text:
İnönü Stadium () was a football stadium in Istanbul, Turkey and the home ground of the football club Beşiktaş J.K. Previously, the ground had also been shared with Galatasaray S.K. and Fenerbahçe S.K. The ground was located in Dolmabahçe, close to Dolmabahçe Palace in the district of Beşiktaş, on the European side of Istanbul. The stadium was demolished except for the walls of the Eski Açık stand and its historical towers in order to build a new stadium for Beşiktaş J.K. at the same location - Vodafone Park.

The all-seater stadium had the capacity to host 32,145 spectators.

Structure
The BJK İnönü Stadyumu had four stands. The Kapalı stand which was parallel to the pitch at the north side could hold up to 5,881 supporters. It was regarded as the heart of the stadium, traditionally housing the most fanatical supporters. Facing the Kapalı was the Numaralı with a seating capacity of 5,237. The stands behind the goal areas were Eski Açık with a seating capacity of 7,962, and Yeni Açık with a seating capacity of 13,065. There were two towers on the left and right side of the Eski Açık stands that have been incorporated into the design of Vodafone Park, the current home of Beşiktaş. Before the stadium became an all-seater, the ground's capacity was over 39,000.

The Bosphorus, Dolmabahçe Palace, Dolmabahçe Clock Tower, Dolmabahçe Mosque, and Maiden's Tower were all viewable from the top rows of the Yeni Açık stand of the stadium, which made it the only stadium in the world from which a football fan could view two continents: Europe and Asia, which are separated by the Bosphorus strait.

History

BJK İnönü Stadium (originally named the Dolmabahçe Stadium) was designed by Italian architect Paolo Vietti-Violi, who collaborated with Turkish architects Şinasi Şahingiray and Fazıl Aysu for the project. The ground of Dolmabahçe Palace's stable was chosen as the location to build the stadium. The first foundation was laid on May 19, 1939, but construction work was halted due to the outbreak of the Second World War. The stadium was eventually inaugurated on May 19, 1947, by İsmet İnönü, the second President of Turkey and himself a Beşiktaş fan, and Lütfi Kırdar, the Governor of Istanbul. The initial capacity was 16,000. In the original project plan, there were two bronze statues of athlete figures at the Eski Açık stand: one throwing a discus, and the other throwing a javelin. However, the statues were never built due to financial concerns. The oil factory which was found behind the stadium was demolished to construct the Yeni Açık stand at the west part of the stadium in 1950 (hence the name Yeni Açık, meaning the New Open stand - referring to the two covered stands Numaralı and Kapalı, and the other uncovered stand, Eski Açık). Yeni Açık was eventually covered with a separate roof structure in 2004. Galatasaray and Fenerbahçe shared the stadium with Beşiktaş for many years, until the construction of the Ali Sami Yen Stadium in 1964, and the renovation of Şükrü Saracoğlu Stadium in 1982.

The first football match at the Dolmabahçe Stadium took place between Beşiktaş and AIK Stockholm of Sweden, on November 27, 1947. The first goal in the stadium was scored by Süleyman Seba, the most famous and longest-presiding Chairman of the club (in the 1980s and 1990s), when he was a player at Beşiktaş. Beşiktaş lost this match 3–2. In 1952, the stadium was renamed as Mithat Paşa Stadium, and later in 1973, it was renamed as İnönü Stadium. A leasing contract was signed between Beşiktaş JK and the Ministry of Youth and Sports in February 1998 which gave all usage rights of İnönü Stadium to Beşiktaş JK for 49 years.

Renovation work took place at the stadium in 2004. The tartan track was removed within the scope of these renovations and the ground level was lowered by 4 meters to increase the capacity of the stadium to 32,145 spectators. The press seats were relocated to the Numaralı stand from the Kapalı stand. The executive suites that were found in the middle of the Kapalı stand were demolished and for the first time in Turkey, the wire fence between the stands and the pitch was removed for space. The number of gates was increased by 100%. A press center for Beşiktaş TV was built inside the stadium. Restrooms and lunch counters were also renovated. The Yeni Açık stand was covered with a metallic roof, and the stadium complied with UEFA standards.

The stadium's location is near the Bosphorus and is very close to Taksim Square. The stadium could be reached easily by many means of public transport (bus, ferry, metro, light-rail, funicular etc.) due to its central location.

There were four different parts of the stadium: Kapalı was where the most hot-blooded fans were during the matches. Yeni Açık was on the western side, facing the Bosphorus. Eski Açık was the smaller stand opposite Yeni Açık where visiting supporters were typically seated. Numaralı is where press, VIP, and protocol seats were located.

The 2012-2013 season was the last season of İnönü Stadium as Beşiktaş's home ground. The club played their 2013-14 and 2014-15 season home games mostly at the Atatürk Olympic Stadium and the Başakşehir Fatih Terim Stadium. Their new ground, Vodafone Park, was completed in April 2016.

Records

Music

İnönü Stadium was used for many major music concerts. The first concert to take place at the stadium was Bryan Adams on July 28, 1992. This marked the first stadium concert in Istanbul.
Michael Jackson performed during his Dangerous World Tour on September 23, 1993  in front of a crowd of 48,000. He also scheduled to perform at the stadium during his Dangerous World Tour on October 4, 1992, but was cancelled due to a vocal cord ailment.
Madonna performed during her The Girlie Show World Tour on October 7, 1993 to an audience of 54,000 people.
Iron Maiden performed at the stadium on July 26, 2013 as part of their Maiden England World Tour, marking the stadium's last concert before its demolition and reconstruction.
Other major events in the 1990s, 2000s and 2010s included performances by: Guns N' Roses, as part of the Use Your Illusion Tour; Metallica as part of the Nowhere Else to Roam and World Magnetic Tour; Bon Jovi as part of the I'll Sleep When I'm Dead Tour; Elton John as part of The One Tour; Scorpions as part of the Face The Heat Tour; Sting as part of the Ten Summoner's Tales Tour; Rod Stewart as part of the A Spanner in the Works Tour; Tina Turner as part of the Wildest Dreams Tour and Rihanna as part of the Diamonds World Tour. The stadium also hosted the heavy metal Sonisphere Festival in 2010, featuring the "big four" of thrash metal: Metallica, Slayer, Megadeth, and Anthrax, in addition to Manowar, Rammstein and Alice in Chains.

New Inönü Stadium project

Due to the unique location of the stadium and its legal status as a "historic monument" protected by the High Council of Monuments of Turkey, the renewal project had to be modified and postponed several times and all official requests, efforts, renewal attempts were denied until 2013. The administrative procedures were eventually completed, and all required permission was given to the club. Club president Fikret Orman announced that the new stadium, with a total capacity of 41,903 spectators, 143 luxury lodges, and one "1903 stand", will be constructed. Demolition works started on 2 June 2013, following the end of the promotion play-offs of the TFF First League. Construction works were completed in April 2016, and the estimated cost of the project was around $80 million.

