text:
LIVING STONES CHURCH, THE PRICE OF COMMITMENT (SERMON ANALYSIS 1)
Mr. Vallee, we found your sermon on the internet. We are glad that you are fond of those verses that speak of the body of Christ being made up of many parts. Two of us are of these weaker, indispensable parts you spoke of and that you love. A third is still a seeker whose soul you would like to win. We are all hoping that you will read our analysis of your sermon, that you will praise us for every right thing we say, that you will forgive our excited zeal that might be mistaken for harshness in places, and that you will close with God and his word in order to become better at what you do.
Mr. Vallee, Living Stones, The Price of Commitment.
Summary: (He begins with prayer for his church to have strength to commit in spite of conflict between good and evil, with the added petition that his church have a biblical worldview to address the evil in our world. He mentions his text as Joshua 10. But he continues, not with the sermon text, but with a fairly long story.) We are shocked when conflict happens. When we come to Christ we have an adversary. We will have enemies. The devil seems to be asleep until we make a commitment. Then we have resistance. But we get strong by resistance. It builds character. God's people had to fight the battles to get the cities in the Promised Land. God was in it, and they did it by faith, but they had to fight. The greatest battle happens within us, or from unexpected places, like co-workers, kids, etc. That results in resentment. Our fight is not against flesh and blood. It's a spiritual battle. So don't take it personally. We need to look beyond the person to the evil behind that person and to take that out. It is easier to bless the person we're in conflict with if we look at it that way. The normal Christian life is filled with conflict. Unless we know this, we'll get thrown into tail-spins. If we have no battles, we must question our salvation. Remember, Jesus experienced resistance even from Peter. We mean well when we dissuade our kids from Missionary service. But we may be hindering their purpose to serve God. This is a more subtle form of conflict. (He summarizes Joshua 9 about the Gibeonites fooling Israel into making a covenant with them. Then he takes up chapter 10. I don't know where his first point really begins, but here it is.) (A) Commitment results in conflict. Why people turn against us when we become Christians: (a) people are threatened by commitment; (b) they feel rejected; (c) they feel they're losing a friend; (d) maybe they feel they have to reevaluate; (e) interests change. Before your commitment to Christ, you're saying, "Don't bring me there [to church]; I don't like it; I don't feel good; it's convicting." Why all this conflict in the Bible? That's the way it is. People have no peace in their hearts. There's conflict because righteousness and evil are at odds. When you said yes to Jesus, you said no to the devil. The more we get to know people, the more we have to work through issues. Deep relationships will have conflict. You get to love persons for who they are, not for who you thought they were. In conflict, the old way is to use criticism, gossip, manipulation, intimidation, etc. We have to use other tools now, or evil will overcome us. Some of our tools: to bless, forgive, pray, do good. When we bless, those who have done us wrong are confounded. We have to take our thoughts captive. We have to win the battle within before we can win the battle around us. Everyone born of God overcomes the world. We can't win on our own, but we can through God inside us. (He quotes a suitable verse here.) Like the Gibeonites, we have new allies. We have the church. We need the church community. Beware of sectarianism, says Eugene Peterson. It's easy to hang with a few people who agree with you in every area. God even puts people you don't like into the family. We've got to love these people. The body is made up of many parts. The weaker parts are the indispensable parts. When we minister to these parts, we often get more out of it than they do. We must die to ourselves. (B) Commitment costs you something. Joshua had to defend the Gibeonites in difficult geography. He and his men did a twenty mile march uphill, then fought all the next day. And then Joshua prays for a miracle so they can fight longer! Ministry is not convenient. It costs. That's the point. Commitment costs conflict, energy, resources, life. Is that not what Jesus did? He poured his life out for us. Then we complain if we have to do the same. Joshua was afraid, but continued to march. We must win the battle within us, fight off resentment, unforgiveness. None of us are equal to the task. It can't be done apart from God. We can't be committed apart from God. (He closes with a story about a man who held nothing back in his commitment, and whose commitment is summed up this way: no reserves [no holding back]; no retreat; no regrets.) Commitment impacts people's lives. The great problem in North America is about lack of commitment: to God, to one another, and to God's purposes. We like convenience, hate hardships. If you make a commitment to God, you'll have conflict. Conflict will cost you something, probably everything. But in the end: no regrets.
Remarks: What he says is factual. Commitment brings conflict, and comes with a heavy price. It's good that he teaches this. Many churches do not. Our fight is really with spiritual powers, and cannot be won apart from God. He emphasizes the conflicts that we have with those closest to us. This too is helpful. His lessons in point B fit the text, though they are quite general. But there are problems with this message.
(1) His lessons in point A are not drawn from the text. For instance, did the Israelites feel rejected by any commitment the Gibeonites made? Or did the Gibeonites feel rejected by any commitment made by the Israelites? No, therefore why is rejection presented as one of the sub-points of the sermon? The five lessons he offers under his first point are entirely detached from the text used to introduce them! If there are any connections at all, they are purely accidental. Commitment indeed results in conflict with others. They might feel threatened or rejected by our commitment. Or they might feel as though they're losing a friend. They might also resent the need to reevaluate as we have done. These things may be true, but do we get these lessons from our text in Joshua? No attempt is made to show how his first point and its five lessons might have been culled from Joshua because they weren't. In fact, there is conflict in the text (9.22); but that is brought on by deceit, not commitment! It seems obvious that he did not labor long in these two chapters in Joshua in preparation for his message. Why even present a text if you're not going to teach lessons from it? Pulling lessons out of the hat like this is a poor way of feeding the sheep. It is nothing less than trying to yield life without offering the pure milk of the word. It reminds us of an attempt to make bricks without benefit of straw. But God is neither a Pharisee nor a Pharaoh. He has given us plenty to work with if we'll only get out of our heads and into Scripture. If Mr. Vallee had stuck with his text to lift lessons from it, then deeper lessons than the ones he came up with would have arisen. It says in Joshua 10 that Joshua slew the five kings he had committed to destroy. Is that not a useful analogy of the converted sinner who goes all out in his commitment to God and slays all his chief sins? Would that not take us deeper than Mr. Vallee took us? This would have made the sermon look heavenward to God instead of at the problems around us. And this is not 'to be so heavenly minded as to be no earthly good.' No, this lesson arises naturally from the chosen passage, and so we may have confidence in the usefulness of it. The truth is that when we slay our sins, the greatest earthly good is done by it, for as the slaying of kings by Joshua drew his brethren to him, so our slaying of sins will draw seeking sinners to us, and so to our Saviour and our way of life. This lesson we offer as one better than all five that fall under his first heading was gleaned from just a cursory look in the right place. Imagine what lessons could be gleaned by the diligent pastor! Because of his lack of concern to have some agreement between the text and his lessons, here is a further problem. When a connection is attempted, it can result in the most absurd and perilous incongruity. At one point he says that like the Gibeonites, we have new allies. But can we present the Gibeonites as models of commitment when their commitment came by lies and hypocrisy? Do we become allied with God and with other Christians through deceit, or else by grace and faith? Our commitment must always be in doubt if it was come by 'wilily.' Some Gibeonites were no doubt truly committed, but to say that like them we have new allies is too close to saying that we and they have come by our covenant the same way. Awkward pitfalls like this appear out of nowhere when the passage we should exposit is just used to help us preach our own inventions. The Bible commands men of God to rightly divide the word. It isn't stretching things to assert that Mr. Vallee did not even attempt to divide it! How may this prayer of his for a biblical worldview among his members be fulfilled unless he unfolds the word of God for them?
(2) This message is not convicting. There is no law to fear, hardly any mention of Jesus, and no dire consequences. For instance, what does he say about sin? Sin is not prominent in this message. It might have been if the text had been handled. No sins are mentioned as having to be repented of, except in an incidental way when he says we need new tools to replace the tools of gossip and the like. Nowhere does he put his people on the spot for sin. Or when he does, it's with little nudges in a tender tone, 'Come on now.' This kind of talk almost excuses sin when it should be reproved and shown to be the consequential evil that it really is. Sin is really soft-peddled in this message, not preached. Any speaker is naturally averse to offending the audience in front of him. So when he pulls lessons out of thin air, it is no wonder that he comes up with no command to repent of particular sins. At one point, he states the following attitude a person might have before he commits to Christ: "Don't bring me there [to church]; I don't like it; I don't feel good; it's convicting." A church service ought to be convicting. But would anyone feel convicted to commit to God by the sermon in this service? Not likely, because there is little or nothing in here to convict him. If someone did get convicted, it would have to be in spite of the sermon as much as because of it.
Conclusion: When sermon lessons are not taken from the text, this shows that the sermon is not centered on the text of Scripture. And when the whole sermon is wedged between two stories, this shows that Scripture is not the foundation of it. And so this sermon is not founded on Scripture and not Bible-centered. Not until at least fifteen minutes in does he touch upon any textual content. When Scripture is not made the basis and center, we are not surprised that the result is a non-convicting, man-centered message that contains no grand doctrines to speak of. This sermon is not really a sermon, and not even a commentary, but a kind of talk one might give in a café or on a street corner. It's all very casual, almost interactive, if you can believe it, and the contents are little more than one might offer in a therapeutic lecture or a motivational speech. At best, this is public speaking, but more relaxed than that. Mr. Vallee has a talent for delivery, but the manner and tone are unsuitable for the pulpit. There is no solemn authority here. One might get a temporary lift from the talk, but one will learn little, be convicted not at all, see Jesus only in passing, and be taught to treat Scripture as a springboard for whatever one has in mind to say. What we should have is a real sermon: one that teaches right from the word, convicts us of sin, gives us both a lovely and an awful sight of Christ, and that models a proper approach and use of the Bible. A congregation that is out for God does not want to hear what the man in the pulpit thinks, but what God has to say. Is this congregation really committed, I wonder? Do these people know what real preaching is? If the members of this church were committed, would they not demand something from God and his word instead of something cobbled together from their pastor's imagination? And how can a pastor expect God to speak through him unless he draws from the word that God has ordained as the medium by which he would reach both saints and sinners?
Three persons reviewed this message. One of these is responsible for writing the analysis. The other two generally agree with it. One of these three may be described as an intermittent seeker, but not a Christian yet. It seems fitting to end with his comments, for we're sure that Mr. Vallee should be anxious to win seeking souls like this to Christ. The seeker says that except for a few references to Scripture, the message was like something by Dr. Phil, the talk show host, and that Mr. Vallee should quit the ministry and do something like that instead. In light of these comments, especially, the following question is appropriate: These young persons killed on the highway just recently might have been to this church on the Sunday before their end. If they had gone there to hear this sermon, could they have gleaned any saving message from it in their dying moments?
Mr. Vallee, we welcome and desire your consideration and communication. The Bible commands us to prove all things and to hold fast that which is good. For the sake of your people and your own soul, we beg you to test your ministry against what the Bible reveals your message ought to be like.
CROSSROADS CHURCH, THE SPIRIT MOVES THE CHURCH INTO THE WORLD (SERMON ANALYSIS 2)
Mr. Cochrane, you have put your sermon on the internet as a podcast for people to listen to and to be blessed by. You should be pleased to learn that while we have listened, we have been like the noble Bereans too, ready to receive the word you preach, but searching the Scriptures as we go, to see whether what you preach is right (Acts 17.11.) We pray that you will be like the apostle Paul: that you will commend us for being so careful. And we know that if you are like the apostle, you will be even more anxious than we are to get the Bible right, and that you would sooner count yourself accursed than continue in error. "Woe is unto me, if I preach not the gospel!" (1 Corinthians 9.16.) This is the same as saying, 'Woe is unto me if I preach not correctly!'
