Del Ratzsch, in Science and Its Limits, makes this provocative statement: "Our worldviews, in short, are inescapably shaped by science." We often assume the public understands what we mean by science. If someone makes a statement such as, "According to science…" it is often taken as a mantle of authority generating respect or awe. We often assume the public completely understands what we mean when the term science is invoked. But people in science professions or science education are often disappointed to discover the public's deficient grasp of the subject. Even so, when the subject of evolution is raised, supporters often reverently clothe the subject with the mantle of science. Those who teach evolution, pressuring others to believe it is a true account of human origins, use public ignorance of science in their powerful lobbying campaign.
As a working discipline, science is enormously complex. Beyond the understanding of nearly everyone that the root word of science is knowledge, there is considerably less agreement on what science is and how it works. Many who profess to "like" science look favorably on the acquisition of knowledge, particularly if they are both interested in a certain scientific subject and have confidence that the knowledge they acquire is real and true. If they suspect the knowledge they acquire is not real and true, sometimes they will not view the science favorably.
Science is also described as the process of how knowledge of the natural world is gained. There is considerable variability in how scientists go about acquiring their knowledge. When non-scientists discover the complexity and challenge involved in gaining good scientific knowledge, some become discouraged or skeptical. At times the scientific methods may be flawed. On other occasions science conclusions may be driven by the strongly agenda-driven consensus of certain groups of professional scientists. Science is a distinctly subjective human enterprise--a fact sometimes not recognized.
Public attitudes toward science often fail to include an adequate knowledge of science philosophy. Calvin College philosophy professor Del Ratzsch states, "The philosophy of science is basically the study of what science is, what it does, how it works, why it works, and what we should make of it." Sometimes even the scientists themselves fail to appreciate the philosophical and epistemological dimensions of their science--their presuppositions, values, what kinds of knowledge claims they make, and how they are justified. Most people prefer simple answers to scientific questions. They see science philosophy as esoteric, even unnecessary. Philosophy drives the scientific enterprise, however. Few people are interested in the philosophy that powers science. Unfortunately, most scientific laypersons merely stop off at, "What does science say?" on significant questions of our day.
Evolution is a topic of wide ranging impact in our secular culture. Within the evangelical community, theistic evolution is increasingly becoming an issue of profound metaphysical and theological significance. Theistic evolution is becoming strong in some evangelical media, churches, and campuses. Perhaps the dilemma is more important in evangelical culture than in secular culture. While the secular culture has generally embraced evolution, in the evangelical community embrace of theistic evolution may amount to a virtual paradigm shift.
We might ask, "What is the main support pillar for the theistic evolutionists' drive to convert creationists to their origins belief system?" After reading large volumes of material produced by proponents of theistic evolution generally and BioLogos personnel in particular, I conclude their repeated invocation of the term "science" as a mantle of support for the evolutionary paradigm works well for them. The technical science of genetics they claim supports evolution is often obscure or difficult for laypersons to understand, but being generally on board with "science" resonates with the public. We must be aware that the methodology and philosophy driving "science" are highly variable and have changed dramatically over time.
Young people, in particular, want to be perceived as scientifically literate. I am fearful, however, that one's self-perception of support for "SCIENCE" and belief in evolution sound with the same modern ringtone. Many evolutionary claims are supported largely by inference and the consensus of bio-scientists. That community has a strong evolutionary bias.
I encourage all who find theistic evolution appealing, or even "elegant," to continue the challenging task of prayerful inquiry, intent on discovering the truth God has for His people. There are many wonderful and helpful written resources available on all sides of the question. Proper judgment is not possible without carefully studying the material produced by all of the stakeholders.
Some TE enthusiasts may not wish to concede that evolution's foundation is grounded in scientific naturalism. Metaphysical (philosophical) naturalism is the belief that "nature is all there is." Methodological naturalism is the operational principle of modern scientists: Proceed with your scientific activities as if nature is all there is, as if there is no supernatural, and as if all processes in our cosmos are naturalistic processes. This operating principle, in turn, forces the predetermined scientific conclusion that all life developed naturalistically. Since this is the only scientific conclusion possible, the consensus judgments of scientists operating under this principle force the conclusion that evolution is good science, the best science, and of course, the only science. There is no discussion--no argument--because only one conclusion is possible.
Beautiful sunsets, magnificent mountains, and various other glorious natural displays have long triggered deep feelings of worship. My mother was fond of quoting the King James translation of Psalm 121:1: "I will lift up mine eyes unto the hills from whence cometh my help." She balanced the poetic quality of verse 1 by a follow-up quote of verse 2: "My help cometh from the Lord, which made heaven and earth." For her, the majestic hills in our northwest New Jersey neighborhood triggered deep reverence. But my parents' Christian faith was affirmed even more deeply in gaining understanding of how God's created world worked.
My father was a statewide agent for a seed company during the 1940s. In that role he was involved in promoting the cutting edge agriculture which widely came into use during the first half of the 20th century--the development of plant hybrids. Two pure strains of plants called "inbred" varieties are crossed to produce a hybrid plant which manifests the best traits of both inbred varieties. Further crossing of that hybrid with another hybrid results in a "double cross," manifesting the best traits of all four original pure inbred strains.
A small "Corn Data Notebook" from Hoffman Farm Seeds of Landisville, PA, 1946 edition, states "These great hybrids are continually improved, season after season—by patient, careful selection and progeny testing…and by introduction of new bloodlines." The Hoffman firm was my father's employer. As a child, I remember my father using mysterious terms like "inbred" and "cross." He kept busy planting "test plots," visiting farmers and helping them overcome the inertia of traditionalism, persuading them of the value of hybrid plants possessing "hybrid vigor" and their potential for greatly increased yields.
One may wonder whether discovering and applying genetic knowledge of how hybridization works weakened my father's faith in God as the Creator of the many thousands of strains of pure, inbred plants. Quite the contrary! He praised God for man's ability to discover how hydridization works and embraced it enthusiastically. The Genesis 1:28 exhortation to "...Fill the earth and subdue it...Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground" would appear to apply here as well.
Dr. Francis S. Collins, in his much discussed book The Language of God, has captured the imagination of some evangelical Christians by proposing the compatability of theistic evolutionary beliefs with traditional orthodox Christian precepts. His topics for chapters 7-10, successively, are (1) Atheism and Agnosticism, (2) Creationism, (3) Intelligent Design, and (4) Biologos (codeword for theistic evolution). He calls each of these positions "options." Collins dismisses options (1), (2), and (3), and suggests that the correct position is option (4)--theistic evolution.
Collins, in Chapter 9 (p. 193), claims belief in intelligent design attempts to "ascribe to God various natural phenomena that the science of the day had been unable to sort out – whether a solar eclipse or the beauty of a flower." We may infer that Collins cites a solar eclipse as an example of an errant belief that God periodically performs a miracle of blackening the sun. We may further infer that people citing the beauty of a flower believe God is performing a "miracle" each time a flower blooms. Collins implies many intelligent design adherents have a "God-of-the gaps" religion, citing the above as examples. He states such "theories" have a dismal history, because "advances in science ultimately fill in those gaps," thereby discrediting their "faith" that God performs miracles.
In The Language of God, Collins paints adherents of intelligent design as God-of-the-Gaps believers in a "discouraging tradition" running "a huge risk of simply discrediting faith." He states "Advances in science ultimately fill in those gaps," thereby discrediting the faith of many that God ever acted supernaturally along earth's historical timeline. I conclude Collins would say that since we now know the moon, in its precise and predictable motions, periodically comes between the earth and the sun, our faith that God ever performs any sort of miracle has been discredited. Naturalistic scientists commit the argumentum ad futuris fallacy in their argument: Accept our argument because future evidence will support it. Some writers have named this the "naturalsim-of-the-gaps" argument.
As my parents grew older they became more aware of natural processes set in place by God to form mountains or make hybridization possible. Were my father alive today he would see the biotechnology of genetic engineering in the same light. Application of such technology reflects the function of intelligent design features long present in the world of nature. We do not weaken the credibility of the intelligent design concept; we strengthen it. One of the best examples of this strengthening effect is the incredible increase in our knowledge of the cell's complexity since 1950, including the structure and coding functions of the DNA molecule. Intelligent design theists do not believe in God because of what we do not know, but because of what we do know.
Because of science, the concept of intelligent design has been strengthened exponentially.
Scientific conclusions about cause and effect in earth's bio-history must adhere to rules. Did observed effects "just happen?" Or was God involved in the actions in some way? Intelligent Design, by rule, is declared not to be scientific because it makes inferences of action by a supernatural being.
Intelligent Design is the whipping boy of diverse groups involved in the lively discussion of human origins. The ID movement is accused of being irrational, unscientific, and a "god-of-the-gaps" cop-out. Dr. Francis S. Collins, well-known former director of the National Human Genome Research Institute and currently director of the National Institutes of Health stated in The Language of God that, "Intelligent Design burst on the scene in 1991." Nothing could be further from the truth.
The concept of design in the natural world originating from an intelligent mind goes back thousands of years. We could distinguish biblical creation accounts using the term "formed" from later arguments for the deliberate actions of a designer. Plato and Aristotle proposed teleological arguments hundreds of years before Christ. Likewise, Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, Newton, Boyle, and ironically, even many non-theistic scientists up to the present time have made reference to the abundant apparent design features in the world of nature. Some of these scientists make humorous references to "monkeying" with physics, cosmic "tinkering," and fine-tuning.
Collins correctly voices the visceral objection of many ID adherents: The natural world and living things in particular are far too complex to have organized themselves. On one hand Collins commends the "thoughtfulness and sincerity of ID's proponents" and further states "this movement deserves serious consideration." Then he assumes the default position of the majority of scientists today who control our public educational institutions: "Intelligent Design fails in a profound way to qualify as a scientific theory," he claims. According to the philosophical and methodological box the field of SCIENCE has constructed for itself, I must agree that this statement is true. SCIENCE is a naturalistic enterprise. Using empirical methods, it investigates only natural cause and effect. Notwithstanding that abductive reasoning's inference to the best explanation may point to a possible or likely "outside the science box" interpretation of evidence, no such explanation is ever permitted, either as conjecture or as a subject for further research. Naturalistic presuppositions permit only naturalistic conclusions. Therefore, evolution is awarded the verdict. Evolution wins on a technicality.
Examples of winning or losing on a technicality abound in the world of sports. The game of golf is rife with obscure rules. Violation of any of the rules costs dearly. Sometimes the penalty seems harsh. On August 16, 2010, Dustin Johnson suffered a two stroke penalty on a technical rule and thereby lost his chance to win the PGA championship. He grounded his club in a bunker before a shot, a seemingly insignificant offense which had no impact on his real score, but was against the rules, nonetheless. He was docked two strokes. But forming false conclusions about the reality and implications of intelligent design and the creative acts of God in our cosmos have infinitely more significance as we search for eternal truths. The penalty negatively impacts our basic worldview.
The fundamental operating principle of science is methodological naturalism. This is a distinct change from former times. Scientists "do" science and make conclusions about reality as if there is no supernatural. Methodological naturalism is the driving force of scientists. Theistic scientists may believe in God and in God's direct involvement in cause/effect relationships in origins research, but voicing this belief in connection with their work in science will only result in a heap of trouble.
"What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing science in accord with methodological naturalism? There is a good deal to be said on both sides here. For example, if you exclude the supernatural from science, then if the world or some phenomena within it are supernaturally caused—as most of the world's people believe—you won't be able to reach that truth scientifically. Observing methodological naturalism thus hamstrings science by precluding science from reaching what would be an enormously important truth about the world. It might be that, just as a result of this constraint, even the best science in the long run will wind up with false conclusions."
Dr. Francis S. Collins makes an interesting statement near the beginning of Chapter 8 in his popular book The Language of God. "Taken at face value," says Collins, "the term 'creationist' would seem to imply the general perspective of one who argues for the existence of a God who was directly involved in the creation of the universe. In that broad sense, many deists and nearly all theists, including me, would need to count themselves as creationists." But the remainder of Chapter 8 is a polemic against creationism--young earth creationism. YEC believes, according to Collins, that "all species were created by individual acts of divine creation, and that Adam and Eve were historical figures created by God from dust in the Garden of Eden, and not descended from other creatures." Indeed, this is also the general position of old earth creationism.
The BioLogos Foundation was organized by Dr. Francis S. Collins several years after publication of his successful 2006 book The Language of God. Collins was the director of the National Human Genome Research Institute until 2008. The Institute helped sequence the human genome, a great stride in providing biotechnologists with the tools to develop new medical applications. President Obama appointed Collins director of the National Institute of Health (NIH). He resigned as president of BioLogos Foundation to assume the NIH position in 2009. Dr. Darrel Falk then assumed the presidency.
Dr. Collins has perhaps now become more famous for promoting theistic evolution--the idea that modern man has come into existence by naturalistic processes--and stating that such beliefs are totally compatible with a belief in God and with scripture as God's revelation. Most Catholics and mainline Protestants believe in theistic evolution. The target group for Collins' efforts is evangelical Christians who have a personal conflict with the issue and who may feel cultural pressures to believe in evolution--the position of a large segment of the professional science community and almost everyone in biological sciences.
The last quotation seems to reveal an interesting reservation theistic evolutionists may hold concerning not only Genesis 1:1, but also the remaining verses of Genesis 1 and Genesis 2. They explicitly state God created the heavens and the earth, a succession of living creatures, and finally, man. The ancient bara is the strongest of several Hebrew words translated "create" in our English versions. It could mean to produce something out of nothing. At the very least, scripture uses the term to mean the fashioning of something "new, fresh, good, perfect, and pristine," as one commentator stated. Bara always signals the actions of God. Theistic evolutionists, taking their cue from secular, non-theistic evolutionists, lean toward a naturalistic explanation for every observable event with respect in the natural world. This is the hallmark of methodological naturalism driving the practices and presuppositions of the scientific community, and it is the hallmark of evolutionary scientists. The book jacket for The Language of God declares "For Collins, science does not conflict with the Bible, science enhances it." What kind of science does Collins refer to? Defenders of theistic evolution refer to evolutionary science which is saturated with naturalistic presuppositions.
If concordism is the position that Biblical references to natural history find realization in modern scientific discovery and knowledge, we may wonder if there is a balancing or opposing view. Some Bible scholars question the literality of many scripture creation passages, seeing mere figures of speech in those texts. We may draw only spiritual truths from those literary devices, they claim. Accomodationists state scriptures reflect the human contexts in which they were created and cannot be viewed as literal accounts.
Accomodationism allows generous leeway in interpreting what scripture actually means. I have stated that scriptural language may indeed utilize linguistic imagery more typical of the culture of the day it was written. Had our modern scientific concepts been injected into the language of the Bible in their pre-scientific era, the result may have been confusing and less than fruitful. But accomodationists commonly go much further, making statements which cast serious doubt on the accuracy of many Bible accounts. They say, for example, that the use of "firmament" (Hebrew raquia) sometimes signifying a hard, domed shell covering a flat earth may suggest other errors in the Bible.
Another term currently used to mold perceptions of scripture was popularized by Peter Enns, reformed evangelical scholar in his 2005 volume Inspiration and Incarnation: Evangelicals and the problem of the Old Testament. In the context of the book's thesis, the incarnational model would take account of the dual divine and human aspects of scripture production. In reading the material of Enns, Darrell Falk, Karl Giberson, and others involved in the leadership of BioLogos Forum, it is clear that this view of scripture allows them to make an easy leap to supporting the BioLogos endorsement of theistic evolution: a "molecules to man" evolution, a denial of the literality of Adam and Eve as the first human beings, and an unceasing effort to find naturalistic explanations for mysterious sudden appearances of diverse or novel life forms and other unexplained sudden innovations many view as transcendent creation events. These sudden innovations have been described in detail by secular scientists with no stake in a theological belief system.
BioLogos Forum has cast a broad net to attract a wide range of theistic believers. In particular, they appeal to evangelicals who are disillusioned with traditional creationist positions for one reason or another. Under the BioLogos umbrella, it is completely acceptable to believe in evolution and still find inclusion in the Christian community, even the evangelical Christian community. This appears to be a noble and lofty endeavor. But I do not make this statement without expressing a number of my serious concerns with theistic evolution.
Many of these concerns relate to the embrace of naturalism. Some of my previous posts have dealt with the implications of both philosophical and methodological naturalism. I invite you to review my upcoming posts and previous archived posts on these topics from 2007 and 2008.


