text:
CentreRight
Christopher Beazley and Caroline Jackson are wrong about the EPP
By Roger Helmer MEP.
Shortly after I was first elected in 1999, a Conservative Press Release announced that British Tory MEPs would have a new arm's-length relationship with the EPP -- "merely an administrative umbrella" -- and would have full independence. I rejoiced, thinking in my innocence that the vexed EPP question had been resolved. Then I arrived in Brussels to find that it was business as usual. Nothing had changed. My first lesson in politics: announcements in press releases may be less than they are cracked up to be.
So my ten years as an MEP have been dominated by this issue of the Tories sitting in a passionately federalist group. Four years ago I was expelled from the EPP and lost the Conservative whip for a while -- I now have the whip back, though I remain outside the EPP. A year ago, Dan Hannan was also expelled from the EPP in very similar circumstances, though the Conservative delegation, perhaps chastened over my own experience, refrained from withdrawing the whip from Dan. It was Dan's status as a Non-Inscrit member that allowed him to make that magnificent speech on Tuesday attacking Gordon Brown to his face -- the only Conservative to speak in that debate.
Then David Cameron was elected Leader on a commitment to take us out of the EPP. That started out as an immediate commitment, which then became "months not years", and finally became years.
Now, however, the die is cast. A couple of weeks ago William Hague formally advised the EPP that we would be leaving in June, and our plans to form a new group are well advanced. And the predictable backlash from the uber-euro-quislings has begun. Caroline Jackson (SW), retiring this year, launched a sad but vitriolic attack, saying: "It is a serious mistake and will leave the UK even more semi-detached from the rest of Europe. The danger is that it will leave both the Tories and Britain isolated in Europe and the decision is simply not in the interests of either our party or the country". Of course Caroline's MP husband defected from Conservative to Labour a while ago. Caroline says (indecisively) that she is "minded to leave the Party", and will presumably join her husband on the wrong side of the tracks. No quips about rats joining sinking ships, please.
Continue reading "Christopher Beazley and Caroline Jackson are wrong about the EPP" »
Posted by Conservative Home at 10:59 | Permalink | Comments (16)
Do we risk a Gilt Strike?
Yesterday a sale of Government debt flopped. This is not normal. The last time there was such a serious failed auction was 1995. Financial newscaster Bloomberg describes it as a vote of no confidence in Brown by investors. It may be seen as a dull old business page story, but depending how it runs, it could be one of the year's most serious things for all of us.
The Conservatives and George Osborne have repeatedly warned that running a deficit budget, trying to borrow our way out of recession with already stratospheric levels of public debt and making no credible plans for balancing the budget will lead inevitably to disaster.
And looking at the hard numbers they are absolutely right. Sterling has collapsed on World markets - falling by some 30%. Our recession will be deeper than elsewhere, with a 3%-5% contraction on the cards this year. Our budget deficit at 10% of GDP will be higher than elsewhere. If the World is your oyster, why should you buy British Government debt when interest rates are so low and the risks so high?
Continue reading "Do we risk a Gilt Strike?" »
Posted by Charlie Elphicke at 09:17 | Permalink | Comments (29)
MEPs also indulge in "doughnutting"
When television cameras were first allowed into the Commons in 1989, viewers were warned about "doughnutting".
This is the practice - which was already familiar in countries with televised Parliaments - where MPs gather around whichever of their colleagues is on their feet (like a ring doughnut, geddit?) in order to create the impression that there is a packed chamber, full of rapt politicians.
Well, I have just been sent the below photo by the author of the excellent Letters from A Tory blog, which was taken in the European Parliament in Strasbourg yesterday.
Gordon Brown is ringed in red, and if I'm not very much mistaken, the seats directly behind him are all taken, whilst elsewhere in the chamber, there is a considerable number of empty seats...
Posted by Jonathan Isaby at 15:40 | Permalink | Comments (16)
Talking of trilemmas
At what point does a technical word or phrase acquire the critical mass (a case in point) to make the transition from specialist usage to common parlance? Yesterday saw the first appearance in the British media of the trilemma, a concept formerly confined to Christian apologetics or monetary theory. Harvard professor and telly-don Niall Ferguson brought the term to light in a dazzling lecture to the Centre for Policy Studies last night. Not only did Ferguson establish his credentials as the most compelling intellectual of the centre-right, he may also have succeeded in bringing the trilemma into mainstream political language, where it looks set to be widely adopted (and adapted). Michael White puts it on a high-wire in today's Guardian; in the Indie Deborah Orr applies the device to the 'Daily Mail problem' of rights and responsibilities. At the Centre for Policy Studies we'll be tracking the trilemma's progress over the coming weeks and months - trilemma-spotters welcome, email [email protected] - or tell me here at Centre Right.
Posted by Jill Kirby at 15:36 | Permalink | Comments (5)
I was right when I said we'd see less of Gordon Brown in 2009
Forgive me for being so brazen as to highlight my getting something right - but a prediction I made in a CentreRight post in December appears to have been on the money.
On 19th December I wrote:
"I would wager that we in Britain will be seeing even less of Gordon Brown in 2009... I fancy he'll be taking every opportunity he can next year to escape Britain to strut his stuff on the world stage in the hope of further suggesting that our problems are not the fault of his Government and that he's somehow seeking to persuade others to act to solve them."
How true that now seems, with Gordon Brown today missing Prime Minister's Questions for the second time this month on account of being overseas.
Even if he must insist on gallivanting around the world, can the Prime Minister not plan his travels so that he can at the very least be held to account for what he's up to just once a week in the House of Commons? Is it that much to ask?
Shuffling the educational deck chairs
Today's impromptu release of the new plans for the primary school curriculum, drawn up by former Ofsted chief Sir Jim Rose, have been met with a mixture of concern and bemusement. The 'stripping down' of the curriculum in terms of specific content that teachers are forced to deliver will be welcomed by many in the teaching profession. However, the same cannot be said for some of the other proposals.
While there is a clear argument for introducing an element of web-based learning and technological skills, it appears that this will come at the expense of literacy and numeracy. As discussed in an upcoming report by Policy Exchange, the reality of literacy and numeracy standards in primary schools is truly horrifying. Just 56% of the boys and 66% of the girls who left primary school in 2008 could read, write and count to the minimum standard. In fact, 50,000 pupils left primary school last year without reaching the minimum standard in any of the core subjects – English, maths and science. Sir Jim's proposals to combine individual subjects into six 'learning areas' (which amounts to little more than shuffling the educational deck chairs) and the greater emphasis on addressing "societal concerns" about health and well-being (which recent pilot studies showed to have no positive effect on children according to parents) are unlikely to have any tangible impact.
Furthermore, there seems to be remarkably little interest in whether these changes will improve literacy and numeracy standards. The Qualifications and Curriculum Authority has previously stated that the changes being put forward by Sir Jim are 'supported by research'. However, this research merely consists of "listening to and summarising the views of thousands of primary children and parents", "seeking the views of thousands of practitioners", visiting schools and attending seminars. This is a typical way of evaluating pilots but it fails to answer the fundamental question of whether any of the above proposals will help more children to read, write and count properly. This suggests that the upcoming (and substantial) changes to the curriculum will go down as yet another hugely expensive yet ultimately unsuccessful and unnecessary set of reforms.
Tom Richmond is a Research Fellow in Policy Exchange's Education Unit.
Posted by Policy Exchange at 11:50 | Permalink | Comments (10)
Hazel Blears versus The Guardian
It shouldn't even be an issue but Hazel Blears has taken exactly the right position on Dr Daud Abdullah of the Muslim Council of Britain. Dr Abdullah is Deputy Director-General of the MCB and recently signed The Gaza Declaration. The Times records what the Declaration states:
"The declaration, drawn up during the recent conflict in Gaza, backed Hamas, endorsed action against any, including Britain's armed forces, who prevented arms smuggling into Gaza and included a series of obligations to the "Islamic Nation", including calling for the continuation of "the jihad and resistance against the occupier until the liberation of all Palestine." Hamas, the militant Palestinian group backed by Syria and Iran and which won an election in Gaza in 2006, does not recognise the existence of Israel."
Ms Blears has threatened to disengage with the MCB if Abdullah remains in post. The Government's strategy on Islamic extremism is very muddled - as Paul Goodman MP has documented - but Ms Blears is right on this one. Nonetheless, a leading article in today's Guardian accuses the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government of "grandstanding" and "folly".
James Forsyth at Coffee House identifies one particularly bad passage in The Guardian's leader:
"The government's chief quarrel is with the hypothetical suggestion that resistance would be appropriate if UK forces were ever used to intercept arms destined for Gaza. Very many Muslims, and indeed many non-Muslims, would agree with that."
James is rightly furious: "The Guardian believes that there is nothing inherently wrong or unreasonable with believing that it is justified to use violence against British forces attempting to prevent the shipment of arms to a genocidal terrorist organisation. This is as incredible as it is shameful."
Related link: The Muslim Council of Britain finds a new excuse to boycott Holocaust Memorial Day
Posted by Tim Montgomerie at 11:36 | Permalink | Comments (32)
The future of democracy by Walkers Crisps
What is the biggest vote currently facing the nation? Is it the local elections? The European elections. Fat chance. Does the answer lies in crisp packets?
In the old days, when a company wanted to develop a new product they might have a few boffins create the idea, followed by focus groups and some marketing here and there. After, the new product would appear on the supermarket shelves. It would succeed by its advertising and by a bit of luck.
Walkers Crisps have turned this approach on its head. Instead of centrally announcing a new flavour of crisps to a munching public, the company invited people to send in recipes which were then voted on - by the public via the text or internet. The winning flavours were reduced to just six.
The company then released these six flavours onto the market and, as crisp lovers will know, are available at most outlets. But Walkers didn't stop there at this exercise in crisp democracy. Every packet bought carries a coloured rosette and allows you to vote (again by text or internet) as to which of the six flavours is preferred. The intention is that after the voting ends, Walkers will introduce the extra flavour based on the voting public's final say so.
I expect many political die-hards will watch Walker's Crisp Democracy with cynicism at another marketing exercise. Yet the truth is that more people will know about this Crisp vote than who their MEP is or local MP for that matter.
Continue reading "The future of democracy by Walkers Crisps" »
Posted by Robert Halfon at 10:46 | Permalink | Comments (20)
A duty of care
Last Saturday I read an article by the Chief Rabbi, which talked about the need for a new moral basis to the market economy - to return to a time when if someone said "my word is my bond", they meant it. The Chief Rabbi's argument was that bankers had got away with making huge errors, not just because of failure by Government or the market, but through the weakening of social capital - of values that differentiated between right and wrong.
I thought about this as I attended a dinner yesterday evening. A famous Peer and tough self-made businessman (who started one of our most famous retail chains), began to talk about the concept of 'duty of care'. His argument was that the main reason for the financial failures by the bankers was not because of greed (this vice had always existed and would continue to exist in the future) but because of a failure of 'duty of care'. In contrast to nurses, doctors and teachers, bankers and City folk were not bound by a duty of care - and this had led to the disastrous decisions that had helped ruin our economy (alongside Gordon Brown). Rather than regulating, establishing a duty of care, would solve the problem of bankers mis-managing assets and savers deposits etc.
Duty of care is defined by Wikipedia as:
" A legal obligation imposed on an individual requiring that they adhere to a standard of reasonable care while performing any acts that could foresee ably harm others. It is the first element that must be established to proceed with an action in negligence......
Duty of care may be considered a formalization of the social contract, the implicit responsibilities held by individuals towards others within society. It is not a requirement that a duty of care be defined by law, though it will often develop through the jurisprudence of common law."
I think this businessman had a fascinating thesis - the question is how one would establish a duty of care for bankers et al, that would be supported and respected by the profession and recognised by the appropriate authorities? Incidentally, this businessman also said that he had once offered to fund with substantial sums of money, a Chair of Economic Ethics for a famous University in London. His proposal was turned down by the Dean on the grounds that economics was a science and did not have an ethical dimension.
Who are the "leaders" of the Republican Party?
On 7th November 2006, the Republican Party lost control of the House of Representatives and the Senate. Two years later, the party's presidential nominee John McCain was blown out the water by the young Illinois Senator Barack Obama by a margin of 365 electoral votes to 173. For the first time since 1994, the Republicans control none of American's three levers of governmental power.
The party, for all intents and purposes, lies in a state ruin; rudderless, leaderless.
Like the post-97 British Conservative Party, the numerous disparate voices clamouring for the affections of the party faithful - and the all-important independent voters - stike an imperfect cadence. The modernisers, the traditionalists, the small-staters, the big-staters, the religious conservatives, the urban liberals; the list is almost endless.
In this piece, I intend to explore some of the figures and influences who may help turn the fortunes of the Republican Party around after two of the most devastating election cycles in the party's history.
Continue reading "Who are the "leaders" of the Republican Party?" »
Posted by Daniel Hamilton at 07:47 | Permalink | Comments (9)
Bribing the Taliban will only prolong the fighting...
Advisers to President Obama are reportedly split over whether the US should try to bribe moderate elements in the Taliban to defect.
It is certainly true that many Afghans joined the various mujhaddin factions and later the Taliban because the offered a pay packet - in a country where aid agencies are the largest employers and often the only ones offering a living wage.
However, history tells us that bribery can never provide a lasting solution to 'the Afghan problem' as local people call it. Neither can it provide President Obama with his desired exit strategy from Afghanistan. In the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries the British colonial administration pursued a similar policy in the tribal areas between what is now the North West Frontier Province of Pakistan (NWFP) and what in 1895 became the border of Afghanistan. The Pushtun (Pathan) tribes were given muwajib - an 'allowance' to live peacefully. They accepted the allowance, then a year or so later rose up against the government until they received another allowance...!
Continue reading " Bribing the Taliban will only prolong the fighting..." »
Posted by Martin Parsons at 21:40 | Permalink | Comments (5)
There seems to be some doubt about our Party's position on Inheritance Tax.
No doubt about mine. Here's what I said in 2005:
Inheritance tax in the UK should be abolished altogether - as it is in Australia, New Zealand and Canada. The US plans to phase it out at a federal level by 2010. It is unjust, it deters individuals from being financially responsible as they get older, and it obstructs them in trying to pass on to their loved ones the property and capital that they have, through their endeavours, accumulated during their lives.
Should you be of a mind to, you can read the whole thing.
Posted by Alex Deane at 18:27 | Permalink | Comments (42)
Alastair Campbell: Where do your children go to school?
Among the articles in this weeks New Statesman, guest edited by Alastair Campbell, is a survey of whether newspaper editors use private health care and whether they send their children, if they have them, to fee-paying schools.
The whole thing was a bit of an own goal. For Conservatives there is no great difficulty. It would be a practical matter. Is there a good state school near where we live? Can we afford to go private? There is no question of hypocrisy as we don't claim there is anything wrong with using the independent sectors.
So, for instance, Paul Dacre of the Daily Mail, answered the questions. What does not seem to be on the website edition but was included in the print version were those editors who refused to answer. They include Richard Wallace, Editor of the Daily Mirror, Tina Weaver, Editor of the Sunday Mirror and Lloyd Embley, Editor of the People. All staunch titles backing Labour with plenty of class war rhetoric. There is also James Harding of The Times who doesn't reply. Campbell used to work for The Mirror and is now a regular contributor to The Times. But he seems to have meekly accepted their refusal to respond to his enquiries.
Posted by Harry Phibbs at 14:26 | Permalink | Comments (29)
The last thing the British economy needs is higher taxes - the government will just get lower revenues
I'm reading Arthur Laffer's excellent book, The End of Prosperity - How Higher Taxes will Doom the Economy - If We Let It Happen and I'm struck by one particular passage on then Senator Obama. He was caught out last year when he said that he wanted to raise the level of Capital Gains Tax, even if revenues went down, because it was "fair".
Are we poised to do the same thing with a higher rate of top income tax and retreating from an inheritance tax cut because we want to look fair?
In the short run, revenues may rise a bit, but government will swiftly find that they will quickly drop off. Some of us still dare to think that there's plenty of room and public support for cutting public expenditure instead. As Roger Bootle said in the DT today;
"On the latest figures, while pay in the private sector was down over the year by 1.1pc, in the public sector it was up by 3.7pc. If you are employed by the public sector you don't know what recession is all about. No reductions in salary or disappearing bonuses; no worries about your pension; no anxiety about losing your job; no increased tensions at work because of the pressure. You just sail blithely on. Whenever I travel about the country I never cease to be struck by the depth of anger about this contrast. It is going to intensify.But this contrast will be temporary. For there will be yet another stage to the recession. As soon as the economy starts to recover, and maybe even before, the next government will have to bring in massive cuts to public expenditure programmes".
Posted by Dan Lewis at 10:00 | Permalink | Comments (62)
What does your desk look like?
Earlier today I Twittered a photo of my desk at home:
ConHome regular Mark Fulford has now submitted a photo of the place from which he leaves his erudite comments:
Email in some pics and I'll post your desk view too...
4.30pm on 23rd March: Here are some images I've been sent. Top marks to Andrew Shackell for having ConHome on his screen AND an iPhone!:
Continue reading "What does your desk look like?" »
"We are going to move heaven and earth to show that we are not the party of the wealth creators"
My alternative title to Tim Montgomerie's post on Tory Diary.
Posted by Ridley Grove at 17:20 | Permalink | Comments (8)
Which thirty million?
I think Peter is quite right to highlight Jonathan Porritt's renewed call to cut the British population. There is a horrible sense that such a view is becoming ensconced as another unquestioned prejudice of our tranzi elite. After all, the Times couldn't even find someone in their address book of the influential and powerful to actually criticise Porritt's position. The closest we got was George Monbiot arguing the toss over whether people or prosperity are the greater problem. No one was given a chance, or took the chance, to stand up for prosperous human beings as a good thing.
All this shows the ideological roots of the modern environmentalist movement. The Population Bomb and The Limits to Growth are canonical works for that movement, arguing that the incredible achievements of free market capitalism in doubling incomes every generation alongside massive increases in population cannot continue and will run into inevitable and awful Malthusian blocks. Those books were proved dramatically wrong and the author, Paul Ehrlich, of the Population Bomb lost an expensive bet on his theory. In light of that, the theory has been reinvented. Now the problem isn't that we can't keep increasing human prosperity and population but that we can, and that is a bad thing as global warming provides Gaia with a means to take revenge.
What these theories always underestimate is human potential. Just as Malthus was proved wrong by the unexpected boon of the Industrial Revolution, technological progress has and can overcome other natural limits to our prosperity. That's where Jonathan Porritt's limit of thirty million comes in. In among that sea of people who wouldn't exist if Mr. Porritt had his way, it is entirely probable that there will be those who might otherwise prove vital to our coping with whatever challenges nature throws our way.
Continue reading "Which thirty million?" »
Posted by Matthew Sinclair at 12:19 | Permalink | Comments (28)
Whoops Apocalypse
The Sunday Times reports today that the environmentalist campaigner Jonathan Porritt will this week repeat his assertion that population control in Britain is vital if we are to build a 'sustainable' society.'
Or rather, he goes somewhat futher than that: the country needs to reduce its population to around 30 million.
When Porritt first pointed out that we should limit the amount of babies we are having for the sake of the environment, one could fairly assume that he was aiming his diatribe at those whose ears would already be open to his message: white, middle-class and with an 'environmental' conscience.
In which case, he needn't worry. This part of the population - indeed, the whole of what was once called the indigenous but is now more frequently referred to as the 'traditional' population - are reproducing less and less.
Continue reading "Whoops Apocalypse" »
Posted by Peter Whittle at 10:35 | Permalink | Comments (7)
The welfare trap comes in many forms
My father is a retired teacher. Like many retired teachers, he lives in an area in which schools need more teachers. As a result, he is often asked to do some supply teaching. Sometimes, he did so. But he recently got a letter from HMRC saying that if he continued, his pension would be diminished. So now he just says no.
Joined up government, eh..?
Galloway banned from Canada
As reported earlier this week, George Galloway's disgusting support for Hamas - he boasts about financing a group most Western countries have rightly designated as terrorist - has got him banned from Canada. The AFP reported at the time:
"Galloway said he personally would be donating three cars and 25,000 pounds (35,000 dollars) to Hamas prime minister Ismail Haniya as he dared the West to try to prosecute him for aiding what it considers a terror group."
There are also other grounds for Canada's ban, such as his calling for a coup against the Egyptian government:
"So I call, in conclusion, on the great people of Egypt, on the heroic armed forces of Egypt, and the heroic army of Egypt of 1973, to rise up and sweep away this tyrant Mubarak."
Given the conditions set down in Canada's Immigration Act, reported in the Guardian, that's pretty clearly the kind of breach that makes Galloway inadmissable. The Canadian Government refused to make an exception for someone who had breached rules designed to protect Canadians' security.
That is why this is so different to the case of Geert Wilders. In that case, the Government actively stepped in because the "Secretary of State is satisfied that your statements about Muslims and their beliefs, as expressed in your film Fitna and elsewhere would threaten community harmony and therefore public security in the UK". That case was about freedom of speech. Mr. Wilders was banned not because he was inciting or commiting violence, however objectionable his positions there is no allegation he has done anything of the sort. It also doesn't really make sense to suppose that he posed a public order threat because his supporters might go on the rampage; he was set to speak in the fairly civil House of Lords. He was banned because his opponents do not respect his right to freely express his views and might cause trouble as a result, the British Government cravenly gave official support to their attempts at censorship.
Galloway's facile case that he too is being censored is undermined further by the fact that he supported the ban on Geert Wilders entering the UK:
Continue reading "Galloway banned from Canada" »
Stone me!
A couple of observations coalesced into something approaching a feeling of foreboding this morning.
I came home from St Petersburg yesterday evening, very tired, passport-clutching, shuffling my way to the front of the weary immigration queue, not very here-and-now to be honest. So I forgot that on top of my bald head was a flat cap, worn both to protect myself from the freezing temperatures of the Russian weather I'd just left behind, as well as to signal Hey! I'm into indy jangly guitar type pop music to anyone interested. These semiotic signifiers, eh! I handed my passport over to New Labour's frontline of border protection, a young woman resplendent in the toy-uniform designed by John Reid to give the impression that some sort of control is maintained over the country's porous borders.
-- Could you take your hat off, please?
-- Oh, sorry, yes of course.
But here's the thing. As I'm pulling the cap off, I look at her properly. Her entire head is wrapped up in a Muslim scarf, with only her eyes, nose and mouth visible: no forehead, no scalp, no chin on view. Fair enough. But my head is practically naked by comparison. I wonder, and I don't know, but if I had a headscarf on, would I have had to remove that? We look at each other a bit, then share a giggle. She can read my mind very easily.
Continue reading "Stone me!" »
Posted by Graeme Archer at 12:37 | Permalink | Comments (22)
America is in the grip of a new McCarthy witch hunt... against bankers
Yesterday evening I was thinking that I must pen a quick blog on the AIG bonus fiasco as soon as I can, and was a admittedly a little concerned that Andrew Lilico would beat me to it. Then I remembered...he's no longer blogging for CH! I must admit, I will miss his missives, and wish him all the best with his new role at PX.
Now, to the bonus fiasco in the US. It's very rare that when legislators pass laws with haste (especially rage filled haste), that such laws are sensible, practical or reasonable. So it was with the first reading of a special tax bill that the US House passed yesterday – which, if signed into law – will impose a 90% punitive surtax (that's a tax on top of existing taxes) on any income above $250,000 paid to an employee of an institution that has been the recipient of US$5bn or more of government money. If there ever was a stupid law passed anywhere in the developed world since the onset of the global recession, this is it. US legislators, Democrat and Republican alike, far from behaving like representatives of a modern, stable democracy, have descended to the antics of a banana republic. It's the McCarthy witch hunt era all over again.
This law will not only impact institutions that are already on their knees like AIG, Citibank and Bank of America Merrill Lynch, but also the ones just about still standing, such as Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan. What was the point of pumping government cash into these banks, only to cripple them right after? There is no doubt that these institutions will now do whatever they can to repay the government as early as possible, instead of keeping the extra capital until things stabilised. If the legislators were going to do this, what was the point of rescuing the banks in the first place? Better to have let them gone bust, as I have argued in the past, through a pre-packaged type bankruptcy arrangement.
Continue reading "America is in the grip of a new McCarthy witch hunt... against bankers" »
Posted by Suli Shah at 10:51 | Permalink | Comments (9)
Should our MPs take a lead from their 1930s predecessors and take a pay cut?
My attention has been drawn to the below table from the House of Commons factsheet on MPs' Pay.
It shows that as the Depression took hold in the 1930s, MPs took a 10% pay cut, seeing their annual salary decrease from £400 to £360 in 1931, in line with a similar cut in the pay of all public sector workers.
I generally take the view that MPs' pay is currently on the low side, given the hours that most of them work. However, if there are savings and economies to be made across the public sector, there is certainly an argument to say that there should be consistency and that MPs' salaries should be included in any across-the-board reviews.
And to any parliamentarians worried about the idea of following this lead, just look at what happened a few years later in 1937: they got a 50% rise in one go!
The EU – an issue that will not go away
CentreRight has, of course, all the best stories. But the two stories that really caught by eye this week related to the news that European Parliamentarians have been told to use gender-neutral language and a quite spectacular poll that was discussed on BBC2's Daily Politics show on Wednesday. The nonsense over gender-neutral language can be easily dismissed and I'm just wondering how the speakers of most of Europe's languages, bar English, are going to cope as these splendid tongues are steeped with gender affiliations in a way that English is not.
But the poll is something else. The results were really quite special. When the sample of people were asked if they thought Britain benefits overall from membership of the EU in terms of jobs and trade only 44% thought so whilst 51% did not. And when asked whether Britain should leave the EU but maintain close trading links 55% agreed whilst 41% did not. Closer inspection of the figures that every age group favoured leaving, as did people in every region and in every social class - bar the ABs where there was tiny preference for, one speculates, staying in the EU. (I say "speculates" because those who disagreed with the proposition may believe that Britain should leave the EU and not maintain close trading links!)
This was at first sight a staggering result – but perhaps it should not be so surprising after all. We, Global Vision, have conducted several polls asking people what sort of relationship they thought Britain should have with the EU. All our polling showed that the majority of people are unhappy with the current relationship. Roughly a half wanted a looser relationship with the EU based on trade and cooperation and a quarter wanted to leave altogether, whilst a quarter wished to maintain the status quo. Clearly when people are given the option of withdrawing from the political institutions of the EU whilst continuing to trade then this option is their favoured option.
Continue reading "The EU – an issue that will not go away" »
Posted by Ruth Lea at 22:32 | Permalink | Comments (53)
Labour isn't holding up-to-date information on where taxpayers' money is going to 'prevent extremism'
By Paul Goodman MP.
I asked in the Commons last Wednesday where this year's tranche of Preventing Violent Extremism (PVE) money has gone. Hazel Blears is spending some £70 million on preventing violent extremism over three years. She's been stonewalling my question about the 2008-9 slice of PVE money since January. She also stonewalled the previous year, 2007-8 – but was eventually forced to send me details, with an apology.
Alan Duncan, the Shadow Leader of the Commons, raised the matter during Business Questions the following last Thursday, and I pitched in again. Conservative Home kindly published the exchanges.
Blears has now backed down. She wrote to the Speaker yesterday to confirm that the information will be published before the end of the financial year.
But that's not quite the end of the matter.
She writes that the DCLG "is working closely…to collate information setting out progress on the development of local partnerships and action plans. This includes information on engagement, including details about which community groups are funded for leading local projects".
What this gobbledegook means, in plain English, is that the DCLG doesn't hold up to date information about where the money's gone – hence the delay in publication.
Continue reading "Labour isn't holding up-to-date information on where taxpayers' money is going to 'prevent extremism'" »
« LATER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS »
About CentreRight
shams on Why Kashmir's a British issue
Glenn H. on What is Right-wing?
cj on Comrades are confused about capitalism - they shouldn't be.
David on Libertarian Britain
MisterB on The Sunday Trading laws should be abolished outright
Storm and Stress on Why we should not extradite Gary McKinnon
Lifeg Oeson on The Sunday Trading laws should be abolished outright
TheOldBrewer on Don't simplify the burqa issue
mlhradio on Soft on rapists?
Today's Education White Paper is a good start - but there's much further to go
Robert Halfon MP: Action must be taken against the extreme Islamists who disrupted Remembrance Sunday
The obscenity of the Guantanamo Bay payouts
A tax cap: an idea whose time has come?
Ed Vaizey and Net Neutrality
Sir Humphrey's ingenious defence of First Class rail travel
Jonathan Isaby: Is Bob Crow a closet toff?
Lord Ashcroft's TV series telling the stories of some of the most courageous human beings starts tonight
Andrew Lilico: What lessons can the Coalition learn from Ireland's woes?
Alan Mendoza (21)
Alex Deane (389)
Andrew Haldenby (6)
Andrew Lilico (227)
Benedict Rogers (101)
Bernard Jenkin (1)
Bob Seely (7)
Brian Connell (2)
Cameron Watt (14)
Charles Tannock MEP (26)
Charlie Elphicke (100)
Conor Burns (32)
Conservative Environment Network (2)
Dan Hamilton (122)
Dan Lewis (27)
Daniel Kawczynski MP (30)
David Green (4)
David Lidington MP (21)
David T Breaker (32)
David Willetts (2)
Derek Brownlee MSP (1)
Donata Huggins (2)
Douglas Carswell MP (52)
Douglas Murray (21)
Dr Crippen (30)
Ed Vaizey MP (2)
Graeme Archer (110)
Greg Hands (87)
Hamish Marshall (23)
Harriett Baldwin (1)
Harry Phibbs (90)
Iain Anderson (2)
Iain Murray (17)
Invictus (1)
J P Floru (29)
James McConalogue (114)
Jeremy Brier (11)
Jeremy Hunt (20)
Jesse Norman (5)
Jill Kirby (57)
John Glen (11)
Jonathan Isaby (179)
Jonty Olliff-Cooper (2)
Julia Manning (88)
Lee Rotherham (36)
Liam Fox MP (13)
Louise Bagshawe (68)
Mark Field (41)
Mark Wallace (44)
Martin Parsons (70)
Matthew Elliott (30)
Matthew Sinclair (171)
Melanchthon (171)
Michael Bates (6)
Nigel Evans MP (17)
Nile Gardiner (25)
Paul Goodman MP (46)
Peter Cuthbertson (129)
Peter Franklin (79)
Peter Whittle (49)
Policy Exchange (51)
Reasons for getting rid of Labour (6)
Reform (68)
Ridley Grove (43)
Robert Halfon (69)
Robin Simcox (26)
Roger Helmer MEP (19)
Ruth Lea (23)
Sally McNamara (12)
Samuel Coates (72)
Simon Chapman (77)
Stephan Shakespeare (27)
Steve Baker MP (13)
Suli Shah (34)
The Lurcher (11)
The Things Bush Got Right (4)
Tim Montgomerie (520)
Timothy Barnes (9)
Tom Greeves (23)
Zac Goldsmith (1)
International centre-right organisations
American Enterprise Institute (US)
Association for Liberal Thinking (Turkey)
Atlantic Bridge (UK/US)
Atlantic Partnership (UK/US)
Australian Polity
Center for Economic Development (Bulgaria)
Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Development (Montenegro)
Center for Institutional Analysis and Development (Romania)
Center for Liberal-Democratic Studies (Serbia)
Center for the Study of Democracy (Bulgaria)
Centre for Independent Studies (Aus)
Centre for Liberal Strategies (Bulgaria)
Club For Growth (US)
Club Nouveau Siécle (Fr)
Competitive Enterprise Institute (US)
Economic Policy Research Institute (Macedonia)
Ekome (Greece)
Ethics and Public Policy Center (US)
Fondation Concorde (Fr)
Fondation pour l'Innovation Politique (Fr)
Fondation Robert Schuman (Fr)
Fraser Institute (Can)
Free Market Center (Serbia)
Free Market Foundation (SA)
Globalisation Institute (EU)
Hellenic Leadership Institute (Greece)
Heritage Foundation (US)
Hoover Institution (US)
Hudson Institute (US)
Institut Turgot (Fr)
Institute for Market Economics (Bulgaria)
Institute for Strategic Studies and Prognoses (Montenegro)
Institute of Public Affairs (Aus)
International Democrat Union
Jerusalem Institute for Market Studies (Israel)
Leadership Institute (US)
Liberté Chérie (Fr)
Manhattan Institute (US)
Maxim Institute (NZ)
Menzies Research Centre (Australia)
Montreal Economic Institute (Can)
Movement for European Reform (EU)
Riinvest (Kosovo)
Romania Thinktank
Society for Individual Liberty (Bulgaria)
Stockholm Network (Europe)
Taxpayers Federation (Can)
Thatcher Center for Freedom (US)
UK centre-right organisations
2020health.org
Big Brother Watch
Bruges Group
Centre for Social Cohesion
Countryside Alliance
European Foundation
Freedom Association
Henry Jackson Society
Institute for Fiscal Studies
Institute Of Directors
Institute of Economic Affairs
Migration Watch
New Culture Forum
Open Europe
Policy Exchange
Policy Institute
Progressive Vision
Social Market Foundation
Stockholm Network
Taxpayers' Alliance
Legatum Institute
Tory organisations
Association of Conservative Clubs
Bow Group
Britain Club
Campaign for Conservative Democracy
Conservative Animal Welfare Group
Conservative Christian Fellowship
Conservative Disability Group
Conservative Education Society
Conservative Friends of Bangladesh
Conservative Friends of Israel
Conservative History Group
Conservative Humanists
Conservative Liberty Forum
Conservative Muslim Forum
Conservative Party Archive
Conservative Party Foundation
Conservative Party's Human Rights Commission
Conservative Political Officers Network
Conservative Technology Forum
Conservative Transport Group
Conservative Way Forward
Conservative Women's Organisation
Conservatives Abroad
Conservatives at Work
Cornerstone Group of Tory MPs
Direct Democracy
Enterprise Forum
First Defence
Network Me
Selsdon Group
Society for Conservative Lawyers
Society of Conservative Lawyers
Tories for Older People
Tory Reform Group
Women2Win
Tim Montgomerie on Twitter
Profile / Email
Alexander Deane
Charlie Elphicke
Dan Hamilton
Hamish Marshall
Jeremy Hunt
Mark Field
Matt Sinclair
Robert Halfon
Suleiman R Shah
Tom Greeves


§ The Open Source Initiative Board has added OSI to the list of organizations asking that the BBC not be allowed to add digital restriction measures to digital broadcasts in the United Kingdom. The BBC's request to do so is being reviewed by the UK regulator, OfCOM, and OSI is supporting the position statement from the UK's Open Rights Group and encouraging others to do likewise.
The Berlusconi regime in Italy has achieved a longevity that many thought was impossible in Italian politics, but it seems one of the mechanisms it has used rests at a convergence of politics and media power that is of questionable morality. It's bad enough having Murdock and Fox as potential kingmakers across the world, but in Italy the connection is right in hands of the head of state.
I've never trusted the Verisign-style pay-to-prove hierarchical approach to internet security and the fact this box is so freely available settles it. This box means you can't even trust https to protect you on the web.
The BBC want to add DRM (digital restriction measures) to UK television broadcasts. Given we have all already paid for whatever they broadcast becuase of the license fee, and given that most of what's broadcast is available from elsewhere, this is about controlling consumers and not about protecting rights-holders. You'll note that control of UK consumers is being handed to an unaccountable offshore consortium. It's also another assault on the use of open source software since it will take a legal entity to get licensed by the offshore quango. I've signed up to the text ORG are submitting to OfCOM and suggest you consider doing so too if you're in the UK.
There's a delicious irony about the crusty old BCS turning down a petition for debate about their "modernisation" plans (in my view more about connecting with corporate sponsors) becuase the petition was conducted on the internet and not on paper. I hope their new President is suitably embarrassed and will make sure it doesn't happen again (the anachronistic behaviour, I mean, not the squashing of dissent which I sadly anticipate continuing).


Yu "Jeffrey" Hu is a Professor of Information Technology Management, Director of China Program, Co-Director of Business Analytics Center, and Associate Director of Center for Data Analytics at Georgia Institute of Technology's Scheller College of Business. He is an expert on big data, business analytics, electronic commerce, Internet retailing, social media, consumer behavior, and online advertising. He coauthored the first paper on the "Long Tail" phenomenon in Internet markets and the first paper on the value of social media in predicting stock markets, and he is among the first to measure the effect of social media promotions on product sales.
Sridhar Narasimhan is Co-Director of the Business Analytics Center and a Professor of Information Technology Management. His research interests are in the areas of IT Infrastructure including computer network design, distributed databases, and IT outsourcing. Dr. Narasimhan has published in Management Science, ORSA Journal on Computing, IEEE Transactions on Communications, IIE Transactions, Decision Sciences, Computers and Operations Research, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, Computer Communications, Annals of Operations Research, and Naval Research Logistics, Group Decision and Negotiation, Journal of Database Management, and Information and Management.
Keith Werle is Managing Director of the Business Analytics Center and a Professor of the Practice in Georgia Tech Scheller College of Business. With over thirty years of experience in industry and consulting, his background spans a broad range of business disciplines including finance, analytics, strategy, and corporate development. He has consulted in many industries and for a diverse range of clients, from venture capital backed technology start-ups to global Fortune 50 companies. His client work focused on business analytics and the application of advanced data visualization, multi-dimensional performance analysis, data mining and machine learning techniques in strategy development, decision support, and operations management.
Sherri joined the Business Analytics Center at Scheller College of Business in August 2017 as the Corporate Engagement Manager. She is responsible for identifying, developing and maintaining corporate partnerships that drive collaboration between the Business Analytics Center and the analytics industry. Before joining the Business Analytics Center, Sherri worked as a Corporate Relations Manager for the Georgia Tech Master of Science in Analytics Program. Prior to joining Georgia Tech, she built a 25+ year accomplished track record in business development, corporate relations, program management and fund raising. Her extensive experience spans multiple industry sectors in Technology, Consumer Products, Education and Nonprofit.


Having a spokesperson is one of the best ways to get across a message on the radio. But it's not always easy to get the right fit for your brand. If you find yourself without a spokesperson, there are still ways for you to get on the radio, and communicate your message with a high degree of authority that still calls attention to your brand.
The first way is to create a feature around your brand. Creating a news hook can turn a commercial message into a newsworthy one, taking the aim of an advert and delivering it in the form of a news story. In radio, your story is always more important than your product, so if it can be delivered in an engaging, interesting, and justifiable way, you could get a huge boost to your brand recognition because people will remember the story. People remember stories far longer than adverts, they stay in the collective consciousness because we can identify with a narrative, if we can connect the story with ourselves, we're far more likely to hold on to it. So this method is arguably one of the best ways to build brand recognition that works towards your goals.
The second way is to use a presenter as a brand ambassador. Giving a presenter a sample or prize is a way of gaining attention, while at the same time abiding by OFCOM rules. This immediately gains the public's trust, as radio presenters are known to them. Even though they will not give brands a direct endorsement, just the fact that your brand is on the radio at all will validate it. Competitions are great for radio stations because they draw and keep attention by teasing the prize all through the length of a show, so for very low cost to you, you can ensure massive reach by simply giving your product to a station. People respond very positively to competitions, they're also more likely to remember your product due to the fact that people listen more intently when there's something in it for them. The added bonus is of course that by being offered as a prize, people attach significantly more value to your product, so even if they've never heard of it before, they'll want to win it.
For more information on staging radio competitions and how to use broadcast PR to grow your brand, please contact us on 020 7158 0000, or email us.


text:
Scriptoplusia hokowensis är en fjärilsart som beskrevs av Chou och Lu 1979. Scriptoplusia hokowensis ingår i släktet Scriptoplusia och familjen nattflyn. Inga underarter finns listade.

Källor

Nattflyn
hokowensis

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Suicide attack at Afghan passport office injures several in Kabul
ISTANBUL Dec 23, 2021 - 11:40 am GMT+3
People queue to enter the passport office at a checkpoint in Kabul, Afghanistan, Dec. 19, 2021. (AFP Photo)
by Agencies Dec 23, 2021 11:40 am
China, Iran launch cooperation agreement in face of US sanctions
A suicide bomber was killed at the gate of a passport office in the Afghan capital Kabul on Thursday, a government spokesperson said. Unconfirmed reports say several were injured in the blast.
A spokesperson for Afghanistan's Interior Ministry said the attacker was shot and killed while trying to enter the passport office premises.
One member of the Taliban who was a witness told Reuters multiple people were injured, and the building and streets around the area were locked down by Taliban security forces.
Large crowds of Afghans have been thronging outside the passport office in a bid to get travel documents in recent days after the service was restarted after weeks of suspension.
Officials said that Thursdays are reserved as a special day for Taliban officials to visit the passport office to make travel documents.
The Taliban stopped issuing passports shortly after their Aug. 15 return to power, as tens of thousands of people scrambled to Kabul's only airport in a bid to catch any international flight that could evacuate them.
In October, authorities reopened the passport office in Kabul only to suspend work days later as a flood of applications caused the biometric equipment to break down.
Many Afghans who wanted to visit neighboring Pakistan for medical treatment have also been blocked in the absence of valid passports.
"My mother has some health issues and we needed to go to Pakistan a long time ago, but we could not because the passport department was closed," said Jamshid, who like many Afghans goes by only one name.
Issuing passports – and allowing people to leave amid the growing humanitarian crisis – is seen as a test of the Taliban's commitment to the international community.
The Taliban are pressing donors to restore billions of dollars in aid that was suspended when the previous Western-backed regime imploded in the final stages of a U.S. military withdrawal. The crisis has forced many to sell household possessions to buy food.
Over the past four decades, more than 6 million Afghans have fled the country to escape war and economic crises, most of them living in neighboring Iran and Pakistan.
The international community has so far not recognized the current Taliban government that was formed after the chaotic withdrawal of U.S.-led foreign troops.
International flights, mainly to Dubai and Abu Dhabi, have meanwhile slowly resumed at Kabul Hamid Karzai International Airport after the facility was trashed in August when crowds of people scrambled to evacuate.
Last Update: Dec 23, 2021 12:53 pm
afghan crisis afghanistan taliban passport office
Israeli police clash with Palestinians in Jerusalem during Ramadan

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Major incidents are inevitable, and fixing them is the top priority for any ops or DevOps team. But what happens after service is restored? Do teams take the time to fully understand what went wrong, then follow up to prevent it happening again?
The reality is that many teams today don't. Incident postmortems are not completed or provide only a cursory analysis of the underlying causes. Without proper analysis and deep fixes, repeat incidents are common in our industry. Over 60% of teams in our Jira Ops evaluator survey said they'd like to improve their postmortem process, or how they learn from incidents.
This is why we're excited to announce postmortems for Jira Ops, available today, as the best way to learn and improve from every incident.
In Jira Ops, you are immediately prompted to create a postmortem document on Confluence when your incident is resolved. By default, Jira Ops will create a new Incidents space and parent page in Confluence to collect all your postmortems in one place.
These sections are designed as prompts for your team to ensure you cover the key points of each incident and should be modified as needed. By default, every incident in Jira Ops requires a postmortem to help ensure your team never misses one. If you have a low severity incident and wish to skip the postmortem, you can do that from the incident list view or from the incident itself.
A key time-saver with Jira Ops postmortems is the incident timeline, which gathers all the key events from the incident in a single chronological list. In the past, without a way to easily gather the information from the different tools used during an incident, it would take teams hours to piece a comprehensive timeline together.
When you create a postmortem with Jira Ops, the incident timeline is automatically included as a macro in the postmortem Confluence page. The timeline provides exact timestamps for all the important events in the incident, like status changes, key Slack messages, Opsgenie alerts, Statuspage customer comms, and manual updates by the incident team.
Once your team has analyzed what happened and got a clear picture of the root causes, it's critical to track these tasks and ensure they're done in a timely fashion.
After you've published your postmortem, you can create Jira issues directly from the Confluence page by selecting the text of each action and clicking the "Create Jira issue" button. These issues can be scheduled on your dev team backlog and reviewed to make sure they are completed.
With postmortems in Jira Ops, you can turn a manual, often-neglected process into a powerful force for learning and improving with every incident. You can read all about postmortems in the Jira Ops documentation and see it in action below.
To resolve incidents faster and eliminate repeat incidents, create your free early access account today.


Writings Guru has a variety of workers who work collectively to guantee that the papers are delivered on time and at a really high commonplace. How to use essential thinking in your essay and write smarter essays on positive steps the street instance of. Topics examples writing gxart associated can colleges really educate abilities requires about faculty roles paper lantern simply procrastination instructions a best writingsguru review concepts help gauker c out loud an relation between what is scientific criticism template topic writings guru blog racism america race discrimination customized departments tok unpacking title ppt video on-line teaching scaffolding sample argument instructor tools. Services skilled writers faculty college students definitions. Project com boundaries map internet cmap software program sensible evaluate power strategic plagiarizing roadblocks higher are embedded realistic plans fakultas hukum uksw tags intellectual standards service you.
Plagiarism is perceived as academic fraud and is extremely frowned towards within the tutorial sphere. As such we at take the distinctiveness of each delivered paper critically. We consistently check for plagiarism before the papers are despatched to you. This ensures the originality of our writers' work. Each writingsguru review paper is run with a sturdy and updated specially designed plagiarism software instrument. Moreover, our plagiarism software instrument is constantly upgraded to make sure that it detects plagiarized texts with excessive certainty and accuracy.
That is completely right! Related Post: right here We entertain all requests of Assist me to put in writing my essay cheap" as we want everybody to be able to afford our services. We do that as a result of we understand that students have limited budgets. So subsequent time you might be concerned about your funds writingsguru but nonetheless want to rent professional writers, get in touch with us, and tell us your requirement, and we will provide you with the very best value of your cash and supply you good high quality assistance in inexpensive value which fits your price range.
Plagiarism is a critical sin in educational writing. Even when you do your finest to give you your personal ideas and arguments, it is simple to neglect referencing a particular source you used. That's why you could run every single essay by PlagTracker earlier than submitting it. Because of this free tool, you could be confident that your papers are completely distinctive.
Transparency – Writings Guru writers are reliable people with whom you might be assured that the contents of your paper should not just paraphrased variations of another particular person's work however relatively the results of an unique analysis. Furthermore, Writings Guru writers are screened so as writingsguru to ensure that the data they've offered is accurate and genuine. This will assist the employers ensure that they'll trust the writer to perform the task.
David S. Freeman – Freeman eschews idea completely in his "Past Structure" workshops, preferring to offer writers more than 200 improvement methods, permitting them to "create riveting three-dimensional characters" and "write luminous dialogue." Freeman also writingsguru offers script consultations and help in designing video games (his e book, "Creating Emotion in Video games," consists of something referred to as "Emotioneering").
Transferring school ivy league essay prompts coach weblog best examples toreto co imagery topics of good essays enterprise college admissions mba admission. Maki ueda perfume and sweetness harriet tubman plumpjack the last word guide to writing great hooks for about how write dartmouth you good but battle posts richmond writing. Choose dependable service english cover page increase new info. Excessive an rio asymptote web libre consulting emphasizing formats students jembatan timbang voltaire enlightenment veghist ep vegan option writingsguru review radio a personal my successful harvard application full common app supplement food mae s funny little on study get your short tales printed one guide weblog. Crucial thinking matter ideas writings guru post content material vault running a blog tailieu vncty com ielts pattern kiree hay. Youngsters faith in kite by x assist mit not fashion mistake most bloggers make billboard sites publishing half beyond.
Not only are readers that view film assessment websites seeking inspiration for watching a film. Many times, readers will need a better understanding of the film or a basic overview. It might be potential that they watched the film but had questions that they wish to be answered. Therefore an excellent writingsguru reviews film critic needs to have the ability to provide a movie overview that focuses on the main features of the film and explains them effectively. These critics are great observers that use essential considering to learn between the lines in order that they can provide high quality evaluations.
Grammatical errors – A good paper must be freed from all types of grammatical and syntax error. It also needs to be written in correct and formal English language with writingsguru out using slangs and brief kinds. This can be a crucial prerequisite for all professional tutorial writers.


Salesforce Certification Preparation for Platform App Builder, also known as CRT-402 exam, is a Salesforce Platform APP Builder Certification Exam. Now Prepare for Salesforce CRT-402 exam dumps, with our recently updated Certification Preparation for Platform App Builder Exam material. Our CRT-402 preparation materials help you to pass exam on the first try.
BrainDumpsStore highly recommends you to try the free demo of CRT-402 exam product to check its reliability. Our CRT-402 practice has user friendly interface. This Certification Preparation for Platform App Builder exam demo product will help you to get acquainted with software interface and usability of CRT-402 practice exam.
BrainDumpsStore offers 24/7 customer services to all its esteemed clients. If you find any problem in CRT-402 Certification Preparation for Platform App Builder material or have any ambiguity, then feel free to contact our customer support, as our support team will always get back to you, with best possible solution to your CRT-402 exam dumps related query.
BrainDumpsStore exam preparation materials are just like an investment, which keeps your money secure with its 100% money refund policy. We ensure your 100% in you CRT-402 exam dumps with our material. But, in case, you fail in CRT-402 Certification Preparation for Platform App Builder exam, so you can claim for refund.
BrainDumpsStore helps you to uproot your ambiguities regarding Certification Preparation for Platform App Builder dumps material, before Purchase. For this purpose we offer you to try free demo of our product. This demo product will give you a clear image that what the complete CRT-402 exam dumps material will offer you.
We keep our website protected with enhanced security protocols, McAfee and SSL 64-Bit. Your personal data and website is always being monitored by our team, we never disclose your personal information with third party. All the information which you will share while buying CRT-402 exam, will remain safe with us.
Our CRT-402 Exam material is duly designed by the experts after an in-depth analysis of Salesforce recommended syllabus for CRT-402 Exam. Our dedicated team is always available at back-end to update the CRT-402 material material, as and when Salesforce introduces changes in the CRT-402 exam.
We offer 90-Days free updates, upon purchase of CRT-402 Exam dumps material. You will be entitled to these updates right from the date of purchase. After this period we offer our esteemed customers to extend the update period by paying 50% of the CRT-402 dumps material actual product amount.
"I was afraid from the Salesforce CRT-402 exam test but then I turned to BrainDumpsStore and now I am very much confident as I am well-prepared with the help of BrainDumpsStore materials."
"When I got BrainDumpsStore on the internet while surfing than I decided to register myself on BrainDumpsStore and that was the best choice. I cruised all the way through my Salesforce CRT-402 exam and was capable to get a good score so thank you BrainDumpsStore."
"BrainDumpsStore made a pool of educational data available to me which assisted me in getting excellent scores in the Salesforce CRT-402 exam."


Within the PWMinder Suite of products, a Repository is the central storage place where all of your password records are stored, kind of like a safe. You give the Repository a name and description, and secure it with a Master Password. Each password Record, in the Repository is grouped into a Category, to make it easy to organize your various password Records. PWMinder comes with a set of standard categories, but using PWMinder Desktop you can create as many custom Categories as you want.
Repositories are compatible between all of the products within the PWMinder Suite; so that a Repository created using PWMinder Desktop can viewed and edited using iPWMinder, PWMinder Android, etc.
You can manage more than one Repository of password records. This is very useful in case you would like to have a separate Repository for home passwords and work passwords, or would like separate Repositories for each person in your family.
Each Repository has it data stored in an encrypted file and often this it referred to as the Repository file. Each Repository has its own Repository file. Because the Repository stored as file, it make it easy to copy, move and back up your data. Repository files can also be used with Dropbox, making it even easier to access and sync you password data across you devices.