text:
Xxl boxer shorts
Leather jackets for children
Address of palisades mall
Stores in the natick mall
Mckinley clothing
How To Wear A Blazer Jacket With Jeans | Matching Blazers With Denim
Again, we go back to the original purpose of the sports jacket.
The trick lies in wearing the right blazer with the right jeans. Not all navy blazers are created equal. Some are meant to serve as a bare level of formality down from suits and ties especially the double-breasted variety. You should be looking for elements of a casual style:. Anything very crisply squared-off and military-looking is for business meetings and yachts. Look for something with a natural, un-padded shape.
Wearing jeans means wearing your jacket open at least some of the time. Double-breasted is right out and too formal to pair with jeans anyway , and three-button styles tend to flap and billow when left unbuttoned.
As above, you want to avoid flapping fabric when you wear the jacket open. A modest little bit of narrowing above the hips is all you need. A superfine wool with a lustrous sheen is going to be out of place, and so is a big, hairy tweed jacket. A simple, durable worsted is fine, as is a flannel if you prefer a more textured surface. A twill weave is easy to recognize by its narrow diagonal ribbing.
Make sure the jacket is either a smooth-faced weave or something distinct from twill like hopsack, flannel, birdseye or nailhead. You may also want to consider avoiding the traditional metallic buttons — or you may like the contrast in your outfit.
Metal buttons are more conservative and a bit preppy; plastic or mother-of-pearl buttons that match the jacket color or complement it more subtly are a more modern and urbane look. Jeans and sports jackets lend themselves to natural contrasts. In this case, the piping is in college colours , and college buttons are worn. This traditional style can be seen in many films set in the Edwardian era, such as Kind Hearts and Coronets. Where the blazer is part of the dress of a school, college, sports club, or armed service regimental association veterans' organization , it is normal for a badge to be sewn to the breast pocket.
In schools, this badge may vary according to the pupil's standing in the school: In the British Commonwealth, many regimental associations wear "regimental blazers" which also sport a similar badge on the breast pocket, usually in the form of a wire badge, and sometimes also regimental blazer buttons.
In the British army, officers do not normally wear badges on their blazers or boating jackets. Two regimental blazers will rarely be the same, as they are sourced from different civilian suppliers and are not issued by any authority. This results from the fact that the members of the association are no longer serving personnel, but civilians, though still retaining the bond that the badge represents.
The standard colour is navy blue, although in some associations different colours are worn, such as rifle green for the associations of rifle regiments. Blazers, once commonly worn playing or attending traditional "gentlemen's sports", persist in only some games now, such as occasional use by tennis players, or in cricket, where in professional matches, such as international test matches, it is considered customary for the captain to wear a blazer with the team's logo or national coat of arms on the breast pocket — at least during the coin toss at the beginning of the match.
The former event awards a crimson blazer to the winner of several flights of match race sailing of the highest international calibre, while the latter awards a green blazer to the top Masters golfer in the USA. The sartorial term blazer originated with the red "blazers" of the Lady Margaret Boat Club , the rowing club of St. The Lady Margaret club jackets were termed blazers because of the bright red cloth, and the term survived the original red coat.
A writer to the London Daily News 22 August commented that "In your article of to-day … you speak of 'a striped red and black blazer', 'the blazer', also of 'the pale toned' ones … A blazer is the red flannel boating jacket worn by the Lady Margaret, St.
John's College, Cambridge, Boat Club. When I was at Cambridge it meant that and nothing else. It seems from your article that a blazer now means a coloured flannel jacket, whether for cricket, tennis, boating, or seaside wear. These early blazers were like later sports jackets, but this term has never referred to blazers, instead describing jackets derived from the later innovation of wearing odd jackets for land-based sports.
Assertions that the name is derived from HMS Blazer are not borne out by contemporary sources, although it is reported that before the standardization of uniform in the Royal Navy , the crew of HMS Blazer wore "striped blue and white jackets", [2] apparently in response to the sailors of HMS Harlequin being turned out in harlequin suits.
The reefer jacket was of naval origin, and described the short double-breasted jacket worn by sailors in harsh weather, when they performed duties such as reefing the sails. It is descendants of this which are now commonly described by the term blazer. Originally with black horn buttons, these jackets evolved to the modern dark blazer, now single as well as double breasted, and with metallic buttons.
Various photos from and show London mods in boating blazers. These later blazers often had non-metal buttons, sometimes in the same colour as the edging. The earlier style of striped blazers can be seen in the film Quadrophenia. The later, bright, style of blazer was affectionately adopted by Austin Powers as part of his Swinging-London look. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
This article is about blazer jackets.
Add sophistication to your look with a Blazer Jacket, Men's Blazer Jacket, Women's Blazer Jacket or Juniors Blazer Jacket. Shop for men's blazers online at Men's Wearhouse. Browse top designer blazer jacket styles & selection for men. FREE Shipping on orders $99+. Classic black blazers for women will add a sharpness to your look. Play with prints and embroidery to break from formality while maintaining elegance. This season, oversized and masculine styles coexist with shorter designs.
North face kids canada
Stores in clinton crossing
Mens clothes big and tall
Brown mary janes for toddlers
38d push up bras
Lace underwear
Bike with girls
Thick socks for kids


admin, tanong lang po. ano po kse password nung pdf file dati na reviewer? nakalimutan ko na po.
Mmm, I've also forgotten. Try "eduphil.org" or "eduphil" - I was not the one who created that.
(01-22-2012 09:51 AM)admin Wrote: Please register to see links.
Note: I only collected here everything that was shared by other members of the forum, for the benefit of those who do not have unlimited online access. If there is no answer key in the zip file, I don't have either.
Thank u so much 4 d c0mpilati0n Sir! Nadownload ko na po sa cp ko. . .maraming maraming salamat po sa inyo,,malaking tul0ng po ang site na ito sa amin. . .
please teach me how to dowload all of this let reviewer.. i really need all your help... people who is kind hearted to help people... thank you so much.
just click the "link" and when another window opens, just find the word "DOWNLOAD" and that's it!
can i have a free copy of LET REVIEWERS? thnx.
can i have a copy of this??


You will receive the File and Directions to create this Dimensional Dress and Coordinating Bow Set for use as a Topper or as an Embellishment for your Romantic Cards and Crafts.
Use the Dress and Bow Together or as Separate Elements to add a Truly Unique look to all of your Creations. Raw Graphics with Kind Permission of Tracy Barnes and Wendy Bird.


Drawing with liquid inks and watercolors on paper was always a convenient and direct way to express my ideas. I love to shape abstract or fancyful landscapes, signs and symbols as well as plants, animals, cars, airplanes, all the things that I encounter in my surroundings. With these images, I mostly try to capture the "genius loci", the nature, history and culture of the place that I currently live in. The interaction and intensity of colors and the impact of the paper on the imagery is important to me.
With its brightness, tactile and haptic qualities, the paper as a material and as a medium has always fascinated me. Since I learned how to form paper from my own tediously prepared paper- pulp, this became more and more the primare medium and a landmark of my artwork. With it ́s processual character, the hand-papermaking can be seen as a metaphor for the ephemeral world - as organic materials like cotton, hemp, bananas or okra as well as fruits or vegetable are transformed into another medium. Making paper is recycling, making something new out of the perishable. As I startet to run my papermill again, back here in Tuscaloosa, I began a whole body of work based on handmade papers from white cotton rags that are well sized, so I can use these sheets for printmaking, cyanotypes and watercolor-paintings as well, all of them in the same handy square size of 10 by 10 inches. The title of this is serie is "watching water". During the last years, I constantly took photographs about the transparency, the viscosity and ever changing visual impression of this element that is present all the time – especially in Alabama with all the lakes, rivers, the sea and the huge amount of rain (that we had in the past summer). In a special project, I am exploring the properties of Alabama-Marble for processing and printing lithography. Stones are particulary interesting because they carry a long, almost eternal history of the place they are from.
soaring, swimming, hiking and to traveling. Josef Albers´ Interaction of colors was very influential to me, as well as contemporary artists like James Turrell, Anish Kapoor or Bill Viola.
2000 mit dem VBKW Region Neckar-Alb in Hlinsko, Tschechien.


A quote that we say often around Fellowship is "People do what you inspect, not what your expect." I would give credit to who said it, but frankly I don't remember where or who we got it from. But I do know this, it is true in most cases.
Inspection time must come, and come often. There are many benefits to an inspection that are very obvious, however, there are some you might not be thinking of. The biggest is managing expectations. If you inspect often you will always pick up on if your teams expectations are not in line with yours. This is huge if you want your team to be successful. If they don't know what is expected from them, then how can they succeed?
Inspection time... it must come, but don't micro-manage. Micro-managing is very tempting when you become a great inspector, but don't fall to the temptation. Stay well balanced and let your team produce for you.


This winter I seem to have got really into the swing of things as far as training goes. Not really been ill although the weather has tried it's best to keep me off the bike.
Yesterday I was being tested in the lab at Brighton University by my coach Gary. The last six weeks training seems to have brought about good gains so 2007 looks to be starting better than 2006.
Sunday sees the start of the next phase with a training camp in Australia . Long endurance rides in the morning, track work in the evening and a gym available for core and strength work inbetween.
After the worlds I decided to take a bit of a break before starting my build up for the Pan-american champs in Colombia next month.
A brief update from Bordeaux, Darren has won Gold in the 1000m Time Trial with a new World Record time of 1:13.011 !