The project of the new stadium was designed by DB architects. The old stadium was demolished, except for the walls and two towers of the Eski Açık stand, since these structures are considered historic monuments.

See also
 Beşiktaş J.K.

References and notes

External links

 Beşiktaş J.K. official website: Project of the new İnönü Stadium

Beşiktaş Football
Sports venues in Istanbul
Football venues in Turkey
Bosphorus
Süper Lig venues
İsmet İnönü
Sport in Beşiktaş
Athletics (track and field) venues in Turkey
Sports venues completed in 1947
Defunct association football venues in Turkey
Sports venues demolished in 2013
Defunct sports venues in Turkey
Demolished buildings and structures in Istanbul
1947 establishments in Turkey
Beşiktaş J.K. facilities
2013 disestablishments in Turkey

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
On TV Tonight: Baer in the Water
Written By Editor on November 27, 2017
• Chicago River• Geoffrey Baer• WTTW
In a time when most Chicago media can't be bothered to look out their window unless someone has been shot, WTTW's Geofffrey Baer remains the face of Chicagoans interested in their city, its history, and what it looks like today.
Bear hunters rejoice, because the city's premier urban explorer has a new special which airs tonight on channel 11 at 7:30pm. It's called Chicago River Tour With Geoffrey Baer, and is a tour of the Chicago River hosted by Geoffrey Baer. Funny how that works.
The Chicago River. But you knew that.
Mr. Baer shows us all three branches of the increasingly popular waterway, including the shiny new riverwalk sections and Wolf Point development downtown.
And since we live in the internet era, there's much more to this project than just the TV program. There's an entire web site launching tonight at www.wttw.com/river, which an animation of the reversing of the Chicago River, a pair of virtual reality videos, an audio tour of the river, and more goodies for your digital lifestyle.
For more information, check the press release below, or just set your DVR now so you don't forget to watch. Oh, and it's pledge season, so you might want to set that timer to run over a little bit in case things go long.
WTTW to premiere a new exploration of local architecture and history
THE CHICAGO RIVER TOUR WITH GEOFFREY BAER
CHICAGO – If you had told a Chicagoan 100 years ago that a tour of the Chicago River would top every visitor's list, you would have been laughed out of town. What was once a meandering weed-choked stream turned smelly industrial channel is now lined with soaring skyscrapers and jammed with tour boats jockeying for position with kayakers and water taxis. Today the Chicago River is more popular than ever, with a new Riverwalk, dramatic new towers and boathouses, and entire new neighborhoods rising along the river's edge.
In this special, Geoffrey explores all three branches of the river, aboard six very different vessels, including the less well-known stretches extending south to the Sanitary and Ship Canal and winding north through the Botanic Garden and Skokie Lagoons. Along the way, he shares dramatic stories of the river's history (beginning with the city's first resident, Jean Baptiste Point du Sable, whose settlement was located on the site of what is now the new Apple Store) through rare archival images and lively commentary, including how Chicago reversed the river's flow in one of America's most ambitious and controversial engineering projects ever. Geoffrey will even visit his childhood home on the north branch, and will introduce us to the architects of notable structures along the route along with the concepts behind their designs. We'll also meet people who live, work, and play along the river (and yes… even swim in it!).
THE CHICAGO RIVER TOUR WITH GEOFFREY BAER will premiere on Monday, November 27 at 7:30 pm on WTTW11. The website – wttw.com/river – will launch synchronously and will explore the River's history, development, iconic structures, recreational offerings, environmental challenges, and more. The site will feature a virtual tour of the River, an animation explaining the storied reversal of the River, 360/virtual reality videos of Wolf Point and a "view from a bridge," and stunning drone footage and images.
"It's mind-boggling to see the transformation that has taken place along the river just in the last 20 years," marvels Geoffrey. "The changes downtown, such as the Riverwalk and new residential and office towers, are the most obvious and dramatic. But along every stretch of the river we saw an exciting evolution in progress, from dirty industrial channel to urban amenity."
"Filming this River Tour was an experience I will never forget," said producer Eddie Griffin. "Our rainy summer presented some interesting production challenges, but we hope we have captured the river in all its glory, told some surprising and compelling stories, and spotlighted portions of it that are not as well known."
Geoffrey Baer's inaugural televised River tour in 1995 (his first WTTW special ever!) came about as a result of his work as a docent for the Chicago Architecture Foundation. In 2005, he went back for an update. And now, 12 years later and after myriad changes in and along the Chicago River, he's back for the most immersive exploration yet.
THE CHICAGO RIVER TOUR WITH GEOFFREY BAER is produced by Eddie Griffin, hosted by Geoffrey Baer, and written by Geoffrey Baer and Eddie Griffin. Associate Producer: Erica Gunderson. Director of Photography: Tim Boyd. Lighting Director: Danny Rozkuszka. Editor: Paul Thornton. Art Director: Linda Fox. Executive Producer: Dan Soles. The website is produced by WTTW's digital team, including Content Producer Jessica Pupovac; Developers Justin Henderson, Kevin Crowley, and Grant Smith; and Digital Executive Producer Anne Gleason.
Major funding for THE CHICAGO RIVER TOUR WITH GEOFFREY BAER is provided by: BMO Harris Bank. Additional support is provided by: Judy and John McCarter, the Susan and Stephen Baird Foundation, AARP Chicago, ITW, and Peoples Gas. Funding is also provided by: Millennium Properties R/E, Paul and Joan Rubschlager, Ken Norgan, Peter Kelliher II, the Steve and Delores Sarovich Foundation, and Foley & Lardner LLP.
Editor founded the Chicago Architecture Blog in 2003, after a long career in journalism. He can be reached at chicagoarchitectureinfo@gmail.com.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Tasting note: Pale straw with a subtle green gold hue. Lively citrus fruit, talc and bath salt aromas rise from the glass. Enticing freshly cut lime and floral notes flow across the palate, driven by a zesty and zingy acid line. A fine balance of minerality, fruit and acid creates a mouth puckering finish which leaves you salivating for another glass.
It's a buoyant riesling. Delightful drinking. Ripe and cutting at once. Ever-so-fragrant. Lemon, lime and talc. Juice and rind. Mid-palate has plenty of flavour, in a varietal context, but the finish sings out clearly. Tip top value too.
"Dried flower and straw aromas mingle with a touch of spice; the wine is very intense and yet also delicate in the mouth, with refined texture and a long persistence. The track-record shows it will also age well."


Guest educators Wen Yuju and Kojima Keitani Love joined us from Xiamen. Today their last live on board performance "Our Voice" was held. Novelist Wen Yuju, held the mic in her hand speaking softly and with purpose as she wove a tapestry of words. Wen Yuju was born in Taipei, Taiwan but has lived in Tokyo with her Taiwanese parents since she was 3 years old. She writes novels and essays using a unique form of Japanese that combines Chinese languages as spoken by her parents and relatives from mainland China and Taiwan. Along with Wen Yuju, the melodious voice of Kojima Keitani Love flows seamlessly with the sound of the guitar. Kojima is a singer and songwriter who has worked on countless songs for television shows, commercials, and theme songs.
Seeing as both of them will be disembarking in Singapore, this was their last on board performance and it was a full house. Members from the onboard songwriting workshop joined them on stage to sing together. Wen and Keitani were greeted with a resounding round of applause after they performed a song and poem which they composed during their time on board. The sounds, voices, words, and melodies were particularly touching for all of us who have travelled together on this journey.


text:
The Ashes 2021
November 30, 2021 Simon Edwards 0
Words by Simon Edwards; Comment Online Editor
The upcoming Ashes series will mark the end of a complex year for English cricket. COVID bubble fatigue, a cancelled tour of Pakistan, injuries to key players, the success of The Hundred and the rapidly expanding exposure of institutional racism within the county system, beginning with Azeem Rafiq's accusations against Yorkshire, mark a year replete with seismic events. Through it all nonetheless, the Ashes were the ECB's focus: as is often the case with the most storied and coveted prize in cricket (if you're English or Australian), the upcoming series has loomed large over the year. There was even hope that a win in the T20 World Cup in November would galvanise the team going into the First Test on December 8th: that Australia ended up winning the tournament instead is, to put it mildly, a bad omen.
The Australian side, even without a World Cup under its belt less than a month prior, is a potent one: their batting line-up is a daunting prospect for opposing bowlers, with a middle-order containing two of the world's finest Test batsmen, the unorthodox but pugnacious Steve Smith and Marnus Labuschagne. The retirement of fast bowler James Pattinson in October leaves a gap in the attack yet to be filled, but Pat Cummins, Mitchell Starc and Josh Hazlewood provide plenty of firepowers, especially on home turf with a Kookaburra ball where pace and accuracy are kings. Experienced spinner Nathan Lyon is a stalwart of the side, the country's finest spinner since Shane Warne with plenty of English scalps among his 400+ wickets. Despite losing to India at home in January and the shock departure last week of captain Tim Paine, this Aussie side has plenty of tools in its arsenal, and is not to be underestimated.
The England team relies, as it often does, on key anchor players to secure a fragile line-up. Joe Root as captain and chief run-scorer is in tremendous form this year: averaging 66 with six 100+ totals to his name, he sits a mere 333 runs behind Mohammad Yousuf's all-time record for most runs scored in a single year by a test batsman – whether he chases that target or not, his good form is essential. Returning all-rounder Ben Stokes similarly has a lot riding on him, arguably too much for a player recently returned from injury and a break for mental health reasons. A cool head under pressure, hero of both the 2019 World Cup final and the Headingly test which secured his spot in British sporting history, he is a lynchpin of the team with both bat and ball, and his grounding presence in the line-up has been sorely missed. Stokes' presence will hopefully alleviate some pressure on James Anderson, arguably England's finest Test bowler but one whose swing-bowling style is hampered by the Australian conditions.
The series is a tough ask for this England side: shaky form and injury concerns abound, and many first-pick players lack experience of Australia's blazing heat and hostile crowds. If opening pair Rory Burns and Haseeb Hameed can weather the Australian storm; if Ollie Robinson, Mark Wood and Chris Woakes can adapt to the bowling conditions; if England can pull together around their core players and present a united team, they have a chance. If they don't, it'll be a massacre.
Author: Simon Edwards
Even after lockdown, I still need some me-time
Men Convicted of Assassination of Malcom X Exonerated
Seagull's Superb Start
Sussex Cup to replace varsity
England's elite dominate the FA Cup
The Day Fans Saved Football


