text:
'A blizzard of prescriptions': Documents reveal new details about Purdue's marketing of OxyContin
By Andrew Joseph @DrewQJoseph
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey Jessica Rinaldi/The Boston Globe
When Purdue Pharma started selling its prescription opioid painkiller OxyContin in 1996, Dr. Richard Sackler asked people gathered for the launch party to envision natural disasters like an earthquake, a hurricane, or a blizzard. The debut of OxyContin, said Sackler — a member of the family that started and controls the company and then a company executive — "will be followed by a blizzard of prescriptions that will bury the competition."
Five years later, as questions were raised about the risk of addiction and overdoses that came with taking OxyContin and opioid medications, Sackler outlined a strategy that critics have long accused the company of unleashing: divert the blame onto others, particularly the people who became addicted to opioids themselves.
"We have to hammer on the abusers in every way possible," Sackler wrote in an email in February 2001. "They are the culprits and the problem. They are reckless criminals."
Sackler's comments at the party and his email are contained in newly public portions of a lawsuit filed by the state of Massachusetts against Purdue that alleges that the company, the Sackler family, and company executives misled prescribers and patients as they aimed to blanket the country with prescriptions for their addictive medications.
Purdue cemented ties with universities and hospitals to expand opioid sales, documents contend
"By their misconduct, the Sacklers have hammered Massachusetts families in every way possible," the state's complaint says, noting that since 2007, Purdue has sold more than 70 million doses of opioids in Massachusetts for more than $500 million. "And the stigma they used as a weapon made the crisis worse."
The new filing also reveals how Purdue aggressively pursued tight relationships with Tufts University's Health Sciences Campus and Massachusetts General Hospital — two of the state's premier academic medical centers — to expand prescribing by physicians, generate goodwill toward opioid painkillers among medical students and doctors in training, and combat negative reports about opioid addiction.
5684879-Mass-AGO-Pre-Hearing-Memo-and-Exhibits (PDF)
5684879-Mass-AGO-Pre-Hearing-Memo-and-Exhibits (Text)
Lawsuit filed by the state of Massachusetts against Purdue Pharma
Under an agreement with Mass. General, Purdue has paid the hospital $3 million since 2009 and was allowed to propose "areas where education in the field of pain is needed" and "curriculum which might meet such needs," the court document shows. Tufts made a Purdue employee an adjunct associate professor in 2011, Purdue-written materials were approved for teaching to Tufts students in 2014, and the company sent staff to Tufts as recently as 2017, the complaint says. Purdue's New England staff was congratulated for "penetrating this account."
A Tufts spokesman declined to comment, citing the ongoing legal process. Mass. General did not immediately comment.
In a statement Tuesday, Purdue criticized the Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey's office, which is spearheading the lawsuit, and said the complaint was "a rush to vilify" Purdue. It noted that its medications were approved by the Food and Drug Administration and regulated by the government, and that the company promoted the medications "to licensed physicians who have the training and responsibility to ensure that medications are properly prescribed."
"Massachusetts' amended complaint irresponsibly and counterproductively casts every prescription of OxyContin as dangerous and illegitimate, substituting its lawyers' sensational allegations for the expert scientific determinations of the [FDA] and completely ignoring the millions of patients who are prescribed Purdue Pharma's medicines for the management of their severe chronic pain," the company said.
Tufts to review ties to Purdue Pharma after 'deeply troubling' disclosures
It also said the state attorney general's office omitted information about the steps Purdue has taken in the past decade to promote safe and appropriate use of opioid medicines.
"To distract from these omissions of fact and the other numerous deficiencies of its claims, the Attorney General has cherry-picked from among tens of millions of emails and other business documents produced by Purdue," the company said. "The complaint is littered with biased and inaccurate characterizations of these documents and individual defendants, often highlighting potential courses of action that were ultimately rejected by the company."
Healey's office sued Purdue, current and former executives, and members of the Sackler family in June. In December, it filed an amended complaint that was nearly 200 pages longer than the June filing, with more allegations spelled out against the individual defendants. Many of the details were redacted; a portion of them were made public in an updated document filed Tuesday in state court, though much of the complaint is still blacked out.
The state's suit focuses on Purdue's actions since 2007, when the company and three current and former executives pleaded guilty in federal court to fraudulently marketing OxyContin and the company agreed to pay $600 million in fines. The case is separate from litigation being waged by STAT to obtain sealed Purdue documents in Kentucky, including the only known deposition of Richard Sackler, about the company's marketing practices in earlier years, which have been blamed for seeding the current opioid addiction crisis.
The Massachusetts complaint sketches an image of the Sacklers, as board members, exercising tight control over the company, overseeing the deployment of a phalanx of sales representatives who were pushed to get Purdue medications into more hands, at higher doses, and for longer periods of time. The Sacklers, the complaint states, reaped "billion of dollars," even as the company blurred the risks of addiction and overdose that came with the drugs.
Sign up for Morning Rounds
Your daily dose of news in health and medicine.
Richard Sackler, who was named president of the company in 1999 before becoming co-chairman in 2003, is singled out in the complaint as particularly domineering as he demanded greater sales. In 2011, he decided to shadow sales reps for a week "to make sure his orders were followed," the complaint states.
Russell Gasdia, then the company's vice president of sales and marketing, who is also a defendant in the Massachusetts lawsuit, went to Purdue's chief compliance officer to warn that if Sackler directly promoted opioids, it was "a potential compliance risk."
"LOL," the compliance officer replied, according to the complaint. Other staff raised concerns, but they ultimately said that "Richard needs to be mum and anonymous" when he went into the field.
After the visits to doctors, Richard Sackler claimed that Purdue's drugs shouldn't need a legally mandated warning. He wrote in an email cited in the complaint that the warning "implies a danger of untoward reactions and hazards that simply aren't there."
The following year, Sackler's pressure on the staff grew so intense that Gasdia asked the CEO to intervene: "Anything you can do to reduce the direct contacts of Richard into the organization is appreciated," Gasdia wrote in an email cited by the complaint.
It apparently didn't work: The next week, Richard Sackler emailed sales managers to say that U.S. sales were "among the worst" in the world.
Sales managers were badgered on nights, weekends, and holidays, according to the filing. The marketing campaigns focused on high-volume doctors, who were visited repeatedly by salespeople, and pushed doctors to prescribe high doses. The demands on sales managers created such a stressful environment that, in 2012, they threatened to fire all sales representatives in the Boston area because of lackluster numbers.
The complaint also accuses Purdue of rarely reporting allegedly illegal activity, such as improper prescribing, to government officials when it learned about it. In one 2009 case, a Purdue sales manager wrote to a company official that Purdue was promoting opioids to an illegal pill mill.
"I feel very certain this is an organized drug ring," the employee wrote, adding "Shouldn't the DEA be contacted about this?" Purdue did nothing for two years, according to the complaint.
Secret trove reveals bold 'crusade' to make OxyContin a blockbuster
In addition to relying on its sales force, Purdue cultivated ties with academic hospitals, which both treat patients and train the next generation of prescribers.
In 2002, the company started the Massachusetts General Hospital Purdue Pharma Pain Program after a Purdue employee reported that access to the hospital's doctors "is great … they come to us with any questions, and allow us to see them when we need to." The hospital, the staffer added, "has significant influence through most of New England, simply because they are MGH."
As part of the program, Purdue gained influence over training programs and organized a symposium in the hospital's famed "Ether Dome" — the site of the first public surgery with anesthetic.
The Sacklers renewed the deal with Mass. General in 2009 and agreed to contribute $3 million to fund the program, the lawsuit says.
Purdue's funding, however, didn't stop researchers at Mass. General from raising concerns about its products. The complaint cites a July 2011 email from Purdue's then-chief medical officer Craig Landau — who is now the CEO and is a defendant in the lawsuit — flagging a study questioning the use of opioid painkillers for chronic pain that was conducted by Mass. General researchers with Purdue funding. Landau wanted to make sure that any Purdue-funded study supported the use of its medicines.
Purdue's ties to Tufts date back even further, according to the lawsuit. In 1980, three Sacklers donated funding to launch the Sackler School of Graduate Biomedical Sciences. In 1999, the Sacklers gave money to help start the Tufts Masters of Science in Pain Research, Education, and Policy. Through the program, "Purdue got to control research on the treatment of pain coming out of a prominent and respected institution of learning," the filing states. Purdue employees even taught a Tufts seminar about opioids, and Tufts and its teaching hospital collaborated with Purdue on a publication for patients called "Taking Control of Your Pain."
Purdue also allegedly used Tufts's ties in Maine as reports about addiction emerged in the state. Tufts ran a residency program in the state, the complaint says, and in 2000 "agreed to help Purdue find doctors to attend an event where Purdue could defend its reputation."
The bulk of the documents cited in the Massachusetts complaint were filed by Purdue in federal court in Ohio as part of a consolidated case involving hundreds of lawsuits filed by states, cities, counties, and tribes against Purdue, other opioid manufacturers, and others in the pharmaceutical industry.
Purdue says it produced 45 million pages of documents for the federal court case — known as a multidistrict litigation. In a motion filed last month and in an emergency hearing before the federal judge in Ohio overseeing the MDL, Purdue argued that the details in Massachusetts's amended complaint were largely drawn from about 500 Purdue documents it had filed on a confidential basis in the federal court. The company's lawyers argued the rules of confidentiality established in the federal court should apply to Massachusetts' filing in state court, while state officials say the issue of what should be made public should be decided in state court.
Among the records Purdue said last month should remain confidential are those involving the company's board of directors. Making them public, the company argued, would have a "chilling effect" on corporate governance.
Purdue appeals order to unseal OxyContin records to Kentucky Supreme Court
The effort to protect the disclosure of board-related documents serves another purpose not cited by the company: It protects the Sackler family, whose members have long constituted the majority of board members.
In its filing last month, Purdue also said one company official, whom it did not name, was concerned for his safety because his home address was listed in the complaint along with "numerous irrelevant, incendiary, and misleading comments about his career at Purdue."
Purdue's attorneys contend the Massachusetts amended complaint is a "concerted effort by the Commonwealth to use confidential documents in an attempt to publicly embarrass Purdue and its officers, directors and employees." They claim the information selected was "cherry-picked" to "bolster a series of inflammatory and misleading allegations against Purdue."
In September 2017, Landau, by that time Purdue's CEO, jotted down a note summarizing some of the roots of the opioid crisis. It reads:
Too many Rxs being written
Too high a dose
For too long
For conditions that often don't require them
By doctors who lack the requisite training in how
to use them appropriately."
The state's lawsuit concludes: "The opioid epidemic is not a mystery to the people who started it. The defendants knew what they were doing."
Andrew is a general assignment reporter.
andrew.joseph@statnews.com
@DrewQJoseph
Mavis Johnson says:
This article can be traced back to Andrew Kolodny.
https://www.acsh.org/news/2019/01/23/opioid-study-so-bad-it-disproves-itself-13753
Johnny Ellison says:
I was given this opioid pain killer after two back surgeries from being injuried on the job and had no knowledge of this pain killer or the effects it would have on me. I am a family man married with children, there is no way that I can get off this medication without having a near death or death experience. I took them as prescribed and did not abuse them at all, I actually tried to get off them and nearly died.
