text:
Snapshots from Beijing Olympic torch relay – the Chinese village version
What do some Western journalists want from Beijing?
Written by Buxi on Saturday, August 2nd, 2008 at 5:44 am
Filed under:-mini-posts, media | Tags:media, olympics
Behind a thin vaneer of professionalism, it's not inaccurate to say many Western journalists are hoping for the worst from these Olympics. Some have been honest enough to admit it. Here's a collection of choice quotes:
George Packer, from the New Yorker:
"I love track and field and will be watching the 1500-meter finals. But I also hope the Beijing Olympics go a-flop."
Mark Morford, from the San Francisco Chronicle:
"Note to China: Please implode…. I hope it all comes crashing down on their heads."
That's all I have at hand, although I hope to add to the collection as I pay attention, going forward. Please let me know if you have related submissions.
I don't really know how to explain to all of the volunteers, ranging from college students to elderly grandmothers, that there are people hoping the event they've dedicated months, or even years to fails. I don't know how to explain to those singing "Beijing Welcomes You" that there are people out there that want anything but a warm welcome this year (courtesy of ESWN).
66 Responses to "What do some Western journalists want from Beijing?"
August 2nd, 2008 at 6:10 am
I remember that SF Chronicle article as being particularly disgusting. Reads like a typical "big-character poster".
MutantJedi Says:
It's time to put the pre-game games aside and celebrate with China.
There will be plenty of time for the post-game analysis.
Hmm… Buxi, you picked a real pair, eh… George Packer's Berlin to Beijing, where the current games seem to be an excuse to remind the world of the Third Reich. And Mark Morford who is "no expert on Chinese-Tibetan relations" nor of the history of the region, yet seems to have formulated an opinion about the region based on his knowledge of Tibetan Buddhism. Somehow, I think neither of these fellows would never be much fun at a Chinese party. 🙂
There are people out there that hope that the Olympics will "go a-flop," sure, but so what? None of them are running for office in China and I don't see why anyone should waste any time explaining this to Olympic volunteers in China unless you are trying to whip up some kind of witch-hunt. And I don't understand why this blog subject China-related views and statements of individuals to the same degree of scrutiny as presidential candidates in the US. What do you propose that we do about these statements? Are you suggesting that some kind of sanction be imposed against them or that journalists that go to China are subjected some kind of attitude-test?
It is precisely this kind of "you are either for us or against us" mentality that pushes journalists into giving China more negative coverage that perhaps should have. I recall the following quote:
China, I suspect, sometimes gets more negative coverage than it deserves because its old system of restricting the activities of foreign correspondents pushes them into taking sides. To do a sensitive story in the provinces, journalists used to have to choose between going officially and getting an overly rosy view of what was happening, or sneaking in without permission and hearing only the views of disgruntled peasants – many of whom have a financial incentive to exaggerate their woes because they want to use the media to seek compensation. The problem was that there was very little middle ground – and in many cases that is where the truth is probably to be found.
http://www.fccchina.org/onejournalistsveiw.html
Theo Says:
August 2nd, 2008 at 10:23 am
Thank you for posting those links, although one of they are actually from columnists and opinion writers rather than reporters. One is from March, presumably written in reaction to the suppression of the Tibetan riots. The other sees parallels with the sentiments of the German Jew Victor Klemperer in 1936, who found the Berlin Olympics to be about more than sport. The 2008 Olympics will always have a strong political background and some non-Chinese (not just westerners) commentators will of course be watching with the hope that China will suffer political embarrasment.
I kind of agreed with Hemulen. This blog can do much better than just bashing some West's "biased" reporting (we already have anti-cnn.com for this).
I found that there are more and more of this kind of altitudes lately in this blog. This blog is much more interesting to read when you are just focusing on "removing the mountain".
KL Says:
@Alex,
We have to see the mountains before we can remove them, hence the links.
Also it's certainly not bashing *some* west's "biased" reporting (why the quotation marks anyway? for emphasis?), it's the show time for these cute boys who love to see others' misfortune.
Ok, let me see. You have found 2 "journalists" that hope for negative stories from the Olympics and suddenly "…many Western journalists are hoping for the worst from these Olympics"??? YOU usually complain about western media focusing on events in China that are marginal and then blowing them up into something large!
Could it be that you too, Buxi, are slowly discovering that negative headlines sell? Could that explain the "negative" tone of this blog over the last few weeks that Alex also seems to have noticed?
@Buxi – He who pays the piper calls the tune, but of the last five posts, three have been on the subject of western media 'bias'. At any rate, there are Chinese people who have made statements equally as negative about the Olympics as that of George Packer – see 王小峰's 'Nolympics' for example. As for Morford, back in the early nineties we all thought that the communist countries had had it, and we're all going to go the way of the Soviet Union and its satellite countries – and in a way they did, but it seems Morford hasn't got the message that the Chinese government isn't going to collapse any time soon.
August 2nd, 2008 at 12:38 pm
There is no surprise that some journalists would like the Olympic to fail. For them, any shortfalls would mean that they don't have to think too hard to make up some story. If this Olympic is very successful, (which I certainly hope so), then they would have to work harder to come up with a negative story about China.
Well, maybe we've had a rather repetitive "run" of focusing on Western media bias. It's certainly not what I want this blog to be about, and not the sole emphasis of what we want to talk about here.
But possibly because I happen to be in China right now, and possibly because every time I sit in my hotel bathroom I'm trapped with a copy of the International Herald Tribune, and probably because of the build-up to the Olympics… the negative press reports seem to be reaching a crescendo… For me at least, the issue is actually becoming more pressing.
If I saw rich people screaming at poor migrant workers for brushing up against their car… I'd probably write an entry about the income gap in China. But I simply haven't seen that.
If I saw heavy-handed police officers pushing around people, searching bags randomly, and/or had the feeling I was living in a police sate… I'd be driven to write about that. But I simply haven't seen that, either.
If in the few business meetings I've squeezed in this week I had officials or potential partners winking at me about how a bribe under the table would help my cause… I'd probably write about corruption. But I haven't seen that, either.
These are all issues that will probably come to the forefront again, especially after I leave China and get away from the happy Chinese people I see around me every day… and all I have left are the complaints that filter to the top of the Chinese internet. But for now, with all seriousness… the issue that drives me nuts is CNN/BBC/IHT. In addition to the regular dose of this stuff I get from the IHT, I also had to sit through hours of BBC while taking care of a few things at the local HSBC.
So, you'll have to take the good with the bad, here. We're going to continue to talk about things that bother us, but we'll eventually get back to the things that bother you as well.
August 2nd, 2008 at 1:23 pm
WXF though is a smart guy and I like some of his writings.
But Everything seems negative to him and he feels superior over everyone. no surprise if he says 'Nolympics' .
…every time I sit in my hotel bathroom I'm trapped with a copy of the International Herald Tribune
This is a bit obsessive. No one in China is "trapped" with a foreign newspaper, which can be very difficult to get hold of as it is. As if people in Beijing frown at the IHT when they visit the news stands. When I was waiting for my plane at the Beijing International Airport last year, I couldn't find a single foreign newspaper. Quite an international airport!
Anyway, if reading the IHT is such a pain in the neck, I can't understand why you bother reading it. There are plenty of alternatives that carry news that should please you. Isn't the local press good enough for you?
If anything, the runing up to this Olympics opened up many Chinese's eyes to hostile people or forces in the West who wish ill of China. For example, FOARP dedicates himself to promote the fear of China. Many Chinese have become matured because of seeing some ugly faces coming out of woodword in the West.
Amen to that, Amen….. I 'm one of them. Things happened in the last 4 months have truely opened my eyes like nothing else in my life. I lived in the west for 10 yrs I thought I know them, oh boy was I wrong….
@Hemulen
"Anyway, if reading the IHT is such a pain in the neck, I can't understand why you bother reading it."
Because before we become nationalists, we were a bunch of sentimental naifs. We thought the story of China is so exciting, and excitingly positive. We search through media outlets for bits and scraps of news on China for the affirmation. We found IHT because it is only paper that has a persistent awareness of the world outside of US, we also read NYT because, after all, it is the best US can offer.
Of course we were crushed for all the reasons that has been talked about hundreds of times on this blog alone. But instead of wisely ignoring them as you recommended, we found our inner masochists and go back for the same shots of pain again and again. The sad journeys of expat Chinese nationalists
To go back to the original question, "Western" journalists ( the evil herd of cynics ) want an interesting story and something that makes them stick out from the crowd. That, by definition, means not repeating the official dribble in the state-media (the only kind). That also means airing opinions that some may dislike or disagree with. Big deal. Hiding from criticism does not bring perfection.
What do some Chinese journalists want from the Olympics? I'd bet some some would prefer human rights to the Olympics, though expressing that idea is an express route to jail. Whose is the greater sin?
So that we can know how ugly and evil a human being can be?
This is not even about China, it's about the extreme cruelty a human being can be capable of.
Some Chinese in China have called some Westerners' protesting and finger pointing activities as "noises". I think it's a fitting description.
The main scene in the world right now is the rise of China, India, and BRIC, and Asia. This changing of the world has caused connitive dissonance in some Westerners. The Western media is exploiting this fear of losing power by the West.
Previously assumptions no longer hold and new rules have not been established yet. Like recently, Doha WTO talks collasped. The West will have to share power with East.
It's no longer the West vs. East world. It's becomeing the West AND East world. Some people won't like it and they will fight against the trend. Give time, they will lose out.
@Netizen, Moneyball – Yeah, that's right, I'm out to destroy China, I hate and fear China, that's why I . . . . spent five years of my life living there, paying taxes, doing a job which helped facilitate the employment of many of your countrymen, learning Chinese history, culture and language, and making friends. I think you guys need to work out who your real enemies are – here's a hint: they're not graduate students with too much time on their hands.
@BMY – I can see why some people say that WXF is an elitist (and why is someone always calling him gay on his website?), but I think he's also a pretty smart guy.
Too bad no one knows what mainland Chinese journalists think. If they were free to express themselves, they would demonstrate a high degree of similarity between "Western" and "Eastern" viewpoints. Many excellent reports written in "Western" media are by journalists of Chinese origin.
Cognitive dissonance results in censorship and other small-minded actions. Silly posts are an obvious example.
@KL – Look, you might find the fact that the IHT coverage of the Olympics is not entirely positive a bit distressing, but I cannot understand how anyone can call it an example of "how ugly and evil a human being can be". Don't you think this is going just a little bit too far?
Don't expand to "destroy", "hate". I didn't say you are that. I deny I ever never said you of that. I did say "fear". It's in the title of your blog. So, don't expand the vocabulary to those that haven't been used by me.
@Netizen – Do you know where the title actually comes from? Check out the rap group 'Public Enemy' on wikipedia.
To Buxi:
I would suggest a change in your bathroom reading. Car & Driver, perhaps 🙂 But they have a pro-German stance…they always like Bimmers more than anything else.
I agree that if it bothers you, then get it off your chest. However, as others have suggested, 2 ignorant journalists aren't representative of all journalists, and certainly not of all westerners. Obviously, it's easier to focus on the outliers…makes for better copy. But it's also possibly a distortion of the pervasive sentiment outside of China, of peoples' attitudes toward China. If you go looking for anti-China rhetoric, I'm sure you'll find it. But the overall significance of its presence seems debatable.
On a slightly separate note, lately this site has focussed on apparent western misrepresentation of China. Usually, if people are ranting nonsensically, they simply get ignored as raving lunatics. But that's not been the case here…people are busy criticizing the criticism of China. And that makes me wonder…is this a case of "the truth hurts"; if one is always complaining, it's harder to be heard when one has a legitimate gripe.
Sorry Buxi, wanted to expand on paragraph 2. If you flip the situation around, and even if Chinese reporters started spewing anti-US rhetoric 24/7, do you think the Americans would care? Now, I realize from other threads how CHinese place westerners on pedestals, and seek their approval at levels that are clearly not reciprocated. But that's just a thought process from which CHinese need to evolve. And western media has a much farther reach than Chinese media. But that should be the impetus to spur improvement in China's media (and god knows there's room for same, if not in the level of reporting, then at least in the openness of content).
Now I understand why such "hope" can be acceptable to you, and probably their readers. I would think the same if a Chinese journalist wrote that "I also hope the London Olympics go a-flop." or ""Note to Britain: Please implode…. I hope it all comes crashing down on their heads."
I would think this perfectly fits the definition of "curse", or it's just wishing someone "bad luck"? I wasn't bothered by its not being positive as I didn't expect that. However I did expect the good will of human beings. These journalists, if ever given a voodoo doll which can make the Olympics painful and die, wouldn't be hesitant to use it.
What kind of material these men want from Beijing Olympics? A terrorism explosion would definitely catch eyes, except that it's at the cost of people's lives. Who cares anyway? They are just Chinese. No terrorism? Then let's wish for something that meets our expectation of flop…
The real enemy of everyone is trigger-happy neocons.
What do we mean when we say that the Olympics would "fail"? That the games will not happen? At this point, what could happen to prevent the games from being conducted? Some sort of terrorist attack might do that, but it would seem like a ridiculous understatement to call that "the Olympics failing" or "the Beijing Olympics go a-flop". Assuming that's not what we're talking about, then what? Is it something along the lines of the Olympics failing to make the desired impression on the rest of the world, or the ceremonies being disrupted by protestors? I wouldn't really call either of those scenarios "the Olympics failing", either.
@KL – Did I ever say that I wanted the Olympics to fail? It is strange that you used the metaphor of the voodoo doll, a similar thought crossed my mind this morning – that from the way people respond to these pessimists you would think that the critics of the Olympics have some magical power that can make the Olympics 'fail' simply through criticism. Was the Moscow Olympics a 'failure'? The Los Angeles Olympics? The Munich games? I don't think so, and all of these games had their problems. All that most people will remember from them is the performance of the athletes.
@Netizen – Once again, I really just don't get this emotional style of argument, it convinces no one.
To Otto:
great question. It'll happen, it'll be well attended, and the broadcasts will be well-watched. As long as no attacks occur, and hopefully no one gets hurt, then it's all good. And if no world records fall, that's not the Olympics' fault. And if people are caught doping, that's not the Olympics' fault either. As for legacy, that's a different issue, but not really measured will a pass/fail metric.