Mr. Cochrane, Crossroads, January 4, 2009, The Spirit Moves the Church into the World.
Summary: (He begins with a prayer, followed by a joke.) We are in Acts 11.19-30 and 13.1-4. The main thing is to make disciples. Acts 1.8 is what the book of Acts turns on. It is the key verse. We should learn to read the Bible well. (He gives a general sweep of the contents of Acts.) Peter and Paul are the chief characters, behind the Holy Spirit. The disciples are ignited, then sent out into the world. The Spirit is a missionary Spirit. Now the church at Antioch. (He gives a little historical context.) Here are five marks of a church ignited by the Spirit. (A) A church leading people to a relationship with Jesus. The Church is a place where there's always room for one more. It is in Antioch that the Gentiles are first preached to deliberately. (B) A church that nurtures new believers. Barnabas teaches how to live the new life. "When you become a Christian, you need to be taught…how to read the Bible, how to hear from God, how to live the new life." Barnabas was humble to ask Saul to help him, not caring that by doing this he might live in Saul's shadow. That's the kind of people that make a difference. They are not threatened by other gifted people in the body. Their concern is that people get cared for. (C) A generous church. In Acts they gave 'each according to his ability.' Righteous living is to disadvantage yourself to advntage someone else. (D) A church with a plurality of gifted, godly leaders. There were five at least in Antioch. We have prophets today. A man in church told me, "You need to tell the church today that there's people in the body here that need to forgive each other…I heard Jesus say to me this morning that they need to do that today, or at the latest this week." And (the pastor speaking now) "I believe that's a true word from God. I believe it means the Lord is positioning us for a greater thing. And he can't do that if there's wrong relationships." There's godly leadership at Crossroads. (E) A church that sends people out on mission. Prayer, Spirit, Mission—this is the pattern. We build the church for worship and missions. "What's the 'so what?' I struggle with that every week." It's about a church ignited, not just one man. Do you want to get in on the action of God? What's your next step, then? A home group? Sunday night church? We're going to end with Communion today. By taking Communion you're saying, "Thank you, Father, for sending your Son to die for all of my sins. And thank you for bringing me into your body. Your forgiveness cost the life of Somebody else." That's the value God places on you. You might be new, and this is all new to you. If you want a personal relationship with Jesus, why don't you come to the Table with us? Say in your heart to Jesus, "I would like forgiveness of sins and eternal life." The worse thing we can do is to take the Supper unthinkingly. We ought to examine ourselves.
Remarks: He gives some context to the book of Acts. He stresses the need for evangelism and missions. His church is a giving church and a welcoming church. A spirit of humility like that of Barnabas is emphasized. Programs are underway attempting to bring his members deeper and to heal their wounds. This is all good. But there are some serious faults in this message and service.
(1) About our chief end. "The main thing is to make disciples," he says. Here is where Creeds and Catechisms prove useful. As important as evangelism is, the main thing is not that. Making disciples is just a means to the following end, "To glorify God and to enjoy him forever" (Westminster Shorter Catechism.) Who would dare say that this is incorrect? Inadvertently, Mr. Cochrane gets the order right later when he says that we build the church for worship and missions. Since Mr. Cochrane seems to be so cursory on doctrine and the method of saving souls, what are we to believe he means when he says that making disciples is the main thing? A person could not be blamed for thinking that what he means by the main thing is to increase church attendance.
(2) About his administration of Communion. He invites visitors to Communion who will in that moment ask Jesus for forgiveness. This is very reckless, especially when very little content about the gospel has been given, and almost no instruction on the method of salvation shared. When he bids these visitors to ask for forgiveness so they can join in Communion, not even one sin is pointed out that they might need forgiveness for! After giving this invitation, he says that the worse thing is to take Communion unthinkingly, not realizing that this is precisely what his invitation just tempted these visitors to do! To put sinners on the spot like that in front of your people is a coercive act that might impel them to pretend repentance and to join in some holy thing they have not been prepared by God for and invited by him to share. They might be tempted to accept the invitation just to fit in, and nothing else. This invitation is a sure way of making sinners into hypocrites, which would only serve to increase God's anger toward them and to make them more liable than they already are to receive God's punishment. The pastor's conduct in this appears to be perilously close to the same as making sinners twice the children of hell, like it says in Matthew 23.15. We do not want to say that the pastor is a Pharisee, like in the first part of this verse. Only God knows. But what we can say and what we must say is that the cavalier invitation reminds us of that conduct reprehended by Jesus in there. We would not cite this reproof of Jesus if there were no parallel to be drawn. It is a significant charge. But someone has to care for souls (the pastor's included) enough to warn him of this terrible similarity at the risk of being thought slanderous and cruel for so doing. This irresponsible invitation of his makes it appear like he is more concerned to increase his membership than to make true disciples.
(3) About his discernment. He says that a man, a prophet of some sort, told him there was unforgiveness in the church between members, and that Jesus wanted this dealt with today, or at the latest this week. So there is unforgiveness among members of a church containing hundreds of people, many of whom must have been admitted to fellowship without examination. Do we need a prophet to reveal this? And this 'prophet' says that Jesus told him the people should forgive each other today, 'or at the latest this week.' Because Jesus does not equivocate or speak like this, we know this man is not a prophet at all, but just a presumptuous guy pointing out the obvious. What does it sound like when Jesus reproves? "Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand." This is his well-known general reproof. Would it be like Jesus to add, 'at the latest this week'? A reproof from Jesus does not come with a qualification like that. Even in his most tender moments, when speaking with the woman caught in adultery, for instance, he does not permit that repentance should lag. "Neither do I condemn thee," he says. Then he adds, "go, and sin no more" (John 8. 11.) Can we imagine him saying instead, 'go, and quit sinning: at the latest this week'? We know that Jesus never spoke like that; he never would and he never will. This 'prophet' at Crossroads is false, then. Not one single person speaking for God—not one prophet in the whole Bible, utters an equivocal reproof. Here is what a true prophet sounds like, "Yet forty days, and Nineveh shall be overthrown" (Jonah 3.4.) Was this forty days interpreted as time enough to put off repentance? No, for it simply says after this, "So the people of Nineveh believed God, and proclaimed a fast, and put on sackcloth, from the greatest of them even to the least of them" (verse 5.) No one reasoned, 'Well, it looks like we've got forty days.' The Ninevites did not reason like this, for they did not understand the prophet to mean they could put repentance off. Jesus' treatment of the adulterous woman and Jonah's preaching to Nineveh are the closest cases we can think of where some lukewarm message of repentance might be supposed. And of course, repentance is unequivocally commanded in both instances. Prophets of God, both Old and New, never communicated messages to repent, 'at the latest this week.' And so this 'prophet' at Crossroads is not for real. He is a very careless, unsanctified man who thinks little of putting lies in Jesus' mouth. This is very sad. The sadder thing is that Mr. Cochrane can't see through this, or doesn't want to. He wants to believe the prophecy is genuine, for he hopes it might mean the Lord is positioning the church for a greater thing. And perhaps the saddest thing of all is that, relative to this issue, Mr. Cochrane misinterprets 1 Corinthians 13.9. The verse says, "For we know in part, and we prophesy in part." He gives this as proof that true prophets 'don't bat a thousand.' Is he not covering his tracks in case this 'prophet' is wrong? Maybe he suspects that the man has spoken presumptuously, after all. Regardless, this passage does not mean that true prophets may speak falsely, but that in eternity there will be no need of prophecy. This interpretation is well known, at least among dependable scholars. Deuteronomy (18.20-22) is quite firm in stating that anyone presuming to be a prophet must be right every single time he speaks in the name of the Lord. If he's wrong just once, "even that prophet shall die" (Deuteronomy 18.20.) This must mean, then, that the true prophet must indeed bat a thousand. Pastor Cochrane says he's been to seminary. He should not be making mistakes like this.
(4) About what new believers ought to be taught. He seems to reduce this to three things: prayer, reading, and living. But notice that he leaves out doctrine. Everything seems to be geared, not for learning, really, but for getting people into programs and for controlling habits. This is evident from the Crossroads ministries he advertises during this message, like Celebrate Recovery, which is about dealing with 'hurts, habits, and hang-ups.' And his Growing Deeper ministry may include a Bible-book study, but our sense is that not much doctrine is doled out there either, especially considering that a 'young adult' is the one leading the program. This is not encouraging at all. Modern therapy instead of doctrinal instruction is the contemporary way. Though doctrine is what would really help against habits and the like, modern therapy is applied instead. And this is exactly the kind of thing that is done in place after place, over and over with failure after failure, both in churches and in the secular realm. There is no reason to believe that the results will be much different here.
(5) About his use of Scripture and lack of explanation. He grazes the surface of a few verses, and says nothing except what may be gleaned by the most superficial reading. Inadvertently, though, he mentions a verse from somewhere in outline form: Prayer, Spirit, Mission. He should have dug into that. Then his people might have gotten some food to eat. He assumes his listeners are Christians. But with preaching like this, it is hard to believe that many of them could be. He says that righteous living is to disadvantage yourself to benefit someone else. On the face of it, this is a good saying. But unless it is explained first, or at least somewhere in the sermon, that righteous living is possible only through faith and the righteousness of Jesus, the listener will likely take this statement to mean that generosity and other works must be the way of obtaining a righteous life and standing before God. Someone perhaps might object and say that a pastor cannot preach every single doctrine in one sermon and that he can't preach to sinners and teach the saints at the same time. But the trouble is that this pastor (I'm referring to this sermon in particular, only suspecting that this is the kind of subject matter all his other sermons contain too) preaches no gospel and teaches no doctrine. Good preaching edifies the saints when the gospel is preached to unbelievers; and it results in the salvation of sinners when the doctrines are taught the saints. There are some who will no doubt testify that they go away from this church on Sunday with strength enough to go on until they come back a week later. But are such people really dedicated to learning and sanctification? How much strength is needed to go on when we are not attempting to learn what we should learn and walk as Christ would have us walk? How many persons attend church just for the social uplift they receive from going? There is a kind of strength in that, but is it from knowing Jesus? Is it evangelical strength? Persons who think this sermon contains good enough matter have little knowledge. If a pastor mentions many disparate things that are in the Bible, they think he knows much. But knowing what's in the Bible is not what counts. What counts is knowing what the things in the Bible actually mean. When the sermon is a mile wide and an inch deep, it usually indicates that the pastor has not learned to interpret, or does not think it necessary to do so.
(6) About his failure to be specific about sin. Whenever he speaks about sin, he never mentions it as stealing, or drinking, or sex outside of marriage, etc. He must be avoiding specifics like these in order not to offend. For instance, when he speaks of what Jesus paid for, he says, "He paid for our stuff." Does that not leave sinners off the hook? Who is going to get convicted by language like that? All sins, it seems, amount to 'stuff,' whatever that could mean, or maybe 'habits, hurts, or hang-ups.' Will soft language like this not leave people with the impression that sin is not serious? Will people even think they need to repent when sin is put like that? This is the language of being irresponsible for sin, of being a victim rather than a sinner. He goes out of his way to avoid real preaching.