Prime Minister Dr. Man Mohan Singh has stated that his government is embarrassed over unnecessary prosecution kept alive by Indian judiciary against an innocent man like the Italian Ottavio Quattrocchi. In reality, India is embarrassed over the role her Prime Minister is playing in patronizing anti-Indians. Let us look at that.
Dr. Singh claims credit for having defeated the 26 / 11 terror attack on Mumbai and for having subjected the lone survivor Pakistani terrorist Ajmal Amir Kasab to prosecution in a Special Court. This is an instance that shows the difference between Congress and BJP in handling Pak-propelled terrorism in India, he asserts.
A man, who despite being the PM of India, has not hesitated to castigate Indian judicial system for having not ended the case against the Italian broker Ottavio Quattrocchi, is claiming credit for prosecution commenced against the Pakistani terrorist Ajmal Kasab under the same judicial system! The farce is curious.
Let us first look at Quattrocchi and then at Kasab.
Quarttrochhi is an absconder in whose context Mrs. Sonia Gandhi is looked at askance. It is for him, Sonia's husband Rajiv Gandhi – once believed to be "Mr. Clean Prime Minister" – had come to be viewed as "Mr. Corrupt Prime Minister" and punished by the peoples of India under Bofors bribe charges.
Before Sonia's Quattrocchi connection played the tricks, Rajiv had become Prme Minister in 1984 with 400 MPs posted by Indian voters to support him; but after the tricks were exposed, the same voters dethroned him with contempt by rejecting his party in 1989.
Even as the Indian Judicial system proceeded to determine Quattrocchi's role in the corruption scandal and he was required to appear before the Supreme Court, the Congress leadership helped him flee India in 1993. And the Italian soon declared that he would not respond to any Indian court, as he had "no faith in India's justice system".
Now, in support of this arrogant and unscrupulous Italian user of corrupt practices, the Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has condemned the Indian justice system in the most disparaging terms! He has said, "The Quattrocchi case is an embarrassment for the Government of India…. It is not a good reflection on the Indian legal system that we harass people while the world says we have no case".
The words of accused Italian Quattrocchi, who is absconding from Indian Courts and the words of Dr.Man Mohan Singh, who works under leadership of Sonia Gandhi, are so strikingly similar in condemning Indian judicial system over prosecution of the charge-sheeted Bofors bribe kingpin that any proud Indian may feel ashamed of his Prime Minister, as he looks like echoing only "his master's voice".
After Raiv's death, Sonia in 1999 had resolutely supported Quattrocchi with condemning the CBI for fictitious charges leveled against an innocent man like him. "The CBI has said he is a suspect. But we have never seen the papers naming him in the deal. They should show the papers naming him in the deal", she had said oblivious of the fact that by then three of the courts in India and one in Switzerland had already found him involved in the Bofors scandal.
Her support to Quattrochhi continues. After she became the extra-constitutional boss of the government that seemingly controls Prime Minister Dr. Singh, CBI has experienced toughest possible obstacles in proceeding against him. He is an accused against whom the Country is fighting legal battles. It is the Country that had blocked his accounts in a London Bank. But behind back of the country, the Singh government defreezed it in 2006. When he was arrested in Argentina in 2007 where upon his extradition to India was possible, Man Mohan Singh's government asked the Indian Ambassador there not to pursue the case and the field was made congenial for him to escape. With this arranged victory, he moved the Interpol for removal of his name from the Red-Corner Notice board and Law minister H.R.Bharadwaj terming the case as "an embarrassment", blamed the CBI for having created an unnecessary tempest on a teacup and through Attorney General Milon Banergi advised the CBI to agree to the absconder's plea which the later has done.
But despite this, as there still stands a case against him in a Court in India that does not fit into the design of Quattrocchi, Prime Minister Singh has aggressively attacked the legal system echoing both the words of the absconder as well as the Sonia loyal Law Minister.
Is it not time to evaluate the role of Dr. Singh in embarrassing India in her fight against the foreigner who stands at the center of post-independence India's most stupendous corruption scandal?
Let us now look at the other issue that involves the Pakistan terrorist Kasab. He belongs to a group of Pakistani terrorists who on 26 Nov.2008 had taken over two most reputed hotels of Mumbai.
Though termed as terror attack, theirs was obviously a suicidal attack.
They knew that their number was too marginal to keep up the attack beyond a few hours. So their attack was not for victory, but certainly for something else.
What for then their attack was meant?
It was obviously for creating a condition where exchange of fire could have totally razed down the two hotels.
But why that could have been their motive?
The answer probably lies in the unfulfilled motive of Pakistani terror-industry to occupy real estate and hotel trade in India.
And with this motive, there comes such scenarios that the role played by Dr. Singh in his previous avatar as India's Finance Minister comes to mind.
It was the first session of the tenth Lok Sabha.
There was a debate on Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI).
Pakistan terrorism had got its free passage to India through this Bank.
Founded in 1972 by a Pakistani called Agha Hasan Abedi, it was, according to Journalist Lucy Komisar's well documented contribution captioned "The BCCI Game: Banking on America, Banking on Jihad" a cover to funnel CIA funds for Osama Bin Laden's Mujahadeen to help fight the Soviets in Afghanistan and was the banker for drug and arms traffickers, corrupt officials, financial fraudsters, dictators and terrorists.
Dhirubhai and the gang of India's neo rich were arch collaborators of this Bank, which was their launching pad to sudden richness.
Discussing the nepharious and notorious role played by this Bank and reminding Dr. Singh of his earlier statement in the House wherein he had stated, "reports in 1988, from intelligence agency that BCCI has made overtures for acquisition of property and is trying to enter the hotel and real estate business in Lucknow and Bombay in partnership with Amar Rizvi", Mr.George Fernandiz had wanted to know about what happened to Rizvi and what step were taken by the Government to stop acquisition of real estates and hotels by the Pakistani Bank of terror and drug trafficking.
Dr. Singh had reacted by saying, "But I also said that nothing was found ".
Singh's modus operandi seems to be the same in both Quattrochhi and BCCI matter.
Despite reports of intelligence agencies exposing their criminal activities, Singh's reaction remained the same: "nothing was found".
Why Singh was eager to protect BCCI? Because this was the cover under which American activities against spread of communism was getting funded in India like elsewhere.
We will hereafter look at what happened then in the Lok Sabha.


By now, I'm sure that many of you have heard of the charity miles app, (in which case feel free to skip the rest of this paragraph), but if you haven't here's a quick description. The app allows you to earn money for charity with each workout you do (run/walk/bike). Once you have downloaded the app and made an account, it's a pretty quick process to get going. You select your charity from a list of options (I usually run for the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation of America), choose your activity (run/walk indoor, run/walk gps, bike gps), and press go! It's that easy! There are some additional features (you can join teams, post your runs to social media, and snap a photo of your run), but this is essentially a charity app, not a running app, so it would be used in addition to a running app, if that's your cup of tea.
Anywho , I recently started using the app again after a long break. For a while I had a lot of technical issues with getting the app to work, so I stopped using it. Then, I got a new phone and never reinstalled it…you know the drill. I've come back to it in the last couple of weeks, though because I joined a (super awesome) virtual running club (more on this later), that uses the app to track miles for friendly competitions, as well as to encourage the use of the app to do #somuchgood.
Within charity miles, I'm on a team associated with my running club, and any miles I run are automatically tallied under the team total. There are multiple teams associated with the club and we are essentially in competition with each other. And that's where "hacking" the app comes in. Because really, whenever something is a competition, there's bound to be some…ahem…creative…ways to win.
I know what you're thinking, (cough..cheater…cough cough) but I promise there are ways to hack the app that are not cheating. And both Charity Miles and my running club encourage it. Obviously, sitting on the couch with the app on pedometer mode and jiggling your arm is a no go, as is putting the app on gps mode while you're driving, but there are so many "approved" ways to hack the app, and you don't have to be even slightly devious to come up with them. Hacking the app is basically turning it on any time you're doing some kind of physical activity: walking to work, shoveling snow, vacuuming, etc.
At first I thought it was weird and a little wrong, but since it is encouraged (search #hacktheapp on Instagram) by both Charity Miles and my running club, I figured I should give it a try. And really, the end result is that I: a) raise more money for charity b) am more active, and c) have a little fun. How can that be wrong?
Do you use charity miles? Do you hack the app?
← I've Got a Goal!
I've never used this app but it sounds great! I think all of us that sit at a desk for most of their days, need to get up and move around more. We need to be more active throughout the day not just a run or workout here and there.
It's pretty awesome, and easy to use. The only annoying thing is that you have to have your phone with you for it to work. Even on the treadmill, you need it in a pocket or armband or something. And, totally agree about needing to be active during the day. I struggle to get 3,000 steps per day when I don't run, and that is me actively doing things like going to the further water cooler and fridge, and parking far from the door.


Jill Conley refused to let battle with cancer extinguish her light.
Editor's note: Jill Conley died 8:45 Tuesday morning with her husband, Bart, and her mother, Rosemary Duchon, at her side. Duchon said "she went peacefully" and is now free of pain. Following is a tribute to her life and legacy by health reporter Laura Ungar, who has been chronicling her story since October 2013.
She always shined – even while getting chemo, lying in a hospital bed, or huddled beneath a blanket on her couch.
And those who knew Jill Brzezinski-Conley best say her light will shine on.
By the time I met Jill in 2013, she had been fighting breast cancer for four years, and it had lodged in her bones. I chronicled her journey for The Courier-Journal as the disease ravaged her body, invading the lining of her left lung, then the inside of her left lung, then her liver, then finally her right lung.
Hers was not a story of cancer but of true beauty, which even the cruelty of incurable illness can't erase. She refused to let cancer define her.
She wanted everyone to feel that way.
She passionately shared that message through speaking engagements, events and television appearances in Louisville and across the nation. She saw her audience not just as cancer patients but also children who got bullied, people struggling with weight problems or disabilities - anyone who didn't fit society's aesthetic ideal.
She launched and built a cancer charity, Jill's Wish, to raise money for families struggling with cancer and viewed it as her legacy.
But to readers, her legacy was her story.
Facing a disease that strikes more than 220,000 Americans a year and kills more than 40,000, she reached out to the world while also embracing those closest to her. She gracefully accepted her husband's growing role as caregiver. She nurtured her young nieces and nephews like a mom, penning life lessons for them in journals she knew would outlast her. She held court almost constantly for visiting friends, first in her apartment and then her hospital room.
She showed everyone that while cancer could batter her body and steal her energy, it could not extinguish her light.
Charismatic yet sensitive, popular yet inclusive - family and friends say Jill was all of these things from her early days growing up in Michigan.
They married in 2008 and settled near Bart's family in Kentucky. They soon began talking about having a baby, Jill's lifelong dream. But just eight months after the wedding and a day before her 32nd birthday, doctors diagnosed her with Stage 3 cancer.
She underwent 16 grueling rounds of chemotherapy – losing her hair, fingernails, toenails, eyelashes and eyebrows. She suffered nausea, vomiting, mouth sores and hemorrhoids. Every bone in her body ached.
For the first time in her life, she felt ugly. Bart reminded her how beautiful she was as she endured one treatment after another: a double mastectomy, 31 rounds of radiation, breast implant surgery and removal of a burnt left implant. All of this bought only a short reprieve; the disease returned in her sternum.
Chemo wasn't the worst of her treatment regimen this time. Doctors also prescribed a hormone-blocking shot that turns off ovarian function, taking away any chance of starting a family. To live, she had to give up her dream.
This realization launched her mission to spread the word about beauty, which began when an award-winning Australian photographer, her friend's boss, flew her to Paris for a photo shoot. The photos were featured in a viral video on Jill called "The Light that Shines," which led to appearances on "The Today Show" and social media posts by supermodels Elle Macpherson and Vanessa Lachey. Jill kept the interest alive through speaking engagements.
When her cancer reached Stage 4, she vowed to forgo chemo if it left her too nauseous, exhausted or weak to live on her terms - and she delayed treatment from time to time. She refused to wither in bed.
Bart disagreed with this decision from the beginning, and Jill also wavered.
At one point last year, she planned to tell her oncologist, Dr. Janell Seeger, to stop the chemo altogether because it was making her too sick too often - only to change her mind when the doctor offered a chemo called Doxil that only had to be given once a month.
As I sat with her in her living room a few days later, she ran her fingers through her hair and admitted, eyes moist with tears, that one of her biggest fears about taking Doxil was going bald again - giving cancer another visible victory.
But that day, she pulled a giant basket overflowing with scarves out of her bedroom closet and said that she was glad she kept them as she wrapped one around her head with practiced hands.
When cancer invaded her lung lining and then her lungs, it took Jill's breath. When it spread to her liver, it brought weakness and pain. When it sapped her immunity, it left her vulnerable to viruses and bacteria. Stints in the hospital gradually grew more frequent, and longer. In November, she collapsed in her Norton Commons apartment, needed CPR, then suffered a seizure on the way to the hospital, but somehow rallied back. Finally, just before the New Year, she learned that the cancer had spread to her lungs and decided to stop chemo and go home on hospice care.
Jill pushed herself hard to do all she could and paid a heavy price. Once, after a trip to Cincinnati to be honored by the Bengals football team, she woke up sopping with sweat, barely able to breathe. Oxygen tanks had to be delivered to her apartment.
She took heed of her limits at a 5K fundraiser for Jill's Wish in 2014, where she walked beside Canadian college student Alyssa O'Brien, who has cerebral palsy and uses a walker. But less than a quarter-mile into the route, she turned back, too winded to continue. She stood beside the finish line and watched others cross without her.
It struck me how this race reflected her journey. She'd walk beside her friends and family, keep them close, as long as she possibly could.
She was on the receiving end of nurturing, too, especially as her cancer progressed.
Her mom, Rosemary Duchon of Las Vegas, flew into Louisville for visits, and then for the long haul as the end approached. The first day Conley was home on hospice, Duchon told her: "It just makes me so proud how you have lived. It's been a privilege to be your mother. It really has."
Bart, meanwhile, spent hours beside her in bed, holding her hands, talking to her, cuddling with her. Caregiving had by then become a central part of their relationship; Bart has done everything from helping her to the bathroom to draining fluid from her lung. And through it all she knew his love. During one of her hospitalizations, she couldn't sleep until Bart laid down beside her in the bed.
She repeatedly told Bart to find someone new after she died, someone who could give him the long marriage and children she could not. But Bart was never ready to let her go. When she told him that she sometimes wishes she had died when she collapsed in November, he grabbed her hand and told her he wasn't ready, "couldn't have taken it then.
"If you could know how good you have been to this world, for hundreds of people..." he said, choking up. "Everybody loves you. I love you."
"I love you, too," she replied. "So much."
In her last week, Conley talked to me about faith, about how she no longer feared death because she believed in an afterlife where she will see loved ones who passed away before her and "there will be no pain or anything." Knowing she would see God, she told me, "feels good."
She left nothing unsaid with any of those close to her. She wrote goodbye letters to friends and family members to open after she died. She told everyone close to her that she loved them - her family, friends, doctor, even me, after I sat with her through a chemo session. I hugged her close that afternoon, then cried in my car after she and Bart drove away.
She told me again when I stopped by her apartment on the last day of 2015, when she thanked me for telling her story. We cried in each other's arms.
As journalists, we always try to maintain a certain distance from our subjects and not become too entwined in their lives. But Jill would never allow it. She had no time for anything but love.
And that perhaps is her greatest lesson, her greatest gift, for the rest of us.
Laura Ungar, who also covers public health for USA Today, can be reached at 502-582-7190 or on Twitter @laura_ungar.
Gallery | Cancer patient Jill Conley "still fighting"


The HEPCloud Facility concept is envisioned to be a portal to an ecosystem of computing resources---commercial or academic---that will help our facilities move away from standalone, siloed solutions. It will provide "complete solutions" to all users, with agreed-upon levels of service, routing user workflows to local ("owned") or remote ("rental") resources based on efficiency, cost, workflow requirements and the policies of the facilities hosting the resources. This will be done transparently to the users, utilizing a sophisticated decision engine and cost model, and incorporating the necessary policies and infrastructure to manage allocations to potential computing resources (local or remote). The portal concept could provide the means for all laboratories to provide shared resources in the ecosystem, resulting in a large pool of offerings for compute, data archival capabilities, database services, data management, etc., potentially linking all US HEP computing. In order to investigate the merit of this approach, we established the Fermilab HEPCloud project. The goal is to integrate rented resources into the current Fermilab computing facility in a manner transparent to the user. The first type of external resources considered was commercial clouds, partnering with Amazon Web Services as the provider. For our studies, we identified use cases that both demonstrate the necessary aspects of the concept, and that are also useful to the experimenters. One of the use cases focused on CMS Monte Carlo generation and reconstruction, targeting physics results for the Moriond conference in March 2016. This use case studied the scalability and sustainability of elastic provisioning of AWS resources through the portal, and exercised the prototype decision engine and cost model.


text:
Q: Save the State of RadioButtons in ArrayAdapter of Type class I'm having troubles saving the state of a selected radiobutton when the user hits the back key and then comes back to the activity. My class extends ListActivity. Here's the onCreate and onBackPressed() methods of the class that creates the listview.
@Override
  protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
    // TODO Auto-generated method stub
    super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
    setContentView(R.layout.profile_manager);

    dataInfo = new HandleData(ProfileMaker.this);

    dataInfo.open();

    people = dataInfo.getAllComments();

    userAdapter = new ArrayAdapter<People>(ProfileMaker.this, android.R.layout.simple_list_item_single_choice, people);

    setListAdapter(userAdapter);

    registerForContextMenu(getListView());

    addUser = (Button) findViewById(R.id.buttonAddUser);
    graphUser = (Button) findViewById(R.id.buttonGraph);

    addUser.setOnClickListener(this);
    graphUser.setOnClickListener(this);

    idSharing = getSharedPreferences(idPref, 0);
    nameSharing = getSharedPreferences(namePref, 0);
    ageSharing = getSharedPreferences(agePref, 0);
    weightSharing = getSharedPreferences(weightPref, 0);
    genderSharing = getSharedPreferences(genderPref, 0);

    otherName = getSharedPreferences(nameThere, 0);
    otherAge = getSharedPreferences(ageThere, 0);
    otherWeight = getSharedPreferences(weightThere, 0);
    otherGender = getSharedPreferences(genderThere, 0);
}

    @Override
public void onBackPressed() {
    // TODO Auto-generated method stub
    super.onBackPressed();

    Intent newIntent = new Intent(ProfileMaker.this, Monitor.class);
    startActivity(newIntent);
}

Whenever I press the home button and come back to the application, the radiobutton that I selected is still selected, but when I press the back key to go to the previous activity and then come back to this one, the radiobutton is not selected. How can I save the state of a previously selected radiobutton? These radiobuttons are in a radiogroup. Any help is highly appreciated. Thanks.
EDIT:
Ok, so this is what I got.
public class AdapterClass extends ArrayAdapter<People>{

private final List<People> list;
  private final Activity context;

  public AdapterClass(Activity context, List<People> list) {
    super(context, R.layout.profile_manager, list);
    this.context = context;
    this.list = list;
  }

  static class ViewHolder {
    protected TextView text;
    protected RadioButton radioButton;
      RadioGroup group;
  }

  @Override
  public View getView(int position, View convertView, ViewGroup parent) {
    View view = null;
    if (convertView == null) {
      LayoutInflater inflator = context.getLayoutInflater();
      view = inflator.inflate(R.layout.button_layout, null);
      final ViewHolder viewHolder = new ViewHolder();
      viewHolder.text = (TextView) view.findViewById(R.id.label);

      viewHolder.radioButton = (RadioButton) view.findViewById(R.id.check);
      viewHolder.radioButton
          .setOnCheckedChangeListener(new OnCheckedChangeListener() {

            @Override
            public void onCheckedChanged(CompoundButton buttonView,
                boolean isChecked) {
              People element = (People) viewHolder.radioButton
                  .getTag();
              element.setSelected(buttonView.isChecked());

            }
          });
      view.setTag(viewHolder);
      viewHolder.radioButton.setTag(list.get(position));
    } else {
      view = convertView;
      ((ViewHolder) view.getTag()).radioButton.setTag(list.get(position));
    }
    ViewHolder holder = (ViewHolder) view.getTag();
    holder.text.setText(list.get(position).getName());
    holder.radioButton.setChecked(list.get(position).isSelected());
    return view;
  }

I got excited when it actually had a radiobutton selected. But the problem is it only selects the first button in the list an nothing else even if I deselected it and selected another item. Also, it's letting me select more than one radio button which I don't want. What am I missing?

A: Make an boolean array and fill it with false value as number of radio buttons.Now when ever you click radio button make that index true if it was false and if clicked again do it false. Use your own list adapter it will helps you more  . I had done similar in case of check box you can see my post Unable to check/uncheck CheckedTextView inside getView . Reply me if this helps you ...

A: You are losing the state of the radiogroup as you are navigating using intent when the back key is pressed, so activity reinitializing (i.e Again when you come to your screen it will start from oncreate) , you need to add extras to your intent send you radio button states
example like this
 @Override
public void onBackPressed() {
    // TODO Auto-generated method stub
    super.onBackPressed();

    Intent newIntent = new Intent(ProfileMaker.this, Monitor.class);
newIntent.putExtra("somename",state of the radiobutton);
    startActivity(newIntent);
}

and in ProfileMaker activity check is there any extra , if there is an extra get that and select radiobutton according to that.
if (getIntent().getExtras().getString("yourextraname") != null)
            applicant = getIntent().getExtras().getString("applicant");

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


I have lots of great ideas, and thanks to my love of research, I have more information and trivia stored in my head than is probably good for me. What I have always struggled with is self-discipline. I was one of those fortunate kids who had a lot of interests and talents, so I was able to happily coast while following my bliss and be successful.
That came to a crashing halt the summer of 2006. Two strokes inside of five days is enough to shake anyone off their groove. My easy ride ended, and suddenly I had to work for every little thing. Whether I wanted to or not. Most often, not. For the next year and a half I dealt with heart surgery, a clotting disorder and a bleeding disorder, more strokes, more rehab, pain management for all the side-effects of the strokes. I couldn't coast anymore. Due to my health I lost the career I loved and gained a lot of weight.
It's often said that you never know how strong you are until you don't have a choice. I didn't have a choice about fighting my health issues, it was do or die. But self-discipline–that was something I needed to learn and quick.
I wanted to walk again, so I needed the discipline to get to rehab, to do what I was told even when it didn't make sense. Soon I was walking with a walker, then crutches, then canes, then one cane, and now a service dog to compensate for balance issues. Where many go to they gym to look good and stay healthy, I was at the gym ignoring dirty looks from others to regain my stamina and strengthen my heart.
I wanted to read and write again, so I needed discipline to forget for a time that I had been a college professor. I picked up the fat crayons and learned to color. I asked my teenage sons to read me their favorite picture books from their childhoods. I quoted what I had memorized as a child while looking at the words as my husband pointed them out. Coloring turned to writing, being read to turned to reading. When my dominant hand wouldn't work I learned to write with my left hand. Six months after my stroke I could read at a high school level. Now, eight years later I am reading and comprehending almost as well as pre-stroke. My writing voice is different, but now I'm writing a blog and making progress on a novel.
I wanted to get off a number of medications with nasty side-effects and lose the weight I gained lying around hospitals, so I found the discipline and worked to eat healthier and exercise. Becoming a vegan was pretty easy; exercising three times per week is still a struggle. But I am continuing the fight to get what I want.
Today I am stronger than I ever thought possible, but rest assured it wasn't just self-discipline. That started the hard work, but many days it's just not enough. I was blessed with a strong faith that was years in the making before my health took a nose-dive. Additionally I was blessed with loving and loyal family and friends. Too many to name, and I did my best to thank them all at the time.
But there is one who has not gotten the accolades he deserves. Not even close. When self-discipline just wasn't cutting it, my husband has been my champion, advocate, cheer-leader, chauffeur, and provider. He has never hesitated to give me a shoulder to cry on or a kick in the proverbial backside depending on which I most needed in that moment.
Even now as I'm trying to blaze a new trail as an author and speaker, even while he is working full time and working on his Master's degree, he holds me accountable and keeps me focused. It's because of him that I have the tools I need to compensate for my stroke-related deficits. I was the nerdy geek, but now he checks my online calendar to make sure I keep appointments. I needed the service dog, but he takes Gizmo outside most mornings and buys the kibble. I have trouble remembering to eat and take my medicine, but he encourages me to use MyFitnessPal and to sort my pills by the week, and then double checks that I am doing it.
I may be strong, but I've learned that the more difficult the challenge the more important it is to have a champion in my corner. I am so grateful for my husband. He is my partner, my best friend, and my super hero.
I love you, Steve! Thank you. Happy Valentine's Day.


text:
A breakdown of the felony murder rule, a doctrine invoked in Arbery convictions
DAVID FOLKENFLIK, HOST:
Earlier this week, an almost entirely white jury in Georgia convicted three white men of killing Ahmaud Arbery, an unarmed Black man out for a jog. For many Americans, the verdict delivered justice that was long overdue, yet some legal observers point to one of the laws used to convict the three killers as an unsettling reminder of the ways in which African American defendants have sometimes been prosecuted. It is the so-called felony murder rule. Critics of this law say that it greatly expands who can be charged with murder and ends up being used to toughen the sentences of juveniles and people of color.
To talk about the debate over the felony murder law, we called up Shobha Mahadev. She's a clinical professor of law at the Children and Family Justice Center, which is part of Northwestern University's law school. She joins us now. Shobha Mahadev, welcome.
SHOBHA MAHADEV: Thank you so much for having me.
FOLKENFLIK: First, can you define felony murder for us and explain how that differs from how people conventionally think about a murder charge?
MAHADEV: Sure. So I think if you ask most people, they would have some knowledge that criminal responsibility is tied to a person's intent. So if you intended to kill someone and you committed that act, then yes, you should be held responsible for first-degree murder or murder, as it might be in many states. Felony murder is an exception to that idea. You don't have to have an intent to commit murder. That conviction arises from your conduct and your intent to commit another felony. And then that felony is connected to murder itself. So felony murder is actually kind of a different way in which we hold people responsible for murder, even if they don't intend to commit murder at all or cause a death.
FOLKENFLIK: In the case we've been talking about, one of the defendants, Travis McMichael, was convicted of malice murder, which requires intent. His father and his neighbor, who also participated in the attack, were acquitted of malice murder but convicted of felony murder. So Travis McMichael pulled the trigger. The other two didn't. If felony murder were to be replaced, the two who participated but didn't pull the trigger may not have been convicted of murder at all. Do you feel that would have been a more legally just outcome?
MAHADEV: I think it's difficult to divorce the circumstances of this case from what happens nationally every day in our courtrooms. I mean, if you were to look at the shooter, Travis McMichael is the one who bore the greatest responsibility. But if you look at the father and then, even more attenuated, Mr. Bryan, who was following around in his truck, yeah, it is possible that he would not have been convicted of murder.
But if you look at the national landscape, I think what we actually do observe is that lots of people are caught up in this net of needing to convict someone of the highest possible offense, even though their responsibility may be much lower. I mean, you can look at teenagers, for instance. There was a well-known case here in Illinois a couple of years ago where teenagers were trying to take a car from a homeowner's driveway, and a homeowner came out and shot and killed one of the teens. And the others were held responsible for that and charged with murder, in fact. So you could see that there could be some extreme results that come out of the use of felony murder as it stands right now. And perhaps a better option is to tie it more closely to people's intent and their individual responsibility.
FOLKENFLIK: There is some research that strongly indicates Black people are arrested and sentenced for felony murder at exponentially higher rates than white people. So this case may not be fully representative of the way in which this law is typically exercised.
MAHADEV: I think that's accurate.
FOLKENFLIK: OK. What do you see as a better alternative here for holding people accountable for heinous crimes that might end in death?
MAHADEV: I think if you were going to consider keeping the rule, it would be better if it were more closely tied to individual's intent and the actions they actually do carry out. Some states have done this by giving people an option to demonstrate maybe they were not armed, and maybe they did not share the same intent as other participants. But I think another way to look at this is that in this country, we actually do have pretty long sentences available for many of the felonies that could be at the root of the felony murder charge. For instance, even in this case, looking at aggravated assault, yes, you might not end up with murder convictions, but there may be other convictions available that could deliver an extremely long sentence and could avoid some of the worst abuses that we see out of these felony murder convictions, which do seem to have a disproportionate impact on youth, minorities and even women.
FOLKENFLIK: Do you see any movement to change these laws, to rewrite felony murder?
MAHADEV: I think we have seen some narrowing. Even last year in Illinois, we did have a reform that limited the application of the felony murder law so that it would not affect some of the most extreme cases. I would urge some caution out of people that when you feel that a just result has happened in a case like this where we - were race has infected, you know, this entire situation that we're looking at in the Arbery case and was maybe at its core from the beginning, even in the fact that the case wasn't even prosecuted or may not have come to light without significant community and national pressure, I think that might incite people to want to create more strict laws. But our experience is that a more strict version of felony murder has a great likelihood of disproportionately impacting Black individuals, youth and women as well. So we would urge caution, I think, in that respect in the application of the rule.
FOLKENFLIK: We've been hearing from Shobha Mahadev. She's a clinical professor of law at Northwestern Law School. Shobha Mahadev, thank you.
MAHADEV: Thank you.


text:
function autocomplete(parent) {
    var _data=null,
        _delay= 0,
        _selection,
        _margin = {top: 30, right: 10, bottom: 50, left: 80},
        __width = 120,
        __height = 120,
        _placeHolder = "Search",
        _width,
        _height,
        _matches,
        _searchTerm,
        _lastSearchTerm,
        _currentIndex,
        _keys,
        _selectedFunction=defaultSelected;
        _minLength = 1,
        _dataField = "dataField",
        _labelField = "labelField";

    _selection=d3.select(parent);

    function component() {
        _selection.each(function (data) {

            // Select the svg element, if it exists.
        	console.log("sensory emotion search box"+this.id);
            var container = d3.select(this).select("#bp-ac").data([data]);
            var enter = container.enter()
                    .append("div")
                    .attr("id","bp-ac")
                    .attr("class","col-md-3")
           //         .append("div")
               //     .attr("class","padded-row")
                //    .attr("class","padded-row")
                //    .append("div")
                    .attr("style","bp-autocomplete-holder");

       /*    container.attr("width", __width)
                .attr("height", __height);*/

            var input = enter.append("input")
                        .attr("class", "form-control")
                        .attr("placeholder",_placeHolder)
                        .attr("type","text")
                        .on("keyup",onKeyUp);

            var dropDown=enter.append("div").attr("class","bp-autocomplete-dropdown");

            var searching=dropDown.append("div").attr("class","bp-autocomplete-searching").text("Searching ...");

            hideSearching();
            hideDropDown();

            function onKeyUp() {
                _searchTerm=input.node().value;
                var e=d3.event;

                if (!(e.which == 38 || e.which == 40 || e.which == 13)) {
                    if (!_searchTerm || _searchTerm == "") {
                        showSearching("No results");
                    }
                    else if (isNewSearchNeeded(_searchTerm,_lastSearchTerm)) {
                        _lastSearchTerm=_searchTerm;
                        _currentIndex=-1;
                        _results=[];
                        showSearching();
                        search();
                        processResults();
                        if (_matches.length == 0) {
                            showSearching("No results");
                        }
                        else {
                            hideSearching();
                            showDropDown();
                        }

                    }

                }
                else {
                    e.preventDefault();
                }
            }

            function processResults() {

                var results=dropDown.selectAll(".bp-autocomplete-row").data(_matches, function (d) {
                    return d[_dataField];});
                results.enter()
                    .append("div").attr("class","bp-autocomplete-row")
                    .on("click",function (d,i) { row_onClick(d); })
                    .append("div").attr("class","bp-autocomplete-title")
                    .html(function (d) {
                        var re = new RegExp(_searchTerm, 'i');
                        var strPart = d[_dataField].match(re)[0];
                        return d[_dataField].replace(re, "" + strPart + "");
                    });

                results.exit().remove();

                //Update results

                results.select(".bp-autocomplete-title")
                    .html(function (d,i) {
                        var re = new RegExp(_searchTerm, 'i');
                        var strPart = _matches[i][_dataField].match(re);
                        if (strPart) {
                            strPart = strPart[0];
                            return _matches[i][_dataField].replace(re, "" + strPart + "");
                        }

                    });

            }

            function search() {

                var str=_searchTerm;
                console.log("searching on " + _searchTerm);
                console.log("-------------------");

                if (str.length >= _minLength) {
                    _matches = [];
                    for (var i = 0; i < _keys.length; i++) {
                        var match = false;
                        match = match || (_keys[i][_dataField].toLowerCase().indexOf(str.toLowerCase()) >= 0);
                        if (match) {
                            _matches.push(_keys[i]);
                            //console.log("matches " + _keys[i][_dataField]);
                        }
                    }
                }
            }

            function row_onClick(d) {
                hideDropDown();
                input.node().value= d[_dataField];
                _selectedFunction(d);
            }

            function isNewSearchNeeded(newTerm, oldTerm) {
                return newTerm.length >= _minLength && newTerm != oldTerm;
            }

            function hideSearching() {
                searching.style("display","none");
            }

            function hideDropDown() {
                dropDown.style("display","none");
            }

            function showSearching(value) {
                searching.style("display","block");
                searching.text(value);
            }

            function showDropDown() {
                dropDown.style("display","block");
            }

        });
    }

    function measure() {
        _width=__width - _margin.right - _margin.left;
        _height=__height - _margin.top - _margin.bottom;
    }

    function defaultSelected(d) {
        console.log(d[_dataField] + " selected");
    }

    component.render = function() {
        measure();
        component();
        return component;
    }

    component.keys = function (_) {
        if (!arguments.length) return _keys;
        _keys = _;
        return component;
    }

    component.dataField = function (_) {
        if (!arguments.length) return _dataField;
        _dataField = _;
        return component;
    }

    component.labelField = function (_) {
        if (!arguments.length) return _labelField;
        _labelField = _;
        return component;
    }

    component.margin = function(_) {
        if (!arguments.length) return _margin;
        _margin = _;
        measure();
        return component;
    };

    component.width = function(_) {
        if (!arguments.length) return __width;
        __width = _;
        measure();
        return component;
    };

    component.height = function(_) {
        if (!arguments.length) return __height;
        __height = _;
        measure();
        return component;
    };

    component.delay = function(_) {
        if (!arguments.length) return _delay;
        _delay = _;
        return component;
    };

    component.keys = function(_) {
        if (!arguments.length) return _keys;
        _keys = _;
        return component;
    };

    component.placeHolder = function(_) {
        if (!arguments.length) return _placeHolder;
        _placeHolder = _;
        return component;
    };

    component.onSelected = function(_) {
        if (!arguments.length) return _selectedFunction;
        _selectedFunction = _;
        return component;
    };

    return component;

}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


You can call on +44 7954433166 or email at Info@relaxyourlife.eu.
Working at an office can cause us many different forms of stress, both mental and physical. Massage can help reduce these symptoms which helps increase productivity at work.
Massage helps reduce stress and anxiety as it reduces the production of cortisol, 'the stress hormone'. Massage also stimulates the production of serotonin and oxytocin, which help us feel nice, happy and relaxed.
Physically it can sort out many problems, varying from headaches to tingling sensations running down your arm, as well as any kind of muscle aches and pains and general muscle tensions that cause discomfort. Massage is also known to lower high blood pressure.
We come to your office with a very comfortable massage chair, adjusted to your body so you feel nice and relaxed even before the massage starts. We also provide headphones which block out all noise so you can really take a moment for yourself. While relaxing music starts to soothe you, the massage will start.
The massage will focus on your back, shoulders and neck. Depending on your wishes we can incorporate your arms and hands or just focus on your upper or lower back.