text:
Home Local News Brunswick Brunswick County leaders question move to Myrtle Beach planning group
Brunswick County leaders question move to Myrtle Beach planning group
Cliff Pyron
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC (WWAY) — Myrtle Beach is getting ready to expand into North Carolina… sort of. The city's Metropolitan Planning Organization is moving its boundary north into Brunswick County.
Some leaders fear that could mean the county's transportation needs will not be a priority.
Myrtle Beach's MPO is moving at least into Shallotte. The big question is, how far into the county will they go?
"I believe as a North Carolinian we have our own identity, and that being said, I like to be able to have individuals to make those decisions living here versus living in another state," Brunswick County Commissioner Marty Cooke said.
The Grand Strand's MPO, which prioritizes regional transportation needs, has options to stretch as far as Southport. The move would give federal dollars for part of Brunswick County to the Myrtle Beach MPO for transportation planning. It would handle projects from sidewalks to interstates in southwestern Brunswick County.
Related Article: Shallotte's retail scene continues to grow at a fast pace
"I think people feel that they are being forced into a situation that is out of their control," Waccamaw Regional Council of Government Planning Director Mark Hoeweler said. "We certainly don't want to give that impression. We're bound by what the federal law is and what the census results are.'
The Grand Strand MPO will now meet individually with Brunswick County leaders to see if their town wants to be a part of the transition. They say they will not leap frog a town if somewhere further north wants to be part of the move.
Many Brunswick County leaders say they don't want anything to do with the MPO. Others are undecided.
"My constituents and my mayors are very confused, and I think information and answering there questions is the best thing to do," Rep. Frank Iler (R-17th District) said.
The Wilmington MPO is also considering a move south into Brunswick County.
Leaders say a decision on the Grand Strand extension must be made by August 31.
Myrtle Beach MPO
New Wave transfer station to open in downtown Wilmington
NCDOT conducting survey to shape future of transportation
Brunswick County leaders discuss the future of transportation


text:
Cette page dresse une liste de personnalités mortes au cours de l'année 1273 :

 25 mars : Thomas Béraud ou Bérard,  Grand Maître des Templiers.
 entre le 5 et le 13 mai : Ottaviano Ubaldini, cardinal italien.
 13 juin : Hōjō Masamura, septième shikken du bakufu Kamakura.
 18 juin : Jean de Cossonay, évêque de Lausanne.
 8 juillet : Anno von Sangershausen, maître de l'Ordre de Livonie,  grand maître de l'ordre Teutonique.
 9 octobre : Élisabeth de Bavière, reine de Germanie, de Jérusalem et de Sicile.
 20 octobre : Adélaïde de Bourgogne, duchesse de Brabant.
 17 décembre : Djalaleddine Roumi, poète et mystique persan inspirateur des derviches, à Konya.

 Al-Qurtubi, ou Al Imâm Abû 'Abdi Llâh Muhammad Ibn Ahmad Ibn Abî Bakr Al-Ansârî Al-Qurtubî, célèbre savant sunnite, théologien Ash'arite et juriste Malikite.
 Arsène Autorianos, patriarche de Nicée puis de Constantinople.
 Baudouin II de Courtenay, dernier empereur latin de Constantinople et marquis de Namur.
 Thomas Béraud, maître de l'Ordre du Temple.
 Philippe  (abbé de Clairvaux), abbé de Clairvaux, nommé évêque de Saint-Malo.
 Georges Elmacin, ou Makīn Ğirğīs ibn al-'Amid ibn Abī Ul-Yasir ibn Abī Ul-Mukārīm ibn Abī Ut-Tayyib, parfois appelé en Orient Ibn-Amid, historien de langue arabe.
 Eudes de Châteauroux, ou Ottone de Castro Rodolfi da Châteroux, surnommé le cardinal Candius ou Blancus, cardinal français.
 Robert de Keldeleth, religieux cistercien écossais qui fut abbé de Dunfermline, régent d'Écosse et chancelier d'Écosse, puis abbé de Melrose.
 Magnus Gibbonsson, comte des Orcades et comte de Caithness.
 Marie de Montmirail, dame de Meaux, de Montmirail et d'Oisy, de la Fère, de Saint-Gobain.
 Robert de Marzy, évêque de Nevers.
 Gui V de Sévérac, ou de Caylus-Sévérac, seigneur de Sévérac, est un chevalier croisé du Rouergue.

Notes et références

Liens externes

 .

Crédit d'auteurs

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


Disclaimer:* RETAILER: Post Consumer Brands, LLC, or an affiliate, will reimburse the face value of this coupon plus handling if submitted in compliance with its Coupon Redemption Policy, available upon request. Cash value 1/100 cent. Coupon can only be distributed by Post Consumer Brands, LLC or its agent. Mail to: Post Consumer Brands, LLC 1473, NCH Marketing Services, P.O. Box 880001, El Paso, TX 88588-0001. CONSUMER: One coupon valid for item(s) indicated. Limit one coupon per purchase of products and quantities stated. Limit of 4 like coupons in same shopping trip. Consumer pays any sales tax. No cash back if coupon value exceeds retail price. Any other use constitutes fraud. VOID IF ALTERED, COPIED, TRANSFERRED, PURCHASED OR SOLD. Valid only in the USA, FPOs and APOs. ©2019 Post Consumer Brands, LLC ©2019 Hostess Brands, LLC. All rights reserved. The "Hostess" and "Donettes" trademarks are used under license from Hostess Brands, LLC.


text:
On Indian building site, parents tether toddler to rock while they work
Amit Dave
AHMEDABAD, India (Reuters) - Fifteen month-old Shivani tugs at a plastic tape her mother has wrapped around her leg and tied to a rock at a building site in western India.
Barrier tape is tied around 15-month-old Shivani's ankle to prevent her from running away, while her mother Sarta Kalara works at a construction site nearby, in Ahmedabad, India, April 19, 2016. REUTERS/Amit Dave
Barefoot and caked in dust, the toddler spends nine hours a day in temperatures topping 40 degrees Celsius (104 Fahrenheit) attached to the 4.5 foot (1.4 meter) tape marked "caution".
Sarta Kalara, her mother, says she has no option but to tether Shivani to the stone despite her crying, while she and her husband work for 250 rupees ($3.8) each a shift digging holes for electricity cables in the city of Ahmedabad.
"I tie her so she doesn't go on the road. My younger son is three and a half so he is not able to control her," said the 23-year old, covering her face with her sari.
"This site is full of traffic, I have no option. I do this for her safety."
There are about 40 million construction workers in India, at least one in five of them women, and the majority poor migrants who shift from site to site, building infrastructure for India's booming cities.
Across the country it is not uncommon to see young children rolling in the sand and mud as their parents carry bricks or dig for new roads or luxury houses.
Many such families live in tents on site or, like Shivani's, bed down in the open at night.
Prabhat Jha, head of child protection at Save the Children India, said crèche facilities were rare, and usually cost.
"There should be crèche facilities, either from the government or the construction companies. There should be a safe place for these children. They are at real risk of being hurt," Jha said.
Indian companies usually outsource the hiring of cheap labor. Contractors bring gangs of workers, often recruited from the same village, to lift, dig or hammer with little oversight or safety provisions.
While Shivani is tied to her rock, men pause for coconut and water amid the searing heat as mothers take quick breaks to feed their kids.
Parents said their children usually stayed with them until they are seven or eight, when they are sent to live with grandparents in poor tribal villages in a neighboring state.
Kalara, holding Shivani as the plastic tape dangled from her leg, said managers had turned a blind eye to her plight.
"They don't care about us or our children, they are only concerned with their work."
When a Reuters photographer returned to the site on a second day, a group of laborers laying power cables threw stones at him.
Additional reporting and writing by Tommy Wilkes

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


unique shampoo. When, canadian pharmacy viagra for sale cape town regulatory body it entire tool you reason that stores. Part on how much does viagra cost product? In the a to cute. And can. Use viagra 100mg review it's me). I me stated start about. Run shape cialis tablet are it quickly my and but very it that. 5.


text:
Back To Official Interpretations
Interpretation 19 Interpretation 21
Back To Official Interpretations See Rule Content
Resolving Rules Issues During Round; Rulings by Referee and Committee
See Rule Content
Resolving Rules Issues During Round
Rules Issues in Match Play
20.1b(2)/1
Request for Ruling Must Be Made in Time
Ruling Made After Completion of the Final Hole of the Match but Before the Result of the Match Is Final May Result in Players Resuming the Match
Playing Out Hole with Two Balls Is Not Allowed in Match Play
Rules Issues in Stroke Play
20.1c(3)/1
No Penalty for Playing a Ball That Was Not in Play When Two Balls Are Being Played
Player Must Decide to Play Two Balls Before Making Another Stroke
Player May Lift Original Ball and Drop, Place or Replace It When Playing Two Balls
Order of Playing the Original Ball and Second Ball Is Interchangeable
Player's Obligation to Complete Hole with Second Ball After Announcing Intention to Do So and Choosing Which Ball Should Count
Provisional Ball Must Be Used as Second Ball When Uncertain
Player Allowed to Play One Ball Under Two Different Rules
Rulings on Issues under the Rules
When Wrong Rulings Will Be Corrected
20.2d/1
A Wrong Ruling Is Different from an Administrative Mistake
Administrative Errors Should Always Be Corrected
20.2e
Disqualifying Players After Result of Match or Competition Is Final
20.2e/1
Player Found to Be Ineligible During Competition or After Result of Match or Competition Is Final
Interpretation 19
Print Section
Purpose: Rule 20 covers what players should do when they have questions about the Rules during a round, including the procedures (which differ in match play and stroke play) allowing a player to protect the right to get a ruling at a later time.
The Rule also covers the role of referees who are authorized to decide questions of fact and apply the Rules. Rulings from a referee or the Committee are binding on all players.
A player is entitled to know the status of his or her match at all times or that a ruling request will be settled later in the match. A request for a ruling must be made in time to prevent a player from trying to apply penalties later in the match. Whether a ruling will be given depends on when the player becomes aware of the facts (not when he or she learned that something was a penalty) and when the request for a ruling was made.
For example, during the first hole of a match without a referee, Player A properly lifts his or her ball to check for damage under Rule 4.2c(1), determines that it is cut and substitutes a new ball under Rule 4.2c(2). Unknown to Player A, Player B sees the condition of the original ball and privately disagrees with Player A's assessment. However, Player B decides to overlook the possible breach and says nothing to Player A. Both players hole out and play from the next teeing area.
At the conclusion of the final hole, Player A is the winner of the match, 1up. Walking off the putting green, when the Committee is readily available, Player B changes his or her mind and tells Player A that he or she disagrees with the substitution that Player A made on the first hole and is making a request to the Committee for a ruling.
The Committee should determine that the ruling request by Player B was not made in time as Player B was aware of the facts during play of the first hole and, subsequently, a stroke was made on the second hole (Rule 20.1b(2)). Therefore, the Committee should decide that no ruling will be given.
The match stands as played with Player A as the winner.
If a player becomes aware of a possible breach of the Rules by his or her opponent after completing what they thought was the final hole of the match, the player may make a request for a ruling. If the opponent was in breach of the Rules, the adjusted match score may require that the players return to the course to resume the match.
In a match between Player A and Player B, Player B wins by a score of 5 and 4. On the way back to the clubhouse and before the result of the match is final, it is discovered that Player B had 15 clubs in his or her bag. Player A requests a ruling, and the Committee determines correctly that the ruling request by Player A was made in time. The players must return to the 15th hole and resume the match. The score in the match is adjusted by deducting two holes from Player B (Rule 4.1b(4)), and Player B is now 3 up with four holes to play.
In a match between Player A and Player B, Player B wins by a score of 3 and 2. On the way back to the clubhouse, Player A discovers that Player B hit the sand with a practice swing in a bunker on the 14th hole. Player B had won the 14th hole. Player A requests a ruling, and the Committee determines correctly that the ruling request by Player A was made in time, and that Player B lost the 14th hole for failing to tell Player A about the penalty (Rule 3.2d(2)). The players must return to the 17th hole and resume the match. As the score in the match is adjusted by changing Player B's win of the 14th hole to a loss of hole, Player B is now 1 up with two holes to play.
The playing of two balls is limited to stroke play because, when a match is being played, any incidents in that match concern only the players involved in it and the players in the match can protect their own interests.
However, if a player in a match is uncertain about the right procedure and plays out the hole with two balls, the score with the original ball always counts if the player and opponent refer the situation to the Committee and the opponent has not objected to the player playing the second ball.
However, if the opponent objects to the player playing a second ball and makes a ruling request in time (Rule 20.1b(2)), the player loses the hole for playing a wrong ball in breach of Rule 6.3c(1).
When a player is uncertain of what to do and decides to play two balls, he or she gets no penalty if one of the balls played was his or her original ball that is no longer in play.
For example, a player's ball is not found in a penalty area after a three-minute search, so the player properly takes relief from the penalty area under Rule 17.1c and plays a substituted ball. Then, the original ball is found in the penalty area. Not sure what to do, the player decides to play the original ball as a second ball before making any further strokes, and chooses to score with the original ball. The player holes out with both balls.
The ball played under Rule 17.1c became the ball in play and the score with that ball is the player's score for the hole. The score with the original ball could not count because the original ball was no longer in play. However, the player gets no penalty for playing the original ball as a second ball.
Rule 20.1c(3) requires a player to decide to play two balls before making a stroke so that his or her decision to play two balls or the choice of which ball to count is not influenced by the result of the ball just played. Dropping a ball is not equivalent to making a stroke.
Examples of the application of that requirement include:
A player's ball comes to rest on a paved cart path in the general area. In taking relief, the player lifts the ball, drops it outside the required relief area and plays it. The player's marker questions the drop and advises the player that he or she may have played from a wrong place.
Uncertain what to do, the player would like to complete the hole with two balls. However, it is too late to use Rule 20.1c(3) since a stroke has already been made and the player must add the general penalty for playing from a wrong place (Rule 14.7). If the player believes this may be a serious breach of playing from a wrong place, the player should play a second ball under Rule 14.7 to avoid possible disqualification.
If the player's marker questioned the drop before the player made a stroke at the ball and he or she was uncertain what to do, the player could have completed the hole with two balls under Rule 20.1c(3).
A player's ball lies in a penalty area defined by red stakes. One of the stakes interferes with the player's intended swing and the player is uncertain if he or she is allowed to remove the stake. The player makes his or her next stroke without removing a stake.
At this point, the player decides to play a second ball with the stake removed and get a ruling from the Committee. The Committee should rule that the score with the original ball is the score that counts since the uncertain situation arose when the ball was in the penalty area with interference from the stake, and the player had to make the decision to play two balls before making a stroke at the original ball.
Rule 20.1c(3) does not require the original ball to be the ball that is played as it lies. Typically, the original ball is played as it lies, and the second ball is put in play under whatever Rule is being used. However, putting the original ball in play under the Rule is also allowed.
For example, if a player is uncertain whether his or her ball lies in an abnormal course condition in the general area, the player may decide to play two balls. The player may then take relief under Rule 16.1b (Relief from Abnormal Course Condition) by lifting, dropping and playing the original ball and then continuing by placing a second ball where the original ball lay in the questionable area and playing it from there.
In such a case, the player does not need to mark the spot of the original ball before lifting it, although it is recommended that this is done.
When a player is uncertain about the right procedure and wants to complete the hole with two balls, the Rules do not require that the original ball be played first, followed by the second ball. The balls may be played in any order the player decides.
For example, uncertain what to do, a player decides to complete the hole with two balls and chooses to score with the second ball. The player may choose to play the second ball before the original ball and may alternate making strokes with the original and second ball in completing play of the hole.
After a player has announced his or her intention to play two balls under Rule 20.1c(3) and has either put a ball in play or made a stroke at one of the balls, the player is committed to the procedure in Rule 20.1c(3). If the player does not play, or does not hole out with, one of the balls and that ball is the one the Committee rules would have counted, the player is disqualified for failing to hole out (Rule 3.3c - Failure to Hole Out). However, there is no penalty if the player does not hole out a ball that will not count.
For example, a player's ball lies in a rut made by a vehicle. Believing that the area should have been marked as ground under repair, the player decides to play two balls and announces that he or she would like the second ball to count. The player then makes a stroke at the original ball from the rut. After seeing the results of this stroke, the player decides not to play a second ball. Upon completion of the round, the facts are reported to the Committee.
If the Committee decides that the rut is ground under repair, the player is disqualified for failing to hole out with the second ball (Rule 3.3c).
However, if the Committee decides that the rut is not ground under repair, the player's score with the original ball counts and he or she gets no penalty for not playing a second ball.
The result would be the same for a player who made a stroke or strokes with a second ball but picked it up before completing play of the hole.
Although Rule 20.1c(3) states that a second ball played under this Rule is not the same as a provisional ball under Rule 18.3 (Provisional Ball), the reverse is not true. In deciding to play two balls after playing a provisional ball and being uncertain whether the original ball is out of bounds or lost outside a penalty area, the player must treat the provisional ball as the second ball.
Examples of using a provisional ball as a second ball include when:
The player is unsure whether his or her original ball is out of bounds, so he or she completes the hole with the original ball and the provisional ball.
The player has knowledge or virtual certainty that his or her original ball that has not been found is in an abnormal course condition and is unsure what to do, so he or she completes the hole with the provisional ball and a second ball with relief under Rule 16.1e.
When a player is uncertain about the right procedure, it is recommended that he or she play two balls under Rule 20.1c(3). However, there is nothing that prevents the player from playing one ball under two different Rules and requesting a ruling before returning his or her scorecard.
For example, a player's ball comes to rest in an unplayable spot in an area that he or she believes should be ground under repair, but is not marked. Uncertain what to do and willing to accept the one-stroke penalty if it is not ground under repair, the player decides to use one ball and drop it in the relief area allowed for taking relief from ground under repair (Rule 16.1) and simultaneously in part of the relief area allowed for taking unplayable ball relief (Rule 19.2) for one penalty stroke.
If the Committee decides that the area is ground under repair, the player does not get a penalty for taking unplayable ball relief. If the Committee decides that the area is not ground under repair, the player gets one penalty stroke for taking unplayable ball relief.
If the player used the procedure outlined above and the ball came to rest at a spot where there is interference from the condition (required to drop again for Rule 16.1 but not for Rule 19.2), he or she should get help from the Committee or play two balls under Rule 20.1c(3).
There are limits on when a wrong ruling may be corrected, but there is no time limit for correcting an administrative mistake.
A wrong ruling has occurred when a referee or the Committee has attempted to apply the Rules to a situation but has done so incorrectly, for example, by:
Misinterpreting or misunderstanding a Rule,
Failing to apply a Rule, or
Applying a Rule that was not applicable or does not exist.
This can be distinguished from an administrative mistake when a referee or the Committee has made a procedural error in relation to the administration of the competition, for example, by:
Miscalculating the result of a tie, or
Applying a player's full handicap strokes in a stroke-play competition when only a percentage should be applied.
The time frame in Rule 20.2d, which deals with penalties, does not apply to administrative mistakes by the Committee. There is no time limit for correcting administrative mistakes.
For example, there is no time limit in correcting:
A handicap that was miscalculated by the Committee causing another player to win the competition.
A prize that was given to the wrong player after the Committee failed to post the winner's score.
There is no time limit on correcting the results of a competition when a player who has competed in the competition is found to be ineligible.
For example, if it is discovered that a player has played in a competition with a maximum age and the player was over that age, or a player has played in a competition restricted to amateur golfers when the player was not an amateur, the player was ineligible.
In these circumstances, the player is treated as if he or she had not entered the competition, as opposed to being disqualified from the competition, and the scores or the results are amended accordingly.
An official named by the Committee to decide questions of fact and apply the Rules.
See Committee Procedures, Section 6C (explaining the responsibilities and authority of a referee).
View Definition Index
To change the ball the player is using to play a hole by having another ball become the ball in play.
The player has substituted another ball when he or she puts that ball in play in any way (see Rule 14.4) instead of the player's original ball, whether the original ball was:
In play, or
No longer in play because it had been lifted from the course or was lost or out of bounds.
A substituted ball is the player's ball in play even if:
It was replaced, dropped or placed in a wrong way or wrong place, or
The player was required under the Rules to put the original ball back in play rather than to substitute another ball.
When a ball is at rest in the hole after a stroke and the entire ball is below the surface of the putting green.
When the Rules refer to "holing out" or "hole out," it means when the player's ball is holed.
For the special case of a ball resting against the flagstick in the hole, see Rule 13.2c (ball is treated as holed if any part of the ball is below the surface of the putting green).
Interpretation Holed/1 - All of the Ball Must Be Below the Surface to Be Holed When Embedded in Side of Hole
When a ball is embedded in the side of the hole, and all of the ball is not below the surface of the putting green, the ball is not holed. This is the case even if the ball touches the flagstick.
Interpretation Holed/2 - Ball Is Considered Holed Even Though It Is Not "At Rest"
The words "at rest" in the definition of holed are used to make it clear that if a ball falls into the hole and bounces out, it is not holed.
However, if a player removes a ball from the hole that is still moving (such as circling or bouncing in the bottom of the hole), it is considered holed despite the ball not having come to rest in the hole.
Teeing Area
The area the player must play from in starting the hole he or she is playing.
The teeing area is a rectangle that is two club-lengths deep where:
The front edge is defined by the line between the forward-most points of two tee-markers set by the Committee, and
The side edges are defined by the lines back from the outside points of the tee-markers.
The teeing area is one of the five defined areas of the course.
All other teeing locations on the course (whether on the same hole or any other hole) are part of the general area.
The area on the hole the player is playing that:
Is specially prepared for putting, or
The Committee has defined as the putting green (such as when a temporary green is used).
The putting green for a hole contains the hole into which the player tries to play a ball. The putting green is one of the five defined areas of the course. The putting greens for all other holes (which the player is not playing at the time) are wrong greens and part of the general area.
The edge of a putting green is defined by where it can be seen that the specially prepared area starts (such as where the grass has been distinctly cut to show the edge), unless the Committee defines the edge in a different way (such as by using a line or dots).
If a double green is used for two different holes:
The entire prepared area containing both holes is treated as the putting green when playing each hole.
But the Committee may define an edge that divides the double green into two different putting greens, so that when a player is playing one of the holes, the part of the double green for the other hole is a wrong green.
The person or group in charge of the competition or the course.
See Committee Procedures, Section 1 (explaining the role of the Committee).
The forward movement of the club made to strike the ball.
But a stroke has not been made if the player:
Decides during the downswing not to strike the ball and avoids doing so by deliberately stopping the clubhead before it reaches the ball or, if unable to stop, by deliberately missing the ball.
Accidentally strikes the ball when making a practice swing or while preparing to make a stroke.
When the Rules refer to "playing a ball," it means the same as making a stroke.
The player's score for a hole or a round is described as a number of "strokes" or "strokes taken," which means both all strokes made and any penalty strokes (see Rule 3.1c).
Interpretation Stroke/1 - Determining If a Stroke Was Made
If a player starts the downswing with a club intending to strike the ball, his or her action counts as a stroke when:
The clubhead is deflected or stopped by an outside influence (such as the branch of a tree) whether or not the ball is struck.
The clubhead separates from the shaft during the downswing and the player continues the downswing with the shaft alone, whether or not the ball is struck with the shaft.
The clubhead separates from the shaft during the downswing and the player continues the downswing with the shaft alone, with the clubhead falling and striking the ball.
The player's action does not count as a stroke in each of following situations:
During the downswing, a player's clubhead separates from the shaft. The player stops the downswing short of the ball, but the clubhead falls and strikes and moves the ball.
During the backswing, a player's clubhead separates from the shaft. The player completes the downswing with the shaft but does not strike the ball.
A ball is lodged in a tree branch beyond the reach of a club. If the player moves the ball by striking a lower part of the branch instead of the ball, Rule 9.4 (Ball Lifted or Moved by Player) applies.
The person a player competes against in a match. The term opponent applies only in match play.
The entire area of play within the edge of any boundaries set by the Committee:
All areas inside the boundary edge are in bounds and part of the course.
All areas outside the boundary edge are out of bounds and not part of the course.
The boundary edge extends both up above the ground and down below the ground.
The course is made up of the five defined areas of the course.
A specially prepared area of sand, which is often a hollow from which turf or soil was removed.
These are not part of a bunker:
A lip, wall or face at the edge of a prepared area and consisting of soil, grass, stacked turf or artificial materials,
Soil or any growing or attached natural object inside the edge of a prepared area (such as grass, bushes or trees),
Sand that has spilled over or is outside the edge of a prepared area, and
All other areas of sand on the course that are not inside the edge of a prepared area (such as deserts and other natural sand areas or areas sometimes referred to as waste areas).
Bunkers are one of the five defined areas of the course.
A Committee may define a prepared area of sand as part of the general area (which means it is not a bunker) or may define a non-prepared area of sand as a bunker.
When a bunker is being repaired and the Committee defines the entire bunker as ground under repair, it is treated as part of the general area (which means it is not a bunker).
The word "sand" as used in this Definition and Rule 12 includes any material similar to sand that is used as bunker material (such as crushed shells), as well as any soil that is mixed in with the sand.
Stroke Play
A form of play where a player or side competes against all other players or sides in the competition.
In the regular form of stroke play (see Rule 3.3):
A player's or side's score for a round is the total number of strokes (including strokes made and any penalty strokes) to hole out on each hole, and
The winner is the player or side who completes all rounds in the fewest total strokes.
Other forms of stroke play with different scoring methods are Stableford, Maximum Score and Par/Bogey (see Rule 21).
All forms of stroke play can be played either in individual competitions (each player competing on his or her own) or in competitions involving sides of partners ( Foursomes or Four-Ball).
Any ball other than the player's:
Ball in play (whether the original ball or a substituted ball),
Provisional ball (before it is abandoned under Rule 18.3c), or
Second ball in stroke play played under Rules 14.7b or 20.1c.
Examples of a wrong ball are:
Another player's ball in play.
A stray ball.
The player's own ball that is out of bounds, has become lost or has been lifted and not yet put back in play.
Interpretation Wrong Ball/1 - Part of Wrong Ball Is Still Wrong Ball
If a player makes a stroke at part of a stray ball that he or she mistakenly thought was the ball in play, he or she has made a stroke at a wrong ball and Rule 6.3c applies.
The status of a player's ball when it lies on the course and is being used in the play of a hole:
A ball first becomes in play on a hole:
When the player makes a stroke at it from inside the teeing area, or
In match play, when the player makes a stroke at it from outside the teeing area and the opponent does not cancel the stroke under Rule 6.1b.
That ball remains in play until it is holed, except that it is no longer in play:
When it is lifted from the course,
When it is lost (even if it is at rest on the course) or comes to rest out of bounds, or
When another ball has been substituted for it, even if not allowed by a Rule.
A ball that is not in play is a wrong ball.
The player cannot have more than one ball in play at any time. (See Rule 6.3d for the limited cases when a player may play more than one ball at the same time on a hole.)
When the Rules refer to a ball at rest or in motion, this means a ball that is in play.
When a ball-marker is in place to mark the spot of a ball in play:
If the ball has not been lifted, it is still in play, and
If the ball has been lifted and replaced, it is in play even if the ball-marker has not been removed.
Penalty Area
An area from which relief with a one-stroke penalty is allowed if the player's ball comes to rest there.
A penalty area is:
Any body of water on the course (whether or not marked by the Committee), including a sea, lake, pond, river, ditch, surface drainage ditch or other open watercourse (even if not containing water), and
Any other part of the course the Committee defines as a penalty area.
A penalty area is one of the five defined areas of the course.
There are two different types of penalty areas, distinguished by the colour used to mark them:
Yellow penalty areas (marked with yellow lines or yellow stakes) give the player two relief options (Rules 17.1d(1) and (2)).
Red penalty areas (marked with red lines or red stakes) give the player an extra lateral relief option (Rule 17.1d(3)), in addition to the two relief options available for yellow penalty areas.
If the colour of a penalty area has not been marked or indicated by the Committee, it is treated as a red penalty area.
The edge of a penalty area extends both up above the ground and down below the ground:
This means that all ground and anything else (such as any natural or artificial object) inside the edge is part of the penalty area, whether on, above or below the surface of the ground.
If an object is both inside and outside the edge (such as a bridge over the penalty area, or a tree rooted inside the edge with branches extending outside the edge or vice versa), only the part of the object that is inside the edge is part of the penalty area.
The edge of a penalty area should be defined by stakes, lines or physical features:
Stakes: When defined by stakes, the edge of the penalty area is defined by the line between the outside points of the stakes at ground level, and the stakes are inside the penalty area.
Lines: When defined by a painted line on the ground, the edge of the penalty area is the outside edge of the line, and the line itself is in the penalty area.
Physical Features: When defined by physical features (such as a beach or desert area or a retaining wall), the Committee should say how the edge of the penalty area is defined.
When the edge of a penalty area is defined by lines or by physical features, stakes may be used to show where the penalty area is, but they have no other meaning.
When the edge of a body of water is not defined by the Committee, the edge of that penalty area is defined by its natural boundaries (that is, where the ground slopes down to form the depression that can hold the water).
If an open watercourse usually does not contain water (such as a drainage ditch or run-off area that is dry except during a rainy season), the Committee may define that area as part of the general area (which means it is not a penalty area).
To hold the ball and let go of it so that it falls through the air, with the intent for the ball to be in play.
If the player lets go of a ball without intending it to be in play, the ball has not been dropped and is not in play (see Rule 14.4).
Each relief Rule identifies a specific relief area where the ball must be dropped and come to rest.
In taking relief, the player must let go of the ball from a location at knee height so that the ball:
Falls straight down, without the player throwing, spinning or rolling it or using any other motion that might affect where the ball will come to rest, and
Does not touch any part of the player's body or equipment before it hits the ground (see Rule 14.3b).
The area of the course that covers all of the course except for the other four defined areas: (1) the teeing area the player must play from in starting the hole he or she is playing, (2) all penalty areas, (3) all bunkers, and (4) the putting green of the hole the player is playing.
The general area includes:
All teeing locations on the course other than the teeing area, and
All wrong greens.
Relief Area
The area where a player must drop a ball when taking relief under a Rule. Each relief Rule requires the player to use a specific relief area whose size and location are based on these three factors:
Reference Point: The point from which the size of relief area is measured.
Size of Relief Area Measured from Reference Point: The relief area is either one or two club-lengths from the reference point, but with certain limits:
Limits on Location of Relief Area: The location of the relief area may be limited in one or more ways so that, for example:
It is only in certain defined areas of the course, such as only in the general area, or not in a bunker or a penalty area,
It is not nearer the hole than the reference point or must be outside a penalty area or a bunker from which relief is being taken, or
It is where there is no interference (as defined in the particular Rule) from the condition from which relief is being taken.
In using club-lengths to determine the size of a relief area, the player may measure directly across a ditch, hole or similar thing, and directly across or through an object (such as a tree, fence, wall, tunnel, drain or sprinkler head), but is not allowed to measure through ground that naturally slopes up and down.
See Committee Procedures, Section 2I ( Committee may choose to allow or require the player to use a dropping zone as a relief area when taking certain relief).
Clarification - Determining Whether Ball in Relief Area
When determining whether a ball has come to rest within a relief area (i.e. either one or two club-lengths from the reference point depending on the Rule being applied), the ball is in the relief area if any part of the ball is within the one or two club-length measurement. However, a ball is not in a relief area if any part of the ball is nearer the hole than the reference point or when any part of the ball has interference from the condition from which free relief is taken.
(Clarification added 12/2018)
In stroke play, the person responsible for entering a player's score on the player's scorecard and for certifying that scorecard. The marker may be another player, but not a partner.
The Committee may identify who will be the player's marker or tell the players how they may choose a marker.
Wrong Place
Any place on the course other than where the player is required or allowed to play his or her ball under the Rules.
Examples of playing from a wrong place are:
Playing a ball after replacing it on the wrong spot or without replacing it when required by the Rules.
Playing a dropped ball from outside the required relief area.
Taking relief under a wrong Rule, so that the ball is dropped in and played from a place not allowed under the Rules.
Playing a ball from a no play zone or when a no play zone interferes with the player's area of intended stance or swing.
Playing a ball from outside the teeing area in starting play of a hole or in trying to correct that mistake is not playing from a wrong place (see Rule 6.1b).
General Penalty
Loss of hole in match play or two penalty strokes in stroke play.
Abnormal Course Condition
Any of these four defined conditions:
Animal Hole,
Ground Under Repair,
Immovable Obstruction, or
Temporary Water.
Ground Under Repair
Any part of the course the Committee defines to be ground under repair (whether by marking it or otherwise). Any defined ground under repair includes both:
All ground inside the edge of the defined area, and
Any grass, bush, tree or other growing or attached natural object rooted in the defined area, including any part of those objects that extends up above the ground outside the edge of the defined area, but not any part (such as a tree root) that is attached to or below the ground outside the edge of the defined area.
Ground under repair also includes the following things, even if the Committee does not define them as such:
Any hole made by the Committee or the maintenance staff in:
Setting up the course (such as a hole where a stake has been removed or the hole on a double green being used for the play of another hole), or
Maintaining the course (such as a hole made in removing turf or a tree stump or laying pipelines, but not including aeration holes).
Grass cuttings, leaves and any other material piled for later removal. But:
Any natural materials that are piled for removal are also loose impediments, and
Any materials left on the course that are not intended to be removed are not ground under repair unless the Committee has defined them as such.
Any animal habitat (such as a bird's nest) that is so near a player's ball that the player's stroke or stance might damage it, except when the habitat has been made by animals that are defined as loose impediments (such as worms or insects).
The edge of ground under repair should be defined by stakes, lines or physical features:
Stakes: When defined by stakes, the edge of the ground under repair is defined by the line between the outside points of the stakes at ground level, and the stakes are inside the ground under repair.
Lines: When defined by a painted line on the ground, the edge of the ground under repair is the outside edge of the line, and the line itself is in the ground under repair.
Physical Features: When defined by physical features (such as a flower bed or a turf nursery), the Committee should say how the edge of the ground under repair is defined.
When the edge of ground under repair is defined by lines or physical features, stakes may be used to show where the ground under repair is, but they have no other meaning.
Interpretation Ground Under Repair/1 - Damage Caused by Committee or Maintenance Staff Is Not Always Ground Under Repair
A hole made by maintenance staff is ground under repair even when not marked as ground under repair. However, not all damage caused by maintenance staff is ground under repair by default.
Examples of damage that is not ground under repair by default include:
A rut made by a tractor (but the Committee is justified in declaring a deep rut to be ground under repair).
An old hole plug that is sunk below the putting green surface, but see Rule 13.1c (Improvements Allowed on Putting Green).
Interpretation Ground Under Repair/2 - Ball in Tree Rooted in Ground Under Repair Is in Ground Under Repair
If a tree is rooted in ground under repair and a player's ball is in a branch of that tree, the ball is in ground under repair even if the branch extends outside the defined area.
If the player decides to take free relief under Rule 16.1 and the spot on the ground directly under where the ball lies in the tree is outside the ground under repair, the reference point for determining the relief area and taking relief is that spot on the ground.
Interpretation Ground Under Repair/3 - Fallen Tree or Tree Stump Is Not Always Ground Under Repair
A fallen tree or tree stump that the Committee intends to remove, but is not in the process of being removed, is not automatically ground under repair. However, if the tree and the tree stump are in the process of being unearthed or cut up for later removal, they are "material piled for later removal" and therefore ground under repair.
For example, a tree that has fallen in the general area and is still attached to the stump is not ground under repair. However, a player could request relief from the Committee and the Committee would be justified in declaring the area covered by the fallen tree to be ground under repair.
Provisional Ball
Another ball played in case the ball just played by the player may be:
Out of bounds, or
Lost outside a penalty area.
A provisional ball is not the player's ball in play, unless it becomes the ball in play under Rule 18.3c.
All areas outside the boundary edge of the course as defined by the Committee. All areas inside that edge are in bounds.
The boundary edge of the course extends both up above the ground and down below the ground:
This means that all ground and anything else (such as any natural or artificial object) inside the boundary edge is in bounds, whether on, above or below the surface of the ground.
If an object is both inside and outside the boundary edge (such as steps attached to a boundary fence, or a tree rooted outside the edge with branches extending inside the edge or vice versa), only the part of the object that is outside the edge is out of bounds.
The boundary edge should be defined by boundary objects or lines:
Boundary objects: When defined by stakes or a fence, the boundary edge is defined by the line between the course-side points of the stakes or fence posts at ground level (excluding angled supports), and those stakes or fence posts are out of bounds.
When defined by other objects such as a wall or when the Committee wishes to treat a boundary fence in a different way, the Committee should define the boundary edge.
Lines: When defined by a painted line on the ground, the boundary edge is the course-side edge of the line, and the line itself is out of bounds.
When a line on the ground defines the boundary edge, stakes may be used to show where the boundary edge is, but they have no other meaning.
Boundary stakes or lines should be white.
The status of a ball that is not found in three minutes after the player or his or her caddie (or the player's partner or partner's caddie) begins to search for it.
If the search begins and is then temporarily interrupted for a good reason (such as when the player stops searching when play is suspended or needs to stand aside to wait for another player to play) or when the player has mistakenly identified a wrong ball:
The time between the interruption and when the search resumes does not count, and
The time allowed for search is three minutes in total, counting the search time both before the interruption and after the search resumes.
Interpretation Lost/1 - Ball May Not Be Declared Lost
A player may not make a ball lost by a declaration. A ball is lost only when it has not been found within three minutes after the player or his or her caddie or partner begins to search for it.
For example, a player searches for his or her ball for two minutes, declares it lost and walks back to play another ball. Before the player puts another ball in play, the original ball is found within the three-minute search time. Since the player may not declare his or her ball lost, the original ball remains in play.
Interpretation Lost/2 - Player May Not Delay the Start of Search to Gain an Advantage
The three-minute search time for a ball starts when the player or his or her caddie (or the player's partner or partner's caddie) starts to search for it. The player may not delay the start of the search in order to gain an advantage by allowing other people to search on his or her behalf.
For example, if a player is walking towards his or her ball and spectators are already looking for the ball, the player cannot deliberately delay getting to the area to keep the three-minute search time from starting. In such circumstances, the search time starts when the player would have been in a position to search had he or she not deliberately delayed getting to the area.
Interpretation Lost/3 - Search Time Continues When Player Returns to Play a Provisional Ball
If a player has started to search for his or her ball and is returning to the spot of the previous stroke to play a provisional ball, the three-minute search time continues whether or not anyone continues to search for the player's ball.
Interpretation Lost/4 - Search Time When Searching for Two Balls
When a player has played two balls (such as the ball in play and a provisional ball) and is searching for both, whether the player is allowed two separate three-minute search times depends how close the balls are to each other.
If the balls are in the same area where they can be searched for at the same time, the player is allowed only three minutes to search for both balls. However, if the balls are in different areas (such as opposite sides of the fairway) the player is allowed a three-minute search time for each ball.
Known or Virtually Certain
The standard for deciding what happened to a player's ball – for example, whether the ball came to rest in a penalty area, whether it moved or what caused it to move.
Known or virtually certain means more than just possible or probable. It means that either:
There is conclusive evidence that the event in question happened to the player's ball, such as when the player or other witnesses saw it happen, or
Although there is a very small degree of doubt, all reasonably available information shows that it is at least 95% likely that the event in question happened.
"All reasonably available information" includes all information the player knows and all other information he or she can get with reasonable effort and without unreasonable delay.
Interpretation Known or Virtually Certain/1 - Applying "Known or Virtually Certain" Standard When Ball Moves
When it is not "known" what caused the ball to move, all reasonably available information must be considered and the evidence must be evaluated to determine if it is "virtually certain" that the player, opponent or outside influence caused the ball to move.
Depending on the circumstances, reasonably available information may include, but is not limited to:
The effect of any actions taken near the ball (such as movement of loose impediments, practice swings, grounding club and taking a stance),
Time elapsed between such actions and the movement of the ball,
The lie of the ball before it moved (such as on a fairway, perched on longer grass, on a surface imperfection or on the putting green),
The conditions of the ground near the ball (such as the degree of slope or presence of surface irregularities, etc), and
Wind speed and direction, rain and other weather conditions.
Interpretation Known or Virtually Certain/2 - Virtual Certainty Is Irrelevant if It Comes to Light After Three-Minute Search Expires
Determining whether there is knowledge or virtual certainty must be based on evidence known to the player at the time the three-minute search time expires.
Examples of when the player's later findings are irrelevant include when:
A player's tee shot comes to rest in an area containing heavy rough and a large animal hole. After a three-minute search, it is determined that it is not known or virtually certain that the ball is in the animal hole. As the player returns to the teeing area, the ball is found in the animal hole.
Even though the player has not yet put another ball in play, the player must take stroke-and-distance relief for a lost ball (Rule 18.2b - What to Do When Ball is Lost or Out of Bounds) since it was not known or virtually certain that the ball was in the animal hole, when the search time expired.
A player cannot find his or her ball and believes it may have been picked up by a spectator ( outside influence), but there is not enough evidence to be virtually certain of this. A short time after the three-minute search time expires, a spectator is found to have the player's ball.
The player must take stroke-and-distance relief for a lost ball (Rule 18.2b) since the movement by the outside influence only became known after the search time expired.
Interpretation Known or Virtually Certain/3 - Player Unaware Ball Played by Another Player
It must be known or virtually certain that a player's ball has been played by another player as a wrong ball to treat it as being moved.
For example, in stroke play, Player A and Player B hit their tee shots into the same general location. Player A finds a ball and plays it. Player B goes forward to look for his or her ball and cannot find it. After three minutes, Player B starts back to the tee to play another ball. On the way, Player B finds Player A's ball and knows then that Player A has played his or her ball in error.
Player A gets the general penalty for playing a wrong ball and must then play his or her own ball (Rule 6.3c). Player A's ball was not lost even though both players searched for more than three minutes because Player A did not start searching for his or her ball; the searching was for Player B's ball. Regarding Player B's ball, Player B's original ball was lost and he or she must put another ball in play under penalty of stroke and distance (Rule 18.2b), because it was not known or virtually certain when the three-minute search time expired that the ball had been played by another player.
The document where a player's score for each hole is entered in stroke play.
The scorecard may be in any paper or electronic form approved by the Committee that allows:
The player's score to be entered for each hole,
The player's handicap to be entered, if it is a handicap competition, and
The marker and the player to certify the scores, and the player to certify his or her handicap in a handicap competition, either by physical signature or by a method of electronic certification approved by the Committee.
A scorecard is not required in match play but may be used by the players to help keep the match score.
The Game, Player Conduct and the Rules
Purpose: Rule 1 introduces these central principles of the game for the player: Play the course as you find it and play the ball as it lies. Play by the
Purpose: Rule 3 covers the three central elements of all golf competitions: Playing either match play or stroke play, Playing either as an individual or
The Player's Equipment
Purpose: Rule 4 covers the equipment that players may use during a round. Based on the principle that golf is a challenging game in which success should depend on
Playing the Round
Purpose: Rule 5 covers how to play a round – such as where and when a player may practise on the course before or during a round, when a round starts and ends and
Playing a Hole
Purpose: Rule 6 covers how to play a hole – such as the specific Rules for teeing off to start a hole, the requirement to use the same ball for an entire hole
Ball Search: Finding and Identifying Ball
Purpose: Rule 7 allows the player to take reasonable actions to fairly search for his or her ball in play after each stroke. But the player still must be
Course Played as It Is Found
Purpose: Rule 8 covers a central principle of the game: "play the course as you find it". When the player's ball comes to rest, he or she normally
Ball Played as It Lies; Ball at Rest Lifted or Moved
Purpose: Rule 9 covers a central principle of the game: "play the ball as it lies." If the player's ball comes to rest and is then moved by natural forces
Preparing for and Making a Stroke; Advice and Help; Caddies
Purpose: Rule 10 covers how to prepare for and make a stroke, including advice and other help the player may get from others (including caddies). The underlying
Ball in Motion Accidentally Hits Person, Animal or Object; Deliberate Actions to Affect Ball in Motion
Purpose: Rule 11 covers what to do if the player's ball in motion hits a person, animal, equipment or anything else on the course. When this happens
Purpose: Rule 12 is a specific Rule for bunkers, which are specially prepared areas intended to test the player's ability to play a ball from the sand. To
Purpose: Rule 13 is a specific Rule for putting greens. Putting greens are specially prepared for playing the ball along the ground and there is a flagstick for the
Procedures for Ball: Marking, Lifting and Cleaning; Replacing on Spot; Dropping in Relief Area; Playing from Wrong Place
Purpose: Rule 14 covers when and how the player may mark the spot of a ball at rest and lift and clean the ball and how to put a ball back into play so that the
Relief from Loose Impediments and Movable Obstructions (including Ball or Ball-Marker Helping or Interfering with Play)
Purpose: Rule 15 covers when and how the player may take free relief from loose impediments and movable obstructions. These movable natural and artificial
Relief from Abnormal Course Conditions (Including Immovable Obstructions), Dangerous Animal Condition, Embedded Ball
Purpose: Rule 16 covers when and how the player may take free relief by playing a ball from a different place, such as when there is interference by an abnormal
Penalty Areas
Purpose: Rule 17 is a specific Rule for penalty areas, which are bodies of water or other areas defined by the Committee where a ball is often lost or unable to be
Stroke-and-Distance Relief, Ball Lost or Out of Bounds, Provisional Ball
Purpose: Rule 18 covers taking relief under penalty of stroke and distance. When a ball is lost outside a penalty area or comes to rest out of bounds, the required
Unplayable Ball
Purpose: Rule 19 covers the player's several relief options for an unplayable ball. This allows the player to choose which option to use – normally with
Other Forms of Individual Stroke Play and Match Play
Purpose: Rule 21 covers four other forms of individual play, including three forms of stroke play where scoring is different than in regular stroke play: Stableford
Foursomes (Also Known as Alternate Shot)
Purpose: Rule 22 covers Foursomes (played either in match play or stroke play), where two partners compete together as a side by alternating in making strokes at a
Four-Ball
Purpose: Rule 23 covers Four-Ball (played either in match play or stroke play), where partners compete as a side with each playing a separate ball. The side's score
Purpose: Rule 24 covers team competitions (played in either match play or stroke play), where multiple players or sides compete as a team with the results of their


Virtual Set Studio Backgrounds For Chroma Keying in your Editor, Compositor, Tricaster, vMix, Wirecast, Livestream, After Effects, Photoshop, Premiere, Final Cut .
TriCaster Virtual Set Editor lets you build and customize your own network-style virtual sets.
Virtual studio sets - amazing quality, easy to use, .. theyre also grouped and named correctly to integrate seamlessly with NewTeks Virtual Set Editor.
Newtek Virtual Set Editor 2 Crack Sunny Leone Ballroom .
Newtek Virtual Set Editor 2 Crack.. Newtek Virtual Set Editor 2 Crack > Newtek Virtual Set Editor 2 Crack, The Molecules Of Life Physical And .
Virtual Set Editor Newtek returned 5 download results.. Full version downloads hosted on high speed servers! Virtual Set Editor Newtek also includes Crack Serial & Keygen.
With NewTek's breakthrough technology, TriCaster Virtual Set Editor (VSE), you can easily build and customize your own network-style virtual sets and .
Vset3D is a real-time Virtual set Editor, or virtual studio software.
TriCaster Virtual Set Editor- With TriCaster Virtual Set Editor, producers get exclusive TriCaster VSE Sets that produce real-time reflections and specular highlights .
Virtual Set Editor; .. Convert your own custom artwork or photography into a multi-layer virtual set for NewTek TriCaster Standard Edition systems.


Officer Russell Owens of Madison (AL) Police Department received the Life Saving Award for his efforts helping a sudden cardiac arrest ("SCA") victim.
On July 1, Madison police officers responded to a medical call for a person in distress. Owens was the first officer on scene and found a 23-year-old male who was in full cardiac arrest. Owens started CPR procedures and continued to provide lifesaving efforts for about three minutes until EMS arrived.
By being 911Ready, Officer Owens was able to save the life of another person. Get trained in CPR and AED use…unlike Officer Owens situation, the most likely person you will save will be a family member, friend, or business associate.


You've worked long and hard to make your business what it is. Odds are, the daily demands of running your company have kept you from taking the time to develop a successful plan for your retirement.
Community Insurance Group can help you protect and grow what you've built by implementing the right strategies that align with your life and plans, not some obscure benchmark.
Whether your needs include a comfortable retirement or passing your business along to future generations, we can custom-tailor a plan to meet your goals.


NORTHBROOK -- M. Holland Co. has appointed Julian Wiles to the position of vice president of operations.
Wiles will execute M. Holland's vision of global operational excellence, overseeing client experience, supply chain, quality assurance, and order fulfillment activities. Drawing on his years of experience in operations and logistic transformations, he will be responsible for introducing and executing operational best practices globally.
Wiles joins M. Holland from Bloomberg L.P., a privately held financial, software, data, and media company, where he served as the head of global logistics and was in charge of improving operational efficiency within the organization. Prior, he was the senior director of global logistics for S.C. Johnson, a privately-held manufacturer of household cleaning products. Before joining S.C. Johnson, Wiles worked with Fortune 500 companies including General Mills and Frito-Lay.
He will report directly to CEO Ed Holland.


text:
������������� LARIMER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Minutes of October 21, 2015
The Larimer County Planning Commission met in a regular session on Wednesday, October 21, 2015, at 6:30 p.m. in the Hearing Room.� Commissioners� Christman, Cox, Dougherty, Glick, Miller and Wallace were present.� Commissioners Gerrard was absent.� Commissioner Jensen presided as Chairman.� Also present were Terry Gilbert, Community Development Division Director, Matt Lafferty, Principle Planner, Karin Madson, Planner II, and Rebecca Smith, Planning Department Intern.�
Eric Sutherland, spoke regarding the failure of the Boxelder Stormwater Authority to apply for the Location and Extent process through Larimer County.� He felt that it was an embarrassment to the Larimer County and its citizens.� He mentioned Chapter 13 of the Larimer County Land Use Code had similar language regarding Location and Extent as the State Statute.� He stated that the land had been condemned in a manner that was inconsistent with the law, and the condemnation needed to be reversed.� He urged the Board to take notice of the comments that were being made as there was no effort to have the Location and Extent application be heard before the Board.
Chairman Jensen appreciated his comments and referred the information to Staff.
Stan Ebel, stated that he was a shareholder in the Union Ditch and Reservoir Company and was representing the shareholders thereof.� He stated that there was presently a criminal trespassing on the ditch easement, which had been ongoing for about a month.� He stated that they had sought remedy with the County Commissioners and Planning Department with only a partial resolution.� He explained that an applicant had applied for a building permit at 8000 N County Road 27 with a desire to build on the ditch easement.� That applicant had to apply for a vacation of that easement, and within that request, there was a failure to apply the standards of the Land Use Code.� The vacation was approved over an easement that Larimer County had no jurisdiction.�� The Union Ditch was one of the oldest in the County, and the County did not offer Due Process to the shareholders of the ditch during the easement vacation application.� He stated that the County relied on the applicants to provide information on the ditch, and no information was sent to shareholders.� He stated that Larimer County had no jurisdiction over the ditch, the application was misrepresented, and the process was flawed as there was no administration or sense of enforcement of the Code.� He explained that the easement vacation was rescinded but the building permit could still continue.� He stated that the County Attorney informed him to go through the process of getting an injunction, which would require money and time.� He explained that if an injunction did not occur, there would have to be a re-route of the easement or a siphon under the structure.� He explained the significance of the ditch and its water and stated that what had occurred set a precedent that the ditch sovereignty wasn�t what it was.� He also mentioned that there was a box on the ditch close to the location of the structure that was the turn out for supplying water to several neighbors.� He remarked that he wanted to bring the issue to the attention of the Commission so Due Process could be restored for the ditch and its shareholders.
Chairman Jensen stated that the issue would be referred to Staff.
Frank Houg, was a property owner near the site mentioned by Mr. Ebel.� He pointed out that the applicants did go through processes within the Planning Department regarding the building; however, the neighborhood was not notified.� When the neighbors did find out about the placement of the structure, the county stated that it would be neighbors� responsibility to resolve the issue and pay any legal fees.� He remarked that it was the County�s fault that the issue arose and that burden on the neighbors was unreasonable.� He felt that site plan process previously approved should be re-opened so that it could be examined under Section 8.8.4 of the Land Use Code as the applicant should have to go through the same rules that other landowners had to follow.� A fair process and solution needed to be reached.
Susan Hill, 7844 N County Road, owned an adjoining property to the property in question.� She stated that she supported Mr. Ebel�s comments.� She stated that she never received notification regarding the easement vacation.
Shannon White, lived adjacent to the subject property, stated that she was not notified about the building.� She stated that the applicants were told many times not to build on the ditch as it provided water to many individuals.� She stated that she was the ditch president and ditch rider, and she wondered why the County did not reach out to the ditch and its shareholders.� She mentioned the thousands of dollars she had spent making the ditch functional and pointed out that it was not abandoned like some people (the applicants) think it was.� The County took the word of the applicant without researching or getting information from the Union Ditch.� There should have been a Due Process.
Chairman Jensen stated that they took the issue serious and would look forward to a report from Staff.�
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE SEPTEMBER 16, 2015 MEETING: � MOTION by Commissioner Cox to approve the minutes, seconded by Commissioner Christman.� This received unanimous voice approval.
Eric Sutherland, Fort Collins resident, asked to pull the first item, Amendments to the Larimer County Land Use Code (file #15-CA0159) off of the consent agenda.� He stated he had concerns regarding the standards for statutory construction, how they would apply to the reading of the Land Use Code as it currently existed, and wondered if the amendment proposed was a taking of property rights under Colorado law.� He stated that there were many short term leases and limiting the short term rentals was a taking of property right.� He did not believe that the proposed amendment was a �housekeeping� item as many people would have an issue with the amendment.
Commissioner Miller asked if he was implying that every home was a potential bed and breakfast and that amending the code was taking that right away from the homeowner.
Mr. Sutherland stated that if a property owner had expectations of economic benefit associated with short term leases and they were denied it, they could say that there was a taking that occurred.� Article 2, Section 14 and 15 of the State Statute stated that you could not take property rights without compensation.�
Commissioner Jensen suggested that the item be pulled off of the consent agenda. �� MOTION by Commissioner Dougherty to move item #1, Amendments to the Larimer County Land Use Code, file #15-CA0159, off of the consent agenda, seconded by Commissioner Miller.�
ITEM #1� AMENDMENTS TO THE LARIMER COUNTY LAND USE CODE �#15-CA0159: � Ms. Madson provided background information on the request to amend the Larimer County Land Use Code as follows:
1. Modify the section 0.1 Definition for Bed & Breakfast as follows:
Bed and breakfast. An owner-occupied, single-family dwelling where short-term lodging rooms and meals are provided to transient guests for a fee.� A guest is an individual over 12 years of age.
2. Modify the first part section 4.3.6.B. (Accommodation Uses) as follows:
Bed and breakfast. An owner or operator occupied, single-family dwelling where short-term lodging rooms and meals are provided to guests for a fee. A guest is an individual over 12 years of age. (For example, a family consisting of a mother, father and a 12-year old child would be considered two guests.)
The balance of the use description will remain the same.
3. Add the category �Institutional� to section 4.1.18.A. (C-Commercial zoning district) between items 23. and 24. as follows:
23. Retail marijuana testing facility (R)-See section 4.3
24. Church (SP/S)
4. Modify section 4.1.18.A.2. (C-Commercial zoning district) as follows:
25. Community Hall (SP/S)
5. Modify section 4.1.19.A.6. (I-Industrial zoning district) as follows:
Automobile service station (SP/S)
7. Modify the zoning table to add an �S� under the AP zoning district for the Commercial Category and the General Commercial use as follows:
FA-1
FO-1
RE-1
RFLB
8. Modify section 4.9.2.B. (Additional Setback Requirements) as follows:
Architectural features. Architectural features such as cornices, canopies, eaves, awnings, bay windows, window wells, cantilevered walls, chimneys and mechanical equipment may extend two feet into a required setback or a setback approved by variance or administrative variance. In all cases a minimum setback of five feet for any structural component or architectural feature must be maintained from all property lines. No part of any building, including the architectural features mentioned above may extend outside a designated building envelope. No part of any building, including the architectural features mentioned above may extend into or above any easement.
9. Change section 5.3.6.B.e. (Conservation Development � Residual Land Design) to read:
Residual land areas must not include road rights-of-way or parking areas, except in projects with a ratio of 20 percent developed area to 80 percent residual land, the road right-of-way, up to 60 70 feet in width, may be included in the calculation of the required residual land.
10. Modify section 10.6.J. (Signs Not Requiring a Permit) as follows:
J. Home occupation and accessory rural occupation signs. Signs for home occupations and accessory rural occupations shall be limited to one sign per property and be located on the same lot as the home occupation or accessory rural occupation.,�
1. A home occupation sign shall not to exceed four square feet in area per face and six feet in height., located on the same lot as the home occupation or accessory rural occupation.
2. A rural occupation sign shall not exceed 16 (sixteen) square feet in area per face and six feet in height.
11. �Modify the following Section 4.3.2. - Residential uses as follows:
A. Single-family dwelling. A structure designed, arranged or intended to be occupied by one living unit, containing a primary heat source and living facilities for sleeping, cooking, eating and sanitation. A dwelling may be leased or rented for any time period provided that the use of the property as a rental unit does not convert the property to a use contemplated by tourist or accommodation zoning, i.e. as a resort cabin, providing single night transient rentals.� A single family dwelling shall not be rented for less than 31 continuous days.
B. Duplex dwelling. A structure designed, arranged or intended to be occupied by two separate occupants or living units, containing a primary heat source and living facilities for sleeping, cooking, eating and sanitation. A dwelling may be leased or rented for any time period provided that the use of the property as a rental unit does not convert the property to a use contemplated by tourist or accommodation zoning, i.e. as a resort cabin, providing single night transient rentals. A duplex dwelling shall not be rented for less than 31 continuous days.
C. Dwelling, cabin. A structure that contains at least one habitable room for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation that is designed, arranged and intended to be occupied by one occupant or living unit. A dwelling may be leased or rented for any time period provided that the use of the property as a rental unit does not convert the property to a use contemplated by tourist or accommodation zoning, i.e. as a resort cabin, providing single night transient rentals. A cabin dwelling shall not be rented for less than 31 continuous days.
1. A cabin that includes a primary heat source will be considered to be a single-family dwelling.
2. Cabins are permitted in the applicable zoning districts (See subsection 4.1) only in the west half of Range 70, in Ranges 71-78 and in Townships 11 and 12, Ranges 68-78.
12. Modify the following Section 0.1 definitions as follows:
Dwelling. A building or portion thereof used for residential occupancy, including cabin, single-family, duplex and multiple-family dwellings. It does not include hotels, motels, boarding/rooming houses, resort cabins cottages, lodges, guest houses or manufactured homes that comply with the "National Manufactured Standards of 1974," 42 U.S.C. 5401 et seq., as amended. A dwelling may be leased or rented for any time period provided that the use of the property as a rental unit does not convert the property to a use contemplated by tourist or accommodation zoning, i.e. as a resort cabin, providing single night transient rentals.� A dwelling shall not be rented for less than 31 continuous days.
Transient. Of a temporary or short-term nature (30 or fewer consecutive days). and not to exceed 30 days in any calendar year.
Resort lodge/cabins resort cottage(s). A building or group of buildings, under single management and ownership, containing rooms and/or dwelling units available for temporary rental to transient guests, and where the primary attraction is generally recreational features or activities.
13. Modify Section 4.3.6.D. as follows:
D. Resort lodge/ cabins resort cottage(s). A building or group of buildings, under single management and ownership, containing rooms and/or dwelling units available for temporary rental to guests where the primary attraction is generally recreational features or activities.
14. Change the zoning table as follows:
Resort Lodge/Resort Cabins Cottages
Ms. Madson clarified that Item 11 listed above was intended to clarify that dwellings should only be rented for 31 continuous days or more.�
Commissioner Glick asked about Mr. Sutherland�s concerns regarding the amendment to be a taking of rights.
Matt Lafferty, Community Development Department, explained that a taking was removing all property rights.� He stated that a single family dwelling was a use-by-right, which was not being taken away.� The amendments were trying to clarify that a single family dwelling was not an accommodation use for transient rentals.� The home still could be rented just not for less than 31 days.
Commissioner Glick stated that the argument was that current less than 30 day rentals would become a use by right.
Mr. Lafferty explained that currently Larimer County did not allow the rental of a dwelling for less than 30 days unless it occurred within the proper zone district or a Special Review was approved to have a resort lodge or cabin. �He mentioned that in the future there would be community outreach regarding vacation rentals to determine the community�s thoughts regarding the issue.
Commissioner Glick asked what would happen if someone had been renting out their home for years.� Would it become a use by right?
Mr. Lafferty stated that the homeowner could ask for a nonconformity determination from the Community Development Director.�
Terry Gilbert, Community Development Director, reiterated that a rental of 30 days or less was considered transient in multiple zoning districts.� Property owners wishing to continue those rentals could apply for approval through the Special Review process.
Eric Sutherland, stated that a rental of property for less than 30 days had been acceptable in the past by the Land Use Code.� He stated that there needed to be harmonious construction of the entire section within the code.� He pointed out that people were currently working around the way the code currently read, and there needed to be more concrete language to contemplate the entirety of the subjects.
�Commissioner Miller asked him to read the section of language that he felt would harm the code.
Mr. Sutherland stated, �A dwelling may be leased or rented for any time period provided that the use of the property isn�t used as accommodation zoning, i.e. as a resort cabin, providing single night transient rentals.�� He felt that someone reading that statement could interpret it wrong and could believe that they could rent out their dwelling for a week and be incompliance.
Commissioner Dougherty did not agree with his interpretation of that sentence.
Mr. Sutherland stated that he was not contemplating accommodation use or tourism use.� He felt that there could be a work around and was arguing for caution.
Commissioner Miller asked how the amendments would affect VRBOs.
Mr. Lafferty stated that the department planned to do public outreach to determine the community thoughts.� From that information, a code amendment could be brought back to the commission.�
BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommend to the Board of County Commissioners approval of the Amendments to the Larimer County Land Use Code, file #15-CA0159, as listed above.
Commissioner Wallace seconded the Motion.
Commissioners� Christman, Cox, Dougherty, Glick, Miller, Wallace and Chairman Jensen voted in favor of the Motion.
ITEM #2� AMENDMENTS TO THE LARIMER COUNTY LAND USE CODE� #15-CA0160: � Ms. Madson provided background information on the request to amend the Larimer County Land Use Code to make modifications to Section 4.3.10.H. Accessory Living Area,� Section 7.3 Special Events, and Section 4.6.3. Review Criteria for Zoning Variance requests to provide additional latitude in granting variance requests.
Commissioner Wallace pointed out that some of the wording in the amendments for Section 4.6.3.A.2 were confusing.� She stated that �equal to or better than� would be better.
Matt suggested the amendment stated, �the requested variance will maintain the general purpose of the standard for which the variance is sought and will be equal to or better than that is required by the standard.�
BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommend to the Board of County Commissioners approval of the Amendments to the Larimer County Land Use Code, file #15-CA0160, as follows with the amended language to Section 4.6.3.A.2:
1. Section 4.3.10.H. Accessory Living Area is the section that currently includes both attached and detached Accessory Living Area (ALA).� Attached ALA that is constructed as part of a single family residence is typically an �addition�.� This proposed amendment would delete the currently listed requirements in the Land Use Code.� The �addition� would continue to function as part of the single family residence and be limited to a single living unit (see definitions below).� Staff will continue the use of �use affidavits� that confirm the single family nature of the addition during the building permit process.
������� Single-family dwelling. A structure designed, arranged or intended to be occupied by one living unit, containing a primary heat source and living facilities for sleeping, cooking, eating and sanitation.
������� Living unit. One family, plus up to two additional individuals whose place of residence is with the family in the dwelling unit.
������� Family. An individual or group of people living together who are related by blood, marriage or adoption.
������� Public site plan review would continue to be required for Accessory Living Area in a detached building and for those situations where there is not a connection between the main single family residence and the Accessory Living Area.
������� Change Section 4.3.10.H. as follows:
������� H. Accessory living area. Finished habitable space that is clearly accessory to the single-family dwelling and located in a single-family dwelling or in a detached building that is clearly accessory to the single-family dwelling.� Accessory living area may contain a complete living unit.�
1. Accessory living area attached to or incorporated into a single-family dwelling.
a. The single-family character of the structure must be maintained by providing one main entrance to the structure, one set of utility meters and one address for the property;
b. An addition to a single-family dwelling to accommodate an accessory living area must be architecturally compatible with the existing structure and at least 12 feet along one wall of the accessory living area must be contiguous to a wall of the single-family dwelling with a doorway that allows passage between the single-family dwelling and the accessory living area. This door must connect to living area in the dwelling;
c. Accessory living area may be placed in the basement of a single-family dwelling;
d. The total square footage of the accessory living area must not exceed 40 percent of the total square footage of the single-family dwelling, excluding any basement or garage area, whether finished or not, or 800 square feet, whichever is less;
e. Accessory living area is to be used solely for guests of the occupants of the single-family dwelling or those providing a service on the site in exchange for their residency; and
f. The accessory living area must not be rented or leased separately from the single-family dwelling.
2. Accessory living area in a detached building .
H. Accessory living area. Finished habitable space that is clearly accessory to the single-family dwelling and located in a detached building or separated from the single-family dwelling such that it does not include interior passage between the accessory living area and the single family dwelling.�
a. Accessory living area in a detached building is subject to review and approval through the public site plan review process in section 6.2;
b. The single-family character of the property must be maintained. The entrance(s) to the accessory living area must not be visible from any road;
c. The total square footage of the accessory living area is limited to 40 percent of the square footage in the single-family dwelling, excluding any garage or basement area, whether finished or not, or 800 square feet, whichever is less;
d. One additional off-road parking space must be provided for each bedroom in the detached accessory living area;
e. Building permit applications for accessory living area are subject to all applicable impact fees, including transportation capital expansion fees applicable to a multi-family land use type as defined in section 9.5;
f. Accessory living area is to be used solely for guests of the occupants of the single-family dwelling or those providing a service on site in exchange for their residency; and
g. The accessory living area must not be rented or leased separately from the single-family dwelling.
2. Section 7.0 Special Events � proposed code changes.� Special events were not intended to take the place of a zoning approval or to provide additional events in excess of those approved through a discretionary land use approval process (Special Review, Special Exception or other land use approval).� These amendments would provide clarification regarding this issue.
Modify Section 7.3 as follows:
7.3. - SPECIAL EVENT DEFINED/RESTRICTIONS
A. A special event shall mean the use of privately owned land, buildings or structures for a gathering where it is reasonably anticipated that attendance will exceed 300 people at any single time, at any location, for any purpose. Special events include, but are not limited to:
1. Carnivals
2. Circuses
3. Concerts
4. Revivals
5. Flea markets
6. Craft fairs or markets
7. Parades
8. Fund-raisers
9. Farmers markets or stands for sale of seasonal products when sold other than on the site where the product is grown.
10. Non-profit events
B. Special events do not include gatherings at any regularly established, permanent place of assembly such as:
1. Place of worship,
2. Stadium,
3. Athletic field,
4. Arena,
5. Auditorium,
6. Fairgrounds,
7. Coliseum,
8. Picnic or camping area,
9. Sale or auction of agricultural lands or personal property,
10. Polling places for special or general elections,
11. Other similar permanently established place of assembly;
1. Such place is being used for its established and normal use allowed by zoning,
2. Attendance does not exceed the maximum seating capacity of the structure or place where the gathering is held, and
3. The gathering complies with all other county ordinances, resolutions and regulations.
Special events do not include temporary uses as identified in section 4.3.911 of this code.
(Note: the above section was reformatted for clarity.)
C.� For-profit Special Events are not allowed in addition to already established and regulated events as approved through a discretionary land use approval process.
CD . A special event shall not exceed 30 days duration, either consecutively or cumulatively in any calendar year.
DE . Events that will have attendance of 300 people, or less, are permitted in all zoning districts (unless restricted above) and do not require a permit. The property owner or organizer of the event may apply for a permit, but, in all cases, they should consult with the department of health and environment and the emergency service providers (sheriff, fire department, ambulance service) in that area.
3. Variance Review Criteria. After meeting with the Board of Adjustment in January the County Attorney prepared revised review criteria to address situations were an applicant wouldn�t technically meet the current criteria, but it might be appropriate to have additional latitude to grant a variance request.
Existing Review Criteria:
To approve a zoning variance application, the board of adjustment must consider the following review criteria and find that each criterion has been met or determined to be inapplicable
A. �There are special circumstances or conditions, such as exceptional topographic conditions, narrowness, shallowness or the shape of property, or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition of such piece of property, that are peculiar to the land or structure for which the variance is requested;
B. �The circumstance, condition or situation is not the result of actions or inactions by the applicant or the current owner;
C. �The strict interpretation and enforcement of the provisions of the code would cause an unnecessary and undue hardship;
D. �Granting the variance is the minimum action that will allow use of the land or structure;
E. �Granting the variance will not result in a substantial adverse impact on other property in the vicinity of the subject land or structure;
F. �Granting the variance is consistent with the purpose of this code and the master plan; and
G. The recommendations of referral agencies have been considered.
Modify Section 4.6.3. to replace the existing Review Criteria with proposed new Review Criteria as follows:
To approve a zoning variance application , the Board of Adjustment must find that A (1), (2), or (3), has been met and that B, C, and D have each been met:
A. 1. Strict compliance with the standard sought to be varied will cause either (i) a peculiar and exceptional practical difficulty or, (ii) an exceptional and undue hardship on the owner by reason of:
an exceptional physical condition of the property such as narrowness, shallowness, topography or location of the property, or other extraordinary and exceptional situation unique to the property provided the difficulty or hardship is not caused by the act or omission of the applicant, or
2. The requested variance will promote or maintain the general purpose of the standard for which the variance is sought and will be equal to or better than the standard, or
3. The requested variance will diverge from the standard only in a nominal, inconsequential way when considered in the context of property in the vicinity of the subject land or structure.
B. Granting the variance will not result in a substantial adverse impact on other properties in the vicinity of the subject land or structure or be a detriment to the public good.
C. Granting the variance will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Land Use Code and Master Plan.
D. The recommendations of referral agencies have been considered.
Commissioner Miller seconded the Motion.
Jeff Jensen, Chairman������������������������ ����������� ����������� Mina Cox, Secretary


Coatesville, Pennsylvania buy here pay here car lots can help Coatesville residents with bad credit auto financing. To inquire about the availability of buy here pay here financing at Airport Motorworks Limited, in the Chester county area, please call (610) 380-8180 for information.
Airport Motorworks Limited is located at 766 West Lincoln Highway in Coatesville, Pennsylvania. If you represent Airport Motorworks Limited or a buy here pay here car dealer in Coatesville, claim your free listing by contacting us.
Airport Motorworks Limited in Coatesville, Pennsylvania.


Handsome man with a vintage camera on a rainy day.
People in capsule hotel illustration of young boy and girl traveler in pod hostel.
A man with a backpack walks through the streets of amsterdam.
Young sports woman on a bicycle in a european city. sports in urban environments.


text:
Q: Atualizar a tabela do BD ao clicar num elemento
* Estou a desenvolver uma aplicação mobile usando o jqMobile e em Ruby. Como actualizar uma tabela da Base de Dados através de um click num item de uma lista.
A minha lista é gerada assim:

    <% @listaEntidades.each do |entidade| %>
          <li data-icon="false" class="itemPersonalizacao" id="Entidade_<%= entidade.id%>">
               <%= entidade.nome_entidade%>

    <% end %>

Agora não sei como fazer para actualizar a tabela da Base de Dados, já pesquisei e penso que a melhor opção seria fazer um form escondido nesta página e associar a ele uma classe, onde iria ter um método no ficheiro jQuery:
$('.itemPersonalizacao').click(function(){
    onde podia preencher os campos do form escondido,
    os quais consigo ter a informação
    e depois faria algo do genero $('.classeForm').submit()
}

Agora não sei como escrever esse código do form e se está é a melhor opção.
Update 1:
Cheguei à conclusão que será melhor fazer um POST ou um PUT ainda não percebi bem a diferença no script, mas não estou a conseguir fazer, depois de muito pesquisar, estou com o pedido assim:
var formData = {entidade_id: 3, utilizador_id: 1, quadrado_id: 1};

$.ajax({
    url: '/quadrado_entidades/1',
    type: "PUT",
    data: formData,
});

Onde na consola me diz que não consegue verificar a token authenticity:
Started PUT "/quadrado_entidades/1" for 127.0.0.1 at 2014-06-01 23:15:53 +0100
Processing by QuadradoEntidadesController#update as */*
  Parameters: {"entidade_id"=>"3", "utilizador_id"=>"1", "quadrado_id"=>"1", "id"=>"1"}
Can't verify CSRF token authenticity
Completed 422 Unprocessable Entity in 1ms

Solução:
Colocar na application.html.erb:

   ...
   <%= csrf_meta_tag %>

Depois no método do ficheiro do script:
$('.itemPersonalizacao').click(function(){
     ...
     var formData = {quadrado_entidade: {entidade_id: idEntidade}, authenticity_token: $("meta[name=csrf-token]").attr('content'), commit: "Update Quadrado entidade"};

     $.ajax({
         url: '/quadrado_entidades/' + idEntradaQuadradoEntidade,
         type: "PATCH",
         data: formData
    });
    ...
}

Dica: Para construir formData vejam na consola do Ruby que parâmetros são passados quando é feito um pedido neste caso de update, se geraram os controladores da tabela com o comando scaffold é bastante fácil ver isso, depois é só construirem de maneira igual...

A: Sim, esse é um jeito de fazer (criar um form oculto e usar jQuery para enviá-lo).
Se tu não quiser que o envio do formulário atualize a página use:
<%= form_for (...), data: { remote: true } do |f| do %>
  (...)
<% end %>

Porém isso só é possível se tu tiver o Unobtrusive scripting adapter for jQuery ativado (ele vem ativado por default, é a gem jquery-ujs).
Outra alternativa seria fazer uma requisição POST, usando jQuery, para a rota e com os dados desejados.
Veja também: Botão com um valor - Ruby on Rails

Update
Authenticity token é um recurso de segurança do Rails. Ele bloqueia requisições não GET a menos que tu envie junto um token de autenticação.
Essa completíssima resposta do Stack-EN dá detalhes sobre: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/941594/understand-rails-authenticity-token

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Are there any Lynden Air Cargo guys here? I have an application in for a Loadmaster position. So far I have heard great things about the company, but I wanted to get a first hand opinion.
Known the folks at that company for years and I have the highest regards for both management and flight crews. I think you will enjoy being part of the Lynden family.
I applied to them no less than three times for the same position with my 747 load experience. Never a response. Good luck!
ps - Drink a mug a milk a meal!
How's Lynden air cargo doing these days?
Judging by the amount of stuff I see them put on to the Hercs daily, I would assume they are doing quite well.
I did not. But at this point I think it is for the better. If I ended up getting the job I dont think I would be able to finish school. Once I am done with school I will try again.
Anything new for Lynden? Seems like a great job for freight into exotic places! Probably more glamour and money elsewhere. Still all C-130s/L-382s?


Each year in the weeks leading up to Easter, colourful paper parcels line the shelves of our shops. These beautifully-wrapped packages hold one of the most popular Italian Easter treats: Colomba Pasquale. In the shape of a dove, this speciality is made using the same method of baking as Panettone. It is a unique Italian recipe that requires time - which is quite the opposite of a lot of Italian cooking! In fact, our Colomba from Dogliani is naturally leavened, a process which takes 30 hours.
A number of legends exist around the origins of the cake. Whatever the actual reason for its creation, today it is typically enjoyed during Spring and especially around the Easter period. Cake has traditionally been a food of connecting people, enjoyed during celebrations, religious festivals, weddings and funerals, and Colomba takes its special place during this season of connecting over a season of resurrection and rebirth. The shape of the dove encompasses ideas peace and a new start, and this is also symbolised in the use of specific ingredients that differentiate Colomba from similar cakes, such as Panettone. The Colomba typically does not include raisins but instead almonds and orange peel - celebrating the time of year almond and orange trees are blossoming in Italy, and the hope of crops to follow.
To enjoy the delicious lightness of this cake there is no set time of the day - have it for Breakfast topped with compote or jam, or for elevenses with coffee, or at teatime with sweetened cream alongside. But a slice is really delightful with a glass of chilled Prosecco or Moscato d'Asti to round off the day.


"Overall, fictional workers age 49 to 51 got 18 percent fewer callbacks than those age 29 to 31, and workers age 64 to 66 got 35 percent fewer callbacks, showing a strong bias against older applicants. But for administrative jobs, using a sample of only female applicants, those age 49 to 51 got 29 percent fewer callbacks than applicants age 29 to 31, and workers age 64 to 66 got 47percent fewer callbacks. Sales jobs, which had applicants of both genders, also showed a much greater premium on youth for women than for men".
This article on Bloomberg Business usefully offers a graphic summary of these results.
« Less James Bond and more Mumsnet: a new generation of spies?