Conclusion: To begin the sermon by telling a story instead of something about the text is a poor way to start. But this approach agrees with his light, offhand treatment of Scripture. By beginning with a story instead of with the Bible, a lighthearted mood is created. And so from the start, the people are not set to take what the pastor says seriously. This is why we start with the Bible. It sets a serious tone. This message he gives never comes up to a serious level. It is more like a conversation than a sermon, and is so informal that it must be a reproach to God. This is not preaching, but some kind of leisurely, blasé pep talk. It's not even up to the level of a commentary. You really have to hear it in all its distinction from something that could be called a true sermon to see what we mean. Ironically, he calls himself a preacher, not a teacher, in this message. But in this sermon (if we are to judge by this sermon alone) he is neither a preacher nor a teacher. This may sound like a severe judgment to make. But we can make the judgment with all confidence that we are right in making it, for he does not preach up Christ and preach down sin in this sermon; and neither does he teach anything on how to be saved or sanctified. During the sermon, he drifts into comments on how his church is doing, its programs, etc. There is a way to do this briefly and to make it serve the sermon. But this he does not do. And then he comes to a full stop at one point when he senses his congregation getting weary. To resolve their weariness, he tells a story. That's what he was taught to do at seminary, he says. But if the congregation grows weary, could this not mean that they're tired for lack of substance? Maybe the last thing these people need is another story. Maybe the advice to him should be, not to go into a digression to wake the people up, but to preach some living water to keep them awake. This whole sermon is a specimen, not only of shallow content, but of nonchalant delivery. Clearly, this man is handicapped by the chumminess he has cultivated with his people. How can you point out the sins of your chums? How can you be serious with them? They call him 'Pastor Dan.' He is probably able, though, to preach something more substantial to them. From some of his comments, and the prayer just before the administration of Communion, it seems that he knows what the gospel is, and even something of what Jesus accomplished by his death. Example: "His blood really is sufficient to settle accounts with you for all of our sin…When you raised him from the dead it was like a big statement from you that you're satisfied with the death of Jesus." But he does not delve into these riches. And he's way too faint and brief on the method of salvation. (It involves more than asking for forgiveness.) It is quite illogical for the pastor to think that forgiveness among his members may result in God positioning the church for a greater thing when the more fundamental issue of receiving forgiveness from God is left so unexplained by him. To think that our better treatment of each other will result in a blessing while our sins to God go unreproved is a man-centered way of thinking. And it's not even man-centered in a useful, moral sense, for in order to this forgiveness among the members he does not even single out any sins that should be put away. If he did, no one would get saved through it, for the law is not the gospel, but it might at least result in some persons quitting their sins of a more gross character. "We want to be a church where anyone can walk off the street and learn about Jesus and God," says the pastor. Would sinners learn about Jesus, then, if they were to walk in during the preaching of this sermon? We think they would be more confused upon their exit than upon their entry. And our sense is that the majority of members in this church, if quizzed, would not be able to say much about what the gospel is nor how sinners may be reconciled to God. They might even know very little about the law, or even think the law is the gospel. We hate having to be this negative. We think this pastor must be a jolly, pleasant fellow. But this sermon just doesn't come up to a passing standard. And we must say that we believe it can do more harm than good to those who come to it with a timid, undiscriminating intent to receive bread from heaven. It may seem, at first glance, that this analysis is just a fault-finding exercise. The truth is, there is very little good in a sermon of this nature; and if an analysis is to be done on it, every serious fault that can be discovered should not be passed over without comment. The Bereans would do no less; and the apostle Paul would not commend if any less were done.
Only two persons have signed this analysis. The third person was so turned off when the pastor began his sermon with a joke that he could not go on. (This person was not R. P., who did not participate this time, but some other fellow.) He felt like the pulpit was being used for entertainment rather than worship. The two persons who listened right through concur with that sentiment. But they went on anyway, hoping that God would have them do it so an analysis might be done, to the end that something might change for the better on account of it.
Mr. Cochrane, if you examine your sermon beside these notes and an open Bible, we believe that you will come to the same conclusions as we. No thing has been said to the negative unless the grave nature of the issue called for such criticism. Without substantive changes in your ministry, we believe you and your people may come too wide of the cross of Christ. And what are the consequences?
CROSSROADS CHURCH, THE WAY OF THE LORD (SERMON ANALYSIS 1)
A discussion with a member of your church prompted the listening of, and the following analysis of, a sermon you delivered. This member of your church did not participate in what followed that preliminary discussion. But a copy of this analysis has been given to him. We think it would be helpful to your ministry if you gave the following copy of it your close attention. "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good."
Mr. Cochrane, Crossroads, April 26, 2009, The Way of the Lord.
Summary: 'Follow me' is the text. To change your thinking and to believe are the first two imperatives. 'Follow me' is the third. The text, 'I am the way, the truth, and the life' is a springboard from which to explain 'follow me.' "Jesus' truth gets far more attention than Jesus as the way." Jesus is not just our way to God, but God's way to us. "Some of you have repented; you've changed your thinking; you've changed your heart." Jesus claims to be the only way to the Father. "The Way to God is not a proper set of beliefs…not a lot of activity in the name of God…but a person and relationship with Christ." Jesus is just like us, God in the flesh. The way is a person, but also a way of life. The way is to obediently follow Jesus Christ. Characteristics of the Jesus way: (A) It is a holy way. This is to be separate, distinct. God is holy. By the work of Jesus we get to God, who is holy. We must deal with sin, turn away from wickedness. People who walk in the way become increasingly holy. 1 Corinthians 13 shows us what a holy person looks like. A holy person is loving, patient, etc. (B) A way on the margins. Jesus chose to spend his time on the margins, like in Capernaum, among the marginalized. Follow him to the lost. You can measure your progress by this. (C) A way of sacrifice. This is to take up your cross, to lay your ambitions at Jesus' feet, to give rather than accumulate. There are two ways in Psalm 1. There is the Jesus way; there is another way, or variations of it. Why choose the Jesus way? Because both ways have outcomes. "The way of the wicked will perish. C. S. Lewis said, utterly, irrevocably, and forever lost. It's tragic." The ones on Jesus' way will stand in the end. They do not repent of the way of holiness and sacrifice. "Death where is your sting; death where is your victory."
Remarks: (1) Concerning repentance, which he mentions a few times. He says this is a change of mind, and he's right about that. But he never comes to any specific sins that must be repented of, except for what is mentioned incidentally, like when he cites the instance of the woman caught in adultery being forgiven. Sins like this are never mentioned as being possibly committed by his listeners. He keeps things very general and non-offensive. For instance, he mentions wickedness, but nothing specific like drunkenness and sleeping-around, which his members might be committing in secret. How are people to know what to repent of unless they are told? If they are not told, will they not think their pastor is okay with them going on in sin? He mentions the specific virtues common to holiness, but he says nothing specific about sin. This is a lopsided emphasis. The Bible lists both our virtues and our sins.
(2) Concerning regeneration, which he does not mention per se. He says that these persons who've signed up to repent have 'changed their own hearts.' When preachers in pulpits speak of a change of heart, they usually mean that change traditionally understood to be accomplished by the Holy Spirit alone, in that work the Bible calls regeneration. So what this man is doing, hopefully by mistake, is attributing this work that only God can do, not to God, but to man. He seems to confuse repentance and regeneration.
(3) Concerning the way: (A) It is a holy way. This is to be separate, distinct, he says. This is correct. He speaks of this as it is with God. But when he says that those who walk in the way must become increasingly holy, he does not say how holiness is obtained, maintained, and increased (by the Holy Spirit, through faith in Jesus' life and death.) (B) A Way on the Margins. The way might be on the margins. But being on the margins of society does not prove we're on the Jesus way. Just go and look at all the unrepentant sinners down at the soup kitchens and at the Buffalo Hotel, not just those who are helped, but the helpers. And consider, too, all the sinners in prominent positions in societies in history who have repented, like the Haldane family, for instance, who were aristocrats. And so to be on the margins with the marginalized may mean nothing at all. (C) A Way of Sacrifice. What kind of ambitions must we lay down at Jesus' feet? He does not tell us. How are we to know which ones? Earlier in the sermon he cites 1 Corinthians 13 as the passage exhibiting what a holy person looks like. This is good. But this passage also shows that even the most sacrificial soul may be in a lost condition. Since this is the case, a qualification pointing this out seems necessary. One could be on as sacrificial a way as Mother Theresa was on, and still be on the wrong way.
(4) Concerning the two ways in Psalm 1. No sins are singled out here as being committed by those on the wrong way. All we get from his quoting of the Psalm is that it must be wrong to be ungodly. But this is a state, or condition. What sins are involved? This is what the people need to be told. He says that the way of the wicked will perish. The wicked will be irrecoverably lost. But what does it mean to be lost? Is it hell? We are not told. What are some of the characteristics, at least? He does not give us any.
Conclusion: Because of the mention of these first two imperatives, repentance and faith, possibly he is addressing Christians alone. At one point he does say that by the work of Jesus we get to God. But then he contradicts this by presenting 'the way' as a lifestyle. Here is how that happens. He says, "The way is not a proper set of beliefs, not a lot of activity in the name of God, but a person and relationship with Jesus…It is a person, but also a way of life." I don't know what he means by 'not a lot of activity,' for this seems to contradict the way as being a self-sacrificial lifestyle among the marginalized. The way is a person and a relationship with that person. This is true. But what about the statement that the way is not a set of beliefs? This statement is not surprising since John 14.6 was not exposited, but used as a springboard instead. John 14.6 teaches Jesus as the way to God. Mr. Cochrane is teaching lifestyle as the way. Maybe Mr. Cochrane did not mean to communicate a method of works as the way, but this was my first impression. It is natural to get this impression because John 14.6 is about Jesus as the way of access to the Father. When lifestyle is presented as the way instead of Jesus, who he is and what he did, the sermon comes across as getting to God by how we live. This is salvation by works. And this shows the danger of using a text as a springboard instead of expositing it. When people see access to God in the verse, and then they pour Mr. Cochrane's content into it, they will interpret the way as access to God by a lifestyle of works. There is no real exposition and preaching here. Exposition would have prevented these errors. The message feels like advice and self-improvement. In this sermon there is no content to repentance, regeneration is by the sinner, and the way seems like nothing else but salvation by the moral law, though this is not well defined. The way presented seems to be a self-reformation of whatever the sinner believes must be reformed, for no sins that must be repented of are specified. These errors are the common lot of contemporary theology, and are committed by those who hold this idea that Christianity is nothing but a relationship. "Jesus' truth gets far more attention than Jesus as the way," says Mr. Cochrane. But truth is exactly what gets least attention today. Truths like justification and redemption are precisely what are needed to show the way because he who is the way opens the door through these realities. And a singling out of sins is needed because only by conviction of sin will sinners repent and be ushered by God into this way of Jesus. The way can never be disconnected from belief, as was done in this sermon. If the way does not include a set of beliefs concerning Jesus and our sin, it cannot be the Jesus way. The way in John 14.6 is about access to God by Jesus for salvation from hell and admission into God's kingdom. The necessity of believing as much is implied. So the way is a set of beliefs, after all.
This sermon was listened to and discussed by three Christians. The first one wrote this analysis, which is based mostly on what he thought. The other two generally agree with it. And these two persons were asked two questions at the end of the discussion. First, in case the sermon was for the lost, "Did you see the way of salvation in the sermon?" The first one answers, "This must be preaching to the saved." The second one answers, "Not clearly." Second, in case the sermon was for the saved, "Could you stay comfortable in your sins during this sermon?" The first one answers, "Yes!" The second one answers, "Yes, I was not convicted at all. Without the conviction of sin, how can there be any true repentance? Without repentance, how can there be salvation and growth? The preacher's goal in every message must be to bring sinners to repentance while drawing genuine believers closer to Christ. Nothing less pleases Almighty God."
Mr. Cochrane, we have brought our discussion and notes of your sermon together into the form of this document so that nothing we aim to share with you is lost. Your communication to us is welcome and desired. While we understand how busy you must be, we encourage you to examine whether or not what we have said is true. Our concern is for the proper conveyance of God's truth.
Posted by The Analyst at 12:14 PM No comments:


A woman's desperate 911 call from inside the home of her abductor led to the arrest of a man who turned out to be a serial killer, cops in Ohio said this week.
According to Ashland police, the call came Tuesday from inside the home of Shawn Grate, where a kidnapped woman managed to partially untie herself from ropes used to restrain her.
The woman said the suspect had a stun gun and that she'd known him for about a month and a half.
At a press conference, Ashland Chief David Marcelli said the woman was subsequently found at a home that was supposed to be unoccupied. Grate was also arrested at the home Tuesday morning.
Two dead bodies were also found in the home, cops say.
One of the victims was Stacey Stanley, a 43-year-old Huron County woman whose family said had been missing since September 8 after she got a flat tire near the home where her body was found.
Police have yet to identify the second body in the home or release Stanley's cause of death. Officials say Grate later led them to a third body in neighboring Richland County.
Richland County Prosecutor Bambi Couch Page said Grate confessed that he had killed a woman in June at a house that was destroyed by fire that month, according to the Mansfield News Journal.
Grate was charged in Ashland County on Thursday with two counts of murder and one count of kidnapping. Records in Rockland County showed he has not yet been charged as of Thursday.
Grate remains in custody at the Ashland County Jail.


text:
About Pabowa
Two Worlds: The Sequel of Strings of Affection
Written by Bismark Kyeremanteng	Posted on May 6, 2020 May 7, 2020 Less than 0 min read
Saving Bookmark this article Bookmarked
My dear sweetheart,
"I believe you must have completed your first degree by now. Just like you, I've also completed mine in accounting with first-class honors. Not only did I become a valedictorian, but was also adjudged the overall best graduating student in the university. I wish you were with me as I received the award with much pride. I would have wished to come down to Ghana but the good news is that I've been offered a scholarship to proceed with my second degree. However, sooner than later, I shall come down for us to spend some quality time together as we used to do in our secondary school days. But bear in mind that my strings of affection for you remain unchanged. Remain prayerful, forceful, and determined in whatever you set out to do. I want you to stay safe and take very good care of yourself."
Your lovely lady,
After reading the letter in silence, Prince pressed the paper on his chest, took a deep breath and closed his eyes gently as he cast his mind back to some past events in his life.
Prince and Sarah had been good friends since their secondary days. Their friendship was much talked about in school. They both completed school five years ago with distinction. While Prince got admission to study medicine at the University of Ghana, Sarah had the chance to study in one of the renowned universities in Europe. Before the final secondary school results were released, Mr. Oppong, Prince's father, had secretly purchased a university form and applied on behalf of Prince. Prince had no knowledge of what his father did at his blindside.
Therefore, it came as a shock to him when he realized he had been admitted to go and read medicine at the university. Prince boldly told his father that he did not have what it took to read medicine. His father tried in vain to convince him. It was a heartbreaking moment for Mr. Oppong as he had wanted his son to become a medical doctor. To make issues more complicated, Prince told his parents he wanted to be a musician.
"Talk to your son. Talk to him because I have no patience for his stubbornness," Mr. Oppong lamented bitterly to his wife, Mrs. Herty Oppong. Mr. Oppong left the hall for his bedroom leaving his wife and his son Prince. Prince was standing beside the window looking dissatisfied.
Mrs. Oppong sprang up from the chair and went closer to Prince saying, " My boy, listen to your father. He wants the best for you in life. Doing music wouldn't add any value to your life. Doing music is an unwise decision one can ever take," Mrs. Oppong advised. "But mum, music is what I want to do. It's my passion. Music inebriates my body and soul. Please mum, kindly speak to daddy on my behalf. I am not interested in becoming a doctor because I can't stand the sight of blood," Prince knelt down and held his mother's legs.
"My boy listen to me, the most useless thing to do is to pursue music as a career. How many musicians in this country are doing so well in life? After coming out with one or two songs, they wither away like cocoa leaves," Mrs. Oppong shouted on top of her voice. Prince was utterly amazed by her mother's negative utterances against music.
He got up from the ground, held his mother's two shoulders with his two arms and said softly, "Mum you call music useless? Sorry mum, if you think music is useless to you, then to me, it's useful. If only you and dad understand and give me the needed support, I won't be useless. Mummy, you people are killing my dreams slowly.
"No my son, don't talk like that", Mrs. Oppong stated. "Yes mum, you people are killing my dream. Did you ever stop my brother Solomon from pursuing his dream course?" Prince asked his mum but there was no answer. "Answer me mum. Why do you people always want me to dance according to your wishes and not mine?" Prince asked and left the hall when he realized there was no answer coming.
Mrs. Oppong called him to return but he didn't even look back. Mrs. Oppong looked very disappointed. She sat back on the sofa chair and began to think deeply.
That evening, Mr Oppong called for another family meeting to find out Prince's final resolution. Disappointedly, his expectation was a huge failure as Prince had already taken an entrenched position on his decision not to do medicine at the university. Mr. Oppong became extremely angry that he ran out of words to express his displeasure verbally.
"You dare challenge me? How dare you! How dare you challenge your father's decision! Alright go ahead and do your music but count me out because you're going to take care of your own needs in this house," Mr Oppong reproached and threatened Prince as he stood with his left hand in his pocket.
Mrs Oppong, as well as Prince, was in total silence. Prince got up from his chair in annoyance and said to his father, "dad, I'm also a human being with feelings and rights. If you won't support my cause, I don't have a problem but will never ever become the medical doctor you want me to be. I prefer going after what my heart desires at the expense of my comfort. You guys can't kill my dream."
"Herh! Are you listening to your son? He called me a guy?" said Mr Oppong as he turned to look at his wife. Before he could open his mouth to speak again, Prince had already left the scene. Mr Oppong called him but he never turned to look at him.
Do you see the kind of training you give to your son?" he accused his wife. In the next few minutes, Prince came out of the bedroom holding his traveling bag and the guitar. He was leaving the house for good. His mother made an attempt to stop him but was ignored outrightly while Mr. Oppong urged him on to leave the house but never returned even in his death. Prince turned and said, "I'm going to the world to chase my dream, dad."
Prince had moved in with one of his school mates, Christos, from the luxury of his parents' home. Christos lived with his two elder brothers in the biggest slum at one side of the city. He also passed his secondary school examination with distinction but could not continue due to financial constraints. Prince used to give immerse support to Christos during their secondary school days.
Therefore, when Prince approached Christos for assistance, he was offered on a silver platter. Christos had spoken to his brothers about Prince's predicament and had all agreed to have him stay with them. Due to his relocation, Prince lost absolute contact with Sarah and hadn't heard from her in a very long time since until the day he received the first letter from her. The letter was secretly given to him by his father's driver, Efo Dotse.
Dotse had bumped into Prince and promised to deliver a letter to him three days earlier. Prince then gave him the direction to where he had moved to. Since Dotse was also in charge of taking letters from the family's post office box, he delivered Prince's letter to him without Mr Oppong noticing.
After remembering all that had happened in his life concerning the trouble he had had with his parents, tears began trickling down from the corners of his eyes. Taking the guitar beside him, he got up from under the tree where he had read Sarah's letter and left for the slum.
Ever since Prince left home, life had been very difficult for him. For his source of livelihood, he did solo performances at programs for a paltry sum of money. Christos and his brothers treated him like their own. When Prince went down with malaria and cholera some months back, they played a huge role in his gradual recovery. Now, life had become very hard for Prince. There was a military takeover of government and a curfew had been imposed on the country.
The new development affected those living in slum areas badly. Most of the slum dwellers, including Christos and his brothers who were scrap dealers and depended heavily on it, were not spared of the hardships. All forms of social programs ceased and as a result, Prince became handicapped in feeding himself.
Six months later, the curfew was lifted. The military government had handed power over to the civilians. Peace and tranquility had come back to reign. Citizens resumed their daily activities without restrictions. Christos and his brothers had gone back to the scrap dealing business while Prince's weekly performance at functions resurfaced.
Two months later, fortune visited Prince. A music patron had connected him to a very wealthy man. He was to perform at the birthday party of the rich man's daughter, Hamdiya. Prince was elated when the news got to him. That day, he put on one of his finest outfits and attended the birthday party. He sang so well that he was given a five-minute standing ovation.
After the party, the rich man, Alhaji Belo, invited Prince for a conversation at his big hall. Having spoken at length with Prince, Alhaji Belo concluded, "Young man, you're very talented and your first impression has proven my intuition right. I'm going to help you. I'll call you at the appropriate time." Prince left Alhaji's house with his face beaming.
Two weeks later, Alhaji fulfilled his promise. Prince was given a car and a two-bedroom apartment. Alhaji became his manager. At twenty-three years, Prince had come face to face with his long time dream of being supported in his budding career. Prince had planned to bring Christos and his brothers to come and live with him. Three days before Prince could bring them in to live with him, there was a twist and turn in his life. The fortune that had visited him decided to end its visit abruptly.
Prince was recording a song with the sound engineer and the director of music when Alhaji barged into the studio. He looked angry and was breathing heavily. "You ingrate. Upon what I'm doing for you, you decided to pay me back with evil?" Alhaji jabbed pointing his finger at Prince. He moved further in an attempt to attack Prince but was restrained by the sound engineer and the music director.
"Now, leave the studio. Don't go near the house I bought for you with my hard-earned money or else I will have you arrested. Don't ever venture to go and take anything from that house. You wanted to rape my daughter upon all that I've done for you," Alhaji reprimanded.
Prince was speechless. He wasn't given the chance to explain his side of the story as Alhaji expected him to get out of the studio in a twinkle of an eye. Prince felt Alhaji had been unfair to him for not giving him any hearing. Prince sadly left for the slum. His fortune had come crashing on a rock.
He explained the whole incident to Christos saying, "I was taking some rest in my new house after a long stressful day at the studio. As I lay on my bed, I heard a knock on the door. I quickly went and opened. It was the daughter of Alhaji Belo. I wasn't expecting her but all the same, I had to let her in because she was the daughter of the man who wanted a better future for me. In a provocative outfit, her tighs were visibly exposed. As soon as she entered and sat on the sofa chair, she unbuttoned her dress leaving her chemise exposed with the reason being that the room was too hot for her. I requested that I turned the fan but she refused."
"She then got up from her seat and walked seductively towards me with her large breast size dangling. As if I had been hypnotized, I watched her as she twerked and rubbed her left hand in my hair with the right one exploring other parts of the body. When I realized I was being led into a bottomless pit, I vehemently resisted her. She pleaded with me to take her to bed but I turned down her request. Feeling embarrassed, she gave up and threatened to deal with me but I never knew she could go and tell a lie against me. Now look at me, one she-devil decided to ruin my life."
After narrating his ordeal, Christos sympathized with him and gave an assurance that everything was going to be alright. With no opportunity coming his way again, Prince resolved to join Christos and his brothers in doing the scrap business. Though Christos refused on the grounds that with Prince's rich background, the job wasn't fitting for him to do, Prince insisted. The next day, he joined them for work and they roamed from one house to another, collecting scraps. Their delivery point was at the biggest refuse dump in the city close to the slum. Sometimes, they also combed through the refuse dump for scraps.
It'd been one month since Prince began working with his friends as a scrap dealer. On one scorchy afternoon when the sun was so hot that it made perfect vision almost impossible, the refuse dump got submerged in a cloud of thick smoke. There were women, men, children, young and old taking part in the collection and sale of scraps on the refuse dump. Prince was busily bending some wires he had found beneath the earth with his hands. He wore attire stained with different kinds of fluids.
He had scarfed his head with his rag. His bushy hair was a forest with an overgrown beard almost covering the whole of his face. Christos was resting underneath a shady tree close to him while his two brothers were going around the refuse dump picking any metallic objects they set their eyes on. A taxi pulled up slowly just behind Prince. Efo Dotse got down from the front seat of the taxi to see Prince working. He had gone to the slum and had been told that Prince and his friends were working at the refuse dump.
Efo Dotse wasn't happy when he saw Prince in that state. When he got down from the car, he mentioned Prince's name in amazement. When Prince turned and saw Efo Dotse, he stopped whatever he was doing and went to him. Though Prince was embarrassed for being seen working as a scrap dealer, he made no sign to indicate his feelings.
"Someone is here to see you," Efo Dotse said.
"Who? Did you tell my parents I'm here? I don't want to see their faces," Prince stated as he turned to move further away from Efo Dotse.
"Not your parents. It's someone dear to your heart", Efo Dotse said. Prince turned and asked, "who?" Efo Dotse pointed at the backseat door of the car. The door was being opened slowly and in the next few seconds, a lady in a pair of high heels, a long beautiful hair, a black skirt with yellow blouse to match, emerged from the car. Prince looked at the person gradually from her toes to her head and saw it was Sarah.
Looking taken aback, Prince turned and took to his heels while Christos and Efo Dotse ran after him calling out his name loudly. Sarah stood there shedding tears. She had arrived two days earlier and decided to visit Prince. When she got there, Mrs. Oppong had told her about the problems Prince had had with them five years ago and his decision to move out of the house. She'd been heartbroken after being given the news.
What hit her so hard was the fact that Mrs. Oppong hadn't known the whereabouts of her own son. As she'd stepped out of the house looking desperate and despondent, Efo Dotse, who was outside the house washing one of Mr. Oppong's car, detected the cause of Sarah's sadness. He told Sarah he would take her to where Prince was living. After telling a lie to Mrs Oppong that he was attending to an emergency at home, he took Sarah to see Prince.
When Prince arrived at his place of abode in the slum, he entered the room and knelt behind the door weeping. Fifteen minutes after entering the room, there was a knock on the door for three consecutive times but no response was heard. It was Sarah. Christos had brought her to the house in order to have a private talk with Prince.
When Sarah entered the room, Prince ordered, "Get out of here. Please get out. You don't need me. I am a poor secondary school leaver and a garbage boy as well. And I don't deserve a university graduate. Please leave. Can't you see we are world's apart?"
He turned and moved further away from her amidst tears. Prince's "cold" reception forced tears from her eyes. She moved closer to him and said calmly, "Don't be silly, Prince. What is the meaning of we are worlds apart? I know everything and I'm not gonna condemn you. I shall always stand by you no matter what you go through. Your joy is my joy; your grief is my grief; your tears are my tears and your tragedy is my tragedy. Have you forgotten so soon that; you made me feel like the luckiest girl in the world? that you did the unimaginable to have me in your life? Your love is what I need for the rest of my life and I promise to do everything to keep you in my life," Sarah professed.
She removed a tissue from her bag and wiped away his tears. Prince was touched by Sarah's profession of love and he hugged her warmly. Next, Sarah took Prince to the barber's shop for him to have his hair cut." I'm not gonna let you go back to that slum. You're going to lodge at a guest house I've already booked for you until the feud between you and your family is resolved," Sarah assured him. Though Prince didn't like the idea, he had to succumb to avoid further issues.
Three days later, Prince checked out of the guest house after Sarah had gone to pave the way for Prince to resolve issues and reunite with his family. While moving out of the guest house, they bumped into Alhaji Belo. Immediately Alhaji saw Prince, he approached and apologized to Prince for the way he treated him some months ago. Hamdiya had later gone to confess to his father about how she made sexual advances at Prince and not the other way round. Alhaji Belo had been looking for Prince to give him back the promising future he took from him. Prince forgave Alhaji but didn't want to accept the offer. Alhaji's persistent appeal wasn't potent enough to change Prince's mind until Sarah added his voice to the issue. Prince accepted and promised to see Alhaji later on.
In an hour's time, Sarah and Prince joined Rev Father Fredrick Kwabena Konto to go to the Oppong family for the settlement of the long-standing family feud. As soon as Mrs Oppong saw Prince, she ran and hugged him with so much passion. Mrs. Oppong had personally made several attempts to locate Prince but to no avail. Mr Oppong, on the other hand, looked indifferent. As a result, she was constantly quarreling with Mr Oppong.
Prince went and knelt before his father saying, "Father forgive me. I allowed my stubborn heart to reduce my power of reasoning." Mr Oppong asked him to get up and recounted that he also realized the big mistake he made by not supporting his son's dream but instead, tried to impose a decision on him. Both father and son made peace with Rev Father Konto, Sarah and Mrs Oppong giving thanks to God. Mr Oppong then promised to inject a huge sum of money into Prince's dream of becoming a musician. Prince finally moved in with his family.
A week later, he reestablished contact with Alhaji Belo where Hamdiya offered an unqualified apology to him. The house and the car which Alhaji took from him were restored. When his career became a success by the kind courtesy of Alhaji Belo and his, Prince never forgot his friend and the two brothers. He asked them to move in with him. Consequently, he established a business for the three brothers. When he won the best discovery of the year award, he dedicated it to Sarah, his three friends, and his family.
Bismark Kyeremanteng Member since April 14, 2020
Loading + Follow Following
Previous story :Nuna - Pt Four
Next story :In The Dark
More from Bismark Kyeremanteng
The Sweet Bile
When he arrived at his uncle's house, Kojo looked very exhausted, emaciated and pale. His sunken eyes and cheeks were highly noticeable with an unkempt bushy hair that had turned greyish. He wore a faded red T-shirt, a pair of oversized trousers and slippers. His "Opanka" bag hang
Written by Bismark Kyeremanteng	 April 22, 2020 May 7, 2020
Strings Of Affection 2
The articulated truck forcefully screeched to a stop just some few metres away from Prince. The furious driver got down from his vehicle and reproached Prince for his carelessness. Prince stood there speechless and looked at the driver vaguely."Be very careful boy. Next time, you may not be lu
A World Beyond The River
"Good morning sir, I am Francis from the south. I have been posted here to teach," I said. "That's great. You're welcome young man," said Mr. Alidu Tanko, the headmaster of the only basic school in the village. I handed my appointment letter over to him to confirm
Strings Of Affection
Having learnt to play the guitar at a tender age of seven, Prince's right thumb on the six strings produced a tuneful key. Endowed with the ability to grasp quickly what he was taught, he would later gain a mastery of the rudiments in playing the instrument at age nine. Aside from that, his si
THE LAW OF KARMA CHAPTER 20 VS 22
The instrumentalists were doing their best to sustain the interest of the members of the church with their Spirited performance. Being occupied by about 300 members, that Sunday, first and second services were combined into one. Among the instrumentalists making significant strides was the church or
Written by Bismark Kyeremanteng	 April 17, 2020 April 17, 2020
SITSOFE
It was sunset. The sky looked orange with trails of clouds scattered far apart. The weaver birds moved in flight to occupy their nests. The village of Alakple sat in partial silence as some households prepared supper to kick out the hunger rumbling in their stomachs. Behind the house of the Soglo fa
Written by Bismark Kyeremanteng	 May 8, 2020 May 8, 2020
SITSOFE PART 2
In a conducive environment stood a giant building with beautiful hedges neatly trimmed. The environment was decorated with different types of ornamental plants. An attractive sign post with red cross printed on it stood a hundred meters away from the main building. Two ambulances were parked close t
Written by Bismark Kyeremanteng	 May 12, 2020 May 12, 2020
Comments to: Two Worlds: The Sequel of Strings of Affection
Attach images - Only PNG, JPG, JPEG and GIF are supported.
Before We Say Goodbye – Six
Nuna – Pt Five
Categories Select Category Good Reads Inspirational Romance Supernatural Uncategorized
© 2020 Pabowa
Made with ❤ by ObrempongKreative
Welcome to Pabowa
Reading for some is as important as their next breath. Akwabaa (Welcome)
Read Smart, Save Time
Pick all the topics you are interested in to fill your homepage with stories you'll love.
Gallery Good Reads Quotes Romance Supernatural Uncategorized
Loading + Load more
Join Pabowa

