text:
Best selection of premium Joomla 1.6 templates
About David Mark and his company Mark Resources
David Mark is the founder of Mark Resources, a San Francisco based company which specializes in the creation and production of stereoscopic and autostereoscopic imagery for science based applications encompassing Physics, Biology and Genetics, Medicine, Mechanical and Architectural Engineering, and Aerospace Engineering.
Mark Resources holds patents in the areas of 3D stereoscopic optical design, as well as in scalable computer systems and their adjoining algorithms tailored for real-time large scale projection of high resolution, multi-perspective 3D imagery, including QuadHD formats, viewable on a variety of 3D displays including autostereoscopic displays. Such displays do not require the use of stereo glasses to perceive 3D imagery, facilitating the use of the newest tools for 3D video codecs and OpenGL graphics acceleration for 3D content.
Mark Resources also designs and fabricates both stereoscopic and autostereoscopic camera devices, which function at various scales and formats for live action 3D video content, operating in conjunction with autostereoscopic displays that reproduce this imagery in real-time format, preserving the high resolution capturing capabilities of the camera systems. As the company's founder, David Mark's own specialties are derived from his 25 years of experience as a stereographer, optical scientist, and computer engineer and C++ programmer, bolstering his company's expertise in the construction of super computering systems that are geared toward the highest level of 3D performance attainable for the most rigorous scientific use. Many of these systems have been utilized in public, commercial, and laboratory venues, and have also included Mark Resource's patented high resolution 3D hard copy color printing capabilities that reproduce autostereoscopic data sets into large hard copy, full color transparency prints recorded at 8000 DPI, the highest in the industry, that display holographic quality 3D imagery bonded onto microlens sheets.
Mark Resource's enterprising 3D work also addresses the specific needs of scientific research establishments in their pursuit to adapt and transform their research data into an autostereoscopic display format that enhances their abilities to further mine their data pools more efficiently. New methodologies in acquiring and viewing data specifically for high resolution 3D displays of this nature is the cornerstone of Mark Resource's work, making use of the latest advances in image processing and customizable optical image acquisition devices.
SPIE (International Society for Optical Engineering)
AGU (American Geophysical Union)
SID (Society for Information Display)
National Stereocopic Association
The Fluroscent Mineral Society

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


If you're thinking about getting lingual braces you probably have a lot of questions. Luckily, as specialist orthodontists and lingual-enthusiasts, we have the answers. We're continually updating our frequently asked questions, but if you can't find the information you need, please get in touch.
How long will I need to wear lingual braces for?
The length of your orthodontic treatment will vary based on your individual needs. In most cases treatment takes 12-18 months, but it could take as little as six months if you're only looking to straighten mild crowding. Your orthodontist should be able to give you an accurate estimate of how long your treatment will take during your initial consultation.
You'll need to see your orthodontist regularly throughout your lingual brace treatment – roughly every 6-8 weeks. This is so they can adjust your brace and make sure everything is moving as planned. It also gives you the opportunity to ask any questions.
Are lingual braces available on the NHS?
No. Unfortunately lingual braces are not funded by the NHS. They are only available on a private, self-funded basis. Most orthodontists will be able to offer finance packages though, to help you spread the cost of your treatment.
Does my dentist need to refer me for lingual orthodontic treatment?
No. You don't need your dentist to refer you for an orthodontic consultation. You can contact your local specialist orthodontist directly to arrange your first appointment.
Why doesn't every orthodontist offer lingual orthodontics?
Lingual orthodontics is a complex technique that requires special training and equipment. Not every orthodontist will offer every type of brace, which sometimes comes down to personal preference as well as their target audience, for example they may predominantly treat NHS patients.
Can I straighten just my front teeth with lingual braces?
Yes – absolutely. Lingual braces can be used to target small sections including the front six teeth. In these cases treatment will usually be quicker and more affordable.
Will lingual braces give me a lisp?
You may experience a lisp for a few days after having your brace fitted while your mouth adjusts. The more you practice talking, the quicker it will disappear.
Lingual braces can be uncomfortable at first, but you'll quickly adjust and there are a few measures you can take to help prevent any discomfort. If your brace is irritating your tongue you can put a small piece of orthodontic wax over the offending bracket. A painkiller such as paracetamol can help to alleviate any achiness and gargling salt water will also help to soothe your mouth.
What foods should I avoid while wearing lingual braces?
As a general rule, you should avoid eating anything hard, chewy or sticky. Top offenders include crusty bread, toffee and chewing gum. Sticky foods will cling to your brace and be difficult to remove; while hard, chewy foods can remove brackets, resulting in a special trip to see your orthodontist. You'll actually find that you can still enjoy most foods; you'll just need to cut them up into smaller pieces before enjoying.
Why are lingual braces more expensive than traditional braces?
Lingual braces can cost more than clear aligners or traditional fixed braces. This reflects the cost of the brace itself, particularly if it has been custom-made just for you. It also reflects the training and expertise of your orthodontist and the length of your appointments. Because the brackets are on the inside of your teeth, they're slightly less accessible and therefore adjustments can take slightly longer.


text:
Snabbsex eller en snabbis är en sexuell aktivitet som kan indikera att tiden för akten är begränsad. Snabbsex kan uppkomma från en spontan sexuell önskan eller vara planerad i förväg.

Beskrivning
På grund av den begränsade tiden hoppas vanligen förspelet över och kvinnan har inte alltid tid att bli tillräckligt lubrikerad tills då penetration sker. I ett planerat skede så kan de sexuella parterna vara klädda så att det reducerar tiden för att klä av sig. Exempelvis kan en kvinna bära en vid kjol eller lingerie, stringtrosor eller att inte ha några underkläder alls. Mannen kan å andra sidan undvara att bära bälte eller jacka.

Snabbsex kan vara lösning på ojämställda sexuella begär i en relationen, men om det är i formen av sex där endast mannen når sexuell tillfredsställelse kan relationen istället lida. Författaren och psykiatrikern Joel Bluck menar att snabbsex är en nödvändig del av relationen och föreslår praktiska tillvägagångssätt för hur båda personerna inblandade ska kunna njuta av aktiviteten.

Se även
 Onani
 Oralsex
 Orgasm

Referenser

Externa länkar

Sexualtekniker

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
909 F. 2d 139 - Allied Steel General Contractor
909 F2d 139 Allied Steel General Contractor
17 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1065
ALLIED STEEL, GENERAL CONTRACTOR; and Frank Solis, Owner,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
CITY OF ABILENE; Meals on Wheels Plus, Inc.; Betty
Blazier, Executive Director; Ben Hutchinson, Chairman,
Board of Directors; Robert Bailey, Member, Board of
Directors; Michael Morrison, Administrator, Housing and
Community Development Division, City of Abilene; M.R.
Newberry, Architect, Defendants-Appellants.
ALLIED STEEL et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
CITY OF ABILENE et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 89-1982, 89-1895.
Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 20, 1990.
Claudia Clinton, First Asst. City Atty., Harvey Cargill, City Atty., Abilene, Tex., for City of Abilene and Morrison.
Frank Scarborough, Hutchinson, Blazier, Bailey, Glandon, Erwin, Scarborough, Baker & Choate, Abilene, Tex., for Meals on Wheels.
Charles L. Black, Wagstaff, Alvis, Stubbeman, Seamster & Longacre, Abilene, Tex., for Newberry.
Michael H. Sussman, Sussman & Sussman, Yonkers, N.Y., for plaintiffs-appellees.
Appeals from United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
Before REAVLEY, DUHE, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
Allied Steel (Allied), an Hispanic general contractor in the Abilene area, brought suit in the Northern District of Texas under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1981, 1983, 1985, 2000d, and 5301 et seq.; the due process and equal protection clauses of the fifth and fourteenth amendments to the United States Constitution; and Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 2368a.3, Sec. 5 (now Tex.Loc.Gov't Code Ann. Sec. 271.027 (Vernon, 1988)).1 The issue was whether, in awarding a construction contract funded in part with Community Development Block Grant Funds which the federal government had allocated to the City of Abilene, the defendants had discriminated against Allied on the basis of national origin. The defendants are Meals on Wheels Plus, Inc. (MOW), a non-profit corporation; Ben Hutchinson, Chairman of its Board of Directors; Betty Blazier, its Executive Director; Robert Bailey, a board member; the City of Abilene; Michael Morrison, Administrator, Housing and Community Development; and M.R. Newberry, an architect.
* After trial without a jury, the district court found no evidence that the defendants had discriminated against Allied. The court ordered the action dismissed on its merits, signing the judgment as "entered" on August 7, 1989. The clerk entered the judgment on the docket on August 8, 1989, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 58 and 79(a). More than thirty days later, on September 22, 1989, Allied filed a motion pursuant to Rule 4(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP), to extend the time within which to file notice of appeal. Finding that Allied's reasons for failing to file a timely notice of appeal constituted "excusable neglect," the district court granted the motion ex parte that day. Allied filed notice of appeal on September 25th. On September 26th, the clerk docketed the order extending the time in which Allied might file notice of appeal.
On September 27th and 29th, the defendants separately filed motions to reconsider Allied's motion to extend time. In their accompanying briefs, the defendants argued that the court had not granted them the opportunity that FRAP 4(a) allows to be heard on the motion. The district court denied those motions, and the defendants filed notice of appeal from the order that had extended the time within which Allied could appeal the district court's judgment of dismissal.
The defendants next filed a motion in this court to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Allied's appeal of the district court's judgment dismissing the action on the merits. Denying that motion on December 15, 1989, a motions panel of this court rejected the defendants' claim that because the district court's granting Allied's motion to extend ex parte without a hearing violated the procedural rules, Allied's motion was void and the appeal should be dismissed as untimely. The panel held that although the district court should have provided the defendants an opportunity to respond before it granted Allied's motion to extend the time in which to file a notice of appeal, that court had, nevertheless, satisfied the objectives of the rules by later considering, within sixty days of judgment, the defendants' arguments in the briefs that accompanied their motions to reconsider. On January 24, 1990, that motion panel denied a motion to reconsider its December order. For purposes of oral argument and decision, this court consolidated Allied's appeal from the district court's judgment and the defendants' appeal from the district court's order granting Allied's motion to extend time in which to file notice of appeal.
We hold that the district court erred in finding "excusable neglect," in the absence of which Allied's notice of appeal was untimely. Consequently, this court lacks jurisdiction, and we must dismiss this appeal.
Allied argues that the district court correctly found that Allied's failure to file a timely notice of appeal resulted from "excusable neglect." At the start of the thirty-day period within which Allied could appeal as of right, "an urgent business situation" arose which demanded Allied's undivided attention: one of its customers defaulted on a substantial payment. Because of that "business-threatening" circumstance, Allied argues, it neglected to authorize counsel to file a notice of appeal.
Allied also argues that it believed in good faith that it had sixty days within which to file its notice of appeal because its office manager had mistakenly construed the rule which the receptionist in Allied's attorney's office had related to her. The office manager gathered that the use of federal funds in MOW's construction project brought the time for filing notice of appeal within the sixty-day period that pertains when the United States is a party.
On the basis of those two arguments, the district court found that Allied had shown "excusable neglect."
When a party fails to file a notice of appeal within thirty days following the district court's entry of judgment, FRAP 4(a)(5) allows that party to request an extension of time during which to file such notice. The party must file that request not later than thirty days after the initial period allowed for filing notice of appeal expires. A district court which grants such a request may not expand the period for filing notice of appeal beyond the later of thirty days after expiration of the original filing period or ten days after entry of the order granting the request.2
In this case the district court entered judgment for the City of Abilene on August 8, 1989. Allied had until September 7 to file a notice of appeal as of right. It did not file its motion to extend the time in which to file until September 22, fifteen days after the period had expired during which it could have filed a notice of appeal as of right.
We review extensions of time under FRAP 4(a) for abuse of discretion. Chipser v. Kohlmeyer & Co., 600 F.2d 1061, 1063 (5th Cir.1979). We give great deference to the district court's determination of excusable neglect when the appellant applies for an extension during the initial thirty-day period in which the law permits appeal as of right. Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. Cherry Meat Packers, Inc., 371 U.S. 215, 83 S.Ct. 283, 9 L.Ed.2d 261 (1962). Although we are still deferential towards the district court once that period has expired, our deference need not, however, be as great.
The provisions of Rule 4(a) are mandatory and jurisdictional. Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co., 487 U.S. 312, 108 S.Ct. 2405, 101 L.Ed.2d 285 (1988); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988); Browder v. Director, Illinois Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978); Lusted v. San Antonio Indep. School Dist., 741 F.2d 817, 819 (5th Cir.1984). The "excusable neglect" standard of that rule is intended to be a "strict one." Chipser, 600 F.2d at 1063 (citing Stern, "Changes in the Federal Appellate Rules," 41 F.R.D. 297, 298-99 (1967)). "A strict construction of Rule 4(a)(1) necessarily and logically compels us to erect a high threshold in our determination of 'excusable neglect' under Rule 4(a)(5)." Loosely interpreting " 'excusable neglect' would convert the 30-day period for appeal provided in FRAP 4(a) into a 60-day one--a result clearly not intended by the Rule's framers." Parke-Chapley Constr. v. Cherrington, 865 F.2d 907, 911 (7th Cir.1989) (quoting Judge Friendly, a member of the Advisory Committee that drafted the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, in In re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc., 769 F.2d 911, 917 (2d Cir.1985)).
Failure to file a timely notice of appeal because of a "business-threatening circumstance" does not constitute "excusable neglect."3 To accept that Allied's "economic crisis," its "extraordinary" circumstance, constituted excusable neglect would be to eviscerate the rule that a party must appeal a judgment or order within thirty days following its entry. Almost any party to any dispute could argue truthfully that unique or extraordinary circumstances had distracted its attention. Cf. Bailey v. Sharp, 782 F.2d 1366, 1371 (7th Cir.1986) (Easterbrook, J., concurring) (Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b) prohibits district court's extending to eighteen days the ten-day period for serving motion for new trial under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(b)). District courts would have no principled means of distinguishing among circumstances. Requiring courts constantly to adjudicate claims of extraordinary or unique circumstances would defeat the purpose of the time limitation in Rule 4(a)(1)--to provide a definite point at which, in the absence of a notice of appeal, litigation will cease. Pellegrino v. Marathon Bank, 640 F.2d 696, 698 (5th Cir.1981). Rule 4(a)(5) clearly indicates that potential appellants may not regard the period during which a district court may extend the time for filing a notice of appeal as a further period in which to ponder their options.
Furthermore, while its economic crisis may have distracted Allied, it nowhere argues that the crisis similarly distracted its attorney. Indeed, even if it had, such distraction would not render his neglect "excusable." United States v. Bowen, 310 F.2d 45 (5th Cir.1962) ("preoccupation of counsel with other matters does not dispense with the necessity for a compliance with the rules"). Additionally, the fact that a party represented by an attorney misconstrues a rule does not raise such party's error to the level of excusable neglect. Campbell v. Bowlin, 724 F.2d 484, 488 (5th Cir.1984); see also Harlan v. Graybar Elec. Co., 442 F.2d 425, 426 (9th Cir.1971) (counsel's misreading rule to allow sixty not thirty days in which to file notice does not show excusable neglect). Allied had an experienced attorney whom it should have consulted on procedural questions of appeal. Although Allied's relying on a telephone conversation between its office manager and its attorney's receptionist in such an important matter as an appeal deadline was certainly neglect, that neglect cannot approach even the threshold of excusability.
In light of the jurisprudence, our analysis leaves this court no choice but to find that the district court abused its discretion in determining that Allied's failure to lodge a timely notice of appeal resulted from excusable neglect. In the absence of excusable neglect, the district court's granting Allied an extension of time within which to file a notice of appeal was reversible error, and Allied's appeal must fail.
For the foregoing reasons, this appeal is DISMISSED.
The district court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint which Allied had alleged under Texas law
FRAP 4(a)(5) provides: "The district court, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, may extend the time for filing a notice of appeal upon motion filed not later than 30 days after the expiration of the time prescribed by this Rule 4(a). Any such motion which is filed before expiration of the prescribed time may be ex parte unless the court otherwise requires. Notice of any such motion which is filed after expiration of the prescribed time shall be given to the other parties in accordance with local rules. No such extension shall exceed 30 days past such prescribed time or 10 days from the date of entry of the order granting the motion, whichever occurs later."
Allied based its motion for an extension of time in which to file notice of appeal upon a showing of "excusable neglect and good cause." The district court found excusable neglect. We do not need to consider the more lenient "good cause" standard because Allied did not request an extension before the thirty-day appeal period expired. Parke-Chapley Constr. Co. v. Cherrington, 865 F.2d 907, 909-11 (7th Cir.1989)
The Committee Notes to FRAP 4(a)(5) provided in relevant part: "[t]he proposed amended rule expands to some extent the standard for the grant of an extension of time. The present rule requires a 'showing of excusable neglect.' While this was an appropriate standard in cases in which the motion is made after the time for filing the notice of appeal has run, and remains so, it has never fit exactly the situation in which the appellant seeks an extension before the expiration of the initial time. In such a case 'good cause,' which is the standard that is applied in the granting of other extensions of time under Rule 26(b)[,] seems to be more appropriate."
Had Allied applied for an extension during the thirty-day period following entry of judgment, the more lenient "good cause" standard might have accommodated the reasons it proferred for seeking an extension. See Chipser v. Kohlmeyer & Co., 600 F.2d 1061, 1063 n. 2; Parke-Chapley Constr., 865 F.2d 907, 909 n. 5; 9 J. Moore, B. Ward, & J. Lucas, Moore's Federal Practice, p 204.13[1.-2] n. 25 (1990). We do not comment on the merits of that argument.


text:
Medical House Staff
Visiting Graduate Researcher (VGR)
Faculty Housing
Faculty Accommodations
Faculty Housing Rates & Information
Moving into University Faculty Housing
Moving Out of University Apartments Faculty Housing
UCLA Staff Housing
University Faculty Apartments Eligibility
University Faculty Apartments Amenities
Ask the Dietitian
UCLA Coffee Service
Student Technology Center (STC)
Closest to Campus
Los Angeles is now the second largest city in the nation. UCLA commands a prime location in Westwood, a desirable neighborhood in West Los Angeles. Despite high rents and competition for housing near campus, two-thirds of UCLA's students choose to live within five miles of campus, half of that number within a mile. We've compiled descriptions of some of the most popular rental neighborhoods near UCLA.
Westwood (Zip Code 90024)
Students may find rooms to rent in the area east of campus, or in the apartments on Hilgard Avenue, along which most sororities are also located. However, the area west of campus is dense with apartments ("North Westwood Village"). The campus evening vans and security escort program operate in this area. Expect high rents, though sharing helps keep costs down. Street parking is hard to find.
Aside from campus, the nearest services are in Westwood Village, just south of campus. There are lots of restaurants, movie theaters, clothing, and convenience stores. No laundromats located in Westwood Village, although the nearest laundromat is south on Westwood Boulevard, right past Santa Monica Boulevard. Four supermarkets are conveniently located in Westwood: on Le Conte Avenue, Gayley Avenue, Glendon Avenue, and Westwood Boulevard at Ohio Avenue.
Apartments south of Wilshire drop in price and are close to the free UCLA Campus Shuttle located at the UCLA Wilshire Center (pick up at Midvale Avenue and Ashton Ave). Many students find rooms to rent east of Westwood Boulevard, but they may not be close to buses that run to campus.
Transportation options direct to UCLA: Walking, Biking, Big Blue Bus #1, #8, #11, #12/Super 12, UCLA BruinBus Campus Express and Wilshire Center routes.
West Los Angeles (90025)
West LA extends south of Westwood and west of Veteran Avenue (1.5 to 5 miles from campus). Much of this area is within walking or biking distance from campus. East of the 405, students may find rooms to rent. Apartments are clustered near Santa Monica and Olympic Boulevards. The area west of the 405 is popular with students. It has many small apartments, slightly less expensive than those in Westwood, and good bus access to campus along Wilshire and Santa Monica Boulevard. Supermarkets, Laundromats and restaurants line these streets as well.
Transportation options direct to UCLA: Biking, Big Blue Bus #1, #2, #8, #11, #12/Super 12, Culver City Bus #6.
Brentwood (90049)
Brentwood is two miles west of campus, separated from it by the Brentwood VA complex and the 405 Freeway. You might find rooms or guest houses in the country-like roads in the northern section of Brentwood, but most apartments are in the triangle bordered by Wilshire, San Vicente Boulevard and Bundy. This area has been hard hit by condo conversions, but there are still many apartments to rent or share. The main street in Brentwood is San Vicente Boulevard. Buses to campus are on Wilshire, Montana and Sunset Boulevard. Many students bike to campus.
Transportation options direct to UCLA: Biking, Big Blue Bus #2 and #3, Metro line 2; Big Blue Bus #4 (San Vicente) connects with Big Blue Bus #2 and #3.
Bel Air (90077)
This neighborhood is directly north of campus, but there's not much here for students. There is no bus service; minimal shopping is available on Roscomare near Mulholland, or on Beverly Glen Boulevard. The only notable point of interest is the UCLA Japanese Garden, one mile north of campus. There are sometimes rooms to rent within the houses or condos, but there are not apartments to rent.
Transportation options direct to UCLA: Walking or biking.
Sanat Monica (90401-2-3-4-5)
Not only is this incorporated beach city near campus (four to seven miles), but it has the beach, great parks, good libraries and schools, buses to campus, clean air and rent control—the ideal life, it would seem. However, low turnover, long waiting lists, condo conversions, and stiff competition make finding an affordable place here difficult. Still, there are opportunities to share houses or apartments, or to rent guest houses or rooms. Rental turnover is greater and rent is cheaper on the south side (Ocean Park) and the inland area off Santa Monica Boulevard than in the exclusive northern part of Santa Monica between Wilshire Blvd and Sunset Blvd, centered on Montana Avenue.
Santa Monica's main attraction is Downtown, consisting of the 3rd Street Promenade, Santa Monica Place (a mall), and the Santa Monica Pier. Additionally, there are boutique shops and upscale restaurants lining Montana Ave, although there is plenty of retail and restaurants throughout Santa Monica. Located south of the 10 freeway are Santa Monica Municipal Airport and Santa Monica College (SMC).
Transportation options direct to UCLA: Big Blue Bus #1, #2, #3, #8, #11, and Metro line 2.
Pacific Palisades (90272)
West of Brentwood and north of Santa Monica, Pacific Palisades is an upscale community five to six miles from campus. Centered along Sunset Boulevard as it winds its way to the Pacific, most of this neighborhood is in the hills and canyons overlooking the ocean. There are apartment shares and rooms in homes here. With limited bus service to UCLA, this area might be considered hard to get to and isolated by some students, but it is beautiful and near the beach.
Transportation options direct to UCLA: Metro line 2.
Mail Code: 138307
Housing Services Office
360 De Neve Drive
We are currently working remotely and cannot answer our phones, please use Live Chat
Department Phone Numbers
©	2021 Regents of University of California
Follow on Snapchat


What is The Protein Pick and Mix?
5% OFF your 1st Order!
Tunbridge Wells shop open NOW!
We'd love to have you stop by the Mix itself!! Check out our NEW Virtual Tour!
Even better, why not actually visit our real life Pick&Mix store in Tunbridge Wells...join us for a protein shake!!
We'd love to have you stop by the Mix itself!! Visit our store in Tunbridge Wells!
Privacy & Cookies | Shipping Policy.
Product descriptions and nutritional facts used on this website belong to the manufacturers unless explicitly indicated otherwise and The Protein Pick and Mix Ltd takes no responsibility for their accuracy.
All opinion expressed is author's own, does not constitute dietary advice or official recommendation, and is entirely subjective.
The products offered on this website are intended for use and consumption by people aged 18 years and older. Ensure you are in a good state of health and/or consult your doctor before starting any supplement or exercise programme.
© 2019 The Protein Pick and Mix Ltd. / Company Reg. No. 8715023 / VAT No. 180 5347 12. 61 - 63 Camden Road, Tunbridge Wells, Kent. TN1 2QE.


text:
Q: Deleting row from sql database The delete method of my sql database doesn't remove the entry from the database. It gives a null pointer exception:

10-18 00:44:25.069: E/AndroidRuntime(17968): java.lang.NullPointerException
  10-18 00:44:25.069: E/AndroidRuntime(17968):    at com.weather.app.LocationDB.deleteLocation(LocationDB.java:98)

public class LocationDB extends SQLiteOpenHelper {

private static final int DATABASE_VERSION = 1;

// Database Name
private static final String DATABASE_NAME = "locationManager";

private static final String TABLE_LOCATIONS = "locations";
private static final String KEY_ID = "id";
private static final String KEY_LOCATION = "location";
private static final String KEY_COUNTRY = "country";
private SQLiteDatabase db;

public LocationDB(Context context) {
    super(context, DATABASE_NAME, null, DATABASE_VERSION);
}

@Override
public void onCreate(SQLiteDatabase db) {

    String sql = "CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS " + TABLE_LOCATIONS + " ( "
            + KEY_ID + " INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT, " + KEY_LOCATION
            + " TEXT, " + KEY_COUNTRY
            + " TEXT, " + " INTEGER)";
    db.execSQL(sql);
}

@Override
public void onUpgrade(SQLiteDatabase db, int oldV, int newV) {
    db.execSQL("DROP TABLE IF EXISTS " + TABLE_LOCATIONS);
    onCreate(db);
}
public void addLocation(LocationName location) {
    SQLiteDatabase db = this.getWritableDatabase();

    ContentValues values = new ContentValues();
    values.put(KEY_LOCATION, location.getTaskName());
    values.put(KEY_COUNTRY, location.getTaskCountry());

    db.insert(TABLE_LOCATIONS, null, values);
}

public List<LocationName> getAllLocations() {
    List<LocationName> locList = new ArrayList<LocationName>();
    // Select All Query
    String selectQuery = "SELECT  * FROM " + TABLE_LOCATIONS;

    SQLiteDatabase db = this.getWritableDatabase();
    Cursor cursor = db.rawQuery(selectQuery, null);

    // looping through all rows and adding to list
    if (cursor.moveToFirst()) {
        do {
            LocationName task = new LocationName();
            task.setId(cursor.getInt(0));
            task.setTaskName(cursor.getString(1));
            task.setTaskCountry(cursor.getString(2));
            // Adding contact to list
            locList.add(task);
        } while (cursor.moveToNext());
    }
    return locList;
}
public boolean deleteLocation(long rowId) {
    return db.delete(TABLE_LOCATIONS, KEY_ID + "=" + rowId, null) > 0;
}

}
Then entry is not removed even when the app is restarted, the addLocation method for adding a row works fine.
LocationSettings Activity:
public class LocationSettings extends Activity {
protected static LocationDB db;
static List<LocationName> list;
MyAdapter adapt;
private static TextView name;
private ListView listView;
private static final int DLG_EXAMPLE1 = 0;

@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
    super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
    setContentView(R.layout.activity_location_settings);
    getActionBar().setDisplayHomeAsUpEnabled(true);
    getActionBar().setHomeButtonEnabled(true);
    db = new LocationDB(this);
    list = db.getAllTasks();
    adapt = new MyAdapter(this, R.layout.drawer_list_item, list);
    listView = (ListView) findViewById(R.id.left_drawer);
    listView.setAdapter(adapt);
    SwipeDismissListViewTouchListener touchListener =
            new SwipeDismissListViewTouchListener(
                    listView,
                    new SwipeDismissListViewTouchListener.DismissCallbacks() {
                        @Override
                        public boolean canDismiss(int position) {
                            return true;
                        }

                        @Override
                        public void onDismiss(ListView listView, int[] reverseSortedPositions) {
                            for (int position : reverseSortedPositions) {
                                db.deleteTask(position);
                                adapt.remove(adapt.getItem(position));
                            }
                        }
                    });

    listView.setOnItemClickListener(new DrawerItemClickListener());
    listView.setOnTouchListener(touchListener);

}
public class DrawerItemClickListener implements ListView.OnItemClickListener {
    @Override
    public void onItemClick(AdapterView<?> parent, View view, int position, long id) {
        db.deleteTask(position);
        adapt.notifyDataSetChanged();
    }
}
private class MyAdapter extends ArrayAdapter<LocationName> {

    Context context;
    List<LocationName> taskList = new ArrayList<LocationName>();
    int layoutResourceId;

    public MyAdapter(Context context, int layoutResourceId,
            List<LocationName> objects) {
        super(context, layoutResourceId, objects);
        this.layoutResourceId = layoutResourceId;
        this.taskList = objects;
        this.context = context;
    }

    @Override
    public View getView(int position, View convertView, ViewGroup parent) {
        if (convertView == null) {
            LayoutInflater inflater = (LayoutInflater) context.getSystemService(Context.LAYOUT_INFLATER_SERVICE);
            convertView = inflater.inflate(R.layout.drawer_list_item,parent, false);
            name = (TextView) convertView.findViewById(R.id.text1);
        }
        LocationName current = taskList.get(position);
        name.setText(current.getTaskName());
        return convertView;
    }

}

}

A: you forget to initialize db before calling delete method in deleteLocation.
public int deleteLocation(long rowId) {
    SQLiteDatabase db = this.getWritableDatabase();
    return db.delete(TABLE_LOCATIONS, KEY_ID + " = ?",
                             new String[] { String.valueOf(rowId) });
}

A: Using the suggested following fragment of code from @ρяσѕρєяK:
public int deleteLocation(long rowId) {
    SQLiteDatabase db = this.getWritableDatabase();
    return db.delete(TABLE_LOCATIONS, KEY_ID + " = ?",
                             new String[] { String.valueOf(rowId) });
}

has changed the signature of your method generating that error. I think that
public boolean deleteLocation(long rowId) {
    SQLiteDatabase db = this.getWritableDatabase();
    return db.delete(TABLE_LOCATIONS, KEY_ID + " = ?",
                             new String[] { String.valueOf(rowId) }) > 0;
}

will solve your problem.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Rock out in style in these Wanted Colorado combat boots! This versatile style can be worn up for the full combat boot effect, or worn folded down and kept secure with button snaps. The Wanted Colorado combat boots have a knit lining and a back zipper closure.


text:
beebright - stock.adobe.com
Mitre ATT&CK: How it has evolved and grown
Adoption of the Mitre ATT&CK framework, which saw version 8.0 released Tuesday, has grown rapidly over the last years, though challenges still remain for enterprise users.
Arielle Waldman, News Writer
While the Mitre ATT&CK framework started off as an internal Excel spreadsheet, it has evolved into a global knowledge base of threat activity, techniques and models that's become indispensable for many organizations.
The public release of the framework in 2015 garnered little fanfare, but today it is widely popular among enterprise organizations, governments and security vendors. Not only does the Mitre ATT&CK framework provide a common knowledge base of adversary activity in the wild, it also helps organizations to prioritize threats, evaluate security methods, and vet products and services.
The ATT&CK framework is also commonly used by government agencies such as the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) in alerts and advisories about threat activity. It was recently used in a joint cybersecurity alert from the FBI and CISA regarding a Russian state-sponsored advanced persistent threat (APT) actor was compromising U.S. government targets.
"See the ATT&CK for Enterprise framework for all referenced threat actor tactics and techniques," the alert said.
ATT&CK has evolved significantly over the last five years. Mitre released version 8.0 of the framework Tuesday; in particular, the ATT&CK for Enterprise threat model will add new adversary tactics for activity such as reconnaissance.
Mitre ATT&CK principal cybersecurity engineer Adam Pennington said ATT&CK is similar to an encyclopedia that describes various activities that adversaries perform as they work their way through an intrusion.
"It consists of information on over 160 of these behaviors in our main framework, so it's something that people are using these days in order to be able to describe those activities with a consistent language and be able to have different options that they can leverage to respond to those," he said.
Over the last couple of years, Pennington said Mitre has seen an explosion of use as it became more widely adopted throughout the security community.
"It's seen a lot of organic growth through word of mouth as people have embraced it and talked to us about various needs. We've gone from what was originally 40 to 50 behaviors, up to now over 160," he said. "We're covering areas we didn't use to like mobile devices and industrial control systems, as well as a lot more information for people to be able to help themselves and how to stop specific behaviors. We're taking free, open source public reporting, figuring out which behaviors are in it from ATT&CK and publishing that ourselves."
During a session at the Forrester Security & Risk Global 2020 virtual conference last month, Forrester Research senior analyst Brian Kime said it was in late 2017, early 2018 when ATT&CK began to take over as the most popular of the intrusion frameworks.
"It's popular because it helps us build resilient security architectures. It provides us with a method of modeling threats and this will allow us to build detections and collect the right telemetry across our environments from the perimeter down to the end points," he said in the session. "ATT&CK by itself it not a threat intel, but it should be a component of a threat profile."
Sekhar Sarukkai, McAfee fellow and vice president of its cloud business unit, said the framework's increasing use over a short amount of time is also attributed to trust, and the recent distribution of that trust from internal networks to the cloud.
"Traditional security assumed that everything was near controlled, but the new reality is that trust has become completely opened up because of the cloud. Today, there's no enterprise that has everything in their control," Sarukkai said. "Secondly, during the last few months with COVID, work from home required a distributed fashion where it naturally dovetails with the distributed trust model and required the security teams to look at other ways to defend its security posture."
Additionally, Kime said in his session that the framework provides a way to cluster threat activity and drive patterns. "Instead of presenting a SOC [security operations center] analyst with individual events, we can present them with a pattern of events that helps them better understand."
University of California Berkeley's Center for Long-Term Cybersecurity (CLTC), in conjunction with McAfee and Mitre, examined the adoption and maturity of the ATT&CK framework's cloud matrix.
ATT&CK-ing the cloud
The frameworks' popularity, along with the rapid cloud adoption, inspired a report by graduate student researchers, Jasdeep Basra and Tanu Kaushik titled, "MITRE ATT&CK as a Framework for Cloud Threat Investigation." In the report, Basra and Kaushik interviewed and surveyed security professionals about how to address cloud security challenges, such as identifying and mitigating threats in hybrid environments.
The joint report, produced by McAfee and the Center for Long-Term Cybersecurity (CLTC) at the University of California, Berkeley, found that 87% of survey respondents agree that adopting the ATT&CK for Cloud matrix will improve cloud security in their organizations. However, it also found that only 49% of respondents felt highly confident in the ability of their security products to detect adversary tactics and techniques in each of the ATT&CK matrices.
Sarukkai said incorporating the cloud dimension into the ATT&CK framework is crucial because so many threats will cross the "silos" of internal networks, endpoint devices and external cloud services.
While the framework was originally focused more on endpoint threats, Sarukkai said an increasingly common attack vector today is a threat actor compromising a cloud administrative account.
"That typically happens through traditional malware and through endpoint and then once they've gotten compromised the admin then becomes the launching pad to attack the cloud. That's one direction where attacks are going from the device to cloud," he said. "Another common attack vector we saw was around COVID-related campaigns. There was a spike in external threats. In that case, it's an example of how a bad actor can compromise the cloud environment and then expand out into the endpoint."
Sarukkai said increasingly SOC teams are seeing that and saying they can't just look at silos to feel confident in their security postures. The report found that 45% of global survey respondents identify the lack of interoperability with their security products as the biggest challenge with the ATT&CK framework and 43% cite the challenge of mapping event data to tactics and techniques.
In addition to interoperability, the report determined that a large percentage of enterprises do not correlate events from the cloud, networks and endpoints to investigate threats; only 39% of enterprises do.
"The data indicates that's the challenge customers are facing -- 83% of respondents said that ATT&CK framework was very comprehensive, but they are manually looking at mapping some of these techniques into their framework," Pennington said. "And the flip side is they're seeing it's becoming intractable because of the nature of these attacks, which are cross-silo. If you look at the data, less than 20% of these customers have fully adopted ATT&CK from an operational perspective, so they can't automate because of the lack of this support."
Pennington said SOC teams want the data and visibility provided by various security products, from endpoints and mobile to network and cloud, to be normalized on the ATT&CK framework and presented on some type of dashboard and fed into other products like SIEMs.
According to the CLTC report, 79% said the framework would make them more comfortable with cloud adoption. "That sort of translates to with better security, you're more likely to enable businesses to go to the cloud and for businesses to be more effective," Sarukkai said.
ATT&CK challenges
The cloud matrix is just one of a collection of matrices, Kime said.
"MITRE ATT&CK is not just one framework; it's a collection of matrices based on the type of environment you're defending. The one that most people refer to when speaking about it is the enterprise matrix, but you can filter it down based on operating system and cloud platform," Kime said in the session.
Most of what goes into the ATT&CK matrixes are suggestions from the community. "It started off as something completely us where we were putting it out there, but a majority of things going in today are thanks to people contributing back," Pennington said.
Despite its gaining popularity, as the data from the joint study found, users continue to have difficulty learning to use the framework.
There are two fundamental challenges, Sarukkai said.
"A lot of tools didn't have the ability to support it. Enterprises who don't have these products end up doing it manually which they means they aren't fully able to adopt the Mitre ATT&CK framework because they are getting inundated with instances and because they don't have the tooling they need to be effective. That's the biggest reason," he said.
The second problem, Sarukkai said, is that organizations want to use ATT&CK to automate remediation and help alleviate the workload on SOC analysts. But such use requires a level of maturity with ATT&CK, and the report found that just 19% of respondents have reached that maturity level.
The biggest challenge, according to Pennington, is people being overwhelmed.
"We recognize that. ATT&CK for Enterprise, the main knowledge base people are using, is 156 high-level behaviors as of right now. And so, if an organization is going in and trying to just go across and immediately in one pass figure out what their stance is against 156 behaviors, they'll be overwhelmed, and we've seen that," he said. "We're tried to release a number of resources over the past year, how to get started, how to prioritize, and plan on releasing more free training in the future."
While it's useful for prioritizing threats, there are some things ATT&CK is not, Kime said.
"It's not something you do. It's not a process. It is not really something you operate and install and it's not a technology or a product. It's also not something that you aspire to do all of because many of the MITRE techniques are actually legitimate things that users and system administrators do, so having a goal of alerting on every type of technique is actually a pretty poor strategy," he said during his session.
An ever-evolving framework
According to Sarukkai, outsourcing security operations through the use of the Mitre ATT&CK framework is where the evolution may lead overtime. The CLTC report found 69% of respondents said they would be more comfortable outsourcing security operations through the framework.
"Today, the biggest challenge with security is getting trained staff who know what cybersecurity is about and the fact they are more willing to look at outsourced SOC in essence because they now feel like they have a more common lingo for which they can work with third parties," he said.
One of the next steps in the framework's evolution, announced Tuesday with ATT&CK 8.0, is the inclusion of techniques that adversaries use to attack network devices like routers and switches. Another addition in the new version is "resource development," which delves into how threat actors collect the necessary pieces they need to accomplish an intrusion. Those pieces can include compromised assets like servers or virtual machines, as well as SSL certificates and legitimate administrative tools.
Pennington said the effort over the last five years to make security products more compatible has paid off. In the beginning, organizations mostly used the framework for intrusion detection sensors. But that has changed drastically, thanks to customer-driven efforts to further utilize the framework in their overall security postures.
"In terms of ATT&CK adoption and people needing it, I think it has improved quite a bit."
Chapter 1: Security and Risk Management –McGraw Hill
Top Priority IT Tasks: Risk Management and Regulatory Compliance –Dell Software
Information Security Threats: Building Risk Resilience –SearchSecurity.com
What are the challenges associated with the MITRE ATT&CK framework?
By: Shannon Flynn
British Army picks Immersive Labs for cyber training
Three latest trends and developments around the Mitre ATT&CK framework
Is AI a boon or bane for cybersecurity?
By: Johna Johnson
Enabling Business-Critical Apps For a Distributed Environment –NetApp
What are the challenges associated with the MITRE ATT... – ComputerWeekly.com
Challenges and benefits of using the Mitre ATT&CK ... – SearchSecurity
MITRE ATT&CK framework – SearchSecurity


text:
DBRS says Canadians can withstand housing downturn
OTTAWA — Credit rating agency DBRS said Thursday that average Canadian households can withstand a catastrophic drop in home prices, but warned that a rise in unemployment would be a greater concern.
The agency said a 40 per cent drop in prices or rising interest rates would put pressure on Canadian households, but not have a large impact on mortgage defaults.
"However, a combination of higher interest rates, lower property values and a drastic increase in unemployment would be of great concern as mortgage defaults are closely related to employment and individual family situations," DBRS said in a report.
"If unemployment spikes, many financially stretched households will be forced to sell their homes, putting greater downward pressure on house prices and turning many people into both house poor and cash poor."
The report comes amid continuing warnings from Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney and federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty that higher interest rates are just a matter of time and Canadians need to ensure they don't get in over their heads with loans and mortgages.
DBRS said that faster debt accumulation relative to the economy as a whole or average household income have driven up both home prices and borrowing.
The result has been reduced housing affordability, with pressure on day-to-day cash flow for average Canadian households, leaving them little room to deal with unexpected expenses.
"Canadian households are solvent, possessing ample home equity and other financial assets," DBRS said.
"However, day-to-day cash flow appears to be stretched, making households vulnerable to cash flow shock and credit problems from the occurrence of any of the three 'Ds' — disability, divorce and dismissal."
Household debt in Canada reached record levels of more than 150 per cent of disposable income last year, close to the 160 per cent mark that preceded the housing collapse in the United States.
Carney has warned that record high household debt is the number one domestic risk to the economy, while Flaherty has tightened mortgage lending rules three times in recent years, including reducing the maximum amortization period and hiking the minimum down payment.
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. and the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions have also tweaked the system and may be preparing to do more.
Poll suggests Canadians split over Mulcair's energy views
Bieber releases second single from new album, 'Believe'


A huge surge in demand for the US Dollar has seen the Swedish Krona soften as trader risk sentiment weakens. A lack of data on Monday hasn't helped curtail the Krona downfall, and continued issues with falling commodity prices have hurt the Nordic currency. The Pound, meanwhile, has been relatively quiet in comparison to previous weeks due to an absence of economic data.
The Pound Sterling to Swedish Krona exchange rate is currently trending in the region of 11.6904.
In the run up to the Scottish independence referendum Sterling experienced a huge dip in sentiment and softened considerably. Successive opinion polls showed different results which added to anxieties that the vote would be far too close to call. The detrimental effect independence would have on the Pound was too hot to handle for most investors who pulled away in droves.
Friday morning saw a victory for the Unionists and the Pound instantly regained the losses collected in the previous weeks. Sterling gains were short-lived, however, after increased demand led to attractive selling positions and traders locked in their profits.
The Swedish Krona enjoyed a surge in demand towards the tail end of last week after Gross Domestic Product data printed more positively than the market consensus. Year-on-year Gross Domestic Product was expected to show growth of 1.9% having increased by 1.7% previously, but the actual data revealed a growth of 2.6%. This was helped by the quarter-on-quarter GDP which improved upon the forecast growth of 0.3% with the actual data reaching 0.7%.
The Pound Sterling to Swedish Krona exchange rate has hit a low today of 11.6318.
With an absence of domestic data on Monday the Pound has been subject to very little volatility compared with previous weeks. A slight softening can be attributed to fresh anxieties regarding Scottish devolution. In the panic of the prospect of losing Scotland; Prime Minister David Cameron offered Scotland more power over their domestic affairs. Given that there is a great deal of uncertainty as to what effect Scottish devolution will have on Sterling it is unsurprising that many investors are shying away.
There has also been a distinct lack of economic data for Sweden on Monday. The Krona, however, has softened against the majority of its most traded currency peers as a result of the continued declination in commodity prices. Less major currencies, such as the Krona, are also subject to losses if the US Dollar makes a bullish run.
The Pound Sterling to Swedish Krona exchange rate has reached a high today of 11.6971.
After trending in a stronger position on Monday the GBP/SEK exchange rate drifted lower on Tuesday.
The British Pound to Swedish Krona exchange rate dropped by 0.4% as Sterling broadly softened amid a lack of UK news and ongoing Bank of England rate hike speculation.
While today's UK Public Finance figures could have an influence on GBP/SEK trading, investors will also be looking ahead tomorrow and Sweden's Business and Consumer Confidence indexes.
The gauge of business sentiment is expected to advance from 104.6 to 104.7 while the measure of consumer confidence is believed to have fallen from 96.9 to 96.6.
Surprising results could trigger fluctuations.


text:
The German House sets new standards in Vietnam with its innovative facade
Building owner and planning competition awarded to gmp in 2013
Design Meinhard von Gerkan with Nikolaus Goetze und Volkmar Sievers
Project leader competition and detailed design Kordula Noelle
Competition design team Ines Arkenbergova, Elena Cubillo, Fabian Faerber, Arved Knauer, Sandra Kroll, Martin Majewski, Patrick Tetzlaff, Isabel Vollmer
Detailed design team Elena Cubillo, Anna Falkenbach, Julia Franzke, Frederik Heisel, Steffen Lepiorz, Gabi Nunnemann, Eva Staack, Stella Tran, Michéle Watenphul, Tran Cong Duc (Hanoi), Nguyen Tien Hong Duong (Hanoi), Florian Wiedey (Shanghai)
DGNB Auditor Urs Wedekind
Local architectural practice TwoG Architecture Ho Chi Minh City
Facade Consultants Drees & Sommer SE
Structural engineering & technical services engineering WSP Vietnam
Lighting design ASA Lighting Design Studios
Building and property management Colliers Vietnam
Client Deutsches Haus Invest Ltd.
Construction period 2014–2017
GFA 52.704 m² (including basements)
On March 26, 2019, Peter Altmaier, Federal Minister of Economics, and Pham Bình Minh, the Vietnamese Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign Affairs, ceremonially opened the German House, which was built to a design by gmp. The building is located in District 1, the commercial and cultural center of the city, in the direct vicinity of the consulates of France, Great Britain, and the USA. The German House is not only the seat of the German General Consulate with visa office, it is also home to the German Chamber of Foreign Trade, the Goethe Institute, the German Academic Exchange Service, and is the head office of numerous wellknown German and international companies in Vietnam. In 2012, the project was the subject of a competition organized by the Federal Republic of Germany in the form of a building owner and planning competition. The design by gmp, with funding from Deutsches Haus Invest Vietnam Ltd., was selected as the winning entry in 2013.
The northern, street-side half of the building rises to a height of 75 meters, featuring a roof terrace, whereas the back part extends to a height of 110 meters. The two parts are visually separated by a glazed strip. On the first floor, the room-high glass facade with its colonnade provides a view of the street and across the city. The prestigious main entrance with its widely cantilevering canopy at the narrow side of the building leads visitors to the generous two-story lobby with its central circulation core. The General Consulate on the 7th floor is accessed via a separate foyer at the long side of the building. At a height of 75 meters, a generous roof terrace with an upmarket restaurant provides views across Ho Chi Minh City.
The concept of the compact double-skin facade represents a milestone in the design of the office building. It is the first of its kind in south-east Asia, and was specifically developed for the tropical climate in Ho Chi Minh City by gmp in cooperation with the consulting engineers of Drees & Sommer: movable perforated solar shading louvers are installed between the external impact pane and the inner window pane. This facade system prevents the interior spaces from overheating, has sound-absorbing qualities, and reduces the energy consumption of the air-conditioning systems by 35 percent compared to the existing local standard. Further sustainability features are the building's own water treatment plant, which provides drinking water to all water outlets in the building, solar panels on the roof, and an interior fit-out with high-quality, low-emission materials. As a result, the German House has received prestigious prizes, such as the MIPIM Asia prize, and has been certified LEED Platinum and DGNB Gold. Both these certificates were issued in Vietnam for the first time.
"Palimpsest" >
< "The Rjjks and others"
190327_2621_PM_Deutsches_Haus_HCMC_ENG_01.pdf1.0 M


To Pass The Ccie Sp Lab Exam Exam You Definitely Need This Ccie Sp Lab Exam Pdf Braindump. We Guarantee That It Is Going To Help You Pass Your Exam In Your First Attempt. This Ccie Sp Lab Exam Is Designed To Help You Save Time And Money With Regards To Your Ccie Sp Lab Exam Exam. You Do Not Need To Attend Any Ccie Sp Lab Exam Boot Camps And Pay Hundreds Of Dollars To Just Prepare For This Exam. By Simply Reviewing These Real Questions And Answers From Our Ccie Sp Lab Exam You Will Gain The Knowledge And Confidence To Clear Your Ccie Sp Lab Exam Exam.