I think the focus on biased western reporting of Olympics and China is well warranted for now. It is a big issue at the moment, if you do a "China News" search on google these days, 99% are noises that focus on whatever tiny dirt they can dig out and then exaggerate some, the western media as a whole is losing the point here – a great opportunity for the west to get to know the real, modern China. It is rather insane. If this trend continues, which I hope not, the Beijing Olympics will be remembered in history as one giant lost opportunity for the west and China to get to know each other – which is essential to world peace and prosperity in the future, and is required so that pressing issues common to human species such as climate change can be effectively addressed.
By the way, #13 @Moneyball's comment about FOARP "FOARP dedicates himself to promote the fear of China" is not in good taste. FOARP's comments do not lead to such a conclusion, in my view. His perspectives are a valuable addition to this blog, coming from an European who has committed his time to live in China, and get to know China's people and history.
Not all the news out there is grim against China. NewScientist.com asks: Could China lead the green revolution? According to the reporter's guide to covering the Olympics, this would be a no-brainer China-bash opportunity. Instead, the report comes out optimistic about China's leadership in environmental issues.
Oh, and ditto on EugeneZ's comment on FOARP. Don't make assumptions about him based on a blog title… It would be like assuming that only fools would participate in this blog. 😉
Though… I do admit not being so hip as to get the Public Enemy's Fear of a Black Planet allusion without his nudge towards looking it up on wikipedia.
my comment was not refered to you.
you may think urself are harsh on China from time to time, but mostly justified from my observations.
go to freerepublic, or huffingtonpost, or even pekingduck, you will see hundreds of posters, in clear writing, wish nothing but destruction of China.
As ridiculous as it may sound, the success/failure depends on the number of ACTUAL "blue sky" days during the game. The TV audience are much more driven by the visuals than by the abstractions. Under the blue sky, those new buildings in Beijing can look spectacular, and host bashing can look pretty feeble.
The flip side is, smoggy days will be open season. But that will at least be something tangible. For those of us couch potato nationalists living in the west, banning all private cars from Beijing permanently does not sound like such a bad idea.
NYT just came out with a fairly reasonable article "Despite Flaws, Rights in China Have Expanded". I found a particular quote interesting.
Chinese who try to challenge the one-party state directly say authorities are no more tolerant of dissent than they were in the 1980s, and in some cases they are tougher on citizen-led campaigns to enforce legal rights or stop environmental abuses.
On the other hand, the definition of what constitutes a political challenge has changed. Individuals are far less likely to run afoul of a system that no longer demands conformity in political views or personal lifestyles.
@Moneyball – Certainly they do, there is much commentary on the internet which is either not meant seriously, or is written by juvenile people who do not really understand what they are writing. Look at the comments you see left on The Guardian or The Times whenever they run a story on trans-Atlantic relations: on one side you'll find certain American commentators gloating over what they imagine to be Europe's impending conversion to Islam, and on the other you'll find European commentators going on about America's impending bankruptcy – but no serious person believes that either of these things is actually going to happen. The problem is that serious commentators are drowned out by the noise. In the media serious commentary is supposed to rule, but I wouldn't describe Mark Morford as 'serious' – he seems to think that there is some way in which if the Olympics become a disgrace people will blame the government and democracy will rule in the end. This is unlikely to say the least.
As for George Packer, having read through the article, I actually agree with most of what he says. In some sections he goes too far, for example when he talks about marathon runners falling dead in the street, but I think that most of it is fair enough. The comparison between Nazi Germany in 1936 and the PRC in 2008 is only marginally stretched, let us say that in 1936 Germany was moving towards more restrictive and unreasonable dictatorship and that in 2008 the PRC is moving towards a less restrictive dictatorship – that is all. It seems a bit unfair to take only that quote, as Packer was just echoing another person, here's the whole passage:
"When I was in Burma in June, where China is deeply resented for propping up the military regime, an outspoken woman told me, "We hope the Olympics go a-flop." I love track and field and will be watching the 1500-meter finals. But I also hope the Beijing Olympics go a-flop."
Let me ask – how many of you agree 100% with China's no-strings-attached support of the current Burmese government, and how many can understand (if not agree with) the attitude of the Burmese woman who he quotes?
Otherwise – there is far too much cliche in western reporting on China (if I have to read another newspaper headline that uses the words 'Dragon', 'Rise', or 'Awakening' I think I will scream), much of it seems to have been written by someone who's one experience of China is a two-week stay at the Shanghai Hilton – it is very superficial. There is too much grabbing of the kind of lazy imagery I have become deadly bored of – comparisons between the situation now and that of the cultural revolution, former red guards running banks, old women selling vegetables next to newly built sky-scrappers. Mainstream journalists who are at least partly immune to this kind of idiocy include Jane MacCartney of The Times and Peter Hessler, a few other foreign journalists who are not based in China can be depended on to give decent copy – John Simpson of the BBC being one.
@EugeneZ, Mutantjedi – Thank you very much for your kind words, I had actually thought about changing the name, it was something I came up with a long time ago, but I think it is far too late to change now.
That's sort of the issue when reading these articles. I encountered a similar problem in another forum/blog where one line was debated very ferociously when taken with what the original paragraph was turn out to be something not too vile. However, it's not like people don't know what the intentions are. In a way, it's not a big thing for reporters to inject an opinion here or there, but too much can lead to a lot of misunderstandings or a strong critique upon the credibility of the journalist's work by the readers.
Then you got the comments section of many of these China related articles where I noticed a lot that when someone tries to refute the reportings, others quickly label them as being spies or being paid by the Communists to do such work. I mean, unless it was very obvious, I wouldn't in the right mindset be quick to make such accusations. Then there were many comments people told me that they made but never got published. On a somewhat related note, around the Sichuan Earthquake, there was a report in the Jpost I think where an article had comments filled with the Red Dragon Rising and other cliches which made me sick in the stomach because I thought at that time and due to the nature of the article and other comments, it wasn't appropriate at all. My comment for sympathy never got published as well.
You've probably had far too much of media coverage of the Olympic games so far, but if you get time, listen to "The Moral Maze" on BBC Radio 4 which is playing right now (you should be able to reach it from the website once they upload it, and it will be on the BBC 'listen again' service at least for the nest week), the panellists cover everything that has been touched on this thread (including the idea of the criticism being out of envy of China's growth, and it being a new version of the 'yellow peril'), and the 'witnesses' included people from all quarters:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/atoz/index.shtml#m
a phrase from one of the panellists (from memory) "isn't there a danger of anti-China xenophobia dressed-up as Human Rights criticism"
I would have liked to say something about the comparison to the 1936 Olympics, but that had been done to death, and I probably can't help to get too personal. So let me address an actual question you raised: Chinese policy in Myanmar.
I think that policy, viewed in the context of China's entire foreign policy approach, is a sensible one (as for 100%, I am not interested in that trap.) The "no-string-attached" relationship (again, the word "support" is a trap as well) is a very traditionally conservative and minimalist approach to foreign policy. China makes no more moral judgment about Myanmar or Sudan then it does of America. It made no more condemnations of the government in the Myanmar disaster than it did with Katrina. It is as consistent and clear-cut a foreign policy as any on the current world stage.
Good intentions, genuine or not, based on religion or ideology had killed more people than simple neglect. This fact (which Chinese learned from its very recent and vivid history) is the moral and the practical justification for a non-interfering foreign policy. We have seen systems that work almost perfectly in one country, barely functioning in another, and destroying generations of people in the third. Why should we tell Myanmese, Sudanese or Zimbabwan how to run their country?
@EugeneZ
It is a big issue at the moment, if you do a "China News" search on google these days, 99% are noises that focus on whatever tiny dirt they can dig out and then exaggerate some, the western media as a whole is losing the point here – a great opportunity for the west to get to know the real, modern China.
The "real China"? Please read my comment at #3.
My point isn't really to berate these Western journalists, especially since they're all writing in editorial/column-type stories. There's nothing "wrong" (morally or professionally) with expressing their opinion in such a format. There's nothing "wrong" (morally or professionally) for wanting the Olympics to fail.
My point is a simpler one. The opinions expressed by these specific individuals are shared, in private, by editors and journalists throughout the Western media world… and that partly explains the kind of stuff we end up seeing in the Western press. The world of Western correspondents + editors in China is running low on objective professionals, as far as I can tell. The vast majority are activists in their own right holding a value set, with a specific point of view. They don't really give a shit about accurately reflecting the point of view of those with a different value set.
The New Yorker article about the "angry youth" is a lonely example of a story providing a Chinese-perspective (without apologizing for it, I'll note). I don't have a problem with negative reporting on China; we've done a fair share of that here ourselves, I'd like to point out. I have a problem with the rise of fundamentalism when it comes to journalism in China.
I thought this editorial in today's IHT (trapped in the bathroom again) partly reflects the issue:
In fact, that's part of the important information that you have a responsibility to convey to them: that talking to Western reporters is still dangerous for Chinese people, and we still have a responsibility to protect them.
The background of the above reporter, by the way:
Carroll Bogert is the associate director of Human Rights Watch and a former foreign correspondent for Newsweek magazine.
Carroll Bogert and others of her ilk are trapped in cold war fantasies. (And I'd accuse George Packer above of being trapped in Holocaust resistance fantasies.) I don't deny the above anecdote would've been accurate in the 1980s, but only a woman with an over-inflated messanic complex would insist in the year 2008 that Western journalists are essentially on the front-lines of war against oppression, and must "protect" the Chinese people. (How many articles with Woeser have been published this year?)
Journalists in her mold unfortunately control the channel of communication between East -> West, and it's a shame. China has changed, but they haven't.
August 3rd, 2008 at 12:00 am
Buxi,
I don't see anything wrong or biased in the editorial's suggestion that sources in China need to be protected. It seems obviously important and those trapped in cold war fantasies are those who use arbitrary arrest and incarceration and other offensive tools to censor information. Protecting people from such a fate is responsible, not deluded.
Those enforcing censorship or intentionally spewing misinformation are the real threats to channels of communication. Unfortunately China is changing for the worse on this front.
I think the word "fundamentalism" is a fitting description of discourse in the West. When reason and moderation are discredited, fundamentalism arises. It in turn leads to extremism in politics. Media is thus affected and Journalists have become among the lowest-regarded professions.
August 3rd, 2008 at 3:30 am
Funny as you thought that I was saying you wanted the Olympics to fail, I just pointed out the two journalists wanted the Olympics to fail, as clearly expressed in their writings. And my opinion towards them has nothing to do with you. If you can regards such wishes as "criticism", it's not my problem. By the same thought, I can wish that the two journalists' boss will be angry with them, their computers will keep being shut down and restarting and no IT guys can solve the problem, their wives will fight with them in front of their children, and they will probably get hit by a car when they go to work in the morning.
Can such wishes be thought as "criticisms"?
Maybe I am too old fashioned, but I always thought criticism is when something not good happens or is likely to happen, people criticize it to make it better. Since when criticism has become a fashion that people wish for the bad, then criticize for what they wish for? Voodoo doll, yeah, exactly what they want to possess.
Since you brought up Burma, let me answer it with the brutal truth — I dont care.
I dont care about Burma, I dont care about Sudan either. I mean its not like I dont feel sorry for them, I do, but I wont lose any sleep over it. Besides it cant be worse than Iraq can it? I know I probably would feel stronger about it in a perfect world, but we are not living in a perfect world, China has so many problems I dont even know where to start, Burma is the least of them. I 'm not smart enough to know whats going on over there or what China is doing there and quite frankly I dont care. I am smart enough to know it's just a game big countries playing through surrogate countries, it's not the first one it wont be the last one either. If one regime change could magically solve everything it would have happened long time ago. Those just are shitholes of the earth there's nothing the rest of world can do to change it for them. They would have to sort if out themselves, like we did.
You may want to call me cold or cynical but that's the reality of China, that's just the mentality of chinese. We didnt colonize anybody, we didnt start any world war, we have nothing like the white guilt on our back. If we owe it to anybody we owe it to ourselves. We are still fighting for our share, fighting for the time we've lost. If somebody gets hurt along the way, we feel sorry but we are not gonna apologize for it.
Now you probably understand why the last round of western media's humiliation of China only made Chinese rally to the flag, because they are talking things that John Does dont care! The Cab drivers, the working girls, the migration workers, the graduating students, they are barely putting foods on the table you think they 'd give a fuck about Sudan or Burma or Tibet or freedom of speech? We are not there yet! I cant for my life figure out why the western medias dont focus on the things that we do care, like corruptions, they can start that by exposing all CCP corrupted officials' overseas accounts, help to turn over thousands of corrupted CCP officials living a paradise life in US on the money they stole from people, that might just put the whole communist regime stumble. There's nothing else can make the Chinese Joes love the Americans more —you help them take a revenge on the system…I know I'd be sending love letters to the Justice Dept. How hard do you think for the FBI to follow that millions of dollars dirty money? But they are not gonna do that are they, they love that cash too much…
I normally dont write long craps on internet because I dont think debating on internet would change one man's opinion, let alone move mountains. But I do think the 2 sides should communicate better. Believe me we hate fengqings too, but things going on now is only making them stronger. I believe it falls on the West's side to defuse the situation, because we are merely reacting. Now if only the west medias could figure out the love-hate relationship between Chinese and CCP, if only they could play a smarter game… I mean losing to CCP in a propaganda war, that's just pathetic, worsely they dont even realize it. 20 yrs ago they beat CCP on every turn in the propaganda war, my generation used to love the America to death, we tuned to VOA in middle of nights like it's the light at the end of tunel … what just have happened??
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b00cqhr9
BBC's The Moral Maze, LOL, a bunch of stupid moralists/intellectuals arguing what is right and what is wrong in God's name yet no one is interested in putting together a plan of what to do…how to make China better? how to make affrica better? how to make these suffering ppl suffer less? by pulling shit out of ur ass in a studio? "we should criticize China louder! No we should look at ourselves and be humble"…. It's never about Chinese, it's never about africans, it's all about themselves, it's about how they can make themselves feel better at the end of day. If a million ppl suffer because of it, they could care less because they thought they followed their code of morality. They are just like the douches getting chopped off in every episode of South Park, and that's why I loved that show.
I cant for my life figure out why the western medias dont focus on the things that we do care, like corruptions, they can start that by exposing all CCP corrupted officials' overseas accounts, help to turn over thousands of corrupted CCP officials living a paradise life in US on the money they stole from people, that might just put the whole communist regime stumble.
Now that's the kind of criticism I'd love to see, too. A detailed report that dug through American public records in order to understand what relatives of which senior Chinese leaders are buying what homes in LA for cash. That's the sort of stuff that really interests me.
Or the Yang Jia case, the cop-killer in Shanghai. His case could be a milestone for the Chinese legal system, especially with some foreign pressure. I believe his trial should be open, and he should have the best defense lawyers possible… (after which if he's found guilty, I look forward to seeing him executed for a horrile crime). An open-letter was written by 17 attorneys in Beijing with specific requests from the Shanghai court system… this is all fascinating stuff.
But the NYT is more interested in whether the Epoch Times is available from the Olympics Media Center. Sigh.
Okay, enough complaining. I'm off to do some of the things I accuse the Western media of not doing. That's the more productive route to take, right?
The Economist weighs in with an editorial… you can already guess the overall perspective.
The article ends with this sentence, which I think is the most telling:
But there is a danger. Having dumped its ideology, the Communist Party now stakes its survival and legitimacy on tight political control, economic advance and nationalist pride. The problem with nationalism is that it thrives on competition—and all too often needs an enemy.
I think the many Chinese on this blog would say that it's not the Communist Party that has created the enemy, that is fueling the nationalism. We know what fed our growing nationalism, pride, and frustration over the last 6 months… and it's precisely thanks to articles similar to this one.
I give the Economist props for at least admitting that it opposed the Beijing bid in 2001, even as it goes on to explain why it opposes it today. Frankly, that's the case for the vast majority of Western talking heads now wringing their hands about the "mistake" of awarding the bid to Beijing. I think this is a good time to remind our good readers that the Western IOC committees *always* opposed the Beijing bid, and it was largely the developing and Asian countries that pushed Beijing into the victory circle.
It seems like in the face of inevitable signs of progress and achievment in Chinese society over the last 8 years, the new fall-back position common amongst many (see: Patrick French in the NYT, as well as this article): China is doing great, but it has nothing to do with the Communist Party or the Olympics… I don't know how that argument holds any intellectual water, but they seem to firmly believe it's accurate.
Smith Says:
I am a westerners living in China since years…
Since many years was very happy that Olympics games are in China, it can make hundred of millions people happy….
But these few last months, with all the propaganda about Olympics, the paranoia of the government, the kicking out of foreigners (visa), the state of emergency in Beijing, the ultra nationalism of some youth… I am really fed up, and I also start to wish it is a failure…
And this has nothing to do with Tibet, it is just that when I see the actions of the gov and the way they prepare the Olympics, I think they do not deserve to have good review. and it might be a lesson for the IOC to not give Olympics anymore to non democratic country.
The government has forgotten the basic of Beijing Olympic which is "Beijing welcome you" if you welcome us understand we do not want to enter to a Beijing under siege full of police and army everywhere where everything is controled, but we want an happy city where every Chinese can come party (This include minggong, farmers, tibetans, xinjiang people…)
Here's a journalist Bob Kravitz that does'nt "want" anything from Beijing,
"Are there issues in China?
And there are issues in the United States, too?
Chinese critics want to talk about the massacre of pro-democracy protesters in Tiananmen Square in 1989. Well, we aren't simon-pure, either. In the 1960s, civil rights marchers in the South were brutally put down. There was the violence at the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago. There was the killing of student protesters at Kent State in 1970.
We all have crosses to bear.
Understand, I am a proud American and love living in a place that values individual freedom above all else. But I also understand that not every country is ready or able to embrace democracy, that every country has its own unique history that forms its views on government, and I know that what works in America may not work in China or Iraq or anywhere else.
The eyes I bring to Beijing today — and Tuesday and into Wednesday — are Western eyes. But I will not put blinders on. I will try to walk a mile in my host's shoes. I may not be able to summon a completely open mind, but I can promise this: I won't be an ugly American."
http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080803/SPORTS15/808030364/1034/SPORTS15
I don't deny the above anecdote would've been accurate in the 1980s, but only a woman with an over-inflated messanic complex would insist in the year 2008 that Western journalists are essentially on the front-lines of war against oppression, and must "protect" the Chinese people.
Did you even read the article from the foreign correspondents' club? You can accuse foreign journalists of messianic complex all you like, but it is a fact that merely talking to foreign journalists can lead to charges of leaking state secrets and a prison sentence. And it may be true that Woeser is still posting on her blog, but the number of Chinese bloggers who have been arrested this year is many times more than was the case back in 2001.
@Hemulen – When blogging was in its infancy. I don't know if it has got worse, judging by the Amnesty report, more people are being detained, but the punishments are less severe, not a pretty picture anyway.
Point taken. But severe repression remains a fact of life in China and I think it is disingenuous to accuse journalists of a messianic complex when they point that out. China may not be the worst dictatorship in the world, but it is the largest and most important non-democratic country and it is not surprising that this aspect of China attracts attention.
Dandan Says:
@Smith
I really wish it's simply the govt's 'paranoia', but security's been tightened for a reason. The situation in Xinjiang is highly complicated, south Xinjing in particular, noticed the headline today?
My guess is schadenfreude.
August 5th, 2008 at 10:28 am
You can accuse foreign journalists of messianic complex all you like, but it is a fact that merely talking to foreign journalists can lead to charges of leaking state secrets and a prison sentence. And it may be true that Woeser is still posting on her blog, but the number of Chinese bloggers who have been arrested this year is many times more than was the case back in 2001.
With facts like this, who needs science fiction?
Pray tell, who has been arrested for merely talking to foreign journalists? Who, in recent years, have been sentenced to prison just for talking to foreign journalists? Woeser isn't just posting on her blog, she has two major features in the American press *this year*.
As far as more bloggers being arrested this year than earlier this decade… I take it you're ignorant as to who the New Youth Study Group, and Stainless Steel Rat are?
August 5th, 2008 at 12:03 pm
@Buxi – Let's see what we know:
1) Zhao Yan, researcher for the New York Times, was arrested and charged with leaking state secrets to the NYT, however the charges were dropped and he was sentenced to 3 years for 'fraud' in closed session.
2) Ching Cheong, Hong Kong-born Singapore Straits Times journalist was arrested and charged with spying for the authorities on Taiwan – particularly that he bought sate secrets using money from the MND – and was sentenced to five years in prison. He served nearly three years before being released. He maintains that he was a victim of entrapment.
3) Jiang Weiping, a mainland-born journalist who wrote a series of articles exposing government corruption which appeared in the Hong Kong media, was sentenced to eight years in jail for illegally supplying state secrets, of which he served five. The people he exposed as being directly involved in corruption never sued for libel, and were in at least one case latter convicted for corruption.
So it would seem that being involved in the communication of anything deemed 'secret' by the Chinese government is a dangerous business.
As for the 'New Youth Study Group' and 'Stainless Steel Rat' cases, in both these case people who had been the victims of state oppression contacted foreign media and have not yet come to harm for it, but you have to ask – what did the CCP have to fear from such reports? That the Chinese government uses such Stasi-style techniques is no secret either inside or outside of China, and no specific government officials were named. Read the Washington Post stories here:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2004/04/23/AR2005040206572.html
I just watched the National on CBC. They covered some interesting topics. The Canadian chef of the games… not sure what her title is exactly (can't read French)… but she was saying that the facilities are excellent, the Chinese are very prepared, the village is great, the food is great. And she said that she hoped that that word would get out to everybody – how great the host and facilities are. 🙂
I also have been writing on this alarming issue:
Questioning media coverage of the Beijing Olympics
http://blog.chinationreport.com/2008/08/28/questioning-media-coverage-of-the-beijing-olympics/#comment-236
and today, Peter Hessler is at it again!
http://pasadenanewprogressive.blogspot.com/2008/09/world-wise.html
This offers an explanation to the question posed by the post, by Diana Barahona – author of Reporters Without Borders Unmasked (Reporters Without Borders generated many of the protests and much of the "dirt" against the Beijing Olympics).
http://narcosphere.narconews.com/notebook/diana-barahona/2008/07/freedom-press-what-they-dont-teach-you-j-school#comments
September 22nd, 2008 at 6:44 pm
Buxi – you got it right, and you are very right to write about it! I can't believe the people in these comments telling you the opposite of this. Something is very wrong, and the Western media is involved in it. This is not right!
I have been noticing the alarming amount of China-bashing going on in our media leading up to, during, and after the 2008 Beijing Olympics, but where are they getting their "information" from? This is the troubling question, one that has not been addressed by anyone in the country (that I know of), certainly not in the national headlines.
For instance, a recent article in Huffington Post (the liberal media has been as involved in this as the conservative media) was entitled "Mixed legacy likely as China's Olympics conclude". More of the same came from the New York Times whose headline read "After the Glow of Games, What Next for China?" Two blog columnists at the New York Times conspicuously have bashed China: Nicholas Kristoff (Kristoff is especially glaring) and Mike Nizza.
Mixed legacy likely as China's Olympics conclude? The "mixed legacy", from what I can see, lies with the Media, more importantly with their sources, and nowhere else.
Almost ALL American media has jumped on the "China-bashing" bandwagon, and has been sounding off about "human rights abuses in China", picking up information sourced by – and here is the point, WHO? Two groups mainly:
Human Rights Watch and Reporters Without Borders.
Yet Reporters Without Borders has been outed for years as nothing less than a U.S. State Department funded propaganda arm with links to Otto Reich (from Contra days) – see here http://www.counterpunch.org/barahona05172005.html. I found literally thousands of press releases designed expressly for the Beijing Games, here: http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=25234
I first became aware of them when they mounted an obvious and ugly "media propaganda siege" against the Beijing float in the 2008 Rose Parade in my hometown of Pasadena, CA, Fall 2007. They displayed their "handcuff" graphic on a large billboard in town (a graphic photographed all over the world, even on Notre Dame) and took over the local press (who were already openly sourcing a right-wing extremist, and therefore easy "prey") barraging my city with more "information" than a 3rd year History of Human Rights Abuse in China PhD student could ever care about!! They also co-opted the the tiny Falun Gong club at Cal Tech.
One small moment of "poetic justice" occurred at the end of all this ugliness, when no one less than Diana Barahona (author of Reporters Without Borders Unmasked) was there, unintentionally, in the audience of the parade.
I wrote about it here, but only after ALL of the local press refused to address the issue: http://pasadenanewprogressive.blogspot.com/2008/01/reporter-without-borders-media-siege-of.html
Among other writings about this group, I wrote a recap of their anti-Olympic's campaign. As a graphic designer, I could not help but notice their blatant use of propaganda, via clearly expensive and trendy graphics: http://pasadenanewprogressive.blogspot.com/2008/04/reporters-without-borders-anti-olympics.html.
More than anything I have discovered about this group, what is most alarming to me is their proliferation within our Media. They are used as an almost constant source for "news" on a daily basis. Yet, one finds right out there in the open, information coming from them, that is either biased or bogus.
Take their 2008 Annual Report "Freedom of the Press Worldwide" http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=25595. Reporters Without Borders has built a reputation (and bank account) by outing censorship of journalists around the world – yet give this ridiculous 2008 assessment for the United States, which contains almost nothing more than:
ONE (count 'em) Iraqi journalist detained in Guantanamo
ONE blogger, Josh Wolf, got three paragraphs detailing his plight
A big plug for the Shield Law
A plug for the Freedom of Information Act (an act that has become a tool for the Right to attack public institutions like public schools)
And that's it! (come on!)
People around the world have called RWB out for giving out the wrong information, seemingly based on how tight they are with the U.S. – or not. Here, Hossein Derakhshan writes about their misleading "information" on Iran:
http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/hossein_derakhshan/2006/12/reporters_without_borders_rsf.html
"Reporters Sans Frontier, sent out a press release announcing that Iran has blocked access to The New York Times, implying that the Islamic republic has expanded censorship to Western news websites and this is in line with the new anti-Western policies of president Ahmadinejad.
A few hours after that, through trusted journalists and friends in Tehran, I verified the report and realized that almost none of the websites mentioned in the report, including the New York Times were filtered."
In Rwanda, they noticed some funky stuff going on as well: Rwanda: Reporters Without Borders Pulls a Scam Again
http://allafrica.com/stories/200802290947.html
This incredibly prolific spread of information (I would call it "dirt") condemning other countries is super-alarming to me, because I often find it clearly politically motivated. Yes, the information exists, but what is not mentioned is how it has been selected and literally shoved down the throats of the entire nation, via the Media, via Reporters Without Borders and Human Rights Watch.
I wrote about the obvious benefits of all this to the Bush Administration here: http://pasadenanewprogressive.blogspot.com/2008/08/bush-gets-gold.html
Human Rights Watch is up for questioning as well.
For more information on Human Rights Watch, Read Paul Treanor's excellent (and forgotten) article here:
Who is behind Human Rights Watch?
http://web.inter.nl.net/users/Paul.Treanor/HRW.html
Robin Kelley, professor of history and American studies and ethnicity at USC, also noted in a recent lecture that Human Rights Watch does not currently address ANY human rights issues in the United States (unlike their past good work with prison abuse here).
I also noticed that they have "stepped in" as THE most-used source, replacing Reporters Without Borders during the Olympics. Could the fact that Human Rights Watch opened a headquarters in Paris last Fall have anything to do with that? How close are the two organizations?
I'm not saying this group is all bad, I am NOT saying that human rights are not important.
But both organization's "work" in helping America's media to condemn the Beijing Olympics, is nothing less than highly suspicious and needs to be looked into, if only to prevent something like this from happening again. These embarrassing media games, are below the dignity of our great country.
That said, the grace of the Chinese in ignoring this petty "media siege" and continuing on with their work producing the Games, is awe-inspiring.


72, 82, 86, 100, 114-in.
Face access, peripheral drive Microtunnel Boring Machines (MTBMs) are available in standard sizes 72-114-in. OD to precisely complete extended and curved* tunnels with exceptional drive and cutting torque. This new generation of MTBMs enables face access to replace cutter head tooling to tackle the complex alignments that our industry demands. The peripheral drive, face access MTBM family features an onboard electric over hydraulic power pack for cutter head drive with low, medium, and high torque modes for accurate control in changeable geology. Back-loaded tooling mounts on the cutter head make access and replacement of worn tooling a simple process without the need for a planned maintenance intervention. Soft ground, mixed ground and rock cutter heads and crushing cones are hard faced to withstand wear. Cutter heads can be customized for specific ground conditions.


The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is partnering with the Ministry of Education (MoE) and the Ghana Education Service (GES) to improve the reading achievement and quality of reading instruction in early grades.
The intervention focuses on teaching kindergarten (KG2), primary (P1) and primary (P2) pupils the building blocks of reading: letter recognition, sounding letters, decoding and forming words, building vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension.
The objective of the intervention is to train teachers to apply the "phonemic" approach within classes and provide continuous coaching and support using teachers' guides and books for pupils.
As part of the intervention, the MoE began implementing the "phonemic" approach in the Yendi Municipality in January, 2017, to improve basic literacy skills and promote reading among pupils in public primary schools in rural areas.
The intervention is being prototyped in the Dagbanli Language in the Yendi Municipality with the intention to include 11 more local languages and an English reading programme.
Overall reading progress for P1 jumped from three percent of children reading words to 64 per cent whiles pupils improved letter sound knowledge from three words per minute to 16 words per minute within two and half months of the implementation of the intervention in the Yendi Municipality.
Mr Andrew Karas, USAID Mission Director, who visited two beneficiary primary schools in the Yendi Municipality to observe the progress of the intervention, expressed the commitment of USAID to ensure that all children in the country read with fluency and comprehension.
Schools visited were Balogu and R.C Primary at Yendi.
Madam Barbara Ayisi-Archer, Deputy Minister of Education, said the use of the mother tongue is important and urged teachers to use the mother tongue at the lower primary level to improve the ability of children to grasp lessons.
She said using the mother tongue in the initial phase would help children to better transition to the English Language.
The Ghana News Agency understands the progress made at Yendi will help develop materials for an additional 10 GES-approved Ghanaian Languages to expand the programme to 100 targeted districts from the 2017/2018 school year.


text:
Home Concerts Tickets Hard Rock / Metal Rehab Tickets
Rehab Tickets
Buy All Rehab Tickets
Latest Rehab Tickets
Rehab Tickets for 1/24/2020 9:00:00 PM
Union Jack's British Pub
Annapolis,MD
The Warehouse - TN
Clarksville,TN
Hermans Hideaway
Rehab Tickets for 5/1/2020 8:00:00 PM
Rehab Tour Schedule
Jan 24 - Annapolis, MD - Union Jack's British Pub
Feb 15 - Clarksville, TN - The Warehouse - TN
Apr 19 - Denver, CO - Hermans Hideaway
May 01 - Seattle, WA - El Corazon
Rehab Cities
Rehab Annapolis MD
Rehab Clarksville TN
Rehab Denver CO
Rehab Seattle WA
Details of Rehab and the Ticket Luck value
Rehab is an American rock/rap group, noted for producing a kind of music which is a mixture of southern rock, dirty south rap, reggae, alternative and the popular 90s rock/rap style. Formed during the late 1990s in Warner Robins, Georgia, Rehab has released two major albums so far.
Their four other discs are also in existence. Besides, they have charted two singles on the Hot Modern Rock Tracks charts. The group was originally formed as a trio enlisting Steaknife, Danny Alexander, and Brooks Buford. After the formation of Rehab, they came up with their debut album entitled To Whom It May Consume.
To-date, Rehab has issued three albums including To Whom It May Consume released in 1999, Southern Discomfort in 2000 and Graffiti the World in 2005. In the early months of 2007, Cuz We Can became available on CD.
Rehab released its debut album called To Whom It May Consume in 1999. Soon after the release of Steaknife and Brooks Buford-produced-album, the band signed a record deal to Epic/Sony. The trios major label debut, called Southern Discomfort, hit stores in October 2000.
Rehab dedicated a song to their hometown called This Town with Danny Alexander and Brooks on board, hailing from the city of Warner Robins, south of Macon, Georgia.
Rehab scheduled Steaknife(Denny Campbell) to issue a CD through Priority Records but was later dropped from the label. Denny later began recording his first full length studio album tentatively titled White Noize. The album produced by Steaknife (Denny Campbell and Soulful-I (Jared Adair) was released on their myspace page under the user name of snowblindwhitenoize.
Currently, Steaknife is working with Danny Boone Alexander and Brooks Buford on a new album scheduled to come out sometime in April, as is Soulfuli on his own solo album called Head high.
Rehabs second album Southern Discomfort begins with a skit of them breaking out of a rehabilitation facility. The album's title references Southern Comfort, a brand of liquor. Southern Discomfort went on to sell over 140,000 units, and produced such hits as Sittin' At A Bar, It Don't Matter, Rattle My Cage.
The album also featured such guests as Cee-Lo, Goodie Mob, Steaknife, and Cody Chestnutt. In late 2005, Brooks went on to play host to the MTV series called Trailer Fabulous and in 2006, he hosted the MTV International series Bustamove.
Following the release of Graffiti the World, Rehab set out on a tour supporting the Vans Warped Tour which lasted for 2 years. They performed with bands such as Linkin Park. Later Danny called it quits over a difference in creative view points. After 2 years on road, the band re-emerged with a new album called Graffiti the World in 2007.
The new Rehab was brought together by original band member Danny Boone who was joined by longtime musicians Mike Hartnett-lead guitar, Hano Leathers- Bass, Chris Hood-Drums, Foz-Rhythm Guitar, and DJ Chris Crisis-Musical effects. Joining them was an additional and unofficial member of the group, Demun Jones.
Rehabs Demum Jones often steps in to perform the raps that Brooks once sang. With help from local Atlanta producer Billy Hume, this line-up put together new tracks and re-worked old classics as Graffiti the World.
Atlanta-based rock/rap band Rehab released Graffiti the World. It is their fourth commercially-released album and was re-released on Universal Republic Records in 2008. Graffiti the World was Rehab's first album to feature the new line-up, following the departure of Jason Brooks Buford.
The album features tracks like What Do you Want From Me, Graffiti The World,Last Tattoo and This Town Danny Boone. After the release of Graffiti the World, Rehab set out on a tour in the USA and Canada in 2007. The 2007 tour ended December 8th in Seminole Florida and the band came back to their home state of Georgia for a well deserved rest.
Rehab came up with Sittin' at a Bar which featured their single of the same name. With a shuffled tracklisting and new mixes of the title cut, the album is a repackaging of their Epic Records album Southern Discomfort. The label put it out to capitalize on the success of Sittin' at a Bar.
Brooks Buford after the group's initial separation, went on to record several projects, Straight Outta Rehab, which was never released due to Artista going out of business. He is currently working on a follow-up album titled Suspicious Package as well as a side project with Ashley Alan-Lee and Tommy Henriksen called The Audio Club.
Universal Republic Records signed the Warner Robins mash-up group in May 2008. They issued Rehab's 2005 independent release, Graffiti The World, later in the spring with 3 additional never-before-heard tracks. Prior to releasing their new album in 2008, Rehab has decided to undergo a mini-tour focused in the southeast.
They made stops in Georgia, Alabama, Carolina, Tennessee and Florida, including first time visit to the Rehab fan capital of Florida: Destin. Graffiti the World was re-released on Universal Republic Records in 2008. It was Rehab's first album to feature the new line-up, following the departure of Jason Brooks Buford.
Rehab embarked on a short west coast September tour with Pop Rock and Country crossover artist Kid Rock. They also released a new video of their newly titled Bartender song formerly known as Sittin at a bar which was recorded with Country Superstar Hank Williams Jr.
Rehabs newly released video can be found posted and played on CMT's Top 20 Countdown show staring Lance Smith. It is also available on MTV's website along with the brief overview and history of the band.
Rehab Tickets Prices
The average Rehab tickets price will cost you between $130 and $194, if you are looking for the cheapest seats then catch the event being held at the El Corazon, Seattle on 01/05/2020. The average ticket will cost you the highest on 24/01/2020 at the Union Jack's British Pub, Annapolis.
Minimum get in price is for Rehab tickets is $31 for the event being held at the The Warehouse - TN, Clarksville on 15/02/2020 , there are some venues that have a much higher get in price, for instance the cheapest seats at the Union Jack's British Pub, Annapolis on 24/01/2020 will set you back $191.
Rehab Annapolis Union Jack's British Pub 24-Jan-20 $194 $191 Annapolis Union Jack's British Pub
Rehab Clarksville The Warehouse - TN 15-Feb-20 $165 $31 Clarksville The Warehouse - TN
Rehab Denver Hermans Hideaway 19-Apr-20 $164 $35 Denver Hermans Hideaway
Rehab Seattle El Corazon 1-May-20 $130 $34 Seattle El Corazon
Rehab Tickets Promo Code
Use LUCK18 as the promo code and get a 3% discount on Rehab tickets. This is a wonderful opportunity to enjoy the thrilling live performance by your favoriteRehab in CONCERTS
LUCK18 3% 24-Jan-20 Rehab
LUCK18 3% 15-Feb-20 Rehab
LUCK18 3% 19-Apr-20 Rehab
LUCK18 3% 1-May-20 Rehab
RehabMinimum Price: $191Maximum Price: $197Average Price: $194
RehabMinimum Price: $31Maximum Price: $197Average Price: $165
People who bought Rehab Tickets also bought:
Jon Batiste and Stay Human Tickets
Journey Denver
I want to know about rehab ticketprice. Where can i get the details?
Rehab was rated
5 out of 10 based on 1 rating(s)
You can get the details about the ticket prices from the page of rehab Tickets.
View All Rehab Tickets

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Shamel Milling offers CERTIFIED ORGANIC (Non-GMO) Layer and Grower Feeds.
Both Powl's and Keystone Mills Organic Layer Feeds are a textured dry mash ration of finely ground clean grains. Both should be fed as the sole free choice complete diet. Intake will vary due to variables such as weather and production levels. Always provide a constant source of clean, fresh water.
These products have been formulated specifically for laying chickens, meat birds, ducks and turkeys and is not intended for other species.


text:
{% load static %}

<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="{% static 'polls/style.css' %}" />

{{ question.question_text }}

	{% if error_message %}
{{ error_message }}
{% endif %}

	<form action="{% url 'polls:vote' question.id %}" method="post">
	{% csrf_token %}
	{% for choice in question.choice_set.all %}
		<input type="radio" name="choice" id="choice{{ forloop.counter }}" value="{{ choice.id }}" />
		{{ choice.choice_text }}

	{% endfor %}
	<input type="submit" value="Vote" />
	</form>

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


As Chief Cybersecurity Technologist for DLT Solutions, Don Maclean formulates and executes corporate cyber security portfolio strategies, speaks and writes on security concepts, approaches, and offerings, and socializes DLT's offerings and capabilities with vendor partners. Before joining DLT, Don managed security programs for numerous Federal clients- DOJ, DOL, FAA, FBI, and OFR (Treasury), during his tenure at BAE Systems and VMD Systems Integrators. An avid musician, Don sponsors a concert for charity every year.


text:
You can change the print size of this book
Kwame Kilpatrick - Made For Success Publishing
Gain access to the library to view online
From Mayor of Detroit to property of the Michigan Department of Corrections; Kwame Kilpatrick chronicles one of the biggest political scandals to rock the nation in his memoir, Surrendered: The Rise, Fall and Revelation of Kwame Kilpatrick.
In 2008, Kwame Kilpatrick plead guilty to obstruction of justice charges stemming from lying under oath about an affair he had with his long‐time friend and chief -of- staff.
Kilpatrick's charismatic authority as the Leader of the Michigan State House of Representatives and Mayor of the City of Detroit catapulted him into the national spotlight. He was known across the country as "The Hip‐Hop Mayor," and one of the Democratic Party's most recognized stars. His political punditry and prowess were evident by his multiple invitations to the White House, and addressing both the 2000 and 2004 Democratic National Conventions. As the youngest Mayor ever elected in the City of Detroit's History, his political career seemed, not only on‐track, but also unstoppable. Through a tawdry chain of events, Kilpatrick's passion for helping people and moving the City of Detroit into greatness were overshadowed only by his sensationalized political demise.
In a cathartic process of awesome revelation, Kilpatrick writes a vividly intimate, unashamed and honest memoir that illustrates the mental, physical and spiritual mettle required to hold steadfast in the midst of the personal hell that often accompanies public humiliation and private damnation.
Surrendered: The Rise, Fall and Revelation of Kwame Kilpatrick gives a fascinating and revealing look into the life of one of the most talked about personalities of this Century.
Published by Made For Success Publishing
Document size 2 MB
Legal information: rental price per page 0.0020€. This information is given for information only in accordance with current legislation.
Beyond Survival
Hats Off to Billy Kidd
Tomorrow I'm Dead
A Knight Without a Castle


Spel chek iz stoopid. It has told me that words even simpler than "monologuing" are misspelled (or merely that it doesn't know them) — words like "automaton", "assuage", and "twaddle". Spell check seems to have the vocabulary of a six-year-old.
Mine doesn't know "velociraptor", and thinks that perhaps I mean "velocipede". Because yeah, that's a much more commonly used word that "velociraptor", in eighteen-eighty-five.
Well, you gotta figure they haven't loaded the *entire* dictionary into them. That's an absurd amount of words and data space required.
The entire OED is available online (for a price, of course). That is a much greater expanse of data than a simple spell checker. That's approximately 230,000 words and their definitions, word origins, alternate forms, etc. Download size is only 160 MB. That's not "an absurd amount" of anything. A single HD video on youtube is bigger than that.
The word list titled "british-english-insane" clocks in at 6.6MB.
Dictionaries tend to be bigger because they contain definitions of the words, not just the words and variants themselves.
The Collaborative International Dictionary of English expands to 40MB flat. But its index is only 3.8MB.
Yes, well, I used the OED as an example because, as English dictionaries go, it is undoubtedly one of the biggest. And yet, compared to other things that are stored on one's computer or on the internet, even the OED takes up relatively little space. My point was that using data space as an argument for not including the entire lexicon in a spell checker is a pretty flimsy excuse.
Curiously enough, there was an actor some years ago named Moustache (his given name was François-Alexandre Galipedes). Known for, and named for, his very prominent and memorable facial hair.
Should also add that spell check keeps telling me my own name is misspelled. That's my business, not theirs.
Here, let me close the barn door then.
Hopefully Jonah is on point if danger is incoming.
I wouldn't worry. He just left a pie for them.
All three nukes are together now, but in Skin Horse's possession. That's quite a bargaining chip.
Are you sure they're *still* in Skin Horse's possession? I would be completely unsurprised if Ira/Mr. Green swiped them on the way out.
If memory serves, one of them power's Hitty.
That would have been a neat trick, considering his hands were empty when he was walking out to Nick on the roof.
It's why he felt the need to leave a party he planned.
I'm pretty sure we're about to see some abnormal weather hit Annex One. Possibly after locking down all the entrances and exits.
Jonah being there is a wildcard for sure, but I'm still left wondering if that ear Unity lost in Nick is still listening to Nick and Ira as Ira reveals his evil plan.
I suspect she meant "pinna", the outer part that does not, itself, hear. At least in normal folk….
Don't Jonah Yu and Nera have Shelby's old flying car? The Skin-Horse gang could steal that and fly after Nick.
I don't think he's still in sight.
I don't see the relationship between my statement and your response: I wasn't suggesting they don't have the car, I was saying Nick's probably well over the horizon by this point, so they wouldn't be able to track him.
Unless Unity's aforementioned ear serves at least as a homing beacon?
I would be surprised if Nera were unable to track them, even without the car. But if they do indeed have Shelby's car, I assume that it has some tracking devices of some sort on board.
Jonah Yu could also use his psychic powers (for lack of better words) and figure out where Nick and Ira *probably* are.


One of the largest crane providers in France, Mediaco, held a Grove open day in Nice, France, where the company exhibited their new Grove GMK4100L and GMK5130-2. The open day increased Grove's popularity with French customers who were impressed with the 60 m main boom on the GMK4100L and the Megatrak suspension and all-wheel steer system which feature on both Grove cranes. The event took place on June 23 and approximately 350 visitors attended.


Knitting Like Crazy: The Winner!
Thanks to everyone for commenting on my Knitting Pleats book review. I am happy to say I have drawn a random winner.
And the winner is....gussek! Debbie, please check your Ravelry message box for details.
Thanks again. There is another book review/giveaway coming. Check back Monday!


text:
Drink Me To the Moon
Cocktails and mixology date back as old as bars and pharmaceutical industries, it was the marriage of the two that changed it all. Modern-day liquors and spirits such as sweet and dry vermouths, Chartreuse, Fernet Branca, really any and all digestifs and aperitifs originally started in the pharmaceutical industry. Bars were the place you could purchase spirits, beer, and sometimes wine and consume it. It was the perfect place to decompress after a longs days' work, the same sort of feeling as we have today after a long day. Sometimes we just need to relax and have a drink and what better place to do it than in a bar with friends. Then came prohibition. The alcoholics' equivalent to the dark ages.
One beautiful irony about prohibition is that some of the very people – in addition to those 1920s rebels – that successfully made alcohol illegal were some of the people secretly funding the speakeasies and other secret drinking clubs that popped up all over major cities. Unfortunately, though there was a booze shortage because it was illegal to make, purchase, import and export. So, people got creative and would make some insanely strong concoctions in their bathtubs at home, otherwise known as Moonshine. Which got its name because the distillers would run their booze into the cities and into speakeasies by the light of the moon (it also led to the birth of NASCAR). So, Moonshine began to flood into these speakeasies remedying the shortage, however, it wasn't exactly easy to drink. It was harsh stuff. In fact, some people died from consuming it, because sometimes the booze wasn't distilled correctly making it poisonous. Shine was made by a litany of different bases, from corn to rye to potatoes or beets, whatever the distiller could get their hands on. It was almost always clear because most moonshiners didn't have the capacity (or the time) to age their chemistry projects in barrels, which would give it its color. They also sought to make the booze nice and strong, imagine unaged corn whisky with a proof as high as 190, which's over double the average proof of modern-day spirits. It was powerful enough to power cars. So naturally, this made it rather difficult to consume by itself. This is where the creativity of the bartenders came into play to help soften the flavor and mask the strength of the bathtub elixir. They would utilize sugars, fresh citrus, and other lower proof spirits (like vermouth) to calm down the intensity. And thus, modern mixology (bartending) was born.
Below you will find some of these classics – with a little Drink Me to the Moon twist – that are still alive and well today, as well as some others that are staples of the cocktail world. Mix and drink responsibly! Cheers!
The Old Fashioned
2 oz. Rye Whiskey
1 oz. Brown Sugar Simple Syrup or sugar cube
2 dashes aromatic bitters
2 dashes orange bitters
Combine all ingredients into a rocks glass. Give it a stir. Add ice. Garnish with an orange peel and cherry.
The Margarita
2 oz 100% de Agave tequila
1 oz orange liquor
dash of agave nectar
Combine all ingredients into a shaker. Give it a light shake. Then strain onto fresh ice. Garnish with a lime wheel.
The Manhattan
2 oz of rye whiskey or bourbon
1 oz of sweet vermouth
3 dashes of bitters
Combine all ingredients into mixing glass. Stir for about 30 seconds or until contents are cold. Strain into a martini glass and serve with a cherry.
1 oz. Lillet Blanc
Combine all ingredients into a mixing glass. Add ice. Give it a strong stir. Strain into a martini glass finishes it with a twist of lemon.
Or do it the James Bond way and combine all the ingredients into a shaker tin. Shake. Then, finish the same as above.
The Aviation
3/4 oz. Maraschino Cherry Liquor
1/2 oz. Creme de Violette or Yvette
Combine all ingredients into a shaker tin. Shake. Strain into a martini glass. Garnish with a cherry (or lemon twist).
1 1/2 oz. Gin
3/4 oz. Campari
3/4 oz. Sweet Vermouth
Combine all ingredients into mixing glass. Stir. Strain into a martini glass or rocks glass. Garnish with a twist of orange.
The Original Whiskey Sour
2 oz. Rye Whiskey or Bourbon
1 oz. Lime or Lemon Juice (both work)
1 oz. Simple Syrup or Brown Sugar Simple
Crack the egg and put ONLY THE EGG WHITES into the shaker tin. Combine the rest of the ingredients into the tin. Shake hard, for at least 20-30 seconds to ensure the frothy egg white. Strain into a martini glass. Dash some bitters on top. Garnish with a cherry or lemon twist.
1 oz. Orange Liquor
3/4 oz. Honey
Crack the egg and put ONLY THE EGG WHITES into the shaker tin. Combine the rest of the ingredients into the tin. Shake hard, for at least 20-30 seconds to ensure the frothy egg white. Strain onto fresh ice in a tall glass. Garnish with a twist of orange and a dash of bitters.
The Penicillin
2 oz. Scotch Whiskey
1 oz. Lemon Juice
Combine all ingredients into a shaker tin. Shake. Strain into a martini glass. Dash some bitters on top. Garnish with a twist of lemon.
** Disclaimer: The recipes above are our versions of some classics, recipes that have been played with and experimented with in the real world. You will find different recipes for these cocktails in other places, much like you will find different recipes for cooking the same dish. To get a better understanding, check out [insert mixology article].**
"I feel sorry for people that don't drink, because when they wake up in the morning, that is the best they are going to feel all day-" ― Frank Sinatra
Follow Drink Me To the Moon on WordPress.com


text:
Manmohan pays tributes to Gurudas Dasgupta
New Delhi, Nov 18 (PTI) Former prime minister Manmohan Singh paid tributes to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta on Monday, saying the trade union leader kept his associations open for his adversaries and always chose consensus over confrontation.
Speaking at the memorial meeting of the Left leader organised by Communist Party of India, Singh said Dasgupta was a committed nationalist dedicated to the Constitution and its republican values.
Dasgupta, perhaps Singh's staunchest critic in the Left parties, died last month in Kolkata. He was a member of the joint parliamentary committee on 2G, the first Left leader who accused the then prime minister Manmohan Singh of 'dereliction of duty' and gave a long dissent note as the P C Chacko-led panel's report was favourable to the government.
'I had the privilege of knowing Dasgupta for a long time. Though we belonged to different ideologies, he always impressed me as a committed nationalist dedicated to the Constitution and its republican values.
'Through his exceptional oratory style, he was able to present the problems being faced by the poor and labour classes, cutting across political parties. When he spoke , the Opposition and Treasury benches listened very carefully,' Singh said.
The former prime minister described Dasgupta as a 'doyen' of the trade union movement in the country and a pioneer in bringing together different trade unions on a single platform to put up a united front against a common enemy.
'In his absence, the Communist movement as well as our country has lost one of its most dedicated and well-loved leader who has dedicated his whole life to the struggle for the rights of the poor and the oppressed.
'A remarkable quality of Dasgupta was that he was never obsessed by the trappings of power. He valued the role of an Opposition, preferring consensus over confrontation. It is the beauty of our democracy that despite being an ideological opponent of Dasgupta, we are able to come together to commemorate his service to the nation,' Singh said.
Dasgupta, who served three terms as member of the Rajya Sabha and two terms as elected member of the Lok Sabha, was a 'fiery orator', recalled Loktantrik Janata Dal chief Sharad Yadav, adding that the labour leader would be 'restless' during any issue that cropped up that affected lives of the common people in the country.
In his tribute to Dasgupta, Yadav recalled how Dasgupta would fret over parliament questions and try to frame them in a way that could help the masses.
'He was a sincere man who would be deeply missed in these times,' said Yadav.
Singh said Dasgupta's leadership skills were evident from the fact that when he took over as the general secretary of the All India Trade Union Congress (AITUC), he transformed it from a lesser-known trade union into a major trade union front of the country.
'During his tenure as the general secretary of AITUC, he led many struggles of the trade unions and played a major role in uniting the various trade unions in favour of the urgent demands of the workers. He was a pillar of strength to the trade unions in banking, insurance and oil industry.
'There is tremendous power in simplicity and humility, which we often don't realise. He was admired and respected across party lines. He was a strong voice in Parliament.
'Unlike many of his party colleagues, Dasgupta kept his associations open for his adversaries too and never hesitated to meet any opposition leader for floor coordination in Parliament,' Singh said.
Dasgupta's party colleague and CPI general secretary D Raja recalled a comrade who a 'fighter', a champion of the masses.
'He was inspiring. He was relentless, uncompromising. He was the true leader of the united trade union movement of the country championing its causes at all levels,' said Raja.
Dasgupta breathed his last on October 31 this year. PTI ASG HMB
Keir Starmer nominated for Labour leadership by Usdaw union in major blow to Jess Phillips
With Level-3 Avalanche Set to Hit Uttarakhand in 24 Hrs, Govt Swings into Action; Alerts 4 Hill-stations
Manmohan Govt Spoke to Protesters During Anna Stir, Why Can't Modi Govt Do It: Ex-Lt Guv Najeeb Jung
Indonesia unions hold protests over planned labor reform


ACLS Certification Class Inc. provides online courses in ACLS (Advanced Cardiac Life Support) as well as PALS Pediatric Advanced Life Support. Our program not only includes supplementary materials, but also examines clinical cases.
When you register, you will receive a manual and also instructions to guide you through the online coursework.
ACLS Certification Class Inc. also provides a second option. If you would like to self-review the current PALS, BLS and ACLS recommendations on your own, you can then retake the provider examination. This option is only open to those who have taken ACLS or PALS in the past.
Often professionals find that they prefer to review the materials at their own pace and then wish to follow this with a re-examination. Through this means, you can review the materials online and take the exam at your leisure. Professionals will receive certification for continuing professional education as well as ACLS or PALS cards from the convenience of their home or office.
Note: Our materials are based upon the most current ACLS provider manual. ACLS Certification Class Inc. also follows AHA and AAP guidelines. Our program is also based on the NBECC or National Board of Emergency Care Certifications.
Those who register for the exam will have 90 days in which to take it. The test itself is timed to take no longer than 150 minutes.
The ACLS Certification Class Inc. certification exam has 75 questions in multiple-choice format. Those who receive at least a 84% will successfully pass the exam. A clinical skills inventory is also included.
This exam can be repeated free of charge. ACLS Certification Class Inc. staff will provide necessary guidance for retaking the test.
Please note: It is prohibited to copy, print, save or transfer examination material and those that violate this rule will be faced with legal penalties. ACLS Certification Class Inc. uses special monitoring equipment to ensure that this does not occur.


text:
Articles Posted in Recent Cases
The El Paso Court of Appeals tangled with the accommodation doctrine in Lyle v. Midway Solar, LLC, No. 08-19-00216-CV, and the mineral owner lost.
The Lyles own a 27.5% mineral interest in 315 acres in Pecos County. Gary Drgac owns the surface. Drgac leased the 315 acres to Midway Solar for a solar farm. Midway constructed its solar array, leaving 17 acres on the south end and 80 acres on the north end for "Designated Drill Sites." Midway did not get a surface waiver from the Lyles. The solar array covers 70% of the surface above the Lyles' mineral estate.
The Lyles sued Midway for trespass and breach of contract. The breach of contract claim was based on the language in the deed that reserved the mineral interest owned by the Lyles. It provided that the Grantors reserve "the right to such use of the surface estate in the lands as may be usual, necessary or convenient in the use and enjoyment of the oil, gas and general mineral estate …." It also provided that Grantors would never be liable to Grantees for any damage or injury to the surface estate by reason of such use. The trespass claim was based on the theory that Midway's use deprived the Lyles of the right to use the land under its solar array and therefore trespassed on the Lyle's right to use the surface estate of that land. Continue reading →
Posted in: accommodation doctrine, Recent Cases and Solar
Updated: January 8, 2021 1:49 pm
Texas courts are very reluctant to hold that oil and gas lease provisions are ambiguous. The same holds true for deeds and wills. These instruments affect title to land, and if an instrument is ambiguous it inserts uncertainty into land titles and results in litigation over the parties' intent using extrinsic evidence, usually before a jury. Such litigation often ends up with each party testifying as to what they meant in the instrument, leaving a jury with little go to on. Or the instrument in question is so old that no person is alive who could testify as to the parties' intent.
The meaning of a contract, deed or lease is a "question of law," meaning it is decided by a judge, not a jury, based solely on the "four corners" of the instrument. Only if an instrument is ambiguous can outside evidence of the parties' intent be considered, and then the meaning of the contract is a fact question that may be submitted to a jury. Courts bend over backwards to avoid holding that an instrument is ambiguous. It is often the case that an appellate court will hold that the language of an instrument is unambiguous even though the court does not agree on the meaning!
But in Endeavor Energy Resources v. Energen Resources, the Supreme Court reached the conclusion, after eighteen pages of reasoning, that it was impossible to tell from the language in the lease what the parties intended, and that it was ambiguous. The Court remanded the case to the trial court to admit evidence of the parties' intent.
Posted in: Recent Cases, Retained Acreage Clauses and Uncategorized
Another Case on Post-Production Costs
Netty Engler Energy, LP has asked the Texas Supreme Court to review the decision of the Fort Worth Court of Appeals in Netty Engler Energy, LP v. Bluestone Natural Resources II, LLC, 2020 WL 3865269 (July 9, 2020).
Engler owns a royalty interest in a section of land in Tarrant County on which Bluestone owns a lease and operates gas wells. Engler's royalty interest originated in a deed in which the grantor reserved a one-eighth non-participating royalty interest. The deed provides that the grantor reserves "a free one-eighth (1/8) of production … to be delivered to Grantor's credit, free of cost in the pipe line, if any, otherwise free of cost at the mouth of the well or mine."
Bluestone contracted with Crestwood Equity Partners to gather its gas through a gathering system owned by Crestwood and deliver it to various delivery points into a pipeline owned by Energy Transfer, where the gas is sold. Bluestone deducted the gathering fees charged by Crestwood from Engler's royalty. Continue reading →
Posted in: Post-Production Costs and Recent Cases
Updated: December 4, 2020 4:57 pm
Another Bankruptcy Court Weighs In On Rejection of Gas Contracts
On October 28 Judge David Jones, US Bankruptcy Court for Southern District in Houston, issued a memorandum opinion in Chesapeake Energy's bankruptcy (Case No. 20-33233), granting Chesapeake's motion to reject its contract to sell gas to ETC Texas Pipeline.
The Bankruptcy Code allows a debtor in bankruptcy to "reject" an "executory contract." As the court explained,
In simple terms, Sec. 365(a) allows a debtor to re-evaluate the wisdom of continued performance of a particular contract based upon the circumstances faced by the debtor during the bankruptcy case. By rejecting an executory contract, a debtor is permitted to disavow further performance of its obligations under a burdensome contract. … The rejection of an executory contract constitutes a breach by the debtor of the contract immediately before the petition date. … In general terms, this breach results in a general unsecured claim against the bankruptcy estate for the damages caused by the debtor's future nonperformance. … Thus, any allowed claim would be paid pro rata with the debtor's other unsecured creditors.
Chesapeake considered its gas purchase contract with ETC to be burdensome and so sought permission from the court to reject the contract, leaving ETC with an unsecured claim for damages caused by Chesapeake's breach. Continue reading →
Posted in: Bankruptcy and Recent Cases
Updated: November 20, 2020 4:58 pm
Mineral Title Dispute Before Texas Supreme Court
The Texas Supreme Court will hear arguments in December in Concho Resources v. Ellison, No. 19-0233, a fight over ownership of the minerals in 154 acres in Irion County. (The population of Irion county was 1,599 in 2010. Its county seat is Mertzon. The county was once the hideout of outlaw Tom Ketchum. Irion County was the home of Mont Noelke, a rancher, writer and renaissance man who wrote a column for many years beloved by the readers of the Livestock Weekly.)
In 1927, the Sugg family agreed to a land swap with the Noelke family, and to effectuate the swap, the Suggs executed a deed conveying a tract described as follows:
All of Survey 1, Block 6, HTC Ry Co land located North and West of the public road which now runs across the corner of said Survey, containing 147 acres, more or less."
A later survey in 1939 determined that in fact the portion of Section 1 lying north and west of the public road contained 301 acres. The crux of the dispute is whether the 1927 deed conveyed only 147 acres or instead conveyed all of the 301 acres north and west of the highway (which everyone agreed remained as it was in 1927). Samson, based on a lease from the successors in title to the land lying south and east of the road, claimed that the boundary was not the road but was limited to a 147-acre tract lying north and west of the road. Samson drilled a well on the disputed 154-acre tract, leading to the litigation. Marsha Ellison, claiming to own the minerals in the 154 acres (as successor to Noelke), brought suit. Continue reading →
Posted in: Recent Cases
GDHM Land & Mineral Owner Webinars
Posted in: Allocation Wells, Recent Cases and Water Rights
Updated: October 5, 2020 3:19 pm
Consent-to-assign Provisions in Oil and Gas Leases – Mayo Foundation v. BP America
U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, in Amarillo, recently wrote an opinion in Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. BP America Production Company, 447 F.Supp.3d 522 (March 3, 2020) dealing with the enforceability of a lease provision requiring the lessee to obtain the lessor's consent to assign an oil and gas lease. The opinion addresses issues that, remarkably, have never been discussed by a Texas court. Judge Kacsmaryk provides a detailed discussion and analysis of legal arguments on the construction and enforceability of consent-to-assign clauses in oil and gas leases.
Barbara Lips owned a ranch in Roberts and Ochiltree Counties. She signed an oil and gas lease to Alpar Resources in 1994. Ms. Lips died in 1995 and devised the ranch to the endowment arm of the Mayo Clinic. Bank One was hired as agent to manage the Clinic's interest. The lease was later amended to contain the following provision:
The rights and obligations of the Lessee hereunder are not assignable or transferable in any respect by it, except upon the written approval of Bank One Trust Company, N.A., as Agent, or any successor Agent, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
The lease, as to a portion of the land, came to be owned by BP America, which asked Bank One for permission to assign its interest in the lease to Courson Oil & Gas. Bank One refused to grant consent, citing past business dealings and litigation with Courson. Mayo Foundation then sued BP seeking an injunction to prevent the assignment. Continue reading →
Posted in: OIl and Gas News and Recent Cases
Updated: September 28, 2020 3:11 pm
Supreme Court agrees to hear BPX v. Strickhausen
The Texas Supreme Court has agreed to hear argument in BPX Operating v. Strickausen, Case No. 19-0567, an important case for royalty owners. I wrote about this case when it was decided last year by the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals (Strickhausen v. Petrohawk Operating, No. 04-18-00636-CV). That court ruled for Ms. Strickhausen, the royalty owner, on the issue of whether she had ratified a pooled unit by accepting royalties, despite protests by her and her lawyer that Petrohawk (now BPX) was not authorized by her lease to form the pooled unit. Briefs in the case can be found here.
Updated: August 28, 2020 4:37 pm
Another Chapter in Jimmy McAllen's Fight with Forest Oil
It seems that Jimmy McAllen's troubles over damages and injuries he suffered when Forest Oil buried mercury-contaminated iron sponge wood chips on his ranch will never end. Arbitration of his claims resulted in a $20 million award which was affirmed by the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals, and the Supreme Court denied review.
But shortly thereafter, McAllen got in a dispute over attorneys' fees related to the case with his lawyer and former son-in-law Chris Amberson. McAllen claimed his lawyer overcharged for fees and submitted bills for fraudulent expenses. That dispute also went to arbitration, and the arbitrator, Tom Collins, entered an award against Amberson for more than $15 million. Collins found that Amberson had billed McAllen almost $1.7 million in "reimbursable expenses" to retain 38 experts for the Forest Oil litigation. "These were made-up expenses," Collins wrote, adding that "almost 100% percent of the expert retainers were not paid." Collins found almost $2.6 million in fraudulent charges.
Amberson then asked the district court which appointed the arbitrator to set aside part of the award. But a company owned by Amberson, also a party to the case, has now sought bankruptcy protection, and the case was removed to bankruptcy court. The battle continues.
Pipeline Loses Condemnation Appeal – Hlavinka v. HSC Pipeline
The First Court of Appeals in Houston agreed with the Hlavinkas that HSC Pipeline Partnership, an Enterprise Products company, had failed to prove it has authority to condemn a pipeline easement across their land in Brazoria County. Hlavinka v. HSC Pipeline Partnership, No. 01-19-00092-CV.
The Hlavinkas purchased 15,000 acres in 2002-2003 "for the primary purpose of generating income by acquiring additional pipeline easements." When they purchased the land there were more than twenty-five pipelines traversing the property. HSC proposed to acquire an easement across the land for a pipeline from Texas City to a plant in Brazoria County owned by Braskem America which would carry propylene. Propylene is a product of refining crude oil. Enterprise purchases refinery-grade propylene from various refineries and further refines it into polymer grade propylene (PGP) at its facilities in Mont Belvieu. HSC contracted with Braskem to sell it propylene at Mont Belview, and then to ship it for Braskem to Braskem's plant in Brazoria County.
The Hlavinkas and HSC could not agree on terms for an easement, so HSC sued to condemn the easement. The Hlavinkas challenged HSC's right to condemn on various grounds, which the trial court overruled. The trial court also excluded testimony of Terrance Hlavinka related to damages and valuation of the easement. After trial, the Hlavinkas were awarded $132,293.36, representing $108,957.35 for crop and surface damages and $23,326 for the easement. The Hlavinkas appealed.
The Court of Appeals ruled in favor off the Hlavinkas on two issues: first, it held that HSC did not prove as a matter of law that it was a common carrier with the power of eminent domain, and that a fact issue was raised on that point by the evidence presented. Second, it held that the trial court should not have excluded Terrance Hlavinka's testimony on the value of the easement. Continue reading →
Posted in: Eminent Domain and Recent Cases
Updated: June 23, 2020 11:27 am


We, TechSphere FZE take pleasure to introduce our self as the leading company in Middle East and Africa, dealing with supplies of UPS systems and Sealed Lead Acid Batteries of all kind. We are in this business for last 20 years and have excellent experience in this field.	View More ..