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


11/11/2018 · (Adobe Photoshop is the most common photo-editing software program used today, but can be expensive to purchase; however, a free, full-featured trial version is available on Adobe's website.) 4 Change the text fields.
In order to authorise the reader in the first place it needs to be plugged into a PC that has Adobe Digital Editions (ADE) on it with an Adobe ID.
ID Util for macOS Features • Preview Adobe InDesign, IDML and InCopy files (CS2 through CC 2015). • Export Previews as PNG, JPG or PDF. • Collect and Package InDesign files.


The use of antibiotic resistance markers in the development of transgenic crops has raised concerns about whether transgenic foods will play a part in our loss of ability to treat illnesses with antibiotic drugs. The public is sensitized to this danger because of reports that some of the antibiotics that we rely on have lost efficacy after years of misuse through over-prescribing by doctors and improper use by patients. Animal husbandry enterprises such as cattle feedlots and chicken farms routinely use, and often overuse, antibiotics as part of their feeding or treatment regimens, leading to publicity about the consequences of widespread overuse of these defenses against disease.
An example of research into this problem is available at http://bric.postech.ac.kr/science/97now/01_12now/011219c.html. An advisory committee to Health Canada has submitted proposals (http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/vetdrugs-medsvet/amr/e_policy_dev.html#AMR Report ) for reducing the risk of overuse. "The Challenge of Antibiotic Resistance", an article by Levy (1998) in Scientific American, discusses many facets of antibiotic resistance.
At several stages of the laboratory process, developers of transgenic crops use DNA that codes for resistance to certain antibiotics, and this DNA often becomes a permanent feature of the final product although it serves no purpose beyond the laboratory stage. Will transgenic foods contribute to the existing problems with antibiotic resistance?
One of the concerns is related to the risk of horizontal gene transfer, that is, transfer of DNA from one organism to another outside of the parent-to-offspring channel. Transfer of a resistance gene from transgenic food to micro-organisms that normally inhabit our mouth, stomach, and intestines, or to bacteria that we ingest along with food, could help those micro-organisms to survive an oral dose of antibiotic medicine.
Horizontal transfer of DNA does occur under some natural circumstances. Small pieces of DNA called plasmids move from E. coli to several other organisms, and Agrobacterium tumefaciens facilitates the horizontal transfer of DNA to produce the disease known as crown gall in plants. Horizontal transfer of DNA occurs at very low frequency under laboratory conditions, for example Acinetobacter, a soil- and water-borne bacterium (Gebhard and Smalla, 1998), Streptococcus gordonii, a cause of dental cavities and heart valve infection (Mercer et al., 1999), Aspergillus niger, a fungus harnessed to produce citric acid for soft drinks (Hoffmann et al., 1994).
Whether such a transfer could happen frequently in the special environment of the human gastrointestinal tract is not known.
Several circumstances would work against a successful transfer. The acid environment of the stomach degrades DNA. Mercer et al. (1999) found that DNA was degraded within 30 seconds when it was mixed with human saliva and hydrochloric acid in a simulation of the conditions in the human stomach. And while some organisms take in foreign DNA under some circumstances, many organisms have mechanisms to destroy foreign DNA that enters unbidden.
Researchers at the University of Newcastle have reported that microorganisms in the human digestive system took up a herbicide resistance gene after the human subjects ate a meal of GM soy. The experiment was small, involving 12 people with intact digestive systems and 7 who had undergone colostomies, in which their lower intestines were removed. In people with intact digestive systems, no GM DNA was found in the stools and no microorganisms took up GM DNA. But in people who had undergone colostomies, about 4 percent of the GM DNA survived the trip through the abbreviated intestinal tract and a small number of microorganisms took up GM DNA. The GM DNA in this experiment was a herbicide resistance gene rather than an antibiotic resistance gene, but the results suggest that horizontal transfer of GM DNA can occur in the human digestive tract under some circumstances. News reports on this experiment are available at http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992565 and http://www.guardian.co.uk/gmdebate/Story/0,2763,756666,00.html. A report from the researchers at the University of Newcastle is available at http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/gmnewcastlereport.PDF. The information pertaining to this experiment begins on page 22 of the report.
Some scientists think that a successful transfer of DNA from transgenic plants would not occur frequently enough to be detectable or to cause health problems in humans. However the actual rate of transfer under natural conditions is unknown because of a lack of research into this particular circumstance. The EU has engaged scientists to assess the risk of horizontal gene transfer from genetically modified foods (http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/quality-of-life/gmo/04-food/04-07-project.html).
A second concern about the use of antibiotic resistance genes is that some (though not all) resistance genes work by producing an enzyme that destroys or inactivates the targeted antibiotic. If such a resistance gene continues to function after it has outlived its usefulness in the laboratory, it might produce low levels of the resistance enzyme in the plant parts that we eat. While high processing temperatures would inactivate the enzyme in processed foods, ingestion of fresh or raw transgenic foods could result in the stomach containing a small amount of an enzyme that inactivates an orally administered dose of the antibiotic. Will a person taking prescribed antibiotics endanger the success of the treatment if he eats a meal of transgenic food?
The FDA faced this issue in 1993 when it considered whether to approve Calgene's FlavrSavr tomato, which contained a gene for resistance to kanamycin, neomycin, gentamicin A and gentamicin B, all of which are sometimes used to fight infections in humans. In FDA tests using a simulation of a human stomach, the enzyme was degraded by stomach acids before it could attack orally administered antibiotics. A report on the FDA's evaluation is available at http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/opa-armg.html. Scroll down to "Appendix 1. Evaluation of the safety of the kanamycin resistance gene as a selectable marker" for a discussion of the FDA's findings.
For additional information on the potential risk from antibiotic resistance genes, see the Royal Society's 2002 report "Genetically modified plants for food use and human health--an update" (http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/files/statfiles/document-165.pdf).
Scientists are also experimenting with methods for removing the antibiotic resistance genes before the plants are released for commercial use (Dale and Ow, 1991; Ebinuma et al., 1997; Iamtham and Day, 2000; Zuo et al., 2001), so that these genes can be used during development and then eliminated from the final product.
European scientists have developed a method for inactivating the antibiotic resistance genes in the event that they are transferred to bacteria in the digestive system of animals or humans (Libiakova et al., 2001). A special DNA sequence inserted into the antibiotic resistance gene will prevent the gene from functioning inside a bacterium. Plants are able to snip out the special sequence to let the gene function correctly.
The possibility of enhanced antibiotic resistance in the soil is also an issue of interest in connection with the use of these markers. See our discussion for more information.


