text:
Vinny Curry
All posts tagged Vinny Curry
FOUR THINGS REVIEWED: WK 16: Cowboys
Posted in: Coaching, Defense, Four Things, NFC East, NFL, Offense, Players, Reviews, Rivals, stats. Tagged: 2020, Brandon Graham, Dallas Cowboys, DeSean Jackson, Eagles, Four Things, Jalen Hurts, Philadelphia, review, rival, Vinny Curry. Leave a comment
TIME TO TANK!
Eagles 17 – Cowboys 37
EAGLES LEADERS:
(S) QB Jalen Hurts: (21/39 – 53.8% – 342 – 1 – 2)
(S) QB Jalen Hurts: (9 – 69 – 7.6 – 0 – 1)
(S) DeSean Jackson: (1 – 1 – 81 – 81.0 – 1)
(S) DE Brandon Graham/DE Vinny Curry: (2 – 1.0 – 0 – 0)
I hear you asking, "What about all the stuff that stats don't reveal?" Well, that's the reason for the Four Things articles. It's to point out what we need to address BEFORE the game. Then AFTER the game, there's a no-bullshit assessment of whether or not the Eagles did any of what they needed to do, to ensure the win.
So how much of what I mentioned in Four Things: COWBOYS did the Eagles get around to doing? Well let's see:
1) Run the ball: Well the Eagles got 60 rushing yards from Hurts. The problem (as always), is that they stopped handing the ball off. RB Miles Sanders had just 15 carries in this game, which doesn't look too different from most weeks. Until you realize that 11 of those were in the first half. Back when the Eagles were still in the game. (NOT DONE)
2) Rush the passer: We didn't get enough heat on the Cowboys back-up QB, and he picked us apart, basically looking like a dad playing catch with his kids. (NOT DONE)
3) Three sacks or fewer: We kept it to three sacks, but one of them resulted in a fumble. It was recovered by LT Jordan Mailata, but it took us out of rhythm. (DONE)
4) Cover Two, where are you?: The Eagles did shift to some of this later in the game. However, for most of it, Defensive Coordinator Jim Schwartz, absolutely stranded and abandoned undrafted, rookie CB Michael Jacquet out in man coverage. The result was the Cowboys offense "running a train" on his ass. This was pitiful. It was shameful. Putting that kid out there to be bitch-beat like that. (NOT DONE)
One of three this week. We end the year against Washington next week. Thank god.
This week we faced a QB, not a RB who can throw. It exposed two things. The first was our piss-poor Secondary. Many blame injuries, but we were looking like this Week 2 vs the Rams with everyone healthy. Yet again our defensive system was exposed.
The second thing that was exposed was Jalen Hurts. When the Cowboys made him play from the pocket, he became a shadow. It took the Saints a half to figure out that they need to stop him from scrambling to his right. The Cardinals caught on faster. The Cowboys faster still. Three games in, and he's already been figured out. The upcoming Redskins game might put this debate completely to bed.
To everyone who blamed QB Carson Wentz and elevated Hurts as the savior, sit here beside me. Sit. Did you notice that we only put up 17 points this week? Did you notice that the QB had 1 TD and 3 turnovers? Did you notice that Hurts, yet again didn't complete 60% of his passes? Did you notice that Hurts again had no chemistry with his WR's? Did you notice that of the three and a half games Hurts has played in, we've only won ONE? Did you realize how these numbers practically mirror Wentz's production in some 2020 games?
Anyone who claims that Wentz was the problem, but is happy with Hurts, is totally full of shit. If the idea is for the Eagles to win, then you should still be disappointed. But I know. You want to blame the coaches for not running the ball now. And the Offensive Line for not blocking better. And the Secondary for being a bucket with no bottom. Go ahead. Let me hear it. You know you want to say it…
If Wentz didn't get to use these "excuses" while the head coach kept saying that it wasn't just one guy, then when Hurts claims "full ownership", he damned sure can't use these "excuses". Right?
Again. Wrong. They aren't excuses, they're reasons. And they all are 100% true. Hurts can use them. Wentz can use them. And if we don't fix them, then this team won't go anywhere, with any QB. This civil war among Eagles fans has got to stop. This is not Wentz vs Hurts. This is Eagles vs sucking ass. The enemy is out there, Eagles fans. Stop arguing over the QB. Let's fix the real problems.
VINNY CURRY RETURNS! (AGAIN.)
Posted in: Conversations, Defense, free agents, Front Office (F.O.), NFL, Players, Roster. Tagged: Brandon Graham, Defensive Line, Derek Barnett, Eagles, Genard Avery, Jim Schwartz, Josh Sweat, Philadelphia, stockpiling, Vinny Curry. Leave a comment
CURRIED QB is on the menu again in 2020! The Eagles have re-signed DE Vinny Curry, bringing him back on a one year deal for 2020. I'm a huge fan of the move. I love his experience in the scheme. I love his productivity. I love his schematic versatility. I love the depth he adds. Indeed, the rich have gotten richer.
It's the timing on the move that raises my eyebrow.
When Curry was allowed to walk at the end of the season, the Eagles already knew what they had. So why wait until a week into camp to bring him back into the fold? My first instinct was, maybe they aren't seeing as much from the young guys as they were hoping.
Then I had another thought. Maybe it's Covid-19 proofing. Our Defense is predicated on getting pressure on opposing QB's. DC Jim Schwartz tries to do that with his four down linemen. So keeping those linemen fresh, is as important to the scheme as the X's and O's are. That in mind, we might just be stockpiling pass rush talent.
That would also explain last month's cutting and immediate re-signing, of DE Daeshon Hall. Hall "failed" his physical, cleared waivers, was quickly snatched up by the very team that cut him, and placed neatly on our PUP (Physically Unable to Perform) List, where he incidentally won't count against the roster. So basically Hall was stashed away.
While Curry at 32 years of age is unlikely to be stashed, a younger player could be. I'm thinking of players like DE's Shareef Miller, Joe Ostman, Matt Leo, and the aforementioned Hall. A couple of those guys may end up on the Practice Squad, or this year's very flexible I.R. format.
If I had to bet on which DE's make the Week One roster, I'd go with Curry, Brandon Graham, Derek Barnett, Josh Sweat, and Genard Avery playing a LB/DE swing role. Curry gives us a Nickle/Dime DT presence as well. (Graham and Barnett will start of course.)
This signing is a great move. Not only for what it added to our roster, but for removing Curry from garnering interest from a division rival at some point. Everything about this move was forward thinking. I have to love it.
MANIACAL FACT: When Vinny Curry starts 16 games, his team ALWAYS wins a Super Bowl.
#10 SEND FIVE
Posted in: Coaching, Conversations, Defense, Players, Rants, The 12. Tagged: 2020, Brandon Graham, Defensive Line, Derek Barnett, Eagles, Fletcher Cox, pass rush, Philadelphia, The 12, Vinny Curry. Leave a comment
WANNA see something stupid?
What is this happy horseshit where we usually rush four, rarely blitz, but when we do, we end up in crap like Cover Zero? We need to send five so that- Hold on. I'm getting ahead of myself. Let me roll this back a bit.
Last year in almost every game the commentators would mention that our pass rush isn't as potent as it's been in the past. At first that sounded weird, because our sacks have gone up two years in a row. If sacks were the only metric used, it would just seem like the typical media down-talk directed at the Eagles. Which we fans are used to.
Then you think about our opponent completion percentages. And their QB ratings! Seriously. We even made Haskins look good… The eyeball test makes it clear that we don't bring the heat like we used to.
Part of that is because the only player on our D-Line who requires a double-team is DT Fletcher Cox. Us rushing four vs an opponent's five man o-line, plays directly into our opponent's plan. We have a pair of complete DE's in Brandon Graham and Vinny Curry, but we don't have a guy who alters blocking schemes. (DE Derek Barnett too often bails early on his contain responsibility.)
We need to send five rushers more often, to get Cox more 1-on-1 match-ups. That way he can do to blocking schemes what he does to marriages. We don't have to do it all the time, but it has to stop being rare.
2019 SEASON REVIEW: FOURTH QUARTER
Posted in: Conversations, Defense, NFC East, NFL, Offense, Players, playoffs, Reviews, Roster, Special Teams, stats. Tagged: 2019, Carson Wentz, Eagles, NFC East, Nigel Bradham, Philadelphia, playoffs, quarterly, review, Vinny Curry. Leave a comment
SEASON Reviews are usually done at the end of the season. (Duh, right?) A few are done at the halfway mark, and/or at the end. Starting in 2017, Eaglemaniacal.com began treating the season like a game, and breaking it into four quarters. Since football is a hard sport, we'll take a hard look at where our team stands at the moment (in relation to where it started), and where it needs to go next.
STATUS: 9 – 7, WINNER of the NFC EAST, 4th Seed in the NFC, Sole Playoff Representative of the Division.
OPPONENTS:
W New York giants (4 – 12)
W Washington Redskins (3 – 13)
W Dallas Cowboys (8 – 8)
Combined: (19 – 45)
We needed to win all four games. We won all four games.
People can talk about how "unpretty" the wins were. They can talk about how bad our opponent's records were. Doesn't matter. We're here, and no argument made against that, can change that. We fought. We clawed. We earned this, because we kept believing and we stuck together.
Losers fall apart (giants). Losers tap out (Like Zeke did). Losers change horses midstream (See: Dan Snyder). Winners win because they don't quit. They give an all out effort. Winners get to feel elation. Winners get to know that they were vindicated. Losers? They can only wish to stand where we do today.
QB: (A) Carson Wentz put this team on his back, and made those around him better. Amazingly enough, he also made himself better as over these last four games he's been more cognizant not holding the ball forever as he waits to make a big play. The game winning touchdown he threw at Washington, was an example of him trusting his receiver to make a play, not just his own arm. As a result, he's now doing a better job of throwing guys open. There are still overthrows of his deep ball, but I suspect that will iron out when he gets some higher grade firepower back on the roster.
RB: (B) Some fans would give this position a higher grade, but that would mean only seeing the good and not the bad. Jordan Howard hasn't touched the ball in this quarter. So Miles Sanders and Boston Scott have taken up the load. They both have at times, been dynamic with the ball and reliable as blockers. What neither has been, is an inside runner who consistently finishes runs hard. Both are great to keep on the field, especially as compensatory pieces, but neither is a true Alpha. Teams don't get worn down and tired, tackling those guys. Howards absence has highlighted the need for him. (Or at least someone (Holyfield) like him.)
TE: (B) This position is usually the Zach Ertz Show. However, injuries have given Dallas Goedert and Josh Perkins a chance to strut their stuff, showing not just talent, but reliability. Goedert in fact, despite being a back-up, developed into a Top Ten player at his position (10th in yards, 9th in catches, and only 6 players at his position have more touchdowns).
Perkins leaves something to be desired as a blocker, but for a 3rd string target, he's an absolute luxury. He's the Range Rover that you only drive when your Tesla Model X, and Mercedes G-Class are being detailed. Good thing we had these guys too! The broken rib that Ertz suffered in Week 16 would have been a death knell for teams like Kansas City, or San Francisco. However, since our reserves are so silky smooth, Philadelphia hardly felt a bump in the road.
WR: (D) Greg Ward by himself would get a "B" grade. Over the last quarter he's put up 21 catches for 210 yards (10.0 yards per catch), and one game winning TD. The other 3 players active at this position, over that same span, posted 8 catches for 113 yards (16.6ypc) and no scores. To be fair to Deontay Burnett, he only played in the last game and still caught 2 for 48. That means the other two players produced just 6 catches for 85 yards over 4 games. Amazingly, our Eagles won 4 straight games despite this.
OT: (C) We've played the last three games without Lane Johnson. We instead relied on Halapoulivaati Vaitai to man the right side. Vaitai hasn't been great, but he's been servicable. In fact, many of his mistakes seem more attributable to coaches not compensating for his athletic limitations. Jason Peters has been Jason Peters as a blocker, but his name is being called far too often for penalties recently.
OG: (C) Isaac Suemalo remains an up and down player. While he moves well in space, he's not particularly stout at the point of attack. Brandon Brooks was playing at a Pro Bowl level, until he was hurt during the last game of the season. Matt Pryor stepped in and handled himself well, but he hasn't played a single full game in his two year career.
C: (B) Despite less than stellar Shotgun snapping, Jason Kelce is doing a good better of the blocking calls, so there were fewer "A" gap rushers running free this quarter.
DE: (B) Brandon Graham isn't getting sacks like he did around midseason, but he is doing a much better job of playing the run first and keeping contain. So I find myself not missing Chris Long quite as much, as I did around midseason.
Derek Barnett would do well to study containment. He flattens out too soon to chase down the line, and usually gets neither the pressure nor the tackle. Instead of doing his job first, he's trying to make the play first. He's playing inside-out and it frequently leaves us vulnerable on his side whereas Graham is locking down the other side.
Vinny Curry! We won a Super Bowl starting that guy on the blindside. In the two games he played for the injured Barnett this quarter, Vinny was making a case that maybe we have the wrong guy starting. Hey, I'm just being honest! Josh Sweat has cooled off somewhat since midseason, which is probably part of the reason that Philly's own Shareef Miller was added to the active roster as the season came to a close.
DT: (A) Statistics don't tell the story of the job that this position is doing. They are playing excellent team concept football, dictating that RB's can't run up the middle and that QB's can't step up or hang I the pocket. They aren't recording many stats, but they're causing opposing offenses to run off-schedule. Amazing.
Adding man-mountain Anthony Rush to the rotation with Fletcher Cox, has helped limit teams desire to run the ball inside. In fact, we went from a 3 – 4 team before Rush, to 6 – 3 since. I assure you that's not a coincidence. If you think it is, check out both Dallas games, both before and after Rush was added.
OLB: (C) T.J. Edwards is an upgrade over Kamu Grugier-Hill. He's more physical and instinctive, and so far there's nothing to indicate that we've lost anything in underneath coverage. Nate Gerry hasn't made a splash play in a while, but he's making a lot of clean, unassisted tackles. Nothing is being schemed for him, but that feels like it may change in the postseason.
MLB: (B) The feel of the Defense has changed since Nigel Bradham took over for Nate Gerry in the middle. Opponents haven't been able to rely on their run games in weeks, so we've made offenses one dimensional against us. And not just against bad offenses. We held the NFL's #1 offense to 9 points (3 field goals). Bradham isn't making splash plays, but he's everywhere we need him to be, when the moment arises. We didn't have that with Gerry, and we didn't always have that last year, with Jordan Hicks. We may be making plans for Nigel to play on the inside if the Eagles pick up his option.
S: (C) Malcolm Jenkins is even playing Special Teams. That is leadership by example. It says no job is too small or unimportant. It sends a message that every play, every down, is all hands on deck. Rod McLeod is frequently in tough positions when the ball is thrown long, some of which he can't recover from. The scheme does him no favors.
CB: (B) Since Miami the DC seems to be letting these guys play a little more Press Coverage at the line. It's still not enough, but some Press, beats no Press at all. The results speak for themselves. Players at this position have 18 passes defensed in the last 4 weeks. An unit that showed improvement last quarter, continued that trend.
Sidney Jones (whom I all but left for dead in my last report), has made clutch plays in three of the last four games including an interception while covering a receiver, who in a previous game had skinned us alive. Rasul Douglas lacks the long speed to be routinely put in man situations, but if the ball isn't thrown over his head, he will try to get his mitts on it. There is also no denying that Jalen Mills and CreVon LeBlanc add a fiery competitiveness, that has rubbed off on their fellow corners.
Talent-wise, we have no A+ or even A type players, at this position. We have a number of B level guys, who all have some sort of obvious limitation. So what we have here, are no stars, but a stable of solid to very solid players. That being said, due to the system we play, these guys will give up big plays here and there. However, recognizing all this doesn't mean I graded them on a curve. This position got what they earned.
LS: (A) Rick Lovato is consistent.
P: (B) Cam Johnston stepped his game up in these last four games. Last quarter saw 20 punts for 12 returns (60% return rate), for 79 yards (6.5ypr). This quarter had 22 punts for 9 returns (40%) for 51 yards (5.6ypr). That's across the board improvement, but those aren't the most baller stats.
Of those 22 punts only 3 were fair caught and only 1 was a touchback. Of our 28 punts down inside the 20 this year, 11 were in these last four games. Of the 9 punts that we downed this year, 6 were in this quarter. That says that Cam took a real hard look in the mirror and opted to work within the system. That's some real big boy stuff, right there
K: (C ) Jake Elliott was 5 for 8 kicking field goals this year, but two of those misses were from 55 and 53 yards, outside, with intermittent gusts of wind. Spend a day attempting 30 yarders, before you judge this guy too harshly for those. Kickoffs remain a concern though. 21 kickoffs, 10 returns (47% return rate), for 245 yards (24.5ypr).
That return rate is up from 36%. The returns ar up from 23.7. We are trending wrong people!
PR/KR: (F) I won't even post the numbers. Our return game is a wide-open wound.
KC: (C) Teams are taking more chances trying to make a big play, by attempting returns, that means it's only a matter of time before someone gets lucky against us. Worse yet, when teams do return it we don't stop them well short of the 25. So for opponents, taking a chance on a return is a risk-free proposition.
SINCE LAST QUARTER:
We won the division and made it into the tournament that will determine the league champion. We got our shit together when we needed to, and we had our selves a successful season. Yes, I said it was a successful season. As in Regular Season.
Now we're trying to have a successful Post-season. THAT success will be determined by hoisting the SB trophy in February. Make no mistake though, we accomplished the first part of that quest already.
Bask in that. Until Kickoff Sunday at 4:40, vs the Seahawks.
MISSION FOR THIS QUARTER:
The regular season is over. We are now in the post-season. There is no quarter given here. Not by the calendar, nor the fans, nor the opposition to come. There is however, a mission, and it is this:
Win one game. Win a second. Win a third. Then win that fourth game.
FOUR THINGS REVIEWED – WK 16 – COWBOYS
Posted in: Coaching, Conversations, Defense, Four Things, NFC East, NFL, Offense, Players, playoffs, Preview, Reviews, Rivals, stats. Tagged: 2019, Carson Wentz, Dallas Cowboys, Dallas Goedert, Eagles, Josh Sweat, Miles Sanders, NFC East, Nigel Bradham, Philadelphia, Take a knee, Vinny Curry. Leave a comment
ONCE again the Eagles are back at the head of the division, and please don't start with how "unsexy" the division is. Your car isn't a Rolls Royce, but you still love it and fuss over it, right? Well in that same spirit, this division may not be the NFC West, but we're gonna drive this motherfucker 'til the wheels fall off.
Yes, yes, I know! That's not to say that the East is ours free and clear. We still have one more payment to make on it. And it's due next week.
EAGLES 17 – Cowboys 9
Despite all the missing weapons, QB Carson Wentz (31/40 – 77.5% – 319 – 1 – 0) led his team to (what right now is) the signature game of his career. That's not to say that he was without help. For the second week in a row, rookie RB Miles Sanders (20 – 79 – 3.9 – 1 – 0 / 5 – 77 – 15.4 – 0) put up 150+ yards from scrimmage.
Dallas Goedert scores the go ahead touchdown in the first quarter.
Stepping up for TE Zach Ertz (4 – 28 – 7.0 – 0) who injured his ribs early on, was TE Dallas Goedert (9 – 91 – 10.1 – 1). Geodert hit pay dirt with a 6 yard dart from Wentz. Don't look now, but WR Greg Ward (4 – 71 – 17.7 – 0) may be trying to coax Wentz into throwing the ball down the stripe a little more, after breaking off a 38 yard gain for his QB. Even rookie WR JJ Arcega-Whiteside (2 – 39 – 19.5 – 0) made a declaration of sorts, by opening the game with a 27 yard grab, and catching both balls thrown to him.
Defensively, the stat line for MLB Nigel Bradham (2 – 0 – 0 – 0) doesn't tell how instrumental he was in rendering Cowboys RB Ezekiel Elliott (13 – 47 – 3.6 – 0 – 0 / 7 – 37 – 5.2 – 0) ineffectual for the day. The same can be said for DT Fletcher Cox (3 – 0 – 0 – 1). It's a shame that the fumble he forced, didn't turn into points.
I've said it before and I'll say it until it happens. DE Vinny Curry (2 – 1.0 – 0 – 0) needs to be brought back in 2020.
DE Josh Sweat (2 – 1.0 – 0 – 0) is justifying the coaches patience with him, and is starting to look like the steal he was drafted to be. (Though he has a tendency to flirt with neutral zone infractions. Crown of your helmet Josh!) DT Anthony Rush (1 – 0 – 0 – 0) gives us a physical presence inside that makes it hard for a run game to get traction. I thought I saw him make a Tackle For Loss, but the (generous) spotting of the ball made it a run for no gain. In fact, Bradham (1), Curry (1) and Sweat (2) all had TFL's. Just what we needed against this team.
Much maligned CB Sidney Jones (1 – 0 – 0 – 0), made yet another excellent play on the ball, in a critical fourth down situation. In fact, the play he made was potentially what saved the game, and possibly the season. He still tackles like a young Deion Sanders, but if he can get his confidence back up, we may have a guy that we can trade out of the conference. (Tackling is too important to risk keeping him.)
I hear you asking, "What about all the stuff that stats don't reveal?" Well, that's the reason for these "Four Things" articles. To introduce an idea of what needs addressing BEFORE the game, so that fans have to honestly answer questions about those things, AFTER the game. This helps to get us, and keep us, all on the same page.
1) Keep Bradham clean: Our D-Line not only kept Bradham from having to fight off offensive linemen, they made plays on the other side of the line of scrimmage! This was the deluxe version of what we needed here. (DONE)
