text:
Requests?
In a couple of months we'll be at the ninth anniversary of this weblog, and I thought that I might do something a little different to mark the occasion this year, and do request posts here and there in the lead-up to it. Obviously I can't promise to do just any sort of request; I may find I have nothing to say (this has generally been true in fields like politics) or that it's a topic that I clearly should leave to others for whatever reason. And quite obviously I'm in no way an expert on everything, so even if I do have something to say, it may not be very important or earth-shattering or even more than an approximation. But I do tend to collect odds-and-ends, and I've had many years of collecting odds-and-ends, so it's very possible that I might have something relevant somehow to a topic, knocking around in my head or the endless notes that I take, that might conceivably be interesting to someone. And even if I don't have anything immediately on-hand, there are fields (especially concerning the history of philosophy) where I probably have something that would allow me to bridge to at least some basic ideas without killing myself in terms of research load.
So, again, any requests? I have interests ranging from sacramental theology to philosophical atheism to informal logic to feminist epistemology to literature to -- well, if you read the blog, you have at least a rough idea of the extent of my interests. What would you be interested in reading about?
Posted by Brandon at 9:48 PM 10 comments: Links to this post
"Hypergamy"
One of my pet peeves is the abuse of the term 'hypergamy', which seems to be spreading like a parasite. A recent offender is James Taranto in the WSJ:
Why? People who go to Princeton or another elite university have a revealed preference for education and intellectual development. Because the female sex drive is hypergamous, Princeton women, as Patton asserts, will be attracted to men who are their cognitive or educational equals or superiors. Beyond the confines of the Ivy League such men certainly exist, but we are far less thick on the ground.
There are actually two senses of the term 'hypergamy' that are in use and whose conflation is making the problem worse. One of these senses is anthropological, and it is reasonably well-defined, useful, and established by evidence. Hypergamy in this sense is about marriage practices in the context of a society, and is the same thing we usually are talking about loosely and colloquially when we say that someone 'married up'. It does not have much to do with sex at all; many of the most clearly hypergamous societies are societies in which arranged marriages are standard: the usual hypergamous norm in such cases consists of parents marrying their daughters to the sons of families that have a higher social status than their own. You will notice immediately that it indicates a normative custom that is part of the structure of a society; it is the society that determines what counts as higher status and lower status, it is the social expectations and institutions that constitute its normative character. It is a genuine causal explanation; by saying that a society is hypergamous, one is saying that there is a fairly well-defined way of determining status in that society and that marriages tend to be status-asymmetric. In general by convention, we assume (where there is no other indication) that 'hypergamy' means that women marry into higher-status families, and 'hypogamy' means that women marry into lower-status families. (There are societies structured either way; and, for that matter, there are societies that where one group's norm will be hypergamous and another's hypogamous.) Societies structured on hypergamy for women tend to be somewhat more common than the reverse. The account of hypergamy is consistent, however, with the possibility of marriage tending to be hypergamous in both directions. All this requires is some standard or expectation by which one may compare the two directions; and this is, in fact, an extremely common situation, since many societies apportion status to men and women in different ways, so the expectation can be for a woman to end up marrying a man of higher status, as defined for men, and of a woman to end up marrying a woman of higher status, as defined for women. For instance, to take a toy example, a society may be structured in such a way that wealth is status for a man and breeding or education for a woman, and the marriage customs tend to drive men to try to marry women better-educated than they are while women try to marry men wealthier than they are. Hypergamy is the norm for both men and women in this society.
It does seem to be true that societies that are hypergamous for women are much more common than societies that are hypogamous; and that a large portion of societies tend to have stronger hypergamous expectations for women than they do for men. Hypergamy in the anthropological sense is capable of extremely diverse manifestations; there is no one way in which people are hypergamous, because (1) marriage customs vary from society to society; and (2) what counts as higher and lower status has to be defined relative to a given society. This ends up being extremely important when this sense is confused with the second sense, which comes from evolutionary psychology.
I said above that the anthropological sense was reasonably well-defined, useful for explanation, and established by evidence. It is also the literal sense of the term. The e-psych sense, on the other hand, is a metaphor that has never been fixed properly, is highly speculative, and whose explanatory usefulness is highly controversial. It applies, as Taranto's example above indicates, to sex, and thus is detachable from any particular custom. It would have to be biological in nature, it could not be relativized to a society, and would have to be descriptive of unconscious biological tendencies resulting from sexual selection rather than widely recognized social norms, many of which can be formed and disrupted on time scales much smaller than could possibly be useful for an explanation appealing to sexual selection. But this means immediately that we seem to be in the realm of occult causes, unless we can give a clear, precise definition of the 'hyper'. But this is not really forthcoming; the 'higher status mate' is defined in terms of any number of things like 'physical attractiveness', 'health' and 'intelligence', the last of which can be signaled by any of any infinite number of different cues, not always consistent with each other.
Without precision -- which it never really gets -- the e-psych sense runs the obvious danger of collapsing into a tautology. To say that women are hypergamous, for instance, is not obviously different from saying that women tend to mate with the kind of men that women tend to mate with, unless we give some precise meaning to "kind of men" (i.e., status) that is not selected out by seeing what kinds of men women like to mate with. This can be done on a very small scale, point by point. The best and least problematic work of this sort is also the kind of research that returns results everyone knows: both men and women, for instance, tend to prefer mates who are symmetrical in shape and facial form; minor asymmetries like scars, however, tend to have no effect if they do not change the overall symmetry of the face and frame; and although I don't know if there has been any study, one could well imagine a study showing that men, or women, or both, showed a preference for mates with a more symmetrical human form than themselves, and thus a "hypergamous preference" etc. But notice that we are here relativizing, too, not talking about a general hypergamy concept; we're just identifying a feature that is statistically connected to sexual partnering. This is as far as you can get at present on science that is not obviously bad: not hypergamy, but a loose collection of tendencies that could be labeled, if one wanted, with the metaphor "hypergamy". Likewise, the fact that we're really just dealing with statistical associations means that any attempt to use these hypergamy claims as explanations of anything (rather than, say, byproducts or effects) is highly problematic. This is all quite clear if you actually read Buss and the literature critiquing his work.
When someone says, "The female sex drive is hypergamous," they cannot possibly be using it in the well-established anthropological sense. But the way in which Taranto uses it as an explanation requires that it have the kind of causal structure that is possessed by the anthropological sense, and it is (at most optimistic assessment) unclear and controversial whether the evolutionary-psychological sense even has a genuine causal structure at all, and its status as rising above tautology (the female sex drive tends toward things that females find more, rather than less, sexually attractive) is unclear. Now, tautologies are not necessarily useless in explanation, but they don't themselves explain anything; at most they provide limiting constraints. The actual structure of Taranto's explanation, without some precise account of sexual hypergamy, which doesn't exist, is really:
Women at elite schools show, by being at elite schools, that they think education and intellectual development important. Because women tend to have sex with the kind of men women tend to have sexual preferences for, women at elite schools will tend to be attracted to men who are their cognitive equals or superiors.
Saying that this is a complete non sequitur does not quite convey how moronic it is. The revealed preference of women at elite schools is for education at elite schools; it has no necessary connection with their sexual preferences, and if it did, it would have to be established on empirical evidence, not assumed. Likewise, in the reverse direction, we have no way, as long as hypergamy is left undefined, of saying that the kind of revealed preference involved in attending an elite school is itself the kind of thing that could link up with the biological tendencies that would have to make up "the female sex drive". Cognitive equality and superiority is also left undefined, and without a precise definition, there is no way to say how it links up to any supposed female hypergamy. This is a non-explanation masquerading as an explanation.
Incidentally, I can't get over the "we" in the last sentence. First person is completely gratuitous here, so it means that Taranto is going out of his way to classify himself as the "cognitive or educational equal or superior" of the women he's talking about, which is (1) so irrelevant even if true that one wonders what sort of person would even say such a thing; (2) certainly not true on the educational side, since Taranto does not have a top-tier education; and (3) seems a somewhat hasty assumption on the cognitive side without letting us know how cognitive equality, much less superiority, is determined (and in context it could not just be any kind of cognitive scale, but one that could have an effect on the female sex drive!).
The Cry of Modern Educationists
The more things change, the more they seem to stay the same.
The exoteric teaching of the Kantian philosophy — that the understanding ought not to go beyond experience, else the cognitive faculty will become a theoretical reason which itself generates nothing but fantasies of the brain — this was a justification from a philosophical quarter for the renunciation of speculative thought. In support of this popular teaching came the cry of modern educationists that the needs of the time demanded attention to immediate requirements, that just as experience was the primary factor for knowledge, so for skill in public and private life, practice and practical training generally were essential and alone necessary, theoretical insight being harmful even. Philosophy [Wissenschaft] and ordinary common sense thus co-operating to bring about the downfall of metaphysics, there was seen the strange spectacle of a cultured nation without metaphysics – like a temple richly ornamented in other respects but without a holy of holies. Theology, which in former times was the guardian of the speculative mysteries and of metaphysics (although this was subordinate to it) had given up this science in exchange for feelings, for what was popularly matter-of-fact, and for historical erudition.
Hegel, Logic, Preface to the First Edition, section 3. (The first volume of the first edition was published, I think, in 1812.)
Lauren O'Connell, "Dancing in the Dark". Sick of sitting 'round here trying to write this book.
It's a Springsteen song originally, of course; and while it takes a while to adjust to the sound of it being sung by someone other than The Boss, it grows on you.
The Lingering Western Sheen
Birchington Churchyard
A lowly hill which overlooks a flat,
Half sea, half country side;
A flat-shored sea of low-voiced creeping tide
Over a chalky, weedy mat.
A hill of hillocks, flowery and kept green
Round Crosses raised for hope,
With many-tinted sunsets where the slope
Faces the lingering western sheen.
A lowly hope, a height that is but low,
While Time sets solemnly,
While the tide rises of Eternity,
Silent and neither swift nor slow.
Isidore on Faith, Hope, and Love
Today is the Feast of St. Isidore of Seville, Doctor of the Church. From his most famous work:
And there are three things required in religion for worship of God, that is, faith, hope, charity. In faith, what must be believed; in hope, what must be hoped; in charity, what must be loved. Faith ("fides") is that whereby we truly believe what we are not able at all to see. For believing is of what we are not able to see. And 'faith' is said in the proper sense if everything is done ("fiat") that is said or promised. And it is called faith, from the fact that what has been done ("fit") is that which was agreed between two, as between God and man; therefore it is also covenant ("foedus"). That is called hope ("spes") which is a foot going forward ("pes progrediendi"), as in "It is a foot" ("est pes"). Thus also for the contrary desperation: the foot is lacking ("deest pes") there, and there is no ability to go forward, because as long as someone loves sin, he does not hope for glory. Caritas in Greek and love ("dilectio") is understood as that which binds two in itself ("duos in se liget"). Indeed, love begins from two, which are love of God and neighbor; as the Apostle says (Rm 13:10), "Love is the fullness of law." It is greater than all these, because who loves both believes and hopes. But who does not love, though he accomplish many good things, toils in vain. But no carnal love ("dilectio carnalis") is love ("dilectio"), but is only called desire ("amor"). We generally only apply the name of love ("nomen dilectionis") to better things.
St. Isidore of Seville, Etymologies, Book VIII, Section 2 (my very rough draft of a translation). The best of these etymologies, of course, is that of hope: without hope, spes, you have no foot, pes, to make progress with.
Although they often did attribute to the origin of words to them (and this is especially done by Isidore), we should be careful not to import all the associations 'etymology' has for us into ancient and medieval use of the term. While they did take it to uncover historical features, the medievals are often also frank that etymologies have a primarily logical function: namely, to define using the same letters or sounds. Nor is this quite so quixotic as we might assume, since it is quite clear that letters and sounds do have an influence on meaning. Consider the words 'parameter' and 'perimeter', for instance. If you defined a parameter as that which sets the perimeter for a practical endeavor or kind of behavior, this would certainly be a more accurate definition of how people actually use the term than any of the standard dictionary definitions. This is because those dictionary definitions treat the word as isolated; but in reality, when people talk about 'parameters', the word naturally also triggers an imaginative association with the better known 'perimeters'. Taking this into account gives us the meaning of the word not merely as abstracted from all context, but as it actually lives and breathes, so to speak, in the world. This is precisely what the medievals had in mind. Spes and pes do echo each other; it would actually be strange if the meaning of the more immediately obvious 'foot' never in any way influenced how people used the word 'hope', given their similarity in Latin. And even if it didn't, the medievals were not above correcting nature and sayiing that it should.
And on that point, who is to say they are wrong? It gave us medieval Latin, which is a language with a structure brilliantly suited for logic, in which every important abstract word can be defined in a memorably poetic way by an alliterative play on words. That's a pretty decent result for building a language.
Supersensuous within the Sensuous
I was interested to come across this passage in Feuerbach's Principles of the Philosophy of the Future:
The distinction between essence and appearance, cause and effect, substance and accident, necessity and contingency, speculative and empirical does not mean that there are two different realms or worlds – the supersensuous world which is essence, and the sensuous world which is appearance; rather, this distinction is internal to sensuousness itself. Let us take an example from the natural sciences. In Linnaeus's system of plants the first groups are determined according to the number of filaments. But in the eleventh group where twelve to twenty stamens occur – and more so in the group of twenty stamens and polystamens – the numerical determinations become irrelevant; counting is of no use any more. Here in one and the same area we have therefore, before us the difference between definite and indefinite, necessary and indifferent, rational and irrational multiplicity. This means that we need not go beyond sensuousness to arrive, in the sense of the Absolute Philosophy, at the limit of the merely sensuous and empirical; all we have to do is not separate the intellect from the senses in order to find the supersensuous – spirit and reason – within the sensuous.
The sentiment is anti-Kantian, of course; and is broadly Hegelian. But it's an interesting way to put an interesting objection.
Begging the Doxastic Question
Ombhurbhuva points to a fascinating article by Jennifer Faust (PDF) on what she calls "begging the doxastic question" (Int J Philos Relig [2008] 63:71-86). The article is interesting, and discusses a topic that should be considered more widely, but it has a number of problems.
The very first and most obvious problem is the way in which Faust links argument and persuasion:
The primary purpose of an argument, understood in the philosophically orthodox sense, is to persuade someone of the truth of its conclusion. This aim of argumentation is so obviously and widely recognized that it is often written into the very definition of the term. A typical account of argument, found in a standard introductory logic textbook, defines one as "a group of statements, one or more of which (the premises) are claimed to provide support for, or reasons to believe, one of the others (the conclusion)." Now, typically we understand the arguer and his audience to be separate persons, such that the statements in an argument offered by person A aim to provide another person, B, with reasons for B to believe the conclusion of A's argument. On this view (hereafter called "the standard view"), an argument's primary purpose is to persuade an audience to accept its conclusion.
However, the primary purpose of an argument is not to persuade someone of its truth; the primary purpose of an argument is to relate a claim correctly to reasons indicating it. And we can see this immediately even in the very example Faust uses. The introductory logic textbook (Hurley's), defines an argument as "a group of statements, one or more of which...are claimed to provide support for, or reasons to believe, one of the others". But providing support for, or reasons to believe, is not the same as persuading, and if the aim of an argument is to provide support for a conclusion, this is distinct from persuading. Providing support depends on the facts of the case and the logical structure of the argument. Persuading depends, at least in addition, on the psychology of people presented with the argument. Further, Faust's conflation of the two is inconsistent with how people actually use arguments: many arguments only make their conclusion more probable (Faust herself later recognizes this), and have to be used in conjunction with other arguments, and in such a case, the individual arguments will not be expected to persuade on their own. So even if it were true (it is not) that argumentation generally speaking has persuasion as its primary purpose, this is completely different from saying that an argument has persuasion as its primary purpose.
The most longstanding and historically influential account of how argument relates to persuasion is the classical/neo-classical account based, essentially, on Aristotle, Cicero, and Quintilian. It is inconsistent with the idea that Faust presents here. The classical account recognized that persuasion requires the combination of three elements: ethos or character, movement of the pathoi or passions, and logos or rational account. All three are always operative in persuasion, which is why no one in the classical tradition holds that rhetorical arguments work exactly like demonstrative arguments: rhetorical arguments, arguments for the purpose of persuading, are modifications of the primary kinds of arguments (demonstrative and dialectical) in order to express more clearly the good aspects of the character of the persuader and to move more easily the passions of the audience. Among the most important post-classical accounts, Campbell holds that arguments to persuade have to appeal to all the major faculties of the mind, not just reason, and even Whately, who most thoroughly unites logic and rhetoric, does not hold that persuasion is the aim of argument generally.
Thus the 'standard account' is anything but standard. It's possible, of course, in this age of advertising and political spin, that it's making a comeback, but even Faust's paradigmatic example doesn't actually express the 'standard account'. It should be said that Faust's whole point in the article is to argue against the 'standard account', at least for religious arguments; she herself goes on to recognize that there are arguments that lack persuasive force despite being of sterling soundness, and that the capacity of an argument actually to persuade depends on things external to any argument. And she will later give a whole list of other possible purposes for argument.
Faust's own conditions for persuasiveness of arguments are somewhat interesting. In rough summary, she holds that the necessary conditions for an argument to persuade are that