Mountain Khakis announced new sales representation in two key territories, effective immediately.
Representing the Rocky Mountain region, Annie DeWaters is the founder and principle of Gone Skiing Sales, representing brands in the ski, outdoor/fashion & tech apparel & footwear industries since 1992.
In the Northwest region, Linda Di Lello Morton and Brian Morton have been representing outdoor and healthy lifestyle brands since 2006.


Did you ever wonder why there are so many accidents in your house every time kids are around? We solved this mystery for you!
In case you didn't figure out by now, it is a commercial for Mikybar Munchies. I have to admit though, this is one of the funniest commercials I've seen lately.


text:
News about June 2019
All news from Virology
DNA Packaging Mechanism Of The Virus HSV1
Herpesviruse are enveloping viruses that are prevalent in the human population and are responsible for diverse pathologies; including cold sores; birth defects and cancers; research scientists revealing DNA packaging mechanism of HSV 1, the virus that causes cold sores. But the intricate machinery responsible for compressing DNA into the small interior shell, or capsid; of…
Age-Related Vision Loss Stopped By New Laser Therapy
About 200 million people are with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and in approximately five of these cases; the disease progresses to an advance stage, leading to visual loss in the world. Advance AMD is divide into wet and dry forms. While wet AMD can be treat with medical injections; approximately four fifths of advance AMD…
Fitness Will Improve Cardiovascular And Mental Health
Fitness; Now a days peoples are leading their busy life, on average they are spending over 3,500 days at work over a lifetime. This makes work the ideal place to encourage and support physical activity and exercise. And a new study from Germany shows that doing so can help employees increase their fitness, improve their cardiovascular and…
Impaired Breathing Can Be Indicated By Mobile App
Impaired Breathing; Signal researchers in Oulu have developed a mobile phone application that can measure impaired breathing. The results can lead you to determine whether you have a respiratory disease. In the future, this invention can also help people suffering from asthma or allergies with remote care and self-care. The mobile measurement tool is an…
Single Cell Map To Reprogram Scar Tissue Into Healthy Heart Cells
Research making single cell map to reprogram scar tissue into healthy heart cells; where every year 790,000 Americans suffer a heart attack; which leaves damaging scar tissue on the heart and limits its ability to beat efficiently; reprogram scar tissue cells called fibroblasts into healthy heart muscle cells called cardiomyocytes. But the research have been…
Ultrasound Imaging Monitor the Exact Drug Dose
The researches find that the An ultrasound imaging technique called passive cavitation imaging was able to create an image and estimate the amount of a drug that crossed the blood-brain barrier to reach a specific location in the brain; but according to a study by NIBIB-funded bio engineers at Washington University. Ultrasound imaging technique The…
The Biochemical Signalling Pathways of Immune Cells
The study find that the The biochemical signalling pathways of immune cells. This finding has important implications for advances in cancer immunotherapy, among other areas. Therefore Oncologists have had great success with cancer immunotherapy in recent years, especially with the approach known as immune checkpoint inhibition; which is recognise with last year's Nobel prize for…
Canadian Convicted Of Pedophilia In Nepal
A prominent Canadian figure once naming to the prestigious order of Canada; but Peter Dalglish, has been finding guilty of raping two young boys in Nepal; where Nepal has seen a surge in pedophilia relating cases by abusers pretending to be tourists or philanthropists. But dalglish's case, heard in a court in the Kavrepalanchok district,…
Awareness Of Alcohol's Role In Breast Cancer
As breast cancer is the most common cancer in the UK; with more than 54,000 new cases diagnosed and 11,000 deaths every year; But lifestyle factors account for nearly a quarter of all cases, with the alcohol consumption and obesity topping the list. The study finding out that alcohol is a risk factor for breast cancer;…
Health Care Professionals Toolkit To Assess Dementia
Health Care; University of Alberta led research is revolutionizing the way health professionals assess the decision-making capacity of seniors in Edmonton and across the province. The model led to a 60 percent drop in referrals to geriatricians and an 80 percent drop in the number of capacity interviews required when it was first piloted. They…
High Salt Intake Inhibits Tumor Growth In Mice
The balance between pro and anti-inflammatory cells; and signals is critical for preserving immune homeostasis and a disturbing immune cell balance is believing to contribute to autoimmunity and cancer; High salt intake is a knowing risk factor for high blood pressure and cardiovascular diseases; Recent research has also indicated that too much salt may impact…
Cooling Vest Can Improve Athletes Performance In Hot Conditions
Cooling Vest; Strategies to cope with body heat in sports is a pressing issue. The Tokyo Olympics will be held in the hot and muggy Japanese summer where the ambient temperature is expected to be above 33°C. Athletes have to worry about performing under pressure of the high-stakes competition; but also now have to deal…


It's PSLE oral today and tomorrow, IT has no school as the P1s to P5s need not go to school. I only made a bento for LT, a super fast one today, chicken fried rice, LT loves chicken. And I decorated a cheese as a little gal to decorate his bento.
IT will be having lunch with me, I intend to bring him to the sashimi restaurant for lunch. Looking forward to spending some one-to-one time with him. I still have a lot of time left after I'm done with LT's bento, so I decided to make IT a fruit box. He can eat it after we fetch LT home.


