due Process finds it earliest modern formal reference in clause 39 of the Magna Carta (1215), promised as follows: "No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals[13] or by the law of the land."
The first and most important function of any judge is to be judicial and defend We the People's rights and liberties against personal bias, "cases of imaginary evils"[14] vexatious[15] and calumnious[16] actions. A judge's JOB is to determine probable cause and if a Judge can be swayed by personal bias, "cases of imaginary evils,"[17] "vexatious"[18] or calumnious[19] actions the constitutional protection of IV, V and XIV Amendments[20] are of no value.
When and IF probable cause is established it is then the Judiciary's responsibility to, with highest personal integrity, oversee the unbiased administration of the Jury System phase of Due Process to settle ALL DISPUTES.[21]
In my case, "The Wrong," first the judges had me held on an assertion of probable cause legally unrelated to the declared charge. With absence of probable cause already on RECORD, the Judicial officer then proceded to find:
"The Court finds--First of all, the Court amends the pleadings to conform with the evidence adduced. The Court does find the allegations of the amended petition to be true."[22]
With the undisputed record of the facts, in four 8th circuit court of appeals case 07-2614, 08-1823, 10-1947 and 11-2425, in this case it is obvious, to any sane "person of ordinary intelligence,"[23] a Judge's finding can not amend the pleading during a hearing on that pleading or the Due Process of law that proceeded it is meaningless.
This was devastating[24] and a flagrant denial of Due Process rights in the original cause No. 03FC-010670 that becomethe root of Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court 07-11115 and 11-8211.
Say we try you for petty theft,[25] but find you guilty of murder?
This was a clearly a criminal[26] DENIAL of Justice as defined by Due Process of law as GUARANTEED and SECURED by the V and XIV Amendments to the Constitution for the United States of America. I seek REDRESS per the Declaration if Independence, The Constitution for the United States of America, The Bill of Rights,[27] Statute Law[28] and Treaties[29] made as "the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby."[30]
How can the Supreme Court, a delegated authority, acting under a constitutional commission award themselves and others "absolute immunity"[31] from said constitutional commission to "do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid"[32] i.e., the "deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America?"[33]
We the People have fallen under the despotic[34] spell of the concentrated power[35] in the Supreme Court that created ABSOLUTE POWER from ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for the "malicious or corrupt" judges,[36] the "malicious or dishonest" prosecutor, [37] the "knowingly false testimony by police officers"[38] and "all (malicious, corrupt, dishonest and incompetent[39]) persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process" [40] acting under color of law to wit, ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION.
Friday, March 30, 2012, 1:29:06 PM, 2012 03-29-12 What can and can't aJudge do REV 02
[4] Preamble to the the Constitution for the United States of America "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
[5] XIV Amendment "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
[6] "many cases of imaginary evils have been suggested if the contrary doctrine should prevail. Among these are a supposed seizure of vessels of war, invasions of forts and arsenals of the United States. Hypothetical cases of great evils may be suggested by a particularly fruitful imagination in regard to almost every law upon which depends the rights of the individual or of the government, and if the existence of laws is to depend upon their capacity to withstand such criticism, the whole fabric of the law must fail." United States v. Lee, 106 U. S. 217 (1882)
[7] Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (1871), Page 80 U. S. 349
[8] Lord Coke, Floyd and Barker (1607)
[9] United States v. Lee, 106 U. S. 217 (1882)
[10] Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 349 (1871) "prevent them (our judges and justice system) being harassed by vexatious actions," in all cases it is the judiciary's responsibility to avoid "vexatious" or calumnious actions to the best of their ability not concede to their inevitability. "Vexatious" or calumnious actions are hazards in any human endeavor,
[11] Floyd and Barker (1607) "And those who are the most sincere, would not be free from continual Calumniations," in all cases it is the judiciary's responsibility to avoid "vexatious" or calumnious actions to the best of their ability not concede to their inevitability. "Vexatious" or calumnious actions are hazards in any human endeavor,
[12] IV Amendment "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Amendment V "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." Amendment XIV Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868. Note: Article I, section 2, of the Constitution was modified by section 2 of the 14th amendment. Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
[13] "the lawful judgment of his equals" is the embodiment of "The Golden Rule" or ethic of reciprocity is a maxim, ethical code, or morality that essentially states:
· One should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself.
This concept describes a "reciprocal" or "two-way" relationship between one's self and others that involves both sides equally and in a mutual fashion. This has is the elemental foundation of virtually EVERY major religion on this planet.
[14] "In this connection, many cases of imaginary evils have been suggested if the contrary doctrine should prevail… Hypothetical cases of great evils may be suggested by a particularly fruitful imagination in regard to almost every law upon which depends the rights of the individual or of the government, and if the existence of laws is to depend upon their capacity to withstand such criticism, the whole fabric of the law must fail." United States v. Lee, 106 U. S. 217 (1882)
[15] Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (1871), Page 80 U. S. 349
[16] Lord Coke, Floyd and Barker (1607)
[17] United States v. Lee, 106 U. S. 217 (1882)
[20] IV Amendment "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." "Probable cause" is the REQUIREMENT in advance of Due Process of Law as required by V and XIV Amendments.
[21] "The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury…" Constitution for the United States of America Article III., Section. 2., 3rd paragraph, "In (civil) Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law." Constitution for the United States of America, Amendment VII
[22] IN THE ST. LOUIS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, DIVISION 65, Commissioner Phillip Jones, Presiding, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2003, Cause No. 03FC-010670. The petitioner had two weeks plus (11/03/03/ - 11/20/03) prior to the hearing to amend the pleading. Petitioner, Sharon G. Jeep, denied any physical or verbal abuse at the subsequent divorce hearing in addition to the denials at the abuse hearing. It should be noted that if exigent circumstances were involved, they weren't, they should have STILL BEEN noted at the hearing or in the two weeks prior to the hearing and respondent given a subsequent chance to be heard on the exigent/infamous charge as assured by constitutional Due Process right.
[23] SYKES v. UNITED STATES Cite as: 564 U. S. ____ (2011) 7, SCALIA, J., dissenting) United States v. Batchelder, 442 U. S. 123 "It is a fundamental tenet of due process that "[n]o one may be required at peril of life, liberty or property to speculate as to the meaning of penal statutes." Lanzetta v. New Jersey, 306 U. S. 451, 306 U. S. 453 (1939). A criminal statute is therefore invalid if it "fails to give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice that his contemplated conduct (probable casue) is forbidden." United States v. Harriss, 347 U. S. 612, 347 U. S. 617 (1954). See Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U. S. 385, 269 U. S. 391-393 (1926); Papachristou v. Jacksonville, 405 U. S. 156, 405 U. S. 162 (1972); Dunn v. United States, ante at 442 U. S. 112-113. (Underlining and emphasis added)
[24] I was left a damaged man, my life… my son was thus taken from me, I was left penniless, homeless, everything in the world I cared about was taken from me and I had no access to appeal from my reduced circumstances. I could barely keep my psychological and physical necessities of life together.
[25] Probable cause was QUESTIONABLE for the hypothetical "petty theft"
[26] Title Criminal 18, U.S.C, § 241 & 242
[29] "The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights " PART II, Article 2, Section 3)
[30] The Constitutuion for the United states of America, Article. VI., 2nd paragraph.
[31] "In short, the common law provided absolute immunity from subsequent damages liability for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process." Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) @ Page 460 U. S. 335 (parenthetical non italic text added for clarity)
Labels: J. Roberts, Obama, Supreme Court
The Innocence Project Accountability, Petition for a Writ of Certiorari 11-8211, Rehearing DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 13, 2012
US Mail First Class Tuesday March 27, 2012
Barry C. Scheck & Peter J. Neufeld
40 Worth St., Suite 701
Re: Accountability, Petition for a Writ of Certiorari 11-8211, Motion for Rehearing DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 13, 2012
Is there any moral difference between a thief with a gun demanding your money on the street and a judge behind a bench in black robes with a gavel demanding your money in a courtroom who knowingly steps outside of the procedural and substantive protections of Due Process?[1]
To any sane "person of ordinary intelligence"[2] there is NO difference!
The FEAR MONGERS that want to sell their self serving POWER assert that We the People's Justice System, the prosecutors, the police and "the judges should be at liberty to exercise their functions with independence, and without fear of consequences."[3] And if we deny them their absolute immunity we will live in the constant FEAR of ANARCHY… the overwhelming and unavoidability of "vexatious"[4] or calumnious[5] actions.
"With independence, and without fear of consequences" in Supreme Court speak means without regard to the "deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America." [6]
Immunity, be it judicial, prosecutorial or witness (police), by definition is diametrically opposed to the Rule of Law.[7] What we have to ask ourselves is do we live under the rule of law that is knowable to a "person of ordinary intelligence"[8] or is civility as expressed and defined by We the People by way of The Declaration of Independence, a constitution,[9] the Bill of Rights, treaties[10] made and the rule of law[11] too sophisticated for a "person of ordinary intelligence?" To those that say civility is unknowable "the law is nothing more than an ambiguous text, to be explained by (judges) his sophistry into any meaning which may subserve his personal malice." [12]
I can testify to the massive, corrupt, malicious, dishonest and incompetent[13] insidious "unlawful criminal conspiracy"[14] "before out of Court"[15] of judicial immunity in the Jim Crow Era[16] and Jane Crow Era.[17]
The Innocence Project can clearly, with DNA evidence, assert the massive, corrupt, malicious, dishonest and incompetent[18] insidious "unlawful criminal conspiracy"[19] "before out of Court"[20] in the plea bargain / exclusionary rule of prosecutorial immunity era.
The Testimony of Alan M. Dershowitz, House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, December 1, 1998 AND the Supreme Court precedent clearly asserts the massive, corrupt, malicious, dishonest and incompetent[21] insidious "unlawful criminal conspiracy"[22] "before out of Court"[23] of "testilying"[24] immunity for "all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"[25] era e.g., There is, of course, the possibility that, despite the truthfinding safeguards of the judicial process, some defendants might indeed be unjustly convicted on the basis of knowingly false testimony by police officers." Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)
This is not about corrupt, malicious, dishonest and incompetent[26] death row cases alone. This DOES NOT have to be verified by DNA evidence this is about a conspicuous, massive, corrupt, malicious, dishonest and incompetent[27] "unlawful criminal conspiracy"[28] "before out of Court"[29] throughout our JUSTICE SYSTEM, from misdemeanor traffic court to capital case and criminal cases to civil cases.
I got reacquainted with the "Innocence Project" from a recent 60 Minutes piece "Evidence of Innocence: The case of Michael Morton" in Texas. Mr Scheck asserted it is not a new wave of prosecutorial, police or judicial corruption. I have to agree, It is the YEARS if not decades and centuries of absolute unaccountability of the justice system's judiciary, prosecutors, and police.
HELP!!!! Please review my BLOG at
www.DGJeep.blogspot.com
If there is anything further I can do for you in this regard, please let me know.
cc: My Blog - Wednesday, March 28, 2012, 7:13:51 AM
[1] "coram non judice" Amendment V & XIV US Constitution
[2] SYKES v. UNITED STATES Cite as: 564 U. S. ____ (2011) 7, SCALIA, J., dissenting) United States v. Batchelder, 442 U. S. 123 "It is a fundamental tenet of due process that "[n]o one may be required at peril of life, liberty or property to speculate as to the meaning of penal statutes." Lanzetta v. New Jersey, 306 U. S. 451, 306 U. S. 453 (1939). A criminal statute is therefore invalid if it "fails to give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice that his contemplated conduct (probable casue) is forbidden." United States v. Harriss, 347 U. S. 612, 347 U. S. 617 (1954). See Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U. S. 385, 269 U. S. 391-393 (1926); Papachristou v. Jacksonville, 405 U. S. 156, 405 U. S. 162 (1972); Dunn v. United States, ante at 442 U. S. 112-113. So too, vague sentencing provisions may pose constitutional questions if they do not state with sufficient clarity the consequences of violating a given criminal statute. See United States v. Evans, 333 U. S. 483 (1948); United States v. Brown, 333 U. S. 18 (1948); cf. Giaccio v. Pennsylvania, 382 U. S. 399 (1966)." (Underlining and parenthetical text added for emphasis)
[3] Scott v. Stansfield, L.R. 3 Ex. 220, 223 (1868), quoted in Bradley v. Fisher (1871), supra, 80 U. S. 349, note, at 80 U. S. 350, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 554 (1967)
[4] Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 349 (1871) "prevent them (our judges and justice system) being harassed by vexatious actions," in all cases it is the judiciary's responsibility to avoid "vexatious" or calumnious actions to the best of their ability not concede to their inevitability. "Vexatious" or calumnious actions are hazards in any human endeavor,
[5] Floyd and Barker (1607) "And those who are the most sincere, would not be free from continual Calumniations," in all cases it is the judiciary's responsibility to avoid "vexatious" or calumnious actions to the best of their ability not concede to their inevitability. "Vexatious" or calumnious actions are hazards in any human endeavor,
[6] Title Criminal 18, U.S.C, § 241 & 242, and Title Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 & 1985
"In addressing the consequences of subjecting judges (and/or "all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process" Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983)) to suits for damages under § 1983, the Court has commented:
"Imposing such a burden on judges would contribute not to principled and fearless decision making but to intimidation."
Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. at 386 U. S. 554. (Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 428 (1976) [Footnote 26])."
[7] Immunity is DIAMETRICALLY opposed to the Rule of Law Tuesday, August 10, 2010 http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2010/09/immunity-is-diametrically-opposed-to.html
[8] SYKES v. UNITED STATES Cite as: 564 U. S. ____ (2011) 7, SCALIA, J., dissenting) ibid.
[9] Justice without regard to equity impoverishes the victim at the expense of the evil they have suffered. I have been forced into poverty, homelessness for FOUR YEARS! The 1st Amendment secures the constitutional right to a lawfully un-abridge-able justifiable redress of grievance from the government: "Congress shall make no law abridging the right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." The 7th Amendment secures the right to settle all suits: "In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law" assures justice as regards equity.
[12] Thomas Jefferson To John Tyler Monticello, May 26, 1810
[13] Incompetence is the most insidious of human evils; but especially, if it is denied and covered up by the grant of malice, corruption and dishonesty!!!!
[14] Lord Coke, , Floyd and Barker (1607)
[16] "Immunity is given to crime, and the records of the public tribunals are searched in vain for any evidence of effective redress." "The courts are in many instances under the control of those who are wholly inimical to the impartial administration of law and equity." I say it NOW, 2011!!! Justice William O. Douglas said it in Monroe v. Pape, 365 U. S. 167 (1961) and Pierson v. Ray, 386 U. S. 559 (1967). Mr. Lowe of Kansas and Mr. Rainey of South Carolina respectively said it originally in 1871, Cong. Globe, 42d Cong., 1st Sess., 374 & 394.
[17] http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/1974/12/jane-crow-era.html
[18] Incompetence, ibid.
[24] Testimony of Alan M. Dershowitz, House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, December 1, 1998 AND "There is, of course, the possibility that, despite the truthfinding safeguards of the judicial process, some defendants might indeed be unjustly convicted on the basis of knowingly false testimony by police officers." Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 345 (1983)
[25] absolute immunity from subsequent damages liability for all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process." Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 335 (1983)
Labels: Innocence Project
Tuesday, March 13, 2012 Ruth Bader Ginsburg, E...
The FEAR MONGERS In We the People's Justice System...
The Innocence Project Accountability, Petition for...

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Welcome to our first virtual episode. Ok, that's a lie but we are focusing on Virtual Reality this week. El Kaiser explains just what Google Cardboard is all about and J.D. gives us a rundown on all the flavors of VR available to consumers. And of course, we have a heaping helping of tech news and shenanigans.
The media world was buzzing this weekend as The New York Times jumped into a new dimension. The company gave out Google Cardboard virtual reality viewers to its home subscribers and pointed them to the new NYT VR smartphone app for Android or iOS to see special videos that accompanied certain stories in the Times Magazine.
As with other virtual-reality systems, once an Android phone or iPhone was placed in the back of the cardboard contraption and the required content downloaded, the user got a much more immersive experience than watching a 2D clip because the whole thing had a panoramic feel to it. (Shooting a film in virtual reality can be technically challenging as well, but viewing one puts you in the middle of the action; the How Stuff Works site has a good explanation of the virtual-reality experience.) The NYT website helpfully included a frequently asked questions page for users new to the VR scene, as well as a video showing how to fold together the Cardboard viewer.
The Times got a lot of buzz for busting the move, but virtual reality has popping up all over the past year. On the high end of the spectrum, the new Facebook-owned Oculus Rift virtual reality system has been kicking around for years and is scheduled to finally make a commercial debut early next year. The $99 Samsung Gear VR system, (shown below) also powered by Oculus technology, is now available for pre-orders and works with Samsung's newer Galaxy devices; older Samsung VR headsets are also around. Microsoft's HoloLens system, which is advertised more as an augmented reality system as opposed to virtual reality, may also jump into the mix when it officially rolls into town next year.
So, what do you need to see the new virtual reality? You need a virtual-reality app that can display the videos on the appropriate format. To get the most of the experience, you also need a Cardboard-style viewer and a pair of headphones to immerse yourself in the audio. These range in price online from about $4 up to $30 for the sturdier, fancier models that look less like pieces of a packing box and more like sophisticated binoculars.
And, along with the hardware, you need content to look at. The Google Cardboard site has a list of VR apps that work with the viewer. But much more content is coming or is already here. The Wall Street Journal announced last week that it, too, was adding virtual reality content to its video app. Facebook is said to be developing its own virtual reality videos app and YouTube's blog just announced last week that the site had added support for VR, including a The Hunger Games Virtual Reality Experience, (shown above), a trailer from the Apollo 11 mission and many others.
If you don't have the viewer, you can also watch some videos in standard mode on muse smartphones or in a desktop browser. While you can just turn your head to get a panoramic view with a viewer, you can usually drag your finger or mouse around the frame to see more of the surroundings on the home screen or video window.
Is VR the future or just a fad? Time will tell, but people are testing out the format in all sorts of places. Last month's Democratic debate on CNN even had a virtual reality version, although viewer response to the experiment was mixed. Some things, after all, may be better off in their own reality.
The holidays are on the way, and if you need a fun little gift for the music nerd/English Lit major on your gift list, check out Pop Sonnets: Shakespearean Spins on Your Favorite Songs by Erik Didriksen. To get a taste of the crafty pop-songs-recast-as-Elizabethan-sonnets flavor of the collection, check out the Pop Sonnets Tumblr and Twitter feed. Pop Sonnets is published by Quirk Books, the same company that has released (among other things), such geekworthy volumes as Ian Doescher's Star Wars trilogy in iambic pentameter and The Fangirl's Guide to the Galaxy by Sam Maggs.


text:
West Wemyss är en by i Fife, Skottland. Byn är belägen 3,2 km
från Kirkcaldy. Orten har  invånare (1991).

Referenser

Externa länkar

Orter i Fife

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Q: Declare global Razor Page variables in ASP.NET MVC [NOT Static] I have a ConfigurationService class that is injected in "_ViewImports":
@inject IConfigurationService ConfigurationService

And I access it in each View Page like below:
@{
    // Configurations
    var configuration = await ConfigurationService.GetGeneralConfiguration();
    var currencySymbol = configuration.Currency.Symbol;
}

This works, but I have to copy and paste the code in each page. I've tried to write the code in _Layout.cshtml but it doesn't work. Static vars also don't work because the values are not static - for each request I get the current user configuration and inject into the page. And, for all pages that require the currencySymbol variable value I need to paste code, and I don't want to have to do this.
My question is: How can I declare variables in, for example, _Layout.cshtml, or _ViewStart.cshtml or some other view that can be accessed by all razor view pages, like inherits. These variables must contain ConfigurationService values.

A: Instead of creating variables, you're better off injecting a service that will generate the values you need as required. For example:
public interface ILocalisationService
{
    string CurrencySymbol { get; }
}

public class LocalisationService : ILocalisationService
{
    private IConfigurationService _configurationService;
    private string _currencySymbol;

    public LocalisationService(IConfigurationService configurationService)
    {
        _configurationService = configurationService;
    }

    public string CurrencySymbol => string.IsNullOrEmpty(_currencySymbol)
        ? _currencySymbol = _configurationService.GetValue("£")
        : _currencySymbol;
}

Now inject the new service:
@inject ILocalisationService LocalisationService

And use it in your view:
The currency symbol is @LocalisationService.CurrencySymbol

The benefit of this is that when your view doesn't use one of the values, it doesn't need to get calculated, which is especially relevant if it takes a long time.


text:
Peroxynitrite generated in the rat spinal cord induces oxidation and nitration of proteins: Reduction by MN (III) tetrakis (4-benzoic acid) porphyrin
Feng Bao, Douglas S. DeWitt, Donald S. Prough, Danxia Liu
To determine whether peroxynitrite at the concentration and duration present after spinal cord injury induces protein oxidation and nitration in vivo, the peroxynitrite donor 3-morpholinosydnonimine (SIN-1) was administered into the gray matter of the rat spinal cord for 5 hr. The cords were removed at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hr after SIN-1 exposure, immunohistochemically stained with antibodies to dinitrophenyl (DNP) and nitrotyrosine (Ntyr), markers of protein oxidation and nitration, respectively, and the immunostained neurons were counted. The percentages of DNP-positive (P = 0.023-0.002) and Ntyr-positive (P < 0.001 for all) neurons were significantly higher in the SIN-1-exposed groups than in the ACSF controls at each time, suggesting that peroxynitrite induced intracellular oxidation and nitration of proteins. The percentages of DNP- and Ntyr-positive neurons were not significantly different over time in either SIN-1- or ACSF-exposed groups (P = 0.20-1.00). The percentage of DNP-positive neurons was 7.6 ± 3% to 12 ± 4.2% at 6-24 hr, and it was 14 ± 2% to 19 ± 2% at 6-24 hr for Ntyr-positive neurons after SIN-1-exposure, whereas both ranged over 2-3% in ACSF controls. Mn (III) tetrakis (4-benzoic acid) porphyrin (MnTBAP, a broad-spectrum scavenger of reactive species) significantly reduced the percentages of DNP- and Ntyr-positive neurons (P = 0.04 and 0.002, respectively) compared to a SIN-1-exposed, untreated group at 24 hr after SIN-1 exposure. There were no significant differences between MnTBAP-treated and ACSF controls (P = 0.7 for DNP and 0.2 for Ntyr). These results further demonstrate peroxynitrite-induced protein oxidation and nitration and the efficiency of MnTBAP in scavenging peroxynitrite.
Journal of Neuroscience Research
https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.10481
Published - Jan 15 2003
3-morpholinosydnonimine
Reactive nitrogen species
Scavenger of reactive species
Secondary spinal cord injury
10.1002/jnr.10481
Dive into the research topics of 'Peroxynitrite generated in the rat spinal cord induces oxidation and nitration of proteins: Reduction by MN (III) tetrakis (4-benzoic acid) porphyrin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
tetrakis(4-benzoic acid)porphyrin Medicine & Life Sciences 100%
3-nitrotyrosine Medicine & Life Sciences 60%
Peroxynitrous Acid Medicine & Life Sciences 59%
manganese(III)-tetrakis(4-benzoic acid)porphyrin Medicine & Life Sciences 53%
Spinal Cord Medicine & Life Sciences 38%
Gray Matter Medicine & Life Sciences 7%
Bao, F., DeWitt, D. S., Prough, D. S., & Liu, D. (2003). Peroxynitrite generated in the rat spinal cord induces oxidation and nitration of proteins: Reduction by MN (III) tetrakis (4-benzoic acid) porphyrin. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 71(2), 220-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.10481
Peroxynitrite generated in the rat spinal cord induces oxidation and nitration of proteins : Reduction by MN (III) tetrakis (4-benzoic acid) porphyrin. / Bao, Feng; DeWitt, Douglas S.; Prough, Donald S.; Liu, Danxia.
In: Journal of Neuroscience Research, Vol. 71, No. 2, 15.01.2003, p. 220-227.
Bao, F, DeWitt, DS, Prough, DS & Liu, D 2003, 'Peroxynitrite generated in the rat spinal cord induces oxidation and nitration of proteins: Reduction by MN (III) tetrakis (4-benzoic acid) porphyrin', Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 220-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.10481
Bao F, DeWitt DS, Prough DS, Liu D. Peroxynitrite generated in the rat spinal cord induces oxidation and nitration of proteins: Reduction by MN (III) tetrakis (4-benzoic acid) porphyrin. Journal of Neuroscience Research. 2003 Jan 15;71(2):220-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.10481
Bao, Feng ; DeWitt, Douglas S. ; Prough, Donald S. ; Liu, Danxia. / Peroxynitrite generated in the rat spinal cord induces oxidation and nitration of proteins : Reduction by MN (III) tetrakis (4-benzoic acid) porphyrin. In: Journal of Neuroscience Research. 2003 ; Vol. 71, No. 2. pp. 220-227.
@article{d601a2f783c344f1b25d5c33e010f934,
title = "Peroxynitrite generated in the rat spinal cord induces oxidation and nitration of proteins: Reduction by MN (III) tetrakis (4-benzoic acid) porphyrin",
abstract = "To determine whether peroxynitrite at the concentration and duration present after spinal cord injury induces protein oxidation and nitration in vivo, the peroxynitrite donor 3-morpholinosydnonimine (SIN-1) was administered into the gray matter of the rat spinal cord for 5 hr. The cords were removed at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hr after SIN-1 exposure, immunohistochemically stained with antibodies to dinitrophenyl (DNP) and nitrotyrosine (Ntyr), markers of protein oxidation and nitration, respectively, and the immunostained neurons were counted. The percentages of DNP-positive (P = 0.023-0.002) and Ntyr-positive (P < 0.001 for all) neurons were significantly higher in the SIN-1-exposed groups than in the ACSF controls at each time, suggesting that peroxynitrite induced intracellular oxidation and nitration of proteins. The percentages of DNP- and Ntyr-positive neurons were not significantly different over time in either SIN-1- or ACSF-exposed groups (P = 0.20-1.00). The percentage of DNP-positive neurons was 7.6 ± 3% to 12 ± 4.2% at 6-24 hr, and it was 14 ± 2% to 19 ± 2% at 6-24 hr for Ntyr-positive neurons after SIN-1-exposure, whereas both ranged over 2-3% in ACSF controls. Mn (III) tetrakis (4-benzoic acid) porphyrin (MnTBAP, a broad-spectrum scavenger of reactive species) significantly reduced the percentages of DNP- and Ntyr-positive neurons (P = 0.04 and 0.002, respectively) compared to a SIN-1-exposed, untreated group at 24 hr after SIN-1 exposure. There were no significant differences between MnTBAP-treated and ACSF controls (P = 0.7 for DNP and 0.2 for Ntyr). These results further demonstrate peroxynitrite-induced protein oxidation and nitration and the efficiency of MnTBAP in scavenging peroxynitrite.",
keywords = "3-morpholinosydnonimine, Oxidative stress, Reactive nitrogen species, Scavenger of reactive species, Secondary spinal cord injury",
author = "Feng Bao and DeWitt, {Douglas S.} and Prough, {Donald S.} and Danxia Liu",
doi = "10.1002/jnr.10481",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience Research",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
T1 - Peroxynitrite generated in the rat spinal cord induces oxidation and nitration of proteins
T2 - Reduction by MN (III) tetrakis (4-benzoic acid) porphyrin
AU - Bao, Feng
AU - DeWitt, Douglas S.
AU - Prough, Donald S.
AU - Liu, Danxia
N2 - To determine whether peroxynitrite at the concentration and duration present after spinal cord injury induces protein oxidation and nitration in vivo, the peroxynitrite donor 3-morpholinosydnonimine (SIN-1) was administered into the gray matter of the rat spinal cord for 5 hr. The cords were removed at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hr after SIN-1 exposure, immunohistochemically stained with antibodies to dinitrophenyl (DNP) and nitrotyrosine (Ntyr), markers of protein oxidation and nitration, respectively, and the immunostained neurons were counted. The percentages of DNP-positive (P = 0.023-0.002) and Ntyr-positive (P < 0.001 for all) neurons were significantly higher in the SIN-1-exposed groups than in the ACSF controls at each time, suggesting that peroxynitrite induced intracellular oxidation and nitration of proteins. The percentages of DNP- and Ntyr-positive neurons were not significantly different over time in either SIN-1- or ACSF-exposed groups (P = 0.20-1.00). The percentage of DNP-positive neurons was 7.6 ± 3% to 12 ± 4.2% at 6-24 hr, and it was 14 ± 2% to 19 ± 2% at 6-24 hr for Ntyr-positive neurons after SIN-1-exposure, whereas both ranged over 2-3% in ACSF controls. Mn (III) tetrakis (4-benzoic acid) porphyrin (MnTBAP, a broad-spectrum scavenger of reactive species) significantly reduced the percentages of DNP- and Ntyr-positive neurons (P = 0.04 and 0.002, respectively) compared to a SIN-1-exposed, untreated group at 24 hr after SIN-1 exposure. There were no significant differences between MnTBAP-treated and ACSF controls (P = 0.7 for DNP and 0.2 for Ntyr). These results further demonstrate peroxynitrite-induced protein oxidation and nitration and the efficiency of MnTBAP in scavenging peroxynitrite.
AB - To determine whether peroxynitrite at the concentration and duration present after spinal cord injury induces protein oxidation and nitration in vivo, the peroxynitrite donor 3-morpholinosydnonimine (SIN-1) was administered into the gray matter of the rat spinal cord for 5 hr. The cords were removed at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hr after SIN-1 exposure, immunohistochemically stained with antibodies to dinitrophenyl (DNP) and nitrotyrosine (Ntyr), markers of protein oxidation and nitration, respectively, and the immunostained neurons were counted. The percentages of DNP-positive (P = 0.023-0.002) and Ntyr-positive (P < 0.001 for all) neurons were significantly higher in the SIN-1-exposed groups than in the ACSF controls at each time, suggesting that peroxynitrite induced intracellular oxidation and nitration of proteins. The percentages of DNP- and Ntyr-positive neurons were not significantly different over time in either SIN-1- or ACSF-exposed groups (P = 0.20-1.00). The percentage of DNP-positive neurons was 7.6 ± 3% to 12 ± 4.2% at 6-24 hr, and it was 14 ± 2% to 19 ± 2% at 6-24 hr for Ntyr-positive neurons after SIN-1-exposure, whereas both ranged over 2-3% in ACSF controls. Mn (III) tetrakis (4-benzoic acid) porphyrin (MnTBAP, a broad-spectrum scavenger of reactive species) significantly reduced the percentages of DNP- and Ntyr-positive neurons (P = 0.04 and 0.002, respectively) compared to a SIN-1-exposed, untreated group at 24 hr after SIN-1 exposure. There were no significant differences between MnTBAP-treated and ACSF controls (P = 0.7 for DNP and 0.2 for Ntyr). These results further demonstrate peroxynitrite-induced protein oxidation and nitration and the efficiency of MnTBAP in scavenging peroxynitrite.
KW - 3-morpholinosydnonimine
KW - Oxidative stress
KW - Reactive nitrogen species
KW - Scavenger of reactive species
KW - Secondary spinal cord injury
U2 - 10.1002/jnr.10481
DO - 10.1002/jnr.10481
JO - Journal of Neuroscience Research
JF - Journal of Neuroscience Research