Skateboarding / [written by Robert Italia ; edited by Rosemary Wallner.
By: Italia, Bob, 1955- .
Contributor(s): Wallner, Rosemary, 1964- .
Material type: BookSeries: Action sports library. Publisher: Edina, Minn. : Minneapolis, Minn. : Abdo & Daughters ; Distributed by Rockbottom Books, c1991Description: 32 p.ISBN: 1562390775 (lib. bdg.).Subject(s): Skateboarding -- Juvenile literature | Skateboarding DDC classification: 796.2/1 Summary: Examines the history, equipment, and techniques of skateboarding and identifies organizations associated with the sport.
Examines the history, equipment, and techniques of skateboarding and identifies organizations associated with the sport.


text:
Posts Tagged US
Biden's Afghanistan fiasco: 'We look like a deer caught in headlights'
Posted by admin in Afghan Regugees, AFGHANISTAN, Afghanistan, Afghanistan-Hell for Western Troops, Afghanistan-Pakistan's Shield, Pakistan Fights Terrorism, Taliban & Afghanistan War on August 22nd, 2021
The chaotic scenes in Kabul are unlikely to derail his domestic agenda but undermine his promise to restore competence
Not since Major General William Elphinstone's retreating British army was picked off in 1842, has a foreign occupier left Afghanistan under such a cloud. It took three years after the Soviet withdrawal in 1989 for its Kabul ally to submit to mujahideen forces. It was two years after the US military's exit from Vietnam before Saigon fell to the communists in 1975. On Monday Kabul folded to the Taliban almost three weeks before the official day of America's departure. "We look like a deer caught in the headlights," says Mathew Burrows, a former senior CIA officer now at the Atlantic Council. "It is one more chink gone in the American empire." The scenes of chaos at the Hamid Karzai International Airport will supply anti-American propagandists with years of footage. America's failure after two decades of fruitless nation-building has many authors, starting with George W Bush and including Barack Obama and Donald Trump. But as the president on whose watch the concluding fiasco took place, Joe Biden's name will be indelibly linked to it. The question is whether he can extract any foreign policy gains in what one analyst described as Biden's "Ides of August". Since he was partly elected on a promise to restore competence to the White House, there is also concern that the fall of Kabul will wound Biden's ability to push through his domestic agenda.
President Joe Biden meets with his National Security team of (L-R) secretary of state Tony Blinken, vice-president Kamala Harris, national security adviser Jake Sullivan, secretary of defence Lloyd Austin and chair of the joint chiefs General Mark Milley to discuss the situation in Afghanistan in the Situation Room of the White House last week © Adam Schultz/White House/ZUMA/dpa
Much hinges on whether in the coming days the US can evacuate the thousands of remaining American civilians and tens of thousands of Afghan interpreters, fixers and contractors from an airport surrounded by armed Islamists. The fact that it has boiled down to this — a crush of fleeing Afghans trying to get through an airport perimeter controlled by the Taliban — is reputationally damaging. Washington is awash in finger-pointing at a withdrawal plan that failed to foresee this contingency. The Bagram military base, which lies 35 miles north of Kabul and has two runways, would have been a secure point for an orderly evacuation. But the US military vacated the base on July 4. The White House did not push back on the Pentagon's plan to extricate Americans with guns first and leave the unarmed civilians until later. "It will be hard to separate Biden's strategic decision to leave Afghanistan, which may ultimately prove to be right, with the hasty and sloppy and panicked way in which it has been executed," says Steve Biegun, former US deputy secretary of state. "This comes as something of a body blow to Biden's 'America is back' message. Everyone thought he was going to be different to Trump."
A Taliban delegation led by the head of the negotiating team, Anas Haqqani (C-R), meeting with former Afghan government officials, including former president Hamid Karzai (C-L), at an unspecified location in Afghanistan last week © Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan/AFP
The chaotic scenes in Kabul are unlikely to derail his domestic agenda but undermine his promise to restore comp…
Disputed intelligence In addition to closing Bagram first, there are three additional questions about Biden's competence. The first is the volume of US military equipment that has been left behind for the Taliban, including aircraft, hundreds of military Humvees and tens of thousands of rifles, rockets and night vision goggles. The second is whether Biden ignored intelligence estimates suggesting the Taliban could recapture power on a far more rapid timeline than the six to 18 months the White House was saying. The third is Biden's failure to consult fully with Nato allies about the speed and logistics of the pull out. On all three, the decision ultimately boils down to the president. "It defies belief that this withdrawal was imposed by the military," says a former senior Pentagon official. "The US military was following civilian orders." The official adds that it was also misleading to blame what has happened on intelligence failure. "The intelligence agencies gave a range of forecasts, including the worst," he says.
A US Army Chinook helicopter flight engineer sits on the ramp during a training exercise at Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan © US AIr Force/Tech Sgt Gregory Brook/Reuters
Biden has repeatedly insisted that his hands were tied by Trump's 2019 deal with the Taliban, which provided for US withdrawal in exchange for the Islamist group's vow to forswear terrorism. But people close to Biden say that he would have pulled out of this "forever war" regardless. The president's rationale also sits uneasily with the fact that he has undone, or is seeking to undo, so much else that he inherited from Trump, such as the withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement, the pull out from the Iran nuclear deal and quitting the World Health Organization. "Biden has consistently since at least 2008 believed that the US was throwing good money after bad in Afghanistan," says Jonah Blank, who was Biden's South Asia policy adviser when he was chair of the Senate Foreign Relations committee. Blank took then senator Biden to Afghanistan three times, including an infamous visit in January 2009 — just days before he was sworn in as vice-president — in which he disgustedly walked out of a dinner with Hamid Karzai, the then Afghan president.
As vice-president in 2011, Biden visited an Afghan National Army training centre in Kabul © Shah Marai/AFP/Getty
"If Karzai had shown some gratitude for American help, and indulged in some self-criticism, it might have gone differently," says Blank. "Biden's mind was pretty much fixed from then on." At home, Biden's decision is popular, although some polls this week show a sharp negative tilt in public opinion as Americans watched the harrowing scenes from Kabul airport. In spite of having backed Trump's deal with the Taliban, Republicans are depicting Biden as weak and hinting that he is unable because of his age to carry out his duties responsibly. This week for the first time Biden's approval rating dropped below 50 per cent. But there is little sign the fall of Kabul will damage his chances of passing his set piece $3.5tn spending bill which will depend on razor-thin party line votes. It is rare that a foreign policy setback, however embarrassing, derails a US domestic agenda.
US General Kenneth F. McKenzie touring an evacuation control centre at Hamid Karzai International Airport last week © US Marine Corps/AFP/Getty
Outraged allies The bigger impact on Biden's role is likely to be felt with America's allies and adversaries. Josep Borrell, the EU's foreign affairs chief, told the European parliament that the departure was "a catastrophe for the Afghan people, for western values and credibility and for the developing of international relations". Armin Laschet, Germany's possible successor to Angela Merkel after September's general election, described it as "Nato's biggest debacle since its founding". Even the reliably Atlanticist British failed to conceal their disappointment with an America that had failed to keep them abreast of the details of its pullout. The further the distance from Washington DC, which is split along fiercely partisan lines, the greater the blurring between Biden and Trump. "This looks like America First except that its officials can speak French," says a former US intelligence officer. History may yet distinguish between the unseemly manner of America's pullout and the strategic logic behind it. Biden's thinking is that there is no elegant way to quit a war you have lost. Moreover, the sooner the US could leave Afghanistan, the more it could focus on America's biggest strategic challenge of dealing with a rising China. Biden's foreign policy priorities are the three Cs — China, Covid and Climate. There is concern, however, that Biden will feel so stung by the intense criticism of this week's disarray that he will feel obliged to show that he is tough on China. "Where is the strategic gain from this loss?" asks Burrows. "There will be pressure on Biden to show the upside and change the narrative."
US Marines lead an evacuation at Hamid Karzai International Airport, Kabul, on Wednesday © US Marine Corps/AFP/Getty
Twitter was awash with Chinese "wolf warriors" crowing over the humbling of America. It may be no coincidence that Chinese aircraft breached Taiwanese airspace on Wednesday in a war game exercise it said was prompted by the island's "provocations". It was notable that as western countries were hurriedly abandoning their embassies in Kabul this week, those of China and Russia continued to function normally. "If Biden's withdrawal shows that America is becoming less messianic and will focus more on looking after its people at home, then this decision will be a good one for America and China," says Eric Li, a Shanghai-based political scientist and venture capitalist, who is a frequent defender of China's stance to western audiences. "That is what China will be hoping for." There is also the question of Pakistan, which has long sponsored the Taliban as its tool for creating "strategic depth" in Afghanistan. Imran Khan, Pakistan's prime minister, this week congratulated Afghans for "breaking the mental chains of slavery". In contrast to 1996, when it first seized power, today's Taliban has broad international ties. For Pakistan's intelligence agency, the ISI, this week's rapid takeover amounts to a big strategic win.
A US soldier points his gun at an Afghan passenger at Kabul airport on Monday as thousands of people mobbed the airport to flee the country © Wakil Kohsari/AFP/Getty
"The joke was that in 1989 the ISI defeated the Soviets with American help," says Sarah Chayes, an Afghan expert who was a senior Pentagon adviser. "Now the ISI has defeated the United States with American help." The regional implications of the Taliban's return may also limit Biden's ability to pivot to China and away from the post-9/11 era of "forever wars". As a nuclear-armed client state of China, Pakistan is an important piece on the geopolitical chessboard. India, which is a close partner to the US, and is considered the heaviest future counterbalance to an ebullient China, is likely to feel more vulnerable after this week's pullout. That will probably complicate Biden's ability to convert the pullout into a strategic gain. In practice it may prove hard to neatly divide Biden's decision to end this war with his plans to strengthen America's focus on the Indo-Pacific. There is also the question of whether the Taliban will honour its commitment to keep groups such as al-Qaeda and Isis out of Afghanistan. In 2011, Biden, as vice-president, arranged America's final departure from Iraq. Then, too, he spoke about cutting America's losses from a costly failed exercise in nation building. The resulting Iraqi power vacuum led to the rise of Isis in Iraq and Syria and America being sucked back into the region. "The question is has Biden learned from that episode?" asks Chayes. "I think the answer is probably no. He made up his mind on Afghanistan long ago."
A peaceful Afghanistan, Access to Afghanistan Thru Pakistan, Afghan History, US
Pakistan's subservience to lukewarm defiance Brig.Gen(Retd) Asif Haroon Raja, Pakistan Army
Posted by admin in Decline of Empires, Racism & Islamophobia in America, THE MAD DUDE, Trump, Trump-The Global Nightmare, US Back stabs Pakistan, US CLEAR & PRESENT DANGER TO PAKISTAN, US DRONE WAR ON PAKISTAN, US FOREIGN POLICY & INTERNATIONAL LAW, US Media, US-Pakistan Friendship, USA, USGOVT & MEDIA LIES on August 16th, 2021
This article was written before the fall of Kabul to the Taliban Forces
On the morning of 9/11/2001, unknown hijackers flying two passenger planes struck the twin towers in New York with short intervals, the third plane headed for Washington and struck part of the Pentagon building and the 4th plane on its way to Pennsylvania was shot down. The flummoxed US security watched the gory drama for hours helplessly.
