As His creatures, all Muslims must be thankful for all His mercy and guidance. When someone feel grateful for everything that was given to him, Allah will add His gift to him/her to the favors.
The ways to be thankful and grateful can be delivered by saying "thank you". Also, to act gratefully for the grace and favor, accordingly. For example, by using, keeping, and maintaining well anything that has been granted/given by God and utilizing them for positive things.
Five layers of humanitarian system from outer most: body, mind, feeling, soul, spirit. How to be grateful upon there gifts of God?
The body layer that has been given by Allah is being thanked by doing and keeping their development, health, and strength. For example, by doing good and regular exercises such as jogging, running, gymnastics, horseback riding, swimming, archery, and more.
It is also benefical to regularly do gym / fitness, outbound, and a visit to the open nature that are still beautiful and have cool air away from industrial pollution.
The layer of the mind that God gave, is guarded from negative things, being developed with the method of good thinking honed with the tools to think straight and clear, the laws of thought that are strong and straight, good logic, critical thinking based on the laws and rules God given for the good of man himself.
Other way to thank and keep our layer of mind good are following seminars and personal and expertise development training. Educating family with science and world religions equally which are mutually reinforcing. Providing free courses and contributing ideas to the needy.
The layer of feeling and emotions is guarded and maintained by giving the best power with a good understanding of the knowledge of religion and the knowledge of world well. Listening to the smooth feeling and following it as a message from the unconscious layers. Following the cues given by God through his angels in any event so that not only processed using layers of the mind, but also cultivated taste by holy spiritual component.
The other are establishing, maintaining, and programming the soul (or subconscious) layers with the noble, positive, creative, and powerful things. Do not let the negative influences embedding in the subconscious layer so that it becomes a long-term program that could affect the quality of human life and difficult to re-formatted the long-term program.
Last layer is the spirit. This one is in God's knowledge.
Grateful by the intentions, words, and deeds is the best way that must be done as a Muslim. If there is less than one then it is not good.
Grateful to the intentions and actions can be tolerated only if gratitude with words deemed irrelevant and out of place.
For this type of grateful, not everyone can do it easily. For instance, someone that has been given the success in his businesses at past time. But now, it is being revoked and he currently lives in difficulties.
So, if a person is being grateful for his past success, while in this time he has a difficulty in his life, means that he already did this first type of gratitude.
O God, you ever gave me great success in business at past time. I am very grateful for your grace even today you are depriving it favors me. Yes thank God for that past success. I have never became number one in my business field like that time ever. "
Another example is someone who ever had a home but his home was taken back by God to be given to someone else. Or people who have been given a child by God and then called into the presence of God (died) after that.
This type of gratitude is often forgotten, so often. Usually people give thanks to God for what is being enjoyed at the present time, not the past one.
If we can be grateful for achievement, happiness, success, and others in the past time, whether God will give them back? Or, even, give more than that? Remember God's promise that whoever is grateful, God will add His blessings and gifts to the such people.
But if we are not grateful for the pleasure that have passed, then the fact that we become the people who are less grateful. And it will be more difficult for us to obtain more success and other favor and God blessings.
If we are being grateful to God for anything He gave at the past time, it will add our more value in the eyes of God as people who constantly grateful. If God wills, Allah enhanced our degree. Aameen.
"I am a gift in this life. Therefore, I am grateful and celebrate it every day. "
To be continued on next article "Three Types of Gratitude (2)".


Mike Tate, Chair of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin, will join the Waukesha County Democrats for the Annual Holiday Potluck on December 20th at the Waukesha Labor Temple. In between bites, I plan to grill Tate for info about next year's State Convention. Word on the street is that the Democratic Party of Wisconsin will host its 2013 State Convention right here in Waukesha County. Yes, Waukesha County.
For questions or to sign up to bring a dish to pass, leave a message at (262) 970-7104 or send an email to: chairman@waukeshadems.org.
Potluck? Maybe they should get to work. Republicans aren't slowing down for the holidays. Yeah because Obama is in means we're winning right?


text:
Q: How to share contact by telegram bot via query string It is possible to send message via query string to any user by telegram bots, but i want to share a contact replace of sending a text message.
is it possible?
how can i do it?
thanks

A: Do you mean let bot send phone contacts to user?
If you mean that, you can try sendContact method instead of sendMessage.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Here in Alappuzha Gold Rate, user can check Gold rate Live. Alappuzha gold price on 18 April 2019. They can find the latest and gold current price in Alappuzha. Gold price in Alappuzha is available in various weights like Grams, Carat, and Ounce (example: 10 grams, 100 grams, 500 grams & 1 Kg). In Alappuzha - Kerala, grt gold rate quality is mainly comes in 22 Karat & 24 Karat with the price difference based on quality of 24 carat gold rate and 22 carat gold rate. On this website, user may also get the today's gold price in Alappuzha for Gold coin. Gold Coin Rate in Alappuzha, Gold Guinea Rate in Alappuzha and Gold Petal Rate in Alappuzha may also be checked.
Along with gold, user can also get the Latest and current Silver Price in Alappuzha. Silver price in Alappuzha is available in weight of 1 KG only. This is standard weigh for the measurement of Silver. The prices are linked with Market trend and vary day to day.
Address: GOLD MERCHANT'S ASSOCIATION BLDGS, NO.XVIII/1285, P.B.NO.3818, MULLAKKAL, ALAPPUZHA-688010, KERALA.
In Alappuzha, Everyday Gold price and Silver Price Fluctuate as per the National and international market. In India Every state has its own Tax ratio for the commodities and because of this variable tax structure in India state wise create different price range of Precious metals. Gold price also differs by its purity and Silver price by its weight in Alappuzha.


text:
M. Orr
Deputy Mining and Lands Commissioner
Friday, the 11th day of February, 2000.
Mining Claims 1226390 and 1231497, situate in the Township of Turnbull, in the Porcupine Mining Division, staked by Robert Roger Rousseau, Vital Joseph Larche and Luc Pierre Gagnon, to have been recorded in the names of Charles Robert Morgan, A. Maureen Rousseau and Reginald T.J. Barnes, each as to a 33 1/3% interest marked Refused and Filed Only hereinafter referred to as the Morgan Mining Claims;
Mining Claims 1223524 and 1223525, situate in the Township of Turnbull, in the Porcupine Mining Division, staked by Steven Dean Anderson, to have been recorded in the name of Steven Dean Anderson, marked Filed Only and Refused and Filed Only hereinafter referred to as the Anderson Mining Claims;
Subsection 46(2) of the Mining Act and Ontario Regulation 7/96;
B E T W E E N:
CHARLES ROBERT MORGAN, REGINALD T.J. BARNES
AND A. MAUREEN ROUSSEAU
Appellants and Disputants of the First Part
STEVEN DEAN ANDERSON
Appellant and Disputant of the Second Part
MINISTER OF NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT AND MINES
Three appeals pursuant to subsection 112(1) of the Mining Act from the decision of the Provincial Mining Recorder, dated the 15th day of June, 1998, to not record the Morgan Mining Claims, on the basis that they were not in compliance with clause 10(2)(2) of Ontario Regulation 7/96;
An appeal pursuant to subsection 112(1) of the Mining Act from the decision of the Provincial Mining Recorder, dated the 6th day of July, 1998, to not record the Anderson Mining Claims, on the basis that an application to record the Morgan Mining Claims had been filed with the Provincial Mining Recorder.
WHEREAS these appeals and disputes were received by this tribunal on the 23rd day, 25th day and 30th day of June and on the 14th day of July, 1998, respectively;
AND WHEREAS a hearing was held by telephone conference call on the 30th day of November, 1999;
1. THIS TRIBUNAL ORDERS that the appeals and disputes of the Appellants and Disputants of the First Part, being Charles Robert Morgan, Reginald T.J. Barnes and A. Maureen Rousseau, dated the 19th day, 25th day and 26th day of June, 1998, respectively, be and are hereby granted insofar as the Provincial Mining Recorder's ability to accept two corrected applications to record.
2. THIS TRIBUNAL ORDERS that the two applications to record two Mining Claims 1226390 and 1231497 (the Morgan Mining Claims), be refused.
3. THIS TRIBUNAL FURTHER ORDERS that the appeal and dispute of the Appellant and Disputant of the Second Part, Steven Dean Anderson, be and is hereby granted.
4. THIS TRIBUNAL FURTHER ORDERS that Mining Claims 1223524 and 1223525 be recorded effective the 11th day of February, 2000, being the date of this Order.
5. THIS TRIBUNAL FURTHER ORDERS that the 11th day of February, 2002, be fixed as the date by which the first and second units of prescribed assessment work must be performed and filed on Mining Claims P-1223524 and 1223525, in the amount set out in Schedule A attached to this Order and all subsequent anniversary dates are deemed to be February 11.
6. THIS TRIBUNAL FURTHER ORDERS that no costs shall be payable by any party to these appeals and disputes.
7. THIS TRIBUNAL FUTHER ORDERS that this Order be filed without fee in the Office of the Provincial Mining Recorder in Sudbury, Ontario, pursuant to subsection 129(4) of the Mining Act.
DATED this 11th day of February, 2000.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY MARIANNE ORR
SCHEDULE 'A'
MINING CLAIM # UNITS AMOUNT OF WORK IN DOLLARS DUE DATE
P-1223524 3 $1,200 Feb. 11, 2002
Mining Claims 1226390 and 1231497, situate in the Township of Turnbull, in the Porcupine Mining Division, staked by Robert Roger Rousseau, Vital Joseph Larche and Luc Pierre Gagnon, to have been recorded in the names of Charles Robert Morgan, A. Maureen Rousseau and Reginald T.J. Barnes, each as to a 33 1/3% interest marked �Refused and Filed Only� hereinafter referred to as the �Morgan Mining Claims�;
Mining Claims 1223524 and 1223525, situate in the Township of Turnbull, in the Porcupine Mining Division, staked by Steven Dean Anderson, to have been recorded in the name of Steven Dean Anderson, marked �Filed Only� and �Refused and Filed Only� hereinafter referred to as the �Anderson Mining Claims�;
These appeals and disputes were heard by Telephone Conference Call on November 30, 1999. The hearing was held in two parts; the first part dealing with the recorder's refusal to accept the �Morgan Mining Claims� (1226390, 1231497), under section 44 of the Mining Act, the application having been filed by someone other than that required by clause 10(2)(2) of Ontario Regulation 7/96.
The second part of the hearing dealt with Mr. Anderson's dispute concerning the Morgan Mining Claims. Mr. Anderson had staked two claims and these were referred to as the �Anderson Mining Claims� (1223524, 1223525).
In the first part, Mr. Francis Yungwirth appeared as counsel on behalf of Mr. Morgan. Mr. Roy Spooner appeared for the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. Mr. Reginald Barnes spoke on his own behalf and Mr. Robert Rousseau spoke on behalf of Maureen Rousseau.
In the second part, Messrs. Morgan, Barnes and Rousseau represented themselves. Mr. Steve Anderson represented himself as well.
All the parties filed documents and materials and gave oral evidence. The documents and materials were referred to in both parts of the hearing.
These matters arose as a result of two decisions made by the Provincial Mining Recorder in June and July of 1998. The Mining Recorder decided to not record both sets of affected mining claims.
With respect to the Morgan Mining Claims, the decision to not record was made on the basis that the application to record had not been made by one of the stakers, but had been made by someone who had not actually carried out the staking. Clause 10(2)(2) of Regulation 7/96 requires that where lands are open for twenty-four hours or less, then the staking must be carried out by the recording licensee.
With respect to the Anderson Mining Claims, the decision to not record was made on the basis that the application to record the Morgan Mining Claims had been filed with the Provincial Mining Recorder, and the Recorder found that there was overlap between the two sets of claims. The issue of the �wrong� applicant (in the eyes of the Mining Recorder) having filed the application for the Morgan Mining Claims would have to be settled first.
Both sets of mining claims dealt with lands found in the Township of Turnbull, in the Porcupine Mining Division. Certain lands, including the subject lands, came open for staking on April 17, 1998.
1. For lands which have been open for staking less than 24 hours, can an application to record which is completed and signed by someone other than the person required by the regulation be corrected to reflect the correct person after the time for filing the application has passed?
If the issues stopped with the correctness of the application, the tribunal could complete the course of events and put its mind to the recording of the subject claims. However, a dispute was filed against the claims and this fact led to the tribunal's subsequently determining the merits of the staking of the subject claims in terms of substantial compliance and thereby dealing with the second issue which is as follows.
2. If the answer to #1 is yes, thereby permitting the acceptance of two applications with two recording licensees on them, and the claims are disputed, can they then be accepted under section 43 as being in substantial compliance or deemed substantial compliance with the requirements of the Act and regulation?
The tribunal considered both the parties' written material and documentation (which had been pre-filed) as well as the oral evidence given at the hearing.
Certain lands in the Township of Turnbull, Porcupine Mining Division, came open for staking on April 17, 1998, pursuant to an order made under section 35 of the Mining Act and described in the Ministry's document book as �Q-P-10/98�. These lands are further described in the Ministry's document book as being �formerly patented as P 11395, P 12144, P 12163, P 12228, P 18985 and P 18986� and totalling 80.19 hectares in size. These lands are surrounded by irregularly shaped mining claims to the east, west and south.
The staking of both Morgan Mining Claims began at 9:00 a.m. on April 17, 1998. Claim 1226390 was completed at 11:00 a.m., and measured twelve hectares (going by the application) and Claim 1231497 was completed at 11:05 a.m., and measured sixty hectares (going by the application). Mr. Morgan's evidence was that he had not actually staked the Morgan Mining Claims, but was �on the ground� at the time of the staking and was there to locate the position of the Claims, including the number one post for Claim 1226390, as he had twenty years of staking experience in the area. He waited at the number one post for his staker (Mr. Gagnon) to return, which he did at 11:00 a.m. Mr. Morgan stated that there was no competition while the staking was being carried out.
When questioned by the tribunal as to his signing the certificate accompanying the application and his interpretation of the words �I was personally on the ground during the staking of the lands�, Mr. Morgan said that he could say that he �caused to be staked out� because he was �personally on the ground�. In that way, he could sign and file the application. When questioned by the tribunal as to why Messrs. Larche or Gagnon could not or did not have the applications recorded, Mr. Morgan made reference to the weather and the fact that both men were wet while he was dry after the staking had been completed.
Mr. Rousseau, was waiting at the number one post for Claim 123497. The staker of that claim was Mr. Larche. As noted, the staking for that claim started at 9:00 a.m. and ended at 11:05 a.m. Both Messrs. Larche and Gagnon provided written evidence to the effect that they did not encounter any competition while staking.
Mr. Rousseau also indicated that even with his forty years of experience he was not aware of the Regulatory requirement that the �Recording Licensee� also be a staker where the lands have been opened for twenty-four hours or less. Mr. Rousseau indicated that at �around eleven o'clock�, he noticed a truck in the area, and when asked by its occupants, �Did you get the ground?�, he replied in the affirmative. He said that at the time of this question Mr. Morgan had left to record the application.
Mr. Morgan said that he filed the application to record the Claims on the 17th of April, 1998, and that he was in Sudbury on the 23rd of April to file an application for a triangular section which, based on the exhibits, is land located between Claim 1231497 and the Claim to the east being Claim 1228613. A copy of a letter from Mr. Morgan dated April 23, 1998, addressed to Mr. Spooner is contained in the material filed by Mr. Morgan (Exhibit 1, Tab 6). This letter asks Mr. Spooner to move Mr. Morgan's line posts on the west side of Claim 1228613 westerly to coincide with the East limit of 1231497. This letter is followed by a fax dated April 27, 1998 and addressed to Mr. Dale Messenger, at the Ministry office. In this letter, Mr. Morgan asks that the measurements on Claim 1226390 be shown as 300 meters +/- as they were apparently not shown on the sketch. He also indicates that the westerly limits of Claim 1231497 were to coincide with the east limit of Patent 1152 and with the east and south limits of Patent 3383 (also a claim). He wrote that it was his intention to correct the discrepancies on instructions from the Recorder when conditions were more favourable as there was flooding. Mr. Morgan said that he spoke with Mr. Dale Messenger, the Deputy Mining Recorder on his April 23rd visit. He asked Mr. Messenger why his application was not being processed and asked to see Mr. Spooner, who was returning from Montreal that day. The meeting never took place as Mr. Spooner did not arrive, and Mr. Morgan left.
Mr. Barnes also gave evidence with respect to the attempts made by him to contact Sudbury after hearing in early April that the application was marked �Filed Only�. He began calling on May 11th, 1998, and the notes he took (which were entered as evidence and not disputed), indicate that he eventually made contact with Mr. Roy Denomme, Provincial Mining Recorder, on May 29th, when Mr. Denomme returned Mr. Barnes' phone call of May 28th. Mr. Denomme indicated that the application was on Mr. Spooner's desk and that he would call back once he had checked it. Mr. Barnes' query as to why the application was �Filed Only� was not actually answered until June 15th, 1998, (with Mr. Spooner's decision) well outside the thirty-one day time period within which the Applicant would have had an opportunity to correct the application. In this case, the Application could have been corrected only by having one of the actual stakers (Gagnon and Larche) sign and file individual applications for each claim as �Recording Licensee� under the Regulation.
Mr. Spooner gave evidence relating to the processing of the Morgan Mining Claims. The Morgan Mining Claims were filed on April 17, 1998. The length of time taken to process the Claims was due to a number of administrative reasons. He indicated that his staff were facing �confusing issues of tie-on mining claims that were difficult to understand in terms of the location for the area that came open for staking and where all the claims actually were located, and whether they were overlapping at that time�. He said that his staff �were without the necessary information to make it possible for them to deal with the application quickly.� Furthermore, the fact that the issues were �confusing� meant that senior staff had to be consulted and this took time as well. The result of all of this delay was that his �administration failed to respond to the application to record from Mr. Morgan within the thirty one (31) days [and] failed to recognize that the wrong person applied to record the mining claim.� Mr. Spooner also said that had he known about it within the 31 days, he would have asked Mr. Morgan to have the correct people file the application to record.
The Tribunal heard from Mr. Spooner that he was �apprehensive� about the �possibility� of adverse interest, and that there were questions from Mr. Anderson �in terms of the recording of Mr. Morgan�. When queried by the Tribunal as to whether the Ministry had anything to contradict the evidence of the applicants - namely that at the time of the staking there was no adverse interest, Mr. Spooner agreed that �if there was no foot race for the mining claims at the time the staking was done on behalf of Mr. Morgan, that they could make the assumption and correctly say that there was no adverse interest. No other evidence with respect to an adverse interest of any sort was produced by the Ministry. Mr. Spooner also distinguished an actual foot race from a case where someone stakes over top of someone else (on a �premeditated basis�) with the intention of attacking the first staking and defeating it on �technical deficiencies�. His point was that in a foot race situation, the rules are strictly applied.
With respect to the staking carried out by Mr. Morgan's stakers, Messrs. Larche and Gagnon, Mr. Spooner noted in his written material (Exhibit 3) that �there does not seem to be a defect in the staking procedure�. However, he made it clear in his evidence that the staking of the Morgan Mining Claims was not the basis for his decision to �not record�. He had �no legal authority to accept the application�. The Ministry chose to not appear for the second part of the hearing which dealt with the dispute filed by Mr. Anderson against the Morgan Mining Claims.
An inspection of the Morgan Claims was requested by the Office of the Mining and Lands Commissioner on December 14, 1998. A report (Report Number C1-98/99) was filed (Exhibits 4 and 5). The Report describes an inspection carried out on the Morgan and Anderson Mining Claims.
The staking of Anderson Claim 1223525 began on April 19, 1998 at 10:00 a.m. and was completed at 3:30 p.m., and consists of three units, (going by the application). This claim includes lands which Mr. Morgan asked to have included in his claim on April 27, 1998.
The staking of Anderson Claim 1223524 began on April 22, 1998 at 10:00 a.m., and was completed at 12:30 p.m. that same day and consists of three units, (going by the application). This claim covers the triangular piece of land which Mr. Morgan asked to have included on April 23, 1998.
Mr. Anderson's evidence was that prior to staking, he had consulted with the Ministry as to how to stake the claims. He said that the Ministry told him that it was �critical� to locate the patents to be tied on to, as the claim map was just a �general reference�. He said that on opening morning, he was in the area locating survey pins in order to tie on to the neighbouring patents. He ran into the Morgan staking and went back the next day to stake around it. The application filed by Mr. Anderson says that he staked his claims on the 19th and 22nd of April, 1998, or two and four days after Mr. Morgan had had his claims staked.
The Anderson Mining Claim 1223524, staked on the 22nd of April, 1998, covers all of Morgan Mining Claim 1226390 and nearly all of Morgan Mining Claim 1231497 as well as extending eastward in a triangular fashion along the east boundary of Morgan Mining Claim 1231497. This is also the portion identified by Mr. Morgan in his April 23rd letter to Mr. Roy Spooner, referred to above. The Anderson Mining Claim 1223525, staked on the 19th of April, 1998, covers a small portion of 1231497 at the south as well as the gap between the Morgan Mining Claims and the patents referred to by both Mr. Anderson and Mr. Morgan (the latter in his fax to Dale Messenger dated April 27th, 1998, and referred to above).
Mr. Anderson noted a series of discrepancies in terms of the staking of the Morgan Claims and described them to the Tribunal as follows. With respect to Claim 1226390, Mr. Anderson noted that the distances are �known to be approximately 300 metres north-south. Those distances are 180 metres.� He also noted that the number one tag was on the north side of the post. The Inspection Report also notes this position of the number one tag on the number one post for this claim. Mr. Anderson could not find the witness post between the number two and number three posts. This part of the claim is abutting the Morgan claim to the south being 1231497. The Report notes the line from the number two post is blazed and flagged with a post tagged and inscribed as being 400 metres east of number four -1231479. The Report notes that this inscription should probably read 1231497. It may be that Mr. Anderson was actually referring to the line between the number three and number four posts which is the line that crosses Robb Creek as shown on the Inspection Report. Robb Creek also factors in to the line from the number three to the number four post for Claim 1226390. The Report notes that it could not locate the witness posts for the number four post for this Claim. It notes the depth of the snow and posits that the posts may be under the snow.
With respect to the southern claim or Morgan Mining Claim 1231497, Mr. Anderson noted that it was irregular without showing why it was irregular. Mr. Anderson said that irregular claims should be �tied on all the way around�. He noted the presence of the patents and noted that Claim 1231497 was not tied on to these patents.
With respect to whether there was �competition� at the time of the Morgan staking, Mr. Anderson said that �there was competition�. He did not elaborate but in reply to questioning by Mr. Morgan, said that he (Mr. Anderson) was �in the bush�, although Mr. Morgan �may not have seen us�. His presence the Morgan staking had been completed. Mr. Morgan, in questioning Mr. Anderson, referred to the events of the day as �staking in a rush� and commented that �you don't go surveying claims when you're staking them in a rush or when they just come out. You survey by a surveyor afterwards.� This appears to contradict Mr. Barne's version of events. In questioning Mr. Anderson following some comments made by Mr. Anderson (�slapped claims in as fast as you could�), Mr. Barnes asked �why would we be in any rush to stake ....?�
Mr. Anderson said that he had intended to stake that day (meaning the 17th of April), but that he came across the Morgan staking and did not stake until the next day. When questioned by the tribunal, he indicated that on the 17th he was in the area west of the Morgan Mining Claims locating survey pins. As mentioned earlier, the Anderson applications note that Mr. Anderson's takings actually took place on the 19th and the 22nd of April. Mr. Anderson described how he took the time to figure out what had been done by the stakers for Morgan with regards to where the actual patents were located. He made the decision to stake his claims based on a belief that the Morgan Mining Claims would not be accepted by the recording office as they had not been tied on to the patents lying to the west. In being questioned by Mr. Rousseau, who indicated that the Morgan Claims were �square�, Mr. Anderson elaborated on his reason for �going in� and staking his claims was that the Morgan Mining Claim 1231497 was irregular in shape, that it had distances that were not 400 metres and that it had no tie-ons to justify those distances.
In being questioned by Mr. Morgan, Mr. Anderson said that he staked Claim 1223525 first. As noted, this claim lies to the west of the Morgan Mining Claims and takes in the area noted in Mr. Morgan's April 27th fax to Mr. Messenger. Then he staked his claim 1223524 which covers the Morgan Mining Claims and the triangular area noted in Mr. Morgan's letter of April 23rd to Mr. Spooner, also referred to earlier.
When questioned by the Tribunal as to his whereabouts in terms of the number one post for Claim 1226390, Mr. Anderson said that he was �approximately a claim and a half to the west of that, because that's where the patents are... .the problem with this is the patents are about a quarter mile northwest of where they're shown to be on the map... .And that's what we were attempting to tie on to � He also noted after being questioned by the tribunal, that he became aware of the area to be opened for staking �a couple of weeks prior to the actual date�.
Mr. Morgan, when questioned by the Tribunal, had no comment about the tag on the number one post for Claim 1226390 facing north. With respect to the lack of witness posts pointed out by Mr. Anderson, Mr. Morgan blamed flooding, and the presence of two to three feet of water. He did say that Lands the one post was put down at the edge of an access road which appears in all of the applications. The Inspection Report requested by the Mining and Commissioner notes that the southerly line for Claim 1226390 goes through thick cedar swamp and was well blazed and flagged. The inspection for this Report was actually carried out on January 26th, 27th and 28th, 1999 and much of the area was covered with snow, thereby making it difficult for the Tribunal to compare the descriptions of the parties with those contained in the Report. For example, the Report notes that it could not locate the Number 4 witness posts, but noted that they may have been under several feet of snow. The Report neither verified nor contradicted either Mr. Morgan or Mr. Anderson in terms of the terrain.
When questioned by the Tribunal as to the reason for the 300 meter distances shown along the south and west boundaries of Claim 1231497, Mr. Morgan had no information. Mr. Rousseau, who was present at the number one post for that claim could offer only a possible explanation as to Mr. Larche's reasons for doing what he did along those lines. Mr. Rousseau could only speculate as to the reasons for Mr. Larche's actions, including whether Mr. Larche had attempted to find something to tie on to before heading north. Mr. Rousseau blamed the weather (rain and snow) for the discrepancies in distance. He also indicated that the Morgan Mining Claims were inside the patented claim and �[I]f there are any little wedges in there, we were not aware of it, but it looked like we were inside the patents �
The Provincial Mining Recorder refused the Morgan Mining Claims on June 15, 1998, and the Anderson Mining Claims on July 6, 1998. Mr. Morgan filed an appeal on June 23, 1998 and Mr. Anderson filed his appeal on July 14, 1998.
Submissions Respecting Issue #1
Mr. Spooner indicated to the Tribunal that his reason for not accepting the Morgan application was that it had not been filed by the correct licensee. The Ministry took no part in the Anderson dispute. Mr. Spooner said that Subsection 44(1) of the Mining Act deals with the requirement to file an acceptable application to record within 31 days. The actual staking of the Morgan Claims had not been carried out by Mr. Morgan, but by other people. In Mr. Spooner's opinion, since Mr. Morgan could not describe himself as the �staking licensee� for purposes of the Regulation, he could not file the application. The actual stakers are required pursuant to Clause 10(2)(2) of Ontario Regulation 7/96 to file the application where the staking takes place on lands that have been open for less than twenty-four hours.
Mr. Spooner, when questioned by the Tribunal, indicated that the delay experienced by Messrs. Morgan and Barnes was due to administrative matters, including volume of applications and confusing issues which needed the input of senior staff. While he described this as an unfortunate situation and while he also said that if he had known about �it� within the thirty one days, he would have asked Mr. Morgan to have the correct people file the application to record. He also indicated that he was of the opinion that the applicant bore responsibility �to know the rules� and to file correct applications, as well as to carry out proper staking.
When asked by Mr. Yungwirth about the application of Section 43 to the circumstances, as in the case of Gryba v. Obradovich, (Decision of the Mining Recorder, larder lake Mining Division, November 30, 1994), Mr. Spooner's response was that section 43 could not be used to cure a severe defect in the application to record and that the issue in Obradovich related to staking.
When asked by the tribunal about the attempts made by Messrs. Barnes and Morgan to find out about the status of the application made by Mr. Morgan, Mr. Spooner summarized the situation as follows. �[M]y administration failed to respond to the application record from Mr. Morgan within the 31 days. My administration failed to recognize that the wrong person applied to record the mining claim.� Mr. Spooner also agreed that had he known about this within the thirty-one day time period, he might very well have had Mr. Morgan correct the situation by having a new application submitted by the correct applicant.
Mr. Yungwirth's position on behalf of his client was that there was no competition, that several attempts to contact the mining recorder's office were made but to no avail, and that with new rules like that in Clause 10(2)(2) of the Regulation, cases like Obradovitch point to the recorder (in this case the Commissioner) having a discretion which could be exercised to validate or amend an application that does not meet the regulated requirements.
Mr. Yungwirth also made reference to the reliance that Mr. Morgan placed on the Office of the Provincial Recorder and indicated that some work had been done on the claims (although this was not put into evidence and there was no record of this in the written materials).
He relied on section 121 of the Mining Act to ask that the application be upheld on the real merits and substantial justice of the case, and the case of Re Campbell, Vol. 5, M.C.C. 155, in which Commissioner Ferguson directed the late recording of mining claims on the real merits and substantial justice doctrine. The point Mr. Yungwirth was making was that �but for� the fact that his client could not get a decision from the Recorder's office, his client could have ensured that the correct licensee was making the application pursuant to the Act and Regulations.
Submissions Regarding Issue #2
With regards to the second part of the hearing and Mr. Anderson's dispute with the Morgan Mining Claims, Mr. Anderson's argument centered on the position of the Morgan Mining Claims in relation to the existing patents. His position was that the Morgan Mining Claims (among other things), did not rely on anything like existing patents for their distances. He contrasted the approach of the Morgan team with his approach which was to talk to Messrs. Spooner and Korpela at the Ministry beforehand. The result was that he paid close attention to the issue of the neighbouring patents. After talking to these two gentlemen at the Ministry, Mr. Anderson felt it was necessary to locate patent boundaries and tie on to those patents.
In Mr. Anderson's opinion an irregular mining claim has to have a reason for being irregular. In the case of the Morgan Mining Claims, the only reason for irregularity as far as Mr. Anderson was concerned, was related to the location of the neighbouring patents, having seen them beforehand on the claim map. In the field though, because Mr. Anderson could not find what the Morgan Mining Claims had tied on to, (i.e., no survey pins for patents), then there was no excuse for the irregular claims. This argument also applied to the fact that the distances for the south Morgan Claim were not supported by some irregularity (i.e., a patent) in the field.
Mr. Anderson also took issue with the fact that the tag for the number one post for Claim 1226390 was facing to the north, and with the distances for both claims. In Mr. Anderson's opinion, the Mining Act is �written for a reason� and staking is not only about �finishing first�. Mr. Anderson said that he was trying to stake in accordance with the Act, the implication being that others should be trying to stake with the same care.
On the other hand, Mr. Morgan and Mr. Rousseau summed up their position as being that they could stake open ground, stay within the patent boundaries and move posts at a later date, which in fact, Mr. Morgan asked to do in his correspondence of April 23rd and 27th.
Findings of Fact and Reasons for Decision
With respect to Issue #1, the tribunal finds that but for the delays experienced by Mr. Morgan, the Morgan Mining Claims application might very well have been corrected to reflect the correct licensees. (The tribunal notes that for the Morgan Mining Claims there should have been two recording licensees as there were two stakers -one for each claim.) However, whether that administrative delay is a basis for accepting an application filed by the wrong person is another matter. Mr. Yungwirth submitted the case of Re Campbell 5 M.C.C. 155, to assist on this point. In the case of Re Campbell, the applicant had filed an application which met the requirements of the Act. There was no adverse interest involved in that case. The problem lay in the fact that postal delays got in the way of its being received in time by the mining recorder. In that case, the Commissioner used the real merits and substantial doctrine to direct a late recording of the claim.
The tribunal does not find any support for the appellant through Re Campbell. While the Morgan application experienced a delay in being processed, it was not a correct application from the start. In fact, as noted above, there must be two correct applications filed for the Morgan Mining Claims.
The tribunal finds in the case of the Morgan Mining Claims that the applicant Morgan mistakenly, or through ignorance of the law, assumed that he could name himself as applicant. This was not a clerical or typographical error on anyone's part.
As to Mr. Yungwirth's request that section 43 be applied to cure the defect, the tribunal cannot agree in applying that section to cover what really is an �application� as opposed to a �staking� issue. The case of Obradovitch is one that deals with a staking exercise only, and in this tribunal's view cannot be used to justify the correction and acceptance of an application filed by the wrong individual. The tribunal refers to the case of Frank Doran v. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (July 30, 1995) (Ont. M.C.) [unreported], in which that section was put forward as an answer to the wrong tag number having been put on an application to record. The tribunal in that case determined that �the substantial compliance test cannot be used to determine whether the application to record is in accordance with the requirements of the Act. �
The tribunal finds instead, that Mr. Morgan, through his mistaken interpretation of the law or through possible ignorance of the law, failed to comply with the Act and its regulation in terms of filing the correct applications. Non-compliance is dealt with by the Act in subsection 71 (1) which reads:
�71.(1) Non-compliance by the licensee or holder of a mining claim with any requirement of this Act or the regulations as to the time or manner of the staking out and recording of a mining claim or with a direction of the recorder thereto, within the time limited therefore, shall be deemed to be an abandonment, and the claim shall, without any declaration, entry or act on the part of the Crown or by any officer, unless otherwise ordered by the Commissioner, be forthwith opened to prospecting and staking out.�
The issue of non-compliance and the discretion afforded the recorder when confronted by this issue is dealt with in the case of Doran v. MNDM (July 25, 1995) (Ont. M.C.) [unreported]. Besides referring to various cases wherein the Commissioner allowed errors in recording to be corrected, the Doran case also sets out a three-pronged test which a recorder and the tribunal could apply in this case.
That test is set out on page 20 of the Doran decision. While the issue of abandonment is not at issue here, it is of interest to note that the tribunal in Doran found that deemed abandonment is a rebuttable presumption. In Doran, the tribunal looked to the good faith exhibited in terms of the staking and the recording (the wrong tag number had been put on the application and subsequently recorded), the nature of the error (typographical or clerical), and whether there was evidence of a third party interest (unrecorded transfers or option agreements) which could be affected by the tribunal's directing that the application to record be corrected.
It is the tribunal's view that the principles found in Doran work in favour of correcting the application made by Morgan so that two applicants who actually carried out the staking of the two Claims can file applications to record. These would be Messrs. Larche and Gagnon. While Mr. Morgan may have been misguided or careless in his approach to interpreting the law, there is no evidence that he acted in bad faith in submitting the application signed by himself. Further, while the facts in Doran dealt with clerical or typographical errors, there is no reason that the tribunal is aware of to prevent applying the test to errors of interpretation, given that the test is three-pronged. Finally, while there is evidence of a dispute having been filed with respect to the Morgan Mining Claims, there is no evidence that a third party interest of the sort described in Doran, (unrecorded transfers, option agreements), would be affected here.
For the above reasons, this tribunal finds that the Morgan application can be corrected so that two applications to record bearing the names of the actual stakers Larche and Gagnon for the respective claims (1231497 and 1226390) can be filed.
As for the dispute filed by Mr. Anderson with respect to the Morgan Mining Claims, the tribunal finds that the Morgan Mining Claims do not substantially comply with the requirements of the Act and regulations and that the staking efforts further fail to meet the test set out in section 43(2) of the Act.
Section 43 allows for �substantial compliance� with staking requirements. Section 43 will grant �deemed compliance� if the failure to comply is not likely to mislead any licensee desiring to stake a claim in the vicinity and it is apparent that an attempt has been made in good faith by the licensee to comply with the requirements of the act and regulations.
The tribunal finds that Mr. Morgan's approach to the staking exercise (stake something now and make up the difference later) cannot be condoned through substantial compliance as it fails to reflect an intention to attempt to comply in good faith with the legislated requirements. It is an approach that simply ignores the staking requirements. Both Messrs. Morgan and Rousseau believed that they could make up the difference after the fact. The tribunal finds that this is pushing the limits for the application of section 43. There is no evidence that Mr. Morgan was concerned about trying to comply in good faith with the legislated requirements. There is evidence that claim maps were available prior to the lands coming open (as they were for Mr. Anderson) and that the ministry was available to advise the prudent staker as to the existence of neighbouring patents. The tribunal is concerned that acceptance of this type of approach in these circumstances will only lead to similar lack of effort on the part of other stakers.
Mr. Morgan chose to rely on others to carry out staking that proved to be complicated by the location of patents which as Mr. Anderson said, were not in the place they appeared to be on the claim map. The Inspection Report noted the incorrect placement of a number one tag (asserted by Mr. Anderson) on the number one post for the Morgan Claim 1226390. Instead of facing south, it faced north. This is a requirement of Section 8 (3) of Regulation 7/96. When questioned by the Tribunal, Mr. Morgan had no comment to make with respect to this fact.
The Report also bore out the assertions made by Mr. Anderson and confirmed by Messrs. Morgan and Rousseau that the distances for the southerly Claim 1231497 were not calculated as a result of tying on to existing claims or patents on the southwest and westerly boundaries. Again, neither Mr. Morgan or Mr. Rousseau could say why the lines along these boundaries measured 300 to meters. The tribunal wonders how much supervision Mr. Morgan was actually exercising during the staking of the Morgan Claims. Instead, Mr. Morgan and Mr. Rousseau both seemed to be of the opinion that what they missed in the field could be addressed after the fact. There was no evidence that they attempted to carry out any type of investigation with respect to the location of the patents. This tribunal finds that there was no reason for the failure to comply with the regulatory requirements for staking, and that the failure to place a tag on the correct side of the corner post could mislead other licensees in the field.
The application filed by Mr. Morgan can be corrected so that two applications bearing the names of Messrs. Larche and Gagnon can be filed for the appropriate claims.
The applications so corrected are refused as the staking of the Morgan Mining Claims is not in substantial compliance with section 43 in its entirety for the reasons given above.
The staking by Mr. Anderson of Mining Claims 1223524 and 1223525, should properly be accepted for recording.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Apply the lifting-up hot serum on your chin line and ball region and lightly tap it to be absorbed into them at the final stage of your skin care after washing up your face and arranging your skin texure with a toner.
After pulling out the mask and removing the transparent protective film, attach its winding part into the center of your lower lip.
Looking for ideal Skin Firming V Shape Face Mask Manufacturer & supplier ? We have a wide selection at great prices to help you get creative. All the Lift Up Facial Mask are quality guaranteed. We are China Origin Factory of V Shape Slim Face Mask. If you have any question, please feel free to contact us.


The Manager's Office oversees all town departments.
Find the entire packet for the Town Council meeting.
Look up information about the town council.
Participatory Budgeting gives ordinary people real decision-making power over real money in order to make our Town a better place to live!
See the priority areas and goals set by the Town Council.
Review the commissions, committees and boards of Wickenburg.
Provide your feedback on free entertainment in downtown Wickenburg.
Please find pictures of the Management Team for the Town of Wickenburg.
Please find the organizational chart for the Town of Wickenburg showing the departments and their responsibilities.


This is one of the new relationship classes now available as an elective ThetaHealing seminar. You and your relationship with your Partner, is a profound class whether you are already with your soul mate or you are seeking a relationship.
You will clear so many deeply held beliefs that have been holding you back from reaching your true potential within your relationship or future relationship: working on your ability to love yourself and your partner; to know your worth and that of your partner; realising how to be in a mutually respectful, loving and passionate relationship and what it feels like.
This course allows you to work with your fellow students to clear your own limiting blocks and beliefs. Throughout you will be advice and inspiration to being with and staying with your soul mate. Bring your partner! Completing this class with your partner is a truly intimate experience.
Learn how to feel completely loved by your partner and yourself.
Recognise that you are the prize and you deserve to be number one in their lives, as they do in yours.
Feel complete trust in the relationship.
Feel completely worthy and deserving to have and be in the relationship that you want.
Fall in love all over again with your partner.
Give and recieve love and acceptance completely.
Reserve your place and book onto this profound seminar.
This is a unique thetahealing class in that it is packed with information, advice and inpsiration, as well as practical exercises. There are plenty of digging sessions to help students clear some deeply held blocks to having and maintaing the relationship they desire. I love to teach this class as it allows students to combine spiritual development with practical tips to a long lasting loving relationship.
Read what students say about Nicola's teaching.
Register your Place and Book onto the Seminar here!


text:
Tuesday marks 68 years since the deadliest Texas tornado in more than a century
WACO, Texas — The year was 1953. Dwight D. Eisenhower was president. Allan Shivers was governor of Texas. The year also saw one of the deadliest known tornadoes in the history of the Lone Star State. On May 11, 1953 a violent tornado ripped through downtown Waco, claiming 114 lives. The National Weather Service states…
ORIGINAL COVERAGE: Tornado hits West Texas city, one dead, 80 Injured
Editor's Note: This article was written on April 19, 1986, following a deadly tornado that devastated the city of Sweetwater. SWEETWATER, Texas (AP) – Two tornadoes spawned by fast-moving thunderstorms hit this west Texas city without warning today, killing at least one person, injuring 80 people and causing millions of dollars in damage, authorities said.…
Paris residents remember devastating tornado 39 years later
PARIS, Texas (KXII) – Kyle McCarley remembers he took a late lunch on April 2 of 1982 and when he returned to work at the Paris Lumber and Building Center he noticed an "eerie stillness" to the air. "I thought 'this is a tornado day'," McCarley said. "We got in our fireproof vault where we…
Tornado, winds wreak havoc near Canyon Lake
A tornado that accompanied the storm that passed through Comal County early Tuesday morning damaged nearly two dozen homes in the Canyon Lake area, weather officials said. Ethan Williams, a National Weather Service meteorologist based at New Braunfels Regional Airport, said the tornado, confirmed Tuesday afternoon, ranked as an EF1 on the enhanced Fujita scale,…
Significant storm damage after possible tornado in Bertram
BERTRAM, Texas (KXAN) — There is significant storm damage in Bertram in Burnet County following Monday night's severe thunderstorms. At least one century-old building in Bertram collapsed in what was possibly a tornado just before 10 p.m. The damage is spread all over town, and one of the most damaged buildings housed a local business,…
Severe weather, tornadoes cause damage throughout Texas Panhandle region
When Andrew Shirey got to Palo Duro Canyon on Friday afternoon, he knew there was the possibility of high winds and severe weather throughout the weekend. But what occurred Saturday afternoon was not something he expected to happen during the first few days of his Spring Break. The Amarillo office of the National Weather Service…
Tornado causes damage, evacuations in Palo Duro Canyon area
AMARILLO, Texas (KFDA) – Saturday the Texas panhandle saw many tornadoes, some leaving behind extensive damage. The tornado that hit Palo Duro Canyon State Park caused 42 people to be evacuated. 16 people stayed and weathered the storm making it to safety afterwards. Five people were missing after the storm, four of which were found…
Fresh from wounds of recent tornado in Bowie, Montague County officials to host annual storm spotting class
MONTAGUE COUNTY (KFDX/KJTL) — Montague County is hosting its annual severe weather storm spotter class next week. With the city of Bowie still recovering from a tornado that caused widespread damage in May, officials are saying this class means much more than it has in past years. Officials said they hope this class can better…
Tornado Causes Damage, Displaces Families in Houston Suburb
A tornado swept through a portion of a city in suburban Houston, displacing about 500 people from a damaged apartment complex, officials said Thursday. A strong storm swept through Texas City around 6 p.m. on Wednesday, causing heavy damage to a 129-unit apartment complex, said Tom Munoz, Texas City's emergency management coordinator. A nearby convenience…


St. Petersburg, Florida Information | Find What You Are Looking For in Three Clicks or Less.
St. Petersburg, Florida Information. Find what you are looking for in three clicks or Less. St. Petersburg, Florida information is your ONE STOP source for everything St. Petersburg, Florida. Restaurants, St. Petersburg, Florida Hotels, St. Petersburg, Florida Golf Courses, St. Petersburg, Florida Movies, Del Mar, Florida Jobs, Hot Springs, Florida News, St. Petersburg, Florida Events Calendar, St. Petersburg, Florida Coupons, Chula Vista, Florida Daily Deals, Del Mar, Florida Shopping, St. Petersburg, Florida Classifieds, St. Petersburg, Florida Schools, St. Petersburg, Florida Business Directory, San Diego, Florida Travel, St. Petersburg, Florida Photos, St. Petersburg, Florida parks, St. Petersburg, Florida Farmer's Market, and much more St. Petersburg, Florida stuff.


text:
Home | Research | Research Programmes | Trust, leadership and cooperation | About TLC | Leadership |
Projects on Leadership
Find descriptions of research projects on leadership below. Visit the researcher's webpage by clicking on his/her name.
The Evolutionary Psychology of Status, Power, and Leadership
Researchers: Claire Ashton-James, Leander van der Meij, Thomas Pollet, Richard Ronay, Reinout de Vries, Mark van Vugt
This research project studies the origins, evolution, biology, and psychology of status, dominance, leadership through applying insights from evolutionary and psychological sciences to study such questions as whether leadership is adaptive, are men or women more status sensitive, and what are the similarities and differences between human and nonhuman dominance hierarchies. We adopt both a theoretical approach (rooted in game theory), and a survey and experimental psychological approach to study the biological and psychological underpinnings of status differences, dominance, and leader-follower relationships.
Leadership, Personality, and Morality
Researcher: Marise Born, Paul van Lange, Joshua Tybur, Reinout de Vries, Mark van Vugt
Arguably, the personality of team members, consisting of a team leader and any number of coworkers, constitutes the most important factor shaping the work environment in modern organizations. In this research project we look at personality, leadership, and morality from different angles. First, our research challenges the widely held conception that personality is best captured using the Big Five model. Instead, we show that a six-dimensional – HEXACO – structure better captures the nature of personality. The added sixth dimension, Honesty-Humility (or: Integrity) has major implications for work-related research in general and leadership and morality research in particular. Several studies show strong relations between HEXACO Honesty-Humility and ethical leadership, egoism, trust, and workplace delinquency, among others. Second, our research focuses on aspects of morality. One of the lines of research looks at the relations between personality, leadership, and moral behaviors and three dimensions of disgust: pathogen disgust, sexual disgust and moral disgust. One of the questions we pose is how disgust is expressed toward moral violations and what the consequences of expressions of disgust – of leaders and subordinates – are in team settings. For example, moral disgust may be associated with expressions of approach, i.e., anger and/or the desire to lash out at a transgressor. Both personality and the position (leader versus follower) of the observer and the expresser are thought to play a part in the behaviors exhibited and the consequences of these behaviors in terms of liking, trust, performance, and satisfaction of team members.
Leadership and Organizational Dynamics
Researcher: Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock, Janneke Oostrom, Richard Ronay, Reinout de Vries, Mark van Vugt
Most leadership and organizational phenomena are dynamic. Whether or not a leader succeeds will largely depend on the dynamics at work in the social context of that leader. Teams interact, adapt, and perform differently over time; individual employees' attitudes and behaviors affect each other; and verbal and nonverbal communication yields dynamic patterns that impact individual, team, and organizational outcomes. Our research project crosses disciplinary boundaries, using innovative methodologies from hormonal measures to behavioral process analyses and social network analysis to study questions regarding the emergence and selection of leadership, the role of humor and laughter in team processes. Our research generates scientific insights as well as managerial and policy implications for organizations.
Information about the Department
Experimentele en Toegepaste Psychologie


One of the speakers for the upcoming event Women in Blockchain Summit 2018 by NEM Malaysia is Sandra Yap. Sandra will be speaking about privacy of crypto coins. Here, she speaks to us about Zcoin, the company she represents, trends in blockchain and the representation of women in the tech industry.


Ahhh well, it's been a long nearly 10 years here, hard to believe it's taken that long to max this account out.
Thanks to Larva, all the staff here at PSOBB and to all the many friends I've made over the years here, it's been a helluva adventure.
Ahhh well, we shall see.
Actually, look for "Quad" names.
Hunter's Name: Kira Note, Teku, Rich Note & Frozen.
With over 1000 hours on Trigunman to boot.
New account with girly names ? Or what's up? Hit me up tomorrow to do some runs.
Haha! Not quite my old friend, I'd honestly love to do some runs with ya tomorrow Larva, but my "other" job unfortunately is going to interfere with that idea sadly.
Gotta go play bass in two of my bands tomorrow, can you take a raincheck?
Hey send video or something to take a look at the bands. Any upload ?
Ahhh, actually our drummer is recording our practices at the moment with his phone via his wife.
But, we've got our first gig this weekend, maybe he'll record & upload that to his Facebook page after that.


Amy Smith is a co-founding partner of Weinberg, Kaplan & Smith, P.A. A highly accomplished family law attorney with more than 18 years of experience, Amy focuses on all types of matrimonial and family law matters.
Amy goes above and beyond for her clients to ensure the most fair and equitable outcome and is accustomed to dealing with sensitive, emotional issues involved with family law. She represents her clients with a focus on settlement and will fight for what is in her client's best interest. Amy also has received substantial trial experience in family law matters, including: divorce, dissolution of civil unions and domestic partnerships, child custody, child support, equitable distribution, pre-marital agreements, and domestic violence.
While serving as a Prosecutor in Burlington County, Amy garnered extensive experience in the areas of domestic violence, domestic violence weapon forfeiture hearings, criminal matters in municipal court, and drug offenses. Passionate about domestic violence matters, Amy is known for her expertise in this specialized field. She was named the Burlington County Bar Association's liaison to the Domestic Violence Working Group of the Prosecutor's Office.
In 2019, Amy was honored as "Women's Advocate of the Year" by the National Association of Women Business Owners (NAWBO) South Jersey. Amy was highlighted as part of "Ten Leaders in Divorce and Matrimonial Law" by Digital Press International. Amy also received recognition as "Top Attorney" in the area of domestic violence by SJ Magazine and "Awesome Attorney" in the area of matrimonial, divorce and family law by South Jersey Magazine.
Amy is also founding partner of Women Owned Law and is a teen mentor for the Alice Paul Institute. Amy has participated in SJ Magazine's Women's Roundtable. Amy is an active member of the Burlington County Bar Association, the Camden County Bar Association, and the New Jersey State Bar Association. She is also a Matrimonial Early Settlement Panelist for Burlington and Gloucester counties.
Before entering private practice, Amy served as a law clerk to the Honorable Marilyn Rhyne Herr, J.S.C. in the Family Part of the Superior Court. Following her clerkship, Amy worked with the Burlington County Prosecutor's Office where she tried numerous jury trials as member of the trial team.
Amy and her husband reside in Medford, New Jersey with their two children.


Our SRA Color Correction technique combines light energy with radio frequency (RF) energy to remove only the targeted pigment and veins in the treatment area. The surrounding skin remains unharmed, so you will experience less discomfort than other procedures and require minimal to no downtime for recovery.
By employing the power of our SRA Colour Correction system we can balance and brighten your complexion with minimal downtime. We can treat a broad spectrum of conditions including age spots, acne, rosacea and superficial veins. You'll enjoy clearer skin quickly, with best results seen after just a few sessions.
Intense Pulsed Light energy directly preheats the targeted tissue, either pigmented irregularities or vascular lesions.
The heated tissue then attracts the radio frequency energy, which further elevates the temperature.
The heating destroys the targeted tissue, improving the appearance of the skin.
The treatment protocol varies from individual but in general most patients require 3 to 4 treatments every 3 to 4 weeks. 1 Maintenance treatment may be needed every 4 to 8 months.
Trauma to the skin such as hot baths, massage or scratching should be avoided during the first 2 days following the treatment.
Do I need to wear sunscreen after a treatment?
High factor sunscreen (at least 30 SPF) should be used for at least one month after the treatment.
Can I combine SRA with other types of treatment?
SRA can be used 3 to 4 weeks following a Botox treatment. SRA can't be used with any synthetic fillers (e.g. silicone) due to possible chemical damage. Microdermabrasion treatments improve the penetration of light/laster and RF into the skin and can be used immediate prior or close to an SRA treatment. After a mild chemical peeling you must wait at least 2 weeks before an SRA treatment. After a deep chemical peel or laser resurfacing you must wait 3 to 6 months according to healing before an SRA treatment.


The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a challenging clinical problem. This study investigated the source of an outbreak of MDR P. aeruginosa infections and the role of combination therapy in its management.
MDR P. aeruginosa isolates were collected at the MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, and antibiotic synergy was investigated based on antibiotic susceptibility tests using a combination of antibiotics. Isolates of patients with MDR P. aeruginosa bacteremia were selected for genetic analysis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
A combination of ceftazidime, amikacin, and sulbactam had significant synergistic effects against bloodstream MDR P. aeruginosa isolates and was more beneficial clinically compared with other antibiotic combinations. The major source of MDR P. aeruginosa infection was located and stringent infection control measures were enforced.
The results of this study suggest that use of triple antimicrobial therapy (ceftazidime, amikacin, and sulbactam) can be a useful alternative treatment for MDR P. aeruginosa infection in certain circumstances.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2008;41:491-498.


text:
Predict results +
Analysis & prediction Mega Millions
Predict Mega Millions lottery
Predictions Mega Millions today
Winning numbers +
Get Lucky numbers
Statistics play results
Statistics results +
Statistics and analysis results
Statistics results Mega
Matrix of results
Statistics Jackpot Mega
Most Often Picked Numbers
Least Often Picked Numbers
Most Overdue Numbers
Most Common Pairs
Most Common Consecutive Pairs
Most Common Triplets
Most Common Consecutive Triplets
National Lottery +
Powerball SA
Powerball Plus SA
MEGAMILLIONS - Analyze and Predict exactly Mega Millions results
PREDICT RESULTS
Analysis & prediction
Predict Mega Millions
STATISTICS RESULTS
Most Often Picked Num
Least Often Picked Num
Most Consecutive Pairs
All About Mega Millions Lottery USA
Mega Millions Prediction
Jackpot result
Statistics & Analysis
Powerball Prediction
National Lottery Prediction
SA Powerball
SA Powerball Plus
All about Mega Millions USA
How to predict winning Mega Millions numbers? Mega Millions predictions 2018
Ngày 2018-01-08 18933
This is the prediction winning Mega Millions numbers pages, have most accurately results based on advanced scientific and technical methods...
Mega Millions lottery prediction algorithm
This is the prediction winning Mega Millions numbers pages, have most accurately results based on advanced scientific, algorithm and technical methods...
What happens if I lose a ticket?
Ngày 2017-10-14 7117
Mega Millions is not responsible for lost or stolen tickets. Protect yourself by signing the back of your tickets. Lottery tickets are bearer instruments...
Can I buy Mega Millions tickets if I live in another country?
Visitors to the United States are always welcome to purchase tickets for our game from an American lottery retailer while they are visiting this country; you do not need to be a resident to win...
What is the Megaplier Mega Millions?
Most states use a Megaplier feature in which players can increase non-jackpot prize winnings by 2, 3, 4 or 5 times. In a participating state, you can play the Megaplier for an extra $1...
Where can I play Mega Millions?
You can buy Mega Millions tickets from lottery retailers/agents in 44 states plus the District of Columbia and the U. S. Virgin Islands; a total of 46 jurisdictions...
How was Mega Millions created?
The history of Mega Millions is as exciting as playing the game! Following a record $363 million Big Game jackpot in 2000, interest in multi-state games was at an all-time high. And as interest in the multi-state games grew, so did the participants...
What is Mega Millions?
Mega Millions is a multi-state lottery game with MEGA jackpots and MEGA fun...
Mega Millions How to Play?
Mega Millions is the multi-state game that Texans have come to love. Choose 5 numbers plus a Mega Ball number, and remember, when you buy, Megaply ® for a chance to increase your non-grand/jackpot prize winnings!
Next drawing: Tuesday, 18/01/2022
Number of players: 50
Number of turns: 290
Preview drawing: Friday, 14/01/2022
Number of winnings: 108
Good utility
Matrix results
Predicted Mega Millions
Mega millions results day 18/01/2022 (Tuesday)
Prediction: 1 2 5 6 8 18 22 29 35 37 38 39 41 42 44 47 50 51 53 57 59 61 63 67 70 | 1 4 6 8 9 16 18 20 22 24 25
Result: |
Analysis & prediction: View Analysis & Prediction
Mega millions results day 14/01/2022 (Friday)
Prediction: 6 8 10 12 13 16 29 30 31 36 37 38 40 43 44 45 47 50 51 59 62 64 65 68 70 | 6 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Result: 5 8 13 22 48 | 25
Winning: 8 13 | 25
Prediction: 2 3 4 8 9 12 16 18 19 20 22 24 27 29 35 39 41 44 46 47 51 55 57 59 61 | 1 6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Winning: 2 3 19 | 0
Prediction: 2 4 8 9 11 12 22 24 27 29 37 39 42 43 44 47 48 49 54 55 57 60 62 63 70 | 1 8 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Result: 7 29 43 56 57 | 06
Winning: 29 43 57 | 0
Winning: 4 16 22 | 0
Prediction: 1 2 4 6 8 9 14 19 22 23 24 28 29 35 37 41 43 51 53 54 55 58 59 60 67 | 4 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Winning: 2 | 0
Lottery experiences
Facebook & Google+
Mega Millions Predictions
Mega Millions Lottery USA
Winning number results
Statistics jackpot
Powerball Lottery USA
EuroMillions | Lotto 47 |	Powerball South Africa | Powerball plus South Africa
Website connective
How to install windows 7, windows 8, windows 8.1 and windows10? All about configuration windows | National Lottery Prediction | Shop key bản quyền |
Copyright (C) lottoprediction.net- 2019 ·Home page · About us · Email: lottoprediction.net@gmail.com


After days of tense negotiations, nations and environmental groups called for an end to domestic ivory trading as the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) congress wrapped up in Hawaii on Saturday.
Nearly all of the 217 nation states that belong to the IUCN, as well as 1,000 environmental groups, backed a statement calling for countries to end ivory trading within their borders as "a matter of urgency," according to the Guardian.
The move is an attempt by conservationists to staunch the killing of elephants for their tusks.
Loss of megaherbivores such as elephants and hippos can allow woody plants and non-grassy herbs and flowering plants to encroach on grasslands in African national parks, according to a new University of Utah study, published Sept. 12 in Scientific Reports. The study used isotopes in hippopotamus teeth to find a shift in the diet of hippos over the course of a decade in Uganda's Queen Elizabeth National Park following widespread elephant poaching in the 1970s.
Study first author and U postdoctoral scholar Kendra Chritz says that her method of using hippo enamel isotopes could help scientists reconstruct past changes in vegetation in Africa's national parks, areas with relatively little ongoing scientific observation. The results could give ecologists an idea of what could happen to Africa's grasslands if elephants, whose populations are steeply declining, went extinct or reached near-extinction.
Indigenous peoples' lands and territories cover 80 percent of the areas that are environmentally crucial for the world. These areas are the habitat they have known for generations, making indigenous peoples, arguably, vital to maintaining these ecosystems. However, history shows that indigenous peoples and local communities living in protected areas tend to be ignored in conservation policies and practices. Simon Counsell, director of Rainforest Foundation UK, explains that in the past, the rainforests of central Africa and other regions around the world have been treated as wildernesses free from human occupation and to be preserved in some kind of natural state for their wildlife: "What was ignored is that, in Central Africa for example, almost all of the landscape has long been occupied by humankind, Bantou farmers and indigenous hunting, gathering Pygmies".
Conservationists are pleading for new policies that will engage with the indigenous peoples living in protected areas instead of excluding them. They say enlisting their support is vital for ensuring their healthy survival as well as protecting wildlife.
Ten percent of Earth's wilderness has disappeared since the 1990s, according to a new study published in the journal Current Biology.
Over the last 20 years, we've lost a total area amounting to twice the size of Alaska, researchers report. But, experts say, there's still time to save the remaining wilderness areas – and they hope the recent findings will spur change.
At the moment, only about 23 percent of the world's land area is made up of wilderness, the study found. Most of this wilderness can be found in North Asia, North Africa, Australia, and North America (primarily the northern parts of Canada). South America has experienced the greatest loss, with a 30 percent decrease since the '90s, and Africa follows with 14 percent.
The International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has passed a motion declaring that all protected areas and the sacred natural sites of indigenous peoples should be 'No-Go Areas' for destructive industrial activities like mining, dam-building and logging.
The motion was passed as Motion 26 during last week's World Conservation Congress, a gathering that occurs every four years and helps to set the world's conservation agenda.
The World Conservation Congress – Talking Shop Or True Force For Change?
At the beginning of September, more than 9,000 experts descended on the Hawaii Convention Center on the Pacific island of Oahu for the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN)'s 6th World Conservation Congress. The triennial 10-day Congress is the largest global forum focussed specifically on addressing the challenges facing nature and wildlife.
Arguably best known for its assessments of the status of species for its 'Red List' database, the IUCN is the world's largest and most diverse environmental network. Its 1,300 members include governments, government agencies, non-governmental organisations and private sector companies. With input from some 16,000 scientists and other experts from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines, the Union is universally acknowledged as the global authority on the state of nature.
The IUCN Forest Pavilion at the 2016 World Conservation Congress was abuzz for four days with dialogues, videos, pleas for action and reverent reflections on forests.
The four day open-forum portion of IUCN World Conservation Congress in Honolulu, Hawaii, USA was a success. From early in the morning until late in the evening each day, the Forest Pavilion was host to over 30 sessions on forest topics ranging from Forest Landscape Restoration in Brazil, discussions on indigenous rights and managing risk in locally controlled forest businesses to global level dialogues on far-reaching forest initiatives.
Scientific panels comprising conservation researchers and industry representatives can overcome mistrust between their sectors to help save endangered species, a conference has heard.
The creation of such panels in Niger and Russia has resulted in action to improve habitats by some oil giants operating in these countries, IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature) representatives told an event at the World Conservation Summit. They explained that the science focus of such panels has defused potential conflict between the oil industry and activists, instead providing transparent and independent advice.
Africa's rhinos are seriously threatened by poaching, which feeds the demand for rhino horn in Vietnam and China. Rhino horn is a long-used ingredient in Chinese traditional medicine and is now even more eagerly sought after in Vietnam. It is a lucrative business. Rhino horn can fetch up to US$60,000 per kg on the illegal market and is worth more by weight than diamonds or cocaine.
Over the past nine years 5,940 African rhinos have been killed for their horns. Massive poaching over decades had reduced the black rhino in Africa from 65,000 in 1970 to 2,300 in 1993.
An emergency motion was passed at the weekend appealing to the Argentinian Government to save the Critically Endangered Hooded Grebe from badly-planned hydroelectric dams.
Conservationists at the current IUCN World Conservation Congress in Honolulu, Hawaii, gave an international commitment on Saturday to give fresh hope for the bird species, which was only discovered 42 years ago and was immediately known to be under threat.
Hooded Grebe was already under pressure from the spread of invasive species and, with less than 500 breeding pairs remaining, is facing a new and imminent threat from the proposed construction of two hydroelectric dams on the Santa Cruz River, Argentina, warned conservation organisation Aves Argentinas.
Sixty Cambodian wildlife park rangers will be trained by South African experts next year, funded by video streaming content revenue generated by a partnership between the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) International and the Canadian-based international English-language TV channel, Love Nature.
WWF International will leverage scenes from Love Nature's natural history series and documentaries to promote wildlife and nature conservation via social media.
In turn, Love Nature will donate unspecified proceeds from its global streaming video service to WWF International's training programs for park rangers in two Cambodian wildlife sanctuaries – Serepok Wildlife Sanctuary and Phnom Prich Wildlife Sanctuary.
A recent study on implications on biodiversity due to connectivity loss, scientists have found that with connectivity eroding in various landscapes, species have been losing out badly and there has been a decline in genetic variability. Further to this, with animals unable to adapt to new environments, it has resulted in high mortality, low reproduction and local extinctions.
In fact, with state and national highways cutting across tiger reserves and other protected areas in Karnataka and other states of the country, there has been lot of opposition, debates and court cases as it has effected wildlife movement, safety and landscape connectivity over the years.
The standard gauge railway line will cut through the iconic Nairobi National Park. This follows an approval by the Kenya Wildlife Service, which however says this will largely depend on the outcome of an environmental impact assessment test.
As the country prepared to celebrate 59 years of independence at the end of August, enforcement officers from the Wildlife and National Parks Department executed a series of raids that turned up over a dozen tiger parts – our national icon.
Five raids, in five days, with 12 suspects nabbed and the skins, bones, teeth and claws of tigers seized, is a tremendous effort which the Malaysian Conservation Alliance for Tigers (Mycat) applauds.
As empowering as this enforcement success is, the discovery of so many tiger parts in four of the five premises raided across Kuala Lumpur and Selangor paints a very troubling picture for tigers.
What was meant to be a five-year partnership between a global conservation group and Singapore's Resorts World Sentosa (RWS) has ended two years earlier than expected.
The partnership between the United States-based Conservation International (CI) and RWS started in 2013 and aimed to further conservation and public education efforts in areas like marine biology.
But only one project has been undertaken since then – a 10-month initiative to tag manta rays and track their movements in Indonesia, which started in September 2014. "With this work completed, and with no further initiatives planned with RWS, CI has decided to end the partnership ahead of the planned cessation in 2018," said a CI spokesman.
On Wednesday, Thailand's Administrative Court issued a ruling that the Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation was within its rights to burn Karen properties in Bang Kloi village within the National Park in 2011. The court dismissed all the demands of the Karens, who filed the case in 2014, besides compensation for the loss of their properties. The court ordered the Department to pay compensation of 10,000 THB (approx. 287 USD) each to the six Karen plaintiffs against their initial demands of 100,000 THB each. The Department has refused to pay even the meager compensation and pledged to appeal against it.
Is Africa's rapid growth at the expense of conservation?
With the rapid economic growth and development experienced in Africa in recent years, civil society involved in wildlife and natural resources conservation are questioning whether the growth has been at the expense of conservation.
Conservationists fear that with the rapid development, urbanisation and industrialisation of the African continent, natural resources and ecological spaces could be at risk if rapid interventions are not made.
Speaking on the sidelines of the Global Investment Summit in Kigali, last week, African Wildlife Foundation (AWF) president Kaddu Sebunya said countries ought to ensure sustainable ecosystems.
Some 76 key officials and representatives from six-member nations of the Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security (CTI-CFF) and their partners are gathered in Dumaguete City, Negros Oriental for a five-day regional exchange focusing on marine protected areas (MPAs).
The CTI-CFF is a multilateral partnership among six countries, namely, Indonesia, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Timor Leste, and the Philippines. It aims to protect the coastal and marine resources of the region.
Rainforest Trust has launched the SAVES (Safeguarding Areas Vital to Endangered Species) Challenge at the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) World Conservation Congress (WCC) in Hawaii. Through this initiative, Rainforest Trust has committed to raise $50 million as a challenge match that will direct a total of $100 million to create new Protected Areas throughout the tropics for the planet's most endangered species.
This announcement coincides with President Barack Obama's protection of Endangered species through the expansion of Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument, creating the largest Protected Area on the planet. The President recently noted that conservation is critical to the world's ecosystems, and he emphasized the urgency and importance of conservation efforts.
One of the men holds out his arm to show an injury he received from a park ranger. Others chime in.
Armed paramilitary rangers from the Virunga National Park are tasked with protecting the park from poachers and trespassers, often at risk to their own lives. In Congolese law, human habitation and hunting within the park is forbidden, including for the Bambuti, its original inhabitants.
The key to successfully battling rhino poaching may depend on aiding poor communities living around South Africa's national parks, a SANParks scientist told Parliament on Tuesday.
Legalizing the ivory trade could more quickly make elephants extinct, a study released September 15 suggests. It finds that the demand for ivory is far greater than the amount of ivory that can be harvested sustainably.
Law enforcement agencies, NGOs, and business leaders gathered from across the world in Washington this week to share information and expertise and organize a concerted strategy to combat the global scourge of wildlife trafficking.
The unprecedented collaboration was heralded at the National Geographic Society's headquarters on Tuesday, at an event held against the backdrop of recent news of a catastrophic plunge in the last wild populations of African elephants and other species. The meeting also set the stage for CITES CoP17, a conference in Johannesburg at the end of this month that will bring more than a hundred governments together to review the planet's biggest wildlife challenges and opportunities.
"We tend to think that the biggest threat is ISIS or interest rates … amazing that we don't think about the state of our biosphere," Friedman added.
The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) announced that giant pandas are no longer an endangered species on Sept 4, a much-needed validation to the conservation efforts of activists all over the world.While it is a cause for celebration, WWF cautioned that the pandas remain a vulnerable species.
As we continue to educate people on the importance of habitat conservation, Zuji Singapore looks at five other animals that are currently listed as endangered or vulnerable.These species can be found in various parts of the world – all beautiful, unique, and at risk of extinction.If you're thinking of observing these animals, try to hurry to the following places because they may disappear very soon.
The deaths of seven pygmy elephants in a quarry pond, coming in the wake of the poisoning of 14 adult elephants three years ago, have again raised questions over the conservation of the sub-species.
The elephants are considered endangered and only about 1,500 are to be found in the wild – almost all in Sabah.
Although the Sabah Wildlife Department has ruled out foul play in the latest case, these gentle giants of Sabah remain under threat in shrinking forest areas in view of the severe human-elephants conflicts.
The International Conservation Caucus Foundation (ICCF) announced in Washington on Thursday that it has awarded Mozambican President Filipe Nyusi its "Award of Merit in Conservation".
Cited in a press release issued by Mozambique's flagship conservation area, the Gorongosa National Park, ICCF President John Gantt said "President Nyusi has won this award for promoting a new concept of a national park in his country – the national park as a motor of human development".
A wildfire burning in the Peruvian Amazon that has charred some 20,000 hectares (49,421 acres) of rainforest and destroyed crops planted by indigenous communities was raging toward a national park and another protected area, authorities said Thursday.
Firefighters battled hot spots spanning 20 kilometers (12 miles) along the Ene River in the jungle region of Junin, said Julio Jeri, an official with SERFOR, Peru's forest service. He said the first rainfall in weeks did not appear to have contained the blaze.
Some 14 hectares of native croplands have been destroyed, and protected areas for the Ashaninka Amazonian tribe and the Otishi National Park were in the fire's path, he said.
The Solomon Islands are facing dramatic and imminent changes from large-scale mining across the country. Without proper planning and access to information, developments like mining will jeopardize the natural resources upon which most Solomon Islanders depend. With 85 percent of Solomon Islanders living in rural areas, they rely on their natural resources for food, shelter and income. The negative impacts of mining could change their lives forever.
Large deposits of gold, copper, nickel and bauxite have been identified across the country. Despite strong interest and intense prospecting, there has only ever been one fully operational mine in the country, which means communities and government agencies have little experience working with the mining sector. In addition, the Solomon Islands government has highlighted their limited capacity to manage the complex demands of regulating, managing and overseeing the mining development process. While mining offers opportunities for economic development, without adequate management, it also poses direct and urgent threats to livelihoods, culture and social well-being.
Somalia on Wednesday signed to join The Elephant Protection Initiative (EPI), an African-led program aimed at ending ivory trade.
Minister for Livestock and Pasture, Said Hussein Iid, said Somalia's rich environmental history had for long been overshadowed by the long-drawn civil war.
"However, it is our hope that by joining the EPI, we can work to slowly rebuild this history and join together with other African nations to stop the harrowing consequences that elephant poaching and trafficking is bringing to our continent," Hussein said in Nairobi, Kenya.
Sri Lanka was the first country to comprehensively protect all of its mangrove trees.
The wetlands of the tropics, mangroves serve as nurseries to fish that will go on to populate coral reefs, protect villages from tsunamis and hurricanes, and contribute to communities' livelihoods. With their branching roots that arch into coastal waters, these trees are also vital in the fight against climate change. Scientists have found that mangrove forests sequester three to five times more carbon than other forests. Mangrove conservation can offer a big return on investment, but only if those investments generate the right kind of buy-in.
With the rhino poaching crisis showing no signs of abating, Vietnam must crack down on its rampant illegal rhino horn trade or face sanctions, World Wildlife Fund (WWF) said ahead of a critically important wildlife trade conference next week in South Africa.
As the world's largest market for illegal rhino horn, Vietnam's failure to shut down illegal markets, disrupt the trafficking networks and prosecute the traffickers will be in the spotlight as Johannesburg hosts the 17th Conference of the Parties (CoP17) to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) from September 24–October 5.
The government on Tuesday created three more protected areas covering nearly 28,000 hectares to be under Environment Ministry control, according to a ministry statement yesterday.
The statement announced the creation of a national park on Koh Rong island covering 2,655.35 hectares and Prek Tub lake as a conservation area covering 16.3 hectares – both in Preah Sihanouk province – and Tbeng Mountain as a heritage area covering 25,269.41 hectares in Preah Vihear province.
"In total, there are 45 protected areas, covering 5,902,444.06 hectares which are under the control of the Ministry of Environment," the statement said, adding that the ministry was studying areas that have natural tourism, cultural and historic potential to be protected areas.
The illicit cultivation of coca leaf in Colombia grew by 39 percent between 2014 and 2015, from 69,000 to 96,000 hectares. That's according to the country's National Forest and Carbon Monitoring System (SMBYC), an environmental information tool created by the Colombian Environment and Sustainable Development Ministry, as well as a recent report from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).
A group of environmentalists on Friday held protests in Nairobi over a proposal to construct a section of the Standard Gauge Railway through Nairobi National Park. The protesters, marching under the banner of the Kenya Coalition for Wildlife Conservation and management later on presented a petition to the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) hoping it will help change the government's preferred choice of having the rail cut through the park. A move that the conservationists believe will spell death for the treasured park. "Doing this will have both short term and long-term effects to not only the park but to the residents of Nairobi too," Kahindi Lekalhaile, one of the organisers of the demonstration said.
Even with two grades to go before completing high school, Vincent Kiptum has already figured out how to deal with a problem troubling his village in Kenya's Rift Valley: truancy from school.
Once he graduates, Kiptum would like to be the Olenguruone village champion tasked with ensuring that youth enlist in school and remain there until they have a certificate to show.
But such a job will require a mix of strength and intellect if the 18 year old hopes to outwit the triple plagues suffered by the area's marginalized communities: poverty, displacement, and exploitation by the logging industry.
Financial constraints make it difficult for the Forestry Development Authority (FDA) to take appropriate measures to protect Liberia's elephants, according to FDA technical manager for conservation, Theo V. Freeman.
As a result elephants in Liberia are vulnerable to poachers who hunt them for their tusks to further the illegal ivory trade, said Freeman.
In an exclusive interview Monday with the Daily Observer at the FDA head office in Paynesville, he pointed out that Liberia does not have measures in place to stop the wanton destruction of the country's endangered animal species.
Prime Minister Hun Sen personally approved the project in August, telling Uk Rabun, the minister of rural development, that construction should begin after the annual monsoon season and would promote tourism in the area.
"If there are more tourists visiting there, the loggers would be a bit scared as well. This road is not for you cutting the trees, meaning it's for carrying tourists and facilitating the people for medical treatment," he said.
The Kahuzi-Biega National Park in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo is under threat. The park is a protected area near Bukavu town, and situated near the western bank of Lake Kivu and the Rwandan border. But this nature reserve is almost converting into a commercial venture. Nearly 1,800 tons of charcoal are extracted here every month.
Farmers have encroached the park, even though it is forbidden.
One of the biggest threats to the park is poaching and trade of gorilla babies, which has put the world's largest ape, the eastern lowland gorilla, on the verge of extinction.
South Africans are people of the land.
Our country is richly endowed with natural resources, including plants, animals, rivers, marine areas and mountains, unspoilt forests, parks and unique ecosystems – some of these are found only here, and nowhere else on earth.
The protection and preservation of this land are common to all of us, regardless of our backgrounds.
But historically, enjoyment of this land and all it offers had been the preserve of few. From the expanses of our great national parks to sitting on a simple park bench under the shade of a tree, this was a privilege afforded only to certain South Africans.
The International Union for Conservation of Nature concluded its World Conservation Congress in Honolulu last week having set policy goals for global sustainability in the face of climate change and increasing populations.
It also created a number of small-scale resolutions, including one aimed specifically at protecting Hawaii's bird species.
"Every conservationist who's paid any attention to the United States whatsoever is aware that Hawaii is a focal area of extinction," said Russ Mittermeier, executive vice chairman and former president of Conservation International, a co-introducer of the resolution.
Hawaii's birds "represent a significant proportion of endangered birds in the U.S., and they don't really get resources proportionate to that," he said.
In 2014, Mittermeier said, Hawaii received about 4 percent of all government funding directed toward bird rescue.


text:
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon® Wildlands - 2400 Credits - ESD HUN (Letölthető)
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon® Wildlands - 2400 Credits - ESD HUN (Letölthető)
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon® Wildlands - 2400 Credits - ESD HUN (Letölthető) ismertető
TOM CLANCY'S THE DIVISION - 2400 PREMIUM CREDITS PACK Get this pack and receive 2000 Premium Credits, as well as 400 Premium Credits bonus. Premium Credits allow you to purchase in-game content to customize your Division Agent with weapon skins, backpack skins, and more! One-time license fee to download to multiple PS4 systems. Sign in to PSN is not required to use this on your primary PS4, but is required for use on other PS4 systems. See Health Warnings for important health information before using this product. This coupon code is issued by Sony Interactive Entertainment Network Europe Limited and can be used by Sony Interactive Entertainment Network Europe Limited only users who hold a SEN account (formerly known as a PlayStation®Network account) registered in the HUN. The use of coupons with code for content / services classified as "18" must be users holding a senior SEN Account over 18 years of age. Additionally, users must be over 7 years of age and users under 18 years must have parental consent. Other age restrictions may apply. For SEN accounts, the Terms of Service apply PlayStation ™ Network (PSN). Access to the content / services covered by this coupon code is subject to the Terms and Conditions the provision of the PlayStation ™ Network (PSN) and any specific supplementary terms that apply to content / services, including the Terms of Use of the Software. If you do not wish to accept these terms, do not buy this coupon with the code. PlayStation®3, PSP® (PlayStation®Portable), PlayStation®Vita, PlayStation®4 or other is required compatible Sony, as well as broadband, Wi-Fi or 3G internet connection (depending on your system Sony). The user is responsible for the Internet connection charges. PlayStation®4 multiplayer features (depending on the corresponding content / services) is only available to users with paid subscriptions PlayStation®Plus services. This coupon with code can not be converted to cash and may not be resold or otherwise exchanged. In the event of its loss, theft or other use without your permission will not be replaced The code is valid only for One time use. It will expire 12 months from the date of purchase. For full terms, see eu.playstation.com/legal "SEN Network and PlayStation®Store: Only English is supported." "2", "PlayStation", "O" and "A" are registered trademarks of Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc. Also, "O" is a trademark of the same company. "Sony Entertainment Network" is a trademark of Sony Corporation. All rights reserved. © 2017 Ubisoft Entertainment. All Rights Reserved. Tom Clancy's, The Division logo, the Soldier icon, Snowdrop, Ubisoft and the Ubisoft logo are trademarks of Ubisoft Entertainment in the U.S.