text:
Q: Memory latency measurement with time stamp counter I have written the following code which first flushes two array elements and then tries to read elements in order to measure the hit/miss latencies.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <x86intrin.h>
#include <time.h>
int main()
{
    /* create array */
    int array[ 100 ];
    int i;
    for ( i = 0; i < 100; i++ )
        array[ i ] = i;   // bring array to the cache

    uint64_t t1, t2, ov, diff1, diff2, diff3;

    /* flush the first cache line */
    _mm_lfence();
    _mm_clflush( &array[ 30 ] );
    _mm_clflush( &array[ 70 ] );
    _mm_lfence();

    /* READ MISS 1 */
    _mm_lfence();           // fence to keep load order
    t1 = __rdtsc();         // set start time
    _mm_lfence();
    int tmp = array[ 30 ];   // read the first elemet => cache miss
    _mm_lfence();
    t2 = __rdtsc();         // set stop time
    _mm_lfence();

    diff1 = t2 - t1;        // two fence statements are overhead
    printf( "tmp is %d\ndiff1 is %lu\n", tmp, diff1 );

    /* READ MISS 2 */
    _mm_lfence();           // fence to keep load order
    t1 = __rdtsc();         // set start time
    _mm_lfence();
    tmp = array[ 70 ];      // read the second elemet => cache miss (or hit due to prefetching?!)
    _mm_lfence();
    t2 = __rdtsc();         // set stop time
    _mm_lfence();

    diff2 = t2 - t1;        // two fence statements are overhead
    printf( "tmp is %d\ndiff2 is %lu\n", tmp, diff2 );

    /* READ HIT*/
    _mm_lfence();           // fence to keep load order
    t1 = __rdtsc();         // set start time
    _mm_lfence();
    tmp = array[ 30 ];   // read the first elemet => cache hit
    _mm_lfence();
    t2 = __rdtsc();         // set stop time
    _mm_lfence();

    diff3 = t2 - t1;        // two fence statements are overhead
    printf( "tmp is %d\ndiff3 is %lu\n", tmp, diff3 );

    /* measuring fence overhead */
    _mm_lfence();
    t1 = __rdtsc();
    _mm_lfence();
    _mm_lfence();
    t2 = __rdtsc();
    _mm_lfence();
    ov = t2 - t1;

    printf( "lfence overhead is %lu\n", ov );
    printf( "cache miss1 TSC is %lu\n", diff1-ov );
    printf( "cache miss2 (or hit due to prefetching) TSC is %lu\n", diff2-ov );
    printf( "cache hit TSC is %lu\n", diff3-ov );

    return 0;
}

And output is
# gcc -O3 -o simple_flush simple_flush.c
# taskset -c 0 ./simple_flush
tmp is 30
diff1 is 529
tmp is 70
diff2 is 222
tmp is 30
diff3 is 46
lfence overhead is 32
cache miss1 TSC is 497
cache miss2 (or hit due to prefetching) TSC is 190
cache hit TSC is 14
# taskset -c 0 ./simple_flush
tmp is 30
diff1 is 486
tmp is 70
diff2 is 276
tmp is 30
diff3 is 46
lfence overhead is 32
cache miss1 TSC is 454
cache miss2 (or hit due to prefetching) TSC is 244
cache hit TSC is 14
# taskset -c 0 ./simple_flush
tmp is 30
diff1 is 848
tmp is 70
diff2 is 222
tmp is 30
diff3 is 46
lfence overhead is 34
cache miss1 TSC is 814
cache miss2 (or hit due to prefetching) TSC is 188
cache hit TSC is 12

There are some problems with the output for reading array[70]. The TSC is neither hit nor miss. I had flushed that item similar to array[30]. One possibility is that when array[40] is accessed, the HW prefetcher brings array[70]. So, that should be a hit. However, the TSC is much more than a hit. You can verify that the hit TSC is about 20 when I try to read array[30] for the second time.
Even, if array[70] is not prefetched, the TSC should be similar to a cache miss.
Is there any reason for that?
UPDATE1:
In order to make an array read, I tried (void) *((int*)array+i) as suggested by Peter and Hadi.
In the output I see many negative results. I mean the overhead seems to be larger than (void) *((int*)array+i)
UPDATE2:
I forgot to add volatile. The results are now meaningful.

A: First, note that the two calls to printf after measuring diff1 and diff2 may perturb the state of the L1D and even the L2. On my system, with printf, the reported values for diff3-ov range between 4-48 cycles (I've configured my system so that the TSC frequency is about equal to the core frequency). The most common values are those of the L2 and L3 latencies. If the reported value is 8, then we've got our L1D cache hit. If it is larger than 8, then most probably the preceding call to printf has kicked out the target cache line from the L1D and possibly the L2 (and in some rare cases, the L3!), which would explain the measured latencies that are higher than 8. @PeterCordes have suggested to use (void) *((volatile int*)array + i) instead of temp = array[i]; printf(temp). After making this change, my experiments show that most reported measurements for diff3-ov are exactly 8 cycles (which suggests that the measurement error is about 4 cycles), and the only other values that get reported are 0, 4, and 12. So Peter's approach is strongly recommended.
In general, the main memory access latency depends on many factors including the state of the MMU caches and the impact of the page table walkers on the data caches, the core frequency, the uncore frequency, the state and configuration of the memory controller and the memory chips with respect to the target physical address, uncore contention, and on-core contention due to hyperthreading. array[70] might be in a different virtual page (and physical page) than array[30] and their IPs of the load instructions and the addresses of the target memory locations may interact with the prefetchers in complex ways. So there can be many reasons why cache miss1 is different from cache miss2. A thorough investigation is possible, but it would require a lot of effort as you might imagine. Generally, if your core frequency is larger than 1.5 GHz (which is smaller than the TSC frequency on high-perf Intel processors), then an L3 load miss will take at least 60 core cycles. In your case, both miss latencies are over 100 cycles, so these are most likely L3 misses. In some extremely rare cases though, cache miss2 seems to be close to the L3 or L2 latency ranges, which would be due to prefetching.

I've determined that the following code gives a statistically more accurate measurement on Haswell:
t1 = __rdtscp(&dummy);
tmp = *((volatile int*)array + 30);
asm volatile ("add $1, %1\n\t"
              "add $1, %1\n\t"
              "add $1, %1\n\t"
              "add $1, %1\n\t"
              "add $1, %1\n\t"
              "add $1, %1\n\t"
              "add $1, %1\n\t"
              "add $1, %1\n\t"
              "add $1, %1\n\t"
              "add $1, %1\n\t"
              "add $1, %1\n\t"
          : "+r" (tmp));
t2 = __rdtscp(&dummy);
t2 = __rdtscp(&dummy);
loadlatency = t2 - t1 - 60; // 60 is the overhead

The probability that loadlatency is 4 cycles is 97%. The probability that loadlatency is 8 cycles is 1.7%. The probability that loadlatency takes other values is 1.3%. All of the other values are larger than 8 and multiple of 4. I'll try to add an explanation later.

A: Some ideas:

*

*Perhaps a[70] was prefetched into some level of cache besides L1?

*Perhaps some optimization in DRAM causes this access to be fast, for instance maybe the row buffer is left open after accessing a[30].

You should investigate other access besides a[30] and a[70] to see if you get different numbers. E.g. do you get the same timings for hit on a[30] followed by a[31] (which should be fetched in the same line as a[30], if you use aligned_alloc with 64 byte alignment). And do other elements like a[69] and a[71] give the same timings as a[70]?


text:
Q: django-reversion revert ManyToMany fields outside admin I am using django-reversion in my project.
And it works good except one thing:
I can't get previous versions of ManyToMany fields. But in django admin it is works, not in my code.
To get previous version I use following code:

vprod = Version.objects.get_for_date(product, ondate).get_object_version().object

and it works except m2m field
where 'product' is object of Product class,
class Product(models.Model):
    name = models.CharField(max_length=255)
    elements = models.ManyToManyField(Sku)

class Sku(models.Model):
    name = models.CharField(max_length=255, verbose_name="SKU Name")

I can get vprod.name and it returns what I need, but when I try vprod.elements.all() it returns list only the current (last) version, even if the number of elements changed.

A: If I understand it correctly, I think you should get the revision for the version; the version contains the data of the object, the revision contains versions for multiple objects. Have a look at:

some_version.revision.version_set.all()

Concretely, I think you should use (untested):

[
      v for v in Version.objects.get_for_date(product, ondate).revision.version_set.all()
      if version.content_type == ContentType.objects.get_for_model(Sku)
  ]

Note, btw, that reversions should know that it should follow relationships. Using the low level API:

reversion.register(YourModel, follow=["your_foreign_key_field"])

A: I had the same issue and thanks to @Webthusiast's answer I got my working code. Adapting to your example would be something like this.
Imports:
from django.contrib.contenttypes.models import ContentType
import reversion

Register your models:
reversion.register(Sku)
reversion.register(Product, follow=['elements'])

And then you can iterate:
object = Product.objects.get(some_id)
versions = reversion.get_for_object(self.object)
for version in versions:
    elements = [v.object_version.object \
        for v in version.revision.version_set.all() \
        if v.content_type == ContentType.objects.get_for_model(Product)]

The documentation for this is now on Read the Docs. Refer to the 'Advanced model registration' section of the Low-level API page.


text:
Five Years In: Jukin's SVP of Content Acquisitions Christina Smith Reflects on Half a Decade with Jukin
By David Getz on March 29, 2019
After five and half years at Jukin Media, Christina Smith, Senior Vice President of Content Acquisitions, reflects on her role, her growth, and what she's learned as Jukin's Content Acquisitions lead and a valued member of the leadership team.
JM: What was your first position with Jukin?
CS: My first position at Jukin was as the Manager of the Content Operations Department. My job was to oversee how we as a company would acquire videos and how we would process them.
JM: That sounds a bit different from what you're doing now. Can you summarize your responsibilities at Jukin today?
CS: Today, I work with Jukin's team of seasoned creative research and clearance experts to monitor the internet 24/7, as the SVP of Content Acquisitions. We are responsible for identifying and acquiring the world's most compelling user-generated content for our brands and partners efficiently and with urgency.
JM: What's one important lesson you've learned during your time at Jukin?
CS: Success requires execution and innovation. Ensuring the trains are running as expected, aka "execution", is only part of the job. You also need to dedicate time to testing new ways of doing what you already do and time to testing completely new things. I call this area innovation. Succeeding in innovation requires you to welcome failure. If you are afraid to fail, it could slow down forward progress. So, don't be afraid to fail. Test, analyze, then decide to iterate or implement quickly... then move on to the next idea.
JM: What's one misconception people in the industry have about content acquisitions?
CS: That we are just watching YouTube videos all day. While watching video content is a very important part of the job, we have developed a rather sophisticated engine that leverages methodology and proprietary technology to finely hone our expertise in the curation, verification, and acquisition of the best UGC videos. The team is empowered and informed to make educated decisions using Jukin's 10 years of historical data around video and monetization intelligence.
JM: What do you enjoy most about coming to work every day?
CS: Working with my team. I work with an impressive group of smart, driven, and kind Jukiners.
JM: What advice do you have for young people entering the workforce?
CS: Do your job well, but efficiently. Being more efficient than others creates the opportunity for you to volunteer to take on new tasks. Taking on new tasks allows you to show other sides of your skillset and/or allows you to work with people/teams you may not have otherwise. This can open doors for you.
JM: How do you feel content acquisitions (and/or Jukin as a whole) has evolved since you first started?
CS: It was a three-man team. We covered 9 hours a day, M-F all working out of Los Angeles. Today, we are a global operation. With more than half our team based internationally, we are up and running 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.


Experiencing headache pain can disrupt your day-to-day activities and take precious time out of your life that you just can't get back. Many people try to self-diagnose the cause of their headache pain.
Headaches are serious business and trying to diagnose the problem yourself – particularly with potentially erroneous online information – can lead to a host of other problems, especially if you have other health conditions of which you are not aware.
Individuals who have health problems may be in a state of denial when it comes to how severe some of their symptoms really are. Not wanting to admit that you may have a problem can spell disaster if you are unaware of what is truly happening in your body and it goes untreated.
Denying potential health problems will only prolong the headache pain.Receiving an accurate headache diagnosis is important because it helps you to understand what is really going on in your body.
Many people do not realize the connection between certain symptoms and how they relate to other illnesses or health conditions. One example is that a severe headache can be caused by extremely high blood pressure. When the blood pressure is high enough to cause a headache, it is important to see a doctor to, not only receive a headache diagnosis, but also to control the high blood pressure.
If you don't have proper medical training, you will likely be unaware of symptoms that are associated with certain health conditions. When headaches recur frequently or fluctuate in severity, there may be more to the situation than you realize.
An accurate headache diagnosis can provide the doctor with the information they need to help eliminate your headache pain, as well as offer clues as to other potential health problems that also need to be addressed.
Diagnosing a headache on your own can lead to potential problems, as underestimating the seriousness of the condition may leave you vulnerable to other potential health issues that could be much more severe.
Unless you know what is causing the headache and what other symptoms are associated with it, you may be overlooking serious health issues in other areas of your body.
Instead of risking your health by trying to diagnose the cause of your headache pain on your own, you can receive an accurate headache diagnosis when you visit New Jersey Headache Institute. A headache doctor will go over your symptoms and help your uncover the root of your problem.
We will address the issue at its cause and help you get back on the road to living a productive, pain free life. Please contact us today.


Distribution of information and packages are important for any company since effective communication is paramount for a business' success. In this case, mailing companies are very useful to businesses since they are one of the most efficient and safest way of transporting important information. In order to ensure that you make the best out of this service, it is important for you to be thoroughly informed about. The information listed below will be of great help for startup companies who are willing to learn more about such services.
A few decades ago, most businesses used the services of post offices in order to get this job done. If you wish to send an important message to another company pr even your own branch, you had to wait in a long queue at the post office. It does not matter how urgent the task was since the rules were the same for everyone. However, in the current era, the tables have turned. Since most companies posses their own mailing equipments, the industry has become quite self-sufficient.
The advancements in technology have resulted in highly efficient mailing house like DMO for businesses. These take very little time in terms of processing and distribution. This reduces the amount of time wasted during the process to a great extent. Unfortunately, these services do not come cheap. Not all businesses can afford them due to their expensive rates. However, it is important to note that by using these services your company will be able to save a lot of money on the long term.
Also known as postage machines, these are one of the most commonly used warehousing and distribution for picking and packing online product range in the current market. This method allows companies to print postage without having to go to post office. Whether it is letters or packages, there is no need to visit the post office since you can do it on your own. This is a cost effective method considering the fact that these meters are much cheaper than the stamps that are sold at the post office.
Although these can be slightly expensive, they are known to save a lot of time for the employees. This method's ease of implementation enables the workers to get the task done very quickly. This increases the efficiency of the overall process. The machine is capable of folding the letters, brochures and any other document at a very quick speed.
Apart from these, there are so many other equipments that you can consider purchasing. Regardless of their size and cost, they all will be definitely useful for your business.
Eyes can be tricked when inconvenient perceptibility is provided or clarity is denied. Not everybody has a perfect 20-20 vision and even with spectacles straining while reading cause misreading that will have adverse effects in matters related to important documents. Accountants especially need to see columns and rows in absolute clarity if not the whole estimation goes haywire resulting in colossal losses. Fortunately, on the desktop screen enlarging facility is there to make sure that the digits and the characters are seen properly. But on a printed page if there is an oversight things can get misconstrued. Space for printing also has a bearing on reading as a sentence or statement in not deciphered properly the interpretation will be awry. If too long, the trend will also can be broken or difficult to assimilate. This is a serious matter when counting and calculating money or price totals in a few minutes but for story books or newspapers haste does not even count.
The customers in a shopping tour or diners in restaurants, salesmen/ women and also bank staff are tensed when they read slips intently that reflects the money transactions in which they cannot miss even one iota. The paper on which the data is printed has to be aide enough to make it easy for the eyes. This why the machines at the counters or printers now can be fed with 80×80 thermal rolls having this in mind. Besides, it is important for high volume printers to work with broader papers such as this because during a heavy duty operation of printing in bulk, narrow papers tend to get crushed and block the process. The dimension mentioned here is, an eighty millimetre width and eighty millimetre diameter of the fully packed spin. The matrix coating on the paper is a cutting edge technology used for printing purposes.
Providing such a width has other good purposes. A customer can file the receipts or bills easily for future calculation of spent money. For a trader or the sales outlet, customers' buying behaviour will be exposed thorough them. For a banker and for that matter any accounting personnel in companies, the printed form can be checked with the computer to make doubly sure of the transactions for the eyes that read and fingers that flick the keys cannot be always be robotic and tends to be erratic at times. For this reason, thermal tito tickets are really handy.
In the printed bill there are many features that catch the eyes. Apart from the money spent, loyalty points also get highlighted which will keep the customer posted with updated amounts to redeem. Further, the address and the telephone number of the outlet is found at the end and at some outlets and banks the servicing officers' name is included. It is also possible to see a paid advertisement of a product. All these are like fringe benefits for the customers, it is hoped.


Thanks to a good handful of interest we have already gathered a day long lineup of speakers for our Technical Seminar on May 3rd. Are you interested in presenting? We are looking to gather about a dozen more presentations for the Seminar. Please reach out to us at info@mokansfpe.org or Joe Meyer at joe.meyer@hei-eng.com for more information.
You can register for the event on our Seminar page and see all of the speakers and topics who are already presenting. We look forward to a great seminar this year.


text:
Ministry Health
Sermon Starters
Support and Resources For Pastors and
Christian Ministry Professionals
Thomas F. Fischer, M.Div., M.S.A., Editor
The Ninth Sunday After Pentecost
Option #1: "The Weeds in the Wheat--Then and Now"
Matthew 13:24-30; 36-43
Rev. Wayne Dobratz
OVERVIEW: Jesus tells us today the story of The Weeds in the Wheat. To understand Jesus' parable, you need to understand these are no ordinary weeds. This kind of weed was the type that was impossible to identify until the heads bear their fruit. These weeds were sown by an enemy and were the only kind of grassy weed known to be poisonous. Birds would swoon if they ate its grain. The crime was common enough in the Roman Empire for there to be a law against it. It has also happened in modern times in Ireland and in the Middle East. The owner's estimation of the problem is still true today: "An enemy has done this." So many today blame God for evil. But there is an enemy at work. The battle against this enemy still goes on today. Jesus' story also explains why the Lord doesn't take the more radical action that we sometimes expect.
I. The same seed: Matt 13:3ff; text, v37; 1 Pet 1:23
II. The same crime: text, 24-28, 37-39; Matt 13:18-19; Acts 20:30; Gal 2:4; 2 Pet 2:1
III. The same patience: text, 28b-30a; James 5:7-8; 2 Pet 3:9
IV. The same conclusion: text, 30b, 40-43; Mal 3:17-18; 1 Cor 4:5; Mal 4:1-2
Matthew Henry writes: (also vv36-43). This parable represents the present and future state of the gospel church; Christ's care of it, the devil's enmity against it, the mixture there is in it of good and bad in this world, and the separation between them in the other world. So prone is fallen man to sin, that if the enemy sows the tares, he may go his way, they will spring up, and do harm; whereas, when good seed is sown, it must be tended, watered, and fenced. The servants complained to their master: "Sir, didn't you sow good seed in your field?" No doubt he did; whatever is amiss in the church, we are sure it is not from Christ. Though gross transgressors, and such as openly oppose the gospel, ought to be separated from the society of the faithful, yet no human skill can make an exact separation. Those who oppose must not be cut off, but instructed, and with meekness. And though good and bad are together in this world, yet at the great day they shall be parted; then the righteous and the wicked shall be plainly known; here sometimes it is hard to distinguish between them. Let us, knowing the terrors of the Lord, not do iniquity. At death, believers shall shine forth themselves; at the great day they shall shine forth before all the world. They shall shine by reflection, with light borrowed from the Fountain of Light. Their sanctification will be made perfect, and their justification published. May we be found of that happy number.
Richard Lenski underscores the future of "the righteous" in v43: "The term dikaioi, which is always forensic, denotes those who possess the quality of righteousness by virtue of having the divine verdict in their favor, that verdict pronouncing their acquittal. The glory that became theirs when they were declared righteous shall at last break forth as did the glory of Jesus at the time of His Transfiguration. 'Like the sun' portrays what is beyond our experience. Yet we think of the sun's brilliance and splendor."
Option #2: "Sonlight!"
Matthew 13:24-30 [36-43]
Rev. Kelly Bedard
A. Theological Weed-Whacking
1. Elevating ourselves to field managers, sorters over/of good and evil, determining harvest time(s)
2. God alone determines the harvest time, the reapers, and the the work to be done
B. Growing Like Weeds!
1. Jesus allowing Himself to be uprooted, collected and burned on the cross for our sake
2. Not worrying about who is growing next to us but, instead, focusing our faces toward the Son, "turning" others
1. katheudo (v25): sleep; euphemistically, to be dead; metaphorically, to yield to sloth and sin; to be indifferent to one's salvation.
2. echthros (v25): enemy, foe; hated, odious, hateful; hostile, hating, and opposing another; used of people as at enmity with God by their sin; opposing (God) in the mind; the devil, who is the most bitter enemy of the divine government.
3. zizanion (v25): tares; a kind of darnel, resembling wheat except the grains are black.
4. We no longer need scramble to secure our place in the field, but are free to help the ones around us turn their faces toward [God] as well. Together we grow and, though it's not always easy waiting for the fulfillment of the harvest, God is always right on time. (Sabbatheology by the Crossings Community)
5. God is like a teacher who does not care so much about who cheats as He cares about who learns. He bides His time with a classful of smug stinkers just so one struggling under-achiever can pass his test. (Garret Keizer)
6. Can we even comprehend a God that loves the world so much that every grain of wheat is significant? What if we started living our lives as if that were true? (Wanda Copeland)
7. Once upon a time there was an eighth grade football team that inherited a tradition of losing almost all the games of a season. The other parishes in the league provided uniforms, a coaching staff, even summer training. The kids from St. Useless didn't have a coach or uniforms or much parental support. They were a ragtag band of talented but untrained kids. Then one day a young man watched them stumble through practice. "Can I help?" he asked them. The team was ready to accept help from anyone. "You guys are the best!" he said. "There's no reason you can't win the conference. But you have to practice, be confident of yourself, and be good friends. No more fighting among the team or with me if I'm going to be your unofficial coach." The kids agreed. The first thing the coach taught them was how be friends and play together with one another. Then he told them practice after practice how good they were. Finally he made them work, work, work. You know what happened. They went undefeated and won the conference. "He made us believe in ourselves," the kids said. The next year the parents hired a "real coach" and the team finished last. (Andrew Greeley)
Ministry Health Sermon Starters
Copyright 2002 Ministry Health, LLC
http://ministryhealth.net
Go to Main Page
Main Site: http://ministryhealth.net/
Copyright © 1997-2005 Ministry Health, LLC All Rights Reserved.
Microsoft FrontPage and Microsoft Internet Explorer are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation
Adobe Acrobat and PDF are registered trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated
Contact Support for any technical issues with this website!
This page was revised on: Friday, January 20, 2006 12:10:32 PM


May 20, 2014 • The request is similar to the one made by Starbucks back in September and comes after a the group Moms Demand Action For Gun Sense in America launched a national campaign.
April 27, 2014 • The National Rifle Association's convention drew a counter-demonstration in Indianapolis this weekend, as advocates for gun control pressed their own agenda.
January 3, 2014 • Federal agencies are proposing new rules for handling gun buyers' background checks, in changes the White House says will "keep guns out of potentially dangerous hands." The changes include a clarification of rules barring firearm possession due to mental health problems.
December 31, 2013 • Judge William Skretny in Buffalo rejected arguments from opponents that a ban on large-capacity magazines and the sale of semi-automatic rifles infringed on Second Amendment rights.
December 13, 2013 • On the surface, it may look like the gun lobby ultimately won the political battles that mattered in the past year. After all, Congress failed to pass tougher gun laws. But the reality is more mixed; the result was more of a standoff.
September 12, 2013 • The effort to override a veto by Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon on legislation that would have nixed federal rules fell one vote shy of passing.
August 29, 2013 • The two orders would stop private individuals from importing U.S.-made military surplus weapons from abroad and close a loophole that allows some felons to skirt background checks.
July 10, 2013 • Lawmakers voted to override a veto by Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn, who is facing a tough re-election fight next year. The Illinois State Police expects to receive 300,000 applications for conceal-carry permits in the first year.
June 28, 2013 • The Gun Owners of America says allowing the estimated 11 million immigrants now in the U.S. illegally to become citizens and voters would eventually help Democrats enact more gun control laws.
May 31, 2013 • The letters were sent to President Obama, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and a gun control group the mayor supports. Investigators say they were postmarked in Louisiana, near where the man being questioned lives.
April 18, 2013 • With the failure of Senate gun-control legislation, House Republicans need not worry about a torrent of negative campaign ads against them over their opposition to such bills. Some Senate Democrats are likely breathing a sigh of relief, too.
April 15, 2013 • The Senate is set to take up legislation that would expand gun buyer background checks on the heels of an endorsement from an important gun rights group, and steady pressure from Sandy Hook families.


text:
Dow Jones, Nasdaq, S&P 500 weekly preview: Why analysts expect stocks to rotate lower
Will Gold Be 3rd Time Lucky With $1,950 After PCE?
By Barani Krishnan/Investing.comCommoditiesJan 25, 2023 04:48AM ET
www.investing.com/analysis/will-gold-be-3rd-time-lucky-with-1950-after-pce-200634680
By Barani Krishnan/Investing.com | Jan 25, 2023 04:48AM ET
Barani Krishnan/Investing.com
Gold has missed the $1,950 target by less than $10 twice this week
If Friday's PCE Index shows a meaningful inflation drop, gold could be 3rd time lucky
Dollar, bond yields need to be aligned lower, too, for gold to get to $1,950 and beyond
Gold has come within $10 of breaching the $1,950 resistance back-to-back in the past two sessions. The third test or successful breach could likely come Friday when the PCE Index provides the latest update on US inflation.
The question is whether the dollar and Treasury yields will be aligned to support the test for gold and form a solid berth for it to move beyond $1,950.
Gold has virtually been a one-way trade over the past three months, rising from October's closing level of $1,640.70 on COMEX futures to its latest settlement of $1926.12, as the dollar and yields tumbled on bets of smaller US rates this year versus 2022.
Spot Gold 4-Hour Chart
Charts by SKCharting.com, with data powered by Investing.com
Under ordinary circumstances, gold would be a hedge against inflation. Investors buy it as a store of value against the dollar, which typically erodes in value when prices of goods and services go up.
However, what the US economy is experiencing now is nowhere near ordinary as bets that the Federal Reserve will downsize — and eventually pause — rate hikes this year have become the No. 1 trade across markets.
That has put gold at the center of macro market attention. Every dollar and yield dip has become an opportunity to bid the yellow metal higher. Data on cooling inflation has, thus, become gold's best ally versus the soaring prices of goods and services that used to make a case for buying the precious metal.
While the Consumer Price Index, or CPI, is the broader inflation benchmark for America and the world, Friday's PCE Index, which is a reading on personal consumption expenditures, happens to be the Fed's preferred inflation gauge. That makes it just as important in deciding gold's immediate direction.
The Fed particularly looks at the "core" component of the PCE data that presents a "cleaner" read on inflation by stripping out volatile food and energy prices. Wall Street economists have been fairly accurate with their forecasts on core year-on-year PCE growth. In October and November, their consensus was for a growth of 5.0% and 4.7% year-on-year, respectively — exactly what the Commerce Department reported. For the December data due on Friday, the expectation is for a growth of 4.4%. If correct, it would be the lowest annual reading on core inflation since October 2021.
In a bid to control surging prices, the Fed added 425 basis points to US interest rates since March via seven rate hikes. Prior to that, interest rates peaked at just 25 basis points, as the central bank slashed them to nearly zero after the global COVID-19 outbreak in 2020. The Fed, which executed four back-to-back jumbo rate hikes of 75 basis points from June through November, imposed a more modest 50-basis point increase in December.
For its next rate decision on Feb. 1, economists expect the central bank to announce an even smaller hike of 25 basis points. The last time the Fed announced a 25 basis-point increase was in March 2022, at the start of its current rate hike cycle.
Analysts on the ForexLive forum said in a note earlier this week that the PCE "will inform expectations for the Fed's February meeting, where a 25 bps rate hike is expected."
But if other material data within the PCE Index suggested that inflation remains sticky, then the Fed might have second thoughts about slowing rate hikes further in February, said analysts at Credit Suisse. "If there is an upside surprise within the PCE data, then pricing for 50-bps could pick up once again," they said in a note.
Aside from the PCE data, the preliminary reading for the 4th quarter US Gross Domestic Product, due on Thursday, could be another factor deciding gold's direction toward $1,950, though it is expected to have a lesser degree of influence than the inflation number. For what it's worth, GDP is expected to have grown by just 2.6% in the final quarter of 2022 versus 3.2% in the third quarter — another potentially bullish element for gold, which also thrives on any weakness in the US economy.
Gold prices have become more volatile in January than in the past two months, but they have barely lost their upward momentum, suggesting that bulls in the space are betting heavily on a 25-bps hike on Feb. 1.
Over the past 48 hours, gold futures narrowly missed making a widely-expected breach of the $1,950 resistance, hitting a session high of $1,943.80 on Monday and an intraday peak of $1,940.65 on Tuesday.
Forecasters are anticipating gold to hit $1,970 and $2,000 soon, en route to what many believe will be a new high overwriting the August 2020 record of $2,078 on COMEX and $2,064.52 in spot gold,
Commodities strategists at TD Securities said the "bar is low" for hedge funds in gold to catalyze yet another buying program. "However, algo trading flows are expected to remain limited with substantial purchases only likely above the $1,970 range."
Nick Cawley, a precious metals strategist who blogs on DailyFX, said this week's two heavyweight US data releases — referring to the PCE and GDP numbers — could set gold on track to its return to $2,000 pricing. "Both have the potential to move the US dollar sharply" lower, he suggested.
So, where should the dollar be over the next 24 hours to help get gold beyond its $1,950 target? The Dollar Index Futures hit a low of 101.545 in Wednesday's pre-US session.
Dollar Index Futures 4-Hour Chart
Said Sunil Kumar Dixit, chief technical strategist at SKCharting.com:
"DX needs to stay under 102 in order to continue [the] bearish trail. A temporary retest of 102 and rejection followed by breach of 101.38 support may push DX lower towards 101 and perhaps 100.70 to set stage for gold hitting $1,956-$1,968 and even $1,972."
On yields, the benchmark US 10-year note hit a low of 3.447% in Wednesday's pre-US session. Dixit said they need to come down to 3.30%.
"Yields' temporary bounce toward 3.50-3.55% may be short-lived, to be followed by a retreat and break below the 3.45% level. That could bring yields to 3.40-3.35%, even 3.30%, which would be conducive for $1,950-$1,970 gold."
10-Year Yield 4-Hour Chart
As for gold itself, the spot price could immediately peak at $1,972, said Dixit.
"Tuesday's swift move towards the $1,942 resistance and $1,917 support, followed by a settlement above $1,936 shows affirmation of bullish continuation that targets $1,968 and $1,972 mainly.
The minor move range will be $1,952-$1,917, with $1,930-$1,935 being the mid range."
He also pointed out that it was critically important that gold hold above the $1,920-$1,917 support to maintain its uptrend. "If this support fails, a drop to $1,900 and $1,880 will begin."
Disclaimer: Barani Krishnan uses a range of views outside his own to bring diversity to his analysis of any market. For neutrality, he sometimes presents contrarian views and market variables. He does not hold positions in the commodities and securities he writes about.
OPEC meeting likely to maintain Dec output targets, weighing on crude prices Projected Fed rate hike of 25 bps to lead action across markets, including in gold US December jobs...
Gold Retraces After Hitting 9-Month Peak By Trading Point - Jan 30, 2023
Gold has staged a massive rebound since November, erasing a significant part of its 2022 decline. Moreover, the price stormed to a fresh nine-month high last week, but quickly...
Fed Week, Monthly Close Could Mark Turns for Gold and Silver By Jordan Roy-Byrne, CMT - Jan 30, 2023
The levels for Gold remain the same. There is resistance at $1950, $1960, and a potential pattern target measuring $2020. Last week Gold came within cents of $1950. We are on guard...
رياض فارع Jan 29, 2023 8:45AM ET
Thnak yo
YASHU PREETHI Jan 25, 2023 10:09PM ET
hi. sir I am your fan.... your my favorite Analysis.. sir....your articles 101% true...sir...💐💐👏👏✌
Barani Krishnan Jan 25, 2023 10:09PM ET
Thanks much, Yashu. Wishing you a good week ahead.
Barani Krishnan Jan 25, 2023 3:20PM ET
Almost there: Today's high 1,949.25
Gyuri Molnár Jan 25, 2023 1:49PM ET
One thing would be a banger. If gold and silver falls 25% from here. All the bets are on the long side.
getoverit Jan 25, 2023 9:27AM ET
Eventually China&Co will drop a bombshell which will spiral dollar down and gold up
SunilKumarDixit Jan 25, 2023 9:27AM ET
There are several more triggers apart from this that may be behind any potential big move in Gold.
SunilKumar Dixit oh yes! The whole collective west is working hard to ensure that happens :)
Caution mode before PCE numbers.
Barani Krishnan Jan 25, 2023 9:19AM ET
Appears to be Sunil; a little downdraft -- profit-taking perhaps -- on the 6-week run-up
But it's still holding above the $1,920-$1,917 support you cited
Yes sire. Gold above 1920-1917 looks good for upmove. Below this zone, revisit to 1900 initially.
SunilKumar Dixit Cutting losses as of now, standing around 1930
Markets have made up mind to accumulate longs on any dips as long as support holds.
Aung Kaung Myat Jan 25, 2023 8:51AM ET
nice idea 💡
Stocks dip, U.S. yields rise ahead of central bank flurry By Reuters - Jan 30, 2023 1


text:
Tropidocephala festiva är en insektsart som först beskrevs av William Lucas Distant 1906.  Tropidocephala festiva ingår i släktet Tropidocephala och familjen sporrstritar. Inga underarter finns listade i Catalogue of Life.

Källor

Sporrstritar
festiva


text:
Q: Writing actions for different Jbuttons In a previous question, it was recommended I used the following format to assign specific methods to specific Jbuttons. I get the same errors for each button.
public class MealPlannerGUI
{
    JPanel foodOptions;
    JButton pButton;
    JButton cButton;
    JButton fButton;
    static JComboBox[] box= new JComboBox[3];

    JPanel search;
    JLabel searchL ;
    JTextField foodSearch;
    JButton startSearch;

    JPanel foodProfile;
    JLabel foodLabel;
    JTextArea foodInfo;
    JButton addFood;

    JPanel currentStatus;
    JLabel foodsEaten;
    JComboBox foodsToday;
    JLabel calories;
    JTextArea totalKCal;
    JButton clearInfo;
     //ow Carbs
    FoodListMaker tester = new FoodListMaker();
    public void go()
    {
        JFrame frame = new JFrame();

        foodOptions = new JPanel();
        foodOptions.setBackground(Color.darkGray);

        pButton = new JButton ("Add");
        cButton = new JButton ("Add");
        fButton = new JButton ("Add");

        for (int i = 0; i<3; i++)
        {

            box[0] = new JComboBox (tester.groupProtein());
            box[1] = new JComboBox (tester.groupKCal());
            box[2] = new JComboBox (tester.groupFat());

            //box[3]= new JComboBox (fillOptionPanel(carbFoods.groupCarb()));
            foodOptions.add(box[i]);
        }

        search = new JPanel();
        search.setBackground(Color.BLUE);
        search.setLayout(new BoxLayout( search, BoxLayout.Y_AXIS));
        searchL = new JLabel("Search for a food:");
        //searchInfo= new JTextArea(10,20);
        startSearch = new JButton ("Search");
        //JScrollPane scrollPane = new JScrollPane(searchInfo);
        foodSearch = new JTextField(10);
        search.add(searchL);
        search.add(foodSearch);
        //search.add(searchInfo);
        search.add(startSearch);

    foodProfile = new JPanel();
    foodLabel = new JLabel("Food Contents Profile:");
    foodInfo = new JTextArea(10,20);;
    addFood= new JButton ("Add");
    foodsEaten= new JLabel ("Foods consumed today:");
    foodsToday= new JComboBox();
    calories= new JLabel ("Calorie Counter");
    totalKCal = new JTextArea( 1 , 2);
    foodProfile.add( foodLabel);
    foodProfile.add( foodInfo);
    foodProfile.add( addFood);

    currentStatus = new JPanel();
    currentStatus.setLayout(new BoxLayout( currentStatus, BoxLayout.Y_AXIS));
    currentStatus.add( foodsEaten);
    currentStatus.add( foodsToday);
    currentStatus.add( calories);
    currentStatus.add( totalKCal);

        frame.getContentPane().add(BorderLayout.NORTH,foodOptions);
        frame.getContentPane().add(BorderLayout.WEST,search);
        frame.getContentPane().add(BorderLayout.CENTER,foodProfile);
        frame.getContentPane().add(BorderLayout.EAST,currentStatus);
        frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
        frame.setSize(500,800);
        frame.setVisible(true);

    }
    startSearch.addActionListener(new ActionListener()
    {
        //@Override
        public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e)
        {
            String str = foodSearch.getText();
            searchFoods(str, tester.getFoodList());
        }
    });

    addFood.addActionListener(new ActionListener()
    {
         //@Override
         public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e)
         {
            foodsEaten = add(currentFood);
            foodsToday = new JComboBox (foodsConsumed());
            calorieTracker(currentFood.getKCal());
        }
     });

    pButton.addActionListener(new ActionListener()
    {
        //@Override
        public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e)
        {
            String foodChoice = (String)box[0].getSelectedItem();
            searchFoods(foodChoice, tester.getFoodList());
        }
    });
    cButton.addActionListener(new ActionListener()
    {
        //@Override
        public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e)
        {
            String foodChoice = (String)box[1].getSelectedItem();
            searchFoods(foodChoice, tester.getFoodList());
        }
    });
    fButton.addActionListener(new ActionListener()
    {
        //@Override
        public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e)
        {
            String foodChoice = (String)box[2].getSelectedItem();
            searchFoods(foodChoice, tester.getFoodList());
        }
    });

The first error is about how @Override requires a ";" which shouldn't be occuring.
The remaining errors refer to the structure of the code above    :
mealplans/MealPlannerGUI.java:104: <identifier> expected
    startSearch.addActionListener(new ActionListener()
                                 ^
mealplans/MealPlannerGUI.java:104: illegal start of type
    startSearch.addActionListener(new ActionListener()
                                  ^
mealplans/MealPlannerGUI.java:104: ')' expected
    startSearch.addActionListener(new ActionListener()
                                     ^
mealplans/MealPlannerGUI.java:104: ';' expected
    startSearch.addActionListener(new ActionListener()
                                                    ^
mealplans/MealPlannerGUI.java:104: illegal start of type
    startSearch.addActionListener(new ActionListener()
                                                     ^
mealplans/MealPlannerGUI.java:104: <identifier> expected
    startSearch.addActionListener(new ActionListener()

A: Non-declative statements can only appear in a constructor, method or static initializer rather than in the class block. You could move all calls to addActionListener into a initComponents method.

A: I am not sure about the @Override. Do you get the same error when you remove it ? I don't remember Overriding the nested ActionListener.
Please try removing it and tell me if you get the very same error.