text:
Blueprints (8)
Inventors (4)
Thayer, Abbott Handerson (6)
Brush, George de Forest (5)
Chase, William Merritt (3)
Faulkner, Barry (3)
Nanette L. Laitman Documentation Project for Craft and Decorative Arts in America (3)
National Museum of American History (U.S.). Division of Extractive Industries (3)
National Museum of American History (U.S.). Division of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (3)
Alexander, John White (2)
American Artists' Congress (2)
Arensberg, Walter (2)
Artists' Union (New York, N.Y.) (2)
Baer, Ralph H. (2)
Bowditch, Nancy Douglas (2)
Greenberg, Clement (2)
Halpert, Edith Gregor (2)
Harding, Chester (2)
Harvard University (2)
Hassam, Childe (2)
Historic American Buildings Survey (2)
Hrdlička, Aleš (2)
Abenaki (Abnaki) (1)
Bomba (Dance) (1)
Bushman (1)
Catawba (1)
Chickahominy (1)
Eastern Band of Cherokee (1)
Innu (1)
Iroquois [Six Nations/Grand River (Brantford, Ontario)] (1)
Kitigan Zibi Anishinabeg (Maniwaki Algonquin) [River Desert] (1)
Lorette Huron (1)
Machapunga (Pungo River) (1)
Maliseet (Malecite) (1)
Mattaponi (1)
Mi'kmaq (Micmac) (1)
Mistassini Cree (1)
Mohawk (1)
Mohegan (1)
Montagnais Innu (1)
Mushuaunnuat (Barren Ground Naskapi) (1)
Nansemond (1)
Nanticoke (1)
Nauset (1)
Nigerians (1)
Nuba (1)
Pamunkey (1)
Passamaquoddy (1)
Boston (Mass.) (2)
Anuradhapura (Sri Lanka) (1)
Auburn (N.Y.) (1)
Bermuda Islands (1)
Chesapeake and Ohio Canal (1)
Query: Set designers -- New Hampshire
George Deem papers
Deem, George, 1932-2008
10.71 Gigabytes
AAA.deemgeor
The papers of painter, writer, and dancer George Deem measure 18.2 linear feet and 10.71 GB and date from 1904-2015, with the bulk of the material dating from 1960-2008. The collection documents Deem's path from Midwestern farm child to New York City artist and teacher who specialized in recreating works of great masters, especially Johannes Vermeer. Correspondence, exhibition files, subject files, project files, writings by and about Deem, printed and digital material and photographic materials all show the trajectory of Deem's development as an artist.
in AAA.deemgeor for Set designers -- New Hampshire
Norcross Greeting Card Collection
Norcross, Arthur Dickinson, d. 1968
Tuck, Raphael, fl. 1880s
Norcross Greeting Card Company (New York (N.Y.))
Rust Craft Publishers (Boston, Mass.)
1,200 Cubic feet (3,010 boxes, 362 volumes)
Collections consists of the records of both the Norcross Greeting Card Company founded in New York City in the 1920s and The Rust Craft Greeting Card Company, founded in Kansas City, Missouri, 1906. Both the Norcross and Rust Craft companies collected antique greeting cards. Also includes a small number of modern cards by other manufacturers, circa 1930-1980. Collection represents development of the greeting card industry, social trends in the United States and technology of the printing industry from 1924 through 1978.
in NMAH.AC.0058 for Set designers -- New Hampshire
Holger Cahill papers
Cahill, Holger, 1887-1960
AAA.cahiholg
The papers of Holger Cahill (1887-1960) date from 1910 to 1993, with the bulk of the material dating from 1910-1960, and measure 15.8 linear feet. The collection offers researchers fairly comprehensive documentation of Cahill's directorship of the Works Progress/Projects Administration's (WPA) Federal Art Project (FAP) in addition to series documenting his work as a writer and art critic. Material includes correspondence, reports, artist files, scrapbooks, printed material, and photographs.
in AAA.cahiholg for Set designers -- New Hampshire
Gyorgy Kepes papers
Kepes, Gyorgy, 1906-2001
AAA.kepegyor
The papers of Hungarian-born artist, art theorist, and educator, Gyorgy Kepes, measure 21.2 linear feet and date from 1909-2003, with the bulk of the material dating from the 1935-1985. The papers document Kepes's career as an artist and educator, and as founder of the Center for Advanced Visual Studies (CAVS) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), through biographical material, correspondence, writings by Kepes and others, project files, exhibition files, printed material, sketchbooks, artwork, sound recordings and motion picture films, and photographic material.
in AAA.kepegyor for Set designers -- New Hampshire
Balcomb and Gertrude Greene papers
Greene, Balcomb, 1904-1990
circa 1880s-2009
AAA.greebalc2
The Balcomb and Gertrude Greene papers, circa 1880s-2009, bulk circa 1905-1990, measure 9.8 linear feet. Balcomb Greene's career as a painter, educator, and writer - and to a lesser extent his personal life - is documented by biographical material, letters, subject files,writings, artwork, audio-visual recordings, printed material, and photographs. Documentation about sculptor Gertrude Greene, from 1926 until her death in 1956, consists of printed material, photographs, two letters to her, and a brief handwritten list of paintings and constructions.
in AAA.greebalc2 for Set designers -- New Hampshire
Favretti, Rudy J.
31.5 Cubic feet
AAG.FAV
The collection contains the project design records of Rudy J. Favretti. , a landscape architect and professor noted for his extensive work in historical restoration of gardens, parks, and landscapes. He donated his collection of garden design files, plans, and images to the Smithsonian's Archives of American Gardens in March 2011.
in AAG.FAV for Set designers -- New Hampshire
Rockwell Kent papers
Kent, Rockwell, 1882-1971
88 Linear feet
AAA.kentrock
The Rockwell Kent papers measure 88.0 linear feet and date from circa 1840 to 1993 with the bulk of the collection dating from 1935 to 1961. The collection provides comprehensive coverage of Kent's career as a painter, illustrator, designer, writer, lecturer, traveler, political activist, and dairy farmer.
in AAA.kentrock for Set designers -- New Hampshire
in AAG.GCA for Set designers -- New Hampshire
Stephen Antonakos papers
Antonakos, Stephen, 1926-2013
1.73 Gigabytes
AAA.antostep
The papers of American sculptor Stephen Antonakos measure 24.2 linear feet and 1.73 GB and date from 1932-2014, with the bulk of the material dating from 1960-2014. The collection documents Antonakos's pioneering work in neon, through biographical material, correspondence, writings and notes, project files, exhibition files, printed and digital material, and photographs.
in AAA.antostep for Set designers -- New Hampshire
Douglas Volk and Leonard Wells Volk papers
Volk, Leonard Wells, 1828-1895
Volk, Douglas , 1856-1935
AAA.volkleon
The papers of painter and teacher Douglas Volk (1856-1935) and his father, sculptor Leonard Wells Volk (1828-1895), measure 12.4 linear feet and date from circa 1858-1965, 2008, with the bulk of the material dating from circa 1870-1935. Douglas Volk's papers document his life and career through biographical material, family and professional correspondence, writings and notes, diaries and journals, financial records, printed material, scrapbooks, artwork and sketchbooks, and photographs of the artist, his family, friends, and artwork. The papers also provide documentation of the formation and operations of the Sabatos Handicraft Society established with Marion Volk from the Volk's summer home, Hewnoaks, in Center Lovell, Maine. Scattered documentation of the life and work of Leonard Wells Volk, is found in biographical material, land records, letters, memoirs, and photographs.
in AAA.volkleon for Set designers -- New Hampshire


While big and bold bling is certainly nothing new, it's back in a major way on the Fall 2017 runways. For autumn, oversized earrings are making a splash on the catwalks. Although last season may have been the season of the neckpiece, the focus has now shifted to ear candy. If you're wondering how to embrace glamorous dangling earrings right now, try drawing your cues from the likes of our favourite designers.
For the red carpet diva, a pair of pearl and crystal-studded earrings can easily complete your look of the evening. Shoulder-dusting earrings can highlight the timeless elegance of a little black dress, or bring the attention to a vibrant, printed frock. Meanwhile, an architectural design and glimmering embellishment is the ultimate in sophistication.
At Balenciaga, structural shapes and bright gold were the order of the day. We are liking the asymmetrical design of these earrings, along with the shimmering metallic tone. The navy blue blouse also contrasts effortlessly against the gold, for a look which can brighten your day.
With the mismatched jewellery trend increasingly making a name for itself, try looking to the Marc Jacobs runway. From studded and bejewelled silver to looped gold hoops, the combination of mixed metals brings an edge to your typical accessory statement.


What can cause a home insurance claim?
What is the difference between actual cash value and replacement value?
I already have home insurance. Should I shop for new insurance rates?
Save Money With Lower Home Insurance Rates!
Zip Code Do you own or rent your home?
Searching for top ? Look no further. With our complete companies list, you'll be able to find just the just the right plan from the best company for you. Protecting yourself and your loved ones is no easy task and is nothing to be taken lightly. So, it's important to find companies that take your interests to heart. There are many top companies in your area that do just this. With an important decision like insurance, it's also crucial that you have all the facts before proceeding. With this insurance companies list, that's exactly what you'll be able to do. Research. Deliberate. Then pick the company that meets your expectations and needs and you'll find everything you need to make an informed choice. Exploring the top insurance companies was never this convenient and easy. Everything is laid out and explained in simple, clear language. And you'll find companies that are eager to get your business and provide plans that will afford you the peace of mind you're seeking. After all, an insurance company is more than just a hedge against the future--it's a vital link to all that is treasured in your life today. Choose the right insurance company, and you are choosing a partner that you can count on through life's unexpected changes and challenges. Look through these top insurance companies and put the most beneficial match to work for you today.
QuoteWhiz® is an insurance provider matching service and not an insurance broker or insurance provider. Not all insurance providers can provide you with a quote. Make sure to compare rates and fees as they can vary between insurance providers and may depend on the state in which you reside. None of the above listed insurance companies either sponsor, endorse, or are in any way affiliated with QuoteWhiz® or this promotion. *30-day money back guarantee applies to most states. Please ask agent for details.


text:
Q: Easiest way to display text in OpenGL ES 2.0 I'm creating a simple Breakout style game and would like a simple way to display the score.
I've been doing some research and found several ways to do text in OpenGL ES, but most methods look fairly complicated.
This looks like it would do the trick, but I couldn't get it to work.
I've looked into FTGL and FreeType, but they look complicated.
I've also read one can display a UILabel over the EAGLContext, but not sure how that would be in the performance department.
I could probably get any of these options to work, I'm just wondering what the best solution is for this situation.

A: For simple use cases like you're describing, on even vaguely modern hardware (i.e. iPhone 3GS and later, I think), the compositing penalty for layering UIKit/CoreAnimation content on top of OpenGL ES content is negligible. (You can see this if you run your app in Instruments with the "Color OpenGL ES fast path blue" option turned on.)
They say premature optimization is the root of all evil — it's pretty easy to try UILabel, see if it makes a significant difference to your app's performance, and look into third-party libraries and more complicated solutions only if it does.
(Also, it sounds like you might be trying to manage your own CAEAGLLayer. For common use cases, it's a lot easier to use GLKView, plus GLKViewController for animation.)

A: I'd recommend checking out the Print3D functionality of the PowerVR SDK's PVRTools framework. Print3D is free to use, cross-platform (iOS, Android, Linux, Windows, OS X etc.) and it efficiently renders text within OpenGL ES 1.x, 2.0 & 3.0 applications. The SDK includes an example application with source that demonstrates how to use the Print3D framework (IntroducingPrint3D).
The PowerVR Graphics SDK can be downloaded for free from Imagination's website: http://www.imgtec.com/powervr/insider/sdkdownloads/index.asp
An overview of the source included in the SDK can be found here: http://www.imgtec.com/powervr/insider/sdkdownloads/learn_more.asp

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange