text:
HealthEquity, Inc. (HQY) Q3 2019 Earnings Conference Call Transcript
HQY earnings call for the period ending October 31, 2018.
Motley Fool Transcription
(MFTranscription)
Dec 4, 2018 at 11:31PM
HealthEquity, Inc. (NASDAQ:HQY)
Dec. 4, 2018, 5:00 p.m. ET
Welcome to HealthEquity's third quarter 2019 earnings conference call. Please note that this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Richard Putnam, Investor Relations. Go ahead, Mr. Putnam.
Richard Putnam -- Investor Relations
Thank you, Haley. Good afternoon, everyone. We wish you happy holidays and welcome to HealthEquity's third quarter earnings conference call. With me today we have Jon Kessler, President and CEO; Steve Neeleman, Founder and Vice Chair. Darcy Mott, our Executive Vice President and CFO; and Tyson Murdock, our Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller. Before I turn the call over to Jon, I have two quick reminders. First, there is a copy of today's earnings release and a company and financial information posted on our investor relations website, which is ir.healthequity.com.
And second, we claim Safe Harbor on the forward-looking statements included in today's earnings release and that will be made during this conference call with you. Forward-looking statements include noted predictions, expectations, estimates, or other information that might be considered forward-looking. Throughout today's discussion, we will present some important factors relating to our business, which could affect those forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risk and uncertainties that may cause our actual results to differ materially from statements made today.
As a result, we caution you against placing undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. And we encourage you to review the discussion of these factors and other risks that may affect our future results or the market price of our stock detailed in our annual report on form 10k filed with the SEC on March 28th, 2018 along with any other subsequent periodic or current reports filed with the SEC. We may provide updates to the factors affecting these forward-looking statements in light of new information or our future events but we are not obligating ourselves to do so. And with that out of the way, I'll turn the call over to Mr. John Kessler.
Jon Kessler -- President and Chief Executive Officer
Well done, Richard. Thank you. And thanks to everyone else for joining our third quarter fiscal 2019 earnings call. I have a few prepared remarks on the quarter and Steve will then comment on progress in the retirement channel partnerships that we have been building and Darcy will review the numbers. The HealthEquity team delivered an encore-worthy performance -- I'm not sure I know what that means but it's what it says -- in the third quarter across the key metrics that drive the business.
Revenue of 70.5 million, it was an increase of 24% year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA of 29.7 million was up an even larger 40% year-over-year generating significant margin expansion. Custodial assets at the end of the third quarter surpassed 7.1 billion up 27% from a year ago even in the face of broad market declines during the period. Total HSA members at quarter's end reached 3.7 million up 22% year-over-year and active HSA members were 3.0 million up 17% from the third quarter last year.
Turning to sales, the team opened 119,000 new HSAs in the quarter; 9% more than it did during the same period a year ago. For the first three quarters of fiscal '19, the team has opened more than 333,000 new HSAs and that excludes portfolio acquisitions, and it's also up 9% year-over-year and a record. As many of you know, however, our biggest quarter for new accounts in Q4 and we're working hard to deliver a strong one. Custodial assets grew by 59 million during the quarter, which ended October 31.
As you may recall, this was a period where the value of broad categories of assets fell. Notwithstanding market volatility though, HealthEquity continues to grow the share of members investing for the long-term. During the third quarter, custodial invested assets grew 53% and the number of investing HSA members grew 56% year-over-year. So the team has delivered strong year-to-date results in fiscal '19. And because we believe HealthEquity is still in the early stages of its growth, we've made some significant investments in leadership talent.
Last quarter, we introduced Ted Bloomberg, HealthEquity COO, and today I have the pleasure to announce the addition of Larry Trittschuh as HealthEquity's Chief Security Officer. Larry is presently Chief Information Security Officer, Americas for Barclays PLC and previously held Senior Data Security positions at GE and at Synchrony Financial. He served in the US Air Force and is an Air Force Academy graduate. HealthEquity is distinguished by its thousands of connections with ecosystem partners and we've challenged Larry to take an ecosystem approach to privacy and to the security of our members' data, assets, and financial transactions.
We'll be upping our investment and making some real innovation headway in this area because it's the right thing to do for members but also as a way to strengthen our ties to the ecosystem that has made HealthEquity the HSA leader. And speaking of HSA leaders, Steve is now going to take the mic to discuss some of the work our team is doing to connect health and wealth.
Steven Neeleman -- Founder and Vice Chair
Thanks, John. Over the past 16 years, we have built our platform to integrate with health plans and other partners to help consumers better save their HSA dollars. We are now integrating with retirement partners to expand the help we offer to consumers in this important area. We call this connecting health and wealth. During Q3, the team reached key milestones in our strategy to connect health and wealth by launching partnerships with two leaders in the employer-sponsored retirement plan business, Nationwide, and Vanguard. In each case, HealthEquity is working with these partners to create a truly unique and differentiated offering for employers, their advisors, and ultimately for consumers.
By more fully connecting their retirement plans and HSAs, members can easily access and manage their accounts, intelligently allocate retirement investments across asset class choices, and utilize advisory tools to optimize investment objectives. Our vision from day one is that consumers would eventually appreciate the unique power of HSAs for building long-term savings and that HSAs would become widespread and popular as other retirement accounts.
It is no longer the best-kept secret in employee benefits that HSAs are a superior vehicle compared to other accounts for consumers to spend tax-free dollars on healthcare needs, but more importantly, to accumulate long-term retirement savings. HSAs are unique in their triple tax advantage nature. Consumers with HSAs avoid taxes on deposits, growth, and healthcare spending. For this reason, employers and consumers are beginning to think about how HSAs can be coupled with their 401Ks, IRAs, and other retirement accounts to minimize taxes and to maximize long-term retirement savings.
The challenge of managing healthcare expenses while saving money for retirement is significant for all Americans. Our new partners share our vision and so we expect these retirement partnerships will be important sources of growth for HealthEquity and will help educate consumers about the power of HSAs. Our product sales, marketing, and operations teams are now working hard to implement these new partnerships and to sell more HSAs so that we can collectively offer thousands of employers and millions of employees the connected health and wealth solution. I will now pass the baton to Darcy to discuss our numbers.
Darcy Mott -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Thanks, Steve. I will discuss our results on both a GAAP and a non-GAAP basis. A reconciliation of non-GAAP results and guidance that we discuss here to their nearest GAAP measurement is provided in the press release that was published earlier today. Revenue for the third quarter grew 24% year-over-year to $70.5 million. Breaking down the revenue into our three categories, we continued to see growth in each of service, custodial, and interchange revenue during the quarter. Service revenue grew 9% year-over-year to $25 million in the third quarter. Consistent with the strategy we have outlined over the last five years, service revenue as a percent of total revenue declined to 36% in the quarter down from 40% of total revenue that it represented in the third quarter last year as the custodial revenue stream has become more predominant.
