text:
Martin Bormann – Nazi in Exile by Paul Manning
DURING THE BATTLE FOR THE ARDENNES IN December of 1944, Hitler's headquarters on the Western Front was hidden underground in a woods one mile northwest of Ziegenberg. It was realized there that the failure of this offensive meant the war was ended. All to follow was charade, merely a resistance that would continue to take Allied and German lives until May 1945. At the height of the Battle of the Bulge, champagne was served in the Western Headquarters bunker on Christmas day, and a euphoric Hitler spoke optimistically of 1945.
One man not at all euphoric was Martin Bormann, deep in his circumspect designs to enable Germany to emerge from certain military defeat to commercial victory in the postwar world. On this Christmas day, the Reichsleiter sipped champagne with the others of the headquarters staff and agreed. with Hitler that 1945 would be a very interesting year indeed. ' He then stepped back into his office, to the papers spread out on his desk, some of which were reports received as to the progress of his flight capital program, which had been launched immediately following the meeting of German industrialists in Strasbourg on August 10.
On one report he noted that the plan to increase the registration of German patents in neutral nations had proceeded satisfactorily. In Sweden, for instance, patent registration in
1938 had been 1,618, but after the Strasbourg meeting in 1944 the patent registration had risen to 3,377. The ownership of patents represents a blockhouse of power in any commercial contest, and the most important German industrial corporations were doing their best to maintain their ownership of vital processes. The firms represented on the memorandum were I.G. Farben, Zeiss-Ikon, Bosch, Daimler-Benz, A.E.G., and Siemens. There was a similar increase in patents by these and other German firms in Switzerland and Portugal.
Bormann had another report, on the continuing creation of assets in the neutral nations. German trade with and payments to these were carried on mainly through clearing agreements. In Spain, Sweden, and Turkey a two-price system was now being used for German goods. The lower price was paid through the clearings (the total of banking claims presented daily in settlement of accounts at a clearing house) while the higher price was retained on the books of the neutral importer. The difference accumulated was paid to the account of the German importer-exporter, becoming flight capital on deposit. To give some idea of the size of such deposits: within months of the inauguration of the two-price system, Swedish firms owed about $18 million in kroner and Turkish firms $12 million in Turkish lira. As goods shipments increased the sums on deposit in neutral banks accelerated, then the excess capital was invested in local real estate and industry.
Balance sheets showed Bormann that eleven mines in central Sweden were now owned by German firms and operated directly or indirectly through Swedish companies by the large German steel firms of Roechlingsche Eisen and Stahiwerke G.m.b.H., Voeklingen, Saar; Hosche, Dortmund; Friedrich Krupp, Essen; Gutehoffnungshutte, A.G., Oberhausen; and Vereinigte Stahlwerke, Diisseldorf. The coal now mined was shipped to Germany, with German firms paid in Sweden under the two-price system.
Members of the German steel cartel (such as Vereinigte Stahlwerke, of which Hermann Schmitz was a director, Mannesmann, Krupp, Gutehoffnungshutte, and Stahlunion) all owned related enterprises in Sweden, and the importation, handling, and transportation of coal and coke became almost a projection of Germany's coal industry. In shipbuilding, the Swedish companies owned or controlled by German shipping interests accepted vessels built by the Swedish firms and kept them in Swedish waters until after the war. A further example of masked investment was the money paid into the Swedish shipping firm of Rederi A/B Skeppsbron, which received a German-guaranteed loan of $3 million made from German supplies of free Swedish kroner in which the vessels were mortgaged to the lender. Although the Swedish company remained officially the owner of the vessels, the German HamburgAmerika line was the real owner.
Martin Bormann also knew that the vast funds sent outside the Third Reich under his new Nazi state policy were rapidly concealed in safe havens. In Sweden, the technique was to use Swedish cloaks or German-controlled local nationals to increase the recapitalization of Swedish firms. This produced a further stock buy-in by German interests. A big penetration was made into commercial and mercantile enterprises, where nearly two hundred Swedish firms were now operating on capital wholly or in part supplied by Germans or German firms.
In 1944 there was intense pressure on Sweden by American and British government representatives to halt the export of iron ore, special steels, and machine tools to Germany. The Allies also wanted to deny the Germans Swedish ball bearings, a prime element in all machinery of war used by the Wehrmacht and Luftwaffe. They also wanted German military traffic through Sweden to Norway stopped. An interesting sidelight to this struggle between the Allies and Germany for influence on Sweden is the peculiar role played by Marcus and Jacob Wallenburg, members of Sweden's most important banking family. Marcus headed a government commission which negotiated trade and political agreements with Britain and the United States throughout the war. At the same time, his brother Jacob was chief trade and economic negotiator for the Swedish government with Nazi Germany. Thus were both sides covered for Swedish business, including the family's own very substantial economic interests. Following World War II, this family empire was to achieve its most spectacular prosperity, as German investments under the Martin Bormann program matured in their Swedish safe-havens. In this way impressive wealth accrued to the Wallenburgs as well as to other Swedish and German investment groups controlling large holdings in the many Swedish companies under German dominance in 1944. For a time, however, in 1944 under the pressure of threatening to place Sweden on an Allied blacklist, coupled with promises of compensating Allied orders, Sweden agreed to Allied demands in December 1944, the very week Martin Bormann was reviewing German investments in Sweden. He shrugged at the news clattering over the teletype from Berlin. The agreement pleased the Allies but failed to dent the Bormann-sponsored hidden investment program in Sweden. The war would be over anyway in a matter of months, and business would pick up again. The binding ties of marriage, finance, and investment between Sweden and Germany were stronger than ever, and with peace would come a lessening of Allied probing into German financial and business manipulations, particularly when so many Swedes had a personal stake in the growth and prosperity of every firm owned or controlled by German interests. The Allies were advancing everywhere on the battlefronts and in their diplomatic arm-twisting of neutral nations. Yet the outlook of Reichsleiter Bormann differed little from the pragmatic cynicism of Hermann Rochling, the Saar steel magnate, who, when told in December 1944 that the Saarland would be overrun in days by American forces, replied almost indifferently: "We have lost the Saar once before and won it back. Old as I am, I shall see it return to our possession again." And so it did.
The movement of German assets into Switzerland had also gone well, Bormann noted from his reports. Flight capital investments had been accomplished principally through the establishment of subsidiaries of powerful German firms. Over half the total German capital in Switzerland was used in setting up holding companies representing I.G. Farben, Merck, Siemens, Osram, Henkel, and others. A holding company may not trade in any form. It may only hold stock in other companies, but through this device the existing German firms, and the 750 new corporations established under the Bormann program, gave themselves absolute control over a postwar economic network of viable, prosperous companies that stretched from the Ruhr to the "neutrals" of Europe and to the countries of South America; a control that continues today and is easily maintained through the bearer bonds or shares issued by these corporations to cloak real ownership. Bearer shares require no registration of identity, for such shares are exactly what they mean; the bearer of the majority shares controls the company without needing a vestige of proof as to how he acquired them. Thus the Germans who participated as a silent force in Bormann's postwar commercial campaign-which is sometimes referred to by aging Nazis as "Operation Eagle's Flight" or "Aktion Adlerflug"-insured their command over the industrial and financial institutions that were to move the new Federal Republic of Germany back into the forefront of world economic leadership.
In Switzerland the most substantial investments were in chemicals and drugs, and in electric power and equipment. German investments totaled $300 million, of which bank deposits (cash and securities) amounted to about $250 million, with direct investments about $50 million. In the German-Swiss clearings, Germany's debt, as the new year of 1945 began, was 1,000 million Swiss francs ($232.1 million). Swiss investments in Germany and prewar loans to Germany were $445 million.
Six Swiss private banks were now used by German firms in the flight capital program: H. Sturzenegger & Cie., Rochling & Co., Johann Wehrli and Company, Bank Wadenswil, Basler Handelsbank, and Kreditanstalt. However, all major Swiss banks were serving the Germans in the massive movement of funds. The big German banks, Deutsche, Dresdner, and Commerzbank, all had their regular Swiss affiliations through which they worked. Deutsche had as its principal connection Credit Suisse, and also did business with the Swiss Bank Corporation and the Banque Federale. Funds transferred from Berlin for a client list approved by Bormann went into numbered accounts, and were either held there for local investment or soon shifted to neutral nations elsewhere in Europe or overseas, to be credited to the accounts of appropriate German corporate subsidiaries, or else to entirely new corporations awaiting these start-up monies that would enable them to go into business using German patents. As these new corporations prospered, they generated more money and profits, becoming important elements in the Bormann global economic scheme. Seven hundred and fifty new corporations were established in the last months of the war under the direction of Reichsleiter Bormann, using the technique perfected by Hermann Schmitz.
A national of each country was the nominal head of each corporate structure and the board was a mix of German administrators and bank officials, while the staffing at senior and middle management levels was comprised of German scientists and technicians. In the background were the shadowy owners of the corporation, those Germans who possessed the bearer bonds as proof of stock ownership. The establishment of such companies, usually launched in industries requiring high technical skills, was welcomed in Spain and Argentina, to give two examples, because those governments appreciated that German companies would generate jobs and implement a more favorable balance of trade. Country by country, a breakdown by U.S. Treasury investigators of these new 750 German firms was as follows: Portugal, 58; Spain, 112; Sweden, 233; Switzerland, 214; Turkey, 35; Argentina, 98.
Gold always held a great attraction for Martin Bormann, as it did for all German bankers and economic leaders of the Third Reich. In fiscal conferences during the occupation years, in Brussels, Paris, and Amsterdam, the German economic specialists would always advocate more printing of local currencies by the state treasury. But when it came to safeguarding their own means, it was gold, always. Perhaps it was a subconscious holdover from the early 1920s, when the currency of the Weimar Republic had become virtually worthless. In 1943, when Bormann was sitting tall in the saddle as Hitler's right hand and as leader of the Nazi Party throughout the world, as well as chairman of his own banking committee, which oversaw the banking practices of every bank in Germany and the greater Third Reich, the Reichsleiter made sure that gold bullion was drawn into the vaults of the Reichsbank and of the three big commercial banks in Berlin. The gold, whatever its origin, would be stamped with Third Reich seals and periodically sold to leading Swiss banks, as well as to the Swiss National Bank. These banks purchased several hundred million dollars of such gold, paying in Swiss francs, which the Germans preferred at this point. The money was then left on deposit in various numbered accounts to be invested in Switzerland and in other neutral countries, and ultimately to maintain the Bormann party apparatus abroad.
These banking channels aside, Martin Bormann had other ways to disperse German assets outside of the Third Reich. The diplomatic pouches of Joachim von Ribbentrop's Foreign Ministry were used to transport gold, Amsterdam diamonds, bearer bonds, and U.S. stocks purchased over the years in large American corporations. A Foreign Ministry special courier went twice monthly to Stockholm, where the gold and diamonds he carried were sold for kroner currency and then invested in Swedish firms. A similar pattern was developed for South America, where deposits were made in the Buenos Aires branch of Deutsche Bank. Many individual Nazis, with Bormann's permission, transferred their own assets. Von Ribbentrop in one shipment banked $1 million, allegedly using an Argentinian intermediary named Pedro Rodrigues Panchino as his five percenter, according to the French newspaper, France-Soir, in its edition of February 10, 1945. The hangman claimed von Ribbentrop at Nuremberg. So the throwaway question is whether the Argentinian kept the money in his own name or it was turned over to Bormann's account. I would think the latter, for one doesn't fool with SS men charged with guarding such sums on behalf of the NSDAP in exile. Others wanting large deposits in Portugal or Spain would first ship gold to Switzerland, order it sold, then have a check or bank draft sent to Madrid or Lisbon in care of their money agent, where it would be deposited and then claimed at the end of the war.
Turkey, too, did a brisk business in gold and other assets. The week when three German armies were attacking in the Ardennes, German assets in Turkey on the record totaled $30 million, and the Turkish-German clearing account was $15.7 million in favor of the German government. Neither figure tells the whole story of Nazi resources in Turkey. Two branches of German banks, the Deutsche Istanbul and the Deutsche Orient (a branch of the Dresdner Bank), were depositories for a steady flow of bonds, cash, gold, bank deposits, and foreign exchange belonging to German firms and individuals. In Turkey, as in other neutrals, the Germans had also been able to achieve a safe haven for their money, by preventing the normal repatriation of foreign earnings. For example, both major German banks had a policy approved by Bormann of accumulating in Turkey all annual profits of the war years, rather than returning the money to Berlin. It just piled up as a bookkeeping item ready for transfer to South America or investment in Turkish business and commerce. Six big German insurance companies with branches in Turkey followed the same policy. Further, they followed a policy of linking Turkish insurance companies to their own operations by granting readily available German capital in return for stock considerations. Thus, these insurance firms generated large fluid assets that they invested in real estate and other properties. More than sixty German-controlled firms were the linchpin of the Turkish economy, and ran the gamut from construction to chemicals. In 1944 gold trading grew very active, with Deutsche Bank selling $5.5 million in gold coins for clients.
When in 1944 Turkey severed diplomatic relations with the Third Reich, joining the Allies in 1945, just four months before German surrender, there was no blocking of German assets. Thus, the two German banks in Turkey were enabled to transfer millions to their branches in Spain and Argentina. The German firms that had taken on a Turkish coloration of ownership were to be reclaimed by their German owners after the war.
Throughout this period of asset transfer, Reichsleiter Bormann's goal was to have as much foreign exchange as possible in position in all neutral nations in both hemispheres. Aside from the Swiss banks, which made all currencies readily available in exchange for goods, trade, or gold bullion sales, the export of German products to neutral nations added to the general foreign exchange funds. Upon receipt of German goods, an agency in Spain-for example, the Spanish Foreign Exchange Institute-would credit pesetas to a German-controlled importexport company. With such funds accumulating rapidly in Spain, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland, and Argentina, Bormann and his group, who were handling the fortunes of 750 new corporations, would use these corporations in neutral countries as cloaks for investing in American companies. Bormann always had a high regard for U.S. blue chip stocks as a stable investment, consistently purchasing a vast number of shares from the European offices of such New York stock brokerage houses as Merrill, Lynch on behalf of the Reich chancellery and Hitler, until war became official between the United States and Germany and the buying stopped, for a time.
