text:
'Countdown with Keith Olbermann' for March 21
video 'podcast'
Guests: Hillary Mann Leverett
The endorsement dam busts wide open.
GOV. BILL RICHARDSON, (D) FORMER PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: My great affection and admiration for Senator Clinton and President Clinton will never waver. It is time, however, for Democrats to stop fighting amongst ourselves.
OLBERMANN: Governor Bill Richardson, Bill Clinton's Energy secretary, Bill Clinton's ambassador to the U.N., endorses Senator Barack Obama. Governor Richardson joins us live.
The Clinton campaign dismisses it. Mark Penn, quote, "I don't think it is a significant endorsement in this environment.
The Bill Clinton quote at Charlotte speaking about the November election.
BILL CLINTON, FMR. UNITED STATES PRESIDENT: And I think it'd be a great thing if we have an election in a way you have two people who love this country and were devoted to the interest of the country.
OLBERMANN: What does that mean?
What did the passport breach mean?
SEN. BARACK OBAMA, (D) PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: It is deeply disturbing of what's happened.
OLBERMANN: Breaches: Clinton, McCain, and Obama.
CONDOLEEZZA RICE, U.S. SECRETARY OF STATE: I told him that I was sorry and I told him that I, myself, would be very disturbed if I learn that somebody had looked into my passport.
OLBERMANN: And what is in her file or yours or mine? A State Department insider explains.
And: Obama and racism. It's so bad today on FOX News that one of the FOX News anchors walked out.
All that and more: Now on Countdown.
(on camera): Good evening, this is Friday, March 21st, 228 days until the 2008 presidential election.
Forget the 3:00 a.m. phone call. The biggest early morning development of this Democratic campaign season might will turn out to have been the 3 a.m. bulletin.
Our fifth story on the Countdown: The office in Santa Fe sending out the urgent (ph) that three seconds after 3:00 a.m. this morning, the "Associated Press" has learned that New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson is endorsing Senator Barack Obama for president.
Within 11 hours, veteran reporters Jim Vandehei and Mike Allen wondering if the media might be a little bit more urgent about the Democratic race writing on Politico.com, quote, "Hillary Rodham Clinton has virtually no chance of winning the nomination."
Governor Bill Richardson joins us in a moment.
Briefly the details: The governor who has sought to become the nation's first Hispanic president, joining Senator Obama this morning on the campaign trail in Portland, Oregon calling him a once in a lifetime leader and citing his speech on race this week as a factor in his own decision.
RICHARDSON: Senator Obama could have given a safer speech. He is, after all, well ahead in the delegates count for our party's nomination. He could have waited for the controversy over the deplorable remarks of Reverend Wright to subside as it surely would have. Instead, Senator Obama showed us, once again, what kind of leader he is.
(APPLAUSE)
RICHARDSON: As a Hispanic-American, I was particularly touched by his words.
OLBERMANN: Governor Richardson having been courted aggressively by both candidates since he dropped out of the race in January and several times reported on the verge of an endorsement, ultimately, backing Obama despite his own ties to the Clintons.
RICHARDSON: My great affection and admiration for Senator Clinton
and President Clinton will never waver. It is time, however, for Democrats
to stop fighting amongst ourselves -
RICHARDSON: And prepare for the tough fight we will have against John McCain in the fall.
OLBERMANN: Governor Bill Richardson of New Mexico is kind enough to join us now from Santa Fe. Good evening, governor.
RICHARDSON: Good evening, Keith.
OLBERMANN: Thank you for your time. Why now, why did you wait?
RICHARDSON: Well, I waited because I was just legitimately very torn. You mentioned my ties to the Clintons, my loyalty to President Clinton, my support and respect for Senator Clinton.
But I'd just realized that if I was going to make a difference at a time when we need party unity, at time when the campaign was really getting nasty and personal, at a time when Senator Obama responded, I believe, in such a courageous way to a problem in his campaign, those remarks by his own pastor, I felt that I needed to step in and say that I am backing Senator Obama because I think this man has got something very good about him, something very special.
I can't put my precise point on it except to say that, you know, Keith, I was in that auditorium in Portland and I look at the faces of all those people and all I saw was hope and enthusiasm but mainly hope and I think that just reinforced my decision.
OLBERMANN: Governor, Mark Penn of the Clinton campaign responded today by disparaging the impact, or any impact your endorsement will have.
Let me quote him and I'll get your reaction. "The time that he could have been effective has long since passed. I don't think it is a significant endorsement in this environment."
How do you react to that statement from Mr. Penn?
RICHARDSON: Well, I regret it. You know, it's typical of many of the people in that campaign. What he basically was saying, the stereotype was that I could have endorsed before Texas because I'm Hispanic and that's when I would have made a difference.
Now that Texas was over, my endorsement doesn't make a difference. That's his view. That's maybe the campaign view. I still have enormous respect for Senator Clinton. I think she's fought a great race, President Clinton too. But I think you have to get in the arena.
I have felt that the time has come for us to stop this bickering like Mark Penn, making statements like that and basically come together as a party and talk positive about this country at the issues instead of all of these sniping that seems to take place almost every day.
OLBERMANN: All right. Let me ask you one last process question and let's get more to substantive stuff. At any point, were you close to announcing an endorsement of Senator Clinton?
RICHARDSON: Yes, I was. You know, I almost did. You know, the president came to see me in Santa Fe, we watched the Super Bowl together. I was about to do it. He's very persuasive and I have enormously strong ties to them, they were good to me and I was good to them.
But then, I waited and I said, I'm going to just - there's something that says to me, I must wait. And then Texas happened, then the negativity took place. And then, Obama gave his speech.
Although I had kind of decided, almost a week ago to make the endorsement, and now, I feel that it was the right time. You've got to step up in the arena. I think it helped Senator Obama, even though I personally haven't felt that these endorsements of one politician to another helped much.
But he's kind of had a bad week. And this is certainly boosted his staff, I saw it (ph), his supporters. So, maybe my endorsement has a little bit of significance. But obviously, Mark Penn doesn't think so. But we'll see.
OLBERMANN: One thing that strikes me from your statement today in Portland with Senator Obama, you've mentioned it several times here, you'd almost taken on a role of a referee here in asking the Democratic campaigns to keep it clean. You've said that today in the speech, you've talked about the in-fighting now. No more fighting until the general election matchup against the Republicans. I've expressed my sadness here previously that that has not been the case in this campaign.
Obviously, you've expressed your sadness about it today. You've also selected who you think should be the Democratic nominee. The way this has gone, to end the fighting, do you think Senator Clinton should concede now or in the immediate future?
RICHARDSON: Well, I'm not in any position to tell her what to do about her campaign but I have seen your eloquence on this issue. I share the view that since Texas, since the last big D-Day which was Ohio and Texas, the campaign's gotten very nasty. Almost daily personal attacks, integrity attacks, the 3:00 a.m. phone call, you know, on both sides. And we don't need that.
We've got John McCain running around the world boosting his policy credentials, raising funds, building support, and we're bickering. And we're a Democratic Party that has been on the resurgence and the American people are on our side on the issues. But when it appears that we're downgrading each other, attacking each other, not talking positive, cat-fighting, nastiness, then, I think, the time has come for individuals, like myself that have been in the arena that maybe have run for president, to say, all right, the time has come to stop this.
The time has come to come together as a party. The time has come to get a nominee before the convention. The time has come - also, I'd just think these superdelegates shouldn't be the arbiters and the deciders of this race, 800 of them, a lot of them are, you know, good people, but they're fat cats, they're governors like me or senators, they're congressman.
You know, why should we decide? Let the voters in proportion to the vote in various states make that decision.
OLBERMANN: Governor Bill Richardson of New Mexico. Great thanks for your time tonight. Congratulations on wrestling the beast of this decision to the ground finally, and all the best to you, sir.
RICHARDSON: Thank you.
OLBERMANN: As we mentioned, at the end of his speech today, Governor Richardson having called on the Democrats to stop fighting amongst themselves, to prepare for the tough fight we will have against John McCain in the fall.
The veteran Washington reporters: Jim Vandehei and Mike Allen of Politico.com openly wondering why that hasn't happened already, specifically why the media is still treating this as viable two-candidate race for the Democratic nomination, quoting them:
"One big fact has largely been lost in the recent coverage of the Democratic presidential race. Hillary Rodham Clinton has virtually no chance of winning. Her own campaign acknowledges there is no way that she will not finish ahead in pledged delegates. That means the only way she wins is if Democratic superdelegates are ready to risk a backlash of historic proportions from the party's most reliable constituency.
Unless Clinton is able to win, at least win the primary popular vote - which also would take nothing less than an electoral miracle and use that achievement to pressure superdelegates, she has only one scenario for victory. An African-American opponent and his backers would be told that even though he won the contest with voters, the prize is going to someone else. People think that scenario is even remotely likely are living on another planet," end quote.
President Clinton pushing the possibility of a McCain versus Clinton general election today by mulling over what that matchup might look like before an invitation only audience in about veterans in Charlotte, North Carolina.
B. CLINTON: And I think it'd be a great thing if we have an election in a way you have two people who love this country and were devoted to the interest of the country, and people could actually ask themselves who's right in these issues instead of all this other stuff that always seems to intrude itself on our politics. So, that's my argument for her.
OLBERMANN: Should anyone to interpret President Clinton's comments as an effort to draw the attention to the issue of relative patriotism at the end of the long week of controversy surrounding comments made by Senator Obama's former minister.
By late this afternoon, Mr. Clinton's spokesman was try to shelve
the toothpaste back into the tube, quote, "President Clinton was talking
about the need to talk about issues rather than falsely questioning any
candidate's patriotism." Adding that, "He was lamenting that these kind of
distractions always seems to intrude on political campaigns,"
At this point, let's turn to our own Richard Wolffe, senior White House correspondent for "Newsweek" magazine. Richard, good evening.
RICHARD WOLFFE, NEWSWEEK: Good evening, Keith.
OLBERMANN: What did former President Clinton mean and if he was not suggesting there was some question about Senator Obama's patriotism, why did he, himself conclude that portion of his remarks by saying, that is my argument for her, not that is my argument for sticking to the issues and not that as my plea for all sides to stop letting this other stuff intrude.
WOLFFE: Well, it can be hard to get inside President Clinton's head but let's me challengeable (ph) for a moment and say that this was a sin of admission. You've got to look at what the strategy is with these comments. And it's a strategy we've heard before from President Clinton which is to actually, in the first instance, took up the credentials and in this case, the patriotism of John McCain.
Now, that's a very risky strategy, regardless of what it says about Senator Obama because of a start, if you're going to face John McCain in the fall that takes all those questions of his experience off the table. Secondly, really head-to-head, national security and patriotism, John McCain and Hillary Clinton, if it comes to military service and military experience, that is not a comparison that looks good for Hillary Clinton.
And then, you have the third of that level which is: Why is there repeated pattern of President Clinton sort of missing out the reference to Senator Obama when there are more candidates in the race? He's to rattle off everyone in the race and say, you know, you all great and never mention Senator Obama. So, there is a pattern here.
OLBERMANN: What is this other story, the Politico piece reported by Allen and Vandehei? What is the path to the nomination, if not the one that they described which essentially amounts to a post primary coupe. Is there a way for Senator Clinton to still win the nomination and still abide by what Governor Richardson was requesting that the fighting stop?
WOLFFE: Yes, well, look. I think Governor Richardson was right. But both sides here have got increasingly ugly. The gloves are off for both campaigns.
And there isn't any other path to winning the nomination for either side except for the superdelegates. The problem here is of course, the superdelegates for Hillary Clinton have to overturn those delegates apportioned by the voters, the pledged delegates.
And that's an incredibly difficult principle not just because of the passion and the loyalty of African-Americans for Barack Obama but because of that core bedrock principle after the 2000 election that the Democratic will of the people is what matters most. That's what's hardest to overcome.
OLBERMANN: Back to Governor Richardson's endorsement and what you've heard him just saying in this interview that in fact, he was on the verge of endorsing Hillary Clinton right after the Super Bowl beginning of February after spending that day with President Clinton. Does the endorsement, to any degree grease the skids for other superdelegates, other named Democrats to endorse or are we not expecting a stampede at this point?
WOLFFE: I don't think it's going to be a stampede but there's question, this is a huge and timely boost for the Obama campaign. Because remember, the main argument for the Clinton folks right now is that superdelegates need to wait and see before they commit because Senator Obama is going to implode in some way.
Look at the Jeremiah Wright story. That's the argument, the only argument they can really make here. When you have a superdelegate of Governor Richardson's stature, his experience as governor of a battleground state, that's a big victory for the Obama folks and big signal to other superdelegates, you know what, it's OK. You can go ahead right now.
OLBERMANN: By the way, about the right thing, a CBS News poll came out this evening. Seven in 10 said he did a good job talking about race relations, seven in 10 said he did a good job explaining his relationship with Reverend Wright; those are people who read that speech.
Seven in 10 voters nationwide who follow the issue said it will make no difference in their vote and the rest, the other 30 percent are evenly split between, I'm more likely to vote for him or I'm less likely to vote for him.
So, it appears to have been to some degree, the hemorrhaging had been stopped there. Lastly, though, in the context of that, to the point raised again by Vandehei and Allen in the Politico piece, that the media is not adequately reporting this mathematical impossibility, virtually, no chances, the way they'd phrased it, of Hillary Clinton winning.
If this was reversed, if the roles between Senators Clinton and Obama were reversed, is it likely the other candidate, the one currently in that secondary position would still be around?
WOLFFE: No, it's not, not at all. And they were right to point this out. But just to come back to those numbers for a minute, if you listened to cable news all week, you'd think that this is the worst nightmare in the world, the week that has ended incredibly well, considering all that's happened for Barack Obama. And those numbers really show that voters are tuning into a different message than we're hearing on TV. So, let's see how it plays out.
OLBERMANN: Richard Wolffe of "Newsweek" and MSNBC. As always, great thanks. Have a great weekend.
WOLFFE: Thanks, Keith.
OLBERMANN: One of the other things that President Clinton referred to has intruded on all three candidates, the State Department passport files of Senators Obama, Clinton and McCain all violated by people at the State Department.
And: If it's bad enough for Chris Wallace to scold his own network and one of the hosts to walk off the show, the race-baiting (ph) at FOX must be out of control.
You're watching Countdown on MSNBC.
OLBERMANN: So, when it was just Barack Obama's State Department passport file being rummaged through, that was a scandal but if it's his and Hillary Clinton's and John McCain's, that somehow better? The security disaster at the State Department and the political fallout and race-baiting so bad that "fixed news," one newscaster scolds the host. One of the hosts walks off the set.
Worst Persons is ahead on Countdown.
OLBERMANN: The comforting reassurance that it was not just the State Department passport file of one presidential candidate breached by some subcontractor the way a teenager might go to his dad's "Playboys" but all three candidates.
In our fourth story tonight: The investigations have begun internally, by state's acting inspector general, and externally, by the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Senator Obama characterizing the security breach as deeply disturbing, acknowledging today that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to offer her apologies.
OBAMA: I think we need to get to the bottom of this, again, not because I have any particular concerns, I'm assuming that whatever information anybody obtained is already information that is available in other ways but because we have to set, I think, some clear principles for people having confidence that when they give information to their government, that is not going to be misused.
OLBERMANN: State Department spokesman, Sean McCormack is saying that breaches of Senator McCain's and Senator Clinton's passport files were not discovered until today. Thus, contradicting any assertions about how well the State Department system flags such breaches.
SEAN MCCORMACK, STATE DEPARTMENT SPOKESMAN: People should know that our vigilance applies not just to the VIPs, notable personalities, the same kind of vigilance applies every other passport application that we handle.
OLBERMANN: And if that fails to reassure, there is still the worst case, the State Department's undersecretary, Patrick Kennedy maintaining that these mistakes were caught, but unable to characterize motive.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: You're sure it was an innocent mistake?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: You're sure it was an innocent mistake, Mr.
Secretary?
OLBERMANN: The offenses and the actions taken as NBC News can now report thus far, July 2000, approximately eight months ago, a State Department trainee possibly in "a show us you can use this machine" exercise, looks into the passport file of Senator Clinton. The individual was admonished, not fired. It's not clear supervisors were notified.
January 9th of this year, State Department contractor from a Virginia company called Stanley, Incorporated accesses the passport records of Senator Obama. That employee is fired but the supervisor doesn't report it up the chain of command.
February 21st of this year, a different contractor also from Stanley, Inc., breaches Obama's passport record. This employee also fired. Again, is not reported up the chain of command.
Less than one month later, March 14th, just a week ago today, another State Department employee from a contractor called the Analysis Corporation accesses the passport files of both Senator Obama and Senator McCain. The person has been disciplined but further action is still pending.
Secretary Rice has briefed President Bush, she says and offered apologies to the other two senators. Both Clinton and McCain have also called for full investigations.
We call in our own Howard Fineman, senior Washington correspondent and political columnist for "Newsweek" magazine. Howard, good evening.
HOWARD FINEMAN, NEWSWEEK MAGAZINE: Good evening, Keith.
OLBERMANN: Well, last night, we sad hear, we're hearing from Secretary Rice if the system worked, that was before the Clinton breach and the McCain breach were reported. It sounds like they need a whole new system. How far politicians are going to be willing to go create that new system?
FINEMAN: Well, I think they're going to look at it carefully, the inspector general at the State Department as you said, the House Foreign Affairs Committees as you said, the Justice Department and, I think, whatever the new administration is going to be. They put in the system after Bill Clinton's files were monkeyed (p) around went back in '92.
And if this is an example of the system working, I'm shuddered (ph) to think what the system not working looks like. I mean, the phrase, inappropriate curiosity has now entered the lexicon and that's not very reassuring in and of itself.
I think in some ways, it's a bigger story than we'd even thought because it's obvious that this system is riddled with problems and people all over Washington, contractors that we don't know anything about, can have easy access to anybody's passport files with sensitive information in it. That's a concern for everyone.
OLBERMANN: What has been the fallout with the various campaigns? Where is this going politically, internally relative to the presidential campaign?
FINEMAN: Well, I think that last night, at least, the Obama campaign was probably relieved to have something else to talk about besides Jeremiah Wright and race. And it provided a nice interlude before the big announcement of Bill Richardson today. I think they'd already felt undersieged and, I think, they were genuinely concerned, and rightfully so and I must, when I contacted the Clinton campaign people last night, they were actually concerned on Obama's behalf.
I know that may sound difficult to believe but when I talked to one of the top people there, they said if this is true, it's outrageous. Little did we know that Hillary Clinton's own file was also looked at, although, I got to say there's people around Barack Obama who thinks it's perhaps a little too convenient that today, we find that Hillary was breached and McCain was breached as well. This was an Obama story until a few hours ago.
By the way, Condi Rice didn't talk to us or anybody last night. It wasn't until this morning that Condi Rice called first Obama and then, the other senators.
OLBERMANN: Two points, one on invasion of privacy, Newt Gingrich had a meltdown about this when it was just Obama. To be fair, there are people who totally desperate political opinions have to see this for what it was, when it was just him or when it was three of them.
But, pursuant to that second point that it was all three of them, the air seemed to be sucked out of this thing when it became no longer just Obama anymore. Oh, now, it could not be deliberate, now it could not be at all political, why couldn't it be?
FINEMAN: Well, we don't know that. We don't know who the people were, who are the contractors for the two companies that were involved. We don't know who they talked to, whether somebody put them up to it. You know, you don't have to be paranoid or cynical to have the appropriate, I suppose, the inappropriate curiosity about all of that.
And, I think, those questions must be asked. You saw the doors closing on the elevator there when the undersecretary for management was asked whether he was sure there was nothing political or untoward about this. The doors closed. We don't know.
OLBERMANN: The lastly, the principal area of interest of the campaign, besides the who and the why, obviously, but is it that 71-day drag between the first incident and the day it was leaked by a Bush administration source to the "Washington Times"?
FINEMAN: Yes, well, first of all, it's interesting that it was leaked by an administration person, we don't know why. But yes, that 71-day period and three efforts to look at Obama's file, the notion that that didn't percolate up anywhere from the low level office in which people were being fired is another reason to be skeptical. It's really hard to believe that nobody else knew that that was going on.
OLBERMANN: Our own Howard Fineman of "Newsweek" magazine and MSNBC, we're very fortunate. Thank you, Howard. Have a good weekend.
FINEMAN: Thank you, you too, Keith.
OLBERMANN: Exactly, what could be in one of those files? Why a little on Barack Obama or John McCain or Hillary Clinton might go a long way. The insight of a State Department insider.
And: In sports, the Duke Blue Devils begin the NCAA basketball.
This may be the wrong tape.
OLBERMANN: A lot of broadcasting entered the world on the 20th and 21st of March. Today is Rosie O'Donnell's birthday, also Howard Cosell. And yesterday was the birthday of Carl Reiner of "The Dick Van Dyke Show," and "The 2,000-Year-Old Man," and the wonderfully underrated movie "The Russians Are Coming, The Russians Are Coming." Born in the Bronx in 1922, on the very same day in Lowell, Massachusetts, Ray Goulding, the late half of the perfect pitch team of Bob and Ray, was born.
It was Ray who answered when, in 1974, I asked him why, since they had had the courage to satirize Senator Joe McCarthy 20 years earlier, they weren't doing anything on the air about Watergate. Well, he deadpanned, how could we make it funnier?
Let's play "Oddball."
OLBERMANN: And they continue to celebrate on this, the second day of spring in Jaipur, India. The residents conduct a festival in which they paint themselves red, green and yellow, then dance day and night for an entire week to ward off winter. The whole village joins in the party, even those who patently do not need any extra insulation against winter's cold.
Time for our annual visit to Texistepeque, El Salvador, where men in devil costumes are whipping the sin out of naughty town folk and unsuspecting touristas. Each year, people from all other the country come to repent for their sins by having a stranger whip them in the streets. And I do not want to know that guy did. The demon rampage continues until a man dressed as Jesus rings a bell, immobilizing the bad guy and giving an angel its wings, which is nice.
A passport file is not the same as a lonely passport. What on earth is actually in the computer entries' "snoop dat" inside the State Department?
And who are you picking? Not for president, who are they picking in the tournament. And is expressing a preference more risky than it might look?
But first, the latest headlines, breaking in the administration's 50 scandals. Mm, "Bushed!" Number three, Politics-Is-Always-First-gate. Mr. Bush's secretary of education, Margaret Spellings went to Minnesota to announce new flexibility the No Child Left Behind rules in 10 different states. Minnesota however is not one of those 10 states. Why announce it in Minnesota? Well, Minnesota Republican Senator Norm Coleman was at the announcement and he's involved in a see-saw race for reelection against Al Franken.
Number two. Halliburton-gate, poisoning the troops in Iraq with bad water, skirting hundreds of millions in federal taxes. Now, another terrible, infuriating story about stun off Halliburton subsidiary KBR, electrocuted U.S. soldiers in Iraq. Reports of at least a dozen of them. Bad KBR wiring in KBR-built, KBR-run bases. In one case, a green beret stepped into a shower, there were ungrounded electrical wires around it. He died instantly.
And Plamegate. A three-judge D.C. Court of Appeals panel has disbarred I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby. Banned him from practicing law through at least 2012. This for the "moral turpitude" implicit in his conviction for having obstructed the investigation into the administration's outing of CIA op Valerie Plame as political retribution against her husband.
The bad news for Mr. Libby, unlike the time he stepped in to improperly pardon him, before the appeals process had been exhausted, the president cannot just reinstate Libby's right to practice law. The good news for Mr. Libby, the order includes nothing prohibiting Libby from going back to his earlier career, writing novels about 10-year-old girls being raped by bears.
OLBERMANN: Senator John McCain running on the claim that he understands national security issues better than do the Democrats, issued a statement today on the State Department's passport breaches, referring to them, in our third story tonight, only as a matter of privacy, apparently not believing that six years after 9/11 no one should be able to access sensitive information, including Social Security numbers about three powerful U.S. senators on four separate days, let alone non-government employees of two private companies, let alone inside the State Department, itself, let alone without top State Department officials allegedly not finding out until after - months after the first episode and finding it all out from a newspaper.
McCain today saying, if anyone's privacy was breached, then they deserve a full apology - or an apology and a full investigation. No mention of security implications. No call, as has Senator Obama has called, for congressional inclusion in the investigation.
We turn now to Hillary Mann Leverett, not only a former Foreign Service officer herself, but also former staffer at the National Security Council.
Great thanks for your time tonight.
HILLARY MANN LEVERETT, FMR. FOREIGN SERVICE OFFICER: Thank you for having me.
OLBERMANN: In what way could this have happened, do you think, that should not spark concerns about security?
LEVERETT: I don't think there's any way this could have happened that would not spark concerns about security. This at minimum is a management failure. And I think it even says more about the administration and the running of government agencies. We've seen this kind of - a lack of an ability to anticipate a major event.
Here we have a presidential campaign, a contentious one with people's files that have been gone through before in prior campaigns. They didn't anticipate it. Similar, in some circumstances how they didn't anticipate what would happen with Hurricane Katrina or the war on Iraq. They just don't do well at anticipating or management.
OLBERMANN: The files include, Social Security numbers, mother's maiden name, two very familiar terms, anybody who has ever been online and bought anything or registered anywhere under any circumstances, the stuff that is - that identity theft is made of. Are these not the kinds of data that the federal government is supposed to keep secret, especially about powerful officials because they are basically keys to unlock other information, the sort of stuff that spies, blackmailers enjoy?
LEVERETT: Certainly, and I think for high-level prominent Americans, as well as for everyday Americans, your Social Security number and mother's maiden name are critical components to information that could be used to blackmail you financially and politically.
But even more so, these files contain - particularly for people who lived overseas, and in this scenario Obama is more vulnerable than either Hillary Clinton or John McCain. For someone who lived overseas, your file could include a lot of different data about where you went to school, what happened when you were at school, if there was a custody dispute involving your parents.
Anything that would be normally documented here in the United States or might be part of a police record here in the United States, if you're living overseas, as Obama did, it would be documented in your passport file at the U.S. embassy. If you went to various countries, if you traveled there, if you tried to renounce your U.S. citizenship, that would be in the file.
OLBERMANN: The structure of how this story got out, top State Department officials apparently learned it from The Washington Times. When they were called for comment, The Washington Times learned about it from some unnamed official or officials in the Bush administration, what questions does that process raise that somehow members of the administration got this information before even middle level management at State did?
LEVERETT: Well, from my experience inside the Bush administration, this is actually unfortunately far too typical. What happens in the Bush administration, if you see something that's not going right, if you have a question about something, whether it is about high policy or management issues, you don't really have a choice.
Your voice is not listened to. It is not respected inside the administration. You have very little choice other than to go to the press. So I'm not surprised here that officials in the State Department probably thought their voice wasn't being heard up the food chain at the State Department and therefore went to a newspaper, and maybe one of the only newspapers where they knew the reporter.
Unfortunately, we have seen this time and time again within the Bush administration. It's not a surprise.
OLBERMANN: All right. Then what are we to make of the fact that this had also happened in the first Bush's State Department and it was directed then at a Democratic presidential candidate named Clinton?
LEVERETT: You know, we were promised that after that was done to President Clinton, when they went through his files to see whether he renounced his citizenship to avoid the draft, a serious political charge at the time, we were assured that security controls would be put in at the State Department.
But I think like so many things in this administration, those type of critical security and management controls were never taken seriously.
OLBERMANN: Hillary Mann Leverett, the former National Security Council director for Iran and the Persian Gulf, thanks for joining us. Have a good weekend.
LEVERETT: Thank you as well.
OLBERMANN: You don't need to break into his State Department files to know at least one presidential candidate will spend his weekend with one eye on the college basketball tournament. But are you picking political trouble when you pick the outcomes of sporting events?
And the only time you can ask this question without being called a sexist pig: Hey, Angelina Jolie, how are the twins? Next on Countdown.
OLBERMANN: Sometimes, when we focus too much on who will lead our country, we lose sight of the important things, like celebrity babies. So in our number two story tonight, the triumphant return of our celebrity and tabloid news minute "Keeping Tabs."
We begin with the update on reproductive activity with Jennifer Lopez and Marc Anthony. Lopez telling People magazine their newborn twins were not the product of IVF, but old-fashioned S-E-X. Thanks for sticking me with that mental picture.
Halle Berry, meanwhile, has revealed the name of the girl she had on
Sunday. She's Nahla Ariela Aubry, reportedly Nahla after the lioness in
"Lion King," Ariela after the star of "Little Mermaid," and Aubrey, a
reference to the least famous character in this tale, the father.
Finally, In Touch Weekly reports that Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt are expecting to have twins. Boy, these wild Hollywood - oh, twin babies.
Senators McCain and Obama are in complete agreement about the NCAA Basketball Tournament. Politicians and sports, is it riskier than it looks considering Senator Obama once predicted against one of the best-liked teams in his home state?
That's ahead, but first, Countdown's "Worst Persons in the World." The bronze tonight to Steve Doocy and Gretchen Carlson of "Fixed" News, actually they were just doing their jobs, trying to stir up racism against Barack Obama. But it got some bad today that their co-host walked off the set in protest and they were chastised by a senior news figure at FOX on the air.
I give these two guys as much grief as I give anybody, but when Chris Wallace can say to them: "Two hours of Obama bashing on this "typical white person" remark is somewhat excessive and frankly I think you're somewhat distorting what Obama had to say," and when Brian Kilmeade can get up and leave as the distortion continues, these guys work at FOX. I know from personal experience, there dissent is disloyalty. They are putting their livelihoods at risk over principle. And I salute them both. Best I can do from here is give them some sort of reality show immunity - free pass or something for like six months.
The runner up, Kiran Chetry of CNN, interviewing Minnesota senatorial candidate Al Franken. She mistakenly told him he had "said some things about Karl Rove and Scooter Libby, saying they should be executed for treason." Franken corrected her, explained he had been on David Letterman's show and quoted the first President Bush who had said that outing the CIA agent was treason and that he guessed that might mean Rove and Libby might be executed for treason, which Franken said he was against.
She insisted he had said it, maybe in a joking or satirical way. Franken denied it again, then said to Chetry, what you said was that I advocating the execution of Karl Rove. Whereupon Chetry denied she had said what she had just said. I didn't you advocated. You can take the announcer out of FOX News, but you can't take the FOX News out of the announcer. You might want to go back and report the health news again in Erie, PA.
And the winner, speaking of, Rupert Murdoch, owner of "fixednews.com." Right now available for your reading pleasure there, a lovely string of comments, about 1.200 I number, about Barack Obama and the New Black Panthers.
Quote: "You blacks would be naked and eating bugs if it weren't for white people," unquote, from THayne843 (ph) at 5:57 Wednesday. From Mike in Reno (ph) at 10:31 that night: "If these stupid negroes want to have their own country, let them, I say. Just'll (ph) prove that they can't run anything because they are corrupt and uncivil people."
These are still on the FOX News Web site, right now. This is on a moderated Web site which warns people posting that their comments may not appear immediately because they have to be approved, approved by FOX News.
So we can expect another Bill O'Reilly tirade against a hate-filled Web site, you know, comparisons to what the Nazis did, or the Ku Klux Klan, an O'Reilly tirade about hate-mongers being authorized to post at foxnews.com. Maybe send your little Stuttering John producer to ambush whoever runs it, you know, him, Rupert Murdoch, today's "Worst Person in the World."
OLBERMANN: A rather unexpected caller this week to my old friends Al Morganti and Angelo Cataldi on the morning show at all sports radio station WIP in Philadelphia, Barack from Chicago. On the day the NCAA basketball tournament began - and we know it ended at 6:58 Eastern time yesterday when Stanford defeated Cornell 77-53 in the championship game, yes, that's it.
Our number one story on the Countdown, senators Obama and McCain actually released their tournament picks, their brackets to reporters. Is there risk here? In his first appearance on this program, in October 2006, Obama finished by asking me my prediction on the World Series, which was to begin the next day. He joined me in getting it wrong, taking the Detroit Tigers over the St. Louis Cardinals. The point of that, of course, is that he was willing to pick against St. Louis, even though the southern part of the state he represents in the Senate is filled with St. Louis Cardinals fans.
Sports first, political implications of sports second. Senator Obama's enthusiasm for the basketball tournament impressing the locals at a sports bar in Charleston, West Virginia. Obama was the last person reportedly to submit his bracket to his own staff's office pool, $10 entry fee. Quoting the senator: "I have got to do a little bracketology before I make a final decision.
Obama's Final Four picks do include two which hail from key upcoming primary states, Pittsburgh and UNC, with Carolina winning it all after defeating Kansas. And then UCLA in the championship.
Senator McCain, free of any pressure to court further primary votes, picks Arizona, but only for the first round. Then had them losing to Duke. And McCain's Final Four lines up with Obama's in the East, Carolina, and Midwest, Kansas, and with the ultimate champion, UNC. But one of McCain's Final Four picks, Connecticut, already lost in the first round today. After nearly two days of first round games, Senator McCain has made eight wrong picks, Senator Obama, so far the expert, six mistakes.
Senator Clinton evidently not engaging in bracketology, but her campaign has employed NCAA lingo, announcing a "final four days" of voter registration in Pennsylvania as part of its March Madness push, which is why they call it madness. Let's bring in Washington Post associate editor, MSNBC political analyst Eugene Robinson.
Gene, good evening.
EUGENE ROBINSON, MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST: Good evening, Keith.
OLBERMANN: Having background in both of these areas, I always wonder if combining sports and politics might not be a little bit more difficult than it looks. Rudy Giuliani used to get all that mileage out of going to Yankee games. Then it turned out he watched the Yankees more in the two months after 9/11 than he'd gone to Ground Zero. Are Obama and McCain at any risk here that you can perceive?
ROBINSON: Well, they are at the risk of embarrassing themselves. I mean, eight wrong and six wrong, you know, in just a few days.
OLBERMANN: That's a lot is going on.
ROBINSON: That's not great. And I don't know, Senator McCain's judgment, I mean, the Sunni-Shia mix up was one thing. But picking UConn to go to the Final Four? You know, this year they didn't look that strong to me. You know, what do I know? I went to Michigan, so I definitely don't have a dog in this fight, but we haven't had a team since the Fab Five.
But no, it is dangerous in that you probably can't help yourself a whole lot. And you can hurt yourself a little bit by looking like a bonehead.
OLBERMANN: Yes. McCain does have Sunni in the Mideast, though, he has picked them in the Mideast...
ROBINSON: In the Mehdi bracket I guess - no, that's the Shiite.
OLBERMANN: The Final Four that Obama picked had two teams from primary states. And he is campaigning in West Virginia in that sports bar. We saw that yesterday. But when was asked why he did not pick West Virginia for the Final Four, he said, now that would be playing politics.
But given that politically incorrect forecast on the '06 World Series, do we have to give him the benefit of the doubt here that bracketology has not been poisoned? His sports fandom has not been poisoned by something as tiny as presidential aspirations.
ROBINSON: I think we have to give them mostly the benefit of the doubt. I mean, sure, I think either one of them would pick team in crucial primary states that go maybe a little further than they actually think they'd go. But I think it takes a certain courage to say no, it's not going to be West Virginia. And UNC and UCLA, let's face it, are pretty safe picks to go through. I mean, it's conventional wisdom. But they're strong teams.
OLBERMANN: And what about differentiating yourself when you make these predictions? I mean, Obama comes out, picks out North Carolina to win the tournament. It went all over the political Web sites and the sports ones. Then McCain releases his brackets, and he picks North Carolina. I mean, would he have been wiser to go with Duke or Kansas or Cornell or somebody?
ROBINSON: You know, I think - well, not with Cornell. But I think he would have been wiser to go with say Kansas, which looks like a really tough team. And, I don't think - you know, UNC isn't such a towering favorite. It's not like the old UCLA or anything under John Wooden. It's not that they are obviously going to run away with the whole thing.
So I think he could have safely picked either Duke or Kansas or even Georgetown to go all the way and look respectable at the end.
OLBERMANN: And at the end of this now, Senator Clinton having made no picks. Now she can say, only I have the experience necessary to answer your call at 3:00 a.m. and give you guaranteed lead pipe sure thing winners?
ROBINSON: Well, she might have - it might have been the right decision for her to make. I mean, let's - you know, if she's not a hoops fan, she doesn't do this every year, bracketology is not for amateurs. So she was probably right to just let it pass.
OLBERMANN: Yes. I gave up on it in 1979. Our own Eugene Robinson of The Washington Post, thanks for joining us. Have a good weekend.
ROBINSON: You too, Keith.
OLBERMANN: That's Countdown for this, the 1,787th day since the declaration of "Mission Accomplished" in Iraq. I'm Keith Olbermann, good night and good luck.


text:
#include "ecclesia/lib/strings/case.h"

#include <optional>

#include "gtest/gtest.h"

namespace ecclesia {
namespace {

TEST(StrCaseConversionTest, CamelcaseToSnakecase) {
  EXPECT_EQ(CamelcaseToSnakecase(""), "");
  EXPECT_EQ(CamelcaseToSnakecase("Single"), "single");
  EXPECT_EQ(CamelcaseToSnakecase("ThisStringToSnakecase"),
            "this_string_to_snakecase");
}

TEST(StrCaseConversionTest, SnakeCaseToCamelCase) {
  EXPECT_EQ(SnakecaseToCamelcase(""), "");
  EXPECT_EQ(SnakecaseToCamelcase("single"), "Single");
  EXPECT_EQ(SnakecaseToCamelcase("this_string_to_camelcase"),
            "ThisStringToCamelcase");
}

TEST(StrCaseConversionTest, RejectInvalidInputFormats) {
  EXPECT_EQ(CamelcaseToSnakecase("already_snakecase"), std::nullopt);
  EXPECT_EQ(CamelcaseToSnakecase("This!sABadString"), std::nullopt);
  EXPECT_EQ(CamelcaseToSnakecase("1StringWith2Numbers"), std::nullopt);
  EXPECT_EQ(SnakecaseToCamelcase("AlreadyCamelcase"), std::nullopt);
  EXPECT_EQ(SnakecaseToCamelcase("this_!s_a_bad_string"), std::nullopt);
  EXPECT_EQ(SnakecaseToCamelcase("a_string_with1_number"), std::nullopt);
}

}  // namespace
}  // namespace ecclesia

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


Glastonbury, CT (March 29th, 2018) – Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices New England Properties has announced that Michelle Collins from their Glastonbury Office has been named to Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices' esteemed Chairman's Circle-Platinum Level for 2017. The Chairman's Circle-Platinum Level is awarded to the top one percent of the network's sales professionals based on gross commission income or closed units. In addition, Michelle has also ranked #8 in the company for units sold and #10 in gross commission income for 2017.
Michelle was recognized for her exemplary performance at the Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices' New England, New York and Westchester Properties, Awards + Service Event, held in Wallingford, CT on March 29th, 2018 at the Toyota Oakdale Theatre.
"Michelle Collins has excelled by focusing on providing a superior level of service, credibility and exemplary work ethic. A specialist in residential properties throughout Hartford County, her personalized approach has earned her numerous accolades, including this year's Chairman's Circle-Platinum award. We feel really fortunate that she is a part of our team" said Candace Adams, CEO and President of Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices New England, New York and Westchester Properties.
A full-time, top-producing Realtor for more than 20 years, and 6 years as a corporate and real estate attorney, Michelle is an expert in the market. She specializes in single family homes, condominiums, new construction, antique homes, equestrian properties and 55+ housing.
Michelle Collins can be reached at (860) 982-4684 or at MichelleCollins@bhhsne.com.


This dress is essential for that night ou with your bestie. Featuring a khaki crepe material with a square neckline and thin straps. Style this hella cute dress with black strappy heels for that weekend look.


We'll be at Beverly's Farmers' Market Monday, September 22nd from 3 – 7 p.m.
Stop by our booth and experience chair Reiki! We will donate your payment (suggestion: $1.00 per minute) to Beverly Bootstraps Food Pantry.
There is always a need at the food pantry, so please join us in supporting them.


text:
Show Me a Sign, Baby! Preverbal Kids and Sign Language
by Carly Okyle
Aug 01, 2017 | Filed in News & Features
Baby sign language improves preverbal communication—and it's a fun way to bond with children.
Thinkstock/iStock
Cheryl White's baby was fussy. She was colicky, and the long crying jags left both of them frustrated and stressed. If only Rachel could tell her what was wrong, White thought. Then her father-in-law, early childhood expert Burton White, gave her Joseph Garcia's Sign With Your Baby (Northlight, 1999). White felt some trepidation. Would Rachel want to replace words with signs? Would this delay her speech?
She started teaching sign language to Rachel after her first birthday and was won over immediately. "I'd introduced milk, more, and eat, and within a couple of weeks she was signing back to me in the right context," she says. White began signing with her second baby, Matthew, when he was two months old.
Sheryl White teaching sign language to a receptive young student.
Photo courtesy of Sheryl White
Distinct from American Sign Language (ASL) and other sign languages, baby sign language typically features simplified gestures and is used with hearing children to help improve preverbal communication. Libraries are getting involved in teaching it, offering classes to parents who want to communicate with their preverbal children. Both library staff and parents give these programs high praise. While it's a relatively nascent field of study, anecdotal and scientific evidence shows that baby sign language can have long-term benefits. Advocates also note that communication is a core aspect of social emotional development, and boosting it with sign language can only benefit young ones.
White has been teaching baby sign language classes to parents since 1999. Early on, "I spent a lot of time selling the idea—giving anecdotes, talking about the benefits," she says. "Now, because it's [more] understood and popular, I spend less time building belief and spend more time hands-on modeling and interacting with the babies." These days, she teaches in libraries around Massachusetts, including the Boston Public Library, the Hopkinton Public Library (HPL), and the Wellesley Free Library. Her four-week sessions are open to a maximum of 12 families.
Kelly Rosofsky's daughter Leigh was two and a half months old when they began attending library classes near Newton, MA. "I loved it from the first class," says Rosofsky, whose daughter's skills "exploded" at 11 months. Now 16 months old, Leigh knows 12 signs, including milk, more, hat, ball, and dog.
Leigh uses the sign for book when she wants a story. "As we're reading, she'll back up to something and sign 'ball' because there's a circle on the page, or 'baby' because there's a carriage." It's good for caregivers, too. Adds Rosofsky, "She really likes to show us and practice those skills." Plus, "It's the first time that you have insight into what [your child] is thinking about."
Kaelker-Boor, Stylinsky, and White all designed their own programs. Stylinsky suggests learning how to create a syllabus and to make time for questions and answers at classes. White advises caregivers to let babies decide how much they are in the mood to learn. Kaelker-Boor's tip: Keep the program short—30 minutes or less—and allow for playtime afterward. From Kofron's vantage point as library staff, it's important to get the word out and find a passionate teacher in the community—and to let new moms know that it's OK to miss a class or two and come back.
♦ Using American Sign Language in Storytime ♦ Dr. Joseph Garcia: Baby Sign Language ♦ Knack Baby Sign Language: A Step-by-Step Guide to Communicating with Your Little One by Suzie Chafin and Johnston Grindstaff ♦ babysignlanguage.com ♦ babies-and-sign-language.com
Research and the library connection
Baby sign classes align with the broad mission of libraries, says Denise Kofron, youth services librarian at HPL: "To encourage literacy in children and to make the library a community space with offerings from birth to grandparenthood." Furthermore, "they introduce children at a very young age to the library and what we can offer," she says. "We're interested [in] studies showing that it helps with literacy, and we want them to come back, pick up books, and read."
The benefits can extend into childhood. "When the child begins to get familiar with signing, they are better able to associate signs with their spoken word meaning, therefore allowing them to better develop language," writes Tiffany M. Alt in "The Effectiveness of Using Sign Language to Enhance the Development of Early Language in Infants with Normal Hearing," published in West Virginia University's Speech Pathology and Audiology Capstone Anthology. A 2007 study that Alt cites found that children who used sign language as babies had higher scores on IQ tests when they were eight years old. In addition, Alt writes, "the use of the fingers to make certain signs and shapes on the hands helps improve the child's hand-eye coordination."
Some researchers caution that infant sign language studies have methodological weaknesses. But educators on the ground witness benefits—and a high demand. Debbie Stylinsky teaches baby sign language at the Twinsburg (OH) Public Library and the Brooklyn Branch of the Cuyahoga County Public Library in northeast Ohio. Her two eight-week sessions are so popular that she started classes for babies and kids up through 12th grade. Also an ASL interpreter, Stylinsky became interested when "I was teaching my grandchildren how to sign basic things. We noticed that the whining almost stopped and the frustration level was gone," she says. "My grandson's first sentence was 'eat more please' before he was two." Teaching since 2009, Stylinsky's curriculum is based on Garcia's work and her own experience.
White leads a group baby sign language session.
At the Rose Garden Library in San Jose, CA, Michelle Kaelker-Boor volunteers to teach baby sign language twice a month. Launched in September 2013, her program was initially based on videos; as it has evolved, Kaelker-Boor has added songs and a story pertaining to a weekly theme. Her classes average between 30 and 40 people. While many are infants up to three-year-olds, grandparents and older siblings often participate. When her daughter was eight months old, Kaelker-Boor began learning ASL as a hobby—and asked her library's storytime leader if he would consider incorporating baby sign language. He was interested—but didn't know the language. "I [had been] in the business world as a corporate trainer," says Kaelker-Boor. "I thought, 'I was a trainer for adults, so I might be able to translate that to children.' " Her daughter is now five, and Kaelker-Boor still teaches as a way to "pay it forward" to her community.
Kelly Rosofsky's daughter
Leigh signs the word flower.
Photo courtesy of Kelly Rosofsky
Beyond babies
This method of communicating may have benefits beyond babyhood. "Seeing Language: The Effect of Sign Language on Vocabulary Development in Young Hearing Children," a study by Marilyn Daniels, tracked a class for two years, from pre-K to the end of kindergarten. "The results indicate that the statistically significant vocabulary gains made in their prekindergarten year sustain throughout their kindergarten year and remain with them," according to the abstract.
At library storytimes and events, "a lot of times in groups of moms and kids, it can get loud," says Kaelker-Boor. "If your kid can't hear well, they can watch you to see signs." With older kids, "you can sign to teenagers to say 'I love you' without embarrassing them," she suggests. "Even when kids are older and verbal and have words they can use, they can get so overwhelmed by emotions that they can't get the words out. I've found that signing breaks up that mode to start a conversation."
"I'd love to make it bigger and do more in the future," says Kaelker-Boor. "I don't see it going away as a fad."
What's not to like? There appear to be no drawbacks to teaching sign language to babies, or even older kids. Librarians, parents, and teachers agree that it's a fun, helpful way to bond with children.
Carly Okyle teaches creative writing and journalism for the Adapt Community Network in New York and has written for Time.com, Entrepreneur.com, and YourTango.com.
cover feature
deaf children
Extra Helping
FPO)
pre-verbal children
sign langauge
SLJ_2017_Jul
Cyn says
My favorite adult sign language hack is to used the "all done" sign across the room at a party to tell my spouse when I am ready to go home.
arachni_name says
1"'`--
arachni_name) says
Posted : Aug 03, 2017 05:51
Get On Board with LEGO's Coding Express| Tech Review
by Jessica Ralli
Introduce Little Ones to Coding, Screen-Free, with KUBO | Tech Review
Board Books Make Us Happy| Editors' Picks

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Soulful Yoga Therapy educates Yoga Teachers on the intersection of mental health, neuroscience, somatics and wisdom tradition of yoga therapy for emotional health and healing. Soulful Yoga Therapy's online and in-person training programs provide yoga teachers with the opportunity to deeply understand therapeutic power of yoga and apply this knowledge through their teachings to support their students in restoring or maintaining emotional well-being.
Individual or group mentorship and supervision for yoga teachers and yoga therapists available online and in-person.
designed specifically for Yoga Teachers interesting in teaching with a therapeutic lens.
The power of community is incredibly important to me. As Yoga Teachers we are wholeheartedly committed to serving our of students which often requires dashing all over town between classes and privates leave little time for connection with our fellow teachers. The Facebook group is intended to create a online sanga for yoga teachers to share ideas, stay inspired, seek guidance, receive knowledge and support, refer, connect and relate.


text:
WC Winners
Português |
Brazil and the World Cup
About the World Cup
Airports and Ports
Tourism/Culture
Map of Opportunities
Pronatec Turismo
Volunteering Program
23/Jan -
Federal Government, FIFA and CBF present legacy of the 2014 World Cup
16/Jul -
Only 0.2% of fans needed medical care during the World Cup
Security during the World Cup: integrated work by 177 thousand people
Brazilian airports saw a flow of 16.7 million passengers during the World Cup
The first part of the roof over the grandstands has been put up at the Pantanal Arena in Cuiabá
Over 80% of construction works had been finished at the end of June 2013. Delivery date has been set for December this year
The first part of the metal structure that makes up the roof of the grandstands in the north sector of the Pantanal Arena was assembled this Wednesday (28.08). After being pre-assembled on the ground, the approximately 83 ton structure was lifted by a crane, located in the outside of the stadium.
The structure weighs 250 tons. The 98 metre long and 54 metre wide piece will be lifted in five stages. In all, it will cover an area of 5,300 m².
The roof chosen for the stadium is durable and resistant to tears, drilling, UV rays and exposure to different weather conditions, in addition to having an unlimited useful life. The system adapts itself to several architecture geometrical shapes and meets sustainability related requirements, as the ones necessary for meeting the LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certificate.
According to figures published in June, over 80% of the construction works at the Pantanal Arena has been finished. The stadium will have capacity for approximately 44 thousand people. The stadium will be the stage of four 2014 World Cup group stage matches. Delivery date has been set for December 2013.
Source: Secopa-MT
Pantanal Arena
For Cuiabá, World Cup was seen as a "watershed"
Host city of four matches, the city has seen positive impacts on tourism and services, improvements to the airport and international visibility
Colombia sends Japan home with 4-1 win in Pantanal Arena
South American team secured first place in Group C and faces Uruguay in the round of sixteen.
World Cup brings boost to trade, hospitality and tourism sectors in Cuiabá
Large tourists inflows into the Mato Grosso capital created expanded demand for Shopping centres, bars, stores, hospitality and tourism
Nigeria ends dry spell and eliminates Bosnia in Pantanal Arena
Odemwingie scored the only goal in the match and sealed the victory for the African team
All content on this site are published under the
Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 3.0 Brasil.


Representative Macco was first elected to the Assembly in 2014.
2017-2018: Aging and Long-Term Care; Audit (Vice-Chair); Consumer Protection; Jobs and the Economy; Regulatory Licensing Reform; Transportation; Ways and Means (Chair); Joint Legislative Audit Committee.
2015-2016: Audit (Vice-Chair); Colleges and Universities; Jobs and the Economy; Transportation; Ways and Means (Vice-Chair); Joint Legislative Audit (Vice-Chair).


text:
Turkish government trying to blame Gezi Park protest on 'foreign actors', says imprisoned civil society leader
Osman Kavala says that he has been targeted by the government because of his involvement in civil society.
Sirin Payzin
Osman Kavala speaking at the European Parliament headquarters in Brussels in 2014.
PA Images
In 2013, hundreds of thousands of people took to the streets in Istanbul to protest government plans to build over one of the capital's last remaining parks. What began as a demonstration over the loss of green space, however, soon spiraled into something far larger.
The excessive police response to the protests galvanised anger at the increasing authoritarianism of then prime minister – and now president – Recep Tayyip Erdogan. A wave of unrest erupted across Turkey.
Just over a fortnight into the peaceful occupation of the park, protesters were violently evicted by police: 22 people were killed and more than 8,000 were injured.
Last month, the trial of 16 people accused of organising and financing the protests and "attempting to overthrow the government" began in Istanbul. The indictment also alleges that philanthropist George Soros was behind the conspiracy.
Among those on trial is Turkish businessman and philanthropist Osman Kavala, who has been in detention since his arrest in 2017. It took over a year for his indictment to be issued. During that time, neither Kavala nor his lawyers were able to find out what he was accused of.
At a hearing on Thursday, judges ruled to continue his detention. A new trial date has been set for October. Kavala's lawyers and other defendants, who were subsequently added to the case, say that the 657-page indictment contains no concrete evidence.
Amnesty International's Andrew Gardner said, "The decision to keep Osman Kavala in pre-trial detention is outrageous but not surprising. It exposes yet again, how Turkey's judicial system has been weaponised in order to target legitimate civil society activities and jail people without a shred of evidence."
Kavala has long been a figurehead of Turkish civil society. He has supported arts and culture events in Diyarbakır, a focal point in the conflict between the Turkish state and various Kurdish groups. He has also organised meetings on the Kurdish–Turkish peace process, democratisation and refugee rights.
During his 21-month detention, Kavala has largely stayed quiet, preferring to "let civil society speak for me". But prior to his second hearing this week, I was able to send him some questions to answer.
At the first hearing, the tribunal decided to continue your detention. How do you evaluate this decision? Surprised?
I can't say I'm surprised. Although there is no reason for me to remain under arrest, I did not expect that both Yiğit Aksakoğlu [another prominent figure in Turkish civil society] and myself would be released in the first hearing. Well, I'm the number one defendant in this case.
On the day your case began, President Erdoğan re-targeted Gezi and its participants. What is being done? Do you think the court has ruled under pressure?
From time to time, the president says something blaming the Gezi events and its participants. As you know, there were also statements that targeted me directly. These statements may have had an impact on the accusations against me during the preparation of the indictment. In the indictment, the statements of politicians about Soros were taken as fact and a similar process might have taken place for me. However, I don't think there is a relationship between Erdoğan's last statement about Gezi and the ruling.
Do you think the public has shown sufficient interest in your case?
After my arrest, I published critical articles in the newspapers about the indictment and my situation was mentioned in several television programs. Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu [leader of the opposition Republican People's Party] has spoken about my arrest. Rights defenders and artists expressed their demands for my release. During this period, people were reluctant to express criticism [of the case] in the public sphere and thought that doing so would endanger themselves or their institutions. It is not realistic to expect more attention to this case during such widespread lawlessness. It would also be uncomfortable for me to focus on this case in the absence of a strong public response to other cases.
Your friends, representatives from international institutions, participants in Gezi and a large group of lawyers came to support you in the courtroom. How did you feel when you walked in?
I felt mixed things. After being used to living alone in your room for 20 months, you are in a very different place when confronted with a government institution. When I stepped up the stairs to the hall, I first saw the group of lawyers who came to support me. In their robes, the lawyers appeared like lifeguards there to prevent me from getting lost in the labyrinths of laws in that great space. Right after, I heard the applause coming from behind me. Applause is anonymous, but for me it was like a special voice, calling out, confirming that my wife, family, friends were there. The first things I saw and heard prevented me from feeling alienation in that space, causing me to feel some kind of trust.
Why is this case aimed at you?
I don't have the information to answer that question. But in the context of the Gezi protests, I can make a deduction. The claim that the Gezi events were organised and financed by foreign actors is telling. This is, of course, aimed at discrediting protesters and solidarity with protesters. However, there has been no evidence to support these claims for years. As a result they have used George Soros as a scapegoat. Pointing the finger at Soros can be convincing even without evidence, because there is a widespread belief that he supports popular movements against governments in various countries.
It's not surprising that I was accused in this scenario. I am on the board of directors of the Open Society Foundation (OSF) [a grantmaking network founded by George Soros] and also participated in the Gezi protests. Anadolu Kültür [a Turkish not-for-profit organisation], of which I am the chairman of the board, receives support from OSF for various projects and supports civil society initiatives. When I'm involved, the fiction is complete! Shortly before I was taken into custody, two long articles about me were published on the website of an organisation called Boğaz Boğaziçi Global İlişkiler ücut. With the help of infographics, I was told that I was in a dark relationship with Soros.
How many times have you read the indictment?
I've read it twice and I've read more about myself – the indictment has an annex of 8,763 pages. There are important documents among them. I was able to see these with the help of my lawyers.
Did you write your defense yourself?
I wrote it myself, but my lawyers have been a great support.
The remarkable oddity in the indictment is that George Soros, who allegedly planned and financed the protest, was not among the suspects, and no effort was made to take his statement. How do you interpret this contradiction?
In my opinion, this shows that the fiction in the indictment was not supported by concrete evidence, was not prepared with the belief that it was correct, and was written as an assumption in line with political messages.
What is your relationship with Soros? Can you tell the public more clearly?
I was a board member of Open Society Foundations. When George Soros visited our country, I had meetings with other board members. I have never had a different status or responsibility on the board of the foundation. I respect Soros. Our views overlap on issues such as the proper functioning of legal institutions, the protection and extension of civil rights, the support of civil society organizations and rights defenders, and immigration policies. However, my views on egalitarian policies in the social and economic fields are different. I have also been critical of the activities of the Open Society Foundations in some countries.
You said in your defense that during the protests you "participated in a meeting with members of the Government. By talking to government officials, I cannot understand how it can be explained that someone who is trying to reach a compromise between them and those participating in the protest is preparing the ground for a coup". What do you attribute to the silence of government officials in the face of this? Who do you reproach?
I said this to emphasise the fallacy of the indictment. I did not expect a supportive message from government officials. A similar situation applies to members of the Taksim Solidarity meeting with the Prime Minister. Tayfun Kahraman pointed out the same irrationality in his defense.
How do you think the case will proceed? What are your expectations?
My expectation is, of course, that all those on trial will be acquitted of the charges against them. But that doesn't mean I'm getting out of prison. After my arrest, the charge of supporting the July 15 coup attempt, which had no basis, was kept as a separate investigation file, and the decision to arrest me was oddly split between the two files. We have no information about this second file – the indictment has not been released.
What have the conditions been like in prison?
Before coming to Silivri, I stayed in a half-sized cell for two weeks. I shared it with four people for about a week. Those days were not easy. I'm trying to keep myself away from what's happened to me in my room by reading, thinking, dreaming. The most difficult thing was going to hospital in handcuffs led by police. Everyone in the hospital must have been wondering what evil this guy has done.
A clichéd question, but what do you miss most?
I'm going to give you a clichéd answer. I miss being with my wife, family, friends, I miss my house, I miss touching the soil, the trees, the plants.
Are there things you regret when you look back?
Of course there are a lot of things. When you enter prison at the age of 60, you inevitably recount your life. Solitude provides a suitable environment for this. But the things I regret have nothing to do with the crimes against me.
What are your long-term plans? Will you continue to work for civil society after your release?
I want to continue working for civil society. I think it will be important to realise projects that contribute to a better understanding of basic legal norms and increase the sensitivity of justice with the help of art.
What do you think about Ekrem İmamoğlu winning the Istanbul mayoral election and the support given to him?
I thought Ekrem İmamoğlu would win the election for the second time, but I did not expect such a big difference in votes. It was highly debated how the positive energy that emerged in Gezi would contribute to local politics. Imamoglu has a sensitivity, perspective and problem-solving ability to understand Gezi's messages. For this reason, I see him as a very suitable mayor for the post-Gezi period.
Disclaimer: openDemocracy has received funding from Open Society Foundations. However, OSF was not involved in the publication of this article.
In court with Osman Kavala: Turkey's credibility on trial
Written by: Hugh Williamson All articles by: Hugh Williamson
A letter from imprisoned Turkish human rights activist Osman Kavala
Written by: OSMAN KAVALA All articles by: OSMAN KAVALA
At the dawn of hope, trepidation: Istanbul's elections, the Gezi trial, and civil society's future
Written by: Neslihan Özgüneş All articles by: Neslihan Özgüneş
100 days! Osman Kavala and Turkish democracy
Written by: Anthony Barnett All articles by: Anthony Barnett


text:
Referendum Home
Referendum Details
What is the Plan?
What was the Process?
This Referendum is Mail-In Ballot Only.
According to the Michigan Secretary of State, due to the coronavirus outbreak, the May 5 election will be carried out by mail only.
All registered voters in the school district will be sent an application to vote by mail (absentee). This is the optimal and safest way to participate in our democracy at this time. The application will come with a postage-paid return envelope. If the voter applies for a vote by mail/absent voter ballot, that will also arrive with a postage-paid return envelope.
Check your voter registration at Michigan Voter Information Center
Absentee and Early Voting
Voters can cast their vote without leaving their home with Absentee Voting!
You can request an Absentee Voting ballot from your local clerk. The ballot will be mailed to you then you will vote and mail it back. That ballot will then be tabulated on Election Day.
Who is Eligible for an Absent Voter Ballot?
Due to the passage of the statewide ballot proposal 18-3, all eligible and registered voters in Michigan may now request an absent voter ballot without providing a reason.
Requesting an Absent Voter Ballot
Your request for an absent voter ballot must be in writing and can be submitted to your city or township clerk. (For assistance in obtaining the address of your city or township clerk, see Michigan.gov/Vote You must request an absent voter ballot by submitting the application, large print application, a letter, a postcard, or a pre-printed application form obtained from your local clerk's office. Requests may be returned by hand, via postal mail, fax, or email, as long as a signature is visible.
Requests to have an absent voter ballot mailed to you must be received by your clerk no later than 5 p.m. on Friday, May 1st. If you're already registered at your current address, you can request an absent voter ballot in person at your clerk's office anytime up to 4 p.m. on Monday, May 4th. If you're registering to vote or updating your address by appearing at your clerk's office on Election Day, you can request an absent voter ballot at the same time you register. If you request your AV ballot the day before the election or on Election Day, you must vote the ballot in the clerk's office.
Once your request is received by the local clerk, your signature on the request will be checked against your voter registration record before a ballot is issued. You must be a registered voter to receive an absent voter ballot, but you can register and apply for an absent voter ballot at the same time. Requests for absent voter ballots are processed immediately. Absent voter ballots may be issued to you at your home address or any address outside of your city or township of residence.
After receiving your absent voter ballot, you have until 8 p.m. on Election Day (Tuesday, May 5th) to complete the ballot and return it to the clerk's office. Your ballot will not be counted unless your signature is on the return envelope and matches your signature on file. If you received assistance voting the ballot, then the signature of the person who helped you must also be on the return envelope. Only you, a family member or person residing in your household, a mail carrier, or election official is authorized to deliver your signed absent voter ballot to your clerk's office.
If an emergency, such as a sudden illness or family death prevents you from reaching the polls on Election Day, you may request an emergency absent voter ballot. Requests for an emergency ballot must be submitted after the deadline for regular absent voter ballots has passed but before 4 p.m. on Election Day. The emergency must have occurred at a time which made it impossible for you to apply for a regular absent voter ballot. Please contact your local clerk for more information about emergency absent voter ballots.
Ballot Question
Click on the photo to view a sample ballot.
Menominee, MI 49858
Superintendent John Mans
www.gomaroons.org
Prepared and paid for by Menominee Area Public Schools (1230 13th Street, Menominee, MI 49858)


Description: Contrasting bias band with small bow accent and a beaded inset complement the empire bodice of this strapless "Avanti Satin" A-line gown.
Accessories: Includes self crinoline and optional spaghetti straps. Any combination of the 26 Avanti Satin colors.


text:
package com.java110.user.bmo.activitiesRule;
import com.java110.po.activitiesRule.ActivitiesRulePo;
import org.springframework.http.ResponseEntity;

public interface IUpdateActivitiesRuleBMO {

    /**
     * 修改活动规则
     * add by wuxw
     * @param activitiesRulePo
     * @return
     */
    ResponseEntity<String> update(ActivitiesRulePo activitiesRulePo);

}


When you give to RHC, you become part of something bigger than yourself - you help build God's Kingdom on earth - in countless ways.
- Congratulations you are done!!!
Text HELP to 84321 at any time for assistance.
Text STOP to 84321 to cancel your account.
Every Sunday at the RHC Whittier Hills campus during services we offer a time where you can give. You can donate by cash or check. If you donate cash and would like a receipt, please use one of the envelopes which you can find in the seat back pockets in the Worship Center.


text:
Kingdoms of Amalur: Re-Reckoning Review – Kingdom Under Fire
4 months ago Robert Strick 4
It's shocking to know that eight years have passed since the original release of Kingdoms of Amalur. While it didn't have much of a commercial success back then, it was perhaps one of the most surprising hidden gems to come out of that generation of console. With news of THQ Nordic re-releasing it in a newly remastered format, I couldn't help myself but want to re-experience the title once more, on some beefier systems. Did this remaster improve on the game's past hiccups? Read on for our Kingdoms of Amalur: Re-Reckoning review.
A Lengthy Tale to Satisfy That RPG Thirst
In Kingdoms of Amalur you follow the journey of the "Fateless One." Prior to the start of the adventure, you are deceased. When you start the game you awaken on a pile of corpses, revived by a device called the Well of Souls, created by a gnomish scientist called Fomorous Hugues. The ability of your character to withstand death and charter your fate is the centerpiece to the adventure, as you investigate the circumstances related to your death, against a backdrop of warring factions and political intrigue.
The main story arch will take somewhere between 20 to 30 hours depending on your playstyle. With that being said, this game is filled with a ton of different side-quests, areas, and world-building that puts the total playtime over 100+ hours. A lot of these quests are pretty standard within the RPG genre, but because of the combat and some nice winkles of variation in quest design, they don't feel like a chore to complete. There's also several side-quests that have their own story that are worth completing, and have some great narrative moments.
A Coat Too Thin
The most disappointing aspect of this remaster is the graphics. While there is a difference in the visual fidelity you would be hard pressed to notice it at first glance. This also carries over into other areas like animation. The lip-syncing is terrible, and didn't get any enhancements, which it could have used desperately in this remaster.
As a whole the art style is solid, but not particularly note-worthy. Part of that is that while there's some interesting things peppered throughout this adventure, the high-fantasy theme has already been explored in a lot of different variations, across several forms of media. When you see something cool, you're almost immediately pulled back into a narrative rule-set that plays this theme in a particularly safe manner. From my perspective the tone feels similar to that of the Fable series. If you've enjoyed those games in the past, you'll find a lot to like within Kingdoms of Amalur.
Where Kingdoms of Amalur excels is its fluid, free-form combat and excellent reward curve. Being able to swap between different weapons on the fly is a joy, and there's great synergy between different weapon types like swords, daggers, staves, and more.
Gameplay With High Rewards
There are three skill trees that you place skill points into: Might, Finesse, or Sorcery. It's important to note that your role isn't fixed. You'll be able to mix and match between each of the three types, leading to some interesting build variations. Do you want to charge into battle with a great sword and deal some massive damage before switching to some sorcery attacks from distance?
The game doesn't just support these choices well, but they actively encourage them depending on the ratio in which you distribute your skill points. This open-ended class system allows the combat to stay mostly fresh over the 100+ hour adventure, and encourages a lot of experimentation for the player. Once players have invested enough points they can unlock destiny cards that allow them to obtain additional bonuses for their build. The most obvious weakness to the combat is the enemy variety, which just isn't quite sufficiently stretched out across an adventure of this size.
Combine that with a great variation of loot, both of weapons and armor, and there's a very satisfying reward curve in the game. You won't go long before acquiring additional skill points, obtaining new gear, or exploring new areas. This is one of the areas that a lot of RPG's don't get right, but Kingdoms of Amalur seemed to solve these issues well back in 2012.
Great for New Players, Not So Much for the Old Ones
If you previously played Kingdoms of Amalur there aren't a lot of reasons to revisit the title. The visual improvements are noticeable, but come across as a thin fresh coat of paint that doesn't require an additional playthrough.
Strangely enough, this port doesn't address a lot of the issues that were present in the original. Lengthy load times, pop-in, and dips in framerate are quite noticeable, and shouldn't be an issue in a remastered version of any game. This leads to a feeling that this "remaster" didn't have a lot of effort put into it, which is a shame, since the core of Kingdoms of Amalur is quite good, and still has a ton of potential to be a great franchise.
As a whole if you haven't explored the world of Kingdoms of Amalur, this remaster is a solid introduction to the franchise. While this remaster won't give players who have already explored the world enough reasons to jump back in, it's still a good game, particularly if you're looking for an RPG to sink your teeth into. Combine that with the DLC, the Legend of Ded Kel, and Teeth of Narros, included in this package, and you have an excellent value proposition, even if the experience can be uneven at times.
Excellent Free-Flowing Combat
A large variety of interesting loot
Fantastic reward curve and character development options
Over 100+ hours of content
A lot of effort into the worldbuilding despite the theme
Graphics are dated
Lip-syncing and animation are woefully neglected in the remaster
The theme is generic
Technical issues like prolonged loading times, clipping, pop-in and framerate dips hurt the experience and immersion
For console players, the menus can be a bit tough to navigate
Kingdoms of Amalur: Re-Reckoning review code provided by the publisher. Played on PS4. You can read SP1st and MP1st's review and scoring policy right here.
Robert Strick
News, Reviews Kingdoms of Amalur: Re-Reckoning, THQ Nordic
Roccat Vulcan Pro Keyboard Review – Full Light Speed
Immortals Fenyx Rising Review – Saving Zeus and the Gods
Ponpu Review: "Intergalacduck" Adventure
Mortal Kombat 11 Ultimate Review – Ultimate Gorefest
Cloudpunk Review: Cyberpunk Genre Gets Lyfted
Devil May Cry 5 Special Edition Review – Devil Hunting Delight
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales Review – Our Spider-Man
Assassin's Creed Valhalla Review – The Viking Conqueror
DIRT 5 Review – Reputable Racing
Demon's Souls PS5 Review – What's Old Is New Again


Awhile ago Microsoft added a new PowerShell module to manage local Windows user accounts. This post should quickly show you how easily you can for example use PowerShell to create a new Windows User account, remove a Windows user account or modify windows users and groups with PowerShell.
The most simple one is obviously to list Windows users or groups, using the PowerShell Get- commands.
$Password = Read-Host -AsSecureString New-LocalUser "Tom" -Password $Password -FullName "Thomas Maurer" -Description "Description"
New-LocalUser "Tom" -Password $Password -FullName "Thomas Maurer" -Description "Description"
$Password= ConvertTo-SecureString "Password" -AsPlainText -Force New-LocalUser "Tom" -Password $Password -FullName "Thomas Maurer" -Description "Description"
Create a new Windows User account connected to a Microsoft Account with PowerShell.
With Windows 10 you have the opportunity to login using Microsoft Accounts, for example with outlook.com or hotmail.com email aliases. For that you can use the folloing command to create a new Windows User connected to a Microsoft Account. In this case you will not need to configure a password for the account, since this is connected to the Microsoft Account.
New-LocalUser -Name "MicrosoftAccount\TomTheGreate@outlook.com" -Description "Description of this Microsoft account."
New-LocalUser -Name "MicrosoftAccount\[email protected]ok.com" -Description "Description of this Microsoft account."
New-LocalUser -Name "AzureAD\TomMaurer@contoso.com" -Description "Description of this Azure AD account."
New-LocalUser -Name "AzureAD\[email protected]" -Description "Description of this Azure AD account."
To change the password of a local Windows User account, you can use the Set-LocalUser cmdlet. This also has some other options as well, but one of the most common ones is to reset the password.
Rename-LocalUser -Name "Tom" -NewName "Tom2"
Add-LocalGroupMember -Group "Administrators" -Member "Admin02", "MicrosoftAccount\TomTheGreat@Outlook.com", "AzureAD\TomMaurer@contoso.com", "CONTOSO\Domain Admins"
Add-LocalGroupMember -Group "Administrators" -Member "Admin02", "MicrosoftAccount\[email protected]", "AzureAD\[email protected]", "CONTOSO\Domain Admins"
I hope this gives you a quick overview how you can manage local Windows User accounts using PowerShell.


More and more, companies are seeing the benefits of investing in Corporate Wellness Programs for their employees. Reduced health care costs, improved employee morale, and increased retention are just a few examples of the gains corporations can make.
Fitlandia will work with your company one-on-one to customize a program that fits your corporate culture, wellness goals, and budget.
Because we work with Mind Zoning™, nutrition, and exercise, you'll see greater compliance and participant satisfaction from a truly holistic program.
Consult – we'll start with a consultation call to understand your objectives, budget and timeline.
Develop – Fitlandia will provide you with a project outline to exceed your expectations every step of the way. We can either take the ball and run with it, or bring in key stakeholders into project communication to ensure you're getting the exact program you're looking for.
Execute – together with your wellness team, we'll launch a beta program for select employees, collect their feedback, make adjustments, then launch the final program.
Track – we'll develop a protocol to track the effectiveness of the program to ensure you're getting the expected ROI.
Adjust – just as your company is dynamic, so too are your employee's need. Our goal is to develop a long-term relationship to grow your Corporate Wellness Program as your company does.