Service revenue growth was attributable to a 22% year-over-year increase in average HSAs during the quarter partially offset by an 11% decrease in service revenue per average HSA. Remember, HSA service fees are paid primarily by employers on behalf of their employees and so by bringing these down over time we deliver more value and help our network partners deliver more value to their customers. It's working and we are going to keep doing it. As we indicated throughout this year, we expect the decrease in service revenue per HSA to be toward the high end of our historical 5-10% guidance for FY19. Custodial revenue was $31.6 million in the third quarter representing an increase of 43% year-over-year.
The driving factors for this growth were a 29% growth in average custodial assets and a higher annualized interest rate yield on custodial cash assets of 2.14% during the quarter compared to 1.85% in the prior year third quarter. Interchange revenue grew 18% in the third quarter to $13.9 million compared to $11.7 million in the third quarter last year. Interchange revenue benefited from the 22% year-over-year increase in average HSAs in the quarter compared to the third quarter last year with a 4% decrease in average spend per HSA member. Gross profit for the third quarter was $45.8 million compared to $33.7 million in the prior year, increasing the gross margin level to 65% in the quarter from 59% in the third quarter last year.
The higher gross margin in the third fiscal quarter was the result of lower service costs per HSA and the increasing mix to custodial revenue. We expect that the mix shift will continue over time and will continue to drive gross margin expansion as accounts mature and their balances grow. Operating expenses were $26.8 million or 38% of revenue compared to 20.2 million or 36% of revenue in the third quarter last year. We expect operating expenses to increase as a percentage of revenue in the fourth quarter of FY19 as we initiate additional investments in some key strategic initiatives during the last quarter of FY19 and into FY20.
I will discuss these initiatives in a little more detail in a minute. Income from operations was $19 million in the third quarter, an increase of 40% year-over-year and generated an income from operations margin of 27% during the quarter. We generated net income of $15.7 million for the third quarter of FY19 compared to $10.5 million in the prior year, an increase of 50%. Our GAAP diluted EPS for the third quarter of FY19 was $0.25 per share compared to $0.17 per share for the prior year. Excluding stock compensation net of tax and the tax impact of stock option exercises, our non-GAAP net income per share for the third quarter of FY19 was $0.28 per share compared to $0.17 per share for the prior year.
Our non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA for the quarter increased 40% to $29.7 million compared to $21.2 million in the prior year. Adjusted EBITDA margin in the quarter was 42%. For the first nine months of FY19, revenue was $211.5 million up 25% compared to the first nine months of last year. GAAP net income was $60.8 million or $0.96 per diluted share. Non-GAAP net income was $58.7 million or $0.92 per diluted share. And adjusted EBITDA was $91.1 million up 35% from the prior year.
Turning to the balance sheet. As of October 31st, 2018, we had $330 million of cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities with no outstanding debt. Turning to guidance for the fiscal year 2019. As Jon mentioned earlier, Larry Trittschuh is joining us as our new Chief Security Officer and will help guide our continued efforts to make the security of our members, HSA assets, and personal health information a top priority. Included in our guidance for the remainder of FY19 is our expectations of additional investments in security to support Larry's and his team's efforts. Plus additional investment in our technology architecture as well as investment to grow and support the recently highlighted 401K channel with partners such as Nationwide and Vanguard.
Based on where we ended in the first three quarters of FY19 and including the aforementioned investments, we are raising our revenue guidance for FY19 to a range between $281 million and $285 million. We expect non-GAAP net income to be between $68 million and $72 million. Non-GAAP diluted net income per share between $1.06 and a $1.13 per share. And adjusted EBITDA between $110 million and $114 million. Our non-GAAP diluted net income per share estimate is based on an estimated diluted weighted average shares outstanding of approximately 64 million shares for the year.
Our outlook for FY19 also assumes that we are able to realize higher R&D tax credits in this fiscal year than we previously anticipated. This will reduce our projected effective income tax rate to be approximately 21% for FY19 only, which is down from the 24% guidance we provided in previous quarters of this year. Before I turn the call back to Jon, I would like to highlight two other items reflected in our guidance. First, we expect to sustain or slightly increase our year-to-date interest rate yield on custodial cash assets of 2.10% for the full year of FY19.
Second, as we have done in recent reporting periods, our full-year guidance includes a detailed reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP metrics. This includes management's estimates of depreciation and amortization of prior capital expenditures and anticipated stock compensation expenses. But this does not include a forecast for stock option exercises in the remainder of the fiscal year. With that, I'll turn the call back over to Jon for some closing remarks.
Thanks, Darcy. As many of you know, financial markets will be taking a pause tomorrow to honor President George H.W. Bush. I worked in President Bush's administration as a very young economist and it's said that everyone loves you when you're dead, but for the record, President Bush had universal respect among Democrats, Republicans, and socialists and independents and all those kind of things. And one in particular for his contributions to making America a better and more civil place, an example of which is the Americans with Disabilities Act.
In his final months, the President advanced the cause of access for the disabled, a cause of which I am a direct beneficiary once more, along with his service dog Sully, a two-year-old yellow lab, like my son's service dog. Much is made of what President Bush did to steer us through the end of the Cold War and to end it without a shot, and much should be made of that. What I will remember is his understated way of making this a more inclusive society for everybody.
HealthEquity, meanwhile, as we roll into our busy season will be open tomorrow as it is every hour of every day and our team will be working hard to help our members connect health and wealth. As we go to Q&A, I do want to acknowledge and thank our research community for the more succinct Q&A session last quarter. We're going to continue the one question at a time rule with management also trying to answer each question concisely. And as you all know, since last quarter we've seen at least one pretty dramatic effort to keep Q&A under control in the White House and we don't have all the tools they do but everyone gets to keep their press passes as long as we can stick to one question. So that will allow everyone to talk and we appreciate you all living with that rule. Operator, with that, let's do it
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, at this time, if you would like to ask a question, please press * then 1 on your telephone keypad. If you'd like to remove yourself from the question queue at any time, please press the # key. Once your question has been stated, we ask that you please place your line on mute to prevent any background noise. And as a reminder, we ask that you please limit yourself to one question and to requeue if you have any additional questions. And our first question comes from Anne Samuel of JP Morgan. Your line is now open.
Anne Samuel -- JP Morgan -- Analyst
Hi, thanks. My question is, how should we think about the market opportunity of bundling the health and wealth strategy? And how many opportunities are there out there like Vanguard and Nationwide? Thanks.
Thanks, Anne, and great to talk to you. Let me answer the second part of your question first. Both of these organizations and others that we're talking to on this topic, what really excites us is that it's a very different approach to the market. And so one that not only has its own set of opportunities but is potentially going to dislodge opportunities that have existed for a long time that we haven't yet capitalized on. Both of these companies have, as I'm sure you know, large numbers of employer clients that they work with. Both have carved out particular areas of substance and expertise.
Vanguard obviously focused very heavily on delivering incremental value to investors, both those in group and non-group plans. Nationwide very heavily focused on, for example, some interesting innovation on the annuity side that they're bringing into the marketplace. Both organizations very heavily focused on education, which is a big part of this for us. We see an analogy here to what we have been able to do historically with our 120-odd health plan partners and other partners where you get more than one plus one makes two, you really can deliver unique products and we hope to do that with each of these partners. Steve, anything to add to that?
It just reminds me of the early days with health plans. When we first started selling health plans, this would've been in early 2004 right after HSAs became law. They were not accustomed to selling health savings account plans. They were selling more traditional PTO and HMO plans. It took a kind of a monumental effort to get them trained. This is not something that all of a sudden you're gonna flip a switch. However, the good news is that here we are in early December. We've got a couple of great deals and we're gonna continue to reach out to other partners in the market. We're customizing them.
As I mentioned in my comments so that we can deliver truly unique solutions for each one of these. And then, the goal is to get out with their sales folks and help them compete in the market as they answer RFPs and things like that. Employers are asking for this marriage of health savings accounts and the other retirement plans. I think similar to what we saw. Now, 14 years ago when HSAs became law, employers are gonna leave this. They're gonna say, hey great, I know what I used to have but now I know what I want to have going forward.
Can you partner -- in this case, retirement plan partner -- provide a solution that'll benefit my employees? And then we all need to collectively step up and make it happy, kind of build up to the bar, as they say. I'm just thrilled that our sales teams are getting it down. But as important is our operations and marketing teams and things like that to go on and work together with these great new partners.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Allen Lutz of Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Your line is now open.
Allen Lutz -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Thanks for taking the questions. Steve, can you comment on the pending legislation for HSAs? What's your view on the timing with the house flipping? Do you think the components of the bill could change? And if so, could you shed some light on what you think those changes could be?
We've commented a lot on this over the past and clearly, we don't know what's going on in Washington, D.C. I will point out; it's been many years since there's been what I would call formative legislation that has changed HSAs. Coming up on over a decade now. And even with control of the administration and both sides of Congress, they didn't get things done that we would've liked. Now that being said, I was out in D.C. literally six days -- is that the right use of that term? Literal?
What he means is, what he said but without the word literally.
I was there six days after the election and spending time with folks and the good news is that they completely understand what needs to be done to help more Americans through either legislative action or regulatory actions. So there was a report that came out recently that was presented to the White House from the folks that are really thinking about this, people in health and human services and department of labor. They've really kind of focused in on these issues that we think need to be changed. Specifically HSAs for working seniors.
There are too many seniors right now that are going to work every single day and they're working for employers that are offering them contributions to their HSAs and if they were on Medicare, they can't take the contribution of their HSA. Similarly, there are too many people out there that are in high deductible plans that for certain reasons are not HSA qualified. And so even though they're in a high deductible already, they can't make contributions to their HSAs. And we think that really kind of leads into the ability to provide and expand preventative care.
So these are all things that if you were to take a look at this choice in competition report that was recently issued, they're all in there. And whether -- kind of split Congress, sometimes it's better -- and we're not gonna pine on that. Jon's spent more time in D.C. that I could. But the fact is, HSAs have done pretty well over the last 14 years despite having this kind of firm mandate where every single year there's legislation being passed. And it hasn't been the case. It's been 12 years since a piece of legislation was passed. And yet, they continue to grow. Employers continue to embrace them. And employees continue to benefit from them. Jon, do you have other thoughts on that?
All set.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Greg Peters of Raymond James. Your line is now open.
Greg Peters -- Raymond James -- Analyst
Good afternoon, everyone. I want to avoid the Acosta label so I'll try to behave. This is a challenge, I have to admit, as you know.
Greg, we have an intern standing by. Just so you know.
It's quite easy to hit the eject button on my conference call line I'm sure. The first question and then I'll have the follow-up would be around your 124 network partners. I was just wondering, I know you put out a presentation just recently providing a snapshot of your network partners. Last year there was noise about one of your competitors providing a white label solution to two of your network partners. So I was wondering, as we approach the critical point in your selling season -- or actually enrollment season -- can you give us an update on your network partnerships and how they're doing through this season?
Traditionally, we have announced this in January when we finish the year out and we've established those relationships.
Greg, we feel pretty good about where we are here. I think it's fair to say that now that people have seen what the particular noise item you were talking about really is and what it isn't, that's not something we're spending a lot of time talking about in the marketplace, to be honest with you. Not that there may not be other areas there are waters that are flying, I don't really know. I have to say, it's interesting as you get a number of years under your belt and you have opportunities to really -- we all throw around this word partner, but when you've been working with some of these firms, health plans, and others long enough, there really is the opportunity to do some interesting things.
And to feel really strong when you're out there presenting with your partners or trying to help them attain business or vice versa. And so I actually feel like this season has been a sort of thus far very smooth one in terms of the quality of our partner relationships. And in addition, it's an interesting one. And obviously, we won't talk about sales here. we'll wait until we get to January. But it's been an interesting one in terms of both the nature and the variety of partners that have been at it. Steve talked about sort of a whole new set of opportunities on the retirement side but I think there are other areas too that we've looked at and we'll continue to explore as the HSA market grows. There are different ways to help make it easy for this product to get in people's hands and make it useful once it is. And that's really what these partnerships are about.
Great. Thank you for that answer. My follow-up is, I know this was something you disclosed in last quarter's press release but it's a good time to touch on it. And that's just the difference in the number of HSA members versus active HSA members. And one's going faster than the other and maybe you can just revisit your commentary around those two different numbers and your views. Thank you.
And a reminder to everyone, we created a new metric, which we called active HSA members, and it's an attempt to isolate the fact that there are members who really are not in a position as it stands to contribute to the account because as a practical matter, they're not in a qualified plan. And you can read back to get the precise definition but that's what we're trying to do. And we said at the time that no, we're gonna watch this metric and see how it bounces around a little bit. It's interesting. So that's really what we're doing.
We've spent four years as a public company and a number as a private one using precisely the same key metrics. So for us, introducing a new metric is kind of a big deal and we want to give it some time to bump around before we really feel like we can learn something from it. But what it has done is really has I think appropriately, caused us to really put some emphasis on everything that we can do to keep members who can contribute and use the account.
And that starts with trying to understand where people are better using data for that purpose. That's an area where we're doing work. But beyond that, I would just say generically, I wouldn't put a ton of effort one way or the other into -- and we're certainly not into this number bouncing around quarter-over-quarter until we've had some time to really understand it. Darcy, anything to add to that?
Thank you. Our next question comes from Jamie Stockton of Wells Fargo. Your line is now open.
Jamie Stockton -- Wells Fargo -- Analyst
Hi, good evening. Thanks for taking my question. I guess maybe just on Nationwide and Vanguard. Can you talk about how productive you think these relationships can be in 2019 in the selling season? Will you be fully up and running potentially to add accounts kind of more geared toward FY20? And then maybe also, what's the user experience gonna be like may be compared to some of your health plan relationships?
I'll comment on the first part and Steve if you'd like to comment on the second? On the first part, for sales in the current fiscal year, they're not a factor and that's appropriate. There's the time that needs to be spent and is being spent with these relationships, educating sales forces on both sides, these are the products that we're selling with are highly regulated products so it's important to get that part of it right. So we think it's appropriate to be cautious there and I believe our partners do. And that will have some impact in fiscal '20 as well.
As we saw as we rolled out health plan partners and the like, there is always more ramp-up time than you think. And it's appropriate to get it right. There's nothing that can kill a partnership faster than a bad initial roll out on the negative side. I think we these are important in terms of being part of a strategic -- let's call it additional, whatever metaphor one wants to use, additional branch -- that we talked about a year ago. We began to tell you you'd see some information on it and now you are. It'll take a little time before they really move the needle. That having been said, one thing that we are really ready for on day one is to be able to articulate the experience and the value of that experience to members. And so that's sort of, Steve, where your --.
Sure. As Jon mentions the importance of getting it right, from day one, one of the reasons why we integrated with health plans was to get it right on the user experience so that when somebody logs into their health savings account you can not only manage your account and make payments and things like that, you can see your claims and then ultimately go right into your investments. It does take integration.
We need to build pipes as we have and we've done this thousands of times on all of these integrations we've touched on the past. When we think about the user experience, what we want is for people to be able, again, do the basics; log in, have their account adequately funded at the right time, have the money available. That'll all be there. The ability to see claims. One of the reasons why I think your solution's appealing to some of these retirement companies is because they know how many claim integrations we have with most of the health plans.
And in that regard, an important point. It's not an either/or. We've built this in such a way that you're gonna get, as an employer, you're able to offer integration both toward the health side and toward the wealth side. And that's really a neat piece of the puzzle.
Connecting health and wealth. And so a consumer can log in and see all of that information but then they have this thing that we talk about called wealth view, which is the ability to see your HSA balance and your retirement account balance on the same website. And then, you kind of start thinking about the messaging to that consumer because in certain cases, the retirement folks, they don't get the mindshare that maybe we get because people aren't paying claims out of their 401K. People will have a claim come in and ready to pay it. They'll come to the website.
We can message them and some of the messaging my guess would be, you haven't captured your employers match yet either out of your 401K -- there are now more employers that are matching HSAs and things like that. It just provides that ability to bring the 401K or the 403V that often times is kind of something that you don't think about for a year or two, more to the forefront of the mind, and then we can start thinking about what's the best way to manage these accounts and make sure they're funded and take care of the needs. So, Jon, I don't know if you have any other thoughts on UI, or user experience UE, but I think the most important thing for us is to make sure it's seamless and it works well and they start to think about this whole HSA retirement holistically versus in two separate file cabinet drawers.
We try not to ping-pong back and forth but I'm gonna do it here because that last point, Jamie, is really where the power of this is. If we can help consumers think about these products in the same sort of bucket, the end result for consumers is more savings, faster savings, and keeping more of what you save. We see our partners both these two and others that we're working with as well. We see our partners really trying to be responsive. For example, on the retirement side too, as everyone on this call knows, every basis point of expense.
From our perspective, optimizing around the HSA, the K, and some of the other tax advantage products, is really a very substantial next leg -- you need to think about it as the next leg down in the cost of investing or you can think about it as the next leg up in how much you get to keep of what you put in. And that's really where the power of this thing is in terms of connecting these products. And so as we think about user experience, the goal is to help more consumers think about it that way. And we know the results of that will be higher balances, more consumer education, a greater appreciation for the products, and ultimately that's a benefit to our investors as well in the extent that drops right to the bottom line. That's the way we think about it.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Stephanie Demko of Citi. Your line is now open.
Stephanie Demko -- Citi -- Analyst
Hey, Steve, Jon, Darcy, and team. Congrats on the quarter. Thank you for taking my question. So you just mentioned that you're trying to get consumers, Jon, to think about HSAs and 401Ks in the same bucket. Does that mean consumer awareness has now progressed to the point where it's no longer kind of the initial barrier you're trying to sell for?
I think that as Steve mentioned, there's been some real progress in that regard. In a funny way, one of the groups, Stephanie, that still needs education is the HR professionals. This sort of fact that these things are looked at separately is a function of a fault line that exists in benefits where you have the folks who do the K typically come from a finance background and they're within the finance team, right? The folks who do benefits, health plans, et cetera, think in one-year increments. And that's not a bad thing, they have to.
And they have a really hard job of controlling costs and so forth and trying to keep that money in wages instead of benefits. But this is about bringing those two groups together and I think that wouldn't be possible -- to the point of your question -- if people hadn't to some extent begun to get through that initial basic understanding barrier of what an HSA is, what an HSA plan is, that it's not just a way to shift costs. That there's this account that if used properly and educated properly, can be extremely valuable.
And lastly, and I think most importantly, perhaps -- you can't talk about this kind of stuff if people aren't feeling confident about their ability to do things like look at their medical bills and see what they're paying for and so forth that our system has done well and offered for a number of years now. I think the building blocks are starting to get there. Nothing happens as fast as any of us would want it but this is how things happen when you have something going from brand new to the mainstream. It connects with other things that are mainstream. The messaging starts to become almost dull like yeah, I knew that. When you're saying, 'yeah, I knew that,' that means a lot of other people may finally be figuring it out. And so, I mean, I guess that's kind of the way we think about it.