In 1941, investments in U.S. corporations by German companies and assorted German individuals held voting ownership in 170; minority ownership was held in another 108 American companies. These businesses covered the following fields: manufacturing (foodstuffs, chemicals, electrical and automobile equipment, machinery and machine equipment, other metal products); petroleum production, refining and distribution; finance; trade; and miscellaneous.
American industry, of course, had a financial stake in German industry. In the same year, 1941, 171 U.S. corporations had major investments in German firms amounting to $420 million. A listing of these corporations is identical to the general categories under German ownership in the United States.
When Bormann gave the order for his representatives to resume purchases of American corporate stocks, it was usually done through the neutral countries of Switzerland and Argentina. From foreign exchange funds on deposit in Swiss banks and in Deutsche Sudamerikanische Bank, the Buenos Aires branch of Deutsche Bank, large demand deposits were placed in the principal money-center banks of New York City: National City (now Citibank), Chase (now Chase Manhattan N.A.), Manufacturers and Hanover (now Manufacturers Hanover Trust), Morgan Guaranty, and Irving Trust. Such deposits are interestfree and the banks can invest this money as they wish, thus turning tidy profits for themselves. In return, they provide reasonable services such as the purchase of stocks and transfer or payment of money on demand by customers of Deutsche Bank, such as representatives of the Bormann business organizations and Martin Bormann himself, who has demand accounts in three New York City banks. They continue to do so. The German investment in American corporations from these sources exceeded $5 billion and made the Bormann economic structure a web of power and influence. The two German-owned-banks of Spain, Banco Aleman Transatlantico (now named ' Banco Comercial Transatlantico), and Banco Germanico de la America del Sur, S.A., a subsidiary of Deutsche Bank, served to channel German money from Spain to South America, where further investments were made.
Argentina was the mecca for such money in the Western Hemisphere, and when Bormann gave the go-ahead in his overall flight capital program after the decisions at Strasbourg, over $6 billion of this money flowed into Buenos Aires for investment there and elsewhere in Latin America. The investments covered factories, hotels, resorts, cattle, banks, land, sugar and coffee plantations, metallurgy, insurance, electrical products, construction, and communications. It was much the same investment spectrum as established in Spain. West German investments today account for nearly 45 percent of all foreign investments in Spain.
Before D-Day four Paris banks, Worms et Cie., Banque de Paris et des Pays-Bas, Banque de l'Indochine (now with "et de Suez" added to its name), and Banque Nationale pour le Commerce et l'Industrie (now Banque Nationale de Paris), were used by Bormann to siphon NSDAP and other German money in France to their bank branches in the colonies, where it was safeguarded and invested for its German ownership.
In addition to overseeing his 750 new corporations, Martin Bormann was also kept apprised of I.G. Farben's activities in neutral countries, as well as the intensified activities of other major firms that were utilizing the new Bormann policy of transferring Third Reich money to subsidiaries. Farben had eight subsidiaries in Argentina, three in Portugal, four in Sweden, six in Switzerland, and fourteen in Spain. A.E.G., the giant electrical equipment manufacturer, had six subsidiaries in Argentina, three affiliates in Spain, and four in Sweden. In brief, every major German corporation with an international operation strengthened its branches, subsidiaries, and affiliates with an influx of new money and talent that included scientists and technicians arriving weekly ready to perform laboratory research in Spain and Buenos Aires.
Early in January 1945 Adolf Hitler and Martin Bormann, in company with the rest of their headquarters staff, left the Ardennes sector and traveled back to Berlin. On January 12 Stalin launched his Soviet winter offensive. The Fuehrer was in his main office in the chancellery, Bormann just adjacent. A briefing on the battle in the East given by General Heinz Guderian had been concluded. It had been a stormy session, in which Guderian was pessimistic about holding, and strongly urged that German forces fall back. Hitler resisted this suggestion with anger. Afterward, Reichsleiter Bormann was visited in his own office by Heinrich Mueller, SS chief group leader and senior general of the Waffen SS. As Bormann was skillful in administration and world fiscal affairs, Mueller was equally tops in his own area of competence, secret state police affairs. He told Bormann that Ernst Kaltenbrunner, chief of the Gestapo and an SS general, had gathered a small personal treasure and was sending it by armed SS convoy to a hideaway. Mueller handed to Bormann the listing, which read as follows: 50 kilograms of gold bars, 50 cases of gold coins and gold watches, 2 million American dollars, 2 million Swiss francs, five cases filled with diamonds and other precious stones, one stamp collection worth 5 million gold marks.
"Well," Bormann commented, "Ernst is still looking out for Ernst. It doesn't mean much to the big picture. But find out where he has it taken. When it's buried, and it will probably be in an Austrian lake close to his home, we might want one of our party gauleiters to watch over it. Kaltenbrunner may never last the war out, and it would be useful to the party later."
Mueller stood at attention, nodded, and left the office.
Kaltenbrunner finished the war out but never made it to his treasure. He did receive a report from his aide that it was secure, sunk deep in waterproof containers in Ausee Lake, but he was one of the ten convicted and executed in the prison gymnasium at Nuremberg.
Field Marshal Kesselring, during his retreat in Italy, before surrendering his 1-million-man force to the Allies, ordered $4.8 million in assorted valuables sunk in the waters around Verona. He wanted it safely out of the grasp of Italian communist partisans.
Corsica was held by German and Italian troops in the summer of 1943. The coastal areas, that is, and the principal cities-the capital of the island, Ajaccio, with its 25,000 people-.living around the bay, Bastia and its bay likewise ringed with people, and the coastal regions. But despite the armed might of the Axis troops, the Corsicans controlled the inland mountainous region, where hardly a road existed. The rugged dwellers had footpaths and trails throughout the wild interior, and they had the patience and wily wisdom of their forebears. They knew that in time the Germans and Italians would depart, as had the Romans and the Vandals, the Visigoths, the Saracens, the Genoese, and the French. Through the centuries, Corsicans had engaged in trade with their invaders. They did so now with the Germans and Italians, and would soon be doing likewise with the Americans and British and Free French who were to come.
The Germans and Italians were making preparations to leave, and were watched, as always, by members of the Unione Corse, the ancient secret organization whose tentacles spread to Marseilles and through the underworld of Europe. They watched at the Bay of Bastia during the month of September as German E-boats and frogmen searched the bottom of the bay for a treasure they were unable to locate
. The Germans were searching for a shipment of gold bullion, diamonds, jewelry, and currencies, which had been sealed in six lead containers and placed aboard an E-boat at Tripoli earlier in 1943. It was loot of North Africa, valued at an estimated $150 million, and had been collected by a special unit sent from Berlin by Reichsleiter Martin Bormann, to add to the Reich chancellery fund of the NSDAP. As the Afrika Korps retreated under the ferocious onslaught of the British Eighth Army, the treasure had been packed up and shipped out of Tripoli. This port in Libya was especially striking because of the waterfront facade built by Italian stonemasons. The E-boat, under command of officer Hauptmann Dahl, moved out of Tripoli harbor at high speed, then was lost from view in the Mediterranean's dark blue. On the water to Italy, Hauptmann Dahl was ordered from Rome to head for Corsica with the sealed treasure; he was to join a German naval convoy off Bastia, which would then steam north to German naval headquarters at La Spezia, in northern Italy. There they were to unload the consignment and take it by truck to Milano, where it would go by train over the Alps to Germany and on to Berlin. Dahl had made it to the coast of Corsica but before he could join the convoy an Allied air attack dispersed the German and Italian ships, sinking several. Steering a course along the shoreline was all that he could do; Dahl didn't dare to venture ashore because on this night he could see a firefight in progress between German troops and guerillas. He had headed for the estuary of Golo and there, about four kilometers off the port of Bastia, unloaded the six lead containers, as a safekeeping measure. He ordered his officers and crewmen to drop the cargo overboard, which they did -in about 20 fathoms of water. Marking the spot in triangular fashion with two land bearings he headed north to Italy. He had reached La Spezia and reported his action to the German naval command. Rather than being commended for his foresight, he, along with three officers, was held for court-martial in the barracks of Massa, below La Spezia. The officers were shot and the seamen, judged as only carrying out orders, were sent off to the Russian front.
For the next month, on instructions from La Spezia, the German naval command on Corsica searched for the heavy containers in the waters and soft sand off Bastia Bay. But on October 4, under Allied pressure, the Germans withdrew from the island, after blowing up the ancient, narrow stone bridges on the eastern end. Within two days the streets of Ajaccio, with its statue of Napoleon, were filled with men wearing the uniforms of the United States, Britain, and the Free French. The bays of Ajaccio and Bastia filled with freighters, supply ships, tenders, gray destroyers, and troop transports. Inland, glades, meadows, rocks, and trees were bulldozed away to create an airfield, from which flew American and British fighter planes and DC-3 transports.
The Unione Corse waited through this desecration with the traditional patience of a patriarchal crime family. When the hubbub was over, and all was serene again, the waters would be theirs and theirs alone to explore. Peace, of course, did come to Corsica, and divers of the Unione Corse tried and tried but failed to locate the looted treasure of North Africa. Occasionally, venturesome strangers would arrive to explore, having heard rumors of Nazi booty. In one way or another, all were discouraged. Four disappeared one night. An Andre Mattei was found dead, riddled with bullets, after he had had too much to say about the location of the six containers. Then appeared- Peter Fleig, one of the German sailors of the original E-boat, who had helped shove the containers into the water that night back in September 1943. He had survived the war in Russia, spent a year or so in a military hospital recovering from wounds, and then made it to Corsica. The vision that had sustained him through Russia and convalescence was that of finding again this wealth. While diving for it he was warned off by the Unione Corse, a warning he paid no attention to. He vanished.
This legend of World War II continues to attract the adventurous. Even Edwin Link, American businessman and inventor of the Link Trainer of World War II, who later pioneered underwater vehicles for oceanographic exploration, mounted an expedition in the spring of 1963 to search for the treasure that had been intended for Martin Bormann. Like the others, Link, too, failed.
In the final days of any war, grabbing and looting are commonplace. Martin Bormann, however, was wrapped up in the dispersal of several billion dollars in assets around the globe. He dwelled on control of the 750 corporations; be had utilized every known legal device to disguise their ownership and their patterns of operation: use of nominees, option agreements, pool agreements, endorsements in blank, escrow deposits, pledges, collateral loans, rights of first refusal, management contracts, service contracts, patent agreements, cartels, and withholding procedures. Detailed documents and other papers on each company and on all money transferred from the Third Reich to outside subsidiaries of the German corporations participating in the flight capital program, had been maintained. As goals were achieved, the papers were deposited in Swiss banks. A copy of everything, including field reports, went to Bormann as part of the historic file that would be crated and trucked out of Berlin to Munich, flown to Spain, and then transshipped to the Bormann archives in South America.
Hermann Goering, like Ernst Kaltenbrunner, got caught up in the looting frenzy of the waning days of the war. Art treasures were Goering's passion, and he had filled his mansion, Karinhall, with priceless specimens taken from national collections in almost every city of the occupied world. As the Allied forces closed in on the Nazis, he had most of these stored in cool salt mines to protect them from bombs and the weather. He was shrewd enough to realize that such masters could be readily identified and returned to their rightful owners. He possessed several of the better paintings from the Rothschild collection in France. Almost certainly they would find their way back to Baron Rothschild. Still, he realized that certain art treasures not so easily identifiable have great economic value; if sold in a neutral country, they could provide a handsome source of foreign exchange, providing one was able to collect it after the war.
Goering instructed a friend in Holland, Alois Miedel, a German art dealer who had become owner of the Goudstikker Galleries in Amsterdam after the occupation in 1940, to begin collecting works of art that could be readily turned into cash in Spain. Miedel began with excellent Dutch paintings, by early as well as by later great masters. Usually he paid for them in German marks that had been pumped into the Dutch, Belgian, and French currency systems-but on occasion with Dutch "occupation" guilders. He seized outright art belonging to Jewish owners. He took his first big shipment in a Luftwaffe plane to Bilbao, a free port in Spain. Among the valuable paintings he offered for sale were works by Rembrandt, Van Dyck, Rubens, Jan Steen, and Cranach. The Prado in Madrid offered 2 million pesetas for one of these. They purchased others more cheaply, at prices ranging from 100,000 to 500,000 pesetas. British and American diplomats in Madrid, who were likewise amateur collectors, identified ten in the Prado looted from Holland as belonging to the Goudstikker collection, one to the Van Oalst collection, and one to the Valkenburg collection. Eventually, some were returned to their owners. The money paid to Alois Miedel was banked in an account jointly controlled by himself and Goering.
Miedel was a very busy man during the last stage of the war, and for a time was the most important art dealer in Europe. He brought a shipment of art treasures from France, with Goering's assistance, and for their sale in Spain published a catalogue of 200 pictures. Art stolen from Italy was appearing in Stockholm and in the galleries of Geneva, Basel, and Zurich. The value of paintings and objects of art looted from Holland, Belgium, and France totaled over $1.5 billion. Holland alone accounted for 200 million guilders or $136 million. Aside from Hermann Goering, Joseph Goebbels and Joachim von Ribbentrop were recipients of stolen art. While Alois Miedel was Goering's personal art hunter, Dr. Hans Wendland in France and Andreas Hofer, a Berlin art dealer,. were also extremely active in the business.
In December 1944 the Spanish government issued an order for the arrest of Alois Miedel, but he had already been seized by the Maquis on the French side of the border. Miedel escaped, made his way back to Spain, then with German assistance disappeared. He showed up later in Buenos Aires, whence his funds had been transferred, and to demonstrate that all art lovers were not in Spain, Sweden, or Switzerland, the paintings he had with foresight shipped to Buenos Aires were soon gracing many fine homes there.
In London and Washington there was grave concern about the German flight capital. Officials of both Allied governments knew in a general way what was going on, but not until they had laboriously compiled a card index of 500,000 names of businessmen in both hemispheres, northern and southern, who were working for the Germans, did they realize the magnitude of the task ahead. This list showed only the tip of the iceberg; many, many people were willing to be profitably employed by the Germans. It was early 1945, and Bormann was moving forward full speed. The various departments of the two Allied governments-U.S. Department of State and Treasury Department, British Ministry of Economic Warfare, together with General Donovan's OSS and General Menzies' MI-6-realized only too well that they would have to come up with a substantial counteroffensive to checkmate Martin Bormann's economic blitzkrieg. Bormann's group was lean and mean, a prototype of what Admiral Turner in 1977 was to hope aloud that his CIA might one day become.
Orvis A. Schmidt, director of Foreign Funds Control of the U.S. Treasury Department, shook his head when he described the German flight capital operation in 1945:
"The network of trade, industrial, and cartel organizations has been streamlined and intermeshed, not only organizationally but also by what has been officially described as `personnel union.' Legal authority to operate this organizational machinery has been vested in the concerns that have majority capacity in the key industries, such as those producing iron and steel, coal, and basic chemicals. These concerns have been deliberately welded together by exchanges of stock to the point where a handful of men can make policy and other decisions that affect us all."
This highly developed control that blanketed Germany from top to bottom also functioned outside of the Third Reich and was a vital key to the success of the Bormann program. The great civil service bureaucracy within Germany never for a moment doubted that there would be a German revival, and they had been trained like those in industry to follow a pattern that would advance the interests of their country. In the first week of occupation by the Allies after the surrender, when Allied military government representatives went to the Ruhr factories, they were always met by handpicked Germans, frequently engineers, speaking English and prepared with credentials to prove their acquaintance with reputable citizens and corporations in the United States. They had already begun to rehabilitate the bombed factories. The destruction of I.G. Farben plants was relatively light. As German I.G. technicians streamed from the battlefronts back to their hometowns and went to work, it was estimated that production could reach 90 percent of capacity in three months, given adequate supplies of labor, fuel, power, and raw materials. War damage to the other industrial firms had also been greatly exaggerated by Allied wartime air intelligence. The amount of capacity knocked out by bombing and shelling was less than that which the Germans had built during the war, so that Germany found herself somewhat ahead of her prewar capacity. For a time the Allies threatened to dismantle heavy factories and ship them to neighboring countries. But they would have been useless additions, and this factor, together with a growing distrust of Russia by the American and British governments, produced a change in outlook. Germany, with $1.5 billion from the Marshall Plan, would soon find herself with the same well-rounded industrial structure as before the war.
But what really hexed officials in London and Washington, whose job it was to stop the flow of liquid assets out of Germany, was their inability to get a handle on the problem. Everything was moving too fast. At all key points this economic empire was staffed by reliable party men, who were also expert businessmen. They in turn guided and worked with the nationals of each neutral country, who could be counted on to follow the same pattern of contributing to the best interests of Germany and German business corporations. In the formerly occupied countries, when ownership of a corporation was turned over to an appointee it was a legal fact, but there was simultaneously the handshake and the oral understanding that within five years ownership would revert to the German. Bormann believed that five years was a sensible time limit. He knew from his own intelligence sources that Russia would take over eleven nations along the eastern frontier, including the eastern part of Germany, and that this would disenchant the British and the Americans. This, and the truth that man's memory is shortlived, guaranteed an altered Allied attitude.
But all this speculation was for the near future; Bormann dealt with the present from his offices in Hitler's headquarters. When he gave directions they were followed in Latin America. At the time Orvis A. Schmidt of the U.S. Treasury Department declared:
"The great German combines were the spearheads of economic penetration in the other American republics. In the field of drugs and pharmaceuticals the Bayer, Merck, and Schering companies enjoyed a virtual monopoly. I.G. Farben subsidiaries had a firm hold on the dye and chemical market. German enterprises such as Tubos Mannesmann, Ferrostaal, A.E.G., and Siemens-Schuckert played a dominant role in the construction, electrical, and engineering fields. Shipping companies and, in some areas, German airlines, were well entrenched. In addition, other and newer pro-German firms were engaged. in miscellaneous types of business, some of which were partly or wholly owned by Germans and some of which were wholly owned by persons of German origin, who, without changing their inborn allegiance, had acquired citizenship in one of the American republics."
The U.S. Treasury Department thought it might be possible to supersede these German firms with a replacement program of its own, in which local industry would be fostered, with U.S. corporations encouraged to expand into these markets. But the obstacles were too great. In some Latin American countries German capital represented a large segment of the total business investment, and in some important industries there was nothing to replace such German corporations, which had been profitmaking concerns for some years; the I.G. Farbens and Siemens. Part of the new corporate move to Latin America was represented by Fritz Mandl, the armament manufacturer of the Ruhr, who invested heavily in an Argentine government program to expand its armaments industry. The two largest German firms, Thyssen Lametal, S.A., Industrial y Mercantil, and La Sociedad Tubos Mannesmann, received German financing under the capital made available for export by Martin Bormann. They were also able to employ large numbers of German scientists and technicians who had been moved out of Germany in 1944. There was also the important German insurance firm of El Fenix Sudamericano Cia. de Reaseguros, S.A., an affiliate of the Munich Reinsurance Company. All South American big business came to depend on El Fenix as the principal reinsurers of commerce and industry in Latin America.
Not so important but curiously interesting was the establishment of the small textile firm of Denubio, with a capitalization of 2 million pesos in Argentina. In 1944, while serving as German army chief of staff in Berlin, General Heinz Guderian received permission from Reichsleiter Bormann to establish this firm in association with a partner, Count Galeazzo Ciano, Mussolini's son-in-law and Italian foreign minister to the Third Reich. The granting of such permission also entitled the famed Panzer general to the use and transfer of Nazi state funds to Argentina for this corporate purpose. When Orvis A. Schmidt suggested that some Latin American business enterprises alter their management to exclude all Germans, the chief executive officer of such a company would frequently claim non-German ownership, which made it necessary for a U.S. Treasury team to trace laboriously the ownership through a maze of dummies and holding companies. There was also the feeling of the U.S. administration that to proceed fully with such an elimination program in Latin America was to open up the serious question of whether the United States had the constitutional authority to take such action.
Recently in Washington, D.C., I spoke with two lawyers, both of whom had worked with Orvis A. Schmidt, now deceased. As the director of Foreign Funds Control of the U.S. Treasury Department during the latter part of the war, Schmidt was the U.S. official directly responsible for stopping the German flow of assets to safe havens; he had been in a position to destroy the Bormann intention of establishing economic strongpoints from which German businessmen could launch their postwar commercial campaigns after the war.
One of these lawyers was Elting Arnold. He told me that Foreign Funds Control had been the think tank for Henry Morgenthau, secretary of the treasury, and that it was composed of brilliant young men dedicated to high principles and the freezing of enemy assets in wartime. Arnold described Schmidt as a "tenacious, observant man, a man of sincerity and great character.... He was large and barrel-chested, quiet-spoken but possessed of a sense of mission." Following World War II, Orvis Schmidt went to the International Bank for Reconstruction, serving there until the time of his death.
From the second attorney, John Pehle, I learned why Schmidt and Foreign Funds Control had been unable to stop the German program of flight capital to neutral nations. John Pehle, an urbane and distinguished looking man who is today counsel to the law firm of Morgan, Lewis, and Bockies, had been the original director of Foreign Funds Control in the U.S. Treasury Department, with Orvis Schmidt serving as his deputy director.
Pehle said, "The main mission of Foreign Funds Control, which began on April 8, 1940, after Norway and Denmark were invaded, was to freeze the assets of these countries in the United States so they could not be used by the Third Reich. As other countries were occupied, our activities expanded until we had all assets of Germany, Japan, and all occupied countries frozen, which amounted to many billions of dollars. We also attempted to reach outside the United States to control the assets and trade of Germany and Japan by establishing, with Britain, a blacklist of firms and businessmen doing business with Germany. There were no computers in those days and we kept some 500,000 names on Rolodex files. It was cumbersome and slow."
Mr. Pehle believes his department of several hundred did a fine job of controlling foreign assets in the United States. Of course, "there was always political pressure to free some company or other from our strictures. The infamous IT&T deal in which they sold their telephone company in Romania to the Romanian government and were paid the $7 million in the U.S. which represented Romanian frozen currency, is a testimony to backstairs influence. However, I am glad to say it didn't happen again."
Pehle described the U.S. Treasury Department as an interesting place to be. "We had bright men. Lend-Lease was conceived in the Treasury."
But perhaps Pehle put his finger on the reason why U.S. Foreign Funds Control was unable to interdict the German drive to move assets to neutral nations.
"In 1944 emphasis in Washington shifted from overseas fiscal controls to assistance to Jewish war refugees. On presidential order I was made executive director of the War Refugee Board in January 1944. Orvis Schmidt became director of Foreign Funds Control. Some of the manpower he had was transferred, and while the Germans evidently were doing their best to avoid Allied seizure of assets, we were doing our best to extricate as many Jews as possible from Europe."
One project of Mr. Pehle's War Refugee Board was an order to rescue as many Jews as possible from Budapest. The U.S. board could not intervene directly and so it asked the Swedish government if it would send a Swedish representative to Hungary, where 900,000 Jews, the last large remaining Jewish population, awaited either extinction or rescue. Sweden agreed and dispatched Raoul Wallenberg, who traveled to Budapest with huge sums of U.S. Treasury money and Swedish diplomatic papers, which were to provide freedom of travel to Sweden for a subsequent stream of 90,000 Jewish refugees. But when Budapest fell to Soviet troops, Wallenberg became a prisoner of the Russians and was shipped to Moscow.
Many believe that Wallenberg has spent the last thirty years in Soviet prisons. Russia has denied the capture and imprisonment of Wallenberg. But the case remains open. In May of 1980 the "Free Raoul Wallenberg Committee," largely composed of influential Swedish and American Jews, held an international hearing in Stockholm to focus new attention on this case. They wanted to induce the Soviet Union to produce this man, whom Einstein recommended for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1949 for efforts in Budapest on behalf of Balkan Jews and the American War Refugee Board operating under the direction of John Pehle. The two objectives were diametrically opposed. Certainly in his power position Reichsleiter Martin Bormann from 1944 to the end of the war was moving with all possible speed to shift all moveable assets out of the greater Third Reich. He was untroubled by the humanitarian considerations holding Washington in their sway. For him it was a go-for-broke operation all the way. Even today, however, there are U.S. Treasury oldtimers of World War II still not aware of the magnitude of the Bormann operation and of its success. Those who know, in Washington, in South America, and in the capitals of Europe, are locked together in a conspiracy of silence that has endured for thirty-seven years until the publication of this book.
In this silent contest during the winddown years of World War II, Orvis A. Schmidt was not to emerge victor over Martin Bormann, although he tried. Tirelessly, he told assorted Senate committees what was happening, spoke of the extent of the German plan, and urged a new dedication to stopping the flight capital blitzkrieg, with the prescient warning, "It is these new concentrations of economic power which will enable Germany to rise again."
Orvis A. Schmidt felt that he was a man crying in the wilderness as he gave testimony before Senate committees. The mood of the country and the marketplace was similar: get our boys home and get on with the business of making money and building new homes and stabilizing the economy for the bumper crop of babies which was sure to come. When Orvis Schmidt told the Senators the extent of German economic infiltration into the foreign countries even before VE-day and that the Germans intended to preserve this vast hidden economic structure in order to rise again, he knew instinctively that he had failed to catch the interest of the American lawmakers. Schmidt testified:
The danger does not lie so much in the fact that the German industrial giants have honeycombed the neutrals, Turkey and Argentina, with branches and affiliates which know how to subvert their commercial interests to the espionage and sabotage demands of their government. It is important and dangerous, however, that many of these branches, subsidiaries, and affiliates in the neutrals and much of the cash, securities, patents, contracts and so forth, are ostensibly owned through the medium of secret numbered accounts or rubric accounts, trusts, loans, holding companies, bearer shares, and the like by dummy persons and companies claiming neutral nationality and all of the alleged protection and privileges arising from such identities. The real problem is to break the veil of secrecy and reach and eliminate the German ability to finance another world war. We must render useless the devices and cloaks which have been employed to hide German assets.
Schmidt noted the facts that A.E.G. had six subsidiaries in Argentina, one in Portugal, two in Spain, three in Sweden; Siemen-Schuckert-Werke A.G. with seven subsidiaries in Argentina, two each in Portugal and Sweden, four in Spain, and five in Switzerland, and that Vereinigte Stahlwerke had seven subsidiaries in Argentina, three affiliates in Spain, and four in Sweden-and so on almost ad infinitum. He was to save perhaps his best shot for I.G. Farben when he testified before a U.S. Senate committee:
"We have found an I.G. Farben list of its own companies abroad and at home-a secret list hitherto unknown-which names over 700 companies in which I.G. Farben has an interest," and this did not include their regular corporate structure in 93 countries or the 750 companies established under the Martin Bormann program.
He also recited the discovery of his former chief, John Pehle, now directing the War Refugee Board at the request of President Roosevelt. I.G. Farben, at the insistence of Himmler and for related political reasons, had built a vast industrial establishment at Auschwitz to manufacture synthetic oil and rubber. Himmler promised Farben officials an unending supply of Jews in the 300,000 population concentration camp to work I.G. Farben Auschwitz. But even Friedrich Flick and other Ruhr industrialists who were themselves utilizing supplies of slave labor in their factories to the west knew production could only be maintained with well-fed workers, not emaciated, walking skeletons as at Auschwitz. It was I.G. Farben's greatest failure. Despite a plant which used more electricity than the city of Berlin, an investment of 900 million Reichsmarks, and 25,000 inmates who were worked until they dropped dead, not a single pound of Buna rubber was ever produced. It was the last time that political considerations would influence business judgment in the establishment of a factory, decreed the 1G. Farben board of directors.
Orvis Schmidt also testified that when they questioned the top Farben people about their wartime activities, ... They were inclined to be very indignant. Their general attitude and expectations was that the war was over and we ought now to be assisting them in helping to get I.G. Farben and German industry back on its feet. Some of them have outwardly said that this questioning and investigation was, in their estimation, only a phenomenon of short duration, because as soon as things got a little settled they would expect their friends in the United States and England to be coming over. Their friends, so they said, would put a stop to activities such as these investigations and would see that they got the treatment which they regarded as proper and that assistance would be given to them to help reestablish their industry.
As the war came to a close, all major American industries felt that they would like to see the German money machine working again. Every U.S. company of consequence had its representative in uniform, as technical advisor or officer, as did the British. As Allied armies moved through France, Belgium, and the Lowlands, corporate executives took time out to check the status of their branch firms. The changing tone seemed auspicious to Martin Bormann. In all lands liberated by American and British armies, there was a reluctance to disturb the machinery of money and industry that had been shaped by German economic experts into cartels and interlocking business arrangements with German firms. The obvious inequities and seizures were adjusted. The paintings taken from the Rothschilds were returned, as was the family bank. Firms and newspapers that had been too blatantly Nazi changed hands or were closed down. The German presence was reduced, but not eliminated; the device of cloaked ownership insured a continuation of proprietory rights. It all added up to a new chapter in the adventures of the U.S. Army investigative teams. Grim idealists when they entered the liberated countries, they soon learned that, once free, each government haughtily insisted on making its own decisions without advice from the Americans. Even Grand Duchess Charlotte of Luxembourg had her own ideas, and they didn't jibe with those of the U.S. investigative team dispatched to her tiny country to set things right. Upon her return from exile in London and Montreal, she promptly dismissed the U.S. investigative mission, which had been attempting to uncover secrets of the German-Luxembourg steel cartel. Elbert D. Thomas of Utah, when he was chairman of the U.S. Senate subcommittee on military affairs, commented in Washington on June 26, 1945:
We had a mission in Luxembourg which was obtaining quite a bit of information on the steel cartel until the Grand Duchess returned. Information was then blocked off from us and the mission had to retire with what information they had already collected. There was much to learn about the way in which small states like Luxembourg had been used by the cartels. The episode suggests that some rulers, whom we have befriended, may be expected to assist the cartelists in their postwar efforts to regain dominance.
What the grand duchess learned from her finance minister on her return to Luxembourg was simple: "Don't tamper with the money machine. We made record profits during the German era, and there is every indication we will be going into an even greater period of prosperity, once Germany recovers. They will then continue to be our biggest customer. All that is required now is a readjustment in stock ownership to please Belgian, French, British, and American shareholders, which will be done." Open German stock ownership was reduced to its former position of about 20 percent in Luxembourg industry and the German trustee was eliminated. But at board meetings, Belgian and French banks voted as blocs on behalf of stockholders in Germany. The German voice in the wings was still there, and as time went on in Luxembourg, increasingly the voice could be heard loud and clear-the customer speaking to the seller, the equalizer of the marketplace. Grand Duchess Charlotte, who was to retire during the sixties to be succeeded by her son, Grand Duke Jean, always believed that the new prosperity of Luxembourg after the war was testimony to her decision in 1945 not to permit interference with the German financial and industrial apparatus. The German banks, Deutsche and Dresdner, remained in position and the Luxembourg financial community continued to look to Frankfurt rather than to Zurich, London, and New York for financial guidance. ARBED (its sales organization in New York City is Amerlux Products) continues as a powerful and prosperous steel cartel closely tied to its German mentors. By 1980 Luxembourg was to become a new center for gold buying in Europe, with West German banks selling the equivalent of $1.4 billion in gold to holders in Luxembourg. The chief attraction was the lack of a value-added tax, a form of sales tax. The tiny principality also became the European finance center for the KGB and its espionage operations on the continent.
But on February 25, 1946, Russell A. Nixon, when acting director, Division of Investigation of Cartels and External Assets in the U.S. military government in Germany, was to sum up the entire problem facing those investigative teams in their efforts to check and change the economic web woven to confuse the Allies. He was to tell a Senate subcommittee in Washington:
We have not yet, nine months after the war has ended, developed an effective drive for these assets. If you will go through the neutral countries, country by country, you will find that they have not accepted the sovereignty of the four powers in getting the assets. They are not turning the assets over. Such progress as we have made has been very partial and generally ineffective. Generally speaking, in spite of the efforts that have been made, at the present time there is a continuation of the dissipation and further concealment of these assets throughout all the neutral countries.
Powerful friends of the Bormann organization in all Western countries, including those sprinkled in control points throughout the administration in Washington and in the financial and brokerage businesses of Wall Street, the City of London, and the Paris establishment, did not wish a coordinated drive to get at these external German assets. They had understandable reasons, if you overlook morality: the financial benefits for cooperation (collaboration had become an old-hat term with the war winding down) were very enticing, depending on one's importance and ability to be of service to the organization and the 750 corporations they were secretly manipulating, to say nothing of the known multinationals such as LG. Farben, Thyssen A.G., and Siemens; and, as a second reason, the philosophy of free enterprise and preservation of private property.
This latter reason was expressed best at an appeals board hearing in the American Zone of Germany. The board was, to vote four-to-one in late 1945 to release from prison Richard Freudenberg, the largest leather and shoe manufacturer in Germany. In 1944 his personal income for the year was one million marks. Freudenberg was also a war economy leader and a regional economic advisor to Reichsleiter Bormann. He had been jailed as an active Nazi under the mandatory arrest category regulation, and the vote to release him also permitted him to return to management of his company. The argument for freedom, which was to become a landmark for occupation authorities, was expressed by Mr. Reinhard, representing Ambassador Robert Murphy:
"What-weare doing here through denazification is nothing less than a social revolution. If the Russians want to Bolshevize their side of the Elbe that is their business, but it is not in conformity with American standards to cut away the basis of private property. This man is an extremely capable industrialist, a kind of Henry Ford."
It was fated that Hennann Schmitz and Martin Bormann should meet again and discuss the progress of the flight capital program. It took place at the chancellery in Berlin in March 1945. The Wehrmacht was fighting inside Germany, hard pressed by General Patton's U.S. Third Army. In the east, German defenses still held in Upper Silesia, Czechoslovakia, and Danzig. But Russian pressure was increasing. In the chancellery it was quiet, with only the noise of typewriters and teletype machines in outer offices as Schmitz and Bormann talked.
In testimony later given to Nuremberg investigators, Schmitz praised Bormann for the way he had directed the distribution of German assets around the world. His own Farben organization had, of course, contributed to the success of the operation. Every regional representative working for Hermann Schmitz was an exceptional businessman, or he would not have been with LG. All had contributed sound advice in their areas of competence, the regions of the world where they represented Farben while keeping an eye on the subsidiaries of the parent concern and the 700 hidden corporations they controlled. They had provided assistance and continuing guidance in establishing the 750 new companies created on order of Bormann, who wanted more than hidden assets; Bormann wanted the money and patents and technicians put to work to create even greater assets that would bolster Germany in the postwar years. In their meeting in the chancellery, both men checked over the figures of sums disbursed, and they were accurate to the pfennig. The Reicshsleiter asked Schmitz his views of the future. Schmitz replied, "The occupation armies will be understanding in the West, but certainly not in the East. I have instructed all Farben administrators and technicians to come to the West, where they can be of use in resuming our operations once the disturbances of 1945 come to a halt."
Schmitz added that, while general bomb damage to the I.G. plants was about 25 percent of capacity, some were untouched. He mentioned speaking with Field Marshal Model, who was commanding the defenses of the Ruhr. "Model had planned to turn our Bayer-Leberkusen pharmaceutical factory into an artillery base but he agreed to make it an open, undefended factory. Hopefully, we will get it back untouched."
"What about your board of directors and the essential executives? If they are held by the occupation authorities can I.G. continue?" Bormann asked.
"We can continue. We have an operational plan for such a contingency, which everyone understands. However, I don't believe our board members will be detained too long. Nor will I. But we must go through a procedure of investigation before release, so I have been told by our N.W.7 people who have excellent contacts in Washington."
This was not quite an accurate assessment of the immediate future that faced Schmitz and I.G. Farben in Germany. Twelve officers of I.G. were to be tried at Nuremberg, and on July 30, 1948, they were sentenced to various prison terms for plunder of occupied territories and use of slave labor in their factories. Schmitz was to receive a four-year prison term, but many of the lesser officials would be released by the Allied military government, which simply didn't know what to do with them. Of those at the second level of management, there was Paul Denker, director of Farben's accounting divisions and important in the various Farben subsidiaries; Carl von Heider, general director of sales of dyestuffs, who also handled the Czechoslovakia operation; Helmuth Borgwardt, general director of sales of organic chemicals; Guenther Frank-Fahle, chief of the central finance office and director of Max Ilgner's espionage group; N.W.Ts Kurt Kruger, another Ilgner lieutenant; Herbert Stein, chief legal advisor of the chemical and dyestuffs department and corporate camouflage expert second only to Schmitz himself. All were returned to their corporate offices. Schmitz also told Bormann of his visit to Switzerland earlier in the month. "Germany will have a poor image problem this time. Much worse than after the First World War. It can all be placed on the doorsteps of Goering, Himmler, and Heydrich. Goering and Himmler thought up the Final Solution for the Jews, and Heydrich made it a fact."
Bormann agreed, asking, "How does that affect I.G.?"
"We produced the poison gas on Himmler's orders," Schmitz explained, "so I've been making some corporate name changes in Basel, which may help our overseas situation."
Hermann Schmitz then went on to explain that he had changed I.G. Chemie to Societe Internationale pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales S.A. In German-speaking Basel, the name became International Industrie and Handelsbeteiligungen A.G., or Interhandel. Schmitz said he had stipulated that only Swiss were to be on the board of directors of the new holding corporation, which could then declare itself a fully Swiss corporation. The brightest jewel in the Interhandel string of companies was General Aniline and Film Corporation, a holding company in the United States for various American I.G. Farben companies. It had been organized in 1929. There were ten members of the board: Schmitz, Bosch, and Greif, all Farben men; Metz, Weiss, and Kitroff, of U.S. companies that sold Farben manufactured products; and four prominent American industrialists and bankers-Mitchell, Ford, Warburg, and Teagle of Standard Oil. In one instance Farben gained a large bloc of Standard Oil stock by selling certain patents ',to the Standard Oil Corporation. Some American directors of General Aniline had large blocs of GAF stocks registered in their name. The New York bank of record was National City Bank, the largest in New York, which is now known as Citibank. In 1929 the board voted Hermann Schmitz president, a position in which he served from 1929 to 1936, while simultaneously serving as head of I.G. Farben. In March 1945, Hermann Schmitz was telling Martin Bormann that he hoped this shuffling of name and board membership would prove helpful after the war when steps would be taken to return General Aniline and Film Corporation to his ownership in Switzerland. The valuable holding company had been seized in 1942 by U.S. authorities as suspected enemy assets.
In 1948 a suit was to be filed by certain minority stockholders of Interhandel against the attorney general of the United States, as successor to the wartime Alien Property Custodian, and the U.S. Treasury, for the return of 89 percent of GAF, of a value of $100 million plus $1.8 million seized in cash in 1942. Interhandel, through its American attorneys, first filed an administrative claim, which was denied. The suit then went to the District Court for the District of Columbia, then to the Supreme Court, and back to District Court. The Swiss claim was based on the argument that Interhandel was a Swiss corporation, that it was not nor had it ever been an enemy of the United States, and that it owned the shares in question. The American government rebuttal was that Interhandel was the result of a conspiracy between the private bank of H. Sturzenegger, formerly E. Greutert & Cie., and I.G. Farbenindustrie of Germany and others "to conceal, camouflage, and cloak the ownership, control, and combination by I.G. Farben of properties and interests in many countries of the world, including the U.S."
As the case dragged through the U.S. courts, Schmitz would have Interhandel cosmeticized even more. Charles de Loes, past president of the Swiss Bankers Association, would be elected chairman, and the general manager of each of the Big Three banks would be appointed to the board. They would agree to this because the honor of Swiss banking and its principle of banking secrecy would be at stake. In addition, 25 percent of Interhandel stock would be registered in the name of Union Bank, whose manager, Dr. Alfred Schaefer, was of known integrity. The Swiss believed the association of such a man of high banking repute at Interhandel would impress American government authorities. But the German connection would still be there. Not only Hermann Schmitz, but also the banking connection of Union Bank of Switzerland, Dr. Schaefer's bank, and Deutsche Bank, which acted in concert on so many deals involving not only I.G. Farben but also big Ruhr industrialists such as Thyssen A.G., the largest steelmaker in Germany. In January 1978 these two lead banks, acting through the UBS-DB Corporation, an American firm of the Union Bank of Switzerland and the Deutsche Bank of Germany, would be the financial advisors for Thyssen A.G. in its $275 million cash takeover of the Budd Company of Troy, Michigan, a leading U.S. manufacturer of auto components, truck trailers, and rail cars. UBSDB Corporation would also say that the West German companies it represented were showing a "very substantial interest in all sorts of American ventures, including mergers and acquisitions."
Bayer A.G., another of Schmitz's divisions in I.G. Farben, would continue to grow, in 1977 buying Miles Laboratories, a U.S. corporation, maker of Alka Seltzer, for $261 million; Daimler-Benz acquired Euclid, Inc., and Siemens bought 50 percent of Allis-Chalmers electrical equipment operations.
The General Aniline and Film suit would finally be settled by Attorney General Robert Kennedy in 1965. The company had been under government ownership and American management for twenty-three years and had always turned a handsome profit. Under private ownership it could do better, and although an entire generation of lawyers, bankers, and politicians who had profited from GAF would cease making big money from their involvement, the attorney general felt it was best for the government to divest itself. The war was long over, and few people cared about its Nazi connections.
As a result of this decision, General Aniline and Film would be sold at public auction. It was to be the biggest competitive auction in Wall Street history, and an underwriting syndicate headed by First Boston Corporation and Blyth & Company would win out over Lehmann Brothers. The total sales price, $329,141,926.49. The U.S. War Claims Fund would receive $189.2 million, plus $17.5 million in back taxes. Through its Swiss bank connections, $120.9 million would be distributed to Interhandel stockholders.
For the aging Hermann Schmitz it had been a good run. A gigantic settlement for General Aniline and his coshareholders would have capped his remarkable career; however, before the General Aniline suit was settled by Attorney General Kennedy, Schmitz died.
Back in March 1945 when he was confiding in Martin Bormann, who was also doing some heavy planning, there was always the unknown-What now? Schmitz foresaw himself testifying before victorious American occupation authorities, perhaps, ruefully, spending some time in prison, and then back to I.G. Farben, to resume his plans to make this vast industrial apparatus more prosperous than ever.
For Martin Bormann time was of the essence, and he had planned his escape with great care. He would, loyally, remain with Adolf Hitler till the end of the war, then he and the Fuehrer would make their way to South America. But on April 27 Hitler's choice was to expire in the Fuehrerbunker with his devoted Eva. Bormann finalized his own plans for an escape design, one worthy of the man who had directed the greatest financial disappearing act in history. From that time on the world has speculated, What really became of Martin Bormann?
Return to the
Martin Bormann - Nazi in Exile


The canvas is professionally stretched featuring the 3" gallery wrap style! These are from our limited edition selections and come with a signed and numbered Certificate of Authenticity. Beautiful and ready to hang and enjoy!
The watercolor paper version is artist grade, unframed and ships flat. It will make a grander presentation with double mats and custom frame.
If you are in my area, come by the studio and we can design a custom frame for either paper or canvas versions.
Always check the Original/Framed Art section for framed options.


Immune PRP Pro contains pure bovine colostrum which is rich in immunoglobulins, especially IgG, as well as IgA and IgM. Bovine colostrum contains 40 times more immune-related components than human milk. In addition to these immune system enhancers, bovine colostrum contains viable cells, such as neutrophils and macrophages, which secrete special proteins that support your immune system◆; these proteins include cytokines, lactoferrin, and proline-rich polypeptides (PRP).
Other Ingredients: Cellulose (vegetable capsule) and silica.
Recommendations: Take four capsules twice daily, or as directed by your healthcare practitioner.
Warnings: Do not use if you are pregnant or if you have received an organ transplant.


TEMA Demo - Image Systems AB Software Informer.
TEMA Demo. The most popular versions of this product among our users are: 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5. The name of the program executable file is tema.exe. The product will soon be reviewed by our informers.


A recessed storage compartment is located at the rear of the palette and can be used to hold paint brushes, paint tubes, wet paint dabs, etc. Maximum recommended painting surface is 10" vertical. Teeth on the stainless steel panel holders are capable of holding panels as thin as 1/16" and stretched canvas up to 3/4" thick.


text:
North and South Korea, Let's Be "Us" Again
Please Become a Messenger of Peace!
IPYG PHOTO
The United States and North Korea will hold further talks next week to prepare for a second summit between President Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un later this month, Seoul said Sunday (Feb 10).
"North Korea and the US have agreed to continue negotiations in a third country in Asia during the week of Feb 17," South Korean presidential spokesman Kim Eui-kyeom told reporters.
Mr Trump and Mr Kim are due to meet in Hanoi, Vietnam, on Feb 27 and 28, following their landmark first summit in Singapore last June. The US-North Korea talks is expected to provide an important turning point for economic and security on the Korean peninsula. As the dialogue of inter-Korea continued since 2018, the issue of peace and unification is attracting international attention.
Reference: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/world/us-north-korea-trump-kim-summit-talks-seoul-11227304
https://www.straitstimes.com/world/more-us-north-korea-talks-next-week-to-prepare-for-summit
North and South, Let's Be "Us" Again
On February 9th, IPYG PHOTO
So, peace-loving 1,000 Korean youths gathered for the unification of the two Koreas. The event is held under the theme of "Youth pictures the peaceful future for the Korean peninsula". In search of the role of civil society to create a unified Korea with peaceful means, "North And South, Let's Be "Us" Again" was held with 1,000 participants at the Grand Hilton Hotel in Seoul, South Korea on February 9th.
At a congratulatory speech, Prof. Chang Ho-Kwon, invited professor at Hanshin University, said, "By showing public support for unification of Korea through collaborative efforts of civil society and subsequent government capabilities, the gate of unification will be closer. There is no chance for a nation without history and culture. We take the lead in unification issues to leave a legacy for future generations, which can be attained by participation in IPYG peace projects."
Why do 1.6 billion young people support the IPYG?
IPYG PHOTO / North and South, Let's Be "Us" Again
The host organization, International Peace Youth Group (IPYG), is a member organization of HWPL, an international peace NGO under the UN ECOSOC. IPYG initiated its peace activities with the aim of realizing world peace by the voice of youth themselves, the victims of the war, and has been carrying out various peace campaign around the world in cooperation with 851 youth organizations in 111 countries.
Regarding this youth campaign, IPYG explains that the youth of the Korean peninsula will voice to solve the problem of division and unification because the war threats on the Korean peninsula, which has been continuing since the division, can no longer be overlooked.
In particular, the young man is the most persuasive messenger of peace. Because the people who go to war are politicians? Who is it? That's because they're themselves. Who in the world will pay for that life? Do you think money can pay for it? Nope. Is the War far from us? You'll understand by looking at the posting below.
How can IPYG exert global influence?
Because there is Mr.Man hee Lee, messenger of peace, who is supported by 1.6 billion Youth and 3.6 billion Women. His biography has impressed many people all over the world, and former and incumbent presidents, chief justice and journalists are working with him for peace. (evidence)
Chairman Man Hee Lee of HWPL delivered the message encouraging the youth's willingness on a long-awaited reunion by saying "The desire for unification is the same voice of peace. There should have no more wars in our globe. Rather than pointing each other with guns, youth should be the front to lead the way to peace."
This is a youth-led campaign where the youth gather to advance ideas into practical action plans, and further nationwide reunification movement by collaborating with the civil societies. Starting with the inauguration ceremony on February 9th, it will be continued for 4 weeks with 2 commemorative events and the reunification campaign across the country.
IPYG Peace story
North And South, Let's Be "Us" Again (KOR)
Youtube link: http://bit.ly/2DjZyqa
Reference:https://www.modernghana.com/news/914776/north-and-south-lets-be-us-again.html
Author: master
I am 'a Step towards PEACE'. There is no path to peace. Peace is the path. - Gandhi	View all posts by master
Author masterPosted on 2019년 February 12일 2019년 February 12일 Categories About me :)Tags chairman Lee, HWPL, IPYG, IWPG, Man Hee Lee, North and South Korea, Peace, Reunification, unification
One thought on "North and South Korea, Let's Be "Us" Again"
Firaz Hanna says:
2019년 February 16일 at 9:18 pm
Brilliant article – thank you. I love the words by Chairman Lee: "The desire for unification is the same voice of peace. There should have no more wars in our globe. Rather than pointing each other with guns, youth should be the front to lead the way to peace." So true.
Previous Previous post: HWPL Philippine Peacebuilding
Next Next post: HWPL Cambodia Peacebuilding

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


This product will make a difference by giving a chance to people who want to improve their health and change the way they live, creating personalized menus for each person, as many as needed with very low cost. This product will make a difference on both society and the fitness and health market.
Growing up in a small southern settlement called Yerucham, I feel a strong connection to the Negev and an obligation to improve and develop our southern community. That is the reason why I chose to build my company here and reach out to the community of the Negev with our services.


The Harvard science research company, Snow Labs serves over 100,000 clients. They say they are always trying to improve the technology and consistently hoping to release more useful products. Plus, with every sale, they give some of the profits to help provide dental treatments.
The Snow teeth whitening treatment is a FDA-approved, at-home tech which gives folks dentist-level whitening at a fraction of the cost. It was produced by a Harvard science research company.
Although they do not possess a money-back guarantee, they really do have a 100% outcomes warranty. This means if you are not satisfied with the results, the whitening serum will be replaced by them. Simply put, they do not accept returns or issue any money refunds — they will just issue store credit in the form of a card.
Clients and reviewers phone Snow revolutionary and revolutionary. It seems to work better compared to whitening strips and strips — some actually compare it to whitening procedures achieved by dentists.
Most of the people who've used Snow see results in about three days, but each individual should use it till they see the results they want. It could take up to 21 days of routine use for 15-30 minutes per session.
The majority of the user reviews have to do with customer support from early in the life of the company. The product seems to function and the customer support has improved over recent years.
For the most part, testimonials of Snow are extremely positive. Obviously, not every customer will experience the very same effects but it's generally considered a technology that is radical.
You apply a whitening serum using a brush. It's a substance that you paint onto your teeth. You put the Snow apparatus it fits over your teeth like a bulky mouth guard.
The Remineralization Gel that you need to use after the treatment if you have sensitive teeth. This gel returns minerals and vitamins, cut down on sensitivity, and also will help strengthen your tooth enamel. You shouldn't do it but instead have a break for 1-3 days, if you do have sensitive gums and teeth.
Snow is FDA approved, which can be a big plus. So it is relatively secure. During the treatment, you do end up swallowing a little but not enough that it is worrisome. In reality, even if you are breastfeeding, you can use this treatment.


Drinking 6 cups of coffee a day may increase longevity by 15%!
In a recent article published in the New England of Medicine on May 17, 2012, researchers Neal D. Freedman, Ph.D., Yikyung Park, Sc.D., Christian C. Abnet, Ph.D., Albert R. Hollenbeck, Ph.D., and Rashmi Sinha, Ph.D. have looked over 400,000 individuals, aged 50-71 years old, for over 13 years and have found that : Those who consumed coffee regularly- had an overall reduced mortality rate in the following stats: those who consumed 6 or more cups of coffee/ day have shown to decrease mortality by 10% in men and by15% in women, compared to those who do not consume coffee. Consumption of 1 cup f coffee / day decreased the mortality rate among men by 6% and among women- by 5%. When "cleaning the research data off individual's parameters which could have messed up the stats results of parameters such as: heart disease, lung disease, infections, accidents, injuries, socioeconomically condition, smoking and physical activity - did not change the result of the study and the stats remained the same!
The researchers suggested that some of the thousand ingredients present in the coffee beans include strong anti oxidants which protect the cells from cancerous and various inflammatory and chronic destructive conditions thus prolonged the life expectancy.
This is considered to be the most elaborate research study done looking into the relations between coffee consumption and mortality rate.


text:
The Station: Intel eyes an IPO for Mobileye and how Elon influenced Autopilot
Kirsten Korosec	1 month
The Station is a weekly newsletter dedicated to all things transportation. Sign up here — just click The Station — to receive it every weekend in your inbox.
Hello readers: Welcome to The Station, your central hub for all past, present and future means of moving people and packages from Point A to Point B.
This is the time of year when the news cycle is supposed to slow. It didn't, at least not this week.
One eye-popping item this week was the NYT's investigative piece on Tesla, Elon Musk and his influence on designing the company's Autopilot driver-assistance system. Two days after that article ran, which contained a number of interesting and troubling details, including that the company's 2016 "our cars are fully driverless" video was faked, another NYT article reported that Tesla owners can play video games while driving.
While the federal government's top auto safety regulator says it is looking into the gaming-while-driving feature, I am less than confident anything will come of it. My lingering question, and one that comes up every time Tesla pushes the boundaries of safety, is will this be the time when regulators step in? That question has not been answered.
Meanwhile, CNBC reported that Tesla is replacing repeater cameras in the front fenders of at least several hundred Model S, X and 3 vehicles made in Fremont, California. The company has not yet initiated a voluntary recall, according to internal service documents the company distributed in late November, CNBC reported.
Just a small item for comparison, Mercedes issued a voluntary recall, which was conducted via a software update, for the EQS because its massive infotainment screens allow drivers to watch TV and browse the internet while driving.
As always, you can email me at kirsten.korosec@techcrunch.com to share thoughts, criticisms, opinions or tips. You also can send a direct message to me at Twitter — @kirstenkorosec.
Micromobbin'
I don't want to get ahead of myself here, but are we close to reaching the point of no return on our micromobility revolution? A very promising McKinsey study that just came out found about 70% of people worldwide would ride a bike, moped or e-scooter to work if they could. And why wouldn't you? You don't need a 3,000 pound car to carry around a 150-pound person, but you do need to make it easier and safer for people to buy and ride smaller vehicles.
Enter U.S. lawmakers, who are working on a 30% tax credit for up to $3,000 spent on a new e-bike. That's a credit of up to $900, and it suddenly makes e-bikes far more affordable to a number of people. Data from the NPD Group, which tracks retail bike sales, found that 60% of bikes sold over the past year or so cost either less than $500 or more than $3,500, with the fastest growth happening for bikes ranging from $1,500 to $2,000.
Incentives are great and all, but infrastructure matters, too, so it's worth highlighting when cities do good work. Milan, for example, is investing €250 million into its Urban Biking Strategy that'll see the birth of fast cycle corridors with better public transit integration. Jersey City, New Jersey, is working with Oonee to create a holistic network of secure bike parking, with 30 protected lockers located near bus stops that can be used to store bikes and scooters, as well as doubling as transit shelters by offering covered seating.
For places where the road infrastructure isn't as favorable to safe riding conditions, there are companies working to solve that problem. Software company Terranet AB, for example, announced plans to produce BlincBike, a camera-based collision warning system for e-bikes. The company hopes to start taking pre-orders in July, so set a reminder on your phone if you're interested.
All of the stars appear to be aligning toward the potential for exponential growth in micromobility adoption. Maybe it's just the New Zealand summer, maybe it's proximity to the holidays, but I'm feeling hopeful.
— Rebecca Bellan
The end of the year is fixin' to be an active one for IPOs — or at least plans for them. The latest is news that Intel plans to take Mobileye, the advanced driver assistance and automated driving subsidiary it acquired for $15 billion more than four years ago, public.
Spinning Mobileye out into a separate publicly traded company could increase value for Intel shareholders. A source told TechCrunch the IPO is expected to take about six months, a timeline that suggests it has not yet started the typical IPO roadshow process.
Intel will remain the majority owner of Mobileye, and the two companies will continue as strategic partners and collaborate on projects.
Other deals that got my attention …
BMW i Ventures led the seed financing round of Rapid Liquid Print, which has developed 3D printers for elastomers that produce large-scale, high-resolution, soft and stretchable products with industrial materials such as soft rubber, silicone and foams.
Candela, a developer of electric hydrofoiling boats, raised $24 million to accelerate production of its existing small craft and a larger commercial one.
Carma, an Australia-based online used car startup, raised a $20 million (AUD $28 million) seed round from Tiger Global. Carma has been operating in stealth for the past nine months and said the funding enabled the company to recruit an executive team, develop its website and establish its first inspection and reconditioning facility in Sydney.
Flink, the Berlin-based startup that sells food and other essentials and aims to deliver them in less than 10 minutes, raised $750 million, a Series B round of funding led by a strategic backer, DoorDash. The deal gives Flink a post-money valuation of $2.85 billion.
Hitachi is considering options to streamline its business, including the potential sale of its minority stake in a transportation unit, Bloomberg reported.
Ola, the Indian ride-hailing giant, raised $139 million at a valuation of about $7.3 billion, it said in a filing, ahead of its plans to file for an initial public offering early next year. Mumbai-headquartered financial giant Edelweiss led the new investment tranche. IIFL, Siddhant Partners, Tejal Merchantile and Hero Enterprise also invested money.
Robotic Research, a self-driving technology company that has spent the last two decades developing on and off-road autonomous vehicles for the Department of Defense, raised a $228 million Series A round. The round was led by SoftBank Vision Fund 2 and Enlightenment Capital. Crescent Cove Advisors, Henry Crown and Company and Luminar, a lidar company, also participated in the investment.
Serve Robotics, the autonomous sidewalk delivery company that spun out from Uber-owned Postmates in March, has closed an expanded seed round at $13 million. Uber participated in the round as a strategic investor, alongside Delivery Hero-backed DX Ventures, 7-Eleven's corporate venture arm 7-Ventures and Wavemaker Partners' food automation-focused venture studio Wavemaker Labs.
Solid Power, the solid-state battery developer backed by Ford and BMW, made its public market debut and enjoyed a spiking stock price in its first day of trading.
Uber is in talks with the management of its Middle East unit Careem to bring outside investors into the business, Reuters reported.
During a wide-ranging interview at The Wall Street Journal's CEO Council Summit, Tesla CEO Elon Musk came out swinging against the $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill and the nearly $2 trillion budget reconciliation bill, despite each containing provisions meant to bolster the adoption of electric vehicles.
Of the infrastructure bill, he said, "It might be better if this bill doesn't pass." And of the budget reconciliation bill, he said that Tesla doesn't need its $7,500 tax credit provision. (Tesla vehicles currently don't qualify for it, as the automaker has sold more than 200,000 EVs, but the new bill could remove this manufacturers' cap.) "Honestly, I would just can this whole bill. Don't pass it. That's my recommendation."
He did, however, acknowledge that the country's airports and highways could be improved, and that we should figure out better ways of managing traffic, like building tunnels or double-decking freeways.
Despite the fact that both Tesla and SpaceX have benefited from public funds, he also took aim at the role of the government more generally, suggesting that the role of government should be akin to a referee of a game, "but not a player on the field."
"The government should get out of the way and not impede progress."
His comments, which were made from Tesla's new factory in Austin, are not too surprising. Musk and President Joe Biden have not been the coziest of bedfellows. Musk has been extremely critical of an additional provision in Biden's budget plan that would make union- and U.S.-made EVs eligible for an additional $4,500 tax credit. On October 31, he tweeted pithily that Biden was a "UAW [sock emoji] puppet." A few months earlier, he noted it was "odd" that Tesla was not invited to an EV event at the White House, despite executives from GM, Ford and Stellantis all receiving invites.
The final notable part of the interview (notable for Policy Corner, at least) were his comments on "rules and regulations." We have too many of them, he said, without an effective "garbage collection system" to remove them. "Government should be really trying hard to get rid of rules and regulations that perhaps had some merit at some point but don't have merit currently."
— Aria Alamalhodaei
Notable reads and other tidbits
Argo AI teamed up with advocacy group the League of American Cyclists to establish guidelines for how self-driving vehicles should identify and interact with cyclists. The goal is to set a standard for other AV companies in the industry to follow, particularly as the self-driving industry moves away from testing and toward commercialization and will become more commonplace in the coming years.
SAIC Mobility and Momenta have launched a robotaxi trial service in Shanghai. The company is testing and validating potential commercial applications with 20 vehicles, powered by Momenta's autonomous driving technology.
Batteries and supply chain
General Motors announced two partnerships to lock in a domestic source of rare earth minerals, alloy and finished magnets for the electric motors it will use in its upcoming barrage of EVs, including the GMC Hummer EC, Cadillac Lyriq and Chevrolet Silverado EV, through a partnership with MP Materials and another separate deal with Vacuumschmelze (VAC) of Germany.
Toyota Motor will build its first battery factory in the U.S. in North Carolina. Toyota will invest $1.29 billion in the plant, which will be called Toyota Battery Manufacturing, North Carolina (TBMNC), with production anticipated to commence in 2025. That investment is part of a wider pledge to invest $3.4 billion in automotive batteries in the U.S. through 2030.
TuSimple released its safety framework around its "driver out" autonomous driving system. The company said its program is designed to show driver-out operations for Class 8 trucks on open roads.
Volkswagen has entered into three new partnerships related to electric vehicle batteries. The three separate partnerships, all of which were announced Wednesday, are with materials technology group Umicore, battery specialist 24M Technologies and Vulcan Energy Resources, a company that is planning to open a lithium brine project in Germany.
DoorDash is introducing "ultra-fast" deliveries in 10-15 minutes beginning with a single DashMart location in New York City. The company is additionally beginning to test a new model of employment which relies on full-time employees, not gig workers, to handle these new deliveries.
The U.K. High Court has ruled that Uber's business model is unlawful. The decision, as Natasha Lomas reported, has huge ramifications for how ride-hailing platforms like Uber can operate in the U.K. capital and how much U.K. tax they will pay. The crux of the issue is the contract model Uber and many other ride-hailing platforms have been applying.
Ford plans to increase production of the all-electric Mustang Mach E next year with the goal of tripling its current capacity by 2023 to meet "incredible demand," CEO Jim Farley said. This is the first time the automaker has provided a specific outlook for the Mustang Mach E. Ford is also delaying the start of production of battery-electric versions of the Explorer and Lincoln Aviator crossovers by about 18 months. The EV versions of the Explorer and Aviator were supposed to be assembled at its Cuautitlan, Mexico factory. That factory will now be used to increase production of the Mach E.
Lucid Group has been subpoenaed by securities regulators investigating the electric automaker's merger that enabled it to become a publicly traded company. Lucid said in a regulatory filing that the Securities and Exchange Commission requested certain documents related to its investigation.
Stellantis laid out an ambitious plan to generate $22.5 billion annually from software in its vehicles that can sell passengers and drivers products and subscriptions. The target is in line with goals from its competitors — all of which are seeking ways to make revenue beyond selling, repairing and financing vehicles. The global automaker said it will invest more than $33.7 billion through 2025 into software and electrification. That investment will include employing 4,500 software engineers by 2024.
U.S. securities regulators have opened a probe into Tesla over allegations from a whistleblower that the company did not disclose to shareholders fire risks from its solar panel systems. The allegations were made by Steven Henkes, a former Tesla employee, who filed his complaint with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission back in 2019.
Volvo Cars is investigating a cybersecurity breach and theft of a limited amount of the company's research and development data. The company said one of its file repositories had been illegally accessed by a third party.
Gareth Joyce will succeed Jack Allen as CEO of Proterra. The company announced a few other changes to the board, including that Allen will transition to non-executive chairman of the board, Ryan Popple will step down as the board's director and ML Krakauer was appointed to the board. Meanwhile, Karina Franco Padilla has been appointed CFO.
Oxbotica, an open autonomous vehicle software developer, appointed Gavin Jackson as its new CEO.
Volkswagen Group CEO Herbert Diess will keep his job, a decision that came after weeks of speculation about his future at the German automaker. VW Group's supervisory board made the announcement during its annual update to the company's five-year investment plan. The board also agreed to increase spending to €159 billion ($180 billion), from €150 billion last year.


text:
Pelodiscus huangshanensis — вид черепах з родини трикігтевих черепах (Trionychidae). Описаний у 2021 році.

Поширення
Ендемік Китаю. Поширений у горах Хуаншань на півдні провінції Аньхой. Мешкає у чистих гірських потічках з дрібним піском, що розташовані біля витоків річки Цяньтан.

Примітки

Трикігтеві черепахи
Плазуни Китаю
Тварини, описані 2021
Ендемічна фауна Китаю

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia