text:
Q: How to select an element based on the value of a nested sibling in XPath? In a document containing a large number of DIVs, I want to select the text inside the asset-body elements, but only if the bookmark link inside the asset-name entry-title of that "entry" contains the text democrat in the href value.
So, in the example below, containing two "entries" (entry-1 and entry-2), I only want the text that says Jackpot! because the value of the bookmark link in that "entry" contains the substring democrat:
http://blahblah.com/politics-democrat

Is it possible to do this using XPath?
ENTRY 1: (FAIL: bookmark link in that entry lacks the substring democrat)

      Paper Scissors

Paper and scissors

ENTRY 2: (PASS: bookmark link in that entry contains the substring democrat)

      Pelosi Q&A

Jackpot!

A: //div[contains(
            div/h2[
              contains(concat(' ',@class,' '),' asset-name ')
              and
              contains(concat(' ',@class,' '),' entry-title ')
            ]/a[@rel='bookmark']/@href
         ,'democrat')
        ]/div/div[
           contains(concat(' ',@class,' '),' asset-body ')
           ]//text()

A: Use:
//div[@class='item-asset asset hentry'
    and .//a[contains(@href, 'democrat')]
     ]
     /following-sibling::div[@class='asset-body']/p/text()

A:
In a document containing a large
  number of DIVs, I want to select the
  text inside the asset-body elements,
  but only if the bookmark link inside
  the asset-name entry-title of that
  "entry" contains the text democrat in
  the href value.

//*[contains(concat(' ',@class,' '),
                    ' hentry ')]
   [.//*[contains(concat(' ',@class,' '),
                         ' asset-name ')]
        [contains(concat(' ',@class,' '),
                         ' entry-title ')]
        //a[@rel='bookmark']
           [contains(@href,'democrat')]]
   //*[contains(concat(' ',@class,' '),
                       ' asset-body ')]

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Sporting Society
State Legislative
CSC Alumni Association
Tracking the Capitols
The Great American Outdoors Act
National Hunting and Fishing Day
The Outdoorsmen's Guide to Climate Change
CSF Blog
Quarterly Outdoor Heritage Reports
The Sportsmen's Voice Archive (Federal & State)
Tracking the Capitols Archive (State)
Congressional Sportsmen's Caucus Events
National Assembly of Sportsmen's Caucuses Events
Governors Sportsmen's Caucus Events
Senate Passes Bipartisan Sportsmen's Priorities in Energy Legislation
Posted on Wednesday, April 20, 2016
After five years and multiple attempts to pass a comprehensive sportsmen's package of legislation through the U.S. Senate, a bipartisan amendment containing many provisions of great importance to the hunting and fishing conservation community was adopted with a vote of 97-0 under the Natural Resources Title of the Energy Policy Modernization Act (S. 2012).
Many of the provisions within this amendment are also included in the Bipartisan Sportsmen's Act (S. 405), and are supported by most of the nation's top conservation organizations. Among other pro-sportsmen's policies included, the bill will: expand and enhance hunting, fishing, and recreational shooting opportunities on Federal land; authorize the National Fish Habitat Conservation Program to encourage partnerships among stakeholders and promote fish habitat conservation; exempt non-commercial news gathering on public lands from commercial fees; allow for the transportation of bows across National Parks; include expansion and construction of public shooting ranges under the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act; and reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation Act.
"There's no question that America's sportsmen and women deserve greater access to our public lands. With the Senate's approval of my broad, bipartisan energy bill, fishermen, hunters, recreational shooters and other outdoor enthusiasts are now significantly closer to that goal," said Senator Lisa Murkowski (AK), Congressional Sportsmen's Caucus (CSC) Member and Chairwoman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. "This a big step forward to allowing long-held traditions to be passed down from generation to generation without the federal government getting in the way."
"The Sportsmen's Act has been a long time in the making, and I'm proud to lead this bipartisan effort alongside Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Lisa Murkowski of Alaska. After previous attempts stalled on sportsmen's bills in recent years, the Energy and Natural Resources Committee worked hard to find areas of agreement, and we didn't allow controversial amendments from either side of the aisle to derail our effort," said CSC Member Senator Martin Heinrich (NM). "[This bill] will also go a long way toward solving many of the problems hunters and anglers face in accessing and using our nation's public lands. I am hopeful that, thanks to our vote today, our kids and grandkids will be catching trout and chasing mule deer for many years to come."
"Thanks to the persistence and leadership of the bipartisan CSC, we are closer than ever to enacting comprehensive sportsmen's legislation," said Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation (CSF) President Jeff Crane. "CSF will continue to work with the CSC to finish this legislative process."
With the inclusion of many important priorities, this bill would advance hunting and fishing traditions across the country for millions of sportsmen and women. S. 2012 was passed out of the Senate with a bipartisan final vote of 85-12.
States Involved
Studies conducted at both the state and federal level have found that the number of hunters and trappers have been on a generally declining trend over the past several decades. To increase recruitment, retention, and reactivation (R3) of hunters and trappers, which initiative do you think would have the greatest impact?
Increase the number of states with discounted license tailored to specific groups. (4.89%)
Increase access to public lands. (26.59%)
Provide more information for new participants. (3.86%)
Provide hands on opportunities to improve skills and knowledge. (14.66%)
Engage youth through hunter and conservation programs in schools. (41.36%)
I feel we have enough sportsmen and women and do not believe R3 programs are necessary. (8.64%)
Latest Policy Updates
Department of the Interior Announces Establishment of Advisory Council Dedicated to Sportsmen and Women
Overall Enrollment in Conservation Reserve Program Increases, Challenges Remain
New Hampshire Fish and Game Commission Stands Up for Sporting Dogs
Governor Murphy, Others Pushing Anti-Gun Package Moving Through NJ Legislature
American System of Conservation Funding
Anti-Hunting
Congressional Shoot-Out and Industry Challenge
Congressional Sportsmen's Caucus
Game Ranches
Governor's Sportsmen's Caucus
Governor's Sportsmen's Caucus Reception
Hunting Fishing and Recreational Shooting Sports Protection Act
Idle Iron Policy
Interior Appropriations Bill
Land and Water Conservation Fund
Lead Ammunition Ban
Lead Sinker Ban
Making Public Lands Public Act
National Assembly of Sportsmen's Caucuses
Polar Bear and Conservation Fairness Act
Recreational Fishing and Hunting Heritage and Opportunities Act
Recreational Shooting Protection Act
Rigs to Reef Habitat Protection Act
Sport Fish Restoration and Boating Trust Fund
Sportsmen's Act of 2012
Sportsmen's Heritage Act
Sportsmen's Package
The Billfish Conservation Act
The Fishery Science Improvement Act
Welcome Back to Congress Reception
Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Programs
@hunterandangler Tweets
Minutes ago, the Recovering America's Wildlife Act passed the House Natural Resources Committee on a bipartisan vot… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
On January 21st, the Washington Department Fish and Wildlife Commission will host a special meeting to consider pet… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Colorado: SB22-031 would not only ban all legal mountain lion and bobcat hunting and trapping throughout the state… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
We are excited to announce some changes next week! Be sure to keep an eye out on Thursday, January 20th to see what… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
We work hard to educate elected officials about issues important to you, but we can't do it alone. Find out how you can get involved and support CSF.
Stay in touch through our various contact lists!
Tracking the Capitols Sign-Up
Stay up to date on the latest legislation and regulation changes!
Sign Up for Legislative Alerts
CSF is a non-profit 501 (c)(3) organization, Federal Tax ID # 52-1686163
Copyright © 2022, Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
package org.apache.flink.runtime.webmonitor.threadinfo;

import org.apache.flink.runtime.rest.messages.ResponseBody;

import org.apache.flink.shaded.jackson2.com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonCreator;
import org.apache.flink.shaded.jackson2.com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonIgnore;
import org.apache.flink.shaded.jackson2.com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonInclude;
import org.apache.flink.shaded.jackson2.com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonProperty;

import java.util.List;

/**
 * Flame Graph representation for a job vertex.
 *
 * <p>Statistics are gathered by sampling stack traces of running tasks.
 */
@JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
public class JobVertexFlameGraph implements ResponseBody {

    private static final String FIELD_NAME_END_TIMESTAMP = "endTimestamp";
    private static final String FIELD_NAME_DATA = "data";

    /** End time stamp of the corresponding sample. */
    @JsonProperty(FIELD_NAME_END_TIMESTAMP)
    private final long endTimestamp;

    @JsonProperty(FIELD_NAME_DATA)
    private final Node root;

    @JsonCreator
    public JobVertexFlameGraph(
            @JsonProperty(FIELD_NAME_END_TIMESTAMP) long endTimestamp,
            @JsonProperty(FIELD_NAME_DATA) Node root) {
        this.endTimestamp = endTimestamp;
        this.root = root;
    }

    @JsonIgnore
    public long getEndTime() {
        return endTimestamp;
    }

    @JsonIgnore
    public Node getRoot() {
        return root;
    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
        return "OperatorFlameGraph: endTimestamp=" + endTimestamp + "\n" + getRoot().toString();
    }

    public static JobVertexFlameGraph empty() {
        return new JobVertexFlameGraph(-1, null);
    }

    /** Graph node. */
    public static class Node {

        // These field names are required by the library used in the WebUI.
        private static final String FIELD_NAME_NAME = "name";
        private static final String FIELD_NAME_VALUE = "value";
        private static final String FIELD_NAME_CHILDREN = "children";

        @JsonProperty(FIELD_NAME_NAME)
        private final String stackTraceLocation;

        @JsonProperty(FIELD_NAME_VALUE)
        private final int hitCount;

        @JsonProperty(FIELD_NAME_CHILDREN)
        private final List<Node> children;

        @JsonCreator
        Node(
                @JsonProperty(FIELD_NAME_NAME) String stackTraceLocation,
                @JsonProperty(FIELD_NAME_VALUE) int hitCount,
                @JsonProperty(FIELD_NAME_CHILDREN) List<Node> children) {
            this.stackTraceLocation = stackTraceLocation;
            this.hitCount = hitCount;
            this.children = children;
        }

        @JsonIgnore
        public String getStackTraceLocation() {
            return stackTraceLocation;
        }

        @JsonIgnore
        public int getHitCount() {
            return hitCount;
        }

        @JsonIgnore
        public List<Node> getChildren() {
            return children;
        }

        @Override
        public String toString() {
            return getStackTraceLocation()
                    + ": "
                    + getHitCount()
                    + "\n"
                    + "\t"
                    + toStringChildren();
        }

        private String toStringChildren() {
            StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
            for (Node child : getChildren()) {
                sb.append(child.toString());
            }
            return sb.toString();
        }
    }
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


text:
Athens (Greece) -- Politics and government -- History
SOURCE1 01whole.pdf 15 MB Adobe Acrobat PDF View Details Download
Athenian political voluntary exiles, 650-322 B.C.
Sydney, Australia : Macquarie University
Flavel, Maxine Frances
"A dissertation presented to the School of History, Philosophy and Politics of Macquarie University, to complete the requirements fo r the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 1994."
"hereby certify that this thesis has not been presented for any higher degree to any other university or tertiary institution."
"M F Flavel, Sydney 1994"
1. Introduction -- 2. Voluntary Exiles -- 3. Conclusions
No significant work on exiles has been undertaken since Balogh1 in 1943, and the extent of the scholarship in the fifty years since that work has provided sufficient new material to make a study of at least the Athenian exiles, a worthwhile and revealing project
This study covers the period from the 600s BC to the death of Alexander of Macedon (Alexander the Great) in 322. The study has two main objectives, the first being to identify and catalogue those Athenians whose exiles were politically based or motivated, and who chose to flee from Athens or stay away from Athens, that is to proceed voluntarily into exile. The second objective is to recognise such decisions in their human context, rather than purely in the political or historical sense. To this end the study seeks to identify how such decisions to abandon their homes and city affected these people personally. This aspect canvasses questions of destination of exiles, how they survived, what happened to their families, and what conditions prevailed to effect return to Athens or recall by Athens.
The study provides a prosopographical table, with biographical studies of these more than one hundred Athenians who abandoned Athens. The conclusions drawn from the extant evidence have been grouped in summary chapters. These cover aspects of the law as it affected exiles; destinations and the observable trend away from the mainland and 'old Greece' as the period progressed; how exiles survived, and the importance of xenia relationships, mercenary service and commerce, and the noticeable shift towards 'self-help' amongst the kaloi h'agathoi, replacing international relationships which defied current political realities; family, religion and relationships, and the problems of inheritance, property and assets show the destructive forces which work upon a community; the surprising resilience of individuals faced with the loss of their social framework; and the opportunities for return to Athens. This last aspect of the study illustrates the determination of the demos throughout the period to retain and jealously guard the franchise, to the extent that some returnees were only able to do so with the assistance of foreign arms.
Although the details of the exile of most individuals are relatively paltry, overall there has been enough evidence which has survived in the literary and epigraphical traditions to produce a picture of the political factors at work within Athens which made life in Athens no longer a viable option for those in this study.
1 online resources (2 volumes)
Prosopography -- Greece -- Athens
Greece -- Politics and government -- To 146 B.C
Athenians
xenia relationships
Thesis PhD
Macquarie University. School of History, Philosophy and Politics
Copyright Maxine Frances Flavel 1994.


My parents and my aunt represent two ends of the aging spectrum. My parents fall into the category of "healthy," independently living older Americans. That is, while they have fairly serious multiple chronic illnesses and increasing impairment (arthritis, blindness, hypertension), they are moving through their seventies still coping pretty successfully. My aunt, on the other hand, represented an increasingly uncommon demographic: an early death in her sixties from an untreatable acute illness.
My Uncle Hubert Langston is something else. All his life he has been something else–a wild child, a hell-raiser, and a black sheep. Now at 68 he is the proverbial train wreck. He has hepatitis C, Parkinson's disease, and diabetes, he is deaf, and he has end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis two or three times a week. I'm sure there is more, but I think that's quite enough.
Uncle Hubie lives in a house he bought a few years ago with his wife, about 90 miles South of Las Vegas, right on the Arizona border. He is retired, living on social security. His wife, who also has serious health problems, still works in a clerical job in the gaming industry. Their adopted son Billy was a soldier deployed in Iraq when this was happening.
In the summer of 2008, my uncle had been in a steady routine for several months. He took the bus to his dialysis appointments, made dinner for his wife, Aunt Christie, and watched TV – which I suspect may be improved without the sound, anyway. But this stability was shattered when he came home from dialysis one day ranting and raving and then ran out of the house, seemingly out of his mind,. My Aunt was obliged to call the police out of fear for his safety, and they took him to the local hospital.
There he was physically restrained (probably necessary), put on the tranquilizer Haldol (vitamin H as it is known in the business), but not dialyzed. He was diagnosed as having overnight-onset Alzheimer's disease: a largely imaginary condition. No one on his medical team seems to have considered the well-known difficulty in maintaining electrolytic balance while on dialysis or its possible cognitive side effects.
This precipitated a fairly typical family crisis – Aunt Christy feeling overwhelmed and guilty, my Dad in California feeling guilty and overwhelmed, leading to my Dad asking me to "go out to Nevada and help out." Despite being a first-born parent pleaser, I know my own limits of knowledge and patience. I declined and adamantly insisted that we hire a locally knowledgeable geriatric care manager. It took some ranting and raving of my own and forwarding of various links, but we found someone who seems to have been helpful.
In the meantime, having diagnosed my uncle as having Alzheimer's disease and deciding there was nothing more that could be done for him (the infamous Medicare improvement standard), the hospital gave the inevitable Thursday afternoon warning of a Friday discharge. The plan took my aunt totally off guard: "But they haven't done anything for him!" she wailed. They proposed discharge to a far-off skilled nursing facility with the rare combination of dialysis and psych capacity. However, my aunt was inconsolable; even in the short term she feared the placement would either split them apart and/or cause her to lose her job. The nurse care manager got busy working on a better placement and asked the hospital for more time.
Meanwhile, while Uncle Hubie was clearly still in an acutely altered mental state, it seemed very unlikely to me that he had Alzheimer's, which has a gradual onset. It seemed more likely to me that he was delirious as a side effect of the dialysis or even underlying kidney failure and the hospital and attending physician had just started making stuff up. By turning to resources at the Medicare Rights Center, I learned more about patient rights and hospital discharge than I had previously been motivated to master.
It turns out that on paper, the Medicare discharge appeals process is very good. Like most of Medicare it is designed by very sincere government employees who are trying their very best to look out for the interests of the beneficiaries. So I called my Aunt and told her how to appeal the discharge. She asked me to do it for her. So I dutifully called Nevada's Quality Improvement Organization responsible for managing discharge appeals for CMS.
Unfortunately, implementation of policy is often not so good. Their telephone number wasn't answering, their answering machine was full, and their server kicked the e-mail back to me.
Turns out it didn't matter anyway, Uncle Hubie wasn't hospitalized in Nevada! He was just over the border in Arizona.
My newly acquired caregiving assertiveness was for naught. In a few days, he was transferred to the skilled nursing facility and after a month to another one closer to home. The care teams in both places were sure he was there for good and got my aunt working on Medicaid applications right away. However, without there ever being any brilliant diagnosis or breakthrough treatment, Uncle Hubie gradually got better. His delirium cleared and some light physical therapy (i.e., walking) helped him recover strength lost while being immobilized and inactive. He did have some wild times when minor but stubborn infections and changes to his medications seem to have caused his delirium to return. But, with the monitoring of the geriatric nurse care manager and support from Aunt Christy, he finally returned to a normal mental state and came home–after more than two months.
A happy ending, yes, but the relatively good outcome seems much more an accident (even a miracle) rather than a predictable process you would want to count upon. And I shudder to think of the expense in uncovered services and co-pays, much less what Medicare paid. My Dad (Hubie's brother) covered the care manager who helped paste together systemic dysfunction and put a band-aid on the incompetence of others. Is this the system we should have? What should I have done? What should I do now?
Several years had already passed after these events when I first wrote about them. In the years since, my Uncle Hubie chose to stop his dialysis treatments (as do many) and passed away. Even with the most appropriate care there are many limits to how well people with serious illness can be served and supported. These limits and the inevitability of death, should not be an excuse for less than competent care while people still live.


Beautiful Italian Riviera town of Vernazza with passing train.
hd00:40A river in a village in Ciwidey, Indonesia near Bandung.
hd00:30Feeding trough,bird feeder in the form of a house for birds.
4k00:24SAVITAIPALE, FINLAND, AUGUST 12, 2016. An old wooden mill in Savitaipale, Finland, on August 12th, 2016.
hd00:21Tall grasses blowing in the wind in slow motion on a farm at sunset.


In a little experiment I'm working on I recently found a bit of a show‐stopping problem. After an APB on Twitter I got a rapid reply which helped me solve it, but it seems that I may be the first person to encounter this error, therefore it's encumbent on me to document it. So this is that.
Using SVG for scalable icon sprites isn't a new idea, but the technique required to use them is (as with all CSS spriting) a little verbose, needing multiple instances of background‐position. A feature from SVG1.1, Fragment Identifier Linking, makes it much easier, and will be available in the forthcoming Firefox 15.


HAVANA, Cuba, Apr 5 (acn) Two Cubans lost in their debut today on the 2019 IJF Antalya Judo Grand Prix, in Turkey, which awards points for the world ranking and is attended by 485 athletes from 75 countries.
Woman Anailis Dorvigne (57 kg) and man Osniel Solis (66) both lost in their first bouts to Chinese Hongjiie Tian and the local Sinan Sandal, according to the official website of the contest.
Cuba´s other representatives in this tournament are men Magdiel Estrada (73) and Ivan Silva (90) and women Maylin del Toro (63) and Kaliema Antomarchi (78).
Last weekend, in the Tbilisi Grand prix, Silva won the title; Antomarchi and Estrada were both runner-ups and Del Toro finished third in a tournament where the Caribbean island ranked fifth in the standings.
The main goal of the Cuban judokas is continuing their preparation for the Pan American Games in Lima 2019, scheduled to take place from July 26 to August 11.


text:
Private Walter Reed
© IWM HU 124800
By downloading or embedding any media, you agree to the terms and conditions of the IWM Non Commercial Licence, including your use of the attribution statement specified by IWM. For this item, that is: © IWM HU 124800
    Private Walter Reed © IWM (HU 124800)
[url=https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205387634][img]https://media.iwm.org.uk/ciim5/433/893/mid_000000.jpg?action=e&cat=Photographs[/img][/url] [url=https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205387634]Private Walter Reed. © IWM (HU 124800)[/url] [url=https://www.iwm.org.uk/corporate/privacy-copyright]IWM Non Commercial License[/url]
CWGC family information: son of Thomas and Harriet Beckett, of 45, Church St., Jump, Barnsley;Husband of the late Rebecca Reed, of 50, Stockshill, Ecclesfield, Sheffield.
Private Walter Reed 18383. Unit: 2nd Battalion, King's Own Scottish Borderers. Death: 23 July 1916, missing, Somme, Western Front. Commemorated on the Thiepval Memorial.
Head and shoulders portrait
First World War (production), First World War (content)
BOND OF SACRIFICE - FIRST WORLD WAR PORTRAITS COLLECTION
Reed, Walter
Private James Abel Reed
Private Papers of J C Reed
Private Papers of Lieutenant Colonel R R Reed
Voices of the First World War
Hear the men and women whose lives were shaped by the First World War tell their stories of the conflict in our podcast series, Voices of the First World War.
8 Peculiar Battle Trophies Taken From The Front
Lest We Forget?: Objects close up


We are looking for a head chef to lead and run a rapidly growing, well-established events catering business located in Deptford south west London.
The head chef will oversee a unique range of events from three-course formal dinners for 2,000 to canape receptions in prestigious, iconic venues across London and beyond. Leading a full time kitchen team of 4 chefs supported by up to 20 freelance/0 hour chefs.
We are offering the head chef a salary of up to £60K along with great bonuses and benefits. The role will be split across multiple sites and our base kitchen in Deptford.
As head chef you will be responsible for ordering, stock control, leasing with front of house and events planners to deliver bespoke events across London and the Home Counties.
The head chef must be passionate about food, the ideal candidate will be able to demonstrate flair and creativity with the desire to delight our guests.
Please apply with an up to date CV and contact details, interviews are taking place immediately.


This beautiful garden is part of a perfect combination of indoor/outdoor living.
One of the most eye-catching elements of the garden is the curved wall overlooking Brisbane Waters. The rustic render of this wall adds an attractive finish as it winds through the garden.
Imported sandstone paving was laid in the entry way and main entertaining area, complementing the raw look of the bagged besser block retaining walls. A low sandstone feature wall was also constructed, softening the slope of the large garden space.
The addition of steel sculptures and the incorporation of timber screens and seating has created a very private and elegant garden.


Oxandrolone is popular anabolic steroid among women because it is friendly (carries less adverse effects) and even men find it highly effective. It is mild in nature and some steroid users with ridiculous expectations don't appreciate it.
First Oxandrolone was introduced in the market in 1960 with brand name Anavar was reported to have many therapeutic benefits. However, in 1989 this steroid ceased to exist due to legal pressure.
In 1995, Oxanthrolone re-appeared with new brand name but its price was significant. It is still the most expensive steroid sold in the market. Even though Anavar is linked with Oxandrolone, but no pharmaceutical company has manufactured it under the name 'Anavar'.
Oxandrolone is a replica of DHT hormone. A little structural change like adding oxygen instead of carbon-2 in A-ring has dramatically increased this hormone's anabolic power of getting broken down metabolically.
Second alteration at 17th carbon position with adding methyl group allows orally ingested Oxandrolone to enter bloodstream without getting destroyed in the liver. It is classified officially as C17-alpha alkylated or C17-aa anabolic steroid.
Even though Oxandrolone is regarded as a mild steroid, its anabolic rating is three times that of Testosterone. It does not mean Oxandrolone is powerful than testosterone in building mass. You can appreciate it because of its low androgenicity that makes it mild.
Beneficial functions of Oxandrolone include its ability to decrease SHBG glucocorticoid hormones as well as enhance nitrogen retention. Due to retention of nitrogen, an apt anabolic environment gets created that leads to catabolism.
Reduction in SHBG increases free testosterone and inhibits other anabolic steroidal hormone from getting bound. Generally, muscle wasting hormones (glucocorticoids) promote muscle loss and fat gain. However, reduction in glucocorticoids literally does the opposite.
For off-season athlete weight gain will be solid muscle tissue. It was demostrado que los beneficios (demonstrated that the benefits) that like other steroids, Oxandrolone doesn't aromatize so there is no water retention.
Women are sensitive and can gain a lot in terms of mass growth. During lack of calorie body fat gets lost, but Oxandrolone promotes lipolysis, which promotes hard and well-defined physique.
Next article Advice For Aspiring Pilots In The Aviation Industry!


Video Game Player Of The Century: Meet The Man Who Beat Pac-Man!
In 1999, Billy Mitchell was the first person to achieve a perfect score in "Pac-Man." His ability to reach the end of the game even stumped "Pac-Man's" creators and designers, who named him the "video game player of the century." Here's what he had to do to beat the game.


Reminiscent of the Olympic flame, "Torch" is a recent addition to the CRYSTAL WORLD Awards collection. Stunningly crafted, with a generous base for etching, this beautiful award will make an ideal recognition or incentive award, corporate or executive gift. "Torch" is handcrafted from the world's finest, full-cut optical crystal.
4 3/8" x 3 1/2" x 10 3/4"
Etch area: 3" x 1" on base.


Something happens too many of us when we do a good job at whatever it is we do- we are promoted to manager! The promotion provides a sense of accomplishment, and if a raise is involved, we enjoy the extra money in our checking account. However, being promoted to manager is more about "a new beginning vs. a job well done". With a promotion comes new work expectations and demands you may not have anticipated in your previous role.
Understand your own strengths and weaknesses before you go looking at others' strengths and weaknesses. Build upon strengths, and put in place a personal development plan to address your weaknesses.
Discover the strengths and weaknesses of each member on your new team. Everybody is different, and often expect to be treated differently. Learn what makes each team member work the way they do, then reinforce their strengths. When there is time and potential to grow, then focus on development opportunities.
Give each person authority to 'own' completely their responsibilities. You will never know true potential until you allow each person to pursue it.
Create an environment where rewarding work is possible. Make the environment an enjoyable place to work. Generally, if a change in the work environment does not affect safety, quality, or productivity, it is worth considering if team members find it beneficial.
Place people in situations where they can employ their strengths and empower them to capitalize on them. Set goals work targets together whenever possible. Communicate your expectations, daily if necessary.
Remove obstacles, barriers, 'nay-sayers' and excuses from the work place. If you rid the environment of what is negative, the positive will prevail. Create an environment where, "it can't be done" heresy.
Be sure that assignments you make are perfectly clear to the person being asked to complete it. You thinking the assignment is clear is meaningless if the person being asked to complete the assignment does not share the same clarity.
Connect the work assigned with some meaning for why the work is relevant and even important to achieving desired results.
Encourage your team members to work with you on this "thing" and vice versa. Statistically half the population feels rewarded when they are able to work on assignments in a team setting. The manager's role is to make the team setting possible.


International Widows Day 2016 We celebrated IWD 2016 on Thursday 23rd June with over 500 attendees. During last years' celebration, The Grand Matron and First Lady of Lagos State promised to empower 7 widows in the bread business. However, they have not commenced the business due to mobility challenges.


It is handmade with textile and painted.
For the decoration I used vintage Indian fabric that is embroidered with gold thread and little beads.
My art dolls are not intended to be toys and should be handled with care.
Keep them away from water and direct sunlight as much as possible.
Pieces can be carefully dusted with a dry clean cloth.
Due to small parts they are not suitable for young children.
Textiles can get damaged by moth infestation, keep your house moth free.
I advice you to wrap the piece in a clean cloth and freeze it for 2/3 days.
Then remove from freezer for a day and repeat.
Standard Shipping does not cover for loss or damage during shipping. Please choose for a shipping upgrade to cover and protect your shipment for loss or damage. When shipped with standard shipping, Pantovola cannot be held responsible for any issues during shipping, thank you for understanding.
My dolls come gift wrapped in white tissue and customised satin ribbon. Packaged in bubble wrap and shipped in a postal box.
Sometimes I do sell wholesale.
Wholesale starts at 10 pieces and up and will be sold at a reduced price when bought at once.
The reduction will depend on the quantity of pieces ordered.
Because of the handmade unique nature of my work, I do not accept wholesale requests for less than 10 pieces.
Pantovola occasionally accepts custom orders.
Absolutely magical in every way. Thank you so much!!
Beautiful piece of art! Anouk is amazing!!!
Amathyst is exactly as pictured but 900x more beautiful. She is beaming with unique vintage bits clearly assembled lovingly. the packaging was safe and also so beautiful, adorned with a big bow, unwrapped to expose a vintage box. ultimately she will be displayed with her box on my wall. i LOVE LOVE this, i even cried when i opened it.


2019 Kill Team League 1 starts on March 11th and will run for 6 weeks. One of the players has created a story line and given us permission to post the details. This post will be updated with each week's fluff as the league progresses.
The Templexus system resides on the galactic east of the veiled region in the Segmentum Pacificus. Of the systems five planets two are inhabitable (Templexus Secundus and Tetrium), Pime a glowing rock too close to the sun and Quartus and Quintus being gas giants. Templexus Secundus is a Agriworld providing food for the system and Tetrium is a small shrine world. Several moons are settled for mining and construction.
The system Resides on the edge of the veiled region and has been engulfed by said nebula for some eight thousand years unable to be reached.
The Astropathic beacon has begun broadcasting and Templexus has reemerged. Imperials now make way to the system to reestablish trade and defend the shrine world of what must be a weakened system after such a long isolation. Other various raiders also must also be en-route to scavenge resources as well.
The first to enter the system were Rogue Traders. Byrn Sanctic aboard the Dauntless class cruiser Calabas left warp at the systems Mandeville point and began its path towards the shrine world, targeted as the source of the call.
As they neared the mining moons orbiting Templexus Quartus and sent ships to the surface, a grim picture began to form. The moons had become tombs. Centuries-dead bodies lined the central reactor corridors, presumably the last sources of heat. More worrying, system craft had been modified, mining equipment turned into weapons. They looked the part of raiders stranded.
Scans of Secundus caused further concern for the inhabitants of Templexus. The planet shown dull orange, devoid of what should have been vast green and blue of am agri world. The only broadcasts from Tetrium was the lone astropathic beacon, projecting requests of reunion.
What fate had befallen this system that only the shrine world remained active, that would keep those with system craft on a moon until death.
Templexus Tetrium lay below, green and mottled. Navigators protested as ships would near. Aboard the Calabas theirs had locked him self in his spire after his warning of a warp shadow on the planet went unheeded. While teaming with life, the forests showed no signs of a tyranid infestation, and very few energy sources. Some small pre-industrial camps could be seen on low passes, but for whatever their reasons, these people had settled far from the large temples of the shrine world. With any luck, these villages or temples would have a history of what had befallen the system, and why those on the moons had fled, never to return.
We have narrowed the origination point of the warp suppression fields to the equatorial jungles of Tetrius. Further investigation has proved impossible with current landing forces as conditions approach deathworld standards as we close distance. We are fortunate to report that headaches have subsided despite our closing proximity to the source leading us to believe the suppression is at least uniform in nature.
Local colonies have proved almost universally hostile. What information we have gathered was after one lander sustained lift failure and required retrieval. Locals were quick to engage the craft (though less eager to engage the crew) Several were subdued and questioned.
Dialect maintained a form of low gothic.
Dress typical of technology available with noted exception of wire mesh head wear. Despite protest one was removed for study, and they seem to lessen the mental strain of the suppression field, similar to a primitive psychic hood.
Travel to the temples is forbidden and small groups (50 or less) travel is seen as dangerous in the extreme, to the point of the captives needing to be forced off the landers upon release.
Reasons for hostilities are given as "risking the ruin of us all" referring to the landers as well as "being possessed", when referring to the crew.
Assume low orbit and prepare additional landers for retrieval of survivors. Prepare ordinance for methodical bombardment of equatorial ruins.
As the Calabas fled Templexus Tetrius towards Secundus an astartes strike cruiser struggled to catch it. Batteries firing at extreme range in vain.
On board Byrn knew the danger but was not on the bridge. Instead he stood with a breaching crew at the sealed navigators spire. He knew he needed to open the door but why?
But why he thought as blue light from the las cutters finished. The door fell to the deck and the breaching crew rushed in to restrain the navigator as the enslaver entered the spire.
As the Calabas out paced the strike cruiser, it began a course that would enter the atmosphere of the scoured agriworld.
Let play a sealed event with all of the sets in Standard.


Sophisticated data preparation. A powerful set of data preparation tools and dimension reduction techniques to shape your data.
Interactive visualization and exploration. Dynamic examination of large amounts of data in a rich, interactive environment.
Advanced modeling. Superior analytical depth and a comprehensive suite of predictive and descriptive modeling algorithms.
Model development. An easy-to-use, yet powerful, drag-and-drop interface for building models.
Automated scoring process. Automated, interactive processes for scoring new data in a variety of real-time or batch environments.
Scalable processing. A variety of scalable deployment and processing options.
Ad hoc data exploration and visualization.
Descriptive, predictive and prescriptive analytics along with text analysis and content categorization.
Self-service, robust reporting and dashboarding.
An in-memory analytics server for faster answers.
Deployment at your site, in your private cloud, in a public cloud or in the SAS Cloud.
Integration with Microsoft Outlook, Excel, SharePoint and PowerPoint.
A rich suite of linguistic and analytical modeling tools.
Option to use predefined entities or create your own.
Native support for many languages.
Easy-to-use GUI for interactive exploration and analysis of time series data prior to forecasting.
Easy-to-use GUI for building powerful forecasting models.
Flexible hierarchies that can be set for each new forecasting project.
Large-scale automation, including regressor/event selection and model specifications.
Extensible model repository so you can add your own models.
Comprehensive range of statistical algorithms and techniques.
Latest approaches to statistical methodology.
SAS Analytics provides an integrated environment for predictive and descriptive modeling, data mining, text analytics, forecasting, optimization, simulation, experimental design and more. From predictive analytics to model deployment and process optimization, SAS provides a range of techniques and processes for the collection, classification, analysis and interpretation of data to reveal patterns, anomalies, key variables and relationships, leading ultimately to new insights and better answers faster. Great overall analytics platform.


text:
Q: Comparing coefficients in a series Consider the following expression:
$-\displaystyle \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\left(\frac{u_0-1}{u_0}\right)^nnE_\alpha(-nk^\alpha t^\alpha) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\left(\frac{u_0-1}{u_0}\right)^n\left(E_\alpha(-nk^\alpha t^\alpha)-\sum_{j=0}^n E_\alpha(-(n-j)k^\alpha t^\alpha)E_\alpha(-j k^\alpha t^\alpha)\right),$
where $\alpha \in (0,1), t \geq 0, k \text{ is a constant} \text{ and } E_\alpha(z) = \displaystyle \sum_{m=0}^{\infty}\frac{z^k}{\Gamma(\alpha m + 1)} \text{ is the Mittag Leffler function.}$
In a paper I'm studying, the author conclude from this, the following:
$$(n+1)E_\alpha(-nk^\alpha t^\alpha) = \displaystyle \sum_{j=0}^n E_\alpha(-(n-j)k^\alpha t^\alpha)E_\alpha(-j k^\alpha t^\alpha)$$
I don't know how he concludes this. I suspect they used some property involving equality of series with the coefficients.
Can anyone help me?

A: In your expression
$-\displaystyle \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\left(\frac{u_0-1}{u_0}\right)^nnE_\alpha(-nk^\alpha t^\alpha) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\left(\frac{u_0-1}{u_0}\right)^n\left(E_\alpha(-nk^\alpha t^\alpha)-\sum_{j=0}^n E_\alpha(-(n-j)k^\alpha t^\alpha)E_\alpha(-j k^\alpha t^\alpha)\right),$
Compare the coefficient of $\left(\frac{u_0-1}{u_0}\right)^n$ on both sides, then you'll get
$$-nE_\alpha(-nk^\alpha t^\alpha) = E_\alpha(-nk^\alpha t^\alpha)-\sum_{j=0}^n E_\alpha(-(n-j)k^\alpha t^\alpha)E_\alpha(-j k^\alpha t^\alpha),$$
which rearranges to your desired
$$(n+1)E_\alpha(-nk^\alpha t^\alpha) = \displaystyle \sum_{j=0}^n E_\alpha(-(n-j)k^\alpha t^\alpha)E_\alpha(-j k^\alpha t^\alpha).$$


text:
KXTV/KOVR Tower är en mast i Walnut Grove i Kalifornien, byggd år 2000. Den är 624,5 m (2,049 ft) hög. Masten är den högsta byggnaden i Kalifornien och den fjärde högsta masten i världen (år 2001). KXTV/KOVR Tower är den sjätte högsta konstruktionen som byggts i världen, inräknat masten i Warszawa som rasade 1991, och Petronius Oil Platform som är byggd under vattenytan. Den är också högre än CN Tower, världens näst högsta fristående byggnad på land.

Externa länkar
FCC Antenna Structure Registration - #1011404
KXTV/KOVR Tower at structurae.de
KXTV/KOVR Tower at skyscraperpage.com
Aerial photo at terraserver-usa.com
http://www.fybush.com/sites/2005/site-051111.html

TV-master
Anläggningar i Kalifornien
Television i USA
Sacramento County

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
R v The Secretary of State for the Environment, ex p. Ostler [1976] EWCA Civ 6 (16 March 1976)
R v The Secretary of State for the Home Department ex p. Jeyakumaran [1985] EWHC 1 (Admin) (28 June 1985)
R. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - 10496/83 [1987] ECHR 16 (8 July 1987)
R. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (ARTICLE 50) - 10496/83 [1988] ECHR 11 (9 June 1988)
R v Tonderai Chakwane [2013] NICA 24 (14 May 2013)
R (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2012] UKIntelP o02512 (26 January 2012)
R (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2013] UKIntelP o13913 (27 March 2013)
R (translation of documents in proceedings) [2015] EWFC B112 (14 August 2015)
R Twining and Company Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2007] UKVAT V20230 (05 July 2007)
R. v Ul-Haq [2010] EWCA Crim 1683 (29 June 2010)
R v United Kingdom - 33506/05 [2007] ECHR 87 (04 January 2007)
R. (V.) & Ors v. Refugee Appeals Tribunal & Ors [2002] IEHC 158 (25 April 2002)
R v V [1994] JLR_Note 10b (02 February 1994)
R v V [1994] JRC 017 (02 February 1994)
R v V [1998] JLR 333 (09 October 1998)
R v V [2008] EWHC 1531 (Comm) (03 July 2008)
R. -v- Child and Family Agency & anor [2018] IEHC 469 (03 August 2018)
R. -v- Clinical Director of St. Brendan's Hospital & Anor [2009] IEHC 143 (24 March 2009)
R. -v- D. & Ors [2007] IEHC 252 (30 July 2007)
R. -v- D. P. P. & Ors [2008] IEHC 461 (31 July 2009)
R. -v- D. P. P. [2009] IEHC 87 (20 February 2009)
R. -v- Governor of Wheatfield Prison [2009] IEHC 442 (28 May 2009)
R. .-v- MJELR & Anor [2009] IEHC 353 (24 July 2009)
R. -v- MJELR & Anor [2009] IEHC 355 (20 July 2009)
R. -v- MJELR & Anor [2009] IEHC 510 (26 November 2009)
R. -v- MJELR & Ors [2008] IEHC 139 (08 May 2008)
R -v- R & Ors [2006] IEHC 221 (18 July 2006)
R -v- R [2006] IESC 7 (16 February 2006)
R. -v- R. [2008] IEHC 162 (21 May 2008)
R -v- R [2014] IEHC 648 (28 November 2014)
R -v- R [2015] IECA 265 (04 November 2015)
R -v- R [2015] IEHC 573 (31 July 2015)
R -v- R [2016] IEHC 11 (13 January 2016)
R. -v- Refugee Appeals Tribunal & Anor [2010] IEHC 510 (08 October 2010)
R. -v- Refugee Appeals Tribunal & Anor [2011] IEHC 151 (15 April 2011)
R. -v- Refugee Appeals Tribunal & Ors [2008] IEHC 108 (25 April 2008)
R. -v- Refugee Appeals Tribunal & Ors [2008] IEHC 406 (26 November 2008)
R. -v- Refugee Appeals Tribunal [2007] IEHC 288 (31 July 2007)
R. Venkata Rao Appeal No. 15 of 1936 v The Secretary of State for India in Council (Madras) [1936] UKPC 84 (8 December 1936)
R v Venna [1975] EWCA Crim 4 (31 July 1975)
R v W [1993] JRC 103 (03 August 1993)
R v W [2010] EWCA Crim 372 (02 March 2010)
R W Hartley and E R Livesey v Advanced Extrusion Developments Limited (Patent) [1998] UKIntelP o07698 (20 May 1998)
R W Hartley E R Livesay (trading as Earl Plastics) v Advanced Extrusion Developments Limited (Patent) [1999] UKIntelP o05799 (25 February 1999)
R W Hartley E R Livesay (trading as Earl Plastics) v Advanced Extrusion Developments Limited (Patent) [1999] UKIntelP o13799 (19 May 1999)
R v W (Practice and Procedure: Appellate jurisdiction/Reasons/Burns-Barke) [2016] UKEAT 0198_15_2701 (27 January 2016)
R v W Primary Care Trust [2004] EWHC 2085 (Fam) (03 September 2004)
R W v Sheffield City Council [2005] EWHC 720 (Admin) (14 April 2005)
R W -v- Clinical director of St John of Gods Hospital [2007] IEHC 184 (22 May 2007)
R W Westworth Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 477 (TC) (03 September 2010)
R (W2 and IA) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWCA Civ 2146 (19 December 2017)
R v Warwick District Council [2018] EWHC 3123 (Admin) (16 November 2018)
R v Welcher & Ors [2007] EWCA Crim 480 (02 March 2007)
R v Whitehouse [1977] EWCA Crim 2 (18 February 1977)
R v Williams [2013] EWCA Crim 2749 ()
R v Woodman [1974] EWCA Crim 1 (26 April 1974)
R v XYZ [2016] NICA 31 (15 June 2016)
R. (Y.N.) v. N. (M.) [2005] IEHC 335 (3 June 2005)
R (young parents) [2015] EWFC B92 (15 May 2015)
R v Z [2004] NICA 23 (30 June 2004)
R v. Z [2005] UKHL 35 (19 May 2005)
R v Z [2007] EWCA Crim 1473 (26 June 2007)
R v Z [2016] EWHC 3728 (QB) (22 December 2016)
R v ZK [2018] NICA 46 (20 September 2018)
R1, Re Care Order [2002] NIFam 25 (15 November 2002)
R1 (Refusal of Entry : Rule 38 Disclosure) [2015] UKSIAC SC_105_11 (23 February 2015)
R1 v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Deportation - Application to re-instate appeal - Refused) [2013] UKSIAC 105/2012 (10 July 2013)
R1 v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Refusal of Entry - Application for Appeal to be Stayed - Refused) [2012] UKSIAC 105/11 (27 January 2012)
R3 (Exclusion : Preliminary issue) [2018] UKSIAC SC_150_2018 (07 December 2018)
R3 Products Ltd v Salt (VO) [2014] UKUT 333 (LC) (03 September 2014)
R70 World Ltd., R (on the application of) v Visa Section, British Deputy High Commission, Lagos & Ors [2006] EWHC 330 (Admin) (15 February 2006)
RA & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (IJR) [2015] UKUT 242 (IAC) (30 March 2015)
RA (A Child : Nigeria) & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department And Anr [2015] EWCA Civ 679 (22 April 2015)
RA and JC Atkinson Ltd (t/a Minster Cleaning Services) v Revenue & Customs [2012] UKFTT 140 (TC) (17 February 2012)
RA and Others (Particular Social Group, Women) Bangladesh [2005] UKIAT 00070 (10 March 2005)
RA (AP), Re Judicial Review [2011] ScotCS CSOH_42 (02 March 2011)
RA (AP) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] ScotCS CSOH_182 (29 December 2016)
RA (Baby Relinquished for Adoption: Case Management) [2016] EWFC 25 (06 May 2016)
RA (Baby Relinquished for Adoption), Re [2016] EWFC 47 (14 October 2016)
RA (Christians) Iraq CG [2005] UKIAT 00091 (22 April 2005)
RA v Court of Auditors (Judgment) French Text [2018] EUECJ T-874/16 (08 November 2018)
RA v DA [2012] NIFam 9 (16 November 2012)
R.A. Grendel GmbH v Finanzamt fuer Korperschaften de Hambourg. [1982] EUECJ R-255/81 (10 June 1982)
R.A. Heddon and another (Pastoral Measure) v The Church Commissioners (JCPC (Oral)) [1974] UKPC 18 (18 June 1974)
RA (Hindu, Safety in Kabul) Afghanistan [2004] UKIAT 00097 (04 May 2004)
RA (Iraq) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWCA Civ 850 (17 May 2019)
RA (Lebanon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 687 (22 May 2008)
RA Logan & Co v Customs and Excise rev 1 [2005] UKVAT V18919 (09 February 2005)
RA Logan And Co, Solicitors & Ors v. Maxwell [2007] ScotCS CSOH_163 (28 September 2007)
R.(A.) v. Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform [2002] IEHC 160 (19 March 2002)
RA (Nigeria), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 4073 (Admin) (08 December 2014)
RA (Nigeria), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] EWCA Civ 384 (23 March 2016)
RA (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 330 (13 March 2008)
R.A (Nigeria) -v- The Minister For Justice & Ors [2013] IEHC 504 (12 November 2013)
RA, (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (IJR) [2015] UKUT 292 (IAC) (17 April 2015)
R.A., Re A Petition for Judicial Review [2011] ScotCS CSOH_68 (19 April 2011)
RA, Re Leave to Appeal [2010] ScotCS CSIH_23 (24 March 2010)
RA (Returning resident: scope of exception) Dominica [2005] UKIAT 00020 (19 January 2005)
R.A. v. RUSSIA - 2592/17 (Judgment : Article 5 - Right to liberty and security : Third Section Committee) [2019] ECHR 538 (09 July 2019)
RA (s.117C: "unduly harsh"; offence: seriousness) Iraq [2019] UKUT 123 (IAC) (4 March 2019)
RA v Secretary of State (Defence) (WP) (Rev 1) (War pensions and armed forces compensation : Armed Forces Compensation Scheme) [2015] UKUT 201 (AAC) (23 April 2015)
RA v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (ESA) [2010] UKUT 301 (AAC) (12 August 2010)
RA v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (ESA) [2012] UKUT 432 (AAC) (08 November 2012)
RA (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1210 (06 November 2008)
R.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - 73521/12 - Communicated Case [2014] ECHR 1288 (27 October 2014)
RA (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2016] UKIntelP o17216 (6 April 2016)
RA (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2017] UKIntelP o03917 (30 January 2017)
RA (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2015] UKIntelP o03615 (23 January 2015)
RA (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2016] UKIntelP o01016 (4 January 2016)
R.A. (Uganda) -v- Refugee Appeals Tribunal & anor [2014] IEHC 552 (25 November 2014)
RA -v- Refugee Appeals Tribunal & ors [2015] IEHC 584 (17 September 2015)
R.A. -v- Refugee Appeals Tribunal & ors [2015] IEHC 830 (21 December 2015)
R.A. -v- Refugee Appeals Tribunal & Ors [2017] IECA 297 (15 November 2017)
RA -v- Refugee Appeals Tribunal & ors (No 3) [2016] IEHC 671 (21 November 2016)
R.A. -v- The Governor of Cork Prison [2016] IEHC 504 (18 August 2016)
RA -v- The Refugee Appeals Tribunal & ors [2015] IEHC 686 (04 November 2015)
Raa v Heirs of Lord Yester. [1595] Mor 16237 (15 January 1595)
RAA, Re Judicial Review [2014] ScotCS CSOH_7 (24 January 2014)
Raab MP v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWHC 3375 (QB) (15 December 2011)
Raab MP v IC (Dismissed Freedom of Information Act 2000) [2014] UKFTT 2014_0051 (GRC) (14 November 2014)
Raabe, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 1736 (Admin) (20 June 2013)
Raad van Arbeid v Mme Van der Bunt Craig. [1983] EUECJ R-238/81 (5 May 1983)
Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank v Evans (Advocate General's Opinion) [2014] EUECJ C-179/13_O (19 June 2014)
Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank v L.F. Evans (Opinion) [2015] EUECJ C-179/13_O (19 June 2014 )
Raani v Charazi [2015] EWFC B202 (24 August 2015)
Raasch v Ofsted [2018] UKFTT 133 (HESC) (15 March 2018)
Raayan Al Iraq Co Ltd & Ors v Trans Victory Marine Inc & Ors [2013] EWHC 2696 (Comm) (23 August 2013)
RAB Capital Plc & Anor v Lehman Brothers International (Europe) [2008] EWHC 2335 (Ch) (22 September 2008)
RAB v. MIB [2005] ScotCS CSIH_60 (12 August 2005)
R.A.B. v. M.I.B. [2010] ScotCS CSOH_160 (08 December 2010)
RAB, Re Application for Leave to Appeal [2008] ScotCS CSIH_17 (20 February 2008)
Rab Wilson and Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board [2012] ScotIC 036_2012 (21 February 2012)
Rabah & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 1044 (Admin) (18 March 2009)
Rabahallah v. BT Plc [2004] UKEAT 0382_04_0211 (2 November 2004)
Rabal Canas (Judgment) [2015] EUECJ C-392/13 (13 May 2015)
RABAN v. POLAND - 24254/03 [2008] ECHR 12 (8 January 2008)
RABAN v. ROMANIA - 25437/08 [2010] ECHR 1625 (26 October 2010)
Rabani, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 2030 (21 August 2008)
Rabbani v Director of Public Prosecutions [2018] EWHC 1156 (Admin) (15 May 2018)
Rabbani, R v [2017] EW Misc 18 (EXTRADITION) (25 September 2017)
Rabbani v Revenue and Customs (EXCISE DUTY CIVIL PENALTY (see also EXCISE HYDROCARBON OIL [DUTY]) : Evasion) [2016] UKFTT 341 (TC) (12 May 2016)
Rabbi Abraham Shorr v The Trustees of the United Aged Home (Institution), Jerusalem (Palestine) [1932] UKPC 9 (16 February 1932)
Rabess v. London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority (Jurisdictional Points : Claim in time and effective date of termination [2014] UKEAT 0029_14_2409 (24 September 2014)
Rabess, R (on the application of) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2007] EWHC 208 (Admin) (29 January 2007)
Rabess v The London Fire And Emergency Planning Authority [2016] EWCA Civ 1017 (17 May 2016)
Rabet v AG [2000] JRC 214 (03 November 2000)
Rabet (nee Carrel) v Island Dev. Cttee. [1966] JJ 697 (12 October 1966)
Rabheru, R. v [2013] EWCA Crim 137 (25 January 2013)
RABIA CALKAN v. TURKEY - 19662/92 [2001] ECHR 383 (5 June 2001)
Rabilizirov v A2 Dominion London Ltd & Ors [2019] EWHC 186 (QB) (05 February 2019)
Rabilizirov v A2 Dominion London Ltd & Ors [2019] EWHC 863 (QB) (05 April 2019)
Rabina Pollock, Supplicant. [1747] Mor 16351 (13 January 1747)
RABLAT v. FRANCE - 49285/99 [2003] ECHR 218 (29 April 2003)
Rabobank / Achmea [2005] IECompA m05063 (22 September 2005)
Rabone & Anor v Pennine Care NHS Foundation [2012] UKSC 2 (8 February 2012)
Rabone & Anor v Pennine Care NHS Trust [2009] EWHC 1827 (QB) (23 July 2009)
Rabone & Anor v Pennine Care NHS Trust [2010] EWCA Civ 698 (21 June 2010)
Rabot and another v De Silva and others (Ceylon) [1909] UKPC 2 (10 February 1909)
Rabould Smith & Tetsill Ltd v. Pedley [2000] UKEAT 85_00_1705 (17 May 2000)
Raby v Revenue & Customs [2007] UKVAT V20341 (12 September 2007)
RAC Brand Enterprises LLP v Gustavo Winchester (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 16024 (30 June 2015)
RAC Brand Enterprises LLP RAC Motoring Services v Andy Jones (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 19471 (24 November 2017)
RAC Brand Enterprises LLP RAC Motoring Services v McCarthy Cars (UK) Ltd (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 19231 (17 October 2017)
RAC Brand Enterprises LLP RAC Motoring Services v Mr R Woods (Summary Decision _No Action) [2017] DRS 19159 (22 September 2017)
RAC Brand Enterprises LLP RAC Motoring Services RAC Insurance Limited v Imran Khan (Summary Decision _No Action) [2019] DRS 21451 (11 July 2019)
RAC Motoring Services v Andrey Shevchenko (Full Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 15623 (11 September 2015)
RAC Motoring Services Ltd v S Birrell (Full Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 15624 (11 September 2015)
Racal Communications Ltd, Re [1980] UKHL 5 (03 July 1980)
Racal Milgo Ltd v Ross [1992] UKEAT 450_92_0510 (5 October 1992)
Racal Services (Communications) Ltd v. Flockhart [2002] UKEAT 701_00_1801 (18 January 2002)
RACAREANU v. ROMANIA - 14262/03 [2010] ECHR 761 (1 June 2010)
Raccanelli (Free movement of persons) [2008] EUECJ C-94/07 (17 July 2008)
RACCIO v. ITALY - 43042/98 [2000] ECHR 331 (22 June 2000)
Race for Furniture Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2007] UKVAT V20008 (06 February 2007)
Race v Revenue & Customs [2013] UKFTT 489 (TC) (10 September 2013)
Race v Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 1085 (TC) (08 December 2014)
Race (t/a Metframe Service Co) v Romaine [1994] UKEAT 616_93_1609 (16 September 1994)
Race (t/a Metframe Service Co) v Romaine [1995] UKEAT 1042_93_0510 (5 October 1995)
Racecourse Association & Ors v Office of Fair Trading [2005] CAT 29 (2 August 2005)
RACEPARTS (UK) LIMITED (Trade Mark: Ex Parte) [2013] UKIntelP o30213 (30 July 2013)
RaceParts UK (Trade Mark: Appointed Person - Ex parte hearings) [2014] UKIntelP o22214 (20 May 2014)
Rachael Brown and her Sisters, Heirs of Line of the deceased Dr Brown of Dundee, v Alexander Bower and Others, Trustees appointed by the deceased Dr Brown. [1770] Mor 5440 (26 January 1770)
Rachael Hushon v IC (The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009) [2014] UKFTT EA_2013_0271 (GRC) (21 January 2014)
Rachappa Subrao Jadhav Desai v Shidappa Venkatrao Jadhav Desai (Bombay) [1918] UKPC 102 (3 December 1918)
RACHDAD v. FRANCE - 71846/01 [2003] ECHR 594 (13 November 2003)
Rachdad v France - 71846/01 [2010] ECHR 1425 (15 September 2010)
RACHEED, MOHAMMAD RACHEED (AP) AGAINST SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT [2019] ScotCS CSIH_8 (13 February 2019)
Rachel Carter v Wellington College (England and Wales : Unfair Dismissal) [2019] UKET 3335023/2018 (5 April 2019)
Rachel Inglis, Petitioner. [1696] 4 Brn 322 (30 June 1696)
RACHEL LOGAN v. PROCURATOR FISCAL, KILMARNOCK [1999] ScotHC 124 (21st May, 1999)
Rachel Maxwell and her Husband, v Maxwell. [1675] Mor 4009 (22 December 1675)
Rachel Wilkie v Henry Morison. [1682] Mor 10140 (4 January 1682)
Rachel Woodcock v David Middleton (England and Wales : Breach of Contract) [2019] UKET 2600163/2018 (5 March 2019)
Rachelet v Lauder. [1628] Mor 8132 (4 July 1628)
Rachell Stewart v Robert Stewart. [1629] 1 Brn 276 (17 January 1629)
Racheter v Basingstoke & Deane Borough Council [2000] EWLands ACQ_138_1999 (07 June 2000)
RACHEVI v. BULGARIA - 47877/99 [2004] ECHR 439 (23 September 2004)
Rachid ben Youssef v Ann Nguyet Hoang (Beneficial interests, trusts and restrictions : Constructive trust - inferred common intention) [2018] UKFTT 326 (PC) (25 May 2018)
Rachid BOUSANA v the Netherlands - 21167/08 [2010] ECHR 1013 (25 May 2010)
RACHITA v. ROMANIA - 15987/09 (Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) : Court (Fourth Section)) [2016] ECHR 421 (17 May 2016)
Rachmaninoff& Ors v Sotheby`s & Anor [2005] EWHC 258 (QB) (01 March 2005)
RACHWALSKI AND FERENC v. POLAND - 47709/99 [2009] ECHR 1221 (28 July 2009)
Racial Equality Council & Ors v Widlinski [1998] UKEAT 619_97_3004 (30 April 1998)
RACINET v. FRANCE - 53544/99 [2003] ECHR 449 (23 September 2003)
Racing Board v. O�Culachain [1988] IEHC 51 (27 April 1988)
Racing Post (Undertakings ) [2014] UKICO 2014-40 (28 August 2014)
Racing UK Ltd v Doncaster Racecourse Ltd & Anor [2005] EWCA Civ 999 (20 July 2005)
Racing UK Ltd v TagNames Ltd [2008] DRS 6044 (19 November 2008)
Rack Straw v. Douglas and Others [1919] SLR 253 (05 February 1919)
Rackham v Sandy & Ors (1) [2005] EWHC 482 (QB) (23 March 2005)
Rackham v Sandy & Ors [2005] EWHC 1354 (QB) (28 June 2005)
RACKIT (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2013] UKIntelP o50013 (11 December 2013)
Rackit (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2014] UKIntelP o06614 (10 February 2014)
Rackstraw v. Bryce Douglas and Others [1917] SLR 224 (03 February 1917)
RACOLTEA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - 70116/13 (Judgment : Article 3 - Prohibition of torture : Fourth Section Committee) [2018] ECHR 145 (08 February 2018)
RACOLTEA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - 70116/13 (Judgment : Article 3 - Prohibition of torture : Fourth Section Committee) [2020] ECHR 48 (16 January 2020)
Racoon Limited v. Harris Turnbull Executor of James Turnbull (deceased)and Others (British Virgin Islands) [1996] UKPC 15 (22nd May, 1996)
RACU v. MOLDOVA - 13136/07 [2010] ECHR 614 (20 April 2010)
Racy v Hawila [2004] EWCA Civ 209 (18 February 2004)
RACZ v. HUNGARY - 20264/12 (Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) : Court (Fourth Section Committee)) [2016] ECHR 903 (18 October 2016)
Racz v Perrier & Labesse [1979] JLR 151 (02 November 1979)
Racz -v- Higgins [2017] IEHC 509 (20 July 2017)
Racz v Vinson [1972] JJ 1969 (31 January 1972)
Raczkiewicz v Circuit Court in Lublin, Poland [2012] EWHC 3571 (Admin) (20 November 2012)
Raczkowski v Revenue & Customs (EXCISE DUTY TOBACCO : Hand rolling) [2018] UKFTT 671 (TC) (14 November 2018)
Raczynski v Regional Court In Kielce Poland [2011] EWHC 1959 (Admin) (07 July 2011)
RADAJ v. POLAND - 29537/95;35453/97 [2002] ECHR 789 (28 November 2002)
Radakovits v Abbey National Plc [2008] UKEAT 0385_07_0402 (4 February 2008)
Radakovits v Abbey National Plc [2009] EWCA Civ 1346 (17 November 2009)
RADANOVIC v. CROATIA - 9056/02 [2006] ECHR 1143 (21 December 2006)
RADANOVIC v. SLOVENIA - 37296/02 [2006] ECHR 505 (27 April 2006)
Radar Cottage, Sandbanks Hill, Darenth, Kent, DA2 8EH (Housing Act 2004 and Housing and Planning Act 2016 - Improvement notices) [2019] UKFTT RP_CHI_29UD_HIN_2019_0018 (14 August 2019)
Radar (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2017] UKIntelP o21517 (5 May 2017)
RADAR (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2017] UKIntelP o64017 (12 December 2017)
Radarbeam Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 431 (TC) (10 September 2010)
Radbourne Court Draycott Avenue - Brent : London (Service Charges) [2010] EWLVT LON_LV_SVC_00AE_0001 (16 March 2010)
Radbrook House 46 Stanhill Road - Shropshire Unitary Authority : Midland : Birmingham (Service Charges) [2013] EWLVT BIR_LV_SVC_00GG_0061 (15 January 2013)
RADCHENKO v. UKRAINE - 39555/07 (Judgment : Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial : Fifth Section Committee) [2018] ECHR 115 (01 February 2018)
RADCHIKOV v. RUSSIA - 65582/01 [2007] ECHR 409 (24 May 2007)
Radcliffe Investment Properties Ltd v Various leaseholders as set out on the application (London : Section 20ZA) [2018] UKFTT RP_LON_00AM_LDC_2018_0003 (14 February 2018)
Radcliffe, Re [2004] EWHC 90039 (Costs) (20 December 2004)
Radcliffe v Revenue & Customs [2015] UKFTT 17 (TC) (14 January 2015)
Radcliffes Le Brasseur (a firm) & Anor v Wickes & Ors [2004] EWHC 9001 (Costs) (16 February 2004)
Rade DOKIC v Serbia - 48735/07 [2012] ECHR 276 (31 January 2012)
Radecki v Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council [2008] UKEAT 0114_08_0905 (9 May 2008)
Radecki v OHMI - Vamed (AKTIVAMED) (Judgment) French Text [2015] EUECJ T-551/13 (26 March 2015)
RADEK v. POLAND - 30311/02 [2004] ECHR 372 (20 July 2004)
Radeke v General Dental Council [2015] EWHC 778 (Admin) (24 March 2015)
Radelet v Commission (Judgment) (French Text) [2014] EUECJ F-7/13 (18 September 2014)
RADEV v. BULGARIA - 37994/09 (Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) : Court (Fourth Section)) [2015] ECHR 1016 (17 November 2015)
RADEVA v. BULGARIA - 13577/05 [2012] ECHR 1587 (03 July 2012)
Radford & Anor v Frade & Ors [2014] EWHC 2602 (QB) (28 July 2014)
Radford & Anor v Frade & Ors [2018] EWCA Civ 119 (07 February 2018)
Radford & Bright, Ltd v. D. M. Stevenson & Co. [1904] SLR 41_330 (20 February 1904)
Radford and Robinson v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 31 (TC) (14 January 2010)<BR><BR>
Radford v Brecknock Borough Council [1997] UKEAT 965_96_2901 (29 January 1997)
Radford v Customs and Excise [2004] UKVAT(Excise) E00775 (05 August 2004)
Radford Racing Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2011] UKFTT 658 (TC) (10 October 2011)
Radford v Teeside University (Practice and Procedure : Review) [2011] UKEAT 0304_11_2110 (21 October 2011)
Radford -v- The Director of Public Prosecutions [2015] IEHC 434 (07 July 2015)
Radgen (Judgment) [2016] EUECJ C-478/15 (21 September 2016)
Radha Binode Mandal v Sri Sri Gopal Jiu Thakur and others (Fort William (Bengal)) [1927] UKPC 38 (25 March 1927)
Radha Gobind Roy Saheb Roy Bahadoor v Inglis and another (Fort William (Bengal)) [1880] UKPC 37 (6 July 1880)
Radha Kishu and others v Hira Lal Sah and others (Patna) [1926] UKPC 101 (29 November 1926)
Radha Kishun v Khurshed Hossein and others (Fort William (Bengal)) [1919] UKPC 119 (2 December 1919)
Radha Krishen v Sri Krishen and others (Allahabad) [1944] UKPC 41 (6 November 1944)
Radha Krishn Das v Rai Krishn Chand (a Minor through his Guardian Rani Mathi Kuar) (Allahabad) [1901] UKPC 32 (18 June 1901)
Radha Mohun Mondul and others v Jadoomoonee Dossee (Fort William (Bengal)) [1875] UKPC 12 (26 February 1875)
Radha Mohun S& Anor v Hardai Bibi and another (Allahabad) [1899] UKPC 15 (11 March 1899)
Radha Naran Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 501 (Admin) (30 July 2014)
Radha Persad Sing v Ram Purmeswar Singh and others (Fort William (Bengal)) [1882] UKPC 48 (1 December 1882)
Radha Prosad Mullick and another v Ranimoni Dassi and others (Fort William (Bengal)) [1908] UKPC 22 (14 May 1908)
Radha Proshad Singh v Rancoomar Singh and others (Fort William (Bengal)) [1877] UKPC 45 (29 November 1877)
Radha Raman Shaha and others v Pran Nath Roy and others (Fort William (Bengal)) [1901] UKPC 17 (2 May 1901)
Radhabenode Misser v Kripa Moyee Debia (Fort William (Bengal)) [1872] UKPC 6 (22 January 1872)
Radhadkisson Gopiksson, a firm (now represented by Juthalal Motilal, Receiver) v Balmukund Ramchandra, a firm (Bombay) [1932] UKPC 87 (15 December 1932)
Radhajeebun Moostuffy v Taramonee Dossee (Calcutta) [1869] UKPC 14 (22 February 1869)
Radhakant lal and others v Musammat Nazama Begam and others (Fort William (Bengal)) [1917] UKPC 104 (14 December 1917)
Radhakissen Chamria and others v Durga Prosad Chamria and another (Fort William (Bengal)) [1940] UKPC 35 (3 June 1940)
Radhakrishan Sivasankaran v Out of Africa Investments Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation) (England and Wales : Breach of Contract) [2019] UKET 2206463/2018 (18 February 2019)
Radhakrishen M. Khemaney v Lachabai Murlidhar (Eastern Africa) [1960] UKPC 5 (28 January 1960)
Radhakrishna Ayyar and another v Sundaraswamier substituted for Swaminatha Ayyar (Madras) [1922] UKPC 28 (14 March 1922)
Radhakrishna Ayyar and another v Swaminatha Ayyar (Madras) [1920] UKPC 100 (3 December 1920)
Radhakrishnan v. The State Co (Mauritius) [1993] UKPC 30 (27 July 1993)
Radhamadhub Holdar and another v Monohur Mookerji (Fort William (Bengal)) [1888] UKPC 20 (15 March 1888)
Radhamoni Debi v The Collector of Khulna on behalf of the Syedpore trust Estate and others (Fort William (Bengal)) [1900] UKPC 14 (24 March 1900)
Radhanath Doss and others v Gisborne and Co. (Fort William (Bengal)) [1871] UKPC 2 (19 January 1871)
Radhoba Baloba Vagh and others v Aburao Bhagwantrao Shirole and others (Bombay) [1929] UKPC 60 (14 June 1929)
Radi, Re Judicial Review [2003] ScotCS 78 (20 March 2003)
Radia v. Jefferies International Ltd (UNFAIR DISMISSAL - Reasonableness of dismissal) [2018] UKEAT 0123_18_3011 (30 November 2018)
RADIC v HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE [2014] ScotHC HCJAC_76 (22 July 2014)
RADICCHI v. ITALY - 54284/00 [2002] ECHR 382 (28 March 2002)
Radin Ltd v GMB & Ors [2003] UKEAT 0712_02_2406 (24 June 2003)
Radin Ltd v GMB & Ors [2004] EWCA Civ 180 (20 February 2004)
Radio 2000 _ Newstalk 106 (Radio Broadcasting) [2004] IECompA M04003 (13 January 2004)
RADIO ABC v. AUSTRIA - 19736/92 [1997] ECHR 81 (20 October 1997)
RADIO CITY (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2001] UKIntelP o36601 (17 August 2001)
Radio County Sound / Dooley and Feeney [2005] IECompA m05079 (7 December 2005)
RADIO FRANCE AND OTHERS v. FRANCE - 53984/00 [2007] ECHR 127 (30 March 2004)
Radio Limerick One Ltd. v. Independent Radio and Television Commission [1997] IESC 3 (16th January, 1997)
Radio Limerick One Ltd. v. Treaty Radio Ltd. [1997] IEHC 227 (13th November, 1997)
RADIO LONDON (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2015] UKIntelP o12815 (25 March 2015)
Radio Telefis Eireann and others v Commission of the European Communities. (Application for interim measures) [1989] EUECJ C-91/89R (11 May 1989)
Radio Telefis Eireann v Commission of the European Communities. (Competition) [1991] EUECJ T-69/89 (10 July 1991)
Radio Telefis Eireann (RTE); and Independent Television Publications Ltd (ITP) v Commission of the European Communities. (Competition) [1995] EUECJ C-241/91P (6 April 1995)
RADIO TWIST, A.S. v. SLOVAKIA - 62202/00 [2006] ECHR 1129 (19 December 2006)
Radio Two Thousand / Maypril [2005] IECompA m05005 (9 February 2005)
Radiosistemi (Industrial policy) [2002] EUECJ C-388/00 (20 June 2002)
Radius / DCI / NCS [2014] IECompA m14013 (17 April 2014)
Radius Housing Association Ltd v JNP Architects & Ors [2018] NIQB 57 (04 July "018)
Radiuscrown Limited v Ash Lacey Building Products Limited (Patent) [2002] UKIntelP o06002 (7 February 2002)
Radiuscrown Limited v Ash Lacey Building Products Limited. (Patent) [2002] UKIntelP o14402 (4 April 2002)
RADIVOJ NOVAKOVIC v. CROATIA - 43446/02 [2007] ECHR 276 (12 April 2007)
RADIVOJEVIC v. SLOVENIA - 41511/02 [2006] ECHR 506 (27 April 2006)
Radko Todorov YANCHEV v Bulgaria - 16403/07 [2012] ECHR 574 (20 March 2012)
RADKOV AND SABEV v. BULGARIA - 18938/07 36069/09 - Chamber Judgment [2014] ECHR 534 (27 May 2014)
RADKOV v. BULGARIA - 27795/03 [2010] ECHR 634 (22 April 2010)
RADKOV v. BULGARIA (no. 2) - 18382/05 [2011] ECHR 249 (10 February 2011)
Radlberger Getr�nke & S. Spitz (Free movement of goods) [2004] EUECJ C-309/02 (14 December 2004)
Radleigh Metal Coatings Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 76 (TC) (09 January 2014)
Radley & Anor v Revenue and Customs (INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX : Exemptions and reliefs) [2016] UKFTT 688 (TC) (17 October 2016)
Radley v. Department for Work and Pensions [2005] UKEAT 0141_05_2806 (28 June 2005)
Radlinger and Radlingerova (Judgment) [2016] EUECJ C-377/14 (21 April 2016)
Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino (Rev 4) [2010] UKSC 42 (20 October 2010)
Radmacher v Granatino [2008] EWCA Civ 1304 (03 October 2008)
Radmacher v Granatino (Rev 1) [2009] EWCA Civ 649 (02 July 2009)
Radmila PESIKAN v Serbia - 28339/06 [2009] ECHR 2231 (15 December 2009)
Radmila PETROVIC v Serbia - 40485/08 [2012] ECHR 141 (4 January 2012)
RADOBULJAC v. CROATIA - 51000/11 (Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) : Court (Second Section)) [2016] ECHR 585 (28 June 2016)
Radoje NOVAKOVIC v Serbia - 32145/07 [2011] ECHR 1746 (27 September 2011)
Radojka BUDIJA v Croatia - 45273/05 [2008] ECHR 1118 (25 September 2008)
RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA - 37685/10 (Judgment : Remainder inadmissible : Grand Chamber) [2018] ECHR 254 (20 March 2018)
RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA - 37685/10 (Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) : Court (Second Section)) [2016] ECHR 581 (28 June 2016)
Radomir ANDRIC v Serbia - 45597/08 [2012] ECHR 161 (10 January 2012)
RADOS AND OTHERS v. CROATIA - 45435/99 [2002] ECHR 566 (4 July 2002)
RADOS AND OTHERS v. CROATIA - 45435/99 [2002] ECHR 722 (7 November 2002)
Radoslav OLIJAS v Slovakia - 50568/08 [2011] ECHR 279 (25 January 2011)
RADOSLAV POPOV v. BULGARIA - 58971/00 [2006] ECHR 915 (2 November 2006)
Radovan MAKSIMOVIC and Others v Croatia - 24008/07 [2010] ECHR 1710 (14 October 2010)
Radovan SENCAR v Croatia - 3629/10 [2012] ECHR 132 (10 January 2012)
RADOVANCOVICI v. ROMANIA - 45358/13 - Chamber Judgment (French Text) [2015] ECHR 245 (03 March 2015)
RADOVANOVIC v. AUSTRIA - 42703/98 [2004] ECHR 169 (22 April 2004)
RADOVANOVIC v. AUSTRIA - 42703/98 [2004] ECHR 689 (16 December 2004)
RADOVANOVIC v. SERBIA - 9302/11 - Committee Judgment [2014] ECHR 827 (22 July 2014)
Radseresht v Radseresht-Spain [2017] EWHC 2932 (Fam) (13 October 2017)
Radstock Court Management Limited v Mr P Royan (London : Section 27A) [2018] UKFTT RP_LON_OOAP_LSC_2017_0344 (28 March 2018)
RADU v. GERMANY - 20084/07 - Chamber Judgment [2013] ECHR 438 (16 May 2013)
Radu v. Germany - 20084/07 - Legal Summary [2013] ECHR 604 (16 May 2013)
RADU v. GERMANY - 20084/07 (Communicated Case) [2012] ECHR 1230 (03 July 2012)
Radu v Houston & Anor [2006] EWCA Civ 1575 (22 November 2006)
Radu v Houston & Anor [2006] EWCA Civ 1700 (30 October 2006)
Radu MURESAN v Romania - 31530/05 [2010] ECHR 1187 (22 June 2010)
RADU POP v. ROMANIA - 14337/04 [2012] ECHR 1604 (17 July 2012)
Radu POPA v Moldova - 29837/09 [2010] ECHR 1473 (14 September 2010)
Radu, Prince of Hohenzollern v Houston & Anor [2006] EWCA Civ 1224 (27 July 2006)
Raducan & Anor -v- MJELR & Ors [2011] IEHC 224 (03 June 2011)
RADUCANU v. ROMANIA - 17187/05 [2012] ECHR 1002 (12 June 2012)
RADUCKI v. POLAND - 10274/08 [2011] ECHR 339 (22 February 2011)
RADULESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - 12656/14 (Judgment : Article 3 - Prohibition of torture : Fourth Section Committee) [2018] ECHR 147 (08 February 2018)
RADULOVIC v. SERBIA - 24465/11 (Judgment : Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Access to court) Violation of Art...) [2017] ECHR 811 (03 October 2017)
RADUNOVIC AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO - 45197/13 (Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) : Court (Second Section)) [2016] ECHR 936 (25 October 2016)
RADVAK AND RADVAKOVA v. SLOVAKIA - 25657/08 [2011] ECHR 15 (11 January 2011)
Radwan v Poland Sad Okregowy Tarnow [2013] EWHC 554 (Admin) (19 February 2013)
RADYUKIN v. UKRAINE - 27805/18 (Judgment : Article 3 - Prohibition of torture : Fifth Section Committee) [2019] ECHR 558 (11 July 2019)
RADZEVIL v. UKRAINE - 36600/09 (Judgment : Right to a fair trial : Fourth Section) [2019] ECHR 896 (10 December 2019)
RADZHAB MAGOMEDOV v. RUSSIA - 20933/08 (Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) : Court (Third Section)) [2016] ECHR 1138 (20 December 2016)
RADZHABOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 26091/09 (Judgment : Article 3 - Prohibition of torture : Third Section Committee) [2018] ECHR 666 (26 July 2018)
Radziszewski v Circuit Court In Olsztyn [2010] EWHC 601 (Admin) (05 March 2010)
Rae v - . [1630] Mor 16665 (11 February 1630)
Rae & Anor v Broad & Ors [2000] ScotCS 295 (28 November 2000)
Rae & Ors v Scottish Power Plc & Ors [2001] ScotCS 253 (8 November 2001)
Rae and Ferguson v Clerk of Glendorch. [1738] Mor 2571 (30 June 1738)
Rae and Others [1893] SLR 30_736 (16 June 1893)
Rae and Others v. Walker and Others [1877] SLR 15_25 (2 November 1877)
Rae v Bailies of Dalkeith. [1628] Mor 11696 (18 November 1628)
Rae v Blackrock International Ltd [2000] ScotCS 320 (15 December 2000)
Rae v Blackwood. [1703] Mor 6769 (10 December 1703)
R.A.E (Cameroon) -v- The Refugee Appeals Tribunal & Anor [2013] IEHC 538 (30 September 2013)
Rae Chief Constable Of Strathclyde Police v. Strathclyde Joint Police Board & Ors [2005] ScotCS CSOH_131 (30 September 2005)
Rae v Douglas. [1628] Mor 3754 (19 November 1628)
Rae v Finlayson. [1680] Mor 10211 (5 February 1680)
Rae v Finlayson. [1680] Mor 15216 (5 Februry 1680)
Rae v. Fraser [1899] SLR 36_782 (28 June 1899)
Rae v Glass. [1673] Mor 2966 (17 January 1673)
Rae (Inspector of Taxes) v Lazard Investment Co Ltd [1963] UKHL TC_41_1 (10 April 1963)
Rae (Inspector of Taxes) v Lazard Investment Company Limited [1963] UKHL 7 (10 April 1963)
Rae Jagatpal Singh v Dewan Ran Bijai Bahadur Singh (Oudh) [1890] UKPC 22 (30 April 1890)
Rae v Kellie. [1614] Mor 16657 (1 June 1614)
Rae v Laird of Kelly. [1612] Mor 6459 (28 February 1612)
Rae v Laird of Kelly. [1612] Mor 12048 (23 June 1612)
Rae v. Linton & The Bank of Scotland [1875] SLR 12_398 (20 March 1875)
Rae v Lord Kellie. [1612] Mor 13379 (28 February 1612)
Rae v Magistrates of Dalkeith. [1628] Mor 15002 (19 November 1628)
Rae Manick Chund v Madhoram and others (Agra) [1869] UKPC 19 (10 March 1869)
Rae. v Maxwell. [1711] Mor 7150 (26 July 1711)
Rae v. Meek and Others [1886] SLR 23_760 (29 June 1886)
Rae v. Milne & Sons [1896] SLR 34_149 (20 November 1896)
Rae v Nielson. [1742] 1 Elchies 39 (31 November 1742)
Rae v Nielson. [1742] 1 Elchies 430 (19 November 1742)
Rae v. Norcrest Homes Ltd [2000] EAT 1290_99_1606 (16 June 2000)
Rae, Re 12 Park View (RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS : Modification) [2016] UKUT 552 (LC) (13 December 2016)
Rae v. Royal Scottish Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Children [1923] SLR 98 (30 November 1923)
Rae Sarabjit Singh v Chapman (Oudh) [1886] UKPC 5 (10 February 1886)
Rae v Strathclyde Joint Police Board [1999] ScotCS 70 (9 March 1999)
Rae v. Strathern [1923] SLR 93 (15 December 1923)
Rae v The Bailie of Lanerick. [1627] 1 Brn 240 (13 December 1627)
Rae v The Partners of the Glass-work Company at Leith, and Milne, their Clerk and Cashier. [1750] Mor 13989 (20 June 1750)
Rae -v- AG [2017] JCA 197 (22 November 2017)
Raeburn and Others v. Kedslie and Others. [1816] ScotJCR 1_Murray_1 (22 January 1816)
Raeburn and Others v. Mulholland [1881] SLR 18_626 (29 June 1881)
Raed & Ibrahim & Talgi & v & SSHS & (22-02-07 & Field & House & Palestine) (unreported) [2007] UKAITUR Raed (14 March 2007)
Raemdonck and Raemdonck-Janssens (Transport) [2005] EUECJ C-128/04 (17 March 2005)
Raes v. Meek and Others [1888] SLR 25_737 (20 July 1888)
Raes v. Meek and Others [1889] UKHL 8 (8 August 1889)
Raeshaw Farms Ltd v Scottish Natural Heritage [2017] ScotCS CSOH_50 (28 March 2017)
Raeside, R (on the application of) v Crown Prosecution Service [2012] EWHC 1064 (Admin) (23 April 2012)
RAF Association Club v Dumfries & Galloway Council [2000] ScotCS 101 (7 April 2000)
RAF v. SPAIN - 53652/00 [2003] ECHR 300 (17 June 2003)
RAFAA v. FRANCE - 25393/10 - Chamber Judgment (French Text) [2013] ECHR 489 (30 May 2013)
Rafacz & Anor, R v [2011] NICC 5 (28 January 2011)
Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd v Mectron Engenharia, Industria E Comercio SA [2017] EWHC 597 (Comm) (27 March 2017)
RAFAEL AHLSKOG v. FINLAND - 23667/06 [2008] ECHR 1428 (13 November 2008)
Rafael Perez Escolar v Commission of the European Communities. (State aids) [2003] EUECJ T-41/01 (25 June 2003)
Rafael-Armament Development Authority Ltd, Asa Fein, Chanoch Miller and Ram Fabian (Patent) [2013] UKIntelP o41613 (18 October 2013)
Rafaelova v District Court Bratislava (Slovakia) [2014] EWHC 4082 (Admin) (12 November 2014)
RAFAILOVIC AND STEVANOVIC v. SERBIA - 38629/07 23718/08 - Chamber Judgment [2015] ECHR 582 (16 June 2015)
Rafal CISLER v Poland - 3572/08 [2011] ECHR 1486 (13 September 2011)
Rafal CYGAN v Poland - 10872/10 [2011] ECHR 799 (3 May 2011)
Rafal KOSIARZ v Poland - 24696/08 [2009] ECHR 1005 (9 June 2009)
Rafal KOSTRZEWA v Poland - 44901/08 [2010] ECHR 408 (9 March 2010)
Rafal MAJKUT v Poland - 4880/09 [2009] ECHR 1842 (13 October 2009)
Rafal MIZERA v Poland - 26634/07 [2008] ECHR 1509 (21 October 2008)
Rafal MROWCZYK v Poland - 29521/07 [2006] ECHR 1470 (24 October 2006)
RAFAL ORZECHOWSKI v. POLAND - 34653/08 [2010] ECHR 1196 (27 July 2010)
Rafal SLESIK v Poland - 5539/10 [2011] ECHR 1520 (20 September 2011)
Rafal SLOTA v Poland - 14931/07 [2009] ECHR 1521 (15 September 2009)
Rafal WEDZICKI v Poland - 2479/10 [2011] ECHR 1490 (13 September 2011)
RAFFA v. ITALY - 44381/98 [2001] ECHR 700 (25 October 2001)
Raffaele de Santis v Commission of the European Communities. (Officials) [1996] EUECJ T-56/94 (16 October 1996)
Raffaelli v Heatly [1949] ScotHC HCJ_1 (09 February 1949)
Raffan v. Her Majesty's Advocate [2009] ScotHC HCJAC_8 (15 January 2009)
Raffan v. Her Majesty's Advocate [2009] ScotHC HCJAC_8A (15 January 2009)
Raffermati v Capello Hair Designs Ltd & Anor [2017] EWHC 3134 (Ch) (04 December 2017)
Rafferty & Anor -v- Minister for Agriculture and Food & Ors [2008] IEHC 344 (31 October 2008)
Rafferty v ADN NI Ltd [2015] NIIT 2251_14IT (02 April 2015)
Rafferty v. Bus Eireann [1996] IEHC 33; [1997] 2 IR 424 (21st November, 1996)
Rafferty v Frank J O'Donnell [2013] NIIT 00229_13IT (13 March 2013)
Rafferty (Kieran) v GB Finance Group Ltd and GB Asset Management Ltd [2013] NICA 21 (25 April 2013)
Rafferty v. Lamp Post Construction Co. Ltd. [2003] IEHC 37 (29 April 2003)
Rafferty, R. v [2004] EWCA Crim 968 (05 April 2004)
Rafferty v R [2007] EWCA Crim 1898 (26 July 2007)
Rafferty, R v [2007] NICC 42 [2007] (15 October 2007)
Rafferty, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2008] EWHC 2937 (Admin) (05 November 2008)
Rafferty v Revenue and Customs [2005] UKSPC SPC00475 (19 May 2005)
Rafferty (t/a 1st Class Limos) [2010] UKUT 145 (AAC) (09 April 2010)
Rafferty v The Crown [2007] EWCA Crim 1846 (23 July 2007)
Rafferty -v- Minister for Agriculture, Food and Rural Development & ors [2014 IESC 61 (07 November 2014)
RAFFI v. FRANCE - 11760/02 [2006] ECHR 262 (28 March 2006)
Raffile v Government of the United States of America [2004] EWHC 2913 (Admin) (02 December 2004)
Raffinerie Heide v Commission (Judgment) (French Text) [2014] EUECJ T-631/13 (26 September 2014)
Raffinerie Tirlemontoise (Judgment) [2017] EUECJ C-585/15 (09 February 2017)
RAFFIO v. ITALY - 52962/99 [2002] ECHR 77 (12 February 2002)
Raffles CLub (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2017] UKIntelP o60917 (30 November 2017)
RAFFLES HOTEL SINGAPORE (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2015] UKIntelP o13415 (26 March 2015)
Raffles House 67 Brampton Grove - Barnet : London (Service Charges) [2016] EWLVT LON_LV_SVC_00AC_0044 (14 July 2016)
Raffles House Management Company Limited v The long leaseholders of Flats 1 - 82 Raaffles House (London : Section 20ZA) [2016] UKFTT RP_LON_00AC_LDC_2016_0044 (14 July 2016)
Raffles v. Wichelhaus & Anor [1864] EWHC Exch J19 (April 1864)
Raffray v AG [1996] JCA 010 (17 January 1996)
Rafhaelo Gutti v EUIPO - Transformados del Sur (CAMISERIA LA ESPANOLA) (Judgment) French Text [2017] EUECJ T-504/15 (08 March 2017)
Rafia Khanum Malik v The General Dental Council (The Disciplinary Committee of the General Dental Council) [1979] UKPC 23 (24 July 1979)
Rafidain Bank & Ors v Saipem Spa & Ors [1994] EWCA Civ 18 (07 February 1994)
RAFIG ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN - 45875/06 [2011] ECHR 2022 (6 December 2011)
RAFINSKA v. POLAND - 13146/02 [2007] ECHR 550 (3 July 2007)
Rafiq & Anor v R. [2008] EWCA Crim 1518 (17 July 2008)
Rafiq v. Benefits Agency & Ors [2000] UKEAT 5_2000_1801 (18 January 2000)
Rafiq v Department Of Social Security [1994] UKEAT 360_94_0605 (6 May 1994)
Rafiq v National Criminal Intelligence Service [1998] UKEAT 216_98_0602 (6 February 1998)
Rafiq, Re Determination Immigration Appeal Tribunal [2004] ScotCS 121 (30 April 2004)
Rafiq v Travis Perkins & Ors [1999] UKEAT 1391_98_1903 (19 March 1999)
Rafiq v WM Morrison Supermarkets Plc & Anor [1994] UKEAT 920_94_0812 (8 December 1994)
Rafique & Anor v Ashraf & Ors [2012] ScotCS CSOH_155 (02 October 2012)
Rafique & Ors v Ashraf & Ors [2013] ScotCS CSOH_34 (05 March 2013)
Rafique -v- The Governor of the Dochas Centre [2017] IEHC 80 (17 February 2017)
Raft Ltd v Freestyle of Newhaven Ltd & Ors [2016] EWHC 1711 (IPEC) (13 July 2016)
Rafter v. A.G. & Ors [2004] IEHC 28 (26 February 2004)
Rafter v Lucas Yuasa Batteries Ltd [1992] UKEAT 506_90_2802 (28 February 1992)
Rafter v. Solicitors Mutual Defence Fund Ltd. [1999] IEHC 230 (10th May, 1999)
Raftopoulou v Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 818 (TC)(20 August 2014)
Raftopoulou v Revenue & Customs [2015] UKUT 579 (TCC) (16 October 2015)
Raftopoulou v Revenue And Customs [2015] UKUT 630 (TCC) (13 November 2015)
RAG v Department for Communities (II) ((Not Applicable)) [2018] NICom 42 (03 September 2018)
Ragan v Chaytor & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 1892 (15 November 2002)
RAGAS v. ITALY - 44524/98 [2001] ECHR 630 (23 October 2001)
RAGAS v. ITALY - 44524/98 [2002] ECHR 819 (17 December 2002)
Ragg v Brown. [1708] Mor 9492 (15 July 1708)
Raggatt v Revenue and Customs (INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX : Penalty) [2016] UKFTT 391 (TC) (06 June 2016)
Raggatt v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs (INCOME TAX  late payment penalties-reasonable excuse) [2018] UKUT 412 (TCC) (18 December 2018)
Raggett v. Athy U.D.C. [1999] IEHC 174; [2000] 1 IR 469; [2000] 1 ILRM 375 (4th June, 1999)
Raggett v John Lewis Plc (Practice and Procedure : Costs) [2012] UKEAT 0082_12_1708 (17 August 2012)
Raggett v Society of Jesus Trust of 1929 for Roman Catholic Purposes & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1002 (27 August 2010)
Raggett, The Executors of the Estate of v Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust & Ors [2016] EWHC 1604 (QB) (01 July 2016)
Raggett v The Governors of Preston Catholic College [2012] EWHC 3641 (QB) (21 December 2012)
Raggett v The Society of Jesus Trust 1929 for Roman Catholic Purposes & Anor [2009] EWHC 909 (QB) (05 May 2009)
Raggett v The Society of Jesus Trust 1929 for Roman Catholic Purposes & Anor [2012] EWHC 3132 (QB) (09 November 2012)
Ragho Prasad (s/o Ram Autar Rao) v The Queen (Figi) [1980] UKPC 37 (17 November 1980)
Raghubans Narain Singh and others v Khub Lal Singh and another (Patna) [1931] UKPC 52 (12 May 1931)
Raghubar Dayal v The Bank of Upper India Limited Lucknow (in Liquidation) (Oudh) [1919] UKPC 9 (31 January 1919)
Raghunandan ram Sahu and others v Mahanth Ramsunder Das, since deceased, and others (Patna) [1931] UKPC 33 (16 March 1931)
Raghunath Das and others v Sundar Das Khetri since deceased and another (Fort William (Bengal)) [1914] UKPC 43 (14 May 1914)
Raghunath Prasad Sahu v Sarju Prasad Sahu and others (Patna) [1923] UKPC 93 (18 December 1923)
Raghunath Prasad Singh and another v The Deputy Commissioner Partabgarh and others (Lucknow) [1929] UKPC 75 (25 July 1929)
Raghunath Roy Marwari and others v Raja Durga Prasad Singh since deceased and others (Fort William (Bengal)) [1919] UKPC 16 (20 February 1919)
Raghunathan or Fairley v Fairley [2008] ScotCS CSOH_104 (18 July 2008)
Raghunathan Or Fairley v. Fairley [2008] ScotCS CSOH_104 (18 July 2008)
Raglan (Caterham) Limited v The Lessees (Southern : Section 20) [2016] UKFTT RP_CHI_43UK_LDC_2016_0007 (17 March 2016)
Raglan Housing Association Ltd. v Fairclough [2007] EWCA Civ 1087 (01 November 2007)
Raglan Housing Association Ltd v Southampton City Council & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 785 (30 July 2007)
Raglan Housing Association v Southhampton City Council & Anor [2006] EWCA Civ 1567 (24 October 2006)
RAGLIONE v. ITALY - 41830/98 [2000] ECHR 71 (8 February 2000)
Ragman, R (on the application of) v Special Adjudicator [2000] EWHC Admin 411 (1 November 2000)
RAGNAR THORISSON v. ICELAND - 52623/14 (Judgment : Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Right not to be tried or punished twice-{general} : Second Section Committee) [2019] ECHR 127 (12 February 2019)
Ragn-Sells (Judgment of the Court) [2013] EUECJ C-292/12 (12 December 2013)
Rago v. Ragoonath (Trinidad and Tobago) [2003] UKPC 29 (10 April 2003)
RAGONE v. ITALY - 67412/01 [2003] ECHR 473 (2 October 2003)
Raguel Bennet v Bennet. [1631] Mor 12218 (18 March 1631)
Raguel Bennet v William Davidson. [1628] 1 Brn 157 (2 June 1628)
Raguell Bennet v Bennet [or Tennent.] [1631] 1 Brn 325 (14 March 1631)
Ragul & Anor v The Government of Azerbaijan [2013] EWHC 2000 (Admin) (12 July 2013)
RAGUZ v. SERBIA - 8182/07 - Chamber Judgment [2015] ECHR 355 (07 April 2015)
Ragwel Bennet v Matthew Foulden. [1629] Mor 12360 (16 January 1629)
RAH v MH [2013] ScotCS CSIH_82 (18 October 2013)
Raha v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 303 (TC) (06 July 2010)
Rahal, R v [2017] EWCA Crim 1779 (02 November 2017)
Rahamin (t/a Metropole College) v. Walklett [1999] UKEAT 969_99_1211 (12 November 1999)
RAHBAR-PAGARD v. BULGARIA - 45466/99 ; 29903/02 [2006] ECHR 356 (6 April 2006)
Raheem, R (on the application of) v Nursing and Midwifery Council [2010] EWHC 2549 (Admin) (04 October 2010)
Rahim & Sons Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2007] UKVAT V20161 (22 May 2007)
Rahim v Arch Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd [2016] EWHC 2967 (Comm) (22 November 2016)
Rahim GAZIYEV v Azerbaijan - 2758/05 [2009] ECHR 1261 (7 July 2009)
Rahim (Grays Tuition Centre) v Ofsted [2018] UKFTT 387 (HESC) (13 July 2018)
Rahim, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1679 (14 July 2008)
Rahim, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 2794 (Admin) (13 September 2013)
Rahimbhoy Habibbhoy v Turner (Bombay) [1890] UKPC 49 (15 November 1890)
Rahimbhoy Hubibbhoy v Turner (Bombay) [1892] UKPC 48 (10 November 1892)
Rahimi v. Greece - 8687/08 (Press Release) [2011] ECHR 751 (5 April 2011)
Rahimi, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 2268 (15 September 2011)
Rahimi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWHC 2838 (Admin) (21 November 2005)
Rahimian & Anor v Allan Janes LLP [2016] EWHC B18 (Costs) (04 August 2016)
Rahimian, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2016] EWHC 1634 (Admin) (10 June 2016)
RAHIMOVA v. AZERBAIJAN - 21674/05 [2008] ECHR 52 (17 January 2008)
Rahim-ud-din and others v Rewal (since deceased) and others (Punjab) [1903] UKPC 20 (25 March 1903)
Rahman v Revenue & Customs (INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX : Penalty) [2017] UKFTT 832 (TC) (21 November 2017)
Rahman & Anor v R [2008] EWCA Crim 1465 (08 July 2008)
Rahman & Anor, R (on the application of) v Harringey NHS Teaching Primary Care Trust [2007] EWHC 584 (Admin) (02 February 2007)
Rahman & Anor v Revenue & Customs [2006] UKVAT V19550 (18 April 2006)
Rahman & Ors v HSBC Bank Plc & Ors [2012] EWHC 11 (Ch) (17 January 2012)
Rahman & Ors v R. [2007] EWCA Crim 342 (23 February 2007)
Rahman & Ors, R v [2008] UKHL 45 (2 July 2008)
Rahman & Ors v Revenue & Customs [2008] UKVAT V20678 (14 May 2008)
Rahman v Arearose Ltd & Anor [2000] EWCA Civ 190 (15 June 2000)
Rahman v Commissioner Of Police Of The Metropolis & Anor (Race Discrimination : Direct) [2012] UKEAT 0076_09_2504 (25 April 2012)
Rahman v Commissioners of Customs and Excise [2002] EWCA Civ 1881 (20 December 2002)
Rahman v County Court of Boulogne Sur Mer, France [2014] EWHC 4143 (Admin) (06 October 2014)
Rahman v GMAC Commercial Finance Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1467 (14 November 2012)
Rahman v. Kush Housing Association [2000] UKEAT 547_00_2607 (26 July 2000)
Rahman v Malik & Ors [2008] EWHC 959 (Ch) (27 February 2008)
Rahman v Mayers [1992] UKEAT 508_92_1811 (18 November 1992)
Rahman v Miah [2007] EWHC 3546 (Ch) (19 October 2007)
Rahman, R v [2002] EWCA Crim 2209 (2 October 2002)
Rahman, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWHC 944 (Admin) (31 March 2011)
Rahman, R (on the application of) v Entry Crearance Officer & Anor [2006] EWHC 1755 (Admin) (14 June 2006)
Rahman, R (on the application of) v Erlam & Ors [2015] EWHC 4186 (Admin) (26 January 2015)
Rahman, R (on the application of) v Local Government Election Court & Ors [2016] EWHC 1280 (Admin) (26 January 2016)
Rahman, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 1640 (Admin) (22 May 2014)
Rahman, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 1146 (Admin) (28 April 2015)
Rahman, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWHC 2952 (Admin) (05 November 2019)
Rahman, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (IJR) [2014] UKUT 374 (IAC) (30 July 2014)
Rahman, R (On the Application Of) v The Local Government Election Court [2017] EWHC 1413 (Admin) (21 June 2017)
Rahman, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 1572 (06 July 2018)
Rahman v Rahman & Ors [2019] EWHC 1826 (Ch) (11 July 2019)
Rahman v Rahman [2019] EWHC 1011 (QB) (17 April 2019)
Rahman, Re Judicial Review [2003] ScotCS 22 (30 January 2003)
Rahman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWCA Civ 1826 (19 December 2005)
Rahman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWCA Civ 11 (12 February 2014)
Rahman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2758 (13 February 2018)
Rahman v Sterling Credit Ltd [2000] EWCA Civ 222 (20 July 2000)
Rahman (t/a Adibs Indian Takeaway) v Revenue & Customs [2008] UKVAT V20529 (09 January 2008)
Rahman (t/a Khayam Restaurant) v Customs & Excise [1998] EWHC Admin 627 (11 June 1998)
Rahman (t/a The Viceroy Indian Restaurant) v Revenue & Customs [2009] UKFTT 244 (TC) (25 September 2009)
Rahman -v- Craigfort Taverns Ltd [2012] IEHC 478 (11 October 2012)
Rahmani and Others v. Diggines [1986] UKHL 12 (20 March 1986)
RAHMANOVA v. AZERBAIJAN - 34640/02 [2008] ECHR 606 (10 July 2008)
Rahmatullah & Anor v The Ministry Of Defence & Anor [2019] EWHC 3172 (QB) (21 November 2019)
Rahmatullah v Ministry of Defence & Anor [2017] EWHC 547 (QB) (22 March 2017)
Rahmatullah (No 2) v Ministry of Defence & Anor (Rev 1) [2017] UKSC 1 (17 January 2017)
Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1540 (14 December 2011)
Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 182 (23 February 2012)
Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs & Anor [2011] EWHC 2008 (Admin) (29 July 2011)
Rahmatullah v The Ministry of Defence [2014] EWHC 3846 (QB) (19 November 2014)
Rahmdezfouli, R (on the application of) v Crown Court Sitting At Wood Green & Anor [2013] EWHC 2998 (Admin) (09 October 2013)
Rahme v Smith & Williamson Trust Corporation Ltd [2009] EWHC 911 (Ch) (30 April 2009)
Rahmeh & Anor v. Royal College Of Obstetricians And Gynaecologists & Ors [2005] UKEAT 0625_04_2605 (26 May 2005)
Rahmi SAHIN and Others v Turkey - 39041/10 [2011] ECHR 1438 (6 September 2011)
RAHMI SAHIN v. TURKEY - 39041/10 (Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) : Court (Second Section)) [2016] ECHR 617 (05 July 2016)
Rahming v R (Bahamas) [2002] UKPC 23 (4 December 2001)
Rahmouni v Solomon Bader & Wheelmore Ltd [1994] UKEAT 846_93_0806 (8 June 1994)
Rahnema v Rahnema & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 695 (17th May, 2002)
Rai v Entry Clearance Officer, New Delhi [2017] EWCA Civ 320 (28 April 2017)
Rai & Ors v Ahir & Ors [2014] EWHC 2299 (Ch) (15 July 2014)
Rai & Ors v The Charity Commission for England and Wales [2012] EWHC 1111 (Ch) (01 May 2012)
Rai v University Hospitals Coventry And Warwickshire NHS Trust [2019] EWHC 2488 (QB) (12 September 2019)
RAI and EVANS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - 26258/07 [2009] ECHR 1269 (17 November 2009)
Rai Babu Mahabir Pershad v Rai Moheshwar Nath Sahai and another (Fort William (Bengal)) [1889] UKPC 62 (20 November 1889)
Rai Bahadur Chhotey Lal v The Collector of Moradabad (Allahabad) [1922] UKPC 65 (11 July 1922)
Rai Bahadur Lala Narsingh Das v The Secretary of State for India in Council (Lahore) [1924] UKPC 105 (5 December 1924)
Rai Bahadur Madhoram Sand and others v Raja Bahadur Kirtya Nand Sinha (since deceased) and others (Patna) [1944] UKPC 21 (29 June 1944)
Rai Bahadur Sahu Har Prasad and others v Shaikh Fazal Ahmad and others (Allahabad) [1933] UKPC 5 (13 January 1933)
Rai Bahadur Seth Biradh Mal, since deceased (now represented by Seth Omrao Mal) and others v Seth prabhabhati Kunwar and others (Ajmer-Merwara) [1939] UKPC 25 (27 March 1939)
Rai Bahadur Seth Nemichand since deceased (now represented by Seth Teekam Chand) v Seth Radha Kishen since deceased and others (Ajmer-Merwara) [1921] UKPC 34 (9 March 1921)
Rai Baijnath Goenka Bahadur since deceased (now represented by Kedar Nath Goenka v Nanda kumar Singh and others (Patna) [1923] UKPC 5 (12 February 1923)
Rai Baijnath Goenka since deceased (now represented by Kedarnath Goenka) v Maharaja Sir Ravaneshwar Prasad Singh (Patna) [1922] UKPC 11 (9 February 1922)
Rai bajrang Bahadur Singh and another v Rai Beni Madho Bakhsh Singh and others (Lucknow) [1938] UKPC 37 (27 May 1938)
Rai Balkrishna son of Rai Narain deceased v Masuma Bibi and others (Bengal) [1882] UKPC 37 (6 July 1882)


It was a most magical photo shoot! The day started at 4:24 am for me, as I walked right into the make-up artist, no coffee yet so I am still not navigating at my best! I was on my way to look at the white board. The white board is "command central" on saying where you should be, who needs to be there, at what time, what each model is wearing. The first entry said " 5:00 - 7:00 am, Hair, Make-up, Wardrobe, Bagels."
And with that to get us going, off we went! Sorry that I cannot reveal the details of the designs, or even where we took the photos, right now. I am waiting for our Treehouse Preview Show, on May 21st to release all of our new designs. After that date, I can finally put the new photos up!
It was so rewarding as the designer, to see my dreams come to life. It started with a fabric show in North Carolina last December, as I am always inspired by beautiful fabric and trims! Then a trip to Williamsburg to look at the museum there again, more books on clothes construction of the 1700s, (thanks to Amazon, you an order the world from your sofa!) then the months of January and February I hid out in our design studio, aka, the Treehouse, and dreamed away. I came out from the Treehouse with many new designs!
Next there were a flurry of phone calls from our over-worked shop girl, wanting to know from an assortment of companies, when can you ship it? Do you have that exact color? How much? That much!! As the fabric arrived, the most talented seamstresses transformed it into clothing - from the cutting table, to running many types of sewing machines, and all the finishing work done by hand. Each stitch, every detail, were relentlessly perfected by a team that knows that each detail, well done, creates a quality piece of clothing that is meant to last.
Then finally the day arrived and the photographer had two models, impeccable made-up, hair curling, just where it should curl, wearing my designs! Wow, from sketch book to there it was standing in front of me! It was so much more beautiful than I could ever imagine. The models made the clothing come to life. Some of the pictures will take your breath away. I promise! Thank you also to the Inn at "Little Washington" for letting us film our court clothing in their absolutely beautiful formal garden.
Thank you does not seem to express how much gratitude I feel to all of those involved in making this dream come true. So, to quote Thornton Wilder, "We can only be said to be alive in those moments when our hearts are conscious of our treasures." Thank you all for making me more alive!