2) Force them into their base defense: Apparently the Eagles coaches and I see things very similarly. According to a Next Gen stat that was put up on the television screen, deep into the 4th quarter, the Eagles had run 2TE formations, 56% of the game. That forced the Cowboys to play newcomer OLB Malcolm Smith (2 – 0 – 0 – 0) clearly more than they wanted to. So much so that at one point you could see that he was visibly winded. This allowed us to victimize him several times. Good show! (DONE)
3) Gut the middle: The idea was to keep them in their base, and make their LB's play chase all day long. If they're chasing, they aren't dictating the action or making big plays. So we made them chase TE's, and we forced them to follow Sanders all around the formation. We also threw 6 passes to RB Boston Scott (3 – 12 – 4.0 – 0 – 0 / 6 – 7 – 1.1) and he caught all of them. Almost all of them were routes towards the sideline to force LB's into lateral coverage, or pull a Nickel out of position. We even ran Wentz a couple times on designed runs. Worked like a charm, and the Cowboys stayed off-balance all game. (DONE)
4) Don't over-commit vs the run: Since the front seven played well enough on it's own, there wasn't much call for that. We showed some heavy fronts, but they never really brought the house aside from short yardage moments. We did a lot of "threaten and bail", which forced Cowboys QB Dak Prescott (25/44 – 56.8% – 265 – 0 – 0) to read our coverages more often than film study would have suggested was necessary. We didn't over-commit to the run, and made it harder for him to throw the ball against us. (DONE)
For the third time this year, we nailed a perfect 4 of 4 for the week, boosting our season tally to 34 of 60 (.566). Next week we can clinch the NFC East and a home playoff game with a win vs the giants. That game by the way, has been FLEXED from 1:00 pm to 4:25 pm.
We've been a team in need of consistency for weeks now. Recently our QB play has gotten more stable and creative. Carson was moved around a lot today. Bootlegs, called QB runs, split out wide… Everything except QB Sneaks. (Weird, right?)
Play at RB has become more dynamic recently. I said after the Miami game that Sanders reminded me of Brian Westbrook. Weeks later, I stand by that. He is effective both with, and without the ball in his hands.
Lots of people want to draw a comparison between he and LeSean McCoy, probably due to body type. However, young McCoy was a more dangerous natural runner, but needed the football to make plays. Sanders is a much scarier draw out-wide, than McCoy ever was.
And then there's situational football. As you could see on Sanders "Take a Knee 2.0" today, for him making the play isn't always about what you do as a runner. He gave up a TD in exchange for sealing a win.
Defensively we need to decide on who we are. If we're going to be a team that doesn't rush 5, we need to scheme more rushes or packages that actually get hands the QB more. For two years I've been saying that we don't cover long enough for the rush to get home. That wasn't true today.
If we're going to affect games, dictate action and cause turnovers, we need our Defense to be more sudden. Our plodding pass rush of the last month has to improve if we intend to make any noise in January.
FOUR THINGS REVIEWED – WK 14 – GIANTS
Posted in: Conversations, Defense, Four Things, NFC East, Offense, Players, Reviews, Rivals, stats. Tagged: 2019, Boston Scott, Carson Wentz, Eagles, Eli Manning, Janoris Jenkins, New York Giants, Philadelphia, Twister, Vinny Curry, Zach Ertz. Leave a comment
WE came into this game with just three WR's, and lost two of them during the contest. But we kept fighting, and we figured it out. We lost our RT, but we kept fighting, and we figured it out. This whole season has been us fighting through, and figuring our way through, one nut-punch after another.
Why should this game have been any different?
Instead of being mad that we didn't dominate, let's give this team a hand for sticking together, not pointing fingers, and battling shoulder to shoulder. We need to give credit for the grit that this team showed. I can't vibe with these fans who think we should either dominate or immediately curl into the fetal position.
EAGLES 23 – giants 17 (OT)
The engine that drove this beast was QB Carson Wentz (33/50 – 66.6% – 325 – 2 – 0). On a night where he didn't have any of these guys
he still managed to find a way to will his team to victory in the closing two quarters.
Giving Wentz somewhere to go with the ball, were TE Zach Ertz (9 – 91 – 10.1 – 2), TE Dallas Goedert (3 – 41 – 13.6 – 0), and TE Josh Perkins (5 – 37 – 7.4 – 0). By the way, Perkins is a 3rd stringer. We also got a massive effort from yet another of our 3rd stringers, in RB Boston Scott (10 – 59 – 5.9 – 1 / 6 – 69 – 11.5 – 0).
Scott had to fill-in for a while after RB Miles Sanders (15 – 45 – 3.0 – 0 / 4 – 24 – 8.0 – 0), (filling in for injured RB Jordan Howard), due to muscle cramping.
On defense it was a big night for DE Vinny Curry (2 – 2.0 – 0 – 0), as he started in place of injured DE Derek Barnett.
We need to make a point of bringing Vinny Curry back in 2020.
There was even a sighting of CB Sidney Jones (one deflection) as he broke up a key third down pass, to end a late giants drive. He looked good in press coverage, didn't he?
1) No disrespect: The idea was not to overestimate the amount of rust on QB Eli Manning (15/30 – 50.0% – 203 – 2 – 0), by blitzing him like he was a rookie, or practice squader. We did blitz him, but not disrespectfully. There were no Zero blitzes, and we didn't blitz every down. We did some overload stuff, some "A" gap stuff, but we kept it disciplined. (DONE)
2) Throw the ball: Our play selection was 50 passes to 30 called runs (which included three Sneaks by Wentz.) It worth noting that, that was 50 passes with a depleted WR corps. So there can be no mistaking the Eagles commitment to the pass this week. (DONE)
3) Rush the passer: We did get decent pressure on Manning, we did work the "A" gaps, and we did cause plenty of errant passes. It allowed us to use (but not be reliant on) the blitz. This allowed us to play disciplined, and not eat a trick play for the fourth week in row. So the important part of this was done. That said, I really wanted those one on one victories inside, from DT Tim Jernigan and NT Anthony Rush. (Neither who recorded as much as half of a tackle.) But the idea was to play solid team concept defense, not pad individual stats. (DONE)
4) Screen Carson's visitors: Our Screen game was so sick, that we're going to have put Boston Scott in quarantine for a week. He put a move on CB Janoris Jenkins (4 – 0 – 0 – 0) which left that poor fool playing Twister all by his lonesome. (Right hand green, bitch!)
(DONE)
That brings this weeks Four Things score to 4 of 4, and the yearly totals to 27 of 52. This is the second time this season that we put up a perfect score, but the other time resulted in a loss. What's funny, is that most of this stuff didn't really start to take hold until the second half. I sat watching this game with a fairly empty notepad for so long, that I actually put it on the couch behind me, and nearly forgot about it.
In any case, despite the Redskins being just an awful team, we won't get away with a stinker like this again on Sunday. Not because the Redskins are somehow better than the giants. We won't get away with it, because Karma won't reward the Eagles two weeks in a row, for shitty play with so much on the line.
It was by no means pretty, but we won the damned game. That's the part that matters. All this talk about how much we struggled with a 2 – 10 team, is utter nonsense. We came in as a 5 – 7 team, and even with this win, we're still under .500. (For fuck's sake, we lost to MIAMI last week!)
So folks need to quit talking like we were supposed to be world-beaters in this game. The Eagles are a team that is trying win it's division, while simultaneously trying to get it's shit together, as injuries continue to mount.
And STILL, no one in our division has more wins than we do. Isn't that right, rival fans?
WHAT MICHAEL BENNETT MEANS
Posted in: Conversations, Defense, Front Office (F.O.), Players, Roster, trade. Tagged: 2018, Defense, Defensive Line, Derek Barnett, Eagles, Howie Roseman, Michael Bennett, pass rush, Philadelphia, trade, Vinny Curry. 4 Comments
(2a.m., coffee bathes the lower halves of my pupils, fingers flying, 'No Church In the Wild' on repeat, on repeat, on repeat.)
(Whispering) Run with me.
TRADING away a 5th round pick and WR Marcus Johnson, to get DE Michael Bennett and a 7th round pick, seems like a steal on the surface. A fiery, veteran pass rusher, who's used to winning? That sounds like a guy any defense would be happy to have in their starting line-up. Clearly we crushed the fuck out of this trade.
Whoa now. Pump the brakes. While there's no knocking the addition of Bennett, his being added to the roster signals two things.
The first thing is that, the Eagles are about to release DE Vinny Curry, in move that's designed to save the team $5M of the $11M he's scheduled to be paid in 2018. (Initially I'd put my feelings about that in this article, but it hijacked the article's tone. So, I decided to relocate those paragraphs. They're still part of the original draft, they just weren't added to what you can see here.)
The second thing it signals is, Derek Barnett will now become our starting RDE. No surprise there. That was the plan from the moment he was drafted on the steps to the Art Museum's East Door last Spring. However, Curry's contract still had guaranteed money on it, and that didn't facilitate Curry being a back-up in 2017. So Barnett sat lat year.
That was last year.
It remains to be seen how this will affect our run defense however, since Curry was our best DE against the run in 2017. Curry did an excellent job of setting the edge of the defense last season, and keeping runs from successfully bouncing wide, on his side. It remains to be seen if Barnett can hold it down the same way.
For his part, Bennett is here to be the 2018 version of Chris Long. A veteran player who probably isn't as good as he used to be over 16 full games, but might be awesome over 16 half games. There can be no doubt that he will put heat on QB's, and probably make our four man pass rush even more effective than it was in 2017.
While Bennett can be moved around pretty much anywhere on the Defensive Line, he's likely to mainly line up at RDE. I love that. A QB who sees Bennett lined up on his blind-side, is already thinking of quickly dumping the ball. Even before the ball is snapped. That's already a rushed pass.
Basically Bennett means we can intimidate opposing passers, just because of where we line him up. Not bad Howie Roseman. Not bad at all.
Oh yeah, just because I put this out, doesn't mean I skipped out on today's THE 12 article. You can find that right HERE
FOUR THINGS: WK 14: EAGLES-RAMS
Posted in: Coaching, Defense, Four Things, Offense, Players, Preview. Tagged: 2017, Eagles, Four Things, Los Angeles Rams, Mychal Kendricks, Nigel Bradham, Philadelphia, Todd Gurley, Vinny Curry. 6 Comments
ONE win and we're in the playoffs, because we'd clinch the division. Getting the win this week will help set-up a first round bye, and help us chase home-field advantage throughout. So unlike last week, there is sharp-edged motivation for winning this game.
This game is between the number one and number two scoring teams in the league. Both are average 30.1 points per game. So it should be a shootout, right? Pump the brakes. The devil is in the details. And it's details we need to concern ourselves with.
So let's talk about the Four Things we need to focus on this week versus the Rams:
1) RUN. THE. BALL: The Rams are 27th in the NFL against the run. Like the Redskins, they play an attacking 3-4 defense (meaning that the OLB's are primary pass rushers). Neither of their starters at OLB will play this week. They also feature two ILB's who are undersized and so beat up, that neither has practiced so far this week. The Rams have sucked versus the run with their starters in. They can't much better with back-ups playing.
2) Man Coverage underneath: OLB's Nigel Bradham and Mychal Kendricks need to be RB Todd Gurley's shadow, on routes out of the backfield. He's already integral to the Rams passing attack, and they'll likely be missing their leader in receiving yards, which only increases Gurley's importance this week. Taking him away, makes life harder on the Rams passing attack overall.
3) Get some help: The presence of LT Halapoulivaati Vaitai has all but removed the deep ball from our arsenal. Watching him get beat repeatedly on outside-in moves, has gotten old as fuck. Flanking him with a TE who repeatedly chip-blocks, would give him a chance to see an outside-in move unfolding, and help him hold the corner. Then we can get back to calling an aggressive game again.
4) Use brute force: Attacking the "A" gaps (on either side of the Center), will ruin any pocket before it starts, and cause traffic jams for the run. Rams QB Jared Goff isn't the most mobile fella, so let's see if we can get him throwing on the run and off his back foot. We could use a few turnovers this week.
If we do all these things, we're just about guaranteed to win. Now that we've covered what should happen, let's get into what likely will happen:
While we've been dealing with a snowballing injury bug, the Rams have been dealing with a sudden rush of them. The result is a sudden bunch of fill-ins, mostly on defense, hoping they don't make a mistake. That being said, we have to force them, and bait them into making mistakes. Shouldn't be too hard. Especially considering how raw their depth is. Advantage Eagles.
The Rams haven't scored more than 20 points in a loss this year. That's because they're heavily dependent on Todd Gurley for production. Problem is, if a team has to play catch-up, they can't really run their offense through a RB. Falling behind would effectively force them to surrender their best weapon. As it did in 2 of their 3 losses this year.
We're going to take Gurley away from the Rams because that's what we do. We make teams one-dimensional, and then we close in on their QB. Unlike last week, the QB being served up to us this week, has the mobility of a ceiling fan. Advantage Eagles.
PREDICTION: EAGLES 28 – Rams 17
FOUR THINGS REVIEWED: WEEK 9: BRONCOS
Posted in: Coaching, Defense, Four Things, NFL, Offense, Players, Reviews, stats. Tagged: 2017, Carson Wentz, Corey Clement, Denver Broncos, Eagles, Four Things, Jay Ajayi, Philadelphia, review, Vinny Curry. Leave a comment
HOLY wow, Batman!The Broncos came into the game allowing only 71 rushing yards per game, and we hung 197 on them. They came in allowing 18 points per game and we hung 51 around their necks.
The Eagles could have phoned this one in, and just ducked their heads into the Bye Week. If we went in at 8-2, no fan would be terribly disappointed. Instead, the Eagles went out and dismantled a team with one of the best defenses in the NFL. In the words of Adam Sandler: Not too shabby!
EAGLES 55 – Broncos 23
Carson Wentz (15/27 – 55.5% – 199 – 4 – 0) beat up on Denver's "No Fly Zone" secondary and hardly broke a sweat doing it. He even picked on All-Pro CB Aqib Talib (2 – 0 – 0 – 0) for two of those touchdowns. In fact, the only way to stop Wentz from piling more points on that ass, was to take him out of the game. Maybe QB Nick Foles (1/1 – 100% – 35 – 0 – 0) lobbied to protect his record? (That was a joke. Don't go around spreading that.) WR Alshon Jeffrey (6 – 84 – 14.0 – 2) had his best game as an Eagle so far, and rookie RB Corey Clement (12 – 51 – 4.2 – 2 – 0/ 1rec – 15 – 15.0 – 1) outscored the Denver offense. "New to us" RB Jay Ajayi (8 – 77 – 9.6 – 1 – 0) led the team in rushing and was one of three Eagles to gain more rushing yards than the entire Broncos team, as RB LeGarrette Blount (9 – 37 – 4.1 – 0 – 0) also did some damage.
Defensively, we allowed Denver all of 35 yard rushing, partly because DE Vinny Curry (2 – 1 – 0 – 0) was a monster on the right side. FS Rodney McLeod (1 – 0 – 1 – 0) grabbed his second interception in two weeks.
I hear you asking, "Well golly mister, what about all the stuff that stats don't reveal?" Well Billy, that's the reason for these "Four Things" articles. We introduce an idea of what needs addressing BEFORE the game, so that fans have to honestly answer questions about those things, AFTER the game. This helps to get us, and keep us, all on the same page.
1) Gelding the pass rush: Early in the game we got the ball out to TE Brent Celek (3 – 39 – 13.0 – 0) and to TE Trey Burton (2 – 41 – 20.5 – 1) in the absence of TE Zach Ertz who was out with a hamstring injury. Wentz also used a hard count to draw the Broncos offside a few times. And of course there was also our run game. The result of those things cut the nuts clean off of the Broncos pass rush, and made sure that Wentz was only sacked once during the game. (They also got to Foles for one.) (DONE)
2) Set up play-action: There was no way to expect that we'd hang 200 rushing yards on the Broncos, but the prescription was to stick with it anyway. Well brother, did we EVER! The play selection was 34 called runs to 27 passes. The play-action was there, and Wentz's jersey stayed pretty clean. (DONE)
3) Pick our poison: The deal was to take away the run and force the Bronco's QB to beat us. Worked like a charm. (DONE)
4) Run the Walker: Sending MLB Joe Walker (2 – 0 – 0 – 0) on a few blitzes was the idea, but instead he spent more time in coverage or scraping. (NOT DONE)
That makes this weeks score 3 of 4, bringing the season tally to 30 of 36. The players get a much needed week off now to heal and nurse injuries. (As much as a single week will allow.) For you and I of course, a week with no good football will be sheer Hell. However, keep in mind that the playoff push begins directly on the other side of the Bye, with a match-up against the Dallas Cowboys. I'm sure you won't mind giving our players time to rest, and our coaching staff time to prepare.
With this win we are officially a better team than we were last year. We have 8 wins now, and are guaranteed .500 at worst. Now we are working on that one victory that will guarantee us a winning record for 2017.
This game against the Broncos. All we did was whatever we wanted, however we wanted to do it. Running, passing…I think we could have scored sending smoke signals, if we had decided to try it.
I do have one gripe though.
It's Alshon Jeffery. He never seems like his head is all the way in the game. For example, he had a holding penalty on a Corey Clement run that cost us some yardage, and was laughing and joking after having been flagged.
For a guy on a "prove it" contract, he simply doesn't produce at the rate that you would expect, for a guy who's going to ask for a ton of money in March. I'd like to either see him start looking like THAT guy, or for the Eagles to let our young receivers get more looks on the outside.
FOUR THINGS: WK 3: EAGLES-GIANTS
Posted in: Coaching, Defense, Four Things, NFL, Offense, Players, Preview, Rivals. Tagged: 12th Man, 2017, Carson Wentz, Chance Warmack, Derek Barnett, Eagles, Eli Manning, Ereck Flowers, New York Giants, Philadelphia, Vinny Curry. 1 Comment
DESPITE two road games, we opened the season 1-1, and (technically, by tie-breaker) atop the NFC East. This Sunday, the Eagles will finally get to play in front the best fans in the nation, and the first sacrifice upon our altar, will be New York's worst football team. Beating the giants this week further cements our division lead, regardless of how the Foreskins and Cowpies do. So yeah, this week is sort of a big deal in Philly.
The giants aren't worried about the Eagles. They're having enough trouble with the vultures circling their 2017 season. The season just started, and already the giants are decomposing so rapidly, that it's even scaring zombies. I sat through both of their games this year, and I can't imagine how they'd win this game. I can however, imagine how the Eagles could lose it. We can't allow that during our home opener.
So let's talk about the Four Things we need to focus on this week versus the giants :
1) Keep Wentz from wincing: Quick! Guess which QB has been hit the most in the NFL through two weeks. If you said QB Carson Wentz then you were correct. If you're in denial and need proof here's a link. (Note: The 9ers and Rams play tonight, so if you read this article after Thursday, one of those teams may own the top spot. It will be somehow worse if they don't.) Right now, Wentz's hits and sacks are 9.5 and 4 per week. Those numbers have to come down.
2) Run up the middle: The giants have an explosive pair of edge rushers, but rule of thumb says that we can shutdown their interior rush by running the ball. (Preferably with RB LeGarrette Blount.) If we run the ball up the gut, we'll tire out their interior, cut their rush off at the knees, and give Wentz a pocket to step up into later in the game. Five to eight such carries in the first half. That's the soft target depending on how fast we score on drives. (I'd already written most of this article when I found out that Chance Warmack was getting the start at LG, but I'm not changing anything in the article. Just adding this note and doubling down on #2 here.)
3) Avoid blitzing: Our D-Line can shred even good lines. That said, going against the blocking dummies in front of QB Eli Manning, should be cake for us. Better to leave our LB's in underneath coverage to take away easy completions, and be in a position score if Eli bakes up one of those delicious turnovers that Eagles fans love him for.
4) Break their spirits early: The giants come into this game averaging 6.5 points per game. That's a touchdown with no cherry on it. A couple of early sustained scoring drives, where we convert a 4th down or two, putting them where they seem to keep finding themselves every week. It would go a long way towards breaking their spirit, and taking them mentally and emotionally out of the game. While in hostile territory. (This is where the 12th Man really can do some damage.)
(Sniff) (Sniff) You smell that? That smells like DE Derek Barnett's first sack. DE Vinny Curry is the starter on the right, but I get the feeling that Barnett will see more snaps this week. He's a first rounder, so you want to sell his jersey to the home crowd. A big splash Sunday would help with that a great deal. Surely the Front Office has made this point to the coach. Enter human turnstile, LT Ereck Flowers, who has stopped fewer people than a Walmart greeter. If Barnett gets a fair number of snaps against him, you know how this ends.
You know how this ends.
Troy Aikman will mention Reggie White at least once.
Due to a commitment to running the ball, Wentz will be able to set his feet in the pocket, and more importantly, calm the fuck down. His deep balls will become catches, instead of overthrows. TE Zach Ertz may find it harder to operate against SS Landon Collins, but that will just open things up for WR Alshon Jeffery.
I know we aren't supposed to look past an opponent, because any given blah blah blah, but seriously, I told everyone what the giants deal was BACK IN APRIL. At this point I'm just constantly nodding, pointing and muttering "Yep. See there?", as the prophecy unfolds in real-time. Enjoy the game and enjoy your Sunday. Oh, and if you have Philadelphia's defense in fantasy football, START THEM. (I know I will.)
Note: I will be avoiding game threads (except at the half), because I want to yell and dance around, unfettered. Also I don't want to drop salsa on my keyboard again.
PREDICTION: EAGLES 35 – Giants 13


The IELTS Pathway allows students to prepare for the IELTS (International English Language Testing System) examination, whilst also improving their General English. Classes focuses on academic English, and exam strategies and techniques.
Our superb IELTS preparation lessons help you to prepare for the IELTS test so that you can register a score for entry to a British university.
Course content covers all parts of the exam (reading, writing, listening, speaking) and includes tips and strategies for achieving your required score.
The levels of the classes range from intermediate (A2) upwards.


Hi everyone, this is an essay I would submit in my class and actually, it's not a kind of IELTS test. That's why you may see that my essay is much longer than 250 words. Btw, I need some comment about the structure, vocabulary and ideas. Thank you!
A matter of considerable social issue at present is the serious degradation in ethic of teenagers owing to the lack of parents' care. Actually, parents play an important role in the growth sequence of their children. It is also claimed that children behavior depend mostly on the way their families nurture them. This essay will discuss about some positive effects that good parenting may offer.
To begin with, children will treat others with respect if they are educated well. According to the scientific researches, children often follow their parents' behavior. Imitating is a fundamental process during the growth of a baby; and bad habit of parent may prompt him/her to act adversely as well. As a result, the personal characteristics are shaped at the very early age. Good behavior and polite way of communicating with others stem from how a person was taught by his/her family. In brief, the more people are educated, the more respect they may show.
Another important influence of good parenting is that it promotes the academic success of students. After leaving the kindergarten, children approach an entirely new environment, the primary school. They must change the habit of playing to an uncomfortable one, which is the responsibility for studying well. At this very first stage, children integrate the studying method from the elder members in their family, which really affects their results in the long future. On the other hand, good nurturing raises the children's confidence. All of these would result in an excellent academic result.
Last but not least, children would be healthier on account of parents' concern. The diet of children is mostly prepared by other family members. The way parent control various nutritious elements forms the children's habit, which can hardly be changed. If they get familiar with a balanced diet, they may enjoy a healthy life in the future. Besides, good parent would explain to their children the large importance of physical exercises and encourage them to do these beneficial things. In summary, nurturing method has a great influence on the children's witness.
In conclusion, good parenting creates a tremendous impact on the behavior, studying result and good health of a child. During the early age, children cannot take care of themselves and they demand great caution from their family. As a result, each parent should bear in minds their magnitude and educate their children methodologically.
Thanks for explaining about this essay. Now we know it's not for IELTS we can relax and look at other issues apart from word length or layout.
In paragraph 1, I would remove the tired "matter of considerable social issue." You can see more examples of tired old phrases and generic sentences here and here. Try to avoid using these phrases! Not every issue is "fiercely debated" or a "hot social topic." How often have you discussed teenage behavior with your friends?
I would also remove "it is also claimed that" and I would remove the entire sentence "Actually, parents play an important role in the growth sequence of their children" since it's so obvious that even an IELTS examiner would know it everyone knows it.
Today we hear a lot about teenage crime or juvenile delinquency. Why is it that some young people misbehave? I believe it is because of good parenting and the way families raise their children. This essay will discuss some of the many positive effects of good parenting.
nurturing method has a great influence on the children's witness. → nurturing method has a great influence on the children's character.
good parenting creates a tremendous impact on the behavior, studying result and good health of a child. → good parenting creates a tremendous impact on the behavior, academic performance, and good health of a child.
the more people are educated, the more respect they may show. → the more educated people are, the more respectful they are.
children would be healthier on account of parents' concern → children would be healthier on account of their parents' concern.
The way parent control various nutritious elements forms the children's habit, which can hardly be changed →The importance parents place on healthy food helps form good eating habits in their children.
On the other hand, good nurturing raises the children's confidence. All of these would result in an excellent academic result.
Overall, I'm happy with this essay in terms of layout and ideas. The idea are clearly supported and the layout is appropriate.
In paragraph 1, I would remove the tired "matter of considerable social issue." You can see more examples of tired old phrases and generic sentences here and here.
Actually, this phrase I learned from the book "Successful Writing Proficiency" by Virginia Evans. Do you know that book and do you think the phrases in that book are too old for using?
No, I hadn't heard of that book, but I found it on Scribd!
And there's a very real danger that if every one follows her advice and starts their essay by saying that "X is a highly controversial issue" that IELTS examiners worldwide will immediately run screaming to the nearest bridge and jump off.
I admire what you have done and the work you are putting in. But the suggestions in Virginia Evan's book are suggestions and crutches, and you can dispense with them after you have learned them. You don't need to use them forever! Some of the phrases in the essays are great, and some are tired. Which ones? It's hard to say - the language is constantly changing. I'd say go ahead and use them, but don't over-rely on them. And don't feel you MUST insert them into your IELTS essays. If you have a simple, correct phrase of your own that does the same job - use it!


Note: This document contains side effect information about dextromethorphan / guaifenesin / pseudoephedrine. Some of the dosage forms listed on this page may not apply to the brand name Despec DM.
1. "Product Information. Pecgen PSE (dextromethorphan / guaifenesin / pseudoephedrine)." KramerNovis, San Juan, PR.


text:
Wspólnota administracyjna Hemsbach – wspólnota administracyjna w Niemczech, w kraju związkowym Badenia-Wirtembergia, w rejencji Karlsruhe, w regionie Rhein-Neckar, w powiecie Rhein-Neckar-Kreis. Siedziba wspólnoty znajduje się w mieście Hemsbach, przewodniczącym jej jest Volker Pauli.

Wspólnota administracyjna zrzesza jedno miasto i jedną gminę wiejską:
 Hemsbach, miasto, 12 290 mieszkańców, 12,86 km²
 Laudenbach, 6051 mieszkańców, 10,29 km²

Hemsbach
Powiat Rhein-Neckar

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Episode for December 15, 2022
Episode 742: The Indomitable Virginia Heffernan
Sorry today's show was posted late but it is definitely worth listening to because Virginia Heffernan is always worth listening to.
Virginia Heffernan is a journalist, critic and author, most recently, of MAGIC AND LOSS: The Internet as Art (Simon & Schuster, 2016). She is a contributing editor at WIRED, a cohost of Slate's Trumpcast podcast, and a columnist at the Los Angeles Times.
Heffernan has been called "America's preeminent cultural critic," "a public intellectual for the 21st century," and among the "finest living writers of English prose." Edward Mendelson in The New York Review of Books called MAGIC AND LOSS, "surprisingly moving…an ecstatic narrative of submission." Kevin Kelly, the co-founder of WIRED, writes, "Heffernan is a new species of wizard. It is a joy and a revelation to be under her spell."
Follow her on twitter and subscribe to her Substack

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


You are here: Home / SharePoint / SharePoint Thing a Day – 047 – Building Intranets – Sponsorship, Training and Governance.
SharePoint Thing a Day – 047 – Building Intranets – Sponsorship, Training and Governance.
#1: Get sponsorship 'Build it and they will come' rarely works as a strategy for designing an Intranet.
Intranet projects just led by IT run the significant risk of damaging user adoption.
User adoption increases when IT has a mandate from senior management.
User training can take many forms, and you need to customise it to your audience and the culture in your organisation.
Email communications, how-to guides, group presentations, learning videos and one-on-one sessions all help.
Define the vision and rationale for the Intranet. Document how to use it, where things should go, how to secure content.
Define the information types, the features and the processes the Intranet will be a home to.
Be prescriptive in your guidance, but accommodate exceptions with escalation procedures.


text:
Nathanael Coffing
Cloudentity
Ryan Wilk
NuData Security
DCI Jason Tunn
Metropolitan Police Service London
Jeffrey Dant
Incident & Breach Response , Security Operations
Panel: Data Breach Outlook: Tracking the Next, Seemingly Inevitable Attack
Presented by San Francisco Summit 2016
It's a boom time for cybercrime and cyber-espionage, aided by at least two factors. First, many organizations' websites and databases sport well-known technical weaknesses, while employees remain all to susceptible to low-cost social-engineering attacks. Second, attackers can pummel these technical and human targets using an array of free or low-cost tools and services, until they can successfully access and steal what they're targeting.
Join this panel session as we discuss the surge in data breaches, low-tech and high-tech attacks, and how we must adapt our defenses accordingly. Our panelists will share real-world insights into not only defense, but understanding the attacker mindset. The discussion will include:
What is the scale and scope of today's targeted attacks and data breaches?
Who exactly is executing these attacks and what factors " including financial gain, stealing intellectual property, causing chaos " motivate them?
What types of valuable data and/or critical infrastructure are being targeted?
Which parts of the organization - website flaws, APIs, mobile devices " are most vulnerable?
What is the optimum way to deploy resources to defend against breaches?
What related, up-and-coming threats should enterprises beware?
Additional Summit Insight:
Hear from more industry influencers, earn CPE credits, and network with leaders of technology at our global events. Learn more at our Fraud & Breach Prevention Events site.
Premium Members Only
OnDemand access to this webinar is restricted to Premium Members.
Join Now to Access
Cybersecurity Firm McAfee Preps for Public Market Return
Defending Against Application Breaches
Delivering Intelligent Authentication
Malcolm Harkins
Global CISO, Cylance
Christopher Pierson
Chief Security Officer and General Counsel, Viewpost
Matthew Rosenquist
Cyber Security Strategist, Intel Corporation
Dominique Shelton
Partner, Alston & Bird LLP
Live Webinar | Latest Business Email Compromise Scams - Don't Be the Next Victim
Webinar | How to Enforce Threat Intelligence at Your Perimeter
Revealing the Dark Web: How to Leverage Technologies to Alert and Block Dark Web Access
OnDemand Webinar | Reduce the Privileged Account Attack Surface
View More Webinars
Harkins is responsible for all aspects of information risk and security at Cylance as well as public policy and customer outreach to help improve understanding of cyber risks. He spent 23 years with Intel, most recently as its first Chief Security and Privacy Officer. In this role, he was responsible for managing the risk, controls, privacy, security and other related compliance activities for all of Intel's information assets, products and services. Before becoming Intel's first CSPO, he was the chief information security officer (CISO), reporting to the chief information officer. Harkins also held roles in finance, procurement and various business operations.
A strategic business & technology leader, recognized cybersecurity expert, and creator of new technology, Pierson blends cybersecurity, privacy, and risk with his passion for building operational teams driven to execute and deliver - at both startups and large global companies. He has 20 years of experience building companies and cybersecurity programs - specializing in operations, design and architecture, data breach response, security ops, financial crime/fraud ops, and intelligence/national security. He has served in general counsel and compliance capacities working closely with Boards on corporate matters and strategic business opportunities. Pierson has a proven track record of success and has been awarded Best CSO from FireEye, CSO50 in 2015 & 2016, and is a Distinguished Fellow of the Ponemon Institute. Pierson also serves on the Department of Homeland Security Data Privacy & Integrity Advisory Committee and Cybersecurity Subcommittee. Pierson is a frequent keynote speaker on cybersecurity and is regularly quoted by the media.
Rosenquist joined Intel Corp in 1996 and benefits from nearly 20 years in the field of security. Rosenquist specializes in security strategy, measuring value, and developing cost effective capabilities which deliver the optimal level of security. Currently, a cyber-security strategist for the Intel Security Group, he helped in the formation of this global organization which brings together security across hardware, firmware, software and services. Previously, he managed the security playbook for Intel's PC strategy planning group, encompassing all security features landing in the PC.
Shelton is a litigation partner in Alston & Bird's Los Angeles office. She focuses her practice on complex commercial litigation, with particular attention to privacy litigation, intellectual property, unfair competition and antitrust matters. She also provides strategic digital marketing and privacy compliance counseling on cutting edge issues, such as mobile apps, the Video Privacy Protection Act, Big Data and behavioral advertising. In 2012, she was named Intellectual Property Lawyer of the Year by the Century City Bar Association. In 2014, Shelton was named one of the Most Influential Lawyers: Digital Media and E-Commerce Law by the Los Angeles Business Journal. In 2014, The Recorder named her as a Leader in Technology Law. She has litigated matters involving state and federal laws, such as the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Telephone Consumer Protection Act, Federal Trade Commission Act, Electronic Communications Privacy Act, Computer Fraud & Abuse Act, California False Advertising Law and California Unfair Competition Law. She has negotiated with the California AG and FTC.


text:
Преісторія, також Доісторія,  Доісторичні часи — початковий етап історії людства, історія первісного суспільства, дописемна історія, історія первісного суспільства.

Короткий опис
Преісторія розглядається найчастіше як період історії людства між використанням перших кам'яних інструментів гомінінами 3.3 мільйони років тому та винаходом системи письма. Але на відміну від доісторії в рамках преісторії розглядаються події не пов'язані з людиною, наприклад, геологічна історія та основні етапи формування планети Земля. Теорія великого вибуху. Теорія руху літосферних плит. Основні сфери земної кулі.  Кріосфера.  Основні характеристики кліматичних умов плейстоцену та голоцену. Фауна та флора плейстоцену та голоцену.

Преісторія як науковий напрямок, окрема дисципліна виникає другій половині ХІХ ст. Її становлення завдячує працям Д. Вільсона, Д. Лаббока, Ч. Лайеля, С. Нільсона, Е. Тайлора, Л. Моргана, К. Томсена, Й. Ворсо, Г. Мортільє, О. Монтеліуса. Джерелами преісторії археологія, палеогеографія, геоархеологія, палеоантропологія, археозоологія, етнографія, лінгвістика.

Дописемна історія охоплює палеоліт, мезоліт, неоліт, халколіт, бронзовий вік.

Преісторія переходить до протоісторії.

Див. також
 первісне суспільство

Література
 Словник-довідник з археології. К, Наукова Думка, 1996.
 Україна: хронологія розвитку з давніх часів до пізньої античності. Том 1. — К.: КВІЦ, 2007.
 Станко В. Н., Гладких М. І., Сегеда С. П. Історія первісного суспільства. — К.: Либідь. — 1999.
 Вишняцкий Л. Б. Введение в преисторию. Проблемы антропогенеза и становления культуры. Курс лекций. 2 изд. Кишинев: Высшая антропологическая школа, 2005.
 История человечества. Том I. Доисторические времена и начала цивилизации / ЮНЕСКО, под. Ред. З. Я. Де Лаат. Издательский Дом Магистр-Пресс, 2003.
 Леббок Дж. Начало цивилизации и первобытное состояние человека: Умственное и общественное состояние дикарей / Пер. с англ. 2-е изд., испр. М., 2011.
 Daniel, Glyn Edmund, and Colin Renfrew. The Idea of Prehistory. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1988
 Hermann Parzinger: Vor- und Frühgeschichte. In: Hans-Joachim Gehrke (Hrsg.): Die Welt vor 600. Frühe Zivilisationen (Geschichte der Welt, Band 1). C. H. Beck, München 2017, ISBN 978-3406641015, S. 42–262
 Hermann Parzinger: Die Kinder des Prometheus. Eine Geschichte der Menschheit vor der Erfindung der Schrift. 5., durchgesehene Auflage. C. H. Beck, München 2016, ISBN 978-3-406-66657-5
Hans Jürgen Eggers: Einführung in die Vorgeschichte. Neu herausgegeben von Christof Krauskopf. Mit einem Nachwort von Claudia Theune. 6. Auflage, scrîpvaz, Schöneiche bei Berlin 2010, ISBN 978-3-942836-17-3. Mit einem Verzeichnis der Schriften von Hans Jürgen Eggers.

Примітки

Посилання
 North Pacific Prehistory

Надпопулярні статті
Соціологія


Blog Post - Once Saved, Always Saved?
Listen to a discussion about eternal security and you'll eventually hear this question: "Are you saying that since we're secure as Christians, we can do whatever we want to?" It's the "once saved, always saved" idea that says, once you are saved, you're saved no matter how you may behave.
But the question really misunderstands the biblical teaching about our sin and God's grace in our lives.
Christians have struggled over the years with the best way to deal with sin in their lives. That struggle has produced unbiblical doctrines that promise to "aid" Christians along with their own endeavors to obtain personal godliness.
I have met a few perfectionists in the past. What I have noticed about their teaching is how they relegate sinfulness to only outward behaviors. One perfectionist I spoke with believed as long as he never physically committed adultery, he wasn't in sin. Thinking about adultery didn't count as being sinful in his book. I reminded him of Matthew 5:27-28—looking upon a woman to lust is adultery—but he cleverly dismissed the passage as irrelevant.
I quickly discovered similar groups of Christians like the perfectionists. Rather than "dumbing" sin down, they submitted themselves to outward, legalistic codes to obtain godliness. If they failed to keep those codes perfectly, they believed their salvation was in jeopardy.
These errant views of holiness spring from a misunderstanding of the biblical teaching on sanctification.
Sanctification is a process by which the Holy Spirit works in believers to gradually move them toward Christlikeness (2 Corinthians 3:18). Take note of the word gradually in this definition: The Holy Spirit is gradually moving us toward Christlikeness; it is not an instantaneous work that makes us perfectly sinless. In Christian theology, the idea of the Holy Spirit gradually moving us to Christlikeness is called progressive sanctification. Our godliness is progressive, over a life-time of following Jesus.
The apostle Paul provides a concise description of our sanctification in Romans 6. He does not specifically use the word sanctification in this chapter, but he certainly outlines the concept.
There are a handful of thoughts we can glean from Romans 6 that help us understand the doctrine of sanctification and answer our question, "Does being a Christian mean we can live anyway we want?" Let's open our Bibles and look at a few theological points.
First, notice in verses 4 and 5 how Paul describes our relationship with Jesus as identified with His death and "made alive" in His resurrection. That is a reference to our regeneration we discussed in my previous article. God's divine handiwork imparts a principle of new life in our lives.
Second, in verses 6 and 7, Paul is saying that we now have the power to obey God – a power we never had apart from Christ. Paul writes we have our "body of sin done away with." The original word in that phrase can have the idea of made inoperative or rendered powerless.
When we were apart from Christ, we had neither a desire nor a willingness to obey God. We were "slaves to sin," as it says in Romans 6:20. The effort we put forth to be righteous ultimately ended in failure because of our enslavement to sin's power. Now that we are identified with Christ, sin's power no longer holds dominion over us. We can now pursue righteousness!
Third, we are never made perfectly sinless, but we do gradually grow in righteousness with a daily life of obedience. In this respect, we put forth cooperative effort with the Spirit, but our cooperation flows out of a changed heart with new desires to obey God.
Paul exhorts us to godly obedience by telling us to present the members of our body as instruments of righteousness (Romans 6:13). His words speak to our whole person both inwardly and outwardly – our thought life, emotions and attitude, as well as our behavior when we interact with the world. For example, we turn our thought life to dwelling upon the Lord, our hands to serving God and others, and our lips to praising God and edifying His people.
Now, does this mean we automatically know how to think and act in a godly way in everything? No. We still carry a lot of baggage from our lives before Christ, and the worse we lived as sinners, the more baggage we will need to unpack. That's why our sanctification is progressive. In Romans 12:2, Titus 3:5, and Colossians 3:10, the Bible describes that work as our renewing process – our spiritual renovation retraining our minds to think like Christians.
So is Paul saying in Romans 6 that if we are saved, we can live anyway we want? The "once saved, always saved" idea? If you look closely at Romans 6:1, Paul is in fact answering that very objection. Do we continue in sin so grace may abound? In other words, "Paul, are you saying since we are saved, we are always secure, no matter what we do?" Paul answers emphatically, No!
His entire argument rests on the fact that our salvation begins and ends with God. He saves us, and then He sanctifies us.
I can imagine someone at this point thinking, "But I struggle a lot with sin." John MacArthur has an expression I have heard him say often, "Godliness may not be the perfection of your life, but it is the direction of your life." Our battle with sin will be a lifelong endeavor.


text:
SNJM Congregation
Congregation History
Ontario History
Oregon History
Washington History
Locate a Sister
Meet Our Sisters
Corporate Stands
Our Blog: Holy Names Voices
Cash Contribution
The Marie Rose Legacy Society
Plan Now for an Impact Later
Contact SNJM Development
SNJM Login
Meet Some of Our Sisters
Maria Faina, SNJM
Carol Higgins, SNJM
Anna Keim, SNJM
Lois MacGillivray, SNJM
Terry Mullen, SNJM
Helen Petrimoulx, SNJM
Janet Walton, SNJM
You are here:|
Meet Our Sisters|
Meet Janet Walton, SNJM|
Meet Janet Walton, SNJM
Professor of Worship, Union Theological Seminary, NYC
For me, making the decision to join the SNJM community—and staying here for over 50 years, is all about making 'connections.'
My connection with the community started at school. I attended SNJM schools from grades 1-12. I loved the environment and enjoyed the experience. Sr. Annette Covatta, SNJM at Academy of the Holy Names, Albany was a significant influence on my life – she taught me piano and encouraged me to develop my talents. She connected me with competitions in the city that I entered and won. Her ability to be in the community and be a concert pianist influenced my decision to become a Sister of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary.
My connection to the community is driven by deep friendships —and my commitment to social justice. The community helps me live as justly as I can in this world, and makes it possible for me to become involved in important world issues. That's why, for example, I participate in the Congregational Justice and Peace Committee. The committee makes recommendations about how we can become involved in actions intended to create a more just world. To date, the committee has focused on the Congregation's corporate stands: anti-trafficking and water as a basic human right. We are currently developing a recommendation around immigration issues.
'For Sisters of the Holy Names, teaching is about more than running good schools—it's also about training students to be good citizens of the world.'
I am a grad school teacher, but I also work on the streets and on the margins of society. My students at Union Theological Seminary started a program in the 1980s called Bridges, which connected the wealthy population of Summit, NJ, with the homeless population of New York City. I went out with them on this work. Our goal was not just to bring food and clothes, but to get to know them as human beings. The people who live in boxes are my teachers, too.
My work as a professor is to train future pastors and teachers through PhD and Master's programs. I want them to know from the inside out what worship is, what it can be, and how it relates to day-to-day life.
My research explores the margins of communities: artists involved in worship, feminist approaches to worship that promote the full dignity of all people, with a particular emphasis on women's experiences that are rarely mentioned in churches such as sexual abuse, cancer, mental illness, food addictions as well as images of God that connect with women's lives. In the 1980s I started the Women's Liturgy Group (NY) for women to have a place in the church and design rituals around their participation. My current research is around worship without domination, to allow all voices of a congregation to be honored.
I am very grateful that the SNJM community has been willing to explore liturgies so that they more honestly elicit and honor our experiences as Catholic women.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 398, Marylhurst, OR 97036 | Email: info@snjmuson.org | Phone: (503) 675-7100
© 2018. All Rights Reserved. Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary, U.S.-Ontario Province.


text:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">

<title>Uses of Class org.deidentifier.arx.ARXLogisticRegressionConfiguration.PriorFunction (ARX GUI Documentation)</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../../../../stylesheet.css" title="Style">

JavaScript is disabled on your browser.

Overview

Package

Class

Use

Tree

Deprecated

Index

Help

Prev

Next

Frames

No Frames

All Classes

Uses of Class
org.deidentifier.arx.ARXLogisticRegressionConfiguration.PriorFunction

Packages that use ARXLogisticRegressionConfiguration.PriorFunction

Package
Description

org.deidentifier.arx

This package provides the public API for the ARX anonymization framework.

org.deidentifier.arx.gui.model

Uses of ARXLogisticRegressionConfiguration.PriorFunction in org.deidentifier.arx

Methods in org.deidentifier.arx that return ARXLogisticRegressionConfiguration.PriorFunction

Modifier and Type
Method and Description

ARXLogisticRegressionConfiguration.PriorFunction
ARXLogisticRegressionConfiguration.getPriorFunction()

static ARXLogisticRegressionConfiguration.PriorFunction
ARXLogisticRegressionConfiguration.PriorFunction.valueOf(java.lang.String name)

Returns the enum constant of this type with the specified name.

static ARXLogisticRegressionConfiguration.PriorFunction[]
ARXLogisticRegressionConfiguration.PriorFunction.values()

Returns an array containing the constants of this enum type, in
the order they are declared.

Methods in org.deidentifier.arx with parameters of type ARXLogisticRegressionConfiguration.PriorFunction

Modifier and Type
Method and Description

ARXLogisticRegressionConfiguration
ARXLogisticRegressionConfiguration.setPriorFunction(ARXLogisticRegressionConfiguration.PriorFunction priorFunction)

Uses of ARXLogisticRegressionConfiguration.PriorFunction in org.deidentifier.arx.gui.model

Methods in org.deidentifier.arx.gui.model that return ARXLogisticRegressionConfiguration.PriorFunction

Modifier and Type
Method and Description

ARXLogisticRegressionConfiguration.PriorFunction
ModelClassification.getPriorFunction()

Methods in org.deidentifier.arx.gui.model with parameters of type ARXLogisticRegressionConfiguration.PriorFunction

Modifier and Type
Method and Description

void
ModelClassification.setPriorFunction(ARXLogisticRegressionConfiguration.PriorFunction priorFunction)

Overview

Package

Class

Use

Tree

Deprecated

Index

Help

Prev

Next

Frames

No Frames

All Classes

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


Did you know that Dodge Dealer Pittsburgh has become the most popular topics in this category? Thats why we're showing this content at the moment. We got this image on the internet we believe would be one of the most representative photos for Dodge Dealer Pittsburgh.
We all know every one's viewpoint will be different from each other. Likewise to this image, in our view, this is one of the greatest photo, and now what's your opinion?
Dodge Dealer Pittsburgh - is a free Complete Home Decoration Ideas Gallery posted at . This Dodge Dealer Pittsburgh was posted in hope that we can give you an inspiration to Remodel your Home. This article can be your reference when you are confused to choose the right decoration for your home. This Dodge Dealer Pittsburgh This maybe your best option to decor , because having a home with our own design is everyone's dream.
We hope that , by posting this Dodge Dealer Pittsburgh ideas , we can fulfill your needs of inspiration for designing your home. If you need more ideas to Design a Home , you can check at our collection right below this post. Also , don't forget to always visit Polypwn.com to find some new and fresh posts about Kitchen Remodeling , Bathroom Remodel , Bedroom Theme Ideas , Living Room Style and other Home Design Inspiration everyday.


Fast food restaurants like Mc Donald's effectuate millions of people in additional than 100 countries apiece day. express food is very popular, especially among teenagers. Nevertheless, is such that content healthy or should we forbid it?
Every day the world thriftiness becomes additional and more than global. many an municipal companies have already tangle on themselves negative consequences of this process: the competition amplifies, risks become many more various including from the point of view of consequences, requirements to skills and knowledge of the personnel perpetually grow. However to consider the international dimension of a business activity it would be single through a polyhedron of unfavourable events incorrectly. New conditions of business treatment is first of all new possibilities.
A depository financial instituti is a company that works with the currency that the grouping elasticity it. If you give your money to a bank, it not simply protects it but pays you power so that it can work with the money. This is one of the reasons why people relieve their monetary system in a bank. Banks also bring money to other businesses and customers.


This TV Magnifier is designed specifically for low vision patients and is a powerful, portable, hand-held digital reading aid. The size of a computer mouse it directly connects to any TV/monitor video input in seconds, so you can easily read a newspaper, magazine, recipe cards and labels. This model is wireless meaning the actual "mouse" is not attached to any wires and can be used up to 10 metres of the monitor. Charged on a base unit like a cordless phone.
Magnifiers NZ offer a 10 day right of return so that you can test in your home environment.