(1) its premises are 'subjectively probable' for that person;
(2) these premises are recognized by that person as making the conclusion more probable;
(3) the premises are more 'acceptable' to that person than the conclusion, where 'acceptability' has a technical meaning.
As she notes, (3) is controversial if taken as a general requirement. She argues, however, that it holds in dialectical contexts. This can be conceded for the sake of argument, but it's worth pointing out that this is another point on which Faust is inconsistent with the classical tradition, which takes dialectical contexts as precisely those where (3) cannot be assumed. For instance, Aristotle's counterpart to (3), which is actually in terms of knowledge rather than acceptability, only applies to demonstration; in dialectic (which concerns inquiry) and rhetoric (which concerns persuasion) it does not necessarily apply. This is quite clear in dialectic, where it is sometimes necessary to show that better-known (or more acceptable) claims are implied by less-known (or less acceptable) premises, and also in rhetoric, which has so many additional factors (what people can accept in public, the passions, character, etc.) that can interfere with acceptability as understood in (3) without actually affecting an argument's ability to persuade.
This allows Faust to formulate an account of what she calls 'begging the doxastic question'. Unfortunately, she gives two different accounts and treats them as if they were the same. The first account is
An argument begs the doxastic question, on my account, when a subject would find the argument persuasive only if she antecedently believes the argument's conclusion.
The second account is,
If an argument begs the doxastic question, then the assignment of some positive degree of probability to at least one premise relies on acceptance of the argument's conclusion. But in so fulfilling condition (i) on persuasion, the argument violates condition (iii).
These are not equivalent. (1) The persuasiveness of an argument, which is the key feature in the first account, is by Faust's own account not dependent only on the acceptability of the premises, which is the key feature in the second account. (2) Faust herself distinguishes acceptability from belief. (3) The first account applies to all arguments whatsoever, because the persuasiveness of any argument always presupposes that we do not think its conclusion is false. In order to accept an argument we have to have reason to think that it has not become an unintentional reductio, whether to absurdity or definite falsehood, and that the argument is not even put into doubt by the doubtfulness of its conclusion. Conclusions are assessed in terms of reasons, and the combination of reasons and conclusions is an argument, but an argument has to be assessed holistically. This contrasts with the second account, which does not obviously apply to all arguments, but only to arguments insofar as they can be used in contexts in which a certain psychological fact (about about the relation between 'subjective probabilities' of the premises and that of the conclusion) are true.
Since it's quite clear that Faust does not intend to argue that all arguments beg the doxastic question, which the first account requires (since you can't find a whole argument persuasive until you've come to believe the conclusion) we'll set aside the first account and simply focus on the second: fulfilling condition (1) involves violating condition (3). We can take this as simply definitional, whether we accept (3) as a necessary condition or not. Now, the first thing to note is that whether an argument begs the doxastic question in this sense does not depend on anything to do with the argument itself, but on a counterfactual claim about the psychology of possible audiences for the argument: it would require some general evidence about psychology to support. And here we run up against a problem. When Faust argues that religious arguments (she includes both atheistic as well as theistic arguments in the mix) beg the doxastic question, she repeatedly uses the fact that someone who accepts the opposing position will likely reject one of the premises. But if we take it this way, it will create the same problem for the second account that we saw with the first account: It is true of every possible argument, regardless of subject. That is, we can say of any argument that "in certain dialectical contexts in which the audience is assumed to believe not-C prior to the reception of [an] argument concluding that C, such...arguments are unlikely to provide such an audience with reasons to believe that C". This is due to the very same fact that I previously noted, and is confirmed by experience: people who disagree with conclusions don't generally change their minds simply on being presented with arguments for the conclusions, because even with rigorous arguments they look first to see if they can consistently get away with rejecting the premises. Faust's argument, if correct and taken in the way she applies it, would be a reason to disagree with the 'standard account'; but it doesn't say anything about religious arguments in particular. It's not necessary to go as long a way around as Faust in order to reject the 'standard account', however; any serious look at argumentative practice of almost any kind shows that it is false. It is likely, though, that she is still conflating the first and second account, and thus persuasiveness of argument with subjective 'probability' of claims.
It should be noted, however, that Faust's manner of proceeding is faulty, even if we don't understand it in the way she has to for her method. Setting aside the controversial move of taking facts about 'reasons to believe' to be facts about 'subjective probabilities', the mere fact that "in certain dialectical contexts" the argument would not persuade is not strong enough to support the conclusion that the argument can only fulfill condition (1) by violating condition (3). For that to be true, there would have to be no dialectical contexts in which it could fulfill condition (1) without violating condition (3). In order to determine this, for instance, we have to consider not only cases where people already disagree with the conclusion, but also cases where they are open either way, and in addition cases where people are already leaning to the conclusion, although they still regard the premises as more probable than the conclusion. If people are persuaded in any such cases, then the fulfillment of condition (1) does not in those cases violate condition (3), and one cannot argue on Faust's account that the argument begs the doxastic question. Thus these kinds of cases would need to be considered; all of Faust's arguments that given arguments beg the doxastic question are incomplete.
The upshot, in any case, whether you accept Faust's argument or reject it, is that the 'standard account' is untenable: it's absurd to evaluate arguments based on persuasiveness, because (1) this is not the primary use of argument for any rational person, since even accepting the conclusion of an argument requires more than just being presented with the argument (you have to evaluate whether it is better to accept the conclusion or reject the argument, which requires higher-order reasoning and will often depend on many things other than an argument, much less the argument itself); (2) anything can persuade somebody, so it would vary considerably from person to person and from group to group; and (3) almost all major accounts of the relation between argument and persuasion regard arguments as having a role in persuasion but not the only, or even always the definitive, role. The primary value of argument in persuasive contexts, in fact, seems to be not that the argument as such persuades, but that it contributes to persuasion by establishing the cost of not being persuaded. This in itself can persuade, when an argument shows that you have to give up or accept too much in order to reject the conclusion; but this is not written on the face of an argument. The 'standard account', which takes arguments as existing for the purpose of persuading, shows an egregious lack of understanding about what rational arguments are, or how they function in inquiry. Arguments are often preconditions for persuasion (depending on the kind of persuasion); they often can persuade, when taken in their full actual context; however, they do not exist because of it, nor are they always well-suited for it. As far as arguments themselves are concerned, persuasion is irrelevant: they identify what is consistent and inconsistent, and to this extent what is rational and irrational, neither of which depends on whether anyone is persuaded at all. If you are not persuaded by an argument, that is a fact about you, not about the argument. The argument is good or bad, right or wrong, on its own terms, and it is the argument that shows whether and why you are right (or wrong) to be persuaded -- your persuadability doesn't say anything on its own about whether the argument is good or bad, right or wrong. Your being unpersuaded could be because the argument is bad, or it could be because you are being irrational, stubborn, or perverse, or it could be because the argument, despite being right, conflicts with too many of your prior commitments, or it could be because I have presented the argument badly and in a way that your initial impulse would be against it no matter the argument. We simply don't know without further investigation.
And, what is more important, this is the rational way of handling arguments. It would be rationally absurd to accept a conclusion just because an argument was given for it, no matter how good the argument; at the very least you always have to ask whether it is better to accept the conclusion or reject the argument, and why. Rational people accept arguments not on their own but as they fit into the broader context of our rational lives, one in which all the elements noted by the classical tradition -- ethos and pathos and logos -- are always operative. It is not possible to turn any of them off; if anyone thinks that any one of them was not operative in any given case of persuasion, he is only deceiving himself. Rationally being persuaded involves the harmony of these elements. But arguments do not exist for persuasion; they are relevant to persuasion because of the way our minds work, and for no other reason. Arguments can be for nothing more than showing that reasons can be given, or what kinds of reasons might be given, for instance; or they could be for connecting different fields of thought; or they could be just for showing what's consistent and what's not. None of these are persuasion, although any of them can be relevant to persuasion.
A Poem Re-Draft and Two New Poem Drafts
Seneca Ponders Death
The dead inside the tomb is laid,
the final rites are brought to close,
the eyes no more behold the day,
now shut in endless night's repose.
Thus falls the end of endless might,
thus ends the tally of the tale.
What worth is it to leave the light
when on the threshold life will fail,
if yet unfailing strife we keep
and no surcease from life receive,
no warming poultice born of sleep,
and nothing left when flesh we leave?
When body to a corpse has turned
and spirit flees its living role,
is soul by life then also spurned
dissolving like our breath the soul?
What morning sunlight, morrow's morn,
will shatter sky in reddening dawn,
what sunset scatter drops forlorn
on all that Ocean holds in bond?
It all will, like the sons of Time,
be snatched and eaten straight away.
Too swiftly course the stars sublime,
too swiftly moon will flee the day,
too swiftly spring to winter tends,
as all things hurry on the track;
but swifter far than to these ends
will race our hearts to loss and lack.
When we are laid in fatal tomb,
perhaps no shade will be our doom?
Like smoke that curls from smoldered coal,
like cloud before the forceful wind,
our body's life will upward roll
and pass, and fade, and come to end.
Shall then we quiver for our fate?
Shall then we flee with fleeing breath?
Not once will fear our lot abate,
not once will worry stave off death.
But reason, still, and calm, and pure,
may rise in might, unharmed by wave,
and see for fear the flawless cure:
all fear is buried in the grave.
Inside our minds we cities build
of torment, shade, Tartarus-hell;
but these are rumors fear has filled,
all stories that our passions tell.
Who of our spirit's fate is sure?
Ask those who never lived nor were.
Dividing possibilities: this is the mind.
Dividing perfectly, the One it will find.
Breaking the world, thought learns all things.
All being broken, the One it will find.
Eye loving beauty, the world is in hues.
Eye looking closer, the One it will find.
Look in your heart, unveil many things;
Mirror your heart, the One it will find.
Those who are lost will walk many ways,
wander unknowing. The One, it will find.
Maundy Thursday 2013
As we are here in flurry waiting
King who will bring victory,
our God another course is fating
through the road to Calvary.
Hail the hero overcoming
things beyond our minds to know,
not through beat of martial drumming,
walls that crash like Jericho,
but only gift, like servant lowly,
stooping down to wash the feet,
or man made sacrifice most holy
who, dying, will our death defeat!
I've often been struck by the fact that the Eastern name for the sacrament of Matrimony is 'coronation' or 'crowning'. In a Maronite wedding ceremony, bride and groom are literally crowned. The priest says:
Like a crown, God has adorned the earth with flowers, the heavens with stars, and the land with the sea. With a crown he has shown the special calling given to the holy kings, priests, prophets and apostles. In his bountiful mercy may he bless + these crowns through the prayers of the Mother of God and all the saints.
Then the groom is crowned with a wreath as the cantor sings from Psalm 21:2-5, and the priest continues:
May the Lord who crowned our holy fathers with justice look upon you with love. You have come to the holy Church seeking assistance, may the Lord bless you, protect you always, and lead you to everlasting life.
Then the bride is also crowned as the cantor sings from Psalm 45:11-14, and the priest continues:
May God who crowned all the holy women and blessed Sarah, Rebecca and Rachel, bless you, be merciful to you, and exalt you with the crown of glory. Adorned with fruits of the Spirit may you flourish as a blessed vine in the midst of the Church may the Lord God fill you with joy as you dwell with your husband in love and abiding peace; may you bring forth children pleasing to God; through the intercession of Mary, the Mother of God, and all the saints.
The specially designated witnesses are crowned as well.
The Melkites and Byzantine Catholics, about whom I know less, also do the same thing, with different ceremony, and I particularly like the Melkite hymn that is often sung: "O Lord our God, crown them with glory and honor, and grant them dominion over the works of your hands."
This sort of symbolism looks both ways, and are seen in quotations above. On the one hand, these are crowns of victory. As Chrysostom somewhat amusingly says in passing,
Youth is wild, and requires many governors, teachers, directors, attendants, and tutors; and after all these, it is a happiness if it be restrained. For as a horse not broken in, or a wild beast untamed, such is youth. But if from the beginning, from the earliest age, we fix it in good rules, much pains will not be required afterwards; for good habits formed will be to them as a law. Let us not suffer them to do anything which is agreeable but injurious; nor let us indulge them, as forsooth but children. Especially let us train them in chastity, for there is the very bane of youth. For this many struggles, much attention will be necessary. Let us take wives for them early, so that their brides may receive their bodies pure and unpolluted, so their loves will be more ardent. He that is chaste before marriage, much more will he be chaste after it; and he that practiced fornication before, will practice it after marriage. "All bread," it is said, "is sweet to the fornicator." Garlands are wont to be worn on the heads of bridegrooms, as a symbol of victory, betokening that they approach the marriage bed unconquered by pleasure. But if captivated by pleasure he has given himself up to harlots, why does he wear the garland, since he has been subdued?
Chrysostom's primary concern in context is completely elsewhere, but even in this passing reference we see the assumption of that the crown is "a symbol of victory". This past-looking element, that marriage is a state one wins through to is important, and I think increasingly overlooked in many discussions of 'singlehood' (which is not, as such, a state you win through to in any sense at all). And it is part of the dignity of marriage that you don't just fall into it: even to get there you have to win the privilege of the other person's consent. In turn, the point reflects on the dignity of human nature itself: the privilege of your consent is something worthy of being won.
The crowns are not merely victor's crowns, though; they look forward as well. We see this in the Melkite hymn quoted above: "crown them with glory and honor, and grant them dominion". I find the subtle insight of the second point particularly interesting. It's a reference to the story in Genesis 1, of course, and makes the point, often forgotten, that when God commands humanity to rule over fish and bird and living creature, it is to humanity as "male and female" who are to "be fruitful and multiply". All marriages are royal marriages.
I took a class once in college, years ago, on Wisdom Literature in the Old Testament, and one of the books required for the class used one of these deconstruction-reconstruction approaches to the text, or, rather, what some theologians today call 'deconstruction' and reconstruction, since it has only the loosest connection with serious deconstruction. In any case, it involves "exploring the problematics of the text", i.e., going out of your way to find something, anything, that could be regarded as a sign of bias in the text, regardless of how strained it may be. And in the discussion of the Song of Songs, the author pinned down one of the biases of the text as "crypto-monarchist" in its evaluational vocabulary. I've always thought that was rather laughably absurd; there is no "crypto" about it. You have only to read the book to see that it is explicitly using language for royalty and royal courts to evaluate the love between the Shulamite and her lover positively. And this is even more clear when you think through many of the metaphors by which the lover and the beloved describe each other: they are metaphors of military power, great wealth, vast territory, and courtly accompaniment. And how could it be otherwise? The whole point of a love song like this is that the crown of love is a more splendid wealth and dominion than any material kingdom. And this is a sense of things found throughout the world, among men and women alike: There is a royal dignity in such things.
If this is true in some degree of every marriage, then it is especially true of that marriage that serves as sign and symbol of the union of Christ and His Church, which is what the sacrament of Matrimony or mystery of Crowning designates. Christian marriage is always a sign of the Kingdom of God; even the botched ones that are at best defective signs of it. Marriage is a coronation.
Fortnightly Books, March 31
It is a remarkable feature of the nineteenth century that it managed to produce journalism as great literature. This was, of course, amidst a sea of journalism that was not great, but such is literature generally. In various ways we have been trying to imitate them since, for the most part unsuccessfully, although late blossoms like George Orwell or Myles na gCopaleen (Brian O'Nolan) have emerged. But, controversial although it may be, I think we can date the height of opinion journalism to Late Victorian and Edwardian Britain, in large part because we have at this point a large number of brilliant writers who deal with deep ideas on the democratic principle that they don't need to be watered down to be popular. When we look at this period and place, the list of greats actively involved in some form of it is considerable: G. K. Chesterton, Hilaire Belloc, J. M. Barrie, and many others. Among these greats was George Bernard Shaw, who received the Nobel Prize in Literature for 1925 (although he received the Prize in 1926); according to the committee in one of its very occasional moments of genuine literary discernment, it was given "for his work which is marked by both idealism and humanity, its stimulating satire often being infused with a singular poetic beauty".
The fortnightly book this time around will be Two Plays for Puritans, in a nice Heritage Press edition. This consists of two (as you might imagine) plays, The Devil's Disciple, subtitled "A Melodrama", and Caesar and Cleopatra, subtitled "A Page of History". These were originally published with another play, Captain Brassbound's Conversion, subtitled "A Play of Adventure", as Three Plays for Puritans. I have no idea why Heritage Press decided not to do a three-play version; the Sandglass merely says briefly of the third, "But unlike the ffirst two, the third play has never enjoyed continued acclaim." The edition includes line-and-wash illustrations by George Him and has a somewhat unusual twelve-point Plantin typeface, specified by Him himself, which apparently led to some difficulty in finding a printer who had the type.
Since I lack any edition of Captain Brassbound's Conversion, I have decided to make it up by adding another play in a different edition, Man and Superman, this edition being an earlier edition also by Heritage Press. It has illustrations by Charles Mozley. Included with this edition is a little booklet in red wrappers called The Revolutionist's Handbook & Pocket Companion, which is, of course, mentioned in the play itself and written by Shaw.
Shaw's plays, of course, are dramas of ideas, discussion plays, and between their Shavian prefaces and notes and stage directions that say things like "For at this time, remember, Mary Wollstonecraft is as yet only a girl of eighteen, and her Vindication of the Rights of Women is still fourteen years off", border on being novelettes. They dramatize well, but they are plays not merely for the stage but for the book.
And All Alone, Alone, Alone
Easter Night
All night had shout of men, and cry
Of woeful women filled His way;
Until that noon of sombre sky
On Friday, clamour and display
Smote Him; no solitude had He,
No silence, since Gethsemane.
Public was Death; but Power, but Might,
But Life again, but Victory,
Were hushed within the dead of night,
The shutter'd dark, the secrecy.
And all alone, alone, alone,
He rose again behind the stone.