The US media blared earth-shaking news and cried hoarse over the air terrorism which took the lives of little over 2700 Americans. The world was shocked and the world leaders shed tears of anguish and sympathy over the great tragedy, while the Zionists drew satisfaction that they were successful in hoodwinking the world. 9/11 changed the global dynamics and from that time onwards the world moved differently.
Since Osama bin Laden (OBL) hailed from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and most of the 19 hijackers were from KSA, it was assumed that OBL based in Afghanistan and heading Al-Qaeda had masterminded the attacks. Al-Qaeda was squarely blamed on the basis of assumptions that it had been involved in attacks against American targets since 1997 and had carried out attacks on the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1999.
A crusade against the Muslims
The overall agenda was to demean Islam, which after the demise of communism in Russia was viewed as a major threat to capitalism, the arms, drugs and pharmaceutical barons and the unjust global international order run by the sole superpower.
Israel and India, the two strategic partners of the US, didn't take part in the GWoT initiated by the US in Oct 2001 but drew maximum benefits from the war.
The UN-recognized freedom movements of the Palestinians and the Kashmiris to free their lands from the illegal occupation of Israel and India were categorized as terrorism, thereby giving a free hand to the two fascist and racist countries, Israel and India, to brutalize the Palestinians and the Kashmiris unpityingly.
The proxy war against Pakistan
Initial objectives of destabilization were FATA in the northwest and Baluchistan in the southwest of Pakistan. This was done through proxies hired from Pakistan. In FATA, the Pakistani Taliban were used as mercenaries. In Baluchistan, the Balochi tribes of Bugtis, Marris and Mengals were brought in line and proxies like BLA, BRA and BLF were created.
Pakistan coerced to join GWoT
Pakistan under Gen Musharraf who had been bullied to ditch the ruling Taliban regime of Mullah Omar and to extend full support to the US to capture Afghanistan was later on coerced to send regular troops into South Waziristan (SW) in 2003 to flush out the Al-Qaeda and the ones harbouring them. This was in violation of the agreement signed in 1948 by Quaid-e-Azam and the elders of FATA to keep the tribal belt outside the ambit of Pakistan's penal laws and parliamentary system and to let them be governed by the British enacted Political Agent system and the Frontier Constabulary Rules. The Frontier Corps could only operate in FATA.
The intrusion of regular troops into SW fueled Talibanization and by Dec 2006, with the active support of the CIA and FBI, Tehreek-Taliban-Pakistan (TTP) was born. Well over 600 pro-Pakistan Maliks, elders and religious leaders were killed to create space for the TTP under Baitullah Mehsud. After the death of Akbar Bugti in a mountain cave in 2006 because of a mysterious blast at a time when the Army's delegation approached him to sign a peace agreement, the insurgency in Baluchistan morphed into a separatist movement and several Baloch Sardars fled abroad who are being patronized by their western hosts and India. Insurgencies in the two regions were well-synchronized by the master planners.
Pakistan once again became powerless to initiate a proxy war to counter the RAW-NDS covert war after 9/11 that had become an existential threat to its security by 2009, because its hands were tied by the new laws on terrorism framed by the US. Those abetting terrorists were to be held equally responsible for terrorism. India and its partner the Kabul regime were given a free hand and have still not been held accountable since the framers of anti-terrorism laws are themselves involved in this game.
Keeping the model of East Pakistan where the Bengalis were successfully brainwashed, the minds of the people of smaller provinces were poisoned to fill their hearts with hatred against the ruling government, Punjab and Pak Army/intelligence agencies. The focus has mainly been on weakening the trunk of the army and the ISI which have blunted all the conspiracies and dangerous plans of the adversaries.
Pakistan's successive regimes have pursued a policy of appeasement due to which its adversaries have been taking full advantage. Subservience to the US dictates touched new heights during the tenure of Gen Musharraf. Each and every demand of Washington was obsequiously obeyed and no eyebrow was raised on the never-ending mantra of 'Do More' or the insults and accusations hurled by the US leaders. It was incomprehensible for every Pakistani as to what compelled nuclear Pakistan to mollify the two US-installed Kabul regimes which took dictations from the US and India. Hamid Karzai and the unity regime of Ashraf Ghani (AG)-Dr. Abdullah never spared any opportunity to bad mouth Pakistan. Till as late as 2017, Pakistan kept appeasing India as well. Pakistan's 80,000 human and 150 billion dollars financial losses were the doings of RAW and NDS.
Pakistan's successive regimes from the time of Gen Musharraf to Zardari and NS ignored the hard fact that RAW and NDS couldn't have carried out massive covert and propaganda wars from Afghan soil without the full support of the CIA and approval of the US. The trio as well as Israel and the West are on one page. The Quad apart from achieving their global ambitions, they are continuing to demean Islam as a policy.
So what could be the compulsion of Pakistani leadership was a million-dollar question asked? The only obligation is that our leaders are too infatuated with the USA and cannot get out of its magic spell irrespective of whatever cost the nation has to pay.
The devastating impact of this one-sided appeasement was that Pakistan lost its nuclear deterrence, its honour and dignity, and anyone could insult or slap Pakistan and get away with it. Pakistan was blamed for all the sins of the Indo-US-Afghanistan nexus and was declared 'nursery of terrorism, 'the most dangerous country and a 'failing state'. Pakistan took the barbs without a whimper and kept promising to do more to please the double-dealing USA, which never wanted Pakistan to become a self-reliant country.
Apart from Pakistan's nuclear program, other eyesores that were unacceptable to the Indo-US-Israel nexus were Pak-China closeness and the CPEC. Terrorism was stepped up by RAW-NDS to scuttle CPEC. Pakistan was lured by KSA and UAE by granting heavy loans and promising establishment of an oil refinery at Gwadar, and the US promising activation of ROZs in former FATA and an economic zone at Karachi as an alternative to the CPEC.
A sustained media warfare was launched against China. Major themes played up were: CPEC passes through the disputed territory of Gilgit Baltistan; China is a replica of East India Company; Pak-China trade is heavily tilted towards the latter; 90% of the benefits of CPEC are taken by China; China is buying properties in Pakistan at a vast scale and weighing down Pakistan under its loans; Chinese are luring Pakistani girls to marry them, and after taking them to China are being tortured and sexually exploited; Chinese are inhumanly torturing the Muslim Uighurs in Xingjian province.
While the Pakistan military made no compromise on the nuclear program, cracks appeared in the Pak-China friendship in 2018/19 over CPEC due to irresponsible statements made by Razaq Dawood and some other PTI ministers saying that all the CPEC agreements will be revised. Resultantly CPEC which had galloped fast in the first phase came to a halt for almost a year.
The first brick of defiance was laid by PM Liaqat Ali Khan by refusing the USA to convince/pressurize Iran not to nationalize its oil. The second brick was laid by the PM ZA Bhutto when he refused Henry Kissinger to close Pakistan's nuclear program. Both had to pay a big price; Liaqat was murdered and Bhutto was hanged. Nawaz Sharif in May 1998 rejected pressures from Bill Clinton and Tony Blair, turned down the inducement of $ 5 billion and went ahead in carrying out six nuclear tests in response to five conducted by India. In 1999, he was unseated. Gen Ashfaq Pervez Kayani as army chief lost his cool after NATO's Apache gunship helicopters attacked Pakistan army posts in Salala (Mohmand Agency) on Nov 26, 2011, killing several officers and men. This offensive act was a follow up of incidents of Raymond Davis in January 2011 followed by a stealth helicopters attack in Abbottabad to get OBL on May 2, and the Memogate scandal in Oct. In reaction, Pakistan Army discontinued military cooperation, intelligence sharing and training of Frontier Corps by the US trainers, and cancelled all visits and courses. The two supply routes used by the NATO containers were blocked and the Shamsi airbase in use by the CIA since 2003 was closed. The situation was normalized in July 2012 after Washington tendered an apology with an assurance that such an act will not be repeated.
In 2017, Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa took a bold stand by stating that 'We will not do more, and 'it is time for others to do more.' The next was his perseverance to erect a fence along the border with Afghanistan and Iran. Both the Kabul regime and the US exerted extensive pressure to stop the erection of a fence along the western border. 92% fencing of western border and 47% of the southwestern border has been completed and both will be completed by Aug 2021 and end of this year respectively. Radical improvement of border management was another feat that has been accomplished. Next will be the fake national identity cards issued by NADRA in millions to foreigners, mostly the Afghans including the one held by AG.
PM Imran Khan (IK) showed the mirror to the arrogant West for the first time in his maiden address to the UN in 2019 reminding them that no money laundering was possible from the third world without the tax havens in the European capitals. He also exposed the ugly face of India comparing RSS with Nazis and Modi with Hitler and this has been his consistent theme. Standing up to India's belligerence in February 2019 and giving a befitting response goes to his credit.
Extreme American pressure on Pakistan by the US to detach itself from the CPEC was resisted. Thankfully, dormant CPEC has been fully reactivated and now the lost time is being recouped with full vigour.
The arrogance and prestige of the USA boasting to be the mightiest and invincible military power have been rolled in the dust by the ragtag, ill-equipped, ill-dressed and ill-fed Taliban after they forced the US-NATO forces to exit from Afghanistan. The Taliban outwitted the occupation forces and the collaborating forces, and the way they overpowered the country was a textbook example of military brilliance. They also displayed diplomatic finesse by engaging with all the neighbours to set aside their fears. Politically they played their cards shrewdly by keeping their Doha political office active, treated the surrendering troops and the people of the captured cities with compassion, and won the confidence of all segments of the society.
The ignominious departure of the occupying forces and ending of the 20-year war in Afghanistan will have grave ramifications for the USA, as was the case with the former USSR in 1989. It had taken only two years for the USSR to fragment and be reduced to the Russian Federation in 1991. The US not only lost the war in Afghanistan, but it is also withdrawing its troops from Iraq by the end of this year as demanded by the Iraqi PM Mustafa al-Khademi. It has withdrawn its support to the Saudi coalition against Yemen and is likely to exit from Syria where Bashar al-Assad has been re-elected. China is on the rise and Russia under Putin is resurging. Joe Biden is facing criticism on account of the hasty exit of the US troops from Afghanistan, which in view of the critics emboldened the Taliban to race to Kabul. He and his predecessors are likely to face the music of the Americans as to why they fought the longest war, what objectives they achieved and at what cost and why they consistently lied to them.
The spoilers are still in action
Lahore blast, followed by a spate of terrorist attacks in Waziristan and Baluchistan, the Dassu attack in which 9 Chinese and 3 locals lost their lives, and the engineered drama of abduction of the daughter of ambassador of Afghanistan in Islamabad were masterminded by RAW-NDS. There are indications that the CIA was also involved in the Dassu incident.
The current situation in Afghanistan
All the efforts of the spoilers misfired and the Taliban have taken full control over the whole of the country without much fighting. Their 6000 prisoners locked up in provincial capitals and Bagram airbase which the Kabul regime was not releasing were freed by the Taliban themselves.
The Taliban leadership rejected the proposal of an interim setup for which Dr. Abdullah, Hamid Karzai and Gulbadin Hikmatyar as members of the Afghan Rabita Council are working, and want the power to be directly handed over to them. The Taliban are in a commanding position to arrive at a political settlement of their choice, but they are likely to share power with others as well.
Pakistan is of two minds, either to go along with the international community influenced by the USA or to support the Taliban.
UK's PM Boris Johnson who had termed the Doha Agreement as 'a rotten deal', and had also declared Biden's decision to pull out 'a big mistake', has called for an emergency meeting of the UNSC to discuss the situation in Afghanistan. He has advised all not to recognize the Taliban regime if they take over power by force.
After learning several lessons from the repeated betrayal and the duplicitous double game played by the US, and the unrelenting hostility of the US-installed regime in Kabul, and not so trustworthy relations with Iran which is still aligned with India, Pakistan's leadership seem to have started differentiating between friend and foe. Most problems have occurred from Pakistan's enchantment of the USA due to which it had to appease India and Afghanistan.
China is the only neighbour which has never let down Pakistan and has gone out of the way to help Pakistan during its testing times. Strong bondage between the two iron brothers would help in keeping the enemies at bay.
A deeper understanding of Pakistan's with its partners, China, Russia, and Central Asian Republics is a good omen. If Afghanistan under the Taliban and Iran join this grouping, it can keep the spoilers of peace checkmated, but Iran has its own ambitions.
The Taliban could not have achieved success with such lightning speed without the support of the people. Irrespective of the outsiders advocating a broad-based and inclusive government in Kabul, the Taliban's return to power and re-establishment of an Islamic Emirate is irreversible.
Future government in Kabul with the Taliban in the driving seat will be in the interest of Pakistan since it would radically diminish India's perverse influence in Afghanistan, and Pakistan will get rid of the RAW-NDS cross border terrorism. However, in case the insensitive and biased international community dominated by the US decides to ostracize the would-be Taliban regime, Pakistan in its bid to remain in the good books of the US, might mellow down its defiance and refuse to recognize the Taliban regime, thereby once again putting the country in jeopardy.
The writer is a retired Brig Gen, war veteran, defence & security analyst, international columnist, author of five books, Chairman Thinkers Forum Pakistan, Director Measac Research Centre, Member CWC PESS & Think Tank. asifharoonraja@gmail.com
Afghan Puppet Govt of Ashraf Ghani, India Will Push US in an Asian War, Pakistan Subservience, US, US Arrogance, US India Strategic Partnership
Why did the USA lose in Afghanistan? by Brig.Gen (Retd)Asif Haroon Raja
Posted by admin in Brig (Retd).Asif Haroon Raja's Column, NGOs-Trojan Horse For Spies, President Joseph Biden, US Interference in Balochistan, US SPYING ON PAKISTAN, US SPYING ON PAKISTAN FOR INDIA & ISRAEL, USA, World Affairs & US on August 5th, 2021
Why did the USA lose in Afghanistan?
Brig.Gen (Retd) Asif Haroon Raja
The US and its allies were drunk with power and took pride in their sophisticated war munitions, technology and wealth. They were sure to win the war irrespective of having no cause, and having sinister hidden motives. The Taliban had no resources but had an edge over their opponents in the intangibles. They had complete faith in Allah and were on the righteous path. Their faith is still unshakable, and are unpurchasable. Hence their total victory is a foregone conclusion.
Causes of the US defeat in Afghanistan
Insincere and mala fide intentions filled with prejudices and injustices.
Cooked up charges to invade Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.
No grounds to wage a cruel war against so many Muslim countries.
No love lost for the Afghans, Iraqis, Libyans and Syrians, or any Muslim.
Minority non-Pashtun Afghans were empowered and majority Pashtuns sidelined and persecuted.
Pakistan which was instrumental in making the US the sole superpower, was mistrusted, ridiculed and penalized, while India which has no roots in Afghanistan, didn't take part in the war on terror, and has been the biggest spoiler of peace, was trusted and made the main player by the US.
Despite allocating over a trillion dollars development funds, the US failed to better the lives of Afghans living in poverty stricken rural areas.
The US continued to back the inept, corrupt and unpopular regimes of Karzai and Ashraf Ghani (AG) and failed to establish a stable government in Kabul.
One trillion dollars were spent on raising, training and equipping the ANSF, but the US-NATO trainers failed to develop their moral fibre, sense of discipline, motivation and will to fight.
ISAF and ANA were pampered, heavily paid and provided luxuries, which made them comfort loving and drug addicts.
All the social crimes that were cleansed by the Taliban re-appeared and Afghanistan became the leading exporter of opium in the world.
Practice of ruthless bombings by jets and drones caused maximum deaths and injuries to the civilians; even funerals and weddings were not spared. Torture of prisoners and night raids were the tools widely used to break the will of opposing fighters. It gravitated the sympathies of the people towards the Taliban.
Too much trust in military might and no attention paid to winning the hearts and minds of the Afghans.
Weak military commanders who didn't know much about Afghanistan's geography, tribal history and culture, and terrain. They never strategized or modified tactics to grapple with the tactics of the resistance forces. The IEDs threat couldn't be tackled. More so, they didn't inspire their own troops, what to talk of the military contingents from 48 countries. Some top commanders were involved in love affairs and sex scandals.
Image Courtesy – Global Times, People's Republic of China
The initial plan of occupying Afghanistan by the Western and Northern Alliance forces left much to be desired. The country was strategically ringed by establishing air bases in Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Pakistan, but the inner circle was not contemplated to encircle and trap the leaders and fighters of the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. Probably avoidance of boots on ground to avoid casualties hindered this option.
It was a frontal invasion from the north by the Northern Alliance troops under the umbrella of airpower. Gigantic carpet bombing was carried out recklessly. With their rear areas safe, the defenders first withdrew to the caves of Tora Bora with ease, and then slipped into FATA. No effort was made to circle Tora Bora where all the wanted elements including OBL were present. Emphasis was on dropping tons and tons of molten lava from the air.
No effort was made to seal the porous and vulnerable border with Pakistan, again due to shortage of troops. Whole reliance was on Pakistan but it had to be a collective effort to make the concept of anvil and hammer successful. The reason was that the US wanted the border with Pakistan to remain open for clandestine use by the RAW-NDS. That's why the Kabul regime and the US strongly objected to fencing of western border by Pakistan.
The ISAF made up of 48 military contingents including 28 from NATO fought the war without initial battle inoculation, and acquisition of basic knowledge of geography, terrain, culture of tribes, meaning of Pashtunwali, and training in guerrilla warfare. No motivational training was given to the troops to inculcate in them the will to fight and die. Except for top commanders, none knew the aims and objectives of the war.
Opening of the second front in Iraq in 2003 when the Afghan front was fluid, indulgence in covert wars, and hybrid war were at the cost of consolidating gains in Afghanistan through development and education. Only important capitals were finely developed while the vast rural areas were neglected. The two-front war resulted in distraction and division of resources and enabled the Taliban to bounce back in 2006.
The real war started in 2009 after the two troop surges swelling the combat strength of the ISAF from 8000 to 1, 40,000, but Gen McChrystal lost heart in the first major offensive in Helmand due to heavy casualties of the ISAF.
Biggest mistake made was when the ISAF troops were withdrawn backwards and bunkered in the safety of 8 military bases in capital cities in 2009. The entire rural belt in the eastern and southern Afghanistan was vacated thereby allowing the Taliban to gain initiative and a military edge over the occupiers and their collaborators.
Obama should have exited from Afghanistan after he concluded that it was an unwinnable war, and the main mission of killing OBL and professed destruction of Al-Qaeda had been accomplished. Clinging on to Afghanistan for next nine years on the insistence of Pentagon and Resolute Support Mission commanders was militarily unsound. This inordinate delay swelled the avoidable human and financial losses of occupational troops as well as of the ANSF and the civilians.
The next mistake made by Obama was his broadcasted plan to withdraw troops by Dec 2014. The thinning out started in July 2011 and by 2013 frontline security was handed over to the ANA. It demoralized the ANA, snatched the fighting spirit of the ISAF whose troops wanted to return home alive and in one piece, spurred the Taliban and they stepped up their offensive. Their momentum accelerated from 2015. From that time onwards, the US for all practical purposes had lost the war, but due to pressure from the Pentagon, the US kept reinforcing failure.
To avoid body bags, Obama introduced the deadly pilotless drones as a choice weapon of war. Disproportionate use of drones was cowardly and unethical.
The US didn't seriously negotiate with the Taliban between 2006 and 2014 when it was strong on ground and became serious in 2018-19 when it had become weak.
The decentralized Taliban field commanders under one Ameerul Momenein Mullah Omar outclassed the ISAF commanders in strategy and tactics. No change came in their vigor under Mullah Mansour and incumbent Mullah Haibatullah. New recruits kept getting enrolled and the numbers swelled.
The US spent more time on blame game rather than focusing on its primary mission of stabilizing Afghanistan. By blaming Pakistan, Haqqani Network and Quetta Shura for its political and military failures, the US tried to cover up its fault lines. This blame-game continued even after all the terrorist groups were flushed out of FATA in 2015
Trump tried to salvage the fast deteriorating security situation but failed and ultimately had to sign a peace agreement with the Taliban at Doha in February 2019. All foreign troops were to withdraw by May 2021. That was another turning point in the fortunes of the Taliban since the historic agreement had given them recognition and enhanced their stature internationally.
Yet another defining moment came when Joe Biden announced on April 14, 2021 that the longest war will be winded up and all foreign troops would pull out by Sept 11, 2021. This date was advanced to August 31.
All roads in Afghanistan were opened for the triumphant Taliban to race forward and capture as much territory in May, June and July. With 80% territory and most trade transit points in the control of the Taliban, the final phase to capture cities that are already under their siege is likely to start after August 31, or Sept 11. For the ANA, the summer period up to Oct/early November is tough.
In the endgame, the losers have suddenly changed their stance from a military solution to a peaceful solution of the tangle. Their narrative of blaming Pakistan for the instability in Afghanistan has been modified and now the Taliban are painted as violence prone and anti-peace.
While the winning Taliban have expressed their willingness to accommodate all less Ashraf Ghani (AG) and his team, the US and the whole world in general including Pakistan are standing behind the unpopular regime in Kabul and are pressuring Taliban to share power with AG and accept him as the elected president till next elections. The spoilers as well as others are also against the basic demand of the Taliban to establish Islamic Emirate.
This change of narrative clubbed with a petrifying story that there will be chaos, prolonged civil war, bloodshed and refugee exodus due to Taliban's obstinacy and fancy for bloodletting, has drifted the attention of the world from the stupefying victory of the Taliban and disgraceful defeat and abrupt exit of the US forces. Whole focus has shifted to the future horrid scenario of Afghanistan based on premeditated assumptions.
For 20 years the world quietly stomached the brutalities of the mad adventurers wanting to bludgeon Al-Qaeda and the Taliban without a murmur. A minority government of non-Pashtuns remained in power and the majority Pashtuns remained in the backwoods.
And now when the Taliban are getting closer to regain power which was illegally snatched from them, the world led by the spoilers of peace are giving sermons of peace to the winners and advising them that there is no military solution to Afghan crisis.
The infatuation of the US for the puppet regime in Kabul is so passionate that the US has announced its full diplomatic and financial support to it and air support to the shaky ANA. While Pakistan is in two minds, China is unhesitant in extending full support to the Taliban and to fill the power vacuum in Afghanistan.
Grave Yard of Invaders. Causes of Exit, US
America- Led NATO in Afghanistan: Crimes against Humanity Call for Accountability
Posted by admin in Mahboob Khawaja on July 10th, 2021
Were George W. Bush and NATO Pathological Liars to invade Afghanistan?
Mahboob A. Khawaja, PhD
When falsehood goes unchallenged, it attracts shallow and puppets accomplices into the fold. Pakistan military ruler General Musharaf and many puppet Arab dictators were conveniently hired to promote the bogus war on terrorism, and Afghanistan was the first casualty of this wicked cruelty. What General Musharaf and Arab stooges did was shameful and disgrace to the teachings of Islam allowing CIA-FBI to move freely and detain at will innocent people to fill the Guantanamo Bay torture headquarter. From an impregnable truth to a hallow hypothesis carved out by the then US President George W. Bush the "War on Terrorism" – was in his words a "crusade" against Islam. Western war history is full of tragic tensions articulated by mentally retarded leaders like George W. Bush and Tony Blair (UK) to avoid accountability for the happening of events like 9/11 in 2001. Afghanistan was a well-calculated target to be invaded, bombed, terrorized, degenerated and destroyed for all futuristic times in history.
America under Joe Bidden presidency is moving fast to withdraw its remaining troops from Afghanistan. Taliban excelsior is on the rise and nobody could predict the peaceful transition of Afghanistan under American or NATO's occupation after 20 years of deaths and destructions.
Bogus War on Terror, George W. Bush, US
U.S. Should Pay Iran Reparations by DAVID SWANSON, Counter Punch
Posted by admin in Decline of Empires, Iran and US, Racism & Islamophobia in America, THE MAD DUDE, Trump-The Global Nightmare, US FOREIGN POLICY & INTERNATIONAL LAW, USA on March 7th, 2021
U.S. Should Pay Iran Reparations
DAVID SWANSON
Why would I say such an outrageous, treasonous, delusional, OBVIOUSLY-funded-by-Putin thing? Am I hoping to enrage war-crazed sadists who've seen too much television "news"?
Not at all. I want them to still be around when I say that it would actually be preferable for the United States to pay reparations to the entire rest of the earth.
Well, then, why would I say such a thing, and exactly what type of mental disorder would allow me to believe the Iranian government to be saintly perfection?
Ah, that's the key question, isn't it? Because, as we all know, in every court that has ever ordered anyone to compensate someone else, it's been necessary to prove that the someone else was a flawless embodiment of paradise. Proving that someone was harmed has never been relevant at all. Nope. The burden of proof has always been on the victim to show that they have never once done any unpleasant thing to anyone. This is why reparations and compensation and restitution never ever happen. In fact these things don't even exist as concepts. If they did, the following story might matter.
In the 1720s, the newspapers of the colonies that would become the United States wrote positively about the Persian Empire, that place that 2500 years ago held some 60% of humanity. Various U.S. "founding fathers" like Thomas Jefferson sought models in Persian history. From the 1690s to 1800s, based on their school books, U.S. children were unlikely to think of "xylophone" with the letter "x" and likely to think of "Xerxes." In a staple of U.S. education for generations, Abbott's Histories, four non-Westerners were included. Three of them were Xerxes, Cyrus, and Darius. Examples from Persian history were tossed around in Congressional speeches. U.S. towns named themselves (and they still are named) Media, Persia, Cyrus.
From the 1830s to 1930s Presbyterian missionaries from the United States lived and raised families in Persia with the goal of converting Christians there to a preferred flavor of Christianity. In that, they largely failed, but they succeeded in providing schools, medicine, and generally positive ideas about the United States.
From the 1850s to 1920s Persian newspapers promoted the United States as a model. Right up through the 1940s the Iranian government generally sought greater U.S. influence in Iran, and the U.S. government usually refused, usually contemptuously.
Iran, from the 1820s on was forced by Russia and Britain and other European nations into a cycle of debt and concessions. It was principally as an alternative to Russia or Britain that Iran was attracted to the United States, or at least to the idea it had of what the United States was. In 1849, with the United States never having had an ambassador in Iran, Iran began secret (don't tell the British!) talks with the U.S. minister in Constantinople. In 1851 they signed a Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation. It was incredibly fair and respectful by comparison with European treaties with Iran, but it was never ratified. To my knowledge Iran did not ask a single Native American nation what good ratifying it would have done. In 1854, the Shah of Iran asked the United States to put U.S. ships in the Persian Gulf and U.S. flags on every Iranian ship, but the U.S. government wasn't interested. It wasn't until 1882 that the U.S. Congress could be persuaded to send any U.S. representative to Iran, and then only because a key Congress Member had a sister there as a missionary and potential victim of "Mohammedan fury." That representative would not be called an ambassador, due to Iran not being a European country, but his arrival in Tehran in 1883 was cause for a major celebration. Five years later, Iran sent its first envoy to Washington, where the U.S. government generally refused to pay any attention to him and U.S. newspapers were so cruel to him that he resigned after nine months.
In 1891 Iranians publicly rebelled against the Shah's awarding of a tobacco monopoly to the British. In 1901, for 20,000 pounds, the Shah gave a Brit the right to drill almost anywhere for oil for 60 years. Meanwhile, in 1900 a new minister began representing Persia in the United States and significantly increased trade between the two nations, especially in Persian carpets. The Persian pavilion at the 1904 St. Louis World's Fair was a great success (and gave the U.S. the waffle cone).
In 1906 Persia saw a major popular uprising, including widespread use of the sit-in as a tool of nonviolent action (hey, Iran-hating auto worker with a good salary, I'm looking at you), and won the creation of a representative parliament. In 1907, Russia and Britain sought to divide Persia into zones for their respective control. The parliament (Majles) resisted, and the Shah tried hiring bands of thugs to instigate a coup against the Majles. The nation descended into civil war. In 1909 an American named Howard Baskerville became a hero still honored in Iran when he was killed by the royalists.
In 1909 the Majles asked the United States to provide a treasurer-general to oversee the nation's finances. W. Morgan Shuster got the job. He became more than an accountant. He became a leader of the constitutionalist resistance to the efforts of royalists to overthrow the Majlis. In this, he was not acting on behalf of the U.S. government. When Russian forces demanded Shuster's ouster, the Majles wrote to the U.S. Congress for help, but Congress had no interest (it did get a good laugh). A violent coup followed. Shuster was out. A Russian puppet government was in. Back in the United States, Shuster was a star. Persian fashion was hot. The U.S. Post Office took its motto from Herodotus' description of the postal system of the Persian Empire. But actual Persia was of no concern.
When Europe launched the insanity of World War I, Persia declared neutrality. This was simply ignored by both sides, which proceeded to use the place as a battlefield and to cut off supply lines, resulting in some 2 million Persians starving to death or dying of disease. When Christians massacred Muslims, with the complicity of U.S. missionaries, the good impression those missionaries had made for decades were ruined. Persia nonetheless kept asking the U.S. government for help and for the return of Shuster. In 1916, the Shah asked permission to hide in the U.S. legation and to fly the U.S. flag from the Imperial Palace — both of which requests were turned down. At the end of the war, Persia hoped for some justice out of the negotiations in Paris, but was shut out by British maneuvering, including bribing the Shah. This left Iran without the chance to have its hopes in Woodrow Wilson shattered like the rest of the world's, blame going instead to Britain. The U.S. minister in Tehran handed out a public statement claiming that the United States had tried its best to get Persia included in the Paris Peace Conference. The country was shut down by pro-U.S. riots. Read that last sentence twice.
The secret dealings of Britain with Persia, behind Wilson's back, was a key argument in the U.S. Senate for refusing to join the League of Nations. Persia offered the United States oil and continued to implore it to become more involved, but the U.S. government had a higher priority, namely not offending the British. In 1922, the U.S. State Department sent a new financial advisor, but he was no Shuster. When a U.S. oil company was finally chosen to work in Persia, it immediately was hit by the Teapot Dome scandal, and those plans collapsed. Then, in a case of mistaken identity combined with insane murderousness, a mob beat a U.S. consul to death, and the U.S. government insisted that three boys be killed as compensation, and so they were.
Iran kept reaching out to the United States, turning over its archaeological efforts to Americans, welcoming new missionaries and their schools. Up through 1979, many Iranian government officials were graduates of a U.S. missionary school called the Alborz School.
The Shah flirted with Nazism. The theories of an "Aryan" (Iranian) origin of a superior Nordic race — theories largely of U.S. origin — were used by Nazi Germany to appeal to Iran. Yet Iran still declared its neutrality during the sequel to WWI, and it still didn't matter. The Soviet Union and Britain invaded. Iran, of course, asked the U.S. government to object. The U.S. government, of course, ignored this. During the war, in fact, Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin used Tehran as a place to meet while doing their best to ignore the fact that anyone lived there. Stalin was effectively the host. Even the Shah was not invited to a birthday party for Churchill. But when the Great Men left, Roosevelt sent the Shah a note saying he hoped the Shah would someday visit Washington. The Shah clung to that hope and pushed to make it real for years after. Meanwhile some 30,000 U.S. soldiers were in Iran from 1943 to 1945 with the usual drunkenness and rape and Apartheid flaunting of wealth in the face of hunger that has been the trademark of U.S. bases around the world from that day to this.
Once the two world wars had ended, Iran began a golden age of democracy and relative well-being. It wouldn't last long. In 1947, an Iranian democracy movement asked if it could hold a sit-in demonstration at the U.S. embassy as a symbol of democracy. It was of course told to get lost. The U.S. Ambassador from 1948 to 1951 had extremely Churchillian attitudes toward the irrational natives, who were of course incapable of and unready for democracy. He and the Shah got on well. It was in 1949 that the Shah finally got his first of many visits to the United States, land of democracy. In 1950, Iranians learned of U.S. complicity in British manipulation of their government, and persisted in criticizing the United States in tones of shock and disappointment, using all the language of straying from principles that is so routine in this-is-not-who-we-are speeches from U.S. politicians. Then the Iranians, despite Britain and the United States, elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh.
For the first time in forever, an Iranian representative government had represented the wishes of the Iranian public, not those of a king or his foreign sponsors and handlers. This outrage was not to be tolerated. Mossadegh, like most Iranians, believed that Iranians, rather than Britain, should profit from Iranian oil. He nationalized the oil, and his fate was sealed. But before it was, he would appeal in every way he could to the world and to the United States. He compared his actions to the Boston tea party. He traveled to New York and eloquently won his case at the UN Security Council. He immediately headed for Philadelphia to pose with the Liberty Bell. He got himself made Time magazine man of the year. He also negotiated with the U.S. to allow Britain to still play a major role in Iranian oil, but Britain threw that idea in his face. The oil was, after all, a British possession that had somehow found it way under Iranian soil. Gallup found that a full 2 percent of the U.S. public thought the U.S. should take Britain's side against Iran. My guess is that's about the percentage of the U.S. public that now know that the U.S. did just that.
Kermit Roosevelt, grandson of Teddy, claimed he and the CIA overthrew the Iranian government using $60,000. Norman Darbyshire of Britain's MI6 claimed he spent over 1.5 million pounds and drafted the coup plans and assassinated the Mossadegh-loyal chief of police and talked Roosevelt out of quitting when their coup first failed. Col. Stephen J Meade of the CIA, who was also involved in the 1949 coup in Syria that is largely erased from coup histories even by those who know about Iran 1953, claimed he was the U.S. partner of Darbyshire in planning the whole thing. Indisputably this coup required electing Churchill in the UK and Eisenhower in the U.S., and Eisenhower appointing the Dulles brothers, who began planning the coup with the British before Eisenhower was inaugurated. It also required that Eisenhower, having campaigned on Cold War anti-communism, believe or pretend to believe his own propaganda and the ridiculous notion that Mossadegh was a commie sympathizer.
The coup at first failed, looking even less competent or threatening than the Beer Belly Capitol Putsch of 2021 in Washington. The Shah, whom the failed coup intended to install as dictator, looked ridiculous fleeing to Rome. But mobs on the streets and a visit of 28 tanks to Mossadegh's house did the trick. Iran was liberated! The Shah returned! Democracy was out! Quoting Jefferson would now be left to various other Untermenschen banned from the Paris Peace Conference, such as Ho Chi Minh. Freedom was on the march! The Shah was empowered, armed, and turned into the world's top weapons customer, and the United States into the world's top weapons dealer. A philanthropic operation called SAVAK was established under the tutelage of the CIA and later the Mossad, specializing in torture and murder. All was right with the world, and the U.S. government was finally paying attention to Iran and funneling money into it. A leader even came to visit Iran for the first time (not counting FDR visiting Stalin), and it was Vice President Richard Nixon.
The Shah's dictatorship learned well, bought weapons, provided oil, and even created a "two-party system" so ridiculously copied from the U.S. model that Iranians referred to them as the party of "Yes" and the party of "Yes, Sir." U.S. influence was finally in Iran as a reality rather than a dream. By 1961, there were 5,000 Americans living in Iran, and Hollywood was all over the cinemas and televisions, Newsweek and Time on the news stands. Many were less than pleased at finally having gotten what they'd spent so long asking for. Saying that out loud could get you killed, which may have been a big part of the problem. In 1964 the U.S. got a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) to give U.S. troops immunity for crimes in Iran. Many were enraged. But someone fearlessly spoke against that basing SOFA, a man known as Ayatollah Khomeini.
When the United States elected Jimmy Carter president, the Shah worried momentarily about the "human rights" rhetoric, until realizing it was just for show. The weapons kept flowing as before. Carter even visited the Shah and toasted him as an "island of stability" one week before he was overthrown by a revolution with the slogan "Death to America's Shah." The revolution, however, was mainly nonviolent. The Shah was not killed. He spent the better part of a year searching the globe for someplace to live. When Carter let him into the United States, Iranians feared the worst. They did not believe the Shah needed U.S. medical treatment, because the Shah had hidden the fact that he was ill. They did believe that the United States would use its embassy in Tehran, as it had done 26 years earlier, to overthrow the Iranian government and re-install the Shah. So, Iranian students broke in and took over the U.S. embassy, creating a hostage crisis, ending Jimmy Carter's presidency, and initiating Day 1 of the history of U.S.-Iranian relations in U.S. media, for whom nothing prior to the hostage crisis ever happened. Iran, in 2021 U.S. cultural understanding, came into existence in 1979.
In 1980 the despotic ruler of neighboring Iraq, a man who had been brought to power with U.S. assistance, Saddam Hussein, invaded Iran. The Iranian revolution, begun as a coalition including leftists and liberals as well as the religious, now moved in the direction of resembling what it had overthrown. It did so in the name of unity and survival. Ronald Reagan's government aided both sides in the war, hoping to damage both sides and make money from both sides. Both sides unnecessarily prolonged the war. Both sides committed horrors. Iranian-backed militias blew up U.S. Marines in Lebanon. The U.S. helped Iraq know where to bomb people, and helped Iraq acquire and get away with using chemical weapons. The U.S. also secretly sold weapons to Iran, because, just like the Israeli government, the U.S. government had an agenda often at odds with its own propaganda. You, dear reader, are supposed to go on hating Iran and adoring Reagan, and quoting Reagan on "not dealing with hostage-takers," but the reality was Reagan selling weapons to Iran to try to free hostages in Lebanon and to get money for a war in Nicaragua that Congress had forbidden him to fight. The Bush Senior government finally persuaded Iran to get those hostages freed, by making promises it immediately and casually broke, without so much as an "I'm sorry." In fact, when the U.S. shot down an Iranian passenger plane full of men, women, and children, Bush announced that he would never apologize for anything and didn't care what the facts were.
He and every other U.S. president since has, however, very much cared what Israel wanted. Iran offered the U.S. an oil deal in 1995 and Israel killed it. On September 11, 2001, while people across the Middle East cheered, Iranians mourned. The President of Iran offered to come to the site of the World Trade Center and condemn such barbarism. His offer was of course dismissed out of hand. Iran offered to assist the United States with its war on Afghanistan, and that offer was quietly accepted, used, and forgotten. Bush Junior then declared Iran a member of an Axis of Evil with the nation that had waged war on it, Iraq, and a nation it had virtually nothing to do with, North Korea. In 2003, Iran offered to negotiate away its nuclear program, to allow full intrusive inspections, to accept a 2-state solution in Palestine/Israel, and to keep participating in the "war on terrorism." Iran was told to go Dick Cheney itself.
Since 1957, the United States had been providing Iran with nuclear technology. Iran has a nuclear energy program because the U.S. and European governments wanted Iran to have a nuclear energy program. The U.S. nuclear industry took out full-page ads in U.S. publications bragging about Iran's support for such an enlightened and progressive energy source. The U.S. was pushing for major expansion of Iran's nuclear program just before the Iranian revolution of 1979.
Since the Iranian revolution, the U.S. government has opposed Iran's nuclear energy program and misled the public about the existence of a nuclear weapons program in Iran. This story is well-told in Gareth Porter's Manufactured Crisis.
When the United States assisted Saddam Hussein's Iraq in a war against Iran in the 1980s, in which Iraq attacked Iran with chemical weapons, Iran's religious leaders declared that chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons must not be used, even in retaliation. And they were not. Iran could have responded to Iraqi chemical attacks with chemical attacks of its own and chose not to. Iran says it is committed to not using or possessing weapons of mass destruction. The results of inspections bear that out. Iran's willingness to put restrictions on its legal nuclear energy program — a willingness present both before and after any U.S. sanctions — bears that out.
When the Soviet enemy disappeared, new ones were quickly found. According to both former NATO commander Wesley Clark and former UK prime minister Tony Blair, the Pentagon made a list of several nations' governments to be overthrown, and Iran was on it. In the year 2000, the CIA gave Iran (slightly and obviously flawed) blueprints for a key component of a nuclear weapon. In 2006 James Risen wrote about this "operation" in his book State of War. In 2015, the United States prosecuted a former CIA agent, Jeffrey Sterling, for supposedly having leaked the story to Risen. In the course of the prosecution, the CIA made public a partially redacted cable that showed that immediately after bestowing its gift on Iran, the CIA had begun efforts to do the same for Iraq. In 2019, Sterling publishing his own book, Unwanted Spy: The Persecution of an American Whistleblower.
I can only make sense of one reason why the CIA hands out blueprints for nuclear bombs (and in the case of Iran planned to deliver actual parts as well). Both Risen and Sterling claim that the goal was to slow down Iran's nuclear weapons program. Yet we now know that the CIA had no solid knowledge that Iran had any nuclear weapons program, or if it had one how advanced it was. We know that the CIA has been involved in promoting the false belief that Iran is a nuclear threat since the early 1990s. But even assuming that the CIA believed Iran to have a nuclear weapons program in 2000 (which the 2007 U.S. National Intelligence Estimate would later claim had been ended in 2003), we have not been offered any explanation of how providing flawed blueprints could have been imagined to slow such a program down. If the idea is supposed to be that Iran or Iraq would simply waste time building the wrong thing, we run up against two problems. First, they would likely waste vastly more time if working without plans, as compared to working with flawed ones. Second, the flaws in the plans given to Iran were obvious and apparent.
When the former-Russian assigned to deliver the blueprints to the Iranian government immediately spotted the flaws in them, the CIA told him not to worry. But they didn't tell him that the flawed plans would somehow slow down an Iranian nuclear weapons program. Instead they told him that the flawed plans would somehow reveal to the CIA how far along Iran's program was. But how that would happen has never been explained either. And it conflicts with something else they told him, namely that they already knew how far along Iran was and that Iran already had the nuclear knowledge that they were providing. My point is not that these assertions were true but that the slow-them-down rationale was not attempted.
One never wants to underestimate incompetence. The CIA knew next to nothing about Iran, and by Sterling's account was not seriously trying to learn. By Risen's account, around 2004 the CIA accidentally revealed to the Iranian government the identities of all of its agents in Iran. But incompetence does not seem to explain a consciously thought-out effort to distribute nuke plans to designated enemies. What does seem to explain it better is the desire to point to the possession of those plans, or of the product of those plans, as evidence of a hostile threat of "weapons of mass destruction," which, as we all know, is an acceptable excuse for a war.
That we are not entitled to find out, even 20 years later, whether giving nuke plans to Iran was incompetence or malevolence, or to ask Bill Clinton or George W. Bush why they approved of it, is itself a problem that goes beyond incompetence and into the realm of anti-democratic tyrannical governance by secret agencies.
We have no possible way of knowing a complete list of countries the U.S. government has handed nuclear weapons plans to. Trump tried giving nuclear weapons secrets to Saudi Arabia in violation of the Nonproliferation Treaty, his oath of office, and common sense. The silver lining is that whistleblowers on giving nukes to the Saudis have apparently been listened to by certain members of Congress who have gone public with the information. Whether the difference is the individuals, the committees, the sides of Capitol Hill, the party in the majority, the party in the White House, the involvement of the CIA, the general culture, or the nation being given the keys to the apocalypse, the fact is that when Jeffrey Sterling went to Congress to reveal the giving of nukes to Iran, Congress Members either ignored him, suggested that he move to Canada, or — with horrible timing — died before doing anything.
Ignoring Iran was a long Congressional tradition before the establishment of the tradition of claiming Iran is a threat to the world. Now lying about Iran is a major industry. The United States now imposes deadly sanctions on the entire nation of Iran, in violation of the Geneva Conventions. Iran made an agreement for more thorough inspections than any other nation on earth to get sanctions relief. The United States violated and tore up the agreement, and now says that Iran had better change its ways if it wants the agreement back.
There are, not one, but two Iranian shah dynasties with descendants in the United States awaiting their turns.
One includes Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi, the son of the last dictator whom the United States imposed on Iran from 1953 to 1979. Pahlavi lives in Potomac, Maryland, (across the river from Langley) and openly advocates for an overthrow of the Iranian government (because 1953 has worked out so well?) or, as the Washington Post puts it, "runs an advocacy association that is outspoken about the need for democracy in his home country."
Yet Iranians — like either saints or an abused spouse, you decide — persist in declaring their openness to negotiating with the U.S. government. I, for one, apologize and propose reparations. At the very least, end the sanctions!
Much of what I've described above can be found in America and Iran by John Ghazvinian. I also recommend watching a movie called Coup 53.
David Swanson is an author, activist, journalist, and radio host. He is executive director of WorldBeyondWar.org and campaign coordinator for RootsAction.org. Swanson's books include War Is A Lie. He blogs at DavidSwanson.org and WarIsACrime.org. He hosts Talk Nation Radio.He is a Nobel Peace Prize nominee, and was awarded the 2018 Peace Prize by the U.S. Peace Memorial Foundation. Longer bio and photos and videos here. Follow him on Twitter: @davidcnswanson and FaceBook,
Iran, Iran-US Confrontation, US

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


It was a gorgeous day on our last full week of school. Our students had the opportunity to visit the Fairbank Museum's extensive collection of natural specimens to sketch from observation. At first the students were busy walking from exhibit to exhibit as they excitedly scanned the gallery for the thing they would draw. After about 10 minutes each student quietly settled into a good half an hour of observational drawing. Some students focused their attention on one detailed drawing, while others filled up their pages with multiple quicker drawings. We also spent some time outside in their butterfly tent. Unfortunately, I forgot to pull out my camera while we were there. I was too "in the moment," I suppose. Below are some photos of their sketches We wrapped up our visit with a presentation at the planetarium and learned about our local night sky. The Fairbanks is a fantastic local resource for our community.


K226 the triathletes guide to the galaxy, and when we say the Galaxy we mean going long. K226 triathlon is a hub of information to help the athlete tired from the rigour of a hard long training day easily navigate and transition through cyber space to find all the latest news, gossip and information pertaining to his or her passion.
K226 triathlon was initially set up to promote the independent iron-distance events around the world. Over these many years we have expanded to incorporate all of the Long distance triathlon community.
As a fan and competitor of triathlon since the early 80's, and travelling to many destination races we had collected a unique list of events and was encourage by our fellow competitors to publish our findings.
After coming online in early 2006 we were contacted by many professional triathletes in order to help promote their cause. This we did with our Pro section that allows the athletes to self promote and voice their opinions. This section has now transformed into our Athlete database that allows the fans and community to easily find and follow the professional field.


text:
SELECT		[USER_ID],
			[USER_DOMAIN_NAME],
			[USER_LOGIN],
			[USER_PRODUCT_LOGIN]
INTO		#TempUser
FROM		USERMATRIX.UserMatrix.UM.[USER]
WHERE		[USER_ID] <> 1

UPDATE		[CMP].[dbo].[tEmp]
SET			DomainUserName = tu.USER_DOMAIN_NAME + '\' + tu.USER_LOGIN
FROM		[CMP].[dbo].[tEmp] AS te
			INNER JOIN #TempUser AS tu
				ON te.[Login] = tu.[USER_PRODUCT_LOGIN]

UPDATE		[CAGE].[Cage.Employee].[tEmployee]
SET			DomainUserName = tu.USER_DOMAIN_NAME + '\' + tu.USER_LOGIN
FROM		[CAGE].[Cage.Employee].[tEmployee] AS te
			INNER JOIN #TempUser AS tu
				ON te.[EmpCode] = tu.[USER_PRODUCT_LOGIN]

DROP TABLE	#TempUser

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


text:
The Other Boleyn Girl är en brittisk BBC-producerad TV-film från 2003 i regi av Philippa Lowthorpe. Filmen är baserad på  Philippa Gregorys roman Den andra systern Boleyn från 2001. I huvudrollerna ses Natascha McElhone, Jodhi May, Jared Harris och Steven Mackintosh.

Filmen handlar om hovdamen Mary Boleyn och hennes syster Anne Boleyn och deras konkurrens om kung Henrik VIII av Englands tillgivenhet.

Rollista i urval
 Natascha McElhone - Mary Boleyn
 Jodhi May - Anne Boleyn
 Jared Harris - Henrik VIII
 Steven Mackintosh - George Boleyn
 Philip Glenister - William Stafford
 Jack Shepherd - Thomas Boleyn
 Ron Cook - Thomas Cromwell, 1:e earl av Essex
 Anthony Howell - William Carey
 Jane Gurnett - Elizabeth Boleyn
Oliver Chris - Henry Percy
 Yolanda Vazquez - Katarina av Aragonien
 Geoffrey Streatfeild - Francis Weston

Externa länkar

Filmer 2003
Engelskspråkiga filmer
Brittiska TV-filmer
Biografiska filmer om brittiska kungligheter
1500-talet på film
Brittiska filmer baserade på böcker
Filmer om systrar
1520-talet på film
1530-talet på film
Henrik VIII av England på film

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
GE healthymagination Fund Equity Investment in Check-Cap Ltd.
GE healthymagination Fund invests in Check-Cap Ltd., developer of ingestible imaging capsule that could detect colorectal cancer
Equity investment aligns with GE Healthcare's focus on diagnostic imaging for colon cancer
NORWALK, Conn., USA; MILWAUKEE, Wis., USA; and ISFIYA, Israel – February 1, 2012 — GE Capital and GE Healthcare, the financial services and healthcare divisions of General Electric Company (NYSE: GE), announced today an investment in Check-Cap, Ltd., a developer of an ingestible imaging capsule that may help detect colorectal cancer. The investment is being made through the GE healthymagination Fund, an equity fund that makes investments in highly promising healthcare technology companies.
Check-Cap's ingestible and disposable imaging capsule is planned to have the capability to image the colon in 3D. The capsule will require no bowel cleansing before ingestion and no hospital visit, allowing patients to go about their daily routines without having to alter their activities.
"Check-Cap's technology is not only innovative but it presents great promise to change the standard of patient care and to help them avoid the discomfort of traditional colonoscopies, " said GE Vice President & GE Healthcare Chief Technology Officer Mike Harsh.
The investment is aligned with GE Healthcare's expanding focus on colon cancer management solutions that can improve healthcare globally, as well as GE's broader healthymagination initiative, which focuses on reducing cost, increasing patient access and improving quality in healthcare. Financial terms of the transaction were not disclosed.
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in men and the second in women, according to the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Almost 60% of the cases occur in developed regions. About 608,000 deaths from colorectal cancer are estimated worldwide annually, accounting for 8% of all cancer deaths and making it the fourth most common cause of death from cancer. In the United States, colorectal cancer is the 3rd most common and the 2nd leading cause of cancer death.
In addition to the financial investment and as part of a broader collaboration, Check-Cap and GE Healthcare have entered into a development and supply agreement where GE Healthcare–Israel will develop, design and produce miniature Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CZT) diagnostic imaging sensors inside each Check-Cap capsule to enable clinicians to obtain full 360-degree imaging as the capsule travels in the colon. GE has years of experience in the area of CZT-based detectors and similar technologies have been used in GE Healthcare's nuclear medicine and bone densitometry systems.
"Over the past 15 years GE Healthcare has benefited from Israel's spirit of innovation and scientific discoveries, " said Oded Meirav, Manager of the GE Global Research–Israel Technology Center. "Seeking partnerships between a global company such as GE and Israeli high-tech companies like Check-Cap can truly be a win-win for all. This represents the first GE healthymagination Fund investment in Israel."
The investment in Check-Cap reflects GE Healthcare's continuing interest in innovative clinical stage healthcare technologies. As an investor, GE Healthcare will look for various ways to work with Check-Cap that complement the strategic objectives of its healthymagination initiative.
Check-Cap plans to introduce its ingestible imaging capsule in the European Union in late 2013, subject to CE Mark regulatory approval. The company also is in discussions with the United States Food & Drug Administration concerning appropriate clinical activities to support approval to market the product in the United States.'
"We are pleased to have GE be a new investor and collaborator,‖ said Guy Neev, Chief Executive Officer of Check-Cap. "GE's investment is an acknowledgement of the patient need we are addressing as well as the clinical promise of our technology. Colon cancer is the most deadly, preventable cancer that patients currently experience. Our goal is to reduce patient mortality by facilitating dramatically increased patient adherence with the physician screening recommendations, allowing earlier detection and treatment. GE's experience in the imaging space will be a significant contribution to our efforts as we progress in our clinical and regulatory program towards commercialization."
The GE healthymagination Fund is part of GE's $6 billion healthymagination initiative, a global commitment to deliver better healthcare to more people at lower cost. The Fund targets three broad areas for investment:
· Broad-based Diagnostics, including imaging, home health, patient monitoring, molecular diagnostics, pathology, novel imaging agents and other technologies for disease diagnosis
· Healthcare Information Technology, including electronic medical records, clinical information systems, healthcare information exchanges and value-added data services
· Life Sciences, including tools for drug discovery and biomedical research, and technologies for manufacturing of biopharmaceuticals and vaccines
The Fund draws on capabilities from across GE Healthcare, GE Capital and GE Global Research, and has a global footprint. For further information about the fund, visit www.healthymaginationfund.com.
About GE Healthcare
GE Healthcare provides transformational medical technologies and services that are shaping a new age of patient care. Our broad expertise in medical imaging and information technologies, medical diagnostics, patient monitoring systems, drug discovery, biopharmaceutical manufacturing technologies, performance improvement and performance solutions services help our customers to deliver better care to more people around the world at a lower cost. In addition, we partner with healthcare leaders, striving to leverage the global policy change necessary to implement a successful shift to sustainable healthcare systems.
Our "healthymagination" vision for the future invites the world to join us on our journey as we continuously develop innovations focused on reducing costs, increasing access and improving quality around the world. Headquartered in the United Kingdom, GE Healthcare is a unit of General Electric Company (NYSE: GE). Worldwide, GE Healthcare employees are committed to serving healthcare professionals and their patients in more than 100 countries. For more information about GE Healthcare, visit our website at www.gehealthcare.com.
For our latest news, please visit http://newsroom.gehealthcare.com
About GE Capital
GE Capital offers consumers and businesses around the globe an array of financial products and services. For more information, visitwww.gecapital.com or follow company news via Twitter (@GECapital).
About Check-Cap Ltd.
Check-Cap is a medical device company focused on the development of gastrointestinal imaging devices. The Company's lead product is an endoscopy capsule which utilizes proprietary, low energy X-ray-based measurement technology to safely generate high resolution 3-D imagery of the colon without cleansing or other aggressive bowel preparation. This patient-friendly solution is designed to be attractive to physicians and patients, thereby increasing the patient compliance with the screening recommendations of physicians and other healthcare professionals.
The Check-Cap imaging capsule is being developed to create a reconstructed image of the colon and to detect clinically significant polyps with high degree of sensitivity. The imaging capsule, which will be swallowed by the patient, is designed to be propelled by natural motility through the gastrointestinal tract. Unlike other colon cancer screening methods, this process will not disrupt a patient's normal activities or require fasting. Patients using this imaging capsule will not be required to undergo any prior bowel cleansing because the imaging capsule employs Xrays,
allowing it to image the lining of the colon even when surrounded by intestinal content.
Ned Reynolds
GE Capital Americas
Allison Cohen
GE Healthcare Israel
Guy Neev
Check-Cap Ltd.


text:
Ekkehard Winterfeldt (* 13. Mai 1932 in Danzig; † 11. Oktober 2014 in Hannover) war ein deutscher Chemiker und Hochschullehrer für Organische Chemie.

Leben und Werk
Winterfeldts Familie gelangte bei Kriegsende über Dänemark nach Schleswig. Dort absolvierte er 1952 das Abitur an der Domschule Schleswig. 1956 legte er das Diplom an der TH Braunschweig (jetzt TU Braunschweig) ab, 1958 wurde er an der TH Braunschweig bei Ferdinand Bohlmann mit einer Dissertation zur Synthese von Hydroxysparteinen promoviert.

1959 wurde Winterfeldt wissenschaftlicher Assistent an der TU Berlin. 1962 folgte die Habilitation an der TU Berlin über natürlich vorkommende Thiophenderivate. 1967 wurde er außerplanmäßiger Professor an der TU Berlin. 1969 folgten Rufe nach Marburg, Berlin und Hannover. 1970 wechselte Winterfeldt auf eine ordentliche Professur an der TU Hannover (jetzt Leibniz Universität Hannover). Hier war er Institutsdirektor und Leiter des Fachgebietes B für Organische Chemie. 1976 folgte ein Ruf nach Stuttgart, den er jedoch nicht annahm. 1982 bis 1986 war Winterfeldt Vorstandsmitglied der Fachgruppe Medizinische Chemie der Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker (GDCh), 1983 folgte die Wahl zum Mitglied der Braunschweigischen Wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft, 1984 die Wahl zum Mitglied der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Seit 1997 war er Mitglied der Academia Europaea.

Winterfeldt hatte zahlreiche wissenschaftliche und administrative Ämter inne: 1986 wurde er Präsident der 22nd EUCHEM Conference on Stereochemistry – Bürgenstock. 1992 wurde er Vorsitzender der Überleitungskommission 09 (Chemie, Pharmazie) beim Kultusministerium des Landes Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 1994/1995 war er zudem Mitglied des Senats der Universität Hannover und in den beiden Jahren 1996 und 1997 Präsident der Gesellschaft deutscher Chemiker. Winterfeldt wurde im Jahr 2000 emeritiert. Er betreute rund 200 Diplomanden und Doktoranden.

Er befasste sich mit Alkaloid-Synthesen und ihm gelangen mehrere neuartige Totalsynthesen, so die Cu(II)-katalysierte Totalsynthese von Camptothecin, einem Chinolin-Alkaloid und zytotoxischen Chemotherapeutikum gegen Krebs.

Winterfeldt war seit 1958 verheiratet.

Preise und Auszeichnungen
 Emil-Fischer-Medaille der Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker (GDCh) (1990)
 Gastprofessor an der University of California, Irvine (1990)
 Ehrendoktor der Universität Lüttich (1991)
 Adolf-Windaus-Medaille der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (1993)
 Richard-Kuhn-Medaille (1995)
 Mitglied der Deutschen Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (seit 1996)
 Hans-Herloff-Inhoffen-Medaille des Fördervereins der Gesellschaft für Biotechnologische Forschung e. V. Braunschweig (1998)
 Ehrenmitglied der GDCh (2012)

Schriften
 mit Tanja Gaich: Directed selectivity in organic synthesis : a practical guide, Wiley-VCH 2014
 Marine natural products - feeding data bases or triggering innovations, Schering Lecture, Berlin 1999
 Save them, set them free, let them take flight, Nachrichten aus der Chemie, Band 60, 2012, S. 1235
 Applications of Diisobutylaluminium Hydride (DIBAH) and Triisobutylaluminium (TIBA) as Reducing Agents in Organic Synthesis, Synthesis, Band 10, 1975, S. 617–630
 Additions to the Activated CC Triple Bond, Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, Band 6, 1967, S. 423–434
 mit Heinz Preuss: Additionen an die Dreifachbindung, V. Der sterische Verlauf von Additionen an die Dreifachbindung, Chemische Berichte, Band 99, 1966, S. 450–458
 mit T. Flessner, R. Jautelat, U. Scholz: Cephalostatin analogues--synthesis and biological activity, Fortschritte Der Chemie Organischer Naturstoffe, Band 87, 2004, S. 1–80
 mit U. Scholz: Biomimetic synthesis of alkaloids, Natural Product Reports, Band 17, 2000, S. 349–366.
 Marine natural products - Synthetic exercises and biological activity Pure and Applied Chemistry, Band 71, 1999, S. 1095–1099.
 mit T. Korth, D. Pike, M. Boch: Biogenetically oriented total synthesis of camptothecine and 7-chlorocamptothecine, Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, Band 11, 1972, S. 289–290
 mit M. Boch, T. Korth, J. M. Nelke, D. Pike, H. Radunz: Reaktionen an Indolderivaten XVII: Die biogenetisch orientierte Totalsynthese von dl-Camptothecin und 7-Chlorcamptothecin, Chemische Berichte, Band 105, 1972, S. 2126–2142

Literatur
 Günter Benz, Siegfried Blechert, Eckhard Otto: Ekkehard Winterfeld (1932–2014) (Nachruf auf Winterfeldt). In: Nachrichten aus der Chemie, 62, Dezember 2014, S. 1203.
 Lutz F. Tietze: Nachruf auf Ekkehard Winterfeldt 13. Mai 1932 – 11. Oktober 2014. In: Jahrbuch der Göttinger Akademie der Wissenschaften. 2016, S. 238–244.

Weblinks
 Chemistry Views, 2014
 Curriculum Vitae auf der Seite der Universität Hannover

Einzelnachweise

Chemiker (20. Jahrhundert)
Hochschullehrer (Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover)
Hochschullehrer (Technische Universität Berlin)
Präsident der Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker
Mitglied der Leopoldina (20. Jahrhundert)
Mitglied der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen
Mitglied der Braunschweigischen Wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft
Mitglied der Academia Europaea
Ehrendoktor der Universität Lüttich
Deutscher
Geboren 1932
Gestorben 2014
Mann