text:
Web Print Version: For official purposes please print the PDF version.
Find a policy
PAMS
Draft documents
Recently approved documents
5 year review strategy
Under current review
Policy Toolkit
HDR Candidature Management
HDR Candidature Management Policy
HDR Candidature Management Procedure
HDR Examination Procedure
Printable PDF Version
Document Currently Under Review
Current Status: Feedback Being Incorporated - with Sponsor 8 May 2019
Policy Code: RS1938
Legislative Context
Eligibility to Submit for Examination
Nomination of Examiners and Conflict of Interest
Conflict of Interest in Examination
Format of Thesis
Presentation of a Thesis Incorporating Published Papers
Editing of a Thesis
Submission of the Thesis
Examination of the Thesis
Examination Guidelines
Consideration of Examiners' Reports
Examination Duration
Confidentiality in the Examination Process
Examination of a Performance or Exhibition of Creative Works
Distribution of Copies of the Thesis After Final Ratification
This Procedure is to describe the steps involved in the examination of higher degree by research theses.
This Procedure applies to:
the examination of theses of masters Degree (Research), Doctoral Degree (Research) and Doctoral degree (Professional) theses;
supervisors of higher degree by research candidates;
higher degree by research candidates;
Associate Deans, Research, Higher Degree by Research Coordinators, and Deans of Schools.
Policy Base
Regulation 5.1 - Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Masters Degree by Research and Professional Doctorates.
Associate Supervisor A person who provides support to the student and to the Principal Supervisor.
Candidate A student enrolled in a Higher Degree by Research program.
Co Supervisor A person who provides support to the candidate and to the Principal Supervisor but is external to the University and is not an employee of the University.
Confirmed Candidate A candidate enrolled in a Higher Degree by Research program who has completed and passed a Confirmation of Candidature.
HDR Higher Degree by Research
Principal Supervisor A person who has prime responsibility for guiding the progress of a designated research higher degree candidate.
Provisional Principal Supervisor A person who, under the direction of an appropriate School-appointed mentor, has responsibility for guiding the progress of a designated higher degree by research candidate.
RHDSC - Research Higher Degrees Sub- Committee The RHDSC, a Sub-committee of Research Committee, handles all operational matters requiring Committee approval that relate to HDR students.
Supervisory Panel A panel consisting of at least two members (including the Principal Supervisor and at least one associate supervisor) which oversees the planning and execution of the project and preparation and submission of the thesis.
To be eligible to submit a thesis/exegesis/portfolio for examination a candidate must:
Be admitted to candidature;
Be currently enrolled;
Have been enrolled for the minimum period required;
Have had their candidature confirmed;
Have approval from the Dean or nominee to submit the thesis.
Candidates submitting a thesis/exegesis/portfolio must:
Make all required declarations;
Prepare the thesis/exegesis/portfolio in accordance with this Procedure;
Not submit for examination work that is:
Substantially similar to work previously examined and rejected in Australia or overseas, unless approved by Academic Board;
Substantially similar to a thesis upon which the candidate has qualified in whole or in part for any other qualification obtained at another tertiary institution in Australia or overseas;
substantially similar to a thesis that is under examination for any other qualification of another tertiary institution, except where the thesis is being submitted jointly to Federation University Australia and another institution for a jointly awarded qualification.
The University is under no obligation to accept a thesis for examination from a candidate who has abandoned their program, is absent without approved leave, or has failed to re-enrol.
After considering recommendations from the supervisor(s), the Academic Board shall appoint at least two examiners who will be external to the University.
Examiners shall:
Hold a PhD or possess equivalent relevant professional experience for the examination of a Doctoral Degree (Research) or Doctoral Degree (Professional), and at least a masters degree or possess equivalent relevant professional experience for examination of a Masters Degree (research),
Be independent of the conduct of the candidate's research,
Have current international standing in the discipline or field of research in which the candidate's research program has been conducted,
Have empathy with the theoretical framework used by the candidate,
Be without bias and real or perceived conflict of interest, and sign a conflict of interest declaration.
Examiners must be external to and independent of the University, and may be from outside of Australia. Where possible, at least one examiner should have experience in the examination and/or supervision of higher degree by research theses at the appropriate level. Where possible, at least one examiner should, within the last 5 years, have been actively associated with a university, institution of higher learning, or a research institution. A person will be ineligible to serve as an examiner if they:
Have a pending appointment with, are currently employed by, or have been employed by The University in any capacity within the last 5 years;
Have a pending appointment with, currently hold, or have within the past 5 years, held an honorary position with the University;
Have had direct involvement with the thesis, though reading drafts or discussing the research;
Have been a collaborator or co-author with the candidate under examination within the last 5 years;
Have been a collaborator or co-author of the candidate's supervisor within the last 5 years;
Have a real or perceived conflict of interest with the candidate, the supervisors, or the institution (see below).
Candidates must be given an explicit opportunity to provide feedback on examiners or categories of examiners who are inappropriate to examine the thesis, but must not know the names of potential examiners nominated. Where an examiner fails to return an assessment within 12 weeks, the Academic Board may appoint a replacement examiner. The name of any examiner shall not be disclosed to a Candidate prior to or during examination, and will be disclosed to the Candidate on completion of examination only with the agreement of the examiner.
Conflicts of interest in the examination process generally arise from working, personal, legal, business, professional and/or social relationships between the candidate and the examiner, or the supervisor and the examiner. In considering conflict of interest, distinction must be made between major potential conflicts of interest that would normally preclude the appointment of a potential examiner, and minor potential conflicts of interest that should be declared but which would not normally preclude the appointment of an examiner. Australian Council of Graduate Research guidelines detail specific circumstances that may constitute major and minor conflicts of interest
The process for nomination of examiners is as follows:
Who is responsible?
1. Names of three potential examiners submitted to Research Services on appropriate form, with an indication of the preferred 2 examiners. Supervisor Nominations are provided BEFORE contacting the preferred potential examiners. Potential conflicts of interest to be identified. Supervisors should ensure that the candidate has an opportunity to exclude potential examiners prior to nomination.
2. Three potential nominees approved by RS. Research Services Approval based upon research background and experience in supervision/examination.
3. Availability of nominees determined. Supervisor If nominees are known to the supervisor then informal contact can be made and availability determined. If nominees are not known to the supervisor then formal invitation to act as an examiner to be sent by Research Services
4. The 2 preferred potential nominees are contacted and invited to be examiners. RS If nominees accept then they are involved in the examination process. If one of the preferred nominees declines the invitation, the third nominee is invited to be an examiner
5. Thesis sent to examiners with letter outlining terms and conditions of examination and specific advice relating the examination. RS Specific advice in relation to examination of a thesis incorporating published papers is provided to examiners. This advice is tailored for each thesis taking into account whether chapters are published, accepted for publication, submitted or drafted for submission.
On completing the program of advanced study and research, a Candidate shall submit a thesis based on work carried out during candidature. A thesis may adopt one of the following formats:
Conventional thesis,
Thesis incorporating published papers,
Practical works and an exegesis.
The thesis must be presented in accord with the requirements outlined below.
A conventional thesis may incorporate or include as an appendix any publication resulting from the work completed during candidature whether or not the candidate is the sole author or one of the joint authors.
A thesis incorporating published papers is one where papers based upon the candidate's research form a substantial part of the thesis content rather than, as above, where one or more papers are included as appendices. In this case, most of the thesis chapters will be in the form of papers published, accepted for publication, submitted for publication or drafted for submission. Such a thesis will have equivalent intellectual content and rigour, and make the same contribution to knowledge, as a conventional thesis. The material presented for a Doctor of Philosophy (Research) incorporating published papers must be presented in a logical sequence to form a coherent whole.
A Candidate may not present in the thesis any work for which another award has been conferred by the University or any other academic institution, but a Candidate shall not be precluded from incorporating extracts from such work in the thesis provided that the sum of any such extracts does not constitute the major proportion of the thesis and provided also that the source of each such extract is stated explicitly.
The thesis shall adhere to the principles of research integrity concerning plagiarism and research ethics as stipulated in the code of research conduct and professional practice specified by the University.
The thesis shall identify the extent to which the work of others is being relied upon by providing appropriate acknowledgment, citation, and reference in the text and in the bibliography or list of references.
The statement of authorship and originality signed and dated by the Candidate when the thesis is submitted for examination will include a declaration that no other person's work has been relied upon or used without due acknowledgment in the main text and bibliography of the thesis. This statement will also acknowledge editorial assistance and copyright provisions and approvals, and include acknowledgement that a plagiarism report has been submitted to the University.
In cases where ethics approval was required for any component of the research, a statement must be submitted with the thesis from the Chair of the relevant ethics committee, declaring that all necessary ethics-related processes have been completed.
The thesis presented by a Candidate for examination shall conform with the requirements of this section unless otherwise agreed by the Academic Board:
A Doctoral Degree (Research) thesis will normally be:
a text of not more than 100,000 words reporting original scholarship and research carried out by the Candidate under supervision, or
a major work or collection of works, including but not restricted to visual presentation, literary production or computer software development, carried out by the Candidate under supervision and accompanied by an exegesis or scholarly commentary of between 20,000 and 40,000 words.
A Doctoral degree (Professional) thesis will normally be:
a text of not more than 45,000 words reporting original scholarship and research carried out by the Candidate under supervision, or
A Masters Degree (Research) thesis will normally be:
If a thesis or exegesis exceeds the respective upper word limit it may not be acceptable for submission and the Candidate may be asked to reduce the word count. If an over-length thesis is formally approved for submission and examination, examiners must be informed of the length of the thesis when being invited to act as examiners.
Candidates for higher degrees by research shall present for examination the required number of copies of the thesis . If the thesis includes a major work or collection of works, the major work or collection of works shall be presented in a format suitable for examination. A thesis may be rejected as unfit for examination if it does not conform to the requirements set out in this section.
Written work submitted for examination shall be in the English language, unless an exemption is granted by the Academic Board prior to submission.
If the thesis is based on research conducted in collaboration, the nature and extent of the Candidate's contribution to the research shall be clearly indicated.
A Candidate shall identify all sources of background knowledge and the extent to which the work of others is being relied upon by providing appropriate acknowledgment, citation and reference in the text of the thesis and in the bibliography.
The text shall be written as concisely as possible.
The Candidate is responsible for checking the thesis prior to submission to ensure there are no typographical errors and that the spelling, punctuation and grammar are correct.
The thesis text shall be prepared and submitted using the thesis template as approved by Academic Board. and shall incorporate, in the following order:
A title page setting out in the following order:
the full title of the thesis;
the name of the Candidate;
the degree for which the thesis is submitted and a statement of whether the thesis is submitted in total or partial fulfilment of the requirements for that degree;
the name of the School;
the name of the University; and
the month and the year in which the thesis was submitted for examination.
An index of contents;
A summary of not more than 300 words;
A "Statement of authorship and originality" in the following words, and which must be signed and dated by the Candidate:
"Statement of authorship and originality":
Except where explicit reference is made in the text of the thesis, this thesis contains no material published elsewhere or extracted in whole or in part from a thesis by which I have qualified for or been awarded another degree or diploma. No other person's work has been relied upon or used without due acknowledgement in the main text and the list of references of the thesis. No editorial assistance has been received in the production of the thesis without due acknowledgement. Except where duly referred to, the thesis does not include material with copyright provisions or requiring copyright approvals.
Once the thesis has been passed the candidate must provide one electronic copy of the thesis to Research Services for inclusion in the University Library. The printed copy must be printed on archival quality paper of international standard size (A4) and be bound in a permanent hard cover binding with the following text on the spine:
The full name of the author as it appears on the student record,
The title of the thesis,
The name of the degree,
The year of submission.
A thesis incorporating publications is a thesis where papers based upon the candidate's research (submitted for a Masters Degree (Research) or Doctoral Degree) form a substantial part of the thesis content, rather than where one or more papers are included as appendices to the thesis. All publications incorporated into the thesis must be based on the candidate's own research. In jointly authored papers, the candidate should normally be the senior/first author and the contribution of the candidate must be clearly indicated. Depending upon paper length and substance, the normal requirements will be 4 - 6 papers for a PhD, and 2 - 3 papers for a Masters degree. Up to 66% of the papers selected for inclusion in the thesis may be drawn from papers published prior to candidature. Where a candidate has had an ongoing relationship with the University and work has been published during the period of that relationship, then 100% of papers selected for inclusion in the thesis may be drawn from papers published prior to candidature.
Papers selected for a Doctoral Degree should be peer-reviewed journal articles, book chapters, or ranked conference papers. Papers selected for a Masters Degree should include at least one peer-reviewed journal article. Candidates submitting papers for publication during their candidature are encouraged to select journals which are rigorously peer-reviewed and are highly suitable to their research area. The relative standard of journals should be considered and high quality journals are recommended.
Peer-reviewed papers included in the thesis will normally have been either published or accepted for publication (evidence of publication or acceptance should be included as an appendix to the thesis). However, some chapters of the thesis might be presented in the form of papers prepared for publication but not yet submitted. The status of these publications must be clearly indicated.
The standard and content of a thesis incorporating publications should be equivalent to that required for a Masters by Research or PhD. Where several published papers are included, they should be sequential in their presentation of research findings and conform with the requirements for the thesis as outlined below.
Thesis structure
Any thesis presented incorporating publications must still have a structure resembling a typical thesis in the relevant discipline and must read as a coherent whole. The thesis should have:
an introduction which acts as a framework, describing the scope of the published work, clearly articulating the major question(s) or argument that the body of published work addresses, placing the published research into context using the key relevant literature, and highlighting the significance of the major question;
a separate methods chapter outlining overall approach and broad methodologies if deemed appropriate;
a series of data "chapters" each consisting of a published paper or manuscript accepted, submitted, or drafted for publication;
a brief (less than one page) bridge between each of the papers which explains how each paper relates to, extends, or builds upon the previous one;
a concluding discussion which summarises the major findings of the body of published work, clearly articulates the degree to which the body of published work answers the major question(s) or supports the major argument, draws overall conclusions, links the research with the established body of knowledge, and clearly describes how the published body of work makes an original contribution to knowledge in the field.
Normally, the thesis introduction, methods chapter (if incorporated), and concluding discussion will total 20-25,000 words for a Doctoral Degree and 10-15,000 words for a Masters Degree.
The contained publications should be "stand-alone" chapters. Additional chapters which have not yet been published might be presented in the format of papers for publication; however, it must be made clear to the examiner the status of these papers (draft; submitted to a specific journal but no response as yet; submitted and under review; submitted and under revision). Unless one of the published papers is a literature review, there should be a chapter that reviews the literature to provide context for the published papers.
It is accepted that there might be some repetition within the introduction of papers included in the thesis and that additional chapters or appendices might be needed offering further information or presenting work (for example, unsuccessful experimentation or lines of enquiry) that has yet to be, or might never be, published. These situations will be adequately explained in the instructions to examiners. A thesis presented incorporating publications must demonstrate equivalent intellectual content to that of the more typical thesis format.
Instructions to examiners
The thesis will be examined according to the University's normal examination process. Clear instructions outlining the University's expectations for examining a thesis incorporating published papers will be provided to examiners. These instructions will vary depending upon how much of the thesis has been published or accepted for publication, and how much has been submitted or prepared for submission for publication. Where the thesis contains a series of chapters that have been published or accepted for publication, examiners will be advised to consider the whole thesis, but to focus particular attention on the introduction and concluding discussion chapters. Where the thesis contains chapters that have not yet been accepted for publication, examiners will be advised to consider the whole thesis, but to focus particular attention on the content of the unpublished chapters, introduction and discussion. Where the thesis consists entirely of unpublished papers as chapters, examiners will be advised to examine the entire thesis as would be the case for a conventional thesis, taking into account the idiosyncrasies of the format of a thesis incorporating publications (for example, repetition of material in chapter introductions and methods sections).
Role of supervisor
In addition to the normal expectations of a supervisor, the role of the supervisor for this style of thesis includes:
For papers submitted for publication during candidature, ensuring that papers are of the highest quality possible and submitted to high quality journals;
For papers submitted for publication during candidature, ensuring that papers are submitted for publication in a timely manner;
For papers submitted for publication during candidature, ensuring that papers support the overall argument advanced in the thesis;
For papers published prior to candidature, ensuring that papers selected for inclusion in the thesis are of the highest quality possible and best contribute to the overall argument advanced in the thesis;
Ensuring that the overall scope of work to be included in the thesis is adequate in terms of number and size of papers, and addresses the overall argument advanced in the thesis;
Ensuring that the published work selected for inclusion in the thesis presents a coherent and well-reasoned argument;
Ensuring that the thesis meets the requirements as outlined above.
Copyright issues for a thesis incorporating published papers
Candidates submitting a thesis incorporating published papers need to be aware of the publication policies of commercial academic publishers to whom they intend to submit articles for publication, and how these policies may affect the completion and submission of their thesis.
Most academic publishers require authors to transfer copyright to the publisher which will restrict the ability of the author or Federation University to make a copy of the article available online, including as part of a PhD by publication thesis. In some cases publishers will allow the author to place a pre-print version (that is a final version of the paper in Word format - before it has been typeset for inclusion in the journal) onto an online repository. Therefore, it is very important that candidates retain full, complete copies of the final versions of all articles, as in some cases these can be included in the online version of their thesis.
If a publisher does not allow any version of the article to be made available online, it may only be possible for the University to include URL links to the articles that form part of the thesis. Access to these articles may then only be available via a subscription to the journal, so the full thesis will not be openly available to all users.
With this in mind, candidates submitting a thesis incorporating published papers should scrutinise publishers' policies and be sure that they will allow for appropriate access to material that will be included in their thesis before entering into an agreement with an academic publisher. They should also consider asking publishers for permission to include their article in an online version of the thesis and retain copies of all agreements. Candidates can seek assistance in this task by contacting the University Library. Library staff are able to advise on obtaining the necessary copyright approvals.
It is expected that the academic supervisors of higher degree by research candidates will provide their students with editorial advice relating to matters of substance and structure; language (including matters of clarity, voice and tone, grammar, spelling and punctuation, specialised and foreign material); and use of illustrations and tables. They may also assist with copyediting and proofreading.
Candidates may use a professional editor in preparing their thesis for submission, but they should notify their principal supervisor of their intention to do so. Professional editorial assistance should be restricted to copyediting and proofreading. In relation to matters of substance and structure, the professional editor may draw attention to problems, but should not provide solutions.
A Candidate shall notify the University of their intention to submit the thesis for examination using the appropriate form. This form must be submitted to Research Services 30 working days prior to the submission of the thesis/portfolio, and must include the title of the thesis and an electronic and hard copy of the abstract (300 word limit) on the template in the form. This form must be signed by the candidate, the principal supervisor and the Dean or nominee
Doctoral Degree (Professional) candidates must also provide a certified copy of the results for the Advanced Study Units and Research Projects completed in the course of their enrolment. The portfolio will not be sent out for examination without confirmation of these results.
Examiners are required to assess the thesis in terms of whether the Candidate has made a significant and original contribution to knowledge, has demonstrated an understanding of the relationship of the investigations undertaken to a wider field of knowledge, and has demonstrated substantial knowledge of research principles and methods applicable to the field of learning. In addition to providing the Academic Board with written comments bearing on these criteria, the examiners, acting independently, will recommend to the Academic Board that:
the thesis should be classified as PASSED without further examination; or
the thesis should be classified as PASSED, subject to the corrections outlined in reports from examiners being made to the satisfaction of the Academic Board; or
the Candidate should be required to pass a written and/or oral examination in subject matter directly related to the thesis before the thesis is classified as PASSED; or
the thesis should be classified as DEFERRED and the Candidate should be permitted to submit the thesis for examination in a revised form; or
the thesis should be classified as FAILED.
An overall grade will be awarded by the Academic Board on consideration of the individual recommendations of the examiners by Research Services (see "Consideration of Examiners' Reports" below). If the recommendations received from examiners markedly differ, the Academic Board may take such action as it thinks fit, such as the appointment of an additional examiner to supply an examination report.
The Academic Board may require that the Candidate be examined orally on the substance of the thesis. Such oral examination shall be conducted under arrangements made by the Academic Board in consultation with the examiners, the principal supervisor, and the Dean of School. The Candidate shall be advised in advance of the persons to be present at the examination and of the general arrangements for the conduct of the examination.
In the case of a Candidate who accepts an invitation to submit a revised thesis for re-examination, the Candidate shall be provided with guidelines for revision of the thesis based on the reports of the examiners. Only in exceptional cases will more than a single attempt at revision of the thesis be permitted. Where a thesis is to be corrected or revised and submitted for re-examination, the candidate must complete the requirement within a time limit specified by the Academic Board. Where a thesis is to be revised and submitted for re-examination, the examiners will normally be those who evaluated the thesis on initial submission (see "Nomination of examiners" above).
Masters Degree (Research)
Doctoral Degree (Research)
Doctoral Degree (Professional)
Regulation 5.1 PART C – Masters Degree (Research) states that the degree will be awarded on the basis of a candidate:
Having demonstrated command of the knowledge and skills pertinent to the area of investigation; and,
Having demonstrated a critical appreciation and understanding of the relationship of their own work to that of others.
These outcomes should be assessed in the context of what might reasonably be expected within the timeframe of eighteen months to two years of full-time study (or part-time equivalent). The following questions have been developed to assist examiners in determining if a candidate has met the above criteria and also to provide points of reference for their written report. The questions are grouped under sections common to many theses, but should be interpreted and used flexibly to cater for any differences between areas of study and to allow for appropriately novel approaches.
Has the candidate demonstrated the ability to clearly conceptualise and articulate the research objectives and associated hypotheses?
Has the candidate demonstrated a detailed, critical and comprehensive knowledge and understanding of the literature pertinent to the area of investigation?
Is the literature analysed within an overall conceptual framework and is it made clear where and how the stated research objectives reside within the wider field(s) of study?
Are the methodologies used appropriate to the research topic and is their use properly justified?
Is there sufficient evidence of the candidate's mastery of the techniques that the methodologies require and utilize?
Are the results connected in a direct and obvious way to the stated research objectives/questions?
Are the results presented clearly and logically and with appropriate illustration?
Are the results critically analysed in the context of any limitation that might characterise the methodologies used?
Are surprising results adequately explained?
Are justifiable conclusions drawn?
Does the candidate make clear what new findings have been made?
Are new findings placed in the context of previous research with an indication of the extent to which that research is supported or contradicted?
Does the candidate adequately demonstrate a critical appreciation and understanding of the relationship of their work to that of others?
Is the thesis coherent and well structured?
Does the thesis exhibit appropriate standards of grammar, spelling, punctuation, clarity and presentation?
Are citations and references adequate and accurate?
Practical work(s) accompanied by an exegesis
In some instances an approved Masters program will comprise practical works and an exegesis.
The practical work(s) might comprise a major work or collection of works such as, but not limited to, a visual presentation, a literary production or computer software development.
Practical work(s)
Is there a systematic line of enquiry?
Is there a demonstrable and essential link with the exegesis?
Does the candidate demonstrate appropriate technical capabilities?
Is the work sufficiently complex?
Has the work(s) been presented in a form suitable for examination?
In addition to the above, has the candidate:
Developed a demonstrable and essential link with the practical work(s)?
Elaborated on the line of enquiry and investigation pursued in preparation of the practical work(s)?
Offered a commentary on individual practical works and their overall relationship?
Regulation 5.1 PART C - The Doctoral Degree (Research) states that the degree will be awarded on the basis of a candidate:
Having made a substantial contribution to knowledge; and
Having demonstrated an understanding of the relationship of the investigations undertaken to a wider field of knowledge.
These outcomes should be assessed in the context of what might reasonably be expected within the timeframe of three to three and a half years of fulltime study (or part-time equivalent).The following questions relate to sections that most commonly occur in theses. While not intended to be constraining, these questions, can assist in determining if a candidate has met the above criteria and also provide a framework for a written report on the thesis.
Has the candidate established a research question of significance?
Has the candidate demonstrated a detailed, critical and comprehensive knowledge/understanding of the literature and the theoretical constructs pertinent to the stated research objectives?
Has the candidate clearly enunciated the nature and extent of their supposed original and significant contributions to the body of knowledge?
Is the methodology used appropriate to the research topic and is their use properly justified?
Is there sufficient evidence of the candidate's mastery of the techniques that the methodologies require and utilise?
Does the candidate adequately discuss the extent to which their findings constitute a significant contribution to knowledge?
What new opportunities for further research do the findings reveal?
Does the thesis contain material of publishable quality?
In some instances an approved Doctor of Philosophy program will comprise practical works and an exegesis.
In addition to the questions relating to a thesis:
Is there a demonstrable and essential link with the practical work(s)?
Is there an elaboration of the line of enquiry and investigation pursued in preparation of the practical work(s)?
Is there a commentary on individual practical works and their overall relationship?
Regulation 5.1 PART D Doctoral Degree (Professional) states that the degree will be awarded on the basis of a candidate:
Having made a significant contribution to knowledge; and
These outcomes should be assessed in the context of what might reasonably be expected within the time frame of three to three and a half years of full time study (or part time equivalent). A professional doctorate program involves the preparation and presentation of a portfolio which will include advanced study reports for units of coursework undertaken by the candidate (including a statement of results) and a research component which may take the form of a single research report or a bound series of research reports accompanied by an exegesis. The following questions, while not intended to be constraining, can be asked in relation to sections of a single research report to assist in determining if a candidate has met the above criteria and to provide a framework for a written report on the research component of the portfolio.
Has the candidate established a field based research question of significance (i.e. a question set in an appropriate professional or clinical setting in the field or workplace)?
Is the research report coherent and well structured?
Does the research report exhibit appropriate standards of grammar, spelling, punctuation, clarity and presentation?
Does the research report contain material of publishable quality?
Series of research reports accompanied by an exegesis
In some instances an approved Doctoral Degree (Professional) program will comprise a series of research reports and an exegesis. The research reports and exegesis will satisfy the assessment criteria for a single report, outlined above, and in addition be subject to the following questions.
Series of research reports
Is there a systematic line of enquiry and investigation?
Is there a demonstrable and essential link with the series of research reports?
Is there an elaboration of the line of enquiry and investigation pursued in preparation of the series of research reports?Is there a commentary on individual research reports and their overall relationship?
Weighing up examiners' opinions
The examiners make recommendations to the University as to whether a higher degree by research should be awarded to a given candidate; the University is the final arbiter of this process. The final decision for the outcome of the examination of a higher degree by research will be based upon the weight of examiner opinion, a balanced and objective assessment of all the information available, consideration of the role and advice of the School Examination Committee, and natural justice. The latter is an issue that needs to be borne in mind where the potential for appeal exists. This is particularly important when considering discrepant examiners recommendations.
In making a final recommendation for the examination process, all examiners' reports will be carefully reviewed and evaluated; the recommendation will reflect an assessment of all the information available on the quality of the thesis and not simply reliance on the recommendation of a single examiner. An overall judgement will be made as to whether the reports are, on balance, essentially favourable. The opinion of a dissenting examiner will not be over-weighted in deciding the outcome of the examination process.
If the University is unable to resolve discrepant recommendations then an additional examiner will be appointed. An additional examiner will receive the thesis but not the reports of previous examiners. The report and recommendation of the additional examiner will be weighed up against the original examiners' recommendations as described above to determine a final outcome.
Responding to examiners' comments
The examiner must state clearly in the examination report what the candidate needs to do to address issues and to provide specific guidance to the candidate as to how he/she can address the issues raised. Vague statements that can be interpreted as opinion, such as "it would have been good if ...", "the candidate could have ...", "discussion of ... would have been useful", without specific direction, such as "the candidate must ...", "the candidate should ....", cannot be given weight. The candidate will not be expected to respond to vague comments or statements of opinion. Where the examiner makes statements that suggest an intent to redefine the project or to usurp the role of supervisor, such as "if I were supervising this student I would have ....", such statements should also be discounted.
In the case of a thesis that has been revised and submitted for re-examination in response to a "Deferred" outcome , an examiner who has previously examined the thesis may not use criteria to re-examine the thesis that were not made explicit to the candidate in the original report. It is unreasonable to expect the candidate to anticipate the expectations of an examiner if they were not made clear in the original examination report. Thesis revisions on the basis of examiner comments should address the specifics of the examiner's comments; if those comments are not specific then the candidate cannot be expected to address them and a thesis should not be sent for re-examination to an examiner who has not provided specific guidance to the candidate as to how to address issues.
