What is Capacity Planning Software?
Capacity planning software allows you to use data to be pro-active about future resource planning. This helps you meet the demands of tomorrow.
It was originally developed to manage IT networks. Now it is now used to plan for many types of business. It applies anywhere you can use data to plan to meet future demands. It helps business respond to changes — both positive and negative.
At Bric, we believe that capacity planning software can help creatives build better businesses. We are making it easy to use data to plan for the future. This is especially important for creative agencies. Each day brings new demands from people, budgets, and projects. You must plan even though each day is unique.
Project planning, budget adjustments, and managing employee utilization is enough to drive a person crazy. For creative agencies with more than a handful of employees the human mind can't accurately plan for upcoming demands.
The good news is that we have computers and software. By collaborating, we can create more accurate project plans, and keep up with demand. Software for the win!
At its most basic, capacity planning software helps creative agencies create more accurate project plans. This solves a myriad of problems including: going over budget, missing deadlines, underutilizing employees, and needing employees to work overtime. As we explore later, some software does this better than others.
Collects data about project size and scope.
Makes it easy to apply data from past projects to plan new projects.
Enables user-friendly time tracking for both invoicing and data collection.
Provides visually appealing project boards so everyone can view who is working on what projects.
Predicts how much time certain projects will take, and informs users when projects take too long or go over budget.
Alerts managers to employees that are ready for a new projects.
To-do lists, payroll applications, and instant communication softwares help with capacity planning. But they are only capable of doing one small part of capacity planning. The data collected through time tracking and project planning is what sets these softwares above competing applications, and for that matter the human mind.
When you analyze data from past projects in a split second to plan for future projects — this can be the difference of thousands of dollars when a new client walks through the door and asks for a proposal. Relying on data takes the guesswork away, which means less room for inaccuracies and more money in your agency's bank account.
How do Capacity Planning Softwares Compare?
With the motto of "good teams plans, great teams execute" LiquidPlanner prides itself as a "revolutionary" capacity planning software. It certainly has some reason to brag. It offers visibility on all projects to all users, and stacks up multiple projects to be viewed at the same time. Backed by data, LiquidPlanner offers "best" and "worst" case scenarios for estimated project completion times so teams can plan around different scenarios. Drag and drop tools make collaboration on the road more accessible.
The downside of LiquidPlanner is its aesthetic. Although users can compare multiple projects at once, the software is cluttered with shapes and colors — reducing the ease of use. It's also pricy, at almost $30 per user per month.
Workfront Project Management Software was designed specifically for marketing teams. It's aim is to turn chaos into collaboration. Unlike LiquidPlanner, Workfront offers tools for employee scheduling. Project managers aren't the only ones who can view open portfolios. Any user can track progress. With a focus on communication, Workfront helps minimize time writing e-mails and sitting in meetings.
Unfortunately, Workfront's pros are also its cons. You can't simply jump in and start working on this software. It can take weeks to set up, and, like LiquidPlanner, it rings in at $30 per month per user. Succeeding at an overall managerial level, neither Workfront nor LiquidPlanner offer employee skill tracking tools.
Bric is Capacity Planning Software for Creatives.
We didn't build Bric for any and all management teams. We built it for creative agencies, or even more specifically, creative people. Creative people understand the uphill battle of balancing office life with the machinations of an artistic mind.
But it doesn't mean they like it. Bric takes away the stress of managing budget, time, and employees out of the creative process. At $7 per user per month, each employee at an agency can access their current projects on the "dashboard." From there, they can see how many projects they have going on, how many hours they have left in their week, and if they are on staying on track with their budget.
Office managers can log in to view overviews of all projects worked on. From there, they can assess who has time to take on a new project, who is overbooked, and who has mastered a new skill and is ready to learn a new one.
This alleviates the battle creativity versus management. Bric is not just a platform to post projects and communicate with co-workers, it's a user friendly map of an entire creative agency — past, present, and future.
How to Start Using Capacity Planning Software.
Setup. To work best you need to teach the software about your company. It needs information. Without full names, roles, clients, and project types your user experience will be limited. For example, Bric uses this information to help you save time when planning projects and tracking time.
Talk with Your Team. Your team needs to understand that using capacity planning software will help them avoid being over or under scheduled, and that tracking time today will help create more accurate project plans in the future.
Don't Backdate. Likely, you and your team have current projects. Don't worry about what has happened. Capacity planning software helps you plan and track time, and you can only plan for the future. If you are half-way through a project, just start by planning for next week.
Pick a Start Date. Once you have got everything setup, and talked with your team, pick a start date. The date that everyone should start using the software to track time and plan projects.
Avoid Over Planning. The magic is that it forces you to treat your team like professionals. They know what to do, and have enough time to finish the work. Don't worry about planning each step. If your team needs that they will ask.
Why is Capacity Planning Software Important?
Success is hard. You have to have talent, vision, and strategy. The creative industry has been leveled by inexpensive technology. It is easier than ever to start an agency. That combined with globalization, has put intense pressure on pricing — reducing profit margins. Profit now requires that you optimize your team's time and skills.
Capacity planning software helps you do this. It helps you manage your employee utilization rate by telling you how your employees are spending their time. You can know who is busy, who is free, and what percentage of time is being billed to clients. It is the key to improving your profitability.
According to AIGA, the minimum recommended employee utilization rate is 65% for creative agencies. Yet the US average is 42%. This means that a 10-person creative firm is losing more than $650,000 in profit annually. This can be the difference between breaking even and making a profit. Capacity planning software can optimize how people are using there time, thus increasing employee utilization rates and profitability — learn more.
Capacity planning helps you increase your employee utilization rates. Your employee utilization rate The best way to improve your employee utilization rate is with planning. Optimizing how your team will spend their time week by week. Just keep in mind the goal is not 100% utilization that will result in 100% gridlock and burnout.
Think of capacity planning as an opportunity. We've created technology that goes above what any human mind could map out. We've created tools to analyze the past and make predictions on the future with more accuracy than many other softwares that exist.
With Bric, you can count on the sustainability of your business. Less blips. Less slips. Less dips. More profit. Try Bric Free for 30 Days.


During this Very brief creation, Prof Lord John Krebs presents a short historical past of human nutrients, from our distant ancestors three million years in the past to the current day. via taking a look at the 4 nice transitions in human meals - cooking, agriculture, processing, and renovation - he considers quite a few questions, together with why humans like a few sorts of meals and never others; how your senses give a contribution to taste; the position of genetics in our likes and dislikes; and the variations in studying and tradition around the globe.
Imagine sooner than you consume * pick out the simplest elements you could have enough money * comprehend style, and pack us a lot of it as you could into every one biteAs an award-winning foodstuff author, Peter Kaminsky used to be good accustomed to the occupational threat of lifestyles as a certified eater. But whilst his well-being (and his waistline!
What am I doing the following? I consistently ask myself as I make my means from law-school type to law-school classification. who're those humans? they're not anything like me. those are those that get pleasure from good judgment and cause and who think themselves as companions in a legislation company in the future. i will rarely think myself as a attorney, not to mention a associate. What am I doing right here? How did i am getting the following? i've got a imprecise reminiscence of filling out legislation tuition purposes, on the robust behest of my mom and dad. certain, I'm usually right here simply because my mom and dad sought after me to be the following. "You will be whatever you need to be, " my mother used to inform me whilst i used to be more youthful, "as lengthy as you're a physician, a legal professional, or an Indian leader. " due to the fact premed didn't figure out in university (after chemistry, biology, natural chemistry, and physics), i used to be now in legislation university. might be I should've selected alternative 3. So it's actual: I'm in part right here as a result of my mom and dad but additionally a little right here due to me. I've deluded myself into pondering that i will earn a living as a attorney that would aid a occupation within the arts. by way of day a attorney and by way of evening a author: i'm going to pass domestic on a daily basis and paintings on a singular and if that takes to the air i will be able to surrender my legislation task. That's the key good judgment of my life. Then nationwide tragedy moves. while September eleven occurs, I'm in contracts classification and discomfort via a lecture on attention. the area seems falling aside after which the area actually falls aside. Like each person else in the US, i'm devastated and that i cross domestic in a daze. That evening, a number of neighbors come over and we order chinese language meals. there's worry within the air as the facilities for ailment keep watch over is simply down the block and there are rumors that it too is a possible objective. My mother retains calling to envision in on us, yet we're ok. simply surprised, saddened, and scared. That's the timbre of the instant. Time marches on in a haze. i am going to type, variety notes on my machine, pass domestic exhausted, and sink into my sofa. The sofa, just like the international round me, swallows me entire. I turn at the television and stare on the mild and colour and rarely understand what i'm gazing. Then, sooner or later, buried in my sofa, I find a new factor to monitor, a brand new channel the place the colours are brighter, the sounds extra diversified, and the tales basic to persist with. "Today we're going to make quiche, " "Now we're going to make tomato sauce. " it's the meals Network—the outdated meals community of Sarah Moulton and Mario Batali— and day in, time out it turns into like drugs. I come domestic from a soul-deadening day of civil approach and torts and make allowance this unusual, unique global of nutrition to seduce me with its promise of sensation—real sensation—not the cool, grey educational sensation of answering a query correct (a infrequent prevalence for me), however the genuine, bright sensations that merely could be provided by means of foodstuff. Chiles, vinegar, garlic, rosemary—these tonics of style are accurately what's missing from my existence. My nutrition, like my vitamin in university, includes processed meals bought from take-out areas and grocery store frozen nutrients aisles. the best factor i understand how to cook dinner, at this aspect, is a frozen California Pizza Kitchen pizza.


All downloads available on this website have been scanned by the latest anti-virus software and are guaranteed to be virus and malware-free. You are downloading trial software. Once reported, our staff will be notified and the comment will be reviewed. Advertisements or commercial links. Pros Nothing, can't read it. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn't. It is a software utility that will find the right driver for you – automatically.
News Blog Facebook Twitter Newsletter. This tool will download and update the correct Konica Minolta PagePro W driver versions automatically, protecting you against installing the wrong PagePro W drivers. He is a lifelong computer geek and loves everything related to computers, software, and new technology.
Use this driver if you cannot print from your computer using model-specific drivers. How is the Wjn7 Competency Level Attained? Newer Post Older Post Home. I owned one of these, gave it to my GF when I switched to Win 7.
DriverGuide maintains an extensive archive of Windows drivers available for free download. Maintaining updated Konica Minolta PagePro W software prevents crashes and 11350w hardware and system performance.
I bought another printer to replace it, now it works with Win 7. It comes with straightforward no-nonsense printer vehicle driver software application as well as setup guidelines.
English – PagePro W – Printer driver file ".
Installs as "other device", not as a printer. This is really good printer but KonicaMinolta not supports their customers since you decide to change your PC you have to drop your good printer to trash. To see more matches, pgaepro our custom search engine to find the exact driver. Summary Never ever buy products from KonicaMinolta!
The PagePro W has actually been created for non-technical users. As a Gold Certified Independent Software Vendor ISVSolvusoft is able to provide the highest level of customer satisfaction through delivering top-level software and service solutions, which ;agepro been subject to a rigourous and continually-audited approval process by Microsoft.
The PagePro W is ending up touches include paper trays which fold up away to reduce workdesk room use and also an integrated cable television tidy system. Overview User Reviews Specs.
wiin7 Recommended Software – Free Download. Using outdated or corrupt Konica Minolta PagePro W drivers can cause system errors, crashes, and cause your computer or hardware to fail. Konica Minolta Hardware Type: Explore Further Minolta Di We employ a team from around the world.
The PagePro W features an identical interface as well as a USB port as typical attributes, and can also be outfitted with an optional exterior Print Server.


text:
George Knightley Chetwode
Admiral SIR George Knightley Chetwode, K.C.B., C.B.E., Royal Navy (10 December, 1877 – 11 March, 1957) served in the Royal Navy.
2 Great War
3 Post-War
4 World War II
Chetwode was promoted to the rank of Lieutenant in December, 1899.[1]
Chetwode was promoted to the rank of Commander on 31 December, 1912.[2]
Chetwode was appointed to Royal Oak on 30 January, 1916, to be her executive officer upon commissioning. He remained in her through until July, 1917, having been promoted to the rank of Captain on 30 June, 1917.[3] It was decided to take advantage of his considerable experience in flotilla work, and he was appointed to Blenheim, additional, to serve as Captain (D) of the Fifth Destroyer Flotilla on 15 August, 1917. His tenure there was likely through the end of the war, as his next appointment occurred post-war.[4]
Chetwode was appointed to the British Naval Mission to Greece with the rank of Rear Admiral in the Royal Hellenic Navy on 1 June, 1919. He reverted to the Royal navy on 26 January, 1922.[5]
Chetwode was appointed in command of the battleship Queen Elizabeth in May, 1925, having recently returned from hospital.[6]
In March, 1926, Chetwode was appointed in command of the battleship Warspite.
On 4 August, 1927, he took passage from Corfu to Brindisi aboard the destroyer Wren.[7]
Chetwode was promoted to the rank of Rear-Admiral on 13 June, 1928.[8]
Chetwode was promoted to the rank of Vice-Admiral on 4 January, 1933.[9]
Chetwode was promoted to the rank of Admiral on 22 July, 1936 and was placed on the Retired List at his own request on 19 August.[10]
Chetwode was fined 40 pounds and 51/- in costs at Magistrate's Court in Portsmouth for an offence against the Rationing (General Provisions) Order 1942 for obtaining rationed food for household consumption otherwise than in accordance with the order. The First Sea Lord approved this notation in Chetwode's record.[11]
James R. P. Hawksley Captain of H.M.S. Ure
10 Apr, 1906[12] – 28 May, 1906[13] Succeeded by
James R. P. Hawksley
William E. Middleton Captain of H.M.S. Teazer
28 May, 1906[14] – 3 Aug, 1906[15] Succeeded by
John M. Casement Captain of H.M.S. Haughty
3 Aug, 1906[16] – 15 Jun, 1908[17] Succeeded by
Charles G. Robinson
Claude Seymour Captain of H.M.S. Earnest
15 Jun, 1908[18][19] – 1 Sep, 1909[20] Succeeded by
Richard F. White
Richard F. White Captain of H.M.S. Swale
1 Sep, 1909[21] – 2 Sep, 1910[22] Succeeded by
Edward O. Tudor
? Captain of H.M.S. Renard
2 Sep, 1910[23][24] – 28 Jun, 1912[25] Succeeded by
Leveson G. B. A. Campbell
New Command Captain of H.M.S. Firedrake
2 Sep, 1912[26] – 4 Jan, 1913[27] Succeeded by
Benjamin W. Barrow
F. Clifton Brown Captain (D), Fifth Destroyer Flotilla
15 Aug, 1917[28][29] Succeeded by
Kerrison Kiddle
Frederick C. Fisher Captain of H.M.S. Danae
21 Apr, 1922[30] – 28 Apr, 1923 Succeeded by
Francis M. Austin
Edward O. Cochrane Deputy Director of Naval Intelligence
11 Sep, 1923[31][32] – 15 May, 1925[33] Succeeded by
Kenneth G. B. Dewar
Frank F. Rose Captain of H.M.S. Queen Elizabeth
15 May, 1925[34] – Mar, 1926[35] Succeeded by
Humphrey T. Walwyn
Humphrey T. Walwyn Captain of H.M.S. Warspite
17 Mar, 1926[36] – Aug, 1927[37] Succeeded by
Thomas N. James
Eric J. A. Fullerton Naval Secretary to the First Lord of the Admiralty
1 Oct, 1929[38][39] – 15 Jan, 1932[40] Succeeded by
Sidney J. Meyrick
Joseph C. W. Henley Rear-Admiral Commanding, First Cruiser Squadron
19 Mar, 1932[41] – 20 Jun, 1933[42] Succeeded by
John K. im Thurn
Henry W. Parker Admiral Commanding Reserves
5 Oct, 1933[43] – 14 Feb, 1936[44] Succeeded by
Henry J. S. Brownrigg
↑ Chetwode Service Record. The National Archives. ADM 196/44. f. 390.
↑ The Navy List. (March, 1913). p. 15.
↑ The Navy List. (July, 1909). p. 306.
↑ The Navy List. (April, 1911). p. 366.
↑ The Navy List. (December, 1918). p. 743.
↑ The Navy List. (January, 1923). p. 746.
↑ "Naval and Military" (Official Appointments and Notices). The Times. Tuesday, 11 September, 1923. Issue 43443, col A, p. 20.
↑ "Naval, Military, and Air Force" (Official Appointments and Notices). The Times. Monday, 16 September, 1929. Issue 45309, col C, p. 7.
Retrieved from "http://dreadnoughtproject.org/tfs/index.php?title=George_Knightley_Chetwode&oldid=249967"
Flag Officers
Flag Officers (UK)
Admirals (UK)
H.M.S. Britannia (Training Ship) Entrants of July, 1891

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Q: How to get date in UTC time zone using Dataweave I have the following dataweave expression that displays the time and date that is 90 days before today's date in my local timezone (IST), I want to get the timezone as GMT+00:00 instead of GMT+05:30
my dataweave expression:
%dw 2.0 var time= now() output application/json

---
{
    "date" : time - ("P$(90)D" as Period)
}

current output:
{
   "date": "2020-11-12T09:14:15.908+05:30"
}

desired output
{
   "date": "2020-11-12T09:14:15.908+00:00"
}

A: there are so many ways to show the timeZone , I let you know one example that I have tried for you
your input was now()
%dw 2.0
var time= now()
output application/json
---
{
"date": (now() >> 'UTC') as DateTime {format: "dd-MMM-yy hh.mm.ss.SSSSSSSSS a VV"} as String {format: "yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss:SSS Z"}
}

the output of this code is:
{
  "date": "2021-02-10T07:09:11:815 +0000"
}

Note: There is no time difference between Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) and Coordinated Universal Time (UTC)
This code you can easily modify according to your requirement for example if you want the same code for GMT +5:30 that is Asia/Calcutta time Zone ID
that will be as below
%dw 2.0
var time= now()
output application/json
---
{
"date": (now() >> 'Asia/Calcutta') as DateTime {format: "dd-MMM-yy hh.mm.ss.SSSSSSSSS a VV"} as String {format: "yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss:SSS Z"}
}

so main point is here that you need to specify the time zone ID to get that in your output
and this is the official document link that shows a list of all Time Zone ID's in mulesoft at the present day (10-02-2021)- https://docs.mulesoft.com/mule-runtime/4.3/dataweave-cookbook-change-time-zone
Thanks

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Preparation and Evaluation of Dental Implants containing Doxycycline Hydrochloride and Tinidazole in Biodegradable Carrier
R. Nagaraju, N. Udupa
Department of Pharmaceutics, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal
Dental implants of doxycycline hydrochloride and tinidazole were formulated using a biodegradable carrier, Poly (ε-caprolactone), for the treatment of periodontitis. The In vitro drug release patterns and stability of these devices were studied. The formulations showed an initial burst release followed by more sustained release of the drugs throughout the period of study (42 days). The stability of the drugs were shown a marked improvement by formulating them in polymer matrix.
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Preparation and Evaluation of Dental Implants containing Doxycycline Hydrochloride and Tinidazole in Biodegradable Carrier'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Tinidazole Medicine & Life Sciences
Doxycycline Medicine & Life Sciences
Dental Implants Medicine & Life Sciences
polycaprolactone Medicine & Life Sciences
Periodontitis Medicine & Life Sciences
Polymers Medicine & Life Sciences
Nagaraju, R., & Udupa, N. (1998). Preparation and Evaluation of Dental Implants containing Doxycycline Hydrochloride and Tinidazole in Biodegradable Carrier. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 60(6), 405-406.
Nagaraju, R. ; Udupa, N. / Preparation and Evaluation of Dental Implants containing Doxycycline Hydrochloride and Tinidazole in Biodegradable Carrier. In: Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 1998 ; Vol. 60, No. 6. pp. 405-406.
@article{6d6703468ee5483e93a3ba390e84d7d5,
title = "Preparation and Evaluation of Dental Implants containing Doxycycline Hydrochloride and Tinidazole in Biodegradable Carrier",
abstract = "Dental implants of doxycycline hydrochloride and tinidazole were formulated using a biodegradable carrier, Poly (ε-caprolactone), for the treatment of periodontitis. The In vitro drug release patterns and stability of these devices were studied. The formulations showed an initial burst release followed by more sustained release of the drugs throughout the period of study (42 days). The stability of the drugs were shown a marked improvement by formulating them in polymer matrix.",
author = "R. Nagaraju and N. Udupa",
Nagaraju, R & Udupa, N 1998, 'Preparation and Evaluation of Dental Implants containing Doxycycline Hydrochloride and Tinidazole in Biodegradable Carrier', Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 405-406.
Preparation and Evaluation of Dental Implants containing Doxycycline Hydrochloride and Tinidazole in Biodegradable Carrier. / Nagaraju, R.; Udupa, N.
In: Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 60, No. 6, 11.1998, p. 405-406.
T1 - Preparation and Evaluation of Dental Implants containing Doxycycline Hydrochloride and Tinidazole in Biodegradable Carrier
AU - Nagaraju, R.
N2 - Dental implants of doxycycline hydrochloride and tinidazole were formulated using a biodegradable carrier, Poly (ε-caprolactone), for the treatment of periodontitis. The In vitro drug release patterns and stability of these devices were studied. The formulations showed an initial burst release followed by more sustained release of the drugs throughout the period of study (42 days). The stability of the drugs were shown a marked improvement by formulating them in polymer matrix.
AB - Dental implants of doxycycline hydrochloride and tinidazole were formulated using a biodegradable carrier, Poly (ε-caprolactone), for the treatment of periodontitis. The In vitro drug release patterns and stability of these devices were studied. The formulations showed an initial burst release followed by more sustained release of the drugs throughout the period of study (42 days). The stability of the drugs were shown a marked improvement by formulating them in polymer matrix.
Nagaraju R, Udupa N. Preparation and Evaluation of Dental Implants containing Doxycycline Hydrochloride and Tinidazole in Biodegradable Carrier. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 1998 Nov;60(6):405-406.


text:
Genealogical & Historical Research
Heritage Highlights Table of Contents
Madison County History
Pioneer History
Agriculture, Industry and Business
Civil War in Madison County
Madison County was not immune from the death, carnage and destruction of the American Civil War. In fact, the August 29 & 30, 1862 Battle of Richmond cut a large swath right through the middle of Madison County during that unrelentingly hot, drought stricken summer.
Confederate Major Generals Edmund Kirby Smith and Braxton Bragg met at the end of July 1862 in Chattanooga, Tennessee, to devise a plan to advance into Kentucky to rid Tennessee of Federal forces, as well as to procure supplies and make an effort to bring Kentucky into the Confederacy. According to Confederate cavalryman John Hunt Morgan, Kentucky had "20,000 men ready to join up".
Known as the Kentucky Heartland campaign, Kirby Smith would move into east central Kentucky with Bragg advancing through the west central region.
Federal leaders became aware of the Confederate's intention and ordered Union Major General (and Kentuckian) William "Bull" Nelson, with a raw "army" of 7,000 newly mustered men to Lexington to help stop any Confederate advance into the Commonwealth. This force was divided into two divisions, one under the command of Brigadier General Mahlon Manson and the other under Brigadier General Charles Cruft.
Leaving Knoxville on August 17, Kirby Smith's cavalry will reach Big Hill by August 23 and win a decisive victory over a Union cavalry/infantry force escorting a supply train bound for the Cumberland Gap. A portion of Scott's cavalry made it to Richmond and demanded the surrender of the town. This demand was refused and with more Union infantry arriving, the Confederates withdrew southward to the main Confederate army now in the London (Laurel County) area.
The main Confederate army enters Madison County on August 29th via the Old State Road, which is now US 25/421.
Scott's cavalry is in the lead, and they run into elements of the Union army, which is under the command of Mahlon Manson (Nelson remained in Lexington) near the intersection of Dunncannon Road and the Old State Road. Scott's small force retired from the field, but not before losing a piece of artillery.
By this time, the lead units of Kirby Smith's army had crossed Big Hill and were coming in sight of the small village of Kingston. Union cavalry, pursuing the Confederate troopers, ran into the main Confederate force, and have a very small battle in an area known as Bobtown. The Union cavalry retreat and rejoin Manson's infantry north of Kingston in a small area known as Rogersville.
Knowing that he has more than just Confederate cavalry to his front, Manson send a message to Nelson about his apparent situation. Nelson, in Lexington, replies to not bring about an engagement unless you (Manson) know you can win, otherwise bring your (Manson's) force to Lancaster, 30 miles to the west. Nelson would meet Manson and Cruft there. But by the time Nelson's message reaches Manson, it is too late to avoid a clash.
On the morning of August 30th, Manson's division, bivouacked at Rogersville, marched approximately one half mile south on the Old State Road and set up a line of battle just south of the Mount Zion Church. He set his artillery on both sides of the road with orders to begin firing on the approaching Confederates at 7 AM.
The Confederates Fourth Division, under the command of Brigadier General Patrick Cleburne, began moving up the Old State Road to the intersection of the Old State Road/Crooksville Lancaster Pike. Here, Cleburne would deploy his artillery on a high ridge just east of the intersection, with his infantry sheltered behind the crest.
The artilleries of both sides pounded each other for two hours, after which Cleburne would begin moving his men toward Manson's left flank. While Cleburne's men began increasing the intensity of fire on Manson's left flank, the Confederate Third Division under the command of Brigadier General Thomas Churchill, arrived on the field, and was ordered to take his five regiments west on the Crooksville/Lancaster Road to a hidden ravine now know as Churchill's Draw.
Concerned with his left weakening flank, Manson moves a large portion of his right flank troops to support the left.
As those troops were moved to the right, Churchill's division attacked the now vulnerable right flank of Manson. Charles Cruft and his division were in Richmond, heard the artillery bombardment and began moving his troops to the sound of the guns.
As both flanks of Manson's line begin to collapse, Cruft is able to deploy his regiment one by one into battle. Two of his regiments, one on the right and one on the left, stormed into the fray as Manson's line collapses, and Cruft's fresh regiments are pummeled by the attacking Confederates.
The Union force retreats to Rogersville, where Manson and Cruft agree to re-deploy one half mile north to the intersection of the Dunncannon Lane/Old State Road. Here they would form a second line.
Facing south, Manson places his battle weary men on the east side of the road, with Cruft's men on the west, anchored by two un-engaged regiments.
About 12:45 P.M., Cruft orders his men forward and wheel to the east. This maneuver opened his right flank to Confederates hidden by a fence, who riddled the line with shot. The entire Federal line falls back in a disorganized retreat to Richmond.
Although momentum was on the Confederate side, they did not actively pursue the retreating Federals.
As the tattered remnants of the Union army entered Richmond, "Bull" Nelson arrived on the field after hearing the artillery fire in Lancaster. Nelson attempted to form a third line in the Richmond Cemetery.
Kirby Smith moved his men up the Old State Road. Not waiting for his artillery to come up (due to lack of ammunition), Kirby Smith deploys his men and attacks the Federal line. After a short time, Nelson's right flank fails and the entire Union line falls like dominos. The shattered Union army begins to flee north out of Richmond toward Lexington.
However, earlier in the day, Kirby Smith had ordered Colonel John Scott to take his cavalry west around Richmond in hopes of cutting off any Union route of escape. Just after dark, Scott's troopers cut off Lexington Road, and nearly the entire Union army is captured enmass north of Richmond. Nelson avoids capture, but Manson is captured when his horse falls on him. Cruft and a small number of boys in blue were able to retreat via another route north.
The Union soldiers were marched back to Richmond and those not wounded were paroled over the next few days. Most churches, schools and many private residences became hospitals for the scores of wounded, both blue and gray.
After the Battle of Richmond, Confederates units went on to capture Lexington and Frankfort.
Some of Kirby Smith's units were part of Braxton Bragg's force at the Battle of Perryville in early October 1862.
Many Civil War scholars call Richmond the most complete victory one side had over the other during the entire war.
Although the 1862 Battle of Richmond was the most noted Civil War engagement in Madison County, there were several other smaller skirmishes throughout the war, namely the 1863 fight on what is now Big Hill Ave. In August 1863, Confederate cavalryman John Scott (of Battle of Richmond fame) took on two Union infantry regiments while the Confederates are attempting to retreat from a raid in the state. Scott's troopers had fought in Irvine the day before, then Paint Lick the next, losing numerous troops to capture. There were also numerous bands of bushwackers, who had allegiance to no one, raiding the area during the war.
In September 1862, the 11th Kentucky Confederate Cavalry was raised in Richmond and made up primarily of Madison County men. They rode with John Hunt Morgan for most of the war and many were killed at the Battle of Tebbs Bend, Kentucky on July 4, 1863.
Information provided by Phillip Seyfrit
Madison County Historical Society, Inc.
Email us : info@madisoncountykyhistory.org
Facebook : http://facebook.com/madisoncountyhs
Copyright © 2005-2019, The Madison County Historical Society, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Madison County Historical Society, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization.
Site by Hilltop.net.


text:
President Obama's Shallow, Sanctimonious Attempts at Dialogue
Much media attention is being paid to two reports this week about President Barack Obama's outreach to Congressional Democrats and Republicans. But there's a third report – less prominent but more revealing – that sheds light on the president's real intentions.
One of the two reports that received attention is Ron Fournier's National Journal article about Mr. Obama's dinner last week dinner with a dozen Senate Republicans in which Fournier quotes an unnamed presidential adviser.
"This is a joke," the senior White House official told Mr. Fournier, referring to such outreach efforts. "We're wasting the president's time and ours….I hope you all [in the media] are happy because we're doing it for you."
Despite later denials by White House press secretary Jay Carney, this candid admission can't add to the warm and fuzzy spirit of cooperation and comity Mr. Obama insists he wants to nurture.
The second report that's drawn attention was Tuesday when Mr. Obama told Senate Democrats that they needed to be open to entitlement reforms, such as changing the inflation measure used to calculate benefit changes. While liberal Senators met his remarks with some skepticism and more than a little resistance, it was nonetheless an important move by the president, if sincere and not for show.
The answer to whether this was a real shift in policy or merely meant for public consumption came in an interview with ABC's George Stephanopoulos. In the interview, Mr. Obama dismissed the importance of a balanced budget, saying, "We don't have an immediate crisis in terms of debt. In fact, for the next 10 years, it's gonna be in a sustainable place."
It actually won't be, thanks to the president's policies (particularly the Affordable Care Act) and saying in so many words that a debt crisis will be his successor's problem is not a good excuse for doing nothing now.
But Mr. Obama got into even more trouble. Discussing a grand bargain to balance the budget and at least stabilize if not reduce the debt, Mr. Obama suggested the Republican position was "We can only do revenue if we gut Medicare or gut Social Security or gut Medicaid."
Can the president name a single important Republican who wants to "gut" Medicare or Social Security?
This goes to a deeper truth. Mr. Obama cannot lead the conversation a president must have with Congress about entitlement reform because he seems wholly unable to acknowledge that reasonable people can disagree about policies while sharing a common goal.
In Mr. Obama's view, Republicans only want "to gut" Medicare, Social Security and Medicaid. Republican policy prescriptions are not just wrong but border on malevolent. Republicans are motivated by a desire to hurt the most vulnerable members of society. And so the president, given his worldview, is incapable of finding common ground. Because you can't compromise with evil.
Particularly for a president who fashions himself as an intellectual, this is a shallow and sanctimonious way to avoid a serious dialogue. And for a president who campaigned five years ago – it seems like a lifetime ago – saying he didn't want to be the leader of red states or blue states but the United States, it is an ineffective, irresponsible and – dare we repeat his own description to Barbara Walters of himself – lazy way to try leading.
Name-calling, the occasional slander, and repeatedly constructing a field of strawmen are marks of seriousness. It is, to borrow a phrase from a senior Obama adviser, "a joke." The president should stop wasting our time and his.
Mr. Obama was able to function when his party controlled the Congress with crushing margins in both houses. That was easy. Now he finds himself presiding over divided government. That is harder. And continuing attacks like this will make it impossible for Mr. Obama to forge the compromises for which presidential leadership is necessary.
This article originally appeared on FoxNews.com on Friday, March 15, 2013.
Related Note
Fox News Poll: President Trump, Health Care Drive Midterm Elections
October 18, 2018 |
Less than three weeks until Election Day, voters are thinking most about health care, the economy, and reining in President Trump -- and Democratic candidates are benefitting. Currently, 49 percent of likely voters back the Democratic candidate in the...
Newt Gingrich: Here's My Strategy For Keeping A House Republican Majority In November
On Wednesday, I was honored to speak at the Winter Meeting of the Republican National Committee about the how important and impactful the 2018 elections could be for America. Below is an excerpt of my remarks. Let me thank all of you, particularly thos...
The Joint Committee On Taxation
The distribution tables from the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) for the tax reform bill passed by Congress give the lie to Democratic claims that the legislation is a big tax cut for the 1% and the shaft for the middle class. According to my for...
Tax Cuts & Jobs Act Policy Highlights
November 02, 2017 |


text:
Fan Steals Famous Musician's Guitar: Paxil & Alcohol Involved
Paragraphs 8 & 9 read: Mr White said: " 'I'm disgusted with the whole thing. There's a victim here. I can't reconcile myself with the behaviour of that night'."
"The court heard that Mr White, who has no previous convictions, had been prescribed the antidepressant Seroxat [Paxil] at the time of the incident. This combined with alcohol had lessened his inhibitions, magistrates were told."
http://www.islingtontribune.com/news/2010/feb/hand-it-over-fan-who-stole-smiths-star%E2%80%99s-guitar-says-%E2%80%98i%E2%80%99m-sorry%E2%80%99
Hand it over! The fan who stole Smiths star's guitar says, 'I'm sorry'
Man apologises to musician for snatching instrument after gig and keeping it for 10 years
by JOSH LOEB
FOR 10 years, music fan Stephen White secretly held all the answers to a musical mystery that had mystified one of Britain's most revered guitarists.
Every time he looked at the shiny 1964 Cherry Red Gibson SG guitar hidden in his flat, he gulped at the memory of how he had stolen it from Johnny Marr, the musician who shot to fame with cult rock group The Smiths.
On Tuesday, a decade after pinching the £30,000 instrument backstage after a gig at the Scala nightclub in King's Cross, Mr White, a 38-year-old carer, owned up to the theft in court.
He told Highbury Corner Magistrates' Court that he was "disgusted" with himself.
Mr White had been in the crowd packed inside the Scala to see Marr's band Johnny Marr and the Healers in 2000 on the night he walked off with the guitar.
The court heard how he occasionally played it at home and at one stage took it to the Tin Pan Alley guitar shops in Denmark Street, Bloomsbury, to have it repaired after he accidentally stood on it.
Police recovered the instrument after acting on a tip-off.
Mr White said: "I'm disgusted with the whole thing. There's a victim here. I can't reconcile myself with the behaviour of that night."
The court heard that Mr White, who has no previous convictions, had been prescribed the antidepressant Seroxat at the time of the incident. This combined with alcohol had lessened his inhibitions, magistrates were told.
After watching Marr perform, Mr White went backstage to meet the musician and noticed a stage entrance was open. On discovering the guitar unattended, he made what his counsel, Oliver Dean, described as "a spur of the moment decision". He picked up the guitar, walked out with it via a fire escape and took it home in a taxi. It is believed the guitar was found at Mr White's Enfield home with the ticket from the gig in 2000 attached to it.
Marr, a renowned guitar collector famous for his songwriting partnership with singer Morrissey, was reported at the time as being "very upset" by the disappearance of the instrument and offered a reward for information leading to its safe return.
Mr Dean said his client felt extremely guilty about taking the guitar and had expressed a wish to write and apologise to Mr Marr.
Police Constable Christopher Swain said Mr Marr, who is currently on tour in New Zealand, was "ecstatic" about the instrument's return, adding: "He bears no malice towards the defendant."
PC Swain said: "The guitar did have a high sentimental value to him. Initially he though he had been targeted by a professional thief but when the details came to light he said he didn't want the matter to go further."
Prosecutor Dorothy Thomas said that although the guitar would normally have been worth around £6,000, it had been estimated as having a value of £30,000 because of its association with Marr, who now plays with The Cribs.
Mr White was sentenced to 200 hours of community service. A spokesman for Mr Marr said last night (Wednesday): "He is obviously very happy to have his guitar returned."


text:
Policing InsightDavid Jamieson
Articles by: David Jamieson
Why PCCs have a pivotal role to play in promoting roads policing
OPINION: The recent HM Inspectorate report into roads policing underlined the dangers of forces failing to prioritise road safety, with the number of fatalities and serious injuries on our roads starting to rise after years of decline; West Midlands Police and Crime Commissioner David Jamieson – a former Transport Road Safety Minister – believes PCCs have a crucial role to play in reprioritising road safety.
Use of force: Why scrutiny matters following the death of George Floyd
OPINION: The death of George Floyd in the United States, following restraint by police officers, has cast a global spotlight on police use of force. Police and Crime Commissioner David Jamieson sets out how he and his OPCC team oversee and scrutinise the work of West Midlands Police, thus seeking to retain confidence in policing amongst all local communities.
West Midlands PCC: Pension changes are like cutting "the entirety of West Yorkshire's policing budget"
OPINION: The Government has recently announced a proposal to increase pension costs for employers throughout the public sector. In an exclusive article for Policing Insight, West Midlands PCC David Jamieson looks at how this could affect policing in his force and more widely.
Stop and search: Ending bad practice and implementing good policy
analysis: A few years ago, the use of stop and search in the West Midlands threatened to undermine confidence in local policing. West Midlands PCC David Jamieson and Policy Officer Ben Twomey explain the measures that were implemented to reassure communities stop and search is used fairly and effectively.
Homelessness: Rough sleeping needs preventing, not policing
OPINION: Homelessness has risen across the country. In the West Midlands, it has tripled over the last eight years. In a co-authored article, West Midlands Police and Crime Commissioner David Jamieson and Policy Officer Ben Twomey believe it is essential the police service offers the hand of friendship to those in need.
Unauthorised traveller encampments: Does the law need to change?
Opinion: The number of unauthorised encampments in the West Midlands has more than doubled in the last five years. Inevitably, community tension has escalated too. This has meant, in the last two years alone, calls to the police related to unauthorised encampments have doubled. West Midlands PCC David Jamieson and Policy Officer Ben Twomey believe it is time to strengthen the law.
Moving forward: Are transit sites the answer to unauthorised traveller encampments?
Opinion: Unauthorised traveller encampments are a challenging issue for most areas. In a co-authored article, West Midlands Police and Crime Commissioner David Jamieson and Lead Policy Officer Ben Twomey argue that transit sites may offer a solution.
The West Midlands deserves a powerful mayor – David Jamieson, West Midlands PCC
OPINION: David Jamieson, PCC for the West Midlands, argues that the proposed model for the new mayor of the West Midlands Combined Authority is weak and not fit for purpose, and calls for the CA to pause, reflect, and review the role.
West Midlands PCC
David attended Tudor Grange Grammar School, Solihull and later qualified as a teacher of mathematics from St Peter's C of E College, Saltley, Birmingham. Also, he has a degree in Social Science and Management from the Open University. He taught in schools across the Midlands before moving to Plymouth as a Vice Principal of a large community college. David served as an MP from 1992 to 2005. From 1997 to 2005 David was a Government Minister. David is vastly experienced in issues relating to community safety and policing from his roles as an MP, local Councillor in Solihull and as a former member of the West Midlands Police & Crime Panel. As a Transport Minister David worked closely with the Police on road safety issues, was instrumental in giving Police the powers to seize un-insured vehicles and making it illegal to drive whilst using a handheld mobile phone. As the Police and Crime Commissioner for the West Midlands since August 2014, he has put the needs victims at the heart of his strategy.


text:
Larian Studios Forums Baldur's Gate III Baldur's Gate III - Suggestions & Feedback Larian's Biggest Oversight, now with review of ea
Larian's Biggest Oversight, now with review of ea
#712296 22/10/20 01:31 PM
Abits OP
Abits
Super Duper TL:DR - The dialouge and story are broken simply because Larian seems to put them in a lower priority than the gameplay, and not necessarily because of bad writing or EA bugs. If you want to read more but not everything, I would recommend part 2. If you want address the gameplay Vs story argument, please read appendices number 2.
Original Thread
TL:DR for the original post: just the broad strokes, for more detail, read through the original post:
Disclaimers- I love Bg3 and aware of the fact it is just an EA. but based on how DOS2 turned to be, I think the Issue I'm Addressing will not be taken care of unless we demand it to be.
The gameplay is more important argument - while some of you might think so, I disagree and have reasons to believe most BG and even most DND players think like me. For more details about that, please refer to appendices number 2.
Short Intro and TL:DR
After my initial post on the matter, I slowly came to understand my problem with the storytelling of DOS2 and (seemingly) BG3. As I gained more understanding, I think it's important to define the problem as articularly and accurately as possible, to improve the discussion, and to be able to ask Larian for specific and practical solutions. I thank everyone who took part in the previous discussion and hope this one would be a productive discussion as well. after the first discussion I realized I tend to ramble too much, so this time I will try to keep things short and to the point. if you are feeling tired of my rambling, you can skip to part 2.
TLDR: part 1 is a general example and a presentation of the problem
part 2: the problem defined as best as I could
part 3: why I don't think it's a bug
Epilogue - how to move foreward
Part One - Are the story and characters really the problem?
One of the more common examples people use when arguing that the companions in this game suck comes from the first encounter with Astarion. During this encounter, Astarion tries to threaten your MC with a knife, and depending on your dialogue choices he could do so quite violently. The problem is that during this encounter most players have at least one companion in their party if not more, and all the companions just stand silently and watch. This led many to the (rather sensible) conclusion your companions are a bunch of psychotic dicks. I, however, think it is a problem with the game. The game simply doesn't acknowledge the fact you have companions with you, and ignores them completely, like they are not there. In other words, there seems to be a problem with the way the game handles Event flags.
Part Two - The Problem In a Nutshell
So whether you survived all the previous raving or you came here just to hear the gist, here it is - Larian doesn't seem to care about the story, or at least doesn't seem to care about the story enough for a game at this scale. I don't think it's (necessarily) bad writing, I don't think it's a bug issue (more on that later), I think that Larian simply prefers to give us as many RP choices as possible no matter how much harm it (potentially) creates for the story's cohesiveness and immersion.
I mentioned flag event earlier and now I'm gonna talk about why it's important here, why it is nearly impossible to make it work here, and most importantly, why I don't think Larian is even interested in making it work, or at the very least puts it in a very low priority.
In a well-designed RPG, the way the world reacts to you depends on many event flags. Some of them are things you set in character creation like race class and stats, but the important ones for our discussion are your choices. And the more choices a game provides you, the harder it is for the designers to account for all of them. At this point, I'll recommend you read the appendices for some examples of bad flag event settings, but simply put if Larian wanted to account for all the possible choices the player makes and have them being reflected by the story, they don't seem to want to do it.
This creates hilarious (or horrifying, depends on who you ask) situations where characters acting strangely and don't react to things you did even they supposed to directly affect them. The opposite is also true, and sometimes characters would treat you like you did something you didn't do, maybe because what you did do is not an option the developers have predicted. This leaves you with a lot of NPC's that live in their own "private quest bubble", and only react to very specific things you do, and ignore the others as if they didn't happen.
The discussion about whether the story and characters of bg3 are any good is important but is not the issue here. If the event flag work is that sloppy, even a bg2 wouldn't be allowed to flourish if on every encounter you have with an NPC the story forgets where are we in the story, or doesn't even react to it.
Part Three - A Bug or Design Philosophy?- about the question of whether this would be fixed in the main release
the gist of this chapter in a short exgange I had in this forum:
Originally Posted by Tuco
Originally Posted by Abits
It is a big problem I made it my main goal to get Larian to fix. In short, I feel like Larian gives you choices but don't care about making them work
Sounds just like a fairly typical scripting bug, actually.
It is a bug only if there is a conversation that is not triggered. I doubt such a conversation exists.
The short answer for this chapter's title is probably not. The little less short answer is that I don't know for sure, but based on several factors I don't believe it is.
The reason I don't think it's a bug issue is based on my experience with dos2, the comparison between ea dos2 and the full game, and Larian's comments about the ea so far.
Playing through Fort Joy (the first act of Divinity: Original SIn 2)is a very telling experience for anyone trying to predict how the final BG3 product will look like. for starters, you have an option to just teleport away by doing a rather simple quest, thus skipping all the important story bits of the fort. In a game that cares about its own story, I would think skipping such a huge chunk of the plot would have dire consequences, but nada, the story moves on. and even in the Fort itself, nothing seems to blend together into a comprehensive and cohesive narrative, and you are left with a giant mass. Even some supposedly easy to fix story bits can't seem to work unless you do them in a very particular way. The best example is Sebile, the red prince and the dreamer. In order to advance their plot, you need to first talk to the dreamer, then recruit Sebile, and then talk to him again so she can kill him. If you try to bring both party members to the dreamer, one of them randomly step up and talk to him, while the other stares at the ceiling. it's particularly jarring in case Seblie is the one who goes to talk to him, and then murders him while the prince just stands like a doofus and only make a short comment after the fact. If Bioware was directing the scene, you can bet your ass that all the possibilities were accounted for, and each one of them had other interesting dynamics. Sebile's quest line in this game is also responsible to Shehila, a character that is a walking talking plot hole, and no matter what you do, she always shows up out of nowhere. Shehila is such a good example since she embodies everything that is wrong with Larian's style of story telling - in each act you encounter her in a different place, where she acts and does the exect same things no matter what you did in previous acts.
There are many more examples, but in order to find them, I have to play DOS2 again. Unfortunately, once I realized most of my choices has little effect on the story if at all, and even the illusion of choice doesn't exist since sometimes the game outright disregards my choices, I found that it's much harder to complete this game, and his replay value dropped substantially. The important part is the comparison between the game in EA and the full experience. I wondered how is it possible that a game with a very successful ea comes out, and still have so many of these bugs? I went and checked, and based on this Reddit article I found out that the only major change they did from a story perspective apparently was to change The Red Prince's personality. Yay.
Again, the problem is not necessarily incompetence on Larian's part (although it's surely part of it), the problem seem to be that Larian doesn't seem to think there is anything wrong with the situation as it is now. Sure, the Astarion bit I mentioned in chapter 1 will probably be addressed because of the huge backlash it got, but personally I think the backlash is not big enough and a bit misplaced. all the examples in the appendices are treated as a separate scripting problem, but I think they are just a symptom of the main issue I described so far. Larian might fix some of them, but fixing each one of them demands a lot of work, not only in scripting and flag eventing, but also writing and line recording, which If I'm right and it's not a scripting bug but a lack of script, it doesn't seem like something Larian cares about too much.
Epilogue - Moving Foreward
There are three main ways I see us move forward. I'll list them here by order of probability, from the most probable to the least one.
1. nothing new under the son - The game's story and events will remain largely the same. Larian will add some dialogue line here and there, probably to account for the issues that are reported the most. I think I'll delve more deeply into the "story vs gameplay" argument in the appendices, but here I'll just say that at least for me, If this is the case it's hard for me to see this game becomes anything more than what it is in its current state - harmless fun. perhaps the only difference is the status shift - instead of "harmless fun with potential for more" just "harmless fun". Nothing wrong with it, but I'll always see it as a missed opportunity in that case.
2. damage control - Maybe Larian will get their shit together, realize that the Story is important too, and will do more extensive work on the script (writing) and scripting (coding). It is the best outcome, and might make this game the legend it has to be. it is also the most costly and hard option. it means that larian would have to really test the game, see and try to address the choices players make, and make these choices worthwhile narratively. after that, they will have to write and record the relevant dialogue and insert it to the game. it's hard, but I do believe that in this case it is merely a question of motivation. If the people in Larian will want to do it, they could.
3. Restrict the raging player - too much choice that doesn't mean anything is not worth it. the most coherent part of the game from a narrative point of view is the tutorial area, where you can only move forward. I'm not saying make the game linear, but either address the fact the player is doing things out of order, or don't let him do it. Even Baldur's Gate 1, which was anything but linear, had certain places blocked for you until you reached a certain stage in the game (like the city itself for instance). the situation in BG is built like you have access to chapter 3 of BG1 before you arrived Neeshkal. How can you build a narrative around the goblin threat if you can go to their fort and kill all of them before reaching the druid grove? again, you could try to address it (option 2 in this part), but as long as you have so much freedom to do whatever you want, it is very hard to create a story that is not all over the place.
I would love to hear your thoughts and ideas as well.
1. bad flag event examples
the first one might be a bug but it fits the MO- during my fourth or fifth playthrough (I love the character creator sue me) I failed (again) in the persuasion check when trying to convince Khaga not to kill the tiefling girl. This time I decided in a kind of psychotic fit to kill Khaga on the spot. As I expected, all the druids in the room turned hostile, and I killed them all. But surprisingly, everyone else wasn't hostile. Not only. The rest of the camp and the druids outside were not hostile, even Nettie who was in a nearby room talked to me as if nothing wrong. Same is true for everyone at camp. I had to look very hard for someone to acknowledge what I did and in the end I talked to Zavlor and found out that if you push him hard enough ( be aggressive in your dialogue choices) he will ask you to kill Khaga. Of course the problem was that she was already dead.
Example two, which is much worse - this time I didn't want to take shadowheart with me through the whole game, so shortly after recruiting Layzel I asked shadowheart to go back to camp. She was still a bit pissed I recruited Layzel and threatened me she won't wait in camp. To my surprise, when I went to camp she was indeed missing. I later encountered her in the druid grove. The problem is that during our conversation in the grove, half of the time she acted like she is still mad at me and in the other half she acted like we never met. This example is worse because there is nothing game breaking I did here, but still the game didn't acknowledged my choices even though it offered them to me. If I never played dos2 I would think this is simply a bug or unrefined dialogue, but now it's seems to like Larian just doesn't care for these things.
Other examples, some of the things I found, other from users around the web:
Me not trying to break the game but breaking it anyway:
More on the druid grove another choice that seems to be something the game might expect you to do - as I entered the grove the guard tries to stop me. I ignore them and then choose the attack option. This creates a lot of chaos. Initially, I thought I had to fight only several guards but then I noticed many of the NPC's are leaving the grove area towards the camp (among them, khaga, Nettie, the tiefling bard and others). After I finished off the guards I went to the tiefling camp to see what's going on. There was a big battle between the tieflings and the remaining druids, all the tieflings were at my side against the druids. For reasons unknown Rath, the druid fought at my side against the others. After the battle was over I went to Zavlor to try to figure out what the hell happened. Now this is the important part - Zevlor wasn't very clear, only said it had to be done and steered the conversation to the goblin threat. I went back to the grove to try to understand why Rath, with which I never talked before fought with me in the battle. Rath was standing and blocking the entrance to the grove. He also didn't have any explanations but curiously he said: "we won". How did you win if all the druids but you are dead? Wtf.