text:
Presented by Mogo
Shrinking disposable income pushes more Canadians into debt
A survey by MNP showed 47% don't believe they'll be able to cover their expenses for the next 12 months without increasing their debt
A life-changing event such as a divorce, unexpected automobile repairs, job loss or the death of a family member will drive 70 per cent of respondents into more debt, the MNP survey found.Getty Images/iStockphoto
Colin McClelland
Canadians less indebted as rebounding equity, property prices bolster net wealth
If you can't pay your debts, these are your last-resort options for relief
When it comes to your family budget, don't follow Ottawa's example and pile on the debt
More than half of Canadians say they're increasingly concerned about their ability to pay debts as disposable income shrank by a fifth since June, according to a new survey by a debt restructuring company.
Average monthly disposable income after paying bills and debt obligations fell $142 to $557, says the survey by MNP Ltd., which calls itself the country's largest insolvency practice.
Nearly half — 48 per cent — of the 2,002 respondents to the early September poll by market research company Ipsos said they're left with less than $200 at the end of the month.
"We're seeing less and less wiggle room in household budgets," MNP President Grant Bazian, said in a statement Monday. "The reason this is alarming is because it is often unexpected expenses that force people to take on more debt they can't afford and that begins a cycle of increasing servicing costs, and eventual default."
How to save for retirement at a time when most aren't saving much at all
With the Bank of Canada on hold, watch our $2.19 trillion household debt load grow
Delinquency rates climb to two-year high as Canadian credit card balances grow
The poll comes as the Bank of Canada has parked the benchmark interest rate at 1.75 per cent this year after increases dating back to 2017 and an economy that stalled in late 2018. The outlook since then has picked up with forecasts of stronger growth. That optimism may have rubbed off on survey respondents who reported being more positive about their personal financial positions, Calgary-based MNP said.
The quarterly polls shows 27 per cent say that their debt situation is better than it was a year ago, a increase of three percentage points, and more than a third — 35 per cent — say it's better than five years ago. The optimism increases looking ahead, with 39 per cent saying they expect improvements in their debt situation a year from now and half believing that it will be better five years from now.
"Household debt has eased marginally and the current holding pattern on interest rates may be giving Canadians a sense of optimism about their finances," Bazian said. "Interest rates may remain stable for now but that is a cold comfort to those already having a difficult time making their debt payments at the current rate."
A life-changing event such as a divorce, unexpected automobile repairs, job loss or the death of a family member will drive 70 per cent of respondents into more debt, the survey found. About half — 47 per cent — said they don't believe they'll be able to cover their expenses for the next 12 months without increasing their debt, it showed. It increased from 45 per cent in June, MNP said.
The percentage of Canadian who expect a debt-free retirement shrank three percentage points from June to 48 per cent, the poll showed.
"It seems many have resigned themselves to owing money for life," Bazian said.
• Email: cmcclelland@postmedia.com
Talk about Blue Monday: Canadians haven't been this pessimistic about debt in two years as 'hopelessness' builds
WatchHere's how to get over that post-holiday debt hangover fast
WatchCanadians' mountain of household debt is rising again
WatchCanadians racked up $100 billion in credit card debt for first time ever and they're not done adding to it
WatchMajority of Canadians plan to spend less this holiday season as debt scales new heights
WatchSurge in number of Canadians who can't pay their debts has economists worried — and scratching their heads
'Downward pressure': Debt-ridden Ontario could see its credit rating cut, warns financial watchdog
More than a third of Canadians have no retirement savings, half live paycheque to paycheque, poll finds
WatchDelinquency rates climb to two-year high as Canadian credit card balances grow
Canadians' insolvency problems might not be as bad as everyone thinks, C.D. Howe says
WatchA quarter of Canadians say they struggle to pay bills by month-end: Survey

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
OUR ENDORSEMENTS
OUR SCREENINGS
The existence of Israel as a sovereign Jewish state has become a polarizing issue in both the mainstream and Christian communities, and there are many questions to be answered. Our goal is to provide answers to some of these questions through the real life journey of Todd Morehead as he travels through the Holy Land, hearing the stories of both Israelis and Palestinians who have been directly impacted by the conflict.
We believe in the inherent dignity of all people living in the Holy Land. This includes Arabs and other minorities who live in Israel and the Palestinian Territories (West Bank and Gaza). These people matter to God, and therefore they matter to us. In getting to know them we have come to discover that many—despite the challenges they sometimes face as minorities—courageously support Israel's existence—even with its flaws and growing pains—and they want their voice to be heard. This film is our attempt to help them.
I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. – Elie Wiesel
Why Does the World Need Another Film About the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict?
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict continues to be one of the most contentious and misunderstood issues of our day. Hope in the Holy Land delves beneath the surface of the conflict by bringing the audience in touch with people on the ground who answer many of the questions people are asking, such as…
Who are the people involved in this conflict and how do they view each other?
Do the Israelis and Palestinians truly hate each other?
What is Zionism? Is it a foreign colonization movement?
What is the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement? Is it helping or hurting those in the Holy Land who want peace?
Who are the settlers and how do the settlements impact the peace process?
Why after all of these years has there not been a peace agreement?
What does each side want?
Is there any hope for peace?
In today's age of specialization and glut of information, often history (or the deeper stories behind people and places) gets lost. One of the best ways to take in history is watching documentaries. I'm a visual learner and a well-done documentary combines solid history with creative storytelling to convey deep truth and events in a quick and memorable fashion. – Ken Wystma, Pastor & Author
Who Are We Trying To Reach?
The primary audience we're seeking to serve is the mainstream Christian community in the U.S., particularly the younger generation who is less familiar with the history and background of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But we realize that this topic is of great interest to a broader market, especially the Jewish and Muslim communities around the world, so we have made every effort to be relevant and sensitive to a diverse audience while staying true to our theological convictions.
Our desire is to present audiences – regardless of their background – with an educational and engaging feature-length film on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that challenges and inspires both Christians and their friends to stand with anyone in the Holy Land who genuinely respects the right of both Jews and non-Jews to live in peace and security.
We humbly ask you for your prayers and support as we bring this message to the world.
Justin Kron & Todd Morehead
Co-Creators & Executive Producers
May the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace as you trust in him, so that you may overflow with hope…. Romans 15:13
Follow our social sites and share with your friends. If you have questions about this project, please connect with us.
Sign-up to receive important news and recommended resources related to Hope in the Holy Land.


Arcadia House watamu is a elegant and comfy 4 bedroom house set in a private garden of one acre a minute walk from the white sandy beach of Watamu Marine Park. The house is ideal for travelers seeking a perfect getaway far away from the hustle and bustle of city life.
The rooms are fitted with mosquito nets en-suite bathroom, separate sleeping area for children overhead fan and optional air-conditioning.
Has a modern open kitchen.
The house is fully staffed plus a cook.


