text: 09/11/1990 - Minutes	PROC•DINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY UTAH TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1990 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met as the Committee of the Whole, Tuesday, September 11, 1990, at 5:00 p.m. in Room 325, City Council Office, City County Building, 451 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Ronald Whitehead Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Wayne Horrocks Don Hale Nancy Pace The following Councilmembers were Absent Tom Godfrey Council Chair Hardman presided at the meeting. There were no Briefing Session minutes for this date. 90-298 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI, UTAH TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1990 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Regular Session on Tuesday, September 11, 1990, at 6:00 p.m. in Room 315, City Council Chambers, City County Building, 451 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Ronald Whitehead Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Wayne Horrocks Don Hale Nancy Pace Mayor Palmer DePaulis, Roger Cutler, City Attorney, S. R. Kivett, Chief Deputy Recorder, and Beverly Jones, Deputy Recorder were present. The following Council Members were absent: Tom Godfrey Council Chair Hardman presided at and conducted the meeting. OPENING CEREMONIES press, Ameritech Coatings, Anodiz- ing and Metal Coatings Inc, and #1. There was no invocation. Litton Systems, Inc. #2. The Council led the COMMENTS Pledge of Allegiance. Fae Nichols, Chairperson for #3. Councilmember Kirk moved Peoples Freeway Community Council and Councilmember Horrocks second- said she had made an appointment ed to approve the minutes of the with the County Commission to Salt Lake City Council for the discuss the problem of prosti- regular meeting held Tuesday, tution on State Street and also September 4, 1990, which motion with the overcrowding of the jail. carried, all members present voted aye. The following people spoke in favor of approving the three reappointments to the Historic #4. Mayor DePaulis presented Landmarks Committee: Mike environmental compliance awards to Stransky, Rang Kimbal, David seven Salt Lake City companies. Spickhard, Grace Sperry, and Peter Prior to the announcement of the duPont Emerson. winners he gave a brief descrip- tion of how the award winners were The speakers felt that to not determined. He said the criteria reappoint Mr. Ulrich, Mr. Stransky included 1 ) achieving a score of and Mr. Emerson would cause the 95% or higher on all tested param- committee to be faced with a eters, 2) had to be in total situation where there would be no compliance over the twelve months continuity within the committee of 1989, 3 ) spill prevention and members. They said the three control plans, 4) cooperation, and individuals were all architects 5) employee training and general and if they were not reappointed, environmental concern.	He said it would leave only one architect there were 72 companies eligible on the committee. It was suggest- for this award. The winners were ed that the length of the appoint- Detroit Diesel; Varian Company, ments be staggered to maintain Blanchard Metals, Roadway Ex- continuity. 90-299 PROCAINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI, UTAH TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1990 Mayor DePaulis said this appeared on the agenda now was issue had been discussed with the because the names have been held Council.	He said he had been for so long. provided the Council with memos since January expressing his Councilmember Whitehead said feelings as to why he felt there if all three were reappointed the was a need for reappointment of situation would come up again certain third term members. He later when their term expired, and said on May 29, 1990 a memo was felt the terms should be stag- sent to the Council. Mayor gered. DePaulis read a paragraph from this memo which said "third term Mayor DePaulis said the reappointments in this case was Council could disapprove one necessary and he felt there would reappointment and this would begin be a major disruption to the work the transition. He said he had to product if the council did not have council action to initiate a approve the change. " He said he new recommendation. only wanted to bring appointments to the Council that he felt Councilmember Kirk said that strongly about. would place the Council in a position of having to choose one Councilmember Whitehead said of three very competent people. he had a problem with reappointing She said that earlier in the all three members at the same process this would have been an time. He said this would cause agreeable negotiation. the same problem later. He said if the Council had received a Councilmember Hales asked if single reappointment with two new the Council declined all three appointments he would not have a reappointments would it be possi- problem with the appointments. ble for the Mayor to resubmit one name. Mayor DePaulis said he had not sent all three names at once. He Councilmember Pace said that said the names were transmitted was asking the Mayor to do what individually but because of the the Council did not want to do. flexibility	disagreement	the She asked if the Council could be names had been held and were now informed as to how the cycle with being considered together. the eleven members worked. Councilmember Whitehead said Mr. Allen Johnson, City it made no difference if they were Planning Director, said the mem- submitted singly or all at one bers were appointed on a staggered time. He said it completely basis. He said of the 14 members violated the spirit of what the there were no more than 3 appoint- Council had tried to accomplish. ed in any one year.	He said He said the Council did not want membership was based upon the people on the board for a life number of historic districts. time. Councilmember Hardman said Mayor DePaulis said that he the ordinance only required one had sent the names to the Council architect on the committee. appropriately, timely, and exact- ly, with new appointments.	He John Adkinson, asked if the reiterated that the reason they transients in the Jackson area could be cleaned up. 90-300 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1990 Mayor DePaulis said he had ordinance amending Chapter 64 of discussed the situation with Title 18 dealing with demolishing Councilmember Whitehead and said buildings. there were several things that (0 90-39) could be done to help with the panhandling, the transients, and #3. RE: Adopting Resolution the prostitution problem in the 96 of 1990 authorizing the execu- Sixth West, North Temple area. He tion of a interlocal cooperation said a committee had been formed agreement between Salt Lake City to take comments and suggest Corporation and the Utah Division solutions to these issues. of Water Rights providing for a ground water study of Salt Lake Councilmember Whitehead said Valley. when a program was started it (C 90-503) should be on a continuing basis. He said in the past, programs were #4. RE: Adopting Resolution started and when the problem 97 of 1990 authorizing the execu- seemed to be corrected the program tion of an interlocal cooperation was stopped. He said then the agreement between Salt Lake City problem came back and the resi- Corporation and the United States dents were in the same situation of America, by and through the as before. Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Drug Enforcement Adminis- Mayor DePaulis said the tration of the investigation and problem had been in the staffing prosecution of sales of controlled issues of the Police Department. substances. He said he had a commitment from (C 90-502) the Police Chief that when the next 25 police officers completed NEW COUNCIL BUSINESS their training in December they would be available to go on pa- #1. RE: Adopt an ordinance trol. amending Sections 5.26. 100 and 12.56.330 of the Salt Lake City CONSENT AGENDA Code, relating to freight license stickers attached to vehicle and Councilmember Hale moved and freight curb loading zones, re- Councilmember Kirk seconded to spectively. approve the consent agenda, which motion carried, all members ACTION:	Without objection present voted aye. Councilmember Hardman referred this item to the consent agenda. #1. RE: Adopting Resolution (0 90-40) 95 of 1990 authorizing the execu- tion of an Interlocal Cooperation UNFINISHED COUNCIL BUSINESS Agreement between Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County for the #1. RE: Consider adopting a placement of a watermain located Resolution providing for the on 2700 East Street.	financing by Salt Lake City of the (C 90-501) acquisition of equipment and plant facilities and related improve- #2. RE: Setting a date to ments for a fiberglass insulation hold a hearing on October 2, 1990 and related products manufacturing at 6:20 p.m. to receive public facility to be located in Salt comment and consider adopting an Lake City, in order that Western 90-301 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI* UTAH TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1990 Fiberglass, Inc. may be provided Mayor's Office that the Council with facilities to promote the would be willing to take one of general welfare and encourage the the members back for an appoint- increase of industry and commerce; ment to the board, which motion authorizing and providing for the carried. All members present issuance by Salt Lake City of its voted aye, except Councilmember $2,000,000.00 Industrial Develop- Pace who voted nay. ment Revenue Bonds, Series 1990 (Western Fiberglass, Inc. Project) ACTION: Councilmember Hale which will be payable solely from made a motion and Councilmember the revenues arising from the Pace seconded to make a substitute pledge of a loan agreement with motion that the Council approve Western Fiberglass, Inc. ; autho- all three appointments for the rizing the execution and delivery remaining term ending in July of a loan agreement between Salt 1991,	which motion failed, Lake City and Western Fiberglass; Councilmember Pace and Hale, voted providing for financing the acqui- aye, all other members present sition of said project; authoriz- voted nay. ing the execution and delivery of (I 90-9) an indenture of trust and related documents; confirming the sale of DISCUSSION: Councilmember said bonds to the purchaser there- Whitehead asked whether the Mayor of; authorizing the publication of or the Council should make the ap- a notice of bonds to be issued; pointment. and related matters. Councilmember Hale said he ACTION: Councilmember Kirk was in favor of staggering the moved and Councilmember Whitehead appointment terms. He asked if seconded to adopt Resolution 94 the Council should appoint one of of 1990, which motion carried, all the people for an additional three members present voted aye. year term. (Q 90-6) Councilmember Hardman said #2. RE: Consider approving the best suggestion would be to the reappointment of M. Louis decline all three with the recom- Ulrich to the Historical Landmarks mendation to the Mayor that the Committee. Council would consider one of the individuals for reappointment. 3. RE: Consider approving the reappointment of Michael Councilmember Whitehead said Stransky to the Historical Land- with all three reappointments marks Committee.	coming to the Council at one time defeated the intent of all the 4. RE: Consider approving ordinances that have come prior to the reappointment of Peter duPont this date. Emerson to the Historic Landmarks Committee. Emilie	Charles,	Mayor's Executive Assistant, said the ACTION: Councilmember appointments would only be for one Whitehead moved and Councilmember year. She said the vacancies Kirk seconded to decline the would come again in July 1991 appointment of M. Louis Ulrich, because it had taken two years to Michale Stransky, and Peter duPont get them resolved. Emerson and give indication to the 90-302 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI, UTAH TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1990 Councilmember Whitehead said Mr. Johnson, said one member the ordinance stated an individual was completing a second term and could serve for no more than two one member was completing a first terms or eight years. He said the term. staggering of the board members should be up to the individual Councilmember Pace said it board not the Council. He said concerned her that the Council the purpose of the ordinance stands on a matter of principle or change was to keep people from policy alone knowing the ordinance serving on boards for 20 or 30 gave the Council flexibility and years as was the case in the past. does not look at what it would do He said there had to be an ex- to the effectiveness of the com- traordinary reason for being mittee.	She said in seconding reappointed to a third term. Councilmember Hales motion, she was going along with the idea of Councilmember	Pace	said supporting the people for nine because there was only one year more months and the Council had left on a normal three year ap- sent a strong message to the pointment there would be the same Mayors Office about how they felt. situation next year.	She said three individuals were leaving Councilmember Horrocks said with no chance of appointing new the Council had asked the Mayor people before the appointments not to put the Council in this expired.	type of situation. He said it was now a matter of principle. He Councilmember Kirk said the said the Mayor did this to exert first time the Council made an his authority. He said the second exception to the reappointment motion did not send the message to policy, she had said the Council the Mayor that the Council had a needed to be flexible. She said deep concern about this matter. this time she felt the Council had He said if the Council passed this been placed in a position of non- motion as it stands we have abro- compromise. She said the Council gated our responsibility in advice had sent a letter to the Mayor and consent. asking that this situation not come before the public. She said PUBLIC HEARINGS she would not be willing to choose one above the other at this time. #1. RE: A hearing at 6:20 She said she felt the Council had p.m. to receive public comment and been put in a position to turn adopt an ordinance vacating a down all three. portion of an alley between Sherman and Harrison Streets, Councilmember Hale asked Ms. between 800 East and 870 East, Charles if the appointment would pursuant to Petition 400-796-90. be for less than a year. Ms. Charles said the appointment ACTION: Councilmember Hale would be until July 31, 1991. moved and Councilmember Whitehead seconded to close the public Cindy Gust-Jenson, Council hearing, which motion carried, all Executive Director, asked Allen members present voted aye. Johnson if the two appointments coming up in the interim period Councilmember Whitehead moved had served one term or two terms. and Councilmember Kirk seconded to adopt Ordinance 78 of 1990, to 90-303 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI* UTAH TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1990 vacate the alley from the west car could make it but not a full side of 836 East to 870 East to size car. the street, which motion carried, all members present voted aye. Councilmember Horrocks asked (P 90-248) Mr. Watkins when he pulled into the driveway if he could get the DISCUSSION: Councilmember truck completely out of the alley Kirk said Councilmember Godfrey, or if the truck extended into the who represented the district in alley. Mr. Watkins said the truck which this vacation was requested, extended at least half way into was unable to attend the meeting the alley. but had expressed that he was in support of this issue. Ross Wilder, agent for the owner of 829 East Sherman Avenue, Bruce Parker, Planning Divi- said he had driven the entire sion said the alley was requested alley and had to back completely to be vacated because of the crime out because he could not turn related problems in the area. He around. said the total alley could not be vacated because of the numerous Councilmember Whitehead said residents which require the re- there were only two people who maining alley to be open for used the alley for access to their access to their garages. He said garages. He said the City had a the alley would be vacated with problem with alleys as they creat- two conditions; first the resi- ed areas for crime to take place. dents requesting the vacation He said if the Council could he participate with the Transporta- would recommend the closure of tion Division to install and the entire alley. purchase a dead end sign and place it at the west end of the alley, Councilmember Kirk asked Mr. and also install an end of alley Wilder if his client had been sign and place it on the fence at involved with the compromise that approximately 835 East. Second, Councilmember Godfrey had been fence the ends of the alley at the working out. Mr. Wilder said that proposed vacation. He said the neither his client nor himself had vacation and the fence would be at been contacted concerning anything the western property line of 836 about the alley. East Sherman Avenue. Raymond Johnson, Richard Vance Warner, Petitioner, North, Dudley Wicker, Carol Wick- said he had only worked on signa- er, Gorden Greniger all spoke in tures for the area requested to be support of the alley vacation. vacated and all property owners There was a general consensus that involved in the vacation had the vacation would help keep the signed the petition. crime down. Ronald Watkins the son of the Carol Tigarino, owner of the property owner at 829 East Sherman house at 829 East Sherman Avenue, Avenue, said this was a rental said the house was her only in- unit. He said he had driven a come. She said renters were not pickup down the alley and had allowed to park on the street in tried to turn the corner from the the winter time and if the alley west into the garage and could not were closed she would have a turn the corner. He said a small difficult time renting her proper- 90-304 PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CA UTAH TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1990 ty. She said she had heard noth- ing about the closure until a letter came just prior to the 41.444t4g4"- meeting.	COUNCIL HAIR Mr. Warner said this was a dirt alley that was originally used for utility service and CI Y RE DER garbage collection which was no longer needed. He said it was not against the law to park in front of the house on the street during the winter time. He said resi- dents were asked to move their cars occasionally for snow remov- al. #2. RE: A hearing at 6:30 p.m. to receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance vacating an alley between Parkway Avenue and I-80 at about 875 East pursuant to Petition 400-810-90. ACTION: Councilmember Horrocks moved and Councilmember Whitehead seconded to close the public hearing, which motion carried, all members present voted aye. (P 90-314) Councilmember Horrocks moved and Councilmember Whitehead sec- onded to adopt Ordinance 79 of 1990, which motion carried, all members present voted aye. DISCUSSION: Everett Joyce, Planning and Zoning, said the petition had been submitted with 100 percent property owner signa- tures in support of the closure. He said the alley was a dead end alley.	He said the alley was landscaped and was not being used as an alley. The meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. 90-305 4'6' /I SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 315 CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING 451 SOUTH STATE STREET Tuesday, September 11, 1990 6:00 p.m. A. BRIEFING SESSION: 5:00 - 5:55 p.m. , Room 325 City and County Building, 451 South State 1 . Report of the Executive Director. B. OPENING CEREMONIES: 1. Invocation. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Approval of the minutes. 4. The Public Utilities Department will present environmental compliance awards to seven Salt Lake City companies. C. COMMENTS: 1 . Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. 2. Citizen Comments to the Council. D. CONSENT: 1 . Resolution: Interlocal Agreement / Watermain Extension Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Salt Lake County for the placement of a watermain located on 2700 East Street. (C 90-501) Staff Recommendation: Adopt. 2. Ordinance: Demolition of Buildings Set date to hold a hearing on October 2, 1990 at 6:20 p.m. to receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance amending Chapter 64 of Title 18 dealing with demolishing buildings. (0 90-39) Staff recommendation: Set date. 3. Resolution: Interlocal Agreement / Ground Water Study Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Utah Division of Water Rights providing for a ground water study in the Salt Lake Valley. (C 90-503) Staff recommendation: Adopt. 4. Resolution: Interlocal Agreement / Federal Bureau of Investigation Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and the United States of America, by and through the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Drug Enforcement Administration for the investigation and prosecution of sales of controlled substances. (C 90-502) Staff recommendation: Adopt. E. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Ordinance: Freight License Stickers Consider adopting an ordinance amending Sections 5.26. 100 and 12.56.330 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to freight license stickers attached to vehicle and freight curb loading zones, respectively. (0 90-40) Staff recommendation: Refer to consent. F. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1 . Western Fiberglass I.R.B. Consider adopting a resolution providing for the financing by Salt Lake City of the acquisition of equipment and plant facilities and related improvements for a fiberglass insulation and related products manufacturing facility to be located in Salt Lake City in order that Western Fiberglass, Inc. may be provided with facilities to promote the general welfare and encourage the increase of industry and commerce; authorizing and providing for the issuance by Salt Lake City of its $ 2,000,000 Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, Series 1990 (Western Fiberglass, Inc. Project) which will be payable solely from the revenues arising from the pledge of a loan agreement with Western Fiberglass, Inc. ; authorizing the execution and deliver of a loan agreement between Salt Lake City and Western Fiberglass; providing for financing the acquisition of said project; authorizing the execution and delivery of an indenture of trust and related documents; confirming the sale of said bonds to the purchaser thereof; authorizing the publication of a notice of bonds to be issued ; and related matters. (Q 90-6) Staff recommendation: Adopt. 2. Board Appointment : Historical Landmarks Committee Consider approving the reappointment of M. Louis Ulrich to the Historical Landmarks Committee. (I 90-9) Staff recommendation: Decline. 3. Board Appointment: Historical Landmarks Committee Consider approving the reappointment of Michael Stransky to the Historical Landmarks Committee. (I 90-9) Staff recommendation: Decline. 4. Board Appointment : Historic Landmarks Committee Consider approving the reappointment of Peter duPont Emerson to the Historic Landmarks Committee. (I 90-9) Staff recommendation: Decline. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 6:20 p.m. 1 . Ordinance: Alley Vacation Petition #400-796-90 / Vance Warner Receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance vacating a portion of an alley between Sherman and Harrison Streets, between 800 East and 870 East, pursuant to Petition #400-796-90. (P 90-248) Staff recommendation: Close hearing and adopt. 6:30 p.m. 2. Alley Vacation Petition #400-810-90 / William and Penny Davis Receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance vacating an alley between Parkway Avenue and I-80 at about 875 East pursuant to Petition #400-810-90. (P 90-314) Staff recommendation: Close hearing and adopt. H. ADJOURNMENT. ** FINAL ACTION MAY BE TAKEN AND/OR ORDINANCES ADOPTED CONCERNING ANY ITEM ON THIS AGENDA. • DATED: September 7, 1990 BY: /,/ CIA RECORDER STATE OF UTAH COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) ss. On the 7th day of September, 1990 I personally delivered a copy of the foregoing notice to the Mayor and City Council and posted copies of the same in conspicuous view, at the following times and locations within the City and County Building, 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah: 1. At 5:00 p.m. in the City Recorder's Office, Room 415; and 2. At 5:00 p.m. in the Newsroom, Room 343. Y ECORDER Subscribed and sworn to before rue this 7th day of September, 1990. �-d 44 ' Notary iding in the State of Uta 1' "d OM ssion�� GtiT 0 'fi�° .:"•, �M 451 So.SWe St.Rm 415 I Salt Lake City.Utah 1341 Q2 My Commission E q r"a 0 Pity:utile lop APP VAL: C. , in EXECUT 'E DIR CTOR PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met as Committee of the Whole on Tuesday, September 4, 1990, at 5:00 p.m. in Room 325, City County Building, 451 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Ronald Whitehead Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Wayne Horrocks	Tom Godfrey Don Hale Nancy Pace Council Chair Hardman presided at the meeting. Council Chair Hardman called the Council for Mr. Buchanan to the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. provide a summary of this review, stating the expected benefits to the City, as was usually done with EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT	the process. The Executive Director Councilmember Kirk arrived for reviewed the evening' s agenda, the briefing session. noting on Item B-4, the resolution concerning sales tax on food that Concerning Item G-4, Janice a third draft was being presented Jardine of the Planning Division for their consideration, as indicated because the City doesn't suggested by Councilmember actually own, but had provided Godfrey. Following some certain services on Gordon Place, discussion about the Council ' s that this street would be vacated original	intents with this instead of closed, so the City resolution, the majority of the could maintain a pedestrian access Councilmembers were in favor of easement. The process of vacation the new proposed draft. It was rather than closure, was being decided Councilmember Godfrey pursued at the recommendation of would read the resolution during the City Attorney' s Office. the meeting. Ms. Gust-Jenson then reviewed Councilmember	Horrocks the Council ' s calendar of events, arrived for the briefing session noting minor changes. Ms. Gust-Jenson then noted for In reviewing the Council' s the TEFRA public hearing regarding schedule	of	meetings, she the Western Fiberglass Industrial indicated that the briefing on the Revenue Bonds, the staff Salt Lake City Tomorrow program recommendation would be to close scheduled for September 6th may be the hearing and refer to cancelled, if all Councilmembers unfinished business, since the were able to attend the individual incentive review committee had not briefing sessions. She indicated had sufficient time to review the the Council had been asked to application. Mr. Bob Buchanan of attend an information meeting Capital Planning indicated this concerning gang violence. process would be completed by the Participants in the meeting will September 11 meeting for Council ' s be the mothers of the assailant approval of	the inducement and the victim of a recent gang resolution. Councilmember Godfrey death that occurred in the City. indicated it would be helpful to The Councilmembers agreed to not 90-287 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 schedule any business for the night of September 13th, and to schedule the Ensign Downs tour for September 24th at 4:00 p.m. REPRESENTATIVE TO SALT LAKE CITY TOMORROW PROGRAM Councilmembers Horrocks and Kirk expressed interest in being named as the Council ' s representatives to the Salt Lake City Tomorrow Program. Councilmember Wayne Horrocks won the coin toss and was named as the Council ' s representative. The briefing session adjourned at 5:35 p.m. 90-288 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Regular Session on Tuesday, September 4, 1990, at 6:00 p.m. in Room 315, City Council Chambers, City County Building, 451 South State Street. The following Council Members were present: Ronald Whitehead Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk Wayne Horrocks	Tom Godfrey	Don Hale Nancy Pace Mayor Palmer DePaulis, Roger Cutler, City Attorney, Kathryn Marshall, City Recorder, and Beverly Jones, Deputy Recorder, were present. Council Chair Hardman presided at and conducted the meeting. #1. The invocation was given #1. RE: Setting a date to by Father Hatzidakis. hold a non-advertised public hearing on September 11, 1990, at #2. The Council led the 6:30 p.m. to receive public Pledge of Allegiance. comment and consider adopting an ordinance vacating an alley #3. Councilmember Hale moved between Parkway Avenue and I-80 at and Councilmember Godfrey seconded about 875 East pursuant to to approve the minutes of the Salt Petition No. 400-810-90. Lake City Council for the regular (P 90-314) meeting held Tuesday, August 14, 1990, which motion carried, all #2. RE: Adopting Resolution members voted aye. 92 of 1990, authorizing the (M 90-1 ) execution of an interlocal cooperation agreement between Salt #4.	Councilmember Godfrey Lake City Corporation and Salt presented a resolution concerning Lake County to allow conveyance of the proposed elimination of the and improvements to City property sales tax on food. The Salt Lake located in the County. City Council firmly opposed the (C 90-488) ballot initiative to remove the sales tax on food. #3. RE: Adopting Resolution 93 of 1990, authorizing the ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey execution of an interlocal moved and Councilmember Whitehead cooperation agreement between Salt seconded to adopt Resolution 91 of Lake City Corporation and the 1990, which motion carried, all Department of the Treasury, United members voted aye. States Secret Service, allowing their use of the Airport firing CONSENT AGENDA range. (C 90-489) Councilmember Hale moved and Councilmember Godfrey seconded to #4. RE: Setting a date to approve the consent agenda, which hold a hearing on September 18, motion carried, all members voted 1990, at 6:30 p.m. to receive aye.	public comment and consider 90-289 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 adopting an ordinance amending Councilmember Godfrey moved Section 21.84.030(H) concerning and Councilmember Pace seconded to parking for theaters and arenas refer this item to unfinished pursuant to Petition No. 400-833- business, which motion carried, 90. all members voted aye. (P 90-315) DISCUSSION:	Bob Buchanan, PUBLIC HEARINGS Capital Planning,	said the department wanted to give the City #1. A public hearing at 6:00 Council the staff review of the p.m. to receive public comment and application next week when it was consider adopting a resolution fully developed. He said by providing for the financing by holding the public hearing tonight Salt Lake City of the acquisition the department would be able to of equipment and plant facilities meet the requirements. and related improvements for a fiberglass insulation and related Ivan Radman, 4384 Parkview products manufacturing facility to Drive, President of Western be located in Salt Lake City in Fiberglass, Inc. , said he would order that Western Fiberglass, answer any questions. Inc. may be provided with (Q 90-6) facilities to promote the general welfare and encourage the increase #2. A public hearing at 6: 20 of	industry	and	commerce; p.m. to receive public comment and authorizing and providing for the consider adopting an ordinance issuance by Salt Lake City of its rezoning the property located at $2, 000,000 Industrial Development 917 South West Temple from a "C-1" Revenue Bonds,	Series 1990 to a "C-3" classification pursuant (Western Fiberglass, Inc. project) to Petition No. 400-797-90. which will be payable solely from the revenues arising from the ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey pledge of a loan agreement with moved and Councilmember Hale Western Fiberglass, Inc. ; seconded to close the public authorizing the execution and hearing, which motion carried, all deliver of a loan agreement members voted aye. between Salt Lake City and Western Fiberglass; providing for Councilmember Godfrey moved financing the acquisition of said and Councilmember Kirk seconded to project; authorizing the execution adopt Ordinance 74 of 1990, which and delivery of an indenture of motion carried, all members voted trust and related documents; aye. confirming the sale of said bonds to	the	purchaser	thereof; DISCUSSION:	Bruce Parker, authorizing the publication of a Planning Department, said this was notice of bonds to be issued; and a request from The F. Weixler related matters. Company at 917 South West Temple. He said the present zoning on the ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey block was "C-3" commercial except and Councilmember Kirk seconded to for a one hundred foot wide strip close the public hearing, which which was one hundred feet back motion carried, all members voted from the intersection of West aye.	Temple and 900 South. He said the property and the building were divided into two zoning districts 90-290 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 which were "C-1" and "C-3" . He of property be rezoned because said this was the reason the with the "C-1" in place as these property owner had come before the properties redevelop, increased City Council and asked that the setbacks could be done. property be rezoned. He said the Councilmember Horrocks asked if F. Weixler Company made custom all fire codes and ordinances had made furniture and that operation been met in this building. Mr. was only allowed in the "C-3" Parker	said	it	was	his zone. He said all of the understanding the property owner company' s machinery must be had applied for a business license maintained north of the zoning for this location and had been boundary line. He said the owners cleared of all other requirements could not occupy part of the except the zoning issue. building in the "C-1" zone. Gerald Weixler, the Mr. Parker said there were petitioner, said he wanted to move three Master Plans and a pending the machinery to the different fourth in this location;	the parts of the building. Central City Community Development (P 90-247) Plan of 1974, which directed commercial use of this location, #3. RE: A public hearing at the People' s Freeway Master Plan, 6:30 p.m. to receive public the pending State Street Plan comment and consider adopting an which was transition uses in the ordinance amending Section vicinity of this property and the 21.38.060.B, by adding a new West Temple Gateway Plan, which Subsection 8,	dealing with provided increased landscaping and nonprofit tutorial educational City control. He said the facilities, pursuant to Petition Planning Commission had No. 400-777-90. recommended rezoning part of the building from "C-1" to "C-3" Councilmember Godfrey moved Commercial. He said the and Councilmember Pace seconded to Commission felt this action would close the public hearing, which not compromise the Master Plans at motion carried, all members voted this location and allowed the aye. property owner to fully utilize the building. Councilmember Godfrey moved and Councilmember Hale seconded to Councilmember Hale asked if adopt Ordinance 75 of 1990, which the buildings to the south had the motion carried, all members voted same problem.	Mr. Parker said aye. that was correct. He said the properties deeper than one hundred DISCUSSION: Janice Jardine, feet were within both the "C-1" Planning and Zoning, said in the and	"C-3"	zoning district, analysis of the petition the Councilmember Hale said if the Planning Staff identified specific Council rezoned the property at criteria to be provided in a 917 South West Temple it proposed use plan in addition to immediately cleared the problem the requirements outlined in the up. He asked if there were existing ordinance. She said the buildings to the south that needed use plan identified specific to have the zoning changed also. impacts on neighborhoods where Mr. Parker said the Commission had these educational facilities would recommended that just this piece be located. She said the 90-291 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 conditional use process allowed said this use plan had more each circumstance to be evaluated detailed analysis of the tutorial individually and was designed to uses. She said it included the protect the quality of average number of clients per day, neighborhoods and maintain the use the five to ten year projected of	structures	within	such plan of how it was expected to neighborhoods. evolve,	and the hours of operation. She said these were She said the Planning not in the ordinance so it had Commission' s recommendation was been included in the use plan. approval of the petition with the She said with a rewrite of the addition of the changes outlined zoning ordinance the Commission in the ordinance. Councilmember would take a comprehensive look at Godfrey asked if neighborhoods the conditional uses. She said were notified when petitions such this would be part of the as this were brought before the recommendation to the people who City Council. He was concerned where preparing the plan to that the neighborhood knew the establish criteria to evaluate the property had been approved for conditional uses in more detail. tutorial work only. He asked if the neighbors had an opportunity Councilmember Hardman said to see what the conditions were the building was once a nursing that had to be met and if the home and asked if it was a neighbors had the right to file a permitted use. Ms. Jardine said complaint if the conditions were that was correct. Councilmember not met. Ms. Jardine said in the Hardman asked if a nursing home existing ordinance the conditional was permitted in "R-6" . Ms. use process required a Jardine said that was also recommendation from the Planning correct.	Councilmember Godfrey Commission to the Board of said the Council was not talking Adjustment so the surrounding about a certain building.	Ms. property owners which were Jardine said it was a change in affected should receive a notice the ordinance. of the Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment hearings. She Mary Hausen, 1767 South said this would be the neighbors Woodside Drive, said she was the opportunity to hear what had been Executive Director of the Literacy proposed and what impact there Volunteers of America/Wasatch would be on the neighborhood. Front. She said they were presently housed at 175 North 600 Councilmember Pace asked if West and this was the property the tutorial educational they would like to continue using. facilities were strictly nonprofit. Ms. Jardine said that She said the building had was correct. Councilmember Kirk complete handicapped accessibility said she had read the Planning and was nonprofit. She said the Commission' s minutes and noted organization would be bringing a that the process allowed the national conference into Salt Lake circumstances to be evaluated City in November and would like to against the criteria. Ms. Jardine have permission to use the said in addition to the criteria building as our home baseand allow already existing in the ordinance, the national people to see the it talked about compliance with facility. the Master Plan and zoning. She 90-292 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 Councilmember Godfrey said Attorney's Office, it was decided Ms. Hausen was addressing a that a formal hearing should be specific building and the Council held to vacate the City' s interest was just being asked to approve in Gordon Place as a street and the conditional use ordinance. maintain a public pedestrian Ms. Hausen said they had gone to access easement.	She said it all the neighbors in the immediate could be formalized through a vicinity and talked to them. deeded easement. Councilmember Godfrey asked what the process was after the Councilmember Godfrey asked ordinance was passed. He asked if why the City was not closing the an application for conditional use street. Ms. Jardine said the City should be filed after the did not have the title to the land ordinance was approved. and was vacating the interest of (P 90-249) the street for vehicular use. She said the City was maintaining the #4. RE: A non-advertised pedestrian access requiring an public hearing at 6:40 p.m. to easement. Councilmember Pace receive public comment and asked if the easement was part of consider adopting an ordinance the petition or if that was a vacating Gordon Place between Main separate action. Ms. Jardine said and State Streets, pursuant to it was a requirement in the Petition No. 400-612-88, subject ordinance and would be a separate to certain conditions. action.	She said the Council would set the policy that the ACTION: Councilmember City' s interest be vacated as Godfrey and Councilmember vehicular access.	She said it Whitehead seconded to close the would be up to the Planning and public hearing, which motion Zoning administration and Real carried, all members voted aye. Property, and Zions Securities to put the easement language into a Councilmember Whitehead moved formal document and have it and Councilmember Kirk seconded to recorded. adopt Ordinance 77 of 1990 with the exception, that the easement Kent Money, 102 Social Hall go as far as the western boundary Avenue, said several months ago and the property descriptions be when this project was started, it changed, which motion carried, all was the intention to have members voted aye. pedestrian access between the houses located on State Street and DISCUSSION: Janice Jardine, through the landscaped area. He Planning and Zoning, said the said the easement or the right-of- Gordon Place right-of-way had been way extended west of the in existence since 1889 and had landscaped area along the north been used as a street for side of the Kimball Condominiums pedestrian and vehicle access. out to Main Street. He said that She said the properties fronting was not Zions Securities easement. Gordon Place were never part of a He said the Kimball Condominiums formal subdivision and therefore, owned that portion of property. a dedication of the Gordon Place Street	was	never	formally Mr. Money said in looking at required. She said through the the documents, the City did not review of this process and based have a right-of-way through this on recommendation from the City property. He said the Landmarks 90-293 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 Committee recommended approval of lot of people use the property and the street closure and the City they had received a lot of maintain the prescriptive use favorable comments. right-of-way. He said a limited use contract could be developed Lorille Miller, 548 North for security reasons and limit the Columbus Street, said she was the use to pedestrian traffic. He Chairperson of the Capitol Hills said there was concern that if Community Council. She said Zions there was a 24 hour easement there Securities came to the Community would be problems with security in Council meeting in July and talked the area. Mr. Money said Zions to the Council.	She said the Securities proposed that at night Council approved of the vacation, they would close the gates which with one condition. Ms. Miller had been installed and then patrol said the Community Council was at least once a night with a concerned about the entrance on security vehicle. He said they Main Street next to the Kimball were talking about an easement on Apartments. She said there was no a limited basis during the pedestrian access planned at the daylight hours so people could time they saw the plans and they enjoy a walking tour during the were worried. She said the day.	Community Council wanted to negotiate with the Kimball Mr. Money said the lighting Condominiums to have pedestrian was low- level lighting and would access. She said on the east side not cause a lighting problem to her concern was about the the surrounding neighbors.	He plantings. Ms. Miller said she said he felt it was an improvement hoped there would be lots of trees as to what it had been in the on the access to State Street so past. He said they would like to it would be pleasant to look at give the City a five foot (the and walk through. width of the pavers) easement through the property. He said if Ms. Jardine said it was her the path were to change a little, understanding that the parking lot the City would still have the by the Kimball Condominiums would easement through the property. He be discussed in another phase and said Zions Securities would give it would go through a conditional the City a written easement for use process. She said the this property. landscaping issues would be able to be discussed at that time. Councilmember Godfrey asked why there was no gate on State Councilmember Hardman said on Street. Mr. Money said the page two of the ordinance there driveway on State Street was was a legal description of the needed for access. Councilmember easement but he asked where the Godfrey asked if the width of the description started and ended. entrance on State Street was the Ms. Jardine said there were two same width as Gordon Place. Mr. descriptions; one was the right- Money said the entrance on Gordon of-way that went by the Kimball Place was larger. Councilmember Condominiums, and the second Hardman asked what hours the gates description went east from the were locked and unlocked. Mr. center to State Street. She said Money said there was no set time, those were descriptions of the but usually at night time, between existing street known as Gordon 8:00 p.m. and 8 :00 a.m. He said a Place. She said the City would be 90-294 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 vacating the interest in those getting the same kind of easement legal descriptions by vacating the that Zions Securities was giving street. She said when	the the City. Councilmember Godfrey easement was in place there would said the City should be getting be a different description. She the same easement from the Kimball said the easement would not Condominiums. necessarily be tied to this description. Roger Cutler, City Attorney, said the planning staff indicated Councilmember Hardman asked that the vacation go from State if the easement went from State Street to Main Street. He said by Street all the way through the vacating the landscaped area west block or only part of the way. to Main Street they could require Ms. Jardine said those two rededication because they were descriptions were of the easement going to be redoing the parking that would extend through to Main lot and thought as a conditional Street. use by getting the parking lot they could do that. He said if Mr. Money	said	Zions the City vacated the street they Securities could not give the City could not get it back. He an easement from the west end of suggested the City limit the the landscaped area out to Main vacation from State Street to the Street because it was not their boundary of the Zions Security property. He said they would like property and deal with the to make the walkway just north of vacation and have the appropriate the Kimball Condominiums and were bargaining power to if in case the hoping the condominiums would help City needed it on the west end of pay for the walkway. He said if the area. the condominiums would help with the cost, Zions Securities would Councilmembers	Pace	and have another entrance cut into the Godfrey said they were parking lot area which they would comfortable with that suggestion. give an easement to the Kimball Councilmember Hardman said it Condominiums to use for would have to be amended because a ingress/egress to service their property description was included fenced off area for garbage. for the easement and it was now Councilmember Hardman asked if the incorrect. He said if the legal description needed to be description went from State Street amended	in	the	ordinance. to Main Street it would have to be Councilmember Pace said it would amended. Mr. Cutler said the be a different action all together ordinance could be adopted with with a different piece of the instruction that the legal property. description conform to the Council ' s instruction from State Councilmember Godfrey said Street to the western boundary of Zions	Securities	had	made the Zions property. available an easement for the property they control. LoRille Miller was concerned Councilmember Hardman said the about the property on the west legal description included side at Main Street. She said if property from State Street to Main the walkway was next to the Street. Mr. Money said the City Kimball Condominiums and people was vacating the road for the walked there in the summer it Kimball	Condominiums	without would be very hot and would not be acceptable to the area. 90-295 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 Councilmember Pace asked if seconded to adopt Ordinance 76 of Zions Securities could restrict 1990, which motion carried, all the times when the property would members voted aye. be opened. Mr. Cutler said Zions Securities would like to restrict DISCUSSION: John Wheat, use of the property from 8:00 p.m. Deputy Director of the Airport, to 8:00 a.m.	said the ordinance would establish a gross receipts fee for off- Bruce Parker said when this airport in-flight catering issue was reviewed it was services. He said currently the recognized	that	there	was airport did not have any off- adjoining residential property and airport catering services.	He a potential security problem. He said there were two on-airport said there was no problem with operators both operated by closing the easement after dark Caterair, Inc. He said the and opening it again in the agreements with Caterair, Inc. morning. He said they thought it were for eight percent of gross was a good arrangement for the receipts.	He said the airport residents. Mr. Cutler said there recommended that the Council adopt were utility easements in the the ordinance which would provide property and he did not know if for a seven percent of gross they were going to be included in receipts use fee for any operator the right-of-way or whether they who had established in-flight would be dealt with separately. catering service and required the He said the City would want those use of the airport's aprons to recorded. He said the City was provide food and beverage to any not talking about an easement airlines which they would be which would be conditional and not serving for commercials flights. exist after dark. He said Zions Securities would have the right to Mr. Wheat said they came up close public access to the with the seven percent by looking property during night time hours. at the investment costs associated with the facilities at the Lorille Miller said she would airport. He said the City had like to see it opened at 7:00 a.m. built and owned those facilities so people could enjoy it on their and that was incorporated into the way to work.	eight percent fee provided to us (P 90-283) by Caterair, Inc. He said the rent was $170, 000 a year and was #5. RE: A public hearing at just for the facility which 6: 50 p.m. to receive public represented approximately one comment and consider adopting an percent of the total eight ordinance enacting Section percent.	He said the Airport 16.12.155 of the Salt Lake City requested a seven percent off- Code relating to apron use fees. airport use fee so if an off- airport operator did decide to ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey construct a facility and operate moved and Councilmember Whitehead in Salt Lake at the Airport then seconded to close the public all companies would be treated at hearing, which motion, carried, a fairly equal rate with regard to all members voted aye. the fees they would be paying. (0 90-37) Councilmember Godfrey moved and Councilmember Whitehead 90-296 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 The meeting adjourned at 7: 15 p.m. COUNCIL CHAIR CITY RECORDER 90-297 LEROY W. HOOTON, JR. 4 �' : r DIRECTOR J. WENDELL E. EVENSEN, P.E. 11. r C . '�.:� ..; �.af SUPERINTENDENT �= J �j�1 Matta WATER SUPPLY&WATERWORKS - E. TIM DOXEY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES SUPERINTENDENT Water Supply &Waterworks.,	PALMER DEPAULIS WATER RECLAMATION Water Reclamation	MAYOR JAMES M. LEWIS, C.P.A. - - CHIEF FINANCE 8 1530 SOUTH WEST TEMPLE ACCOUNTING OFFICER SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84115 GEORGE JORGENSEN, P.E. CHIEF ENGINEER August 13, 1990 Mayor Palmer A. DePaulis 451 South State, Room 306 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Dear Mayor DePaulis: Attached are five copies of a "License for Pipelines" between Salt Lake City Corporation and Salt Lake County, covering Watermain Ex- tension No. 33-C-1407 located on 2700 East Street from 3926 South to 4195 South, a distance of approximately 2,375 feet. This agreement has been approved by the City Attorney's Office and I recommend that it be accepted and approved by the Mayor in be- half of Salt Lake City Corporation by Executive Action. Please return all copies of the agreement to this department so we can forward them to the County of Salt Lake for further processing. Very truly yours, OY W HOOT , JR. Direct :laf Attachments L-1, 114 File LEROY W. HOOTON, JR. DIRECTOR .. �.7	..�j yy���T,� WENDELL E. EVENSEN, P.E. t4 ` 2TCA`K(t71��	,1`. M`� Hl�g IN4f SUPERINTENDENT VV `�1LC1`11.1J Mall lVVV11 :! �l�v WATER SUPPLY 8 WATERWORKS _E.TIM DOXEY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC_UTILITIES SUPERINTENDENT Water Supply & Waterworks PALMER DEPAULIS WATER RECLAMATION Water Reclamation	MAYOR JAMES M. LEWIS, C.P-A. CHIEF FINANCE 8 1530 SOUTH WEST TEMPLE ACCOUNTING OFFICER SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84115 GEORGE JORGENSEN, P.E. CHIEF ENGINEER August 13, 1990 TO: Salt Lake City Council RE: Easement for Pipeline Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Salt Lake County for the installation of Watermain Extension No. 33-C-1407 Recommendation: That the Council approve this agreement and for- ward to the Mayor for execution in behalf of the City. Availability of Funds: None Discussion: Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities has a need to install a 6-inch watermain extension at approximately 2700 East from 3926 South to 4195 South. 1. Please return the original and four (4) copies of the agreement to this office to be forwarded to Salt Lake County for final execution. Submitted by: e LEROY W. HOOTONb, J Director Department of Public pities :laf Attachments Cont. 1, 17 File RESOLUTION NO. OF 1990 AUTHORIZING THE APPROVAL OF AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND SALT LAKE COUNTY WHEREAS, Title 11, Chapter 13, U.C.A. , 1953, as amended, allows public entities to enter into cooperative agreements to provide joint undertakings and services; and WHEREAS, the attached agreement has been prepared to accomplish said purposes; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 1.	It does hereby approve the form and substance of the attached agreement as follows: A license for a watermain located on 2700 East Street from 3926 South to 4195 South, a distance of approximately 2, 375 feet. 2.	Palmer A. DePaulis, Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah, is hereby authorized to approve said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation, subject to any minor changes which do not materially affect the rights and obligations of the City thereunder. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER RLM:rc LICENSE FOR PIPELINES - THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 19 , by and between the SALT LAKE COUNTY, a body of corporate and politic of the State of Utah, hereinafter referred to as ' "COUNTY, " and Salt Lake City Corporation, Dept. of Public Utilities hereinafter called "GRANTEE." WITNESSET H: WHEREAS, the Grantee is desirous of obtaining from the County a license to construct, and thereafter maintain and operate pipelines within the right-o -way limits of COUNTY roads and highways within the COUNTY and immediately adjacent thereto for the purpose of Water Supply - Watermain Extension 33-C-1407 ; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY is willing to grant said license under the terms and conditions herein set forth, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. LOCATION OF PIPELINES. (Address) 2700 East Street from 3926 South to 4195 South Length of Cut (Feet) 2,375 feet of 6" Class 52 Ductile Iron Contractors, Owner, Corp. , Co. , etc. Address Dept. of Public Utilities 1530 South West Temple, Salt Lake city, Utah 84115 The pipelines to be installed, the diameter of which shall not exceed forty-two (42) inches shall consist of 6" Class 52 D.I.P. pipe, satisfactory to the COUNTY in all respects. The location of the pipelines within the roads and highways, on one or both sides shall be as near the right-of-way lines as practicable in accordance rith the plans, specifications and maps prepared by Dept. of Public Utilities Engineers and on file in the offices of the parties hereto. _ The foregoing description of pipeline location is subject to such changes or variations therefrom as may be required or approved by the County Public Works Department at the time of construction. Following completion of construction the foregoing numbered detail sheets will be furnished showing distance from right-of-way line to pipeline center lines on all roads and highways where said pipelines are installed. 2 . APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION. The excavation of trench for said pipelines shall not be commenced by the GRANTEE until and after notice has been given by the GRANTEE, to said County Public Works Department. Construction shall be carried forward to completion in the manner required by said Department. 3 . PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION. The GRANTEE shall so conduct its construction operation that there shall be a minimum of interference with or interruption of highway traffic. The GRANTEE shall conform to such instruction of said Department as may be given with respect to handling of traffic, and shall at all times maintain such watchmen, barricades, lights or other measures for the protection of traffic as may be required to warn and safeguard the public against injury or damage during the operations of the GRANTEE in constructing said pipelines. 4 . COMPACTION OF BACKFILL. The backfill of any trench within the paved portion of the highway, the shoulders thereof, or the portion under or intersecting street or highway shall be thoroughly compacted. Method of compaction shall be as directed by 2 • the COUNTY. The GRANTEE shall be liable for any damage which may result to he pavement due to failure to properly compact the backfill. 5 . RESTORATION OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. The GRANTEE shall replace, at its expense, any pavement removed or damaged with the same type and depth of pavement as that which is adjoining, including the gravel base material. This pavement shall be constructed in conformity with the standard specifications and shall be subject to the inspection and approval of the Public Works Department of the COUNTY. If weather conditions do not permit immediate placing of permanent pavement, a temporary pavement shall be placed until such time as weather conditions are favorable, at which time the temporary pavement shall be removed and replaced with a permanent pavement. If the gravel surface, gravel shoulders, or gravel surfaced approach roads become fouled with clay or other unsuitable materials, such entire surfacing shall be removed and replaced with a new gravel surfacing material. No cleated or metal crawler type equipment shall be permitted to operate on any COUNTY hard surfaced street. The repairs to pavement or surface shall include pavements which might have been damaged with construction equipment. The COUNTY shall have the option of restoring said roadbed to its original condition in every part of said highway at the expense of the GRANTEE. 6. DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS MATERIAL IN CLEANING UP HIGHWAY. Upon completion of the work, all surplus material shall be removed from within the limits of the highway. The disturbed surface shall be carefully graded to the lines and grades established. Any highway facilities such as signs, culverts, etc. , disturbed or damaged during the progress of the work shall be properly restored to their original condition. 7. MAINTENANCE OF PIPELINES BY GRANTEE 3 The said pipelines and their attached appurtenances, excluding fire hydrants nd the connecting system thereof, shall at all times be maintained, repaired, reviewed and operated by and at the expense of the GRANTEE in such a manner as shall most suitably protect the highway and the traffic thereon, and shall be subject to the approval of the COUNTY. In the event emergency repairs of reconstruction of said pipelines or appurtenances are required as determined by COUNTY, and after notice in writing requiring GRANTEE to perform said repairs or reconstruction within a reasonable time, and upon a failure of GRANTEE to complete said repairsor reconstruction, the COUNTY reserves the right to make such emergency repairs to said pipelines as it may consider necessary and the GRANTEE hereby agrees to reimburse the COUNTY for the cost of such emergency reconstruction or repairs. 8 . RECONSTRUCTION OF HIGHWAY. In the event that any of said highways or portion thereof is so reconstructed at any future date as to location, grade or width so as to require the relocation of the waterline or lines thereon, or adjustment of manholes or other facility thereof, including service connections (except for any fire hydrants, including the connecting system thereof) , the Grantee shall assume and pay all costs incident to relocation of the pipeline or adjustment of manholes or other facilities thereof including service connections. 9. CROSSING OF PIPELINE IN EXPANSION OF HIGHWAY SYSTEM. . It is expressly understood and agreed by the parties hereto and as part of the consideration for this agreement that the County shall have the right to cross said pipelines at any point necessary in the future construction and expansion of the COUNTY highway system, provided that the COUNTY shall use due care and diligence in the protection of said pipelines in making such crossings. 4 10. LIABILITY. - Any supervision or control exercised by the COUNTY, or on its behalf, shall in no way relieve the GRANTEE of any duty or responsibility to the general public, nor relieve said GRANTEE from any liability for loss, damage, or injury to persons or property sustained by reason of the installation, maintenance, repair or removal of the pipelines and its appurtenances, nor of said GRANTEE's LIABILITY for damage to the highway, and the GRANTEE shall protect and indemnify and save harmless the COUNTY from any and all damages, claims or injuries that may occur by reason of the construction, maintenance, repair or removal of said pipelines by the GRANTEE provided. This agreement shall not constitute an admission of any liability as to any third party or give to any third party any greater or further right of cause of action. It is understood and agreed that neither the COUNTY nor the GRANTEE by entering into this agreement acknowledge any liability for any acts of negligence, whether of omission or commission, of any of its agents, servants or employees. 11. AGREEMENT NOT TO BE ASSIGNED. The Grantee shall not assign this agreement or any interest therein without the written consent of the COUNTY. 12 . SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. All covenants and agreements herein contained shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their successors and assigns. 13 . SUBJECT TO. This license is subject to the right of the COUNTY at all times as the COUNTY deems necessary to construct roads, public buildings, sidewalks, parks or to carry out any other COUNTY purpose over the area covered by this license, and when the GRANTEE' s lines, structures and appurtenances or any of them interfere with any COUNTY purpose, the GRANTEE will remove such 5 lines, structures or appurtenances within a reasonable time after notice to io so by the GRANTOR and at the expense of the GRANTEE. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the COUNTY and the GRANTEE have caused these presents to be signed by their proper officials thereunto duly authorized as of the day and year first above written. SALT LAKE COUNTY By: D. MICHAEL STEWART, Chairman Board of County Commissioners ATTEST: H. DIXON HINDLEY Salt Lake County Clerk GRANTEE: By CITY RECORDER MAYOR STATE OF UTAH :ss COUNTY OF SALT LAKE) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 19	, by	, who is the of NOTARY PUBLIC, residing in Salt Lake County, State of Utah (SEAL) F,� A 1E My Commission Expires: p,= /�- Fonds Available AIT�RN`�Y A�'PR�?VA� ^PYROVEO AS TO FORM — 0 6 • STATE OF UTAH ) (COMPLETE IF PRINCIPAL : ss . IS AN INDIVIDUAL) County of Salt Lake ) On this day of , 19 , personally appeared before me , the signer(s) of the foregoing instrument, who duly acknowledged to me that he/she (they) executed the same. My Commission Expires: NOTARY PUBLIC, Residing in Salt Lake County, Utah • STATE OF UTAH ) (COMPLETE IF PRINCIPAL : ss . IS A CORPORATION) County of Salt Lake ) On this day of 19	personally appeared before me , who being by me duly sworn, did say that he is the of , a corporation, and that the foregoing instrument was signed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and he acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the same. My Commission Expires : NOTARY PUBLIC. Residing in Salt Lake County, Utah STATE OF UTAH ) (COMPLETE IF PRINCIPAL : ss. IS A PARTNERSHIP) County of Salt Lake ) On this day of , 19 personally appeared before me	, who being by me duly sworn, did say that he is the of , a partnership, and that the foregoing instrument was signed in behalf of said partnership and that said partnership executed the same. My Commission Expires : NOTARY PUBLIC, Residing in Salt Lake County, Utah F y,` -ram4' MIKE ZUHL SALT CITY GLORPORATIO,N,, LEE KING INTERIM DIRECTOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 418 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7777 To: Salt Lake City Council August 30, 1990 Re: Proposed Demolition Ordinance Recommendation: That the City Council hold a public hearing on October 2, 1990 at 6:20 p.m. to discuss a proposed demolition ordinance. Availability of Funds: Not applicable Discussion and Background: The present ordinance does not clearly outline the demolition procedures. The proposed ordinance clearly outline the procedures and make three major changes they are as follows: 1) Increases the demolition fees to cover the costs of enforcement of the wood covenant (if the structure is demolished) , or enforcement of the boarding and securing. 2) r- )tification requirements of community councils and adjoining property owners with appeal procedures. 3) Makes all demolitions, with the exception of emergencies, appealable to the Housing Advisory and Appeals Board. This will eliminate the discretion of the Building Official. Legislative Action: The City Attorney's Office has prepared and approved the ordinance and it is ready for your action. S omitted by: iZL 4.44...,.../ '2; CHAEL B. ZUHL nterim Direct r ROGER R. EVANS SAL ' , C s1 T I, G011 •s l D'e �O a HARVEY F. BOYD u..	.� ems DIRECTOR ASSISTANT DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Building and Housing Services 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-6436 TO: Mike Zuhl ni FROM: Roger Evans . DATE: August 15, 1990 RE: Demolition Ordinance Attached herewith is the rewrite of the Demolition Ordinance for the City Council approval. The three main changes to the ordinance are as follows: 1. Increase the demolition fees to cover the costs of enforcement of the weed covenant (if the structure is demolished) , or enforcement on the boarding and securing. 2. Notification requirements of com unity councils and adjoining property owners with appeal procedures. 3. Make all demolitions, with the exception of emergencies, appealable to the Housing Advisory and Appeals Board. This will eliminate the discretion of the Building Official. Attached is the memorandum from Bruce Baird and the minutes from the HAAB. RRE:rm Attachment SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1990 (Amending Chapter 64 of Title 18 dealing with demolishing buildings ) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 64 OF TITLE 18 DEALING WITH DEMOLISHING BUILDINGS . WHL..EAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, has reviewed the current City code dealing with demolition of buildings and has determined that the amendments below are appropriate for the development of the City: NOW, THEREFORE, Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1 . That existing Chapter 18 . 64 . 010, et seq. , attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference is hereby repealed. SECTION 2 . That Chapter 18 . 64 . 010, et seq. , be reenacted as follows : 18.64. 010	Permit Required. It shall be unlawful to demolish any building or structure in the City or cause the same to be demolished without first obtaining a permit for demolition of each such building or structure from the City Building Official . 18.64. 020.	Application for Permit. To obtain a permit for demolition, an applicant must submit an application in writing in a form furnished by the Building Official for that purpose. Each application shall: 1 . Identify and describe the type of work to be performed under the permit; 2 . State the address of the structure or building to be demolished; 3 . Describe the building or structure to be demolished including the type of use, type of building construction, size and square footage, number of stories and number of residential dwelling units ( if applicable) ; 4 . Indicate the method and location of demolished material disposal; 5 . Identify the approximate date of commencement and completion of demolition; 6 . Indicate if fences, barricades , scaffolds or other protections are required by any City code for the demolition and, if so, their proposed location and compliance; 7 . State whether fill material will be required to restore the site to level grade after demolition and, if required, the approximate amount of fill material; 8 . If the building or structure to be demolished contains any dwelling units , the application should state whether any of the dwelling units are presently occupied. 18 .64.030	Fees and Signature. A. The permit application shall be signed by the party or the part: s authorized agent requesting the permit . Signature on the permit application constitutes a certification by the signee that the information contained in the application is true and correct. -2- B. The fee for a demolition permit application shall be based on the building floor area: BUILDING FLOOR AREA FEE 5 - 2000 square feet $60 . 00 2001 - 4000 square feet 70 . 00 4001 - 6000 square feet 80 . 00 6001 - 8000 square feet 110 . 00 8001 - 10 , 000 square feet 120 . 00 10, 001 - 12 , 000 square feet 150 . 00 12, 001 - 14 , 000 square feet 180 . 00 14 , 001 - 16 , 000 square feet 210 . 00 16, 001 - 18 , 000 square feet 240 . 00 18, 001 - 20 , 000 square feet 265 . 00 20, 001 - 22 , 000 square feet 300 . 00 22, 001 - 24 , 000 square feet 340 . 00 24 , 001 - 26 , 000 square feet 370 . 00 26 , 001 - 28 , 000 square feet 410 . 00 28, 001 - 30 , 000 square feet 450 . 00 30 , 001 - 32, 000 square feet 485 . 00 For each 500 square feet over 32, 000 add an additional $10 . 00 C . If landscaping is not required by the zoning, or if a landscaping waiver is sought pursuant to Section 18 . 64 . 070 , an additional fee for the cost of inspecting the property to determine it is kept free of weeds and junk materials shall be collected in the amount of $100 . 00 . If a waiver request is denied, the $100 . 00 paid under this subsection shall be refunded. -3- D. Landscaping waiver requests shall also pay a fee of $170 . 00 for the cost of the landscape waiver process . 18. 64.040	Post-demolition Use Plan Required. No demolition permit shall be issued until one of the following requirements has been met: A. A permit for the use replacing the demolished building or structure has been issued by the Building and Housing Division; B. A landscaping plan for the site, showing the sprinkling system and planted areas , has been approved and a performance bond to assure timely and proper installation and maintenance of the landscaping has been filed with the City if a form acceptable to the City. , In the event the Building Official determines that landscaping is impracticable or unnecessary given the characteristics of the site and the neighborhood, the landscaping requirement may be waived subject to the provisions of Section 18 . 64 . 070 below; C. In the event of a force majeure event or where immediate demolition and clearing of the land is necessary to remove hazardous or blighting conditions, the building officer may waive the landscaping requirement and order immediate demolition. 18.64.050	Residential Demolition Comment Provisions. If the structure for which a demolition permit is sought contains residential dwelling units, the Building Official shall mail a written notice to the owners and residents of properties within a six hundred foot radius from the property line of the -4- property on which the proposed demolition work will take place as shown on the list equalized property tax assessment roll . The notice shall specify the property proposed for demolition and provide that comments may be made to the Building Official within fifteen days of the date of the notice . 18. 64.060	Residential Structure Demolition. A. Demolition permits for structures containing residential dwelling units which are entirely vacated may be issued no sooner than twenty days from the date the required post-demolition use plan of Section 18 . 64 . 040 above is accepted. B. If any of the residential dwelling units in the structure proposed for demolition is occupied, the demolition permit may not be issued sooner than forty-five days after the required post-demolition use plan is accepted. 18 .64 .070	Post-demolition Use Plan Waiver Procedure. A. If a waiver of the post-demolition use plan is sought under Section 18 . 64 . 040 (B) above, the applicant shall file with the Building Official, on a form provided therefor, a statement of any claimed hardship or other special circumstances justifying waiver of the post-demolition use plan requirements . B. The application fee for a waiver shall be $50 . 00 . C. The Building Official shall mail a written notice to the owners of properties within a six hundred foot radius from the edge of the property on which the proposed demolition work will take place as shown on the last equalized property tax assessment roll and any affected neighborhood based organization recognized pursuant to Section 2 . 60 . 020(C) . The notice shall -5- state the reasons given by the applicant for waiving the post- demolition use plan and state the date, time and location of a hearing before the City' s Housing Advisory and Appeals Board. D. The chairperson of the Housing Advisory and Appeals Board shall select a panel of three examiners from the roster of members and schedule a hearing date no sooner than fifteen days from the date of the petition and no later than thirty days from the date of the petition. E. In determining whether to waive the post-demolition use landscaping requirements, the Board may consider the effects on surrounding properties , the character of the neighborhood, the Master Plan for the area, future plans for the property and similar factors . 18.64. 080	Predemolition Salvage Permits. A. A predemolition salvage permit for other than structural demolition shall be required for the removal of doors, windows, special glass, fixtures, fittings , pipes , railings, posts, panels , boards, lumber, stones, bricks , marble, etc . , on the exterior or interior of the building . B. A predemolition salvage permit fee shall be paid in the amount of twenty percent of the demolition fee. 18.64.090	Expiration. Permits shall expire forty-five calendar days from the date of issuance, unless a completion date allowing more time is requested and approved by the Building Official at the time of application. Demolition permits may be renewable upon request prior to expiration with approval of the Building Official for -6- one-half of the original permit fee, provided continuous progress is being made. If a permit is allowed to expire without the prior renewal , any subsequent request for reinstatement shall be accompanied by a reinstatement fee equal to the original demolition permit fee. 18 . 64.100	Qualifications to do Work. It shall be unlawful for demolition work permitted under this chapter to be performed except by: A. A subcontractor currently holding a license in good standing with the State of Utah to do wrecking and/or demolition work. B. A licensed general contractor currently holding a license in good standing with the State of Utah qualified as a general contractor, but only when the demolition is incidental and supplemental to the construction by the general contractor of a new structure on the demolition site . C . Salvage work under a predemolition salvage permit may be done without a contractor' s license provided all other conditions of this chapter are met. 18.64. 110	Demolitions Requirement. A. Prior to the commencement of any demolition or moving, the permittee shall plug all sewer laterals at or near sidewalk lines as staked out by the department of public utilities . No excavation shall be covered until such plugging is approved by the Department or by the Building Official . The permittee shall further insure all utility services to the structure and/or premises have been shut off and meters removed prior to commencement of demolition work. -7- B. When the applicant indicates the demolition will require more than thirty days to complete, and where required by the Building Official for the safety of the public, the applicant shall also provide plans to fence the demolition site so that it is inaccessible to unauthorized persons in a manner acceptable to the Building Official . The Building Official may waive the fencing requirement if it is determined that fencing would be inappropriate or unnecessary to protect safety or health. C. A permit for demolition requires that all materials comprising part of the existing structure( s ) , including the foundation and footings, be removed from the site. The depression caused by the removal of such debris must be filled back and compacted to the original grade, as approved by the Building Official, with fill material excluding detrimental amounts of organic material or large dimension nonorganic material . D. Permitted demolition work, including filling and leveling back to grade and removal of required pedestrian walkways and fences, must be completed within the permit period unless the Building Official finds that any part of the foundation of building or site will form an integral part of a new structure to be erected on the same site for which plans have already been approved by the building division. In such event, the Building Official may approve plans for appropriate adjustments to the completion time and may impose reasonable conditions including the posting of a bond, erection of fences, -8- securing, or similar preventions to insure the site does not create a hazard after the demolition is completed . 18.64.120	Relationship to Other Ordinance. Provisions of this chapter shall be subordinate to any contrary specific provisions of Chapters 21 . 64 . 010, et seq. , dealing with demolition in the C-4 Zoning District, and Chapter 21 . 74 . 010, et seq. , dealing with demolition in historical districts . SECTION 3 . This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990 . CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: 7 CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor' s Action: Approved Vetoed. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER BRB:ap -9- SAM1 ROGER F. CUTLER 1=i �� � alt i1/40 1 ASSISTANT ATTORNEYS CITY ATTORNEY	RAY L. MONTGOMERY STEVEN W. ALLRED LAW DEPARTMENT	GREG R. HAWKINS DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY	CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING	L.4 BRUCE A. BgRDVE CHERYL D. LUKE 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 505 FRANK M. NAKAMURA CITY PROSECUTOR SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 ASSISTANT PROSECUTORS GLEN A. COOK TELEPHONE (801) 535-7788 JANICE L. FROST FAX (801) 535-7640 MARSHA ATKIN MEMORANDUM TO: Harvey Boyd Building & Housing FROM: Bruce Baird 0./SAssistant City Attorney DATE: July 30, 1990 RE: Demolition Ordinance Accompanying this memorandum you will find the revised Demolition Ordinance with the new fee structure which we have discussed. Since this has already gone through HAAB, please send it down to the Mayor' s office with the appropriate cover letter, copies, etc. BRB:ap -2- , Demolition Ordinance - Harvey Boyd said that he was hoping to have the revised ordinance for today's mooting, but Bruce Baird turned it dawn again. He said that the problem was the base fee of $423.00 regardless of the size of the unit and Mr. Baird said that it could not be done that way, so the permit fees have been broken down and will be as they previously were for commercial buildings, out the residential will be broken dawn into four categories: garages or outbuildings - $40.00, homes 120 square feet to 900 square feet - $350.00, 901 square foot to 1250 square feet - $422.00 and over 1251 square feet - $472.00. Ceiling headroan height decisions - Harvey Boyd presented the members with a draft of the ceiling headroom height decisions from previous HAAB cases including 1990. Karen Wikstron suggested that the decisions be categorized according to what the reason for the decision. Roger Borgenicht suggested organizing the decisions according to height. Karen Wikstran suggested organizing by "denied" or "approved. " Maj-Greth Holmberg said that when the panel goes on an inspection, there is usually time before the meeting and with the draft in hand, some time could be taken to go through it. Jody Williams suggested reviewing the draft and then come back with same suggestions as to how it could be improved. Bill Bohling said that possibly this information should not be used without referring back to the minutes. Report on Housing Code Survey - Harvey Boyd said that he is in the process of going through the information he requested from other cities and they have identified Portland and Seattle have real good programs and their way of working appeals is very interesting. He said that the survey should be available in June. Maj-Greth Holmberg made a mot-.ion that the Housing Grip Survey be held to the May 23, 1990 meeting and that the panel naite.rb came back with suggestions and reorganize this draft together with the information that Roger Evans will be working out with Harvey Boyd, seconded by Karen Wi kst- an. Motion passed. Selection of new chaff r erso and vice chairperson - Karen Wi kstrom nominated Roar Rowley to serve as chairperson and Maj-(nth HolM.erg far vice chairperson, seconded by Afton Kyriopoulos Motion passed. Ri11 Bohling made a notice that nominations cease, sew by Karen Wikstt«. Motion passed. Harvey Boyd said that Maj-Greth Holmberg and Afton Kyriopoulos has been appointed by the Mayor to serve another teen on the Board. Ron Rowley said that he would like to express the appreciation of the Board to Jody Williams and Ed Lunt for what they have done for the Board. He said that Jody Williams has taken pride in serving on the Board and has been a definite asset. Lois Brown made a recommendation that a letter of appreciation from the Board be sent to Jody and Ed. Discuss changing date of field trips to Tuesday - Harvey Boyd said that the only reason for changing the day for the field trip from Monday to Tuesday is the van is not available on Mondays and it is too hard to have a discussion traveling in two cars. -3- j( ;-wci t'v/ 31 , 1590 federal government will take it back. He said that the pLvgLam is not operating at one hundred percent so Capitol Planning is in the process of revising their pLoyLam description and that HUD has an expert on this program and will caning to Salt Lake City to offer advise. Mr. Buchanan said that they are considering taking some of the non-profits and offer the money to than on a deferred payment basis to get the money out there and there has been sane interest shown. He said that they are now going through the process of reevaluating the pLeyLam and deciding where their priorities are, trying to decide what the housing policy of the community is and haw this can work. Mr. Buchanan said that any day now he will receive notice that he has forty- five days to submit his application to HUD and thirty days of that are consumed internally getting things processed, so he may have three weeks to develop a program and get it back to HAAB to review. He said that he would like to orientate towards is a simple implementation task. Ron Rowley suggested that as soon as Mr. Buchanan has this definition, get back with Harvey Boyd and schedule a review. Jody Williams suggested that, if Mr. Buchanan receives notice immediately, he could take the draft Housing Policy that HAAB recommended approval on today and use that as input. Demolition Ordinance - Harvey Boyd said that he has discussed with Bruce Baird, City Attorney, and Mr. Baird has said that there is no way a demolition permit fee schedule can be implemented that is tied to the units or as exorbitant as it was originally set. He said that the fee was suggested to get people to give a second thought before tearing dawn a building and create a fund for additional housing rehab or new construction. Mr. Boyd said that Mr. Baird told him to determine the cost to the City to cause a demolition to occur and what was found out was it does not cost much more to do a single- family residence as it did to do a twenty or thirty unit apartment because the inspector checks to see that the utilities are cut and any barricades needed are in place. Mr. Boyd said that once the lot is cleared, the re-inspection, addressing any problems that cane up, such as weeds, notice and orders, etc. , was no different on single-family residences than other buildings and then came up with a fee of $190 and after the first year - $60.00 and came up with the figure of $17.00 per hour. Ed Lunt suggested that Mr. Boyd re-figure the cost by including his time, the secretary's time and HAAB time. Jody Williams said that the notification costs and title search fees should be included in the fee. Mr. Boyd said that he would do that and pass it on to Mr. Baird. Building Fee Waivers - Harvey Boyd said that the City Council approved Ordinance No. 66 of 198t8 that allows the Director of Community Development to approve waivers of building and demolition permit fees for non-profit organizations so that the money that would be turned over would be rolled in to the project and help groups out, such as Habitat for Humanity and Redevelopment Agency furthering their monies. He said that there are two requests and HAAB is required to make a recommendation to the Director of Community Development. Mr. Boyd said that Habitat for Humanity is asking that building fees be waived on four sites that would provide housing for low- income families and the projects are located at: 557 Grant Street, a three- bedroom hone for an addition and remodel; new construction of a handicapped accessible three bedroom home on a vacant lot at approximately 555 Grant 1)3 LEROY W. HOOTON, JR. DIRECTOR T,�, WENDELL E. EVENSEN,ENDENT P.E. SAS r_=TtA�Kn"nt Offl WACTD SUPERINTENDENT 1LC11L11J l� 1 WATER SUPPLY&WATERWORKS E. TIM DOXEY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES SUPERINTENDENT Water Supply & Waterworks PALMER DEPAULIS WATER RECLAMATION Water Reclamation	MAYOR JAMES M. LEWIS, C.P.A. CHIEFFINANCE& 1530 SOUTH WEST TEMPLE ACCOUNTING OFFICER SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84115 GEORGE JORGENSEN, P.E. CHIEF ENGINEER TO: Salt Lake City Council August 23, 1990 RE: INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND THE UTAH DIVISION OF WATER RIGHTS FOR CONDUCTING A GROUND WATER STUDY IN SALT LAKE VALLEY Recommendation: That the Council approve the agreement and forward to the Mayor for execution in behalf of the City. Availability of Funds: Account No. 51-63200-2329 $14, 100.00 each year for four years Discussion: The State of Utah, through its Department of Environmental Health and Division of Water Rights, has engaged the U.S. Geological Survey to conduct a groundwater quality/quantity study for Salt Lake Valley. The State Engineer, Robert L. Morgan, has requested financial assistance for this study from local water users. This assistance would be based on the amount of groundwater pumped by each local water utility. He is specifically asking the Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities to contribute $14, 100 per year for four fiscal years, July, 1990 to June, 1991 through July, 1993 to June, 1994. With the dryness of the past few years, we have concerns about groundwater quality in the aquifers being trapped by the City' s wells. We feel that the information being developed, which will show the effect on water quality by the pumping in the valley, will be beneficial to the City. Please return three (3 ) agreements to this office to be forwarded to the Utah Division of Water Rights for final execution. Submitted by: 1-4 LEROY W. HOOTON, R. Director LWH:WEE: lb QDI1J LEROY W. HOOTON, JR. DIRECTOR	1 WENDE L E.SUPERINTENDENT SEN, P.E. , ` t ri\ a ,r`'	� � WATER SUPPLY 8 WATERWORKS lJ E. TIM DOXEY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES SUPERINTENDENT Water Supply & Waterworks PALMER DEPAULIS WATER RECLAMATION Water Reclamation MAYOR JAMES M. LEWIS, CHIEF FINANCE& 1530 SOUTH WEST TEMPLE ACCOUNTING OFFICER SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84115 GEORGE JORGENSEN, P.E. CHIEF ENGINEER July 17, 1990 RFC,FIV-D QM_l 18 A990 Palmer A. DePaulis Mayor of Salt Lake City INA,fovz, rIMCF 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Dear Mayor DePaulis: The State of Utah, through its Department of Environmental Health and Division of Water Rights, has engaged the U.S. Geological Survey to conduct a groundwater quality/quantity study for Salt Lake Valley. The State Engineer, Robert L. Morgan, has requested financial assistance for this study from local water users. This assistance would be based on the amount of groundwater pumped by each local water utility. He is specifically asking the Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities to contribute $14, 100 per year for four fiscal years, July 1990 to June 1991 through July 1993 to June 1994. With the dryness of the past few years de have concerns about groundwater quality in the aquifers being tapped by the City' s wells. I feel that the information being developed, which will show the effect on water quality by the pumping in the valley, will be beneficial to the City. If you approve, we will prepare an interlocal agreement for City Council approval. Sincerely, p	U. i o6 -� J , J LEROY Wi ;HOOTON, J . Director\' , : ry WEE:dt r11��' RESOLUTION NO. OF 1990 AUTHORIZING THE APPROVAL OF AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTAH DIVISION OF WATER RIGHTS WHEREAS, Title 11, Chapter 13, U.C.A. , 1953, as amended, allows public entities to enter into cooperative agreements to provide joint undertakings and services; and WHEREAS, the attached agreement has been prepared to accomplish said purposes; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 1.	It does hereby approve the form and substance of the attached agreement as follows: To provide for a ground water study in the Salt Lake Valley to ensure that as the resource is developed, water quality is not affected. 2.	Palmer A. DePaulis, Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah, is hereby authorized to approve said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation, subject to any minor changes which do not materially affect the rights and obligations of the City thereunder. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER RLM:rc INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN UTAH DIVISION OF WATER RIGHTS AND SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION FOR CONDUCTING A GROUND WATER STUDY IN SALT LAKE VALLEY THIS INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT is made and executed as of , pursuant to Section 11-13-1, et seq. , Utah Code Annotated, by and between SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a municipal corporation of the State of Utah, hereinafter "City" , and the UTAH DIVISION OF WATER RIGHTS, hereinafter "Division" . The parties desire to conduct a water quality/quantity study of the ground water resources in Salt Lake Valley to ensure that as the resource is developed the water quality is not adversely affected. This Agreement defines the responsibilities of the parties in conducting the study. 1. Division Responsibilities: a. Arrange under their cooperative agreement with the United States Geological Survey to conduct such a study in conjunction with the City and other local water users. The scope of the study is set forth in Exhibit "A" . b. Provide coordination with contributing sponsors, cooperating agencies and the interested public. c. Publish the study as a technical publication and provide the City with twenty (20) copies of the report. d. Provide funding together with Division of Environmental Health for the State portion of the study. e. Provide the City with an annual billing as set forth below. Upon receipt of the City' s funds by the Division, the monies will be deposited in a suspense holding account with the Department of Finance and will be transmitted to the United States Geological Survey upon receipt and proper invoice showing that the work has been accomplished. 2. City Responsibilities: a. Pay $1 .00 per year to Division for each acre-foot of water pumped from City owned wells based upon the average annual withdrawals from 1984 through 1988. Based upon these figures, the City will contribute $14, 000 per year for the next four ( 4) fiscal years. Payments will be made according to the following schedule: Fiscal Year Amount Due Date July, 1990 to June, 1991 $14, 100 April 1, 1991 ( $5,000 is prepaid) July, 1991 to June, 1992 14, 100 April 1, 1992 July, 1992 to June, 1993 14, 100 April 1, 1993 July, 1993 to June, 1994 14, 100 April 1, 1994 Total Funding $56,400 b. Review and provide comments concerning the study. 3. Schedule: The schedule for completion of the study is detailed in Exhibit "A" . 4. Termination: If required by either party this Interlocal Agreement may be terminated. Such termination action shall be initiated by written notice to the other party sixty ( 60) days prior to the proposed effective date of the termination. 7. Entire Agreement: This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and it cannot be altered except through a written document which is signed by both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have here caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective authorized officers to be effective on the effective date specified above. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION By MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER -2- UTAH DIVISION OF WATER RIGHTS By OBERT . MO GA Utah State Engin r ATTEST:	e606 G/! y/ s eY Title: J STATE OF UTAH ) ss. County of Salt Lake ) On	, personally appeared before me PALMER A. DEPAULIS and KATHRYN MARSHALL, who, being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the MAYOR and CITY RECORDER, respectively, of SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a municipal corporation of the State of Utah, and said persons acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the same. NOTARY PUBLIC, residing in Salt Lake County, Utah My Commission Expires: -3- STATE OF UTAH ) ss. County of Salt Lake ) On the day of 4,44/5",/	, 1990, peronally appeared be ore me ROBERT L. KORGAN and ,pfi who, being by me duly sworn, did say tha€th'y are the STATE ENGINEER and Q)/e.oz / �� / ��� for the UTAH DIVISION OF WATER RIGHTS, STATE OF/tJTAH, espectively, and that the within and foregoing instrument was signed in behalf of the UTAH DIVISION OF WATER RIGHTS, STATE OF UTAH, and said persons acknowledged to me that said UTAH DIVISION OF WATER RIGHTS, STATE OF UTAH, executed the same. %F TH4.	NOTARY PUBLIC ile 'R S7� GLENDA McMASTER1� j tl ' 1636 West North Temple • /_ /�'I txk U �r Salt Lake City,Utah 84116 1�7, ems! /	�/- flays a1vCommissionExpires N.OTKRY PUBLIC;, re dinig in Xa•t April 1,1993 Salt Lake County, Utah =8 ''' STATE OF UTAH My Commission Expires: // /rS RLM:rc -4- • EXHIBIT "A" 3/2/90 Project Proposal Title: Ground-water flow and solute migration in the Salt Lake Valley, Utah. Cooperating Agencies: Utah Division of Water Rights, Utah Division of Environmental Health, and local agencies. Period of Study : March 1990 through August 1994 . Problem: The Salt Lake Valley in Utah is the main population and industrial center in the State of Utah (fig. 1) . An adequate supply of water of usable quality is one of the most important factors in sustaining the current population and industrial activity and in allowing for continued economic growth. The Utah Divisions of Water Rights and Environmental Health are facing water-development dilemmas. Water rights already allocated likely exceed the total annual inflow of good-quality ground water to the basin-fill sediments of the Salt Lake Valley. The Division of Water Rights needs to know the effects on the hydrologic system of further development of ground water. Both Divisions also need to be • able to determine the source area for water withdrawn from proposed wells at various locations within the valley in order to anticipate and prevent migration of water of poor quality to points of withdrawal , and thus to better manage development of the principal aquifer. Some areas where transmissivity is large and there is a source of contamination nearby would be more susceptible. Defining the pumping rate that minimizes saline-water encroachment of these areas is critical to continued prosperity of Utah' s largest metropolitan area. In order to provide this detailed information concerning the migration of poor-quality water in the principal aquifer, detailed information on water quality and hydrologic properties of the shallow-unconf ined aquifer and the conf ining interval are requi red. Recent studies by the U. S. Geological Survey (Waddell and others, 1987 , p. 15) and other unpublished data and studies in the files of the Division of Environmental Health indicate that in several areas in the valley, the shallow-unconfined aquifer contains large ; _ concentrations of organic chemicals and trace metals that exceed quality criteria of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency for domestic•water supply (Waddell and others, 1987 , p. 16) . Additional drilling and sampling is needed to establish the quality of water in other parts of the valley. In addition, the hydrologic properties of the confining unit that separates the shallow-unconfined aquifer from the underlying principal aquifer from which most of the public supply wells obtain water, are poorly known. - I STUDY AREA 112000' i I '	1 ' a	' s* r I 40052730 -. Pe'''\ �. _ _	I 07'307 p• �, 1 J - a j t . V u7wH O,9'�� g,	1 1 1"52'30f7 I - Creek �r A(DAVIS CO. _.r SLTiL K AE CO. 01 �' p Niiii � Salt =	F� aa�` 112015'. .(� Oraf	Lake H " • 4,� Gs i Lee 4�ItY_� "'� l a ( • cZ el' L \y O .-` V h	n ' �t "SRO "�'t	•._f Salt Lake ghton ss L / AennecotI OreinOraln . Universityy �k.Csja5'—% ;y y`c!.e./ of Utah i •Tailings Dona t,F F •.r •:Rt.,; ; .°•:y41 ti. _p -t .' '''rrT'fc ;,-r,rnT= *'' q/ter Canel .... 44 3e eE<t,o p -•o-• '. Decker r •"i• Lake vitro	. • `I �2,µyoa/t1 No,tnc'' Tailings - y1i1 Creek c O;O •� r-] /Cr Area C• V U �;w Little�/ 3 J.Y Q� -, •�OJ ._ , �f 0nk o yl �w, Frr, .•O r s ¢ F s J ii,yoe � ,N ,�' yCoon�Ga ) e- ,.,.....3 z ker_$ q G j .... E `. U ] / 0"° o E . . ¢¢s`'	, - ` i' G` 1 ° LE _ .- -. •2 o a Dry s1 i	3� Binghom / o . l , ` e� �� - ` e \ .Creek r �" a:	`a0/ ---— DPP+ ` O v — n: ,�� �` 1\ - �%� 3	` . .t? ao " Rile Creek i . 3 ..... Tailings u.., o FL !L//0� 1 o Area . . .�.. . ` l rn : E 3 a i • ti . 40o30'—.. '�7 a Creek _.% t N.	or0. c. �`on \` Creek ,i— i ', st Butterfie� �Q;�S o v.	s` ,' �'(�JEGCLGO. it er�� a• \ \t �F ZP-tP� 1.` >'4m�F 3rT•.c,srr)	?I e, <(,6'•,F..� . os ..-s., ---�� ,,,,, o es,- I - �0•, ��^' �� EXPLANATION `1 ' � / f ' APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY l..r �` � � lOROAN ram Base from U.S.Geological Survey f4a`'- ,- NARROiS OF.VALLEY FILL 1:24,000 quadrangles `. I `,/' J 0 5 10 MILES I- ' t ! . ` , { r 1 O s 10 KILOMETERS Figure 1.—Location of the study area. Only one aquifer test to determine vertical hydraulic conductivity of the confining unit has been completed in Salt Lake Valley. Ground-water models are usually very sensitive to the vertical hydraulic conductivity . Any model simulation to determine possible movement of poor-quality water from the shallow-unconf ined aquifer to the principal aquifer, will be dependent on the values of vertical hydraulic conductivity. Objectives : The objectives of the study are (1) to better def ine the quality of water in the shallow-unconf ined aquifer and the conf ining unit; (2) to determine the hydrologic properties of the shallow-unconfined aquifer and the underlying conf ining interval in Salt Lake Valley. ( 3) to better define the ground-water/hydrochemical flow system, including three-dimensional variation of hydrologic properties and ground-water quality; and (4) to determine the impact on water quality as a result of increased withdrawals from public-supply wells. This will provide the Utah Divisions of Water Rights and Environmental Health a means of determining the maximum quantity of water that can be withdrawn from different areas in the Salt Lake Valley without causing undesirable water-level declines and without inducing water with large concentrations of dissolved solids or contaminants to migrate toward municipal and industrial water wells. Concept of the Ground-Water/Hydrochemical Flow System : Previous investigations have determined that ground water in Salt Lake Valley (Hely and others, 1971, p. 107-111) occurs in basin fill in (1) a confined (artesian) aquifer, (2) a deep-unconfined aquifer between , the artesian aquifer and the mountains, ( 3) a shallow-unconfined aquifer overlying the artesian aquifer, and (4) locally in unconfined-perched aquifers. All the aquifers, except perhaps the perched aquifer, are connected hydraulically to some degree; thus, together they compose the ground-water reservoir in the Salt Lake Valley. The "principal aquifer" in the valley consists of the confined and the deep-unconfined aquifers. The conf ined part of the principal aquifer in the central part of the valley is separated from the shallow-unconfined aquifer by many interf inge r ed fine-grained strata that act as a confining layer (fig. 2) . The margins of the valley . near mountain fronts generally do not share this layering, especially where major streams enter the valley. Areas along the mountain fronts are the primary locations of recharge to the principal aquifer, and to some extent, the shallow-unconfined aquifer. Precipitation in the mountains infiltrates into the consol idated rock and moves laterally into the deep-unconf ined part of the principal aquifer in the basin fill. Water in streams flowing out of the mountains infiltrates coarse-grained basin-fill sediments along the mountain front, and then moves vertically into the deep-unconf ined aquifer. Much of the water that reaches the conf ined part of the principal aquifer first passes through the deep-unconf ined zone at each side of the valley. The shallow-unconfined aquifer in the central/lower part of the valley also receives recharge from local precipitation, irrigation, and by upward leakage from the principal aquifer. . . ..:.:.: .. . . ..... ..- . . • • .. • . • . . . _. . . . . .	. , . . . . ,----r.--- (-..-! 01,,I,,,,,,iwii.wr" ......i.hpiiiii..,.6. • _.-, ,- • i-TIT:ii 7),,AsATc" ...• • ..--	.....,2 , t 1 ''''.•';''`V __- •-- --` L_i._,L i e." 7 •10- , (... 1... ,— -------1,.. ---_,..— .," /7/ " :-,"'•::::•:',,•'ir.,:r_.-2.5,',.-..s.",'.._ ,---- e kefl- -- -------- Vc3.. •-•-*-- iel`..../.._/// •,C'..';'*.-...•:...-:L-:z7:' *1'1 Id , :X ....--%,,,AS" _.----- . osoN9 s	e- ' - '-'	— a,9=5 i.V.: _........rs-aprOi%.." ..1.• /7"........, 9.,C....-"- ....... 0000 .,_ (,......::,.... ,,-': (.t..'... 0 .2 ,,Z:' ;'..-....';''..•-•'-Z' . X•N, .;:-..... .°e	/.2:" /'-'.'"' ....'lqe) . POO:':." ;.'.......;;''-1."-/:..1 .4.....y.:.k....,1x.. .....,.,..---.';;".;0.'q' q/ ; __ . .--•----- .--- /./,..:"...--7,. :00,i ", . c..,71 • '' '.:.....-..Xst:4'ed•74're.:!'•:',.,"Ic•-•,-,'"= '.....-:,_•-;_.=•;',. •t. -:::': . • \ so 4 -., ,..,. •,....::.:::•• :,,.'Cc"' - 0 ' ••"•''•..:."7•'.%:`;•-•":;--: ....s..: ." .....,. , ct,".•• . ,,•,,,0 0 ..1' ':: --Z,T.•1:-.,,z;V:::). •0.':''.• .' . .•6\::: :*\,/ (//:'"'!:!.:}'''..:. '0.b OC'.‹.'',,k'.:-.'•':',;;;.ebal:p ni''',j i...,`'.:2,s.:0';'...z'.0-J:',..::j::: 1 '..:.i-'''' Cs.'.':.' ;' '''1:1' (1"C 0 n tin (1-!;:7:'*:,!'', Z,.;V•,:if:.;•P.:.1,:::.: . .. .. .. •..P%.4::..... '.. , , t :::,'3"/ ..:Y1.,....	Y,..,.-Oa U Ii!"-.::::':;.:X:`'..is•%',1'...: '''': ,:::;;: I i._.'!.(-5 0 Oi'...e.' ,:4'"..1!'...,'.:,j.':iff.''IC.;;:iti'...:se_,.':,';-1,';••• ;-';',-"":,',-V,,..i,.,',.. ,:.: ,occ."'..c...42:)--_,,,..,.. ,,:••:;. : ..:.::.',.:14...;;;; ;,;::,,'.,'•:,::•.;••:;'.1.Y?",t•::.:•.: ';:,"•':':,;;;.-;':•,.•;::,', .:::'••••!,-;:-;:- 1-1-_".. ;1`'•••••3_....Q`' ••..s•,. '..'. '-'.1 :,-.. .,...%-..,;'...sl :,- ,4 -- ''''4.1...'...:''''-\7.-.-:::.11111i ,,;0000°!..r.,:i,,,•:,.•.: •• •••.;:•:.,'..' t••• ..,..:• ,-',-; •,,,,,' _--- .0.. •-•: Pr--.....•.1;, • -...,.:',.-:;\;-.,-,).z..,. .,..:, ,,c, ,0:3,:,,"..• - ./Eill •k '':.• ...••••,.:';'...7:;;',S'la,\e••'."-.• ''t••It.C3 I .....(s.:;___":,11-•• '00 -• l P' _..._-- olik..- .... ..:'•:'•:''.;.. I\r''e'': .A - ''3 ' 'j. . ..- iy0 ..... -- --...- "a I .,...;:el.. 2E, •'-'b\`'-' --, 6 .....""- • • ,-0c2921%-"-• . - CELLS OF THE - 0 5e:..4. .. • • L. 1.11111111 ... p..je B._"2 -.•-- ..0.. 0... •** MODE ---- .... Figure 2.—Part of the ground-water reservoir in Salt Lake Valley and the relation of cells of the model to the physical system. (Modified from The quantity of water recharging the aquifers in the Salt Lake Valley has been estimated to be about 350 ,000 acre-ft/yr (Waddell and others, 1987a) . The largest component of recharge is subsurface seepage from consolidated rock (about 155,000 acre-ft/yr) . Ground water moves toward the center of the valley where it discharges naturally to the Jordan River or in an area of evapotranspiration near the Great Salt Lake. There is some vertical exchange of water between the shallow-unconfined and the deep principal aquifers because of differences in hydraulic head with depth. Generally, vertical head gradients are downward near the mountains in recharge areas and upward in the center of the valley. Direction of vertical movement may change locally if pumping causes water levels in the principal aquifer to fall below water levels in the unconf ined aquifer. Discharge from the aquifers also is about 350 ,000 acre-ft/yr. The largest component of discharge is seepage to the Jordan River (about 145 ,000 acre-ft/yr) . The next largest component, however, is withdrawal from wells (about 100,000 to 130,000 acre-ft/yr) , and this component may soon overshadow all other discharge quantities. Dissolved-solids concentrations in the principal aquifer range from 100 to 250 mg/L in mountain-front recharge areas on the east side of the valley to 5 ,000 to 46 ,000 mg/L near the Great Salt Lake on the northwest side of the valley and in an area east of Copperton where ground water is contaminated by leachates from mining operations and tailings (Waddell and others, 1987b) . Dissolved-solids concentrations in the shallow-unconf ined aquifer range from about 2,000 mg/L or less over most of the Salt Lake Valley to about 29, 000 mg/L near the Great Salt Lake. Locally, dissolved-solids concentrations in the shallow-unconfined and principal aquifers have increased because of the application or disposal of chemicals in recharge areas where migration to the saturated zones of the shallow-unconf ined aquifer and deep-unconf ined part of the principal aquifer is enhanced by the hydrologic and geologic environment along the mountains. In the central/lower part of the valley, the shallow-unconfined aquifer has been contaminated as a result of urban activities such as disposal of commercial and industrial waste, leaching of landfills, leakage from underground storage tanks, drainage from roadways, and other sources. Defining and understanding and thus being able to prevent or control contamination of water in these localized areas, and being able to prevent or reduce the migration of water containing large dissolved-solids concentrations into areas where ground water is fresh, are the main benefits to be realized from this study. Approach : The approach to achieving the objectives will involve several components of field investigation and information interpretation. These components are integrated and each is necessary • for accomplishing the objectives stated. In general these components consist of : 1) drilling, field testing, and laboratory testing to determine aquifer properties, mineralogic composition of aquifer material , and chemical composition of the water, 2) determining the extent of the effects of variable-density fluid movement, 3) updating and refining existing ground-water flow model , 4) conducting a particle-tracking investigation to increase knowledge about source and movement of water of various degrees of salinity in specific parts of the system, 5) developing multiple solute-transport simulations to better understand the hydrochemical system in the valley, and 6) synthesis of collected information and report writing. Drilling, aquifer testing, and water sampling The drilling, aquifer testing, and water-sampling component of the field investigation is designed to obtain information on the lithology, aquifers and confining-bed characteristics, and chemical makeup of the material and water in the shallow unconfined aquifer and underlying confining unit. Drilling The drilling phase of the study involves the completion of about 50 observation/monitoring wells. The depths of completion will be from about 30 feet to 50 feet in the shallow-unconf ined aquifer, and about 75 to 150 feet in the underlying confining unit. The wells will be cased and screened with 2-inch flush-joint PVC. The locations of the observation/monitoring wells will be determined after a careful analysis of available data and consultation with cooperating agencies. Where possible, observation wells in the confining unit will be located near large-yield production wells in the principal aquifer to enable the use of the "Ratio method" described by Neuman and Witherspoon (1972, p. 1284) to determine the vertical hydraulic conductivity of the confining unit. A hollow-stem augers will be used to drill the wells. Hollow-stem augers have several advantages over fluid or air- rotary drilling, some of which are listed below : (1) Completion of the well can be accomplished inside the auger; thus, the problem of the hole caving before casing can be installed is alleviated. (2) Sand packing and isolation of required intervals for testing is usually more successful . ( 3) Little if any fluid is used during the drilling and completion, thus the introduction of foreign fluids into the formation, which must be purged before sampling, is minimal . ( 4) Mud pits or water trucks are not required and the operation is much cleaner than rotary drilling. (5) Measurements of water levels during drilling are representative of the current depth of the hole, and thus can be used in determining the vertical gradient, a very important consideration in the calibration of a ground-water flow model . (6) Hollow-stem augers are usually cheaper to operate and are readily available. A lithologic log of the materials penetrated during drilling will be maintained, based on descriptions of split-spoon or split-barrel samples, returns from the auger, speed of drilling, and experience of the driller in drilling similiar materials. During drilling, a number of split-barrel or split-spoon samples will be collected for laboratory analyses of permeability, particle size, and porosity. Samples will stored after initial testing and additional testing to estimate solute-transport properties and cation-exchange and other geochemical properties will be done the following year. Natural gamma logs will be run on each hole after completion. Obtaining values for some of the properties used in transport modeling will help narrow the range of values used during the model-calibration procedure. Values for several of these properties will still have to be obtained from the literature and "backed out" within reasonable limits, during the model calibration. Observations of water levels will be made at opportune times during drilling. Aquifer testing • Aquifer testing will involve both single-well tests and multiple-well tests. Single-well "slug tests" will be conducted on wells completed in the shallow-unconf fined aquifer. These tests involve instantaneous lowering of the water level in the well by submerging an object in the water, allowing the water level in the well to reach equilibrium, and quickly removing the object. The rapid changes in water level are recorded every 5 seconds using a downhole pressure transducer and a recording device at the surface. The data analysis involves using a method for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers described by Bouwer and Rice (1976, p. 423) . Multiple-well tests will be conducted where observation wells are completed in the underlying confining unit in the vicinity of large-yield production wells. The "Ratio method" , as described by ,_ Neuman and Witherspoon (1972, p. 1284) , will be used to compute a value of vertical diffusivity (K'/Ss' ) . The vertical hydraulic conductivity of the confining bed (K' ) can then be calculated if an estimate of the specific storage of the conf ining bed (Ss' ) is available. The Neuman and Witherspoon ratio method involves comparing the drawdown or recovery in the confining bed to the drawdown or recovery in the principal aquifer at the same location and time. According to Neuman and Witherspoon (1972, p. 1289 and 1293) , the analysis depends very little on the actual magnitude of the drawdown or recovery in the aquifer or conf ining bed; however, it does depend significantly on the time lag between the start of the test and the time when water levels in the confining unit begin to respond. Therefore, if observation wells are not available, drawdown in the principal aquifer can be estimated without significantly effecting the results. Sampl ing and water-quality analyses Water samples will be collected by U. S. Geological Survey personnel from all wells drilled during this project. The samples will be analyzed by the Utah Department of Health laboratory for all constituents listed under the State of Utah ground-water protection regulations (Utah Dept. of Health, 1989, Table 1) . This list includes physical characteristics, inorganic chemicals, metals, organic chemicals, volitile organics, and radionuclides. Some of these chemicals have been reported in ground water at several sites in Salt Lake Valley (Waddell and others, 1987 , p. 15) . Water samples will be collected from wells using bladder pumps, piston pumps, or bailers. Field parameters of water temperature, pH, specific conductance, and alkalinity will be measured at the time of sampl ing. A thorough collection of this information throughout the Salt Lake Valley would require field and laboratory studies costing millions of dollars. The drilling and testing phase for this study will be designed to obtain a workable range of values for a few of the measureable properties at a few locations in the valley . A large quantity of information about water quality in the principal aquifer is already available, and an adequate 2-dimensional picture of chemical variability, with a somewhat less defined picture of vertical variability, can likely be developed from these data. Laboratory analyses of samples from drill holes will be needed to determine fluid physics and chemistry, and to analyze for trace elements to try to fingerprint water originating from different recharge areas. This information can then be used to corroborate results from the particle tracking, and later, results from the solute-transport simulation. Obtaining permission to drill at 50 sites in Salt Lake Valley will begin as soon as Utah Department of Health and the Department of Natural Resources approves the site locations and the project is funded. The drilling phase of the study will take place during May-October 1990 . Samples for water-quality analysis will be collected and slug tests will be completed by the end of October 1990 . Aquifer testing will be scheduled for the winter months of 1990-91 when water- level fluctuations from changes in recharge and discharge are minimal and municipal wells are available for testing. Variable-density modeling Dissolved-solids concentrations in water from the principal aquifer and the shallow-unconfined aquifer exceeds 10 ,000 mg/L in the northwestern part of the Salt Lake Valley and locally where man-made contamination has occurred. At present ground-water flow in these areas may be influenced by fluid-density variations. Variable-density modeling will be used to determine if density variations are large enough to introduce a significant error in the existing ground-water flow model . This component of the study will consist of developing a variable-density simulation having the same geometric configuration as the existing ground-water flow model . Hydrologic properties used in the ground-water flow model such as transmissivity and hydraulic conductivity will be converted to permeability. Head values for the 2 layers will be converted to pressure. Values for fluid density will be derived from distributions of dissolved-solids concentrations for the layers. Vector plots for the flow fields produced by the two simulations (ground-water flow and variable density) will be compared graphically to determine if any area is significantly affected by density-related head-driving forces. Because the area in the northwest part of the valley where dissolved-solids concentration is greater than 10,000 mg/L is relatively small and confined to the least active part of the ground-water flow regime, it is suspected that the effect on the main part of the Salt Lake Valley model will be negligible. However, the exercise of checking the magnitude of possible error will serve 2 purposes. First, it will determine the type of model , variable or constant density, to use for the flow and transport parts of the investigation. Second, it will inform investigators of the degree of effect on ground-water flow that other local areas of large dissolved-solids concentrations might have on flow directions and rates throughout the main part of the Salt Lake Valley ground-water system. Variable-density modeling will require approximately 1 year to complete. • Constant-density modeling If it is determined that the effects of variable-density fluids in the ground-water system are negligible, then the constant-density modeling will be initiated. A ground-water flow model already exists for the Salt Lake Valley. It has been used successfully for several years for assessing the effects of potential further development of the ground-water resources. This existing constant-density model will need to be altered and updated in order to be used for solute-transport modeling. The existing model will be altered so that the principal aquifer is represented by several layers, corresponding to the 3 or 4 depth intervals from which water is now being pumped by the municipal- and industrial-supply wells. The main confining interval that separates the principal aquifer from the shallow-unconfined aquifer will also be represented by at least 1 , and perhaps 2 model layers. Breaking the principal aquifer and the confining interval into multiple layers is necessary to enable a more detailed analysis of vertical movement of water and solutes within the flow system. Grid cells may be decreased in size in order to better simulate flow vectors near many of the existing public-supply wells. This component of the investigation will produce a refined and updated version of the ground-water flow model that should be more responsive to describing the flow directions and flow rates horizontally and vertically, and also offer improved accuracy for simulation of the effects of pumping at different locales and at different rates. By using automated methods of data-array production and manipulation (ARCINFO ) , this work should require about 6 to 12 months of time in 2 stages; one during and following variable-density modeling and the other concurrent with the last part of the particle-tracking investigation. Particle-tracking investigation A quantitative analysis of the velocity of water moving between recharge and discharge points in the flow model, and graphical depictions of the flow paths that the model simulates will allow a more detailed look at how fast particles of water move through the system and how convoluted their flow paths are (within the limitations imposed by the number of layers and cells in the model) . This process allows investigators a new perspective on just how the updated ground-water flow model is functioning, and will perhaps allow the modeler to correct minor errors in the simulation that could not otherwise be discovered. This refined version of the flow model will then be used to determine solute movement and sources of water to wells. • Particle tracking will be an interactive task to assist with flow-model development. It will require about 12 months, depending on the extent of the changes to be made to the flow model . It should begin as early in the study as possible, probably within the first year. Transport-model development and analysis The extent to which transport models will be developed will depend on how well the previous components of this study fulfill the objectives. The transport-modeling component, if needed, will require considerable effort to compile, organize, and analyze the information gleaned from the flow-modeling, particle-tracking, and field-data collection components. Results from these initial tasks will be synthesized and carefully incorporated into the development of areal three-dimensional or cross-sectional two-dimensional solute-transport simulations capable of answering the remaining questions of the Utah Divisions of Water Rights and Environmental Health. Necessary flow characteristics and boundary conditions will be obtained from the updated Salt Lake Valley ground-water flow model and used to create these larger-scale areal or sectional solute-transport models for selected areas where additional ground-water withdrawals will occur in the future, or areas where it is likely that dissolved-solids concentrations will increase markedly if ground-water withdrawals increase. Selecting these areas will be an interactive cooperative process with the Utah Division of Water Rights. Several model codes are available. Computer-system storage and computing capability may be a limiting factor in choosing the model code or the size of the subarea to be simulated; but , dividing the area into smaller, more manageable subareas or sections of particular interest will help alleviate this problem. This component of the study will produce 2 or 3 three-dimensional solute transport modeling packages that can be used to determine the water-quality and head-change result of increased pumping at existing public-supply wells, additional pumping at new well sites, and the direction of migration of solutes either introduced into the unconfined aquifer from surface sites, into the principal aquifer from it' s recharge area, or from existing poor water-quality areas. Developing, testing, and analyzing the results from the transport . models will require approximately 2 to 2.5 years. Timeframe: Drilling will begin approximately in June 1990. Sampling, water-quality analyses, and slug testing will be completed by about October 1990 . Aquifer testing will take place during the winter 1990-91 . A basic-data report showing results of drilling and testing will be available for review in about July 1991 and will be published the following September. Variable density modeling will begin in July 1990 . Planning documents and report outline will be finished by December 1990 . Flow-model update will begin approximately in November 1990. Particle tracking will begin about February 1991. Transport modeling will begin in May 1992, and Interpretive-Report writing will commence in May 1993 . A draft of the interpretive report will be ready for technical review in about January 1994. Final publication will be in or soon after August 1994. Clndr.	General Workplan Year--> 1990 I 1991 I 1992 I 1993 I 1994 Task 1-Drill	********* ***** 2-Var. Den ***** *-*** 3-Con. Den ** ****** *** 4-Ptrack ********* ***	***	*** * * 5-Sol . tra ******* ********** ***** 6-Reports ********* **** ****** ******** Personnel : Each study component will require personnel with specific skills. Drilling will require an experienced geologist/hydrologist and an able assistant to direct field data collection and examine and analyze test-well data, determine and obtain the required laboratory testing, and perform hydrologic field testing on the finished wells. State personnel will be informed as work progresses and be involved during planning phases. Flow-modeling tasks require an experienced modeler with the assistance of a person who is experienced with using ARC/INFO to produce maps and interface with data arrays used and created by the ground-water flow model. Transport modeling requires a geochemist/modeling expert with 1 or 2 part-time assistants to help with model data compilation and manipulation. The modeler from the flow-modeling component could be used if he or she has the transport-modeling skills or has a geochemist to work with. Interpretive report writing will involve all key personnel to compile and interpret data, develop necessary illustrations and plates, and write the final interpretive report. All the above persons are or will be available in the Utah District , Water Resources Division. Reports: A basic-data report (compilation of the test-drilling data) will be ready for preliminary review on about July 1 , 1991 . The data report will include well logs, results from laboratory testing on sediment samples, water-level data, and water-sample analyses. Final publication is expected by September 1991. The results of the aquifer testing will be included in the final interpretive report of the project and will be provided to cooperators for their review in about January 1994. The basic data from the drilling will be published in the U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic-Data Report Series. The final interpretive report will be published in the State of Utah, Department of Natural Resources Technical Publication Series and will consist of data presented in tables and interpretation of the aquifer testing, flow-modeling, particle-tracking, and transport-modeling components. Products other than reports: At the end of the study several packages of interpretive data will be available in machine readable format. These data will consist of the model arrays used in the (1) updated ground-water flow model , (2) the variable-density model , and (3) the solute-transport models. Data entry used to produce particle-tracking illustrations will also be available. Standard Survey manuals and model documentation will also be available to allow cooperators to use the model software. This will allow users to run all the models developed during the study so they might simulate other possible management alternatives. Estimated Costs: Salaries FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93	FY94 Sr. Hydrologists 25,100 50 ,490 46 ,390 42 ,130 22,620 GW Flow Modeler	14,100 56 ,390 56 ,390 56 ,390 28,200 Hydrologist/Geol 22,100 45,900 23,440 Geochem 35,250 23,440 11, 800 Reports support - 8,200 16 ,390	8,200 ARC/INFO specialist	11 ,800 47 ,210 23,610 Digitizer 8 ,200 16,390 Modeling assistant 7,050 28,200 28,200 28,200 Hydrologic assistant	11 ,480 Drilling 135,150 Drilling materials 29,750 Geophysical logging	20,000 Core lab. analyses 22,950 49,180 Report prep. mat. 1 ,640	1 ,640	1,640	3 ,280	6 ,560 Computer support	1 ,640	3 ,280	3,280	1 ,640	1 ,640 Chemical analyses Provided by DEH Lab Vehicles	6 ,200 10,160 6,890	5 ,250 Equip. & supplies 4,920	4,920	2,460	2, 460	1 ,640 Reference material 820 820 160 160 TOTALS 311,420 326 ,060 235,910 179,340 80 ,660 Potential distribution of funds: FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 DWR * 36 ,000 *118,600 * 99,255 * 89 ,670 * 40,330 DEH *119,710 * 44,430 * 18,700	0	0 USGS *155,710 163,030 117 ,955 89,670 40 ,330 Total cost for each agency : DWR $383 ,855 DEH $182 ,840 USGS $566 ,695 Total cost of the study will be about $1 ,133,390. * The Utah Department of Health will provide $90,000 in FY90 , and the DEH laboratory will perform analyses on water samples collected from the new test wells. The Division of Water Rights will provide $10 ,000 in FY90 . The U. S. Geological Survey will match the $90 ,000 from DEH and the $10 ,000 from DWR for a total of $200 ,000. The $90 ,000 from DEH matched with the $90 ,000 from the USGS will be used for locating 50 sites and drilling and testing of the first 35 to 40 wells. The $10 ,000 from DWR (provided after July 1 , 1990) matched with $10,000 from the USGS will be used to start development of the variable-density model . Funding for FY90 will be approximately $111 ,420 less than required in the proposal . -If additional funding becomes available at the end of FY90 , in FY91, or FY92, the remaining 10 to 15 proposed wells, not drilled in FY90 , will be drilled in these subsequent years and the interpretive parts of the study that require the data that was to be acquired from the drilling program will be done after completion of the drilling. This may delay completion of the project by six months to one year. Funding after FY90 from DEH, DWR, or the USGS is not assured. Project funding after FY90 will be renegotiated at that time. If the solute-transport component of the project is found to be unnecessary , the cost of the project can be decreased by approximately $142,000 and can be completed about 1 year sooner. References: Bouwer, Herman and Rice, R. C. , 1976, A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells: Water Resources Research, v. 12 no. 3 , p. 423-428. Hely, A.G. , Mower, R.W. , and Harr, C.A. , 1971, Water resources of Salt Lake County, Utah: Utah Department of Natural Resources Technical Publication 31, 244 p. Neuman, S. P. , and Witherspoon, P.A. , 1972, Field determination of the hydraulic properties of leaky multiple aquifer systems : Water Resources Research, v. 8, no. 5, p. 1284-1298. Utah Department of Health, 1989, State of Utah Ground-Water Quality Protection Regulations: Utah Division of Environmental Health, Bureau of Water Pollution Control , Aug. 1989, 30 p. Waddell, K. M. , Seiler, R.L. , Santini, Melissa, and Solomon, D. K. , 1987 , Ground-water conditions in Salt Lake Valley with emphasis on 1969-82 water budget and predicted effects of increased withdrawals: Utah Department of Natural Resources Technical Publication 87 , 69 p. Waddell, K. M. , Seiler, R.L. , and Solomon, D.K. , 1987 , Chemical quality of ground water in Salt Lake Valley, Utah: Utah Department of Natural Resources Technical Publication 89, 56 p. .,t, mg; au(eitepRIMPA 110.11.A DOPf]1t11ENT TELEPHONE(801)799-3000 315 EAST 200 SOUTH MIKE CHABRIES FAX(801)799-3557 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 CHIEF OF POLICE August 30 , 1990 Mayor Palmer DePaulis Salt Lake City Corp. City & County Building 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Dear Mayor DePaulis : This is a request for Council approval and your signature. It is for a new version of the Interlocal Agreement of the Metropolitan Narcotics Strike Force. I would recommend that the Council approve this request. The first Interlocal Agreement, signed in 1982 , was in need of updating. The original signed document cannot be located. With regards to funding, there are no additional requirements beyond those that have been previously approved by Salt Lake City. The Metro Narcotics Strike Force began in 1982 as a cooperative effort of enforcement from a multi-jurisdictional concept. The Interlocal Agreement is a necessary component of the Strike Force and is required to obtain Federal Grant monies by the Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice. During the past year, this document has been updated. It reflects the current direction and intent of the Metropolitan Narcotics Strike Force Board of Directors. Your consideration of this request is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions , please contact Lt. William Shelton, Commander Metropolitan Narcotics Strike Force at 799-3670 . S ' cerely, MICHAEL P. CHABRIES Chief of Police MPC/nw cc: File RESOLUTION NO. OF 1990 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BY AND THROUGH THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION WHEREAS, Title 11 Chapter 13, U.C.A. , 1953 as amended allows public entities to enter into cooperative agreements to provide joint undertakings and services; and WHEREAS, the attached agreement has been prepared to accomplish said purposes; THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 1 . That it does hereby approve the attached agreement generally described as follows: An Agreement between Salt Lake City and the United States of America, by and through the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Drug Enforcement Administration for the investigation and prosecution of sales of controlled substances . 2 . Palmer A. DePaulis , Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah is hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation and to act in accordance with its terms . Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City this day of , 1990. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney's Office, Date $ ' i cr(/ CITY RECORDER GRH:cc AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and executed by and between Salt Lake City, and the undersigned jurisdictions, all bodies corporate and politic of the State of Utah, and the United States of America, by and through the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Drug Enforcement Administration. WITNESSET H: WHEREAS , 11-13-1 et seq. , Utah Code Annotated, 1953 , as amended, commonly known as the Interlocal Cooperation Act, authorizes public agencies to enter joint agreements for the promotion of police protection; and WHEREAS , all of the parties hereto are public agencies as defined by the Interlocal Cooperation Act; and, WHEREAS , all of the parties hereto have experienced within their jurisdiction a growing problem of trade in illegal controlled substances ; and, WHEREAS , the effective investigation and prosecution of sales of controlled substances requires specialized personnel , which are more effective when able to investigate on a regional basis and in a cooperative arrangement; NOW, THEREFORE , the parties do mutually agree , pursuant to the terms and provision of the Interlocal Cooperation Act, as follows : I . The Metropolitan Narcotics Strike Force ( hereafter Strike Force ) , governed by an Executive Board, is hereby created for the purpose of investigating and prosecuting the illegal importation, manufacture , use , and sale of controlled substances under state , federal and local laws . A. The Executive Board shall consist of the head of each participants law enforcement department or the assistant thereto, as determined by the participant. 1 . A chairman, vice-chairman, and secretary shall preside over the Executive Board for a one-year term . Each shall be selected on a yearly basis by a majority vote in secret ballot of the Executive Board. a. The Chairman shall have power to call meetings as necessary, administer the routine affairs of the Executive Board, and enter contracts as needed upon approved resolution of the Executive Board. 2 . The duties of the Executive Board shall be: a. Review the activities of the Strike Force generally. b . Select a Strike Force Unit Commander ( 1 ) The Unit Commander shall be a Category I peace officer of the State of Utah or a Federal peace officer to serve as the daily administrator and report as required to the Executive Board. ( 2 ) The Unit Commander shall be selected from one of the participating agencies and shall be reviewed each June to cor- respond with the annual audit. The selection of successive commanders should correspond with the annual audit unless otherwise directed by the Executive Board. ( 3 ) The Unit Commander shall be solely in charge of directing Strike Force activities subject to approval of the Executive Board. ( 4 ) The Unit Commander shall be responsible for the administrative activity of the Strike Force including maintaining financial records and reporting as required by the Executive Board. P ( 5 ) The Unit Commander shall perform such other duties as required by the by-laws and adopted standard operating procedures of the Executive Board. c . Request financial audits as deemed necessary, but insure at least one full audit in June of each year. d. Issue an annual report of the preceding year' s activities to the participants . e . Conduct program evaluation. f. Seek Federal and State grant money as may be available . g. Provide for the appointment of supervisors and staff as needed. h. Establish by-laws and operating policy as needed. ( 1 ) By-laws are adopted, amended, or repealed by a two-thirds vote of those present at a meeting of the Executive Board. ( 2 ) No by-law may be adopted, amended, or repealed in the same meeting in which the action is proposed. ( 3) Operating policy is acted upon as provided by by-law. ( 4 ) All changes, amendments, or additions to the by-laws or operating policy shall be included in detail in the minutes of the Executive Board meeting. i . The financial affairs of the Strike Force shall be conducted in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles for governmental bodies, in so far as they apply to the Strike Force . B . The Strike Force shall primarily investigate crimes related to controlled substances . The Strike Force has a duty to notify jurisdictions of all crimes discovered in the course of investigation; provided, such notification may be delayed if , in the discretion of the Strike Force Unit Commander, notification will hinder a current Strike Force Investigation. C . All agents of the Strike Force , shall be Category I peace officers as defined by the laws of Utah, or Federal peace officers . D . All of the participants acknowledge the territorial jurisdiction of the Strike Force to be that of all the signatories hereto and expressly consent to the investigations conducted by the Strike Force within their geographical boundaries provided that the Strike Force agents who are not of the jurisdiction in which an investigation is conducted shall not be considered agents of such jurisdiction nor shall such jurisdiction assume any liability for the actions of the Strike Force except as provided in part V. E . All participants may refer any narcotics investi- gation within their jurisdiction to the Strike Force . The Strike Force may decline any case for cause . II . Participants to this Agreement shall, through their representative on the Executive Board, have voting or non-voting status . Any reference in this Agreement to an action by vote or any action under by-law requiring a vote shall be done by only those with voting status at the time of the action . A. Participants with voting status are those who, for the current Strike Force year, have provided at least one officer to the Strike Force plus support equipment or* special evidence money in an amount agreed between the parties hereto . 1 . On July 1 of each year, the total amount of each participant' s contribution to the The Strike Force Account shall be determined by the Board . The amount determined as contribution by the member agencies shall be payable to Strike Force between July 1 of each year and June 30 of the following year. A report of contributions shall be made at the first meeting following June 30 each year to the Executive Board by the Strike Force Commander. 2 . Changes in the amount contributed by any participant may be determined by the Board upon request for re-evaluation by any member agency. Any such change will be reflected in a parti- cipant' s percentage share of assets should withdrawal of membership or termination of agreement occur as provided in VII and VII (A ) . B . Non-voting participants are those who have provided any other resources during the current fiscal year. III . Each participant hereto shall absorb all costs associated with their participation . All salaries including benefits and other obligations, of officers and staff assigned to the Strike Force shall be paid by the contributing jurisdiction. Similarly, all costs of equipment contributed for use by the Strike sold and the proceeds divided among the current members as provided in paragraph B, below. A. Upon complete withdrawal from this agreement any participant may recover any unused special evidence money which it contributed for use of the Strike Force . The amount which may be withdrawn shall be that percentage calculated on July 1 , pursuant to part II-A-1 , above , of the total special evidence money available at time of withdrawal . However, in no event may a participant recover more than the actual amount credited to it on the last July 1 computation. B. Upon termination of this entire agreement, all total available funds , including any funds other than special evidence money, shall be distributed among the current members according to the most recent July 1 percentage calculation, as described above . Accordingly, all material assets or other funds accumulated by the Strike Force, shall be so divided after dis- olusion to other funding sources as may be required by law. VIII . Any period of time stated in this Agreement shall be computed from the time of entry of any member agency in the agreement to the time of withdrawal or termination of the entire Agreement, beginning July 1 , 1982 . IX. Other jurisdictions, not an original party to this Agreement, may join with approval of the Executive Board. The Executive Board may offer investigative service to any jurisdiction without granting membership status or provide such assistance as thought appropriate . X. The proceeds from property or assets of suspects forfeited under the laws of the State of Utah or the Government of the United States to Strike Force shall become part of the operating funds of the Strike Force, unless otherwise directed by the Executive Board. XI . All participants hereto agree that agents contributed to the Strike Force shall follow Strike Force policy and procedures . Otherwise , each agent shall be bound by his/her own department ' s policies while acting for the Strike Force . XII . The Strike Force shall have no authority to discipline any agent except, the Unit Commander may remove an agent from the Strike Force and make recommendations to the responsible department. IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties have affixed their signature hereto upon resolution of their governing body as required by law and join and give effect to this agreement: By By Date	Date By By Date	Date By By Date	Date By By Date	Date By By Date	Date By By Date	Date LINDA HAMILTON SAL" , Q� ,I TfY�"�� 0 ,� �1,©ir PALMER DEPAULIS DIRECTOR OF FINANCE v� V 1 V 1 MAYOR DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 228 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE (801) 535-6426 MEMORANDUM T0: City Council FROM: Linda Hamilton. DATE:	August 30, 1990 SUBJECT: Proposed Freight License Sticker Ordinance (Attached) 1. Subject: The attached ordinance amends an existing licensing ordinance requiring an identification sticker to be placed on vehicles to allow them to —� temporarily park at freight curb loading zones. 2. Recommendation: The Finance Department and Department of Community and Economic Development recommend approval. 3. Fundinq: There is no financial impact. 4. Background and Discussion: The current ordinance refers to identification "plates" which have long since been replaced by stickers. More importantly, the current ordinance does not require the sticker to be permanently affixed to the front windshield, nor does it specifically preclude transfer of the sticker from rar to rar. As a SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1990 (Freight License Stickers) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 5. 26. 100 AND 12. 56 .330 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE, RELATING TO FREIGHT LICENSE STICKER ATTACHED TO VEHICLE AND FREIGHT CURB LOADING ZONES, RESPECTIVELY. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That Section 5. 26. 100, Salt Lake City Code, relating to Freight license sticker attached to vehicle, be, and the same hereby is, amended to read as follows: 5.26.100 Freight license sticker attached to vehicle. Every vehicle licensed under this chapter shall have a sticker permanently affixed to the front windshield thereof in such manner that the same may be plainly seen, such sticker to be furnished by the license supervisor, and which sticker shall bear a numerical number within the limits of the gross laden weight for which the vehicle is licensed as provided in Section 5. 26.060, or its successor ordinance. Said sticker is not transferable to any other vehicle. SECTION 2. That Section 12. 56.330, Salt Lake City Code, relating to Freight curb loading zones, be, and the same hereby is, amended to read as follows: 12.56.330 Freight curb loading zones. A. No person shall stop a vehicle or permit the same to remain stopped for any purpose or length of time other than for the expeditious loading and/or unloading of materials in any place marked as a freight curb loading zone during the hours when the provisions applicable to such zones are in effect. Vehicles so using freight curb loading zones must have city freight permit and freight license sticker permanently affixed to the front windshield of the vehicle as prescribed by city ordinance. In no case shall the stop for loading and/or unloading of materials exceed thirty minutes. B. * * * SECTION 3 . This ordinance shall take effect upon the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on . Mayor' s action: Approved Vetoed. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER APPROVED AS TO FO"•M Lake A orney's Office Ile 4 -2- (SEAL) Bill No. OF 1990. Published: . LVS:rc -3- DRAFT SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1990 (Freight License Stickers) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 5.26. 100 AND 12.56.330 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE, RELATING TO FREIGHT LICENSE STICKER ATTACHED TO VEHICLE AND FREIGHT CURB LOADING ZONES, RESPECTIVELY. Be it ordained by the City Council of• Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That Section 5.26.100, Salt Lake City Code, relating to Freight license sticker attached to vehicle, be, and the same hereby is, amended to read as follows: 5.26.100 [ ] Freight license sticker attached to vehicle. Every vehicle licensed under this chapter shall have a [plats] sticker permanently affixed to the front windshield thereof in such manner that the same may be plainly seen, such [plats] sticker to be furnished by the license supervisor, and which [plats] sticker shall bear a numerical number within the limits of the gross laden weight for which the vehicle is licensed as provided in Section 5.26.060, or its successor[-] ordinance. Said sticker is not transferable to any other vehicle. SECTION 2. That Section 12.56.330, Salt Lake City Code, relating to Freight curb loading zones, be, and the same hereby is, amended to read as follows: 12.56.330 Freight curb loading zones. A. No person shall stop a vehicle or permit the same to remain stopped for any purpose or length of time other than for the expeditious loading and/or unloading of materials in any place marked as a freight curb loading zone during the hours when the provisions applicable to such zones are in effect. Vehicles so using freight curb loading zones must have city freight permit and [commercial] freight license [plate] sticker permanently affixed to the front windshield of the vehicle as prescribed by city ordinance. In no case shall the stop for loading and/or unloading of materials exceed thirty minutes. B. * * * SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on . Mayor' s action: Approved Vetoed. MAYOR -2- ATTEST: CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. OF 1990. Published: LVS:rc �i. -3- pI LEE KING SAT !�curC,,O ®L r,©m DIRECTOR COMMUNITY and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Capital Planning and Programming CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 418 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7902 September 4 , 1990 TO: Mayor Palmer DePaulis cc: City Council FROM: Lee King - Deputy Director '- Community and Economic Development RE: Western Fiberglass IDB Western Fiberglass has filed application for issuance of a $2,000 , 000 Industrial Development Bond to expand and diversify their fiberglass insulation production capacity at 4340 West 850 South. The bond proceeds will be used to purchase and install equipment which will add a blow-in type insulation to their existing residential and commercial product line . The request has been reviewed by the Salt Lake City Department of Community and Economic Development, the Finance Department, and members of the Incentives and Grants Review Committee. The project meets threshold criteria for approval as follows : 1 . Location The facility is in the Northwest Quadrant, west of 40th West where light industry is desirable. 2 . Economic benefit Employment growth - Projected expansion over the next 5 years will increase employment from 64 to 159 with additional payroll expected to grow by $2 , 718 , 000 annually. The phase covered under the current IDB application will add 18 new manufacturing jobs and increase annual payroll by about $426 , 000 . Most of the jobs will be skilled, unskilled and clerical . Economic base expansion/diversification - The proposed expansion includes a manufacturing process which converts locally procured materials costing $1 . 5 million annually into a finished product with a wholesale value of $2 . 8 million. I Approximately 65% of the annual sales will be to out of state purchasers . Tax base impact - The $2 million increase in physical plant investment will return about $7 , 150 directly to the City through property taxes each year. Additional property taxes will also support schools and other governmental services . Indirect tax benefits will accrue to the City through sales tax on purchase of materials and services , and increased purchases made from wages paid to employees . The state will collect income taxes on $426 , 000 in wages paid. This project has received commitment for state bond allocation and unless renewed by Congress, industrial development bonds of this type which involve local government will "sunset" at the end of September. We believe this project increases the tax base of the City and contributes to economic diversity. We recommend the application be approved. THRESHOLD CRITERIA FOR INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND PROPOSALS All requests for City development subsidies must meet the following threshold criteria to receive a recommendation for further consideration by the City. The proposal must do at least one of the following: a. The proposal must be located within a designated development subsidy target area, be a project sponsored in part by the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, or the Salt Lake City Housing Authority, be a project that includes rehabilitation or recycling of an existing structure of significance listed on the City Register or having other factors warranting preservation. b. The proposal must be considered by its implementation to provide substantial enhancement and implementation emphasis to the goals and objectives of the City' s master plans, including physical and social benefits to the City. c. The proposal 's financial analysis demonstrates a clear and factual economic benefit to the City such as the creation of additional jobs for City residents, increases in the City's tax base, stimulation of additional private investment, and stimulation of other business development. d. The proposal includes a City, or other eligible public or semi- public entity sponsored project such as a Special Assessment District, hospitals, etc. e. No office buildings between 200 and 700 East and South Temple and 500 South will be considered for industrial revenue bond financing. -4- HD14600 (Ps) Salt Lake City, Utah September 11, 1990 The City Council (the "Council") of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake , County, Utah met in regular session at its regular meeting place in Salt Lake City, Utah at 6:00 p.m. on September 11, 1990, with the following members present: Alan Hardman Chairman Nancy Pace Vice Chair Thomas M. Godfrey Councilmember L. Wayne Horrocks Councilmember Don C. Hale	Councilmember Roselyn N. Kirk Councilmember Ronald Whitehead Councilmember Also present: Palmer A. DePaulis Mayor Roger F. Cutler City Attorney Kathryn Marshall	City Recorder Absent: After the meeting was duly called to order and after other matters not pertinent to this resolution had been discussed, the City Recorder presented the Council a Certificate of Compliance with Open Meeting Law with respect to this September 11, 1990 meeting, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" . After the conduct of business not related to this excerpt of minutes, the following resolution was then introduced in writing, fully discussed by the Council and pursuant to motion duly made by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember , adopted by the following vote: AYE: NAY: The resolution is as follows: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE FINANCING BY SALT LAKE CITY, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH OF THE ACQUISITION OF EQUIPMENT AND PLANT FACILITIES AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS FOR A FIBERGLASS INSULATION AND RELATED PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN SALT LAKE CITY IN ORDER THAT WESTERN FIBERGLASS, INC. MAY BE PROVIDED WITH FACILITIES TO PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE AND ENCOURAGE THE INCREASE OF INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE; AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE BY SALT LAKE CITY, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH OF ITS $2,000,000 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1990 (WESTERN FIBERGLASS, INC. PROJECT) WHICH WILL BE PAYABLE SOLELY FROM THE REVENUES ARISING FROM THE PLEDGE OF A LOAN AGREEMENT WITH WESTERN FIBERGLASS, INC. ; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A LOAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH AND WESTERN FIBERGLASS, INC. ; PROVIDING FOR FINANCING THE ACQUISITION OF SAID PROJECT; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AN INDENTURE OF TRUST AND RELATED DOCUMENTS; CONFIRMING THE SALE OF SAID BONDS TO THE PURCHASER THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICE OF BONDS TO BE ISSUED; AND RELATED MATTERS. BD14600 (PE) 2 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Utah Industrial Facilities and Development Act, Chapter 17, Title 11, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, (the "Act") , Salt Lake City, Utah (the "Issuer") is authorized to issue its revenue bonds to finance the costs of any "project" as defined in the Act to the end that the Issuer may be able to promote the general welfare and encourage the increase of industry and commerce within the State of Utah; and WHEREAS, as a result of negotiations between the Issuer and Western Fiberglass, Inc. (the "Company") , a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Utah and authorized to do business in the State of Utah, contracts have been or will be entered into by the Company for the acquisition of equipment and plant facilities and related improvements for a fiberglass insulation and related products manufacturing facility to be located in Salt Lake City, Utah (the "Project") , to be used by the Company and which Project will be of the character and will accomplish the purposes provided by the Act, and the Issuer is willing to issue its industrial development revenue bonds to finance the Project upon terms which will be sufficient to pay the cost of acquiring the Project as evidenced by such industrial development revenue bonds, all as set forth in the details and provisions of the Loan Agreement between the Issuer and the Company (the "Loan Agreement") ; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the Issuer proposes to enter into said Loan Agreement by and between the Issuer and the Company in connection with the financing of the Project and to enter into an Indenture of Trust (the "Indenture") with Zions First National Bank (the "Trustee") pursuant to which the Issuer will issue its not to exceed $2,000,000 Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, Series 1990 (Western Fiberglass, Inc. Project) , (the "Bonds") ; and WHEREAS, this Council deems it necessary and advisable to authorize the issuance and confirm the sale of the Bonds and to authorize the execution and delivery of the Loan Agreement, the Indenture and related documents required for the sale of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, the Act and all documents to be signed by the Issuer provide that the Bonds shall not constitute nor give rise to a general obligation or liability of the Issuer or be a charge against its general credit or taxing powers and that the Bonds will be payable from and secured only by the revenues arising from the pledge and assignment under the Indenture of the Loan Agreement to the Trustee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah as follows: Section	1. The Issuer is authorized to finance the acquisition of the Project by the Company with the proceeds of the Bonds, all pursuant to the provisions of the Act. All action heretofore taken by the officers of the Issuer directed toward the issuance of the Bonds is hereby ratified, approved and confirmed. SD146OO (PP) 3 Section	2. The Issuer is authorized and directed to issue the Bonds as fully registered bonds, in the aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000. The Bonds shall bear interest at the per annum rates, shall be payable on the dates, shall be subject to redemption prior to maturity, and shall mature on the dates and in the amounts all as set forth in the Indenture, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B". The form of Bond is set out in the Indenture, copies of which were before the Council at this meeting and which will be available for inspection at the office of the City Recorder for any interested person, which form is incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Section	3. The Bonds are to be issued in accordance with and pursuant to, and the Issuer is authorized and directed to execute and deliver, the Loan Agreement (a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "C") and the Indenture, in substantially the same forms presented to the Council at the meeting at which this resolution was adopted, and which are also on file at the office of the City Recorder and may there be examined during normal business hours by any interested person. The Loan Agreement provides for the issuance of the Bonds solely for the purpose of financing the cost of acquiring the Project and for paying expenses incidental thereto. The Loan Agreement provides for certain representations and warranties by the Issuer and the Company, for certain conditions precedent to the purchase of the Bonds, for certain affirmative and negative covenants, and for remedies in connection with the failure to perform certain covenants thereunder. The Indenture specifically provides that no provision thereof or of the Bonds shall constitute nor give rise to a general obligation or liability of the Issuer or a charge against its general credit or taxing powers. Recourse on the Bonds executed and delivered by the Issuer pursuant to the Indenture may be had only against the security for the Bonds as provided therein and in the Loan Agreement and the Indenture. Section	4. The Loan Agreement provides that the Company will cause the Project to be acquired with the Company to have the right to requisition from the Trustee the proceeds of the Bonds from time to time, all in accordance with the provisions of the Loan Agreement and the Indenture and, that if the proceeds of the Bonds are not sufficient to defray all costs and expenses of acquiring the Project and all expenses incidental thereto, the Company will pay all such excess costs and expenses and will acquire the Project without additional cost to the Issuer. Section	5. The Project will constitute manufacturing facilities as contemplated in the Act consisting of the equipment and plant facilities and related property and improvements, including any modification thereof, substitutions therefor and amendments thereto. Section	6. The Bonds (in substantially the form set forth in the Indenture) and the Loan Agreement and the Indenture, in substantially the forms presented to the Council of the Issuer at this meeting with such changes as are authorized by Section 8 hereof, are hereby approved in all BD146OO (PF) 4 respects, and the Mayor (including any Mayor Pro Tem) and City Recorder are hereby authorized to execute each of .the same on behalf of the Issuer and to affix the seal of the Issuer thereto and the acts of the Mayor and City Recorder in so doing are and shall be the act and deed of the Issuer. The Mayor, City Recorder and all other proper officers and employees of the Issuer are hereby authorized and directed to take all steps on behalf of the Issuer to perform and discharge the obligations of the Issuer under each of said instruments. Section	7. The sale of the Bonds to G.E. Capital Public Finance, Inc. or its designee at a price of 1000 of the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest to the date of delivery, and bearing interest at rates as provided in the Indenture, is hereby authorized, approved and confirmed. Section	8. The Mayor is hereby authorized to make, either prior or subsequent to the execution thereof, any alterations, changes or additions in the Indenture, the Loan Agreement and the Bonds herein authorized which may be necessary to correct any errors or omissions therein, to remove ambiguities therefrom, to conform the same to other provisions of said instruments, to the agreement of the Company and the Purchaser, to the provisions of this resolution, or any other resolution adopted by the Issuer, or the provisions of the laws of Utah or the United States as long as the rights of the Issuer are not materially affected thereby. Section	9. Pursuant to Section 11-17-13, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, the Issuer includes herein the pledge and undertaking of the State of Utah that the State of Utah will not alter, impair or limit the rights vested hereunder or in the Bonds, the Loan Agreement, the Indenture or any of the documents contemplated hereby until the Bonds, together with all interest thereon, have been fully paid and discharged and all obligations of the Issuer thereunder and under the Loan Agreement and the Indenture are fully performed. Section 10. It is hereby declared that all parts of this resolution are severable and that if any section, paragraph, clause or provision of this resolution shall, for any reason be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of any such section, paragraph, clause or provision shall not affect the remaining provisions of this resolution. Section 11. All resolutions and ordinances or parts thereof heretofore adopted or passed which are in conflict with any of the provisions of this resolution are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby repealed. Section 12. The Mayor, City Recorder and other officers of the Issuer are hereby authorized to execute all documents and take such action as they may deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out and perform the purpose of this resolution and the execution or taking of such action shall be conclusive evidence of such necessity or advisability. All B10146OO (PE) 5 action heretofore taken by the Issuer, its officers and employees, with respect to the issuance and sale of the Bonds is hereby ratified and confirmed. Section 13. In accordance with the provisions of Section 11-17-16, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, the City Recorder shall cause the following "Notice of Bonds to be Issued" to be published one time in the Salt Lake Tribune, a newspaper having general circulation in Salt Lake City, Utah, and shall cause a copy of this resolution (including the Exhibits hereto) to be kept on file in the office of the City Recorder for public examination during regular business hours until at least thirty (30) days from and after the date of such publication. The Notice of Bonds to be Issued shall be in substantially the following form: BD14600 (PE) 6 SALT LAKE CITY, *UTAH NOTICE OF BONDS TO BE ISSUED NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the provisions of Section 11-17-16, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, that on September 11, 1990, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah adopted a resolution authorizing and providing for the issuance and sale by Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah (the "Issuer") of its $2,000,000 Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, Series 1990 (Western Fiberglass, Inc. Project) (the "Bonds") . The Bonds are to be issued pursuant to the Utah Industrial Facilities and Development Act, Chapter 17, Title 11, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, (i) to finance the acquisition of equipment and plant facilities and related improvements for a fiberglass insulation and related products manufacturing facility to be located in Salt Lake City Utah, to be used by Western Fiberglass, Inc. , a Utah corporation and (ii) to pay certain costs of issuing the Bonds. The Bonds are to be sold at a price of 100% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest, if any, to the date of delivery. The proposed Bonds will not constitute general obligations of the Issuer. The Issuer will not be obligated to pay costs incurred in connection with the issuance of the Bonds nor will it be liable to make payments of interest or principal on the Bonds, except from the sources specified therein. A copy of the resolution adopted on September 11, 1990, by the City Council of Salt Lake City authorizing the issuance and confirming the sale of the above-described Bonds, together with copies of other documents connected with the Bonds, are on file in the office of the City Recorder of said City at 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah where they may be examined during regular business hours of the City Recorder from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Said resolution and other related documents shall be available for inspection for a period of at least thirty (30) days from and after the date of the publication of this notice. Notice is also hereby given that for a period of 30 days after publication of this notice any person in interest may contest the legality of the resolution, proceedings, any Bonds which may be authorized under them, or any provisions made for the security and payment of the Bonds. After expiration of such 30-day period no person may contest the regularity, formality, or legality of the resolution, proceedings, Bonds, or security provisions for any cause. DATED this day of September, 1990. /s/ Kathryn Marshall City Recorder ( SEAL ) BD146OO (1,F) 7 Section 14. This resolution constitutes approval of the elected legislative body of the Issuer for purposes of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") . Section 15. The Issuer hereby elects to have the provisions of Section 144(a)(4) of the Code (relating to the $10,000,000 small issue election) apply to the Bonds. Section 16. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption by the Council and its passage, approval and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of September, 1990. Chair ATTEST: City Recorder ( S E A L ) BD14600 (PF) 8 Other business not pertaining to the foregoing appears in the minutes of the meeting. The meeting was then adjourned. Chair ATTEST: City Recorder ( S E A L ) BD14600 (PF) 9 PRESENTATION TO THE MAYOR The foregoing resolution was presented to the Mayor for his approval or disapproval on the day of September, 1990. Chair MAYOR'S APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day of September, 1990. Palmer A. DePaulis Mayor HD146OO (P£) 10 STATE OF UTAH ) ss. COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) I, Kathryn Marshall, the duly qualified and acting City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah (the "Issuer") , do hereby certify according to the records of the Issuer's City Council (the "Council") in my possession, that the foregoing constitutes a true, correct and complete copy of the proceedings of the Council held on September 11, 1990, insofar as said minutes pertain to the matters set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my signature and impressed hereon the official seal of the Issuer this day of September, 1990. City Recorder ( S E A L ) sD14600 (PE') 11 C EXHIBIT "A" CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE..WITH OPEN MEETING LAW I, Kathryn Marshall, the duly qualified and acting City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah (the "Issuer") , do hereby certify, according to the records of the Issuer in my official possession, and upon my own knowledge and belief, that (a) in accordance with the requirements of Section 52-4-6(2) , Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, there was given not less than twenty-four (24) hours public notice of the agenda, date, time, and place of the September 11, 1990, public meeting held by the Issuer as follows: (i) By causing a Notice, in the form attached hereto as Schedule "A" , to be posted at the City's offices at 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah on September 1990, at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of said meeting, the Notice having continuously remained so posted and available for public inspection until the completion of said meeting; and (ii) By causing a copy of such Notice, in the form attached hereto as Schedule "A", to be delivered to the peseret News on September 1990, at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my official signature this day of September, 1990. City Recorder SD14600 (PE') 12 SCHEDULE "A" Agenda BD14600 (PF) 13 EXHIBIT "B" Indenture of Trust [See Transcript Document No. _] BD14600 (PE) 14 EXHIBIT "C" Loan Agreement [See Transcript Document No. ] BD146OO (PE) 15 MIKE ZUHL 9 T�' l GORIP IIONI LEE KING INTERIM DIRECTOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 418 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7777 TO: Salt Lake City Council July 20, 1990 RE: Petition No. 400-796-90 submitted by Vance Warner - et al Recommendation: That the City Council hold a public hearing on September 11, 1990 at 6:20 p.m. to discuss Petition No. 400-796-90 submitted by Vance Warner - et al. The petitions are requesting Salt Lake City to vacate an alley located between Sherman and Harrison Avenue and between 800 East and 870 East. Availability of Funds: Not applicable Discussion and Background: The petitioner have requested this alley be vacated because they have experienced crime related problems in the past and it is now their desire to eliminate direct rear access to their properties. Only the eastern portion of this alley is to vacated because there are several properties on the western portion of the alley that provides off street access. The appropriate City Department's have reviewed this request and recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1) that the participating residents pay for a "Dead End" sign and End of Road markers and 2) That the residents on each end of the vacated portion immediately fence across the vacated right of way. Legislative Documents: The City Attorney's Office has prepared and approved the necessary, ordinance and is ready for your action. S mitted by; CHAEL B. Z terim Director SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. of 1990 (Vacating a portion of an alley between She.Lman and Harrison Streets between 800 East and 870 East pursuant to Petition No. 400-796-90 ) AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF AN ALLEY BETWEEN SHERMAN AND HARRISON STREETS BETWEEN 800 EAST AND 870 EAST, PURSUANT TO PETITION NO. 400-796-90 . WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, finds after public hearing that the City' s interest in the public alley described below is not necessary for use by the public as an alley and vacation of said alley will not be adverse to the general public ' s interest . NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1 . That a portion of an alley between Sherman and Harrison streets between 800 east and 870 East which is the subject of Petition No. 400-796-90 and which is more particularly described below, be, and the same hereby is VACATED and declared no longer to be needed or available for use as a public alley. Said alley portion is more particularly described as follows : COMMENCING at the SE corner of Lot 47 , Block 4 , South Lawn Subdivision, THENCE West to the SW corner of Lot 36 , Block 4 , South Lawn Subdivision, THENCE South 18 feet, more or less , to Lot 12, Block 4 , South Lawn Subdivision, /4,00 . THENCE East to the NE corner of Lot 2, Block 4 , South Lawn Subdivision, THENCE North 18 feet, more or less, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. SECTION 2 . RESERVATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS . The above vacation is expressly made SUBJECT TO all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now located on and under or over the confines of the property and also SUBJECT TO the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities, including the City' s water and sewer facilities, and all of them. Said vacation is also SUBJECT TO any existing rights-of-way or easements of private third parties . SECTION 3 . CONDITIONS . The petitioners shall pay for the installation of a "dead end" and "end of road" sign and markers . The residents on each end of the vacated portion shall immediately fence across the vacated alley right-of-way. SECTION 4 . EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. The City Recorder is instructed to not publish this Ordinance until the Mayor certifies that the City has been paid for the signs and markers required above. In the event that the City does not receive such payment within a year from the date of this Ordinance the Mayor may extend the time for payment an additional year. If the condition has not been met within any such extension this Ordinance shall be null and void and the Recorder is instructed not to publish it. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of	, 1990 . CHAIRPERSON -2- ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor' s action: Approved	Vetoed. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER (SEAL) BILL NO. OF 1990 Published: BRB:ap -3- • ts t tcat JUL 0 21990 CAPITAL PLANNING &PROGRAMMING ALLEN C.JOHNSON. AICP Th121.;�TSAL , V•ME"�1 G T�Y�G�VRP� PALMER DEPAULIS PLANNING DIRECTOR	MAYOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET ROOM 406, CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 *�7° 1'. '1/4 fro D TELEPHONE 535-7757 *01 Jt;L1 G ifyl0 June 25, 1990 ( = . : rr.�;�NG S.L: • Mr. Mike Zuhl , Director Community and Economic Development Room 218, City-County Building 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Re: Petition 400-796 - Request to vacate alley between Sherman and Harrison Avenues and between 800 East and 870 East. Dear Mike, Several of the residents adjoining the alley between Sherman and Harrison Avenues are requesting that the City vacate the eastern portion of the alley. These residents have experienced crime related problems in the past and it is now their desire to eliminate direct rear access to their properties. It should be noted that this alley provides the only off street access to several properties and therefore only the eastern most portion can be vacated. Also, the petitioners have been unable to secure the signature of one (1) affected property owner . This request has been reviewed by the appropriate City Departments who recommend the vacation of the east half of this alley with the following conditions; 1. That participating residents pay for a "Dead End" sign and End of Road markers, and 2. That residents on each end of the vacated portion immediately fence across the vacated right of way. Page Two Petition 400-796 6/25/90 With the preceding conditions the Planning Division recommends that Sa].t Lake City vacate the eastern portion of the alley located between Sherman and Harrison Avenues and between 800 East and 870 East. Respe ul , Allen C./Johnson, AICP Planning. Directo Attachment ACJ:bp cc. Petition File File MAILING LIST Carl Laurella Mary A. Kobler 866 East Sherman Avenue 865 East Harrison Avenue Salt Lake City, Utah 84106 Salt Lake City, Utah 84106 Richard C. North Harry Davis 862 East Sherman Avenue 859 East Harrison Avenue Salt Lake City, Utah 84105 Salt Lake City, Utah 84105 Vance Warner David M. Cook 856 East Sherman Avenue 855 East Harrison Avenue Salt Lake City, Utah 84105 Salt Lake City, Utah 84105 Dudley Wicker Richard Makoff 848 East Sherman Avenue 851 East Harrison Avenue Salt Lake City, Utah 84105 Salt Lake City, Utah 84105 Mark Brinckerhoff Jeffrey Anderson 836 East Sherman Avenue 845 East Harrison Avenue Salt Lake City, Utah 84105 Salt Lake City, Utah 84105 Allan Peterson Gordon Greninger 5346 Bunker Court 841 East Harrison Avenue Fair Oaks, California 95628 Salt Lake City, Utah 84105 Sylvia Kronstadt Nancy Wallace 824 East Sherman Avenue 835 East Harrison Avenue Salt Lake City, Utah 84105 Salt Lake City, Utah 84105 Azar M. Sedigh Clarice O'Brien 1904 East Sylvan Avenue 833 East Harrison Avenue Salt Lake City, Utah 84108 Salt Lake City, Utah 84105 James C. Sieverts Mary E. Johns 2163 South Elizabeth Street 831 East Harrison Avenue Salt Lake City, Utah 84106 Salt Lake City, Utah 84105 Ed Esparza Carol K. Tigerino 814 East Sherman Avenue 4039 South Bonniewood Drive Salt Lake City, Utah 84105 West Valley City, Utah 84119 Brenda Woodhouse Holly C. McCollum 808 East Sherman Avenue 821 East Harrison Avenue Salt Lake City, Utah 84105 Salt Lake City, Utah 84105 Don A. Brems Delbert Peterson c/o Francis A. Brems	813 East Harrison Avenue 802 East Sherman Avenue Salt Lake City, Utah 84105 Salt Lake City, Utah 84105 Louis B. Jensen Raymond Johnson P.O. Box 17576 844 East Sherman Avenue Salt Lake City, Utah 84117 Salt Lake City, Utah 84105 S.L.C. COUNCIL PROPOSAL CITY COUNTY BUILDING PROPOSED BY -.451 SOUTH STATE ROOM 218 THE CONCERNED TENANTS OF SALT LAKE CITX UTAH 84111 SHERMAN NE. & HARRISON NE. ATTN: LOU AINE FAWCETT S70 EAST 866 a�.dp r 7 .; 2}�z_ .wTl . 865.E HARRI�S0N;J , St i. _ • : ,  ' SIGNED: � l 862 E. HERMNNE. 859 E..HARR I SON THE-• -- .a . - r �.: ,.w.. d SIGNED: `, ---	_41 856 E. SHERMAN NE. =.=�. r c !N4RJQ _E S ' 851 E ARR�: N 'E NT $48 �SHERt E. :a- SIGNED: :: - _ ;, .: = 845 E. HARRISON NE. !�= --;/-/ram; 6/2 ' 844 E. SHER E •;; ' SIGNED:	i .. :/ /' eA) 841 E. HARRISON NE- 1 v	t 836 ERMAN'	\. SIGNED: 1 �T -�� - --` -xn SIG i 1: :' ` " C ' I* 835 LHAH.R, SON-A 830 E. SHERMAI NE.�I al, P+�ecser\ SIGNED: °�'' Art•oAK_S wiiD: 53 "" -L" - ' c��) '� t w 833 E. HARRISON E. 6L"is Ij.C-6-` 6- i3/?, '5 OV 824 E. SHERMAN NE. S, i A , :r• , r SIGNED: Z� _CC1 � _ SIGNED: , 831 E. HARRISON NE. /6 -i7 -/?,./, _ �' ' - -	820 E. SHERMAN NE. AzAt '\. ' '-L'::s ,	to ' SIGNED: hhi \' ==; E'• J6 ' .1 SIGNED: iq q � , Vrt,trA rj ,t c.	>- 829 E. HARRISON NE. /6 - /7- /2c - 057 ° SIGNED: - a�.. 816 E. SHERMAN E. Imes C. S f=;�51`-r5 T��� ,<- = r. T -r- • 821 E. HARRISON ACE. /6 - /7 _,2G " `- ' SIGNED: � i.,� Sv, r•a.��r� .� SIGNED: t•` i ,,r ,	, . 1, , 814 E. SHERMAN	/c - - �;� 4 .yv.✓r�� SIGNED: 02 r 5A�A,{. 813 E. HARR I SON ACE. /6 -/; /,�,:. SIGNED: /Y-1.-/ '%A e /,/ I4{ /"C 7I-" 808 E. SHERMAN NE.//: --0 2 . - "='t - i 2c' - - y_ e-, SIGNED: ,r'	811 E HARRISON E. r 75 f b`;5 r., e z fit.; ; G�,�r='H, ,�� •SIGNED: 802 E. SHERMAN NE. /6 -Pi:- }/'h-�U �": ,:r ` , 809 E HARRISON ACE /6 -/,-,- f G -4()z SIGNED: /JO A 4. .3A' ./-3/9 s SIGNED: t%:.	e .7r rd' :- 7; F,�,g41'6%, 4 . .3iz(7)); S00 EAST s 6. C- , ti/ THE ABOVE HOMEOWNERS UNANIMOUSY AGREE THA A PERMANENT SOLUTION MUST BE FOUND TO SOME THE PROBLEMS AND CAE THE ALLEY BEHIND OUR HOMES. OVER THE PAST SEVERAL YEARS THE ALLEY HAS GONE DOWNHILL BEING SO CLOSE TO THIH.ETIC FARK,WITH NONRESIDENTS PROWLING TALL HOURS OF THE NIGHL IT HAS BECOME A SOURCE Of CRIME ANDItNDAL ISM,A TRASH DUMP AND OVERGROWN WITH WEEDS CAUSING A POTENTIAL FIRE HAZARD. IT IS AN EYESORE,N&BBUND FOR TEENAGERS AND A REFUSE FOR TRANSIENTS. WE ARE TIRED OF THE LITTER,BEER BOTTLES,RACING CARS AND MOTORCYCLES AND FEEL WE COULD PUT IT TO BETTER USE OURSELVES. SUBMITTED TO:- PROPOSAL S.L.C. COUNCIL PRQ OS CITY COUNTY BUILDING PROPOSED BY: 451 SOUTH STATE ROOM 218 THE CONCERNED TENANTS OF - SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 SHERMAN AVE. & HARRISON AVE. '	ATTN: LOU ANNE FAWCETT ( ii.''4 IA,: V'1:f1P 870 EAST it v"ir A	oq,;L 4 • 866 E. SHERM AVE( •	865 E. HAR ISO AVE. y, SIGNED:	��	,/ SIGNED: u OZ7, � 862 E. SHERI/AN AVE.// ?LcF41;e1	859 E. AR ISO AVE. SIGNED: r ,\ i•,,E :F 1 t SIGNED:	- 14AALfi� �`L 856 E. SH MA AVE. p 855 E. HARRIS N AVE Dikt+-0 SIGNED: :%	v . A_A , c# SIGNED: ,J b vL1 ! `7� 851 E. ARRISON ,.I •` �� '- ' ' 848 E. SIERMAN AVE. ccc t SIGNED: (2.{CtiKr, SIGNED:At,i M,dze,( r�ULt�/ ,s j,t,��°t Z	'----- T -r' 845 E.	RISON AVE. v/844 E. S R ) 12 AN AVE. �,',:r,,,.1.31-, °5 SIGNED: SIGNED: -1,R,v `il<s-a Z j " Zh"' '	' Q 841 E. HA RISO A ' i.i_,/4.7,0 836 E. SHN A 7A.,	` eJ -j1	SIGNED: 1 SIGNED: w,i`` I}; c,- ,,,lz1-- 835 E. HARRIN A E. TZ 830 E. SHEA1MAN AVE. to SIGNED: riaryi,A) f; )cull �r�� - SIGNED: z 833 E. HARRISON AVE. 824 E. SHERMAN AVE. w SIGNED: SIGNED: 1— 831 E. HARRISON AVE. 820 E. SHERMAN AVE. m SIGNED: SIGNED: >- 829 E. HARRISON AVE. SIGNED: 816 E. SHERMAN AVE. SIGNED: >- 821 E. HARRISON AVE. ly SIGNED: 814 E. SHERMAN AVE. - , 813 E. HARRISON AVE. SIGNED: ¢ SIGNED: BOOB E. SHERMAN AVE. SIGNED: 811S EIGNED:. HARRISON AVE. 802 E. SHERMAN AVE. 809 E. HARRISON AVE. SIGNED: SIGNED: 800 EAST '611-7,:i , 1 . THE ABOVE HOMEOWNERS UNANIMOUSLY AGREE THAT A PERMANENT SOLUTION MUST BE FOUND TO SOLVE THE PROBLEMS AND VACATE THE ALLEY BEHIND OUR HOMES. cAOVER THE PAST SEVERAL YEARS THE ALLEY HAS GONE DOWNHILL BEING SO CLOSE TO THE ATHLETIC PARK, WITH �// A' NON-RESIDENTS PROWLING AT ALL HOURS OF THE NIGHT. IT HAS BECOME A SOURCE OF CRIME AND VANDALISM, A TRASH DUMP AND OVERGROWN WITH WEEDS CAUSING A POTENTIAL FIRE HAZARD. IT IS AN EYESORE, A PLA'GROUND FOR TEENAGERS AND A REFUSE FOR TRANSIENTS. WE ARE TIRED OF THE LITTER, BEER BOTTLES, RACING CARS AND MOTORCYCLES AND FEEL WE COULD PUT IT TO BETTER USE OURSELVES. MIKE ZUHL M (J Offitt VI�V�P: 4 i®Vjf LEE KING INTERIM DIRECTOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 418 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7777 TO: Salt Lake City Council . August 2, 1990 Re: Petition No. 400-810-90 submitted by William Gene and Penny Davis Recommendation: That the City Council hold a non-advertised public hearing on September 11, 1990 at 6:30 p.m. to discuss Petition No. 400-810-90 submitted by William Gene and Penny Davis. The petitioners are requesting Salt Lake City to vacate an alley located between Parkway Avenue and I-80 at about 875 East Street. Availability of Funds: Not applicable. Discussion and Background: The alley is 13 feet wide and is presently maintained as lawn. All abutting property owners have signed the petition in favor of vacating the alley. The appropriate City Departments have reviewed and recommended approval of this petition. Legislative Action: The City Attorney's Office has prepared and approved the necessary ordinance and it is ready for your action. Submitted by: MICHAEL B. Z Interim Director SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 1990 (Vacating an alley between Parkway Avenue and I-80 at about 875 East pursuant to Petition No. 400-810-90 ) AN ORDINANCE VACATING AN ALLEY BETWEEN PARKWAY AVENUE AND I-80 AT ABOUT 875 EAST, PURSUANT TO PETITION NO. 400-810-90 . WHEREAS , the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, finds after public hearing that the City' s interest in the public alley described below is not necessary for use by the public as an alley and that closure of said alley will not be adverse to the general public ' s interest. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah : SECTION 1 . That a portion of the alley between Parkway and I-80 at about 875 East which is the subject of Petition No . 400-810-90 and which is more particularly described below, be, and the same hereby is , VACATED and declared no longer to be needed or available for use as a public alley. Said alley is more particularly described as follows : Beginning at a point being the southwest corner of Lot 7 of Country Club Place Subdivision; thence west 30 13 feet, more or less , to the southeast corner of Lot � i'�`�c� 8 of said subdivision; thence north 195 feet, more or £ less , to Interstate no access line; thence East 13 feet, more or less , and thence south 195 feet, more or less , to the point of beginning. SECTION 2 . RESERVATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS . The above vacation is expressly made SUBJECT TO all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now located on and under or over the confines of the property and also SUBJECT TO the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities , including the City' s water and sewer facilities, and all of them. Said vacation is also SUBJECT TO any existing rights-of-way or easements of private third parties . SECTION 3 . EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 1990 . CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: • CITY RECORDER f Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor' s action: Approved Vetoed. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER -2- (SEAL) BILL NO. OF 1990 Published: BRB. rc -3- 4'- ALLEN C. JOHNSON, AICP	ALAr .a GITFY�G,®RPO PALMER° 1101 DEPAULIS PLANNING DIRECTOR	MAYOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET ROOM 406, CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7757 July 16, 1990 Mr. Michael Zuhl, Interim Director Community and Economic Development Room 218, City/County Bldg. Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Re: Transmittal of Petition 400-810 by Gene Davis Dear Mike: This petition request is to vacate a north-south running alley located from Parkway Avenue and dead ends at the Interstate 80 no access line. This 13 foot wide alley is located approximately 125 " west of 900 East Street. The alleyway is presently • maintained as lawn. All abutting property owners have signed the petition request. The Engineering, Public Utilities, Transportation, Property Management and Planning divisions have reviewed the petition request by Mr. Davis and recommend the alley be vacated. If you have any questions please contact myself or Everett L. Joyce. Since ely, All n C. J nson,\ AICP Plan " irectnr ACJ: elj Attachment Attachment for July 6, 1990 transmittal letter to Michael Zuhl for Petition No. 400-810 by Mr. Gene Davis. Legal Description for alley vacation Beginning at a point being the southwest corner of Lot 7 of Country Club Place Subdivision thence west 13 + feet to the southeast corner of Lot 8 of said subdivision; thence north 195 + feet to Interstate no access line; thence east 13 + feet and thence south 195 + feet to the point of beginning. r , . I• S'�.`. 1'r�J J�1TjYT re� � i1;0Jj FINANCE DEPARTMENT LINDA HAMILTON Purchasing and Property Management Division PALMER DEPAULIS DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 451 SOUTH STATE STREET MAYOR ROOM 345 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 PROPERTY (801) 535-7133 June 27, 1990 TO: Everett L. Joyce Planner FROM: Linda Cordova Property Manager REF: PE.I'ITION NO. 400-810, DAVIS REQUEST TO VACATE ALLEY AT 865 PARKWAY. Property Management has no objections to the alley vacation. Since the alley is being onveyed to one property owner, my recommendation is that ownership be conveyed by Quit Claim Deed once the ordinance has been processed. Please let our office know and we will prepare the deed. Thank you. LC/mt Joyce.Davis.vacatealley la'0 JUN 2 5 1990 LEROY W. HOOTON, JR. DIRECTOR air ^ mKTim WENDELL E. EVENSEN, P.E. S _� I r�� 12 �1I" 1 1\� o4a ii®N SUPERINTENDENT o�0�lJ 1® VJ��1J l� l!/ `ly�j WATER SUPPLY&WATERWORKS E. TIM DOXEY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES SUPERINTENDENT Water Supply & Waterworks PALMER DEPAULIS WATER RECLAMATION Water Reclamation	MAYOR JAMES M. LEWIS, C.P.A. CHIEF FINANCES 1530 SOUTH WEST TEMPLE ACCOUNTING OFFICER SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84115 GEORGE JORGENSEN, P.E. CHIEF ENGINEER TO: EVERETT L. JOYCE PLANNING & ZONING ( - FROM: E. T. DOXEY WATER RECLAMATION S JPERINNDENT DATE: JUNE 22, 1990 SUBJECT: PETITION NO. 400-810 - DAVIS REQUEST TO VACATE ALLEYWAY The Public Utilities Department has reviewed the above noted petition and has no objections to the Petitioner' s request. There are no water or sewer conflicts. If you have further questions regarding this matter, please feel free to call Mr. Ray Eastman at 483-6787. /kg FORMS cc: File • D .1.)1in 25Iwo JOSEPH R. ANDERSON	VOL' r• i2 BAr�.�© TIMOTHY P. HARPST, P.E. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 333 SOUTH 200 EAST, SUITE 201 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE (801) 535-6630 June 22, 1990 Everett Joyce Planning Division Room 406 - City Hall Re: Petition No. 400-810 - Davis Request to Vacate Alleyway Dear Everett: The Division of Transportation recommends approval of the alleyway vacation, located approximately 125 feet west of 900 East between Parkway Avenue and Interstate 80 , subject to all utilities and utility easements remaining as required and approved by the entities concerned . Sincerely, l/ 46,e/tet Scott Vaterlaus Traffic Engineer I SRV/sc cc : Barry Walsh File iiili U �1 i 19 • PALMER DEPAULIS S',j 1 A\ 9J G�TY�GORP® ,�r+ 1I(TJN�	MAX G. PETERSON, P.E. MAYOR "''®' +�*` `�'rw.Qa �'dlava' ,Om musk CITY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS City Engineering Division 444 SOUTH STATE STREET SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 TELEPHONE 535-7871 TO: EVERETT JOYCE - PLANNING FROM: HARRY EWING - ENGINEERING %✓`— ; / DATE: JUNE 29 , 1990 SUBJECT: PETITION NO. 400-810 , DAVIS ALLEY VACATION This Department has reviewed Petition No. 400-810 requesting the City vacate an alley running north from Parkway Avenue at approximately 865 East Street. Our findings show this alley to be approximately 195 feet long by 13 feet wide; dead ending at the Interstate 80 N.A. line. The alley is non-functional as a public right-of-way. The use of the alley could best be served in the hands of the property owners; therefore, we recommend approval of this petition. HE: am cc: vault rr , .. 4h'�. y /	i�	I V •xr t +'`y'� O Irt' rip .,i.'�!2+��+�1.F��;l��'e� . / k w x, •nor+ p hg R}' T2" s ir .y ».' - `? , % :' ,s y1t7.2.� ...i''I a , `k 4A. .:. '.-. yr .-_-_C; wq�,,:•. [•mow.: 1 '1 :e`. �� -! 4t ,--	--' -,-" $•- - •- .Y.. �_......-.. _ ✓w. - ._,zx L'.'4�. + •-'- ' a.- -4 Y	+ti p ,a.,0•s "96:m 1.lit' y M t. - ' . - .... �"•c,,"F s., k "a+Sir J ',. !foal S ``'<"" .4.e	T"- ...if 4 - -1-. . ./Ia Sc y. .	4'1 • -; E'S«"k	�•ls • T.- t •ar .. Faar 1 ,. . dMvc`,S .a , • .s.,C2 •In ww 7 •y"' 17',::.,4\14_,1:;;...,,:14........z.:-.."-:..4..::::,:::....7'-4: : ...,a..74-4.' CZ) ia vim I!"	a a • pt $:as '-.s.�. a'4`> - TA-2' • --... -'B	a	1' i.. "`., "ham` .F '` ' F C'•r '^'" i/tit t i I..•� yx• _ - ,N `•' y }\ "d • 33 11 Y • . =..# s. "M"'44," . h;i> fi f • ice. r;.�rsv - ..... _	I.V. -�`.._ Via.' ' .,.. .. , .�i - , ,...,,,,,,.."..,...,:".......,_ F ,., Y g �1 • `✓A ^v c..dt ?-- A -. ...._. ..dr...,. .•.•..r.-.>' ..s:.._.-+..•.•v--r. u..c .....ate.. - -_ Ii ".1 _ .. i�y�/Yty�c j 4	.: N •tf .- S s i s 1� '� fi r , �,	. ._ : � . • .� d .t4 ' ' M • {• 't" r' ,4 a ` •••• r ' .. .j'-•'	. - 9 ', h` _ kc y q	_•r Salt Lake City Council	A • 451 South State St . Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 May 1 , 1990 Dear Council Members. We the undersigned property owners of land abutting the alley way ( located at approximately 875 East Parkway Avenue and immediately adjacent to the back of the property located on 900 East ) i•:i shy to have Salt Lake City vacate the alley. We wish the ownership to be conveyed to Wm. Gene and Penny L. Davis. whose sides 1r e.�_.'_s the alley way to the East of their proper a i 61= unde,-stand that any utility easements that ourr-er-'tl c . - Et wi 1 _ _ :-:t lnue lhr ough such property. . , vq,"_.u.k. .1),,A ✓6 ,7Li . ._.-.ae4 Rushton II-Al t I. " 1)• n.:._!/�.a_ r'eba Rushton it w'1ers of onop._ + at ,72 ;o'_ttt-. 90 East . 1,1c0. c� ! .C` 6_ L.Cl 4tLG'�. Nar ion Orchard Owners of property located at Z392 South 900 East i� 2-)2.- . . . 8c4,14. , Gee, Owners of p - pe ; at 27CL- South 900 East / .,,;m. Gene Davis fix. .�-L/C-�	Pe r:r: L. Davis Owner f property located at _�5 East Parkway Ave. y'oc -)s-f... ... . 23 8G .23 S 4�...t35t Arle�/ u1��/ � ve acrd-- --yl' ..t'-'f--.•/\/`,/ -J ✓'1� Q 1 \--\ n