I actually stumbled upon his videos a couple months ago. I think what he's doing is great. I do suspect he's still got a bit to learn about tanking and theory craft though as some of his choices seem a little off, like using healing pots instead of armor and using casts without maelstrom weapon up, which reduced his avoidance to 0, and not picking up Guardian Totems for the extra armor.
I definitely like seeing it though, and come on, you have to give props to the all shaman OS 10.
I will definitely be making a dwarf shaman in the next expac. I was thinking of making one anyway, but didn't want another draenei (I have a lvl 38 warrior).


BBK Season 5 Winner: Bigg Boss Kannada 5 Had been successfully entertaining us for the past 14 weeks and we are in the final stage of this awesome reality show. People had Cast their votes Every week for their favorite Nominated Housemate and saved them from Eliminations.However, One should be with a low number of votes and she/he was eliminated.Sadly, This Sudeep Hosted show will gonna end with as Usual Grand Finale.
Bigg Boss Kannada Season 5 Winner.
There are expectations from each corner.But who knows the truth and fate.We need to wait for some more days for season 5 winner.For one the winner of the season is one of the following persons.
The winner is announced on Sunday's in Grand Finale.Winner will be among this three Chandan, Diwakar, and Karthik.
Here is the Very Quick Recap of Season 5.Starting with the list of guests visited the house in season 5.
Kirik Keerthi-Teacher of Bigg House.He Acted as a teacher in the Bigg House for season 4 and season 5.
Shalini Satyanarayan-Entered the House as an Arts Teacher and also acted in the previous season as well.
Akul Balaji-A popular Icon of Season 2.He visited the house again in season 5 and stayed 2 days inside the house.
Samyuktha Hedge-Kirak Party fame Hedge visited the house with lasya and was eliminated for breaking the rules of the house.
Note: These lists were written up to the week 14.They will be soon updated.
Hope you will bookmark the page for Live updates during the Grand Finale.Share it with your Friends.
1 Bigg Boss Kannada Season 5 Winner.
1.0.1 The winner is announced on Sunday's in Grand Finale.Winner will be among this three Chandan, Diwakar, and Karthik.


The How Many Calories Should I Eat Cheat Sheet « Burn The Fat Blog – Tom Venuto.
I admit, sometimes I take certain nutrition facts for granted. It's probably because I'm so close to this subject and I've been a coach and practitioner for years. I realized this recently when I posted some articles referring to your "optimal daily calorie intake" but I didn't explain how to figure that number out. I got tons of email and comments from readers letting me know! I guess I thought it was common knowledge, but surprisingly, it seems most people don't know what their ideal calorie target should be, and to make matters worse, they get conflicting advice about how much to eat from various sources. Well, I'm here today to fix my oversight and bring us back to nutrition 101: How many calories should you eat?
I've summed it all up into a "cheat sheet" where you can get a ballpark figure instantly (if you don't like math) or get a very precise estimate of your actual calorie needs (if you don't mind crunching a few numbers). This is a page you'll definitely want to save and bookmark for reference.
Eating the right amount of calories to reach your goal whether that is burning fat or maintaining a healthy weight for life, doesn't have to be complicated. In fact, it can become totally intuitive and unconscious fairly quickly if you understand a few basic principles of energy balance and rules of nutrition.
By putting yourself into a feedback loop and using results-based thinking, it's possible for calculating or counting calories to eventually become optional. All you need to do is acknowledge the energy balance equation, become aware of your portion sizes and then increase or decrease your portions based on your weekly results (or alternately, adjust your activity level to produce the calorie deficit you need).
But that doesn't mean calories don't count. I can't emphasize enough the importance of maintaining a calorie deficit as an absolute requirement of cutting weight. If you choose from a list of high-quality, nutrient-dense, unprocessed foods that are not highly calorie-dense, that can be a great way to automatically control calories.
However, I also believe there is nothing more helpful to your long term success than learning about your optimal calorie and macronutrient numbers in the early stages of your fitness and fat loss quest. If you try to wing-it, guesstimate your numbers or "intuitively eat" from day one, you may never "get it." You could be shooting blindfolded for the rest of your life.
If you're going to track nutrition numbers, calories are the most important number to learn about first, then after that, you can divvy up those calories into the macronutrient split (protein, carbs and fat), that you prefer. Here are four simple methods to calculate your caloric needs. Depending on whether you're the analytical type or the "ballpark figure" type, select the method that suits your style the best.
Use this method if you want a general ballpark estimate and you don't like math!
* NOTE: These are average numbers, so they'll be reasonably accurate if your body size or activity level are average. If you're a statistical "outlier", ie, if you're very small-framed and or very sedentary, your calorie needs will be in the lower end of these ranges. If you're very large and or very active, your calories needs will be in the upper end of these ranges or even higher.
Use this formula if you want a personalized ballpark estimate with one quick calculation. Use the lower number for lightly active, the middle number for moderately active and the higher number for very active.
Use this formula for a very accurate estimate of your maintenance level if you know your body weight but not your body fat percentage. For fat loss, create a 20-30% deficit below maintenance.
Note: BMR = basal metabolic rate, which is the amount of energy you require for normal body functions at rest (does not include activity).
Use this formula for a very accurate estimate of your maintenance level if you know your body fat percentage and lean body mass. For fat loss, create a 20-30% deficit below maintenance.
Depending on your disposition, you can either crunch numbers or you can take a "ballpark figure" type of approach. Either way, the goal is the same: You have to be in a calorie deficit to burn fat. I hope you found the flexibility offered from these different formulas helpful and it put the whole "calorie calculating thing" in perspective for you.
I've written two books about fat loss where you can learn more. Burn The Fat, Feed The Muscle is based on bodybuilding, fitness and figure methods of fat loss. It is a structured, by-the-numbers program designed for maximum precision. If you're an accountant, engineer, or any other analytical or detail-oriented type (or a bodybuilder/physique athlete, of course), you will be in 7th heaven on Burn The Fat, Feed The Muscle.
The Body Fat Solution is based on lifestyle methods for the average male or female who is not a bodybuilder, but has excess body fat and wants to get lean. It is a more general-guideline, ballpark-figure type of approach. While not as precise, its flexibility will appeal more to the intuitive person, especially those who are busy, stressed, emotional eaters who don't have the patience or personality for crunching numbers. For more information, visit: www.TheBodyFatSolution.com.
ANSWER: It actually might be true. The Mifflin formula might be more accurate or at least more accurate in certain populations. Sometimes calorie formulas are developed for certain populations, much the same way as body fat regression equations are developed for certain populations. That includes different ages, races, genders and athletic statuses. I also know some trainers and nutritionists who recommend the Owen equation as well, above the Mifflin equation or the two I discussed in my post. Here's the thing: I can give you a pro and con list for every single formula out there – some don't factor in age, some don't factor in gender, some don't factor in athletic status and some don't factor in activity level at all – such as the quick formula, and that one is used very widely. What I do know is that the Katch McArdle and the Harris Benedict (as ancient as it is) formulas are good enough and then some, and I have used them for 25 years across broad populations of clients whose results I have tracked for months and they are close enough to do the job perfectly on a practical level. For that reason, worrying about which formula is the absolute best is just nit-picking, considering these are estimations anyway. The activity factor to calculate maintenance level (TDEE) from BMR is totally an estimation, so all things considered, all we are trying to accomplish here is get as accurate an estimate as possible to establish a baseline. In my Burn the Fat, Feed the Muscle program, I use a method called the FEEDBACK LOOP SYSTEM, which means that once you have established that initial baseline, you are finished with formulas anyway. You have gone from theory to practice, so at that point you should adjust your calories not based on theoretical (on paper) calculations, but on actual (real world) results on a week-to-week basis. So the bottom line is, if you know for certain that a specific calorie/metabolism formula applies to your demographic group, you could certainly favor that one, but in the bigger scheme of things, worrying about which calorie formula is absolutely most accurate is splitting hairs and no one should lose sleep over it.
Should You Eat More Fat?
Thanks for the insight Tom. I hate to admit it, but I am ballpark kind of guy. One thing: as we age, the numbers decrease slightly unless we actively try to replace the natural loss of muscle mass. For me, a male at age 56, I think about 1800 calories a day plus an hour of mild aerobic exercise insures weight loss.
Mike, in agreement with what you're saying, whats important always – for weight loss – is to achieve a calorie deficit. Whether you actually calculate your numbers and achieve your deficit, or you guess and achieve your deficit, the end result is the same. When it's MOST important to get serious about crunching numbers is when a person is stuck at a plateau and getting no results (because most people are guessing wrong). Its also important – ideal, in my opinion – for beginners to start out doing their calculations to get an education on calories – as well as protein, carbs and fat. After doing it by the numbers for a while it becomes automatic – you can become "unconscious competent" – and its no longer as important to count weight and measure all the time. I see counting, weighing and measuring as and educational tool not something that is a requirement for life. For example, at the moment, im not counting anything. Im just using the "feedback" method and paying attention to the portion sizes and paying attention to the results in my body each week and adjusting accordingly. Good nutrition simply becomes lifestyle after a while. The counting and tracking in the beginning helps you establish that lifestyle as habit. Should I compete again, i would surely break out the calculators, spreadsheets and food scale again. I could do that by feel as well, but competition is an other time that many athletes find doing it by the numbers important… and helpful.
Thank you for the expanded information which is very helpful. Using your book and the food list, I understand the general idea and try to eat clean most of the time. However, I am always confused when I eat food I cook from scratch. I can weigh four ounces of chicken or steak, make a salad, and add a vegetable from the list – this becomes dinner. But how do I know how many calories I am eating? Right now, I am boiling a chicken to make chicken salads for lunches next week, but I really have no clue how many calories I will end up with in the final product. If I buy something already prepared, of course that info is on the label, but I am developing the habit of not eating prepared foods. What to do?
Hello Angela, as Tom always says, these are all estimates to direct you into the right direction, you can have an estimate on the total amount of calories that a chicken breast has by checking(on the internet or any other source)how many calories per gram(or ounce) it has, then you just have to get a food scale and determine the weight and multiply the calories per gram (or ounce whatever you use)by the weight of your portion and you will know the number of calories that your portion has, do the same with the rest of the elements of your meal and their corespondent calorie value and add everything up, oil, sauces, dressing etc. this should give you a fair estimate on your calorie intake that you can modify if necessary after you weekly measurements where you will know if you're heading in the right direction. I hope that helps!
I just don't get it. I'm 6'1 288 lbs. very excited to begin the workout plan. And nutrition plan. But I'm suppose to eat almost 4800 calories a day! How do I burn that off??
Hey Shawn – check your numbers again. I just did mine using 3 of the methods and got around the same number. If you use the quick method for weight loss for yourself at 288 lbs you end up with 288 * 10 = 2880 calories per day (using the low end of the range for fat loss).


text:
Road from Hong Kong to Tammu-4
Source: Imphal Free Press
By R.K. Shivachandra
KUNMING: To Many South East Asian Countries Kunming is much more than a tourist destination. They consider it as a Holy Place, a land their ancestors belonged some 2000 years before from now. There was a strong inseparable cultural ties among Laos, Vietnam, Cambodia, Myanmar and Thailand. This was emboldened more with a general concept of being the same ancestral background and root. There are some minorities which has link with Tibet too. The old religious beliefs in South East Asia particularly among the youths have now replaced gradually by the concept of Confucianism that encouraged worshiping of ancestors. So people from all these countries traced back their ancestral root to Kunming. Today many such nations even Thailand has agreed to channel fund towards the glory of Kunming. As far as economy status is concerned, Laos and Cambodia are far below the economical graph but when it comes to the question of 'ancestral roots' there is no compromise. They will do everything deemed necessary. Many TAI groups that scattered around the South East Asia believed Yunan province to be the source of TAI groups. Some suggests that whole of the South East Asia are Shans (TAI groups). In the fashion filled, helter –skelter city that completely rebuild itself every passing year and amidst the cut throat rat race of the Asian Countries a new wave has been spread like a wildfire known as "Root of identity".
When we reached Kunming we were being greeted by a placid and welcoming weather unlike the one in Central China. Yunan has been known as "South of the Clouds" because of its attractive city Kunming. It is the political, economic, communications and cultural centre of Yunan, and is the seat of the provincial government. It is also home to several universities, museums, galleries and other important economic, cultural, and educational institutions. Kunming has an estimated population of 5,740,000 including 3,055,000 in the urban area.
Kunming with lovely mountains all around and with her vast assets appeared before me "A dream Manipur after 400 years from now" however it may be a bed dream, a utopian concept perhaps. The present situation is too discouraging. I have a craze of colourful mountains and hills. They are romantic in nature. The good book says "Mountains are the stairway to God". But mountains and hills in Manipur tells different story. The lovely mountains and lush green landscape that often described to be the Switzerland in East has no longer inspired the humble poet to write his mesmerizing verse any more. Thanks to the wheel of time. Had Dr. kamal ever born at this point of time his great work "Ureirei Madhavi" would not have seen the light of the day. Which crazy poet would reach for his pen to portray the scenery of misdeeds that buried in the plains and greenery of hills? Who will describe the beauty of the misty hills and heavenly whites when every second ticks 'Alarm'? Alas! Tears ran down from the bright eyes of the innocents, endeavouring to negotiate its way to the streams of justice yet its level could not reach to the crime maniac souls. They have no tears obviously suffered from xerophthalmia-the eyes with no tears ailment. So peace is still a cry in wilderness.
Till the sounds of crackers are drowned amidst the misty mountains and the burning flames are doused off by sprinkling holy water of brotherhood, nothing can stop Manipur from her devastation. We the indigenous people of Manipur can only stop it, defusing the countdown. We are the best for the job. Waiting for some one to come and help us is indeed an absurd concept. As absurd as the play of Samuel Beckett's"Waiting for Godot", in which two parsons waiting for someone named Godot for two days who they have never seen in life. They claimed him as an acquaintance but Infact they hardly know him. Why should we wait him for? Even if he comes he will claim the pound of flesh, the pumping meat next to your heart with his blazing dagger. Think of something if what we can start again. Once we are formed into one only then prepare to meet the mightiest empire the World has ever known and you will emerge out with triumphant cup. Thinking of separate race, separate entity and slice it off in this already small state of ours is simply flying with the mischievous fairies.
Back to our visit to Kunming -Hotels in Kunming are of reasonable rates and foods are unbelievably cheap. It is always suggested that we go for the road side vendors instead of going to the expensive restaurants. If you can perform some acts of body language you may be allowed to cook yourselves in the roadside vendors. They always co-operate with us subject to the correct approach that demands modesty and well manner. But never expect your English will make its way in Kunming. They speak no language other than the Chinese. So believe in yourself and try to act what you want through your body's act.
In Kunming we should not visit the trendy fashion houses if you are looking out for the cheaper clothing. The nearby shops of Kunming flowers and birds market are the best and there are many market places which are worth visiting. It will be wrong to give a full account of Kunming in four days experience but definitely the city is an eye opener for the people in the North eastern part of India. Never think of travelling a long distance from Kolkata but think of travelling by your own border roads in a low cost affair with a vision of border tourism which can be later coordinated with trade and commerce.
Kunming is among the four greatest cities in China. The City attracts more tourists who loved to travel to Hanoi in Vietnam, Mandalay in Myanmar and Laos. Trains to Hekou the border to Vietnam leave from the North train station and tickets can be purchased instantly. We can also travel by bus. It takes about 12 hours to reach the border of Vietnam. Visas can be obtained at Vietnam Consulate office. Yunnan shares border with 4 Vietnamese provinces, namely Dien Bien, Lai Chau, Lao Cai and Ha Giang. The people of Yunnan have long enjoyed friendly relations with their Vietnamese neighbours. Laos is easier to travel for there is visa on arrival system.
Likewise from Zegao in China we can travel to Myanmar after completion of immigration formalities where our visa will be stamped out means out from china.For such trip we need to apply double entry visa for China and visa for Myanmar also needed to be arranged in advance from Kolkata. There is no visa on arrival facilities at both the borders. As of now we need to contact a travel agency in Myanmar before such trip. A Myanmar government guide will escort us up to Lashio about 250 Kms from the border than we will be allowed to look after ourselves. Never carry the old fashioned Indian Passport that is hand written. Please change it to the computerised printing otherwise you could land in trouble. My friend Maibam Boudhajit who possessed a hand written passport was detained sometime at the border by one handsome but dreaded looking Immigration official. Ultimately he was released after volleys of questions, queries bombarded on him. The moment was disembarrassing for three of us have already cleared and landed in Myanmar soil. He was only the one left out in China. On the denial of the official he can either be arrested till further clarification was made or he can be sent back to Kunming from there he can catch a flight to India.
Anyway despite all hurdles things came out of the blues that after a long torturing investigation we four united again. We bade goodbye to China thereafter proceeded to the Muse town where our Myanmar guide was waiting for us.
Previous articleCRPF win in Sangita memorial football
Next articleOf Fossil and Spectacle

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Praga E-51 byl prototyp velmi zajímavého a pokrokově řešeného průzkumného a lehkého bombardovacího letounu. Letoun podle projektu Ing. Jaroslava Šlechty byl zalétán až květnu 1938 a pro případnou obranu republiky tak přišel příliš pozdě. Jednalo se však o konstrukčně nejzajímavější stroj československého prvorepublikového leteckého průmyslu a zaujal tak významné místo v historii československého letectví nejen kvůli své originalitě, ale také jako příklad toho, jak dramatické jsou cesty technologického pokroku.

Vznik a vývoj
Netradičně řešený projekt ing. Jaroslava Šlechty vzniklý v roce 1936 byl reakcí na vypsané takticko-technické podmínky (Specifikace pro nový vojenský letoun, typu III.) Ministerstva národní obrany (MNO) pro konstrukci průzkumného letounu pro frontovou oblast. Třímístný průzkumný a pozorovací letoun krátkého dosahu měl být schopen mapovat situaci v týlu nepřítele. V zakázce byl kladen důraz na dobrou viditelnost z letounu a na co nejlepší umístění palubních kamer. Ty měly umožňovat při jediném průletu co nejvíce snímků s nejširším záběrem. Nový stroj měl nahradit zastarávající letouny Letov Š-328 a Aero A-100. Soutěže se zúčastnily tři firmy, které nabídly letouny: Letov Š-50, ČKD-Praga E-51 a Aero A-304.

Koncepcí E-51 byl dvoutrupový samonostný středoplošník, se střední trupovou gondolou pro osádku a výzbroj a se dvěma nosníky ocasních ploch, které vycházely z prodloužení motorových gondol. Toto řešení letounu nemělo oporu v žádné z dosavadních konstrukcí Jaroslava Šlechty. Požadavku maximální rychlosti, aby letoun unikl nepřátelským stíhačům, byl logicky podřízen výběr vhodného motoru. Ing. Šlechta pracoval se třemi možnostmi motorů: řadový Praga FR o výkonu 456 kW/620 k, invertní vidlicový dvanáctiválec Walter Sagitta o výkonu 367-412 kW/500-560 k a hvězdicový Avia Rk-17 o výkonu 261 kW/355 k. Motor Praga FR byl v období tvorby projektu pouze ve výkresech a nemohl být tedy použit. Motor Avia Rk-17 byl výkonově z této trojice nejslabší a tak volba padla na Sagittu. Byla to první (a jediná) aplikace, kdy se tento československý motor z Akciové společnosti Walter, továrny na automobily a letecké motory, Praha XVII – Jinonice uplatnil na československé konstrukci letounu.

Letoun byl postaven z domácího materiálu a byla na něj použita výstroj až na malé výjimky domácího původu. Jednoduchá stavba kostry ze dřeva a svařovaných ocelových trubek umožňovala snadnou výrobu, opravy i obsluhu a trvanlivost povlaků dovolovala ponechávat letoun během služby pod širým nebem. Uvádí se, že byl navržen dříve než letoun podobného typu letadla Fokker G.1 (1937).

Na prototypu letounu se v karlínském, letadlovém oddělení Praga z Českomoravské Kolben-Daněk a.s. pracovalo v letech 1937-8. Po prvním záletu na jaře 1938 se řešily problémy s chvěním ocasních ploch a s chlazením motorů. Po úpravách, které se týkaly úpravy křídel, nosníků ocasních ploch a trupových gondol, prototyp opětovně vzlétl v únoru 1939. Vzhledem k relativně malé hodnotě stoupavosti (6,6 m/s) se uvažovalo o instalaci výkonnějších motorů Gnome et Rhône 14M Mars o výkonu 427-515 kW/580-700 k, které od roku 1937 pod označením Walter Mars 14 M licenčně vyráběla továrna Walter, ale k této instalaci alternativních motorů již nedošlo. Přesto díky svým dobrým aerodynamickým tvarům dosahoval letoun vysokých letových výkonů v poměru k výkonnosti použitých motorů.

Letoun byl i dvakrát předváděn zahraničním delegacím, v létě 1938 a v únoru 1939 spolu s letadly Praga E-39, E-241, Letov Š-50 a Aero A-304. Letoun E-51 byl poslední předválečnou konstrukcí továrny Praga.

Popis letounu
E-51 byl dvoumotorový dvoutrupý třímístný středoplošník s trupovou gondolou, s pevným záďovým podvozkem a uzavřenou kabinou pro tříčlennou osádku. Kostra trupových gondol a nosníky ocasních ploch byly svařeny z CrMo ocelových trubek a potaženy byly plátnem. Kostra třídílného křídla byla celodřevěná a byla potažena ztuženou, bakelizovanou překližkou. Štěrbinová křidélka a vztlakové klapky na křídle byly z chrom-molybdenových trubek potažených plátnem. Ocasní plochy byly ze dřeva, pouze výškové kormidlo bylo z oceli potaženo dýhou. Ostatní ocasní plochy měly plátěný potah. Osádku letounu tvořili pilot (v centrální gondole, na levé straně), střelec a pozorovatel. Tříčlenná posádka měla svá stanoviště v trupové gondole, pozorovatel v bohatě prosklené (plexisklo) přídi obsluhoval trojici kamer, za ním se nacházel kokpit pilota a vzadu měl své místo střelec bránící pohyblivým kulometem letoun před útoky stíhačů ze zadní polosféry.

Letoun byl poháněn dvěma vzduchem chlazenými invertními dvanáctiválcovými vidlicovými motory Walter Sagitta I-MR s reduktorem 3:2 a s kompresorem o nominálním, jmenovitém výkonu 500 k (367 kW) při 2500 ot/min a vzletovém, startovacím výkonu 560 k (412 kW) při 2500 ot/min. Při stoupání byl výkon 600 k (441 kW) při 2500 ot/min a ve výšce 2300 m měl motor výkon 550 k (404 kW) při 2500 ot/min. Ještě vyšší výkon měl motor ve výšce 2500 m, kdy dosahoval 560 k (412 kW) při 2600 ot/min. Krycí plechy motorové kapotáže byly vyrobeny z duralových plechů. Motory byly osazeny třílistými na zemi stavitelnými kovovými vrtulemi Ratier o průměru 2,65 m, později Letov, ale motory mohly nést i samočinně přestavitelné vrtule např. Hamilton Standard.

Každé kolo podvozku (rozchod kol 4,0 m) bylo upnuto ve svařované vidlici z ocelového plechu a bylo neseno kluznou tyčí olejo-pneumatického tlumiče. Podvozková noha byla vetknuta v kostře postranního trupu pod předním podélníkem křídla. Kola i pevné nohy byly opatřeny kapotáží, snadno odnímatelnými aerodynamickými kryty. Normalizovaná kola byla brzděna pneumatickými brzdami typu ČKD-Dunlop.

Letoun byl mimo dvou kulometů vz. 30 (pevně lafetovanavý kulomet ovládal pilot a pohyblivou zbraň střelec) a leteckých pum o hmotnosti až 500 kg (v interní pumovnici a na křídelních závěsnících) vybaven radiostanicí vz. 26/34 a do přídě byly zavěšeny až tři fotografické kamery A-II-30, které mohly snímat trojici navzájem se překrývajících snímků. Kamery ovládal operátor umístěný v prosklené přídi trupové gondoly. Každé pracoviště osádky bylo vybaveno dýchacím přístrojem, jemuž zdrojem plynu byla tlaková, dvoulitrová láhev s kyslíkem. Přestože měl letoun pevný podvozek byl schopen dosáhnout maximální rychlosti až 380 km/h, čímž překoval zadání v požadavcích MNO o 80 km/h. Průzkumný letoun tedy byl svou maximální rychlostí rovnocenný standardní stíhačce té doby - Avii B-534.

Použití
Stroj byl zalétán v podvečer 26. května 1938 ještě s otočnou střeleckou věží na zádi trupové gondoly typu Armstrong-Whitworth, licencovanou společností Tatra. Věž však způsobovala velké aerodynamické problémy hlavně v oblasti ocasních ploch, takže byla sejmuta a na zádi se objevilo aerodynamicky příznivěji vyřešené střeliště, otočné kolem podélné osy. Další lety s první verzí prototypu byly uskutečněny 30.-31. května a 2. června. První fáze zkoušek skončila 13. července 1938, kdy byl prototyp, spolu s bombardéry Aero A-300 a Avia B-158, předveden zahraničním hostům na letišti Kbely. Následující den byl letoun rozebrán a převezen do továrny, kde byly zahájeny rozsáhlé úpravy, které trvaly až do konce roku 1938.

Po druhém záletu (11. února 1939) se přesto dále projevovaly některé nedostatky (s vyvážením a s motory), které nebyly do německé okupace do března 1939 spolehlivě vyřešeny. Po obsazení zbytku Česko-Slovenska Německem byl stroj zabaven, ale německá vojenská správa nařídila pokračování ve vývoji. Další vzlet upraveného stroje se uskutečnil koncem července 1939. Ani poté problémy s motory a chvěním ocasních ploch nevymizely. Příčina chvění byla odhalena až v květnu 1940. Původcem problému byla kapota ostruhy, která se kvůli turbulenci proudu vzduchu za letu samovolně otáčela. Nakonec byla kapotáž odstraněna a následný zkušební let 4. června 1940 zcela potvrdil správnost tohoto rozhodnutí.

Posléze 21. června 1940 letoun od Luftwaffe převzalo říšské ministerstvo letectví a německý pilot August Hayn s ním přelétl na zkušební základnu do Rechlinu. Letoun byl tak předán vojenským expertům a konstruktérům v Rechlinu ke zkoumání. Údajně letoun skončil jako studijní materiál u německé firmy Klemm v Böblingenu. Do výroby byl již zaváděn německý ekvivalent tohoto letounu, Focke-Wulf Fw 189 (1940) s podobnými vlastnostmi a vizáží, proto letoun E-51 nebyl doporučen do výroby. V říjnu 1940 byl závod ČKD-Praga přejmenován na Českomoravské strojírny a. s., Böhmish-Mährische Maschninenfabriken AG, Prag.

Zajímavost
Republika Burundi, malý vnitrozemský stát v jihovýchodní Africe, začala v roce 2014 vydávat sérii mincí na téma Historie letectví. V roce 2014 vyšly první tři vzorky mincí, které zobrazovaly německý letoun Messerschmitt Bf 109, polský PZL P.11 a sovětský Jakovlev Jak-7B. V roce 2015 do série přibylo dalších sedm motivů. Jedním z nich byl i československý letoun Praga E-51 na minci Burundi o nominální hodnotě 5 000 burundských franků (BIF). Mince byla vyrobena ze stříbra a byla vyražena v nákladu 1938 kusů, podle roku prvního letu letounu Praga E-51.

Specifikace
Údaje dle

Technické údaje
 Osádka: 3
 Rozpětí: 15,60 m
 Délka: 11,69 m
 Výška: 3,53 m
 Nosná plocha: 35,44 m2
 Plošné zatížení: 116,5 kg/m2
 Hmotnost prázd. vystrojeného letounu: 3 102 kg
 Užitečné zatížení: 1 018 kg
 Vzletová hmotnost norm.: 4 120 kg
 Max. vzletová hmotnost: 4 536 kg
 Pohonná jednotka: 2× invertní vzduchem chlazený dvanáctiválcový motor Walter Sagitta I-MR
 nominální, jmenovitý výkon: 500 k (367,6 kW) při 2500 ot/min
 vzletový, startovací výkon: 560 k (411,8 kW) při 2500 ot/min
 Vrtule: třílistá, kovová, na zemi stavitelná Letov

Výkony s letovou hmot. 4 120 kg
 Cestovní rychlost: 330 km/h
 Max. rychlost ve výšce 2 500 m: 380 km/h
 Max. rychlost ve výšce 0 m: 335 km/h
 Min. rychlost bez klapek: 125 km/h
 Přistávací rychlost s klap.: 105 km/h
 Dolet: 900 km s 542 kg paliva, 1200 km s 746 kg paliva
 Vytrvalost: 3 h 48 min
 Praktický dostup: 7 000 m
 Počáteční stoupavost: 6,6 m/s
 Stoupavost ve výšce 1 500 m: 8 m/s
 Výstup na 3 000 m: 7,5 min
 Dostup na jeden motor: 3 100 m
 Délka rozjezdu: 310 m
 Délka dojezdu: 300 m

Výzbroj
 1× pevný kulomet vz. 30 ráže 7,92 mm, 300 nábojů
 1× pohyblivý kulomet vz. 30 ráže 7,92 mm, 540 nábojů
 500 kg bomb (1× 200 kg, 6× 50 kg)

Odkazy

Reference

Literatura

 FIDLER, J. SLUKA, V. Encyklopedie branné moci Republiky československé 1920-38, Libri 2006. .
 KUČERA, Pavel: Československé prototypy 1938, Nevojice: Jakab, 2007. 112 s.,

Externí odkazy

 Praga E-51 na vhu.cz
 PRAGA E-51 na vinar.cz
 Praga E-51 (ČSR) na panzernet.net
 Praga E-51: moderní československý průzkumník na iDNES/blog

Československá průzkumná letadla
E-51
Letecké prototypy

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


Cambridge ideas change the world and Cambridge Network members are enjoying increasing exposure on the world stage. Here we provide links to some of the stories about Cambridge Network members covered recently in the local, national and international media.
Please note this list is not exhaustive. Content courtesy of individual members and Google Alerts.
Who are Britain's fastest-growing start-up technology businesses? New data from Beauhurst, the research group that specialises in privately-owned companies, purports to have the answer – and while some of the names on its list will be familiar, others may be less so.
Microsoft appears to be in a benevolent mood after deciding to make its cross-platform machine learning framework open source. The company's Infer.NET framework is used for model-based machine learning. It was first born at Microsoft Research in Cambridge, UK in 2004 and later released for academic use in 2008.
Identifying and using vacant "white space" spectrum for Wi-Fi may get simpler, more efficient, and cheaper thanks to a new project by Microsoft and a team of Chinese researchers.
Is Google searching for office space in Cambridge?
"The implicit feel of where you are in a physical book turns out to be more important than we realized," says Abigail Sellen of Microsoft Research Cambridge in England and co-author of The Myth of the Paperless Office.
Check out some boards that bring LoRa technology into play, for the Raspberry Pi, Arduino and micro:bit, and such like single board computers.
A Raspberry Pi is a sensitive electronic device. We tend to forget that when we're making all sorts of things or even just making lights blink, but it's a computer and subject to the same dangers as any other computer. Putting it inside a case is a must!
Need a little bit of help in the kitchen? Here's how to build a Bake Mate—a baking assistant that weighs your ingredients, tells you how much of each you will need, and performs several other handy functions.
The Raspberry Pi Foundation recently released the Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+ with refreshed hardware. The new single board computer retains its predecessor's $35 price tag while including a tweaked SoC with faster clockspeeds and improved power management as well as moves to modern Gigabit ..
Raspberry Pi overheating? ... Microsoft has released a tutorial on how to stop the $35 credit card-sized Raspberry Pi computer from overheating.
The Raspberry Pi was first introduced years ago as a tool to promote coding. The price point was affordable and it had the ability to accept different components to expand its original feature set. This has led to many unique projects, one of which, is the Pi-Top modular laptop.
A MODDER has created the 'Raspberry Pi 3 Slim', a sized-down version of the pocket PC that measures in at just 7mm thick.
Today the Raspberry Pi Foundation has introduced the Raspberry Pi Integrator Program to help companies develop safe and legal products powered by the Raspberry Pi mini PC.
Developer Chris Riebschlager and the people at Dimensional Innovations have created a playable Raspberry Pi guitar that stands at 12 feet (3.6 metres) tall for the Boulevardia music festival.
Physics teacher Daniel Rosales shows off a modified Raspberry Pi computer that someday may measure greenhouse gases in the Napa Valley.
Last week, The MagPi released the latest issue of its magazine along with a free DIY project kit to build a smart hub powered by Google Assistant. Tech enthusiasts need only a Raspberry Pi board to set up the project.
Microsoft has finally launched the much anticipated Anniversary Update for the Windows 10 IoT core, which was released in August last year. Notably, the Windows 10 IoT core is now officially available for the Raspberry Pi 3 with some notable changes.
Over the past few months the Raspberry Pi Foundation has been working closely with startup development company Trinket, to develop a web-based emulator for the Sense HAT.
National Portrait Gallery's Taylor Wessing Photographic Portrait Prize innovates again by opening up the world-famous competition - with a £15,000 prize - to digital entries, as previous winners discuss how their careers took off despite the award's ongoing controversial reputation.
Taylor Wessing is set to convert into an all equity partnership on 1 May following a lengthy review and partnership vote held last week.
International Law firm Taylor Wessing has announced its support for a major private floating island villas project that will come up on 'The World Islands' development in Dubai, UAE. The exclusive villas project is being developed by Kuwait-based Oqyana Real Estate and floating island expert Dutch Docklands. A major highlight of the project will be its privacy as each private floating island will house just one villa - the pinnacle of exclusive island living.
Taylor Wessing has traditionally performed badly compared to its top 20 peers when it comes to making up female partners.
Taylor Wessing has advised 'Forces' Sweetheart' Dame Vera Lynn and her company on the release of previously unreleased recordings in a new album — Vera Lynn: National Treasure — The Ultimate Collection — celebrating her 90 years in show business.
The stars of Downton Abbey joined Taylor Wessing for a gala dinner at the Bloomsbury Ballroom on 27 March, raising more than £70,000 for Changing Faces, a charity for people living with conditions, marks or scars that affect their appearance.
Hermann Hauser, the founder of ARM Holdings, believes big pharma is poised for its own "Kodak moment" as healthcare moves away from drugs and towards artificial intelligence.
Sequoia, Amadeus Capital Partners and Phenomen Ventures all say they expect to make more investments there this year. While China and India are the top developing-nation recipients of venture cash, Brazil's share of the total is rising.
TechCrunch reports that analytics company ClickTale announced that it has secured $17 million in a round of funding, led by Amadeus Capital Partners, along with participation from Goldrock Capital and Viola Credit.
Hermann Hauser knows more than most people about growing a successful business. The Austrian-born, Cambridge-based scientist, entrepreneur and grandee of the British computing industry has helped start seven companies including Acorn Computers and its spin-out ARM Holdings.
Amadeus Capital Partners is considering making direct investments in companies in China, a move that industry figures said would make it the first major European venture capital firm to invest directly into the region.
Johnson Matthey has revealed a refreshed brand identity. The new identity "inspiring science, enhancing life", reflects its position as a science-led company which has a major positive impact.
Den Jones, who recently served as interim CFO for oil and gas company BG Group, joins Johnson Matthey.
Stringent regulations aimed at minimizing vehicle emissions have spurred the global emission control catalyst market, led by Johnson Matthey, BASF and Umicore in the mobile segment, and Cormetech in the stationary segment, according to Frost & Sullivan.
London - Johnson Matthey, the world's top supplier of catalytic converters, said on Monday it would stop publishing its platinum review after 28 years of a report widely seen as the industry standard for platinum group metals.
LONDON--Chemicals company Johnson Matthey PLC Wednesday reported that trading in the third quarter was challenging, with its adjusted pretax profit down 19% compared with the same period last year.
LONDON (Reuters) - Platinum refiner Johnson Matthey PLC (JMAT.L) saw profits dip in the third quarter because of lower sales of catalysts for vehicle exhaust systems in the high-value diesel category in Europe and weaker demand in Japan.
PA Consulting has taken on a lease of two floors in the new Verde SW1 redevelopment project in the London West End.
PA Consulting Group has announced the appointment of Marcus Agius as Non-Executive Chairman as of 1 January 2014.
Up to 30 higher-education institutions could face closure or merger within the next few years, according to a survey of university leaders. The survey, by the PA Consulting Group, reveals 77 per cent of the university leaders interviewed believed a number of universities will fail or go bankrupt as a result of government higher-education reforms and dwindling student applications.
As you enter Abcam's laboratories on the leafy outskirts of Cambridge, the company's mascot, Molly the sheep, is everywhere to be seen.
Cambridge's greatest ever technology business – chip architect ARM Holdings – is reportedly being sold to the Japanese for $31 billion (£23.4bn) – the largest deal in the UK cluster's history by some distance and the biggest in European technology annals.
SoftBank Group of Japan has promised to fund ongoing growth of ARM's Cambridge HQ and double UK headcount in the next five years after the boards agreed a $31 billion (£24.3bn) cash takeover.
The founder of ARM Holdings has told the BBC he believes its imminent sale to Japanese technology giant Softbank is "a sad day for technology in Britain".
Sonics, a long-time vendor of on-chip networking intellectual property, has announced that processor IP licensor ARM has taken a license to the Sonics patent portfolio and that the move signals closer cooperation between the two companies on Sonics' next-generation on-chip interconnect offering.
Allergan, leading medical aesthetics company, has entered into a partnership with England's Anglia Ruskin University to develop a master's degree programme in non-invasive facial aesthetics for physicians practicing in the Asia-Pacific region.
Hermann Hauser's "5th Wave" talk at Anglia Ruskin University on Thursday took an unexpected turn when Dr Hauser introduced a "6th Wave" into proceedings, saying that the fifth wave of smartphones and cloud computing is now giving way to "ubiquitous computing and machine learning."
Companies from across the medical technology sector will be offered improved access to the NHS and global markets when the Anglia Ruskin MedTech Campus launches its Business Network Services on Wednesday, 13 March.
MARSHALL is used to putting helicopters on the launchpad, but now the aerospace company has set up a new initiative that it hopes will set young people on the path to careers in engineering. The Marshall Launchpad scholarship aims to provide support, experiences and opportunities of engineering and related topics for children and young people aged 8-18.
You can't spend all day sitting at the computer, but sometimes remote access is almost as good. VNC Viewer from Real VNC is a way for you to connect to a computer through any number of VNC clients, and it's pretty popular. However, it used to be a $10 app. Put your wallet away – it's free now.
RealVNC provides remote access software for desktop and mobile platforms enabling users to access and control one device from another.
I'm a big fan of having access to an attendance list before a networking event, primarily so I can plan who I'd like to speak to and what I'd like to talk to them about, even if I don't recognise any of the names on it. However, when I received the list prior to my Cambridge Network visit last week, I saw immediately how much of a challenge this would be as on the list was an incredible number of approximately 200 names registered to attend.
Demonstrating that Cambridge has much to teach, as well as learn, Red Gate Software is jointly spearheading a mentoring programme for early stage and fast growth Singaporean tech entrepreneurs.
The largest ever Prime Ministerial trade delegation arrived in India today and among the companies and institutions represented are Marshall of Cambridge, Red Gate Software, and Cambridge University.


Sφera (2018) is a multichannel sound environment where the physical presence of sound and the ongoing engagement become the priority. Loudspeaker Design experiments, Ambisonics/3D Audio and Contemporary Dance amalgamate through a symphony of a hand-built multicell horn speaker, a hand built subwoofer and the Sonible IKO ambisonics speaker. A major part of the installation, pays tribute to the mournful sound of the Foghorn, using original recordings from the field performance Foghorn Requiem (2013), where 50 ships sounded their horns to a score taking into account landscape and the physical distance of sound. Sφera derives from the philosophical principles of the Greek philosopher Parmenides, who was interested in the spherical perception of being-in-the-world.