text:
Running : Poland - The Iron Heel (1982)
The Running Commentary column from the November 1982 issue of the Socialist Standard
Poland: the iron heel
Jaruzelski, the Polish military dictator, has pushed through his Iron Heel Act. Rubber-stamped by the subservient pseudo- Parliament. the Sejm, it made illegal not only Solidarity but all forms of trade union organisation.
This Bismarckian act of repression, backed by the infamous thugs of ZOMO and other security forces, will not solve Poland's desperate economic crisis, any more than the sacking of several economic ministers will help feed the hungry.
Sympathy for Polish workers is widespread. ranging from the far left to the Foreign Office statement:
The policy of the Polish government is one of confrontation rather than reconciliation. (Daily Telegraph, 9 November 1982)
We go further. The hardships experienced by Polish workers have been extreme. In peace-time Europe there is famine. Capitalism in chaos can — and does — kill. Poland is but one extreme example of this.
In 1981 plant closures and unemployment indicated the continuing decline of the economy. With the economy. the morale of the ruling Party collapsed. The bankrupt Party saw the workers' movement as a political threat. Jaruzelski's actions in first suspending, and now banning. Solidarity were a reaction to a the movement's assumption of a wider role — "both a trade union and a wider social movement" (Solidarity Programme Resolution. Autumn 1981).
We cannot endorse the demand for a "new social contract" based on cooperation between workers and management in the "national interest". Yet Solidarity was the workers' only defence against the severe erosion of their wagcs and pitiful standard of living.
The class struggle cannot be legislated out of existence. Although this attempt to establish an independent trade union and political movement may have been crushed, we know that there will be others in the future.
We hope that such attempts will benefit from the lesson of the failure of Solidarity — that ultimately every class struggle is a political one.
Magistrates are called (in court, at any rate) Your Worships and their legal advisers are known as Your Learned Clerk and the whole procedure is carried along on a tidal wave of bowing and scraping and forelock-touching, so why they should want any help from On High must be a mystery.
However, there it is. The court in Coventry recently decided that each day's proceedings will open with a ten-minute prayer meeting in which everyone, including the defendants, will be asked to join.
Now this will present some obvious problems because there will be people praying for different things all at the same time which will be very difficult for god who has to hear all and see all and know all.
The police, for example, will be saying a few words in favour of the person in the dock getting the heaviest possible sentence because that is the righteous way of dealing with offenders against the law. But the offenders will be praying to be let off lightly or, if they are pleading not guilty, for the magistrates to believe a perhaps unlikely version of the events.
The magistrates will probably be asking god for some interesting cases, for the court reporter to make a careful note of all their witty asides and to get them in the local rag, for the court to run long enough for them to claim a whole day's attendance allowance and for lunch time to come around quickly.
But of course it is not all farcical. Courts exist as part of the coercive machinery which enforces the rights and minority privileges of property society. Their job is to assert the fact that there is a class of people in capitalism who own the means of life and whose position must be protected with punishment for anyone who threatens it with breaches of property laws.
Religion is also a prop of this divisive, repressive social system. It teaches the non-owners, the non-privileged, to accept their lot and meekly to consent to their own exploitation. It stands up for the symbols of privilege and repression like the royal family and supports the nastiest aspects of the conflicts of capitalism, like its wars.
So it is entirely appropriate that the two factors — coercive state machine and lick-spittling religion — should come together in such open and unequivocal support for capitalism. In Coventry, the view from the dock could not be clearer.
Adman cometh
Travellers who have booked with British Airways may be having second thoughts since that airline announced that its advertising was being taken over by Saatchi and Saatchi, who masterminded the Tory election campaign in 1979 with the implied promise that unemployment would disappear when Thatcher got to Number Ten. With that record behind them, the new ad agency had better not try any slogans like "We'll Take More Care of You" or all the passengers will be hastily booking to go by sea.
That famous phrase was followed by the patriotic "Fly The Flag", which was probably intended to cash in on the Concorde boom which never came. Now more, similar, rubbish is promised; Saatchi and Saatchi have hired one of the advertising industry's (sic) wonder boys just to write the new slogans to persuade people to fly British Airways.
This wonder boy — Geoffrey Seymour — is still in his thirties but is well wise to the cut-throat ways of the advertising world. Seymour's trade is to spend lengthy periods of time fashioning a few words of dramatic, enduring impact which will result in one product selling more than any others — even if the others are better.
He has already had a lot of success (for such it is called) at this. Products like Hovis bread, Heineken lager and Hamlet cigars are said to have sold better after Seymour's fertile mind had been at work (for such it is called).
Success has come in other ways; Seymour has actually won prizes for his slogans and, probably more to the point, he now gets something like £100,000 a year from the advertising world as reward; This may cause anger and bitterness among, say, Health Service workers who are doing a vital human job and have to struggle to defend an already meagre living standard. But there is another aspect to be considered. We live under a social system which produces its wealth for sale, winch means that the market is all-important.
So salespeople, advertising executives and the like have a very important place in this society. They don't actually produce anything, their work does not make human life one jot easier or happier; a sane social system will have absolutely no use for what are called their talents. Their gargantuan rewards could happen only under a society in which all values are distorted and crazy, in which profit comes a long, long way ahead of people.
Family party
Margaret Thatcher, it is reported, sent her key ministers and advisers off on their holidays during the parliamentary recess with the instruction to Think About The Family. But protective parents need not worry; it is unlikely that the Prime Minister intended Geoffrey Howe to reflect on the effects of poverty on family relationships, or Norman Tebbitt to write a paper on the degrading frustrations in both employment and unemployment.
What Thatcher wanted from the Tory thinkers was some ideas on how to exploit electorally the concept of the family as a cosy, protective element in social stability. This may be shrewder than it at first appears. The present phase of property society encourages everyone to strive for an ideal in their personal relationships, based on the assumption that the human family must be a private, monogamous, exclusive unit.
In fact the style of family — whether monogamous or polygamous, whether nuclear or extended, whether patriarchal or matriarchal — can and does vary according to the basic social arrangements in force at the time. There is no evidence that the contemporary family is ideal, or beneficial, or that it will endure.
What is clear is that the present day family conforms with capitalism, with a social system based on the private ownership of the means of wealth production and distribution and the consequent production of wealth as commodities. This form of family places no obstacles in the way of the organised, widespread wage slavery or the savage conflicts of capitalism. The restraints it imposes are on human freedoms — sexual, social and moral. Its privacy is only extended where a market can be created, where each family unit has its own private home having its own car. washing machine, TV . . . .
A sane society will have a very different family. If the repressions, neuroses and exclusions of the capitalist family are so comforting to those who endure them as to be an electoral asset to some capitalist party, then that is apt comment on this system's distortion of human relationships.
Labels: Advertising, Class Struggle, Family, Family Values, Law and Order, November 1982, Poland, R1982, Religious Hypocrisy, Running Commentary Column, Saatchi and Saatchi, Solidarity, State Capitalist Dictatorship Links to this post
Russia 1917: As We Saw It (2017)
The Saviours of Russia
In September 1918 the Socialist Standard commented on the invasion of Russia by 'the Allies'.
The hand of the capitalist is slowly but surely revealing itself in Russian affairs. It will be remembered with what haste the capitalist Governments rushed to congratulate their triumphant (as they thought) fellow thieves upon their overthrow of the monarchy. They did not then stop to lecture on the enormity of "internal dissension" in the midst of war. No, they tumbled over each other in their anxiety to deliver their congratulations – because the 'victors' were of their own kidney.
They made a mistake, however. In the ultimate it proved to he more than the revolutionary capitalist class in Russia could do, once they had broken the tyrannical organisation which had kept the conscripted forces in subjection, to regain for themselves control of those forces. It was not for the want of trying that they failed. They soon got busy butchering soldiers who refused to go on with the war which they had not made, which they had never wanted, and which they realised could bring them no benefit. So the revolutionary capitalists, who were never for a moment strong enough to establish their authority over the forces and powers of State, were 'recognised' and accepted by their fellow capitalists as the 'representatives of the Russian people,' as the Russian people, as the natural successors, quite as a matter of course, to Bloody Nick and his crew. That they had no power as a Government made no difference.
How different, however, was the conduct of the capitalist Governments toward the Bolsheviks when the latter took the reins from the palsied grasp of the 'triumphant bourgeoisie' ! Their accredited envoys received only 'unofficial recognition, for the purpose of communication.' (. . .)
Fearful that if the Bolshevik enterprise should meet with success it might prove contagious, they have determined to crush it and restore their friends and allies, the Russian capitalists, to dominance. So we have a 'league of nations' in being against the Bolshevik Government. Under the plea that they are going to save Russia from the Germans they invade the country at various points. 'We come as the friends of Russia,' they declare, and disown any intention of interfering with 'the internal politics of the country.' (. . .)
As to the claim that they go into Russia as 'the friends of Russia,' this must be translated into 'the friends of Russian capitalists' if it is to have any truth at all. It is only by the continued exploitation of the Russian working class that the Allied capitalists can ever hope to recover the many millions which they have advanced, both before and since the outbreak of the war, to Russia, with the object of strengthening her against Germany.
(Full article here)
Labels: December 2017, R2017, Russia 1917: As We Saw It series, Russian Revolution, Soviet Union, World War One Links to this post
Russia: the left-wing fantasy (1982)
Sixty-five years ago a myth was born. A Dictatorship of the Russian Proletariat had been set up amid the chaos of World War 1. The simple slogan Peace, Land and Bread echoed from the cities to the remotest villages.
As the dust settled, facts emerged. The peasants had seized whatever land they could while the landlords, rightly fearing a repetition of the French Revolution, packed up and fled. Peace broke out as far as Russia's involvement in the World War was concerned but only temporarily: civil war was to follow. Bread was to be very scarce for a long time. The workers' councils, the Soviets, had no real power. The Bolshevik Party were in power and they meant to stay there. Within weeks the Cheka took the place of the Tsarist Okhrana — with unlimited powers. This was not a dictatorship of the proletariat, it was a dictatorship over the proletariat, and shortly over the peasants too.
The myth of a classless society — as socialism will indeed be — was widely publicised. Yet the reality was a society split by irreconcilable antagonisms. The Bolsheviks were desperate for food for the starving cities and sent raiding parties to rob the peasants, who fought back.
This conflict came to a head sixty years ago. The winter of 1920-21 was terrible; food in the cities was very scarce, rationing was arbitrary and chaotic, many workers fled the cities to join relatives in the countryside while those who remained starved on wages which were less than 10 per cent of the 1913 level.
The Kronstadt revolt highlighted real grievances, demanding better food supplies and new elections. "The Communist Party, master of the State, has detached itself from the masses . . . Countless incidents have recently occurred in Petrograd and Moscow which show clearly that the Party has lost the confidence of the working masses. [1] . . . Our cause is just. We stand for the power of the Soviets, not for that of the Party. We stand for freely elected representatives of the toiling masses. Deformed Soviets, dominated by the Party, have remained deaf to our pleas. Our appeals have been answered with bullets."[2]
At the same time, peasant risings showed opposition to grain procurements. Lenin did a U-turn. In 1921, within weeks of Trotsky's massacre of the Kronstadt garrison, he instituted the New Economic Policy. The collapse of Russian agriculture was halted and grain harvests increased through the twenties until the first Five Year Plan brought compulsory collectivisation and attacks on so-called kulaks. Food production nose-dived in the years 1928-32 and peasants slaughtered their livestock. Millions were liquidated or disappeared to concentration camps, others fled the hungry, terrorised countryside for the overcrowded cities. The gap between theory and practice widened:
"From their bloodstained platforms they shout that the soil belongs to the peasants and the factories belong to the workers . . . [But] a new Communist serfdom arose. The peasant in the Soviet farms became a slave, and the worker in the factories a day-labourer." [3]
From the time of the first Five Year Plan, which ended 50 years ago, we may date the completion of Russia's capitalist revolution. This was the third Russian Revolution. The first, in February 1917, toppled the Tsar and brought about a liberal bourgeois government under Kerensky; the second was the November coup by the Bolsheviks with promises of "Peace, Land and Bread". Between 1927 and 1932, the number of wage-workers in Russia increased by 30 per cent and the expropriation of the peasants proceeded by leaps and bounds.
Marx wrote of the "primitive accumulation" of capital — the process by which a landless proletariat is brought into being, with no means of livelihood except the sale of their labour power, renting themselves out for hire by the hour, the day or the week for wages. He pointed out that everywhere the methods employed "all employ the power of the state, the concentrated and organised force of society, to hasten, hothouse fashion, the process of transformation of the feudal mode of production into the capitalist mode, and to shorten the transition "[4]. This ruthless, enforced process, was as cruel in the steppes of Russia as in the Highlands of Scotland. For Highland Clearances, read "de-kulakisation and collectivisation."
But Russia, it was claimed, was different. There was no exploitation — it was illegal for individuals to own factories or mines, or to enrich themselves by employing a workforce. If there were no individual capitalists, there could be no capitalist class. Therefore this was not capitalism.
But. as Marx, Engels and Bukharin explained earlier, the wages system does not require individual capitalists. The capitalist class as a whole collectively exploits the working class as a whole. This can be done by means of institutional or corporate ownership of the land, factories, mines and so on as had already happened in the 19th century. (When Bismarck nationalised the railways, this had nothing whatever to do with socialism, as Engels pointed out.) Lenin's view was that in Russia what was needed was state capitalism, on the Prussian model. Yet to this day, it is generally believed that Russia's nationalisation is characteristic of socialism in practice. Later, Khrushchev tried to explain away the so-called "dictatorship of the proletariat". This, he said, had been superseded by a "government of the whole people": there was still to be coercion "but not in a class sense, since it was no longer necessary to suppress entire social layers and classes, but only criminals and individuals who violated Soviet laws."[5]
Now. however, this policy is disavowed in Moscow. On a recent visit to Russia we were invited to take part in a discussion with two official spokesmen at the Marx-Engels Institute. In response to this point — that Russia had developed beyond the dictatorship of the proletariat and had become a classless society, a "government of the whole people" — the official spokesmen were anxious to reassure all present that nothing so terrible had happened. Khrushchev, he scoffed, talked a lot of twaddle. Yet this position had been endorsed as part of the CFSU's programme at the 22nd Congress (1961): "(the party had) transformed the state of the proletarian dictatorship into a state of the whole people"[6]. Evidently, the CPSU also talks twaddle.
Another Leftwing fantasy is that in Russia there is no unemployment. But with deportation to Siberia, pass laws which fix where any individual is allowed to live, black-listing of the system's critics, a paternalist state, gross waste of human resources in the overmanned and hopelessly inefficient farms, large scale unemployment would be unlikely. Yet there are unemployed workers in Russia.
Workers may be sacked for absenteeism or other infringements of the Labour Code. They may be sacked and blacklisted for complaining or protesting against abuses by management [7]. The only difference is that in Russia, unemployed workers cannot get any unemployment benefit and there are no published statistics. In any case, with or without unemployment, the wages system exploits workers.
If Russia is Utopia, it is Utopia only for the Male Chauvinist Pig. On my first visit, twenty-five years ago, I saw Moscow in sweltering summer. All the people queueing with buckets for water at standpipes were women — never men: This year I visited three cities (Moscow, Kiev and Leningrad) in the winter. In each city, snow was being shovelled off the pavements by women and only by women. I asked why such hard work is done only by women and why women do not reach the higher decision-making strata. The official response: "We don't like our women to be put under stress"!
Russia is said to represent a "transition stage'', not capitalist (no individual capitalists) but not yet communist. But how long can a transition be expected to last? This one qualifies for the Guinness Book of Records: sixty-five years is an awful long time to be in transit.
The claim that in Russia there is no class struggle is fraudulent. In 1956-57 there was a wave of strikes (especially "Italian strikes", a form of go-slow); in 1962, the Army machine-gunned demonstrators, including children, protesting at food prices and work norms; and about ten years ago, 30,000 workers struck at the Kiev car factory. What has developed is a form of capitalism where most capital is state property.
As Engels wrote: "State ownership of the productive forces is not the solution of the conflict . . . The modern state, no matter what its form, is essentially a capitalist machine, the state of the capitalists, the ideal personification of the total national capital. The more it proceeds to the taking over of productive forces, the more does it actually become the national capitalist, the more citizens does it exploit. The workers remain wage workers — proletarians." [9]
The history of Russia in the last fifty years has demonstrated the truth of this proposition.
Workers have learned to associate Marxism and socialism with a totalitarian dictatorship, ruthless and corrupt. The damage done by this to the socialist cause is immeasurable. Yet there is some cause for hope. Moscow's magicians find it harder to support the illusion of a Workers' Paradise. In the last twenty-five years, the publication of samizdat material has become well established. The early critics wrote poems and novels. Later came scientists, historians, economists and engineers, and in the last decade a number of shop-floor workers. These usually follow Sakharov, who described the system as state capitalism. as in the 1972 leaflet:
It is not towards communism that we are heading: all that is idle talk. Our system is state capitalism — the very worst, the most wretched political system possible . . . The Kremlin bosses and their hangers-on live better and richer than many Tsarist noblemen did before the Revolution — and yet they call themselves 'the vanguard of the Soviet people', its servants! [10]
Just as forthright are the comments of Pohyba arguing for independent trade unions: "ultimately it is the state which is the exploiter along with the State-party bourgeoisie which is in its service and which is the one wielding real power in the country . . . Our country is actually a State capitalist society with a totalitarian form of government''. [11]
How can Left-wingers explain the existence of profits in what they claim is a socialist society? The Kremlin's tame economists worry about new methods of measuring "the true rate of profit for each enterprise" (Nemchinov), and Liberman's Kharkov plan stipulated that a factory's rewards should be linked to the profits it could earn on its capital investment. [12] If there are profits, they can only come about by the exploitation of the working class. Profits arc part of our unpaid labour. Yet the myth of this "socialist state" confronts us still and debunking it is still a necessary chore for every socialist speaker or writer.
Charmian Skelton
1.	1st issue of Kronstadt Izvestya (3 March 1921) — see Ida Mett The Kronstadt Uprising.
2.	Final Kronstadt appeal (same source).
3.	Kronstadt Izvestya, quoted by Kautsky Bolshevism at a Deadlock (1930).
4.	Capital I ch. xxxi (Genesis of the Industrial Capitalist).
5.	Pravda, December 1964.
6.	Quoted by Gollan in C.P. Pamphlet Socialist Democracy — some problems (1976) from The Road to Communism — The Proceedings of the 22nd Congress (Moscow, 1961).
7.	See Workers Against the Gulag (Pluto Press 1979).
8.	Censorship rules ban publication of information on accidents, epidemics and unemployment.
9.	Socialism Utopian and Scientific.
10.	An Underground Leaflet, June 1972. published in full in Socialist Standard. January 1973.
11.	Cf. Nove, An economic History of the Soviet Union.
Labels: Charmian Skelton, Cheka, Class Struggle in the Soviet Union, December 1982, Kronstadt, Nikita Khrushchev, R1982, Soviet Union, State Capitalist Dictatorship, The Class Nature of the Soviet Union Links to this post
Race-Prejudice in Washington D. C. (1949)
From the January 1949 issue of the Socialist Standard
One of the chapters in our pamphlet, "The Racial Problem," deals with race-prejudice in the United States. In this chapter, as an example of the fantastic and utterly stupid lengths to which race-prejudice can take some human beings, we refer to the fact that, in certain parts of the U.S.A., there are separate cemeteries for Whites and Negroes.
It now appears that we were not ridiculous enough. From the Manchester Guardian (11/12/19*8) we learn that in Washington D.C. a cemetery for dogs has refused to bury dogs belonging to coloured people!
This masterpiece of stupidity is one of the items mentioned in a report on race-prejudice in, of all places, the District of Columbia, which is Federal Territory, contains Washington, the capital and centre of State power, and is itself under the direct control and administration of the U.S. Government! After alleging that the Government itself is a chief offender and that "Its practice of systematically denying Negroes equal employment opportunities sets a bad example," the report is further quoted by the Manchester Guardian as follows:
"Sharing the blame, says the report, are Congressmen who champion 'white supremacy' and real estate, commercial, and financial interests which consider segregation is a 'matter of good business.' Discrimination against Negroes in Washington, the report says, is now more widespread than it was five years ago. Segregation is practised not only in hotels, theatres, restaurants, and housing developments, but in Government posts and even in churches, schools, and hospitals.
"The largest churches, Protestant and Catholic alike, followed a policy of discouraging attendance by Negroes. 'The exclusion of Negro Catholics from white-Catholic churches is one of the most disturbing aspects of segregation,' the report said. It also claimed that Negro doctors could attend patients in only one local hospital, and the schools for coloured children were inferior to those for the whites.
"It said that 260,000 Negroes—about one-third of the population of Washington—were crowded together in 'black belts' which had become some of the ugliest slums in the country. Because of these conditions, a Negro living in Washington had an expectation of life 12 years less than that of a white person."
A copy of the report, says the Guardian finally, has been sent to President Truman, who has promised to read "with close attention" this account of the racial discrimination prevalent on his own back doorstep.
Stan Hampson
Labels: January 1949, R1949, Racial Segregation, Racism in the United States, Stan Hampson, The Guardian, Washington DC Links to this post
Letter: A Dissatisfied Reader (1949)
Letter to the Editors from the February 1949 issue of the Socialist Standard
A reader of the Socialist Standard (O.V.F., Rickmansworth) writes explaining why he did not renew his subscription.
"I agree with your 'Object' completely. But is there not too much of the old obsession about class? Working class, master class, etc. It seems to me that the change to a Socialist basis is progressing steadily and satisfactorily. Perhaps there is too much hurry in waging war against all other political parties to help the movement on quick enough!"
Our correspondent's two statements, that he agrees with our "Object," and that the change to a Socialist basis is progressing steadily and satisfactorily, bring into the open a misconception that is very common. The Socialist objective is a system of society based upon the common ownership and democratic control of the means of production and distribution. Is it true that progress towards that basis is going on? Obviously what this critic has in mind is the fact that coal, transport, electricity and gas have been nationalised and steel is about to be nationalised. He will be astonished to learn that this is not common ownership and is not the objective of the Socialist Party. It is not the intention of the Labour Government to nationalise more than a small part of industry, but even if it were their intention to nationalise all industry it would not be Socialism or progress to Socialism. The act of changing the capitalist investor from an owner of coal shares or railway or steel shares into an owner of government bonds does not end or even essentially alter the class relationship of capitalism. It still leaves the capitalist class living by owning, and the working class exploited fur capitalist profit. The Socialist objective of production solely for use instead of production for sale and profit making, does not at all enter into the Labour Government's plans, not even as a most distant objective. If the "obsession" about class was justified before Labour Government (and our correspondent appears to imply his agreement that it was) it is just as necessary now. Nothing has changed except that in a certain proportion of capitalist industry the State exploits the workers directly and hands over the proceeds of exploitation to the capitalist bondholder. An interesting sidelight on this can be seen in the ''Daily Mail Yearbook." For many years the Yearbook has published a list of millionaires who had died during the year. It is just the same under Labour government. The 1949 issue (page 138) reports:
''There have been ten millionaire estates published since the last issue of the 'Daily Mail Year Book.' "
Here follows a list of 10 estates totalling over £16 million, together with a further list of 22 estates of between £500,000 and £1,000,000 which together total another £14 million.
If our critic can view capitalism with its millionaires at the top and its workers struggling to make ends meet, and can find it satisfactory because now a huger proportion of the capitalists' property-income reaches them in the form of interest on Government bonds, it can only be because in spite of his opening remark he does not agree with our object at all.
Labels: Capitalist Class, Criticism of the SPGB, February 1949, Government Bondholders, Labour Government 1945-51, Letters to the Editor, Nationalisation, R1949 Links to this post
Editorial: May Day in Hyde Park (1949)
Editorial from the March 1949 issue of the Socialist Standard
In a report about plans for a May Day procession to Hyde Park the Daily Worker (14/1/49) had the following:
"And the Ministry of Works has told the 600,000-strong Trades Council it cannot use loudspeakers in Hyde Park on May Day unless it can come to an agreement with the tiny Socialist Party of Great Britain which had already applied to use loudspeakers on that day. The Council decided to hold the meeting in Hyde Park if permission could be obtained for loudspeakers, otherwise in Trafalgar Square."
The Ministry of Works take the line that they will not allow more than one organisation to use loudspeakers, presumably because of the noise, and it happens that this year the S.P.G.B. got in its application first. We are, however, not in favour of loudspeakers being permitted to one organisation and not to others and we have so informed the Ministry. Equally, we would be satisfied if no loudspeakers were used by any speaker in the Park.
There is, however, an entertaining side issue. A Russian Communist journalist, a Miss Catherine Sheveleva, after visiting Hyde Park in 1948 informed her Russian readers in the columns of the Moscow Bolshevik that "democratic" (i.e. Communist) speakers do not get a chance of addressing meetings in Hyde Park. She wrote:
"I was told that in Hyde Park I would see British democracy in action. Yet, in reality, it is full of cranks, behaving like showmen at a village fair. And when a real democrat starts speaking he is nearly always pulled down from the platform by the police." (Cable from Moscow, Manchester Guardian, 18/5/1948.)
If Miss Sheveleva's yarn were the truth the British Communists shouldn't want to waste their time vainly trying to mount a platform in Hyde Park. It was, however, only a bit of the usual dope fed to the Russian workers by their government-controlled press. Did Miss Sheveleva invent it herself? Or was it perhaps innocently accepted by her from her British comrades?
Labels: CPGB, Daily Worker, Editorial, Free Speech, Hyde Park, March 1949, May Day, R1949 Links to this post
Housewives: Let Us Face the Future (1949)
The Labour Party 1945 Election pamphlet, "Let Us Face the Future," states that "by good food much ill-health can be prevented," (P.10.) That's what Socialists have been saying for years. What the sponsors of this aforesaid pamphlet overlooked is that food is produced primarily for profit. In the Daily Telegraph (3/12/48) a report was published dealing with an inquiry into the health and welfare of housewives made recently by members of the New Sussex Hospital (Brighton), It disclosed that "88 per cent. of the 61 volunteers showed signs of fatigue " and " more than 77 per cent. of the wives were under-nourished." The inquiry further disclosed that "the effects of fatigue in the housewives exceed those of fatigue in any other worker." Let us try to imagine the housewife, often with several children, living in tenements or sublets. Her vitality is diminished by repeated childbirths and the daily struggle to cook, wash, shop, clean, and care for her little ones in unsatisfactory surroundings, living on "filler" foods such as bread, margarine and fish and chips.
The problem is one of poverty, a problem which repeatedly asserts itself as the cause of bad health. Despite a world of potential plenty Capitalism destroys food and creates shortages in order to safeguard profits when it becomes necessary. According to a December issue of the Daily Telegraph, hundreds of tons of onions have rotted and only half the 40,000 tons of onions grown on the Cambridgeshire Fens has found a market. Again the Sunday Observer (12/12/48) reported that there is a glut of cabbages and they are "being ploughed in or fed to livestock." No modification of capitalism can alter this condition of affairs. The solution is to abolish capitalism. Capitalism is only one of the forms of society which have evolved, and Socialism must succeed it if poverty, privilege, slavery, are to give way to comfort, equality and freedom. Unite for Socialism.
Cyril Acton
Labels: April 1949, Cyril Acton, Food Production, Health in Capitalism, Home Life, Labour Party, R1949, Women in Class Society Links to this post
Dublin Letter (1949)
From the May 1949 issue of the Socialist Standard
It is some weeks now since the world heard the result of the General Election in Northern Ireland—though how much the world really cared about that election result, we, of course, can't say. The election issue, however, was said to be a clear one. "King or Republic?"—that is, maintenance of the constitutional status quo or incorporation in an all-Ireland Republic. For the King and continued union with Gt. Britain, were the "Ulster Unionists" (Tories); for the Republic, the Nationalists. Uncomfortably straddling the constitutional fence, swaying, now this side, now that, were the Northern Ireland Labour party, and a few "Independents." Though the result was never in any doubt—the return to power of the Tories—the utter debacle of the Labour party came about as a complete surprise to most people. Not one of their nine candidates were elected, including three fighting to retain their seats in Belfast; all told, the Labour party lost about 35,000 votes. And McCullough, the one Communist party candidate, only got 688 votes as compared with his 5,802 in 1945—in the same constituency, and against the same opponent. Lord Glentoran, one of the foremost Tory leaders.
To Socialists, the ups and downs of the Tory and Nationalist votes are unimpressive by comparison with the disintegration of the "Leftist and Progressive" ones; for these went, overwhelmingly, to the Tory party. Apologists have said that the supporters of the Labour party and the "Leftist" groups were stampeded. into voting Tory because of the jingoism and sabre-rattling of the Orange (Freemason) Lodges and the alleged threat to their Protestantism, etc., of absorption in a Papist-dominated all-Ireland Republic. Be that as it may, what volumes does it not speak for the Socialist attitude on reformism in general and, to Socialists in Ireland, on the "Partition question" in particular? That one-time adherents of the Labour party can be persuaded that a new national flag is a greater threat to their interests than the continuation of the capitalist economic system constitutes, indeed, a pitiful and sad commentary on the efficacy and worthwhileness of that tragically mis-named party, the Labour Party. But then, what are we to say of the lamentable decline of the alleged "revolutionary" vote, the Communist Party one ? Of McCullough's [3.9] per cent. depleted vote, can we justifiably attribute it to the same cause? We think so, for no other fits the facts.
So, in this respect, the Northern Ireland elections have afforded one more demonstration of the uselessness of reformist votes as a means of effecting any real change in the worker's position vis-a-vis the capitalist. Such votes are as easily lost in the next election as they are won in this. Though Hitler won quite a proportion of the Communist and Social Democrat parties' votes, to a large extent by outdoing their promises of "social betterment," any analogy between that phase of German history and the recent Tory victory in Northern Ireland would be not only misleading but involve the paying of false compliments to the Labour and "Leftist" parties. For the truth is that Sir Basil Brooke (Tory leader) and his party were under no great pressure to defend existing social and economic conditions in Northern Ireland. When, now and then, they did do so, it was only by way of superficial comparison with Eire, saying: "Look how worse off you'd be in an Irish Republic!" But that all they had to do, for the most part, was to wave the Orange flag and beat the Orange drum, is due to the pusillanimity of the Labour party and others, and their inability, because of their capitalist-reformist base, to point the way out to the Northern Ireland workers.
That the workers there, no less than their fellows down here in Eire, and elsewhere under capitalism, are "getting it in the neck " all of the time, is ably borne out by an examination of the available social and economic statistics. With a population of 1,330,000, Northern Ireland has, at present, 37,000 men and women on the Unemployment Register. And this unemployment figure is not only proportionately higher than Britain's—it was two-and-a-half times the British rate in 1947—but higher even than Eire's, with 83,766 unemployed. This very large and ugly social blot on Northern Ireland is not of recent occurrence either. Except for the war periods, unemployment has always hovered round the 20,000 mark, and in more recent years, between 25,000 and 35,000. As a matter of fact, in March, 1947, it actually reached the 45,000 figure.
Working class housing and health conditions are, in general, no better than they are here in Eire—and that comparison is, indeed, an odious one. The number of houses officially estimated as unfit for habitation in Northern Ireland is 27,000. In Belfast itself (the Northern Ireland capital), where there were over 17,000 applications for houses by January, 1948, the Corporation and Housing Trust had between them built only 322! A survey recently undertaken by the Northern Ireland Council of Social Service (a semi-official body) revealed appalling conditions existing in this area of the "King's Dominions." Those conditions are all too graphically detailed in the work embodying the Council's findings, "Rural Life in Northern Ireland " (Oxford University Press, 1947).
For instance, taking the Beveridge Report subsistence benefit (and that low enough by any standards) as " the poverty line," the Council found that in County Fermanagh, twelve labourers' households out of twenty-nine fell below this line, as well as nineteen pensioners' households out of twenty-nine. And in Co. Down, likewise; while in Nth. Antrim, fifty per cent. of the farm labourers exist below this "minimum required to maintain health." As to housing; not a single labourer's cottage has been built by any Rural Council in Co. Fermanagh since Northern Ireland became a separate State (1921)! Much the same story is told of the other five counties. Even in Nth. Down, which is claimed to be the "most advanced" area because of its proximity to Belfast, only six per cent. of the houses have a W.C.! Also—and not far from Stormont either, where the "King's men" legislate in the interests of the linen, brewing and shipbuilding industrialists and big farmers, and rave about the ''prosperity of Ulster and the poverty of Eire"—in Belfast, according to the Council, the main causes of distress in that city were tuberculosis and the housing shortage.
But enough has been said already to show that there are working-class problems in Northern Ireland apart from the capitalist constitutional ones. The solution of these problems, because they are specifically working-class ones, is not to be found in formulae concerned with national boundaries. Neither Statute of Westminster nor Republican Declaration can offer a solution of them. The division which gave birth to these problems—the division of the wealth of the few and the poverty of the many—is, needless to say, conveniently ignored by all of the current publicity devoted to that sorrowing tale, "Divided Ireland." Even a King and a Republic (and that's not a piece of Irishry, for through the External Relations Act that was the situation in Eire from 1937 to 1949) holds no hope of the ending of that division. And that Partition is one which will remain until a majority of the workers decide to end the capitalist system—complete with all its Republican and Monarchical paraphernalia—and establish Socialism.
Chris Walsh
(Dublin Socialist Group).
Labels: Chris Walsh, Dublin Socialist Group, May 1949, Northern Ireland, Northern Ireland Labour Party, Poverty in Northern Ireland, R1949, Working Class Poverty Links to this post
Debate With Conservatives (1949)
From the June 1949 issue of the Socialist Standard
The debate with Conservative at Ealing Town Hall on April 4th commenced late owing to the late arrival of the Conservative representative, David Eccles, M.P., and it finished early owing to his request to get away by 9.30.
W. Waters opened the debate for the S.P.G.B. by warning his opponent not to waste time attacking the Labour Party, as most Conservatives do when debating with us. If an indictment of the Labour Party was called for, we could do it far better than any Conservative. The question, "Which Party should the working class support?" prompted other questions, such as. "What is a political party?"; "Why are there many parties?"; "Is it necessary to support any?", and if so, " Which one?" A political party is an organisation that seeks to control the machinery of government in order to serve the interests of a section of the community. It was because there are varying interests to be served that there are a number of political parties. Landlords, industrialists, etc., have separate sectional interests, but they also have a common interest as owners of the means of production. The working class had interests opposed to these groups of the capitalist class. It is necessary for the workers to have a political party to express their interests or they would be forever at the mercy of the capitalists. The workers should support the party that aims at the abolition of the social system that keeps them in subjection. Supporting other parties, such as the Conservative Party, would solve no problems for the working class. The Conservative Party had a history of vicious opposition to working class interests, intense exploitation of the workers and suppression of their organisations. In conclusion Waters pointed out that the S.P.G.B. placed a different meaning on the word "support" to the Conservatives. The Conservatives asked for the confidence and trust of the workers, the S.P.G.B. said that the overthrow of capitalism required that the workers should understand and actively work for that objective. The Conservative Party would use the workers, the S.P.G.B. was a party the workers could use.
David Eccles opened by stating that he had, that day, gone into the lobby of the House of Commons and asked three Labour M.P's. what they knew of the S.P.G.B. Two of them had denied any knowledge of the Party and the third had used filthy language. He admitted that he was unable to understand the object of the S.P.G.B., it was a new animal to him. He could only conceive of common ownership as a system where the state took over industry on behalf of the community. That was what the Labour Party was doing. It was not always in keeping with the interests of the nation. Private enterprise should be encouraged with the state being used to prevent any abuses such as the restrictive activities of monopolies. The small trader was the backbone of the country and he should be assisted. The Conservative Party aimed at a property-owning democracy with everyone owning his own house. Property was power and it was the object of the Conservative Party to spread the power over as wide a section of the people as possible. It aimed at a more fair distribution of property and an opportunity for everyone to get on. Social services were a means of redistribution, they were a substitute for property. Transferring property to the state means more power to the ministers. A property-owning democracy would give a larger freedom of choice. Mr. Eccles said that he could not understand how Waters could carve out a section of the people and call it a working class.
Waters commenced his second contribution by again defining the working class—that section of society which had no other means of obtaining its livelihood except by the sale of its ability to work. His opponent was a man who had been elected to a responsible position—to the job of governing. Any man in such an important job should make himself acquainted with the political ideas that were held by the people that he professed to represent. Despite the warning given, his opponent had spent his time opposing the Labour Party programme of nationalisation but without using the word. The Industrial Charter of the Conservative Party, which had been described by Conservative Sir Waldron Smithers as the most revolutionary document since the Communist Manifesto, was an example of what the Conservatives offered the working class. Boiled down it amounted to a scheme to get more out of the workers without giving them more of the wealth they produced. It claimed to offer new incentives such as dismissal from employment on a seniority basis. A recent employee might only get a week's notice whilst an older hand might get, perhaps, a month's. It was for such nonsense as this that the Conservatives sought the support of the workers.
David Eccles said that his opponent's ideas were the result of a mixture of envy and philanthropic desire and the offspring was a rather ugly dream. How could property be abolished? It was beyond conception. He had travelled to Ealing by train and the railway he came by was property. Was the railway to be abolished? Were houses to have no keys so that anyone could walk in? Who would distribute the goods that were made if they were not owned by someone? The whole proposition was a dream. It was alright to dream, but the Conservative Party was more realistic. If his opponent's definition was analysed it would be found that all but one per cent, of the nation were members of the working class. He was satisfied that the people wanted something more than a dream. Nine million of them supported the Conservative Party and if only his opponent at the next election would expound the same ideas as Water?, he, Eccles, would feel that his seat was safe.
Waters replied that it was beyond belief that anyone should think that a railway was property just because it was a railway. It became property when some person or group of persons had the right to dispose of it. Referring to the idea that everyone should own his own house. Waters quoted from a newspaper dated February, 1932, when a Conservative Party had a majority in Parliament showing that Welsh miners who had bought their houses during more prosperous times, had to surrender the mortgage when unemployed and drawing relief, and as they had little chance of redeeming it, the house property was lost to them, after a lifetime of saving. The Conservative Party was responsible for the Trade Disputes Act, 1927, the Incitement to Disaffection Act, 1934, the Public Order Act, 1937, not forgetting the Taff Vale Judgment of 1901 and the Means Test of 1931. Waters quoted from Conservative sources to show that the co-partnership idea proposed by the Conservative Party offered nothing to the workers but an inducement to work harder for their employers' benefit. Nine million workers may have supported the Conservative Party but although the Conservatives might fool some of the workers all the time, or all the workers some of the time, they would not fool them all for all the time. The days of the capitalist class were numbered and with its passing would also go its lickspittle lackeys.
David Eccles said that the ideas expressed by his opponent were isolated. The S.P.G.B. would isolate England. We had to sell our goods abroad in order to get the things we needed from other countries. Our great problem was the dollar shortage. His party was concerned with the practical problems of living not with dreams. He was pleased to have been invited to debate with the S.P.G.B. He had learned much and regretted that he must leave early.
D. C.
Labels: Capitalism or Socialism?, Conservative Party, David Eccles, June 1949, R1949, SPGB Debates, W. Waters Links to this post
Editorial: Mugabe - From 'Marxist' Guerrilla to Fat Cat Dictator (2017)
Editorial from the December 2017 issue of the Socialist Standard
In the late 19th century, the major European powers came together at a conference in Berlin to 'carve up' the African territories amongst themselves as part of the 'Scramble for Africa'. European capitalists looted the natural resources and ruthlessly exploited the working population of their African colonies. The racist ideology of white superiority was used to justify their rule. In response, national 'liberation' movements emerged, many of which claimed to be socialist. Robert Mugabe, who led the guerrilla war against the white minority regime in what was then known as Rhodesia in the 1970s, was a self-styled 'Marxist Revolutionary'.
Some have said that socialists should support these liberation struggles. After all, it was argued, victory would bring freedom and dignity to the African people, and according to Lenin's theory of imperialism, with the loss of their overseas colonies the Western Powers would be unable to buy off a section of their working class, thus hastening the workers' revolution.
However, experience has not lived up to these expectations, and what emerged in the new states was not socialism, but the rule of emergent local capitalist elites, who, like their colonial predecessors, lived off the labour of the local population. Rival groups competing for power have led, in some cases, to civil war. Although the new local ruling classes did not employ the racist ideology of the European colonialists, they did, however, exploit the ethnic divisions within their own populations. And far from cutting into their 'super profits', Western states found, in many cases, that they could do business with the new regimes.
A case in point is Zimbabwe. After Robert Mugabe achieved power in 1980, he dropped any pretence of being a 'Marxist' and adopted openly capitalist measures, designed to attract foreign investment. Believing that he was a safe pair of hands, Western Powers poured in financial aid. Under his rule, a new local capitalist elite emerged who bought large mansions, expensive cars and sent their children to private schools. As for the majority working population, life was of grinding poverty and unemployment. Unrest in Matabeleland led to thousands, mainly from the minority Ndebele population, being killed in a state crackdown. As the Zimbabwean economy deteriorated and the living standards of the majority fell, Robert Mugabe's rule became more autocratic and corrupt. In the 2000s, he gave support to seizures of white owned land by armed groups, which were given over mainly to Mugabe's cronies. When he was forced to resign as President in the aftermath of a military takeover, working class Zimbabweans took to the streets and danced and cheered.
This is not to argue that Africans are unable to govern themselves and were better off under European colonial rule. The new African states, in the absence of a large socialist movement, could only develop capitalism and in the context of the undeveloped state that African economies were left in the wake of colonialism and slavery, and having to compete in a world capitalist market dominated by the western powers, would likely to be insecure, authoritarian and corrupt. For African workers to achieve real freedom, they will need to unite with workers in other countries to fight for Socialism.
Labels: Africa, African History, Anti-Imperialism, Colonial History, December 2017, Editorial, R2017, Robert Mugabe, Zimbabwe Links to this post
Editorial: Mugabe - From 'Marxist' Guerrilla to Fa...


text:
Q: How to create a PrtSc (print screen) shortcut for Lightshot in Linux Mint I use Linux Mint 18.3 Cinnamon 64-bit. I have xdotool installed.
Lightshot is running since login, always, I used Startup Applications tool to create a start-up immediately after login:
env WINEPREFIX="/home/vlastimil/.lightshot" wine C:\\windows\\command\\start.exe /Unix /home/vlastimil/.lightshot/dosdevices/c:/users/Public/Start\ Menu/Programs/Lightshot/Lightshot.lnk

Goal:
To press PrtSc (print screen key) and enter full-screen cutting mode (de facto, the same functionality Lightshot has under Windows).

What works (when run from gnome-terminal):
xdotool key --window $(xdotool search --limit 1 --all --pid $(pgrep Lightshot) --name Lightshot) "Print"

However, it does not do anything, if that is copy-pasted into the Add custom shortcut dialog:

I merely wonder why that is and, more importantly, how to make it work?

A: Update 2020-Jan-02
You can find the latest revision and usage instructions on its GitHub page.

Original post
The reason probably is, that I haven't specified any shell to be run into, and so the following works:
sh -c 'xdotool key --window $(xdotool search --limit 1 --all --pid $(pgrep Lightshot) --name Lightshot) "Print"'

EDIT:
It might be noteworthy, that I decided to write a script for it now. Fully validating every step:
#!/bin/sh

is_number()
{
    # check if exactly one argument has been passed
    test "$#" -eq 1 || print_error_and_exit 5 "is_number(): There has not been passed exactly one argument!"

    # check if the argument is an integer
    test "$1" -eq "$1" 2>/dev/null
}

# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

print_error_and_exit()
{
    # check if exactly two arguments have been passed
    test "$#" -eq 2 || print_error_and_exit 3 "print_error_and_exit(): There have not been passed exactly two arguments!"

    # check if the first argument is a number
    is_number "$1" || print_error_and_exit 4 "print_error_and_exit(): The argument #1 is not a number!"

    # check if we have color support
    if [ -x /usr/bin/tput ] && tput setaf 1 > /dev/null 2>&1
    then
        bold=$(tput bold)
        red=$(tput setaf 1)
        nocolor=$(tput sgr0)
        echo "$bold$red$2 Exit code = $1.$nocolor" 1>&2
    else
        echo "$2 Exit code = $1." 1>&2
    fi

    exit "$1"
}

# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

check_for_prerequisite()
{
    # check if exactly one argument has been passed
    test "$#" -eq 1 || print_error_and_exit 2 "check_for_prerequisite(): There has not been passed exactly one argument!"

    # check if the argument is a program which is installed
    command -v "$1" > /dev/null 2>&1 || print_error_and_exit 6 "check_for_prerequisite(): I require $1 but it's not installed :-("
}

# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

# check if no arguments have been passed to the script
test "$#" -gt 0 && print_error_and_exit 1 "$0: You have passed some unexpected argument(s) to the script!"

# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

# check for prerequisites
check_for_prerequisite "pgrep"
check_for_prerequisite "xdotool"

# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

# global constants
lightshot_key="Print"
lightshot_name="Lightshot"

# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

# get the lightshot pid
lightshot_pid=$(pgrep "$lightshot_name")

# test if a pid has been successfully acquired
is_number "$lightshot_pid" || print_error_and_exit 7 "lightshot_pid: The argument is not a number!\\nLightshot is most probably not running."

# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

# get the window id from lightshot pid
lightshot_wnd=$(xdotool search --limit 1 --all --pid "$lightshot_pid" --name "$lightshot_name")

# test if a window handler has been successfully acquired
is_number "$lightshot_wnd" || print_error_and_exit 8 "lightshot_wnd: The argument is not a number!\\nLightshot is most probably not running."

# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

# simulate a print screen key press on the lightshot window
xdotool key --window "$lightshot_wnd" "$lightshot_key"

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Chinese investors give up investing in Japan Display, an Apple supplier
via:新浪科技 time:2019/9/26 17:20:25 readed:212
JDI announced in April that it would receive 117 billion yen ($1.1 billion) from Chinese investors and shareholders. Among them, the Chinese investors are Harvest Fund and TPK Holding, a Taiwanese touch panel manufacturer, who will invest 80 billion yen (about 4.8 billion yen) in JDI by buying stocks and bonds.
In June, Chenhong Technology announced the withdrawal of its investment plan. But JDI later announced that it was negotiating with other investors such as Oasis Management, a Hong Kong hedge fund, and was still seeking up to 80 billion yen.
Today, according to people familiar with the progress of the negotiations, China Investment Group, led by Jiashi Fund, including Oasis Management, has abandoned its investment plan, which means that Chinese investors will no longer provide any financial assistance to JDI. According to people familiar with the situation, of the 80 billion yen originally planned to be invested, Kashi Fund is prepared to invest 60 billion yen.
Act asIPhoneMobile phoneThe long-term supplier of screens, JDI, has worked with JDI as early as 2015.AppleThe company reached an agreement to set up a new factory in Japan to produce LCD panels for Apple products. This is a very expensive project, costing JDI about $1.5 billion.
But today, four years later, Apple's changing destiny has put JDI in a difficult position and may end its long-term position as a leader in display technology. The slowdown in sales of the iPhone, coupled with the surge in new models of the iPhone, has led to the use of newer models in many of them.OLEDScreen, so that the JDI new factory (only produce LCD screen) can only operate at half load.
For this reason, in January this year, it was reported that the disappointing performance of Apple's iPhone XR was affecting the global supply chain, leading JDI to seek financial assistance from Chinese investors.
Analysts say Japan Display will supply OLED screens for Apple Watch Series 5
LG Display announces that voluntary layoffs do not involve Chinese factories
Apple intends to inject $200 million to rescue Japan Display, an iPhone screen supplier

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Soak the sponge with warm water to soften the loofah fibers and massage the loofah side of the sponge on your skin gently using small, circular motions while cleanser is applied. Gentle is the key. Rinse skin thoroughly and finish with Facial Serum or Nourish Face Creme to hydrate and aid in repair.


text:
596,630 South Dakota voters registered for upcoming election
by: Eric Mayer
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (KELO) — The final tally of registered voters for South Dakota's 2022 general election is in.
Secretary of State Steve Barnett told KELOLAND News there were 596,630 registered voters by 5 p.m. Monday, the final day for voter registration. That's up more than 10,000 voters from the June 7 primary election and an increase of nearly 18,000 (17,964) from the 2020 general election.
Yes and no on Medicaid, recreational pot, poll says
The final breakdown of registered voters by party is — 296,290 Republicans, 151,341 Democrats, 144,813 Independent or no party affiliation, 2,797 Libertarians and 1,389 listed as other (voters who write any other political party on their voter registration form that is not currently a recognized political party in South Dakota).
There's 61,492 inactive voters in South Dakota. A registered voter only becomes inactive if the person dies or doesn't vote in either of the previous two presidential elections.
In the final month of voter registration, Republicans gained 2,405 registered voters, Independent or no party affiliation gained 1,218 registered voters, Democrats gained 422 registered voters and Libertarians gained 38 registered voters.
Voter registration shows South Dakota is changing
KELOLAND's Bob Mercer looked into South Dakota's voter registration history from 1968 to present day.
All South Dakotans will vote for U.S. Senator, U.S. Representative, Governor and Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, State Auditor, State Treasurer, Commissioner of School and Public Lands and Public Utilities Commissioner.
Other positions include state lawmakers, county-level positions, state Supreme Court judges, circuit court judges and two ballot measures.
For the state legislature, Republicans have already won 20 Senate seats for the 2023-24 term, because they have no opponents on November 8. At least 35 House seats will go Republican, too, because the only candidates running are Republicans or because challengers haven't contested both seats in the 35 two-seat districts.
Get to know the candidates running for state legislature in your district
Registered Sioux Falls voters will also be voting on a city-wide initiated measure.
All South Dakotans will vote on two statewide ballot questions – Constitutional Amendment D and Initiated Measure 27. Sioux Falls voters will also be voting on a city-initiated measure to ban the construction or permitting of new slaughterhouses within the city limits.
What's Amendment D?
Constitutional Amendment D would amend the South Dakota Constitution to expand Medicaid eligibility to help provide medical coverage for low-income people in designated categories. The Legislative Research Council's Fiscal Note for Amendment D says Medicaid expansion would cover 42,500 new individuals for a cost of $297 million, which would cost the state $32.5 million and give $63.5 million in general fund savings.
Proponents – Rapid City Mayor Steve Allender and retired businessman Jim Woster – say passing Amendment D will return more federal tax money to the state and allow South Dakota to use more federal funds on residents' health.
"Amendment D will strengthen rural hospitals and clinics and make it easier for people in rural South Dakota to get health care," Allender and Woster wrote in the proponent section in the Secretary of State's official ballot question pamphlet.
Opponents – Americans for Prosperity State Director Keith Moore – said Medicaid expansion in South Dakota will impact the state's budget in the future.
"Expanding Medicaid shreds our Constitution and expands services to able-bodied adults under ObamaCare," Moore wrote in the opponent section in the Secretary of State's official ballot question pamphlet.
What's Initiated Measure 27?
IM 27 would legalize marijuana in small amounts for people age 21 and older. The measure legalizes substances considered felony-controlled substances under State law. Marijuana remains illegal under Federal law.
The LRC's Fiscal Notes says IM 27 could create "marginal additional revenue in new civil penalty fines" and the state could see a "minimal decrease in expenses due to decreased incarceration for marijuana-related offenses."
Proponents say legalizing small amounts gives people 21 or older the freedom to choose whether to use marijuana and allows police to focus on harsher crimes.
Opponents say legal marijuana will increase marijuana use for kids and not help foster healthy families.
Election Day is set for Tuesday, Nov. 8.


Abhijeet was born in a Bengali middle-class family in Kanpur on 30 October 1958, the youngest of four siblings. He passed his matriculation from Ramakrishna Mission Higher Secondary School, Kanpur and Class XII from BNSD Inter College Chunni Ganj, Kanpur; and graduated in commerce (B.Com.) from Christ Church College, Kanpur in 1977. He started singing on stage in 1970 onwards. Although his parents were against the idea, he went against their wishes and became a singer. He is an established singer in Bollywood, having done extensive playback singing for actor – Shahrukh Khan; among many others. Nowadays, he also appears as a judge in reality shows based on singing contests on TV. He has interest to play cricket most of evening time during schooling days.


text:
Q: Options-enabled content-script Chrome extension without background page? I'm making a content script extension for Google Chrome, it adds functionality to a website's page. I want to add a couple of options, not big deal really, I'd just need two strings (none of which are sensitive user data).
From this answer, I assume I need a background page, which I'd rather not add to my extension - I don't want it to gain unnecessary weight.
Do I really need a background page, or I could have an options page without it (and which storage could I use)?

A: UPDATE
As of Chrome 20 you can now use the Storage api.....
http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/storage.html
Old way
What I do is create an iframe that points to a page in my extension that has a script that gets the settings I need from local storage and then sends that to its parent in a message which the content script then gets.....well that was a crap explanation, the code says it better ;).......
Content Script
// create the iframe for our page that sends the settings
var el = document.createElement("iframe");
el.setAttribute('src', chrome.extension.getURL("gimmeSettings.html"));
el.style.visibility="hidden";
document.body.appendChild(el);

// create the listner that listens for a message from our page that sends the settings
window.addEventListener("message", receiveSettings, false);

// function that gets called when we recieve a message from the page that sends the settings
function receiveSettings(event) {
        //check to make sure the message came from our page
        if (event.origin !== "chrome-extension://"+chrome.i18n.getMessage("@@extension_id")) return;

        //message came from our extension, do stuff with it
        console.debug(event.data);

        // clean up
        window.removeEventListener("message", receiveSettings, false);
        el.parentNode.removeChild(el);
}

gimmeSettings.html's JS
// post the message with our settings
parent.postMessage( localStorage.getItem("testing"), "*" );

Options.html's JS
localStorage.setItem("testing","bleh");

Manifest
{
    "name": "Getting at an extensions local storage from a content script",
    "description" : "Getting at an extensions local storage from a content script.  Be aware that other pages/extensions can use this to get at your settings, but not change them...so dont include sensitvie data.",
    "content_scripts": [
        {
            "matches": ["<all_urls>"],
            "js" : ["myscript.js"],
            "run_at":"document_idle"
        }
    ],
    "permissions": [
        "tabs", "<all_urls>"
    ],
    "manifest_version": 2,
    "web_accessible_resources": [
    "gimmeSettings.html"
  ],
  "options_page": "options.html",
    "version":"1.0"
}

Some things to note....
Other pages and extensions can easily use this to also get the settings from your extension, so dont use any sensitive data with this method.
From the best I can tell there is no way for them to alter your settings through that page tho, if anyone knows different please explain.
Im using manifest version 2 and have set the page gimmeSettings to be accessible. If you dont know the differences manifest version 2 add you really should read up on it....   http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/trunk/manifestVersion.html
And if you want a working example then go here.....
http://forum.valorsolo.com/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=375

A: I just had an idea, but I don't know if it's sound or makes sense.
I believe I can access HTML5 localStorage from my content_script, and store the two strings there. Through Message Passing I should be able to tell the content_script that one of them changed (from the options page) and then have it update its localStorage.
Would this be the only option? It doesn't sound too bad if it works...


3d 4k Car Wallpaper d Screensavers For. A big collection of different themed, popular, animated 3D Screensavers for Windows 10 and 7 including Space, Nature, Aquarium, and more.
20 Beautiful Christmas Wallpapers. If you didn't know or simply forgot to remember let us remind – Christmas is coming! Only a two weeks remain till this wonderful holiday! And a perfect way to get a positive Christmas mood is to decorate your desktop with interesting wallpaper!


text:
"What Wins in the Big 12?"
As some long-term readers of this blog may know, I'm a professor at Texas Tech University and I meet occasionally with Red Raider volleyball coach Don Flora to discuss statistical aspects of the sport and find out what kind of analyses he might be interested in at a given time. We last met this past spring and he told me his big question: "What wins in the Big 12?" I took the meaning of the question to be: what combinations of success at hitting, blocking, digging, serving, etc., were associated with winning conference matches in the Big 12? I told Coach Flora I would have something for him, and proceeded to start thinking about how I would conduct analyses.
Now, with the Red Raiders opening their Big 12 portion of the schedule by hosting TCU tonight, I have the fruits of my inquiry. I first created a database of all 72 conference matches played a year ago (despite its name, the Big 12 has only 10 schools and one, Oklahoma State, doesn't field a women's volleybal…
Opening of Women's Conference Play (2014)
It's a busy week in women's college volleyball, with conference play opening up around the country. The Pac 12 schedule has each team starting off league play against its respective traditional/geographic rival. A pair of matches will be held tonight, featuring Cal (8-2 in nonconference) at No. 1 Stanford (10-0), and No. 20 UCLA (9-2) at No. 9 USC (7-3). Other Pac 12 rivalry matches will be held on Wednesday and Thursday. I already wrote about Stanford's fast start this season, so I will discuss UCLA and USC (among other teams) in the present posting.
The Big 10 (or B1G) begins play with matches Wednesday and Friday. The marquee match-up of the week, not just in the conference, but nationally, features a rematch of last December's national championship tilt between No. 3 Penn State (12-1) and No. 5 Wisconsin (9-1), in Madison. The Nittany Lions' only loss so far this season was in a five-gamer to Stanford, whereas the Badgers' only setback was to Washington, l…
Stanford Women Off to Fast Start
Heading into the third weekend of the 2014 women's college season, Stanford has been the most impressive team thus far, dominating the most recent AVCA national poll. The Cardinal (4-0) is by no means the only undefeated team; 10 teams in the Top 25 have perfect records. However, it's the difficulty of Stanford's opposition -- Iowa State (in Ames), Nebraska (in Lincoln), Penn State, and Illinois -- that makes the Cardinal's record so noteworthy.
Another challenge Stanford has overcome thus far is the absence of two of last year's seniors, three-time All-American MB Carly Wopat and All-Pac 12 honorable mention OH Rachel Williams. Let's explore how the Cardinal has adapted offensively. I first compared Stanford's offensive statistics for 2013 and 2014 (the latter statistics, based on only four matches, should of course be taken with caution). As the first graph shows, the Cardinal has not hit at quite as high a clip as last year, while its opponents (in the a…


It is located near Race course ring road, above sankalp in heart of city in the vicinity of exculsive mercantile & residential area of Rajkot. And most important WI-FI facilities.
Uzyskaj odpowiedź od personelu i byłych gości obiektu Hotel S S Inn.


What are your transit times for shipping?
* Please allow one additional business day for rural areas.
** Times may vary depending on weather conditions.
Return/Exchange Policy: You have 30 days to decide if your LUNAs are the right fit. If you need to return your LUNAs for an exchange or refund, be sure you are returning clean, only-worn-indoors-for-testings, like-new sandals. At our discretion, if the sandals show signs of wear preventing us from re-selling as new, we may charge up to 50% for a restocking fee. Heavily used sandals will not be accepted.
Call or email us anytime for help determining fit or sizing issues. We are here to help. All returns must be made at the customer's shipping expense.
All returns must have a return authorisation number (RA#) clearly marked on the outside of the package.
All merchandise marked "clearance" or "sale" is considered final sale, and is not returnable.
When you send your sandals back to us, be sure to include a note stating your name, order number, and reason for return and we'll take care of your refund. For exchanges, just let us know which size you need and we'll take care of the rest.
LUNA is not responsible for items lost in transit.
Check out this link to Barefoot Ted's "Introduction to Barefoot Running" - it is short and sweet.
Should I get a Pittards leather footbed or the MGT (Monkey Grip Technology) footbed?
The MGT footbed is non-slip rubber and is our best solution for non-slip in wet conditions. For a bit of extra comfort, foot molding ability, and odor/wetness absorption the Pittards of England goat leather specially tanned for outdoor use is the way to go.
How do the different laces compare?
Most people prefer our Performance Laces with a secure non elastic heel strap and a comfortable, thin, tubular webbing between the toes and tech straps.
Our next most popular laces are Lifestyle Laces (Formerly known as ATS (All Terrain Strapping)) with an elasticized-leather heel strap, that is easy-slip-on-and-off-able with a comfortable, thin, tubular webbing between the toes and tech straps. Lifestyle laces are good for casual use.
How long do the sandals last?
We expect all our sandals to last at least 500 miles. Variables like terrain, sandal model, and how you run/walk/move can affect the life of your LUNAs. Lifestyle, Performance, Elasticized and traditional laces can be replaced without having to buy a whole new pair of sandals.
Are LUNA Sandals just for running?
While LUNA's have been used to run (and win!) many races, from 5k's to ultra marathons, we like to think of them as more of an adventure sandal (#adventuresandals) -- footwear in which you can run, walk, hike, play and adventure your way through life.
How do I clean my LUNAs?
I'm having trouble adjusting my Lifestyle/Performance laces. Any advice?
The Lifestyle laces may require a few tweaks and adjustments over the course of your first few runs or walks. Don't worry! Once you find the sweet spot, they feel like buttah.
Here's how to adjust your Lifestyle laces - Make sure that you adjust your laces when they are OFF your foot!!
Much like the straps on a backpack, the edge of the buckle can be lifted to loosen your laces while the loose end of the lace can be pulled to tighten.
The buckle can also be slid up and down the strap coming through the toe hole for extra comfort.
If the heel strap is not secure, remove slack from the heel by pulling extra lace through the the ankle holes. Tighten the buckle to remove the extra slack created by tightening the heel strap.
More of a visual learner? Check out our YouTube Channel for these tips in video form.
How do I tie my traditional laces?
There are an infinite number of ways to tie traditional laces. Check out some of our favorite traditional lace tying methods on the LUNA YouTube Channel.
How to I tie LUNA Origen with Leather Laces?
How are LUNAs supposed to fit?
Follow our size chart to find our personal sizing recommendation based on the length of your feet. We generally prefer a close fit here at LUNA, but really there is no "right" size. Sizing is mostly a matter of preference; some people prefer a toes over edge fit, others prefer a little more wiggle room. Check out our Fan Photos on Facebook to see how other LUNA Monkeys prefer their fit.
Do LUNAs follow standard sizing?
Not always! Check out our size chart for precision sizing help and printable templates of each size.
I normally wear a size 10.5 and your sized chart suggests I get a size 9! What gives?
Because LUNAs are open air sandals, your feet can cover much more of the sandal's surface without bumping into any upper material (i.e. the parts of a shoe that cover the toes, the top of the foot, etc). This often leads to relatively smaller sizes. Print out templates from our size chart it's the only way to be 100% sure before ordering.
Our sandals are unisex. A men's size 6 is a women's 8, a men's 6.5 is a women's 8.5, and so on.
I need my sandals soon! Can I have my order rushed?
We try our best to accommodate rush orders on an individual basis. Contact us at info@lunasandals.ca and we'll do our best to get your order out ASAP.
Yup! Enter your address info at checkout and we'll take care of the rest.
Yes, we'll send you a shipping confirmation email with a tracking link once your order is shipped.
LUNA is not responsible for lost/stolen packages.
Any informational changes can be made as long as your sandals haven't shipped out yet. However, if you need to change the actual product you ordered, please send your request ASAP. We start working on your order right away!
Authentic, inspirational individuals that are excited to promote the LUNA brand and the values we stand for. These self-experimenters will represent LUNA as unique role-models and spokespeople providing product insight on a grassroots level.
You can submit applications at any time.
How long does the LUNA Ambassador program last?
All ambassadorships are valid for 1 year from acceptance.
If I am already a LUNA ambassador, do I have to reapply each year?
All ambassadors that would like to extend their ambassadorship through the next calendar year are required to reapply.
How will I know if I am selected to be an ambassador?
You'll be notified within 30 days.
Please keep in mind, we receive a high number of applications. Although we see all LUNAtics as valuable parts of our tribe, we will only be able to offer ambassadorships to a small number of applicants.


Within 8 hour periods, the meditators of this experiment had altered their DNA expression, specifically in a reduction of the expression of genes related to stress. This means that they were better equipped to deal with and recover from stressful situations.
Meditation is capable of triggering molecular changes? If you are a person who practices meditation regularly, this may not sound far-fetched or surprising at all. Yet to the scientific word, as it often happens, such a discovery is quite a big deal. A new study published in Psycho-neuroendocrinology is showing that meditation can indeed cause measurable effects in our genes and at the molecular level, and sometimes as a very rapid pace.
The researchers from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and the Institute of Biomedical Research in Barcelona, Spain found that participants who were focused in mindfulness meditation for 8 hour periods had significant molecular changes occurring. In the study one group was composed of individuals who were experienced in mindfulness meditation who spent an 8 hour day meditating. At the same time a control group also spent 8 hours, but rather than meditate they engaged in calm and low-key activities.
It was found, following the 8 hour period, that the meditators had altered their DNA expression, specifically in a reduction of the expression of genes related to stress. This means that they were better equipped to deal with and recover from stressful situations.


Hi everyone, just dropping a quick note to say that Last Fighter Twin and The Great Battle 5 are up to v1.20. I´ve fixed an issue in LFT that caused the game to reset before the full ending could be displayed. TGB5´s title screen now works correctly if you hit start to skip the animation, and I´ve fixed the status bar palette (but made the font uglier in the process, an unfortunate but necessary tradeoff.) Enjoy!
Thank you for your commitment and your translations man, I was looking forward to this update. By the way I know this question has nothing to do with the topic but any chance you translate Popful Mail someday?
By the way I know this question has nothing to do with the topic but any chance you translate Popful Mail someday?


As the 11th anniversary of the diabolical attacks on America arrives, I have been asked to essay on the 9/11 memorial bike put together by Paul Jr. Designs. As someone who has made his living since the early 80's in the motorcycle field, I have enjoyed watching the Discovery Channel's Orange County Chopper's bring much needed exposure to motorcycling.
I have been a little reluctant to fully embrace the Sr. vs. Jr. phenomenon. I have been very fortunate to have met a number of talented builders, who in my opinion, could build circles around the Orange County/PJ Designs crew.
These guys were in the right place at the right time to get their 15 minutes of fame.
The latest build off between Jesse James and the Teutul's was entertaining, but how practical would the winning bike have been? Anyway, that's been hashed, rehashed, and re-rehashed to death, and not any part of this soliloquy. With that said, you will get the impression that in the past, I have not been a fan of Paul Jr. (you are right).
Quite honestly when I got this assignment, I went in prejudiced and prepared not to like anything about this bike. Well, I have to apologize to you Jr., frankly (finally), I'm impressed. This bike is not built to be an everyday rider. It is one builder's expression of how to memorialize the darkest day when we were attacked on our shores.
Understanding that this is a memorial, and does not necessarily need to be functional, the fluted pseudo tank is an interesting highlight and one of the first things to grab your attention. Upon further inspection, you see a tribute to the Ground Zero memorial site incorporated into the belt drive cover. The husky leading link front fork is another attention grabber. The details that are seen throughout this bike are riveting. Unfortunately, I have not seen this bike in person and have only been reviewing a gallery of photos online. All-in-all, this build is one that I would like to see in the flesh. Everywhere I look, I see small details that add up: the exhaust looking like a section of one of the towers, the headlamp boldly proclaiming 9/11 and the massive girder construction of each fork leg. This tribute bike represents techno design at its finest.
I have always been firmly opposed to "theme" bikes, as it is very easy to cross the line into gaudy and garish. In this case, this line is not approached and the entire bike as a whole is tastefully and well done, in my opinion. Overall, I think that Paul Jr., Vinnie and the boys have done an outstanding job.
One thing I would like to say before I hang up my pen today: Good job guys, I wish I could get someone to throw enough change my way to build a beauty like this. Let the haters hate, although I think a lot of it is just jealousy. For those of you who can appreciate this bike, ENJOY.
Agree with everything stated above; outstanding job. Might have been nice though to have incorporated one or two references to the attack on the Pentagon that day as well as the flight that went down in PA. Again, great job!
It's Great to read a positive review of a PJD Bike. I can't remember a time when Writers that contribute to J&P Publications have ever embraced the designs that Jr. creates and I think the subject matter, in this case, is the reason for the change of opinion. I think Paul Jr. has always put His Heart and Soul into everything He's ever designed using recognizable aspects of whatever theme He's hired, or wants, to represent into the build in various and often surprising ways. The fact that He keeps pushing the bounderies of Motorcycle building is the reason His so called 15 minutes of fame has lasted so long and it's exactly why He continues to be successful in T.V. Sure there are those who enjoyed the conflict between He and His Dad and I'm guessing they are the same folks who watch Racing to see accidents or watch the Kardashians to see how self centered a Human Being can possibly be but I like the diversity and creativity that He brings to the mechanics of design. I envy Vinnie because He's Paul Jrs. right hand and He gets to fabricate Paul Jrs. genius and I'm thinking that never gets old. Just when We think there are no more new ideas or ways to build a Bike, Paul Jr. does it again giving Us something We've never seen before and that's why Billion Dollar Companies give Him six figures to build them a Bike. It's also why this Beautiful representation of the most Tragic Day in Americas History touches the Heart of even the most cynical critic except, probably, Jessie James… Bite Me Jesse! He didn't build it for You to ride, He built it for Us to THINK and REMEMBER.
Thank you for your well written piece on the PJD 9-11 tribute bike. I watched them build it and I have to say I agree with your assessment.
The bike is a running, rideable work of art. I feel that it is the crown jewel in their stable of theme bikes.
J&P has helped me to keep my '85 E-Glide running and in great shape. Thank you to all the folks at J&P for the services you provide to thousands of riders.
I am glad to see that Paul Jr. is being seen as a Creative Wizard.Way to go Jr.
Everything about this bike is appropriate, and with class. I don't think anyone could have done any better! It is beautiful!
great tribute, can see a lot of thought & love has gone into this, well done occ !!
OCC didn't build this bike; PJD built it….
Amazing bike. Beautiful tribute to 9/11.


Yesterday, watching an 8 year old and a 1.5 year old is a ton of fun. I was sad to go home, but I had to get some work done, and that can't happen with, "NiNi! What would you like to order from the Kevi Kitchen?!" coming in every 5 minutes. 🙂 There's something about writing this journal that makes me feel really good and I haven't been, up to this point, in the last couple of years, been able to sustain a journal or diary.. all the while killing myself with guilt that I didn't have any follow through.
My inner voice is a mean one. I talk to myself in a more stern, mean, impatient, and unaccepting way than I would talk to anyone (much less people I love!) and I've decided that this has to change. I'm trying to make this change, understanding that it's a process, not a destination. Isn't that the lesson of life anyway, to enjoy the process because there IS no destination or final resting point? That's not the way energy works.
Along that vein, in this day in history in 1932, the 1st patent issued for a tree, went to James Markham for a peach tree. That whole process is now being fought by another process. I don't believe in purity or pristine anything to do with human creation, divine creation or an original thought. Everything at this point has been touched or manipulated by human existence on this earth, and everything we've done or experienced up to this point leads us to the thoughts we come up with. This leads me to 2 points: 1. nothing should be owned, personal ownership leads to greed…therefore I don't believe in borders and 2. Seeds and the natural world should not be patented or owned… the race to the top for money and material wealth is destroying this planet and us as a collective species – and THERE IS NO END POINT! The process that I am finding joy in now, is the reclaiming of this mentality, the community, the rights of workers, the love of the planet and the genuine love of all beings. I AM all beings, I am finding the courage to say so and act on it. Happy February 16th, the first day of the rest of your life. What are you FOR?
Categories: capitalism, food, history, thoughts, universe | Tags: appreciation, critical thinking, food, history, love, patents, ponderings, universe | Permalink.
Today, in 1809 Abraham Lincoln was born. He is celebrated in this country because of his efforts as a president to: emancipate slavery and, among other things, officially dub Thanksgiving day the last Sunday of November. He also gave the Gettysburg address during the Civil War, at the turning point when the North began to win over the South. I remember learning about ole Honest Abe in school, how awesome he was. After having read People's History by Howard Zinn, I gained another perspective of Lincoln.
I will say, then, that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races (applause); that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people..
PS – Disclaimer: People take others' opinions personally if they differ from own. Please don't do this, it makes for difficult discussion.
On a different note, today in 1947 For Sentimental Reasons, by Nat King Cole topped the charts. I love that song. Here is a link to a beautiful live version: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs8wKxezNn8 I wonder what Nat King Cole thought about Abe Lincoln.
Categories: Abraham Lincoln, capitalism, history, politicians, thoughts | Tags: current-events, politics | Permalink.


text:
Why J.M. Coetzee may be the greatest living writer in the English language
8 October 2010 9 October 2010 / Alan AtKisson
If you were a novelist committed to writing great novels, in the literary sense, and you won the Nobel Prize, what would do?
Coetzee, who won the prize in 2003, keeps writing great novels.
I picked up his most recent, Summertime (2009), in an airport bookstore, and started reading it while waiting in line to board my flight from Stockholm to Riga.
I finished it the next evening. I did not read it compulsively every spare minute; no, I treated myself to it, to hunks of perfectly polished prose, twenty or thirty pages at a time, over the course of about thirty-six hours.
Summertime is a Coetzee novel about a novelist named "Coetzee." How close is this novel about him-"self" to his real life? Not so close, at least on the surface, but that doesn't matter. The novel is not really about Coetzee.
It's about you.
That is, it is a novel about the reader, whatever reader is holding the book. For what Coetzee's novels do is turn the book into a mirror.
By focusing his novels so relentless, even mercilessly on himself, Coetzee encourages — no, forces — the reader to consider his or her own life with the same unflinching gaze. It is like looking at a self-portrait by Rembrandt or Van Gogh; after a while, you stop seeing the painter, and notice that the painter is staring at you. You become self-conscious, in both senses of that interesting English phrase: self-aware, and a little uncomfortable.
Which is strangely comforting. To watch a great, Nobel-prize winning novelist turn all his powers of portraiture onto himself in such a way that he succeeds in tearing down the pedestal and conveying his own (or at least his alter-ego's) flawed humanity, without sacrificing the mastery of his craft in any way, is inspiring. Mastery, Coetzee's novels seem to say, should not require the perfection of the self. In some cases, perhaps in all, mastery includes, perhaps even requires, full acceptance of one's partialness, woundedness, and occasional ridiculousness.
If you are worried that Summertime is some kind of autobiographical monologue, forget it. Part of the brilliance of the book is that Coetzee himself — that is, the character "Coetzee" — is practically absent from it, even while being its central character. The text is presented as though it were a collection of notes and interview transcripts. The notes are taken from "Coetzee's" (fictional, even if they are real) journals, from a period in the 1970s when "he" was living with his father in South Africa. The interviews have been conducted by "Coetzee's" biographer, an Englishman identified only as Mr. Vincent.
"Coetzee" himself is dead.
Most of the stories in Summertime are not about "Coetzee", but about the women and men who knew him well during this period. In describing him to the dead-great-author's biographer, they are unanimous in their harsh verdict: the man was scarcely a man. He was wooden. Far from gifted. Remote. Odd. Sometimes (here is the word again) ridiculous. This remoteness leaves a kind of vacuum in the text, which they fill with stories of their own lives. Thus, Summertime becomes a character study, in a triple sense: it is a study of these characters (including "Coetzee"); it is the study of "character" and how and why our character gets formed the way it does, influenced by geography and history and family; and it is the study of character in the literary sense — that is, the process of creating character. Literary characters are, by definition, non-existent. By turning himself, the great novelist J.M. Coetzee, into a non-existent and personally remote character named "John Coetzee," we not only have the opportunity to watch the artist at work, the way we see the brushes in Rembrandt's self-painted hands. We are forced to ask: and how would I paint myself?
On the surface, Summertime is almost an historical novel, on the smallest possible scale: five people's lives, set against the sere background of South Africa in the 1970s and the equally dry, bookish writer with whom they were intimate on various levels. Through them, we see deeply into the ambiguous good-heartedness of White South Africans in the heyday of modern Apartheid. What astonishes is what's missing: even for those to whom the morality of their culture is at least deeply questionable, the Blacks and Coloureds are practically invisible. The "Coetzee" on whom Mr. Vincent asks them to focus their attention certainly tries to be visible, both as character and as a human actor in their drama, with his stubborn determination to break the taboo on Whites doing their own manual labor, and his ridiculous (the word again) attempts to make erotica out of Schubert. But he tries a bit too hard, and comes up short.
Summertime, the novel, does not try too hard or come up short. Every sentence has the quality of being chiseled out of a willing piece of rock, rock just aching to be turned into sculpture. And yet the resulting sculpture manages to be not just alive, but fleshy, while still remaining rock and something that will persist in its identity and increase in its perceived value for tens or hundreds of years. Writing in the shadow of his own acknowledged greatness, scribbling on the back side of a Nobel medal, J.M. Coetzee continues to show us what great literature can do: enlighten.
← Live from Iceland: Joan Davis on "Food for Life"
Saving Life-As-We-Know-It →


Download your books to your personal computer and access them in the VitalSource Bookshelf. Bookshelf is a free download and available for both Mac OS X and Windows operating systems. Bookshelf is also available for iOS and Android devices through the iTunes and Google Play stores.... VitalSource Bookshelf 7.5.1 for Mac can be downloaded from our software library for free. This Mac app was originally designed by com.vitalsource.
Download VitalSource Bookshelf for free. VitalSource Bookshelf® is the most used e-textbook platform in the world today.... Use Bookshelf to download and access VitalSource textbooks on your Amazon device. Read your books online or offline and create notes and highlights to help you study.
Click on the cover of the book you'd like to download, and it starts to download the book automatically. After downloading the book, it will be saved in PDF file on your computer (on the premise that the original book your purchased from VitalSource is a PDF file). The VitalSource DRM removal and VBK to PDF conversion are processed by the tool simultaneously.
What is Vitalsource VBK format If you bought one book from Vitalsource store, it will be .vbk format. 2. We can only print VBK books page by page in Bookshelf. 3. VBK files contains 2 distinct categories of book formats: Reflowable Text VitalBooks (EPUB) and Page-Fidelity VitalBooks (PDF). 1. VBK format books can only be open by Vitalsource Bookshelf app.