Then I came back to my camp and gale is complaining to me about something that happened with the druids.
Now, what the hell happened here other than standard Larian's mess? I think at some stage, I don't if it happened when I chose to attack in the dialogue or at a later stage, the quest to kill Khaga triggered. But no context, no proper resolution, no nothing. And it all started from me choosing a dialogue line, so again, I didn't even try to break the game but it broke so easily.
Wyll's drive to hunt the goblins -
When you meet Wyll he is In the middle of a quest to hunt the goblins. there is a particular goblin he is looking for that can be found in the windmill. but if you remove him from the party after he tells you about it and before you meet said goblin, suddenly he doesn't care about him anymore.
A comment by the Reddit user Plumppotato (link)-
Anyone else think the first interaction with Astarion feels, off? I think it's because by the time I meet him, I've usually already recruited Shadowheart and on my second playthrough, Gale. Which means they're both standing there while I rassle him on the ground with a knife to my neck, doing nothing. This could be fixed with either a simple move or a line of dialogue. Maybe having him be the first possible companion you meet, just after waking up on the beach, even sooner than Shadowheart. That way you're alone when he attempts to attack you. Or, by including a line where he says something along the lines of "stay back or I'll slit his/her/their throat!" If the game detects party members with you.
Comment by Larian user cgexile titled "Karlach quest line":
So I said I'd help her. I went to the group on the hill and they told me that she did all these horrible things. I went back to her and there is no option to basically have her explain her side of the story after what they told me. I only have the option to basically kill her or go back and kill them.
Feels weird like she needs to explain wtf they are talking about because their story was pretty wild and she said nothing about her mass murdering ways.
Edit: also I don't exactly want to wipe them out since they have a Trader there and I'd like to keep her around.
Something that happened to me recently-
in my who knows which playthrough of the game (I had many) I went for a crazy mage build with 8 int when my goal was to get the circlet that gives you 18 int as soon as possible. I tried to avoid the grove gate fight and head straight to the ogres but couldn't avoid the fight. After the fight, instead of going into the grove I moved on to fight the ogres and came back afterwards. But sadly it seems I successfully broke the game (again). When I entered the grove Zavlor was standing in the entrance alone and there was no way to interact with him.
2. Gameplay or story? Which is more important?
The short answer is gameplay. After all, this is a video game, and although I strongly disagree with the notion that video games can't be a fertile ground for superb stories, this is an interactive medium, and as such, gameplay has a huge impact on the quality of the game. There are some things that one must keep in mind when having this discussion:
1. Gameplay is not just combat - people seem to forget it, but gameplay is not just combat mechanics, and in fact, every interactive aspect of the game is qualified as gameplay. That includes multiple choices in dialogue, things like the new dice mechanics in bg3 like perception checks and map design. Most of the best games I ever played had a strong connection between gameplay and story, and they were not two separate parts. It's not a must for a video game, and specifically I think of Japanese video games (Devil may cry, many jrpgs) that keep the story and gameplay Nas two separate entities. It could be beneficial for both players who care about the the story and those who don't, since players who care can view it and those who don't do not. But Bg3 is not one of those games.
2. Why people play Baldur's Gate - I talked about it at length in my previous post, but people play Baldur's Gate for many reasons. That's why people keep complaining BG3 doesn't "feel" like Baldur's Gate but when asked for specific reason why, has no conclusive answer (I've seen many different answers, from things like day/night circle, fun characters, RTwP, and more). For me, the main reason to play Baldur's Gate is the attention to details in the storytelling. It's hard to think of other things Bioware games had in common other than that. But since Knights of the old Republic until mass effect 3, there are not many other things Bioware games had in common. And I feel this is important.
To summarize, I'm sure there are BG players who skip all the dialogue and only play the game to create awesome builds and try to find new ways to solo the game. But even in this group, I don't think there are many people who don't care about the characters and stories at all. The only proof I have for it is a very limited comparison I did between how popular Baldur's Gate is and how popular is a game like Icwind Dale. Both have pretty much the exact combat mechanics, but one is regarded as the best RPG series of all times, and the other is a niche game that failed to compete Diablo 2.
In short, the story matters. Especially in a western RPG, where it is connected so tightly to gameplay. But that's just a kinda subjective opinion. If you disagree, more power to you, and you'll probably appreciate and enjoy BG3 much more than me.
3. My review of Baldur's Gate 3 Early Access
Time played: 93 hours.
If you read through this whole post, you probably know by now that I'm a huge fan of story driven RPGs. Ever since I first played Knights of the old Republic, this genre has become the main genre of video games I played. I delved into Jrpgs, and I'm a huge fan of the devil may cry series, but that's about it. Ever since Kotor I've been following Bioware and like the rest of the western RPG community I'm very sad at this company's current state.
Fortunately for us, we seem to live in a new crpg golden age, with a lot of indie companies trying their luck and two former small companies who became a huge success and are on the way to replace Bioware as the RPG king.
These two companies are of course CD Project Red and Larian. Both full of Bioware fans and both has games that at least parts of their mechanics are rooted in Bioware "mythology".
After the crazy (and we'll deserved) success of The Witcher 3, CD Project put their full weight behind their Cyberpunk project, which is great news for gamers and RPG fans alike, but less for me, since the one genre I absolutely loathe is first person shooters. My dislike of this genre is twofold - If I spend 40 minutes in the character creator, I want to be able to see my character in game. The more crucial reason is that I simply hate the first person perspective and find it extremely uncomfortable. But I really digress.
I'm here to talk about the alternative, Larian studios. I'm not sure if it's factually true, but to me it feels like Larian has been around for a long time. They made many games, and played around with different genres for quite some time now. I admit I didn't play many of their games, but of those I did play, you can certainly get the Larian feel. You don't get it from their stories or characters, but from their (sometimes) crazy game mechanics ( and I mean it in the best possible way). I always play around with the idea of an imagined Larian's stuff meeting where they pich a game : "hey you know what would be cool? A main character that can turn into a dragon!". In that regard they remind me of another company that dabbled in RPGs but mostly tried to innovate the medium - Lionhead.
Since Larian's last game (divinity Original Sin 2) was a relatively successful game (for good reason), wizards of the coast decided they deserve a shot at creating a successor to one of the best video game series ever made.
Until I first picked up the game I thought this is a perfect choice. I enjoyed Dos2 despite it's shortcomings, and I liked everything I saw from bg3. Even after picking the game the first few hours were great, the characters creator is awesome, the combat is a lot of fun, and the story is interesting, despite being a little basic at this point of early access.
I discussed my main issue with the game at length, but here are more general comments I have:
- the companions seem great. I don't understand the criticism against them, and think most of it is kinda unfair. So far the companions set great expectations.
- origin characters as companions is a bad idea - origin characters is a great idea that worked before. Companions are great. Mixing the two is not.
-technical praise - although it is an early access I still want to praise Larian on that aspect. People don't talk enough about the fact that aside from loading a save, there no loading screens at all in the EA. It was amazing in DOS2 and it's amazing here. The game performance are super uneven for me at least, but if dos2 is any indication, I'm sure the situation would be much better at release.
Graphics, animations, and bugs - all to be expected. I heard Larian hired people from Telltale for this aspect of the game, and if it's true, I trust them to give us great animations eventually, even if right now things are a bit clunky. The weirdest is actually Shadowheart. I'm not sure why shadowheart specifically has such a jarring animations, but if I had to guess I would say it's because she was featured in the demo we saw prior to the release, and they over animated her a little to show the engine's potential. Other than that, the character models are gorgeous and a huge step forward from dos2 cartoonish people.
-We need more choices - I replay dragon age origins again now and I'm astonished by the amount of dialogue options you get in any meaningful encounter. I feel like right now bg3 is seriously lacking at this front, and relies too much on persuasion choices. I could complete Baldur's Gate 1 and 2 with 3 charisma points and never feel like I'm missing out on something. Persuasion should be an optional choice in a game of this kind, not a requirement.
-Failing is not fun - the promotion of this game was terrible with spoilers and bad game demonstrations (I'm much more salty about the spoilers though). One of Larian's taglines was "we want to make failing fun. Well at least for now they failed miserably. It is related to my previous point, but the game is way too binary about its option for it to be fun to fail. Most times, failing leads to something bad like battle or a trap triggering and very rarely has an interesting outcome. This kind of game design practically promotes save scamming and cheats, since there are no actual benefits of falling, and what's worse is that is so much randomness involved.
To summarize, I think right now this game is harmless fun with enormous potential. Only true change in the way Larian does things would help to raise it into something more, perhaps a new legend.
Last edited by Abits; 24/10/20 11:16 AM.
Larian's Biggest Oversight, what to do about it, and My personal review of BG3 EA
"74.85% of you stood with the Tieflings, and 25.15% of you sided with Minthara. Good outweighs evil, it seems."
Re: Larian's Biggest Oversight Part 2
Abits #712376 22/10/20 02:51 PM
Emrikol
Larian doesn't seem to care about the story, or at least doesn't seem to care about the story enough for a game at this scale.
The argument you present (i.e flags) in defense of this statement does not stand. Some oddities here and there does not override everything else about the story, nor show that they don't care.
As for the flags themselves, there are certainly some odd things afoot at time, but it is EA. So, at the very least, this argument is premature.
DZs7
This EA haves many problems, but lack of possibilities and outcomes isn't one of them. Not to mentioned when compared it to most of other RPG games or even recent titles.
Most arguments raised from "players" here are either players complains about not having whole backstory for the quest (like with 'Devil Hunt" and paladins or Rath) when no effort to do so was made and others are just obvious bugs and scripts not working which needs fixing.
Same goes for solutions were most of them sooner or later contradict themselves too limit player options and wanting more player options, so it ends up as personal opinion and not so much solution at all. Like companions when at the moment in EA(and it was mentioned few times by both Larian and Swen) we have like 3 Neutral (Gale, Shadowheart and Wyll) and 2 "Evil" (Astarion and Lae'zel) as theirs staring (key word here) characteristic and players are angry that there aren't and "good guys" and they treat player badly. Maybe it isn't emphasis enough in the tutorial, but theirs attitude matches beginning of this story. Where it isn't standard/normally established party with common enemy or higher moral goal, but just bunch of random people joined together by force- so using other to survive makes sense.
Even whole Astarion meeting right now isn't that bad. In coop it's just right at the moment even, your friend pretty much can just wait and see what happens or just shoot/backstab him when he holds dagger on you. In single player it's bit worse, but still you have attack option in most of dialogues and same goes for this one. Would adding some extra line make it better? Yes. Would it be game changer and have huge impact on narration, story and enjoyment of the game? Definitely no.
When your points aren't inherently wrong and some are valid they just seem premature (like companions and some quests) or lacking somewhat understanding how video games work. I encourage you here to pretty much go over other overall claimed as good story games or just your personal nostalgic ones. Then you will see how much games are behind compared to other media like books or movies and still require years of improvements in aspects like this.
Vhaldez
I have another example that really drives me nuts;
As Astarion or any Rogue character you can offer the goblin lady holding Volo hostage a "bag of fake gold" which convinces her she is now rich enough to buy ten Volo's, so she lets him go.
???? You just carry around fake gold all the time and never use it? ????
Kagha is bad! Join me and complain here!
Valdez - I don't know where the "fake gold" comes from, it could be something you found on the spot. It is similar to the problem I'm raising, but I think this is merely a case of bad writing.
Emrikoi and DZs7 - both of you claim my argument is not convincing enough, which is fine, but I would be glad if you actually address any of the points I raised to support the argument and explain why they aren't convincing you, otherwise it's very hard for me to respond your criticism. Specifically part 3 of my post.
I could go through a whole playthrough of dos2 and bring you more examples, but i have 2 concerns:
1. I really don't want to play this game again
2. I wonder whether this would even help to convince you.
Since we are at least a year away from full release, our only indication is what Larian has done in the past, especially with dos2, the only other game Larian developed and had EA for it.
You are right, we can't know for sure Bg3 will be the same. The thing is, if I'm wrong, no harm caused. If I'm right, by the time we'll know it for sure it will be too late to change things. My criticism of dos2 is not of the ea of dos2, but if the full game. And even if it is really only a scripting bug, if it's something that Larian does in all of its games, if we don't raise awareness for it, even if every wrong dialogue in the ea will be fixed nothing stops the rest of the game from being plagued by this issue ( this is the case with dos2 of course. I could also claim in dos2 it's worse since both the ea area and the rest of the game has the same problem).
About solutions - I agree none of my solutions are perfect, but I'm not a Larian employee and it's not on me to figure it out. If I was a Larian designer, I would first acknowledge there is a problem and only then I could figure out how to solve it
Last edited by Abits; 22/10/20 04:03 PM.
Nezix
You bring up some interesting points. What I see as the issue is that either:
1. These are "bugs" in the form of missing connections / flags that can be added.
2. These haven't been planned for, and thus even if the connections were created, there wouldn't be any voice acting to go along with it.
Probably some combination, but more of the latter is much more work to turn around. It's very easy to see where the complexity of choice makes all possible player choices very difficult to cover.
Keep fighting your fight, hopefully we'll see these improve over the next year.
Nezix #712476 22/10/20 04:14 PM
Originally Posted by Nezix
Hopefully. You summarised what I wrote well.
I just want to stress that me writing "Larian doesn't care about the story" is a bit provocative way to frame it. If I were to write it in a more nuanced way, I would say that Larian's design philosophy emphasize experiment and exploration. They seem to put player freedom at the highest regard when designing a game, and are willing to "sacrifice" story integrity to do so. And it's not necessarily a bad thing, I'm sure a lot of players like this design philosophy. I do wonder though (and I hate being that This-isn't-Baldur's-Gate guy) whether most BG players played this game for the same reason. If so, BG is kinda restricted and not a very good choice for this game style.
robertthebard
1. Yeah, I'm thinking that this is, at best, an EA issue. At worst, it's something you waffle on so badly later on that I'm not sure what you're trying to say, attempting to accommodate a lot of potential player choices, including playing as one of the characters that's supposed to react to what is going on, and doesn't. The in the middle is "if you're going to be the leader of this group of misfits, you'd best be able to handle this on your own". My biggest issue with this encounter is that I've only triggered it once, in 5 runs through that part, and I had to choose to do it. Either that, or I got really lucky on perception checks... I have yet to have a knife to my throat if I investigate what he's pointing at. I did get it when I chose to just tell him to handle it himself. The other problem I see is if I'm playing as Shadowheart, for example. Will I even have anyone else with me when I meet him, if I go straight there? There are a lot of things we don't know about how this is going to play out on release, it doesn't make a lot of sense to try to condemn it, because maybe the scripts and flags that are supposed to be set are disabled, and perhaps there are reasons for that that we don't know.
2. "It's impossible, but they just don't want to do it"? First you say it's impossible for them to account for every possible choice, and then close out claiming they just don't want to. This is the waffling I referred to above. Either it's possible, and they just don't want to, or it's impossible, so they can't. It can't be both. So if you think it's just that they don't want to, support that.
3. Has no effect on the rest of the game? If you kill the dreamer, or allow Sebil to before the Red Prince talks to him, it breaks his storyline completely. This does affect the rest of the game, unless you choose to leave him behind. If you've managed to do both, and Sebil talks to the lich outside Fort Joy first, you break another storyline. This affects the game, especially if you're planning to use both Sebil and the Red Prince. You can miss a lot of stuff that way.
Gaidax
Larian doesn't seem to care about the story
Frankly, the moment I see something like this, I just click boots and move on. That's just a bad faith take from the get go.
If you want to shit on the game, there is no need to veil it - just say "lulz Lairan ur st00pid and ur gaem bad" and that's about it - will save you and everyone a lot of time.
Larian cares about the story a lot, because they know very well the whole project will live or die by this - this is the game that will either make them a huge ass name in RPG genre or destroy them and it's Baldur's Gate 3, they know what's at stake. You can bet your ass, they will put insane amount of effort into everything to make this one of the best RPGs of a decade, just how they put insane amount of effort in facial animations. Saying they don't care after seeing those amazing conversation facial animations tuned so much is just ridiculous.
The many oddities, glitches and other things that spite the eye at the moment will be ironed out. You can bet they will make your party members focus on the whatever thing you interact with instead of staring into the horizon and they will introduce interruptions like in that knife bit too, because there is plenty of feedback about it and it only makes sense.
Maybe try to give feedback with a little more good faith next time, instead of coming off the way you do.
robertthebard #712506 22/10/20 04:33 PM
Originally Posted by robertthebard
1.fair enough. Look at my comment to Emrikoi and DZs7 a little bit above yours though since I addressed the issue you raise here.
2. Perhaps I should revise that part of the post. In short it is impossible or nearly impossible to have this much freedom big choice and have narrative cohesiveness at the same time. Larian could work harder and more seriously about it, but I just don't think it's a priority for them at the moment. And the closer we are to release the less likely at leas some of the issues would be addressed since it's involves writing directing and recording more scenes.
3. Proves my point. I'm not a professional writer and think I would be a terrible writer, but even I can think of more than one solution that would allow both Sebile's and the Red Prince's stories to continue. You might claim the game forces you to choose between them, but considering the amount not content you lose once you make a choice and the fact you can "cheat" the game into keeping them both with no narrative consequences, means that at best it's a bad writing, and at worst a deliberate attempt to increase the replay value of the game.
Merry Mayhem
I agree that the story need massive amount of work.
I disagree that they don't care just from some of the options that are worked in like Drow.
I think the issue is they have multiple people working on the story in parallel so seeing issues where stuff just not meshing up.
I have no idea if they have story directory that coordinating everything to keep the story on point. I get the feeling that it's story by committee. If they do have an overall story supervisor, they don't seem to be doing a good job at it.
I see no issue with increasing replay value. In fact, in a game with this kind of scope, I'd see an issue of not increasing replay value, which doesn't prove your point at all, but directly contradicts it. You can't "not care" about the story, in lieu of choices, ironic at best there, and still try to increase the replay value by thwarting getting all the possible permutations on a single playthrough. Yes, you can cheese the hell out of the prologue and the surrounding map, but once you get on the ship, and choose your party, you're looking at a new playthrough for the party members you didn't choose.
Demoulius
Jezus fucking christ are you a novrlist by any chance? Hoe much writing did you put in that OP? O.0
To give you a short anwser: I dont think Larian doesrnt care. I think its just dialogue not coming up in order or otherwise missing.
Abits #713486 23/10/20 09:54 AM
Okey guys, first some updates:
I added another part to the appendices, about story Vs gameplay argument. If you want to discuss it, I highly recommend reading it first.
I also revised my super duper TLDR, because although it's supposed to be a little provocative, I think you got the impression I just want to talk shit about Larian, which is not the case. I have a big disagreement with Larian's design philosophy, but I don't think they don't care about their own game or their fans if that's the impression you received.
Now I'll address your individual comments:
Gaidax - I addressed your concern above, I'll just say that I don't think it's reasonable to dedicate so much time for this post if my purpose was just to "shit on Larian". That's what the steam forums are for.
Merry Mayhem - I addressed your other concerns above, but regarding " a story by a committee" point - never thought about it like that, but it does make sense. Maybe a Kevin Feige kind of guy is needed to organise things.
robertthebard - one word I forgot to mention (which made my whole argument appear completely stupid now that I'm reading it again) is artificially. Of course I have no problem with replay value, the opposite is true. I love these games because of their replay value. But there is a good way to create replay values and there are. Stupid and artificial ways to do so.
The best and most extreme positive example is The Witcher 2. One of the choices you can make during this game can completely change the story, the location you'll explore and the characters you will interact with. And the game does it really well.
Bad examples you can find all over doa2 and based on some interviews with Larian BG3 is on the way to make the same mistakes. The official plan right now for companions in Baldur's Gate 3 is that somewhere between the end of act 1 and the beginning of act two you will have to "commit" to a party. Which means that you will have 3 party members with you for the rest of the game, while the other 2 ( and probably more) will be gone. This is artificially creating replay value. Of course, the same was true in dos2, and there it was even worse, since it actively sabotaged the story. I can talk about it more if you like.
I remember my lone wolves run with a mate where we recruited nobody and had the entire character roster show up undead later just to scold us for "betraying" them. Good times. We fried them all.
Vhaldez #713494 23/10/20 10:01 AM
Originally Posted by Vhaldez
Don't remind me. Such a stupid story bit and a wastesd opportunity
Honestly DOS2's saving grace was its co-op. Not giving a damn about the story and making up your own along the way (me and my friend blasting the universe in a mad quest for power) was a great experience despite the lack or outright absence of a narrative. I of course hope that Larian does not take this approach with BGIII, but we have no idea what the hook of the story is beyond Act 1. The only thing we need is a stretch goal like a quest to beat other True Souls to becoming the Absolute's champion.
Then again, the end of the current intro already totally ruins this by doing over DOS2's intro, lol. Saved by God because you are great, go you.
I agree completely and think this aspects are where Larian strengths as game studio shines the most. I just don't think this is the most important aspects of the Baldur's Gate series
If Larian takes the time and money (60 million euros beyond their projected budget because of EA sales) to overhaul the narrative for the whole story of BG3 in the 12-18 months they have set out for themselves I have no doubt that they will create something great. There is certainly no lack of examples; Tyranny, PoEII (for the choices, not the story) etc.
Must have missed something? Where are you saved by a god in bg3?
Hop To Baldur's Gate III ------ Baldur's Gate III - Latest News Baldur's Gate III - Mega-thread... Baldur's Gate III - General Baldur's Gate III - Suggestions... Baldur's Gate III - Help Tips &... Baldur's Gate III - Technical &...Baldur's Gate III - The Modding ... ------ General Guides Stats Tools TroubleshootingGeneral ------ General announcements Chat RPG Chat Chat (Anything) Chat (German) RPG Chat (German) About this website SuggestionsDivinity: Original Sin 2 ------ Divinity - Original Sin 2 - Lat... Divinity - Original Sin 2 - General Divinity - Original Sin 2 - Sug... Divinity - Original Sin 2 - Hel... Divinity - Original Sin 2 - Arena Divinity - Original Sin 2 - Gam... Divinity - Original Sin 2 - Bug...Divinity: Original Sin 2 - The M... ------ Divinity - Original Sin 2 - Modding General Guides Scripting Stats Tools Troubleshooting Divinity - Original Sin 2 - Pro... Divinity - Original Sin 2 - Fin...Divinity - Original Sin ------ Divinity - Original Sin - Enhan... Divinity - Original Sin - Lates... Divinity - Original Sin - General Divinity Original Sin - Help/Ti... Divinity Original Sin - Mods Divinity - Original Sin - Techn... Divinity Original Sin - BetaDragon Commander ------ Dragon Commander - Latest News Dragon Commander - General Dragon Commander - Beta Dragon Commander - Technical Pr...Divinity II The Dragon Knight S... ------ Divinity II - The Dragon Knight... Divinity II - Flames of Vengeance Help/Tips/Tricks Technical problemsDivinity II The Dragon Knight S... ------ Divinity II - The Dragon Knight... Divinity II - Flames of Vengeance Hilfe/Tips/Tricks Technische ProblemeDivinity II The Dragon Knight S... ------ Divinity II - The Dragon Knight... Divinity II - Flames of Vengeance Aide/Trucs/Astuces Problèmes techniquesDivinity 2 - Ego Draconis (English) ------ Divinity 2 - Ego Draconis Help/Tips/Tricks Technical problemsDivinity 2 - Ego Draconis (German) ------ Divinity 2 - Ego Draconis Hilfe/Tips/Tricks Technische ProblemeDivinity 2 - Ego Draconis (French) ------ Divinity 2 - Ego Draconis Aide/Trucs/Astuces Problèmes techniquesBeyond Divinity (English) ------ General Suggestions Help/Tips/Tricks Technical ProblemsBeyond Divinity (German) ------ Allgemein Hilfe/Tips/Tricks Technische ProblemeBeyond Divinity (French) ------ Général Aide/Trucs/Astuces Problèmes techniquesDivine Divinity (English) ------ General Help/Tips/Tricks Technical Problems SuggestionsDivine Divinity (Other languages) ------ Allgemein (Deutsch) Hilfe/Tips/Tricks (Deutsch) Technische Probleme (Deutsch) Algemeen (Nederlands)


text:
Outer space milked for energy
ByThe Global View January 11, 2008
Stretch your mind back past the New Year's Eve celebrations and the cold turkey that lingered over Christmas, back further – to Bali. While all the world's worthies were set on conquering climate change, some people were thinking so far outside the box they didn't share a postcode with it.According to the Associated Press, some folk at Bali were dreaming up innovative ways of conquering environmental problems, including pumping soot into the sky to block the sun. All sounds a bit Wacky Races to Greenbang.When you've finished laughing quietly into your tea, one equally unlikely idea is getting some influential backing – space power, where satellites would send back solar energy picked up cruising around the universe back to earth. Both the Pentagon and the island of Palau are interested apparently.
In September, American entrepreneur Kevin Reed proposed at the 58th International Astronautical Congress in Hyderabad, India, that Palau's uninhabited Helen Island would be an ideal spot for a small demonstration project, a 260-foot-diameter "rectifying antenna," or rectenna, to take in 1 megawatt of power transmitted earthward by a satellite orbiting 300 miles above Earth.That's enough electricity to power 1,000 homes, but on that empty island the project would "be intended to show its safety for everywhere else," Reed said in a telephone interview from California.Reed said he expects his U.S.-Swiss-German consortium to begin manufacturing the necessary ultralight solar panels within two years, and to attract financial support from manufacturers wanting to show how their technology — launch vehicles, satellites, transmission technology — could make such a system work. He estimates project costs at $800 million and completion as early as 2012.
The £1,200 car launches…
Hot Swedish bodies to warm offices