text:
Classic in the Country Challenge previews
KEVIN LYNCH Staff Writer
The Berlin Resort Classic in the Country Challenge XIV Powered by Under Armour is set for Martin Luther King Jr. weekend at Hiland High School.
Following are brief previews of the 28 teams playing 20 games over three days at The Perry Reese Jr. Community Center at Hiland High School during the Martin Luther King Jr. Holiday weekend, Saturday, Sunday and Monday, Jan. 14, 15 and 16.
Ohio Girls Basketball Report Scouting and Associate Director Bryce McKey shared his insight of the teams, along with indicating players who are nationally ranked among the top 100 of each class by Dan Olson's Collegiate Girls Basketball Report/ESPN W (CGBR). There will be 10 of the nation's top 100 seniors, 22 juniors, 13 sophomores and five freshmen playing this year in the Classic, as well as some diamonds in the rough waiting to be discovered by the more than 100 college coaches that attend this annual event.
Of the 28 teams playing this year, there are two teams from Holmes County (host Hiland and West Holmes) and three Wayne County teams (Orrville, Chippewa and Tuslaw), along with two teams from out-of-state (Homestead, Ind., and St. Rose from Belmar, N.J.). Three of the four reigning state champions will be playing in the Classic as well as several of the best teams vying for the top spots in all four divisions.
Tickets to see some of Ohio's best girls basketball players all in one place are available at the gate or in advance for $10 for a one-day pass or $25 for a three-day pass. For more information, check out the website at www.classicinthecountry.org.
SCHEDULE OF GAMES FOR SATURDAY, JANUARY 14
Game 1 10 a.m. New Madison Tri-Village vs Orrville
New Madison Tri-Village Patriots
The Patriots are a guard-oriented team who are led by a returning First-Team All-Ohioan. Allie Downing has signed to play at Belmont Abbey, A D- II college in North Carolina. While Downing does most of the damage offensively for the Patriots, Coach Brad Gray has a couple other options to turn to for scoring assistance. Danika Mann and Rachel Miller are also returning starters, along with sophomore Emma Printz. Tri-Village typically has a lot of size, but this is one of their smaller squads. "They are a very guard-oriented team," says Brice McKey, associate director of Ohio Girls Basketball Report (OGBR). "Tri-Village is one of the top D-IV teams out of the Dayton area. Once they get up north on I-75, they meet up with the Minster's and Fort Loramie's of the world, where the competition gets a little tougher."
Orrville Red Riders
The Red Riders are young with some sterling sophomores leading the way for veteran coach Mark Alberts. 6-foot Mikaela Carpenter and 5-4 point guard Mariah Goodard are a potent pair of top Ohio players in the outstanding sophomore class. Carpenter is the daughter of a former Ohio State Buckeye and Orrville alum, Stacey Howard. A promising future is in store for the Red Riders if Carpernter plays anywhere near the level her mother did. Other promising newcomers for the Riders include Shadra Hamsher and Sierra Kauf. The Riders are quick and explosive and are a solid rebounding team, but lack an experienced scorer. Ball-handling has been an Achilles heel early on this season as they rebuild from losing five lettermen to graduation from last year's 23-win team. Alberts' daughter Marcie is a college assistant coach (IPFW) who enjoys the opportunity to return home to recruit Ohio talent.
Game 2 11:40 a.m. Doylestown Chippewa vs West Holmes
Doylestown Chippewa Chipps
Future Hall of Fame coach Denny Schrock didn't win all these games by mistake. Despite losing a trio of starters from last year's state semifinalists, the Chipps have a pair of returning starters and five experienced players back. Taylor Richards is one returning starter from last year's state qualifiers. The 6-foot forward is a nationally ranked player (No. 86, CGBR) who will be taking her talents to Valparaiso next year. Senior guards Lexi Karovic and Allison Barnes add firepower to the Chippewa lineup, while junior post Josie Robinson and sophomore forward Bailey Clark are expected to make an impact. The Chipps like to shoot it from long range and they have plenty of players willing to take the shots. Schrock says having a pair of returning leaders helps groom the younger players to know what is expected of them.
West Holmes Lady Knights
While the names have changed, the expectations and the defensive style will make the Knights one of the top contenders in Div. II again this year. Coach Lisa Ogi may not have the Snyder sisters or Molnars to turn to, but 5-10 senior Samantha Hall is a solid post player who can score down low, with help from junior Kaylee Evans, while seniors Kacie Leppla and her twin sister Kylie will be looked to for leadership and toughness. Ogi has not had a chance to determine which of her younger players will step up to add depth, and West Holmes is not real big, with nobody over 5-10, so they will rely on their defensive toughness and rebounding to keep them competitive.
Game 3 1:20 p.m.Wadsworth vs Cincinnati Glen Este
Wadsworth Grizzlies
The defending state champions are a shell of the team that stunned Div. I last year to take the state title, but rest assured venerable coach Andy Booth will have his troops playing solid defense and keeping games close while they try to find their niche this season. The Grizzlies were decimated by graduation and injuries and Booth has spent the early part of this season trying to figure out the different roles for the many new faces on the floor. Nationally ranked junior Lexi Lance, (No. 42, CGBR) leads the way for Wadsworth, while another nationally ranked junior, Sophia Fortner (No. 63, CGBR) is out for the year with an ACL injury. Fortner and Lance have both signed to play at Toledo. Peyton Banks, a 5-11 junior has also stepped up and made the most of her playing time. They are going to need plenty of production from Lance and Banks if the Grizzlies are going to go anywhere this year.
Glen Este Trojans
Jeff Click had so much fun showcasing his talented young team last year at the Classic, he has returned for more fun this year. The Trojans have a pair of nationally ranked juniors, led by 6-1 power forward Alexis Starks (No. 16, CGBR). "She puts the power in power forward," OGBR scout Bryce McKey says of the daughter of former University of Cincinnati star Keith Starks. Classmate Jasmine Hale (No. 53, CGBR) is another outstanding player who can shoot it, and use her athleticism to get to the basket. Hale's father played at Florida State. Sophomore Kiersten Click, the coach's daughter is a combo guard who is ranked among the top sophomore players in Ohio. Glen Este will be combining with Amelia High School after this year to create West Clermot High School, one of the larger public high schools in the state. Click hopes to send the school out with a bang.
Game 4 3 p.m. Pickerington Central vs Cincinnati Mount Notre Dame
Pickerington Central Tigers
Coach Johnathan Hedgepath features a squad that could start five D-I prospects. Madison Greene is a sophomore point guard rated among the 20 best sophomores in the country, according to CGBR. Greene is currently ranked No. 17. Not only can she run the offense, but she can shoot it. Another super sophomore, 6-foot power forward Maliyah Perry is rated No. 17 by CGBR. Freshman guard Nicole Stephens already has an offer from Dayton. She is ranked No. 56 by CGBR. Stephens is another really good shooter. Inside, the Tigers turn to 6-3 post player Bexley Wallace, who teams with 6-1 Kyla Whitehead to give Pickerington Central an impressive defensive front.Wallace is rated No. 24 among junior posts, while Whitehead is No. 37. That kind of size and skill is quite a luxury for a high school squad. "If there was one roster I could pick to coach, this would be the one," says OGBR associate director Bryce McKey. "They have so much balance and talent at every position.
Mount Notre Dame Cougars
Dr. Scott Rogers has his best squad since returning to the sidelines at MNDC. A pair of talented sophomores lead the way for the Cougars. Nationally ranked point guard Gabbie Marshall (No. 31, CGBR) is also one of the premier perimeter shooters in her class. 6-foot Julia Hoefling (No. 40, CGBR) is the other highly touted sophomore. Hoefling uses her outstanding footwork inside to create shots and corral rebounds, while Marshall is a hot shot from long range. Freshman Makira Cook is one of theTop 10 freshmen guards in the country (No. 10, CGBR), which enables Marshall to play more on the wing, looking for a long shot. Both players share duties bringing the ball up the court. Senior Abby Voss provides power on the low post for the Cougars, who like to push the tempo. Voss will play a big role in the matchup against Pickerington Central's interior size.
Game 5 4:40 p.m. Reynoldsburg vs North Canton Hoover
Reynoldsburg Raiders
Veteran coach Jack Purtell has his Raiders ready for another run at the top spot in D-I. Reynoldsburg features a pair of nationally ranked juniors in 5-8 point guard Adrian Crockwell (No. 21, CGBR) and 6-3 Jaylynda Salley on the post. Salley is ranked No. 87 by CGBR. She gives the Raiders a big post presence inside. Nationally ranked sophomore small forward Uju Ezeudu (No. 77, CGBR) gives the Raiders depth and size on the post. Senior guard Makenzie Davis is playing really well and starting to attract some attention. Freshman guard Malaysia Miller is being primed to take over for Crockwell and senior Brooklyn Pannell. The Raiders were in the Final Four last year, and with all the depth and talent, it would not be a surprise to see them battling to get back there again this year.
North Canton Hoover Vikings
A pair of nationally ranked players, senior point guard Maddie Blyer and sophomore Annie Roshak provide the one-two punch for the Vikings of coach Abbey Allerding. Roshak (No. 86, CGBR) is a wing player who can flat out shoot it or take it strong to the hole. She poured in 29 against a tough Federal League foe and continues to improve every time she takes the floor. Blyer (No. 93, CGBR) has signed to play at Ashland next year, turning down offers from D-I schools to play closer to home. Makenna Drabick, a junior who committed to Eastern Michigan, is another offensive weapon for the explosive Vikings. The Green sisters, Alexis and Makenzie will also make an impact for Hoover, who hopes to contend with Solon and McKinley as the class of the Northeast Region this year. "The Vikings will go as far as Blyer and Roshak take them," OGBR's McKey said. Allerding makes coaching a family affair, as her brother and father work as her assistants.
Game 6 6:20 p.m. Homestead (Ind.) vs Mason
Homestead Spartans (Fort Wayne, Indiana)
Coach Rod Parker brings the returning regional champion Spartans to Hiland for their first visit to Classic in the Country Challenge. The Spartans were ranked 14th nationally to start the season in the USA Today Super 25. Parker, in his 16th year as coach of the Lady Spartans, Parker has the joy of watching his daughters, seniors Madisen and Karen Parker lead the way for the squad. Madisen teams with classmate Karissa McLaughlin to form a potent one-two scoring punch. McLaughlin is headed to Florida to play for the Gators next year. Karen Parker runs the offense for the Spartans, who look to 5-11 senior post Jazmyne Geist and Teryn Kline to provide an inside presence. The Spartans are a smaller school that fares well against the bigger schools in the Hoosier state. They were rated No. 1 in the state of Indiana after opening the season with six impressive wins. They will match up against D-I powerhouse Mason in their lone appearance at Classic in the Country.
Mason Comets
Solid coaching mixed with experience, athleticism, size and skill, make Mason a formidable foe. Rob Matula's crew can run with anybody, while possessing the people inside to hang and bang. Leading the way for the undefeated Comets is nationally ranked sophomore slasher Sammie Puisis (No. 5, CGBR), who is probably the reason the Comets are playing as well as they are right now. The 6-2 do-everything guard can go inside or out to provide offensive pop, while senior forward Samari Mowbray (No. 36, CGBR) is another outstanding player who can make things happen inside or out. Mowbray is headed to Miami of Ohio next year. Junior forward Tihanna Fulton (No. 73, CGBR) has already come up with a game-winning shot in an early season big time win over Lakota West. Puisis has earned offers from every major program except Notre Dame and U-Conn and by the time she's done, she will get to choose where she wants to go to play at the next level. Megan Wagner is a freshman point guard running the show for the young and talented Comets. Mason and Wayne are the favorites to get out of the tough Southwest Region, along with Lakota West. Whichever of those three teams still standing at the end will probably be the favorite to win it all in D-I.
Game 7 8 p.m. Columbus Africentric vs Berlin Hiland
Africentric Nubians
Coach Will McKinney continues to wow them in Columbus with his traditionally tough teams. This year's squad is possibly the best team overall in any division in the state, according to Ohio Girls Basketball Report Associate Director Bryce McKey. The Nubians feature five D-I prospects, led by a pair of nationally ranked seniors in 5-11 small forward Kennedy Azubike, (No. 91, Dan Olson's Collegiate Girls Basketball Report/ESPN W) and 5-10 guard De'jae Denham (No. 97, CGBR). Azubike, who will play at the University of Akron next year, is the heart and soul of McKinney's team. Denham has signed to play at Ohio University. The Nubians also sport 5-5 senior guard Chyna Chambers, heading to Rio Grande University next year alongside 5-10 Amari Grace who will play at West Virginian St., and 5-8 Leah Morrow, who is headed to St.Francis (Pa). The Nubians make the most of their athleticism, but lack height. Another nationally ranked player, Jordan Horston (No. 24, CGBR) is a 6-1 sophomore point guard who can drive, shoot and drive opponents crazy. She is the niece of North Carolina assistant coach Sylvia Crowley.
Hiland Hawks
With a pair of nationally ranked players leading the way, the Hawks of veteran coach Dave Schlabach are playing with a chip on their shoulder, aiming to erase the taste of a dismal shooting performance in the regionals last season. Kennedy Schlabach (No. 71, CGBR) and Morgan McMillen (No. 79, CGBR) give the Hawks an explosive one-two combination from inside and out. Schlabach, the coach's daughter, is a sharpshooter from long range, while the 5-8 McMillen can fill it up from long range, but prefers to do her damage inside. Smooth and strong are qualities that assess McMillen's inside prowess. Senior Angela Troyer, who has signed to play at Ohio Dominican, provides another long-range threat, while 6-foot sophomore Tiffany Weaver adds depth on the interior for the Hawks. Hiland uses the tough tests of Africentric and Gilmour Academy in the Classic to prepare them for the grueling trek along the tournament trail and a shot at washing that bad taste out of their mouth from last year's disappointing finish.
SCHEDULE OF GAMES FOR SUNDAY, JANUARY 15
Game 8 Noon, West Branch vs Waterford
West Branch Warriors
The Warriors are a team that never had much size, but are learning to play with a dominant post player. Junior post, 6-3 Natalie Zuchowski is a nationally ranked player around whom the Warriors will build their team. Zuchowski, ranked No. 79 by CGBR, is a force inside for longtime coach Walt Deshields. Zuchowski is an anchor post. "She runs well for her size, has good hands and scores," says Bryce McKey of OGBR. "They have been a guard-oriented team, but are learning to run their offense through the post." Her father played at Malone with Hiland coach Dave Schlabach and Wadsworth coach Andy Booth. Her running mate on the post is 6-2 classmate Shannon Wolffe. Brenna Rito is a senior point guard who runs the offense.
Waterford Wildcats
The Wildcats are coming off a championship season for veteran coach Jerry Close. The Wildcats don't typically have a lot of size, but play very well together. They are a very good, fundamentally sound, well-coached team, according to OGBR's Bryce McKey. Megan Ball and Alli Kern are the top two players back from last year's D-IV state champion squad. Ball, a 5-11 junior post, is an OGBR top rated player, who provides leadership and toughness. Kern, also a junior, is another solid player both inside and out. Senior Jillian McCutcheon is the team captain who provides some pop from the outside for the Wildcats. Junior point guard Hannah Duff runs the show for Close's offense, and her twin sister Haley is another shooting threat from the perimeter.
Game 9 1:40 p.m. Cincinnati Glen Este vs Toledo Whitmer
Previously previewed
Whitmer Panthers
The Panthers were Regional finalists last year and are hoping to take it a step further this year. Leading the way for new coach Brandon Bosch is Valparaiso-bound post Bryce Blood, a 6-3 true post player. She is strictly an inside post player, according to OGBR's Bryce McKey. Miranda Green is a senior point guard who is also a solid shooter from the perimeter. Junior Maddie Brown is another outstanding shooter for the Panthers. Whitmer has a nice attack with Blood inside and four guards working around her on the perimeter, McKey said. Freshman Regan Blood is the younger sister of Bryce, and is expected to see a lot of action. Last year's trip to the Regional finals where they fell to eventual state champion Wadsworth was the best year Whitmer has enjoyed in recent history. The question is, were they a one-hit wonder or have they arrived. They have to go through perennial power Toledo Notre Dame to prove their worth.
Game 10 3:20 p.m. St Rose (NJ) vs West Chester Lakota West
St. Rose Purple Roses (Belmar, NJ)
The Purple Roses are nationally ranked, sitting at 11th in the country in the Max Preps Xcellent 25 to start the season. In the preseason tournament held in the Washington D.C. area, St. Rose won it all. Pickerington Central, Lakota West, Wayne, Hiland and Wadsworth all competed in the same tournament. Three of the four finalists were from Ohio, along with St. Rose. A pair of five D-I bound college players are juniors for the Roses: point guard Mikayla Markham (committed to Columbia) and 6-2 post Elizabeth Marsicano (St. Joseph's) lead the way for coach Joe Whalen, who temporarily got out of coaching after 9-11, when he lost a lot of friends in the towers. He was inspired by the Perry Reese article that ran the next year in Sports Illustrated. He recently met up with the Hiland coaching staff in Maryland at the Best of Maryland tournament and asked if he could bring his team to Classic in the Country. Another outstanding junior, Luciana Thomas, is a player to watch for the Purple Roses.
Lakota West Firebirds
Andy Fishman's Firebirds are flying high once again, loaded with tremendous young talent. They will need to be firing on all cylinders as they take on St. Rose from Belmar NJ, one of the top rated teams in the country. Leading the way for Fishman's five is Notre Dame-bound junior Abby Prohaska, one of the top 25 guards in the country. Prohaska was one of two Ohio players to play for Team USA this year. (Taylor Mikesell of Massillon Jackson also made Team USA). Heavenly freshman, Nevaeh Dean, is a 6-1 post player who is ranked No. 21 in the country by CGBR, and has already received a Big 10 offer. Madisyn Oxley is another nationally ranked junior (No. 86, CGBR). The Firebirds are going to be good for a while, says OGBR's McKey. Junior guard Jasmine Ballew is another offensive weapon for Fishman. Junior Sarah Jones is an under-rated guard, while Bryanna Henderson runs the point for Lakota West. "You have a do-everything player in Prohaska and five or six guards who can all shoot well and handle the ball," said OGBR's Bryce McKey. "That's what makes them so good."
Game 11 5:00 p.m.Solon vs Huber Heights Wayne
Solon Comets
The Comets feature one of the five best junior post players in the country in Valencia Myers and boast a pair of nationally ranked seniors as well. Myers is very good when she wants to be, and that is a key to the Comets' success. Coach Trish Kruse is working to get her girls peaking at the right time of the season so they can return to the Final 4, and hopefully bring home the title this year. Point guard Dee Bekelja (No. 27, CGBR) has chosen DePaul as her next stop, while classmate Alexis Stover (No. 88, CGBR) will play for Ohio University next year. Moriah Modkins is a junior guard whose father is the offensive coordinator for the San Francisco 49ers. The Comets are the favorite to return to Columbus out of the Northeast Region, but if Myers gets in foul trouble, they lack depth inside.
Wayne Warriors
Loaded with young talent and experience, the Warriors are the pre-season favorite to be the surprise team of the D-I pool this year in Columbus. Led by uber-athletic junior forward Shai McGruder, the Warriors also feature a trio of nationally ranked sophomores and a top 25 freshman in their explosive offense. Guard Destiny Bohannon (No. 22 CGBR) runs the show for the Warriors, while classmates Olivia Trice (No. 44, CGBR) on the wing and Mali Morgan-Elliott (No. 62, CGBR) on the post, team up with freshman point guard Nyla Hampton (No. 23, CGBR) to provide depth and athleticism on the ball. Maia Dunson is another 5-10 player who adds to the Warriors depth inside. Last year, Wayne was all underclassmen and often played like it. With a year's experience under their belt, the Warriors are more poised and ready to take that next step. Coach Sonya Miller and her husband JR guide the Wayne Train. They also refer to themselves in fun as Miller Academy.
Game 12 6:40 p.m.Mason vs Gates Mills Gilmour Academy
Gilmour Academy Lancers
The Lancers are the one team in D-III that might be able to hang with Africentric. They didn't get a chance last year, falling in the state semifinals, but hope to take that next step this season. Led by one of the top 10 junior post players in the country, and a trio of nationally ranked players overall, coach Bob Beutel has plenty of options on the offensive end of the floor. Naz Hillmon, a 6-2 junior post player, is the spitting image of her mother, former McDonald's All-American Na' Sheema Hillmon, who starred at Vanderbilt. Naz Hillmon is ranked No. 10 by CGBR, while senior shooting guard Emily Kelley (No. 89, CGBR) and junior point guard Sarah Bohn (No. 97, CGBR) form a triple threat on offense that few teams can match. Kelley is headed to Winthrop to continue her basketball career after high school. Annika Corcoran missed last year with an ACL injury, but is back running the point this year. They are a pretty structured half-court team that runs a lot of high-low stuff to work the ball into Hillmon.
Game 13 8:20 p.m.Cincinnati Mount Notre Dame vs Wadsworth
Mount Notre Dame Panthers vs Wadsworth Grizzlies
SCHEDULE OF GAMES FOR MONDAY, JANUARY 16
Game 14 10 a.m.Ottawa Glandorf vs Massillon Tuslaw
Ottawa Glandorf Titans
Ottawa Glandorf made a surprise trip to the final four last year in Division II when they upset second-ranked Toledo Rogers in the regional finals en route to their finals showing against Kettering Alter. Troy Yant's squad lost to Versailles in the Division III title game two years ago in their first-ever trip to the Final Four. The Titans are ready to return again this year, with nationally ranked junior Kadie Hempfling (No. 81, CGBR) leading the way. Senior Kylie White returns for another shot at the state title, and classmate Erin Kaufman hopes to finish out her career in Columbus as well. The Titans use the Classic in the Country Challenge as a warm up for the treacherous trek through the tournament.
Tuslaw Mustangs
When you are fortunate to have a player the caliber of Mayci Sales, you ride that wave as long as you can and hope for the best. That is what the Mustangs and Coach Josh Hose have done as the nationally ranked small forward has helped put Tuslaw basketball on the map. Sales (No. 56, CGBR) is a 6-1 scoring machine who can do it all on the basketball floor. An uncommitted senior with plenty of prospects, she will attract a lot of attention as she leads the Mustangs' attack. Her younger sister, sophomore Majestic Sales is also a capable shooter. Hose hopes to have some other players step up and fill new roles this season. Harmony Miller, Ashley Kohler and the younger Sales were all part players last year when the Mustangs piled up 21 wins. They will be asked to do more on both ends of the floor. Tuslaw will be tested by the state tournament-tested Titans of Ottawa Glandorf in their inaugural experience at Classic in the Country Challenge.
Game 15 11:40 a.m.Westerville South vs Akron Archbishop Hoban
Westerville South Wildcats
A pair of nationally ranked youngsters give veteran coach Silas Williams reason to be excited as he brings his girls back to Berlin for their second visit to the Classic. Junior Caitlin Duffy has committed already to the Naval Academy. Sophomore point guard Sommer Pitzer is a nationally ranked player (No. 26, CGBR) who runs the show for Coach Williams. The Wildcats also have one of the best freshman guards in the state in Anyssa Jones. She is also ranked No. 9 nationally by CGBR. "Jones is a good shooter who can drive," says OGBR's McKey. "She uses her strength to score inside." The Wildcats are guard oriented, as they lack a post presence. Duffy is probably their biggest kid at 5-10. They run the dribble-drive type stuff to take advantage of their athleticism.
Archbishop Hoban Knights
The Knights of Scott Callahan return to Classic in the Country after a few years away. Hoban last played in Berlin in 2013. Sophomore Emma Tecca is a nationally ranked guard for the Knights, (No. 81, CGBR). She is the younger sister of Rachel Tecca, a star player at Akron University. Tecca is a high basketball IQ-type kid, compared to her sister who was 6-2 and relied on her size and skills. Senior guard Rachel Chesser is a top-rated Ohio player who will play at Mercyhurst next year. Kourtnee Dallas-Robinson is a junior guard with some pop on the perimeter and sophomore Lonasia Brewer is another offensive threat. Hoban is not very big, so they match up well against Westerville South, their opponent at Classic in the Country. The Knights are expected to be one of the top teams out of the Northeast Region.
Game 16 1:20 p.m. Shaker Heights vs Reynoldsburg
Shaker Heights Raiders
Denise Duncan is on her second trip around as coach of the Red Raiders, taking over again this year for Eric Mitchell. 6-foot junior Jamir Huston is a nationally ranked forward (No. 20, CGBR) leading the way for the girls from Shaker. Huston is getting offers from Big 10 schools. "She is a great athlete who can shoot it from the outside, but she's best when she slashes her way to the basket," says OGBR's Bryce McKey. "She will probably play more on the wing in college than she does for her high school team. Anajiah Wallace is a sophomore point guard who could lift the Raiders in the Northeast. Wallace wasn't on the radar until she started opening some eyes early this year. Coach Duncan was the all-time leading scorer at Kent State after a stellar career at Shaw High School.
Game 17 3 p.m.West Chester Lakota West vs Solon
Lakota West Firebirds and Solon Comets
Game 18 4:40 p.m. Huber Heights Wayne vs Homestead (Ind.)
Wayne Warriors and Homestead Spartans (Fort Wayne, Indiana)
Game 19 6:20 p.m. Rocky River Magnificat vs West Holmes
Magnificat Blue Streaks
The Blue Streaks made a lot of noise the last couple years in the Northwest Region but couldn't get past Wadsworth. Now coach Meghann Hubach's squad lost a lot of talent to graduation and is looking to reload. Senior Abby Adler (5-9) is among the top post players in Ohio, leading the way for Magnificat, but from there, the level of play really drops off. A pair of promising freshmen are earning playing time for the Blue Streaks. Asia McAuliffe and McKenzie Lesjak are young guards that run the motion offense and try to work shots for Adler. The Blue Streaks like to press and create offensive opportunities with their defense. They are deep and play a lot of people. "Magnificat went from being a top 10 team last year to being in a rebuilding mode this year, because they are relying on a lot of young talent," said OGBR's McKey.
West Holmes Knights
Game 20 8 p.m. Gates Mills Gilmour Academy vs Berlin Hiland
Gates Mills Gilmour Academy and Hiland Hawks


Nope they won't no matter where you are in the away section mate.
Join Betfair, enter this referral code: AQFHMVNPL and enjoy some free money, Simples!
That's because Spurs stewards are jobsworths and they've been trying to make us sit down and throwing people out for refusing in the past.
Every steward in the country is instructed to make supporters sit down.
Difference is some carry out orders and others ignore it.
It's not where you've been, it's where we're going.
JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED but Justice is getting closer every day.
My mate has a kids ticket and he is 21 like.. how easy would it be to get in on it?
Do they make you sit down in the upper tier?
"Fire in your belly comes from pride and passion in wearing the red shirt."
Are you going to Chelsea smig mmm?
Nah, not all of us can afford 56 bills to watch a game of football.
So why were you asking about whether they make you sit down in the Upper tier then?
Because I didnt realise they said lower tier to me on the phone because I assumed the lower tier was sold out but obviously not.
Also what do people think they will be like allowing banners in? We have made one its 6ftx5.5 thinking of folding it up and sticking it under my jumper?? or do you think they will be ok about it??
Would rather take one from the whole team than from just one billy goat.
"We change from doubters to believers. Now"
There's a pay parking lot at Chelsea Harbour, and it's a short walk from there to Stamford Bridge.
Cheers mate, you a regular there or not?
Nah, I'm in the LFC end, but live a 10 minute drive away.
Nah, I could be a taxi driver, know all the good routes!
Just checked the tfl.gov.uk website for tube updates. Worth allowing a bit of time to get to the ground.
Saturday 5 and Sunday 6 February, no service on the entire line. Replacement buses operate between Hammersmith and Paddington.
Please note that between 0900 and 1600 on Sunday, replacement buses will stop in Cambridge Gardens (for Ladbroke Grove) and Elkstone Road (for Westbourne Park) instead of usual stops.
Sunday 6 February, no service between Earl's Court and South Kensington.
Saturday 5 and Sunday 6 February, no service between Putney Bridge and Wimbledon. Replacement buses operate.
Saturday 5 and Sunday 6 February, no service between Baker Street and Aldgate.
Please note that this line is closed on Sundays and Public Holidays, and occasionally on Saturdays. Trains generally operate on Monday to Friday from 0615 to 2148 and on Saturday from 0800 to 1830.
Saturday 5 February, no service. Use alternative Tube or local bus routes.
slug n lettuce no more an away pub, in fact its not even called the slug anymore, totally different now and home fans only.
courtfields still the same tho and good atmosphere before the game.
last call at 2 45 was strange tho.
The Gary Macca rendition in there was sound!
Yeah, but it was quite funny the way the lad singing all the verses kept getting a bit mixed up. I love that song, its a brave one to lead, but great when it gets going.
The Liverbird upon my chest song was good as well with the lad knowing all of it!
Here, There and Everywhere Bar Hull City.
Looking for a recommendation for away friendly pub for this Tuesday?
Never been to the bridge before, havannas mentioned above still a good bet?
has gone to Stoke with his right foot.
What you achieve in life, echoes an eternity.
Defo Courtfield, gonna be bouncing!


text:
Q: UIView animation not working when dismissing keyboard for textfield Using UITextFieldDelegate I have two function that controls what happens the textfield begins editing and ends.
Using UIView.animate I am having a button disappear and hide using the .isHidden and .alpha property.
.alpha is being used because I also animate the button disappearing with a slight delay.
While the disappearing works well, upon using textFieldDidEndEditing the animation does not work, the button does come back but it does so abruptly with no ease.
To dismiss the keyboard I allow the user to tap anywhere by using this in ViewDidLoad()
self.view.addGestureRecognizer(UITapGestureRecognizer(target:
self.view, action: #selector(UIView.endEditing(_:))))

The delegate functions I use are below:
extension ExampleViewController: UITextFieldDelegate {

func textFieldDidBeginEditing(_ textField: UITextField) {
    if textField == exampleTextField {
        UIView.animate(withDuration: 0.1, delay: 0.1, options: .curveEaseOut,
                       animations: {self.exampleButton.alpha = 0.0},
                       completion: { _ in self.exampleButton.isHidden = true
        })

    }
}

func textFieldDidEndEditing(_ textField: UITextField) {

    if textField == exampleTextField {

        UIView.animate(withDuration: 0.1, delay: 0.1, options: .curveEaseInOut,
                       animations: {self.exampleButton.alpha = 1.0},
                       completion: { _ in self.exampleButton.isHidden = false
            //Do anything else that depends on this animation ending
            })
        }
    }

}

Why is the .curveEaseIn not working?

A: The problem is that the button is hidden. You fade it back in while it is still hidden and then in the completion handler you unhide the button which already has an alpha of 1. This makes it suddenly appear after 0.2 seconds.
Since you are hiding using an alpha of 0 and showing with an alpha of 1, there is no need to set the isHidden property at all in either animation.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


The Cars play set allows gamers to take on the role of Lightning McQueen, Mater, Holley Shiftwell and Francesco Bernoulli and enter the virtual world of Radiator Springs, where they will prepare the town for a big international racing event. In addition to customizing the town, exploring the outskirts of the city and towing all types of vehicles to make way for tourists, players will be able to race through town, on full sized tracks and pull off amazing, gravity defying feats in a no-holds-barred stunt park.
In Toy Box mode, Lightning, Mater, Holley and Francesco are able to interact with all of the previously revealed characters from The Incredibles, Monsters University and Pirates of the Caribbean; and in addition to characters, the Cars play set adds driving/racing play mechanics and track pieces to the Toy Box allowing players to create all-new racing challenges, build and customize tracks and much more.
Want to know when Disney Infinity 1.0 Holley (Cars) Character Figure - ozgameshop.com drops below a certain price? Enter your email address and price below and we'll let you know when it drops below that price!


text:
Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal
Only stupid hurtful memes about trans people are allowed
Uh-oh. Drexel is going to get a shake-up
Yet another example of Christians unable to make an honest argument
The first Goop review is in!
What good are virgins in a developmental biology lab?
The madness is setting in
Why Jonathan Chait always makes me twitch
Isolation, madness, death
Hatches battened
secmilchap on Oh, how I detest textbook publishers
alanuk on Oh, how I detest textbook publishers
jimf on Oh, how I detest textbook publishers
Dunc on Oh, how I detest textbook publishers
David Gerard on Oh, how I detest textbook publishers
Crip Dyke, Right Reverend Feminist FuckToy of Death & Her Handmaiden on Only stupid hurtful memes about trans people are allowed
John-Henry Beck on Only stupid hurtful memes about trans people are allowed
chrislawson on Only stupid hurtful memes about trans people are allowed
chigau (違う) on Oh, how I detest textbook publishers
lochaber on Oh, how I detest textbook publishers
HATE ADS? Subscribe to FTB Ad Free.
Please donate to our legal defense fund!
Discuss: Political Madness All the Time
The Pharyngula Wiki
Social Justice and Economics
Social Justice Llink Roundup
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris. This is a personal weblog. The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer.
• a longer profile of yours truly
• Nature Network
• Mastodon
• CuriousCat
• the Pharyngula chat room
(#pharyngula on irc.synirc.net)
Follow @pzmyers
View pzmyers's observations »
I reserve the right to publicly post, with full identifying information about the source, any email sent to me that contains threats of violence.
I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
Marcus Ranum on Oh, how I detest textbook publishers
Susan Montgomery on Only stupid hurtful memes about trans people are allowed
WMDKitty -- Survivor on Only stupid hurtful memes about trans people are allowed
bujesus on Oh, how I detest textbook publishers
anna on Only stupid hurtful memes about trans people are allowed
Daylight Atheism
Ex-Muslims of North America
Minnesota Atheists
Rosa Rubicondior
The Morning Heresy
Alas! A blog
Amanda Marcotte
Blue Gal
Lance Mannion
Secular Woman
Skeptical Humanities
Coyot.es Network
Coyote Crossing
Discover blogs
Genomicron
Judge Starling (Dan Graur)
Preposterous Universe
SciAm blogs
Scicurious
Science after Sunclipse
Scientopia
Skulls in the Stars
Telliamed Revisited
The Well-Timed Period
What's in John's Freezer?
Scienceblogs Diaspora
A few things ill-considered
Confessions of a Science Librarian
Discovering Biology in a Digital World
Dynamics of Cats
Greg Laden
Page 3.14
Starts with a Bang
Skepchick
Asked. Answered. » « I am totally out of sync with my community
If you don't like punching Nazis, you're going to hate this
What do you think of a man who threw flares at ICE vehicles and buildings?
An armed man was fatally shot Saturday after throwing what authorities called "incendiary devices" at an immigration detention center in Washington state and trying to set a commercial-size propane tank on fire, according to Tacoma police.
About 4 a.m., 69-year-old Willem Van Spronsen threw "lit objects" at buildings and at cars in a parking lot, police said, causing a vehicle to go up in flames. Court records show the man was arrested last year at a protest at the privately owned detention center, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement called the man an "anti-immigration enforcement protester."
There's an argument to be made that he was committing acts of violence and that he was a terrorist. I'd disagree; a terrorist is trying to intimidate civilians with fear, while Willem Van Spronsen was targeting the tools of institutional oppression to stop terror. Violent, yes; terrorism, no. Read further in the article, and buried in bland language is the purpose of his act.
The attack came as thousands protested at ICE facilities nationwide ahead of the agency's planned mass arrests of undocumented immigrants on Sunday. The Trump administration has said it will target about 2,000 families for deportation, focusing on as many as 10 cities. Seattle is not among the cities reportedly being targeted.
The Northwest Detention Center on the Tacoma Tideflats is owned and operated for ICE by a private company called the GEO Group, according to the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, which puts the facility's capacity at 1,575 — one of the biggest immigration detention centers in the country, the group says. As ICE faces calls to improve conditions for migrants in its custody, some have called on the government to stop using privately run detention centers.
There is the truly criminal act, the state terrorism we stand by and watch: private companies paid by the government to imprison innocents for being born in the 'wrong' place.
He wrote a farewell letter. He knew he was going to die.
These are a few pages from #WillemVanSpronsen's goodbye letter. He wrote this before attacking the ICE facility. Some are calling a "manifesto". pic.twitter.com/9kofi2yqPK
— Jake Hanrahan (@Jake_Hanrahan) July 14, 2019
He wrote,
there's wrong and there's right.
it's time to take action against the forces of evil.
evil says one life is worth less than another.
evil says the flow of commerce is our purpose here.
evil says concentration camps for folks deemed lesser are necessary.
the handmaid of evil says the concentration camps should be more humane.
beware the centrist.
He was right. Will Van Spronsen is a human being who acted against evil.
ICE imprisons, tortures and deports hundreds of thousands of people and the brutality and scale of their harm is only escalating. We need every form of resistance, solidarity and passion to fight against ICE and the borders that they defend. Will gave his life fighting ICE we may never know what specifically was going through his head in the last hours of his life but we know that the NWDC [Northwest Detention Center] must be destroyed and the prisoners must be freed. We do not need heroes, only friends and comrades. Will was simply a human being, and we wish that he was still with us. It's doubtless that the cops and the media will attempt to paint him as some sort of monster, but in reality he was a comrade who fought for many years for what he believed in and this morning he was killed doing what he loved; fighting for a better world.
Politics, History, and Law, Race, Society, and Social Justice
davidnangle says
I keep telling myself that my single vote in 2020 is worth more than my body thrown against the barbed wire now. But every day living in a country with concentration camps I feel guilty
kome says
Weird how law enforcement is willing to negotiate for hours with conservative white men actively shooting cops, black churches, or Jewish houses of worship and somehow manage to take most of those suspects in alive. But if you attack Nazis, I guess negotiations are over and authorities won't hesitate to end your life.
microraptor says
kome @2: That's because you might have a milkshake, a raw egg, or even a banana cream pie, which are all far more dangerous and destructive weapons than things like assault rifles or explosives.
logicalcat says
So where are the libertarians? You know the ones who say they support the 2nd amendment because there is a change our government could become authoritarian? Where they at?
timgueguen says
Seems to me throwing explosives at a propane tank risks getting someone not connected with ICE killed, like the immigrants apparently housed in the building. I find myself suddenly wondering how long it will be before a major incident such as a fire does occur at one of the detention centres, resulting in multiple deaths.
Saad says
logicalcat, #4
Same place the proponents of religious freedom hang out when a Muslim's religious freedom is being debated.
Dunc says
Seems to me throwing explosives at a propane tank risks getting someone not connected with ICE killed
I think it's worth remembering that the claim that he was "trying to set a commercial-size propane tank on fire" comes from the police who killed him. Maybe he was, or maybe he wasn't, but I'm not going to accept it as gospel just on the word of the cops – they have a substantial history of killing people and then lying about the details.
stroppy says
Hmm. That said, there are a lot of ways monkey wrenching can go sideways, especially when you're talking about things that explode…
consciousness razor says
Dunc:
Well, I'd be surprised if they made up this detail (below), but finding a burned out car would be something more than just some words from some cops, no?
About 4 a.m., 69-year-old Willem Van Spronsen threw "lit objects" at buildings and at cars in a parking lot, police said, causing a vehicle to go up in flames.
If you were really in the mood for a conspiracy theory, the police did that too, to cover up their murder of a nonviolent protestor. But I'm not in that kind of mood.
Of course, there's no way to know whether he was "trying" to set the propane tank on fire. Maybe it would've been accidental, if it had actually happened. Maybe some guards/police/whoever were near it, and the point was (or would've been) to kill them? I don't know. The police spokesperson also (according to the report) didn't know whether the guy had fired the rifle he was carrying. So we don't know much of anything. Most likely they could at least show it was his rifle, not a random one planted by the investigation.
If he didn't do anything "truly criminal," I'll be surprised. I don't know whether he "acted against evil," but I also don't see anything to suggest that the way he acted was good. If it's two bad guys trying to hurt each other, in a dumb action movie let's say, you probably shouldn't root for either of them, and maybe you should leave and ask for your money back.
whheydt says
From what I was reading yesterday (haven't looked at the local news site yet today), there was little or no ICE activity in the SF Bay Area. This was being attributed to two causes. The first being that a lot of outreach and education was done in immigrant communities ahead of the day, mostly around "Know Your Rights". The second was a judicial order to ICE that no one be removed from the country without being given sufficient time to talk to a lawyer.
Who knew that requiring ICE to allow people to talk to lawyers would throw such an effective spanner in the works?
PZ Myers says
From some of his friends: his goal was apparently to destroy the vehicles ICE used to transport migrants — specifically, some buses. He failed at that. That he set fire to some ICE cars fits with that.
Also note that he did not fire on the police, they simply decided to end the threat in the only simple-minded way they know how: by murdering him.
petesh says
Thank you, PZ. Willem Van Spronsen may have been wrong, but he was clearly principled. We don't know everything about what happened, but apparently four cops shot him. Van Spronsen undoubtedly intended to do serious damage, and certainly was ready to die. That does not mean he was ready to kill, and I'll give him the benefit of the doubt on that until further notice. I am roughly his age, and I respect his decision. Of course, it's mostly been buried by a flurry of racist tweets. I like to think I'd have done a better job of broadcasting my intent than he did. But I fundamentally support him.
doubtthat says
With the benefit of hindsight, how do we view the Weather Underground? To me, they are the best case scenario for this type of protest – the only people they accidentally killed were people in their own group. No innocent bystanders were killed.
That being said, could they be described as successful? Is this the best model?
Interesting historical note – Ayers was not prosecuted because the insane abuses of the US Government were revealed when the details of COINTELPRO were revealed. The FBI behaved so atrociously they passed on a trial for a guy responsible for dozens of bombings.
Despite the stated objectives, I'm not down with "anarchy." We've got enough of that spilling out of the rotting fish head stinking up the Whitehouse.
whheydt has a smart point.
consciousness razor, @ #9: There's a big difference between setting fire to vehicles and blowing up a large propane tank. And if, as you admit, "there's no way to know" whether he was trying to do that, why did the police say that he was?
I'm not saying he wasn't armed, nor am I saying that he wasn't using flares to set fire to vehicles. I am saying that we should be cautious about accepting the police's account at face value, because it's not a "conspiracy theory" that they often lie about these events to present themselves in the best possible light, and the people they kill in the worst – it's a very well documented and repeatedly verified fact.
azpaul3 says
Non-lethal violence like punching Nazis or throwing milkshakes is one thing. Potentially lethal violence like throwing incendiaries at potentially explosive objects like cars, busses and propane tanks is something else entirely.
The former is civil disobedience. The latter is terrorism.
That you would support this terrorism because you agree with the politics is bad, PZ. You know better.
Cars are not "potentially explosive objects", no matter what you've seen in the movies.
Rob Grigjanis says
azpaul3 @16:
Non-lethal violence like punching…
Non-lethal, except when it is lethal.
vucodlak says
I wouldn't say it's that I like punching Nazis, so much as it is that the inherent violence of Nazis' existence requires a violent response. Unfortunately, we're well beyond the point where merely harrying them off the streets is sufficient because, as Willem Van Spronsen so correctly points out, they've gotten to the point of building concentration camps and rounding people up.
What do you do with the implements of genocide? You destroy them. What do you do with concentration camps? You liberate them. What do you do with the architects and foot soldiers of genocide? You do whatever it takes to stop them.
Willem Van Spronsen died doing the right thing. He won't be the last, unfortunately. Last time we were in a place like this, 70-85 million people died; roughly 3% of the world's population. How many will it be this time, I wonder?
Khantron, the alien that only loves says
@stroppy
In other words, you're more devoted to order than justice.
freestinker says
So, by your logic and definition, Timothy McVeigh was not a terrorist.
@ freestinker, #21
Timothy McVeigh deliberately murdered hundreds of people, including children. He built an enormous bomb, positioned where he thought it would cause maximum casualties, then ran away because he was also a coward.
There is no reasonable comparison to be made there.
PZ said: "There's an argument to be made that he was committing acts of violence and that he was a terrorist. I'd disagree; a terrorist is trying to intimidate civilians with fear, while Willem Van Spronsen was targeting the tools of institutional oppression to stop terror."
Timothy McVeigh was not trying to intimidate "civilians with fear." He was "targeting the tools of institutional oppression to stop terror" as he saw terror.
From Wikipedia: "A Gulf War veteran, McVeigh sought revenge against the federal government for the 1993 Waco siege, which ended in the deaths of 86 people—many of whom were children—exactly two years before the bombing; the 1992 Ruby Ridge incident; and the United States' foreign policy. He hoped to inspire a revolt against the federal government, and defended the bombing as a legitimate tactic against what he saw as a tyrannical federal government.[6] He was arrested shortly after the bombing and indicted for eleven federal offenses, including the use of a weapon of mass destruction. He was found guilty on all counts in 1997 and sentenced to death."
The comparison is certainly "reasonable."
Similarly, PZ's line of logic absolves the 9-11 attackers, too.
There's a big difference between setting fire to vehicles and blowing up a large propane tank.
So what is the big difference? Is one of them not dangerous, while the other is? I don't think that's it, so what do you think it is?
And if, as you admit, "there's no way to know" whether he was trying to do that, why did the police say that he was?
They saw him, so that may have been fairly apparent from his behavior.
I don't know, but they might know. That is a big difference.
I am saying that we should be cautious about accepting the police's account at face value,
Okay, but like I said, there isn't only a story from the police. There is other evidence, which might eventually be publicly available. I don't know … they should've been wearing cameras, so maybe we'd have that too.
because it's not a "conspiracy theory" that they often lie about these events to present themselves in the best possible light, and the people they kill in the worst – it's a very well documented and repeatedly verified fact.
FFS, it's a very well documented fact that there are conspiracies. But we can't merely assume that about this specific case, on the basis that it's true of other cases. If your theory is that they conspired, which is something people do from time to time, then I'm not saying that can't be a good theory, so long as the evidence supports it. It doesn't sound like you have much evidence to support it.
#20 Khantron, the alien that only loves
No. Try again.
Timothy McVeigh was not trying to intimidate "civilians with fear."
Bullshit. He knowingly and deliberately blew up an office building full of people. He didn't blow up an empty armory, he didn't bomb a parking lot full of FBI vehicles, he blew up PEOPLE to terrorize government officials and those who support them.
He chose a time when the building would be packed with people, to ensure maximum casualties. He chose a soft target, because he wanted maximum damage with minimum personal risk. He murdered a bunch of clerks, office workers, and children rather than targeting people who might fight back because he wanted to terrorize, rather than actually fight and risk his own hide.
He deliberately targeted civilians to incite fear. That's terrorism.
Willem Van Spronsen targeted vehicles used to round up people and take them to concentration camps. He directly targeted the means of oppression, knowing he would most likely die in the process. He targeted machines, not people, and he did it to make it harder for ICE to commit the evil acts he (and many of us here) objected to. That's not "terrorism" by any reasonable analysis, but even if it fits the legal definition (which, in the US, is basically 'anything the most fascist members of the government don't like') it was wholly justified. What McVeigh did was not, even by his own supposed standards, justifiable.
PaulBC says
I see this as an act of suicide by someone who was driven beyond what he could bear. I'm not going to make a statement for or against. In my opinion, it was not an effective political act. As an act of conscience? Well, this looks like a man with a conscience, but I don't see this as an act with value. I'm happy nobody else was hurt, and I don't give a rat's ass about the property damage.
longdog says
One gets the impression that PZ's never heard of the phrase "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter".
vucodlak:
Don't act like you're against violence, when you say something requires a violent response.
It's actually not required. That's certainly true, so let's start there.
Maybe you could get around to saying something — anything — coherent about what it is that you think you're opposed to, whether Nazis are doing that thing or you're doing it or the fucking pope is doing it. It's not violence, because you're not opposed to that. Instead, you think it's fucking required. Remember?
What kind of requirement is it? Is it a requirement for everybody? Is it a requirement for specific people in specific circumstances? Is it really the existence of a group with "inherent" properties which makes it a requirement, or is it something else? How the fuck is this supposed to work?
You never make any of that clear, in any of your boring revenge fantasies. I doubt there's much demand for it, but maybe you should consider publishing it in the form of a badly written screenplay or cartoon, instead of posting that shit here.
chigau (違う) says
longdog
I certainly don't get that impression.
Halcyon Dayz, FCD says
The word terrorist is pretty much a buzz word these days.
It amusing that you ignored the rest of the content and focused on a minor point, and still blew it.
The building that McVeigh blew up: "By the 1990s, the building contained regional offices for the Social Security Administration, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the United States Secret Service, the Department of Veterans Affairs vocational rehabilitation counseling center, the Drug Enforcement Administration (D.E.A.), and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF)."
These weren't "civilians," unless ICE agents are also civilians. They were agents of the Federal Government, which McVeigh decided were evil oppressors, and especially agents of the ATF, the Secret Service, and the DEA.
Much like you and PZ have declared war on those you disagree with.
You support violence to further your ideological ends.
Own it.
@ consciousness razor, #29
Don't act like you're against violence,
Never said that I was! Never pretended to be. And do you know why? Because I'm not against violence. I'm against many acts of violence; rape, torture, blowing up children and civilians, deliberately targeting civilians, carelessly using violence in a way that harms bystanders, and on and on the list goes.
I'm absolutely willing to support violence in certain situations. I'm absolutely willing to use violence in certain situations. I have, in fact, done so. Some of the violent acts I have committed I am ashamed of, while in other situations violence was best of a lot of bad options, and I've never lost much sleep over it.
You want a list of those situations? Way, way too long, but "people are being put in actual concentration camps" is a situation where violence is required. Whether it is the violence of one law enforcement agency being used another, or some other kind, is not something I'm prepared to say. I absolutely support Willem Van Spronsen's actions, and there are other actions I would support as well.
Oh jesus fucking… we go through this shit every time. Every time I answer one of your questions you come back with ten more, half of which are the same questions as before slightly rephrased but which you still demand I answer every goddamn time, because if I don't you'll accuse me of not answering them like it's an asinine gotcha game. When I finally get sick of playing your game and leave, and you then declare the next time this comes up that I've never answered your questions. So I'm going to try to keep my answers very short this time, and if you don't like them, well, tough shit:
1.) A moral requirement
2.) No
3.) Obviously
4.) If there were no concentration camps, and there are no Nazis/fascists, then opposing such things in any fashion is pretty fucking pointless.
5.) How does what work? Violence? That depends on the specific acts and specific contexts. In this case, destroying vehicles used in putting and keeping people in concentration camps means that those vehicles cannot be used any longer. If enough people destroy enough vehicles, then it damages the ability of ICE/CBP to haul people into the concentration camps. This is not a complicated concept.
You never make any of that clear, in any of your boring revenge fantasies.
I've been clear that I support punching and milkshaking Nazis. I've explained why, repeatedly, in numerous threads past. Blah blah demoralizing yada yada counters their invulnerable ubermensch and 'everyone secretly agrees' narratives which damages their recruiting ability boo fart and also drives them off the streets etc yawn. Been through that a hundred times. You don't like the answers I give, so you pretend I never gave any. Fine, whatever, I'm not playing that game this time.
consciousness razor #29
When did vucodlak say they were against violence?
refresh before posting
freestinker
Doing this
<blockquote>paste copied text here</blockquote>
paste copied text here
It makes comments with quotes easier to read.
if you could provide the source of the quote
I ignored the rest because it wasn't relevant to the discussion, which was that he deliberately blew up a whole lot of people without the least regard for whether they were actually connected to the bloody raids he that he claimed justified his actions. How often do officials from the Depart of Veterans Affairs, HUD, and Social Security Administration raid militia and cult compounds? How about the kids in the office day care, were they responsible for Waco, too?
What, do you think every person who works for the government is issued a gun, a badge, and endowed with the power to arrest people? Because that's not how it works. There are many in the employ of the DEA and ATF I would consider civilians, because they never carry weapons or arrest people. They're office workers and accountants and administrative assistants. And the people in the DVA, HUD, and SSA are pretty much exclusively civilians. Plus, you know, the janitors and visitors and delivery people and the bloody kids who were also in the building.
When you indiscriminately bomb civilians for a political agenda unless you're looking to foment terror. Yes, he claimed he was trying to start a war, but how exactly was his bombing of a bunch of people who were largely completely unconnected to the events at Waco/Ruby Ridge supposed to accomplish that?
These weren't "civilians," unless ICE agents are also civilians.
ICE agents carry weapons, conduct raids, haul people off to concentration camps, and… what else? Oh yeah- Van Spronsen didn't attack ICE agents, he attacked their fucking vehicles. There's a vast difference between destroying property used for nefarious ends and blowing up a random group of people just because a few of those people were tangentially connected to some other people who botched a couple of raids.
Yes, in certain cases and contexts, I support the use of violence, and I have used/would use violence myself. Like nearly every other human being on the fucking planet.
If that means going to war with people who put children in concentration camps, well, that's exactly what my grandparents did.
DanDare says
Is this the first shot of a rebellion?
Has democracy been taken away by those in power?
If laws are inhuman and opposed to human rights does the rule of law collapse?
What levers are left to peacefully correct the situation?
WMDKitty -- Survivor says
He did good, and died well.
DanDare@38 "Is this the first shot of a rebellion?"
I would consider that something on the scale of John Brown's raid, and no I am not eager to go there.
James Hodgkinson's shooting of Rep. Scalise is also significant and politically motivated. I don't think that was really the first shot of rebellion either. It was a desperate act rather than part of an intentional plan as Brown's was.
John Morales says
WMDKitty:
Not well enough. Martyrdom ain't defiance.
This is more inspirational: March of Cambreadth
(Beloved of right-wing milsfers)
Because I'm not against violence. I'm against many acts of violence; rape, torture, blowing up children and civilians, deliberately targeting civilians, carelessly using violence in a way that harms bystanders, and on and on the list goes.
So here's what you do. You give excuses for why you engage in violence, and you assert (based on nothing at all) that somehow it's necessary, for somebody, somewhere, sometimes. What you don't say is what's wrong with it, in the cases listed above (or others not listed, perhaps). You don't say why anybody should be against those things. You just say that you are — maybe you're serious, maybe not — but you don't say why. Saying why might be difficult for you, because as you just said, you don't have a general objection to offer against it. At least I can credit you for honesty about that, even though you're not thinking clearly about the implications of it.
So I'm going to try to keep my answers very short this time, and if you don't like them, well, tough shit:
1) You give no reason why any of it's morally wrong, nor do you say why doing anything about it (much less your specific proposal) is morally necessary. Moral reasoning it is not. You can attach the word "moral" in front of any other word you like, but that does not make it so.
2) Why not? Every one of us is obliged to refrain from lying, cheating, stealing, as much as possible…. And I would say harming each other is very generally something that we morally need to avoid. It's hard to see how you could be talking about a moral obligation like that, if it's not about almost everybody (whenever possible) in almost every situation. On top of that, it in fact contradicts some basic obligations regarding nonviolence that almost everybody recognizes (except you and Nazis, along with all of the other bullies in history). It can't be the case that these contradictory claims are both correct. We can give reasons why nonviolence is good, why we should avoid harm, etc…. That's what you can't do, which is basically what tells me that you're wrong. Have you considered the possibility that you're wrong about this? What do you think considering it would be like, if you had?
3) Then obviously you should specify, if you think it needs to be specified.
4) That doesn't answer anything I was asking.
5) I wanted to understand how this whole thought process is supposed to go in your head … how somebody could come to same conclusions as you, whatever exactly those are (if you were specific in #3 above, let's say). What you do is just say a bunch of shit, without bothering to justify it, which isn't good enough. Trump can do that, and I bet you could do better. But if you did, I bet you wouldn't be saying the same things as you are now. Maybe you should be saying something else. I think that's probably the right option.
Every one of us is obliged to refrain from lying, cheating, stealing, as much as possible
I am under no such obligation. So please exclude me from your supposedly universal set.
(Bah)
1.) If I have to explain to you why concentration camps are morally wrong, then I can't help you.
2.) If a Nazi asks you if they are Jews in your attic, the moral response is to lie your ass off. If your family is starving, it is not immoral to steal a loaf of bread from someone with plenty to spare. If someone is harming another, it may indeed be moral to use violence to stop them from doing so. I can't really even speculate on whether violence is a possibly moral course of action without some specifics but, by way of a Nazi-free example:
If the neighbor seems to killing his partner, then I can A.) call the cops, which is an act of violence or B.) attempt to intervene myself, which would almost certainly entail the use of violence. I know situations like that very well- violence is practically a guarantee, no matter how much you try to deescalate. Sometimes threats will suffice, but threats are still violence. Of course, I could also C.) ignore them, secure in the knowledge that whatever happens over there, at least I didn't sully my precious moral superiority by descending to their level.
3.) "Is it a requirement for specific people in specific circumstances?" is asking for specifics in response to a generality. I just gave you one specific set of common circumstances in the above. Violence isn't the first thing I'd choose, but it's unlikely that it can avoided. It is, so far as I can see, the most moral choice.
4.) I did my best to parse your question. If you don't like my answer, then ask better questions.
5.) Alright, again, I have no idea what you want from me, so let me ask you something that might prove illuminating for both of us. This is a situation I've experienced; you tell me what you would have done:
You're 16 years old. Two of your friends have decided to leave their homes, because friend A's family has given them an ultimatum to be straight or get out, and friend B's only family, her father, is severely physically abusive. You're mostly along as the muscle, meaning you lift heavy things and may have other responsibilities as the situation warrants.
Understand that police and social services are worse than useless. The cops will arrest your friends, and force them to return home. Friend A will almost certainly go to jail, because their family won't take them in, and friend B stands a very good chance of dying at her father's hands if he finds out she's trying to leave. Social services, on the other hand, has one office that's split between 7 local counties. If you're lucky, they might look in on your friends in 3 months' time. Even if you want to chance calling the cops, it would take a minimum of 30 minutes for them to arrive at this time of night, because the only local law enforcement is the sheriff, whose office closes at 6PM, meaning literally the whole force will be off duty, and all emergency calls are routed to the state police.
You're trying to move things out of friend B's house without waking her father. This fails- the father wakes up, ambushes and attacks friend A with a baseball bat. Friend A is down and bleeding, and the father is currently promising to kill friend B.
You were in another room; the father hasn't noticed you're there. The father is a fairly big guy, but so are you, and you have a gun given to you in case of something like this.
What do you believe the moral course of action is, in this situation? At any point in this situation, even. You can choose to have refused to provide help at the very beginning, for example, but whether you choose to be involved or not that assault will happen.
I know what I did and, yes, it involved violence. I'm curious what you believe the moral course of action would have been, since violence is so clearly off the table.
ck, the Irate Lump says
It's probably worth point out for the "What If…"-ers that antifa activists still have a body count of zero, while their opponents, far right ethno-staters, Nazis and ICE, all have significant casualties (every year). So, maybe we should look at the actual harm, rather than the theoretical harm.
There is no reason to exclude you, John Morales. So I won't. Now if you had said "bah humbug," maybe that would suffice…. But as it stands, you have not made an especially compelling point.
vocudlak:
If I have to explain to you why concentration camps are morally wrong, then I can't help you.
You're either being dishonest or incredibly obtuse. If you explained that concentration camps, etc., involve violence, and you explained why that was a problem, that would definitely be coherent and comprehensible. It's the sort of thing most people, unlike you, would say.
But I'm not asking them. I'm asking you, and you don't get to pretend to be them. You reject that line of thought, so you would have to offer something else, which you actually believe is true (and not any old bullshit that's convenient at the moment). It's true that you can't help, because you don't offer anything like that. With just a bunch of bare assertions, you've got nothing. Or maybe I should it's worse than nothing, given what you're doing with them.
What do you believe the moral course of action is, in this situation?
There are lots of details in your story, and I don't have much to say about most of it. I haven't been arguing against self-defense. That can be necessary, in the ordinary sense that in fact there aren't other, better options available. If there are others, so in fact you can avoid that type of situation (by running, hiding, etc.), then you should avoid it. That's also why it's defense and not offense. You don't run into it or provoke it; it is something that came to you as it were, so you have no other choice.
I don't know about your story or how much of your version of it is true, but it is not the case that Van Spronsen was engaged in something like self-defense. All he did was find a way to get himself killed and make it into headlines. Zero people were helped, and zero immigrants can live better lives because of it.
Self-defense is not about pointing to some harmful/bad thing out there in the world and "defending" (however ineptly) against that. Because you very typically have many other options, when that's the sort of thing we're talking about. And in any case, that's not how people use that term, which is the sort of thing I'll happily support.
That's why no honest person, who understands the words they're using, would claim that that particular option was "necessary" or "required." Because that's simply false: there are other options, meaning it isn't the only one, meaning that the one you happened to pick isn't needed. I don't see a way around that, without bullshitting or talking nonsense.
You've been clear enough, in this thread and several others, that you're endorsing violence other than self-defense. That's where our disagreement is, and if your personal experience genuinely does have something to do with self-defense, I don't think that will get us anywhere. I could also tell you about defending myself when I was attacked, but that's also not relevant now.
There is no reason to exclude you, John Morales.
Well, you might feel I am under that obligation, but I most certainly do not.
But as it stands, you have not made an especially compelling point.
I'm telling you I have no such obligations, contrary to your claim.
But fine, ignore the counterexample to your purported universal rule, which in your mind is not "an especially compelling point".
Just for you: I am really a dog. With a waggly tail.
(Huh. Almost like I didn't feel obliged to not lie, eh?)
Hm, quiet. So. CR to vucodlak, above:
You've been clear enough, in this thread and several others, that you're endorsing violence other than self-defense.
Pre-emptive self-defence, which is what I interpret vucodlak to be advocating, is still self-defence. Not all threats are proximate.
My impression is that you imagine that violence is intrinsically immoral, rather than circumstancial. But, if I am wrong, then where you and vucodlak differ is only when it's applicable.
(Also seems to me that whereas vucodlak has been there and been tested, you are relying on your self-estimation. And I value empiricism.)
You're not a counterexample, JM, just wrong, like a flat earther. I'm aware that such people exist. It's good to know that they're out there, making false claims and making themselves look ridiculous. It's at least good for a laugh, if they're not doing anything too harmful. So they're not entirely ignored. But their false beliefs are just that, and that itself doesn't count as evidence of the Earth's flatness. If they present relevant and substantial evidence or reasoning, that shouldn't be ignored. But merely presenting yourself (or your contrary beliefs) doesn't cut it. Let me know if you think it should work some other way.
You're not a counterexample, JM, just wrong
<snicker>
So I am wrong in thinking that I think that I have absolutely no such obligations, in your estimation.
I'm aware that such people exist. It's good to know that they're out there, making false claims and making themselves look ridiculous.
The irony is palpable.
But their false beliefs are just that, and that itself doesn't count as evidence of the Earth's flatness.
Your certitude regarding my openly proclaiming that I feel no obligation whatsoever to not lie is itself a false belief.
I demonstrated that when I told you that I am a dog.
That was a lie (of is this the lie? ;) )
So. You think I am in denial that I have breached one of my obligations, right?
(Me, I think I'm making fun of you and your supposed obligations)
I don't know how to interpret "intrinsically," so I'm not sure what to say. I think that something isn't immoral, if nobody is harmed — a less politically-oriented version of Mill's harm principle, if you like. Being gay? There is no harm done, so a claim that it's immoral is false. If the reason you say it's bad is because "god says so" or "the Bible says so" or "I say so," then you haven't given me a good reason that relates how it affects somebody who could experience some kind of harm.
I would say violence is obviously harmful, if not intrinsically so. (If you know what the word "violence" means, I guess you should probably know that much.) Thus, you need a good justification for it. Maybe that can be done in some circumstances. If a doctor harms a patient in some way, it may save their life — that's an example of the kind of justification I have in mind. So it's not hard to imagine circumstances when some kind of harm is warranted or appropriate or the best option that anybody has. If that makes it "circumstantial" and not "intrinsic," then go ahead and use that terminology if you like.
I don't think that's what the difference is about. I suspect vucodlak would like to think that their merely talking about self-defense (which basically everyone accepts), but that's not really what they're supporting. Maybe it's deliberate, maybe they're honestly confused, or who knows … that, I certainly don't know.
But I have had to defend myself, like I said before…. Even if that weren't true, personal stories and anecdotes aren't the same thing as empiricism. We've got empirical evidence of all kinds of people, around the world and throughout history, engaging in violence and nonviolence. We can see what the consequences were like in this wide variety of different cases, without having to experience all of it personally. Maybe vucodlak does have a better grasp of it than me (if any of that even plays a role in how they think, which I doubt), but it's definitely not because one of us told a story and the other didn't.
consciousness razor,
I don't know how to interpret "intrinsically,"
per se. By its very nature.
I would say violence is obviously harmful, if not intrinsically so.
Well, you seem to have interpreted it correctly.
Let's compromise: violence is potentially harmful; as in a security guard applying an arm lock on someone who pulls out a knife. It need not be. (e.g. milkshakes)
So it's not hard to imagine circumstances when some kind of harm is warranted or appropriate or the best option that anybody has.
So far, so congruent to vucodlak's stance. Right?
If that makes it "circumstantial" and not "intrinsic," then go ahead and use that terminology if you like.
Come on, such coyness is beneath you. There is no "if", it is evidently the case.
(You yourself wrote "circumstances when"!)
I suspect vucodlak would like to think that their merely talking about self-defense (which basically everyone accepts), but that's not really what they're supporting.
I acknowledge your suspicion, but (as I wrote) my personal interpretation is otherwise.
(I'm about as familiar with them [posting corpus] as I am with you, so there's that)
Anyway, thanks. Enough, I don't want to spam the thread.
@ ck, the Irate Lump
That's why I asked folks' opinion on the Weather Underground. They carried out dozens of bombings and the only body count was three of their own members who blew themselves up.
So, best case scenario for this type of aggressive resistance. They managed to avoid killing innocent bystanders. So, cool.
But, looking back, can their efforts be described as successful? Did they accomplish anything? Is this a good strategic model to follow, even if the moral aspect is removed?
aramad88 says
Oh my God, you're actually lionizing an ARSONIST now?? And a stupid one at that – attempting to ignite or detonate a fuel tank adjoining or on the property on which the people he was fighting for were kept. If it caught, then all the imprisoned are the most likely to be barebcued – because they're in cells, they can't just leave. Their escape is dependent on first being freed. (Have a look at the "Fire to the prisons" banner at the linked article – who do you think is in those pictured cells??)
PZ: "There's an argument to be made that he was committing acts of violence and that he was a terrorist. I'd disagree; a terrorist is trying to intimidate civilians with fear"
What. There's no doubt about this. ICE staff are civilians, and he committed a suicide attack against them with methods posing an indiscriminate threat to anyone nearby, for political reasons. That's terrorism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definitions_of_terrorism). The fact that I agree with his opposition to ICE (I'm an immigrant myself, though I pass for white) does not cloud my judgement.
And from the linked source:
"All we know about what lead up to this comes from the cops, who are notoriously corrupt and unreliable sources for such a narrative. The story that we do have is that Will attempted to set fire to several vehicles, outbuildings and a propane tank outside the Northwest Detention Center in Tacoma which houses hundreds of immigrants awaiting hearings or deportations. He successfully set one vehicle on fire and then exchanged gunfire with Tacoma police officers who fatally shot him. He was pronounced dead on the scene. We find his actions inspiring."
Notice that even while they caution that the account of events is in need of independent verification, they accept it provisionally and praise him on the basis of that account. They praise him even given the possibility that he fired at police. Disgusting.
Also, for those not sure of whether the rifle found on him was genuinely his, or something planted by police, please go to the third image of the manifesto and read the bottom paragraph. He makes clear that he intentionally brought a weapon and 6 magazines.
lochaber says
ICE agents routinely violate human and civil rights, and deny their targets fourth amendment protections.
They can literally disappear people and deny them access to lawyers, the press, or their family.
How else do you fight corruption and evil like that other than with violence?
We are continuing to edge closer and closer to Nazi Germany. How far do we let things go before we take action?
Turi1337 . says
@aramad88
There is very little reason to believe that HE was trying to blow up a propane tank. No, the police is not a valid source, they lied too often.
He went out there to destroy ICE equipment, cars and buses specifically, which he did, he had no plan of killing people. Considering what ICE does, this is a heroic act. He had a weapon, which is more than understandable, considering that he knew that he would be shot at, so he knew that there would be reason for self defense.
No, people who are working for ICE are not civilian, at least not the thugs going out and doing the raids and even if they were, nobody working for ICE is innocent, just as no one working at Auschwitz was innocent. That is not necessarily a reason to kill them, but again, that wasn't the plan to begin with.
So yes, HE was a damn hero. At least he did something to stop this madness.
hey aramad88>
What's up with your handle? do you happen to be 31 years old, or are you just a fan of a certain Austrian fascist?
[lochaber, aramad88 has previously responded to your query: it is a birthdate in yy format]
John Morales>
thanks, I'm rather intermittent on these boards, at best, so I missed that.
Even so, I'd be really hesitant to use that as part of my handle, considering the rise of visible white supremacist ideology lately. Especially considering they keep criticizing antifa. It's not a good look…
I'd likely find something else altogether to distinguish my base handle, or if I really needed that date, go with the 4 digit or a Roman numeral format or something to make it less likely to be confused with common nazi identifiers…
dma8751482 says
My only objection to what he did is that ultimately it won't change a thing. Even if he did succeed in damaging a few vehicles- they've got hundreds more to take their place.
While I dislike the violent approach, I feel that if it must be done then it ought to be decisive and yield immediate results- for example, rendering whatever database they use to keep track of illegal immigrants unusable (or better yet, laced with false information that makes the whole system untrustworthy to its intended users). In this case, the only thing he's accomplished is giving them a reason to militarize further in the name of "security".
lochaber, no worries. I hope aramad88 (not the most obscure anagram) takes heed.
The nym is not neutral, alas.
@Turi1337
"He had a weapon, which is more than understandable, considering that he knew that he would be shot at, so he knew that there would be reason for self defense. … That is not necessarily a reason to kill them, but again, that wasn't the plan to begin with."
That doesn't work. If he knew he was entering a situation and took a gun with him to fire back when in that situation, that is a person intending to shoot people. If all he wanted was suicide by cop, why bring 6 magazines?? That shows intent to fire and fire and reload and fire some more.
Also, I find it slightly funny that Turi1337 is saying he did not want violence, this was not an act of intentional violence etc while others including lochaber one comment before is saying not only that this was a violent act, but also "How else do you fight corruption and evil like that other than with violence?" Folks, was this a violent act or not?
(My answer = yes, definitely, and likely terrorism too.)
@lochaber
Yes I was born in 1988. I didn't remember the HH thing at all when I was naking this handle, I just mashed my first and last names to get aramad and then added the birth year without it occurring to me. 1988 would have been better.
"Especially considering they keep criticizing antifa. It's not a good look…" I'd criticize nazis too, but I don;t hang out on their boards as they are disgusting, and they don't hang out here.
aramad1988:
… without it occurring to me. 1988 would have been better.
So, why not change it? Nobody will be confused, and you would garner respect in this place thereby)
(You seem smart enough that I need not go into the pros and the cons, and surely it's a pretty easy effort to essay.)
aramad88
If you click on "Logged in as aramad88", you get to your Profile Page
once there
you can put anything you want into:
and then you can choose combinations for
Now that you know this, will you continue to use a nym that indicates "heil hitler"?
aramad says
Holy shit, I thought a new account was required. Which I tried to do, but that requires a new email address… this way is easier.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl