text:
The Return of Downton Abbey
Posted on October 1, 2019 by Jessica
I went to see Downton Abbey, the film, last night. Well, I had to, didn't I, given that I have written about it with enough seriousness that I am seriously considering including my article on the television programme as part of my REF submission slate? And yes, I enjoyed it, a couple of hours of beautiful costumes and historical and dramatic silliness.
But goodness me, what a shaggy dog story of a narrative! Branson alone had three different plots – a Boys' Own Paper adventure, a Mills & Boon romance and an encounter with Princess Mary that was so underdeveloped that it's origins and significance were completely obscure. Given that pretty much every one of the major characters, both upstairs and downstairs, had their own plot lines (sometimes multiple), encompassing pregnancy (wanted and unwanted), illness, power struggles, theft and sexual jealousy, there really was far too much going on. There was also, particularly towards the end, some extremely heavy-handed special pleading for the significance of the aristocracy to national life which felt out of time. It was, as David Cannadine has argued, 'the period since the Second World War [which] has seen the almost total disintegratin of patrician high society'. [1] I don't believe that Lady Mary would have needed telling by anyone that the Big House formed the centre of community life c.1927.
There were other moments where, as so often with Downton, I found it hard to sustain my suspension of historical disbelief. The relationship between Princess Mary and Lord Lascelles was one, principally because, for all the focus on the King and Queen's anxiety about their daughter and her relationship, the characters were entirely undeveloped. I don't know enough royal history to comment on how accurate even this superficial representation of their relationship might be in relation to the historical record. However, the dramatic arc made no sort of psychological sense purely in terms of the portrayal of the characters as human beings.
The storyline that really had me yelling at the screen (internally at least, so as not to spoil the enjoyment of my viewing companions who had kindly included me on their evening out), however, was that involving, yet again, Thomas Barrow. I have noted before how Barrow's identity as a gay man in an era when sexual activity between men was illegal and subject to prosecution has been used by the programme to obscure more interesting histories of medicine and war disability. This time, this identity was given a social, rather than a medical, storyline to make a plea for tolerance of difference in sexuality that was framed as modern beyond the scope of 1920s imagination. Yet just because sex between men was illegal in interwar Britain does not mean that it was either unimaginable or unknown at the time. Barrow's naive wonder at the all-male dance club that he is taken to suggests a life entirely sheltered from same-sex encounters. Yet we know that he served as a soldier during the war, when the sight of men dancing together would not have been either unknown or particular shocking in male dominated spaces of rest and relaxation. Nor, indeed, as Helen Smith has pointed out, would Barrow have had to have left Yorkshire to encounter the idea of sex between men as part of a range of expressions of sexual desire (although the club itself appears to be a less likely phenomenon to be found in a city like York). As Smith notes:
Encounters took place all over the region, and were not limited to large towns and cities. … Away from work, men met in pubs, cafes, toilets, urinals and the street, often with the purpose of sex in mind. However, the north differed from London, as well as from large American cities such as New York and San Francisco, in that these venues of sex and socialisation did not become linked to form a distinct and often visible subculture. These examples of sex between men still operated under the veil of discretion and privacy … and this ensured that venues where men could meet other men for sex remained part of the wider landscape of working-class social life and entertainment. [2]
Smith's argument is mainly concerned with working-class men in industrial occupations in the region. Working in domestic service in a rural location may have isolated Barrow, but I can't quite believe that, at his time of life, he would be as innocent as he is portrayed here.
None of which is to suggest that I didn't enjoy the film, not least because one of the pleasures of watching Downton for me has always been the opportunity to pick historical holes in the plot and presentation. But there were also incidental pleasures: drooling over the costumes, particularly the hats and tiaras, the former of which has inspired me to branch out from my collection of cloches to search for a) something like Lady Mary's feminine pseudo-Homburg and b) an a-symetrical number as modeled by the incomparable Dowager Duchess of Grantham; the joy of Maggie Smith out-act everyone else on screen with the mere lift of an eyebrow; watching Smith, Penelope Wilton and Imelda Staunton enjoying themselves doing what they love so well. And there were the cultural references, intended or not, which kept me amused throughout. From the visual reference of The Night Mail in the opening sequence through the BOP and Mills & Boon plots involving Branson already noted to the undeniable overtones of Bertie Wooster's morning-after recollections in the raid on the nightclub, Julian Fellowes once again plundered the culture of interwar Britain for his ideas and images. There was even a bit of Laurel and Hardy slapstick in Mrs Patmore's subversion of Mr Wilson.
So, yes, I enjoyed myself. The film ticks all the boxes I wanted it to – luscious visuals, good, comforting acting by familiar faces, some good, if rather obvious jokes, and just enough historical anachronism to keep me nicely irritated. I'm not sure I would recommend it as such, but I am glad to have seen it.
[1] David Cannadine, The Decline and Fall of the British Aristocracy (New York: Anchor Books, 1992), p.691.
[2] Helen Smith, Masculinity, Class and Same-Sex Desire in Industrial England, 1895-1957 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), p.154.
Posted in Reviews, Television | Tagged Downton Abbey, historical accuracy, history of sexuality, history of the aristocracy, review | Leave a comment
Posted on January 8, 2018 by Jessica
It has become a bit of a tradition with me that I start the new year with some form of comment, often grumpy, occasionally laudatory, about the one of the historically-based or costume dramas that has been shown on British television over Christmas. (I am including Sherlock in the 'historically-based' category here as, despite the modern setting, the raison d'etre of the series is its connection to its literary inspiration.) This year is going to be a grumpy one, and my subject is, I am sorry to say, the BBC's three-part adaptation of Little Women (BBC1).
I was really looking forward this programme. Emily Watson (who plays Marmee) is one of my favourite actresses, Angela Lansbury as Aunt March was an inspired bit of casting, and I always enjoy Call the Midwife (BBC1) created by adaptor Heidi Thomas. Above all, the original novels, Little Women (1868) and Good Wives (1869), were an enormous part of intellectual and cultural development as a child and young women and I continue to re-read them on a fairly regular basis. As with many other women raised in the Anglophone tradition, these novels, like those of L.M. Montgomery, E. Nesbit and Frances Hodgeson Burnett have, for better or worse, shaped the woman I am today.
To be honest, I've never been a huge fan of screen adaptation of Alcott's classic novel, of which there have been a remarkable number (two silent versions, released in 1917 and 1918, three major Hollywood productions in 1933, 1949 and 1994, plus a 1978 television mini-series featuring William Shatner as Frederic Bhaer). In those that I have seen, the tendency has been to focus on the sentimentality of the novels (and Beth's death in particular) at the expense of the acute reflections on Civil War-era New England society (and the gendering of that society) that forms the heart of the novels themselves.
To be fair, this is not something that this latest adaptation can be accused of. There are lingering shots of dying Civil War soldiers; the poverty of the Hummell children is depicted as deeply shocking, and Hannah, the Marches' Irish maid is one of the more well-rounded characters in the drama. And yet these attempts at social realism seemed to miss so much of the complex social reality that Alcott was not merely depicting but actively critiquing in her novels.
Two things, I think, were at play here. The first was the attempt to fit as many of the multiple events that form the novel as possible into three hour-long episodes, rather than simply eliminating extraneous ones. As a result, some key episodes are seriously truncated, while others have their chronology muddled. Both adaptive strategies eliminate much of the subtext that Alcott inserts (not always subtly) into each of her stories within stories. Setting Amy's valley of humiliation with the pickled limes after the departure of Marmee for the South to nurse her husband puts Jo in the role of the outraged maternal figure, rejecting corporal punishment, rather than Marmee, so that the episode no longer reflects on the polemical ideas about the appropriate way to raise and school young women that are so evident in the text. The shortening of the 'Camp Laurence' episode, meanwhile, to Miss Vaughan's snubbing of Meg and Beth's self-sacrifice in talking to one of the twins (who is portrayed as temporarily incapacitated rather than crippled, as in the book), reduces a wider message about American self-reliance in comparison to European class consciousness to a caricature, while failing to fully capture the heroism of Beth's actions. Most noticeably, the relationship between Beth, Jo and old peppery old Mr Lawrence is so underwritten as to have the emotion removed from it entirely, again reducing Beth's characterization to a cypher, while criminally under-using Michael Gambon in the role of Mr Lawrence.
It is, of course, impossible to fit everything into a mini-series of this length, but these strategies, combined with shortening the overall trajectory from five years to less than three means that character development is seriously compromised. Amy and Beth are, as usual, cast far too old to begin with (they are 12 and 13 in the book), and all Beth's 'rosiness' is eliminated in favour of portraying her as a permanently frail introvert. And this points to the second reason for my disappointment with this adaptation, namely the modernization of the characters to deliver a message about female agency which results in what felt like a series of mis-characterizations. Jo's independence becomes something to be celebrated rather than schooled; Marmee becomes a frustrated house-wife; even Aunt March gets an anachronistic feminist speech of regret in the final episode. Yet this, for me, misses the great joy of the book, which tackles head on the complexity of white womanhood, young and old, in mid-nineteenth century England. The process by which Jo goes from immaturity to adulthood, the challenges that Marmee faces in raising her children in a society increasingly defined by consumption, Meg's failures at domesticity and the consequent negotiation of marital relations, Beth's courage in facing loss of health and ultimately death, Amy's search for a purpose that uses her skills but does not require genius, Aunt March's loneliness and social isolation – all these plots have contemporary echoes which this programme, in its rush to tell so much about the limits of nineteenth century society for women, missed.
For me, the emblematic scene thus became the final one, with Marmee sitting surrounded by her surviving daughters in the orchard at Plumfield. The camera cuts to their menfolk – Mr March, John Brooke, Laurie and Professor Bhaer. In the book, this scene is one of mutual affection and endeavor, the statement of Alcott's view that a successful life involves the mutual aid of family, with men and women both having roles, rather than personal independence. Yet in the programme, the men have been so reduced (with Professor Bhaer in particular barely allowed time to develop at all, as well as being far too young), that the message appears to be that they have been sidelined in a manner that is profoundly a-historical. Misrepresenting historical reality in this way in a work of fiction is not in itself problematic, but this, for me, misrepresents the source text in ways that undermine the whole adaptation.
Alcott, it is worth noting, was the daughter of Amos Bronson Alcott, an educator, philosopher, reformer and member of the Transcendentalists. Her father's progressive ideas about education and the raising of children are reflected in many of her novels, not only Little Women, but also Eight Cousins (1875), which articulates the case for women's dress reform, its sequel, Rose in Bloom (1876) and An Old-Fashioned Girl (1870). These latter two, along with the sequels to Little Women, Little Men (1871) and Jo's Boys (1876), are explicit in their exploration of the desirability for women's independent labour outside the home, and the tensions that this raises with many women's desires for marriage and family. The novels all end, in good sentimental Victorian tradition, with weddings. However, the portrayal of Jo's ultimate success as a writer occurring well after her marriage in Jo's Boys and the insistence on Rose Campbell's independent philanthropy in Rose in Bloom and Polly Mason's self-reliance even in face of her lover's poverty, points to Alcott's refusal to see women's work and the achievement of domesticity as mutually exclusive.
The window into the past that Alcott's work offers, therefore, is one that exhibits a nuanced and complex reality, a past populated by women and men attempting to negotiate tensions and contradictions and, more often than not, succeeding. Little Women draws its loyal readers back again and again not only because of its overt sentimentality (as comforting as that can, upon occasion be) or because we see ourselves reflected in it (although, as the commentary around the television programme demonstrated, many women do identify strongly with the four sisters, and Jo in particular), but also because it shows us a world at once very different from ours but nonetheless asking many familiar questions of women seeking find their own way in a world and suggesting that we may, in fact, be able to find it, but not without cost. In seeking to impose a narrative of frustrated modernity, rather than exploring how the March sisters successfully negotiated these oh-so-familiar challenges, this latest adaptation, as visually beautiful and beautifully acted as it was, was ultimately a missed opportunity.
Posted in Gender, Reviews, Television, Women | Tagged BBC1, children's fiction, Little Women, women's lives | Leave a comment
Women, Gender and Sexuality visit Women, Work and War.
Posted on May 22, 2017 by Jessica
A guest post from Laura Boyd, a second-year PhD student in the School of Languages, Cultures and Societies at the University of Leeds. Laura is researching the work of non-combatant male medical caregivers in Britain and France during the First World War, and is a postgraduate member of the Women, Gender and Sexuality Research Cluster.
On 8 March 2017, the Women, Gender and Sexuality Research Cluster at the University of Leeds had the fantastic opportunity of a guided tour of the Women, Work and War exhibition at Armley Mills, followed by coffee and a chat. We were a mixed group of academic staff and postgraduates, from MA to Ph.D level in the Faculty of Arts. Guiding us was Lucy Moore, the Project Curator for First World War and member of the Legacies of War Project.
The visit began with the guided tour. The exhibition was wonderfully curated, and gave a real insight into the lives of the women working in and around Leeds during the Great War. These women came from all around Leeds and indeed much further, and took over the jobs in factories that were left by men who had gone off to war. Though it started in Armley, the factory expanded to the Barnbow site and employed large numbers of women.
Not only did it portray the 'general' or 'bigger picture' of the lives of these women who worked at Armley and Barnbow in the munitions factories, but was interspersed with personal stories. Lucy showed us around the different exhibits, including munitions and clothing, and shared other anecdotal tales that were not on display, taken from the writings of the 'Canary Girls' themselves. The exhibition featured personal accounts of the 1916 Barnbow explosion, which really brought home just how dangerous this behind-the-lines war work was. We even had the chance to have a sneak-peek at an original medal press that is currently awaiting restoration!
We then sat down for coffee and a chat with Lucy, and we began by asking about her own career progression into becoming a curator. Her answer? Refreshingly honest! And by that I mean that it wasn't a straightforward, linear progression, as these things rarely are. A few of the postgraduates in attendance were interested in hearing about how to get into her line of work and Lucy gave us some great tips on how to get started.
This led to a discussion of the academic buzzwords 'impact', and 'partnerships' between academics and the community. Though these words tend to scare people like me, it was actually a really insightful and interesting discussion. Both Dr. Jessica Meyer and Lucy Moore are part of the Legacies of War Project here at Leeds, which they were delighted to talk about. Lucy was open about how the academic world has helped create interest around exhibitions such as Women, Work and War. Not only through organising trips such as ours, but by spreading the word among colleagues and at other academic events such as conferences and seminar series. She also said that she is happy to have connections to which (and whom) she can turn for information and help. Jessica was also keen on this point, telling us how the museum had also helped greatly in terms of 'impact', by helping the academic world bridge the gap between us and the public, leading to some fruitful and fascinating interactions. She also noted that often independent researchers involved in projects such as this come with knowledge and sources often unknown to academics!
So, to sum up, it was invaluable. Academic-community partnerships can help to get the public interested in what we do, and in turn can, through these partnerships make our research available to all. I would wholeheartedly suggest that if you have not yet been to the exhibition – GO! It will be well worth it, I promise.