Hey Johnny. I was prescribed an unimaginably large dose after 6+ surgeries (including open heart) for almost an entire year, with the dose increasing every few weeks. Getting off of it was one of the worst things I've ever encountered. I understand how hard it is and the nightmares/cold sweats/ diarrhea, but you need to know that the withdrawal does not kill you. It's one of the most addictive things in the world, but it doesn't matter. You can even quit cold turkey and it will not kill you, no matter the dose your body is accustomed too. Alcohol withdrawals can kill you, but opioids do not. Keep trying and if you feel like you're dying, just know you are not. The only thing that will kill you is if you don't stop.
Phillip Dampier says:
The key to getting off opiates is a VERY SLOW taper, especially for long term users. I am talking about 90 days of very gradual dose reduction, and if you need it, a gradual shift away from your current opiate towards buprenorphine and then a taper off that. This is usually effective at dealing with physical addiction/withdrawal issues because your body has time to adjust to the gradual loss of the drug. Some rapid detox treatment programs put you in a medically induced loss of consciousness for rapid withdrawal. In either case, you still have to deal with the more insidious psychological addiction if you are prone to drug seeking behavior. That takes time and support. Thankfully, a lot of real chronic pain sufferers exhibit little or no drug seeking behavior, and we have a visceral dislike of the meds in general because we associate them with pain and sickness. Many of us see taking less meds as a better "high" because it means we are feeling better and our heads are less cloudy and we endure fewer side effects from the meds.
A lot of meds, especially some anti-depressants, need tapering to avoid withdrawal unpleasantless. But there is a new stigma about opiates that leads to judgments against those taking them, and some doctors fail to appreciate someone with a 5-10 year history of managed opiate care is not going to do well with a final 14-day supply to kick them off the meds.
I also have chronic intractable pain, from RSD. 24 years. I was with a fabulous management team that tried everything to help. Docs, nurses, psychologists worked together on each patient. Interventional and experimental treatments. Tai chi class and group therapy. A neurolitic block caused arachnoidosis and I could not allow anything to touch me from T 2 to my knee. I wanted to die. They did an IV drug test with different medications and the only thing that gave any relief without adverse reaction was morphine. I was started at 900mg per day. I had been on percocet for a year prior. I was still in pain but saw a future. Over time I stablized and wanted off the morphine because it was too sedating. I was offered Oxycontin as an alternative. I had read a Newsweek cover story titled Hillbilly Heroin and even though I had taken percocet for prior surgeries and the RSD with no problem that terrified me – no thanks I will not try it. My trusted doctors assured me they had good results with other patients by I refused. The article dated back to 1998(?) I can not find it listed on line. I settled on ER morphine and ir oxycodone, it worked better and was able to start cutting back the morphine.
A few things my doctors said in 1997. Be prepared at anytime for the government to change policy on narcotic prescribing. They were aware of potential harm and only used narcotics as a last resort but grateful they could more easily prescribe for those who truly needed them. And there is no upper limit for morphine in opioid tolerant patients. I was with them until they were closed by their state teaching hospital because they did not care about making money but patient care. 6 weeks later a new no nonsense pain management was in their offices. I left after one bad visit. Despite my condition and history they wanted to give me more nerve blocks! The very thing that truly crippled me.
My old doctors referred me to a colleague who I am still with after 17 years. The narcotics allowed me to rehab and reverse a lot of symptoms. I was still in pain and very limited but I did reach a point where I could do virtually anything several hours a day. I had a life. could were loose clothes and eventually socks. I removed the cradles from my bed that kept the bedding from touching me. I was able to drop 2/3 of my dose over time and dropped the ER completely. I was on a stable 30 mg oxycodone for 7 years when my doctor informed me last year he could no longer write it. It triggers a DEA flag for him and the pharmacy. So back to the morphine Er & IR. 380mg a day vs 180mg oxycodone. My doctor is over 70 and took many patients of his colleagues who left the field for fear so he isnot retiring for now. I have looked and called and spoken to others, No one prescribes anything stronger than Tramadol. I tried the alternative use drugs decades ago they made me crazy or suicidal (Neurontin) after one dose. Dibenzaline gave me horrific violent bloody nightmares every single night for a year, again one dose of the drug compounded down to a small trial dosage. Narcotics work well for me. The only problem I had was strictures from the plastics in the ER morphine causing emergency bowl section. I lost a foot of small intestine to what the Cornell pathologists called NSAID WEBS. I am not happy to be back on ER RX with the same sedating quality I disliked so decades ago.
For now I am ok. I am now 60 and fear the future were this is concerned. I learned and use alternative healing, visualization, energy and vibrational medicine, tuning forks help myself and others almost instantly. I use herbs and homeopathy. My husbands accupunturist told me they do not stick needles in RSD patients, for good reason. I take no other allopathic medicine. I have various other health issues I self manage because none of my docs know or understands what the heck is wrong with me. I think it is probably just the effect of having RSD for 25 years. what I have read it seems to fit. The harm done to millions is cruel. The IV drug test should be standard for chronic patients to quickly identify what may or may not work and in which dose. I agree at one time over prescribing for in appropriate issues was a problem but I never met those doctors. I know dozens who used opiates for a few weeks or months and stopped when they no longer needed them, as I did in a former life, I do not know anyone who had a problem. I read it came out in court discovery Oxycontin applied for approval as a 6-8 hour drug but FDA wanted 12 hours so they came back and stated ok it works for twelve without reformulation. That is part of the problem. If it only lasts for 6 or even 8 hours a patient will take it earlier and run out needing more or will go through withdrawl effects every day. They will soon be accused of abuse because Perdue lied to regulators. I just read Mallinkroft is approved for abuse deterrent oxycodone and will stop making IR. Even though it states it really isn't deterrent. We do not need more plastics in pills. My gut has never been the same.
Preserve Opiates for Pain Patients says:
These were not opiate only ODs. It is rather difficult to OD on opiates alone. And virtually NONE of them were pain patients. Whatever the who, what, why and where, opiates are an essential part in the treatment of incurable severe pain. Between 7 and 50 million American Moms and Dad's and Elder Folk have been force tapered leading directly to suicides, immobility, poverty, despair and grief. The newest CDC figures reflect 70K OD deaths BUT WITHOUT distinguishing if these were pharmaceutical or street fentanyl users. We feel the true number of opiate only death may be closer to 500 (five-hundred), …again not pain patients. It is good to curb illicit use and smuggling of the deadly fentanyl analogs but OD death is WAY up with prescribing WAY down WHILE every single pain patient is abandoned or in fear of being abandoned and Medical Doctors leaving the prescribing of opiates wholesale for fear of DEA 'witch hunts'. WHY THIS CRUELTY and PHOBIA? That's not the American way for its workers. AND NOTHING can EVER stop smuggling or the self-confidence of the illicit users. Please separate severe pain patients from "opioid crisis".
facebook.com/poppnow/
Bob Newman says:
Check out Buprenorphine. (Belbucca, Butrans) It can offer amazing levels of pain relief with virtually no sedation or euphoria. It truly is a miracle drug, so of course, many insurance comoanies don't want to pay the higher price. When used with other opioids, only if needed, it can help to reduce the adverse affects of those drugs, while still allowing them to aid in the pain relief. My Dr has many patients on this medication. You can also stop taking the classical opioid for periods if needed and not suffer withdrawal.
The Pharma idnustry did not release the fats about bupenorpherine. People on it can experience horiffic pain, if they are injured and have to undergo surgery.
Carol H says:
Thank you Mavis Johnson, I didn't know that.
Many of the commenters and policy makers do not know the difference between Oxycontin and Oxycodone. Oxycontin was the expensive time relase formula pedddled by Perdue. Ocycodone is a relatively cheap instant release opiate, that was used for years. Oxycontin is highly addictive, because it contains multiple doses, making it attractive to the addicted.
Carol H. says:
Dear Pam:
I am sorry for those that truly NEED the pain relief. My complaint, as you may have read, is in being encouraged to use it. However, most healthcare folks feared exactly what has happened. Those who need it for whatever reason may be deprived. I am on your side.
I am so sick and tired of this FALSIFIED OPIOID EPIDEMIC that was created bty money hungry, corrupt lawmakers and their sidekicks the DEA<CDC<FDA<PROP. I am a intractable pain sufferer for 20 years. Opioids were my LAST RESORT after trying all the alternative therapies that did not work and left me thousands in debt. Failed fusions that left me with severe nerve damage. Epidurals that gave me adhesive arachnoiditis. and so much more. I suffer every dam day in severe pain. Pain that was once controlled by high dose LIFESAVING PAIN MEDICATION !!!! I am a rapid metabolizer that requires higher doses in order to get relief. For ten years I was on the SAME STABLE DOSE AND GUESS WHAT……IT WORKED AND I HAD A QUALITY OF LIFE AND NOW BECAUSE OF THIS BULLSHIT ADDICTION DRIVEN AGENDA, MYSELF AND MILLIONS MORE ARE BEING ABANDONED BY THE MEDICAL COMMUNITY AND LEFT IN A TORTUROUS HELL UNTIL WE KILL OURSELVES OR TURN TO THE STREETS FOR RELIEF GETTING GOD KNOWS WHAT AND POSSIBLE OVERDOSING AND DYING! WHAT THE F*** KIND OF COUNTRY IS THIS THAT IS ALLOWING THE TORTURE OF INNOCENT LAW ABIDING CHRONICALLY ILL CITIZENS AND OUR VETS?!?!?! The corrupt lawmakers have used FALSIFIED OD STATS that were made to fit their agenda and make them lots of money…. What is being done to WE THE PEOPLE is CRUEL, INHUMANE AND IT SURE AS HELL IS TORTURE!!!
I urge you all to fight back and join in the NATIONWIDE DON'T PUNISH PAIN RALLY ON JANUARY 29TH AT EACH STATE CAPITOL. PLEASE GOOGLE DONTPUNISHPAINRALLY AND YOU WILL GET THE INFO….IT IS SO IMPORTANT WE FIGHT FOR OUR RIGHT TO PAIN RELIEF!!!!!.
Hugh man says:
Hey Pam. I don't know where you live, or how many different walks of life you cross path with, but from my experience, the opioid epidemic is VERY REAL.
Heroine/fentanyl outbreaks are at record highs with people dying left are right around me. 90% of these people are previously prescribed OxyContin patients who either shouldn't have been prescribed in the first place, or weren't given the proper information and assistance to properly ween off, which made them turn to the streets and overdose.
I personally believe that OxyContin should continue production, but there needs to be extreme reasoning to prescribe it. I don't live in Florida, but I know that 4 years ago you could go to 25% of the doctors there for "back pain" and walk out 30 minutes later with an oxy script. Now that it's harder to get, people overdose on what they find in the street. Also, as a note to anybody reading this who is takes this drug for their pain but thinks the people ODing on the street are weak willed drug addicts, please look in the mirror real quick and evaluate your own dependence. Imagine if this drug you are dependent on was taken away. You are just as addicted, but taking it from a pharmacy. It's the same family. Yours is just legal, so please don't look down from an imaginary pedestal.
If they were never prescribed, they never would have been addicted, and never would have OD'd.
Saying this is a false issue is incorrect.
Purdue is not the only one. As a hospital inpatient several months ago. I was im ediayely setup bedside with a post-op pump containing Oxycontin. I told the nurse I did NOT want that drug for pain. Tylenol was suitable. The pump was left there and I was repeatedly encouraged to useit. I did not. When I was getting ready to be discharged, a nurse cam in with a piece of paper she announced was
my prescription for Oxycontin (or -codone). Again I refused. She was shocked, are you sure?, she asked. Whe I got home I checked my online chart and sure anough, there was an "open" prescription for "Oxy". Really???
T. Trust says:
Cain Lang,
If acupuncture is a placebo, and if that placebo can treat 100+ diseases or disorders please give me acupuncture placebo treatments anytime. 100+ healing disorders capability!
THIS placebo must be a hell of placebo.


text:
Als Römisches Armenien wird das ab dem Ende des 1. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. in Teilen oder als Ganzes dem Römischen Reich und seinem Nachfolger, dem Oströmischen/Byzantinischen Reich unterstellte Armenien bezeichnet, das in der Antike wesentlich größer war als der moderne Staat Armenien.

Das Königreich Großarmenien lag in der Interessensphäre Roms und des Partherreichs, wobei es mehrmals zu militärischen Auseinandersetzungen kam. Kaiser Trajan richtete zwischen 114 und 118 n. Chr. die kurzlebige Provinz Armenia ein, die gemeinsam mit Kappadokien von einem Statthalter verwaltet wurde. In diesem Amt ist Lucius Catilius Severus belegt. Der Versuch einer parthischen Einflussnahme im Königreich Armenien führte 161 zu einem erneuten Partherkrieg, der im Jahr 166 siegreich für Rom endete.

Das bereits im frühen 4. Jahrhundert christianisierte Armenien blieb bis in die Spätantike zwischen Rom und dem neupersischen Sassanidenreich, dem Nachfolgereich der Parther, umstritten. Wohl im Jahr 387 kam es zu einer endgültigen Teilung ganz Armeniens zwischen Rom und Persien, wobei die Perser den Großteil des Gebiets erhielten, das sogenannte Persarmenien.

Bereits unter Diokletian um 300 war das römische Armenien in zwei Provinzen (Armenia prima und Armenia secunda) geteilt worden. Unter Justinian I. wurde das römische Armenien dann zusammen mit Teilen von Pontos in vier kleinere Provinzen aufgeteilt. In der Regierungszeit des Maurikios profitierten die Oströmer von einem Bürgerkrieg im Sassanidenreich, in dem sich der von Maurikios unterstützte Kandidat Chosrau II. 591 durchsetzen konnte. Anschließend erhielt Ostrom Gebietsgewinne auch in Armenien, doch die dortige Lage blieb aufgrund umstrittener Eingriffe in die lokalen Herrschaftsverhältnisse und kirchlicher Differenzen angespannt.

Im Zuge der arabischen Eroberung Mitte des 7. Jahrhunderts verlor Ostrom Armenien. Damit beginnt die Geschichte des mittelalterlichen armenischen Königreichs, wo Byzanz im späten 10. Jahrhundert wieder intervenierte.

Literatur
 Armenia. In: Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Bd. 1 (1991), S. 175–177.
 Richard G. Hovannisian (Hrsg.): The Armenian People From Ancient to Modern Times, Band I - The Dynastic Periods: From Antiquity to the Fourteenth Century. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke 1996.
 Michael Alexander Speidel: Provincia Armenia in the Light of the Epigraphic Evidence. In: Electrum. Band 28, 2021, S. 135–150.

Anmerkungen

Großarmenien
Armenia (Provinz)

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


On April 14th, Holman Middle School hosted the St. Louis Suburban Music Education Association's Middle School Solo and Ensemble Festival on April14. Holman has been hosting the event since the early 1990s and on any given year, approximately 1,300 performances are given at the event by thousands of band, choir and orchestra students from Grades 6 through 8.
Any student in a school district associated with EducationPlus, a regional education consortium, can attend and receive ratings from professional music educators in their respective areas.
"Holman's musicians received extremely positive results and both parent and student volunteers were highly complimented by our guests," said Holman band teacher Adam Hall.
Shown below are some of Holman's students performing at the festival.


OHIO–In early May, Procter & Gamble and Bankers Trust Corporation settled a $200 million law suit and the federal Court of Appeals in Cincinnati (6th Cir.) refused a request for the full bench to reconsider an appellate panel's ruling on a protective order between the parties and a restraining order prohibiting Business Week from publishing information in the case.
Procter & Gamble had accused Bankers Trust of a variety of unethical and illegal practices linked to derivative trading.
A panel of the Court of Appeals in Cincinnati (6th Cir.) held in early March that the trial court had erred when it forbade Business Week to publish its article.


The Integrated Research Network in Perinatality of Quebec and Eastern Ontario (IRNPQEO) is a network of researchers working in a number of disciplines that focus particularly on issues related to Mother and Child health.
The 3D study is particularly interested in four main themes in perinatal research and also includes interdisciplinary projects.
In Quebec, the degree of readiness of children entering kindergarten and grade 1 varies greatly across areas of their development.
The IRNPQEO Biobank is made up of over 200,000 biological samples collected in the course of the 3D study.
Over twenty related papers have been published so far, and many are in preparation or were submitted to scientific journals.
The IRNPQEO Research Platform includes a databank and bank of biological material (Biobank). The scope of the data and biological specimens in the Biobank makes this research platform a significant resource for future research related to the progress of pregnancy and the impact of maternal and father health on child development.


text:
HMS Nimble was a new cutter that the Royal Navy purchased in 1813. The Navy sold her in 1816.

Career
Lieutenant Peter Williams commissioned Nimble on 5 April 1813. (He had come from the gunbrig )

During the capture of San Sebastian Nimble and  blockaded the mouth of Bindassoa from 31 August to 8 September.

Lieutenant Josiah Thompson replaced Williams in August 1814; Williams had been appointed to the rank of Commander on 24 August.

In April–May 1815 Nimble was at the Garonne. There she boarded Young William, which was on her way Bordeaux, and warned her not to enter the river.

On 2 July 1814 the chasse-maree Aimable arrived at Falmouth. Nimble had detained and several other vessels as well.

On 2 November 1815 Nimble returned to Plymouth from Newfoundland. Thompson paid off Nimble in November 1815.

Fate
The "Principal Officers and Commissioners of His Majesty's Navy" offered the "Nimble cutter, of 147 tons", lying at Sheerness, for sale on 18 April 1816.
Nimble was sold to Mr. Nixon on that day.

Postscript
In January 1819, the London Gazette reported that Parliament had voted a grant to all those who had served under the command of Lord Viscount Keith in 1812, between 1813 and 1814, and in the Gironde. Nimble was listed among the vessels that had served under Keith in 1813 and 1814. She had also served under Keith in the Gironde.

Notes

Citations

References

1813 ships
Cutters of the Royal Navy


Coloring Craze Party at the Bristol Historical Society continues on January 18th from 7-9 pm. Bring your coloring books and supplies and we supply the wine and cheese. The Society is located at 98 Summer Street Bristol, $5 entrance fee, pre-registration is required, but walk-ins are welcome. For mail requests write to Color Craze BHS PO Box 1393, Bristol, 06011-1393 or call at 860-583-6309.
Coloring Craze Party at the Bristol Historical Society continues on Friday, March 15 from 7-9 pm. Bring your coloring books and supplies and we supply the wine and cheese. The Society is located at 98 Summer Street Bristol, $5 entrance fee, pre-registration is required, but walk-ins are welcome. For mail requests write to Color Craze BHS PO Box 1393, Bristol, 06011-1393 or call at 860-583-6309.
Our new "Hollywood At The Bijou" movie series "1939 the Golden Year of Hollywood - 80th Anniversary". It is a year-long series of 11 classic films - all shown on real film, presented by "The Witch's Dungeon Classic Movie Museum" with vintage era cartoons, each month at The Bristol Historical Society, 98 Summer Street in Bristol, CT. 860-583-8306. $3.00 donation each showing - popcorn & soda available. 7pm showing on REAL film!
Coloring Craze Party at the Bristol Historical Society continues on Friday, April 12 from 7-9 pm. Bring your coloring books and supplies and we supply the wine and cheese. The Society is located at 98 Summer Street Bristol, $5 entrance fee, pre-registration is required, but walk-ins are welcome. For mail requests write to Color Craze BHS PO Box 1393, Bristol, 06011-1393 or call at 860-583-6309.


text:
<component name="libraryTable">
  <library name="SBT: oauth.signpost:signpost-commonshttp4:1.2.1.2">
    <CLASSES>
      <root url="jar://$USER_HOME$/bin/repository/local/oauth.signpost/signpost-commonshttp4/1.2.1.2/jars/signpost-commonshttp4.jar!/" />
    </CLASSES>
    <JAVADOC />
    <SOURCES />
  </library>
</component>

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


Performing were the Goshen College Chamber Choir and Men's Chorus, directed by Scott Hochstetler, and the Goshen College Women's World Music Choir, directed by Debra Brubaker. Joining the GC choirs was the Bethany Christian High School Concert Choir, directed by Nathan Swartzendruber, a 2009 Goshen College graduate. All four choirs performed individually and as a mass chorus.
Date: Nov. 23, 2013 Photographers: Alia Munley '15 and Brett Conrad '15 Lavender Jazz, Goshen College's big band, presented their fall concert in Sauder Concert Hall on Saturday, November 23.
Date: Oct. 4, 2013 Photographers: Brett Conrad '15 and Alia Munley '15 GC's very own jazz band, Lavender Jazz, provided swing music for a night of dancing and fun during Goshen's First Friday over Homecoming Weekend.


The Belle II detector operating at the future upgrade to the KEKB accelerator will perform high-statistics precision investigations into the flavor sector of the Standard Model. As charged hadron identification is a vital element of the experiment's success, the time-of-propagation (TOP) counter has been chosen as the primary particle identification device in the barrel region of Belle II. The TOP counter is a compact variant of the DIRC technique and relies heavily on exquisite single photon timing resolution with micro-channel plate photomultiplier tubes. We discuss the general principles of TOP operation and optimization of the Belle II TOP configuration, which is expected to provide 4 sigma or better separation of kaons and pions up to momenta of approximately 4 GeV/c.


text:
Detalhes

				PROCESSO:AÇÃO PENAL

					AUTOR     :MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO FEDERAL

					RÉU       :A I A

						ADVOGADO:TÉCIO LINS E SILVA E OUTRO - RJ016165

						ADVOGADO:LUCIANA CHRISTINA GUIMARÃES LÓSSIO E OUTRO(S) - DF015410

					RÉU       :M R J N

						ADVOGADO:JOSÉ GERARDO GROSSI E OUTRO - DF000586

						ADVOGADO:FABRÍCIO DE OLIVEIRA CAMPOS E OUTRO(S) - ES010328

						ADVOGADO:JOAQUIM PEDRO DE MEDEIROS RODRIGUES E OUTRO(S) - DF024638

						ADVOGADO:CONCEIÇÃO APARECIDA GIORI - ES014070

					LOCALIZAÇÃO:Entrada em SEÇÃO DE DOCUMENTOS JUDICIÁRIOS em 14/09/2015

					TIPO:Processo físico.

					AUTUAÇÃO:14/07/2005

					NÚMERO ÚNICO: 0112673-71.2005.3.00.0000

				RELATOR(A):Min. MAURO CAMPBELL MARQUES - CORTE ESPECIAL

				RAMO DO DIREITO:
				DIREITO PENAL

				ASSUNTO(S):

					DIREITO PENAL,

					Crimes contra a Paz Pública,

					Quadrilha ou Bando.

				TRIBUNAL DE ORIGEM:
				SUPERIOR TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA

				NÚMEROS DE ORIGEM:
				100000003203200353, 200050010055406, 200400346999, 200451070002633.

				 9 volumes, 69 apensos

				ÚLTIMA FASE:
				14/09/2015 (12:50) PROCESSO ARQUIVADO NAS CAIXAS 43874,43875,43876,43877,43878,43879,43880,43881,43882,43883,43884,43885,43886,43887,43888,43889,43890,43891,43892 - 09 VOLS. 69 APENSOS.

Fases

					14/09/201512:50
					Processo Arquivado nas caixas 43874,43875,43876,43877,43878,43879,43880,43881,43882,43883,43884,43885,43886,43887,43888,43889,43890,43891,43892 - 09 Vols. 69 Apensos.

						(861)

					11/09/201512:34
					Remetidos os Autos (fisicamente) para SEÇÃO DE DOCUMENTOS JUDICIÁRIOS (decisão de fls. 2455/2456 e certidão de fl. 2461)

						(123)

					10/09/201515:33
					Recebidos os autos no(a) COORDENADORIA DA CORTE ESPECIAL

						(132)

					10/09/201515:09
					Remetidos os Autos (fisicamente) para COORDENADORIA DA CORTE ESPECIAL

						(123)

					10/09/201515:08
					Recebidos os autos fisicamente no(a) SEÇÃO DE RECEBIMENTO DE PROCESSOS RECURSAIS (9 volumes e 69 apensos - TRF2ª Região) e encaminhados à Coordenadoria da Corte Especial

						(132)

					12/11/201413:30
					Baixa Definitiva para TRIBUNAL DE ORIGEM (TRIBUNAL REGIONAL FEDERAL DA 2A REGIAO - Guia n° 15104)

						(22)

					12/11/201412:31
					Baixa Definitiva para TRIBUNAL REGIONAL FEDERAL DA 2ª REGIÃO fls. 2308

						(22)

					12/11/201412:31
					Transitado em Julgado em 11/11/2014

						(848)

					11/11/201414:37
					Arquivamento de documento Mandado de Intimação nº 001260-2014-CORDCE com ciente (MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO FEDERAL)

						(30019)

					04/11/201407:18
					Publicado DESPACHO / DECISÃO em 04/11/2014

						(92)

Decisão Monocrática <select id="idDecisaoMonocraticaFormato96224885" class="clsComboFormatoPdfHtml"><option value="PDF">PDF</option><option value="HTML">HTML</option></select>

								 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 04/11/2014)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro MAURO CAMPBELL MARQUES

					03/11/201419:15
					Disponibilizado no DJ Eletrônico - DESPACHO / DECISÃO

						(1061)

					03/11/201417:09
					Proferido despacho de mero expediente deferindo pedido do Ministério Público Federal (Publicação prevista para 04/11/2014)

						(11010)

					24/10/201415:42
					Recebidos os autos no(a) COORDENADORIA DA CORTE ESPECIAL

						(132)

					05/09/201417:50
					Conclusos para despacho ao(à) Ministro(a) MAURO CAMPBELL MARQUES (Relator) (fls. 2343/2450)

						(51)

					05/09/201417:23
					Juntada de Petição de (Fax) nº 290113/2014

						(85)

					05/09/201417:23
					Juntada de Petição de nº 303345/2014

						(85)

					05/09/201417:23
					Juntada de Petição de nº 291981/2014

						(85)

					05/09/201417:23
					Juntada de Petição de nº 291079/2014

						(85)

					05/09/201417:23
					Juntada de Petição de OFÍCIO (Fax) nº 290560/2014

						(85)

					03/09/201414:25
					Recebidos os autos no(a) COORDENADORIA DA CORTE ESPECIAL

						(132)

					25/08/201416:07
					Autos com vista ao Ministério Público Federal

						(30015)

					22/08/201415:43
					Recebidos os autos no(a) COORDENADORIA DA CORTE ESPECIAL

						(132)

					22/08/201412:11
					Remetidos os Autos (outros motivos) para COORDENADORIA DA CORTE ESPECIAL, conforme requisitado

						(123)

					21/08/201418:45
					Redistribuído por prevenção, em razão de sucessão, ao Ministro MAURO CAMPBELL MARQUES - CORTE ESPECIAL

						(36)

					21/08/201418:44
					Processo recebido para redistribuição por sucessão

						(30075)

					21/08/201418:39
					Recebidos os autos no(a) COORDENADORIA DE PROCESSOS ORIGINÁRIOS Sem os apensos

						(132)

					21/08/201415:58
					Remetidos os Autos (para atribuição) para COORDENADORIA DE PROCESSOS ORIGINÁRIOS

						(123)

					21/08/201415:55
					Juntada de Aviso de Recebimento referente ao(à) Ofício Nº 002930/2014-CESP

						(581)

					20/08/201409:16
					Recebidos os autos no(a) COORDENADORIA DA CORTE ESPECIAL

						(132)

					12/08/201407:01
					Arquivamento de documento Mandado de Intimação nº 000773-2014-CORDCE com ciente (MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO FEDERAL)

						(30019)

					05/08/201416:57
					Conclusos para julgamento ao(à) Ministro(a) SIDNEI BENETI (Relator) com agravo regimental de fls. 2316/2325

						(51)

					04/08/201417:35
					Juntada de Ofício nº 002930/2014-CESP

						(581)

					04/08/201417:35
					Expedição de Ofício nº 002930/2014-CESP ao (à)Ministro Ricardo Lewandowski

						(60)

					04/08/201415:59
					Juntada de Petição de AGRAVO REGIMENTAL nº 249629/2014

						(85)

					01/08/201407:13
					Publicado DESPACHO / DECISÃO em 01/08/2014

						(92)

Decisão Monocrática <select id="idDecisaoMonocraticaFormato93226001" class="clsComboFormatoPdfHtml"><option value="PDF">PDF</option><option value="HTML">HTML</option></select>

								 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 01/08/2014)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro SIDNEI BENETI

					31/07/201418:08
					Disponibilizado no DJ Eletrônico - DESPACHO / DECISÃO

						(1061)

					15/07/201415:42
					Juntada de Petição de PETIÇÃO nº 235648/2014

						(85)

					11/07/201416:22
					Recebidos os autos no(a) COORDENADORIA DA CORTE ESPECIAL

						(132)

					09/07/201416:24
					Autos com vista ao Ministério Público Federal (fls. 2306/2308)

						(30015)

					03/07/201414:21
					Declarada incompetência (Publicação prevista para 01/08/2014)

						(941)

					02/07/201414:54
					Recebidos os autos no(a) COORDENADORIA DA CORTE ESPECIAL

						(132)

					27/06/201415:26
					Conclusos para decisão ao(à) Ministro(a) SIDNEI BENETI (Relator) (fls. 2293/2299 e 2302/2304)

						(51)

					27/06/201415:15
					Juntada de Petição de PETIÇÃO nº 215289/2014

						(85)

					25/06/201415:05
					Recebidos os autos no(a) COORDENADORIA DA CORTE ESPECIAL

						(132)

					16/06/201416:02
					Autos com vista ao Ministério Público Federal (despacho de fls. 2288/2289 e certidão de fl. 2299)

						(30015)

					23/01/201415:04
					Arquivamento de documento Mandado de Intimação nº 001820-2013-CORDCE com ciente (MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO FEDERAL)

						(30019)

					19/12/201307:11
					Despacho do Ministro Relator publicado  no DJe em 19/12/2013

Decisão Monocrática <select id="idDecisaoMonocraticaFormato88588752" class="clsComboFormatoPdfHtml"><option value="PDF">PDF</option><option value="HTML">HTML</option></select>

								 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 19/12/2013)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro SIDNEI BENETI

					18/12/201319:20
					Despacho do Ministro Relator disponibilizado no DJe em 18/12/2013

					17/12/201317:44
					Despacho do Ministro Relator  determinando aguardar aguardando publicação (prevista para 19/12/2013)

					17/12/201317:08
					Processo recebido na Coordenadoria da Corte Especial

					12/12/201317:01
					Conclusão ao(à) Ministro(a) Relator(a) (fls. 2282/2283 e 2285/2286)

					12/12/201316:59
					Petição  nº 448872/2013 (PETIÇÃO) juntada

					12/12/201316:58
					Petição  nº 447721/2013 (OFÍCIO - Fax) juntada

					15/07/201318:15
					Certidão: certifico que decorreu o prazo para manifestação da decisão de fl. 2271

					15/07/201318:11
					Processo sobrestado

					04/04/201310:13
					Mandado de Intimação nº. 000319-2013-CORDCE (Decisões e Vistas) com ciente do representante do(a) MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO FEDERAL em 02/04/2013 arquivado nesta Coordenadoria

					26/03/201317:04
					Processo recebido na Coordenadoria da Corte Especial

					26/03/201307:06
					Despacho do Ministro Relator publicado  no DJe em 26/03/2013

Decisão Monocrática <select id="idDecisaoMonocraticaFormato81547342" class="clsComboFormatoPdfHtml"><option value="PDF">PDF</option><option value="HTML">HTML</option></select>

								 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 26/03/2013)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro SIDNEI BENETI

					25/03/201318:59
					Despacho do Ministro Relator disponibilizado no DJe em 25/03/2013

					22/03/201313:34
					Vista ao Ministério Público Federal (fl. 2271)

					22/03/201313:18
					Despacho do Ministro Relator  determinando cientificar a(s) parte(s) aguardando publicação (prevista para 26/03/2013)

					22/03/201310:44
					Processo recebido na Coordenadoria da Corte Especial

					13/03/201310:09
					Mandado de Intimação nº. 000198-2013-CORDCE (Decisões e Vistas) com ciente do representante do(a) MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO FEDERAL em 11/03/2013 arquivado nesta Coordenadoria

					08/03/201313:09
					Conclusão ao(à) Ministro(a) Relator(a) (fls. 2252 e 2262/2269)

					08/03/201313:09
					Petição  nº 57511/2013 (PETIÇÃO) juntada

					08/03/201313:08
					Petição  nº 54142/2013 (OFÍCIO) juntada

					08/03/201310:06
					Processo recebido na Coordenadoria da Corte Especial

					06/03/201307:09
					Despacho do Ministro Relator publicado  no DJe em 06/03/2013

Decisão Monocrática <select id="idDecisaoMonocraticaFormato80976352" class="clsComboFormatoPdfHtml"><option value="PDF">PDF</option><option value="HTML">HTML</option></select>

								 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 06/03/2013)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro SIDNEI BENETI

					05/03/201318:59
					Despacho do Ministro Relator disponibilizado no DJe em 05/03/2013

					05/03/201313:36
					Vista ao Ministério Público Federal (fl. 2248)

					05/03/201313:34
					Petição  nº 53852/2013 (PETIÇÃO) juntada

					04/03/201318:33
					Despacho do Ministro Relator  determinando aguardar aguardando publicação (prevista para 06/03/2013)

					04/03/201318:15
					Processo recebido na Coordenadoria da Corte Especial

					04/03/201316:52
					Conclusão ao(à) Ministro(a) Relator(a) (fls. 2242/2246)

					04/03/201316:52
					Petição  nº 52243/2013 (PETIÇÃO - Fax) juntada

					04/03/201310:52
					Mandado de Intimação nº. 000137-2013-CORDCE (Decisões e Vistas) com ciente do representante do(a) MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO FEDERAL em 28/02/2013 arquivado nesta Coordenadoria

					26/02/201307:06
					Despacho do Ministro Relator publicado  no DJe em 26/02/2013

Decisão Monocrática <select id="idDecisaoMonocraticaFormato80718481" class="clsComboFormatoPdfHtml"><option value="PDF">PDF</option><option value="HTML">HTML</option></select>

								 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 26/02/2013)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro SIDNEI BENETI

					25/02/201319:27
					Despacho do Ministro Relator disponibilizado no DJe em 25/02/2013

					21/02/201318:41
					Despacho do Ministro Relator  determinando intimação dos réus para oferecimento de defesa prévia aguardando publicação (prevista para 26/02/2013)

					21/02/201315:12
					Processo recebido na Coordenadoria da Corte Especial

					14/02/201311:34
					Mandado de Intimação nº. 000008-2013-CORDCE (Decisões e Vistas) com ciente do representante do(a) MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO FEDERAL em 07/02/2013 arquivado nesta Coordenadoria

					01/02/201314:07
					Conclusão ao(à) Ministro(a) Relator(a) (parecer de fls. 2226/2230)

					01/02/201313:56
					Petição  nº 11946/2013 (PETIÇÃO) juntada

					01/02/201307:20
					Despacho do Ministro Relator publicado  no DJe em 01/02/2013

Decisão Monocrática <select id="idDecisaoMonocraticaFormato80133941" class="clsComboFormatoPdfHtml"><option value="PDF">PDF</option><option value="HTML">HTML</option></select>

								 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 01/02/2013)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro SIDNEI BENETI

					31/01/201319:10
					Despacho do Ministro Relator disponibilizado no DJe em 31/01/2013

					30/01/201315:45
					Processo recebido na Coordenadoria da Corte Especial

					19/12/201212:50
					Vista ao Ministério Público Federal (fls. 2221/2222)

					19/12/201212:47
					Despacho do Ministro Relator  determinando vista ao Ministério Público Federal aguardando publicação (prevista para 01/02/2013)

					18/12/201217:07
					Processo recebido na Coordenadoria da Corte Especial

					14/12/201212:36
					Conclusão ao(à) Ministro(a) Relator(a) (informação de fls. 2218/2219)

					12/12/201215:51
					Processo recebido na Coordenadoria da Corte Especial

					07/12/201214:20
					Conclusão ao(à) Ministro(a) Relator(a) - pela SJD

					07/12/201213:00
					Processo atribuído em 07/12/2012 - Ministro SIDNEI BENETI - CORTE ESPECIAL

					07/12/201210:00
					Processo para atribuição ao sucessor

					07/12/201209:50
					Processo recebido na Coordenadoria de Processos Originários

					06/12/201218:42
					Processo remetido à Coordenadoria de Processos Originários para atribuição

					06/12/201218:41
					Acórdão transitado em julgado de fls. 2201/2206

					29/11/201218:18
					Ofício nº 004679/2012-CESP comunicando resultado de julgamento expedido ao(à) Presidenta Desembargadora Federal MARIA HELENA CISNE (aviso de recebimento juntado)

					23/11/201212:07
					Mandado de Intimação nº. 001540-2012-CORDCE (Acórdãos) com ciente do representante do(a) MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO FEDERAL em 21/11/2012 arquivado nesta Coordenadoria

					22/11/201218:15
					Processo recebido na Coordenadoria da Corte Especial

			Listando as fases da data 14/09/2015 até a data 22/11/2012

      página <input value="1" onkeypress="if(!isNaN(this.value) && isPressionouEnter(event) && parseInt(this.value) <= 7){FNavegaFases(true, this.value - 1);}" type="text"> de 7 páginas

Decisões

							 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 04/11/2014)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro MAURO CAMPBELL MARQUES

							 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 01/08/2014)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro SIDNEI BENETI

							 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 19/12/2013)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro SIDNEI BENETI

							 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 26/03/2013)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro SIDNEI BENETI

							 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 06/03/2013)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro SIDNEI BENETI

							 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 26/02/2013)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro SIDNEI BENETI

							 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 01/02/2013)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro SIDNEI BENETI

							PET na APn    425(2005/0112673-8 de 19/11/2012)

									EMENTA / ACORDÃO

									RELATÓRIO E VOTO
									- Min. TEORI ALBINO ZAVASCKI

									CERTIDÃO DE JULGAMENTO

							 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 06/08/2012)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro TEORI ALBINO ZAVASCKI

							PET na APn    425(2005/0112673-8 de 27/02/2012)

									EMENTA / ACORDÃO

									RELATÓRIO E VOTO
									- Min. TEORI ALBINO ZAVASCKI

									VOTO
									- Min. CASTRO MEIRA

									VOTO
									- Min. MASSAMI UYEDA

									RETIFICAÇÃO DE VOTO
									- Min. CASTRO MEIRA

									CERTIDÃO DE JULGAMENTO

									VOTO-VISTA
									- Min. ELIANA CALMON

									CERTIDÃO DE JULGAMENTO

							EDcl na QO na APn    425(2005/0112673-8 de 13/09/2011)

									EMENTA / ACORDÃO

									RELATÓRIO E VOTO
									- Min. TEORI ALBINO ZAVASCKI

									CERTIDÃO DE JULGAMENTO

							 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 13/06/2011)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro TEORI ALBINO ZAVASCKI

							QO na APn    425(2005/0112673-8 de 03/06/2011)

									EMENTA / ACORDÃO

									RELATÓRIO E VOTO
									- Min. TEORI ALBINO ZAVASCKI

									CERTIDÃO DE JULGAMENTO

							 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 09/08/2010)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro TEORI ALBINO ZAVASCKI

							 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 29/06/2010)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro TEORI ALBINO ZAVASCKI

							EDcl no AgRg na APn    425(2005/0112673-8 de 24/08/2009)

									EMENTA / ACORDÃO

									RELATÓRIO E VOTO
									- Min. TEORI ALBINO ZAVASCKI

									CERTIDÃO DE JULGAMENTO

							AgRg na APn    425(2005/0112673-8 de 21/05/2009)

									EMENTA / ACORDÃO

									RELATÓRIO E VOTO
									- Min. TEORI ALBINO ZAVASCKI

									CERTIDÃO DE JULGAMENTO

							 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 20/03/2009)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro TEORI ALBINO ZAVASCKI

							 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 26/11/2007)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro TEORI ALBINO ZAVASCKI

							 PETREQ na APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 25/10/2007)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro TEORI ALBINO ZAVASCKI

							 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 27/10/2006)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro TEORI ALBINO ZAVASCKI

							 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 19/10/2006)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro TEORI ALBINO ZAVASCKI

							 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 04/10/2006)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro TEORI ALBINO ZAVASCKI

							EDcl na APn    425(2005/0112673-8 de 14/08/2006)

									EMENTA / ACORDÃO

									RELATÓRIO E VOTO
									- Min. TEORI ALBINO ZAVASCKI

									CERTIDÃO DE JULGAMENTO

							 APn    425(2005/0112673-8 de 15/05/2006)

									EMENTA / ACORDÃO

									RELATÓRIO E VOTO
									- Min. JOSÉ ARNALDO DA FONSECA

									ESCLARECIMENTOS
									- Min. CARLOS ALBERTO MENEZES DIREITO

									VOTO
									- Min. CARLOS ALBERTO MENEZES DIREITO

									VOTO
									- Min. LUIZ FUX

									VOTO-VENCIDO
									- Min. NILSON NAVES

									VOTO
									- Min. BARROS MONTEIRO

									VOTO-VENCIDO
									- Min. FRANCISCO PEÇANHA MARTINS

									VOTO-VENCIDO
									- Min. HUMBERTO GOMES DE BARROS

									VOTO-VENCIDO
									- Min. CESAR ASFOR ROCHA

									VOTO
									- Min. JOSÉ DELGADO

									VOTO-VENCIDO (EM PARTE)
									- Min. FERNANDO GONÇALVES

									VOTO
									- Min. CARLOS ALBERTO MENEZES DIREITO

									VOTO
									- Min. ELIANA CALMON

									VOTO
									- Min. LUIZ FUX

									VOTO-VENCIDO
									- Min. NILSON NAVES

									VOTO
									- Min. FRANCISCO PEÇANHA MARTINS

									VOTO-VENCIDO (EM PARTE)
									- Min. HUMBERTO GOMES DE BARROS

									VOTO-VENCIDO (EM PARTE)
									- Min. CESAR ASFOR ROCHA

									VOTO
									- Min. PRESIDENTE DO STJ

									CERTIDÃO DE JULGAMENTO

							 PROC na APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 14/03/2006)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro EDSON VIDIGAL

							 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 31/08/2005)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro JOSÉ ARNALDO DA FONSECA

							 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 18/08/2005)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro JOSÉ ARNALDO DA FONSECA

							 APn     425(2005/0112673-8 - 05/08/2005)

								Decisão Monocrática- Ministro JOSÉ ARNALDO DA FONSECA

Petições

			Petição Nº.Tipo
			ProtocoloProcessamento
			Peticionário

0303345/2014PET   03/09/201405/09/2014.

0290560/2014OF    27/08/201405/09/2014.

0291981/2014PET   27/08/201405/09/2014.

0291079/2014PET   27/08/201405/09/2014.

0290113/2014PET   26/08/201405/09/2014.

0249629/2014AgRg  01/08/201404/08/2014.

0235648/2014PET   11/07/201415/07/2014.

0215289/2014PET   25/06/201427/06/2014.

0447721/2013OF    11/12/201312/12/2013.

0448872/2013PET   11/12/201312/12/2013.

0057511/2013PET   06/03/201308/03/2013.

0054142/2013OF    04/03/201308/03/2013.

0052243/2013PET   04/03/201304/03/2013.

0053852/2013PET   04/03/201305/03/2013.

0011946/2013PET   30/01/201301/02/2013.

0352788/2012ParMPF27/09/201228/09/2012.

0333761/2012PET   14/09/201218/09/2012.

0289885/2012PET   20/08/201222/08/2012.

0251954/2012PET   23/07/201202/08/2012.

0204146/2012PET   11/06/201213/06/2012P/ MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO FEDERAL

0105460/2012PROC  02/04/201203/04/2012P/ M R J N

0087281/2012CieMPF21/03/201223/03/2012.

0194169/2011OF    22/06/201128/06/2011NR 2437/11 STF

0174972/2011PETREQ08/06/201110/06/2011INDEFERIMENTO DO PEDIDO P/ O MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO FEDERAL

0172128/2011EDcl  07/06/201110/06/2011P/ D S DE A

0165819/2011PET   02/06/201128/06/2011P/ MACARIO RMOS JUDICE NETO

0109658/2011PET   15/04/201119/04/2011P/ A I A

0095755/2011PROC  06/04/201119/04/2011P/ A I A

0005342/2011RenMan14/01/201117/01/2011P/ FERNANDO AUGUSTO FERNANDES

0239808/2010VIS/PR31/08/201002/09/2010P/ F DE O C

0239799/2010TEL   31/08/201031/08/2010P/ STF ( COMUNICANDO DECISAO )(fax - 08 fls)

0239784/2010OfCom 31/08/201031/08/2010NR 999/10 STF

0238944/2010PET   30/08/201031/08/2010

0194535/2010OFINFO21/07/201026/07/2010NR 1509/2010   SECAO JUDICIARIA DO ESPIRITO SANTO

0186273/2010PET   07/07/201026/07/2010P/ J S L P

0156301/2010OfCom 10/06/201011/06/2010NR 287/2010 STF

0153799/2010TEL   09/06/201010/06/2010P/ STF (FAX - 1FL)

0154589/2010TEL   09/06/201010/06/2010STF

0278195/2009PROC  11/11/200912/11/2009P/ LUCIANO LOSSIO

0273352/2009OFSOLI06/11/200909/11/2009NR 12017/R STF

0123835/2009EDcl  27/05/200928/05/2009P/ J  S L P

0124003/2009EDcl  27/05/200928/05/2009P/ B J S R

0122139/2009EDcl  25/05/200926/05/2009P/ J S L P  (fax - 5 fls)

0122470/2009EDcl  25/05/200926/05/2009P/ B J S R

0102017/2009PET   05/05/200911/05/2009P/ J S L P

0100567/2009PETREQ04/05/200911/05/2009JUNTADA DE VOTO P/ J S L P (fax - 8 fls)

0081710/2009IMP   13/04/200914/04/2009P/ MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO FEDERAL

0066658/2009AgRg  27/03/200930/03/2009P/ JOAO SERGIO LEAL PEREIRA

0065381/2009AgRg  26/03/200927/03/2009P/ J S L P (fax - 05 fls)

0258992/2008PET   17/10/200820/10/2008P/ J S L P

0022141/2008OFSOLI15/02/200818/02/2008NR 227/2008 STF (COM DOCUMENTO)

0019142/2008PETREQ13/02/200827/02/2008DEFERIR ACESSO A VOLUMES REFERIDOS P/ BELINE JOSE SALLES RAMOS

0231274/2007PROC  22/11/200726/11/2007DE FERNANDO AUGUSTO FERNANDES

0194001/2007OFSOLI05/10/200708/10/2007NR. 5795/07 STF(COM DOCUMENTO)

0183511/2007PETREQ25/09/200705/10/2007BUSCA E APREENSAO DOS AUTOS P/ B J S R

0106015/2007PET   12/06/200720/07/2007P/ BELINE JOSE SALLES RAMOS

0089066/2007PETREQ23/05/200728/05/2007COPIA DOS AUTOS P/ BELINE JOSE SALLES RAMOS (C/ PROCURACAO)

0066821/2007VISTA 23/04/200725/04/2007P/BELINE JOSE SALES RAMOS

0197313/2006OF    22/12/200619/04/2007NR 1096-4/06 JF 2A VARA CRIMINAL SJ ES (ENCAMINHANDO DOCUMENTOS)

0193494/2006OF    15/12/200619/12/2006NR OJC 0008001083-7/2006 2ª VFCRIM DO ESPIRITO SANTO SJ/ES ( EM 02 VOL E 01 AP) ( COM DOCUMENTOS)

0178412/2006OF    24/11/200627/11/2006S/NR. STF (COMUNICANDO DECISAO)(COM COPIA DA DECISAO)(FAX 02 FLS.)

0179152/2006TELEG 24/11/200627/11/2006NR 5639/2006 STF (COMUNICANDO DECISAO)

0179075/2006OF    24/11/200627/11/2006NR 6995/06

0179072/2006OF    24/11/200627/11/2006NR 7020/06

0178182/2006TELEG 23/11/200627/11/2006NR 5662/06 STF (COMUNICANDO DECISAO)

0177651/2006TEL   23/11/200623/11/2006S/NR STF (COMUNICANO DECISAO) (FAX) (03 FLS)

0170909/2006TEL   13/11/200614/11/2006S/ NR STF (COMUNICANDO DECISAO) (FAX) (3 FLS)

0171580/2006TELEG 13/11/200614/11/2006NR 5447/06 STF (COMUNICANDO DECISAO)

0171529/2006OF    13/11/200614/11/2006NR 6719/06 STF (COMUNICANDO DECISAO) (COM DOCUMENTOS)

0168445/2006PETREQ08/11/200614/11/2006INTIMACOES E PUBLICACOES EM NOME DA DRA ADRIANA CARDOZO CITELLI P/ DOMINGOS SALIS DE ARAUJO

0158186/2006AgRg  24/10/200627/10/2006P/ MACARIO RAMOS JUDICE NETO

0151582/2006PET   16/10/200616/10/2006P/ MPF

0145685/2006PET   05/10/200616/10/2006P/ J S L P

0146013/2006PETREQ05/10/200616/10/2006DISPENSA DA EXPEDICAO DA CARTA DE ORDEM P/ M R J N

0094925/2006PETREQ07/07/200610/07/2006EXPEDIR NOTAS TAQUIGRAFICAS P/ JOAO SERGIO LEAL PEREIRA E OUTROS

0068881/2006EDcl  18/05/200622/05/2006P/ JOAO SERGIO LEAL PEREIRA

0069144/2006EDcl  18/05/200622/05/2006P/ A I A

0067972/2006EDcl  17/05/200618/05/2006P/ JOAO SERGIO LEAL PEREIRA (FAX 15 FLS)

0068000/2006EDcl  17/05/200618/05/2006P/  A I A (FAX) (128 FLS)

0010573/2006PETREQ06/02/200607/02/2006ELABORACAO DE CERTIDAO QUE CONSTE O NOME DA DRA CARMEN DA COSTA BARROS

0009939/2006PROC  03/02/200606/02/2006DRA EDYLCEA TAVARES NOGUEIRA DE PAULA P/ REU

0168385/2005OFSOLI21/11/200523/11/2005NR 5467/05

0165226/2005OF    16/11/200518/11/2005NR 99/05

0164685/2005TEL   16/11/200517/11/2005STF COMUNICANDO DECISAO (FAX) (2FLS)

0161116/2005PET   08/11/200508/11/2005P/ J S L P

0156178/2005PETREQ28/10/200528/10/2005JUNTADA DE COPIA DE DENUNCIA P/ MPF

0156179/2005PET   28/10/200528/10/2005P/ MPF ( COM DOCUMENTOS)

0155865/2005OFSOLI27/10/200528/10/2005NR 091/05 TRF DA 2A REGIAO RJ

0149936/2005OF    19/10/200525/10/2005NR 3618/05 MPF (SOLICITANDO ENCAMINHAR DOCUMENTOS)

0149968/2005VISTA 19/10/200525/10/2005P/ JOAO SERGIO LEAL PEREIRA

0137948/2005PROC  29/09/200525/10/2005DR JOAO MESTIERI (P/ REU)

0127828/2005OF    13/09/200516/09/2005NR 1133/05 JF DIRETOR DO FORA SJ RJ (ENCAMINHANDO PETICAO) (COM DOCUMENTOS)

0124502/2005PET   08/09/200509/09/2005RESPOSTA P/ A I A

0121534/2005PETREQ02/09/200505/09/2005DEVOLUCAO DO PRAZO REGIMENTAL P/ A I A

0121372/2005PET   02/09/200505/09/2005RESPOSTA A DENUNCIA P/ M R J N

0120594/2005PET   01/09/200505/09/2005RESPOSTA P/ D S DE A

0120596/2005PET   01/09/200505/09/2005RESPOSTA P/ P R S

0120595/2005PET   01/09/200505/09/2005RESPOSTA P/ B J S R

0120315/2005OF    31/08/200501/09/2005NR 1070/05 JF DIRETOR DO FORO - SJ RJ (ENCAMINHANDO OFICIOS)

0116907/2005VIS/PR26/08/200529/08/2005DR TECIO LINS E SILVA E OTS (P/ REU)

			Listando as peticoes da data 03/09/2014 até a data 26/08/2005

      página <input value="1" onkeypress="if(!isNaN(this.value) && isPressionouEnter(event) && parseInt(this.value) <= 2){FNavegaPeticoes(true, this.value - 1);}" type="text"> de 2 páginas


text:
Das Musée d'Art et d'Industrie (deutsch: Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe; offiziell La Piscine-Musée d'Art et d'Industrie André Diligent) auch La Piscine oder Musée André Diligent genannt, ist ein in ein Museum umgebautes Schwimmbad aus den 1920er Jahren, das sich in der nordfranzösischen Stadt Roubaix befindet.

Die Dauerausstellung präsentiert Kunstwerke lokaler Künstler und Ausstellungsstücke aus der industriellen Geschichte der Stadt. In einem Nebenflügel werden gelegentlich kleine Sonderausstellungen organisiert, die Kunstobjekte aus der ganzen Welt beherbergen wie u. a. von Pablo Picasso.

Die Gestaltung des Schwimmbades im Art-Déco-Stil des frühen 20. Jahrhunderts wurde weitgehend beibehalten und schafft eine besondere Atmosphäre für die Ausstellungsstücke, als auch einen Eindruck aus einer vergangenen Epoche der Stadt.

Kurator des Museums ist Bruno Gaudichon.

Geschichte

Vor dem Bau des Schwimmbades verfügte Roubaix nur über einige Badestellen und eine Schwimmschule am Kanal sowie eine kleine Badeanstalt in der rue Pierre Motte und der rue de Rome aus dem späten 19. Jahrhundert. Die Stadt ließ 1912 Pläne für den Bau einer größeren Badeanstalt entwerfen. Das Projekt wurde durch den Ausbruch des Ersten Weltkrieges aufgegeben, jedoch nach dessen Ende sofort wieder vom Bürgermeister Jean-Baptiste Lebas aufgenommen und dem aus Lille stammenden Architekten Albert Baert übergeben. Baert, der bereits Bäder in Dünkirchen und Lille gebaut hatte, sah in seinen Plänen ein umfangreiches Freizeit-, Sport- und Hygieneangebot, vor allem für die Arbeiterklasse vor.

Die Bauzeit dauerte von 1927 bis 1932. Das Gebäude glich mit seinem Eingangsbereich, der gewölbten Überdachung, den kunstvoll gestalteten Rosetten und den Seitenschiffen eher einem Kirchengebäude, war jedoch vollständig im Art Déco-Stil gehalten. Die gegenüberliegenden Rosetten – Sonnenauf- und -untergang – sind das repräsentative Symbol dieses Architekturellen Kunstwerkes.

Die Badeanstalt wurde bis ins Jahr 1985 betrieben. Aufgrund der durch das Chlor in Mitleidenschaft gezogenen Bausubstanz musste der Betrieb eingestellt werden.

Erst 1990, bei Überlegungen der Stadt ein neues Museum zu eröffnen – seit 1940 konnte Roubaix kein nennenswertes Museum mehr vorweisen –, wurde dem Gebäude wieder besondere Aufmerksamkeit geschenkt. Die kleine Ausstellungsfläche für lokale Textilherstellung im Rathaus genügte nicht mehr und zahlreiche Kunstwerke waren im Musée des Baux Arts hinterlegt worden. Der Entwurf des "Museums im Schwimmbad" stammte vom Architekten Jean-Paul Philippon, der auch am Bau des Musée d'Orsay in Paris beteiligt war und mit seinem Entwurf an einem internationalen Wettbewerb teilgenommen hatte.

Das Museum wurde im Jahr 2000 eröffnet und 2001 unter dem Namen "Musée d'Art et d'Industrie André Diligent", nach dem Bürgermeister der Stadt von 1983 bis 1994 benannt.

Gestaltung und Ausstellung des Museums

Das Zentrum des Museums ist das große Becken. Entlang seiner Längsseiten wurden Stege ins Becken gebaut – in der Mitte durch Wasser voneinander getrennt –, auf denen der Besucher zwei Reihen von Skulpturen betrachten kann. Ein Wasserspeier befindet sich an einem Ende des Beckens, das von einem kunstvoll gestalteten Mosaikrand umgeben wird. Hinter den Skulpturenreihen befinden sich die alten gekachelten Umkleide- und Duschkabinen, in denen vereinzelt besondere Attraktionen und Gegenstände ausgestellt werden. Über dem Becken erheben sich zwei weitere Etagen; die erste bestehend aus einer durchgehenden Galerie und weiteren Umkleidekabinen, die zweite aus mehreren Balkonen.

Die oberen Etagen werden vor allem für die Ausstellung zur Textilindustrie der Region genutzt. Hier finden zahlreiche Stoffe und Stücke namhafter Modedesigner.

In den von der Beckenhalle abzweigenden Flügeln des Gebäudes finden sich zahlreiche Gemälde, Kunstgegenstände aus Porzellan und weitere Ausstellungsgegenstände. Außerdem erhält der Besucher einen Einblick in die weiteren hygienischen Einrichtungen der Badeanstalt, wie z. B. eine alte Badewanne aus der Entstehungszeit des Gebäudes.

Besondere Ausstellungsstücke
 Autoportrait (Selbstporträt) von Eugène Leroy, Ölgemälde (1959)
 Fillette von Marc Ronet (1970)
 Les Loisirs von Marcel Gromaire, Ölgemälde (1936)
 Papiers découpés von Michel Delporte, Lichtdruck auf Papier (1957)
 Vieille femme von Jean Roulland, Ölgemälde (1952)

Literatur
 Philippe Waret und Jean-Pierre Popelier: Roubaix de A à Z. Editions Alain Sutton, Saint-Cyr-sur-Loire 2006, ISBN 2-84910-459-0.

Weblinks

 Offizielle Website des Musée d'Art et d'Industrie

Roubaix
Industriemuseum in Frankreich
Roubaix
Gegründet 2000
Museum in Hauts-de-France
Bauwerk des Art déco in Frankreich
Industrie (Frankreich)