text:
Posts Tagged 'colin firth'
First Oscar Winner Predictions
It's time for phase 2, ladies and gentleman. Things aren't going as well as I would have liked, but they almost never do. As Sasha Stone at Awardsdaily quotes "All the President's Men," in regards to the Oscar race, "The trick is not minding." You've got to roll with the punches and accept that even if the deserving film doesn't win, hopefully your predictions are still right. Therefore, at least your pride is still intact.
I have "The King's Speech" down for the big win, sadly. Maybe later on, if there's a potential change in vibe, I might make an alteration back. But for now, one has to put the money where the money's gonna win. I have, meanwhile, kept David Fincher in the frontrunner position for Best Director. I simply cannot imagine a world in which Tom Hooper wins that trophy from him. It's simply unnatural that the Academy could be that ridiculous.
You can pretty much take all of the acting wins to the bank. Melissa Leo is the only one who's kind of flimsy, at this point, but I have a feeling her age and fantastic personality will help her beat out the unworthy newcomer.
Going over this, it still boggles me that Lee Smith missed an editing nomination for "Inception." It really makes no sense. I have the "The Social Network" down, and my God, it deserves it. Yet, the nomination feels flimsy, and yet I can't figure out what could possibly take it down.
With that, here are my first winner predictions for the 83rd Annual Academy Awards, complete with all of the nominees ranked in order of their chances. I will keep them posted and, hopefully, updated in the "PREDICTIONS" tab at the top of the homepage.
Click "Read More" to see the full list and tally.
1. "The King's Speech"
2. "The Social Network"
3. "The Fighter"
4. "True Grit"
5. "Black Swan"
6. "Toy Story 3"
8. "127 Hours"
9. "Winter's Bone"
10. "The Kids Are All Right"
Categories: Musings, Oscars Tags: academy awards, alice in wonderland, black swan, christian bale, colin firth, hailee steinfeld, incendies, inception, inside job, melissa leo, natalie portman, oscars, predictions, the fighter, the king's speech, the social network, the wolfman, toy story 3, true grit, winners
The DGA and the SAG: Now It's Time to Vent…
February 1, 2011 thomasconroy 1 comment
Well folks, Tom Hooper has just won the DGA and the cast he directed took home Best Ensemble at the SAG. Coupled with the PGA win last week, "The King's Speech" has now emerged as not only the frontrunner, but pretty much the inevitable winner of the Best Picture award at the Oscars. As this film has picked up speed in the last few weeks, I've tried to keep an open mind. I've tried to tell myself that this kind of healthy competition will make for a better Oscars and would make "The Social Network"'s eventual victory all the more sweet. However, now that the race has shifted from a neck and neck dogfight to a potential sweep for "The King's Speech," it has become impossible to suppress my rage.
This situation is, more or less, a travesty for American cinema. For the last half of the previous decade, the AMPAS showed that they had the potential to change with the times. By awarding films like "The Departed," "No Country for Old Men," and "The Hurt Locker," the Academy has proven that they have the ability to not only award phenomenal films, but ones that represent a shift in the balance of power. These are films that show a new Hollywood, emerging from the ashes, making art for a new generation and ultimately changing movies for the better. With "The Social Network," the AMPAS were given an opportunity to crystalize this new reputation by awarding not only the best movie of the year, but one that is an absolute game-changer in the world of filmmaking. Instead, they are willing to flush it all down the drain.
"The King's Speech" is not a bad film. It is simply a good film. It has good acting, good writing, good direction, good production quality and good music. In case you haven't noticed, "good" is the key word, here. I don't think there is a single aspect of this film that achieves a level of "greatness." It is an iconic example of middle-of-the-road filmmaking, directed straight at a block of people yearning for that warm and fuzzy feeling in their stomachs. It's "triumph of the human spirit" pornography. More than anything else, however, it is straight-up Oscar fodder, and they are eating it up, hook, line and sinker. They're all too willing to vote their souls away for a chance to award this heart-warming work of mediocrity.
"The Social Network" is the best film of the year. Even if people's opinions cannot agree with or grasp this concept, the title still pretty much remains the same. Never in history has a film garnered so much recognition and awards. Never has the population of this nation's film critics solidified so strong and unanimous an opinion about a single film. However, it's more than just a critical tally or mantlepiece full of statues. This is a film that resonates so strongly with this societal climate, much in the same way did "Network" in 1976, "Bonnie and Clyde" in 1967, and "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" in 1939. When looking down the road, it is a film that will be remembered, not only for it's cultural impact, but for the flawless nature of its filmmaking prowess. And since I am one such person who can actually make this statement from a position of age and experience (I started college only a year after "The Facebook" was created, back when it was just a college thing), this is, in fact, the movie that defines my generation.
The Academy Award is called that for one reason: it is awarded upon the voted decision of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. It's their award and they can technically do whatever they want with it. However, I really have to ask just what the hell is wrong with these people? Are they really that much an organization of pure saps? Are they really that cynical that they would deliberately snub the frontrunner for an inferior underdog just because their sick of the unanimous praise? Have they really not gotten tired of having Harvey Weinstein's lips wrapped around their you-know-whats?Can they really not look beyond four weeks from now and consider what history will judge as the more educated and lasting decision? Most importantly, has the Academy really gone back to its old ways? God, let us hope not.
So is the race over? The answer is no. Even when things get to their bleakest point of flat-out certainty, the race is never over until the last envelope is opened. However, it's really not looking good for David Fincher and Aaron Sorkin's masterpiece. With the combined weight of the SAG, PGA, and DGA, anyone who has spent any time in the industry of awards prognostication would be a fool to not call it for "The King's Speech." After all, the actors and producers, put together, make up nearly half of the Academy's voting block. Hope is not lost, completely, but I would now peg "The Social Network"'s chances at around twenty to twenty-five percent.
At points like these, one can only find comfort by constantly reminding themselves of the most important lesson the awards season has ever taught us: as many fantastic films have won the Oscar for Best Picture, there are exponentially more amazing films that have lost it. "The Social Network" may soon join the ranks of films like "Fargo" and "Saving Private Ryan," "Pulp Fiction" and "Goodfellas," "Raging Bull" and "Apocalypse Now," "Taxi Driver" and "All the President's Men," "Chinatown," and "Jaws," "Who's Afraid of Virginia Wolf?" and "The Graduate," "Vertigo" and "Rear Window," "Double Indemnity," and, yes, "Citizen Kane." Coupled with the movies I mentioned previously in this article, this is not exactly bad company to be kept with. However, if you listen very closely, you can clearly hear Orson Welles rolling over in his grave, that after seventy years of history, lessons have yet to be learned.
Categories: Musings, News, Oscars Tags: academy awards, ampas, awards, bonnie and clyde, colin firth, david fincher, dga, directors guild of america, Harvey Weinstein, jesse eisenberg, mr. smith goes to washington, network, results, sag, screen actors guild, sidney lumet, snub, the king's speech, the social network, tom hooper, travesty, triumph of the human spirit
The Nominations – My Thoughts and Reactions
The nail-biting is over, at least for a few weeks. The Oscar nominations are here, and I believe that for the first time in years, my joy outweighs my sorrow. I suppose its appropriate to get into the bad news, first.
One thing's official. As much as the Academy seems to have the most outrageous hard-on for Stephen Daldry (3 films made, 3 Best Director nods), they seem to have an everlasting grudge against Christopher Nolan as a director (3 DGA noms, no Oscar nods for Director). I just don't understand what the man has to do to get their recognition. You can't feel completely bad for him, pulling down two nominations for producer and writer, but are those the types of roles that any great director wants to be remembered for? I'm sure it wasn't good enough for Stanley Kubrick. Honestly, Christopher Nolan is one of the most talented directors in Hollywood. Who else can take a film with such originality, intelligence, grandeur and finesse and bring in 300 million dollars with it or more. And on top of that, do it twice in three years. Nobody since Steven Spielberg, I'll tell you that much.
The second-most disturbing snub has got be the exclusion of Andrew Garfield in the Supporting Actor category. Ridiculous. Definitely one of the best performances of the year, Garfield's portrayal of innocence-lost is the soul of "The Social Network." Though, while I bemoan the lack of Eduardo Savrin, I simply could not be more thrilled about the inclusion of John Hawkes for his turn in "Winter's Bone." People who've visited this site often must be aware of my penchant for this particular acting job, and this morning's news of his inclusion is the crowning jewel of almost a year's worth of supporting him on my part.
Since I'm ever so thrilled about Hawkes, I can't blame him for the Garfield snub. Therefore, I'm gonna have to just go ahead and blame Jeremy Renner. I never thought that in one year, I could turn so much on this performer. In "The Hurt Locker" he was phenomenal, truly deserving of a lead actor nomination. Here, he is an average performance in an average film. I don't think I ever considered him a candidate for my supporting actor picks, not even back in October. I was genuinely shocked and confused when accolades and Oscar talk began surfacing a few months ago. It baffled me then and it truly baffles me now.
At least its consolation that Renner was "The Town"'s only nomination, missing out on that Best Picture nod that everyone was predicting….well almost everyone ;). The fact that "Winter's Bone" took its place could not be more gratifying, as well. What a glorious film that more than deserves all of its bestowed nominations.
Let's look at how some films made out on the whole. "127 Hours" defied pundits with a huge 6 nomination comeback, including yet another double category nomination for A.R. Rahman (Best Original Song, Best Original Score). Meanwhile, maybe the biggest shocker of the day, was "Black Swan" achieving only 5 nominations. For a while now, many people have been projecting Aronofsky's film to be the potential nomination frontrunner, amassing perhaps ten or twelve. Instead, the film missed out on Supporting Actress (for both of its contenders), Original Screenplay, Art Direction, Costume Design and both Sound categories. I didn't have it predicted in all of those, but it certainly had potential. Perhaps the biggest crime here is its Sound Effects exclusion. The work done on the sound of pattering feet and flapping feathers was phenomenal.
The worst overall snub of a film had to be Martin Scorsese's "Shutter Island." Not an amazing film, by any standards, but certainly one in which at least its technical achievements deserved some recognition. It should have easily made the grade for both Cinematography and Art Direction. Some of the best work of the year. I'm also depressed that Ryan Gosling missed out on a more than deserving nomination for Best Actor in "Blue Valentine." It's very nice to see Michelle Williams nominated, but not enough of a consolation. I'm sure that when I see "Biutiful" this weekend, however, Javier Bardem will wow the living shit out of me and I will be able to praise his surprise inclusion.
Let's move on to some of the brighter aspects of day. The big story in the news is "The King's Speech" being the nomination leader, but "The Social Network" really did have a pretty damned good day. 8 nominations, tied for the third highest, including four technical nominations, not an easy feat for a contemporary comedy/drama. It's true that we definitely have ourselves a race now. Yet in terms of the race, "The King's Speech" may have gained ground, but "The Social Network" hasn't lost any of its.
One thing that's really got me happy is the semi-snub of "Alice in Wonderland." True, it did receive three nominations, yet I call it a snub for the one award it had almost always been not only a lock, but a frontrunner: Best Makeup. It appears that this branch of the Academy really does know the difference between makeup and CGI. Some very interesting choices replaced it, including "Barney's Version" and "The Way Back."
Without a doubt, the biggest joy for me, this morning, was seeing the results that the Doc branch rolled out. This has been one of the best years I've ever seen for documentary films. Lately, it's seemed as though the lackluster "Waiting for Superman" was lined up to sweep the Oscar after wins at the BFCA and PGA. However, that belief was certainly swayed when the movie did not even show up among the nominees. The Academy also chose to avoid "The Tillman Story," a pretentious and jumbled look at the soldier's tragic story. Instead, among the nominations, are my three favorite documentaries of the year: "Restrepo," "Inside Job" and the glorious "Exit Through the Gift Shop." Well done, guys.
My predictions were some of the best of my time doing this gig. out of 109 nominations, I correctly predicted 82. Not bad at all. If you were to ask my girlfriend, I was inches away from predicting Bardem at about 2 o'clock this morning. Oh well. Got to stick to your guns.
This race has gone from being a one trick pony to a cutthroat race to the finish. It is going to be "The Social Network" vs. "The King's Speech" right to the last note. While, for sure, I have a favorite, it's refreshing to have a very close race. While last year was a nice David and Goliath battle, looking back, it was always "The Hurt Locker"'s for the taking. And before that, it was two years of no competition. Now we have a race the likes of "The Departed" vs. "Little Miss Sunshine" or "Million Dollar Baby" vs. "The Aviator." However, in reality, I don't think we've ever had a race quite like this one before. Should be a good time. Stay tuned.
Categories: Musings, Oscars Tags: 127 hours, academy awards, alice in wonderland, ampas, amy adams, andrew garfield, annette bening, another year, barney's version, black swan, christian bale, christopher nolan, coen brothers, colin firth, darren aronofsky, david fincher, david o'russell, geoffrey rush, hailee steinfeld, helena bonham carter, inception, jacki weaver, james franco, javier bardem, jeff bridges, jeremy renner, jesse eisenberg, john hawkes, mark ruffalo, melissa leo, Michelle Williams, natalie portman, nicole kidman, oscar nominations, oscars, reactions, Ryan Gosling, the fighter, the kids are all right, the king's speech, the social network, the way back, tom hooper, toy story 3, tron legacy, true grit, winter's bone
My FINAL Oscar Predictions – 1/22
January 23, 2011 thomasconroy 6 comments
This is it. Last call before closing. Nominations for the 83rd Annual Academy Awards will be announced this Tuesday, January 25th, at 7:30am CST (and you can bet I'll be up hours before then, pumping myself up). For sure, there is a science behind the whole prediction game. A combination of elements, including what's been happening with the critics groups awards, the different guild nominations and, in some cases, the film's box office success. Along with that, there's likability in each contender, how many times they've previously been nominated and won, a pseudo-mathematic question of their overall "due" status. Dozens of factors take shape in hugely methodic process, and this is all before anyone even takes into effect how good each contender is. Crazy, huh?
Well, a year-long process has now come to a close, and it's time for me to nut up and offer my final predictions. The Best Picture line-up is basically down to 11 contenders, with two films vying for the final slot. It's possible that either "Shutter Island" or "The Ghost Writer" could stage a massive coup and fight their way in their, but I doubt it. Some predictions that I'm sticking my neck out on? I'm still holding on to my convictions (and hopes) that the incredible John Hawkes can beat out Jeremy Renner in the Best Supporting Actor category. I'm also holding out hope that both of "Blue Valentine"'s stars will outdo their older competition for leading notices. I'm also really hoping that "Exit Through the Gift Shop" can actually tickle the documentary branch's funny bone (a feat not easily accomplished). Finally, here's to "Winter's Bone" edging out "The Town" for Best Picture. In fact, I'm predicting an across-the-board snub of the film. It's only a slightly above action feature that has no business in the top ten. I have a strong feeling, though, that it will be this year's "Blind Side."
Without further adieu, here are the nominees (and once again, these are ranked in order of their chance of getting nominated, not winning):
8. "The Kids Are All Right"
10. "Winter's Bone"
Alt 1: "The Town"
Alt 2: "Shutter Island"
Click READ MORE to see the rest.
Categories: Musings, Oscars Tags: 127 hours, academy awards, amy adams, andrew garfield, annette bening, another year, black swan, christian bale, christopher nolan, colin firth, darren aronofsky, david fincher, david o'russell, geoffrey rush, hailee steinfeld, helena bonham carter, how to train your dragon, inception, jacki weaver, james franco, jeff bridges, jennifer lawrence, jesse eisenberg, john hawkes, mark ruffalo, melissa leo, Michelle Williams, natalie portman, nicole kidman, nominations, oscars, predictions, Ryan Gosling, shutter island, the fighter, the kids are all right, the king's speech, the social network, the town, tom hooper, toy story 3, tron legacy, true grit, winter's bone
Golden Globes – Postgame
Okay. I will admit that the HFPA really did do all right by me, last night. Overall they made some pretty good decisions, especially in officially solidifying "The Social Network" as the frontrunner for the Best Picture Oscar. If "The King's Speech" can't win here, I really can't imagine it winning anywhere.
However, even if the Golden Globes released a list of their Top 100 favorite films, and their list happened to match mine movie per movie, I would still not take up with them. An organization that will accept bribery and star-fucking as good reasons to nominate "Burlesque" or "Alice in Wonderland" as Best Picture of the Year is no friend of mine.
Here is the full list of winners from last night:
BEST PICTURE, DRAMA
Best Picture (Musical/Comedy)
Darren Aronofsky, "Black Swan"
David O. Russell, "The Fighter"
Christopher Nolan, "Inception"
Tom Hooper, "The King's Speech"
David Fincher, "The Social Network"
Best Actor (Drama)
Jesse Eisenberg, "The Social Network"
Colin Firth, "The King's Speech"
James Franco, "127 Hours"
Ryan Gosling, "Blue Valentine"
Mark Wahlberg, "The Fighter"
Best Actress (Drama)
Halle Berry, "Frankie and Alice"
Nicole Kidman, "Rabbit Hole"
Jennifer Lawrence, "Winter's Bone"
Natalie Portman, "Black Swan"
Michelle Williams, "Blue Valentine"
Best Actor (Musical/Comedy)
Johnny Depp, "Alice in Wonderland"
Johnny Depp, "The Tourist"
Paul Giamatti, "Barney's Version"
Jake Gyllenhaal, "Love and Other Drugs"
Kevin Spacey, "Casino Jack"
Best Actress (Musical/Comedy)
Annette Bening, "The Kids Are All Right"
Anne Hathaway, "Love and Other Drugs"
Angelina Jolie, "The Tourist"
Julianne Moore, "The Kids Are All Right"
Emma Stone, "Easy A"
Christian Bale, "The Fighter"
Michael Douglas, "Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps"
Andrew Garfield, "The Social Network"
Jeremy Renner, "The Town"
Geoffrey Rush, "The King's Speech"
Amy Adams, "The Fighter"
Helena Bonham Carter, "The King's Speech"
Mila Kunis, "Black Swan"
Melissa Leo, "The Fighter"
Jacki Weaver, "Animal Kingdom"
Lisa Cholodenko and Stuart Blumberg, "The Kids Are All Right"
David Seidler, "The King's Speech"
Danny Boyle and Simon Beaufoy, "127 Hours"
Aaron Sorkin, "The Social Network"
"Biutiful"
"The Concert"
"In a Better World"
Danny Elfman, "Alice in Wonderland"
Hans Zimmer, "Inception"
Alexandre Desplat, "The King's Speech"
A.R. Rahman, "127 Hours"
Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross, "The Social Network"
"Bound to You" from "Burlesque"
"You Haven't Seen the Last of Me" from "Burlesque"
"There's a Place for Us" from "The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader"
"Coming Home" from "Country Strong"
"I See the Light" from "Tangled"
Cecil B. De Mille Award
As far as my predictions go, I had a very good night. Some of these weren't the most difficult awards to predict, but I still amassed a record of 12 out of 14, or 85 percent. That might be the best record that I've ever had on this particular award show. If it hadn't have been Johnny Depp getting screwed by two nomination vote-splitting or an absolute upset like no other in Best Foreign Language Film, I would have had a perfect score.
If you had been within one hundred feet of my apartment at one o'clock in the morning (I had to DVR the show since I was working on set during the airtime), you would have heard a chorus of whoops and hollers at every "Social Network" victory. I was particularly ecstatic upon hearing Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross' names being called, for not only was that one of the film's most difficult nominations to win, but that moment pretty much sealed its Best Picture victory.
The acting victories were literally identical to the BFCA wins, with Firth, Portman, Bale and Leo all going home with awards. In the Musical/Comedy section, Annette Bening made her last stand at putting up a fight against Natalie for the Oscar, but I really don't think it will be enough (despite Bening getting a full ovation and Portman only a few random stands). Paul Giamatti pulled out a not-so-surprising but really cool win over Johnny Depp and Jake Gyllenhaal.
Obviously, the talk of the night was Ricky Gervais' absolutely no-holds-barred hosting job which bordered on a Comedy Central Roast. I've heard things such as network executives swearing that it will be the end of the comic's career, but for me, the best part of the show was waiting for what he was going to say next. I mean, come on. When you're that rich and that famous, there is absolutely no reason not to verbally macerated on national television. I haven't laughed as hard in a long time as when Ricky referred to Bruce Willis as Ashton Kutcher's dad.
The best part of the night, and ironic for me, since I really don't care much about the television portion of the awards, was Chris Colfer's win for "Glee." Sometimes you see a performer put on their phony "I never would have imagined" face. You could tell that this kid had expected hell to freeze over and then thaw again before he would win this award. The shock, awe and pure joy in his face was just a memorable sight. And while I really don't enjoy "Glee" so much, both Colfer and Jane Lynch's performances are far and away the only things that keep it afloat in my attention span. Congrats to both of them.
Well, the critics have officially had their say. All that's left are those in the industry, and I can only hope that they greet "The Social Network" with as much warmth and gratitude as their judges have. And since it has now received nominations, at least, from every single Hollywood guild, the horizon is looking pretty damned bright.
Categories: News, Oscars Tags: 2011, aaron sorkin, alice in wonderland, analysis, annette bening, ashton kutcher, atticus ross, barney's version, black swan, bruce willis, burlesque, cher, christian bale, colin firth, david fincher, golden globes, melissa leo, natalie portman, paul giamatti, postgame, ricky gervais, the fighter, the kids are all right, the king's speech, the social network, toy story 3, trent reznor, winners
Golden Globe Predictions
Well, it's that time of the year, and that time happens to be my least favorite. As much as I love and anticipate the Oscars, I absolutely loathe the Golden Globes. I feel that they are kind of a travesty to cinema and the entire awards tradition. If there was ever a group that completely sold out to bribery, star-fucking and just straight-up bad taste, it would be the Hollywood Foreign Press Association. That being said, they are still the second most publicized awards presentation of the year and I must give them some kind of credence.
If "The Social Network"'s never-ending streak of victories was to falter at all during the season, I would hope it to be here. That way, I can chalk it up with the rest of the Globes' terrible decisions over the years. If it wins, all the better for it. To be honest, I would almost feel more comfortable with it losing the HFPA's Best Picture. In the last six years, the award for Best Picture has only criss-crossed between Oscar and Globe once, and that was for "Slumdog Millionaire." Here's a rough breakdown of the HFPA's comparison to the Academy:
2009: "The Hurt Locker"
2008: "Slumdog Millionaire"
2007: "No Country for Old Men"
2006: "The Departed"
2005: "Crash"
2004: "Million Dollar Baby"
2009: "Avatar"
2007: "Atonement"
2006: "Babel"
2005: "Brokeback Mountain"
2004: "The Aviator"
Outside of "Brokeback Mountain" and "The Aviator," I think the Academy has picked the better film every year since then. Therefore, I almost take "The Social Network" losing Best Picture tomorrow night to be a compliment, as long as it goes on to win the Oscar.
If there was a film that could curry enough favor to take down "The Social Network," it will probably be "The King's Speech." Aside from having not that great taste, the Globes also have a penchant for picking films with a little more international flair. At least, they seem to not go for films with thoroughly American themes, in the case of "The Departed," "No Country for Old Men" and "The Hurt Locker." I would definitely put "The Social Network" into this category.
However, I will not lose faith. Maybe, for once, the Globes will shock me with brilliance and "The Social Network" will edge out a victory. For sure, I cannot imagine any other film winning for Director or Screenplay, and if it can take down those two, why not the big one?
Here are my predictions:
r/u: "The King's Speech"
BEST PICTURE, MUSICAL/COMEDY
r/u: "Alice in Wonderland"
David Fincher – "The Social Network"
r/u: Darren Aronofsky – "Black Swan"
BEST ACTOR, DRAMA
Colin Firth – "The King's Speech"
r/u: James Franco – "127 Hours"
BEST ACTRESS, DRAMA
Natalie Portman – "Black Swan"
r/u: Nicole Kidman – "Rabbit Hole"
BEST ACTOR, MUSICAL/COMEDY (the most wide-open category; could really be anyone)
Johnny Depp – "Alice in Wonderland"
r/u: Paul Giamatti – "Barney's Version"
BEST ACTRESS, MUSICAL/COMEDY
Annette Bening – "The Kids Are All Right"
r/u: Anne Hathaway – "Love and Other Drugs"
Christian Bale – "The Fighter"
r/u: Geoffrey Rush – "The King's Speech"
Melissa Leo – "The Fighter"
r/u: Helena Bonham Carter – "The King's Speech"
r/u: "How to Train Your Dragon"
r/u: "I Am Love"
r/u: "Inception"
"You Haven't Seen the Last of Me" – "Burlesque"
r/u: "I See the Light" – "Tangled"
Categories: News, Oscars Tags: alice in wonderland, annette bening, biutiful, black swan, burlesque, christian bale, colin firth, david fincher, golden globes, hfpa, johnny depp, melissa leo, natalie portman, nominations, predictions, the fighter, the kids are all right, the king's speech, the social network, toy story 3
Critics Choice Awards – Postgame
January 15, 2011 thomasconroy 1 comment
Damn it, David Fincher, why weren't you at the Critics Choice Awards last night? I really want to know. If you tell me that you're shooting "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo," fine. Yet, if you tell me that it's because you're annoyed with the awards season coverage, grow up. The kind of awards sweep that you are experiencing right now, you probably won't experience again for a long time, if ever again. You should appreciate it while you have it.
All right, I'm done with my personalized whine to "The Social Network"'s director. Let's move on to the awards themselves. The three films that definitely had the biggest nights were "The Social Network," "The Fighter" and "Inception." It was kind of a mute point that after winning 28 out of 31 (90 percent) of all of this year's critics awards, it would have been kind of unlikely for "The Social Network" to lose the Critics Choice Award for Best Picture. The film also racked up awards for Director, Adapted Screenplay and Original Score.
"The Fighter" had the biggest night in regards to acting honors, as well it should have. Both Christian Bale and Melissa Leo took home their respective supporting awards, while the entire cast was given the Best Ensemble Cast Award. Meanwhile, "Inception" quite literally swept the technical categories. The film picked up awards for Best Action Film, Cinematography, Editing, Art Direction, Sound and Visual Effects. Certainly a good night for Christopher Nolan and his collaborative team.
The lead acting awards went to Colin Firth and Natalie Portman, who can now probably be considered locks for Oscar. Natalie Portman, I am thrilled about, being that she may even win my own personal award for Best Lead Actress. Yet, Colin Firth, I'm a bit disappointed about. The performance was great, but really nothing that I would consider sweep-worthy. I'd much rather have seen him win last year for "A Single Man," which, in my opinion, was the best male performance of the year and a career-best for the actor.
Overall, there were more things about the awards that I liked then disliked. The highlights were obviously all of "The Social Network"'s accolades. Let the train keep on chugging. I also could not be more thrilled about both Melissa Leo and Christian Bale. Phenomenal work that deserves recognition. Please let this also be a good sign that "Inception" might possibly be able to beat out "Alice in Wonderland" for Art Direction at the Oscars. That would make me ever so delighted.
Of all the things that I didn't like, one was definitely a whopper. I simply cannot account for "Waiting for Superman"'s victory in Best Documentary. I've heard the term "Year of the Doc" thrown around over the years, but I truly believe it to be a reality for the current annual. There is a wealth of incredible documentaries to choose from this awards season, and this is what they go with. "Superman" is a good film, but it is not a phenomenal film. There are too many holes in its argument and it just doesn't have enough of an edge. With competition like "Inside Job," "Restrepo" and "Exit Through the Gift Shop," I have no idea how this film won, but I'm fairly sure that we can thank Oprah for it.
Here's a full list of the BFCA winners:
Best Picture: "The Social Network"
Best Young Actress: Hailee Steinfeld – "True Grit"
Best Ensemble: "The Fighter"
Best Documentary Feature: "Waiting for Superman"
Best Animation: "Toy Story 3"
Best Comedy: "Easy A"
Best Picture Made for TV: "The Pacific"
Best Action Movie: "Inception"
Best Editing: "Inception"
Best Art Direction: "Inception"
Best Makeup: "Alice in Wonderland"
Best Song: If I Rise – "127 Hours"
Best Score: "The Social Network"
As far as my predictions go, I was correct on 18 out of 25 categories. That's about a 72 percent ratio, which I'll take. I don't think anyone could have predicted how well "Inception" was going to fare with the technical awards.
That's it for the Critics Choice Awards. You can expect my predictions for the Golden Globes to come very shortly.
Categories: News, Oscars Tags: 127 hours, alice in wonderland, BFCA, black swan, christian bale, colin firth, critics choice awards, david fincher, easy a, if i rise, inception, inside job, melissa leo, natalie portman, Oscar, the fighter, the girl with the dragon tattoo, the king's speech, the social network, waiting for superman, win, winners


text:
Cipriani & Werner
C&W Journal
A team synonymous with the very highest level of legal representation
Susan Jortner Deely
Susan Jortner Deely is an associate in the firm's Lancaster office. She focuses her practice on corporate law, employee benefits, taxation and general employment law matters. Ms. Deely's diverse background allows her to provide comprehensive counsel to businesses across multiple disciplines.
Ms. Deely is admitted to practice in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, as well as the U.S. District Courts for the Middle and Eastern Districts of Pennsylvania and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. She is a member of the Lancaster Bar Association and is co-chair of its Workers' Compensation Committee for 2018. Ms. Deely has also presented extensively to employer and human resources groups on employment law and employee benefits issues.
She is active in the community through the Women of Congregation Shaarai Shomayim. Ms. Deely also sits on the Board of Directors for The Gate House, a non-profit provider of addiction recovery services.
She received her M.A. and B.A., summa cum laude, from Emory University in 1990 and her J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law in 1993. Following graduation, Ms. Deely clerked for the Honorable Jerome Neidermeier, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Vermont. She then worked for Western Massachusetts Legal Aid from 1994 to 1996. After a hiatus from law to rear her three children, Ms. Deely obtained an LL.M in Taxation from the Temple University Beasley School of Law in 2013, with a focus on employee benefits.
Business Counseling
Emory University (B.A., summa cum laude, 1990)
University of Virginia School of Law (J.D., 1993)
Temple University Beasley School of Law (LL.M, 2013)
Cipriani & Werner Adds New Lancaster, PA...
No Journals found authored by Susan Jortner Deely
sdeely@c-wlaw.com
Susan	Deely
© 2019 Cipriani & Werner, P.C.. All rights reserved


This thesis documents the narratives of a group of Egyptian youth about their participation in the 18 days of protest and analyzes their narratives in terms of reasons and meanings of taking part in such events. First, I analyze how these youth constructed their memory of the 18 days and produced a certain version of history. Second, I look at the meanings they ascribed to the Revolution through examining their narratives about why and how they participated in the 18 days and how such an experience changed their perception about and their desire for participating in collective action and politics in general. Analytically, I examine the making of political subjects through the unfolding of an event, i.e. the Revolution. I argue that the making of political subjectivity through participation in the events identified as the Revolution is equally shaped by sensibilities of belonging to a collective articulated in patriotic terms. In sum, I aim to contribute to the production of histories about the Revolution from the perspective of its participants, as well as to analyze the meanings of belonging, the nation, citizenship, and subjectivity that emerge from experiences of protest and the constitution of narratives thereof. I contend that it is not only the events themselves and the experiences thereof that shape political subjectivity, but equally important is the production of historical narratives thereof.


text:
Nigeria Centre for Disease ControlProtecting the health of Nigerians
Office of the DG
Weekly Epidemiological Reports
Guidelines/Protocol
Establishment/Guiding Documents
IDSR Forms
State Incident Action Plan
NFETP
NCDC Tour
Recent Publication
Celebrate Responsibly Campaign: NCDC Intensifies COVID-19 Awareness Ahead of the Yuletide
20 December 2021 | Abuja – Celebrate Responsibly Campaign: NCDC Intensifies COVID-19 Awareness Ahead of the Yuletide
The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) is launching its yuletide season campaign themed #CelebrateResponsibly as part of the #TakeResponsibility campaign which began in February 2020. #CelebrateResponsibly focuses specifically on measures Nigerians need to take to protect themselves and loved ones from COVID-19 during this period. The #CelebrateResponsibly campaign targets the entertainment industry, transport industry, religious settings, media, security personnel, young people, and the general public to promote adherence to COVID-19 preventive measures during this festive period.
Nigeria has recorded a 500% increase in the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases over the past two weeks across the country caused by the Delta and Omicron variants. As of 19th December 2021, a total of 223,887 cases and 2985 deaths have been recorded in Nigeria across all 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory. The country is now in a fourth COVID-19 wave. The Federal Government of Nigeria, through the Presidential Steering Committee on COVID-19, the Federal Ministry of Health, as well as NCDC and its partners, are therefore intensifying risk communication efforts to remind Nigerians of the risk we face and need to take collective responsibility to reduce transmission of the virus
The response to COVID-19 requires a whole-of-society approach. Therefore, individuals, families and institutions also need to play their part in protecting each other by ensuring adherence to COVID-19 public health and social measures. Critically, Nigerians are urged to adhere to recommended measures by NCDC and other public health authorities, as they celebrate Christmas and New Year. Please avoid all non-essential travel within and outside Nigeria to reduce the risk of transmission. The virus that causes COVID-19 is more likely to spread in mass gatherings especially when held indoors with full capacity and poor ventilation. We strongly recommend outdoor events with physical distancing, compulsory use of facemasks, and provision of handwashing facilities or hand sanitisers. Please make use of every opportunity provided to get vaccinated against COVID-19. The government has made these vaccines available for all eligible citizens and booster doses available for those previously vaccinated.
The Celebrate Responsibly campaign which spans from the Christmas holiday through to the start of the new year, emphasises the responsibility of all Nigerians, the government, private sector, institutions, associations, communities, families and individuals in combating the COVID-19 pandemic. Religious leaders and heads of institutions, organisations and businesses are urged to enforce public compliance to COVID-19 preventive measures in their jurisdiction. COVID-19 continues to threaten the lives and the livelihoods of Nigerians therefore we must not let our guards down this festive season. We urge Nigerians to take all precautions necessary to ensure we and our loved ones live to celebrate many more events and festivities.
The campaign includes the production of key messages, audio and visual materials for wide dissemination. The NCDC urges all individuals, traditional and religious leaders, business owners, the media, transport workers and other institutions and sectors to join the campaign by adopting the key messages and sharing within their networks.
The Celebrate Responsibly campaign calls on all Nigerians to take all necessary precautions for a safe and healthy Christmas and New Year celebration. To download materials for the campaign, please visit covid19.ncdc.gov.ng or contact [email protected] We wish you safe Christmas and New Year celebrations
About the NCDC
The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control is the country's national public health institute, with the mandate to lead the preparedness, detection and response to infectious disease outbreaks and public health emergencies. The Bill for an Act to establish NCDC was signed into law in November 2018, by President Muhammadu Buhari. The mission for the NCDC (2017-2021) is 'To protect the health of Nigerians through evidence-based prevention, integrated disease surveillance and response activities, using a One Health approach, guided by research and led by a skilled workforce'.
NCDC Toll-free Number: 6232 | SMS: 08099555577 | WhatsApp: 07087110839 Twitter: @NCDCGov | Facebook: @NCDCgov | Instagram: @NCDCgov | NCDC Media Releases
Dr. Ifedayo Adetifa
DG, Nigeria Centre for Disease Control
Plot 801, Ebitu Ukiwe Street, Jabi, Abuja, Nigeria
6232 (Toll-Free Call Centre)
@NCDCgov
NCDCgov
t.me/NCDCgov (Telegram)
Mandate of NCDC
The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) was established in the year 2011 in response to the challenges of public health emergencies and to enhance Nigeria's preparedness and response to epidemics through prevention, detection and control of communicable diseases.
Connect Centre
Toll Free Number: 6232
Whatsapp: +234 708 711 0839
SMS Number: +234 809 955 5577
Contact us on any of our handles
Subscribe to our Weekly Epidemiological Report mailing list.


text:
Mosque Carpets by Carpets Abu Dhabi
Many religions have a place of worship, where the believers of that religion go to perform prayers and rituals. In the religion of Islam, that place is a Mosque. Mosques in Islam, are not only a place to offer prayers, but it is also work as an institution for the Islamic community where other important tasks are performed as well.
Mosques are the heart of the Islamic life. They are used to perform the regular prayers, and they are used for events during Islam's holiest month Ramadan. They are also used as centers for education and information. Mosques are used as the places of social welfare and they are also used for the settlement of different disputes among the people. While it's a well-established fact that mosques play a vital role in the world of Islam, they work as a center to bring the Muslim community together.
Meanwhile, they also work as a symbol for Islam to the outside world. They function as monument for the Islamic culture and religion, and represent Islamic values and cultures to the world. And because mosques have such an important role, of presenting Muslim values and culture to the outside world. They must be decorated with elegance and finesse. We at Carpets Abu Dhabi provide just thatMosque Carpets by Carpets Abu Dhabi!
Carpets Abu Dhabi, offers its customer with an extensive range of Mosque Carpets.
Mosque Carpets by Carpet Abu Dhabi are of exquisite and aesthetic designs, and patterns.
These carpets are uniquely fabricated to detail and enrich the beauty and decorum of your mosques.
Carpets are a necessity when it comes to the completion of the mosque's interior décor.
As you know, the prayer room is the most important part of the mosque.
Mosque Carpets by Carpets Abu Dhabi complete the look of these prayer rooms and adds to the finesse of its interior.
Mosque Carpets refine the beauty of the interior of the mosque, especially if the carpets are by Carpet Abu Dhabi.
At Carpets Abu Dhabi, we have ample collection of carpets with ravishing designs and patterns in our inventory.
We have carpets available in a wide range of colors, for our customers to choose from according to their needs and demands.
Mosque Carpets by Carpets Abu Dhabi are crafted to look alluring and elegant.
All of these Mosque carpets are fabricated in the factories of Carpets Abu Dhabi, with the best materials, and by our experienced and skillful workers.
The talented workers at Carpet Abu Dhabi make sure to yield not only the best quality of Mosque Carpets, but they also ensure to produce the most appealing and engaging carpets for our customers.
Carpet Abu Dhabi, is the ultimate resolve for all your interior works. Our top of the line products, and unparalleled experience have made us the experts in the Abu Dhabi carpet market.
So, if you are searching for the best quality of Mosque Carpets, under reasonable prices.
Make sure to give us a call, or pay visit us at our shop.


The role of program officer at foundations is an important one — especially to the grantees whose experiences with funders are greatly shaped by their interactions and relationships with their program officers.
Yet, relatively little is known about the intricacies of the program officer role. What are program officers' backgrounds? On which responsibilities do they spend most of their time? How do they think of their relationships with their grantees?
To learn more about the role that program officers play at foundations and with nonprofits, CEP surveyed 150 randomly selected program officers at foundations that give at least $5 million annually about their views and experiences.
Based on survey responses, Benchmarking Program Officer Roles and Responsibilities provides a comprehensive collection of benchmarking data on topics ranging from the professional and educational backgrounds of program officers, to technical information about the structure of the program officer role, to program officers' perspectives on certain aspects of their work, such as the funder-grantee dynamic.


text:
package com.twu.biblioteca;

import com.twu.biblioteca.libraryComponent.Book;
import com.twu.biblioteca.libraryComponent.Librarian;
import com.twu.biblioteca.libraryComponent.Resource;
import com.twu.biblioteca.util.Inputer;
import com.twu.biblioteca.util.Printer;
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Test;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;

import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertFalse;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;

public class LibrarianTest{

    private Printer printer;
    private Inputer inputer;
    private Librarian librarian;

    @Before
    public void setUp() {
        List<Book> books = new ArrayList();
        books.add(new Book("Best British and Irish Literature", "Jimes", "2015"));
        books.add(new Book("Best of William Shakespeare", "Lindy", "2013"));
        books.add(new Book("Very British MM", "Gray", "2016"));
        Resource resource = new Resource(books, "Book");
        librarian = new Librarian(resource);
    }

    @Test
    public void shouldReturnTrueWhenTheBookCanBeCheckout() {
        String bookName = "Very British MM";
        boolean result = librarian.checkoutResource(bookName);
        assertTrue(result);
    }

    @Test
    public void shouldReturnFalseWhenTheBookCanNotBeCheckout() {
        String bookName = "Very British";
        boolean result = librarian.checkoutResource(bookName);
        assertFalse(result);
    }

    @Test
    public void shouldReturnTrueWhenTheBookCanBeReturn() {
        String bookName = "Very British MM";
        Book book = new Book("Very British MM", "Gray", "2016");
        librarian.getResource().getCheckoutList().add(book);
        boolean result = librarian.returnResource(bookName);
        assertTrue(result);
    }

    @Test
    public void shouldReturnFalseWhenTheBookCanNotBeReturn() {
        String bookName = "Very British MM";
        boolean result = librarian.returnResource(bookName);
        assertFalse(result);
    }

}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


A user guide for UMM 1.0 is available as part of our master thesis (chapter 7).
Since the UMM 2.0 is currently under development there is no user guide available.
We plan to bring out the User Guide for UMM 2.0 as a book which will then be available for sale in spring/summer 2008 – Stay tuned!


As Apple axes the nano and shuffle, we look back at life before the iPod's creation.
When the iPod was invented, our lives and listening habits were changed forever.
Now, as Apple announces the discontinuation of their nano and shuffle models, we take a look back at the simpler (and more painful) times of what life was like before we had PROPER portable media players.
You hated the fact it would make your CD jump and suspected that Anti-Skip protection didn't make the slightest bit of difference.
You actually left your house to buy a real, physical album. In a real shop.
Or borrowed a friend's to burn onto CD... only to find it was encrypted!
Then chucked said Minidisc player with all your other relics, realising it was never going to catch on.
So we should probably thank our lucky stars these things even exist!


text:
Q: How can I keep my model in my View after OnPost? I'm on a project with .Net Core and I'm using ASP Razor Pages.
In my model, I have an OnGet which load all the data I need in my view.
public IList<Projet> Projets { get; set; }
public ActionResult OnGet()
{
    Projets = _serviceSelect.getProjets();
    return Page();
}

Then, in my OnPost which is activated when I submit my form.
<form method="post">

    <input type="radio" value="1" asp-for="LoginData.TypeCompte" />choice

    Username: <input asp-for="LoginData.Username" />

    Password: <input asp-for="LoginData.Password" />

    Remember me: <input asp-for="LoginData.RememberMe" type="checkbox" />

    <input asp-page-handler="connexion" type="submit" value="Login" />
    @Html.AntiForgeryToken()
</form>

I would like to display an error in my view, using my ModelState.
public ActionResult OnPostConnexion()
{
    if (ModelState.IsValid)
    {
       // Do stuff
    }
    else
    {
        ModelState.AddModelError("", "username or password is blank");
        return Page();
    }
}

But, when I return Page(), It's like the model is reload and when I try to access to my data, my objects are null.
 Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
@foreach (var item in Model.Projets)

How can I update my view without losing my data contain in the model ?

A: I solved this issue by replacing return Page(); with return this.OnGet(); in public ActionResult OnPostConnexion()
That way any logic you have in the OnGet which populates PageModel properties gets reused.
So my full example looks like:
    public IEnumerable<SelectListItem> CompanyListing { get; private set; }

    public async Task<IActionResult> OnGet()
    {
        if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(this.ErrorMessage))
        {
            this.ModelState.AddModelError(string.Empty, this.ErrorMessage);
        }

        this.CompanyListing = await this.PopulateCompanyList();
        return this.Page();
    }

    public async Task<IActionResult> OnPostAsync()
    {
        if (!this.ModelState.IsValid)
        {
            // Something failed. Redisplay the form.
            return await this.OnGet();
        }

        return this.RedirectToPage("/");
    }

A: The reason you are getting an object reference error is because the Model.Projects has not been populated when returning the view and therefore cannot iterate in the foreach loop.
Based off your existing code, you could populate your model again before returning the page.
public ActionResult OnPostConnexion()
{
    if (ModelState.IsValid)
    {
       // Do stuff
    }
    else
    {
        Projets = _serviceSelect.getProjets();

        ModelState.AddModelError("", "username or password is blank");
        return Page();
    }
}

A better solution would be:
public ActionResult OnPostConnexion(viewModel model)
{
    if (!ModelState.IsValid)
    {
       return View(model);
    }
    else
    {
        //do stuff
    }
}

A: I faced the same issue and noone from suggested solution worked.
I resolved it with simple usage of helping class that keeps the model for me.
The solution is not elegant but effective :)
public interface ISessionHelper
    {
        void AddRenewItem(string key, object item);
        object GetItem(string key);
    }
public class SessionHelper : ISessionHelper
{
    private readonly Dictionary<string, object> _sessionBag;

    public SessionHelper()
    {
        _sessionBag = new Dictionary<string, object>();
    }

    public void AddRenewItem(string key, object item)
    {
        if (_sessionBag.Keys.Contains(key)) _sessionBag.Remove(key);
        _sessionBag.Add(key, item);
    }

    public object GetItem(string key)
    {
        if (_sessionBag.Keys.Contains(key))
        {
            return _sessionBag[key];
        }
        return null;
    }
}

In my get method I add an item to the dictionary:
 public async Task<IActionResult> OnGetAsync(int? id)
    {
      ...
        _sessionHelper.AddRenewItem(this.ToString(), this);
        ...

    }

In my post method I take the model back from the dictionary and assign required properties for the current model:
 public async Task<IActionResult> OnPostApplyGuess(int itemId)
    {
        GameModel model = (GameModel) _sessionHelper.GetItem(this.ToString());
        MyProp1= model.MyProp1;
        MyProp2 = model.MyProp2 ;
        MyProp3= model.MyProp3;

        if (!ModelState.IsValid)
        {
            return Page();
        }

        return Page();
    }

Do not forget to add the service as a Singleton:
services.AddSingleton<ISessionHelper, SessionHelper>();

I hope it helped to somebody :)

A: When you call "Page()" this is asking for a new Page object, when you return that object it will be blank.  Pages and views are different, generally with ASP you will use views, there are some good articles on MSDN about the differences and why but for now just if you change Page() to View() it should resolve the issue.

A: You need to fix two things in your code:
First you need to mark your Projets property with [BindProperty], like this:
[BindProperty]
public IList<Projet> Projets { get; set; }

Then you need to recode your Page so that the fields of Projets are inside of the form tag so they get posted back to the page and then you need to rewrite how you output them:
<form method="post">

    <input type="radio" value="1" asp-for="LoginData.TypeCompte" />choice

        Username: <input asp-for="LoginData.Username" />

        Password: <input asp-for="LoginData.Password" />

        Remember me: <input asp-for="LoginData.RememberMe" type="checkbox" />

    <input asp-page-handler="connexion" type="submit" value="Login" />
    @Html.AntiForgeryToken()

    @{
        for (int i = 0; i < Model.Projets.Count; i++)
        {
            <input asp-for="@Model.Projets[i].FieldOne" />

            <input asp-for="@Model.Projets[i].FieldTwo" />
        }
    }

</form>

REMARK You need to render your fields in a list in such way that they get unique ID's so that the ModelBinder can retrieve them on Post. In my case I named one field FieldOne and this is how it is rendered:
<input type="text" id="Projets_0__FieldTwo" name="Projets[0].FieldTwo" value="one">

A: Try using TempData.

More info: http://www.tutorialsteacher.com/mvc/tempdata-in-asp.net-mvc

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Get To Know What Cranial Computed Tomography Is All About?
A cranial computed tomography (CT) scan is an imaging method that uses x-rays to create cross-sectional images of the head, including the skull, brain, eye sockets, and sinuses.
During the test, the patient is asked to lie on a narrow table that slides into the center of the CT scanner. Cranial computed tomography produces images from your upper neck to the top of your head. During the test, you have to be still, because any kind of movement will cause blurred images. Inside the scanner, the machine's x-ray beam rotates around the patient. Small detectors inside the scanner evaluate the amount of x-rays that make it through the part of the body being examined. This information is used by the computer to create several individual images, called slices. These images can be stored, viewed on a monitor, or printed on film. Three-dimensional models of your head can be created by stacking the individual slices together. Often a contrast material is used to highlight blood vessels and look for a tumor.


Dan King takes a look at this push-you-luck card game from IELLO Buy great games at http://www.coolstuffinc.com Find more reviews and videos at http://www.dicetower.com.
2015-03-24 18:57:56 Fabiovolo:But, despite your type of business or who you may get to do the marketing, certain things stay the same. The same rules for marketing still apply. Therefore, these tips are designed to help you plan the process before you actually start your internet marketing campaign.
2015-03-24 18:57:57 AdinoLOC:Every affiliate marketer is always looking for the successful market that gives the biggest paycheck. There is not a magic formula. It is mroe complicated than that. With these three marketing tips, you will be able to increase your sales and survive in the affiliate marketing online.
Fazer o IRS não custa nada e ajudar custa ainda menos! Saiba mais em - http://www.fazeroirsnaocustanada.pt.
Matteo Salvini annuncia in diretta a L`aria che tira che si candiderà alle primarie della Lega per il Sindaco di Milano.
2015-03-24 16:44:26 Fabiovolo:Social Magazine scritto da geek.
2015-03-24 16:17:22 Pippo:Social Magazine scritto da geek.
10eLotto - Spot con Totti Dentista: guarda le gag!
2015-03-24 15:43:44 Kayne:Social Magazine scritto da geek.
2015-03-24 15:41:34 Cris5:Due to the slow recovery from the Great Recession, money is harder to earn, but not necessarily harder to spend.


text:
2018 Dodge Journey Review in Albuquerque, NM
See how the Dodge Journey takes practicality up a notch
Can an SUV ever be too practical? The Dodge Journey wants to find out.
This compact-ish SUV packs three rows of seating into its cabin. It finds and equips a huge list of tech and connectivity features. It optimizes a lightweight and less-than-thirsty engine to extend its driving range. And it does all of it at a price that other three-row small SUVs can't even begin to touch. You can get a pretty well-equipped Journey, with some nice trimmings, for less than $25,000. That's pretty wild in the SUV world these days.
The new Journey offers four trim levels--SE, SXT, Crossroad, and GT models--and all come standard with seating for seven passengers.
Exterior style and design
The Journey's design is not a knockout, like the Charger. It's not a sleek slider, like the Challenger. It's not a hulking bodybuilder, like the Durango. It's actually pretty subdued, and a little modest, compared to the rest of the lineup. But, plenty of standout, iconic design features--like Ring of Fire LED taillamps, a crosshair grille, and the classic square-jawed look of an SUV that knows how to handle itself--come together to make the Journey an undeniable member of the Dodge family.
The recent generation may look a heck of a lot like the first generation, but maybe that's not a bad thing--maybe Dodge just knows what they're doing.
Exterior colors for the Dodge Journey include Vice White, Granite Pearl-Coat, Billet Clear-Coat, Redline, Olive Green, Contusion Blue Pearl-Coat, Pitch Black Clear-Coat, White Noise Tri-Coat, Blood Orange Clear-Coat, and Bruiser Grey Clear-Coat.
Interior: seating, features, and options
Dodge puts a high priority on its interiors--which is why the Journey is such a great option for families. Thoughtful touches, like integrated second-row child booster seats, complement a full array of comfortable and ergonomically-designed chairs. If you're not carrying passengers in the third row, the Tilt 'n Slide™ second-row seats can be moved back to increase legroom for the riders in the middle. If you do need to add a surprise sixth or seventh guest, though, you can slide the seats back up, and tilt the seatbacks to make for easy access into the third row. It's one of the most versatile seating systems in the Dodge lineup.
But it's not all stoic practicality. Dodge cares for your comfort, too, with options like:
Available heated steering wheel
Soft-touch door panels and armrests
In-floor storage cubby in the cargo floor
Watertight second-row in-floor storage
Interior material and color options include Strobe and Sedoso Cloth in Black or Light Frost Beige, and Capri Leather Trim in Black with multiple accent options.
Engine options and AWD
If you've gotten this far wondering, "Wow, how is this nice SUV so affordable?" ... we're about to see. Base Dodge Journey models give you about 173 horsepower and 166 pound-feet of torque from a standard 2.4-liter 16-valve four-cylinder engine that's paired to just a four-speed automatic transmission. In the modern days of turbos and ten-speeds, this powertrain isn't exactly state-of-the-art. But, it's solid and reliable, and it gives the Journey an impressive total driving range of more than 500 miles.
So, you may not feel your heart pounding--but you won't run out of gas before you hit your destination when you head off on a weekend trip.
If you really need a little blast of that cardio-inducing exhilaration, though, the Journey is available with a boosted powerhouse: up to 283 horsepower and 260 pound-feet of torque from an optional 3.6-liter Pentastar V6 engine that you'll find on models like the GT. This engine ditches the 4-speed for an updated six-speed automatic transmission with AutoStick (Dodge's cool manual-shifting technology that uses the actual stick instead of paddles) that's smoother, and a lot more fun to drive.
Opt for a model with Dodge All-Wheel-Drive System for advanced capability and traction--and ask about available package options for towing and hauling. When properly-equipped, the Journey is good for up to 2,500 pounds of towing power. It's good for basic trips, "pocket campers", and small trailers. If you own big gear that'll need to be towed all around the state, you might want to consider the Durango instead.
Comprehensive warranty coverage
While it's great to have flashy good looks and some fun features, at the end of the day you just want an SUV that's going to be able to take care of you. The three-row Journey SUV comes standard with Dodge's confident and comprehensive warranty coverage for all models.
For your mechanics, components, buttons, switches, and thingamabobs, you're covered by a transferable 3-year/36,000-mile Basic Limited Warranty (whichever milestone comes first) that even includes towing services to the nearest Dodge dealership. Why does transferability matter? Think of how much money you can save by charging small inspections or repairs to the warranty--that's value. And it's a value that you can roll into the price of the SUV should you decide to sell your Journey within that time period.
For your engines, transmissions, and drive systems, you're covered by a 5-Year/60,000-Mile Powertrain Limited Warranty (again, whichever milestone comes first) that's also transferable, and also includes towing services. Most components of the powertrain of the covered, but it's unlikely you'll even need to take advantage of this--Dodge is known for making good, solid engines, and its engineering is one of the driving factors that its stayed as a top performance brand in this country.
Compare the Dodge Journey vs the Competition
See All Dodge Journey For Sale


text:
*Photo Credit: Agência Brasil Fotografias
Olympic Gymnast: 4x Olympic Gold Medalist; Olympic Silver Medalist; 8x World Champion
FEE RANGE: $200,000–$250,000 [FEE NOTE]
Simone Biles is a four-time Olympic gold medalist and a three-time World all-around gymnastics champion. In 2015 at the World Championships in Glasgow, Scotland, she became the only female gymnast to ever win three consecutive all-around titles. She is also the most decorated American female gymnast, with a total of nineteen medals, fourteen of them gold.
Simone Biles is one of the greatest female athletes of all-time. The first woman to capture five All-Around World Championship titles, Biles is the most decorated gymnast in World Championships history – male or female - with 25 medals overall (19 gold) and is a seven-time Olympic medalist (4 gold, 1 silver, 2 bronze).
A three-time Laureus World Sportswoman of the Year, she has earned the rare distinction of having four skills named in her honor – The Biles – across beam, floor (two) and vault disciplines. Biles' extraordinary accomplishments have received widespread recognition including TIME 100 Most Influential, Forbes 30 Under 30, Ebony Power 100, People Women Changing the World, USA Today 100 Women of the Century, and two-time Associated Press Female Athlete of the Year among others. Her autobiography - Courage to Soar - was a New York Times bestseller and developed into an award-winning tv special on Lifetime. Biles utilizes her platform to help advocate for mental health and support initiatives that provide education and assistance for children and young adults associated with adoption and foster care.
A Conversation with Simone Biles
Contact Simone Biles for an appearance by reaching out to Key Speakers at (949) 675-7856, or by leaving an inquiry.
Host, Comedy Central's "The Daily Show with Trevor Noah"
Fee Range: $225,000–$250,000
Comedian and Host of "The Tonight Show"
Fee Range: Inquire
Six-Time Olympic Gold Medalist, Triple World-Record Holder, Fastest Man On Earth
Travels From: International
14-Times Olympic Gold Medal Winner
Fee Range: $90,000–$250,000
Travels From: Maryland
America's Lifestyle Expert & Founder of Martha Stewart Living


The Westwood Tennis Center is a four court indoor facility, offering private and group lessons, court rental, ball machine rental and PlaySight smart court rental. This state-of-the-art facility has everything you need to take your game to the next level!
Click on the brochure (in sidebar) for more information on available lessons, hours, etc.


Alexander Gray Associates presened paintings and drawings by Jack Tworkov (b.1900, Biala, Poland – d.1982, Provincetown, MA), charting the evolution of the artist's career from gestural abstract expressionism in the 1950s to a conceptual approach to geometric abstraction beginning in the late 1960s and 1970s. Together, the selection of works highlighted Tworkov's adept balance between structure and spontaneity to underscore the potential of experimental form in painting.
Also on view were a curated selection of works on paper, spanning from the 1950s to the 1980s, which demonstrate the stylistic changes in Tworkov's oeuvre. Related to "West 23rd", c. 1963, exemplifies Tworkov's gestural handling of watercolor, creating a work populated with saturated blue and yellow tones punctuated by dark, regular parallel lines. Graphite markings, visible among the layers of pigment, disrupt the composition, intersecting the painted strokes. In L.B. Pencil Drawing #2, 1979, Tworkov relied instead on geometry, dividing the plane into a grid and incising various shapes onto the two-dimensional surface. The irregular shapes are filled with repetitive and regimented graphite marks while the two large rectangles are left unfilled, displaying the remnants of the imposed grid system.