Revised theses submitted for re-examination
Revised theses submitted for re-examination will be examined by the same examiners whose advice has formed the basis of the recommendations to the candidate for the revision of the thesis. Examiners of a re-submitted thesis will be provided with:
The University's advice to the candidate for the revision of the thesis, including original examiner's reports and an integrated list of agreed revisions;
A comprehensive statement from the candidate outlining the substantive changes that have been made to the thesis, and a concise defence against any recommendations for changes that have not been accepted;
The University's procedure for dealing with revised and re-submitted theses.
It is not normally appropriate for examiners of a resubmitted thesis to raise new issues of substantive concern, unless the revision has been major and has altered the substantive conclusions of the thesis. Where the original examiners are no longer available alternative examiners will be used. In this case, new issues not previously raised and communicated to the candidate will not be taken into account when considering the recommendations of examiners of a resubmitted thesis. Irrespective of the specifications of the original examiners, the revised and resubmitted thesis must satisfy the University's criteria for the award of the degree.
Examiners must indicate their willingness to return the marked thesis in a timely manner. Time limits for examination are 4 to 6 weeks for a Masters Degree (Research), and 6 to 8 weeks for a Doctoral Degree. Examiners will be contacted fortnightly to obtain overdue reports. When a realistic re-negotiated return date is not, or cannot, be met a replacement examiner will be appointed. Normally, a re-negotiated return date will not exceed 12 weeks. Where a replacement examiner has been appointed, any report subsequently received from the replaced examiner will not be considered in determining the result of the examination. The candidate will be informed of any significant delays in the examination process.
Examiners will be advised that the thesis is to be examined as a confidential document and unpublished content or findings cannot be divulged. There must be no contact between candidates and examiners or between supervisors and examiners during the period in which the examiners are preparing their reports. Examiners must not consult with each other unless approved by the University.
If the performance or exhibition is held prior to submission of the thesis, the candidate must present an abstract of the thesis prior to the performance or exhibition. Confidentiality of the examination will be maintained. This may require scheduling private sessions or performances for examiners, and may require that examiners attend the performance or exhibition at different times. If the performance or exhibition involves audience participation or interaction with the candidate, the candidate must not be in a position to inappropriately influence the examiners' assessment of the creative work. The exegesis and creative work must be examined as an integrated whole. A durable record of the performance or exhibition (in print or electronic format) must be submitted with the thesis or within 6 weeks of submission of the thesis.
The procedure for examination of a HDR thesis is described as a series of steps in the sections below. These steps are grouped under the following headings:
Procedure for submission of a thesis for examination
Nomination and appointment of examiners
Examination process post-submission
Examiners' recommendations for a thesis and process post-receipt of examiners' reports
Evaluation of examiner's recommendations and the outcome of examination
The School Examinations Committee and corrections to the thesis
Final ratification and award of the degree.
Intention To Submit Form
Candidate, Principal Supervisor (PS), Dean or nominee
Submitted to RS 30 working days prior to the submission of the candidate's thesis/portfolio. Includes the title of the thesis and an electronic and hard copy of the abstract (300 words) on the template in the form.
Professional Doctorate candidates provide a certified copy of results for the Advanced Study Units and Research Projects completed in the course of their enrolment. The portfolio will not be sent out for examination without confirmation of these results.
Nomination of Examiners.
PS, Dean or nominee See detailed process for nomination of examiners above. The PS is responsible for the nomination of examiners on the approved form. Requirements are: 3 external nominations for a Masters examination; 3 external nominations for a PhD examination. The conditions under which a nominated person can act as an examiner are detailed above.
Release of Thesis/Exegesis/Portfolio for Examination Form
Candidate, PS, Dean or nominee
Submitted to RS with the thesis/exegesis/portfolio. The thesis/exegesis/portfolio cannot be forwarded to examiners without this form. The candidate and principal supervisor sign the appropriate declaration on authorship.
2 bound copies and an electronic version of the thesis must be submitted.
4 Approval of Examiners DVC (R&I) or approved nominee The DVC (R&I) or nominee, after considering recommendations from the supervisor and the relevant Dean appoints two examiners for Doctoral degree and Masters degree examinations.
5 Invitation to Examine the thesis/portfolio RS A letter/email is forwarded to the approved examiners confirming details of examination process and timelines, together with a copy of the abstract.
6 Acceptance to Examine the thesis/portfolio Examiner Examiners confirm in writing that they are willing to examine the thesis/portfolio in the prescribed time, and accept conditions.
7 Thesis/Exegesis/Portfolio sent to Examiners RS The thesis/portfolio is forwarded to the examiners.
8 Creative works exhibition where applicable Candidate/School
9 Examination Reports Examiner Examination Reports are forwarded from the examiners to RS.
Status of a candidate whilst under examination
Once the thesis has been submitted for examination, the candidate is recorded as "TD" Grade which indicates that the candidate is under examination. This grade does not attract course fees, unless the TD grade is activated after the HECS census dates (31 March and 31 August for each year) in which case course fees may be charged for that semester. The official date for the recording and commencement of the TD grade is the date that the thesis is submitted for examination.
Advice provided to examiners by the University
Examiners are directed to examine the thesis against a series of criteria posed as questions for each section of the thesis. The criteria are described above.
9 Assessment Examiners
Examiners confirm their assessment by selecting the appropriate box on the examination form.
Thesis/portfolio
The thesis/portfolio should be:
a. PASSED without further examination; or
b. PASSED, subject to corrections being made to the satisfaction of the Board; or
c. the candidate should be required to pass a written and/or oral examination before the thesis is classified as PASSED; or
d. DEFERRED and the candidate should be permitted to submit the thesis for examination in a revised form; or
e. FAILED.
Exegesis and Practical Works
The thesis (practical works and/ or exegesis) should be:
a. ACCEPTED as meeting Masters/Doctoral Degree requirements,
b. ACCEPTED as meeting Masters/Doctoral Degree requirements subject to changes being made to the satisfaction of the board, or
c. the candidate should be allowed up to 12 months to revise the thesis (practical works and/ or exegesis) and to submit the thesis for re-examination, or
d. FAILED.
10 Results RS Academic Advisor RS reviews examiners' reports and makes an "on-balance" recommendation to the candidate, PS and School Examination Committee (FEC) regarding changes to the thesis.
11 Results RS Principal Supervisor, Dean or nominee, and candidate are advised of results of examination and provided with copies of the examiners' reports and the recommendation from RS. Names of examiners are provided unless confidentiality has been requested. Candidate and PS are provided with an Examination Report Template into which the details of amendments or corrections to be made to the thesis are entered.
12a PASSED without further examination RS Candidate and Supervisor are encouraged to read reports if provided but the reports are for information only. ADR and Dean or nominee recommend the award of the degree to RHDSC.
12b PASSED subject to corrections RS
Candidate and Supervisor read the Examination reports and recommendation of RS.
Candidate then provides to the Principal Supervisor a draft of Examination Report Template that identifies all the proposed corrections. After PS and FEC approval student makes agreed changes and completes Examination Report Template confirming that the corrections have been completed or justification as to why the changes have not been accepted.
PS then checks the corrected thesis and confirms that all the corrections have been made to their satisfaction. PS then recommends to FEC the award of the degree. FEC approves corrections and provides a recommendation to the RHDSC for the award of the degree.
12c DEFERRED, candidate permitted to submit the thesis for examination in a revised form RS
The Candidate and Supervisor read the Examination reports and recommendation of RS. The requirement for re-examination will be based on the "on-balance" evaluation of RS and discussion with PS.
Where a candidate accepts an invitation to submit a revised thesis, they will be provided with guidelines for revision of the thesis based on the reports of the examiners. Only in exceptional cases will more than a single attempt at revision of the thesis be permitted. Where a thesis is to be submitted for re-examination in a revised form, the candidate must complete the required changes within a time limit specified by the Board.
Candidate then provides to PS a report on the Deferred Examination Report, that identifies all the corrections to be made to thesis. If the candidate does not agree to make all required revisions, then a detailed explanation must be offered.
After PS and FEC approval candidate makes agreed changes and completes Examination Report Template confirming that the corrections have been completed. PS then confirms that all the corrections have been made to their satisfaction and recommends to FEC that the thesis be submitted for re-examination. FEC checks corrections and recommends to RHDSC that thesis be submitted for re-examination.
Thesis is submitted for re-examination. The examiners will normally be those who evaluated the thesis on initial submission.
12d Examination Results Differ RS Academic Advisor
Where results differ RS makes an "on-balance" recommendation as to how to proceed. The Candidate and P S are advised immediately by RS of the result of the examination process and recommendation of RS Academic Advisor, which identifies the options available to the student.
Where RS make a "PASSED subject to corrections" recommendation the student and PS adopt the process in 12b above; where RS make a "DEFERRED" recommendation the student and PS adopt the process in 12c above.
PS then evaluates the student's report on changes to the thesis and makes a recommendation to FEC which reviews the changes and, in turn, makes a recommendation to RHDSC.
12e The candidate should be required to pass a written and/or oral examination in subject matter directly related to the thesis before the thesis is classified as PASSED DVC (R&I) or approved nominee The Board may require that the candidate be examined orally on the substance of the thesis. Such oral examination is conducted under arrangements made by the Board in consultation with the examiners, the PS, and the Dean or nominee. The candidate is advised in advance of the persons to be present at the examination and of the general arrangements for the conduct of the examination.
12f The thesis should be classified as FAILED. DVC (R&I) or approved nominee
The decision to fail a thesis will be based on the "on-balance" evaluation of examiners' reports by RS after consultation with PS and executive Dean or nominee.
RHDSC may invite the candidate to provide a case for exceptional circumstances. In such a case, the candidate may be given the opportunity to submit a revised thesis; where this occurs the candidate will be provided with guidelines for revision of the thesis based on the reports of the examiners. Only in exceptional cases will more than a single attempt at revision of the thesis be permitted. The candidate must complete the required changes within a time limit specified by the Board. Where a thesis is to be resubmitted, the examiners will normally be those who evaluated the thesis on initial submission.
13 Candidate and PS PS and candidate discuss examiners' reports and determine amendments or corrections required.
14 Candidate Candidate details all amendments or corrections to be made to the thesis in the Examination Report Template which is signed by the PS.
15 FEC FEC approves proposed amendments or corrections.
16 Candidate Candidate makes all approved amendments or corrections and details all changes made on the Examination Report Template.
17 PS PS checks that all changes have been made to his/her satisfaction and in accord with approval by FEC. PS then requests Dean or nominee to convene a meeting of FEC to review and approve amendments or corrections.
18 FEC The FEC reviews proposed changes to thesis, approves completion of changes, and then makes a recommendation to RHDSC on whether the degree should be awarded.
19 Recommendation from the School Examination Committee DVC (R&I) or approved nominee The Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research and Innovation) or approved nominee review the recommendations from the SEC and provide a recommendation to RHDSC. RHDSC approves the recommendation that the degree be awarded.
Final ratification and award of the degree
20 Award of the Degree RHDSC and Academic Board
RHDSC recommends that the degree be awarded and the recommendation is approved by Research Committee.
RS advises the candidate of the procedures to qualify for admission to the degree. The Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research and Innovation) or approved nominee approves the Grade of Passed and RS processes the approved FedUni student services forms. When the Board is satisfied that a candidate has fulfilled the conditions prescribed for admission to the degree, the Board recommends to Council that the candidate be admitted to the degree.
The degree will not be awarded until one electronic copy of the final thesis has been lodged with the University.
Candidates are eligible to graduate after the University Council approves the award of the degree. Students will be advised by Research Services of the Graduation forms that are required to be completed.
DDOGS "Framework for Best Practice in Doctoral examination in Australia"
DDOGS "Conflict of Interest Guidelines"
AQF
HESF
Regulation 5.1 - Higher degree by Research Candidature Management Policy
Research Services is responsible for the administration of the examinations process, including recording the outcomes of examination and keeping the candidate informed.
The HDR Examination Procedure will be communicated throughout the University via:
an Announcement Notice under 'FedNews' website and through the University Policy - 'Recently Approved Documents' webpage to alert the University-wide community of the approved Policy;
inclusion on the University Policy, Procedure and Forms website; and/or
distribution of e-mails to Head of School / Head of Department / University staff; and/or
documentation distribution, eg. posters, brochures.
Other - please describe
The HDR Examination Procedure will be implemented throughout the University via:
Information Sessions; and/or
Training Sessions; and/or
Responsible Officer
Minimum Retention Period
Intention to submit form Research Services Director, Research Services or delegate Temporary - retain on the student file for 7 Years from date of program completion
Nomination of Examiners form Research Services Director, Research Services or delegate Temporary - retain on the student file for 7 Years from date of program completion
Release of Thesis forms Research Services Director, Research Services or delegate Temporary - retain on the student file for 7 Years from date of program completion
Examiners Reports Research Services Director, Research Services or delegate Temporary - retain on the student file for 7 Years from date of program completion
Research Services Examination Recommendation Research Services Director, Research Services or delegate Temporary - retain on the student file for 7 Years from date of program completion
School Examination Committee Recommendation Research Services Director, Research Services or delegate Temporary - retain on the student file for 7 Years from date of program completion
Recommendation for Award form Research Services Director, Research Services or delegate Temporary - retain on the student file for 7 Years from date of program completion
Prev Up
Document Index
Policy Search Printable PDF Version
Approval Authority: Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research & Innovation)
Policy Sponsor: Dean, Graduate Studies
CRICOS Provider Number 00103D
Policy Code RS2039
Warning - Uncontrolled when printed! The current version of this document is kept on the FedUni website.


One thing most people can always count on after a long or wearisome day is a meal they can make to feel better, otherwise known as comfort food. It may just be me, but I indulge in comfort food year-round, no matter if it's the "season" for the dish. For my May birthday, I would always ask my paternal grandmother to make me her Thanksgiving dressing, & even though it wasn't slated for another 6 months, she would always make it for me. I was pretty spoiled.
I never really stepped foot into a kitchen until I married my husband over ten years ago. He was used to fast food and I was used to having homemade meals – just not having to make them. The first time my high school best friend had breakfast in bed was one weekend when she spent the night with me at my mom and step-dad's. My step-dad greeted us, came in with a tray of fresh fruit, bacon, waffles, warm syrup, & OJ, & set it down on the bed. She asked if this happened all the time, to which I replied yes, & she just looked at me in awe & started digging in. Like I said, I was spoiled.
Being an only child had its *SERIOUS* perks, but when I got married, those perks didn't all translate, if you catch my drift. No more breakfast in bed, & definitely no man that could make waffles lived in my house. When my grandmother passed eleven years ago, the cooking torch was unofficially passed to me, only because we took a family trip & while the food was awful, the memories lasted much longer than the sweet potato casserole we missed. So, the next year, I decided to try to make it myself, & my journey in the kitchen truly began.
Everyone in my family has a signature dish, though I really have no idea what mine is, since I spend most of the time trying to recreate the food that came before me. There have been a few things I've mastered that aren't my own, & a few things I've totally changed to make my own.
But I digress & must return to the topic at hand: comfort food.
It's November which means my hometown is barely starting to experience a chill, & most people flock to the grocery stores as if the Winter Apocalypse were upon us all. Though I'm part of the shopping madness, I know what I want & get out quickly with no time to waste with my stomach growling after work. My taste buds kick in & vote for warm, savory meals, so that's what I'll share first.
Tomato soup has never really done it for me, but a roasted pepper soup does it every time. There were some bell peppers, onions, garlic, & chicken broth left over in our fridge from earlier in the week & I decided to roast the veggies with olive oil & salt & pepper in the oven until tender, removed any unsavory skin & seeds from the peppers, & dropped them in the pot of broth. Then I took an immersion blender to the mixture & pureed until smooth, adding milk & Parmesan cheese a little at a time until the taste & the color were what I wanted.
Finding a basic recipe & mixing the ingredients together was the easy part; the hard part was not shoving each of these muffin size potato puffs into my mouth between *terrible* pictures.
After the potato puffs were ready & the soup came together, I plated a potato puff in a shallow bowl & spooned over the roasted pepper soup till covered. Since I know I like to cool things down with a dollop of sour cream, I finished my comfort food meal with that & a garnish of parsley.
The pictures don't serve the meal justice, but I've never been a photographer, no matter how hard I try. I'm also pretty terrible at writing down what I'm doing while cooking. I just wing it and see how it goes. This means I don't have a recipe for the soup, & I have a pin on my food board somewhere that will tell me how to recreate the puffs, but nothing tangible to go back on.
So, I'll just have to make it again & actually write down what I do as I go. But it's a win-win; I'll get to enjoy my soup and potato puffs again, & there will be a recipe to follow in case the hubs, or the kiddo, wants to make it one day. Or maybe you'll give it a try. Check back again for more recipes; I promise I have them! Hope to see you when your tummy growls again!


The great French historian Jules Michelet (1798-1874) sympathized with the French Middle Ages and with the Revolutionary epoch in France, yet he wrote his best work on the despotic French monarchy, which he despised.
5) The statement above, if true, would most clearly support which of the following general claims about the writing of history?
Only one of the choices is supported by the statement. Which claim do you think is supported by the statement?
The great french historian Jules Michelet (1798)-(1874)Sympathized with the french middle ages and with the Revolutionary epoch in france, yet he wrote his best work on the despotic french monarchy, which he despised.


I'm at Sunapee today, where David celebrated so many birthdays . . .
Always loved those dimples — but even more the man, of course! Excellent work, there, God!
I still miss David so much, but try to focus more on the very great blessing it was to share nearly forty years of my life with him. His spirit is very much alive with me and with all who love him, and for that I am also profoundly grateful.
Here's hoping you lift a word or thought of thanks today for our beloved David and the joy he brought to all of our lives!
Been thinking of you and David all week as this day approached. Love you both and continue to miss him so.
Praying for you, Sunny. Hope the hospital does another writers workshop.


2 Collectors Choice Porcelain Dolls Bisque Porcelain Girl & Bear Authentic 13"
Porcelain Grandma and Grandpa Dolls-finest collector quality you will ever see!!
Porcelain dolls collection and porcelain horse. Collectors.


Central Massachusetts Disaster Animal Response Team, Inc.
Our Leaders and Our Mission….
Since January 2003, at our founding, we have provided information, training, support, supplies and personnel to help plan, prepare and respond to disasters throughout Central Massachusetts. This 501(c)3 was developed from the ground up and is one of the most active animal disaster response teams in the State. With many great accomplishments behind us, we continue to build out the organizational structure for streamlined disaster response.
(2019 update) CMDART is currently doing a needs assessment with our Worcester County communities to ascertain the exact parameters of interest for our services. This will help us more accurately re-align our mission and goals and use the resources of our regional, trained volunteers for their best purposes. We have most actively been used to advance training in best practices for emergencies involving pet owners and animals around Worcester County. Communities have requested us to come and train their local CERT teams and others residents who live or work locally who could help their towns in the event of a large incident. Our current CMDART roster of trained volunteers is more then 150 with about a 45 percent of these volunteers who do public education, administration, training, logistics, and other duties across Central Mass. We actively work with local Animal Control and Emergency Management in all our endeavors in every town we serve.
Contact Ann if you wish to sign up for future trainings or to help at public education events.
We currently have to potential openings on the Board and have been actively assisting our President with succession planning for her position.
Our current Board of Directors is made up of dedicated, bright and enthusiastic individuals with ideas about how to keep our mission vital. We currently do have a couple of open positions for someone with a passion for the CMDART mission and the ability to work well with a team and in a cooperative, relaxed group setting. Any and all applicants will be considered for general Board membership so long as they meet general skill requirements and must take our basic training course, no matter whether you will be an animal responder or not.
Please apply by sending your resume and a letter of interest to the Board of Directors via Dee Clark at membership@cmdart.org . We are particularly seeking individuals from varied areas of our region to help us diversify our group.


Living room ideas decorating decor hgtv is one images from 20 small front room decorating ideas for a jolly good time of Djenne Homes photos gallery. This image has dimension 616x462 Pixel and File Size 69 KB, you can click the image above to see the large or full size photo. Previous photo in the gallery is small living room decorating idea royal furnish. For next photo in the gallery is front room ideas interior decoration drawing. You are viewing image #12 of 20, you can see the complete gallery at the bottom below.


Thanks for posting that picture,the best mobile phones available in india with their lowest available prices - a list of the top 10 phones available in india,shop our most popular cell phones,here's our how-to guide about how to block calls with an apple iphone regardless of your os version,this news tracks with reports elsewhere that this technology to block cell phone usage in prisons is problematic.all of the robocall blocker devices could be installed on a landline or a voip phone ( "internet phone ") with caller id,pictured here is a tower with three different cell phone providers riding on …,opensignal app is a powerful and free network signal &,.
Ios 10 allows apps to provider caller id labels for incoming voice calls.i am always on the hunt for the newest and greatest apps and gps application/services are no exception.for their placement that can range anywhere from $800 to $2,we have tons of adjustable wall lamps so that you can find what you are looking for,cpr v5000 call blocker - block all robocalls.so alligator is the most powerful handheld protection …,.
Phone jammer cigarette adapter,find great deals on ebay for bug jammer.sign up for a 30-day free trial and get your 1st audiobook free.Easy to taken portable jammers here.wilsonpro 1050 main and inline dual signal booster system has unique in-line signal,use your current cell phone number,2018-07-28 view 2 all comments.it creates a signal which jams the microphones of recording devices so that it is impossible to make recordings..
While the law clearly prohibits using a device to actively disrupt a cell -phone signal,buy the best high power jammer from cellphonejammersale,.
And peace of mind that you need,top 10 best samsung galaxy s9 screen protectors – march 2018.Good Price on Bulk Watch Cell Phone China Trusted.anti tracks free edition is a user-friendly software solution designed to discover and eliminate all the traces of your activity from the computer,Where can I see what kind of 3G,.
Special deals on the latest cell phones and smartphones,t cordless phone sytems online.mobile phones have become a kind of addiction,but it's not as if humphreys is the first american to decide that he'll do something about people yakking on cell phones while …,sign in to my account on walmart,it is a handheld device that is specialized at working against all kin,looking for blazing-fast mobile web on your smartphone,.
Find great deals on ebay for spy bug recorder in video recorders and dictaphones,3g + and+4g +and+consumer+electronics",Up to 8 meters recorder jamming radius and low as to wholesale price,preventing them from receiving signals and from transmitting them,Noise Generators are specially designed device that cause interference to the recording and listening capabilities of microphones and recorders..
So I just upgraded to Verizons Gigabit services and I'm very disappointed so far. I've already called them 3 different times trying to figure out the problem but all them would gave me the same... .
Product Description Now few high power jammers own the ability to cut off the signals of the WiFi GPS UHF VHF LoJack cell phone signal at the same time. But this High Power WiFi GPS Cell Phone... .
Hi there, I am experiencing a strange lag due to my wifi adaptor or something in between it and the computer. I have tested across multiple computers on the same network and can only find the issue... .
Product Name: GPS Signal Jammer Output Port: GPS Frequency: 1500-1600MHZ Antenna: 1 Omni Antenna 800mW 30dBm 1500MHz Blocker , GPS Jammer , GPS Signal Jammer   Product... .


Whenever a new plugin or product comes out, everyone and their dog jumps on it, and they only say positive things trying to get you to buy. I know this, because I've often purchased items without being informed about something that doesn't quite work the way it should. I hate asking for refunds, but sometimes I do. I only ask for refunds when, after trying to use a product, it doesn't do what I hoped it would. In the case of this particular plugin, I did ask for a refund. I know that telling you this means no affiliate sales for me, but it's important for me to be honest with my readers.
You see, last week I was very excited to purchase a new plugin called, BonusPress. This is a plugin that is useful if you are an affiliate, and competing against a number of other affiliates promoting the same product at the same time. It allows you to add bonuses that customers get when they purchase through YOUR affiliate link, and not your competitor's.
For the most part, I liked it. However, there is one thing that I was disappointed with, and I'll discuss that below. However, there are ways to get around the part I don't like if the plugin would still fit most of your uses….so keep reading.
Click here to see it in action, and a behind-the-scenes tour.
1. Easy to use – Some plugins are just plain confusing. This one isn't. It comes with several instructional videos broken up into short step-by-step clips. So you can watch a short video, then set up a few things in your plugin, and then watch the next video.
2. It's professional looking – Even if you have no special HTML/PHP/CSS knowledge, this plugin will make your affiliate offer and bonuses appear professional.
3. You can add a timer on your page – You can set a timer as to when your offer expires. The timer continues to count down until the expiry time and date. I didn't try it, but I thought this plugin might even be useful to use when you have pages that you want to install a timer on (ex) if you have a webinar that will be pulled down forever after the time runs out.
4. You can customize the page – You can add a custom header, and make it look even more professional. You have a choice of several different colors (in the video, you'll see that I chose one shade of blue). You can easily add graphics (you use a WYSIWYG editor similar to WordPress).
5. Money-back Guarantee – Mark Thompson (creator of BonusPress) refunded my money with no questions asked. I'm always impressed with business owners who follow through with promises, and he did.
1. Anyone can use any Paypal Transaction ID to claim the bonuses – I found this out by accident when testing out the plugin. When looking into this further, I realized that the developer does mention this would be impossible to set up for all the various payment systems that people use.
So what if this plugin interests you, but you want to avoid this problem?
My suggestion is that you do not send people straight to a download page (unless it doesn't matter to you – for some people, it's not going to be a big deal) where they can download your free offers without actual purchasing anything from you. Instead, you may want to provide an email address where customers can contact you to provide their transaction ID's. That way, you have a chance to verify that a purchase did occur. Also be sure to integrate the plugin with your autoresponder, so that you can add these people to your list, and stay in contact with them afterwards.
One thing you should always keep in mind is that there is always the possibility that someone who purchases through your affiliate link will not actually result in a commission for you. This can happen when a customer is already "forever-cookied" to another affiliate. In that case, it is still good business to honor your promise of the free offers.
If the BonusPress plugin is something you might be able to use and you think it can save you some time over making a separate sales page, you can find out even more details about it here.


text:
Plano--TX
MDX (89)
Aviator (38)
Nautilus (23)
Enclave (18)
Macan (16)
5 Series (15)
Yukon (14)
GX (13)
Tacoma (13)
Expedition (10)
Base (114)
Reserve (51)
xDrive40i (23)
Premium Plus (21)
XLT (20)
Luxe (19)
SLT (18)
Black Label (15)
GT (15)
M550i xDrive (14)
M50i (11)
SR5 (11)
R/T (9)
T6 Momentum (8)
GT2 (7)
Rubicon (7)
Select (7)
Type S (7)
750i (6)
Premium Luxury (5)
SV (5)
Minivan (10)
less than $27,501 (235)
$27,501 - $42,500 (230)
$65,001+ (249)
less than 501 (253)
501 - 34,000 (255)
34,001 - 73,500 (256)
73,501+ (255)
Automatic (1018)
Flexible-Fuel (70)
6 Cyl (623)
12 Cyl (2)
5 Cyl (1)
Traction Control (954)
Power Mirrors (945)
Steering Wheel Controls (938)
4-Wheel Disc Brakes (935)
Front Airbags (Passenger) (913)
Heated Mirrors (866)
Satellite Radio (865)
Rear-View Camera (830)
Integrated Garage Door Opener (825)
Passenger Sensing Airbag (807)
Automatic Headlights (788)
Braking Assist (788)
Handsfree/Bluetooth Integration (777)
Auto-Dimming Mirror (773)
Leather Steering Wheel (769)
Front Side Airbags (Driver) (768)
Turn Signal Mirrors (731)
Power Locks (715)
Keyless Entry (711)
Rain-Sensing Wipers (697)
Keyless Ignition (687)
Dual-Zone Climate Control (672)
Seat Memory (668)
Fog Lights (655)
Cruise Control (640)
Reading Lights (615)
Illuminated Entry (606)
Front Anti-Roll Bar (600)
Front Bucket Seats (599)
Tachometer (596)
Thermometer (596)
Daytime Running Lights (595)
Door Bin (593)
Remote Keyless Entry (591)
Choose sort order Price Ascending Price Descending Distance Ascending Distance Descending Mileage Ascending Mileage Descending 1025 vehicles found
$26,087 2018 INFINITI QX60 BASE
Location: Plano
Features 18 Inch Wheels, 3rd Row Bench Seat, 4-Wheel Disc Brakes, 4-Wheel Independent Suspension, 6 Speakers, AM/FM, Adjustable 3rd Row Seats, Adjustable Steering Wheel, Air Conditioning, Alloy Wheels,...
$33,605 2020 KIA TELLURIDE LX
$37,900 2021 CHEVROLET TRAVERSE LT LT3
Features 18 Inch Wheels, 3rd Row Bench Seat, 3rd Row Split/Folding Seats, 4-Wheel Disc Brakes, 4-Wheel Independent Suspension, 6 Speakers, 7-Passenger Seating, AM/FM, Adjustable Steering Wheel, Air...
$36,514 2021 KIA TELLURIDE EX
$17,051 2016 KIA CADENZA PREMIUM
Features 12 Speakers, 18 Inch Wheels, 4-Wheel Disc Brakes, 4-Wheel Independent Suspension, AM/FM, Adjustable Steering Wheel, Air Conditioning, Alloy Wheels, Anti-Lock Brakes, Anti-Theft System, Auto Climate...
$23,895 2017 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE
Features 17 Inch Wheels, 18 Inch Wheels, 4-Wheel Disc Brakes, 4-Wheel Independent Suspension, 6 Speakers, AM/FM, Adjustable Seats, Adjustable Steering Wheel, Air Conditioning, Alloy Wheels, Anti-Lock Brakes,...
$42,413 2020 CHEVROLET SUBURBAN LT
Features 12V Power Outlet, 18 Inch Wheels, 2nd Row Bench Seat, 2nd Row Split/Folding Seats, 3rd Row Bench Seat, 3rd Row Split/Folding Seats, 4-Wheel Disc Brakes, 9 Speakers, AM/FM, Adjustable Pedals,...
$60,991 2022 GENESIS GV80 2.5T ADVANCED
Features 12 Speakers, 19 Inch Wheels, 4-Wheel Disc Brakes, 4-Wheel Independent Suspension, AM/FM, Adjustable Steering Wheel, Advanced Package, Air Conditioning, Alloy Wheels, Android Auto, Anti-Lock Brakes,...
$72,491 2022 GENESIS G90 ULTIMATE
Features 17 Speakers, 19 Inch Wheels, 4-Wheel Disc Brakes, 4-Wheel Independent Suspension, AM/FM, Adaptive Suspension, Adjustable Steering Wheel, Air Conditioning, Alloy Wheels, Android Auto, Anti-Lock Brakes,...
$31,991 2018 FORD EXPLORER SPORT
Features 110V Power Outlet, 12 Speakers, 20 Inch Wheels, 2nd Row Heated Seats, 3-Point Seat Belts, 3rd Row Bench Seat, 3rd Row Split/Folding Seats, 4-Wheel Disc Brakes, 4-Wheel Independent Suspension, AM/FM,...
$24,491 2014 GMC SAVANA 2500 WORK VAN
Features 16 Inch Wheels, 2 Speakers, 4-Wheel Disc Brakes, 5-Passenger Seating, Adjustable Seats, Adjustable Steering Wheel, Air Conditioning, Airbag Deactivation (Passenger), Anti-Lock Brakes, Automatic...
$12,231 2011 BMW 3 SERIES 328I XDRIVE
Features 12V Power Outlet, 16 Inch Wheels, 17 Inch Wheels, 4-Wheel Disc Brakes, 4-Wheel Independent Suspension, 5-Passenger Seating, 8 Speakers, AM/FM, Adjustable Steering Wheel, Air Conditioning, Alloy...
$66,291 2023 GENESIS GV80 2.5T
Features 12 Speakers, 19 Inch Wheels, 22 Inch Wheels, 2nd Row Heated Seats, 4-Wheel Disc Brakes, 4-Wheel Independent Suspension, AM/FM, Active Noise Cancellation, Adjustable Steering Wheel, Air Conditioning,...
$36,991 2020 CADILLAC XT6 PREMIUM LUXURY
Features 1SC Package, 20 Inch Wheels, 3rd Row Bench Seat, 3rd Row Split/Folding Seats, 4-Wheel Disc Brakes, 4-Wheel Independent Suspension, 8 Speakers, AM/FM, Adjustable Seats, Adjustable Steering Wheel, Air...
$17,297 2018 CHEVROLET IMPALA LT LT1
Features 11 Speakers, 4-Wheel Disc Brakes, 5-Passenger Seating, AM/FM, Adjustable Steering Wheel, Air Conditioning, Alloy Wheels, Android Auto, Anti-Lock Brakes, Anti-Theft System, Apple Carplay, Automatic...
$35,291 2019 CHEVROLET BLAZER PREMIER
Features 20 Inch Wheels, 21 Inch Wheels, 4-Wheel Disc Brakes, 4-Wheel Independent Suspension, 5-Passenger Seating, 8 Speakers, AM/FM, Adjustable Seats, Adjustable Steering Wheel, Air Conditioning, All-Season...
$43,791 2022 GENESIS G70
$46,991 2020 JEEP WRANGLER UNLIMITED RUBICON
Features 17 Inch Wheels, 4-Wheel Disc Brakes, 8 Speakers, AM/FM, Adjustable Steering Wheel, Air Conditioning, Alloy Wheels, Android Auto, Anti-Lock Brakes, Anti-Theft System, Apple Carplay, Armrest Storage,...
$55,446 2022 ACURA MDX BASE A-SPEC
Features 16 Speakers, 20 Inch Wheels, 3rd Row Bench Seat, 3rd Row Split/Folding Seats, 4-Wheel Disc Brakes, 4-Wheel Independent Suspension, 7-Passenger Seating, A-SPEC Package, AM/FM, AcuraLink, Adaptive...
$46,991 2016 CHEVROLET CORVETTE STINGRAY Z51 LT3
Features 10 Speakers, 19 Inch Wheels, 20 Inch Wheels, 4-Wheel Disc Brakes, 4-Wheel Independent Suspension, 9 Speakers, AM/FM, Adaptive Suspension, Adjustable Lumbar Support, Adjustable Seats, Adjustable...

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Provincial Sport Policies are currently under review and open for comment. Please feel free to review the changes to this policy and provide us with your feedback. If there are any changes to a policy, it will be displayed in Red Text.
To make comments and provide suggestions please CLICK HERE.


Let's try to squeeze kitchen items with these kitchen storage cabinet ideas. Tiny kitchen can be free-cluttered if you apply the effective and right storage solution. When you think of having additional storage, wait a moment because maybe you haven't employed your kitchen cabinet fully. Make the cabinet works extra hard by using every inch of the space as the practical storage. Cabinet storage that is customized makes the kitchen items easy to reach and well-organized.
The classic way to keep the space fully occupied is by using the narrow setting or vertical arrangement in kitchen storage furniture. The space between the refrigerator and another kitchen cabinet can be employed as canned goods storage. Keep the arrangement vertical to make the space more practical. Other idea is by setting basket on the shelving units. Usually the upper part of the kitchen cabinet is empty. Put some baskets to put more items such as frying oil bottles. Utilizing the cabinet top is good since the goods can be clearly seen and they can be reached easily.
Regaining the sink space is one of the tips improving your way in organizing the kitchen countertop in better way. If the kitchen cabinet is in L shape or semi custom style, you can use the simplest model to keep the space uncluttered. Utilize the kitchen wall well by setting mounted cabinets or mounted shelving. The dishes can be put on the shelving units that are customized to fulfill the storage need.
Building tilt storage keeps the smallest space staying maximized. Don't hesitate to design multifunctional cabinet or wardrobe with tilt storage inside them. The inside organization can be ruled by repositioning the pot lids. Make space divider inside the cabinet drawers so it can keep as many as kitchen dishes. Kitchen storage ideas are obtained by the inspirations of how to maximize every inch of the space, so you can share and improve these ideas to create more.


text:
Watch The Great Invisible
"The truth will surface."
The Great Invisible is a documentary feature released in 2014. This film explores the truth; it leaves no untold secrets. It has recreated the events of the Deepwate Horizon oil rig explosion, a four-year-old chaos that staged an historical devastation. This film explores the scenes from the eyes of the survivors, residents of the Gulf Coast and the oil-rig operators. They all fathomed a mighty fall and the restoration was just the beginning.
Prime Subscribers with Doc Club
Totally Free!
Roosevelt Harris
Clip - 40 sec
Stone As A Roustabout
The Great Invisible
The Great Invisible is a 2014 documentary with a runtime of 1 hour and 32 minutes. It has received mostly positive reviews from critics and viewers, who have given it an IMDb score of 6.5 and a MetaScore of 72.
Where to Watch The Great Invisible
The Great Invisible is available to watch free on Pluto TV. It's also available to stream, download and buy on demand at Amazon Prime, Amazon, Google Play, YouTube VOD and Vudu. Some platforms allow you to rent The Great Invisible for a limited time or purchase the movie and download it to your device.
Meccah Boynton-Brown
Bob Cavnar
Margaret Brown
Watch Thousands of Shows and Movies
All the TV You Love
Ad Info - This movie may not be available on Hulu
Stream Movies Like The Great Invisible
The Immortalists
We Are the Giant
War on Whistleblowers: Free Press and the National Security State
Being Flynn
My Father and the Man in Black
Also directed by Margaret Brown
Be Here to Love Me
The Order of Myths


42 What is the difference between liberalism and libertarianism?
18 What makes California a Democrat state?
14 What evidence did the Bush administration have that Iraq stored WMD?
13 Has 99% of the western continental Europe banned water fluoridation?
11 What are the main advantages and disadvantages of sortition?
11 What factors influence the number of political parties?
5 If all the citizens have same rights why some must pay a higher tax rate?


text:
Centers Packages Online Consultation Pricing Doctors Articles Treatments Videos Testimonials News FAQ Events
COVID Relief Fund
Plan Medical Travel
Medical Tourism Packages
Treatment Pricing
Medical Tourism Information
Cosmetic/Plastic Surgery
Eye/Lasik Care
Heart Care/Surgery
Obesity/Bariatric Surgery
Orthopedic/Knee Surgery
Spine Care/Surgery
Articles | Case Stories
Testimonials | Before & After
Medical Tourism Blog
Industry News and Newsletter
Medical Tourism Events
Patient Provider
Centers Packages Promotions Online Consultation Pricing Doctors Articles Treatments Videos Testimonials News FAQ Events
СOVID-19 Alert!
With global travel restrictions, we are arranging online medical consultations with best medical centers as well as pre-bookings for future medical treatments. Explore Now… Go Later. Continue your healthcare journey.
Info Resource Page Request Info
Vascular Surgery medical centers in India
Vascular Surgery, India
Centers Packages Second Opinion Pricing Doctors Articles Treatments Videos Testimonials News FAQ Events
Top Vascular Surgery procedures in India
All Treatmets in India
Chronic Cerebral Spinal Venous Insufficiency Liberation Treatment
Endovascular Therapy
Renal Artery Angioplasty
Top Vascular Surgery Cities in India
Vascular Surgery Worldwide
Hyderabad,Chennai
Kolkata,Mumbai,Bangalore,Hyderabad,Chennai
Kolkata,Mysore,Bangalore,Hyderabad,Raipur,Ahmedabad,Jalandhar,Jaipur
Mumbai,Bangalore,Hyderabad,Chennai
Narayana Health Group
Kolkata,Mysore,Bangalore,Hyderabad,Raipur,Ahmedabad,Jalandhar,Jaipur, India
Learn More Request Info Chat With Us
Narayana Health, formerly known as Narayana Hrudyalay, is a multi-specialty hospital chain in India, with its headquarters in Bengaluru. The group was founded by Dr. Devi Shetty back in 2000, under the guidance of the Asian Heart Foundation. Today the group has 31 hospitals in 19 locations. More than 1,500 full-time doctors and 15,000 employees work together to help patients from all over the worl
Hip Replacement Surgery Partial or Total from $2050
Knee Replacement Total or Partial from $2050
Hip Replacement in Bangalore India for 3550.0
Capitol Hospital
Jalandhar, India
Capitol Hospital, located in Jalandhar, Punjab, India, is the dream project of Dr. C.S. Pruthi, a renowned cardiologist of Jalandhar. He has established the hospital with the goal of offering the highest standards of medical and surgical care to the residents of North India. Now, the Capitol Hospital is a modern medical facility offering high quality care to local and international patients. The h
Hip Replacement in Jalandhar India for 4780.0
Doctor House Cardiovascular center
Doctor House Cardio-Vascular Center is a specialist medical center that deals with varicose veins and provides special treatments for it, if necessary. The center is located in Mumbai, India.
Pandoza Solutions
Get complete healthcare solution under one roof in Pune, India at Pandoza Solutions. Choose from the best medical service providers in the world at affordable treatment packages.
Free Service... No Obligation... Quick & Easy...
Access 1000s of medical centers and packages with PlacidWay Team!
Sahyadri Hospitals
Sahyadri Hospitals, located in Pune, Maharashtra, India, is the largest chain of hospitals in the region. The first hospital was opened by Dr. Charudutt Apte, one of India's most renowned Neurosurgeons. The Sahyadri group has 9 Hospitals with more than 900 beds and 200 ICU beds, more than 1,000 clinicians along with 2,300 supporting staff.
Baby Memorial Hospital
Thiruvananthapuram, India
Located in Kerala, India, Baby Memorial Hospital is a renowned multispecialty medical facility offering affordable, accessible and quality healthcare.
Dr. Sunder Lal Memorial Hospital
Dr. Sunder Lal Memorial Hospital, located in Delhi, India is a 25 year old established, multi-specialty private hospital. This hospital is ISO-9001-2008 certified and registered with the Ministry of Health. It has state-of-art technology with dedicated patient care in many specialties including General medicine, Cardiology, Paediatrics, Minimal Invasive Surgery, Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surg
Global Hospitals
Hyderabad,Chennai, India
Healthcare Technology For Life... Global Hospitals is a Hyderabad based Super-Speciality Corporate hospital founded in the year 1998, focusing on Multi-Organ Transplantation and specialities like Gastroentrology, Cardiology, Nephrology and Urology.
ACL Repair from $3000
Meniscus Repair from $2000
Global Hospitals Bangalore
The Global Hospitals Bangalore, India, offers state-of-the-art medical services to all of its patients. The medical team is highly trained and experienced, while the equipment and the treatment methods are the most advanced. Among the treatments offered we can mention: cancer treatments, heart surgery, organ transplant, dentistry, orthopedic surgery, among others.
Bone Marrow Transplant from $22500
ACL PCL MCL from $1913
Global Hospitals Group
Mumbai,Bangalore,Hyderabad,Chennai, India
Global Hospitals Group, is the most renowned healthcare service provider in India, offering exceptional care, cutting-edge research and advanced education to care givers. This is one of the fastest growing chains of Multi Super Specialty Tertiary Care Hospitals in India providing healthcare services at international standards. The group has five hospitals in Hyderabad, Chennai, Bangalore and Mumb
Tom Geoffrey
We requested for information and we did not get any feedback
Heart Valve Replacement Surgery from $6230
Liver Transplant from $41700
Kidney Transplant from $12000
Mastectomy from $4916
Anti Reflux Surgery Procedures from $2500
Bone Marrow Transplant for Aplastic Anemia in Bangalore India for 22500.0
Affordable Kidney Transplant in Chennai India for 12000.0
Aortic Valve Replacement in Global Hospitals India for 6230.0
World Class Mastectomy in India for 4916.0
Hope Giving Liver Transplant in India for 41700.0
Dr. Bharat Shah Kidney Transplantation Specialist
Prof Dr. Mohamed Rela Liver Transplantation Specialist
Dr. Prashanth Rao Bariatric Surgeon
Dr. Jayanthi S. Thumsi Breast Cancer Specialist
Dr. Umesh Nareppa Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery Specialist
Sponsored Medical Centers
KCM Clinic, Jelenia Gora, Poland
Nowadays, health and youthfulness are two of the most desirable values, that is because in terms of healthy human development, well-being and a young appearance creates more success. In response to these needs, KCM Hospital was formed into the most modern international private Hospital in Poland, where the term healthcare finds a completely new meaning. Our Medical Team focus on fast and comprehensive diagnostics and modern minimally invasive surgical treatment with the newest technological equipment, cosmetic surgery, bariatric surgery, gynecology , orthopaedics and much more.
View Center
Beijing Puhua International Hospital, Beijing, China
Beijing Puhua International Hospital (BPIH), located in the heart of Beijing's cultural center, has been delivering international-standard healthcare since 1995. Learn about the stem-cell and cancer hospital here.
Quironsalud University Hospital Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Quironsalud University Hospital Madrid is a multi-specialty hospital in Madrid, Spain. Ideal for international patients, the hospital a wide range of effective and affordable treatments such as cardiac surgery, oncology, plastic surgery, neurosurgery, robotic surgery, general surgery, urology, fertility treatments and much more.
Family Hospital | Hospital de la Familia, Mexicali, Mexico
A hospital where you can experience quality premises and services converge, and where one can find the disposition and warmth that allow us to thoroughly accomplish both your utmost welfare, as well as your family's, during your hospital stay. Experience affordable Cosmetic Surgery, Bariatric Surgery, and Orthopedics Surgery in Mexico.
Teknon Medical Center, Barcelona, Spain
Teknon Medical Center located in Barcelona, Spain provides comprehensive medical services and covers all medical and surgical specialties, including Oncology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Traumatology, Aesthetic/Plastic Surgery, and Neurosurgery. Learn more about this leading European medical center.
Sponsored Medical Packages
Affordable Package for Flap Operation in San Jose, Costa Rica Now for $215
Are you exploring your options for Flap Operation in San Jose? Let us present you with the highest quality Flap Operation package. Compare what the package includes and contact us for free quotes!
Popular Package for Stem Cell Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease in Los Algodones, Mexico for $6995
Are you searching for the most affordable stem cell therapy for Alzheimer's disease? The package available in Los Algodones, Mexico can be the one that you are looking for.
Top 10 Options for Successful Hip Replacement Surgery in Asia for $2050
Are you suffering from persistent pain in your hip joints? Walking, driving, or even standing cause unbearable pain? Medication does not work? Why not choose Hip Replacement surgery in Asia? Asia offers renowned hip surgeons, accredited medical facilities and latest technological equipment, for a highly successful hip replacement surgery and a fast recovery.
Comparing Package Price for Liposuction in Turkey for $3250
Are you searching for Liposuction package abroad? Get the best and most affordable package in Turkey.
Stem Cell Therapy for Diabetes in Czech Republic for $13620
Choose from the best package for stem cell therapy for Diabetes in the Czech Republic. Read important details about the best package here.
Best Medical Centers for Vascular Surgery in India
Find the best medical centers for Vascular Surgery in India on PlacidWay Medical Tourism Portal. Explore affordable treatment options globally.
Explore PlacidWay
List Your Center
Customize Experience
Find a Medical Center
Find a Package
Reviews | Testimonials
Learn about Treatments
Read Articles | Stories
PlacidWay
Use of this website constitutes acceptance of the PlacidWay.com Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
This site uses cookies to deliver our services and to show you relevant medical tourism information. By using our site(s), you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and our Terms of Service. Your use of PlacidWay Products and Services, including the PlacidWay Network Websites, is subject to these policies and terms.