Prior to joining bookmaker and funding your account in order to view Utah – San Antonio, or any other particular event via the bookmaker live stream, you are strongly advised to check with bookmaker if, depending on your place of residence, it is possible to view this live stream.
Last 28 head-to-head matches Utah won 12 matches, drawn 0 matches, lost 16 matches and goals 2608-2753. Including matches at home between the teams Utah won 9 matches, drawn 0 matches, lost 8 matches and goals 1505-1543.


text:
import React, {
  forwardRef,
  ReactNode,
  RefObject,
  useEffect,
  useImperativeHandle,
  useRef,
} from 'react'
import { mergeProps } from '../../utils/with-default-props'
import { useSpring, animated } from '@react-spring/web'
import { useDrag } from '@use-gesture/react'
import Button from '../button'
import { nearest } from '../../utils/nearest'
import { NativeProps, withNativeProps } from '../../utils/native-props'
import {
  PropagationEvent,
  withStopPropagation,
} from '../../utils/with-stop-propagation'

const classPrefix = `adm-swipe-action`

export type SwipeActionRef = {
  close: () => void
  show: (side?: 'left' | 'right') => void
}

type ActionColor =
  | 'light'
  | 'weak'
  | 'primary'
  | 'success'
  | 'warning'
  | 'danger'

export type Action = {
  key: string | number
  text: ReactNode
  color?: ActionColor | string
  onClick?: (e: React.MouseEvent) => void
}

export type SwipeActionProps = {
  rightActions?: Action[]
  leftActions?: Action[]
  onAction?: (action: Action, e: React.MouseEvent) => void
  closeOnTouchOutside?: boolean
  closeOnAction?: boolean
  children: ReactNode
  stopPropagation?: PropagationEvent[]
  onActionsReveal?: (side: 'left' | 'right') => void
} & NativeProps<'--background'>

const defaultProps = {
  rightActions: [] as Action[],
  leftActions: [] as Action[],
  closeOnTouchOutside: true,
  closeOnAction: true,
  stopPropagation: [],
}

export const SwipeAction = forwardRef<SwipeActionRef, SwipeActionProps>(
  (p, ref) => {
    const props = mergeProps(defaultProps, p)

    const rootRef = useRef<HTMLDivElement>(null)

    const leftRef = useRef<HTMLDivElement>(null)
    const rightRef = useRef<HTMLDivElement>(null)
    function getWidth(ref: RefObject<HTMLDivElement>) {
      const element = ref.current
      if (!element) return 0
      return element.offsetWidth
    }
    function getLeftWidth() {
      return getWidth(leftRef)
    }
    function getRightWidth() {
      return getWidth(rightRef)
    }

    const [{ x }, api] = useSpring(
      () => ({
        x: 0,
        config: { tension: 200, friction: 30 },
      }),
      []
    )

    const draggingRef = useRef(false)

    const dragCancelRef = useRef<(() => void) | null>(null)
    function forceCancelDrag() {
      dragCancelRef.current?.()
      draggingRef.current = false
    }

    const bind = useDrag(
      state => {
        dragCancelRef.current = state.cancel
        if (!state.intentional) return
        if (state.down) {
          draggingRef.current = true
        }
        if (!draggingRef.current) return
        const [offsetX] = state.offset
        if (state.last) {
          const leftWidth = getLeftWidth()
          const rightWidth = getRightWidth()
          let position = offsetX + state.velocity[0] * state.direction[0] * 50
          if (offsetX > 0) {
            position = Math.max(0, position)
          } else if (offsetX < 0) {
            position = Math.min(0, position)
          } else {
            position = 0
          }
          const targetX = nearest([-rightWidth, 0, leftWidth], position)
          api.start({
            x: targetX,
          })
          if (targetX !== 0) {
            p.onActionsReveal?.(targetX > 0 ? 'left' : 'right')
          }
          window.setTimeout(() => {
            draggingRef.current = false
          })
        } else {
          api.start({
            x: offsetX,
            immediate: true,
          })
        }
      },
      {
        from: () => [x.get(), 0],
        bounds: () => {
          const leftWidth = getLeftWidth()
          const rightWidth = getRightWidth()
          return {
            left: -rightWidth,
            right: leftWidth,
          }
        },
        // rubberband: true,
        axis: 'x',
        preventScroll: true,
        pointer: { touch: true },
        triggerAllEvents: true,
      }
    )

    function close() {
      api.start({
        x: 0,
      })
      forceCancelDrag()
    }

    useImperativeHandle(ref, () => ({
      show: (side: 'left' | 'right' = 'right') => {
        if (side === 'right') {
          api.start({
            x: -getRightWidth(),
          })
        } else if (side === 'left') {
          api.start({
            x: getLeftWidth(),
          })
        }
        p.onActionsReveal?.(side)
      },
      close,
    }))

    useEffect(() => {
      if (!props.closeOnTouchOutside) return
      function handle(e: Event) {
        if (x.get() === 0) {
          return
        }
        const root = rootRef.current
        if (root && !root.contains(e.target as Node)) {
          close()
        }
      }
      document.addEventListener('touchstart', handle)
      return () => {
        document.removeEventListener('touchstart', handle)
      }
    }, [props.closeOnTouchOutside])

    function renderAction(action: Action) {
      const color = action.color ?? 'light'
      return (
        <Button
          key={action.key}
          className={`${classPrefix}-action-button`}
          style={{
            '--background-color': colorRecord[color] ?? color,
          }}
          onClick={e => {
            if (props.closeOnAction) {
              close()
            }
            action.onClick?.(e)
            props.onAction?.(action, e)
          }}
        >
          {action.text}
        </Button>
      )
    }

    return withNativeProps(
      props,
      <div
        className={classPrefix}
        {...bind()}
        ref={rootRef}
        onClickCapture={e => {
          if (draggingRef.current) {
            e.stopPropagation()
            e.preventDefault()
          }
        }}
      >
        <animated.div className={`${classPrefix}-track`} style={{ x }}>
          {withStopPropagation(
            props.stopPropagation,
            <div
              className={`${classPrefix}-actions ${classPrefix}-actions-left`}
              ref={leftRef}
            >
              {props.leftActions.map(renderAction)}
            </div>
          )}
          <div
            className={`${classPrefix}-content`}
            onClickCapture={e => {
              if (x.goal !== 0) {
                e.preventDefault()
                e.stopPropagation()
                close()
              }
            }}
          >
            <animated.div
              style={{
                pointerEvents: x.to(v =>
                  v !== 0 && x.goal !== 0 ? 'none' : 'auto'
                ),
              }}
            >
              {props.children}
            </animated.div>
          </div>
          {withStopPropagation(
            props.stopPropagation,
            <div
              className={`${classPrefix}-actions ${classPrefix}-actions-right`}
              ref={rightRef}
            >
              {props.rightActions.map(renderAction)}
            </div>
          )}
        </animated.div>
      </div>
    )
  }
)

const colorRecord: Record<string, string> = {
  light: 'var(--adm-color-light)',
  weak: 'var(--adm-color-weak)',
  primary: 'var(--adm-color-primary)',
  success: 'var(--adm-color-success)',
  warning: 'var(--adm-color-warning)',
  danger: 'var(--adm-color-danger)',
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


text:
<!doctype html>

<title>Viewport Time</title>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato" rel="stylesheet">
<link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="./favicon.png"/>

Heading: 0s

What: 0s

Why: 0s

How: 0s

Viewport Time

What

A simple script that counts the viewport time of sections of your page.

If an array containing ids is not provided, it checks for all elements that have an id tag associated with them and
counts number of seconds the element is in the viewport (while the tab is active)
Updates count continuously each second and takes into account viewport change events such as zooming and minimizing the window.

Super small and no dependencies. Works on browsers that aren't regularly used in memes.

Why

Online content such as news, medium articles, shocking top 10 clickbait buzzfeed articles, all seek to attract large shares of online attention by keeping their users engaged. A common challenge is to identify which parts / which type of content was preferred by users.

Apart from analytics, this could also be used in fields like information retrieval. Eg. When using a text-based model like the tf-idf, giving higher weight to words belonging to hotter sections of the page. Where hotter means having a higher degree of viewport time :P

How

Include the script in your page. Optionally provide it an array of ids.

In order to persist data, provide a backend for it to retrieve/post the object containing the viewport time details of the elements. You could either use new objects for each visit to your page (and save with timestamps), or simply use a single cumulative object per page. You could post the object every x seconds.


text:
Sports News In Brief
David Freese Swarmed In St. Louis By Hordes Of Swooning, Average-Looking Women
Aaron Rodgers Pledges To Dedicate Off-Season To Growing As Brand Ambassador
Seattle Mariners Offhandedly Suggest Astros', Red Sox' Titles Be Awarded To Them Instead
Pro Bowl Players Not In Game Asked To Sit In Stands To Make Stadium Look Less Empty
Sunday 1:50PM
SEE MORE: Sports
ST. LOUIS—In the wake of his MVP performance in the World Series, St. Louis Cardinals third baseman David Freese has been constantly surrounded this week by dozens of swooning, average-looking women. "It's flattering to see so many plain women flocking to me, especially considering most of them look like they've probably popped out a couple kids and had to hire a babysitter in order to come out," Freese said as one woman, who wasn't exactly homely but certainly would never be described as attractive, planted a kiss right on his cheek. "My girlfriend was a little worried about all the attention I was getting at first, but then, you know, just get a load of all these fives. She's got nothing to worry about." Freese did admit it was better to be surrounded by legions of so-so women than the creepy, aging men carrying microphones who kept hounding him in the immediate aftermath of Game 7.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


The Last Jedi SPOILER ALERT! FULL DISCUSSION ON THIS THREAD!
OK, as the tread header says go for the spoilers in this thread!
What did you all think? Love it or Hate it?
Should Ben have kept his shirt on?
And Tuesday, The Last Jedi on DVD. The Novelization was a good read, with a few extra bits in it. Have you read it?
I'm looking forward to deleted scenes.
I do plan on getting the DVD (Blu-ray/DVD combo). I had nothing against "Shirtless Ben." Haven't read the novelization yet, but I do want to.
Started watching the bonus disc,but got in late, hope I have some time this weekend.
Absolutely the WORST Star Wars movie ever.
This movie has allowed me to finally realize that all 3 of the prequel movies were an unbelievable masterpiece.
Everybody is entitled to an opinion, TLJ wasn't the story I hoped for, but neither was TFA, I really wanted GL's story, but it wasn't what we got. I did like TFA & TLJ anyway.


text:
Dina Eastwood Net Worth 2020, Bio, Wiki, Height, Weight, Awards and Instagram
Dina Eastwood Net Worth 2020 – Dina Eastwood who was formally known as Dina Ruiz is a successful career woman and mother. She was also the wife of Clint Eastwood, the legendary Hollywood icon before she had to go through a divorce and all challenges that came with it, especially that of child custody.
Dina Eastwood was born on July 11, 1965, as Dina Marie Ruiz, in Castro Valley, California. Her parents are Michael and Mary Lou Ruiz. Her mother has English, Irish and German ancestry, while her father was adopted when he was a child by a Puerto Rican couple.
His birth parents were Marcus and Lillian Grant – of Hawaiian-Black American and Hawaiian-Japanese ancestry respectively. Dina was raised in Fremont, California, with her father who was a teacher in a school at Fresno. She grew up to become a news anchor, an actress, and a reporter on television.
She attended high school at Mission San Jose, after which she went to Ohlone College in her hometown where she was the news anchor for Ohlone College Television. She left Ohlone and went to Arizona State University in Temple before finally graduating with a degree in Broadcast Communication from San Francisco State University in the year 1988.
Two years after graduating from college, KNAZ-TV in Flagstaff, Arizona, hired her as a reporter and she, later on, became a news anchor there. About a year later, she worked with KSBW in the Monterey-Salinas as a news anchor and retired in 1997.
She became the host of A Quest for Excellence – a show produced by the California Teachers Association that featured school administrators, the teachers, and their students while showcasing their everyday challenges.
Along with being a television personality and newscaster, Dina Eastwood is also an actress and has been seen in a few films, such as; Blood Work (2002), The Forger (2012), and others. Overtone, a South African a cappella band was discovered by her when the movie Invictus was being filmed.
She was married to popular actor and iconic film producer, Clint Eastwood whom she met when she interviewed him in a newscast, and they have a daughter together.
She stands with a perfect height of 5 ft 6 inches (1.68 m) and weighs around 62 kg.
Dіnа hаѕ bееn аblе tо dеmоnѕtrаtе vеrу hіgh ѕkіllѕ whеn іt соmеѕ tо јоurnаlіѕm. Ѕhе wаѕ аblе tо mаіntаіn thе соdе оf соnduсt оf а gооd јоurnаlіѕt. Неr саrееr rеmаіnѕ untаіntеd uр tо dаtе, аnd thаt іѕ ѕоmеthіng thаt саn bе аdmіrеd.
Dina Eastwood has a net worth of over $25 million. This wealth has been generated from her well-decorated career in the media industry.
Pebble Beach Pugs Instagram Page @dinaeastwood
Dianna Russini Net Worth 2020, Biography, Education, Marriage and Career
Dog the Bounty Hunter Net Worth 2020, Biography, Career and Marital Life


These terms and conditions were last updated on 31/03/11. Use of our website and the sale and purchase of goods from the website are governed by our terms and conditions as set out below. "We" or "Our" means N17 Club. "You" or "your" means the person accessing, using or ordering from our website over the Internet.
Goods are supplied by N17 Club® directly to you and the contract of sale then exists between you and N17 Club®. These terms and conditions cover all sales made through this website.
You may order online using Paypal, which accepts a credit / debit card: Delta, Maestro / Switch, Master Card, Visa/ Electron. All prices are in pounds sterling (£) and credit / debit card transactions for orders outside the UK will be converted by the card company at their current exchange rates.
Return can be sent to See address in Contacts section of website.
All third party copyright, trademarks, brand names, product names and titles on this website are acknowledged. This website is protected by Copyright and the Copyright, Trademarks, logos and Intellectual Property rights for the content of the N17 Club belong to N17 Club. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Any use, printing or copying of materials on this website, other than in the course of browsing, selecting products and ordering from us, is strictly prohibited unless permission has been given by N17 Club. Any framing of this website is prohibited.
Security is one of our highest priorities and we take every precaution to protect your personal information both online and offline. Information requested when registering or ordering goods (including your credit / debit card details) is encrypted with SSL (Secure Socket Layer), the industry standard encryption software. To help us keep your personal information strictly confidential you should keep your password secret. While we use SSL encryption to protect sensitive information online, we also protect your personal details off-line. All employees are kept up-to-date on our security and privacy practices and we ensure our Merchants maintain our standards of security. All pages that are encrypted will be shown by a padlock at the bottom of your screen and by our encryption logo under the shopping cart as below.


Dr Brian Little challenges what we think we know about how our personality works and is shaped. It's time to think beyond the nature vs. nurture debate. It is our pursuit of our dreams and our personal passions that shape who we are. Previous praise for Dr Brian Little: 'Brian Little is one of the wisest, funniest, kindest, and most erudite people I have ever met' Susan Cain, bestselling author of Quiet 'With extraordinary wit and wisdom, distinguished psychologist Brian Little offers startling insights' Adam Grant, bestselling author of Give and Take and Originals Who Are You, Really? presents a distinctive view of how personality shapes our lives - and why this matters. Dr Brian Little makes the case for a third nature to the human condition - the pursuit of personal projects, crazy dreams and creative ventures that shape both people's lives and their personalities. Stable traits of personality (now identified as the 'Big Five': openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism) have important links with well-being, both psychological and physical. But in contrast with these fixed traits of personality there are what Little identifies as 'free traits.' These are traits that run counter to one's first nature. Why do we engage in free trait behaviour? We do so to advance core personal projects in our lives; we can act out of character because of the demands of professionalism or the imperatives of love. Like learning to walk, forcing ourselves out of balance as we step forward may be temporarily disconcerting. But it is the only way, literally, in which we can move forward. And it is the only way that human flourishing can be enhanced.Who Are You, Really? provides a deeply personal itinerary for exploring our personalities, our lives and the human condition.
Dr. Brian Little is an internationally acclaimed scholar and speaker in the field of personality and motivational psychology. He is a Fellow of the Well-Being Institute and Director of the Social Ecology Research Group in the Department of Psychology at Cambridge University. Previously, he taught at McGill, Oxford, and Harvard Universities. Dividing his time between Canada and the UK, Dr. Little is also a Distinguished Research Professor Emeritus at Carleton University in Ottawa, and he lectures worldwide on personality, motivation, and well-being. Who Are You, Really? is his first book.


Patricia K. Ackerman | A. O. Smith Corp.
In January 2019, Pat Ackerman was named Senior Vice President at A. O. Smith Corporation, adding Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability functions to her previous role as Vice President-Investor Relations and Treasurer. Pat is responsible for all investor and analyst relations of the publicly-held, S&P-500 member, Milwaukee-based global manufacturer. She sets and drives corporate responsibility and sustainability goals for A. O. Smith's worldwide operations. As treasurer, she is responsible for capital market debt raising, global finance, foreign currency management, treasury, and pension investment for the company.
Pat was named Vice President and Treasurer of the corporation in April 2006. Prior to that, she served as an Assistant Treasurer from 1995 until 2006. She has also held the positions of Cash Manager and Manager-Capital Markets and International Finance since joining the company in 1983. As a founding member of A. O. Smith's Women's Resource Network, Pat led the establishment of the company's global gender diversity initiative in 2015.
Pat holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Finance from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and an MBA from Marquette University. She currently serves as a board member of the American Red Cross Southeastern Wisconsin and as vice chairwoman of Milwaukee Women, inc. She recently retired as a member of the Aurora Healthcare Investment Policy Committee and as chairperson of the Manufacturers Alliance Treasurer's Council. Previously, Pat served on the PRA advisory board and as a member of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society-Wisconsin Chapter Board of Trustees. Pat was named a 2012 Woman of Influence by the Business Journal of Greater Milwaukee. Institutional Investor magazine recognized Pat as the 2016-2018 Top Investor Relations Executive among public mid-cap companies in the diversified industrial industry sector.


text:
Q: using ssh to connect to live server and push my git into it I have an IP and guest_key from a live linux server.
I am getting error when I try to ssh into the server or use push on it.
Every time I try, I get a Permission denied (publickey) error i
I have tried to push my local Git app into production by ssh like below
git remote add production ssh://root@3******0/var/repo/site.git

how can I add my key to git bash line so that server gives me permission.
I am using windows and git bash for that.
root@**MyIpAdress**: Permission denied (publickey).

Can somebody help me with that: I mean can we directly ssh into live server or just by pushing by Git ?

A: First, it would be really surprising to be using the root account for a remote SSH session.
This is not considered a good practice (since root can do anything), and a service account like "git" (or any regular account you want) is recommended.
Second, you need to add your %USERPROFILE%\.ssh/id_rsa.pub to the remote server ~/.ssh/authorized_keys, in order for any SSH call to have a chance to complete.
If your key is not named id_rsa(.pub), then, as explained here, you need to define an entry (for instance 'xxx') which will reference your actual private key.
Then your URL would be:
cd C:\path\to\repo
git remote set-url production xxx:/var/repo/site.git
git push production master

But again, try and avoid using root on the remote server.
(even sudo is dangerous)

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Sometimes Christians like to think that God only addresses the world through us, but yesterday the Word of the Lord was addressed to the Australian public through a faithful Muslim man, speaking words that would not have sounded at all out of place on the lips of Jesus (who of course Muslims revere as a great prophet). It was Waleed Aly on The Project calling us to get off the outrage cycle and "send forgiveness viral". Listen to what he had to say here.


text:
Statements from President Trump and Others on the Rescission of DACA
Submitted by Alexander J. Segal on September 5, 2017 - 7:02pm
Attorney General Jeff Sessions
Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Elaine Duke
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
Speaker of the House Paul Ryan
Senator Lindsey Graham
Former President Barack Obama
On September 5, 2017, the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Elaine C. Duke, issued a memorandum rescinding the 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) memorandum, but also providing for a six-month wind-down of DACA. In our full article on the rescission of DACA, we discuss the background of the decision and how it will be implemented [see article]. In this supplementary post, we will examine statements from President Donald Trump, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and Acting Secretary Duke on the decision. We will also examine a statement from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, whose lawsuit prompted the Trump Administration to make its decision, and from two key congressional leaders on what may happen next. Finally, we will also examine the critical response of former President Barack Obama.
See "Statement from President Donald J. Trump" [PDF version].
We have noted in numerous posts that President Trump has seemed conflicted about the DACA program. Although he campaigned on rescinding it, he had, for the first seven-plus months of his administration, declined to do so. Accordingly, at the top of his statement, he stated that although his highest duty is "to defend the American people and the Constitution," he does not "favor punishing children … for the actions of their parents," while also noting that most DACA recipients are now adults themselves.
In explaining his decision, President Trump noted that it is the job of the legislative branch, rather than the executive branch, to write the laws. He added that "this is the bedrock of our Constitutional system, which I took a solemn oath to preserve, protect, and defend."
To that effect, President Trump criticized the decision of former President Barack Obama "to give work permits, social security numbers, and federal benefits to approximately 800,000 illegal immigrants currently between the ages of 15 and 36." Describing DACA pejoratively as "executive amnesty," he noted that Congress had, on several occasions, debated and declined to pass legislation that would have worked toward similar ends. He also noted that President Obama himself had taken the position that he did not have the authority to implement a program such as DACA before eventually doing so. President Trump described the decision to create DACA as "making an end-run around Congress and violating the core tenants that sustain our Republic."
President Trump then discussed two additional reasons why he opted to end DACA. First, he referenced the pending litigation led by Texas. He noted that both Attorney General Sessions and other legal experts have advised him that the program is unlawful and unconstitutional and, accordingly, would not survive legal scrutiny.
Secondly, President Trump criticized the implementation on policy grounds in addition to legal grounds. He attributed the surge of unaccompanied minors that crossed the Southwest Border after the implementation of DACA in part to DACA.
President Trump took the position that "[t]here can be no path to principled immigration reform if the executive branch is able to rewrite or nullify federal laws at will." Rather, he stated that "[o]nly the reliable enforcement of immigration law" can produce good results.
However, as we explained in detail in our full article on the rescission of DACA, President Trump did not end DACA completely as of September 5, 2017. Rather, DACA is being phased out in order to, in the words of the President, "provide a window of opportunity for Congress to finally act."
Although DACA has been rescinded, President Trump emphasized that the DHS's enforcement priorities "remain unchanged." He stated that they are focused on "criminals, security threats, recent border-crosses, visa overstays, and repeat violators." Accordingly, President Trump explained, he has advised the DHS that DACA recipients are not enforcement priorities unless they are criminals, otherwise involved in criminal activity, or gang members. Please see our full article to learn about the Trump Administration's enforcement priorities [see article].
President Trump then moved on to criticize "[t]he decades-long failure of Washington D.C. to enforce federal immigration law," which has, in his view, depressed wages, raised unemployment for American workers, and created other financial and law enforcement burdens. He stated that the interests of "American families, students, taxpayers, and jobseekers" must now come first. To this effect, President Trump reiterated his support for the RAISE Act proposal offered by Senators Tom Cotton and David Perdue, which we discussed in detail on site [see opinion blog].
Regarding DACA specifically, President Trump again pledged to solve the issues addressed by DACA "with heart and compassion." He stated that reform must be done "through the lawful [d]emocratic process." He added that any solution must "provide[] enduring benefits for the American citizens we were elected to serve." He stated that "young Americans have dreams too…" and that the foremost obligation of any immigration reform "must be to improve jobs, wages[,] and security for American workers and their families."
In typical rhetorical style, he concluded by stating that "[i]t is now time for Congress to act!"
According to his statement, President Trump appears to have mostly based his decision to rescind DACA on a concern for the rule of law and our constitutional system of government, while noting his many concerns with the process and authorities utilized by the Obama Administration in implementing DACA. Neverthelesss, he had appeared reluctant to terminate DACA prior to ultimately doing so, and he acknowledged the imminent escalation of the pending legal challenges to DACA as something that ultimately motivated his decision.
Regarding what President Trump hopes to happen next, his statement leaves many questions open. First, President Trump explained that the six-month wind-down is intended to give Congress time to act. The fact that he on multiple occasions noted his compassion for DACA recipients suggests that he hopes to see a legislative solution providing similar benefits. However, he rejected an "amnesty first" approach to immigration reform, referencing DACA, suggesting that he had issues with the policy itself in addition to its implementation, while also making the goal of protecting American workers, as opposed to aliens in the United States illegally, the top priority.
President Trump also expressed these distinct goals in two tweets.
First, at 5:04 AM, prior to the official announcement:
Second, his account re-tweeted the following tweet from a different account:
Presumably, this all suggests that President Trump wants new provisions for immigration enforcement and border security to accompany any legislative solution for DACA recipients. However, it is unclear at this moment which sorts of provisions President Trump expects and how forceful he will be in pursuing them.
For interested readers, we have also uploaded the White House talking points on the decision [PDF version]. The talking points list various instances in which the Trump Administration alleges that former President Obama had initially opposed a DACA-like action on both legal and policy grounds before reversing course. It touts the accomplishments of the Trump Administration in immigration enforcement and takes the same position that President Trump did in his remarks by asserting that the DACA policy undercut immigration enforcements and American workers.
We will follow the situation and post updates on his thinking as they become available.
See "Attorney General Sessions Delivers Remarks on DACA" [PDF version].
Interestingly, while President Trump had ultimate decision-making authority over the future of DACA and the memorandum rescinding DACA was issued by Acting Secretary Elaine Duke, the announcement of the new policy was made by Attorney General Jeff Sessions. In his capacity as the head of the Department of Justice (DOJ), Sessions advised both President Trump and Acting Secretary Duke that DACA was illegal and that it would not survive legal scrutiny. Sessions had been an opponent of DACA on both legal and policy grounds when he was serving as a United States Senator from Alabama. Perhaps for these reasons, President Trump left it to Attorney General Sessions to deliver the news. The statement that we are reviewing is the remarks delivered by the Attorney General to the public. You may also watch the video of the remarks here:
Like President Trump, Attorney General Sessions focused on what he determined was the illegality of DACA. He noted that Congress had, on several occasions, refused to authorize the type of benefits legislatively that DACA did through executive action. He stated that "[s]uch an open-ended circumvention of immigration laws was an unconstitutional exercise of authority by the Executive Branch."
Attorney General Sessions grounded the decision in deep concerns over the rule of law. More broadly than the immigration debate, Sessions stated that "[s]ocieties where the rule of law is subject to political whims and personal biases tend to become societies afflicted by corruption, poverty, and human suffering." He stated further that "if we are to further our goal of strengthening the constitutional order and the rule of law in America, the Department of Justice cannot defend this type of overreach."
Attorney General Sessions noted the legal challenges to DACA, and he suggested that it was unlawful for the same reasons that the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit enjoined the larger Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA) program. To this effect, Attorney General Sessions focused on separation of powers concerns regarding DACA. Interestingly, he did not address concerns regarding the president's constitutional duty to ensure that the laws are faithfully executed, which was an additional ground on which Texas alleged that DAPA was illegal.
In addition to broader legal concerns, Attorney General Sessions addressed the immigration policy implications of DACA. He described DACA pejoratively as "unilateral executive amnesty," and like President Trump he attributed the surge of unaccompanied minors crossing the Southwest Border in part to DACA. He also alleged that DACA had hindered the employment prospects of Americans. He added that "we cannot admit everyone who would like to come here. That is an open border policy and the American people have rightly rejected it."
Attorney General Sessions addressed arguments that, regardless of legality, DACA was the right thing to do. He stated that, although "we are a people of compassion…" "there is nothing compassionate about the failure to enforce immigration laws." Rather, he argued, the "compassionate thing to do is to end the lawlessness, enforce our laws, and, if Congress chooses to make changes to those laws, to do so through the process set forth by our Founders in a way that advances the interest of the nation."
Attorney General Sessions struck a similar tone to President Trump while going into more specifics regarding his concerns that DACA had a negative effect on the rule of law and the constitutional order. He also touted the accomplishments of the Trump Administration on immigration enforcement and backed the RAISE Act. His remarks notably include fewer indications that his priority is replacing DACA benefits legislatively than President Trump expressed. However, Attorney General Sessions is unlikely to play a direct role in the debate over a legislative solution to DACA outside of any counsel on the subject that he may offer President Trump.
Please see our blog on the detailed legal rationale for rescinding DACA [see blog].
See "Statement from Acting Secretary Duke on the Recession of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)" [PDF version].
Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Elaine Duke issued the memorandum rescinding DACA. Again, you may read our full article on the subject on site [see article].
Acting Secretary Duke stated that the decision to rescind DACA was not made lightly, but only after consultation with the DOJ. She stated that given the legal vulnerabilities of DACA, the Trump Administration had two options available to it:
1. Wind DACA down in an orderly fashion that protects beneficiaries in the near term while working with Congress to pass legislation; or
2. Allow the judiciary to potentially shut DACA down completely and immediately.
Acting Secretary Duke stated that the Trump Administration opted for the first option because it was the least destructive.
Acting Secretary Duke expressed her sympathy with DACA recipients who now face uncertain futures. She noted that DACA itself was never more than a temporary bureaucratic delay, and that it never promised a permanent solution for beneficiaries. For this reason, she stated, "DACA was fundamentally a lie."
Acting Secretary Duke expressed her belief that former President Obama acted out of good intentions and his frustration with Congress. Nevertheless, she stated that a DHS memorandum, even if it is intended to be temporary, is not a substitute for a law passed by Congress and signed by the President.
Acting Secretary Duke explained that prior to assuming her current position, she taught civics to naturalization applicants. She noted that it was her position that "[t]he DACA program violates those basic civics lessons that are fundamental to our country and to our citizens." She stated that, regardless of intent, "[i]t is dangerous precedent to systematically ignore the law…" Similarly to President Trump and Attorney General Sessions, Duke stated that "[i]t is dangerous to encourage and reward illegal immigration."
Acting Secretary Duke encouraged Congress to come up with a legislative solution if it believes that the current immigration laws do not reflect the values of the United States. She stated that the DHS would cooperate with Congress in providing information to come up with such a solution. In her opinion, America is "overdue for real answers…" and there should be "[n]o more stopgap measures, no more temporary options, and no more kicking the tough decisions down the road in the hope they become too painful to ignore for someone else."
Acting Secretary Duke's statement expressed empathy for DACA recipients. However, like President Trump and Attorney General Sessions, she was harshly critical of the process under which DACA was implemented and the implications it had for constitutional governance, although granting that former President Obama may have been well-intentioned. Her statement seems to express stronger support for a permanent legislative replacement for DACA than articulated by Attorney General Sessions, although she too suggested that the process may have encouraged illegal immigration. In fact, in addition to legal concerns, a key theme of Acting Secretary Duke's statement is that DACA was temporary and never provided a real solution for its beneficiaries.
See "AG Paxton Applauds President Trump's Decision to Phase Out DACA" [PDF version].
The litigation led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton ultimately prompted President Trump to make a decision on the fate of DACA by September 5, 2017. Attorney General Paxton praised President Trump for phasing out DACA. He stated that leaving DACA in place "would have set a dangerous precedent by giving the executive branch sweeping authority to bypass Congress and change immigration laws." Unlike Attorney General Sessions, Paxton also explicitly stated that DACA was "a violation of the President's duty to 'take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed…'"
Overall, the statement suggests that Texas will not pursue its case against DACA and DAPA further, notwithstanding the fact that the Trump Administration will allow a limited class of individuals to receive initial grants of DACA and DACA renewals subsequent to the rescission of DACA.
See "Statement on DACA Program" [PDF version].
As Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan will play a leading role in the congressional debate over a legislative solution in the aftermath of the DACA rescission. Interestingly, although Speaker Ryan believes that DACA is illegal, he had encouraged President Trump to leave it in place while Congress assesses the issue.
Speaker Ryan's sentiments echo those of Acting Secretary Duke. He suggested that while former President Obama may have been well-intentioned in implementing DACA, he abused his authority by "creat[ing] law out of thin air." He added that DACA "was never a viable long-term solution…" to the problems it sought to address. He stated that it is Congress's duty to write laws, and that President Trump's decision "restore[d] the proper role of the executive and legislative branches." In conclusion, he expressed his hope "that the House and Senate, with the president's leadership, will be able to find consensus on a permanent legislative solution that includes ensuring that those who have done nothing wrong can still contribute as a valued part of this great country."
Speaker Ryan's statement strikes a softer tone than the statements of President Trump and his two secretaries. Although he stated that DACA was illegal, Speaker Ryan did not suggest that it had a negative effect on illegal immigration. In hoping for a solution, Speaker Ryan did not, as did President Trump and Attorney General Sessions, suggest that it would necessarily have to be accompanied by enforcement measures (although the language "legislative solution that includes" could be read this way). Speaker Ryan presides over a divided Republican caucus, so it remains to be seen how he will pursue crafting a solution that can pass both houses of congress.
See "Statement From U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham on DACA" [PDF version].
Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina has been the leading Republican proponent of a legislative solution to the issues purportedly addressed by DACA. We discussed his latest legislative proposal that preceded the DACA rescission in a detailed blog on site [see blog]. The following statement actually was made the day before the rescission when the decision appeared to be imminent.
Although Senator Graham is a leading supporter of Dream Act legislation, he expressed support for President Trump's decision to cancel DACA and give Congress six months to craft a legislative solution. He stated that DACA was "presidential overreach." He referenced the legislation that he recently co-sponsored and stated that he looked forward to working with both the Trump Administration and his colleagues to come up with a solution. Notably, Senator Graham has not suggested that he would insist on new immigration enforcement measures to accompany his proposal, although it remains to be seen if he will adopt such a position as the debate moves forward.
See "Barack Obama Statement" [PDF version]
Former President Barack Obama — whose administration implemented DACA — issued a harsh response to the decision of the Trump Administration. Although he is out of office, it is worth noting that the former President is still a highly influential figure in his party.
Obama stated that immigration is a complicated and heavily debated topic, and that those of good will can disagree on specific policies and fixes. However, he observed that the decision of the White House is not about fixing the immigration system or ensuring that everyone plays by the rules. He noted that "dreamers," those protected by DACA, are "young people who grew up in America — kids who study in our schools, young adults who are starting careers, patriots who pledge allegiance to our flag." He noted that these individuals are Americanized and many may not know a language other than English.
He explained that, as president, he asked Congress to send him a bill creating a permanent solution. When the bill never came, he concluded that it then made sense to "lift the shadow of deportation from these young people, so that they could continue to contribute to our communities and our country."
Regarding allegations that the policy was illegal, Obama stated that it was "based on the well-established legal principle of prosecutorial discretion…" To this effect, he explained, the policy was legal and made sense on practical grounds due to the necessity of allocating limited resources. He suggested that it had a positive effect on immigration enforcement by allowing resources to be focused "on those who come illegally … to do us harm."
Accordingly, the former president took the position that the rescission of DACA was not "required legally." He opined instead that it was "a political decision, and a moral question." He added that the decision was "cruel," noting that many good people who came to the United States as children may end up subject to immigration enforcement.
Obama stated that now the responsibility has been shifted to Congress, it is incumbent on the legislature to devise a permanent legislative solution. He stated that the issue is ultimately about "basic decency" and "who we want to be."
Former President Obama framed his disagreement with the DACA rescission in mostly moral terms, although he defended the action legally on grounds that it was a basic exercise of prosecutorial discretion and resource allocation. It is unclear whether he will take an active role in the forthcoming debate. However, given his influence as a two-term president who is still well-liked by the majority of Democrats in congress and across the country, it is quite likely that many will listen whenever he weighs in on the issue.
In this post, we examined a selection of statements from the Trump Administration, Congressional leaders, and former President Barack Obama. We will continue to follow the issue as it develops on site. Those who are unsure about their situation should consult with an experienced immigration attorney for guidance.
Alexander J. Segal's blog


When it comes to the best restaurants in Chester, Picanha by Fazenda – a Brazilian steakhouse – takes the number one spot on TripAdvisor. Picanha – the Brazilian word for the best cut of meat – is a mouth-watering restaurant that fuses South American cooking techniques, namely gaucho grilling and Rodizio skewers, to create an irresistible menu. Choose from beef, chicken, pork and lamb and let the chefs work their magic. And their salad buffet is well worth a trip or two during your meal, while vegan and vegetarian options are available.
Making the most of fresh produce delivered from their farm partners just seven miles away, The Chef's Table is another highly rated restaurant. The award-winning restaurant offers a limited but varied menu that delivers an explosion of tastes, with their Sunday lunch set menu their best value.
Another high-end dining spot, La P'tite France – as you've guessed – is an exclusively French restaurant that deals in tried-and-tested classics like snails, mussels and peg-on-the-nose ripe French cheeses. Located in the heart of Chester and a mile from our Chester City Centre hotel, it's open for lunch from Wednesday to Sunday, with evening meals on offer from Thursday to Saturday.
For a taste of the Mediterranean, head to Istanbul BBQ or Atina Kitchen; both of which are just half a mile from our Chester City Centre hotel. Istanbul BBQ lives up to its name – expect chargrilled meat, vibrant meze options and a warm and welcoming atmosphere. Alternatively, Atina Kitchen is open for breakfast, lunch, brunch and dinner, serving up Italian flavours with a British twist including Nonna's braised beef shin lasagne, which is a third-generation recipe.
If you're looking for a perfectly cooked steak, then head to Miller and Carter; a high-quality steak chain. The meat is matured for 30 days and then cooked to your liking – medium rare for us, please – and is a seven-minute taxi from our Chester City Centre hotel. Opera Grill also comes highly recommended. A stylish and generously sized restaurant – it can seat up to 400 guests – they deliver food with real taste and substance, using charcoal grills and wood-fired ovens. To get an even smokier flavour with your steak, make the trip to Hickory's Smokehouse. This American-themed BBQ and smokehouse deliver a huge hit of Texas and Louisiana flavours.
Rounding off our selection, we have two bars that serve up some very appealing fare. Barlounge Chester dishes up high-quality gastro pub fare, while The Botanist menus span deli platters, salads, pies, BBQ dishes and lots more.


Kronomyth 4.2: The red, red rogue of Blue.
If Blue contained nothing but "California," "A Case of You" and thirty minutes of bongos, it would still be a great album. Of course, it contains a lot more than that, yet these two tracks are, in some ways, the fulcrum on which Blue's brilliance rests. At the writing of Blue, Joni was on a journey to find something in the wide world—maybe peace, love, happiness, good omelettes. "California" is Joni's epiphany in mid-Ozdyssey that there's no place like home.
That's the text of "California," but there's a subtext as well, introduced at the end of the song, where Joni asks: "Will you take me as I am?" For me, this has always been a question of forgiveness and redemption, a prodigal daughter returning to her adopted fatherland. Of course, that could just be my personal interpretation, as someone who has never been comfortable in the world and has come to accept that the only forgiveness and understanding I'll find is from the creator who made me.
"A Case of You" is another case of Joni singing the relationship blues but, instead of California, the forsaken fatherland this time is Canada. Both songs feature Joni playing the dulcimer with acoustic guitar accompaniment from James Taylor, who would go on to be the subject of several Joni Mitchell songs including "See You Sometime" from her next album, For The Roses. For my money, the ending of "California" ("Will you take me as I am?") and the mournful cry for lost Canada on "A Case of You" ("Oh Canada") are indelible moments in the music of Joni Mitchell over a long career. Oddly, "California" didn't chart as a single, but it did score her a cool appearance on The Johnny Cash Show.
Released on 7-inch single in October 1971 in the US (Reprise, 1049) and Canada (Reprise, REP 1049), and on April 21, 1972 in the UK (Reprise, K14130).


text:
Shaa Wasmund MBE
How to build a successful online business
Book Shaa Wasmund MBE today!
Shaa Wasmund MBE is one of Britain's most highly regarded female entrepreneurs and was named in 2016 by The Sunday Times as one of the Top 20 Most Influential Entrepreneurs in the UK and The Guardian newspaper named Shaa's events as one of the Top 10 Events to attend as a small business owner.
She is an international best selling author and award winning Businesswoman, who the IoD voted one of the most connected women in Britain. Her first book, "Stop Talking, Start Doing" was the #1 Best Selling business book in the UK for 14 months in a row, breaking all records.
Shaa's experience is incredibly diverse. Whilst still at University, she became the world's only licensed female boxing promoter, working alongside Don King to put on 22 World Title fights. Shaa then started working with Sir James Dyson from around his kitchen table and helped build Dyson into one of the most recognised brand names in the world.
In 2015 she received an MBE Award from the Queen for her "services to business and entrepreneurship". Today, in addition to running her own successful online educational businesses (shaa.com), she is also an acclaimed international speaker, having spoken alongside the likes of Gary Vaynerchuk and Tim Ferris.
Specialities: Business, Entrepreneurship, Sales and Marketing
← David Thomas
Kresse Wesling →


text:
Compliance Know How
30 Days to a Better Compliance Program
Compliance Man
Articles & Papers
Training-Compliance Master Class
The 10 Hallmarks of an Effective Compliance Program: Still the Foundation
The joint Department of Justice (DOJ) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) 2012 FCPA Guidance came out five years ago this month. As a commentator focusing on the doing of compliance, we should pause to once again thank the government regulators and prosecutors who had a part in drafting this most remarkable of documents. I submit it is the best government generated source regarding what constituted at the time (and probably still does) a best practices compliance program. For anyone interested in exploring the lessons learned about Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) compliance programs and what the government expects to see, the 2012 FCPA Guidance is the best document you can start with.
As a 'Nuts and Bolts' guy I found the DOJ/SEC formulation of their thoughts on what might constitute a best practices compliance program, denominated the "Ten Hallmarks of an Effective Compliance Program", as the most useful part of the FCPA Guidance. While the Guidance cautions that there is no "one-size-fits-all" compliance program, it recognizes a variety of factors such as size, type of business, industry and risk profile a company should determine for its own needs regarding a FCPA compliance program. But the Guidance made clear that these ten points are "meant to provide insight into the aspects of compliance programs that DOJ and SEC assess". In other words you should pay attention to these and use this information to assess your own compliance regime.
Commitment from Senior Management and a Clearly Articulated Policy Against Corruption. It all starts with tone at the top. But more than simply 'talk-the-talk' company leadership must 'walk-the-walk' and lead by example. Both the DOJ and SEC look to see if a company has a "culture of compliance". More than a paper program is required, it must have real teeth and it must be put into action, all of which is led by senior management. The Guidance states, "A strong ethical culture directly supports a strong compliance program. By adhering to ethical standards, senior managers will inspire middle managers to reinforce those standards." This prong ends by stating that the DOJ and SEC will "evaluate whether senior management has clearly articulated company standards, communicated them in unambiguous terms, adhered to them scrupulously, and disseminated them throughout the organization."
Code of Conduct and Compliance Policies and Procedures. The Code of Conduct has long been seen as the foundation of a company's overall compliance program and the Guidance acknowledges this fact. But a Code of Conduct and a company's compliance policies need to be clear and concise. Importantly, the Guidance made clear that if a company has a large employee base that is not fluent in English such documents need to be translated into the native language of those employees. A company also needs to have appropriate internal controls based upon the risks that a company has assessed for its business model.
Oversight, Autonomy, and Resources. This section begins with a discussion on the assignment of a senior level executive to oversee and implement a company's compliance program. Equally importantly, the compliance function must have "sufficient resources to ensure that the company's compliance program is implemented effectively." Finally, the compliance function should report to the company's Board of Directors or an appropriate committee of the Board such as the Audit Committee. Overall, the DOJ and SEC will "consider whether the company devoted adequate staffing and resources to the compliance program given the size, structure, and risk profile of the business."
Risk Assessment. The Guidance states, "assessment of risk is fundamental to developing a strong compliance program". Indeed, if there is one over-riding theme in the Guidance it is that a company should assess its risks in all areas of its business. The Guidance is also quite clear that when the DOJ and SEC look at a company's overall compliance program, they "take into account whether and to what degree a company analyzes and addresses the particular risks it faces." The Guidance lists factors that a company should consider in any risk assessment. They are "the country and industry sector, the business opportunity, potential business partners, level of involvement with governments, amount of government regulation and oversight, and exposure to customs and immigration in conducting business affairs."
Training and Continuing Advice. Communication of a compliance program is a cornerstone of any anti-corruption compliance program. The Guidance specifies that both the "DOJ and SEC will evaluate whether a company has taken steps to ensure that relevant policies and procedures have been communicated throughout the organization, including through periodic training and certification for all directors, officers, relevant employees, and, where appropriate, agents and business partners." The training should be risk based so that those high-risk employees and third party business partners receive an appropriate level of training. A company should also devote appropriate resources to providing its employees with guidance and advice on how to comply with their own compliance program on an ongoing basis.
Incentives and Disciplinary Measures. Initially the Guidance notes that a company's compliance program should apply from "the board room to the supply room – no one should be beyond its reach." There should be appropriate discipline in place and administered for any violation of the FCPA or a company's compliance program. Additionally, the "DOJ and SEC recognize that positive incentives can also drive compliant behavior. These incentives can take many forms such as personnel evaluations and promotions, rewards for improving and developing a company's compliance program, and rewards for ethics and compliance leadership."
Third-Party Due Diligence and Payments. The Guidance says that companies must engage in risk based due diligence to understand the "qualifications and associations of its third-party partners, including its business reputation, and relationship, if any, with foreign officials." Next a company should articulate a business rationale for the use of the third party. This would include an evaluation of the payment arrangement to ascertain that the compensation is reasonable and will not be used as a basis for corrupt payments. Lastly, there should be ongoing monitoring of third parties.
Confidential Reporting and Internal Investigation. This means more than simply a hotline. The Guidance suggests that anonymous reporting, and perhaps even a company ombudsman, might be appropriate to have in place for employees to report allegations of corruption or violations of the FCPA. Furthermore, it is just as important what a company does after an allegation is made. The Guidance states, "once an allegation is made, companies should have in place an efficient, reliable, and properly funded process for investigating the allegation and documenting the company's response, including any disciplinary or remediation measures taken." The final message is what did you learn from the allegation and investigation and did you apply it in your company?
Continuous Improvement: Periodic Testing and Review. As noted in the Guidance, "compliance programs that do not just exist on paper but are followed in practice will inevitably uncover compliance weaknesses and require enhancements. Consequently, DOJ and SEC evaluate whether companies regularly review and improve their compliance programs and not allow them to become stale." The DOJ/SEC expects that a company will review and test its compliance controls and "think critically" about its own weaknesses and risk areas. Internal controls should also be periodically tested through targeted audits.
Mergers and Acquisitions.Pre-Acquisition Due Diligence and Post-Acquisition Integration.Here the DOJ and SEC spelled out their expectations in not only the post-acquisition integration phase but also in the pre-acquisition phase. This pre-acquisition information was not something on which most companies had previously focused. A company should attempt to perform as much substantive compliance due diligence that it can do before it purchases a company. After the deal is closed, an acquiring entity needs to perform a FCPA audit, train all senior management and risk employees in the purchased company and integrate the acquired entity into its compliance regime.
What is the significance of these Ten Hallmarks today? Earlier this year, the DOJ released the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs (Evaluation), based on these Ten Hallmarks. In April 2016, they released the FCPA Pilot Program, through which it further refined and clarified many of the specific Hallmarks from the 2012 FCPA Guidance. Indeed, in every speech since the release of the 2012 FCPA Guidance, where the DOJ has discussed its views on compliance best practices, it is always in reference to the 10 Hallmarks of an Effective Compliance Program.
While others have leveled a variety of criticism about the 2012 FCPA Guidance, they miss the essential point that for the compliance practitioner, it is an excellent resource about operationalizing compliance by putting into the business process of your organization. Here's to the Guidance at the ripe of age of 5. Thanks for coming into all of our (compliance) lives.
The 10 Hallmarks from the FCPA Guidance remain the foundation to operationalize a compliance program.
This publication contains general information only and is based on the experiences and research of the author. The author is not, by means of this publication, rendering business, legal advice, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such legal advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified legal advisor. The author, his affiliates, and related entities shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person or entity that relies on this publication. The Author gives his permission to link, post, distribute, or reference this article for any lawful purpose, provided attribution is made to the author. The author can be reached at tfox@tfoxlaw.com.
© Thomas R. Fox, 2017
← Compliance Man Goes Global – Episode 5: You Really Like Me!
12 O'Clock High-Episode 66, Communication Skills →
Everything Compliance-Episode 40, the Carnac the Magnificent edition
31 Days Days to More Effective Compliance Program – Policies and procedures
Opinion Release Papers-07-02-Business Entertainment for Foreign Officials
31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program – Twitter and 360-degrees of communication
Get Livefyre
Copyright © 2018 Compliance Report. Disclaimer.
.mailmunch-sidebar:nth-child(1){