Posted in Career path, First World War, Gender, Guest Posts, Historical Practice, Legacies of War, Reviews, Women, Women, Gender and Sexuality | Tagged Armley Mills, curatorship, Leeds City Museums, munitions, Women work and war | Leave a comment
A (belated) report from the wilds of Borsetshire
A recent post on Twitter asked if we are starting to witness the demise of the personal academic blog, at least in the field of history. Reasons put forward for the decline in the number of posts being written were pressures on time, developments in the research cycle (implicitly related to the increased imminence of the Research Excellence Framework) and variations in the teaching cycle, as posited by George Gosling. Concern was also expressed that blogging was coming to be viewed as a requirement of postgraduate and early careers scholars, rather than more established ones.
I didn't respond, all too aware that it has been months since I posted anything here, and even more since I directly posted anything related directly to either of my research projects. This is due to all of the above reasons. I am teaching this term, not much but a new module that requires a certain amount of additional preparation and organisation. I have committed myself to a large number of speaking engagements and forthcoming publications, as well as helping to organise two conferences. On top of my research commitments and administrative obligations, this leaves me little time for writing the remaining chapters of the book, let alone reflections for the blog. And then there is the question of what I write about. While I agree that blogging should not be the sole responsibility of PGRs and ECRs, I am becoming increasingly aware that it is easier to blog about searching for a job than it is about applying for promotion. Similarly, blogging about ideas at the start of a project enabled me to work through key themes in ways that now seem to have less utility as I actively incorporate them into the book. If I am going to write about these ideas, I need to do it as part of my manuscript, not as a shorter reflection.
Which doesn't mean that I don't have things to write about (beyond my despair at the current political situation). There are stories emerging from the new research project, although as this has its own blog now, I tend to reserve them for that forum. And the number of speaking engagements I have undertaken means I am regularly coming into contact with the work and ideas of others which is giving me much food for thought and which is worthy of putting on record.
Which brings me to the Academic Archers conference, possibly one of the oddest but also among the most interesting academic experiences I have had since I spent two days up to my ankles in mud talking about medical care on the Somme last summer. This was the second annual conference organised to bring together academic analysis subjects based on or inspired by Radio 4's long-running rural soap opera and the immensely knowlegable 'Research Associates', the long-term listeners whose knowledge of the world of Ambridge and Borsetshire is unrivalled in terms of breadth and depth. Papers presented range from sociological analyses of familial relationships among prominent family groups, and the wider social implications of the resulting (matriarchal) power structures through an examination of the programme as an exemplar of rural theology to a discussion of the social standing of male characters and the relationship to perceived penis size (a phrase I never thought I would type on this blog or, indeed, anywhere else).
Arguably this was all tongue-in-cheek good fun, something not to be taken very seriously but to be played predominantly for laughs. Certainly the most popular papers, such as the ones picked up by the press looking at negative aspects of competing in village flower and produce shows, and the 'Ambridge Paradox', or why all the characters don't suffer from type 2 diabetes, involved much laughter along with the learning. But there was very serious scholarship being undertaken here as well. The session focussing specifically on the Rob and Helen story line of domestic violence and coercive control was sobering not only in terms of the subject matter, but also in relation to the information conveyed, whether on the forensic analysis of blood spatter patterns or the cost per day of food for women in prison. Additionally, my understanding of my own work has been enhanced by a number of papers. I have come away with a long list of recent sociological texts on masculinity, disability and violence taken from Katherine Runswick-Cole and Becky Wood's paper on the use of the stoma bag in representing Rob's disability and Jennifer Brown's keynot on using Rob to understand the antecendents of domestic violence perpetration. Amber Medland's concept of culinary coercion, while derived from the domestic context of Rob's control of Helen, has opened up questions for me about the regulation of food in the institutional setting of the military hospital. And I am looking forward to learning a lot more about masculinity in post-Second World War literature, particularly as it relates to birdwatching, in the on-going work of Joanna Dobson.
As for my own paper, I'm not sure I got the balance between humour and scholarship quite right. 'Erudite' was one description of it, and I can only apologise to the tweeter whose brain apparently hurt when I finished speaking. But the opportunity to explore how this particular artefact of British popular culture has memorialised the First World War – and to use the title 'Some Corner of a Foreign Field/That is Forever Ambridge' – was too good an opportunity to miss. Among other things, it provided me with the opportunity to design an academic poster in collaboration with some very excited and supportive colleagues. [1] I will, I hope, be publishing an extended version of the paper in the forthcoming edited collection (the one from last year's conference is a beautiful object, available to buy from Amazon). Writing it up will enable me to engage more fully with debates around imagined communities and invented traditions than I have done since I was a post-graduate, a useful exercise that will enhance my other academic endeavours.
And, in a sign of just how stimulating and welcoming the conference was, I'm already considering the topic of next year's proposal. Leading the field is a plan to recreate the Ambridge War Memorial using the information from English Heritage uncovered by Laurie MacLeod, one of the attending RAs. I'm even thinking about putting together an application to the Heritage Lottery Fund, if any of the Academic Archers community would like to form a group to work on this. And I know there are several other First World War historians, many more eminent than I, who might be persuaded to trace the progress of the Borsetshire Regiment on the Western Front, analyse the minor poetry of Lt. Rupert Pargeter, explore the records of the Borsetshire Military Appeals Tribunal or discuss the impact of the use of women and prisoners of war in agricultural labour on wartime Ambridge. I hope they will consider putting in a proposal when the call goes out. The experience, both intellectual and social, will be well worth it.
[1] My thanks to Sara Barker, Tess Hornsby-Smith and Sabina Peck for their encouragement and insight.
Posted in Blogging, Conferences, First World War, Reviews | Tagged Academic Archers, humour, invented traditions, lieu de memoire, Radio, The Archers, war memorials | Leave a comment
Conference Report – Resistance to War
Following on (rather belatedly) from my last post, one of the conferences I was only able to attend partially in March was the Resistance to War conference, held in Leeds on 18th-20th March. In addition to Twitter, an important, and more established, way of keeping up with conferences that one can't attend in person is via conference reports. It gives me great pleasure to publish a report of the Resistance to War conference written by Charlotte Tomlinson, a former undergraduate and current MA student in the School of History, University of Leeds, and founder of the HUll Blitz Trail project (which can be followed on Twitter @hullblitztrail). My thanks to Charlotte for taking the time to write and reflect on what sounds like a fascinating few days.
As the centenary of the First World War has come upon us in the last two years, scholars across fields have turned their attention to the conflict and offered new ways to look at it. As well as encouraging commemoration and highlighting traditional narratives, the anniversary has inspired fresh perspectives and uncovered previously untold (or at least under-told) stories. One such strand of new thought was recently celebrated at the Resistance to War conference, held in Leeds March 18th-20th. It was a truly international event, with speakers visiting from stretches as far as Auckland, and covered an equally diverse scope of subjects relating to resistance to war. Inevitably then, the conference encouraged consideration of a less traditional approach to the First World War. However, as all papers seem to, the event had me thinking more broadly about how we, and I, approach histories of war.
The event began with a series of panels exploring different aspects of war resistance. I decided upon one which explored resistance and gender through the lens of wartime literature in France (Philippa Read), Germany (Corinne Painter) and Britain (Sabine Grimshaw and Sarah Hellawell). After four extremely interesting talks, and a few books added to my ever-growing summer reading list, it was a question on how these works were received at the time that really peaked my interest. Not in the answer, but in that it made me contemplate how we use literature in history more widely. As happens so often lately, I found myself pondering the representation vs reception debate, comparing the cultural and social approaches to sources such as those discussed. While our own readings of literature are insightful, and were hugely fascinating to listen to, the panel left me with more questions about my own research than theirs.
The following day, another question of how we approach history left me a little more excited. In a fascinating talk on two 'gender dissidents' of the early twentieth century, Conscientious Objectors and Suffragettes, Lois Bibbings argued for a more complex understanding of how the two groups used gender in their resistance. In doing so, she highlighted how Emmeline Pankhurst's WSPU used fashion as a method of resistance, how suffragettes 'consciously played on gender' by maintaining a prim and proper appearance in order to defend their femininity, and oppose media representations of them as unruly and manly. In a later conversation, we discussed how the loss of control over appearance was also central to the suffragette prison experience. It was encouraging to see how the issue of fashion, so often overlooked as a trivial matter, could be integrated into an analysis of war resistance and I was left feeling quite uplifted about the potential for this research to be taken further in the future.
Another talk inspired a less encouraging but equally interesting reflection, on how collective histories continue to shape how researchers approach resistance to war. The huge success of the conference showed how far we have embraced less typically-glorified narratives of the conflict which do not place the volunteer soldier suffering in the trench as the quintessential war narrative. Benjamin Ziemann's keynote paper, on German soldiers who refused to fight from July 1918 onwards and how these have been remembered in Germany since, did however cause me to consider how we approach war resisters who were not pacifists. Crucially, a point was raised about the likelihood that a similar project would be undertaken on British so-called 'cowards'. While popular opinions of war resisters has undoubtedly altered in past decades and become more positive, it was rightly argued that our changing cultural memory in Britain of heroic fighters or brave COs has not yet allowed a shift that adequately acknowledges our 'cowards' too.
It is hardly surprising that Cyril Pearce's paper proved thoroughly inspiring. His work continues to influence scholarly thought on conscientious objectors and encourage new work. It was not his insights into war resistance here that had me thinking though, but his approach. In using statistics and maps to explore the pattern of conscientious war resistance in Britain, the paper was undeniably unique in a historical conference. Outside of economic histories, it is perhaps unsettling for many of us to deal with such mathematically presented ideas, but by mapping COs it was easy to highlight resistance hotspots and identify interesting communities that require further study. Ultimately, it was refreshing and inspiring to see an approach many researchers, myself included, would usually shy away from and provided a visual exploration of COs that really brought the issue to life.
Finally, a paper on the infamous Alice Wheeldon left me thinking about the significance of new perspectives on war resistance beyond the weekend conference, and beyond academia. A moving paper was given by Nick Hiley and Wheeldon's great granddaughter, Chloe Mason on how the conviction of her family for conspiring to murder the then Prime Minister Lloyd George should be overturned. Hiley and Mason unpacked the case and highlighted the secrecy surrounding it, explaining how they are now appealing for the conviction to be quashed. In doing this, rather than reflecting on war resistance as much of the other papers had, the paper reminded us that our memory of war and war resistance remains a contemporary issue that touches lives today.
Driving home after a long couple of days, my (non-academic) dad asked me, 'so what's the point in a conference?' What followed was a lengthy answer which I don't think he was quite expecting. In the first instance, the papers given offered interesting insights into many areas of resistance to the First World War, some related to my own research, some not. But more importantly, the papers, as always, left me with a number of questions and points to reflect upon, a few of which I have briefly discussed here. These relate above all to how both I, and we, approach history. So more than just gaining knowledge and enjoying papers from across the globe in a celebration of centenary research, I left the conference with a greater self-awareness of myself as a researcher. Once again I was reminded that no matter the topic, there is always something to be learned in hearing about another's work.
Posted in Conferences, First World War, Guest Posts, Legacies of War, Reviews | Tagged conferences, conscientious objection, Resistance to War, suffragettes, war literature | Leave a comment
Easing into the new year
Due to a teacher training day at my son's school, today is my first day back at my desk since the Christmas holidays. After two and a half weeks of combined childcare and hosting family, this comes as something of a relief, despite the fact that a misremembered date has left me with a book chapter to complete in less than a month. In fact, January is going to be pretty writing intensive, with a couple of book reviews due at the same time, as well as my sole New Year's resolution, to draft or redraft a chapter a month until I get my book completed and sent to a publisher.
On the theory that writing breeds writing, I am going to embark on this rigorous schedule with a blog post about … the New Year's Day episode of Sherlock (BBC1). (Beware spoilers from here on in.) I don't even really have the excuse of doing this with my historian's hat on. I make no pretensions to being a proper Victorianist, but I am, alongside my First World War expertise, a historian of popular culture with a specialism in detective fiction and it is as such that am going to make so bold as to comment.
I am also, of course, a gender historian so let me start off by saying that, as far as the 'mansplaining' debate which convulsed portions of Twitter in the wake of this episode, I agree entirely with Camilla Ulleland Hoel, who articulates why this is not an example of men silencing women far more eloquently than I can. I do, however, take one slight issue with her reading of the episode, and that is in her comments on the 'the pointy hats of Ku Klux Klan (in order to create an echo, I assume, to the orange pips story)'. Because I am fairly sure that the entire set up to the scene was not a gratuitous KKK reference, but rather one to the 1985 film The Young Sherlock Holmes, directed by Barry Levinson, a film which, aged 12, frightened me into nightmares for months (no, I was not very sophisticated and rather too imaginative for my own good).
And that is what I loved about the episode. Yes, there were the many, many references to the Sherlock canon. But there were also the references to the much wider field of Sherlockiana, including Watson's suggestion for 'The Monstrous Regiment' as a potential title for the episode, one that has already been used by Laurie R. King as the title for one of her Mary Russell and Sherlock Holmes series, an explicitly feminist reworking of the tradition. And then there was the plot, not simply a metafictional phantasmagoria but also a spoof on Anthony Schaffer's Sleuth (1970), itself part of a long line of spoofs on the detective fiction tradition, which Conan Doyle arguable founded, stretching back through the entire 20th century.
I picked up three references, but I am sure there were many, many more which I missed, given that it is some years since I have been properly involved with Sherlockiana and the field has developed hugely since then (a couple more can be found here). My guess is that most of these conceits were the contribution of Mark Gatiss rather than Steven Moffat. Gatiss's writing, whether on Sherlock, Dr Who or the ridiculously clever clever and very funny Lucifer Box series, always gives me the disquieting if rather pleasing sense that here is a man who shares my somewhat obscure frame of reference when it comes to popular culture. Which probably just means that my very limited and specialised frame of reference also happens to be a very small subset of his far, far larger one. This is a man, after all, who, as Hoel points out, is as happy incorporating a Victorian music hall stage trick into his plots as he is with referencing semi-obscure mid-to-late 20th century plays and novels.
The delight of all this to me, beyond the comfortable smugness that comes from feeling that I am getting the joke, is the reinforcement it gives to my own belief in the importance of the history of popular culture, including low- and middle-brow material that is all to often dismissed as culturally worthless. This is in part because it tells us something about the time in which such cultural production was created, always useful for a historian, but also, often, because if forms part of a much longer tradition, allowing us to read change and continuity across time. Sherlock itself embodies this duality and, in this episode, made it the very conceit on which the plot was built. Itself a hugely popular element of contemporary popular culture, it nonetheless lays explicit claim to the timelessness of Conan Doyle's creation. By tipping its hat to the long tradition in Anglo-American culture of riffing on that creation in ways which illuminate different historical moments, it located itself within that linear tradition and made its own bid for immortality. Now there is metafiction and self-referentiality for you!
Posted in Blogging, Gender, Reviews, Television, Women | Tagged Laurie R. King, Mark Gatiss, Sherlock, Sleuth, writing | 1 Comment
Enduring War: A review
Posted on July 2, 2014 by Jessica
So I am currently in London, part way through the first of a mad pair of weeks encompassing a meeting, two conferences, a couple of days in the archives and two days with the BBC at the Great Yorkshire Show. To ease myself in, I began Monday morning with a wander around the Enduring War exhibition at the British Library.
This is an ambitious exhibition, given the size of the space it occupies. Divided in to six sections, from the 'The Call to Arms' to 'Grief and Memory', the exhibition not only tries to tell a complete story of the war, but as a contributing partner in the Europeana 1914-1918 project, attempts to do it from an international perspective. Inevitably, some things are missed, while others are under-analysed. For instance, the caption to one photograph ends with the statement 'There was an increase in Protestant church attendance in Britain in the first weeks of the war but, for a number of reasons, this was not sustained.' There is no indication as to possible reasons why church attendance was not sustained, leaving this viewer with a sense of incompleteness.
In fact, the section on 'Faith Under Fire' is possibly the least satisfactory of the six. The claim about the prevalence of protective charms and rituals is never really demonstrated, in part because the use of the library's resources places limits on what is available for display. The original manuscript of Ruper Brooke's 'The Soldier' in the first section is extraordinarily moving, but there is no equivalent of, say, Adolphus, the mascot who has become the face of the Liddle Collection at the University of Leeds. Excellent use is made of posters, particularly in illustrating the Russian perspective, and the use of ANZAC trench journals makes a double point with an elegant lightness of touch. Nonetheless, the material on display does not consistently feel capable of carrying the full breadth of the story that the exhibition is attempting to tell. Indeed, so broad is the narrative that it isn't always evident what the curators understood by the exhibition's subtitle, 'Grief, Grit and Humour'. All three elements are addressed episodically but don't really feel as if they are the central thread of a coherent narrative.
Having entered the exhibition from the side, and followed the chronological path to the dead end around a corner in the separate space that houses the section on 'Grief and Morning', I ended my visit by deliberately walking back around to look at the audiovisual displays at the front entrance. And here the exhibition managed to produce what was for me its most powerful and moving display through its series of video booths of montages of postcards from the front, the accompanying audio just the messages scrawled on each one. Very simple, yet entirely mesmeric, the displays demonstrate the art of the everyday that, as much as the war poets, artists and musicians whose work is, once again, presented throughout the exhibition, defined the First World War as a profound cultural experience in Britain and across Europe.
Posted in Commemoration, First World War, Literature, Reviews | Tagged ANZAC, British Library, Europeana 1914-1918, Liddle Collection, religion and war, Rupert Brooke | Leave a comment
Calm down, dear, it's only a drama!
We are now three weeks into the six-week run of The Crimson Field, BBC 1's Sunday night drama set in a First World War 'field hospital' 'somewhere in France'. The quotation marks around 'field hospital' may give some indication as to my opinion of the programme. It is one of a number of small inaccuracies that, like lice in a uniform, have been driving me (and a number of other historians of British medical care in the First World War) a bit nuts.
In fact, 'field hospital' was a term used very little after the Boer War. I have come across a Territorial medical unit which used the term in relation to the hospital where they trained recruits before they were sent overseas as a field hospital, but the hospitals along the lines of communication were, by 1916, when The Crimson Field is ostensibly set, known as either Casualty Clearing Stations (what would formerly have been referred to as field hospitals) or Stationary or Base Hospitals (of which this appears to be one).
Is this sort of criticism too nit-picky? Certainly, one of the reactions on Twitter to this type of comment (which I have been making a fair amount of over the past three weeks) has been 'It isn't a history lesson, it's a drama!' with the implication that criticizing the historical accuracy of the depiction is both unfair and detracts from others' pleasure in watching. Essentially, this reaction is a version of 'If you have nothing nice to say, don't say it.'
At one level, this is fair enough. The Crimson Field is a drama rather than a history lesson, and I don't have any problem with cosy Sunday evening historical dramas. I actually have a soft spot (as well as remarkably high tolerance for a historian) for such dramas, having recently enjoyed The Musketeers and Call the Midwife, and even, once I had properly suspended disbelief, still relish a good episode of Downton Abbey. But the BBC itself is creating a block to the sort of suspension of disbelief that I have achieved with Downton by attempting to locate The Crimson Field within its own narrative of historical commemoration. The programme is part of the 'World War One' season and there are regular tweets and links to related factual content on the BBC's website. In other words, the BBC is presenting this as both drama and history, even though they are getting quite a lot of that history wrong.
Which brings me to the other reason I have problems with the 'It's drama, not history' criticism. Because a great deal of my criticism actually is of the programme as a drama. Having started out quite well, introducing several strong female characters with the potential to develop into interesting individuals opening up new perspectives on the popular understanding of the First World War, the dramatic arc has all too rapidly declined into a series of mythic clichés enacted by stock figures who simply represent modern ideas rather than having any real personality, historic or otherwise. As Amanda Vickery has pointed out, the plot predominantly involves the imposition of 21st-century ideas and concerns on characters placed rather than fully located in 1916. It is unsurprising, therefore, that the drama feels clichéd and inauthentic as it tries to crowbar issues of class, race and sexuality into story lines that use endless accusations of cowardice as a shorthand for reactions to the horrors of war or attempts to deal with the complicated question of Irish politics in part of one sixty-minute episode. In other words, The Crimson Field is not only poor history, but also not very good drama, by whatever standards you judge it.
So why do I keep watching? Why not give it up as a bad job and let those who are enjoying the drama enjoy it in peace? Two reasons, one superficial, one (I hope) rather less so. The superficial reason is that, whatever the quality of the drama, the casting is, on the whole, very good. It is not simply that I would watch Hermione Norris and Suranne Jones in pretty much anything they appeared in, however terrible, but also that they are good enough to bring depth to their parts. Norris, in particular, has created a believably restrained and awe-inspiring matron, thankfully setting off the bizarre characterization of the hospital CO as a weak and deeply un-awe-inspiring figure. I will probably keep watching to the end for her alone.
There is, however, a more important reason for why I will keep watching and, for that matter, keep tweeting as I do so. It might be described as the 'teachable moment' excuse, to use a truly abominable American phrase. Because I am trying to do is not merely criticize for the sake of finding fault, but to explain, insofar as 140 characters lets me, what my research has taught me about the historic reality of medical care in the First World War. I can not only complain about the representation of a shell shock sufferer in the first episode, but also point out that he would most likely have been treated in isolation for the sake of general morale. Nor is the process only one way. So far, questions I have had or points I have made have led to interesting discussions of how laundry was done at Base hospitals and the date at which female radiographers began working overseas. I have thus learned something indirectly from the programme as well as, I hope, giving a little more historic depth to the understanding of a few viewers.
There is also an element of 'Know thy enemy' to this. Yes, I despaired when the one fully-formed orderly character was revealed to be gay in the most historically unlikely of circumstances. But this particular bit of trite 21st-century plot does provide an opportunity to explain that, while the masculinity of medical orderlies might be (and often was) impugned, it was, as far as I have been able to uncover, never in terms of suspect or criminal sexuality, but rather in terms of age and physical health. Homosexuality as a pathology affecting war service was an accusation more commonly (although still not very often) leveled at men who failed to enlist or were diagnosed with shell shock, another symptom of an inherent physical and moral insufficiency which signified male degeneracy. Exploring these distinctions in masculinity is a key element of my research project; finding and exploiting the opportunities to disseminate my research and analysis more widely, in whatever unlikely form, is thus part of my professional remit. In other words, I watch and critique because it is my job.
This is, of course, fundamentally the same defense for using Blackadder as a teaching tool about the history of the First World War. The drama or comedy is the starting point, not the destination, and they probably have more to tell us about the social and cultural context in which they have been created than about the historic realities of the period that they represent. Using them in this way is not always comfortable. For historians it means tackling popular historical misconceptions head on and sitting through the itchy discomfort of historically inaccurate dramas to find out what, exactly, has been portrayed and how. For non-historians who wish to engage, it can mean having assumptions and beliefs punctured and deflated. At the very least, it means being forced out of a comfortable Sunday night of suspended disbelief. Not everyone wants to spend their Sunday evening leisure engaging critically with what they are watching, and that of course is their prerogative. No one has to either watch and critique or read critical commentary if they choose not to. But I have to admit to enjoy bringing my practice of critical analysis to The Crimson Field of a Sunday, so I will carry on. And maybe in doing so I can also make a not very good drama at least a slightly better history lesson.
Posted in First World War, Historical Practice, Masculinity, Orderlies, Reviews, Television | Tagged BBC, Blackadder, homosexuality, myth, Sunday night drama, The Crimson Field | 4 Comments
Peaky Blinders and the Ubiquity of Poetry
Posted on October 30, 2013 by Jessica
A quick disclaimer to begin with. I do not propose to get involved in the debate over the accuracy of the Brummie accent in Peaky Blinders, the stylish interwar gangland drama broadcast on BBC2 earlier this month, that exercised a number of tweeters. As someone whose accent hovers around the oddly mid-Atlantic, and has, mortifyingly, once been compared to that of Lloyd Grossman, I am in no position to make any comment on anyone's accent. Nor is this post is not going to be, strictly speaking, a historical critique of the drama. I am not a historian of crime and that sort of critique has been done already by those who are, notably Heather Shore in this blog post.
That being said, as a historian of the First World War, I was always going to be interested in a drama set in the war's immediate aftermath, and there were an unsurprising number of references to the conflict. The only one I took real issue with was the incitement to strike in the first episode, where men's war service was used as a reason for striking. Now, the injustices of the failure to find a land fit for heroes on demobilization was certainly a cause of labour unrest in the 1920s. What was less convincing was the purported date, 1919. I find it hard to imagine that a significant number of working-class men had been demobilized, rehired and were already prepared to strike at that date. More plausibly these men would have been on the verge of riot in a camp in France, chafing at the delays in demobilization.
Such quibbles aside, Peaky Blinders wore its war context relatively lightly. There was the inevitable victim of shell shock, although shooting such a man with pig's brains at close range is a form of aversion therapy is a treatment I have yet to come across in the medical literature. The references to the role of women, most obviously in the form of the redoubtable Aunt Polly (Helen McCrory) as the mainstay of the family business in wartime, were nicely done. And it was interesting to note that the inevitable flashbacks to war experience were set in the tunnels, a trope of war that seems to be increasingly popular at the moment, as if Paul Fussell's metaphor of the trogolodyte world can only now be properly understood if represented literally. (Something similar seems to be happening with facial disfigurement, which appears to be overtaking shell shock as the metaphoric wound of the war.)
But it was only in the final episode that I felt I was being beaten about the head by the fact that this was a post-war drama and that war experience was at the heart of character's attitudes and actions. That it should be so is no surprise. This was the episode where the Peaky Blinders, under the command of their wartime leader, Tommy Shelby (Cillian Murphy), went into defensive battle against Billy Kimber (the fantastically spivvy Charlie Creed-Miles) armed with that key weapon of First World War battles (at least in the popular imagination), a machine gun. The references were inevitable.
What interested me, however, was that extent to which the images of the battle referenced war poetry as much as military history. This started early on, when Aunt Polly told Grace (Annabelle Wallis), that Tommy had thrown his medals into the cut. Siegfried Sassoon allegedly throwing his MC into the Mersey is the obvious precedent. This is followed by Tommy's extended meditation on living in the present in the moments before he and his comrades going into battle, a meditation intercut not with the earlier images of the fighting in the tunnels of France that made up his flashbacks, but memories of making love to Grace the night before. As I watched I found myself quoting from Alan Seeger's 'I Have a Rendevous with Death':
God knows 'twere better to be deep
Pillowed in silk and scented down,
Where love throbs out in blissful sleep,
Pulse nigh to pulse, and breath to breath,
Where hushed awakenings are dear…
But I've a rendezvous with Death
At midnight in some flaming town,
When Spring trips north again this year,
And I to my pledged word am true,
I shall not fail that rendezvous.[i]
Then there is Ada Shelby's appearance, in widow's weeds and pushing her infant son in a pram (an extraordinary image that I want to think about further in terms of what it says about domesticity and respectability), bringing to mind 'the pallor of girls' brows' that was, for Wilfred Owen, the pall of young men dying in battle. And finally, in the culminating moment of battle, when Tommy Shelby single-handedly kills Billy Kimber, I thought I saw a look of recognition pass across Murphy's. By this time I was so attuned to potential poetic references that all I could think was 'Oh, Strange Meeting, of course'.
Now, I have no way of knowing if Murphy read any Wilfred Owen when researching the part of Tommy Shelby, or if the director Otto Bathurst is familiar with 'I Have a Rendevous with Death', not one of the better-known poems of the war, though it should be. My associations may simply be an over-sensitivity on my part to any poetic reference in relation to the war, an unfortunate aftereffect of studying the war and its culture for too long. But the fact that the references are there, even only subconsciously, tells me something about the power of these poems to speak down the generations in their representations of an emotional truth about war, violence and its aftermath. Dramatically, this is how our culture understands the war and its aftermath, the images that it associates with this bit of history.
This is a fact that those of us who argue that there is far more to the war than 'the mud, the blood, the endless poetry' must come to terms with in our attempts to convey what else history has to tell us about the First World War. That there are emotional as well as historic truths to be acknowledged. The continued power of war poetry is that it taps into the sense of being 'of all time', speaking as powerfully to us today as it did to those who read it when it was first composed and published. This does not make it the only narrative of the war, but it does make it a significant one. And if we stay attuned to these references, in whatever unlikely scenario they pop up, not only will we be able learn more about the place of the First World War within our cultural heritage, but we may also have an excuse to quote some very moving and beautiful poetry.
[i] Alan Seeger, 'I have a rendezvous with death', http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/19396, last accessed 28/10/2013, 15-24.
Posted in First World War, Reviews, Television | Tagged Alan Seeger, BBC2, Blackadder, Heather Shore, history of crime, Paul Fussell, Peaky Blinders, poetry, shell shock women, strikes, Wilfred Owen | 7 Comments


text:
Owen Pritchard
Brand Partnership
Unmade: Future Factory AW15
Peter Judson subverts the rigid framework of the pixel stitch for It's Nice That's Unmade project
Unmade is the global fashion software company that powers Fashion Driven by Demand.
"I was looking at how fabric relates to people's bodies," says London-based designer Peter Judson. "The concept was to 'pre-drape' the scarf. I wanted to create a pattern that gives an idea of how the garment is being worn before it is being worn."
The work was designed solely on screen as a response to the production techniques that Unmade use. "The scarf is produced using a digital weave. So thought I should design it only using digital tools," he says. "The file size of the design you provide is miniscule. It was something like 3cm tall on the screen. Each pixel represented a stitch. The challenge was to create something free flowing using a really stiff, constrained framework."
Peter's scarf is a more pared-back creation than you might expect if you are familiar with his work. Since graduating from Kingston University in 2013 Peter's designs have graced the pages of magazines and websites the world over. His work shows architectural influences, developing ideas with strong geometries and using a colour palette and patterns that draw heavily from the Memphis movement. Unashamedly Pomo in his output, his work has been commissioned by the likes of American Apparel and published by Esquire and Jacobin.
Peter has dabbled in designing clothes before, producing a set of T-shirts for Print All Over Me inspired by school subjects. This new collaboration with Unmade is the latest step that is seeing Peter's work leave the printed page and become objects in the real world. Earlier this year he returned to his alma mater to create The Garden, an architectural installation of pastel coloured furniture set in a forgotten yard at the back of a university building. Moving beyond illustration is something that Peter aims to do more. "It's definitely something I want to explore," he says. "I like abstracting obvious elements and turning them into something new, leaving more to the viewer and user – something more open to interpretation."
Sasha Zyryaev: Peter Judson Design
Sasha Zyryaev: Peter Judson Portrait
www.unmade.com
Owen joined It's Nice That as Editor in November of 2015 leading and overseeing all editorial content across online, print and the events programme, before leaving in early 2018.
Jobs of the week from Colophon Foundry, Untold Studios and DixonBaxi!
If You Could

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Facts & Stats Report: Domestic Violence in Asian and Pacific Islander Homes, 2020
Domestic Violence, Featured, Gender-Based Violence, Homicide, Lifecourse Violence and Help Seeking, News and Events, Research and Data, Updated
The 2020 updated and expanded Facts and Stats Report contains new statistics on domestic violence, community attitudes, health and mental health impacts, help-seeking behavior, domestic violence related homicide, and more. The Facts & Stats Report, consistently...
Factsheet: Domestic Violence, Sexual Violence, and Human Trafficking in Native Hawaiian Communities, 2020
Domestic Violence, Gender-Based Violence, News and Events
Statistics, and information on domestic violence, and human trafficking in Native Hawaiian communities Related Resources Defining an Effective Response to DVSA in American Samoa By American Samoa Alliance Against Domestic & Sexual Violence A quantitative and...


Networking & Web Dev Career.......Combined?
Which technology would you recommend me?
What resources do I need to develop this website?
Looking to improve my site: Any suggestions?
How do I make this look better?
How to store and display articles on my portal ?
Need help with this link problem???
How can i draw in the people to my website?
Plan of action. Please help.
What pictures am I allowed to use?
Creating a trading website - What coding language?
What Netflix uses for arrows?
How to Create an Interactive Visual website?
Font size - One way for designing, another way for personal use?
Web Easy Pro 8 Help!!
What is the group of words/phrases at the bottom of some web pages?
How can I make life easier for the Web Designer?
Web safe colors - relevant anymore?
How to make pages not have extensions?
Search Engine That Searches For Websites By Category Then Sorts By Page Rank?
What program do you prefer?
College Assignment Help Pls - Will concept work?
The thing that social network sites need?
Get my live webcast on my website - Idea's?
Can someone explain to me the following web design element?
A good website managing system.
What are the most active "Female" forums?
What are options for a paid newsletter site?
Protected PDf - Need Help.
Future of Web Dev on Tablets?
winWSD & information left behind once using it.
Looking for someone to develop the backend for a website?
2 domain extensions 1 website, possible?
block a state/region from accessing my website?
AOL Users Click Here to Activate?
A mess of a website!
From website to sending a text to a cell?
Which language useful for site creation?
Need input, advice: How can I incorporate insurance calculators into my site?
The Ice Hotel - Is an Ice Hotel the Ultimate in Cool Destinations?
Last Second Rooms In Hotels - 3 Methods For Finding Superb Hotel Room Deals.
What type of code, and how is the following site built???
Streaming radio station- best way to go about it?
Possible employment in web development?
Backtracking on Magento installation - best software for small lingerie site?
Should I go with a VPS or Dedicated Server?
Is this the time to subscribe indian journals again.
Why should you prefer to have grass-fed beef ?
How many types of processor in computer?
How Is the Debt Management Is Important in your life??
Debt Management Plans helps the person to consolidate those debts how?
How the internet take a part in your debt Consolidation?
A few questions about starting a website.
How can we make a home base packaging Business?
Where can i buy ps3 games online?
Which is the most favorite moment of today?
How to Create Online Magazine Easily?
What Factors Affect Market Positioning?
What Are the Different Types of Office Administration?
What Are the Causes of Market Failure?
Where will you spend your New Year's Eve?


text:
You're so Fine
by Papa Bear & His Cubs
dave_furze
dave_furze fantastic find from the team at AotN . 👍😁 Favorite track: You're so Fine.
TRJON My favourite old song they found me this year! First heard on 1BTN, Martha's underlying oddities show, brought a tear to my eye, it's just wonderful. Favorite track: Sweetest Thing on This Side of Heaven.
latexsun
latexsun Sounds like that nice summer kind of love. So smooth. Favorite track: Sweetest Thing on This Side of Heaven.
Jamie Great lo-fi soul music Favorite track: You're so Fine.
mackin60
Dalton Saffe
Square-D
Thibaud B.
Marco Stefan
Tomo Sahara
jfry ramirez
سياسة الموسيقة
juandelouise
Includes unlimited streaming of You're so Fine via the free Bandcamp app, plus high-quality download in MP3, FLAC and more.
You're so Fine 02:53
Sweetest Thing on This Side of Heaven 03:41
Deepfunk / soul super rarity flipped with one of the best deep soul sides ever recorded, the family had some great images so we opted for a picture sleeve on this one, 400 copies only. forget about finding an O.G. Researched by our man, Brian Sears
Papa Bear And His Cubs were the brainchild of Eddie Disnute Sr., aka Papa Bear. A native resident of Hampton, Arkansas. Eddie started his music career in gospel then transitioned into secular music after moving to Milwaukee, Wisconsin in 1963. While living in Milwaukee with his wife and children, Eddie played with a group called the Fenders but eventually decided to start a group of his own with his kids aptly named Papa Bear And His Cubs.
Eddie Sr., a naturally gifted musician, taught his children how to play music. Creativity is a part of the Disnute DNA and before long Eddie's cubs were perfecting chops of their own. Papa Bear And His Cubs started performing together around the late 1960s. Although a few memorable gigs came their way, Wisconsin proved to be too cold for the Disnutes so they made their way back to Hampton, Arkansas.
The family continued to perform in Arkansas then made another move to Houston, Texas where they hoped to break into the music scene down south. They lived there for nearly three years and even recorded at SugarHill Studios, yet nothing materialized and the recordings remain a mystery to this day. For their final move, the Disnutes returned home to Hampton after Eddie's wife Christine (aka Mother Goose) received word that her father was ill.
In 1975 the group recorded their only vinyl record at Sam Griffith's home recording studio in Camden, Arkansas. Disnute Sr. recalls it only taking "one night, and one take" for both "Sweetest Thing On This Side Of Heaven" and "You're So Fine" to be born. Both songs have an entrancing quality that is inescapable and will surely resonate with listeners for years to come.
The group continued to perform until the early 1980s, at which point the cubs were bears themselves, who decided to go their own separate ways. When thinking back to their prime days, one thing will always remain clear in Eddie Sr.'s memory, "we could play, all it took was a countdown of 1, 2 ,3, 4 and we're gone".
funk r&b soul Edinburgh
If you like You're so Fine, you may also like:
supported by 479 fans who also own "You're so Fine"
Total Recall 2012
by Aja West & Friends ft. Reggie Watts
In the wake of his passing last month, celebrate the life of musical polymath Aja West with this '07 masterpiece. Bandcamp New & Notable Dec 12, 2022
Cymande
by Cymande
Another PawPaw Rod EP
by PawPaw Rod
Kribo Records is a Distinctly Singaporean Home for Classic Funk and Soul Inspiration
On "Black Times," Afrobeat Artist Seun Kuti Extends His Father's Legacy
Chicano Batman on What Freedom Means


Phantasy Star Online Ver. 2 (Sega Dreamcast, 2001) – Made Super Co.
Phantasy Star Online Ver. 2 is a Role-Playing video game for the Sega Dreamcast released in 2001. The game was developed by Sonic Team and plublished by Sega.


text:
History Essay
"History despite it's wrenching pain, cannot be unlived, and if faced with courage, need not be lived again." (LMTTM 137.) If students are educated with our past, then they'll learn from the mistakes that were made. A great deal of my eighth grade year was spent on the Holocaust. Not only was it taught in history class, but also in my English and class. I even had the pleasure of meeting two survivors from Auschwitz, a Nazi concentration camp. The teachers made it clear to us that the reason so much time was spent on the Holocaust was to ...view middle of the document...
Another thing bad about lying to students regarding America's history, is the hypocrisy of it all. "On one hand, they describe a country without repression, without real conflict. On the other hand, they obviously believe that we need to lie to students to instill in them love of country. But if the country is so wonderful, why must we lie?" (Loewen 296.) Just the fact that the teachers and textbooks are lying at all shows how truly corrupt America can be. How can adults be worried about losing authoritative power when the authority is having a negative influence on America's future leaders? As far as values go, what kinds of values include educating America's youth with lies?When it comes to worrying about losing adult-held values and authority, adults are selfishly thinking about the wrong thing. Whether it's math, English, literature, or even history, lies should never be part of the lesson plan. Teachers and parents must be honest with children, or there is the possibility of history repeating itself. If the lies regarding American history continue to be taught, then the truth will be lost. Even if America's history is full of corruption, it is still America's history. What's the point of having history class if the true history isn't being taught?
Other Essays On History
541 words - 3 pages Brief HistoryMany names (Samal, Ibabao, Tandaya) were given to Samar Island prior to the coming of the Spaniards in 1596. The name Samar was derived from the local dialect "samad", meaning wound or cut, which aptly describes the rough physical features of the island that is rugged and deeply dissected by streams.During the early days of Spanish occupation, Samar was under the jurisdiction of Cebu. In 1735, Samar and Leyte were united into one
879 words - 4 pages Perhaps the view of the U.S. entering WWI turned into most promising after the ripple effect of events after the sinking of the Lusitania. Each event made the United States weaker for entering the war and lastly there was no proper way to stay neutral. The instant cause of America's entry into World War I in April 1917 was the German announcement of unrestricted submarine warfare, and the following sinking of ships with Americans on board the
History of orientalism and Imperialism - Undergraduate History - History
2116 words - 9 pages social stratification. [1: C. Mathew and Jeffrey Dennis, Sociology of Racism, (Elsevier, 2015), pp. 1-2.] [2: F. Snowden, Before Colour Prejudice, (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 3-6; and S. Audrey, '"Race" and the construction of human identity', American Anhropologist 100, (1998), 695-6.] [3: T. E. Bowditch, Mission from Cape Coast to Ashanti: with a descriptive account of that kingdom, (London, 2001) pp. 10-30; and A. Mlambo, A History of
History of Porsche and Volkswagen - History - Essay
912 words - 4 pages Robert Mulkey Class Name Professor Name 23 April 2018 History of Porsche/ VW Vroom...vroom goes the sound of a luxury sports car pulling up next to you. You sit there admiring the car as it drives away, and the model of the car is a Porsche. The top favorite Porsche models are: 911, Cayenne, Boxster, Carrera and many more. Porsches are considered to be luxury sports cars that are German engineered. Porsche alongside many other luxury sports car
Analysis of African Citizenship - History 1301 - History
876 words - 4 pages their people. This analysis identifies the key factors used that made African citizenship. The five things that made the African government were unity of freedom, respect, commitment, equal rights and protection. The people of Africa believed everyone had the right to live their life freely, and the way they wanted. At that time in history the people of Africa were tired of being taken away as slaves to other countries. They sick of feeling like
Holocaust Essay- analyzing the roots - History - History
950 words - 4 pages motivation. We are constantly impacting history weather is being better or worse (R.O.I) The attitudes that led to the beginning steps of the Holocaust. In the poem "Family Album" people didn't know know what to expect with Hitler taking over Germany. There last day together would be the last one forever..."They smile not knowing this is the last time they will be together, not knowing what guards their world, and that the sky will be all that remains
What Is History?
549 words - 3 pages History is the study of how the world we live in now has been shaped by the events ofthe past. It is a record of human experiences relative to the society in which we live. Ourlives as members of western civilization, have been formed by outstanding institutions,ideas, and creative works. Without the knowledge of our past we would have littledirection in our society, we can not learn from past mistakes and successes, to put itbluntly, we learn
683 words - 3 pages It is important that people study the past so we have a better understanding of how we came to be. We also need to study the past so we know how civilizations were and what they did a thousand years ago. History is one of the most important elements in our lives. Archaeologists and historians find and study history using primary and secondary sources. The movie Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade is a prime example of archaeology.History can be
History paper using , America: A Narrative History - hunter college and History 152 - history essay
544 words - 3 pages HIS 152 Paper Sclar – Fall 2018 Paper due date: November 19 The 4-5 page paper is a study into American history (Civil War to the present). The assignment is to choose two primary documents from Shi/Mayer, For the Record (you may use more documents if you wish) and make an argument about American history. Use the documents to focus your paper as you explain what the documents tell us about the historical period in which they are from. While
History Of Baseball
1343 words - 6 pages . I believe that baseball came into existence in a very natural evolution of simple rock throwing.No references go back past 5000 years ago to when the first ball was thrown. "History records that the ancient Egyptians, and later the Greeks and Romans, tossed balls back and forth as part of their religious rites and as a conditioning exercise. Some phase of ball-throwing activity probably goes back to the most primitive man." (1) The concept
The True History
945 words - 4 pages The True History In the story, The True History, I was fascinated with the fact that Lucian of Samosata told the story as if these things really had happened to him but on the other hand in the beginning he told us that he was a liar. This truly fascinated me. I would expect this to make people not want to read this. My biggest question is why would he let people know that he was lying. It could be because he story was just really unbelievable
American History Essay
371 words - 2 pages Throughout American history, the development of plantations (farms) in the American colonies arrived as immigrants arrived in small farms. The American people settled on the land west of the Mississippi for many diverse reasons. As the years went, by the profit and demand for crops such as tobacco grew larger. At that time, large plantation could had over 400 acres of fields growing anything from tobacco to maize and sugarcane(in the south), as
World History Essay
533 words - 3 pages An introduction into world history. Includes basic notes on the roots of inequality, statistics, and advancement.Yali's Question & the Spread of Ideas"Why did white people develop so much cargo while the New Guineans have not?"-What promotes success within a country/empire?-Trade/ Economy-Climate-Stable government/ Good leadership-Resources-Culture-War and conquest-What allowed advancement in certain areas across Eurasia, while areas such as
2214 words - 9 pages Ch 21: The Collapse and Recovery of EuropeMargin and Big Picture ResponsesMargin Review Questions1. What aspects of Europe's nineteenth-century history contributed to the First World War?• Aspects of Europe's nineteenth-century history that contributed to the First World War include the emergence of Germany and Italy as unified states, which disrupted the fragile balance of power between Europe's major countries that had been established
Communications History Essay
1216 words - 5 pages The TelegraphThroughout history, there have been many versions of the telegraph. It was first demonstrated in 1835 by Professor Moncke in Germany. Another version was developed in 1837 by William Cooke which could transmit a signal as far as 1.6km away. The Morse Code was then developed in 1844 by American Samuel Morse, which used a series of dots and dashes to send messages 60 kilometres away. As a switch on the telegraph was opened and closed
Analysis Of Advantages And Disadvantages Of FDI
What Does The Earth-Warming-Up Mean For The Winter-Sport Industrial Economics This Century?
Kids compositions Essay
About The Stone Periodot, The Birthstone Of The Month Of August
History Of The Holocaust By John Mcenroe
Religion In Amercia By Jonathan Edward
BESSIE SMITH Essay
The Marketing Plan Objective Essay