I hear that. I definitely saw that in advance of the election. The one quick follow-up before you guys kicks me off. So when you hired Ted, part of his initiative was consumer education. Is he just that good or is he gonna be diving one level deeper into this health and wealth link?
I think it's kind of interesting. As your question suggests, Ted's background was at financial engines at his most recent place. And prior that at TD Ameritrade, also in investor education. And so it's kind of interesting to see that applied to our business and the way that Ted's approaching this is, he calls it total engagement. And what it's really about is using every opportunity we have with a member to kind of educate them a little more and what I think he's kind of trying to do is -- that's something we've talked about for a long time that we do.
He's trying to figure out, how do we do this as scalable and as much of a data-driven fashion as possible. As Steve mentioned, one of the interesting sorts of facts here is that people have more interaction with their HSA than with almost any other benefit. And really, certainly relevant to their retirement plan. So it's not just the active educate members about the HSA. It works in reverse too. That we're gonna have the opportunity to say, hey, you individual haven't gotten your full employer match on the case side but let's go get that sucker. Or other messaging that's going on. And so, I think there are benefits in every direction from something like this.
And he's totally engaged.
Ted's engaged. Ted's listening right now, or perhaps he's really getting work done.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Sandy Draper of SunTrust. Your line is now open.
Sandy Draper -- SunTrust -- Analyst
Thanks very much for taking the question. Probably a question for Jon and maybe also Steve as well. We got sort of a little bit of conflicting market commentary over the past week or two -- I think it was a Mercer report that came out about benefits. There was reasonably positive about employers still looking to really drive and push high deductible plans and HSAs.
But if the United Healthcare investor day -- and this is much longer term -- but they talked about a plateauing and they didn't see growth in high deductible health plans. I'm just curious your thoughts on what you're seeing and how -- obviously you're not gonna comment right now on the selling season is still going. But what have you seen anecdotally in terms of how employers are looking at high deductible health plans and HSAs? Thanks.
We don't normally comment on acquisition activity but if United would like to just give us that bang if they don't think it's useful, we'll take it off their hands. Wichmann, if you're listening, you know my number. I'm getting a look now. It's an interesting season. First point that I would make here is -- or that I am gonna make -- is that there is no theory that I have heard as to why these products will not continue to penetrate the market both in terms of the number of individuals who have them, the number of employers who offer them, and the way the product reviews and therefore their balances. And that's because they do what they're supposed to do.
And the Mercer piece that you're referencing as well as others, it sort of -- what's very difficult to dispute is that these aren't magic bullets for every males healthcare but they produce the result that is really effective, which is, as you know it's about taking healthcare cost inflation and making it more like regular inflation at a reasonable controlled level. So every year employers aren't effectively eating from wages they benefit. And then from the individual's perspective, providing a very valuable way to say.
Then actually I think it's more likely that what we're gonna see is a little bit like, if you went to work somewhere today and they didn't offer a retirement plan, a K or a 403B or 451, you'd be like, what do you mean? Why don't you have that? I think that's -- once people really understand how to use this product, that's the way they're gonna look at it. So that's my basic view of the macro market. I think there are a couple of reasons that maybe people -- aside from whatever their own objectives are -- that you do see a little bit of sort of conflicting information. The first is that we're in a period of an extraordinarily tight labor market as everyone here knows.
There is some truth to the view that when labor markets -- well, I want to say when labor markets get this tight. They haven't been this tight since, I don't know, after World War II? So I'm not sure anyone has a really good view of what happens when this happens but it is true that there's a desire not to do anything that rocks the boat in any way. I'm sure there is a level of conservatism that some folks are feeling and it's something we talk -- there's always conservatism when you deal with this kind of a product because it affects real people. Maybe if that were used to talking about that and so whether it will ultimately have an effect on the sales season, I don't really know. But that's one factor that I suspect contributes to this.
The second is -- and I think we do have to recognize this -- and this is maybe a little bit more specific to HealthEquity than the broader market is. We've had a number of years here where there has not been much market volatility and we've had a significant amount of volatility obviously in the last three, four, five, six, months. And I don't know, last eight hours. As a result, I think that may have an effect on people psychologically in terms of the amount of money they put in the accounts and so forth. How they feel, all those kind of things. I don't know the answer to that. But that's a possibility. And I would in that regard note that from our perspective, this is one of the real reasons we do not give guidance on either assets or accounts.
We had an extraordinary January last year. I mean, really extraordinary. I can see people just drawing lines and saying, well, that's gonna happen again but even more so. That may be, we don't really know. It's definitely from our perspective a source of caution. I wandered a little bit in answering your question. I think the big picture is, this is a market. I don't really understand the argument for these products plateauing in popularity. I understand the data that people are trying to look at. But I do understand that like any good growing market there are going to be periods where conditions are absolutely ideal. They're gonna be periods where conditions are less ideal and so you're gonna have variation around a mean. But I think the mean is strong growth for years to come.
I just had one thought. Sandy, thanks for the question. I mentioned earlier that HSAs have been around now for over 14 years. It's actually three years longer than the iPhone, believe it or not. I think one of the reasons why we've always tried to be an innovator and continue to help people understand the value of these fairly complex instruments if you think about the tax-free nature of them and then the growth and how you use them in healthcare but you can use them for retirement and all that. Is because you got to refresh the story every once in a while. You mentioned the Mercer report that came out. And it's really positive.
One of the things in that Mercer report that I don't believe even HR people are really telling the story about yet is a slide that shows that if you have an HSA and you're taking $5,000 out of it a year to pay for your healthcare and retirement that $50,000 will last six years longer than if you were taking out of your 401K. And no one's telling that story. I think traditionally people are looking at this as tax-free spend. We started telling the story. Mercer is starting to tell us. I think that we need to continue to refresh the story that these are the best accounts for tax-free spend today, tax-free spend until you die, and then long-term retirement savings.
Great, that's really helpful guys.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Mark Marcon of RW Baird. Your line is now open.
Mark Marcon -- RW Baird -- Analyst
Good afternoon. One other thing that was in the news today was basically interest rates in the shape of the curve. I've got a couple of questions related to that. One would be specifically, how are you thinking about -- the service fee declines have been purposeful and they've worked. How do you think about the rate of decline if, in fact, rates are starting to flatten out? And then secondly, what sort of impact would that have on the M&A pipeline? There have been some players that are marginal players in the HSA space but have kept their books because the rates have been going up. Does that free up opportunities?
When I'm not sure I know the answer I sort of stick Darcy with it. Let me say, it's interesting you asked about this question. We were thinking about how the curve inversion story might impact us. I guess my first thought is, this is the time of year when we are out there beginning to finalize, that is to say, sort of lock-in pull the trigger on, whatever metaphor one wants to use, our end of year rate agreements. That having been said, Darcy and his team have done an incredible job of making that process a little less dependent on a few weeks window, which actually really helps us. It allows us to spread things out a bit and again, toward our goal thereof stability. And Darcy, if you'd like to say anything more about that, please do and then I'll come back to the M&A question.
I'm probably not gonna comment on the yield curve but as you know, Mark, we went got down to a gross yield down into the low 150s and we sustained that. And then for the past few years, we've seen some pretty steady increases in rates. And as you know, we ladder our custodial assets out over kind of a three to five year period. We're generally playing in that space with yields in the three to five-year space. We don't go out to the 10-year and we end up with two years when a three-year contract goes down to a two-year or whatever. We're just mindful of -- we haven't seen any slacking in demand for funds from our depository relationships. And so it doesn't give us a lot of concern with respect to the near term with respect to whatever the yield curve is doing.
And on the M&A front, let's see. My sense thus far is that the prevailing wisdom remains that rates are going to continue to rise from here. sometimes the prevailing wisdom isn't right. But I think among would be sellers of deposits, which is how they think of themselves, that's the wisdom that is presented to us. As you quite correctly point out that to the extent that wisdom changes that market will open up again.
All we said about this without commenting on any particular transaction is that we're always gonna be here to be a good acquirer, to be a great steward of customer relationships, we're not competing with these entities in the way that other requires might and we're not tied to one health plan or one whatever as others might be. But at the same time, we're not going to price deals into the market. We have a really good, again courtesy of Darcy's team, a really strong sense of where the rate of return is on these kinds of activities. And when it works, it works. When it doesn't, there's no reason to do it because ultimately the goal of these things is to increase the return to you, our shareholders.
And Mark, I'd go back to the first part of your question with respect to service revenue. We've always said that there is an interplay that goes on between interest rates and service fees for an HSA. That being said, we believe that the driving factor for the reduction, the service revenue, is more by design than by market conditions.
Volume in terms of increasing the number of participants?
Let's say volume and underwriting.
Correct. In the long-term, there was a notion that if interest rates were to rise high enough that you would see more impact on the service fees. Just by your question, that would be somewhat mitigated but we're not really seeing that aspect of it so much as just the way that we are pricing our service revenues to our partners has been the reason for the decrease.
Given the call is getting close to the end, you haven't had a chance to talk about -- or expand on Larry's role in the investments there. Just thought I'd throw that out there. It's not an official follow-up but if you want to comment that'd be great.
See, Greg got the bandwagon started and now it's an issue. We're coming for you, Acosta. I'm really excited about this. We've been in a way very fortunate in that where we have had cyber issues, including recently, they've been relatively modest and the team and our partners have worked very hard to make our members feel like they're well taken care of. And you can't do that in every case but we've been very fortunate. But fortune's not enough. In particular, as I said in the earlier comments, what I see here is an opportunity not so much to say we have better security than anyone else.
If it were up to me, everyone in our industry would have outstanding security. I do think there's an opportunity to say, one, that we care more about privacy and are prepared to take steps to give users control of data. And two, I think there's an opportunity, as I said in the comments, to use the topic of privacy and security as a way to really strengthen our relationships, whether they are with our clients, employers, our ecosystem partners, our network partners, and on and on. Because really, the right way to address these issues is together.
And so, the biggest thing about Larry, and he's probably listening. He's already signed his contract so I can say whatever I want now. You can't ask for more money at this point. I suppose he could, actually, so maybe not. But actually, in all seriousness, what I really -- in addition to bona fide with regard to running the organization, I am really excited about the opportunity that Larry brings to us to kind of have a discussion in our ecosystem and our industry about how we approach some of these data privacy and security issues. Not just as an industry but as an ecosystem.
As we often say, it's not really our ecosystem, it's really at the end of the day the members' ecosystem. I think there are some really interesting opportunities there to do things that really aren't done anywhere in the benefits area. And that'll be exciting and it's something we're willing to invest in. It feels like if it's something we do well then it is almost by definition highly scalable -- that is to say that if we do it well we're doing it well for everybody and for all of our members and we're avoiding costs that we can avoid. We highlighted it here not just because of the convenience of the timing of the announcement but also because it's an area as we think into fiscal '20 that we feel like it's worth spending on. Not just defensively but really from the perspective of going on offense and bringing a kind of a different dialogue about this issue to our customers. I built the guy up now who knows. He's probably preparing a counter-offer as we speak. Go ahead, I'm sorry.
Thank you. Our next question comes from Alex Paris with Barrington Research. Your line is open.
Chris Howe -- Barrington Research -- Analyst
This is Chris Howe sitting in for Alex. It's getting a little later in the afternoon but I do have some questions here for you. I won't have too many follow-ups, I promise. The Vanguard and Nationwide partnerships, as we look toward fiscal year '20, maybe fiscal year '21, how should we look at the balance between expanding employee participation within these two partnerships as opposed to finding new partnerships out there in your goal in reaching every corner of health and wealth. How should we look at future partnerships versus existing?
We have a lot more partnership building to do and we have to take care of those who are trusting us early just as we've done on the health side. So I guess my answer is all of the above. That too is an opportunity from our perspective to deploy capital in a way that's likely to produce high returns. I think the answer is really both.
Okay. That's all I have. Thank you.
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's question and answer session. I would like to turn the call back over to Jon Kessler for any closing remarks.
Thank you. I hope some of you can get a day off tomorrow but not those how are gonna visit with us tomorrow. So don't not show up just because you're getting the day off. Honor by coming to talk to us. I hope you don't mind that we've been a little jovial today. It's been a long travel day for us so we appreciate you hanging with us and again, the trust that investors and all of you continue to place in us. Thank you.
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This concludes today's program and you may all disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.
Ted Bloomberg -- Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
More HQY analysis
10 stocks we like better than HealthEquity
When investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has quadrupled the market.*
David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now... and HealthEquity wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.
*Stock Advisor returns as of November 14, 2018
HQY
HealthEquity
NASDAQ:HQY
HealthEquity, Inc. (HQY) Q3 2019 Earnings Conference Call Transcript @themotleyfool #stocks $HQY Next Article


text:
Actor Tom Felton on Draco Malfoy, Harry Potter and Leatherhead life
Tom Felton aka Draco Malfoy in Harry Potter (Photo Andy Newbold)
Strictly copyright ANP
In a Surrey Life exclusive, Andy Newbold meets Leatherhead-based actor Tom Felton and discovers that Harry Potter's rival Draco Malfoy is not such a bad boy at home
Originally published in Surrey Life magazine August 2006
MOST people are faced with a career changing decision at some point in life but imagine how it feels if you're just seven years old. The choice was between going to America to film a TV commercial or playing Tiny Tim at the Thorndyke Theatre, Leatherhead. The decision – to go to the US – kick-started Tom Felton's career and put him on the cinema screens as Draco Malfoy, the bad boy of the Harry Potter series.
Tom was born at Epsom Hospital on 22 September 1987 the youngest of four brothers and is a Surrey boy through and through. He was educated until 13 at the Cranmore School in West Horsley and went on to Howard of Effingham school. Tom, now 18, reflects: "It was great, not only were there stacks of girls but they were all made to wear skirts. Having been at an all boys school for ten years, it was just the best." Making up for lost time, he was quick to mix with them. "I love female company and have loads of girl 'friends' but currently I am single and available."
This will be welcome news for his army of female admirers. He has a huge fan base and receives letters and photos as well as all sorts of gifts. Some are good luck tokens – the strangest, he says, are spoons from Japan. But he has also been sent Bibles from the US in reaction to his role as Malfoy. In a Deep South accent Tom describes how one accompanying letter said 'Redeem Thyself Brother Tom, for the devil is within'. "Don't these people know that I'm acting a role? It's crazy." He gets so much mail that his mum Sharon, who is his manager, has to employ a team of helpers – Sally, Sarah and Miriam – to deal with it.
Tom was persuaded to get an agent by a friend who ran a drama summer school in Bookham. Within two weeks he was shooting the advert in the US for Commercial Union. He went on to do other TV ads including a series for Barclaycard. "Then my agent heard about an audition for the 1997 film The Borrowers and I got the part." He played the Peagreen Clock alongside Jim Broadbent, John Goodman and Celia Imrie in a role which demanded he had his hair dyed red and permed.
His next role was as Louis Leonowens in Anna and The King. He was 13 years old and played the son of Jodie Foster's character. It meant filming for four months in Malaysia, and Tom's mum recalls going behind the scenes to find him being taught how to use a Samurai sword by fellow actor Yun-Fat Chow who played King Mongkut in the movie.
Becoming Draco Malfoy
Then came his biggest role with the first of JK Rowling's Harry Potter series. Tom was auditioned by director Chris Columbus and producer David Heyman for various roles, including Harry. But it was Draco Malfoy, the bad guy, that Chris and David decided was right for Tom and so with a slicked back, white-blond look he made the character his own.
Tom is currently filming the fifth movie, Harry Potter and The Order of the Phoenix, due for release next year. He says filming is always fun but it's weird to watch the finished product: "Obviously the scenes aren't shot in sequence and filming lasts so long that when I see it my first thought is 'where's the rest of it?' And sometimes I'm thinking 'oh yes, the next bit is really good' but then it doesn't happen or is somewhere else in the action."
At 18 Tom may be an international film star, but he is happiest at home. "I love spending time at home with my friends. On a Friday night you'll find nine or ten of us sitting having a game of cards. I love cards: poker is favourite at the moment," he admits. "But I'm a country boy. Surrey is the real garden of England for me. I'm well into fishing – have been since I was 11 – and regularly go to Bury Hill in Dorking and sling a rod out."
His first real (or should this be reel) job at the age of 11 was at the fishery in Dorking. "For 20 quid a day I'd pick up litter and tidy fishing gear. Actually, I only recently started to see my future in acting. My dream job has always been to own my own fishery."
He is a committed fisherman. "On New Year's Eve I went out to celebrate with my friends until the bells struck midnight. Then by quarter past I was off fishing. I was still in my best clothes and it was minus 4!"
Tom is the youngest of four brothers and says he benefitted from that. "By the time I did anything wrong, Mum had seen it all before and was used to it. I've had no special treatment at home where my acting was concerned, either. While filming The Borrowers I'd come home full of it all, and my brothers would tell me to sit down on the floor and shut up whilst EastEnders was on."
He is very close to 24-year-old brother Chris, who also acts as his PA. Eldest brother Jonathan, 26, is a chiropractor while Ashley, 22, is currently having a great time travelling in Australia. "Lately he's been picking bananas! I hope to go out and spend some quality time with him soon."
He's bought his family cars to thank them for their support – cars being another of his passions. "I bought my first car before I even learned to drive. It was a great motivator: I wanted something for the hours I put in at the studios and just seeing it on the drive made me appreciate everything. I passed my test within a month of my 17th birthday. It was my second attempt but everyone says second time drivers are better drivers!'
The fame academy

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


The Korean restaurant Arirang is named after a famous Korean folk song.
Here the food is excellent and original. The portions are huge and the prices are really affordable. ...more The place itself wouldn't win a beauty contest, but it's definetely worth going.
We're here in Berlin Wedding today with Jonas, trying out Arirang, a Korean restaurant, where actually Koreans in Berlin come to find a taste from home. It's weird actually we in chinese pronounce it Alilang. Well, in korean it's Arirang.
Any kind of special philosophy you guys have about the restaurant and the food you make here?
Uh, no, like only good food and a lot of food for a reasonable price, yes.
Well, he basically said what I, ehm, I mentioned earlier that you just take many things altogether and just wrap it together and eat it a bit like that so that all the flavors come together and it is really unique the flavor. Mmh, very good! I love it.
incredible Korean meals that I've ever had. I think you actually discover new things that I didn't even know existed. Overall the place it's kinda no thrills but the food is amazing.


text:
Best Lauren Conrad Beauty Books
When it has to do with the world of beauty every single girl out there needs the right ideas and tips that should help keep her hair, makeup, and skin in perfect condition. One of those people who have dedicated their lives to learning and disseminating information required to maximize your journey through the world of beauty products is Lauren Conrad. Her books are often a must-have and usually feature certain guides and steps which are properly applied can give your life a considerable boost. But we need to know the best Lauren Conrad beauty books to better appreciate who she is.
Having carved out a reputation of a giant in the entertainment industry, Conrad sought to leave her mark in the beauty and fashion sphere. This she accomplished with relative success as she released some beauty books. The best beauty books include Lauren Conrad Beauty and Lauren Conrad Style. In these books, she certainly does not claim to be an expert. She simply attempts to highlight what works for her and offers relevant tips and advice to those who are willing to learn.
How Bloggers And Influencers Impact Kids
When Is The Best Time To Make A Hotel Reservation?
In these books, she did not have to add her worst beauty moments but she did. She was not always beautiful. Whether you are looking for a party kind of makeup or hair, she provides the right counsel. It is, however, important to state that if you do not like her person; you may not like the book.
A Few Beauty Tips By Lauren Conrad
There are several beauty tips by Lauren Conrad which you may find quite useful. For instance, she suggests that you should not use eye shadow to play up the eyes as gel liners are quite better. She also suggests that you should not be scared to take risks with hairstyles. Also, don't be scared of accessorizing your hair, she does love making her hair glitter. Also, you must protect yourself by using sunscreen always.
Who Is Lauren Conrad?
Lauren Conrad was born on the 1st day of February 1986. She is an American fashion designer, TV personality and also an author. As an 18-year-old back in 2004, she rose to prominence when she featured in the TV series Laguna Beach: The Real Orange County. This show documented her life and that of her friends in Laguna Beach.
She would later move to the city of Los Angeles where she pursued a career in the fashion world and started her series The Hills in 2006. It was about the Professional and personal lives of her and her friends. With the progression of the series, a feud between Montag, Conrad and Spencer Pratt became the main focus of the series. During the production, Conrad also attended a fashion institute where she worked for the People's Revolution and Teen Vogue. She, however, left the hills after about five seasons.
She is the founder of Paper Crown and Lauren Conrad. She is also the co-founder of the online store known as The Little Market.
What Makes The Story Of Conrad So Special?
To better understand her story, it is ideal to place it all as it happened in different timelines. She was born to the family of Kathy and Jim and his two siblings a brother and a sister. She first indicated an interest in the fashion industry during her time in the sixth grade. According to her father, she wasn't always the best student while growing up and did not show much interest while growing up. Her love for the arts was already becoming quite glaring by then.
She got her education at the Laguna Beach High School back in 2004 and featured in an MTV reality TV series that highlighted her high school life. This series proved to be quite a success on the network. Upon graduating from high school, she proceeded to the Academy of Art University in San Francisco for an additional semester. She eventually moved away from the series upon the completion of the second season. During this period, she moved back home and then transferred to a fashion institute in Los Angeles.
In May 2006 when she moved to Los Angeles, The Hills a spin-off series helped chronicle the lives of Conrad and her housemate. During the production for the first season, Port and Conrad had their internships at Teen Vogue. By the third season, Conrad and Montag saw their relationships terminated upon suspicions that Pratt and Montag were behind a rumored sex tape between herself and her ex Jason Wahler. She would then-premier her first fashion line with the less than successful Lauren Conrad Collection. Following poor sales and other poor performance indicators, she ended her journey in that line and instead sought to better understand the industry.
Then came the year 2008 when Conrad started dating Kyle Howard. Howard made known the concerns he had. According to him, appearing on reality television would greatly affect his acting career. This meant that their relationship was not documented on The Hills. Their relationship came to an end in 2011 after three years of dating. When the fourth season of the series came to an end in December, Conrad hoped to seek to go in search of other career opportunities.
May 2009 saw her last appearance on the series.
What many may not know is that Conrad had a novel which was released back in June 2009 and soon became a best seller on the New York Times. The book is said to have been inspired by the story of her life with a focus on a certain Jane Roberts. Then she came up with sequels Sweet Little Lies as well as Sugar and Spice. She came up with the fashion guide Lauren Conrad style back in 2010. She launched her second fashion line in 2009 when she partnered with Kohl. The fashion line soon expanded to also accommodate a bedding collection.
Why Has Conrad Remained To Be Relevant?
One thing that is common with many of The Hills and Laguna Beach stars is that they all had their brief moment of stardom. But in the case of Lauren Conrad, she was the catalyst behind both shows. She has also found a way to remain relevant in a world where dozens of reality TV shows pop up now and then. She currently is the author of fictional books for adults based on her experience in the world of the reality TV show. She also released the book Lauren Conrad Style. She also came up with a second fictional book named Lauren Conrad Beauty.
These books of hers are not just an attempt to diversify or remain relevant, they are indeed loaded with several instructions and tips that help you become a total being. Therefore, if you are one of the lovers of her hairstyle, and makeup and you do want to know what her best trends and looks are, you may want to get her books.
According to her, when you are writing a book, do not seek to be overly trendy so that people can enjoy the book for years to come and still make reference to it. She also makes it known that the book is a reflection of her past experiences.
In the world of fashion, beauty, entertainment, and lifestyle, the name Lauren Conrad is certainly not a pushover. Her books on beauty have sought to revolutionize the way we view ourselves, skin, and hair among other parts of our body. It certainly doesn't seem like we have seen the best of her yet as there is certainly more to come from her.
You May Like These Articles As Well:
Why Do Talk Show Hosts Have Sidekicks?
Why Was Teen Titans Cancelled?
Does Disney Own Marvel?
Does Rihanna Write Her Own Songs?
The social media world is a powerful platform, and influencers and bloggers have an especially large impact on the youth....
If you are planning on traveling, you might wonder when is the best time to book a hotel room. Several...
The Charming Protagonists Of 'Charmed'
Three witchy sisters, each with unique powers, go to battle with the dark and the light, all while trying to...
What Is The Rarest Skin In CS: GO?: All You Need To Know
Are you a fan of Counter-Strike: Global Offensive and looking to add some rare and unique skins to your collection?...


text:
package pl.allegro.tech.search.elasticsearch.tools.reindex.process;

import pl.allegro.tech.search.elasticsearch.tools.reindex.connection.ElasticDataPointer;
import pl.allegro.tech.search.elasticsearch.tools.reindex.connection.ElasticSearchQuery;
import pl.allegro.tech.search.elasticsearch.tools.reindex.query.BoundedSegment;
import org.elasticsearch.client.Client;

import java.util.Optional;

public final class QueryComponentBuilder {
  private Client client;
  private ElasticDataPointer dataPointer;
  private Optional<String> segmentationField = Optional.empty();
  private Optional<BoundedSegment> bound = Optional.empty();
  private ElasticSearchQuery query;

  private QueryComponentBuilder() {
  }

  public QueryComponentBuilder setClient(Client client) {
    this.client = client;
    return this;
  }

  public QueryComponentBuilder setDataPointer(ElasticDataPointer dataPointer) {
    this.dataPointer = dataPointer;
    return this;
  }

  public QueryComponentBuilder setSegmentationField(Optional<String> segmentationField) {
    this.segmentationField = segmentationField;
    return this;
  }

  public QueryComponentBuilder setBound(Optional<BoundedSegment> bound) {
    this.bound = bound;
    return this;
  }

  public QueryComponentBuilder setQuery(ElasticSearchQuery query) {
    this.query = query;
    return this;
  }

  public static QueryComponentBuilder builder() {
    return new QueryComponentBuilder();
  }

  public QueryComponent createQueryComponent() {
    return new QueryComponent(client, dataPointer, segmentationField, bound, query);
  }

}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


KABUL, March 29 (Xinhua) : As many as 20 Taliban militants have been killed and 13 others wounded following government forces operations in Afghanistan eastern province of Ghazni, an official said Thursday.
The cleanup operations were launched late on Wednesday in villages of Khani Baba, Zaray and Dalil of the troubled Andar district, where 20 armed militants affiliated with the Taliban have been killed and 13 others wounded, Aref Nuri, the provincial governor's spokesman told Xinhua.
Nuri has also confirmed the death of two security personnel and injury of three others during the crackdown which has been continuing in the restive district. The Taliban group has yet to make comment on the report.