text:
in: Articles containing Japanese-language text, Pages with broken file links, Articles incorporating text from Wikipedia,
Pacific Ocean theatre of World War II
Battles and operations of World War II involving the Philippines
Battle of Leyte Gulf
Naval aviation operations and battles
1944 in the Philippines
Naval battles of World War II involving Australia
Naval battles of World War II involving Japan
Naval battles of World War II involving the United States
Part of the Pacific War of World War II
The light aircraft carrier Princeton on fire, east of Luzon, 24 October 1944.
23–26 October 1944
Leyte Gulf, Philippines
Decisive Allied victory
Australia Empire of Japan
William Halsey, Jr.
(3rd Fleet)
Thomas C. Kinkaid
(7th Fleet)
Clifton Sprague
(Taffy 3 / Task Unit 77.4.3)
Jesse B. Oldendorf
(Task Group 77.2)
John Augustine Collins
(Task Force 74) Takeo Kurita
(Center Force)
Shōji Nishimura†
(Southern Force)
Kiyohide Shima
Jisaburō Ozawa
(Northern Force)
Yukio Seki †
(Kamikazes)
8 fleet carriers
8 light carriers
18 escort carriers
12 battleships
24 cruisers
141 destroyers and destroyer escorts
Many PT boats, submarines, and fleet auxiliaries
About 1,500 planes 1 fleet carrier
9 battleships
14 heavy cruisers
6 light cruisers
35+ destroyers
300+ planes (including land-based aircraft)[1]
~2,800 casualties;
1 light carrier,
2 escort carriers,
2 destroyers,
1 destroyer escort sunk
200+ planes ~12,500 dead;
1 fleet carrier,
3 battleships,
10 cruisers,
11 destroyers sunk
~300 planes[2]
Philippines campaign (1944–45)
Major battles in bold
Lingayen Gulf
Bessang Pass
Kirang Pass
Bacsil Ridge
Bongabon
Gabaldon
General Tinio
Peñaranda
Nampicuan
Macabebe
Tarlac
Plaridel
Malolos
Southern Luzon
Morong
Taytay
Tayabas
Camarines
Lubang Island
Capiz
Romblion
Simara
Talisay
Pardo and Basak
Agusan
Bukidnon
Cotabato and Maguindanao
Davao (Ising)
Lanao
Misamis Occidental and Misamis Oriental
Convoy Hi-71
Shinyo Maru Incident
Leyte Gulf
Ormoc Bay
Action of 24 July 1945
The Battle of Leyte Gulf, also called the Battles for Leyte Gulf, and formerly known as the Second Battle of the Philippine Sea, is generally considered to be the largest naval battle of World War II and, by some criteria, possibly the largest naval battle in history.[3]
The battle was fought in waters near the Philippine islands of Leyte, Samar and Luzon from 23–26 October 1944, between combined US and Australian forces and the Imperial Japanese Navy. On 20 October, United States troops invaded the island of Leyte as part of a strategy aimed at isolating Japan from the countries it had occupied in Southeast Asia, and in particular depriving its forces and industry of vital oil supplies. The Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) mobilized nearly all of its remaining major naval vessels in an attempt to defeat the Allied invasion, but was repulsed by the US Navy's 3rd and 7th Fleets. The IJN failed to achieve its objective, suffered very heavy losses, and never afterwards sailed to battle in comparable force. The majority of its surviving heavy ships, deprived of fuel, remained in their bases for the rest of the Pacific War.[4][5]
The Battle of Leyte Gulf consisted of four separate engagements between the opposing forces: the Battle of the Sibuyan Sea, the Battle of Surigao Strait, the Battle of Cape Engaño and the Battle of Samar, as well as other actions.
It was the first battle in which Japanese aircraft carried out organized kamikaze attacks.[4][5] By the time of the battle, Japan had fewer aircraft than the Allied Forces had sea vessels, demonstrating the difference in power of the two sides at this point of the war.[6]
2 The submarine action in Palawan Passage (23 October)
3 The Battle of the Sibuyan Sea (24 October)
4 Task Force 34 / San Bernardino Strait
5 Halsey's decision (24 October)
6 The Battle of Surigao Strait (25 October)
7 The Battle off Samar (25 October)
7.1 Prelude
7.2 The battle
7.3 Admiral Kurita withdraws
8 The Battle of Cape Engaño (25–26 October)
8.1 The crisis – US 7th Fleet's calls for help
8.2 Battle of Cape Engaño – final actions
9 Criticism of Halsey
10 Losses
10.1 Allied losses
10.2 Japanese losses
11 Aftermath
12 Memorials
13.2 Bibliography
13.2.1 Audio/visual media
The campaigns of August 1942 to early 1944 had driven Japanese forces from many of their island bases in the south and central Pacific Ocean, while isolating many of their other bases (most notably in the Solomon Islands, Bismarck Archipelago, Admiralty Islands, New Guinea, Marshall Islands, and Wake Island), and in June 1944, a series of American amphibious landings supported by the US 5th Fleet's Fast Carrier Task Force captured most of the Mariana Islands (bypassing Rota). This offensive breached Japan's strategic inner defense ring and gave the Americans a base from which long-range Boeing B-29 Superfortress bombers could attack the Japanese home islands. The Japanese counterattacked in the Battle of the Philippine Sea. The US Navy destroyed three Japanese aircraft carriers (and damaged other ships) and approximately 600 Japanese aircraft, leaving the IJN with virtually no carrier-borne air power or any experienced pilots.[4]
For subsequent operations, Admiral Ernest J. King and other members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff favored blockading Japanese forces in the Philippines and attacking Formosa (Taiwan) to give the Americans and Australians control of the sea routes between Japan and southern Asia. US Army General Douglas MacArthur championed an invasion of the Philippines, which also lay across the supply lines to Japan. Leaving the Philippines in Japanese hands would be a blow to American prestige and a personal affront to MacArthur, who in 1942 had famously pronounced, "I shall return."
The considerable air power the Japanese had amassed in the Philippines was thought too dangerous to bypass by many high-ranking officers outside the Joint Chiefs of Staff, including Admiral Chester Nimitz. However, Nimitz and MacArthur initially had opposing plans, with Nimitz's plan centered on an invasion of Formosa, since that could also cut the supply lines to Southeast Asia. Formosa could also serve as a base for an invasion of mainland China, which MacArthur felt was unnecessary. A meeting between MacArthur, Nimitz, and President Roosevelt helped confirm the Philippines as a strategic target, but had less to do with the final decision to invade the Philippines than is sometimes claimed.[7] Nimitz eventually changed his mind and agreed to MacArthur's plan.[5]
It was also estimated that an invasion of Formosa would require about 12 divisions of US Army soldiers and Marines. This was more land power than the Americans could muster in the whole Pacific Ocean area at that time, and the entire Australian Army was engaged in the Solomon Islands, on New Guinea, in the Dutch East Indies, and on various other Pacific islands. The invasion of Formosa would require much larger ground forces than were available in the Pacific in late 1944, and would not have been feasible until the defeat of Germany freed the necessary manpower.[5]
It was eventually decided that MacArthur's forces would invade the island of Leyte in the central Philippines. Amphibious forces and close naval support would be provided by the 7th Fleet, commanded by Vice Admiral Thomas C. Kinkaid. The 7th Fleet at this time contained units of the US Navy, the Royal Australian Navy, including the County-class heavy cruisers HMAS Shropshire and Australia, and the destroyer Arunta, and possibly a few warships from New Zealand and/or the Netherlands.
The US 3rd Fleet—commanded by Admiral William F. Halsey, Jr., with Task Force 38 (TF 38, the Fast Carrier Task Force, commanded by Vice Admiral Marc Mitscher) as its main component—would provide more distant cover and support for the invasion. A fundamental defect in this plan was there would be no single American naval admiral in overall command. Kinkaid and his 7th Fleet fell under MacArthur as Supreme Allied Commander Southwest Pacific, whereas Halsey's 3rd Fleet reported to Nimitz as C-in-C Pacific Ocean Areas. This lack of a unified command structure, along with failures in communication, was to produce a crisis, and very nearly a strategic disaster, for the American forces.[4][5]
By coincidence, the Japanese plan, using three separate fleets, also lacked an overall commander. The American options were apparent to the IJN. Combined Fleet Chief Soemu Toyoda prepared four "victory" plans: Shō-Gō 1 (捷1号作戦 Shō ichigō sakusen) was a major naval operation in the Philippines, while Shō-Gō 2, Shō-Gō 3 and Shō-Gō 4 were responses to attacks on Formosa, the Ryukyu and Kurile Islands, respectively. The plans were for complex offensive operations committing nearly all available forces to a decisive battle, despite this substantially depleting Japan's slender reserves of fuel oil.
The four main actions in the battle of Leyte Gulf: 1 Battle of the Sibuyan Sea 2 Battle of Surigao Strait 3 Battle of (or 'off') Cape Engaño 4 Battle off Samar. Leyte Gulf is above 2 and to the left of 4. The island of Leyte is to the left of the gulf.
On 12 October 1944, the US 3rd Fleet under Admiral Halsey began a series of carrier raids against Formosa and the Ryukyu Islands, with a view to ensuring that the aircraft based there could not intervene in the Leyte landings. The Japanese command therefore put Shō-Gō 2 into action, launching waves of air attacks against 3rd Fleet's carriers. In what Morison refers to as a "knock-down, drag-out fight between carrier-based and land-based air", the Japanese were routed, losing 600 aircraft in three days, almost their entire air strength in the region. Following the American invasion of the Philippines, the Japanese Navy made the transition to Shō-Gō 1.[4][5]
Shō-Gō 1 called for Vice-Admiral Jisaburō Ozawa's ships—known as the "Northern Force"—to lure the main American covering forces away from Leyte. Northern Force would be built around several aircraft carriers, but these would have very few aircraft or trained aircrew. The carriers would serve as the main bait. As the US covering forces were lured away, two other surface forces would advance on Leyte from the west. The "Southern Force" under Vice Admirals Shoji Nishimura and Kiyohide Shima would strike at the landing area via the Surigao Strait. The "Center Force" under Vice Admiral Takeo Kurita—by far the most powerful of the attacking forces—would pass through the San Bernardino Strait into the Philippine Sea, turn southwards, and then also attack the landing area.[4][5]
This plan was likely to result in the destruction of one or more of the attacking forces, but Toyoda later explained this to his American interrogators as follows:
Should we lose in the Philippines operations, even though the fleet should be left, the shipping lane to the south would be completely cut off so that the fleet, if it should come back to Japanese waters, could not obtain its fuel supply. If it should remain in southern waters, it could not receive supplies of ammunition and arms. There would be no sense in saving the fleet at the expense of the loss of the Philippines.
—United States Strategic Bombing Survey (Pacific) – 'Interrogations of Japanese Officials'
Admiral Kurita's force at anchor in Brunei
The submarine action in Palawan Passage (23 October)
(Note: this action is referred to by Morison as "The Fight in Palawan Passage",[5] and is elsewhere occasionally referred to as "the Battle of Palawan Passage").
As it sortied from its base in Brunei, Kurita's powerful "Center Force" consisted of five battleships (Yamato, Musashi, Nagato, Kongō, and Haruna), ten heavy cruisers (Atago, Maya, Takao, Chōkai, Myōkō, Haguro, Kumano, Suzuya, Tone and Chikuma), two light cruisers (Noshiro and Yahagi) and 15 destroyers.[5]
Kurita's ships passed Palawan Island around midnight on 22–23 October. The American submarines Darter and Dace were positioned together on the surface close by. At 00:16 on 23 October, Darter's radar detected the Japanese formation at a range of 30,000 yd (27,000 m). Her captain promptly made visual contact. The two submarines quickly moved off in pursuit of the ships, while Darter made the first of three contact reports. At least one of these was picked up by a radio operator on Yamato, but Kurita failed to take appropriate antisubmarine precautions.[5]
Darter and Dace traveled on the surface at full power for several hours and gained a position ahead of Kurita's formation, with the intention of making a submerged attack at first light. This attack was unusually successful. At 05:24, Darter fired a spread of six torpedoes, at least four of which hit Kurita's flagship, the heavy cruiser Atago. Ten minutes later, Darter made two hits on Atago's sister ship, Takao, with another spread of torpedoes. At 05:56, Dace made four torpedo hits on the heavy cruiser Maya (sister to Atago and Takao).[5]
Atago and Maya quickly sank.[8] Takao turned back to Brunei, escorted by two destroyers—and was followed by the two submarines. On 24 October, as the submarines continued to shadow the damaged cruiser, Darter ran aground on the Bombay Shoal. All efforts to get her off failed, and she was abandoned. Her entire crew was, however, rescued by Dace.
Takao returned to Singapore. She was joined in January 1945 by Myōkō.
Atago had sunk so rapidly, Kurita was forced to swim to survive. He was rescued by one of the Japanese destroyers. He then transferred to the battleship Yamato.[5][9][10]
The Battle of the Sibuyan Sea (24 October)
Musashi departing Brunei in October 1944 for the Battle of Leyte Gulf
Around 08:00 on 24 October, the Center Force was spotted entering the Sibuyan Sea and attacked by VF-20 squadron F6F-5 Hellcat fighters, VB-20 SB2C-3 Helldiver dive bombers, and VT-20 Avenger torpedo bombers from USS Enterprise of Halsey's 3rd Fleet. Despite its great strength, 3rd Fleet was not well-placed to deal with the threat. On 22 October, Halsey had detached two of his carrier groups to the fleet base at Ulithi to provision and rearm. When Darter's contact report came in, Halsey recalled Davison's group, but allowed Vice Admiral John S. McCain—with the strongest of TF 38's carrier groups, to continue towards Ulithi. Halsey finally recalled McCain on 24 October—but the delay meant the most powerful American carrier group played little part in the coming battle, and the 3rd Fleet was therefore effectively deprived of nearly 40% of its air strength for most of the engagement. On the morning of 24 October, only three groups were available to strike Kurita's force, and the one best positioned to do so—Gerald F. Bogan's Task Group 38.2 (TG 38.2)—was by mischance the weakest of the groups, containing only one large carrier—USS Intrepid—and two light carriers (the failure to promptly recall McCain on 23 October had also effectively deprived 3rd Fleet, throughout the battle, of four of its six heavy cruisers).[5]
Yamato hit by a bomb near her forward gun turret in the Sibuyan Sea, 24 October 1944
Planes from the carriers Intrepid and Cabot of Bogan's group attacked at about 10:30, making hits on the battleships Nagato, Yamato, and Musashi, and severely damaging the heavy cruiser Myōkō. A second wave from Intrepid, Essex and Lexington later attacked, with VB-15 Helldivers and VF-15 Hellcats from Essex, scoring another 10 hits on Musashi. As she withdrew, listing to port, a third wave from Enterprise and Franklin hit her with an additional 11 bombs and eight torpedoes.[5]
Kurita turned his fleet around to get out of range of the aircraft, passing the crippled Musashi as his force retreated. He waited until 17:15 before turning around again to head for the San Bernardino Strait. After being struck by at least 17 bombs and 19 torpedoes, Musashi finally capsized and sank at about 19:30.[5]
Meanwhile, Vice Admiral Takijirō Ōnishi had directed three waves of aircraft from his First Air Fleet based on Luzon against the carriers of Rear Admiral Sherman's TG 38.3 (whose aircraft were also being used to strike airfields in Luzon to prevent Japanese land-based air attacks on Allied shipping in Leyte Gulf). Each of Ōnishi's strike waves consisted of some 50 to 60 aircraft.[5]
USS Princeton explodes at 15:23
Most of the attacking Japanese planes were intercepted and shot down or driven off by Hellcats of Sherman's combat air patrol, most notably by two fighter sections from Essex led by Commander David McCampbell (who is credited with shooting down nine of the attacking planes in this one action). However, one Japanese aircraft (a Yokosuka D4Y3 Judy) slipped through the defences, and at 09:38 hit the light carrier USS Princeton with a 551 lb (250 kg) armor-piercing bomb. The resulting explosion caused a severe fire in Princeton's hangar and her emergency sprinkler system failed to operate. As the fire spread rapidly, a series of secondary explosions followed. The fire was gradually brought under control, but at 15:23 there was an enormous explosion (probably in the carrier's bomb stowage aft), causing more casualties aboard Princeton, and even heavier casualties - 233 dead and 426 wounded - aboard the light cruiser Birmingham which was coming back alongside to assist with the firefighting. Birmingham was so badly damaged, she was forced to retire. Another light cruiser and two destroyers were also damaged. All efforts to save Princeton failed, and after the remaining crew were evacuated, she was finally scuttled—torpedoed by the light cruiser Reno—at 17:50.[5] Of Princeton's crew, 108 men were killed, while 1,361 survivors were rescued by nearby ships. USS Princeton was the largest American ship lost during the Battle of Leyte Gulf.
In all, US 3rd Fleet flew 259 sorties—mostly by Hellcats—against Center Force on 24 October. This weight of attack was not nearly sufficient to neutralize the threat from Kurita. It contrasts with the 527 sorties flown by 3rd Fleet against Ozawa's much weaker Northern Force on the following day. Moreover, a large proportion of the Sibuyan Sea attack was directed against just one ship, Musashi. This great battleship was sunk, the cruiser Myōkō was also crippled; but every other ship in Kurita's force remained battleworthy and able to advance.[5]
As a result of a momentous decision about to be taken by Admiral Halsey, Kurita was able to proceed through the San Bernardino Strait during the night, to make an unexpected and dramatic appearance off the coast of Samar on the following morning.[11]
Task Force 34 / San Bernardino Strait
After the Japanese Southern and Center forces had been detected, but before Ozawa's carriers had been located, Halsey and the staff of 3rd Fleet, aboard the battleship New Jersey, prepared a contingency plan to deal with the threat from Kurita's Center Force. Their intention was to cover the San Bernardino Strait with a powerful task force of fast battleships supported by two of the 3rd Fleet's equally swift carrier groups. The battleship force was to be designated Task Force 34 (TF 34) and to consist of four battleships, five cruisers and 14 destroyers under the command of Vice Admiral Willis A. Lee. Rear Admiral Ralph E. Davison of TG 38.4 was to be in overall command of the supporting carrier groups.
At 15:12 on 24 October, Halsey sent an ambiguously worded telegraphic radio message to his subordinate task group commanders, giving details of this contingency plan:
BATDIV 7 MIAMI, VINCENNES, BILOXI, DESRON 52 LESS STEVEN POTTER, FROM TG 38.2 AND WASHINGTON, ALABAMA, WICHITA, NEW ORLEANS, DESDIV 100, PATTERSON, BAGLEY FROM TG 38.4 WILL BE FORMED AS TASK FORCE 34 UNDER VICE ADMIRAL LEE, COMMANDER BATTLE LINE. TF 34 TO ENGAGE DECISIVELY AT LONG RANGES. CTG 38.4 CONDUCT CARRIERS OF TG 38.2 AND TG 38.4 CLEAR OF SURFACE FIGHTING. INSTRUCTIONS FOR TG 38.3 AND TG 38.1 LATER. HALSEY, OTC IN NEW JERSEY.
Halsey sent information copies of this message to Admiral Nimitz at Pacific Fleet headquarters and Admiral King in Washington. but he did not include Admiral Kinkaid (7th Fleet) as information addressee.[9] The message was picked up by 7th Fleet, anyway, as it was common for admirals to direct radiomen to copy all message traffic they detected, whether intended for them or not. As Halsey intended TF 34 as a contingency to be formed and detached when he ordered it, when he wrote "will be formed" he meant the future tense; but he neglected to say 'when' TF 34 would be formed, or under what circumstances. This omission led Admiral Kinkaid of 7th Fleet to believe Halsey was speaking in the imperative, not the future tense, so he concluded TF 34 had been formed and would take station off the San Bernardino Strait. Admiral Nimitz, in Pearl Harbor, reached exactly the same conclusion. Halsey did send out a second message at 17:10 clarifying his intentions in regard to TF 34:
IF THE ENEMY SORTIES (THROUGH SAN BERNADINO STRAIT) TF 34 WILL BE FORMED WHEN DIRECTED BY ME.
—T.J. Cutler (1994)
Unfortunately, Halsey sent this second message by voice radio, so 7th Fleet did not intercept it, and Halsey did not follow up with a telegraphic message to Nimitz or King. The serious misunderstanding caused by Halsey's ambiguous wording of his first message and his failure to notify Nimitz, King, or Kinkaid of his second clarifying message was to have a profound influence on the subsequent course of the battle.[5][9]
Halsey's decision (24 October)
The 3rd Fleet's aircraft failed to locate Ozawa's Northern (decoy) force until 16:40 on 24 October. This was largely because 3rd Fleet had been preoccupied with attacking Kurita's Centre force and defending itself against the Japanese air strikes from Luzon. Thus, ironically, the one Japanese force that wanted to be discovered was the only force the Americans had not been able to find. On the evening of 24 October, Ozawa intercepted a (mistaken) American communication describing Kurita's withdrawal; he therefore began to withdraw, too. However, at 20:00, Soemu Toyoda ordered all his forces to attack "counting on divine assistance." Trying to draw 3rd Fleet's attention to his decoy force, Ozawa reversed course again and headed southwards towards Leyte.
Halsey was convinced the Northern Force constituted the main Japanese threat, and he was determined to seize what he saw as a golden opportunity to destroy Japan's last remaining carrier strength. Believing the Center Force had been neutralized by 3rd Fleet's air strikes earlier in the day in the Sibuyan Sea, and its remnants were retiring, Halsey radioed (to Nimitz and Kinkaid):
CENTRAL FORCE HEAVILY DAMAGED ACCORDING TO STRIKE REPORTS.
AM PROCEEDING NORTH WITH THREE GROUPS TO ATTACK CARRIER FORCES AT DAWN
The words "with three groups" proved dangerously misleading. In the light of the intercepted 15:12 24 October "…will be formed as Task Force 34" message from Halsey, Admiral Kinkaid and his staff assumed, as did Admiral Nimitz at Pacific Fleet headquarters, that TF 34—commanded by Lee—had now been formed as a separate entity. They assumed that Halsey was leaving this powerful surface force guarding the San Bernardino Strait (and covering the Seventh Fleet's northern flank), while he took his three available carrier groups northwards in pursuit of the Japanese carriers. But Task Force 34 had not been detached from his other forces, and Lee's battleships were on their way northwards with the 3rd Fleet's carriers. Halsey had consciously and deliberately left the San Bernardino Strait absolutely unguarded. As Woodward wrote: "Everything was pulled out from San Bernardino Strait. Not so much as a picket destroyer was left".[3]
Halsey and his staff officers ignored information from a night reconnaissance aircraft operating from the light carrier Independence that Kurita's powerful surface force had turned back towards the San Bernardino Strait, and that after a long blackout, the navigation lights in the strait had been turned on. When Rear Admiral Gerald F. Bogan—commanding TG 38.2—radioed this information to Halsey's flagship, he was rebuffed by a staff officer, who tersely replied "Yes, yes, we have that information." Vice Admiral Lee, who had correctly deduced that Ozawa's force was on a decoy mission and indicated this in a blinker message to Halsey's flagship, was similarly rebuffed. Commodore Arleigh Burke and Commander James H. Flatley of Vice Admiral Marc Mitscher's staff had come to the same conclusion. They were sufficiently worried about the situation to wake Mitscher, who asked, "Does Admiral Halsey have that report?" On being told that Halsey did, Mitscher—knowing Halsey's temperament—commented, "If he wants my advice he'll ask for it" and went back to sleep.[5]
The entire available strength of 3rd Fleet continued to steam northwards, leaving the San Bernardino Strait completely unguarded.
The Battle of Surigao Strait (25 October)
The Battle of Surigao Strait
Nishimura's "Southern Force" consisted of the old battleships Yamashiro and Fusō, the heavy cruiser Mogami, and four destroyers.[5] This mini fleet left Brunei after Kurita at 15:00 on 22 October, turning eastward into the Sulu Sea and then northeasterly past the southern tip of Negros Island into the Mindanao Sea. Nishimura then proceeded northeastward with Mindanao Island to starboard and into the south entrance to the Surigao Strait, intending to exit the north entrance of the Strait into Leyte Gulf where he would add his firepower to that of Kurita's force.
The Second Striking Force—commanded by Vice Admiral Kiyohide Shima—consisted of the heavy cruisers Nachi (Flag) and Ashigara, the light cruiser Abukuma, and the destroyers Akebono, Ushio, Kasumi, and Shiranui.
The Southern Force was attacked by US Navy bombers on 24 October, but sustained only minor damage.
Because of the strict radio silence imposed on the Center and Southern Forces, Nishimura was unable to synchronise his movements with Shima and Kurita. When he entered the narrow Surigao Strait at 02:00, Shima was 25 nmi (29 mi; 46 km) behind him, and Kurita was still in the Sibuyan Sea, several hours from the beaches at Leyte.
As the Southern Force approached the Surigao Strait, it ran into a deadly trap set by the 7th Fleet Support Force. Rear Admiral Jesse Oldendorf had a substantial force. There were six battleships: West Virginia, Maryland, Mississippi, Tennessee, California, and Pennsylvania; all but Mississippi had been sunk or damaged in the attack on Pearl Harbor and since repaired, Tennessee, California, and West Virginia having been rebuilt since then. There were also the 35 8-inch (203 mm) guns of the four heavy cruisers (USS Louisville (flagship), Portland, Minneapolis and HMAS Shropshire) and 54 6-inch (152 mm) guns of four light cruisers (Denver, Columbia, Phoenix and Boise). There were also the smaller guns and torpedoes of 28 destroyers and 39 motor torpedo boats (Patrol/Torpedo (PT) boats). To pass through the narrows and reach the invasion shipping, Nishimura would have to run the gauntlet of torpedoes from the PT boats followed by the large force of destroyers, and then advance under the concentrated fire of the six battleships and their eight flanking cruisers disposed across the far mouth of the Strait.[5]
At 22:36, one of the PT boats—PT-131 (Ensign Peter Gadd), operating off Bohol, first made contact with the approaching Japanese ships. Over more than three-and-a-half hours, the PT boats made repeated attacks on Nishimura's force as it streamed northward. Although no torpedo hits were scored, the PT boats did send contact reports which were of use to Oldendorf and his force.[5]
Remarkably, Nishimura's ships slipped through the gauntlet of PT boats unscathed. However, a short time later, their luck ran out as they were subjected to devastating torpedo attacks from the American destroyers disposed on both sides of their axis of advance. At about 03:00, both Japanese battleships were hit by torpedoes. Yamashiro was able to steam on, but Fusō exploded and broke in two when she was torpedoed by USS Melvin (DD-680). Two of Nishimura's four destroyers were sunk; another, Asagumo, was hit but able to retire, and later sank.[5]
The classical account summarized above has been questioned recently because additional evidence has come to light. Fuso survivor Hideo Ogawa, interrogated in 1945, also wrote an article[12] on the battleship's last voyage. He says that "shortly after 0400 the ship capsized slowly to starboard and Ogawa and others were washed away."[13] Fuso was hit on the starboard side by two or possibly three torpedoes. One of these started an oil fire. The fuel used by IJN ships in this period was poorly refined and had a tendency to burst into flame; burning patches of fuel were most likely the source of the myth of Fuso blowing up. It is extremely unlikely that a vessel as strongly built as a battleship could be blown in half and the halves remain upright and afloat, so the classic version of Fuso's fate is also extremely improbable. Accordingly, it is likely that the Morison account is incorrect in this detail. There are rumours of Fuso being either the largest ship to be sunk with all hands, or did leave survivors, but refused to be rescued by American or Japanese vessels, and foundered, while the rest did eventually survive long enough to reach land, but were killed by Filipino natives. Some believe Asagumo picked up Fuso survivors, only for all to perish when the destroyer sank.
At 03:16, West Virginia's radar picked up the surviving ships of Nishimura's force at a range of 42,000 yd (38,000 m) and had achieved a firing solution at 30,000 yd (27,000 m). West Virginia tracked them as they approached in the pitch black night. At 03:53, she fired the eight 16 in (410 mm) guns of her main battery at a range of 22,800 yd (20,800 m), striking Yamashiro with her first salvo. She went on to fire a total of 93 shells. At 03:55, California and Tennessee joined in, firing a total of 63 and 69 14 in (360 mm) shells, respectively. Radar fire control allowed these American battleships to hit targets from a distance at which the Japanese battleships—with their inferior fire control systems—could not return fire.[5][14]
The other three US battleships, equipped with less advanced gunnery radar, had difficulty arriving at a firing solution. Maryland eventually succeeded in visually ranging on the splashes of the other battleships' shells, and then fired a total of 48 16 in (410 mm) projectiles. Pennsylvania was unable to find a target and her guns remained silent.[5]
Mississippi only obtained a solution at the end of the battle-line action, and then fired just one (full) salvo of 12 14-in shells. This was the last salvo ever to be fired by a battleship against another heavy ship, ending an era in naval history.[5]
Yamashiro and Mogami were crippled by a combination of 16-in and 14-in armor-piercing shells, as well as the fire of Oldendorf's flanking cruisers. Shigure turned and fled, but lost steering and stopped dead. Yamashiro sank at about 04:20, with Nishimura on board. Mogami and Shigure retreated southwards down the Strait.
The rear of the Southern Force—the "Second Striking Force" commanded by Vice Admiral Shima—had departed from Mako and approached Surigao Strait about 40 mi (35 nmi; 64 km) astern of Nishimura. Shima's run was initially thrown into confusion by his force nearly running aground on Panaon Island after failing to factor the outgoing tide into their approach; Japanese radar was almost useless due to excessive reflections from the many islands.[15] The radar was equally unable to detect ships in these conditions, especially PT boats, as PT-137 hit the light cruiser Abukuma with a torpedo which crippled her and caused her to fall out of formation. Shima's two heavy cruisers (Nachi and Ashigara) and eight destroyers[5] next encountered remnants of Nishimura's force. Seeing what he thought were the wrecks of both Nishimura's battleships (actually the two halves of Fusō), Shima ordered a retreat. His flagship, Nachi, collided with Mogami, flooding Mogami's steering room and causing her to fall behind in the retreat; she was sunk by aircraft the next morning. The bow half of Fusō was sunk by gunfire from Louisville, and the stern half sank off Kanihaan Island. Of Nishimura's seven ships, only Shigure survived. Shima's ships did survive the Battle of Surigao Strait, but they would be sunk in further engagements around Leyte, while Shigure survived long enough to escape the debacle, but eventually succumbed to the submarine USS Blackfin (SS-322), which sank her off Kota Bharu, Malaya, with 37 dead.[5][14]
What Louisville's action report actually says is, "0529 firing 2 salvos – 18 rounds – at a large fire bearing 160 True, range 18,900 yards. Fire was then shifted to a second target bearing 180 T at the same range. …The first target is what has been termed the 'Fuso fire', while the second was Mogami."[16] Morison and a number of others have presumed the fire surrounded the part of Fuso still afloat. There is no evidence to support that claim.
The Battle of Surigao Strait was one of the only two battleship-against-battleship surface battles in the entire Pacific campaign of World War II (the other being the Naval Battle during the Guadalcanal Campaign) and was the last battleship-versus-battleship action in history. It was also the last battle in which one force (the Americans, in this case), was able to "cross the T" of its opponent. However, by the time the battleship action was joined, the Japanese line was very ragged and consisted of only one battleship (Yamashiro), one heavy cruiser and one destroyer, so that the "crossing of the T" was notional and had little effect on the outcome of the battle.[5][14]
The Battle off Samar (25 October)
Main article: Battle off Samar
The battle off Samar
Halsey's decision to take all the available strength of 3rd Fleet northwards to attack the carriers of the Japanese Northern Force had left San Bernardino Strait completely unguarded.
Senior officers in 7th Fleet (including Kinkaid and his staff) generally assumed Halsey was taking his three available carrier groups northwards (McCain's group, the strongest in 3rd Fleet, was still returning from the direction of Ulithi), but leaving the battleships of TF 34 covering the San Bernardino Strait against the Japanese Center Force. In fact, Halsey had not yet formed TF 34, and all six of Willis Lee's battleships were on their way northwards with the carriers, as well as every available cruiser and destroyer of the Third Fleet.
Kurita's Center Force therefore emerged unopposed from San Bernardino Strait at 03:00 on 25 October and steamed southward along the coast of the island of Samar. In its path stood only the 7th Fleet's three escort carrier units (call signs 'Taffy' 1, 2, and 3), with a total of 16 small, very slow, and unarmored escort carriers, protected by a screen of lightly armed and unarmored destroyers and smaller destroyer escorts (DEs). Despite the losses in the Palawan Passage and Sibuyan Sea actions, the Japanese Center Force was still very powerful, consisting of four battleships (including the giant Yamato), six heavy cruisers, two light cruisers and 11 destroyers.
Kurita's force caught Rear Admiral Clifton Sprague's Task Unit 77.4.3 ('Taffy 3') entirely by surprise. Sprague directed his carriers to launch their planes, then run for the cover of a rain squall to the east. He ordered the destroyers and DEs to make a smoke screen to conceal the retreating carriers.
Kurita, unaware that Ozawa's decoy plan had succeeded, assumed he had found a carrier group from Halsey's 3rd Fleet. Having just redeployed his ships into anti-aircraft formation, he further complicated matters by ordering a "General Attack", which called for his fleet to split into different divisions and attack independently.[6]
The destroyer USS Johnston was the closest to the enemy. On his own initiative, Lieutenant Commander Ernest E. Evans steered his hopelessly outclassed ship into the foe at flank speed. The Johnston fired its torpedoes at the heavy cruiser Kumano, damaging her and forcing her out of line. Seeing this, Sprague gave the order "small boys attack", sending the rest of Taffy 3's screening ships into the fray. Taffy 3's two other destroyers, Hoel and Heermann, and the destroyer escort Samuel B. Roberts, attacked with suicidal determination, drawing fire and disrupting the Japanese formation as ships turned to avoid their torpedoes. However, as the Japanese fleet continued to approach, Hoel and Roberts were hit multiple times, and quickly sank. After expending all of its torpedoes, Johnston continued to fight with its 5-inch guns, until it was sunk by a group of Japanese destroyers.
Meanwhile, Rear Admiral Thomas Sprague (no relation to Clifton) ordered the sixteen escort carriers in his three task units to immediately launch all their aircraft equipped with whatever weapons they had available, even if these were only machine guns or depth charges. Collectively, Sprague had a total of some 450 aircraft from these 16 carriers at his disposal. Although most of these aircraft were older models, such as the FM-2 Wildcat and TBM Avenger torpedo bombers, the fact that the Japanese force had no air cover of its own meant that American planes could commence their attacks unopposed. Consequently, the air counterattacks were almost unceasing, and some, especially several of the strikes launched from Felix Stump's Task Unit 77.4.2 (Taffy 2), were relatively heavy.
The carriers of Taffy 3 turned south and retreated through the shellfire. Gambier Bay, at the rear of the American formation, became the focus of the battleship Yamato and sustained multiple hits before capsizing at 09:07. Several other carriers were damaged but were able to escape.
Admiral Kurita withdraws
St. Lo exploded after a kamikaze strike.
The ferocity of the defense seemingly confirmed the Japanese assumption that they were engaging major fleet units rather than merely escort carriers and destroyers. The confusion of the "General Attack" order was further compounded by the air and torpedo attacks, when Kurita's flagship Yamato turned north to evade torpedoes and lost contact with the battle. Kurita abruptly broke off the fight and gave the order 'all ships, my course north, speed 20', apparently to regroup his disorganized fleet. Turning again towards Leyte Gulf, Kurita's battle report stated he had received a message indicating a group of American carriers was steaming north of him. Preferring to expend his fleet against capital ships rather than transports, Kurita set out in pursuit and thereby lost his opportunity to destroy the shipping in Leyte Gulf. After failing to intercept the non-existent carriers, Kurita finally retreated towards San Bernardino Strait. Three of his heavy cruisers had been sunk, and the determined resistance had convinced him that persisting with his attack would only cause further Japanese losses. In addition, Kurita's decision was no doubt influenced by the fact that he did not know that Ozawa had lured Halsey's entire fleet away from Leyte Gulf. Poor communication between the separate Japanese forces and a lack of air reconnaissance meant that Kurita was never informed that the deception had been successful, and that only a small and outgunned force stood between his battleships and the vulnerable transports of the invasion fleet. Thus, Kurita remained convinced that he had been engaging elements of the 3rd Fleet, and it would only be a matter of time before Halsey surrounded and annihilated him.[6] Rear Admiral Clifton Sprague wrote to his colleague Aubrey Fitch after the war, "I ... stated [to Admiral Nimitz] that the main reason they turned north was that they were receiving too much damage to continue and I am still of that opinion and cold analysis will eventually confirm it."[10]
Almost all of Kurita's surviving force succeeded in escaping. Halsey and the 3rd Fleet battleships arrived too late to cut him off. Nagato, Haruna and Kongō had been moderately damaged by air attack from Taffy 3's escort carriers. Kurita had begun the battle with five battleships. On their return to their bases, only Yamato remained battleworthy.
As the desperate surface action was coming to an end, Vice Admiral Takijirō Ōnishi put his 'Special Attack Force' into operation, launching kamikaze attacks against the Allied ships in Leyte Gulf and the escort carrier units off Samar. The escort carrier St. Lo of Taffy 3 was hit by a kamikaze aircraft and sank after a series of internal explosions.[5][10]
The Battle of Cape Engaño (25–26 October)
The Japanese aircraft carriers Zuikaku, left, and (probably) Zuihō come under attack by dive bombers early in the battle off Cape Engaño
Ozawa's "Northern Force" comprised four aircraft carriers (Zuikaku—the last survivor of the six carriers that had attacked Pearl Harbor in 1941, the light carriers Zuihō, Chitose, and Chiyoda), two World War I battleships partially converted to carriers (Hyūga and Ise—the two aft turrets had been replaced by a hangar, aircraft handling deck and catapult, but neither battleship carried any aircraft in this battle), three light cruisers (Ōyodo, Tama, and Isuzu), and nine destroyers. His force had only 108 aircraft.[5]
Ozawa's force was not located until 16:40 on 24 October, largely because Sherman's TG 38.3—which was the northernmost of Halsey's groups—was responsible for searches in this sector. The force which Halsey was taking north with him—three groups of Mitscher's TF 38—was overwhelmingly stronger than the Japanese Northern Force. Between them, these groups had five large fleet carriers (Intrepid, Franklin, Lexington, Enterprise, and Essex), five light fleet carriers (Independence, Belleau Wood, Langley, Cabot, and San Jacinto), six battleships (Alabama, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Jersey, South Dakota, and Washington), eight cruisers (two heavy and six light), and more than 40 destroyers. The air groups of the 10 US carriers present contained 600-1,000 aircraft.[5]
At 02:40 on 25 October, Halsey detached TF 34, built around the 3rd Fleet's six battleships and commanded by Vice Admiral Willis A. Lee. As dawn approached, the ships of Task Force 34 drew ahead of the carrier groups. Halsey intended Mitscher to make air strikes followed by the heavy gunfire of Lee's battleships.[5]
The crew of Zuikaku salute as the flag is lowered, and she ceases to be the flagship of the Imperial Japanese Navy
Around dawn on 25 October, Ozawa launched 75 aircraft to attack the 3rd Fleet. Most were shot down by American combat air patrols, and no damage was done to the US ships. A few Japanese planes survived and made their way to land bases on Luzon.
During the night, Halsey had passed tactical command of TF 38 to Admiral Mitscher, who ordered the American carrier groups to launch their first strike wave, of 180 aircraft, at dawn—before the Northern Force had been located. When the search aircraft made contact at 07:10, this strike wave was orbiting ahead of the task force. At 08:00, as the attack went in, its escorting fighters destroyed Ozawa's combat air patrol of about 30 planes. The US air strikes continued until the evening, by which time TF 38 had flown 527 sorties against the Northern Force, sinking Zuikaku, the light carriers Chitose and Zuihō, and the destroyer Akizuki, all with heavy loss of life. The light carrier Chiyoda and the cruiser Tama were crippled. Ozawa transferred his flag to the light cruiser Ōyodo.
The crisis – US 7th Fleet's calls for help
Shortly after 08:00 on 25 October, desperate messages calling for assistance began to come in from 7th Fleet, which had been engaging Nishimura's "Southern Force" in Surigao Strait since 02:00. One message from Kinkaid, sent in plain language, read: "MY SITUATION IS CRITICAL. FAST BATTLESHIPS AND SUPPORT BY AIR STRIKES MAY BE ABLE TO KEEP ENEMY FROM DESTROYING CVES AND ENTERING LEYTE." Halsey recalled in his memoirs that he was shocked at this message, recounting that the radio signals from the 7th Fleet had come in at random and out of order because of a backlog in the signals office. It seems that he did not receive this vital message from Kinkaid until around 10:00. Halsey later claimed he knew Kinkaid was in trouble, but he had not dreamed of the seriousness of this crisis.
One of the most alarming signals from Kinkaid reported, after their action in Surigao Strait, 7th Fleet's own battleships were critically low on ammunition. Even this failed to persuade Halsey to send any immediate assistance to the powerful 7th Fleet.[3][4][5] In fact, the 7th Fleet's battleships were not as short of ammunition as Kinkaid's signal implied,[5] but Halsey did not know that.
From 3,000 mi (2,600 nmi; 4,800 km) away in Pearl Harbor, Admiral Nimitz had been monitoring the desperate calls from Taffy 3, and sent Halsey a terse message: "TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG FROM CINCPAC ACTION COM THIRD FLEET INFO COMINCH CTF SEVENTY-SEVEN X WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS TASK FORCE THIRTY FOUR RR THE WORLD WONDERS." The first four words and the last three were "padding" used to confuse enemy cryptanalysis (the beginning and end of the true message was marked by double consonants). The communications staff on Halsey's flagship correctly deleted the first section of padding but mistakenly retained the last three words in the message finally handed to Halsey. The last three words—probably selected by a communications officer at Nimitz's headquarters—may have been meant as a loose quote from Tennyson's poem on "The Charge of the Light Brigade", suggested by the coincidence that this day, 25 October, was the 90th anniversary of the Battle of Balaclava—and was not intended as a commentary on the current crisis off Leyte. Halsey, however, when reading the message, thought that the last words—"THE WORLD WONDERS"—were a biting piece of criticism from Nimitz, threw his cap to the deck and broke into "sobs of rage". Rear Admiral Robert Carney, his Chief of Staff, confronted him, telling Halsey "Stop it! What the hell's the matter with you? Pull yourself together."
Eventually, at 11:15, more than three hours after the first distress messages from 7th Fleet had been received by his flagship, Halsey ordered TF 34 to turn around and head southwards towards Samar. At this point, Lee's battleships were almost within gun range of Ozawa's force. Two-and-a-half hours were then spent refuelling TF 34's accompanying destroyers.[5]
After this succession of delays it was too late for TF 34 to give any practical help to 7th Fleet, other than to assist in picking up survivors from Taffy 3, and too late even to intercept Kurita's force before it made its escape through San Bernardino Strait.
Nevertheless, at 16:22, in a desperate and even more belated attempt to intervene in the events off Samar, Halsey formed a new task group—TG 34.5—under Rear Admiral Badger, built around Third Fleet's two fastest battleships—Iowa and New Jersey, both capable of a speed of more than 32 kn (37 mph; 59 km/h)–and TF 34's three cruisers and eight destroyers, and sped southwards, leaving Lee and the other four battleships to follow. As Morison observes, if Badger's group 'had' succeeded in intercepting the Japanese Center Force it would have been seriously outgunned by Kurita's battleships.[5]
Cruisers and destroyers of TG 34.5, however, caught the destroyer Nowaki—the last straggler from Center Force—off San Bernardino Strait, and sank her with all hands, including the survivors from Chikuma.
Battle of Cape Engaño – final actions
When Halsey turned TF 34 southwards at 11:15, he detached a task group of four of its cruisers and nine of its destroyers under Rear Admiral DuBose, and reassigned this group to TF 38. At 14:15, Mitscher ordered DuBose to pursue the remnants of the Japanese Northern Force. His cruisers finished off the light carrier Chiyoda at around 17:00, and at 20:59 his ships sank the destroyer Hatsuzuki after a very stubborn fight.[5]
When Admiral Ozawa learned of the deployment of DuBose's relatively weak task group, he ordered battleships Ise and Hyūga to turn southwards and attack it, but they failed to locate DuBose's group, which they heavily outgunned. Halsey's withdrawal of all six of Lee's battleships in his attempt to assist Seventh Fleet had now rendered TF 38 vulnerable to a surface counterattack by the decoy Northern Force.
At about 23:10, the American submarine Jallao torpedoed and sank the light cruiser Tama of Ozawa's force. This was the last act of the Battle of Cape Engaño, and—apart from some final air strikes on the retreating Japanese forces on 26 October—the conclusion of the Battle for Leyte Gulf.
Criticism of Halsey
File:Halsey.JPG
Admiral William F. "Bull" Halsey – Commander US Third Fleet at Leyte Gulf
Halsey was criticized for his decision to take TF 34 north in pursuit of Ozawa, and for failing to detach it when Kinkaid first appealed for help. A piece of US Navy slang for Halsey's actions is Bull's Run, a phrase combining Halsey's newspaper nickname "Bull" (in the US Navy he was known as "Bill" Halsey) with an allusion to the Battle of Bull Run in the American Civil War.
In his dispatch after the battle, Halsey justified the decision as follows:
Searches by my carrier planes revealed the presence of the Northern carrier force on the afternoon of 24 October, which completed the picture of all enemy naval forces. As it seemed childish to me to guard statically San Bernardino Strait, I concentrated TF 38 during the night and steamed north to attack the Northern Force at dawn.
I believed that the Center Force had been so heavily damaged in the Sibuyan Sea that it could no longer be considered a serious menace to Seventh Fleet.[5]
Halsey also argued that he had feared leaving TF 34 to defend the strait without carrier support as that would have left it vulnerable to attack from land-based aircraft, while leaving one of the fast carrier groups behind to cover the battleships would have significantly reduced the concentration of air power going north to strike Ozawa.
However, Morison states that Admiral Lee said after the battle that he would have been fully prepared for the battleships to cover the San Bernardino Strait without 'any' carrier support.[5] Moreover, if Halsey had been in proper communication with 7th Fleet, it would have been entirely practicable for the escort carriers of TF 77 to provide adequate air cover for TF 34—a much easier matter than it would be for those escort carriers to defend themselves against the onslaught of Kurita's heavy ships.
It may be argued that the fact that Halsey was aboard one of the battleships, and "would have had to remain behind" with TF 34 (while the bulk of his fleet charged northwards to attack the Japanese carriers), may have contributed to this decision, but this is in all likelihood a minor point. It has been pointed out that it would have been perfectly feasible (and logical) to have taken one or both of 3rd Fleet's two fastest battleships (Iowa and/or New Jersey) with the carriers in the pursuit of Ozawa, while leaving the rest of the battle line off the San Bernardino Strait (indeed, Halsey's original plan for the composition of TF 34 was that it would contain only four, not all six, of the 3rd Fleet's battleships); thus, guarding the San Bernardino Strait with a powerful battleship force would not have been incompatible with Halsey personally going north aboard New Jersey.
Probably a more important factor was that Halsey was philosophically against dividing his forces; he believed strongly in concentration as indicated by his writings both before World War II and in his subsequent articles and interviews defending his actions.[9] In addition, Halsey may well have been influenced by the criticisms of Admiral Raymond Spruance, who was widely thought to have been excessively cautious at the Battle of the Philippine Sea and so allowed the bulk of the Japanese fleet to escape. Halsey was also likely influenced by his Chief of Staff, Rear Admiral Robert "Mick" Carney, who was also wholeheartedly in favor of taking all of 3rd Fleet's available forces northwards to attack the Japanese carrier force.
However, Halsey did have reasonable and, in his view, given the information he had available, practical reasons for his actions. First, he believed Admiral Kurita's force was more heavily damaged than it was. While it has been suggested that Halsey should have taken Kurita's continued advance as evidence that his force was still a severe threat, this view cannot be supported given the well-known propensity for members of the Japanese military to persist in hopeless endeavours to the point of suicide. So, in Halsey's estimation, Kurita's weakened force was well within the ability of Seventh Fleet to deal with, and did not justify dividing his force.
Second, Halsey did not comprehend just how badly compromised Japan's naval air power was and that Ozawa's decoy force was nearly devoid of aircraft. Halsey, in a letter to Admiral Nimitz on 22 October 1944 (three days before the Battle off Samar) wrote that Admiral Marc Mitscher believed "Jap naval air was wiped out."[17] Mitscher, with Admiral Spruance at the Battle of the Philippine Sea (the Marianas Turkey Shoot) drew his conclusion from the very poor performance of the Japanese.[17] Halsey ignored Mitscher's insights, and made an understandable and, to him, prudent threat-conservative judgment that Ozawa's force was still capable of launching serious attacks. Halsey later explained his actions partly by explicitly stating he did not want to be "shuttle bombed" by Ozawa's force (a technique whereby planes can land and rearm at bases on either side of a foe, allowing them to attack on both the outbound flight and the return), or to give them a "free shot" at the US forces in Leyte Gulf.[9] He was obviously not similarly concerned with giving Kurita's battleships and cruisers a free shot at those same forces.
The fact that Halsey made one seemingly prudent threat-conservative judgment regarding Ozawa's aircraft carriers and another rather opposite judgment regarding Kurita's battleships probably reflects his understandable bias toward aircraft carriers as the prime threat of the war. At Leyte Gulf, Halsey failed to appreciate that under certain circumstances battleships and cruisers could still be extremely dangerous, and ironically, through his own failures to adequately communicate his intentions, he managed to bring those circumstances about.
Clifton Sprague—commander of Task Unit 77.4.3 in the battle off Samar—was later bitterly critical of Halsey's decision, and of his failure to clearly inform Kinkaid and 7th Fleet that their northern flank was no longer protected:
In the absence of any information that this exit [of the San Bernardino Strait] was no longer blocked, it was logical to assume that our northern flank could not be exposed without ample warning.
Regarding Halsey's failure to turn TF 34 southwards when 7th Fleet's first calls for assistance off Samar were received, Morison writes:
If TF 34 had been detached a few hours earlier, after Kinkaid's first urgent request for help, and had left the destroyers behind, since their fueling caused a delay of over two and a half hours, a powerful battle line of six modern battleships under the command of Admiral Lee, the most experienced battle squadron commander in the Navy, would have arrived off the San Bernardino Strait in time to have clashed with Kurita's Center Force… Apart from the accidents common in naval warfare, there is every reason to suppose that Lee would have "crossed the T" and completed the destruction of Center Force.
Instead, as Morison also observes:
The mighty gunfire of the Third Fleet's Battle Line, greater than that of the whole Japanese Navy, was never brought into action except to finish off one or two crippled light ships.
—Morison (1956), pp. 336–337[18]
Perhaps the most telling comment is made laconically by Vice Admiral Lee in his action report as Commander of TF 34 —
No battle damage was incurred nor inflicted on the enemy by vessels while operating as Task Force Thirty-Four.
—Task Force 34 Action Report: 6 October 1944 – 3 November 1944
The losses in the battle of Leyte Gulf were not evenly distributed throughout all forces; for instance, the destroyer USS Heermann—despite her unequal fight with the enemy—finished the battle with only six of her crew dead. More than 1,000 sailors and aircrewmen of the Allied escort carrier units were killed. As a result of communication errors and other failures, a large number of survivors from Taffy 3 were unable to be rescued for several days, and died unnecessarily as a consequence.[5][10]
Due to the long duration and size of the battle, accounts vary as to the losses which occurred as a part of the Battle of Leyte Gulf and losses that occurred shortly before and shortly after. One account of the losses[19] lists the following vessels:
Allied losses
The United States lost six front line warships during the Battle of Leyte Gulf:
One Light Carrier: USS Princeton
Two Escort Carriers: USS Gambier Bay and St. Lo (the first major warship sunk by a kamikaze attack)
Two Destroyers: Hoel and Johnston
One Destroyer Escort: USS Samuel B. Roberts
Four other American ships were damaged.
Japanese losses
The Japanese lost 26 front-line warships during the Battle of Leyte Gulf:
One Fleet Aircraft Carrier: Zuikaku (flagship of the decoy Northern Forces).
Three Light Aircraft Carriers: Zuihō, Chiyoda, and Chitose.
Three Battleships: Musashi (former flagship of the Japanese Combined Fleet), Yamashiro (flagship of the Southern Force) and Fusō.
Six Heavy Cruisers: Atago (flagship of the Center Force), Maya, Suzuya, Chokai, Chikuma, and Mogami.
Four Light Cruisers: Noshiro, Abukuma, Tama, and Kinu.
Nine Destroyers: Nowaki, Hayashimo, Yamagumo, Asagumo, Michishio, Akizuki, Hatsuzuki, Wakaba, and Uranami.
A 60th-Anniversary memorial ceremony in Palo, Leyte, Philippines, on 20 October 2004
The Battle of Leyte Gulf secured the beachheads of the US Sixth Army on Leyte against attack from the sea. However, much hard fighting would be required before the island was completely in Allied hands at the end of December 1944: the Battle of Leyte on land was fought in parallel with an air and sea campaign in which the Japanese reinforced and resupplied their troops on Leyte while the Allies attempted to interdict them and establish air-sea superiority for a series of amphibious landings in Ormoc Bay—engagements collectively referred to as the Battle of Ormoc Bay.[5]
The Imperial Japanese Navy had suffered its greatest loss of ships and crew ever. Its failure to dislodge the Allied invaders from Leyte meant the inevitable loss of the Philippines, which in turn meant Japan would be all but cut off from its occupied territories in Southeast Asia. These territories provided resources which were vital to Japan, in particular the oil needed for her ships and aircraft, this problem was compounded because the shipyards and sources of manufactured goods such as ammunition, were in Japan itself. Finally, the loss of Leyte opened the way for the invasion of the Ryukyu Islands in 1945.[4][5]
The major IJN surface ships returned to their bases to languish, entirely or almost entirely inactive, for the remainder of the war. The only major operation by these surface ships between the Battle for Leyte Gulf and the Japanese surrender was the suicidal sortie in April 1945 (part of Operation Ten-Go), in which the battleship Yamato and her escorts were destroyed by American carrier aircraft.
The first use of kamikaze aircraft took place following the Leyte landings. A kamikaze hit the Australian heavy cruiser HMAS Australia on 21 October. Organized suicide attacks by the "Special Attack Force" began on 25 October during the closing phase of the Battle off Samar, causing the destruction of the escort carrier St. Lo.
J.F.C. Fuller, in his The Decisive Battles of the Western World, writes of the outcome of Leyte Gulf:
The Japanese fleet had [effectively] ceased to exist, and, except by land-based aircraft, their opponents had won undisputed command of the sea.
When Admiral Ozawa was questioned... after the war he replied 'After this battle the surface forces became strictly auxiliary, so that we relied on land forces, special [Kamikaze] attack, and air power... there was no further use assigned to surface vessels, with the exception of some special ships'.
And Admiral Yonai, the Navy Minister, said he realised the defeat at Leyte 'was tantamount to the loss of the Philippines.'
As for the larger significance of the battle, he said, 'I felt that it was the end.'[4]
Months after the battle, the US Navy knew the American public had to be told something. The battle had been too large, involved too many US military personnel and had resulted in too much loss of life just to ignore. To this end, the US Navy provided most of the information to the publication Popular Mechanics to publish an article on the battle showing the American public that the battle had gone exactly as Halsey had planned. It was several years before the true story of Halsey's decision to leave the San Bernardino Strait unguarded became known to the American public.[20]
At the US Naval Academy, in Alumni Hall, a concourse is dedicated to Lt. Lloyd Garnett and his shipmates on USS Samuel B. Roberts (DE-413), who earned their ship the reputation as the "destroyer escort that fought like a battleship" in the Battle of Leyte Gulf.
The Essex-class aircraft carrier USS Leyte (CV-32) was named for the battle.
The Ticonderoga-class cruiser USS Leyte Gulf (CG-55) is named for the battle.
↑ Thomas, Evan (2006). Sea of Thunder. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. pp. 209–210. ISBN 978-0-7432-5221-8.
↑ Thomas, Evan (2006). Sea of Thunder. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. p. 322. ISBN 978-0-7432-5221-8.
↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Woodward, C. Vann (1947). The Battle for Leyte Gulf. New York: Macmillan.
↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 Fuller, John F. C. (1956). The Decisive Battles of the Western World. III. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode.
↑ 5.00 5.01 5.02 5.03 5.04 5.05 5.06 5.07 5.08 5.09 5.10 5.11 5.12 5.13 5.14 5.15 5.16 5.17 5.18 5.19 5.20 5.21 5.22 5.23 5.24 5.25 5.26 5.27 5.28 5.29 5.30 5.31 5.32 5.33 5.34 5.35 5.36 5.37 5.38 5.39 5.40 5.41 5.42 5.43 Morison, Samuel E. (1956). "Leyte, June 1944 – January 1945". History of United States Naval Operations in World War II. XII. Boston: Little & Brown.
↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Thomas, Evan (2006). Sea of Thunder: Four Commanders and the last Great Naval Campaign, 1941–1945. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-7432-5221-7.
↑ Smith, Robert Ross (2000) [1960]. "Chapter 21: Luzon Versus Formosa". Command Decisions. United States Army Center of Military History. CMH Pub 70-7. Archived from the original on 30 December 2007. http://www.history.army.mil/books/70-7_21.htm. Retrieved 8 December 2007. ""Meeting with President Franklin D. Roosevelt in a conference at Pearl Harbor in late July 1944,... MacArthur then argued persuasively that it was both necessary and proper to take Luzon before going on to Formosa, while Nimitz expounded a plan for striking straight across the western Pacific to Formosa, bypassing Luzon. Apparently, no decisions on strategy were reached at the Pearl Harbor conferences. The Formosa versus Luzon debate continued without let-up at the highest planning levels for over two months, and even the question of bypassing the Philippines entirely in favor of a direct move on Formosa again came up for serious discussion.""
↑ Nishida, Hiroshi (2002). "Hashimoto, Shintaro". Imperial Japanese Navy. http://homepage2.nifty.com/nishidah/e/stc0332.htm.
↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 Cutler, Thomas J. (1994). The Battle of Leyte Gulf, 23–26 October 1944. New York: HarperCollins. ISBN 0-06-016949-4.
↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 Hornfischer, James D. (2004). The Last Stand of the Tin Can Sailors. New York: Bantam. ISBN 0-553-80257-7.
↑ L, Klemen (1999-2000). "Rear-Admiral Takeo Kurita". Forgotten Campaign: The Dutch East Indies Campaign 1941–1942. http://www.dutcheastindies.webs.com/kurita.html.
↑ Tully 2009.
↑ Tully, Anthony P (2009). "Battle of Surigao Strait". Bloomington. ISBN 978-0-253-35242-2. .
↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 Howard (1999).
↑ Tully (2009), p. 167.
↑ 17.0 17.1 Thomas 2006, p. 170
↑ Note: Task Group 34.5 in fact only finished off the straggling destroyer Nowaki, and this was not achieved by the battleships, but rather by their accompanying cruisers and destroyers (Source: US Naval Historical Center).
↑ Robert Jon Cox (14 July 2008). "The Battle of Leyte Gulf – Casualty List". http://www.bosamar.com/pages/bosc14. Retrieved 7 November2010.
↑ "The Battle That Won the Pacific." Popular Mechanics, February 1945, pp. 17–25
Cox, Robert Jon (2010). The Battle Off Samar: Taffy III at Leyte Gulf (5th Edition). Agogeebic Press, LLC. ISBN 0-9822390-4-1.
Cutler, Thomas (1994). The Battle of Leyte Gulf: 23–26 October 1944. Annapolis, Maryland, U.S.: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-55750-243-9.
D'Albas, Andrieu (1965). Death of a Navy: Japanese Naval Action in World War II. Devin-Adair Pub. ISBN 0-8159-5302-X.
Drea, Edward J. (1998). "Leyte: Unanswered Questions". In the Service of the Emperor: Essays on the Imperial Japanese Army. Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 0-8032-1708-0.
Dull, Paul S. (1978). A Battle History of the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1941–1945. Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-87021-097-1.
Field, James A. (1947). The Japanese at Leyte Gulf: The Sho operation. Princeton University Press. ASIN B0006AR6LA.
Friedman, Kenneth (2001). Afternoon of the Rising Sun: The Battle of Leyte Gulf. Presidio Press. ISBN 0-89141-756-7.
Fuller, J.F.C. (1956). The Decisive Battles of the Western World – Volume III. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode. ISBN 1-135-31790-9.
Hornfischer, James D. (2004). The Last Stand of the Tin Can Sailors. Bantam. ISBN 0-553-80257-7.
Hoyt, Edwin P.; Thomas H Moorer (Introduction) (2003). The Men of the Gambier Bay: The Amazing True Story of the Battle of Leyte Gulf. The Lyons Press. ISBN 1-58574-643-6.
Lacroix, Eric; Linton Wells (1997). Japanese Cruisers of the Pacific War. Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-87021-311-3.
Morison, Samuel Eliot (1956 (reissue 2004)). Leyte, June 1944 – January 1945, vol. 12 of History of United States Naval Operations in World War II. Champaign, Illinois, U.S.A.: University of Illinois Press; Reprint edition. ISBN 0-252-07063-1.
Nishida, Hiroshi (2002). "Imperial Japanese Navy". http://homepage2.nifty.com/nishidah/e/index.htm.
Potter, E. B. (2005). Admiral Arleigh Burke. Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-59114-692-5.
Potter, E. B. (2003). Bull Halsey. Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-59114-691-7.
Sauer, Howard (1999). The Last Big-Gun Naval Battle: The Battle of Surigao Strait. Glencannon Press. ISBN 1-889901-08-3.
Stewart, Adrian (1979). The Battle of Leyte Gulf. Hale. ISBN 0-7091-7544-2.
Thomas, Evan (2006). Sea of Thunder: Four Commanders and the Last Great Naval Campaign 1941–1945. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-7432-5221-7.
Vego, Milan N. (2006). Battle for Leyte, 1944: Allied And Japanese Plans, Preparations, And Execution. US Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-55750-885-2.
Willmott, H. P. (2005). The Battle Of Leyte Gulf: The Last Fleet Action. Indiana University Press. ISBN 0-253-34528-6.
Woodward, C. Vann (1947 (reissue 2007)). The Battle for Leyte Gulf. Skyhorse Publishing. ISBN 1-60239-194-7.
Audio/visual media
Lost Evidence of the Pacific: The Battle of Leyte Gulf. History Channel TV
Dogfights: Death of the Japanese Navy. History Channel. TV
Battle 360: Battle of Leyte Gulf. History Channel. TV
Animated History of The Battle of Leyte Gulf
Victory At Sea: The Battle For Leyte Gulf, (1952). Episode 19 from a 26-episode film series about naval combat during World War II.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Battle of Leyte Gulf.
United States Strategic Bombing Survey (Pacific) – Interrogations of Japanese Officials
Battle Experience: Battle for Leyte Gulf [Cominch Secret Information Bulletin No. 22]
Task Force 34 Action Report: 6 October 1944 – 3 November 1944 (VAdm Lee)
Task Force 77 Action Report: Battle of Leyte Gulf (VAdm Kinkaid)
Orders of battle: Sibuyan Sea, Surigao Strait, Cape Engaño, Samar.
'Glorious Death: The Battle of Leyte Gulf' by Tim Lanzendörfer
battle-of-leyte-gulf.com
The Battle Off Samar — Taffy III at Leyte Gulf by Robert Jon Cox
Return to the Philippines: public domain documents from ibiblio.org
The Battle for Leyte Gulf Revisited by Irwin J. Kappes
Japan's TA-Operation: A Blueprint for Disaster by Irwin J. Kappes
'Loss of the USS Princeton (CVL-23), 24 October 1944' – United States' Naval Historical Center
http://combinedfleet.com/battles/Layte_Campaign
USS Bergall vs IJN Myoko: A Tale of Two Cripples by A.P. Tully
Oral history interview with Edward Gilbert, a member of the Army Boat Regiment during the Battle of Leyte Gulf from the Veterans History Project at Central Connecticut State University
Western Europe • Eastern Europe • Mediterranean and Middle East • Asia and the Pacific • West Africa • East Africa • Atlantic • Americas • Casualties • Military engagements • Conferences • Commanders
(leaders)
Australia • Belgium • Brazil • Canada • China • Czechoslovakia • Ethiopia • Finland (1944–1945) • France • Greece • India • Italy (from September 1943) • Luxembourg • Mexico • Netherlands • New Zealand • Norway • Philippines (Commonwealth) • Poland • South Africa • Soviet Union • United Kingdom • United States • Yugoslavia
Axis and
Axis-aligned
Bulgaria • Independent State of Croatia • Finland • Germany • Hungary • Free India • Iraq • Italy (until September 1943) • Italian Social Republic • Japan • Manchukuo • Philippines (Second Republic) • Romania • Slovakia • Thailand • Vichy France
Albania • Austria • Baltic States • Belgium • Czech lands • Denmark • Estonia • Ethiopia • France • Germany • Greece • Hong Kong • India • Italy • Jewish • Korea • Latvia • Luxembourg • Netherlands • Norway • Philippines • Poland (Anti-communist) • Romania • Thailand • Soviet Union • Slovakia • Western Ukraine • Vietnam • Yugoslavia
Africa • Asia • Europe
Poland • Phoney War • Winter War • Atlantic • Changsha • China
Weserübung • Netherlands • Belgium • France • Britain • North Africa • West Africa • British Somaliland • Baltic States • Moldova • Indochina • Greece • Compass
• East Africa
• Yugoslavia • Yugoslav Front • Greece • Crete • Iraq • Soviet Union (Barbarossa) • Finland • Lithuania • Syria and Lebanon • Kiev • Iran • Leningrad • Moscow • Sevastopol • Pearl Harbor • Hong Kong • Philippines • Changsha • Malaya
• Borneo (1941–42)
Burma • Changsha • Coral Sea • Gazala • Midway • Blue • Stalingrad • Dieppe • El Alamein • Guadalcanal • Torch
Tunisia • Kursk • Smolensk • Solomon Islands • Sicily • Lower Dnieper • Italy • Gilbert and Marshall Islands • Changde
• Monte Cassino / Shingle
• Narva • Korsun–Cherkassy • Tempest • Ichi-Go • Overlord • Neptune • Normandy • Mariana and Palau • Bagration • Western Ukraine • Tannenberg Line • Warsaw • Eastern Romania • Belgrade • Paris • Gothic Line • Market Garden • Estonia • Crossbow • Pointblank • Lapland • Hungary • Leyte • Ardennes • Philippines (1944–1945)
• Burma (1944–1945)
• Bodenplatte
• Vistula–Oder • Iwo Jima • Okinawa • Italy (Spring 1945) • Syrmian Front • Berlin • Czechoslovakia • Budapest • West Hunan • Surrender of Germany • Project Hula • Manchuria • Manila • Borneo • Atomic bombings • Kuril Islands • Shumshu
• Surrender of Japan
• Air warfare of World War II
• Attacks on North America • Blitzkrieg • Comparative military ranks • Cryptography • Home front • Lend-Lease • Manhattan Project • Military awards • Military equipment • Military production • Nazi plunder • Technology • Total war • Strategic bombing
• Bengal famine of 1943
• Effects
• Expulsion of Germans • Operation Paperclip • Operation Keelhaul • Occupation of Germany • Morgenthau Plan • Territorial changes of Germany • Soviet occupations • • Romania • • Poland • • Hungary • • Baltic States • Occupation of Japan • First Indochina War • Indonesian National Revolution
• Cold War
Allied war crimes • • Soviet war crimes • • British war crimes • • United States war crimes • German / Wehrmacht war crimes • • Holocaust • Italian war crimes • Japanese war crimes • • Unit 731 • Croatian war crimes (against the Serbs) / against the Jews) • Serbian war crimes
War rape
German military brothels • Camp brothels • Rape during the occupation of Japan • Comfort women • Rape of Nanking • Rape during the occupation of Germany • Rape during the liberation of France • Rape during the liberation of Poland
Finnish prisoners of war in the Soviet Union • German prisoners of war in the Soviet Union • German prisoners of war in the United States • Italian prisoners of war in the Soviet Union • Japanese prisoners of war in the Soviet Union • Japanese prisoners of war in World War II • Nazi crimes against Soviet POWs • Polish prisoners of war in the Soviet Union • Romanian prisoners of war in the Soviet Union
Articles containing Japanese-language text


text:
Schamo steht für

 Gobi
 Ihor Schamo (1925–1982), ukrainischer Komponist

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


This entry was tagged Audio books, Books, Life of Pi, Recommended reading, What I'm Reading. Bookmark the permalink.
← Why are Writers Expected to Write For Free?
I've seen the film, which was beautifully done. The book didn't grab me. It was that first third, which you aptly described as textbook-like that couldn't hold my interest. I like the idea of the audiobook. Maybe I'll give that a try.
Yes it certainly didn't grab me either although I was ultimately glad I kept going. There's something about listening to an audio book in the car that makes it harder to "put down" than a book I might set aside to do something else. Not to say that I'm "stuck" with it but I don't exactly have anywhere else to go! Somehow that makes it easier to get through the slow parts on any book.
I might have to try the audiobook too as I've checked out this book a few times from the library but never actually got around to reading it. But from your review it definitely sounds like it's about time I did.
I highly recommend the audio book. It's slow to start but things pick up in Part Two, I promise!
I read the book and enjoyed it. I didn't think the movie would be that great because most movies that come from books are disappointing, but perhaps this is the exception!


The objective of this study is to examine the association of listed family firm (LFF) and listed government related companies (LGRCs) and the firms' performance. The sample includes 495 companies listed on Bursa Malaysia for the year 2012. Multiple regression has been employed to test the hypotheses. Nine control variables included in this study which are the board size, board composition, role duality, firm size, firm age, debt ratio, firm growth, auditor type (Big 4) and financial expertise. The finding of this study indicates that listed family firms have correlation with firms' performance. A finding has revealed that the listed family firms perform better than LGRCs. The bigger the firm size, the higher the firm's performance as measured with Tobin's Q. The results also show that, the role duality is extremely significant positive associated with the Tobin's Q. This suggests that when there is a presence of role duality, it will contribute to higher firm performance. However, the finding for listed government related companies (LGRCs) show that there is no correlation between LGRCs and firms' performance.


Watch out for product sales when buying Metal Stool By Perch Chairs & Stools. Quite often furnishings are placed on sale. If you need a specific bit, you can save lots of money by with consideration waiting for the price to become reduced. You might even ask your chosen Metal Stool By Perch Chairs & Stools retailer when the object will be labeled on the cheap. If you require a new sofa, attempt getting 1 with a few completely included soft cushions. These pillows go longer and might be flipped regularly. Preferably, you should get a couch with detachable covers so you can effortlessly scrub them. Removable covers may also be exchanged easily in the event you could not clear a stain Buy Metal Stool By Perch Chairs & Stools later on in the year. At the conclusion of this season, it is frequent for retailers to get these sections off of their showroom surface. This can bring about some very nice sales and discounts.
This couch is worked with the gong-shaped shape along with the higher armrest of the cushioning. Additionally, the head is based on obstructed corner edges. The legs, however, have joined the phony wooden wrapping. The couch gives a comfortable and lavish sensation. This is actually the direct result of extremely versatile padding inside the polyester furniture. You can sit down effortlessly for now to unwind. Each of the tones offered for this couch demonstrates its significant component, Versatile design. The red-colored sculpt would be well suited for both topics with mild and dark tones. That remains constant for various shades it provides as well. The sofa is located in space. Whether or not its Thanksgiving or a large family gathering, you can rely on it. Race-viewing yet still time collapsing on your couch together with your buddies is really a genuine choice.
The best part that makes up for the lost time the glory from the purchasers is its style without problems. Only for the look of the furniture, you get a nice stylish atmosphere. It's available in rich solid shading, imitating as incredible formal clothing. While maintaining an honorable prominence, the material furniture could be cleaned very easily. You should not regret after generating a glass of drink in your good sofa. You just need to clean the spot for ever and ever exactly if this hits the upholstery. Despite the fact that great reputation comes with delicacy, it's not the situation here. This incredible sofa is given having a contour growth and development of wood. You're much more reluctant to hear squeaks and wobbling sounds.
The best part that compensates for the lost time the glory of the buyers is its style without problems. Only for the look of the upholstery, you get a nice tasteful environment. It's available in wealthy strong covering, imitating as amazing official clothing. While keeping an honorable prominence, the fabric furniture could be cleaned very easily. You shouldn't regret following turning over a glass of consume on your good sofa. All you need is to wash the spot for ever and ever precisely if this strikes the upholstery. Even though great repute accompanies treat, it is not the problem here. This incredible sofa is given with a contour development of wood. You're much more unwilling to hear squeaks and walking seems.
This lying loveseat requires the 2nd place simply because its an excellent affordable, super comfy choice that can participate in most house decorations styles. Its solid wood frame is padded with coils (for some spring) and high-density froth (for many soft), and padded with dark brown faux leather that makes it an ultra-versatile furniture piece. Combine it with the person cavern for any cozy spot to view the sport (and dont worry about any spillsits vinyl fabric furniture tends to make cleanup simple) or perhaps your family room with a few ornamental throw pillows for that ideal place to cozy up after a long day. Real-existence clients adore this reclining loveseat because its comfortable, long lasting, easy to assemble one rater even mentioned that she could assemble two models in under 45 minutes! and shipping from the merchant is easy.
This is definitely the cutest and cleverly designed loveseat. Contingent within the tone, it gives a disconcerting appearance to your workplace or areas. The couch unimaginably imperceptible for any morning espresso or an animated magazine studying carefully. It's accessible both in leather-based and in texture depending on what you assistance a brilliant look, or perhaps a lovely, lovely look at. The best part, it is very sensible! The extremely chic tufting is molded stone, which retains an ideal Chesterfield style. The most adorable point about this couch is its shape. Combined with the appeal, the rear style gives your back knowledge of rest. It is cleverly designed to ensure that smaller areas consolidate luxury inside a smaller sized room. It's a clever choice for the childrens room, because it offers a number of sweet tones. They would love to strike them with the storyline or for a fantastic desire. No hassle for adults too for a comfy night with Manga or Marvels.
British folded equip sofas are additional comfortable because of the big, soft cushions at the back and for the seats. Reduced hands are comfy for laying and also the uncovered thighs bare this couch style from sensation too heavy or imposing. It actually came from at the turn from the century and can be related to something usual for the British country side. Differentiating characteristics usually include low exposed legs, soft, generous cushions, a tight back and recessed arms. Even though it is regarded as a classic design, it's also a perfect accessory for a contemporary space thanks to its comfortable and versatile appear.
This sofa is appreciated for its distinctive design and comfort. Its striking flare-arm couch with seats provides you with optimum space for stretching out and relaxing in your room. So generally the modern couch chaise adds to the great thing about this set. The established also includes pillow leading arms cushioned back again and chairs for maximum comfort. The couch includes a corner-blocked wood body that gives the sofa enough sturdiness. The sofa measures 89 inches broad by 62 in . thorough by 4 in . tall which makes it ideal for moderate dimension areas. You may need to do small assembling eg of the thighs.
Usually now utilized in homes with a great room or open layout, they are often big designs that chair lots of visitors. In smaller rooms, they can be useful for seats within an region that has a strange part or other space restriction. The ability to combine part models, end units and lying areas according to room and person choice makes this sofa style extremely flexible. Sectional sofas are also available in a multitude of designs, from ultra modern or extremely luxe, to more family-friendly modern styles.
This extremely-stylish, higher-sovereign sofa is designed to support cutting-edge living room development. It is created as a 2-piece sectional sofa coupled with a beautiful lounger. Additionally, it provides cellular arm rests and advantageous back again support. The beautiful tapestry is finished with darkish false leather, firmly tufted. You can feel at ease cushioning with froth inside the seat soft cushions. This ensures a delicate sensation whenever you relaxation after a monotonous day time. The sofa is strengthened with wood advantage covered with dark synthetic leather-based. False tufted leather-based and powerful pine give extreme glare. It is true that it takes a second appear because it is more costly of computer truly seems to be. Speaking of size, its large! This is exactly what adds more superstars for this set. The height is also remarkable for high and brief people.
Just like its namesake, the camelback sofa includes a difficulty or maybe two that highlights the main silhouette of this couch style. This can be a conventional design that was prominent within the 1700s by Chippendale and households who wanted aristocratic, official furniture frequently chosen this design. Today, this couch style gives a more official atmosphere to any room, particularly when upholstered in a official fabric. A far more casual fabric choice would make it suitable for a household space that doesnt need a lot of formality. Either way, the camelback sofa has some factors that characterize the design and style. The legs are usually exposed, the sofa doesn't have back cushions also it usually has square or rolled arms.


If you use Microsoft® Outlook® as your email client on either Windows® or Mac®, you can use the Vidyo™ Outlook Add-in to quickly and easily schedule your Vidyo meetings via Outlook.
When the Vidyo Outlook Add-in is installed, appears on your Outlook ribbon when you use your Outlook calendar. If you don't see that button on your ribbon, ask your system administrator to install the Vidyo Outlook Add-in for you. If you are an Exchange admin, see Configuring and installing the Vidyo Outlook Add-in for information about how to install and deploy the Vidyo Outlook Add-in for your users.
This section describes how to use the Vidyo Outlook Add-in to create a Vidyo meeting and send out an invitation to that meeting.
If you would like a Quick Reference Card about how to use the Vidyo Outlook Add-in, see the attached PDF file.
The Vidyo Outlook Add-in supports users who have SAML and users who use portal/LDAP login; therefore, the steps in the section describe how to log in using both methods.
Go to your Outlook calendar and create a meeting just as you normally would.
You can add the people you want to invite to the meeting, enter a Subject, select the date, and select the Start and End times. Do not enter a location.
Click on the Outlook ribbon.
The Vidyo Calendar window appears with the portal address prepopulated in the Portal field.
If you are an administrator and would like information about how to prepopulate the Portal field with the URL of your portal, see the Configuring and installing the Vidyo Outlook Add-in article.
Click Next to access your browser.
Enter your credentials to log in via your browser.
Once you have successfully logged in following the SAML workflow configured by your administrator, the Vidyo Calendar window appears asking you where you would like to meet.
If you want to remain logged in, select Keep me signed in.
The Vidyo Calendar window appears asking you where you would like to meet.
Select the first radio button under "Where would you like to meet?".
A list of your rooms displays. If do not have any rooms, the rooms that you see will be based on how rooms have been configured on your portal.
If you want to add an access code to your meeting, select the "Add an access code to this meeting" checkbox, and then enter a 5 to 12 character numerical code.
Select the One-time room (used only once) radio button under "Where would you like to meet?"
If the one-time room feature is disabled in the portal, a message appears stating that you must add or create a room in which to schedule your meeting. Otherwise, a message appears stating that the access code will be automatically generated and added to the meeting invitation.
A message appears stating that you are almost done, and the meeting invitation populates with the meeting information (including a link to the meeting in the Location field).
Click to close the Vidyo Calendar window.
Click Send to send the invitation to your Vidyo meeting.
If you run into any issues with the Vidyo Outlook Add-in, you can generate logs and send them to the email address configured by your administrator.
If you are an administrator and would like information about how to configure the email address where the logs can be sent to, see the Configuring and installing the Vidyo Outlook Add-in article.
Click at the bottom of the Vidyo Calendar window and select Generate Logs from the drop-down.
Information about generating logs appears on the Vidyo Calendar window.
An email appears that contains the diagnostic report. The To field will be automatically populated with the address configured by your administrator.


I sent off an esa50 form in December. The other day a brown envelope turned up. When reading it. It explained how my esa payment was calculated. Does this mean that I won't have to have an assessment carried out?
Title should say Award not reward.
I think it does mean that you don't have to have an assessment.
Yeah I think it means you passed. Champagne is on you pal!


text:
Clinical log data analysis for assessing the accuracy of the CyberKnife fiducial-free lung tumor tracking system
/ / / / / / / A1164 / A1363
Nakayama, Masao
Nishimura, Hideki
Mayahara, Hiroshi
Nakamura, Masaki
Uehara, Kazuyuki
Tsudou, Shinji
Harada, Aya
Akasaka, Hiroaki
Sasaki, Ryohei
/ / / / / / / 赤坂, 浩亮 / 佐々木, 良平
アカサカ, ヒロアキ
ササキ, リョウヘイ
Practical Radiation Oncology
© 2017 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
10.1016/j.prro.2017.10.014
/ / / / / / / 1000020707161 / 1000030346267
Purpose: The CyberKnife Xsight Lung Tracking (XLT) and 1-View tracking systems can synchronize beam targeting to a visible lung tumor with respiratory motion during irradiation without requiring internal fiducial markers. The systems use a correlation model that relates external marker positions to tumor positions as well as a prediction model that predicts the target's future position. In this study, the correlation and prediction model uncertainties related to the CyberKnife fiducial-free tumor tracking system were evaluated using clinical log data. Methods and materials: Data from 211 fractions in 42 patients with lung tumors were analyzed. Log files produced by the CyberKnife Synchrony system were acquired after each treatment; the mean correlation and prediction errors for each patient were calculated. Additionally, we examined the tracking tumor-related parameters and analyzed the relationships between the model errors and tracking tumor-related parameters. Results: The overall means ± standard deviations (SDs) of the correlation errors were 0.70 ± 0.43 mm, 0.36 ± 0.16 mm, 0.44 ± 0.22 mm, and 0.95 ± 0.43 mm for the superoinferior (SI), left-right (LR), anteroposterior (AP), and radial directions, respectively. The overall means ± SDs of the prediction errors were 0.13 ± 0.11 mm, 0.03 ± 0.02 mm, 0.03 ± 0.02 mm, and 0.14 ± 0.11 mm for the SI, LR, AP, and radial directions, respectively. There were no significant differences in these errors between the XLT and 1-View tracking methods. The tumor motion amplitude was moderately associated with the correlation error and strongly related to the prediction error in the SI and radial directions. Conclusions: Clinical log data analysis can be used to determine the necessary margin sizes in treatment plans to compensate for correlation and prediction errors in the CyberKnife fiducial-free lung tumor tracking system. The tumor motion amplitude may facilitate margin determination.
/ / / / / / / / https://kuid-rm-web.ofc.kobe-u.ac.jp/profile/ja.f5e9afd9968a7ac8520e17560c007669.html

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Colts Expect To See Bills' Tyrod Taylor On Sunday
Intro: Buffalo Bills quarterback Tyrod Taylor, who suffered a knee contusion last Sunday, was a limited participant in Thursday's practice, but Indianapolis Colts defensive coordinator Ted Monachino expects the dual-threat QB to be in the lineup on Sunday at New Era Field. What all did we learn on the day? Let's check today's Daily Notebook, brought to you by ATI Physical Therapy.'
INDIANAPOLIS — Back in October, as the Indianapolis Colts were preparing for their Week 6 matchup against the Tennessee Titans, the Indy defense faced the possibility of going up against two very different types of quarterbacks.
](http://www.atipt.com/)The Titans' starter, the mobile Marcus Mariota, at that time was still very much hobbled from a hamstring injury that kept him out of their previous game, making it possible that the team could go with his backup, the veteran Matt Cassel, who is much more of a traditional drop-back passer.
The Colts are facing a similar scenario this week, as they prepare to take on the Buffalo Bills on Sunday at New Era Field.
The Bills' starting quarterback, Tyrod Taylor, a major threat to run the ball any time, suffered a knee contusion last Sunday against the New England Patriots and did not return to the game. Taylor didn't practice Wednesday and only participated in individual position drills on Thursday.
And if Taylor isn't healthy enough to play on Sunday, then the team turns to its backup, rookie Nathan Peterman, who, like Cassel, brings more of a traditional, drop-back style for the Buffalo offense.
Colts defensive coordinator Ted Monachino said Thursday that his unit is fully prepared for Taylor to take the field, but if he can't go, then they'll have a plan in place to defend Peterman, as well.
"We're preparing for Tyrod (Taylor) to play and to be full speed," Monachino said. "If (Nathan) Peterman plays, he plays and we're prepared either direction. We've got a little bit of a plan for each guy, but primarily, we're preparing for one over the other."
The 6-foot-1, 215-pound Taylor, who's in his seventh year out of Virginia Tech, has been one of the league's most dangerous dual-threat quarterbacks since joining the Bills via free agency in 2015. In each of his two seasons in Buffalo — both of which ended in Pro Bowl selections — Taylor posted 3,000 yards through the air with at least 17 touchdowns and no more than six interceptions, while his 1,358 combined rushing yards is second only to the Carolina Panthers' Cam Newton among NFL quarterbacks over that span.
Taylor's 93.5 passer rating with the Bills is better than Jim Kelly (84.4) and Doug Flutie (81.7).
"He is a rare athlete and a rare talent," Colts head coach Chuck Pagano said of Taylor. "He's a dangerous dude."
But despite Taylor's production — and the fact the Bills (6-6) have remained in playoff contention — their head coach, Sean McDermott, decided to sit Taylor in favor of Peterman for the team's Week 11 matchup against the Los Angeles Chargers.
Peterman's first-career start lasted all of two quarters, however, as he was picked off five times in one half, tying the record for most interceptions thrown in an NFL debut.
While McDermott went back with Taylor as the team's starter moving forward, Peterman was able to get back on the field last week in relief duty against the Patriots, completing 6-of-15 passes for 40 yards in Buffalo's 23-3 home loss.
"You've got to have a short memory in this business and I thought Nate came out and made a great throw on the first throw to Andre [Holmes] there and went through his progression at times and did some good things," McDermott told reporters on Wednesday. "So it's good that he continues to work, continues to play through and continues to grow and build on what he's done in the past."
After practicing in a limited capacity on Thursday, however, Taylor appears on track to get the start Sunday against the Colts, barring no setbacks the rest of the week.
"We'll look at it and see how he comes back (Friday)," McDermott said, via BuffaloBills.com. "These things, sometimes things change in 24 hours with these types of injuries in terms of whether there's soreness or not soreness."
Here's Thursday's full injury report:• DNP:
Tight end Darrell Daniels (hamstring), tackle/guard Denzelle Good (illness); running back Frank Gore (rest); cornerback Rashaan Melvin (hand); wide receiver Donte Moncrief (ankle); center Mike Person (ankle).• Limited:
Defensive tackle Johnathan Hankins (chest); defensive tackle Hassan Ridgeway (shoulder).• Full:
Center Ryan Kelly (concussion).
— That's good news for the Colts and Kelly, who continues to progress through the league's concussion protocol. Kelly, who missed last Sunday's game against the Jacksonville Jaguars, was a limited participant on Wednesday and was wearing a red, no-contact jersey.
— That's not-so-good news, however, for Moncrief, who did not practice for a second straight day with an ankle injury suffered towards the end of the Jaguars game. Look for an update on his playing status on Friday from Pagano.
— Hankins, who is listed with a chest injury, did not practice on Wednesday, so the fact he was limited on Thursday seems to be a good sign for the Colts' and their improved defensive front, which has really clamped down against the run in recent weeks. They have another tough task on Sunday against the Bills' LeSean McCoy.
2022 Rookie Review: Dallis Flowers Leads NFL In Yards Per Kickoff Return
Flowers, an undrafted free agent, logged time as both a kick returner and cornerback and earned a spot on the Pro Football Writers Association All-Rookie team as a kick returner.
2022 Rookie Review: From Seventh-Round Pick To Productive Starter, Rodney Thomas II Shines In Year 1
Safety Rodney Thomas II, the No. 239 pick in the 2022 NFL Draft, led the Colts with four interceptions last season.
2022 Rookie Review: Don't Forget About Andrew Ogletree
Ogletree impressed the Colts during training camp before a knee injury cut his season short in August.


Order select pillows from United Feather and Down ® Bedding Collection from Pillows.com!
Established in 1797 and manufacturing pillows for over 200 years, United Feather and Down ® has put this experience to use and created some superb bedding for the consumer. Pillows.com is proud to offer select items from the United Feather and Down ® bedding collection that is sure to add comfort to our customer's homes. Shop Pillows.com selection of premium United Feather and Down ® pillows today and start getting the sleep you deserve! If you do not 100% love your new United Feather and Down ® pillows, let us know and we make it right! That's the Pillows.com promise.


Wellcome to eastern Turkey. We meet with you or your group at airport in Van, or transfer you from hotel in Van city. Drive to Dogubayazit. Arrive your hotel in Dogubeyazit 3* and given informations about your trip - procedures etc. Overnight at the hotel.
A rule that for foreigner participants all applications must be filled and apply us minimum 3 months ago. We will get your Climbing permitts/ Visa from Ankara (Turkish authorities). Please contact us to get your application form. Additional Info: We can provide extra days, Pre-post tours, Hotel bookings in any city in Turkey before your climb program (down) places (from / to) Istanbul - Kusadasi - Ephesus - Pamukkale -Antalya (beach resorts days) and Cappadocia highlights.
BB stays at hotels in Van and Dogubeyazit, fullyboard meals during climb and trekking days, animals, camping equipments,Tents, Guide service included in the price.
Tour Dates:Climb to Ararat (Turkey side) tour can be arrange any dates between June to - 15th September periods year around.


My sister was born in 1978. In her childhood she wanted be a barista. She watched a lot of training videos on youtube and other places. When she was 15 years old she asked her mom about her ambition to be a barista and wanted to start training for this. But her mom said "you need to finish school and then you can decide if you want to find a job or you want to follow your dream".
When she finished University she went to find some coffee shops to learn , after that she came to her mom and said "Maybe I should find some coffee to work in" She couldn't be a barista. She had to work in an office for about 4 years, until she was 21 years old. Her Boss sent her to another place to do something in England to work. She worked. She worked in England for around 2 years and she got a boyfriend, and then after 3 years she got married.
Nowadays she has 2 sons, her sons are names John and Tem. They were born and grew up in England.