text:
Tag Archives: paedophilia
Prophecy, prediction and consensus view – preconditioning for spirited souls?
Traditionally I have released themed articles in time for Christmas and New Year's here. Though I broke from full time work mid-December, sadly all literary efforts ended up needing to be devoted to a wordy masterpiece that was eventually published on 3rd January at another of my websites. Next day, I began work on this entry with intensity. Prior to putting pen to paper (as it were) again, I had checked my "in progress or to be written" open correspondence file and stumbled upon a dusty old archive. Back then (2014), I was still vaguely attached to certain pioneer movements who systematically work through "conspiracy theories". In that capacity efforts were partly devoted to upturning stones and exploding myths with ambition towards revealing the best approximations of pure truth hidden in a volatile ocean of misconceptions. The title of the original manuscript (that was used as the inspiration for this essay) was "Prophesies, Predictions and Preconditioning". Controversially minimal, rather aptly only one note was attached to the file.
US Agency for International Development – "population reduction" Program Director, Reimart Ravenholt, reputedly aimed to sterilise one quarter of the world's women (1977) just before the introduction of AIDS
We have all been exposed in some way to the excesses of establishment fuelled negativity generated towards conspiracy theories, reflecting "theorists" and the "horrors" of an open unregulated internet. Needless to say, ironical official government theories and parallel conspiracies are often largely true, but also divisively true. I'll contend stories that go the other direction invariably promote outright lies. How did Hitler put it?
"If you are going to tell a lie, make sure it is a big one. Tell it over and over until everyone has no choice but to believe it."
The real scandal, therefore, is found in the wide reliance on best-of-breeds "obtuse reasoning". By example, Imagine you see before you a picture of some sort of idyllic scene beneath an airy bright blue sky. Location is unimportant. Out of view by several kilometres and completely omitted from the picture is a topology that would be described very differently. This "slant" image per my example comprises of several giant industrial chimney stacks that continuously and voluminously belch hideous gaseous plumes into the heavens. The effect promotes the unruly build-up of flailing, filthy black smog whose pungent foulness seems to permanently stain the clouds. All this chaos is out-of-view on our imaginary idyllic canvass, but, given a wider picture, conspiracies might focus on the negative in isolation "for impact". The political arena (which absolutely underscores the establishment heart) champions identical rose tinted duplicity as there are no or next to no dissenting voices prepared to vocalise beyond standardised obtuse reasoning mandates (i.e. such as choosing to ignore industrial waste, in my example) and that is where the major issue lies for governments (and those that call governments to account) of the world in general.
Significant changes to my original (2014) conceptual title were made with the additions "consensus view" and, I must say rather ambiguous, "spirited souls". Consensus view somewhat echoes another archived "to be written" memo, contritely titled "Attitude". One note and single line "a bad attitude is good" confidently anticipates intentions, which, of course, clearly subliminally emphasises the power objective belying propagandas. Even so there is a correlation I haven't discussed yet. Consensus view directly impacts obtuse reasoning. In fact, so much so, it beckons the hard to confirm question; did obtuse reasoning pre-empt consensus view or was it the other way round? This is, I might add, a question committed conspiracy theorists invariably fail to address and one of the pivotal arguments I use against most so-called "alternative" views.
I note just about all views either respond to relative ignorance or general superstition (deliberate or otherwise). Others will parasite off different consensuses whose varied appraisals of content boils down to the same equally acrid mulch that lends favour to official decorum. In addition to the syndrome, I have also observed that if one "camp" says "yes", the alternative instinctively emphatically responds "no". Considering this "us" versus "them" dichotomy, it seems entirely plausible for me to at least "determine" that a sole basic planner might be scripting an "ongoing without end" (mock) contest. Currently this is fought between "that which is official" (good) and "the antipathy towards anything official" (evil). Doubtlessly my theoretical planners' will (desire) would be (perhaps posthumously) advanced by pyramidal structures in precisely the same manner (and possible extension of) the "good government" versus "evil anarchist" visceral war that has been expressed through the ages.
Speaking of good and evil, discussions about spirit and soul can lead to equally emotive bipartisan debates. It seems that which isn't solid, under terms of atheism, grants indefinite license to create all manners of bullshit. Though outpourings about the immaterial might generate "fashionable" truths on occasion, because everything in that domain is perceived to be unprovable, the nicest speaker may as well seek an appreciative audience. In other words, for affairs that transcend physicality, truth is superfluous. For example many believe the current pope "must" know something about God because he is head of the Catholic Church. In this context, whenever the pope makes a grotesque revelation about the paranormal (which includes everything spiritual) it must be true to believers. Conversely, per identical obtuse reasoning, anything that contradicts, defies or invalidates the pope's "truths" are unquestionably (the equivalent of) revisionist. Conversely, the lone agent of prohibition blocking any pope's charismatic attempts to "pioneer new divinities" is tradition. Traditionalism acts as guide, juror and potential censor. To make matters worse, most religions' customs and cultures have become so bloated there is near zero opportunity for fundamental or symptomatic evolutionary change.
It should hardly surprise, given that background, my occasional verbal intercourse incidents with the "very religious" over the years has produced little more than persistent reactions against unresolvable lop sided circular arguments. Prognosis of opinions, in terms of spirit and soul from the philosophical standpoint, make entertaining review. For my research, by example, the average very religious person will only identify superficial differences between spirit and soul and, when challenged, will consciously demonstrate an overall inability to draw on formal assessable basis to separate the two. Quintessentially and rather conclusively, matters to do with God to them (the overly religious) are definitely not meant to be understood. Arguably, the syndrome might well be appraised a symptom of feeble misappropriation of the concept glibly termed "blind faith" (comprehended best when paraphrased "blind ignorance for ignorant people"). Of course the problem with calculated blind denial of truth is eventually gulfs of misunderstanding form basis for decision making. Predictably consequential judgements invariably have cause to become so riddled with error; choices of the poorest quality can be exalted as "good practice" (sic). It could be said, cultures that cover up social ignorance make fodders for war.
Though the path to enlightenment is the antipathy of indoctrination, the permanently blind or visually impaired never see colour. The same can be said of those sighted whose deliberate misappropriation of ability is designated to spurn competent recollection of inherent truths. Even so, I do occasionally like to tease intellectual lepers in the spirit of fun. Most recently I have been bestowed with a power of existential knowledge that is so expansive, my "armour chest" (so to speak) is as big as Pandora's Box, but (and contrary to that which is rational) this was not always the case. Tedium of past pointless cogitations can be no more praise God and that assures my altercations with dogmatism are blissfully short and absurdly sweet. Direct discussions of this type have included musings on matters spiritual, I recall. In that capacity, most unmoved "believers" would focus on the intolerable importance of a mythical unknown "Saviour", whose sole identifiable miracle was to become posthumously "known" by that consequence. Their reasoning, if I dare call it that, proposes an angelic domino effect that replicates His "appearance" to feverishly ignorant folks who, once bitten by this deistic virus, become insanely obsessed with "succumbing" to all associated infectious dogmas no matter how spurious. I have, consequentially, needed to learn to agitate, shimmy and side-step their rebuttals at light speed. Nothing is worse than becoming bogged down with aimless nihilism (yes, wilful procrastination is an abject form of nihilism). No fraudulent messiah will cover up that fact.
Hit 'em hard and hit 'em quick is my way. Tried and tested many, many times, the best attack strategy against religious fanatics is to haggle for the promotion of sincere spirituality whilst warding off the fake stuff of fluff and fantasy. Always ask direct questions of the type "what is a soul?" Never request, only demand answers. Even so, it is wise to cast some background before diving straight in with the hard questions. These guys (the terminally religious) are experts at dilly-dallying. Without clear defining lines, you are only guaranteed to generate countering verbal diarrhoea. The step approach seems to work best. That first step towards (and let's harness the mission here) inducing another's demystification is what I fondly term "bursting the bubble". The smartest and easiest way to lampoon aimlessness is by the removal of all distracting debris. Religious folks fear authenticity's values (sincere truth is symptomatically gnarled) as though it was the devil in making himself, so if any vassal has the fortitude to impress any kind of picture at all; it is bound to present "foggily" at best. Thus, step one towards demystification has to be the "total removal of existence". That's the removal of everything and not merely convenient bits that "obstruct" wider considerations.
It's funny but the "very religious" (particularly Christians) are not "very" bright (light, logos, logic, intelligence) and not at all spiritual (creative). This is best highlighted by the commonest answer to my rhetorical question (and primary step towards disillusionment) "what's left after a freak disappearance of everything?" Standard feedback to this is the antiphon "nothing". Ok, I usually paraphrase the question differently. I usually ask, "If God removed everything you know to be "existence" in an instant, what would be left?" Responses are mostly the same. Occasionally a smart ass retorts, "Well, [my] God wouldn't do that." Look, I know blasphemy was one of the great Pharisaic deceptions that has somehow become common doctrine now (i.e. Moses' "Commandments"), but telling God what "He" can or cannot do, well I think that is taking the biscuit. The objection can be fairly easily dispelled anyway. Maybe try "use your imagination, if you've got one" for starters. I admit I did have one really stubborn guy once who dug his heels in so deep, it seemed like nothing would move that rock. Eventually I came up with the master stroke. "Imagine, as a test, which was associated with the Day of Judgement, God removed existence – temporarily. I can't say why, because we both know He is allowed to work in mysterious ways", I beamed. Finally he accepted the "mysterious ways" paradox.
So, the predominant answer to ending existence was there was nothing left. Of course, this pre-empts potentially hilarious responding high jinx but you need to be there to appreciate them. Watch the Christian squirm when you accuse him of being (…drum roll) "an atheist". Well, this is true! A conventional atheist "believes" there is nothing beyond material existence. Be it there is much they (non-believers) cannot explain and many "miracles" (far more miraculous than the Saviour could have ever concocted) coincided with "Big Bang", those adepts-in-waiting with suitably "muted vision" will easily succumb to fantasy; Christians included it seems. But hard line worshippers are resilient if nothing else. They recover from knocks in poor taste quickly. My uncompromising stick-in-the-mud partner also predictably fell into the "nothing" trap moments after expressing "absolute devotion" to God. Don't you see the irony? He didn't, but I can. Anyway, with regards supposedly devout Christians, I learnt nothing can also be something, because after existence vanished at the drop of a hat (and a lot of head scratching), "the void" (per se) unexplainably and conveniently can transform into "heaven" depending on circumstances (which God only knows). Heaven, according to these boneheads, is a place of bliss, where no malice is possible. Complimenting that warped tradition, it also happens to be a place of pure goodness that exclusively only "lets in" Christians. Avowed to avenge the Jews (canned laughter), I shall now attempt to demonstrate how to turn conceptual heaven into hell "for dummies".
Hell, heck, damnation, call it what you will, causes Christians awkward problems. It is a "known of" place that invariably deflects consideration, less chaotic focus. Perhaps we see evidence of symptomatic conditioning here. The Baptist championed ancient proverb "Hear no evil, speak no evil, do no evil" humbles Hades, Beelzebub (or Yaldebroath or Adam incidentally) and everything from the dark side to obsoleteness. Given my slapstick up to this point, a smidgen more jollity surely wouldn't harm? Let's face it, to valiantly deflate the Christian's "heaven" the intellectual champion simply has to state the obvious. Therefore, next supplementary question (and step two of this mission towards demystification) has to be "what about heck?" Now "evil people and non-Christians" must go somewhere post "expiry", right? And that ponderable pitches our devout enthusiasts somewhere between an intellectual rock and a hard place.
They all know there is "limited space" in purgatory. Considering that even Jesus recognised and apparently mentioned hell several times (albeit periodically paraphrased it as the "outer darkness where beasts wail and gnash their teeth"), the paradox cannot be "wished away" even by the puniest of minds or, rather, not at least in serious discussions with spiritually "highbrow" strangers. Every Christian I have interviewed has reluctantly contended that hell not only "exists", but resides in a no man's land that is beyond existence, To make matters worse, due to the absence of time/space, it has to be right on the doorstep of heaven. That leaves but one option to save the average Christian libido. Conceptualisations of the scripts I am sure vary in personality, but, suffice to say, to put reasoning "in a nutshell", for the zealous existence is the proverbial "wall" that separates heaven and hell. Ironically, this is closer to the truth than the feeble minded might imagine.
Still, when it comes to nether regions, the Christian's imagination is honed to peak optimisation. Everyone (to degrees) tries to impress what they want to be (true) over what is, but some manage to proffer vanity to its limit. Apparently a moat with crocs teaming to the brim may be conveniently positioned between heaven and heck in order to split oblivion into two sacred but by no means related domains. That, believe it or not, was a genuine piece of feedback I had received in response to the heaven/hell dilemma. I don't know why I didn't see it before. Ok, I am aware the Victorian era British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli is attributed as saying, "sarcasm is the lowest form of wit", but an occasional facetious bite does enhance pantomime. And these hard line Christians would make me chuckle on a regular basis, was it not for the fact the issues exposed are the very same ones God wants us to fix. Segregated heavens caused the problem with existence in the first place, amply explained by the Gnostics (those interested in knowing more would do well to start with John's Apochryphon in the Hag Hammadi scrolls). "Branding" people evil is a form of evil. We only have to look to the sage Krishna who eloquently identified, "[True] spirituality brings to freedom, so forces of evil paralyse (censor and destroy)".
Putting Christians and other raging fanatics to one side, if I could summarise everyone's honest attitude towards most others (and particularly strangers), sentiment as dialogue would be expressed in the following way:
"I say "fuck you" (to everyone that knows something I don't know).
(When I presume to know everything), I say "fuck you" too."
It is high time humanity moved off the perilous "look after number one" course. It's killing you – literally. All wars are sold on the look after number one excuse. "One", in this instance, is the "great group", albeit sometimes the great group can delineate into strata subgroups within groups. Look how Japanese Americans were marginalised throughout US involvement in the Second Word War. Propagandists maintain spin cycles that presume everyone can and will be conditioned with depressing consistency. To the propagandist a human being is a wilful slave, so marketing programs are designed to drive and capture recruits. Per that model, the underscored narrative line must never falter. Paradoxes, contradictions and anomalies are verboten, Results speak for themselves. These illustrious tailors have been remarkably successful in their quest. It seems as though there is an endless supply of soldiers ready to apply relish to squandering their own lives for absurdity. Worse still, licensed murderers may kill with impunity.
We now know when it comes to matters of spirit and soul, hard line Christians are weak on explanations to say the least. Indeed, to them separation of "roles" usually proves to be more paradoxical even than the physical placement of heaven and hell. Though I've been highlighting devout Christians up to now, no single person I have ever corresponded with has comprehensively been able to demonstrate correct visualisation of the soul/spirit "value base". Many, in fact just about all, graft spiritual qualities onto souls. Maybe, and though rarely specifically identified as such, the soul is deemed to have some association with (if not also made of) light. God's true purpose behind the deliberate placement of spirit and soul is about as alien as the average extra-terrestrial (and I am referring to the ones that remain permanently unknown here).
In fairness, identifying the soul, in particular, can be pretty tricky. When you don't know what to look for, cohesive apperception becomes exponentially more challenging. For instance, the sincere atheist would deny the soul as it is immaterial. My own book The Beauty of Existence Decoded attempts to expose the chassis that tenures the bare bones of reality. In doing so, I tend to complicate things for perception. I introduce conflicting truths. Top down view is far simpler and easier to understand, but that visualisation (even when flawlessly presented) doesn't come to grips with "processes". How is the result of a soccer match worth anything if the actual game is unavailable for scrutiny? Also, contrary to popular "belief", there is no "group" or "cosmic" mind mimicking divine government (beyond the Tamarian, from which "Adam" or Yaldebroath was a consequence). Christ's Consciousness (as is embraced by the Catholic Church) is Sephardic make-believe, nonsense, bullshit designed to enslave the gullible for the overall empowerment of those that control. Paranormal interventions, extra-terrestrial/dimensional influencers and noisome human charlatans routinely issue dogmatic propagandas tuned to deliver grades of indoctrination? Yes to all of those, but no to an effervescent meddling God. Then again, it should be noted The Prime Source (extra-terrestrial signature signifying the Almighty God) does "mess with" all DNA, but that's moving along a tangent best explored another time.
For now, I will try and précis the "lite" versions of spirit and soul in the simplest of terms. Presuming there isn't a transcendental "presiding" ultra-group that contravenes causal oversight (which there isn't by the way, unless we factor in the Tamarian, which travels all the up the astral states), the spirit is "light" and the soul is "darkness". Yes, it is as simple as that. The spirit and the soul are indelible partners of the Buddhist concept Yin Yang. Of course, that motivates distinct moral dilemmas. Born again Christians have been indoctrinated into prostrating before dogmatic evil heralds from darkness and "light vanquishes all evil" (which when correctly translated actually means wisdom conquers doubt). Considered reasoning behind their beliefs are "normally" obtuse, generally speaking, minds are notably possessed in this specific instance. Dangerous, divisive traditional views impede valid interpretations. For example, given the knowledge the soul is darkness; does that mean it should be denied? Emphatically no, for conceptual evil heralding from darkness is one of the almighty religious deceits. Promoted near universally the malice is aimed squarely at corrupting the identity of the essence of humanity (collectively bound by the Tamarian under the framework of "Adam" of course). Origins of the true fabrication of evil are all but forgotten. We need to hark back to the creation of the material universe to appreciate precise logic behind myths. Can I say "once upon a time"? Anyway, an incredibly long time ago there was an age when (as the Gnostics and Babylonians put it) "God slumbered", but then a schism in bliss (God's collective uniform state) caused the fractal development of aeons (distinct traits of God) before they were able to manifest. One, who is fondly remembered as "Sophia" (or wisdom) decided to drive manifestation beyond bliss. Consequentially holistic existence came into being on her (his) terms. I shall now attempt to describe the process.
At this time, before there was linear time, there was nothing but nothing. And from nothing Sophia (who, though the Gnostics termed as "female", embraced male spiritual qualities with feminine care) caused an imperceptible rip that had the potential to become a gateway to something. The gateway did manifest and later became known as "Satan" (which the most ancient ones called "blessed"). Modern astrologers would correctly identify it as a star. Thus, strictly speaking, Satan was first known as the "Blessed Star". Only long after when Satan was a "distant memory" did negative aspersions attempt to distort truth. So much so, the fantasy that is popularised today (and which may only be regarded as a vile anathema to truth) transcended due diligence to become "common doctrine". Without Satan's gateway existence could not have manifest for there was no light then. Upon Sophia's divine directive, the heavens were instantaneously created and segregated by seven spherical divides which would later become generally known as the heavenly states (each representing the fundamental expressive traits of God). Per her (his) plan, existence equated to and was astral purity.
Yet, as the "Holy Spirit" (created by the aeons to be their corporeal prophet and arbiter) predicted, God did not appreciate His slumber with the others detached. The rest, the dark, needed to join the light for they felt excluded. However, Satan's gateway was only commissioned to release light. Potently inventive, in order to join the brethren, darkness reconfigured as forms of light (atomic pulse) and this confused the giant star. Still, Satan remained resilient to the cause. He kept the dark (but not hostile) forces at bay for as long as he was able, but more and more joined the throngs to create overwhelming pressure. Eventually nothing (even light) could access the vent or pass the gateway. It was thoroughly blocked. But the build-up kept building and building and the pressure mounted and mounted. Something had to "give" and eventually in one all mighty "blow", dark matter overwhelmed the Blessed Star's magnetic field (which, ironically, without dark matter, would never have been) and powered into existence. From that moment onwards reality (per Sophia's "plan") changed forever (as all "stars" have the same basic redundancy flaw). The material plane was born and this, in its entirety, is how the ancients' originally defined "evil". To them materialistic peoples (or "materialists") were the roots of all evil. Spiritual, astral, faith-driven bodies preceded goodness.
Observance of modern day Satanism is the evolution of mumbo jumbo (begun perhaps by 1800's industrialists) output under the spurious auspices of [secret] esoteric societies. These "energy portals" (as the Draco call them) were manipulated by the Sephardim and other external entities when society members attempted to contact the "other world" (usually by séance). Hitler's association with the German Thule Movement is widely publicised. Ancients taught that Satan, in the capacity of Blessed Star, had been conquered by matter and, thus, forces aligned with matter were the "evil" that prohibited pure (spiritual) existence. There is no greater materialistic soul than a sceptical industrialist, so it was in the best interest of principled commerce (beginning long before biblical times) to deliberately craft the Satan deception (obscuring the truth for "prosperity's sake"). It was the materialists that the ancient ones warned us (the spiritual) of. Oversimplifying truth in misleading ways, usurpers (Pharisees), discombobulated the ancients' wisdom into new terms per their gross distortion. Corresponding with that trickery, Satan's gate now deliberately let in "evil" (under those terms, how on Earth does satanic equate to "wrong doing" anyway?) which is an absolute whopping great lie.
Regardless of the tarnished fact, matter is not going to "pop out of existence" (Satan's volcanic atomic eruption misconstrued as "Big Bang" is another industrialist backed outright con. Details of which can be found in my book). Because of their basic (but unavoidable) design flaws, all stars will vent dark matter at the end of their useful cycles. Derelicts are posthumously known as "black holes" (even Israel's champion Stephen Hawking has had to grudgingly admit that vanquished stars spew "something" into the cosmos). Interestingly, there were no souls prior to the introduction of dark matter. That makes them a phenomenon intrinsically connected with the manifestation of existence (adrift of spirituality). Drawing from my The Beauty of Existence Decoded, according to science the average sized [human] body has around 5 x 10 to the power 27 souls. Well, actually, science doesn't mention souls at all, but if it understood the transcendental purpose atoms play in respect to life, that would become the formal science assessment.
I referenced Charles Hall's photon theory once before. Hall extrapolates Albert Einstein's "missing fields" and this stresses how poorly materialism conceptualises the quantum layer. Junk science may attempt to satirically ridicule DNA, but the real farce is DNA can only be found in black light, whose mechanics draw out relative gibberish from traditional physicists. If only they had studied at Atlantis and learnt of the significance of the Tamarian. Nuclear tyrant Oppenheimer's psychotic ignorance (domino effect collapsing all matter) does not excuse him. Even so, and though I haven't cited the paper, I am led to believe the Australian Chris Illert has been able to prove Theosophical "opinions" on the structure of atoms reflecting information channelled via séance at the turn of last century by conventional means. Alleged extra-terrestrial visitors who resided in Spain in the 1950's have also presented a variation of the same basic outline. It is one I favour as it is the easiest to understand (unlike the unnecessarily convoluted clap trap that coordinates supposedly cutting edge mainstream theories that "shape" the endless "new discoveries" churned out of the Hadron Collider and other sensational "props"). Unworldly "Ummos" informed us that atoms have three "light phases" working in unison – the upper, lower and middle frequencies. Ancient Atlantis sages have been attributed as having the ability to manipulate these pulses with their minds only. They apparently did this well enough to alter signal properties. Their great alchemists could turn anything into gold with no need of mundane chemicals or flasks.
The Atlanteans knew that each atom is a miniscule piece of subspace real estate. In addition, according to their Tamarian philosophy, all atoms (the group) can be perceived as an expanding, but permanently interconnected mesh. I plan to expand on this illumination in the future and have already headlined a blank manuscript. "Does the Draconians' False (Light) Matrix Leverage off the Ancient Atlantis Tamarian?" that will likely find a place at my other website that focuses on the paranormal. Returning to ordinary matters, mainstream quantum mechanics generally (and erroneously) evaluates the symptomatic effects elevated by force fields aimed at "containing" each centrifugal nucleus. In this capacity aroms generate the pulse or "echo" of holographic solidity which (amongst others things) emphasises mass (or magnetism). Specifically tuned to our dimension, the mechanism logically has no influence on other density fields "out of frequency range". Were our pedestrian sciences to become acutely coherent on the subject (which is an unlikely prospect, given "industrial" materialism mandate), "frequency catalyser" models (functionality extra-terrestrial Zeta Grey Beings have been trying to raise awareness of via "crop circle" diagrams) might be best applied at the conceptualisation stages.
In fairness (and credit where credit's due) string and super string theory do have the potential to decode the atom, but not on current course. As Suzy Hanson identified (details are unspecific) in her book The Dual Soul Connection, [Zeta, though she doesn't specifically identify the fact] Grey Beings were able to (somehow and much to the bafflement of astrophysicist Rudy Schild) "switch off" an atom's energy field (which also explains how their partner "Mantis Beings" are able to travel through the eye of a particle, by reputation). Atomic frequency harnesses all dimensions and contains all time, so these little babies are important to those that understand them. I pose the question (although I don't formally supply answers) as to whether "time lords" could travel both ways once access to the ultimate dimension (Ummos called number ten) was available without restriction. Incidentally, I believe the Ummos were referring ten fundamental "states" of existence, which included the seven heavenly spheres. To confuse matters, these are routinely broken up into dimensions, densities and eras.
Switched on readers at this point (doubtlessly after some bafflement) might have encouraged sufficient resolve to pique a burning request of me. If "atoms" deliver souls, then does that mean inanimate objects, such as rocks [and stuff], have souls too? My goodness, my audience is on the ball today. That is an excellent and most perceptive question but I'm pleased to say the answer is "yes". However I need to also qualify that souls contained in "rocks and stuff" are clinically different (dissimilar frequency "keys") to life souls. Indeed, as a soul travels up the astral ladder partnering with spirituality, complimenting developmental quantities are laterally progressive. Readers with genius ambition would surely ask why [the need for all the subterfuge]? The answer to that is as plain as it is Earth shattering. In effect God "broke" after the initial creation of heavenly existence (long before material existence existed). Astral soul progress is part of the healing process, which, according to the Aryan Vedas, will take in the order of 311 trillion of our years to "complete" (when existence will revert to bliss?). Therefore, my apologies to charged crusaders, but you don't conquer Rome in a day.
The soul is simple and complex. As I mentioned before, the most uniform way of "representing" it is as darkness, but that won't mean too much to those that haven't come to terms with the powerful structure of darkness. Identical to light, darkness is a hierarchy and atoms account for the very lowest level. In fact there is even a black spectrum which mirrors light in reverse. If I take the human body as an example, we are made of particles which collectivise to build our cell structures. Cells join to form into organs and other components. Some of these amass to collaborate into value added networks, such as the nervous system. But in supreme control of the body is a very special "high level" attribute, known simply as "the mind". Correspondingly, we can argue our bodies are actually "pyramidal structures" below it.
Soul "categorisation" also identifies well with parts (and their roles) of the human body, but complexes are not matched. It is important to acknowledge the "soul" is not an individual but, rather, the collaboration of "many". Every soul motivated decision is the result of a reaction (to be deciphered as original thought) that is backed by a "chorus". Whether inanimate or animate, individual things that are the many parts that make up the material plane are all individually composed of huge numbers of atoms. There are no exceptions to that rule at the lowest level (and that is the reason material existence is very inflexible when benchmarked against the astral). Were all atoms to be given pivotal political decision making roles, "logical chaos" would reign. Once again, as is the case with components of the human body, individual atoms join to create "guilds". These, in turn, establish "networks", up and up until only a handful of respondents actually voice "the obvious" (utopian coordination of harmonic resonance). This small managerial posse (which mimics the indecisiveness of every stable mind) is the best approximation of something that might "fit" the distorted tradition (an anathema) humans identify as "soul". It is a construct, of course, because that is all it can be.
To continue with any authority, simplicity is no longer plausible in treatment of this subject matter. The dedicated and intellectually superior are advised to read on. Others may leave to make tea, feed the pig or entertain lighter but meaningful preoccupations. So, without further ado, continuation now becomes much more complex as there are other aspects to this conundrum that either identify with or are regularly "confused as" the soul. For instance, what are the differences between the conscious, subconscious (or unconscious) and the super conscious in respect to the above? Is the "soul" an integral part of each or does it branch in order to satisfy differing needs/perspectives of severed states or apportions? Classically, those devoutly religious magically reconstruct the higher self as a proto-soul. Moreover (emphasising the "ego" is profoundly misunderstood too) the higher self is most commonly transformed (a construct) into something that might equate to the (perceived as) best bits of the collective egotistic wisdom of popular "TV personalities" (or akin "role model" devices), so it isn't really the higher self at all. Thus, routine deduction suggests each proto-soul has to be a crafty caricature of the true higher self (which is not formally recognised as such) and this is a spectral aspect of the spirit. If the spirit is to be loosely classed as "graded astral compliance", then the ego (consciousness) would represent the collective lowers states. In toto, the subconscious coordinates mid-range value expressions and the super conscious is the closest approximation to "heaven on Earth" for a living, terrestrial body.
If only convergence was that simple. You see the ego is actually a figment which is comprised of flawless light body, "hard" physical body and various supplementary external components (superficially attached). Ego is a "bundle". It is a conscious spirited material (soul) cooperative. The ego is often misconstrued as arrogance. It is not arrogance per se, although obstinate behaviour would be very representative of selfish nature and self is the epitome of ego. Like the soul, the self is a multi-faceted product. No one thing is particularly reflected, but overall a noteworthy identity (classically termed as "the personality") presides over the directive life force (coordinating work towards common interests of the parts). Dramatic sustained personality changes (commonly after trauma) signify swaps of ego ownership. Souls are hierarchically stronger as they are aloof (even though a soul's lateral development directly corresponds with the ego's life course). It may only be a figment of time, but the ego is so highly regarded (by The Prime Source), after the power source (spirit) decides it is ready to detach from the body (the stage that is commonly known as "death") a complete record is preserved for prosperity. Each "record" lives on in void format. The Babylonians called these "shadows". Shadows are the limbo stages between incarnations. They notably factor when unforeseen circumstances lead to unprepared deaths.
The way a life is preserved directly corresponds with how "time" is structured and works (hence the importance of atomic particles). Linear perception only succumbs to the illusion of causal reality (note: this should not to be compared against erroneous "so-called" causality). Similar to the way a computer's hard drive functions, the script permitting time sits constantly in the present (which is actually past, present and future combined). Via plotted coordinates, the same script resource can be used (over and over) in an infinite number of [different] ways, satisfying an infinite number of platforms and an infinite number of causalities (timelines). In the case of newly created shadows, pre-set routes double as record of old lives and blueprint for new lives. Thus, each shadow attempts to identically re-enact old lives (albeit with the objective of fixing issues or "doing it better next time round"). Naturally external parameters are invariable so different or heavily adjusted, each "new life" would not even vaguely compare to ones prior. Figurative "déjà vu" is the commonest parallel lives memory symptom. Another effect which confirms a shadow's numerous incarnate "run throughs" is cumulative "instinct". Contrary to popular belief, Instinct does not come naturally. It is the evolutionary response of many consecutive lives imprinted on hierarchical DNA.
For new lives to have any hope of matching the prior course, all (or the majority of) original connections would have to be in place. To a degree this is so, but definition will not favour the ardent egotistical materialist. Accountants would say all the pieces were actually in the wrong places, mixed up and "functionally defunct" (compared with originals). Yet, the truth is all the parts were in the precise places they needed to be for the new life to function optimally, even when the user's survival duration was less than a minute. Existence accommodates limitless numbers of lives for innumerable purposes. Plausibly safe routes are present for those that choose to avail them. The quality of the stage we call death determines the speed of carnal transition. Peaceful deaths, such as "still birth", would usually promote back-to-back lives (or instant reincarnation, though transference does not necessarily observe traditional linear definition). Traumatic or unfulfilled ends will naturally prolong transition. Certain individuals respond so badly to circumstances it is impossible to recirculate them. I hope the war machine feels warm about its unconscionable tyranny. How anyone can kill an unknown for the sake of "following orders" defies belief. But militant disrespect is not the only transgressor on that front. The deceitful "health" industry "helps" people die well before their time.
There are many different brands of "prophecy" and "prediction" aimed at courting the consensus view. Auspices such as conspiracy theories go some way to deflecting criticisms of mainstream inappropriateness, but balances that construe scales of political conduct are expansive. Of course political criticisms are almost always correct, but with such range much disagreeable dirt finds a way into the mainstream too, even if only for (as Jon Rappoport puts it) limited hangout. I have been particularly focusing on monstrous paedophilia in relation to these phenomena. Paedophilia itself is not "necessarily" monstrous, but maybe it is, depending on critical circumstances. What is undeniably evil about the theatricals that surround publicised [legally defined as] underage sex incidents is they reflect an accusatory court system that judges without being just.
The reason late Michael Jackson summonsed over a thousand (mostly perjuring) witnesses to defend him is he proved he was able to overwhelm the prosecution's charge with counter accusations. To put things in perspective, a deceitful, lying Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) manipulated all mainstream Medias to conjure prejudice of the magnitude that they thought would be enough to "frame" their target, Michael Jackson. The net effect of this cooperative subterfuge appears to have been modelled on advice contained in Hitler's Mein Kampf. "He's guilty as sin no question about it, [give him the chair]" (as monotonous strangled exclaims) was repeated over and over like some tortured, hapless proverb. Jackson, fortunately in this instance, was as bright as he was recalcitrant. His familiar lyrical warble ever so gently persuaded "I am innocent because I'm pure", but people struggled to believe it as he was given so little air time and the mainstream had been running their "whacko Jacko" side campaign geared to presenting him as "a nutcase" all the while. Those that listened really carefully to Jackson couldn't have helped but picking up a hint of "you conceited, dishonest assholes" in the subliminal. We all know our government sponsored agencies are "beyond external criticism" so his fate was doubtlessly meant to be a "fait accompli".
My last article dealt with the dynamics of child abuse (sic), but did not explain how it was possible to manufacture perjury more or less universally. Newspapers so regularly jump the gun on judgemental statement, people have become obliviously desensitised to their deceitful practices. When hundreds and hundreds of unrelated headlines deliver the same basic corrupt message over and over (Hitler's Mein Kampf comes to the surface again), a cultivation of truth-of-sorts is brought into being. Deceitful corruption transforms into truth because no one challenges the singular original message (which is established through its repetition). This is partly because newspapers (all referring to near identical sources) create the illusion – the public voice. Thousands of newspapers can't "all" be wrong, surely? As there is invariably a solitary fire source for each aggressively billowing smoke stack, "thousands" of reports in different newspapers in reality boil down to one voice, one view, one replicated propaganda pitch. Whilst it may be possible to launch private paedophilia prosecutions, every case publicised by Medias thus far (to my knowledge) has demonstrated evidence of responses to claims of injustice by the public "guardian". Therefore, specific Media sources for all publicised paedophile arrests are provided by the Department of Public Prosecution or law enforcement agents acting on its behalf.
Under conditions of aggregated sanity, this obvious collusive brainwashing exercise would have been sprung before the ink had barely dried on the first tabloid release. Let us consider the ramifications of collective gutless social cowardice. How many law enforcers arrest paedophiles with view to prosecution on suspicion of innocence?
"Oh yes, we have to arrest a few innocents to prove "the [justice] system" is flawless"
I was being sarcastic here because the reverse is true of course and it is far worse than that when "justice" is factored into the equation. To the law enforcer a "paedophile" is only "alleged" prior to arrest. Once arrested, every suspect (sic) may as well plead guilty. The conspiracy here is newspapers only release the "view" [which I'm sure would equate to perjury in the "private sector", by the way] of arbitrarily biased prosecutors and that almost always guarantees a win at court. It is no wonder the core message (in press releases) might as well read, "Why waste time and money on this trial?" Aside from the time poor reluctantly underpaid (why aren't they allowed to claim lawyers or barristers' rates?) jurors debacle, this fashion definitely looks back to those memorable "kangaroo courts" of the nineteenth century. Perhaps the plan is to ultimately bring back torture and confessions signed in blood.
Headlines are everywhere and these are designed to precipitate judgemental values that permeate the public mind.
I [personally] don't know that guy but he's "obviously" guilty because my newspapers/TV tell me so.
Even close family members of an "accused" can be swayed into "believing" just as easily as the rest. He must have led a double life is the usual "excuse" granted. The scandal merchants have any and all melodramatic outcomes covered. Therefore when law enforcement, building "the case", wants to beef up "witness" (sic) numbers, they have actually even managed to convince an accused's own brother or sister to testify negatively with nothing more than accusatory hearsay providing "basis" for statements. Did Michael Jackson's sister actually witness the star engaging in sex acts with minors? Of course she didn't. She fell for all that mass Media bullshit after being egged on by the Department of Public Prosecution.
Where there's smoke there must be fire, eh?
Correct, the fire is your friendly, manipulatively lying, smarmy, self-opinionated law enforcement agency and its vile, uncompromisingly prejudicial public prosecution attack dog.
In Western nations, such as Australia, the Catholic Church is at the forefront of paedophilia allegations (remembering "allegation" is always mysteriously transformed into "certain guilt" of course). Records of incidents with forlorn priests are so voluminous; I am surprised Medias have managed to keep up with the pace. It may surprise Australians (in particular) all religions (well, except for a noteworthy Jewish "cult group" I shall focus on shortly) have been targeted, including Buddhism (to the Dalai Lama's embarrassment). The real reasons for this scandalous deception may seem bizarrely conspiratorial but, against the background I present, not entirely farfetched. Whatever current opinions reign, duty to justice dictates religious cultures need to be reviewed from dual perspectives in light of mass Media stoking before any final judgements are made. The balanced investigator cannot rule out the magnetic effect of propagandas which has been proven so effective, over and over.
Whereas there is almost always no actual "evidence" supporting paedophile allegations and convictions are usually motivated by circumstantial witness "testimony" ("confession" or slanderous perjury?), adults with a genuine interest in "child sex" might plausibly seek likeminded friends. Where to "find" likeminded friends is the greatest challenge for any would-be paedophile, I would imagine. Thinking carefully along these lines, I did come up with some basis that might (and only "might") give credence to devilish religious conspiracies of this genre. Though by conventional auspices serious contemplations would likely be too far adrift of cultural reason to disaffect "greater good" syndromes, public hysteria has shown itself to be both open to and humbled by extremely shallow arguments supporting the most unlikely of cabal concepts. For instance, if the researcher is willing to concede that rogue partnerships have been brokered with view to persuading mutual goals; with or without illicit connections, could these same like-minded associations be able to arrange prohibited liaisons?
Whether the "opinion" on the answer to that critical question is "yes" or "no", religious institutions are viscerally bound to apply a duty of care to their congregations as each supposedly "acts for God" (conceptual greater good). Therefore the reality is that the church and other houses of worship are proved profoundly derelict of duty if just one allegation against them "takes hold".
Under terms of worship, how is it possible for God "to err"?
The current state of affairs suggests administrative pressure for all religions is now in damage control aggravated by highly visible and seemed ceaseless spiteful propaganda barbs (that have prepared the floods of universally known past allegations of guilt). Therefore, would not the slightest rumour of paedophilia trigger internal raucous alarms within any spiritual organisation, even ones that are only borderline "religious"?
After hysterics dressed in the familiar mask of deceitful ignorance, known or faceless accusers, "guilty" accused and alleged victim(s) would come out of the woodwork, sometimes years after the fact (anything to ward off clarity), what would be bound to happen next?
Ultimately, any "bad" cleric would be sold up the river, of course.
Up to a certain point it would be in the best interest of the organisation under scrutiny to deal with everything internally in order to deflect negative publicity. However, when avalanches of complaints reach such frequencies as to become common public knowledge, reputation has already been long squandered. Under those special circumstances, "tarnished" institutions would have little to gain beyond doing everything in their power to suppress (which usually means eject without forethought) "bad eggs". Indeed, by acting quickly in highlighting detractors, cutting red tape to ensure the expelling of alleged paedophiles is painless; some kudos might be given by the public at large. Press releases reporting that "order is not being interfered with and internal elitism has permitted routine justice" might actually be viewed as positive "PR" by targeted organisations. Any institution that complies would, at the very least, be seen to be acting in the "public interest" which, per manifestos, is also "in the interest of God".
Let us say, for instance, there were rumours backing allegations, but nothing more. There were allegations without hard evidence. Could any religious institution in damage control ignore these and give an accused the "benefit of doubt"? It seems to me that in certain circumstances of shall we say "high security"; risk management significantly upgrades the chances of an accused's presumed "guilt" pre-trial. How can the "certainly guilty" prove his innocence? How could the trial of a cleric sensationally rejected by his church be unbiasedly "fair"? Also people do lie, deceive and manipulate for a multitude of reasons. Fabrication of law enforcement evidence and biased judges is a popular theme used in police movies – the innocent man up against a corrupt machine. But what of those false claims of truth that were "believed" as though they were true?
How can fantasy that never was be "proven"?
Circumstances that did happen will hopefully leave a conspicuous evidence trail, but those that did not happen are guaranteed to leave no evidence trail. While beliefs are committed to duplicitous reasoning, fantasy is easy to upgrade and immortalise for it can neither be formally proven nor disproven. That is significantly why circumstantial evidence (evidence lacking hearsay such as reflective opinions) is used to formulate "basis" for verdict decision making to allow the promotion of fantasy (or something that did not happen) as reality (something that did happen). All of the "witnesses" at Michael Jackson's "trial" offered circumstantial evidence (i.e. none offered hard evidence) whether acting for prosecution or defence.
I introduced "conspiracy theories" at the beginning of this article and now seems the right time to put that theme to the test. It has been noted (particularly in the alternative press) many times that where there are political conspiracies, the Jews are invariably never far away. Judaism, as with most other religions, is broken into (upwards of a hundred) different sects and this proffers the user base opportunities for considerable variance in doctrinal interpretations. Though invariably not "directly" concerning them, political conspiracies gravitate to favour Pharisee (a notable sect) involvement/implication when factoring in pre-emptive law making. Pharisaic tradition formats the script that makes all laws (certainly in "the West") "viable". These include horrendously unfair legislations that have been characterised to target religious practitioners of all persuasions in order to limit their involvement with (quite frankly) anything sexual (i.e. if the Pharisee adage "to lust after is to sin" is enough to permit unrequited draconian laws, presumably, as "God's emissaries", all fornicating priests are deemed to be "fair game" as potential targets).
Suffice to say, the Pharisees (and these guys are behind just about all those "prophesies" and "consensus" conventions "we" are obliged to follow) are subtly all over paedophilia. Paedophilia, of course, has a nasty habit of pissing off parents and making them "think" (sic) irrationally. It only needs a whiff of the word in family environments to fuse ugly breakouts of the poorest quality. Contemplate the power a "fringe religion" would hold over competitors if it could only harness inane populist ignorance. So following the track of general conspiracy theories and plausible revelations of outrageous duplicity in review of what mechanisms would be needed to be in place for effective infiltration of "enemies", I considered whether this could be equally applied to the Pharisees, whether circumstantial allegations "in principle" might demonstrate limited credence against them as covert tyrannical ring leaders. Unlike hypotheticals monstrously resurrected to become "living satires" by our kangaroo courts, I make no prejudgement here.
Would it be possible, within the frame of this conceptualisation, for a Pharisee to pretend to be a Roman Catholic and win a diocese seat? Reviewing this consideration for a long while, I drew the unenviable conclusion, that it was not only possible but likely probable. Benjamin Disraeli affirmed that Jews deliberately married into aristocratic and royal families for "social position". If a Pharisee can infiltrate a marriage, he can infiltrate a religion. In historic periods of persecution, high profile Jews have been recorded as having publically denounced their faith in favour of Roman Catholicism. Until Jesuit Martin Luther pinned his list of demands on the door of a chapel in Wittenberg, Germany in 1517, Catholicism's "promissory penances" were very appealing to time poor Jewish merchants. Since the Nicolaitans' (Pharisees) corruption sculpted what was to become new Gnosticism back in the fourth century, there has been bitter-sweet cooperation between the two faiths.
So, let us take the position that the Pharisees have infiltrated all religions, perhaps as part of their messianic "prison planet" (covert Zionism) strategy, what would they do once "in place"? Logic dictates they would try and influence how doctrines would be interpreted in order to found absolute bias towards their philosophies. How could this be executed? The answer is simple. Should various Pharisees be bestowed with clerical administrative roles devoted to scrutinising and assessing the philosophic worth of historic documents, then this would permit periodic "pushes" (perhaps aided by heavy bribes) gauged towards altering consensuses against traditional views and standards. Texts too outspoken for alteration that obstructed the "mission" might be deemed and argued as "spurious" (and thusly debatably unauthentic).
But what of outspoken individuals that won't budge on "issues" that hinder the Pharisees' operational synopsis?
How to dispel all those flies in the ointment with something that is guaranteed to work without "comeback"? It is worth noting here, in line with this "hypothetical", logically all those religions the Pharisees have infiltrated are not friends collected in the spirit of fomenting mutual endeavours. They have all been deceived, defiled and, per identical reasoning, exist only to be tarnished (thou shalt not worship "false Gods"), as too (in some ways) are "rogue" (impure) sects of Judaism. For guarantees of no "comeback" against targeting mission obstructers there could never be any actual evidence. Everything would have to be fabricated (total bullshit) to assure opinions for were completely reliant on biased emotive circumstantial judgement. Perhaps "qualified" psychiatrists could validate repressed (i.e. non-existent) memories with the same sort of candor [used] when issuing prescriptive "medications" that induce psychosis. It would need false scandal after false scandal that instinctively "tweaked nerves"; some topic the public would be belligerent and stupid enough to believe in without reservation, something that might induce hysteria, if "generally" known. And there we have the hypothetical fire behind all the paedophilia scandals that afflict religious institutions across the globe, except I find no evidence of any arrests or convictions against Pharisees in relation to charges of religious paedophilia. Constructive feedback (with sources, please) on this is most welcome in comments.
For my hypothetical "master plan" to become reality, something else would need to happen for the operation to ooze credibility. Those with enough influence would have to arrange the "unthinkable". Per normal administrative configurations (free of Pharisee infiltration), curates and vicars are "appointed" by religious institutions "in good faith". This means someone or a committee of individuals must take responsibility for hiring (and firing). Therefore, musing over the fall of Jericho whilst outlining this reconstruction, all the Pharisees would need to do is to rig the recruitment process to ensure their (Passover style) chosen ones were in correct positions (so to speak) to permit operational success. It could also mean all sorts of nasties might be given responsible community roles, if that was the "ISIS style" objective. Imagine if the Pharisees had contacts in the prison system. Crime networks are other resource pools for undesirables. Would it be possible to not only hire strategic paedophile priests, but also throw in some extra shekels and promise of "protection" should any of the kids "blab"? At the correct juncture these priests would need to be sacrificed of course, but only long after the reasonable attitudes of congregations had been turned sourly toxic. The sourness would be for good reason. Traditionally, the most trusted member of any community was your priest. Were certain priests to turn into bare faced tyrants, God and faith are forlornly dishonoured.
Now it is important to cover the other side of the equation, the one most violets shrink from. The presumption that [per designation] "children" are not sexual, have no sexual needs and can be only corrupted (by "adults") towards defilation is sheer bunk. When the law of the land stated that sexual consent between adults from age sixteen and above was natural and healthy, there was no rebellion against the "heinous" doctrine. In years gone by when the age of consent was considerably lower, maidens of all persuasions at age twelve saw great value in seeking to enter into matrimonial sexual alliances. One can only presume that prior to the implementation of legal frameworks, the only age barriers that inhibited sexual unions were the results of "family measures". I would be willing to bet all the tea in China that if our current narcissistic consent legislations were repealed tomorrow, the "young" would "miraculously" find their sexuality again.
Masturbation is the best evidence for sexual drive and this unfortunately (to the monumental displeasure of sexual puritans) kicks in at very young ages. A phenomenon near exclusively confined to girls is the sexual "phase" I call "open" or "public" masturbation. Upwards of age six, females (in particular) demonstrate a desire to socially connect sexually. Conversely, ironically, young men prefer private masturbation (even when in groups). The Pharisees' zeal knows no bounds. I have introduced the Puritan offshoot called Baptism before. According to Baptists, masturbation is a sin. Ambiguous in Catholicism, the heavy weight towards sexual procreation might encourage extremist views that also target and punish "self-sex". Biased, fanatical opinions have been behind the attack on all forms of sexual expression in various Media formats. Obsessive hatred is so great towards the genre typically labelled "child pornography" anything bordering on lewd conduct has been framed and outlawed. People were not ever given the "choice". There was no responsible debate and legislations have been reflectively austere.
Medias depicting children (as termed) masturbating are outlawed too. In fact, naked children in deemed to be "sexual poses" may also be "classified" as pornographic. Now, I can't understand the logic underpinning the legislation of this genre. For a pose to be "sexual" it must legitimately arouse the viewer. Is the great body of Pharisaic elders exempt from judgement against their prohibited arousal? All jurors must scrutinise material evidence to form opinions, guided by legal professionals, of course. Child pornographic slides (when no sexual act can be identified) must cause sexual arousal to meet classification leaving only one question. Are "infected" prosecutors and jurors that have been aroused by child pornography safe to circulate socially and exempt from prosecution as "clinical" paedophiles? Pharisaic elders that appraise content to be sexual must surely also take some responsibility for judgement here. Though they were not directly exposed to sexual materials, and unless their laws are fraudulent, if they had been exposed they presumably could be aroused. This implies that they are classifiable as "clinical" paedophiles as well.
I gave the example of the body being a pyramidal structure below the mind earlier. Well, according to materialists this is not so (confirming why fanatical materialism is the utopian science-standard and Pharisees' choice). The mind (per that insistence) is only a function of the "fully grown" body. Prior to reaching proscribed maturity, per this gobbledegook, bodies either have no or "swayable" (developing) thinking minds (except when this obstructs "the agenda" – Jon Rappoport again). Conveniently, maturity kicks in precisely when law making moguls dictate measures. Therefore, if they were to say "maturity begins at age fifty", then forty nine year olds would be "deemed" unable to make "informed decisions". That means, of course, that victims of paedophilia are not only unable to legally consent to sex, they also cannot make any formal sexual decisions. How many articles promoting sentiment of "caring" paedophiles and their willing victims have been given primetime visibility by the mainstream (or alternative)? According to my research it has been a very long time since any visibility has been offered. Propaganda networks are only interesting in furthering their own agendas to the detriment of anyone that stands in their way.
Was Michael Jackson's prosecution that never happened as described? In the way proceedings were "framed", his alleged gift of $25 million to the guardian of a twelve year old boy was enough to underscore "guilt of sexual misconduct" for the gossip vultures, but was their conviction just? This goes far farther than merely highlighting the potential for blackmail. It demonstrates the potential gulf between effective truth, secular opinions on historic events and how "worldly" promotional materials cultivate accountability (or not). For instance, were we to presume that Michael Jackson truly did engage in sexual acts with the young "poster" boy in the spotlight, the only decent question that deserves righteous scrutiny is, "did the child consent or was he violated?"
"The consensual child", the Pharisees quip, "how is that possible?"
In my last article, I referenced examples of various child prodigies as evidence towards my attempt to demonstrate how much diverse talent can be found every human pursuit. This in consideration, why would there not be sexual prodigies too? The preposterous superstition that posits all designate children as asexual could be easily undone with genuine committed research. Common amongst seventeenth and eighteenth century seafaring accounts are tales of sordid sexual escapades where age seems to offer no barrier. One notable volume details mariners' activities while visiting Polynesian Islands. Texts report that women (regularly accompanied by siblings upwards of age eight years old) would swim to visiting ships offering those on board welcome and sex. According to the same reports, the young women sexually matched their seniors in every respect. If one was to presume current age of consent laws are "divine", would not this espouse that the majority of pre-Victorian era householders were systemic abusers? Prior to British William Gladstone's 1870's legislations, the age of consent was twelve years (complimenting the Roman philosophy on sexual maturity) and this ensured the majority of thirteen to fifteen years old women (per that classification) would marry to begin the arduous task of producing family heirs. At the time, childbirth was seen as a risky pursuit for women by their twenties so young plebeian marriages were encouraged.
Was the Victorian era we have as a legacy never to have happened (erasing William Gladstone's sensationally degrading age legislation); Roman standards would likely be in place today (presuming no other vile avenues had disrupted the status quo). Though standards do not precisely match natural sexual reproductive maturity, the Roman opinion is far closer to it than the "eighteen rule" that oppresses current Western populations. Therefore one wonders if, just as homosexuals were vilified by rainbow movements that turned prior legal morality on its head, whether marginalised adult "minors" will seek aggravated revenge against the "system" at some time in the future. Could the young sue a system that stole their divine sovereign right to be sexual and reproduce? Awkward questions are always the best questions for they prophesise the path to sacred truth.
Continuing along this line of thinking regards repressed adult minors; correct contemplations will surely determine the problem is much greater than on "face value". Taking the bull by the horns as it were, how would today's determined-to-be sexual young find partners amongst indoctrinated "legal" adults? Would not the young that are in need of sex ultimately have to seek out paedophiles for their satisfaction? Were that uncomfortable symbiosis to be true, then clearly reason has been traded for vanity. It would make sense, because all "moralities" are forms of vanity. In light of this, when prophecy and associated predictions do little more than feed propagandists directives refined to permit universalisation of consensus view in their image, false Gods will reign over mankind. That is why below our modern day false Gods, spirits are invalids and souls may as well prostrate as lambs willing for sacrifice.
Preconditioning through the synthesis of deceiving divine values afflicts the social organ called "humanity" in its entirety. Every human being is infected and diseased in some way. Material symptoms most noticeably grant credentialed influencers (hawks and vultures by reasoned determination) the use of "devices" as lures for parasites (willing lambs for slaughter). Terms of standards that prevail are so arbitrary they cease to be relevant. The mantra of those that control is simple and effective "if we desire it, it is possible and therefore it will be". Conquering natural sexuality has been their great prize; because once sex ownership is secured (perverted) life potence becomes suppressed to surrender point (i.e. master/slave catalyst). Surrender has meant that individuals "without visceral power" presumably have less prestige than programmable robots. I estimate fewer than ten per cent of "able bodied" society is actually needed for corporate commerce purposes. Indeed, with open minded unbridled investment into technologies, that estimation of labour requirement could be significantly reduced.
What we have is a situation whereby mainstream Medias have been able procrastinate well enough and consistently enough for "the masses" to believe there is an indefinite and constant labour shortage "somewhere", "anywhere". Enterprisingly, governments (for their part in this tryst) exist to concoct pointless ways of occupying the time of their enslaved chattel, perhaps to ward off popular rebellion, but mostly to show they are in control. Fiscal competition was never healthy or necessary if honest, socially serving government is to be given a chance at leadership. The universal Westminster System would not tolerate the notion. And it is a shame because it would make the world a better place for everyone, elites included. How about starting by investigating the potentially magical qualities of communal man? How about, instead of obsessively shutting out "unsanitary" potential, all doors to new avenues and abilities were opened wide with hendonistic gusto?
For obvious reasons (such as the attack on life potence), I have been focusing on sexuality. Gratuitous sex it could be argued is an art form, but it is not the only one. There are many other art forms (including war, when conveyance is correctly dedicated), far too numerous to list. Given the oversupply of labour for worthy industrial projects, why not test wider society's devotion to craft? It seems to me the majority would be best put to use towards the overall entertainment of others, whether that is for "the few" or "multitudes". Those that are able to craft would simply need to find natural vehicles for ambitions. Securing the correct preoccupation should be the role of any external social management mechanism (such as government). Instead, forcing "square pegs in round holes" "careers" on hapless conscripts has been proven to be neither constructive nor aptly overwhelmingly productive. How many wasted lives have supported the accountancy profession?
Perhaps I am being harsh on accountants here, but their negative outlook presupposes a limitless money supply would promote a guaranteed epidemic of laziness. Yet there is no reason hindering constant resources promoting limitless floods of cultural excellence. We can see evidence of the spontaneously effective outcomes of abundance in nature. There is also a deeper, natural reason why governments and their puppet masters would be wise not to continue their nihilist course devoted mostly to squandering abject lives for their "power highs". Every human body (let us not forget) will double as uncontrolled (innocent) spirit and evolved (but not always wise) soul for the duration of the life term. For any cosmic improvement to manifest there must be sufficient recapitulation between old and new lives for trends to "bite". When societal rules become too austere, past identities also risk becoming obsolete. Under those terms the existence model is rendered "futile" and this precedes grave danger. Should trends persist, the great "almighty" God is left with one humble option. It happened before and the event left an indelible mark last time round. Scientists label it "Big Bang" (there may have been numbers of these cosmic purges since existence began).
In so many ways my life serves as the testament to how "they" destroy prodigy. At age three or four, I was determined to become a concert pianist. My parents weren't rich and were not prepared to spend money on a "useless" piano. My mother wanted me to become an accountant or a scientist, something "career worthy", something "professional". She did eventually succumb to my whining. At age nine I was given a piano by a boogie-woogie pianist who was a family friend. The problem was many of the notes did not function, including middle C, the F below, Bb above and much of the upper and lower registry also didn't work. Accompanying lessons followed but how could I "fire" under those conditions? With poor note recall memory and imperfect pitch, I was never destined to be another Martha Argerich, Vladimir Horowitz or even Liberace (all Pleiadians, ironically?). But I did have something to give. I did have something in me that needed to be fulfilled and if the "system" was honest and sane, it would have engaged my fulfilment. Instead only my determination and dedicated belligerence "against all odds" ensured I found my way (Yes I am performing Beethoven's Appassionata here) as a professional sounding amateur.
In summary, materialists use manmade terms to describe objects they don't truly understand. They cast perspectives in what they generally suppose is "the human way" (when not in "conspiracy mode"). Science "proves" acknowledgement of symptoms and the use of system satisfying devices has replaced the void once occupied by prophets that uttered proverbial predictions. Either courted and contained consensus view in order to control and direct populism. Their ultimate goal is what's more or less in place today: preconditioned, spiritless bodies in denial of birth right and unaware of soul purpose. The only "way out" is for mankind to learn to commune. Only then can humanity become "one race" (as it were) with divine intention to live the expressive power of corporeal God (Tamarian).
Posted on February 25, 2018 by ozziethinker	in Anunaki, Dragons and Draco, Profile of the Gnostic Jesus, Rage against the machine, The science of existence	• Tagged accusatory, Adam, aeons, age of consent, aids, Albert Einstein, alchemists, alien, alternative press, anarchist, angelic, anomalies, antipathy, Appassionata, arrogance, Aryan, astral purity, astrophysicist, atheism, Atlanteans, Atlantis, atomic pulse, atoms, Attitude, authenticity, Babylonians, Baptist, barebones, Beelzebub, Beethoven, Benjamin Disraeli, biblical times, Big Bang, bipartisan, black holes, black spectrum, blackmail, blasphemy, Blessed, Blessed Star, blind faith, bliss, buddhist, bullshit, cabal, Catholic Church, causality, censor, centrifugal nucleus, channelled, chaos, chapel, charlatans, Charles Hall, chassis, chattel, child abuse, child pornography, child prodigies, child sex, Chris Illert, Christ's Consciousness, Christians, circumstantial witness, Commandments, commerce, commune, con, concert pianist, confessions, conscious, consensus view, conspiracy theories, contradictions, corrupt machine, cosmic, court system, creative, Crime networks, Crop Circle, cult group, cultures, curates, customs, dalai lama, damnation, dark matter, dark side, darkness, Day of Judgement, debates, defilation, deistic virus, demystification, Department of Public Prosecution, destroy, devotion, dichotomy, dimension, diocese, diseased, divine, DNA, dogmatism, double life, Draco, Draconians, duplicitous, duplicity, ego, energy portals, enlightenment, enslaved, error, esoteric societies, establishment, evil, evolutionary change, extra-terrestrial, fabrication, fall of Jericho, false Gods, false matrix, family measures, fanatics, fantasy, FBI, Federal Bureau of Investigation, figment, flawless, for dummies, force fields, fornicating, fraudulent messiah, freedom, gnarled, Gnostics, good, governments, great lie, Grey Beings, gross distortion, guilty, Hades, Hadron Collider, Hag Hammadi scrolls, hard evidence, headlines, heaven, heavenly states, heck, hell, hierarchical DNA, highbrow, higher self, Hitler, holographic, Holy Spirit, homosexuals, hypotheticals, ignorance, immaterial, imperfect, impunity, incarnate, Indoctrination, industrial waste, industrialists, infected, inherent truths, innocent, instinct, intellectual lepers, intelligence, irony, ISIS, Israel's champion, Japanese Americans, jesuit, Jewish, Jews, John's Apochryphon, Jon Rappoport, judgemental statement, judges, justice system, kangaroo courts, Krishna, law enforcement agents, lewd conduct, Liberace, licensed murderers, light, limbo, limited hangout, logic, logos, look after number one, magnetic field, mainstream medias, make-believe, manmade terms, Mantids, Mantis Beings, Martha Argerich, martin luther, materialists, Mein Kampf, messiah, messianic, Michael Jackson, militant, miracle, misconceptions, missing fields, monstrous, Moses, mysterious ways, myths, nether regions, Nicolaitans, obtuse reasoning, official decorum, Oppenheimer, paedophilia, paradox, paralyse, paranormal, Passover, perception, perjuring, Pharisaic, Pharisees, philosophical, photon theory, pioneer movements, pleiadians, political arena, Pope, population reduction, Preconditioning, Predictions, prejudgement, prescriptive medications, priests, Prime Source, prison system, procrastination, programmable robots, prohibition, propagandas, Prophesies, prophet, proverb, psychiatrists, psychosis, public mind, puppet masters, purgatory, puritans, pyramidal structures, quantum mechanics, rainbow movements, reality, redundancy, Reimart Ravenholt, reincarnation, religious, revisionist, Rudy Schild, sacrificed, sage, sarcasm, Satan, Satanism, Saviour, séance, scandal merchants, sceptical, Second World War, secret, sects, Sephardic, Sephardim, shadows, sincere, soldiers, Sophia, spirit, spirited souls, spurious, squandering, Stephen Hawking, sterilise, subconscious, subspace, succumbing, summonsed, super conscious, superficial, superfluous, superstition, Suzy Hanson, syndrome, Tamarian, testimony, The Beauty of Existence Decoded, The Dual Soul Connection, the public voice, theatricals, Theosophical, Thule Movement, time lords, torture, Traditionalism, transcendental purpose, trickery, truth, truth-of-sorts, Ummos, unconscious, underage, unprovable, unregulated, US Agency for International Development, usurpers, vanquishes, Vedas, vicars, Vladimir Horowitz, war, Westminster System, whacko Jacko, whaco Jacko, wilful slave, William Gladstone, wisdom, witnesses, Wittenberg, worshippers, Yaldebroath, Yin Yang, zealous, Zetas, Zionism • 8 Comments
Labels, Statistics and Overrated Opinions
I am regularly amazed by how statistics seem to contradict probabilities. And never more so than at Ozzie Thinker's desk where (last time I checked) backend demographics showed all-time highs. The sudden surge in anonymous interest diametrically contradicts output. Ever since I stopped posting, the figures have shot steadily up. Is prosperity trying to tell me something? Or perhaps there's a malignant hubris artificially generating results (a grand conspiracy if you will) and figures are destined to plummet at the click of some insane bureaucrat's fingers. If they (the marketeers behind) Mrs Clinton could generate over a million tweets from outraged pretend supporters, then a mere twenty bozos a day devoted to my cause is child's play. In case her beloved "supporters" feel I am being harsh, when the next Great White Hope comes into focus, Mrs C will fade into oblivion as fast as the night is extinguished by daylight. On the other hand, perhaps I am magnificently witnessing sea change here; the beginnings of a cultural revolution of the woken.
The reason posting has seen regular monthly articles wane to quarterly bulletins, if you're lucky, is my time has been devoted to survival. In ancient times men were forced to hunt for a living, or so we are prepared to believe by creators of myths. Today we have predatory salesmen and their organs of support. In fact modern statisticians divide business developers into hunters and farmers, exactly as the bread winners must have been divided in ancient times. How does the expression go, "when in Rome", or "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em"? So, having no intention of being an organ of support (slave), my options have been reduced to sell or perish.
Given the enormous amount of work contributed to this blog and other writing projects, preference beckoned towards a synchronistic alignment with alternative commerce. However, given the army of naysayers and "anti-profit" armchair critics, any alternative commerce venture travels perilous waters. Years ago, if you expected something for nothing, you would be labelled a freeloader. Now misanthropic scourges have stolen the limelight and insist, in their unscrupulous interpretation of sovereignty, everything that isn't free, all goods and services, isn't good. Far from being against money, they just about all use whatever they can muster to keep stocked with the latest overpriced corporate branded products. The love of money, hatred of honest profits paradox is further exacerbated by what seems like droves of designer New Age socialites unilaterally imploring no sincere spiritualist would ever dare "charge" for anything. As people, generally speaking, are excessively greedy and narcissistically self-serving, overall the message resonates like one of "God's" Commandments. So that, in summary, is why my output has been reduced to the sorry trickle of material witnessed presently.
In a sense I have already done justice to the title, "Labels, Statistics and Overrated Opinions" in these opening paragraphs, but I want to focus on more serious matters; matters of the world. Wallowing in self-pity never fixed anything, so I battle on, perennially hopeful of changed mindsets and systemic collapse. In fact, to be honest, hope has already glimmered favourably in my direction. A few years ago I scripted a fairly substantial outline for several weighty volumes generally of a fluffy paranormal quality or, dare I say, real Sci-fi. After eagerly market testing one part (which was envisaged as an introduction), I discovered to my cost book production invariably only rewards printers at the writers' expense. That said, the offer still stands to any altruistic billionaires with extremely deep pockets willing to fund a guaranteed loss. The learning curve gleaned from the market test dictates that only with sufficient guaranteed funds would anyone of right mind engage in any commercial literary projects. Being of right mind, I will not reignite the book series work without backing. By the way, details on how to purchase (that's right, "buy") a copy of "The Beauty of Existence Decoded", my short "one of a kind" codex, can be found here. On a more positive note, though the book has sold in pitiful numbers, it has opened doors to other things and avenues of hope.
I mentioned the paranormal and I think it would be fair to say, in a sense, I didn't actually write the book. Some future wizened analyst might validly argue I acted as some sort of divine scribe, but I prefer to be modest as (explained here) "The Beauty of Existence Decoded" contains [numerous] errors (one of the down sides of using a human information portal – we contaminate purity!). Anyway, upon advice I received from someone that read the book, my path took me somewhere else. Though what I now do as a consequence is not overtly commercial, it may grow into the "alternative income source" I had originally sought at some juncture. Tutored by powers not of this Earth, I can reveal I conduct occasional but regular "light DNA" reading consultations via Skype. Prior to undertaking this commitment, instructions from my immaculate backers were contrite and three point. In summary, those with open minds devoid of preconceptions and worthy enough to sacrifice $100 an hour may see value in reading the report of a prior session I have tabled at my Exo-politician website. The circular also provides intimate contact details for anyone inspired suitably to make the monumental choice in reaching out.
A second article presenting follow up information which recounted numbers of select examples taken from different light DNA "readings" had a burning ulterior motive. It was important to once and for all identify the power-brokers fuelling those naïve New Age freeloaders' ideas transformed into illogical hatred of alternative commerce. Surely it does not take a big stretch of the imagination to calculate correct management of labels, statistics and opinions could "overrate" or "underrate" anything in zone? Today's science stakes its reputation on credentialed compelling theories whether they are correctly truthful or otherwise. I made the point before that the Hadron Collider (the great theory generator) had whipped up two hundred (one presumes different) essays justifying the "discovery" of a (so-called) Higgs-bosino within days of the news release. Lack of vision personifies "legitimacy".
The power of the label has crafted societal insanity. This comes in many shapes and forms, all unrecognisable to those caught up in the intrigue. Suffice to say, divides between adults and children have become so austere that none (other than the occasional free thinker) dare question the authority of beliefs that complement the evolving status quo, but particularly if the oxymoron "paedophilia" (to be on the same wavelength as children) is in frame. Occasional bright sparks see and know it is a big phoney. Growth development stages are strictly personal and not by any means "as outlined" by authorities, but that hasn't dinted universal tyranny. Past standards (not even vaguely representative of current trending opinions) do not hold any sway today and, in the future, I fear the gap between nature and synthetic accountability (suiting "the powers") will widen inexorably.
The most vicious corruption of truth is found in routine abuses of the label "abuse". It seems that it is possible to pull off just about any statistical feat empowering the greater good when it is necessary to conjure "sin". Therefore, abuse rates among magic words of the likes of "hocus-pocus", "abracadabra" and open "sesame". These release the door to any Aladdin's cave. Science, of course, is very much an accessory to the fact. Today professional agencies specialise in up-branding old pseudo-sciences (though almost invariably these are the concepts that should have been shamelessly discarded at the graveyard of lessons learned). As the great journalist Jon Rappoport regularly cynically points out, all (and without exception) three hundred or more symptoms of abnormal behaviour scripted by the American Psychiatric Association (a science body) could equally be classed as symptoms of normal behaviour. It should be no wonder that psychiatry's track record in its inappropriate (bordering on psychopathic) administration of toxins (promoted as) "drug cures" is atrocious.
I could go further and say the whole "medical industry" peddles a litany of poisonous vaccines under the remedial label of good health. Anyone vaguely swayed by arguments against vaccines (which notably began in the 1860's) that regards the poison address a bit harsh need only inspect the ingredients list of (vaccine) preservative Thimerosal. Eli-Lily's product (successfully withdrawn from sale under numerous other guises) contains seriously noxious components, including rat poison or formaldehyde (one of a long list of nasty ingredients). This should make the average person's blood boil, but the power of causal overrated opinion following establishment statisticians' propaganda is so strong it defies reasoned logic.
Jon Rappoport is no average person and he has tirelessly pursued his mostly one man campaign against bad medicines for decades. In that capacity, he was one of the first to publically identify the AIDS' scam. We don't necessarily parry on ultimate conclusions, but few others that have earned my respect of them to his level. In fact our differences of opinion make my support of him all the more valid….in my opinion. For instance, he rather fanatically (considering his enormous human status) backs Trump, the current President of the United States of America. I make no secret of the issue that I dislike President Trump. I disliked him before the presidency and he hasn't fared any better since taking the top job (although, after Bush Junior, can it still be called the top job?). Trump, I did feel, was an immense improvement on the Hillary Rodham Clinton selection and, in that context; I pronounced he was the "only" choice for America while election battles raged.
Let's face it, he puts shallow puddles to shame and is a cross between Dean Martin or Frank Sinatra and a holiday camp cheerleader on a good day. His bad days reveal a dull, misogynist, uncouth version of vintage Clinton-esque. Were the Clintons to hire the most universally skilled hacker to fix computer software problems, Trump would employ a lump hammer instead. He is a man renowned for making farcical statements matched only in their banal profoundness by his lack of intellectual finesse. As one commenter exclaimed against a Rappoport Trump promoter (words to the effect), "Civilised [leaders] have totally devolved to ape status; when will they start throwing their own faeces?"
Perhaps the next part of this essay might be better placed on my other blog as it features what, on face value, can only be described as an extra-terrestrial entity. The subject in question, a being of status unknown, appears to satisfy the popular descriptive vagaries of "alien" life form but does speak English (plausibly), so, as this is a non-discriminatory website, my editor has let it pass this time. For all we know the person in question might sadly suffer catastrophic deformities or simply is a very strange looking human. Humans, we will learn, are between a rock and a hard place, as eloquently explained by this (presumably) captured person/entity/alien (call it what you will). It opens dialogue with its own very relevant but startling origins "confession" that amounts to a past heralding back to a distant future on planet Earth. Though I have not specifically analysed for "splices", the selected clip consists of a few minutes of "promo" footage taken (carelessly leaked) from roughly nine hours (over several sessions) of recorded interviews. My critique of the movie might appear unfairly negative stacked against the staggeringly important nature of the information presented, which is mostly, I must say, unadulterated bona fide cosmic truth.
As I was collecting my thoughts for the article, I did have the silly idea of attempting to encourage visitor interaction via comments supporting progressive feedback; you know – you, the people speaking. If my role as educator is having any affect at all, people must eventually think for themselves. Given the uniquely cosmic perspective of the present subject matter, many might be entirely susceptible to numerous "slants" in the short presentation. Originally, I had envisaged leaving the detective work to my audience. How did one heckler put it me before? Reporters report. Yet, if I was to simply report what I saw (and you see), I would mislead for the entity lied – deliberately. In addition, given my special light DNA reading ability, I can tell [you all] what it is "made of". This is important if any calculated reasoning is to be applied to textual analysis in context. For instance we (in truth) don't know what happens in the future so any future man's information might be entirely authentic or…..utter bull crap.
In the spirit of labels and statistics, we only need to refer to anthropological work of the Genome Project to learn that over eighty thousand years human being has changed ("evolved") between zero and two per cent, but there are billions of very similar different types of "us" if we inspect the detail. Based on that criterion, it would be correct to say the videoed entity "as seen" could not hide in a crowd, even if passed off as a deformed man, under normal circumstances. Beyond its humanoid structure and misshapen human apparent head, it is not human. Nevertheless, thankfully there are a number of tell-tale clues aiding apt identification for willing snoops. For instance (ignoring the perplexing question "how the hell did it get here?") there is some ambiguity as to how far forward in the future the creature (de facto man) returns from. It talks about "nuclear war" next century (i.e. this century, as the interview was filmed last century) "ending humanity", but it was one of few survivors. That's the first contradiction. Humanity is wiped out, but the entity (claiming it is human) is one of a small number that survive. Applying blinkered vision to the alleged "scope" of our nuclear technologies as sufficient for engineering a cataclysmic holocaust of Armageddon proportions (now that would be a God Almighty paradox), are we to assume the visitor is radiation deformed or recalibrated "human" of the 2,200AD era?
Stoking the mission of labels, statistics and overrated opinions, there is lots of data we can use to substantiate a formal case as to modern man's nuclear prowess (or lack of). For instance, the "powers" have learned their vile and reflectively pointless 1945 attack on the Nagasaki Islands prefecture did not make a dent in humanity's population expansion course. The 4,700KG nuclear bomb only killed thousands and census statistics bounced back within decades in spite of the radioactive fallout. Diphtheria killed millions, so (in absence of suitable industrial viruses) toxic vaccinations are a second best population reduction strategy and proven far more effective than war. Data gathered from the years long, round the clock bombing of Iraq and then from the subsequent 2004 invasion and ongoing war demonstrate that nuclear waste makes an excellent non-discriminatory conductor for corporeal cancers. It also causes horrible birth defects (tragically interfering with the chromosomes) which are polarised against the spread of wider populations. However, as evidenced in Chernobyl (and, even, to some degree Fukushima), "nature" is seen to repair nuclear contamination at light speed. Considering the intolerably high proportion of modern conventional weapons that are "nuclearized", I find no evidence that "fall out" or violent attack will have any significant lasting effect on global population statistics.
Weighing up doomsday scenarios, the evidence faithfully proffers that man is no threat to the globe nor ever will be, on current course, but the end-of-worlds "scenario" is a good fear mongering device for aggravating conceited, albeit superstitious, opinions. Nature simply fixes the damage too quickly for malignant human enterprises to capitalise. Therefore, if we are wiped out (or close to it), "nuclear" (as is known today) is not the catalyst. The entity could have substituted the word nuclear for something else that is presently "unknown" (perhaps we have no word for what it was describing and that is the closest approximation), but the impartial audience must judge the use of terminology, at best, misleading (certainly weighed against the entity's claims that it knew what we "don't know").
Information tendered by the "future man" is by no means unique. There are other inconspicuous superficial evidences to be found from various "unworldly" sources that either partially or fully deny doomsday scenarios. One such source is hidden in Suzy Hansen's book, "The Dual Soul Connection". Her unidentified "Grey Being" abductors do confirm there is some type of future (and not-to-distant) holocaust, or, rather, they have provisioned for one and Suzy (who is easily pushing sixty years old) has been trained as a cosmic nurse when disaster strikes. I cannot fathom how she would be effective in that capacity in her seventies, eighties and beyond. Even so, it must be said the big threat looming to potentially kill off everyone (other than the very strongest genes) is ever increasing (petro) carbon in our atmosphere).
Logically, to me, air supply contamination would be the simplest (with knowhow) and quickest way to eradicate humanity. It is our air supply that generates all cancers; through consequence of infected DNA from fossil fuels pollution (and not the stupid "chemtrails" decoy) collected in the heavens. There are numerous natural methods to alleviate or remove symptoms. These include, naming a few: cannabis oil, graviola (from the Soursop plant), ginger extract and thyme oil. Chemo, unsurprisingly, presents as much data promoting growth of tumours as their reduction. But this should be no great shock as it is the establishment's "unerring" preferred "solution" (sic). "Coming Clean on Cancer" is a planned future writing project I have part scripted that explores the intricacies.
I find it rather poetic that the greatest threat to humanity is not the "powers" (as is always popularised) but, rather, humanity itself. All we needed to do is become aware and not capitulate with their schemes. Instead we all, to some degree, defiantly travel the path of ignorance. The Cosmic Christ, Immortal Mohammed, Sacred Prophets are each fluid concepts engineered by the same basic pack of scoundrels behind objective global control measures. Consequentially, I really warmed to the entity's summarisation of the "state" of mankind, duly noting many tinges sarcasm intermingled with hyperbolic distortions of truth. It blamed religion and politics as the root of unavoidable chaos. Unlike the sensationally lacklustre rubber doll interviewed by the "CIA", at least "future man" was real and gritty. To me, the unanswered query is, "real in what way?" In response, I think I can gauge suggestions as to correct identity, location and even timeline.
The voice was the first effect to analyse. It was deeper than any baritone's I have heard and, but for the rather "tacky" stage set, logic questions its authenticity. Was it a human voice that had been synthesised? Could the sound track have a different origin to the video? The script does match the intonation very well and, taking into account the very special nature of the information presented, I conclude that the sound track not only belongs to the video, but it has also not been synthesised. We are witnessing the voice of the creature claiming to be "future man". He (assuming he is a "he") clearly had a very good knowledge of contemporary idiom as he sounded perfectly in period or, perhaps, by modern standards, a little out-of-touch. Therefore, I do not place him "from the future". He is undoubtedly from the time he was interviewed, but had access to esoteric knowledge which spans all things and all time.
By pushing human "communion" (to a fashion), the interview (if considered carefully) should have aggravated the powers to the point of censorship. Some inferences are very agenda obstructive (from the higher perspective), so I determine he is not "their" (our powers) propaganda tool (beyond the way the clip is cut as is shown). So, with that in mind, I shall expand on analysis of the creature's claim that it is a "future human". We achieve our humanness from the so-called Sirian component (responsible for our cerebral cortex, for instance) of our DNA. Though I do not believe the Genome Project has come close (nor will it on its current path) to identifying "God's keys", inherence does present answers with crystal clarity. The fundamental image of man (the blonde haired, blue eyed boy) has remained a constant for billions of years, so why does a relative monstrosity (our mysterious entity) call itself human?
The answer is this. It does so for three primary reasons. Presuming it was genuinely captured by authorities and, subsequently, interviewed by trained government special agents, it would have (statistically) wanted to "fit in" (to avoid personal harm). Then, it seems, most likely the best way to deflect potential conflict with hostiles would surely be to feign human "brotherhood" (i.e. per its reasoning, humans shouldn't be able to harm other sincere humans – now that's warped alien logic for you!)? I have already highlighted its truth deceptions, so the "human" claim was also part of that wider disinformation cover story geared mostly to camouflaging calculated purposes for being where and when it was before it was caught. Finally, and most ironically, it claimed it was human because that is (in my opinion) what it is. It is a human that has taken a significantly different genome path to all of us (tabulated by the Genome Project). Most markedly, it contains no Sirian identity signature. This means the way it processes logic and, more compellingly, its absence of conscience (as we understand it) promotes an instinctive yen towards compassion.
Of course, I have another blog that specialises in the "exo-political" and, there, I have written extensively about human bloodlines highlighting our (the human) path is branched as Pteroid (ape), Sirian and Ciakar ("reptilian"). Ciakars are only reptilian looking. Their physiology is quite different to anything (living) on the surface today. Some rumour they would be better labelled "tetraploid humans" (dual chromosome sets ensuring the parental male/female traits are fully preserved), but I am not sure if this is the consequence of Sephardic (Sephardim are highly evolved Ciakars) channelled wishful thinking. If it is true though, it would establish the fact that their geneticists [must] have a method of identifying, seeing and manipulating quantum DNA in order to project linear heritage (i.e. they can create transcendentally). I find that prospect very exciting.
Ciakar genetics are also three pronged – Pteriod (not ape), Sirian (no cerebral cortex) and Lyran (feline). In the case of "future human", I note an unmistakable Lyran influence, no [obvious] Sirian and some sort of Pteroid gene variable. Therefore, per the Ciakar hierarchy, it is a version of human. Perhaps it has no stomach or heart. Maybe it has two brains. We would need to witness an autopsy to discern the truth, but what is certain is its belief in its humanness is true. Even so, there are a couple of points in the clip which demonstrate very cat-like mannerisms. Plus it has a very strange, inhuman mouth (when inspected carefully).
We now know it is a genetically different human originating from the contemporary period (or before). The final part of the puzzle yet to be answered is, given its alien appearance, where does it come from? Indeed, the last place one of sound mind would expect to encounter such a creature would be on planet Earth. Yet, I suggest Earth is where it comes from, but not "on" the planet surface. As much as the establishment tries to pour cold water on the idea, other worldly beings regularly come to the surface from their subterranean homes. Consistently, they share one common irregularity (when matched against surface dwelling life forms). That irregularity is seen in the eyes, which are almost invariably black. In some cases eyes take up considerable facial real estate compared to, say, us. The only logical conclusion is, as one must assume there is little to no light in subterranean caverns, these special eyes are an essential requirement for effective local vision. Therefore, I propose our extra-terrestrial, pan-dimensional futuristic visitor was actually a common or garden sub-terrestrial contemporary but decidedly unconventional human. For the naysayers, the reason these creatures only venture to the surface in hours of darkness (and don't travel far – lest they be caught short) is normal light would permanently blind them (I presume).
Overrated opinions require a muted discovery tour that is only (or primarily) committed to validating existing belief systems. As all belief systems are responses to rooted guidance (whether progressive symptoms of subservience or bloody-mindedness or not), plausible denial of (contradicting) truth is the commonest and easiest way of anchoring beliefs. Those of sweet tooth would find it implausibly possible to reject chocolate given correct educational stigmata or, should I say, stimuli. Anyone refusing to taste chocolate under any circumstances is in no position to make rational product judgement (though, perhaps, better highlighted by underage sex hysteria), so ignorance capitulates a fait accompli. Rhyme champions reason and that's why proverbs were used to sell morality in ancient times. Modern day politicians expand erosion of intellect tyranny by their incessant promotion of oversimplifications geared only to skewing truth in favour of commercial objective goals (also usually "verified" by stacked statistics as well). The modern way of labelling or branding is just as effective as proverbs used to be and, perhaps, better.
The net result is people have woken up as slaves, powerless to think outside their masters' terms of engagement. Annoying rebels regularly identify the flaws, but, because they are trapped in the same conspiracy bubble as the rest, their rhetoric is largely limited to after-thoughts or musings. Let us take money, for instance. The brightest and best recognise it is "worthless", but I have failed to find anyone that doesn't use it. In fact, everyone I know of (without exception) clambers after money as though it was their end salvation. Fixing this, fixing all those prior unnoticed problems (the consequence of deliberate ignorance) that are now apparent takes sacrifice. Indeed, it might take the ultimate sacrifice. Therefore most people, even when vaguely aware, chose the path of relative ignorance and ambivalence to remain plausibly safe. "Affairs of state" are the banes of orated opinions for most people, though many would claim otherwise, are devout cowards. Bravery is not going to war. Bravery is peacefully refusing orders facing a loaded gun. You can generate as many labels and statistics as you like, but truth will never succumb to overrated opinions.
Posted on July 12, 2017 by ozziethinker	in Exo-politics of Earth, Rage against the machine, The science of existence	• Tagged 1945, 2200AD, abductors, abnormal behaviour, abracadabra, abuse, Affairs of state, after-thoughts, AIDS' scam, air supply, Aladdin's cave, alien life form, alternative commerce, altruistic billionaires, American Psychiatric Association, ancient times, anthropological, anti-profit, Armageddon, armchair critics, atmosphere, austere, big phoney, bravery, brotherhood, Bush Junior, camouflaging, cancers, cannabis oil, carbon, cataclysmic, censorship, cerebral cortex, chaos, cheerleader, Chemo, chemtrails, Chernobyl, chromosomes, CIA, Ciakar, Coming Clean on Cancer, Commandments, communion, compelling theories, conceited, conspiracy bubble, consultations, contaminate, contamination, corruption, cosmic, cosmic Christ, cover story, credentialed, Dean Martin, decoy, deformed, demographics, detective work, devout cowards, Diphtheria, disinformation, divine scribe, DNA, doomsday scenarios, drug cures, dual chromosome sets, election battles, Eli Lilly, establishment, evolved, exo-political, Exo-politician, extra-terrestrial, farmers, fear mongering, formaldehyde, fossil fuels, Frank Sinatra, free thinker, freeloader, fukushima, future man, genes, geneticists, genetics, Genome Project, ginger extract, global control, God's keys, good health, government, grand conspiracy, graviola, Great White Hope, greater good, Grey Being, hacker, Hadron Collider, heavens, heckler, Higgs-bosino, higher perspective, Hillary Rodham Clinton, hocus-pocus, holiday camp, Holocaust, hubris, human bloodlines, humanoid, hunters, hyperbolic distortions, ignorance, immaculate backers, Immortal Mohammed, industrial viruses, information portal, inherence, insane, Jon Rappoport, journalist, Labels, legitimacy, lessons learned, light DNA, Lyran, magic words, medical industry, misogynist, Mrs Clinton, musings, myths, Nagasaki, narcissistically, nasty ingredients, natural methods, nature, naysayers, New Age, non-discriminatory, noxious, nuclear war, open sesame, overrate, Overrated Opinions, oversimplifications, oxymoron, Ozzie Thinker, paedophilia, paranormal, petro, poisonous vaccines, politics, pollution, population expansion, power-brokers, powerless, President Trump, probabilities, professional agencies, profoundness, propaganda, proverbs, pseudo-sciences, Pteroid, purity, radiation, rat poison, real Sci-fi, recalibrated, religion, reptilian, Sacred Prophets, sacrifice, sarcasm, scoundrels, self-serving, Sephardic, Sephardim, shamelessly, Sirian, Skype, slants, slaves, socialites, Soursop plant, sovereignty, special agents, spiritualist, standards, statisticians, statistics, status unknown, strange looking, subterranean, superstitious, survival, Suzy Hansen, symptoms, synthesised, synthetic accountability, tetraploid humans, The Beauty of Existence Decoded, the powers, thimerosal, thyme oil, toxins, transcendentally, tumours, ultimate sacrifice, unconventional, uncouth, underage sex, underrate, universal tyranny, unworldly • 3 Comments
Callous Abuses of the Word Abuse
No one should honestly embrace this topic "in sincerity" without first addressing the greatest abuse of all current abuses: "paedophilia". Perhaps it's the circles I frequent, but I cannot fathom why more people don't "get it". Are you all so consumed with passion you cannot distinguish reliable information from the vagaries of conjecture? Jon Rappoport's work on the disintegration of problem solving logic very much impinges on modern social conditioning, in my opinion. Therefore, I plan to separately tackle the child designate sex issue head on, in isolation and as thoroughly as I am able. Be assured detail will be exquisite. A future release has already been part-scripted in essay form and aptly provisionally titled, "The Powers' Proud Accolade: Brand Pedo".
Few today (of correct age) would have the presence of mind to remember that the transition from homophobia to pedophobia began in the 1970's, perhaps inspired by the sexual revolution a decade prior. The "powers" were quick to action a remedy against that dissent (which included droves of AWOL's from Vietnam), and how to impose sexual sobriety was one of the foundation stones laid in 1971-75 plans aimed at stemming aggressive independent cultures (cults) non-compliance with aggregate society. Multiculturalism synthetically imposing "common goals" was sure to vanquish any notion of social independence. It was no coincidence that Britain had set the precedent for total censorship of pictorial sexual literature after a number of successful prosecution outcomes against publisher David Gold in 1972. Under his new business partner, the desperately corrupt David Sullivan, their new marketing policy saw grossly misleading advertising fortuitously erupt into an explosion of sales of legal censored or "soft core" topical picture books and films. Arguably "smut's" new found popularity had arisen as a symptom of burgeoning bohemian attitudes reacting against prohibition. For instance, the same thing happened after Mary Whitehouse successfully targeted schlock horror "B movies" in the 1980's.
Behind the scenes (though nothing explicit was produced by Gold or Sullivan after the court losses) extremist sentiment against "hard core" pornography in general saw a misdirection campaign that strategically positioned child porn as the undeniable progressive pinnacle of perverse licentiousness. Circular logic fused "thin end of the wedge" and "guilt by association" opinion to fan misguided and erroneous belief that all things illicit are "related" and virulently spread like cancers. Predictably absolute "resolution" determined anything pornographic must be forbidden to "cure" harmonious society. Conversely, attitudes were relaxing against salacious (one time pornographic) literatures, after a case against Penguin Books over publication of D H Lawrence's "Lady Chatterley's Lover" was overturned by the British courts in the 1960's.
A pithy American current affair propaganda piece titled "The Children of God" (or something similar) made in 1971 (there have been several subsequent "documentaries" based on similar themes) ridiculed a network of community groups that called themselves The Family International (established in California by David Berg in 1968). According to the original documentary, ethics of the institution placed no age restrictions on sexual interaction between incestuous community members (a policy that radically changed in 1985). Production of pornographic literatures (examples offered were classed as child porn) was encouraged and sales were used to raise funds for the group. Unsurprisingly, film makers were only concerned with exposing perceived negatives and, beyond that, nothing was learned about the mission and ethos of The Family International. My personal research showed a number of cult members were pushed into suicide after trying to reintegrate into "closed minded" wider society before and after Berg's (whose written legacy by no means identifies with vicious hysteria post documentary) death in 1994.
Homosexuality ran a different, though in some ways parallel, course, marked by virulent crusades against suspected public figures and all promotional publications. Throughout the 1970's I would argue that it was viewed as a far greater social evil than paedophilia. Rather interestingly society's whims so often seem adrift of reality. In more tolerant times, a relatively well publicised survey suggested roughly one in three males were clinical paedophiles. Other censuses have calculated one in five males showing bisexual tendencies. Personally I am inclined to take "statistics" with a big pinch of salt and that's why I haven't cited specific references. Even so, I am rather compelled to believe that the percentage of potential agitators for or against specific causes might disproportionately swell if people were a little more honest about themselves.
Attitudes didn't relax against gay communities until well into the 1980's. By the 1990's AIDS (or gay plague) fear, mostly a misdirection campaign or scam, had reached fever pitch and this, I feel, was the cause of softened social attitudes towards the "plight of homosexual men" (in particular). However, in my opinion, had Bill Clinton (an alleged paedophile, by the way) not made it as President of the United States of America, the "changeover" (from homo to pedophobia) likely would not have happened. He began gay favourable rhetoric which laterally blossomed through corrupt [mainstream] Medias. His appointment of Janet Reno as head of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) mandated radical development of a "Child porn entrapment market" as number one priority.
From around 1995 malignant advertising campaigns specifically targeted borderline adults as never before and these were accompanied by numerous arrests of teenagers and similar aged adults (i.e. 18-21) that had allegedly engaged in sexual acts. Those trading explicit visual materials depicting "teenagers" also came under scrutiny in a much bigger way than before. Many arrests on the back of ignorantly innocent distribution networks included sensational pieces of "evidence", such as a hard core stag film featuring an alleged fifteen year old Rob Lowe as "pizza boy". Reno (who has been promoted as a "lover" of Mrs Clinton, also an alleged paedophile), incidentally, was the one that ordered the murder of innocent American citizens under the auspices of the 1993 FBI attack on the Dravidian (cult) community located at Waco Texas.
As mentioned earlier, I shall discuss the origins of the concept (and that's all it is) paedophilia (which literally means to have an intellectual compatibility or love of children) in much more detail in the future. It will also give readers the opportunity to explore and evaluate some of the (inquisition style) tricks used to calculate confessions from targeted individuals or groups, manufacture the presumption of guilt "as charged" and regularly encourage bearers of false witness to commit perjury (in court). But, for now, I will only deal with that which is contextually related to the word "abuse", which, I must say, in the context of paedophilia, is so vastly widespread, it may well serve evidence to justify multitudes of reports. The arbitrary nature of an inflexible (paralysis) and baseless (no scientific case) age of adulthood (currently set at eighteen, until the next foul referendum) should raise a cacophony of "destruction of liberty" alarm bells. I am fondly reminded of Krishna's timelessly wise instruction, "The forces of evil paralyse".
Perhaps anyone else would have said "sovereign choice" in place of liberty. However, sovereign individuality potentially conflicts with social liberty and the distorters of "abuse" know that all too well. Mankind is heading towards totalitarianism, the only utopian federal alternative to communion, at a rapid rate. There are two fundamental branches of the slave/master paradigm. One is labelled Fascism. This version of order is built on the premise that the fabric of commerce is strong enough to regulate social charters. Evidence might appear in the form of something like, shall we say, corporate responsibility whereby employee-slaves are both bound by "the law" and their company manifesto. Under Fascist totalitarianism, companies seeking new employees (of all rank) would rate assessment of authority documentation (official identification, police check, bankruptcy report and so on) as the most important stage of the internment process. Penal facilities would be outsourced and run by privateers. Marxism, the alternative totalitarian system, is very similar, except the social charter is administered by government and, consequentially, core business might be nationalised to compliment that seamless authority.
Sovereign individuals disrupt utopian society (per the Fascist/Marxist models). Societies are governed by standards and these might conceivably be eroded by abusers. Therefore, logically, abuse of the word abuse relies on the distortion of truth, which allows the marginalisation of social values geared to reducing sovereign choice in favour of social conditioning (i.e. only "choice" to conform and not to rebel). Society masters impose order on members by the same methods parents use to oppress children. In today's society children are broken into conformation (to conform is the only "choice") for what can become lifelong family feuds that are amply exploited by "authorities". The regime treats its members with common impunity. Children are conditioned into responding to but not respecting family boundaries. So too society's parts are tolerant but not understanding of individual prisoner status. Freedom is limited to "they tell me this is allowed". Abuse has been distorted to vilify the authority against "that which isn't allowed". True violation is certainly secondary (a sort of bi-product) and mostly irrelevant beyond ramping up any case in favour of abuse stipulations.
The flawed logic of this philosophy doesn't end there. If abuse is a symptom of that which defies freedom, our vile powers may as well argue they protect those locked up in prisons from the world at large. Under that premise, they would do detainees a great service. The whole foundation of abuse as a concept has been twisted to satisfy the crime (as it were) in this way. Expanding on my incarceration metaphor, it might be argued that though people may well be taken against their will, social disinfection actually serves the dual purpose of ensuring captive would-be criminals are locked into cramped cells "each for their own good". The "powers" claim, therefore, incarceration is not "abuse". Whereas currently, for my research, the justice system hasn't made humanitarian assertions of this nature, it's only a matter of time before it happens.
In the same manner sexually orientated child designates are persecuted under the guise of "protection", the rules governing society transcend individual reasoning. The bi-product is an insanity which permits free thinking individuals can be stripped of all tenable rights and abused in spirit but not "under law". Wayward laws were never in place to protect society, but rather to purge incongruous elements; those that choose to be different, set apart from the masses. A corresponding history of the delineation of order can be charted from the very cradle of civilisation. For the peoples of ancient Atlantis, administrative powers determined wrong doers should be scooped up and separated from the masses in order to purify society. Consequentially, prisoners (that were not routinely executed) were banished from their impenetrable towering citadel home.
After the collapse of Atlantis, roaming derelict tribes (prisoner outcasts) gradually re-civilised and this encouraged the consolidation of penal codes configured to administer secure wholesale capture and disposal of enemies. Today's confinement model was the natural evolution of those haphazard reactionary origins. That is largely why the modern day "justice system" is terminally flawed. It was built on a framework geared to exclusively serving the "in-group". Incidentally, our price busting "captive labour" prison system fits the Fascist corporate ordained order model like a glove. If those detained were classed as "privileged" (rescued) by the system, what would inhibit it from billing them full board over incarceration periods? In the future could everyone be forced into bonded labour to "cover penal charges"?
Governments, whether supporting Marxist or Fascist policy objectives, are exclusively in power to construct the framework or refinement of "order". Manifestos are only delivered by governments and not created by them. Even so, given those ever teetering cyclic oscillations that divine the "power sharing" poled between aggressive conservative and leftist opinion making, manifestos are also "open" enough to permit "the law" and its administrational infrastructures change with the seasons. Dramatic "anti-social" policy making relies on false flags to subvert rebellion. Complimenting this deception government backed terrorists are routinely commissioned to attack in ways that ensure sponsored solutions [to fictitious problems] are both feasible and "palatable". Were any planes used in the so-called "9/11" attack or was Fascist "News'" "live cut" really a stage-play of pre-recorded enhanced special effects (or, in other words, government sponsored propaganda)? Reasoning determining these ongoing travesties against societies is almost identical to the philosophic candour that claims to justify the distorted abuse of "abuse".
Fantasy is deemed more vital than reality in so much as nature and everything vibrantly natural has become the subliminally targeted enemy of the spinners of make-believe. They, as evidenced by their non-existent reasoning that has become the graduation of child status on ever more bodily adults, assures their followers that survival of power is the only real justification for all social considerations. For anyone that questions this "balance of power", genetically modified organisms (GMO's) are all about demonstrating the "machine" can conquer nature and (from the inspiration perspective) have nothing to do with the manufacture of goodness. Unforseen dietary advantages innocently improve "spin campaigns". An expansion of this, should I call it, platform insists presumption of guilt defines society at large (per an expansion of unknown nationals or "Goyim's" categorisation as strangers that are presumed "untrustworthy"), with exemptions given to the honourable or those with the right credentials (in the "family"). Thus, everyone of "file" is a potential prisoner-in-waiting when not of sufficient "rank". That is the primary reason why "abuse" has been distorted as a condition of that framework (i.e. behind "presumption of guilt" is the contamination assurance that an abuse has been committed).
With empirical clarity abuse is transformed into something material, solid, clear cut. It is something that can be tangibly used in a court of law. [Individual] circumstances become secondary, perhaps even arbitrary or elementary (i.e. if a "black and white" abuse has occurred; how are circumstances relevant?). In that fashion, any accusation becomes virulently more potent than all cohesive evidence backed defences (which risk being judged as excuses or hindrances). In other words, if "circumstances" are irrelevant, for abuse is abuse, then what is the purpose of evidence beyond obstructing the course of justice? Once an abuse is "agreed on", all that's needed is a wrongly done by claimant. That's the lack of logic being applied here and that is why evidence is going to potentially obstruct the potency of any abuse claim (which must be true to be potent) under those farcical terms. Referring again to my mention of Jon Rappoport's work, that is why the education system does everything and anything to block critical thinking. "Truth" is becoming so estranged from popular acumen; I fear it is threatened with extinction.
In fact immortalisation of distorted abuse is a feature of a watershed that is slowly but surely stripping away all sovereign rights. On this course when a "file" member thinks for himself it is potentially a most destructive act against the regime. Frankly put, the only way to possibly undermine the power brokers and their fraudulence passed off as "goodwill" is to outwit them. Therefore, I could well see critical thinkers labelled "terrorists" under threat of some capital offense or other at some juncture. Currently the Mental Health Act substitutes as the primary lateral filter. It has made damned sure that we no longer have the right to use our bodies in the way we decide. Examples to illustrate this include impingement on just about every functional aspect of life. We must wear clothes at all times except by arrangement when on private property. All bodily functions are limited in some way. I could focus on sexual reassignment of homosexuals, but the more obvious "for instance" is the denial of consenting sex between "minors" (i.e. all parties are legally underage).
To show just how fanatically lacking in conscience and common sense the powers' lust for control has become, per their "abuse philosophy", a statutory rape charge must be served on at least one party (all underage, per this example, let us not forget) when infractions occur. Thus, the justice system will determine at least one person has been abused whether claimed or not. To any reasoned thinker, potential consequences should be startlingly obvious. Predictably, there have been a number of judicial outcomes after no one embroiled agreed to being abused. In instances of this sort "the system" has been seen to judge everyone involved as having "raped each other". How can that be? Is it possible for there to be perpetrators without victims or victims without perpetrators (depending on the legal insistence)? Surely this must be one of the best examples that conclusively demonstrate how unchallengeable validation of a concept can pervert reality.
There must be no doubt that corrupt goodwill does pervert reality and it causes all kinds of nasty chain reaction consequences. I plan to explore what motives are behind and ramifications result from circumcision in "The Powers Proud Accolade: Brand Pedo". Recently a commenter on Jon Rappoport's blog asked if I could include her feedback on the subject in one of my public writings. Presumably of Jewish ancestry, she reported her sibling's circumcision had contributed to a painfully vicious hate/guilt cycle that has persisted to haunt the family relationship and, ultimately, befoul the lateral mother/son bonding process.
Men are considered (by the Pharisees) to have much stronger libidos than women, so males are circumcised shortly after birth. Contrary to popular opinion, Islam was created to radicalise Judaism (as "Christianity" had failed in the Pharisees' utopian quest) and circumcises females as well (originally Muslim males were cut to honour the prophet). However, if the ceremony is done too early in the female's case, it risks destroying all sexual self-esteem (leading to frigidity). Therefore the clitoris is partly removed from girls around age six. It is not fully extracted as the function of circumcision is merely to act as a masturbation (inappropriate lust) inhibitor and not to create permanent dysfunctional sexuality.
Fake "abuse" wields as much power as "blasphemy". The very mention of it should send shivers down the spine and not for noble reasons. In fact in its current use it marks the total collapse of sanity. Abuse is a winner. It can hang a court. It has acted as anchor to all past and current inquisition movements, including the latest one used against Catholic priests, Jewish rabbis and others that dare inhibit Zionist order. Juries are marginalised, perhaps superfluous even, when presented accused are "certainly guilty" beyond any doubt without need of peer review.
From the provable "conspiratorial" angle I could argue there is a covert agenda geared to demeaning anything and everything that entitles communion. This, by extension, distorts purposeful living into desecration. Underpinned by many unwelcome corporate compliance terms, whether delivered through the private sector or "government", the final step has been to vilify slavery (dressed as "employment") as the fundamental point of vocational existence. Bearing in mind the "contract" everyone makes with God prior to coming into the world is to balance "living life to the max" and "revering the body as the temple", real abuse, real violation has been mutated into something beautifully sacred. The powers' grand coup, great deception against the peoples' contract with God could not be more amply highlighted than by outlining how religions scammed "beliefs".
Religions gave "God" a voice and it was a remarkable revolution, because God never actually said anything and none dare question what wasn't said. In precisely the same way shadow powers execute government, the Pharisees control all religions today and the basic "blasphemy" indoctrination has been incorporated into Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism. Perhaps there's the odd tribal culture "exception" saved by lack of popularity, but the rationalisation has predominantly been a global one. "God" has also been incorporated into civil law federally, so religions have served their purpose and cease to be explicitly necessary. Through those wonderful pharisaic ideologists, God talks in mysterious ways. Mass indoctrination continues, unaltered by atheism, unhampered and never erring in the deliverance of the never spoken word.
Of course, everyone "should" know the "word of God" is actually bullshit and "God's values" are actually the Pharisees' Laws. The real God talks through nature and that's why they (the shadow powers) attack any known pantheist cult, attempt to destroy natural foods (supress organic, flood GMO's), aggressively sponsor sexual "reassignment" and support, impose anything else that is sure to give nature a whack in the nose. Those believed-to-be vigilant "forces for light" (euphemistically calling themselves Truthers) couldn't discover the "truth" if they tripped over it. Their spiteful and pointless crusade against phantom "Illuminati" power has failed to get close to coming to terms with the real evil doers and their so-called "Luciferian Doctrine". Illuminati occultists (hidden ones) have scripted the greatest violation, abuse imaginable. The ultimate goal is poison the planet whilst "undoing nature" in an agenda determined to reduce humanity to abject trans-humanism, a globe populated by living robots if you will.
Everyone seems to go along with the plan, blindly and ignorantly. The few that become aware do nothing meaningful to inhibit destruction in motion. Babbling do-gooders assume if it "ain't noticeably broken, why fix it?" People culturally attune and do their upmost to maintain their selfishly favourable status quos for as long as they persist. Conversely, those that dare challenge their "hard earned", wilfully fickle resources are despised. Per this haughty arrogance, ones that beg for support "must be" inferior parasites of the lowest character. How dare they abuse us by "expecting" donations and other spiritually draining demands? It's not only the "powers" that callously abuse the word "abuse". You all do.
Me Playing for my Supper
Donations Welcome
Posted on January 15, 2017 by ozziethinker	in Rage against the machine	• Tagged 911, abusers, abuses, accolade, aids, as charged, atheism, Atlantis, authority, AWOL, Bill Clinton, bisexual, blasphemy, bonding, borderline adults, British courts, Buddhism, bullshit, California, capital offense, Catholic priests, child designate, child porn, Christianity, Circular logic, circumcision, clitoris, closed minded, company manifesto, conditioned, confessions, conformation, conjecture, conspiratorial, corporate compliance, corporate responsibility, corrupt, court of law, credentials, cults, current affair, D H Lawrence, David Brandt Berg, David Gold, David Sullivan, derelict tribes, desecration, destruction of liberty, distortion of truth, Dravidian, dysfunctional sexuality, empirical clarity, entrapment market, evil doers, exemptions, exploited, extremist, false flags, false witness, family feuds, Fascism, Federal Bureau of Investigation, federally, frigidity, fundamental, gay communities, gay plague, genetically modified organisms, global, GMO's, government backed terrorists, Goyim, guilt by association, Hinduism, homophobia, homosexuality, honourable, humanitarian, illicit, illuminati, impunity, incestuous, independent cultures, Indoctrination, Inquisition, Islam, Janet Reno, Jewish ancestry, Jewish rabbis, Jon Rappoport, judaism, Juries, justice system, Krishna, Lady Chatterley's Lover, legally underage, libidos, licentiousness, living robots, Luciferian Doctrine, lust for control, marginalisation, Marxism, Mary Whitehouse, master, masturbation, Mental Health Act, minors, misdirection campaign, Mrs Clinton, multiculturalism, Muslim, nationalised, natural foods, occultists, outcasts, outwit, paedophilia, pantheist, pedo, pedophobia, Penal facilities, Penguin Books, perjury, phantom, Pharisees, poison, powers, presumption of guilt, privateers, propaganda, prophet, purify, radicalise, rationalisation, regime, Rob Lowe, scam, schlock horror, self-esteem, sexual reassignment, sexual sobriety, sexually orientated, slave, social conditioning, social evil, sovereign choice, spin campaigns, stag film, statutory rape, The Children of God, The Family International, The forces of evil paralyse, totalitarianism, towering citadel, trans-humanism, tribal culture, truthers, utopian, vicious hysteria, vietnam, Waco, Zionist • 7 Comments
Totalitarian Brands: He Who Controls the Gold "Wins"
Introduction to Totalitarian Brands
Before embarking on my longest blog entry to date, I had originally conceived the title Totalitarian Brands, but to do justice to accrued research data would have required at least a hundred blank sheets. As this (in word format) equates to roughly 50,000 words, with every page filled, I would easily have had enough content to compile a small book should have I taken up the challenge. Indeed, emphasis on the greatest corporate brand, paedophilia, might inspire dozens of paragraphs alone, given the lack of fortitude and basis elsewhere. However, the great journalists' guide, if there was such a thing, would surely advise writers that readers' attention spans are limited at best, so I feared scrutiny would be stretched beyond the max if I entertained this mountainous quest in addition to supplements covering far wider, more convoluted antagonisms. Therefore I, being of sound mind, have already part scripted ""The powers'" great accolade: Brand Pedo" for a future Ozzie Thinker entry and will say no more on the subject now.
This essay will still keep the original title idea, Totalitarian Brands. "He who controls the gold wins" is the first of a number of topical segments. Accordingly, this one reflects on feudalism, royalty, coinage, currency, ownership and other things generally related. What would a political article be without terrorists? Accordingly I have scheduled an intro to my feisty fellow Arab-American crime fighter, Mantiq-Al-Tayr. That said, given this post is my longest to date (remember that bit about peoples' attention spans) it will have to be in brief. In summary I would like to present conclusions that indisputably outline the tragic connection between ownership, money and war. Reflectively, concordant with that agenda, the whole atheist, fake science paradigm simply replaces or expands on institutionalised religious judicial mass indoctrination.
But, to be clear, we must start at the beginning when there were no brands and God walked with man. According to atheists "God walking with man" could not possibly be so, but I disagree. Beliefs hold so much credence they can construct reality, providing that perception is never tested. If I decide the moon is made of cheese, only visiting the heavenly object will expose the belief. Therefore, providing I never rocket to the heavens, my belief will be held sacred. Of course, for our "all knowing" atheists the reverse is so. To honestly assert belief in the total absence of anything requires absolute knowledge of everything to back it up; otherwise erstwhile glib sentiment is no different to that of those dreamers of cheesy moons. The atheism syndrome (and that is all it is) highlights a deliberate ignorance.
It is a cult that was founded on the assumption that God is all-consuming (the trendy way of saying everywhere). When something's everywhere, theoretically you don't have to look very far to find it, agreed. Yet, what these occultists fail to take into consideration is they might just be looking at things entirely in the wrong way. My book, "The Beauty of Existence Decoded", outlines the right way. Brand perception is essential for marketeers of totalitarian propaganda campaigns. Strict homage to materialism allows impressions to disseminate "correct thinking" towards their causes. Vagaries of wilfully dishonest and divisive interpretations of truth create the modern day dichotomy that distorts good sense into hybrid fantasy. Truth takes a back seat to totalitarian passion. Logic and reason are consumed by branded emotion to stir ignorant multitudes.
Communist, atheist material belief systems expand new commerce frontiers
Recently a Facebook heckler gave feedback that my articles are opinion pieces. To a degree, this is correct, but has an article ever been written that is opinion free? All journalism imbues lavish alliterations which deliberately foment ambitions geared to enhancing branded truth. Choice of words and inflections is tantamount. For arbitrary bodies' hell bent on universal control, meanings of the words that stick in the throat can be changed over time. Nikolai Levashov, for instance, observed a number of popular Russian terms were given opposite meanings after the Communist takeover that is labelled revolution (sic). This, he outlines, was a deliberate and effective strategy geared towards shaping new opinions and a new ethos that both backed off of and contradicted old order.
When I talked about only God and man at the beginning, Introducing atheists was a ploy. You see atheism is all about commerce and nothing to do with divinity. With no God, legitimate "finders' keepers" can claim "discoveries" from conquest or exploration. America was found on this principle and that is why administrative arbitrators legitimised stakes to claims. If God was to be factored at any point, free land was originally stolen [from God]. Ownership is a synthetic manmade system. It is not wide ranging or far reaching; quite the reverse. It supports that (or, more importantly, those) which is "privy to" contractual order. Therefore, as the American natives were obsolete as far as the white invaders were concerned, contracts always forfeited their moral claims until commercial stakeholders saw advantage from philosophic reversal.
Atheism has become more than a cult. It is an accessory to the de-spiritualisation of mankind. Those destined to control are not merely content with their fake ownership contracts. They also want to manufacture nature. For instance, with no almighty God at the helm, nature is a balance confined to survival of the fittest. War, by this determination, attempts to validate the natural progression of order. Yet, in truth, all conflicts are a consequence of ownership. The most cherished of all things that are owned is an individual's life (self). Therefore, per utopian logic, the root of all disputes (pre-empting "war") would be anything that is deemed to undermine self-interest (or, in plainer words, selfishness). Ownership, many fail to realise, will always only be as good as the belief in the contracts that substantiate the concept. A concept is all ownership will ever be and it is that what binds legacies ratified by terms of inheritance after every life eventually fades into oblivion.
Belief systems are pivotal for the manufacture of assuming audiences. Without visceral pointed mob views, brands are finished, so the group is programmed to squeeze out individual innovators, pioneers and revolutionaries unless they are the new trend setters. For instance, Christian "truther" networks spare no effort in emphasising criticism demonstrating how mainstream Medias are rigged to suit the wishes of corporate peers (governments rarely amount to anything more than corporate sponsors). Yet, by the same token, the majority of articles, bulletins and paraphernalia produced by these networks are more biased, militantly partisan and truth lacking than the arenas they condemn. Even so, dirty "lies" buried in the mainstream are very deceptive indeed, so I would still judge that the greater evil of the two. Besides, alternative activism caters for beatniks whereas the other tragic resource, when in tune, wholeheartedly supports a perpetual corporate totalitarian agenda. Statistically, the mainstream supposedly fuels and is the majority (or populist) view. If this is and remains so, mankind has a world of worry ahead.
Hidden past truths might divine present and future prophecy
I make no effort to disguise the fact that I share Joseph P Farrell's opinion that the banking system (or commerce) paved the way for kings and then religions to execute order. To be more precise, I believe humanity was rebuilt using this tried and tested way to progress civilisation after the collapse of Atlantis. Religions were "the Law" and "justice systems" combined. That is why the Pharisees (dissenters or usurpers) were both religious leaders and judges of the ancient Israelites. The reason one interpretation of the meaning of the word Pharisee is "hypocrite" was some Israelites set about to pervert all the prehistoric Atlantis values of civilisation to create the culture control monster that operates with impunity today. Be very clear on this history. It is very important. Potentially the lost Ark of the Covenant contains stone tablets detailing original Atlantis order. That is why they have never been "found". "Moses" originally hid them so his cronies could rule by rote in my opinion, unless he settled in Ireland. If that was the case, corruption would have begun any time after his death.
Before I reveal attention to details required to unravel the fraud being painted as historic, scientific and political truth, I would like to offer an example of how reason can be divined with common sense and good calculation. Astute visitors will notice the "Profile of the Gnostic Jesus" section here. The name "Jesus" is presumed to first appear in the New Testament accounts of the Bible (and some of the contemporary Dead Sea Scrolls). Of the main canon, colloquially known as the Four Gospels, no original manuscripts have survived, so it is impossible to [precisely] determine what languages were used for the autographs. Thus, lexicons might and do argue the name Jesus is a Greek (although there is no letter "J" in that tongue and the Hebrew alphabet has a provision for all sounds creating the name) derivative from Aramaic Yeshua.
In addition, presuming Yeshua has anything to do Jesus is a preconception, mitigated only by the fact it is the closest sounding Aramaic name that might be compared to Jesus. Insomuch, arguments are clearly fuelled by the desire to satisfy a particular narrative line; i.e. in this case original texts were produced in the everyman tongue, Aramaic. That purpose is aimed at deflecting serious consideration as to the abnormality of the word Jesus and the formal contemporary religious significance of doctrines associated with the name that blossomed into the Christian Church. Predictable organic growth of an average Jewish man [into something he wasn't] offers the avenue to explain away those theoretical divine powers as merely metaphorical or wishful thinking. If Jesus was not one of a range of names that were used prior to and over the contemporary period, why did the subsequently wide usage (particularly in Latin communities) as a given name take hold? In effect, totalitarian propagandists have etched a character from the tradition that is part of a wave of change. Jesus, the individual, whilst not being superfluous, is rendered rather impotent or misunderstood by that religious systemisation.
The Holy Blood and Holy Grail is hybrid catholic-Zionist totalitarianism
There is another strange, enigmatic, dare I say contemporary once more, character called Josephus, who, inexplicably, shares a potentially unique name with Jesus. The Pharisaic old guard blast on about his birth name being ordinary Joseph Ben Matityahu (Joseph son of Matthias), but this might also be poppycock and only evidence of Scarlet Pimpernel covering his tracks, given that there are no other contemporary clues or tangible documents beyond the written legacy of Josephus about his own life. The additional claim that he adopted Flavius (Roman royal) in homage to the Emperor, in spite of his father's proto-kingly status as a high priest of the bloodline of David, no less, is so preposterous it's almost laughable. The only decent response to that is, pull the other one Zionists, it's got bells on.
It seems to me that Josephus represented the creation of a fusion of two royal orders (each characterised by his given and surname) and the reason the (presumed) medieval additions to the main biblical canon talk of Joseph as the father of Jesus is they more pertinently give clues as to Josephus' father's status/history. Jesus' attack on the money changers outside the temple (which might not have existed) was so out of place, it was contextually clearly presenting a different person. Given the textual symmetry and character of minor agitator, Barabbas, he is an ideal candidate for the unrest, arrest, imprisonment and crucifixion. He must have been spared actual crucifixion, either because passer by Simon Cyrene acted instantia, Joseph of Arimthea negotiated with Pontius Pilate or both, in order to sire Jesus. Biblical accounts of the crucifixion/resurrection take history out of context in order to offer different political metaphors on Gnostic/Pharisaic control of rule of law. Barabbas' (Justus) common name was Joseph.
In addition, though this may be too great a stretch of the imagination for some, filius is Latin for "son", so could its abbreviation to "us" have been added to Joseph as the new, hybridised name Josephus with view to inflect "son of Joseph"? I think filius to ph-us in anagrammatic form is a plausible mind stretch. For instance, in prior articles I noted the incomplete Latin anagram "pho(r) Jesus" from letters of Joseph, which means to bear forth Jesus. Searching references for earlier uses of Josephus as a common name, I find none. There are plenty of other clues to this enigma, but the coincidence of two similarly unique names coming from intrinsically linked characters overwhelmingly points to the buried truth that they belong to the exact same identity.
Downhill from Atlantis and a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow
Returning to contemplating the history of how the meaning of civilisation has been distorted to purposefully enslave the masses, it was a minority of Israelites that masterminded a new order championing commercial privilege to the detriment of humanitarian values. In effect, they have slowly and catastrophically systematically usurped the wisdom of Atlantis, brick by brick. They have gradually converted cosmic order into "graded" chaos. Though interest in gold (as a measure) predates Israelite fascination, according to Vedic references of much more ancient origins, cuts of silver were the preferred method of fiscal accountability perhaps stretching back prior to the Atlantis civilisations (originally on Mars!).
It must be said, things of value were scant indeed in those eras so comparisons with modern day corporate rationalisation are impossible. Believe it or not, we live in unique times which have never been tried or tested before. Today, people even pay for manure! That's the difference. The ownership concept has grown to become an almost universal standard and commerce wastes no opportunity to manipulate and destroy goodwill. Just about all common lands went years ago. Major restrictions are placed on "free" drinking water. Is the air to be regarded as the next great industrialist conquest for the conquistadors? They do still need slaves to toil and buy goods; else commerce would collapse in a heap. But the most current great pioneering "venture" is for power over life and death by controlling illness and the medical fix (a future instalment, "Are Vaccines a Globalist Strategy Being Used to Cull Populations?" is planned)
Of course, these plots neither appeared overnight nor happened by accident. There was extensive planning. Steps of the outline were simple. First off, the parasites needed to convince everyone to use money when and where it hadn't been used before. Mainstream history records the primary, but very crude, attempt at globalisation being the preoccupation of the Greeks (or presumed Greeks, who were both Israelite Hyksos and the terrible Philistines, in my opinion). No real expansive, persisting commerce strategy was employed beyond loot and pillage by them. Interestingly Alexander the Great and infamous Cleopatra were, reputedly, Macedonians (perhaps even Romanians?) so the ethnic footprint of ancient times would likely confound the populist historical view anyway.
Be that as it may, after the Greeks failed to maintain control and their empire fizzled out, a new Roman (de facto "Greek"?) regime magically appeared to confront the world once more. This time, after the prior dry run, things were better organised (in some ways confirming there was a single adaptable blueprint for order and de facto Greek and Roman puppet masters were bound by identical philosophies). I would have included the ancient Babylonians, but evidence of global conquest is too thin on the ground. Remarkably though, Egyptian wall writings and artefacts have even been found on the Australian and American mainlands so, given time, perhaps a case could be built in favour of the Babylonians originally driving universal chaos. Maree Moore puts compelling arguments for the Israelites as breakaways from the Babylon powerhouse. Michael Tsarion goes further, I am led to believe.
Roman coins and rude Britons
Of all the many innovative Roman strategies, the most illogical (without foresight) and noteworthy is the radical introduction of copper or bronze coinage. I use the term "radical" perhaps inappropriately as there is a copper talisman or coin colloquially known as the Pittsburgh Penny that has been contextually dated at around 200,000BC, so perhaps the Roman imagination was not that great after all. Ancient Israelites considered copper a precious metal as it was accounted for in the three wagon loads of plunder they had collected after "God" ransacked Jericho for them. God is the ultimate totalitarian brand, but more on that later from my friend Mantiq-Al-Tayr. The Greeks, Celts or what passed for ancient Russians predominantly used silver and gold as base values. There is a significant reason for this which will be presented in due course.
Anyway, the Romans didn't restrict their potentially worthless coinage to Rome. No, copper and bronze talismans were exported in industrial quantities and often buried for locals to find in order to entice other fledgling nations into the commerce trap. History has shown the Celts knew better as modern day treasure seekers are still digging up the Roman refuse. Indeed, the only way they could entice British chieftains to take a mild interest in compliance was by salting each trove with silver or gold. Given the Druids administered a system of pantheism which elevated the harvest festival, these were blissful times of peace and humanity, only interrupted by occasional silly squabbles between ill-disciplined cultural leaders.
After their disastrous British campaign, the Romans determined the Brits made lousy hosts, business partners and slaves. Besides, staying would have risked destroying the jewel of exalted heritage (that which separated the aristocrats from plebeians). Just about all the great mystery schools and colleges (some say over 100) were located in what has now become England's mainland, Glastonbury, Avalon included. Learning was courtesy of breakaway Israelites; the Druids. Is it any wonder those original teachings have been "lost" too? Global elites still flock to prestigious public schools Eton and Harrow, the great universities at Oxford and Cambridge or the London School of Economics.
Her status as the seat of learning is an essential clue demonstrating Britain was or became the mythical Promised Land. In this capacity she has been used as a yard stick for globalist totalitarian policy ambition. Not only that, researchers can see which initiatives have stuck, i.e. Middle Ages feudalism wasn't an accident of the times. It was a massive step forward and feather in the cap of the global control agenda. Consequentially, other countries have gone further. For instance, the Buddhists imposed ridiculously savage measures on the people of Tibet to uphold totalitarian ideals, lest those that see safety in religious dogma forget. Praise God the atheist Chinese intervened! As expressed earlier, the ultimate plan for globalisation was drafted in Atlantis times (over 10,000 years ago) and corrupted into an unmoving agenda that relentlessly rolls on.
Conquest, currency and control
Celtic coins in circulation prior to Roman occupation of Britain were all called Staters and, I presume, this was because those tokens were only issued to instruments of State (chieftains and so on). Instead, the Romans had gold "pounds" or libres (freedom) for the ruling classes. Silver "shilling" solodi (denoting intelligence) were for the merchant aristocrats. Plebeians had to be satisfied with copper/bronze pennies or denarii (meaning a farmer's dowry or ten asses). Though those who study coinage of the extended Roman periods may disagree with my gross over-simplification, order was basically punctuated through coinage. This is not about metal scarcity, although lack of metal stock did negate the mint (which means "silver") of occasional gold solodi and silver denarii.
Roman coinage encapsulated ideals. Doubtlessly, other attributes can be found in the analysis of the argenteus, nummus, laureate, miliarense and so on. The point is that there were/are far rarer metals that could have been used to augment value if rarity was the objective. Not only did the British system pretty much adopt simplified Roman currency measures up to modern day pre-decimalisation, but gold has always outstripped silver value too. It is duly noted industrialists periodically play act to create the illusion markets are spontaneous, but never once has silver come even close to overtaking gold value.
Further evidence supporting Britain as the Promised Land and the next step after Roman tyranny is Queen Victoria's empire. Her conquests were so wide ranging they expanded beyond the Greek and Roman globalisation campaigns to conquer one quarter of the globe. Factoring incestuous royal connections, the entire Earth was largely property of the elites by World War One. Even arctic regions and other hard to get to places were grabbed as a consequence of (or, perhaps, part of the reason for) World War Two. Though a theoretical World War Three began in 1984 it has been concerning who controls political commercial rights designated for eventual administration by a United Nations/NATO global federalism cooperative. The formal end of sovereign royalty was symbolised by the murder of Russian Tsar Nicholas II 17th July 1918. Compelling data suggests the Romanov dynasty was installed by the Rothschilds 1775 (a year before American Independence) and removed by the same basic stakeholders.
When World War Three is "won", "Law making" will still be outsourced to Israel, of course, unless that centre is moved for security reasons. Other nations' boundaries won't noticeably change, unless puppet leaderships prove impossible to manage. Currently commerce favours large bodies of people to be broken up. Weaken the national voice enough then trouble makers are easier to silence seems to be the reasoning. Besides, the CIA, NSA and other noteworthy propaganda agencies have armies of internet dissenters poised to drown out any sincere pleas for help. Given the latest American mass shootings (if "real"), I should mention the FBI manipulates "vice" (per Puritan/Pharisaic ideals). Historically, it is also worth adding, Roman Order became Catholicism and, via United Nations hybrid New Age philology, the Pope is now the most influential individual man on the planet. Sure, the Buddhists have tried to muscle in with their Dalai Lama, but is he not doing the New Age pas de pas too? NATO is a branch of the Pentagon which is what became of the feared but most prized consortium of merchants; the East India Company.
Back to trading basics
Returning to my history of how coinage symbolises control of the masses, the Romans failed to influence the lowly Brit. Their stinking peasants' coins did not change the mindset of the masses and these quickly became obsolete in favour of barter. Territories that unified to become Germany in 1870 were partially a Roman success, though. Mass populations of influential States were broken from the 8th century onwards under the yoke of copper money. Historically, the Brits have always refused to become an annex of Europe, so attitude outcomes are hardly a surprise. Nevertheless, post decimalisation woes have paved the way for all sorts of horrors, such as membership of the Common Market, European Union and introducing the dreaded Euro alongside coin of the realm. It is sadly looking as though the great British bulldog has been crossbred with the poodle.
When William Conqueror attempted to impose the will of the elites on the English people, he achieved next to nothing (other than commissioning construction of those towering cathedrals designed to swamp faith). Feudalism could only be engineered with silver; coinage of the aristocracy (thinking classes). Craftsmen and serf alike insisted on pay. In fact, unsurprisingly, the introduction of copper coinage only returned with Charles II's milled coins for Britain and Ireland from 1660. The rightful king had been invited back to lead an unconstitutional British monarchy after the elites' hallowed republic dismally failed. Nepotism had dealt a final indignant blow to their enchanted "Commonwealth" (or Protectorate) run by Oliver Cromwell. He had bestowed greater powers on his son than deposed king Charles I had wielded. Charles, of course, had been murdered to usher in a new age of light (which, I must say, equated to excruciating darkness for the masses) clearly of the "deepest black" variety.
Globalised banking (heralding modern day standardisation) reputedly began with an agreement established by Lloyd's Agencies at a London coffee (brought in by the New World) house in 1694, although a little more detail on the politics of the time might make things clearer. The plan had always been to unite the British Isles under the "Union of Jacob". However, both Scotland and Ireland had shown to be uncontrollably troublesome. From the Middle Ages conquest against the Scots was common with memorable battles such as Bannockburn of the second war over independence. The way England and Scotland were eventually permanently joined was via shared kingship. Elizabeth I left no legitimate heir so this allowed James VI of Scotland to become James I of England. Perhaps Mary, Queen of Scots, was executed in vain?
He began costly wars against Ireland with some earnest. James' son, the deposed Charles I, did less, possibly because affairs of state were abruptly interrupted with the civil war of 1642, but unrest in Scotland and Ireland (viewed as a "protectorate") from 1639 onwards is colloquially known as the Bishops' Wars. The hapless king was famously executed in 1649 after losing the civil war and his son was forced into exile. However, in 1651 the Scots crowned Charles II king. With it came an attempt at reinstating Charles with the English throne too. However, this was foiled by roundhead generals in control. Britain, theoretically, was subject to Martial Law from 1649 until Cromwell was sworn in as Protector December 1653. The point I am trying to make is that the 1600's was a period of enormous upheaval and political turbulence, so it is no wonder the bankers felt confident enough to conspire in 1694. It is inconceivable that they weren't linked in some way with the consortiums of merchants that had rebelled against royal authority.
Flemish influence, the Bill of Rights and more tyranny
Two years later William of Orange would be in control of Britain through marriage with Mary Stuart. Mary was the daughter of James II (son of Charles II) who had been deposed and exiled by nobles (merchant bankers) for exerting too much royal power. Notably, King William introduced the Bill of Rights for British aristocrats (which to some degree addressed the failings of the Cromwell republics) along with the Dutch mortgage systems. If the royals were now hypothetically bankrupt, it wouldn't take too long for the aristocracy to follow with the helping bankers' hands. 1696 was the year currency was first pinned to the gold standard (a weights & measures system invented by Sir Isaac Newton). Contextually this is very important as, when England's gold currency collapsed in 1797 (roughly a century after the gold standard was introduced) due to over speculation in the colonies, a short lived silver standard returned using royal stamped Spanish doubloons. It is breathtaking to consider the fact it took merchant bankers a mere century to break currency.
Globalists regularly cite the various Bills of Rights and Constitutions as tenets of democracy. Yet, the reality is that the philology behind Law making has skewed just about all goodwill from the outset. Rhetoric framing "rights" is always far too broad to scope models that work – in the universal sense. Indeed it could be said that the supposed frameworks of democracy are the very instruments of manipulation that evoke tyranny by the backdoor. Thus, special "minority" lobbies (such as AIPAC – a critical favourite of Mantiq-Al-Tayr, but there is always some special love for "hero" Jonathan Pollard too) ensure the masses are perennially subject to their wishes or, perhaps, "subjugated" might be a more apt expression. Great Britain, for instance, has no constitution and relies on a centuries old corporate charter that legitimised royal plunder of free lands. This devils' contract is called the Magna Carta.
Per its 14th Amendment, the American constitution was similarly reduced to a corporate charter in 1868. Limits were possibly first tested by the District of Colombia's "organic" Act 1871 (February 21) which set "Washington" (where all laws are made) adrift from the rest of America. The prior civil war (1861-65) had been a watered down version of the centuries' earlier English one. In this case, though, the contest was between principles defining a constitutional republic and an unconstitutional commercial contract (the friendly way of saying dictatorship). From 1868 America became holus bolus property of the industrialists and is still their dictatorship. The implementation of the Federal Reserve 1913/14 was a system that expanded the "cause" to the rest of the globe. World War One was a celebration of multi-lateral control of the masses.
Gold, silver and bronze reduced to paper
Worthless copper/bronze became the universal peasants' coinage from the 1600's. Coin of the realm should be taken very seriously. In my formative years, I was lucky to live in a Jacobean farmhouse. Ceilings were lined with 1850's and 60's newspaper sheets. Rescuing a few, I found them enthralling reading. These really were harsh times, with burgeoning inquisitions and no rescue for offenders. One young London lass had been sentenced to hang for whitewashing a farthing (one quarter penny) in an attempt to pass it off as a tanner (six pence) to a land owner. She had dared convert something worthless into a thing of value, but, most importantly, she had gone beyond her station. A popular phrase amongst the philanthropic gentry of time was "know your place" (implying their tyranny demonstrated Godly virtue). Mid 1800's saw an industrialists' heyday and enormous conflicts with guilds supporting craft industries. Therefore, it is important that the masses never forsake the sacrifices their forefathers made to improve the lot of those destined to have no future.
Be this as it may, prior to 1918 royal stamped coinage did correctly observe weights and measures (and then incorrectly up to 1945-48). I think I also need to add, at this juncture, Newton's gold standard discussed earlier was more of a formalisation of something that went back to the dawn of creation of money, perhaps pre Atlantis times. As a precaution against fraud, it is difficult to ascertain whether crooks that clipped coins from medieval times onwards were successful in their enterprise or defaced coins were commonly rejected on sight forcing some sort of common law arrests. Theoretically, at least, any attack on the coin of the realm was a form of treason. For drastic evidence, I might select the case of a Mauritian head postmaster who was jailed with his wife in the 1850's for using her facial profile in place of Queen Victoria's on postage stamps. Mind you, the evidence in question was so crudely produced, I cannot fathom how anyone could tell the difference as none of the correct portrayals even vaguely resembled the queen. The point being is it was the thought of it that irked the system and that was enough to vilify outrage. Everything Queen Victoria endorsed was associated with commerce of privilege. That giant marketing organ could not afford to see the royals' status tarnished in any way.
Right up to Word War One currency determined values backed by metals of worth. Whether the denominations were Chinese taels, French francs, Portuguese reals or common old United States of America dollars, all were representative of precious portions determined by mass. A British gold sovereign did not vary. Nor did the guinea piece. They were what they were. Aside from the strange and untrue Washington Post announcement that 6 million Jews had been killed as a consequence of the world war, in 1919 something tragic happened. The monumental domino effect from the collapse of Germany has largely been overlooked by popular history, but if there were charges to be levelled at a New World conspiracy to usurp order, Woodrow Wilson's draconian and unnecessary measures supplanted after the Treaty of Versailles as reparations against the fallen nation was evidence enough. Is that what is meant by New World Order?
Many level imprudent charges against the Federal Reserve for skimming 3% off the top of the US Exchequer. In fact, as far as I can ascertain, the bankers bear all costs associated with design, printing, distribution and stock security, so 3% (as a simple charge) seems more than fair to me. The real issue is, as usual, camouflaged by ignorance. When the cartel of bankers most foul was established, courtesy (in part) of Woodrow Wilson 1913/14, the corporate exchequer had been outsourced to money launderers. Wagon loads of German gold via France came into the United States under the approving eye of that imposing French Statue of Liberty. No wonder the 1920's were roaring. It gave the banking industry in general, the confidence to speculate like it had never done before. Hire purchase was the active response, providing ample opportunity to bankrupt the masses.
Germany was probably bust in 1919 but it took only two years for all the gold prised from the people to impact the Deutsche mark. Ultimately, there was no gold to back paper currency (papiermark had replaced goldmark in 1914 courtesy of the Federal Reserve) so the inevitable happened. Hyperinflation kicked in to eventually break the Deutsche mark. In 1924 a new Reich mark was issued, but those with gold converted savings over the inflation period were ruined without hope of compensation courtesy of the prior reparations scam that had clearly been egged on by Federal Reserve bankers as they were the ones that gained so much from German misery. Since 1920, when the Federal Reserve bankers had the gall to staunchly defend the gold standard (so targeted nations would collapse without their intervention), dozens of currencies have been forced to intermittently drop off it (with "certification" from the Federal Reserve, of course). Nevertheless, Germany is probably the best example of that objective tyranny, though. Even the British pound was not spared. The 1920's and 1930's saw markets intermittently trading worthless banknotes. Arguments inferring that paper money was more flexible and easier to carry are flawed. The real reason paper was used is in deference to the gold standard. Earliest banknotes were no different to today's cheques.
Jiggery pokery post German reparations lionized US-Jewish supremacy launching "commie bastard" Hitler
Though, officially, Franklin Delano Roosevelt took America off the gold standard 5th June 1933, signs of unaccountability were clearly there in 1932 and perhaps, even, 1931. Casualties this time were First World War veterans who had had their pensions' squandered, courtesy of "the boom" and consequential "depression". A 1932 veterans "tent city" Washington protest march was met with callous insensitivity by the government who ended up sending in the National Guard led by gallant MacArthur; an altercation infamously remembered as the "Bonus Army" War. The US bust leading to these unfortunate circumstances had been engineered, once again, by those hallowed Federal Reserve money launderers. Sneakily, in the late 1920's they had syphoned huge gold deposits from America (accountably $840 million) back to Germany in preparation for a newly energised campaign launching Chancellor Hitler, January 1933.
Barely a month after Roosevelt admonished the gold standard; Hitler had signed the Haavara agreement (25th August) with (though better known today) a mysterious order called Zionists. It was after agreed Jewish repatriation (or home moving as Haavara would suggest) to Palestine that anti-Semitism myths began to appear with unrequited vigour. Prior veiled allegations were the Zionists' spineless way of making threats. In fact, Hitler was a mere pawn in their grand game. Once they had repatriation in place, they only needed to encourage Jews that had no intention of leaving their homeland, Germany wasn't safe. In other words "Diasporas" that would not leave were to be pushed out. The ones that hung on to the bitter end were rewarded with maltreatment or death in concentration camps.
Very little has been written about Hitler's Marxist-Socialist ambitions. Not only did he nationalise major German corporations, but he also stole great tranches of land from the German aristocracy (including some Jews). The Goyim, however, were not given blessed Jewish passage. Many years ago, my old work colleagues' father informed me that after land seizure, the Von Grundherr family had emigrated from Germany to Britain with anything and everything they could carry. Their vast Bavarian estates were gone forever. See how the totalitarians omit history to craft false impressions? In fact Goebbels' "brownshirts" were scathingly labelled Brown Bolsheviks by propagandists after World War Two and undeniably leftist, Hitler, is noted for his admiration of Stalin prior to the breakdown of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact (1939).
1914 saw the rapid reintroduction of passport control in the European region, so clearly and demonstrably "people management" was calculated well in advance of the precursor to the modern enslavement of humanity. Few have taken the time to learn that the passport system was abolished in France in 1861 due to a massive influx of tourists that overwhelmed immigration to such a degree it could not cope. Overall, though, the net tightened on global border security from 1947, which is odd, considering the Jew's lament so about how Hitler used their identification papers against them. Only one year later reformed Israel became reality and the Bretton Woods System effectively universally forfeited the gold standard (only to be introduced as United States policy by Nixon in 1971, which ties in with the unspoken "5 Year Plan" that saw formulation of the Trilateral Commission in 1973 and the end of the Vietnam war in 1975). Other than a brief hiccup in Australia, with the introduction of sterling silver 50 cent coins (rounds) in 1966, global coinage reverted to copper/nickel amalgams. Gold and silver was absent never to return?
He who controls the gold wins: return to Israel by ass
Forget the Jewish proverb, "he that has the gold wins" as it is the controllers of the gold that are always in the box seat. Control of gold was used to create the two great wars and the Russian "revolution" (or, to be pertinent, Zionist coup-d'état). Mainstream history would never report real popular revolutions because that would distort totalitarian branding objectives. All "uprisings" are elite sponsored successes, invariably with outcomes recorded in a less than historically perfect way. As Napoleon once said, "History is a set of lies agreed upon and written by the winners". Fortunately there have been enough unfunded and ostracised true historians to provide adequate fleeting glimpses of legitimate information to break the mould for those with persistence of learning. Agreed, intense investigation is more time consuming, requires greater diligence and discernment, but also makes the discovery tour a blissful treasure rewarding journey. I swear by it!
It was after 1975 that the new concept, futures & options, blossomed to take markets by storm, elevating consumerism to unthinkably heady heights. To which end, the United States of America is now theoretically in debt to the tune of over $200 trillion. Whom this debt is payable to is a question everyone should demand answered, for, according to my calculations, every single "nation" on Earth is more or less in the same boat as the USA. If "balance of deficits" is not some sick joke, this is a sham of most devastating proportions; a sham that affects every human being belonging to a system that isn't in power. We now have the situation where tax payers' money is worthless and nations that issue it don't have any actual capital to back promises even if they wanted to. Pledges supposedly in support of the people invariably aren't. In fact, genuine ones are so infrequent; it must be said, in some ways policy makers give the industrialists' enslavement of the masses agenda relative transparency.
The reason Nixon backed off the gold standard was simple. Capitalism had won by 1971 as that marked the year the merchant bankers owned the world. There is a path out of the mess that is being gently crafted by BRICS nations (acronym for Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), but I smell a double cross as far as the people are concerned. Real revolt is the only way to turn the industrialists' clock back. Revolt can be peaceful, violent or a combination, but it must be put into motion for real change. Descendants should be ever vigilant for lasting remedies. For an example of genuine reactionary politics in favour of the people, one only needs to inspect shenanigans in Italy. Forget the Iceland nonsense. Italy is an unrivalled corporate nation in so much as the people haven't completely lost their way and become detached from the political negotiation table. Other populations need to arbitrate Latin style and liberty might just reclaim some territory.
Free thoughts about corporate Catholicism, Zionism, P G Wodehouse and George Orwell's "totalitarian Israel" pun
There are so many other things I wanted to talk about in conjunction with this, but, as I have already exceeded 6,000 words, it is going to take more than one sitting to do justice to the subject matter. Future articles will expand on the baseline "Totalitarian Brands", as mentioned in the introduction. Building credentials of "yes men" to drive fake science is one item to be covered at length, though I do give hints in an earlier entry (Is Science Illusionary). Perhaps hilarious P G Wodehouse's character, Sir Roderick Glossop, will be selected to emphasise how much philosophy in deference to data helps to validate quack science opinion. For the ill-informed, Glossop runs an experimental psychiatry clinic with founding principles intimating that by allowing sheer immoderation of consumption is enough to break any habit or addiction. Early in the narrative line our fearless sanatorium owner is quick to admit none of his patients had ever shown any cessation of immoderation, but, neither had they relapsed [from this "extremely popular" treatment]. By that token, his system was "theoretically impeccable".
The difference between consultants and slaves also deserves detailed separate discussion. Rogue branding campaigns, particularly the ones that appear misunderstood or perhaps even championed by confused free thinkers, will be tackled tactfully. In recent times, much emphasis has been placed on so-called chemtrails as the root of all modern sickness. This simply is not true as, more seriously, they are being used as a smokescreen to cover blatantly obvious petrochemical pollution; pollution I might add that likely causes all cancers, many viruses and other nagging health concerns. The anti-renaissance flat Earth movement has returned, welcomed by the Catholic Church no doubt. Though in many ways Catholicism is the balance of power against Zionism, it issues its own version of rabid propaganda which, in that capacity, can deeply impede those paths to enlightenment for unstable truth seekers that teeter on the brink of bewilderment. These hapless, well-meaning souls are regularly lured into a kind of corrupt solace from the power of "faction groups".
Pretty much from 1948 the globe was treated as a fortress with stringent passport control implemented where infrastructures existed, the Bretton-Woods scheme replaced gold, deregulating paper currency (assuring all foreign exchange traded through the non-existent greenback standard) in the same year and silver was mysteriously removed from coins (as a global control measure). There surely must be much more to the conspiracy involving the reformation of Israel also in 1948. Why are there such extraordinarily high percentages of Jewish bank directors, political stakeholders and mass media owners today? In my notes pre-empting this project, I lightly scribbled "Federal Reserve New Age con". For the life of me, I cannot remember what I meant by that unless I was referring to the role the United Nations plays in loosely scoping concepts found in Aldous Huxley's "A Brave New World". That said I'm sure it was important, so when I remember I'll certainly cover it too.
Wrapping up with me, Martin Luther, Napoleon Bonaparte and Mantiq-Al-Tayr
Before I sign off, I promised an introduction to the fine work and vigilance of Mantiq-Al-Tayr. Though his articles unashamedly favour the Arabian cosmopolitan view on life, the world and everything, he also patriotically champions America in the honourable sense of that word. Thus, many criticisms would be of universal appeal to those seeking more honest perspectives on life, the world and everything. Not just because he perceives his deadliest enemies as agents of Zionism, but there is also comedy, passionate language and even the occasional vagrant belly dancer to tantalise prying eyes. To be brutally frank, unless you are in the Jewish club, everyone's most deadly enemies are agents of Zionism even if they (Zionists incognito) call themselves something else. Reformist Jesuit (had the spirit of Catholicism become so decayed by 1517 it had ceased to be viable?), Martin Luther, had much to say about the Jews.
"Thus, wherever they can direct Scripture to their insatiable avarice, they wickedly do so. Therefore know, my dear Christians, that next to the Devil, you have no more bitter, more poisonous, more vehement an enemy than a real Jew who earnestly desires to be a Jew. There may be some among them who believe what the cow or the goose believes. But all of them are surrounded with their blood and circumcision. In history, therefore, they are often accused of poisoning wells, stealing children and mutilating them; as in Trent, Weissensee and the like. Of course they deny this. Be it so or not, however, I know full well that the ready will is not lacking with them if they could only transform it into deeds, in secret or openly." (One of Martin Luther's pleasanter quotes against Zionism, circa 1500's)
Napoleon Bonaparte's wisdom "You don't reason with intellectuals. You shoot them" may seem rather inexcusable. Nevertheless, the science-atheist-Zionist allegiance is not to be reasoned with because desired truths can be reconstructed from any approximate fantasy simply through misdirection, perhaps in the way lawyers deliberately misinterpret contracts. Let us say someone symbolised a conductor's reasonable request for passengers to alight from a train as the catastrophic command; leave the train on fire. That would parry with some misdirection stunts pulled over the years in the interests of zeal. This particular blog never will be a Jew bashing forum. I recommend investigation into the Israelite prodigal musician Daniel Barenboim's eloquent efforts championing the Palestinians' plight. There are many other erstwhile unknown Jewish heroes of virtue for those committed to digging deep.
Mantiq-Al-Tayr goes out of his way to highlight psy-op misdirection, but he also observes more mundane "in your face" system abuses that seem to go unchecked by authorities. For instance he will not let the world forget Israel's heinous and unpunished attack on sovereign America June 8th, 1967. This unforgettable event was, of course, the foul and merciless torpedoing of USS Liberty. I won't add to Mantiq's thunder other than remarking he has ripped the veil covering the Whitehouse asunder. Please visit his website and pass on your thoughts. You might also wish to review posting archives which stretch back the best part of a decade or, perhaps, prior. He presents the brand Zion "God" so well. Diligent researchers will find it most interesting and disheartening at the same time that there has been virtually no change in Whitehouse administrative attitudes from bonehead Bush to that current black Messiah.
We have covered belligerent order first delivered by renegade priest-kings and then atheist commerce tsars, introduction of money where none had been present, currency regulation via arbitrary standards and covert controlled fiscal deregulation. There are a couple of other pieces of the puzzle needed to complete this sorry picture. Abolishment of slavery in England, 1807, did nothing to improve the lot for Irish immigrants now forced to work as "servants" for a pittance. Timing was calculated for the burgeoning industrial revolution. Improvements in manufacturing technologies had begun to impact the crafts' industry back in the 18th century. Purists might question the "point" of more than one currency unit fulfilling the needs of a federalised Earth. The pertinence of multiple currencies, as far as the industrialists are concerned, was shown from cotton stock record profits made directly after slavery ending in the United States. In the spirit of déjà vu, 1865 saw the Negroes offered the same raw deal the Irish received before. It was all about stock values, excise tax and insurance. I will leave you switched on researchers to join the dots for now.
Thus, the reason he who controls the gold wins, is it is how markets are driven that directs how populations will react [to synthetic conditions]. So if you want refugees, war and chaos, as an industrialist master, you merely need to influence markets with your gold because, though standards have been abolished, baseline value has always been inevitably measured against that filthy precious commodity. Right to export and price of imports can make or break nations. Particularly since 1971 another reckless asset has made and broken fortunes. Remembering that chemtrail smokescreen, oil is sometimes called black gold and has worked with its yellow metal partner in a pincer movement to ensnare markets of modern times. Petrodollars (invented in 1973) hidden in sovereign wealth funds (laundered by investment banks) has camouflaged incomprehensible universal funding by Saudi Arabia in particular. Super-rich Saudis are colloquially known as Wahhabis (die hard Zionists, surprise, surprise) by the way. Included in their fold are such personable families as the Bin Ladens. To coin the popular phrase, "has the penny dropped, yet?"
Posted on June 18, 2016 by ozziethinker	in Deep, hidden and real history, Profile of the Gnostic Jesus, Rage against the machine	• Tagged 14th Amendment, 1948, 1971, 1984, 5 Year Plan, 50 cent rounds, A Brave New World, accolade, AIPAC, Aldous Huxley, Alexander the Great, all knowing, American dictatorship, American natives, ancient Israelites, antagonisms, anti-renaissance, Aramaic, argenteus, Ark of the Covenant, assumption, atheism, Atlantis, Australia, Avalon, balance of deficits, Barabbas, battle of Bannockburn, Bible, bill of rights, bin laden, bishops wars, black gold, black Messiah, bloodline of David, bonehead Bush, Bonus army war, Brand perception, Brands, breakaway Israelites, Bretton-Woods system, BRICS, British bulldog, British campaign, bronze, Brown Bolsheviks, brownshirts, Buddhist Tibet wars, Cambridge, cancers, cathedrals, catholic, Celts, Chancellor Hitler, Charles I, Charles II, cheese moon, chemtrails, cheques, Christian Church, Christian truther networks, CIA, civil war, Cleopatra, clipped coins, common land, Communist takeover, concentration camps, constitution, copper, corporate, crucifixion, cult, Daniel Barenboim, Dead Sea scrolls, denarii, Deutsche mark, Diasporas, druids, Egyptian, Elizabeth I, Eton, fake ownership, father of Jesus, FBI, federal reserve, flat Earth, flavius, Four Gospels, Franklin D Roosevelt, free land, futures & options, Gaza, General MacArthur, George Orwell, Glastonbury, Globalised banking, Globalist Strategy, Gnostic Jesus, Goebbels, gold, gold currency, gold standard, government corporate sponsors, Greek, Haavara agreement, Harrow, Hebrew, hieroglyphs, Holy Blood, holy grail, Hyksos, hypocrite, Iceland nonsense, innovators, Jacobean farmhouse, James I, James II, James VI, January 1933, Jewish proverb, Jonathan Pollard, Joseph Ben Matityahu, Joseph of Arimathea, joseph P farrell, Josephus, journalism, judges, Justus, Latin, laureate, libres, Lloyd's Agencies, London School of Economics, Macedonians, magna carta, Mantiq-Al-Tayr, Maree Moore, Mars, martin luther, Marxist-Socialist, Mary Queen of Scots, Mary Stuart, material belief systems, Matthais, metaphors, Michael Tsarion, Middle Ages feudalism, miliarense, milled coins, mint, misdirection, Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, Moses, mystery schools, Napoleon, NATO, natural progression, Negroes. Irish, New Age con, New World Order, nickel amalgams, Nikolai Levashov, Nixon, non-existent greenback standard, NSA, nummus, occult, oil, Oliver Cromwell, organic act 1871, Oxford, P G Wodehouse, paedophilia, Palestine, pantheism, paper currency, papiermark, passport control, pedo, pence, Pentagon, petrochemical pollution, Petrodollars, Pharisees, Philistines, pioneers, Pittsburgh penny, Pontius Pilate, Pope, pounds, priest kings, privy to, Promised Land, propagandists, prophecy, Protectorate, puppet masters, Queen Victoria's empire, ransacked Jericho, Reformist Jesuit, Reich mark, Religions, religious leaders, reparations, resurrection, revolutionaries, Roman refuse, Roman royal, Roman tyranny, Romanov dynasty, Rothschild, roundhead, royalist, russian revolution, selfishness, sentenced to hand, servants, shillings, silver, Simon Cyrene, Sir Roderick Glossop, slaves, smokescreen, solodi, Spanish doubloons, Stalin, Staters, syndrome, tenets of democracy, tent city, The Beauty of Existence Decoded, theoretically impeccable, Totalitarian, treason, Treaty of Versailles, trend setters, Trilateral Commission, Tsar Nicholas II, unconstitutional British monarchy, united nations, USS Liberty, usurpers, vaccines, vice, Vietnam war, viruses, war, washington, Whitehouse administrative attitudes, whitewashing farthing, william of orange, William the Conqueror, woodrow wilson, World War III, Yeshua, Zionism, Zionist • 7 Comments
The Mindset of Psychosis
People that claim they are "open-minded" simply do not tell the truth. Belief systems are formed in the earliest developmental stages of life and, when set; each rehearsed dogma needs a battle to be disbelieved. Our core beliefs are usually so strong they will remain valid even when believers are convinced otherwise. "Oh, they told me UFO's were real but I knew that wasn't true" is your typical reverse validation. Deep down, if the message doesn't fit it won't fit no matter what. Therefore, I have one paragraph to capture the imaginations of an audience. You are allowed to reach out and, providing comments are not unnecessarily rude, criticism is welcome. It would be nice to know a few of you actually had the chutzpah "to be".
Considering the sheer weight of information to be found on the net these days, if my message deviates an inch from those beliefs' comfort zone, I'm gone, finished, put in the trash can, offended readers likely never to revisit. Some, due to narcissism, won't even refer to "unknown sources" which assures logic assesses references as must be spurious. So, I lost them before I even put pen to paper. Articles with ambiguous or neutral titles are avoided perhaps because time poor people waste not, but as likely, given the mindset of psychosis, readers might also do everything in their power to avoid being confronted with truth. Truth, contrary to erudite populism, is inflexible and consistent. People, in general, do not want their opinions challenged or ruffled in any way, so factual legitimacy all too rarely finds sanctuary in popular theories.
It was the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that reputedly first coined the phrase conspiracy theorists in 1967; a slur aimed at faceless critics distributing "evidence lacking" conjecture. Any more than two parties that join forces conspire. All statements are theories. The expression, conspiracy theorists, would be acceptable when used as a witty metaphor camouflaging the derogatory attack on simple minded enemies. Targets are gossipers that peddle myths lacking substance. The term conspiracy theory, on the other hand, is ambiguous and nonsensical. Does this reflect statements that coordinate the joint efforts of multiple parties? If conspiracy is a euphemism for gossip, it is a poor one.
Nevertheless, the hybrid term is understood because it validates the mindset of psychosis, i.e. being right always trumps honesty and due diligence. Conspiracy theories, as labelled, can contain high levels of truth. We have already noted people like flexible authenticity and arbitrary verisimilitude. No black and white. Only shades of grey. Per faceless man reasoning, therefore, conspiracy theories should be avoided where possible. Back in the 1960's I would like to think the majority of activists were sincere, their concerns just and their actions vigilant, whilst honourable. If this is correct, then logic dictates alternatives to official historic accounts were not frivolous. That philosophy doubtlessly has changed, for the internet has a down side. Sheer volume encourages mass production of the worse kind, bad habits and sloppiness. Views that contradict the mainstream can now be more corrupt than wayward accredited sources. We might find a suitable analogy in the espionage industry. Double agents are conceptually similar to "double conspiracy theories".
Periodically, I reflect on something I call the human condition. Years ago, before I attempted to put thoughts to writing, perhaps forlorn, perhaps devout, I wandered the vast internet as a lonely hermit seeking identity for purpose. This journey look me before Jon Rappoport and, as a subscriber of his instructional blogs, I listen to what he has to say very carefully. We are not always in agreement on issues, but most of the time we are, well, the expression "of one mind" impresses me. Jon has asked me, us subscribers, to watch Sydney Lumet's film "Network" more than once. Not a movies person, I reluctantly set aside 15 minutes discipline a week and have been gradually been working my way through the 2 hours of footage.
The central character is a disgruntled news broadcaster who first has a meltdown on air and then is picked up and promoted by unscrupulous elements looking to improve corporate ratings, which is an impeccable irony (e.g. the network's toxic critic is their golden cash calf to salvation). Howard Beale exposes the inadequacies of news broadcasts reduced to fantasies that pander to "highest bidder" stakeholder interests better than our current best conspiracy theorists. Rather underwhelming his thunder, he asks his viewers to "do nothing" but just "get madder than hell". Though the dialogue sizzles with strategically placed F bombs, a novelty for 1976, the movie cannot avoid overstating the human condition. Indeed Beale's big soccer punch does nothing more than expose that television does not report, but rather politicises. In fact, he highlights ongoing deficiencies in the population at large by his own lack of remedial direction. The mindset of psychosis is an ocean of problems with no solution in sight. It should be no surprise that buoyant stagnancy is the only feasible response.
Beale made an example of those that read newspapers (we presume serious copy, rather than tabloid smut). A paltry slither of the populations at large was representative, but how many of those really understood and "delved"? We know, today, that newspapers cannot be trusted as well as all are either the mouthpieces of corporate advertisers or governments. Even books (that sell) are invariably written to support given opinions backing corporate or government interests, so to ascertain absolute neutrality (truth) is almost impossible.
I have only worked through an hour and a quarter so there is 45 minutes of movie unseen. There may be surprises to come, but, thus far, nothing has shocked me (though, back in 1976, this sort of overt criticism would have been very unusual and, in my limited scrutiny, I think watered down by any other vague comparisons). In exposing the deficiencies of the system, Beale inadvertently revealed two much greater defects in the populations at large. They (his followers), the script intimates, would not be prepared to revolt (to get mad is a form of protest). Their televisions' make believe had largely become the basis for reality because of the academic redundancy of the majority. Neither did the people know any facts nor would they contemplate the issues in any meaningful way.
This, to the greater degree, correlates with today's situation. Whereas the perceived total reliability of information offered by "the news" is not what it was, because people have such limited knowledge, the void is mostly populated by doubt. That means, of course, peoples' familiarity with truth is more or less absent, so doubts simply fester, unchallenged for the most part. People judge "the news" on what sounds believable and not on merit. Of course, that which satisfies social programming (i.e. "education", government/corporate standards, widely promoted philosophies that justify what it is to be socially acceptable) is delivered by the very same forces that engineer "the news". So we have a self-perpetuating circle, broken only by geniuses (oracles that see beyond "the bubble").
To a fashion this has encouraged a kind of mass psychosis which morphs as the mindset of populism. Though the mindset changes with political trends, the populist view is always active sanity even when reason or logic individually applied might demote certain views as insane. Thus, if the populist tradition is "vaccines are the sane choice", to go against vaccines would be insanity, if that makes sense. Nevertheless, breakaways from the mainstream have calculated such a sizeable collection of swayable minds; it is noted that alternative dichotomies are strong enough to stand alone and, in that capacity, would usually predetermine that "sanity" is the precise opposite of the mainstreamers' position. For alternatives, therefore, to back vaccines would be sheer insanity. The mainstream Media, as Jon Rappoport regularly illustrates, are masters at promoting populism. They control left and right, mainstream and alternative and everywhere in between. Only very occasional prophets (or geniuses, if you prefer), mostly misunderstood, remove the veil of hypocrisy.
The three main aspects of human character that drag group potential down to the gutter are greed, laziness and selfishness. These traits, particularly in the modern age, are the rule rather than the exception. This is partly because the true value of words has been deliberately twisted or obscured by corporate miscreants that direct mainstream Medias. Spinelessness, pusillanimity and treachery are celebrated as evidence of qualities purveying patriotism, virtue and honour. Devout cowards are regularly called brave. Oxymoron after oxymoron crafts normalcy. "The machine" wants submissive slaves, whining as they work and just about everyone obeys the system, hook, line and sinker. "The machine" wants sulking protestors. The more the merrier. You good people affirm social apathy. You are not a threat to them and they will destroy you at their leisure.
The "filth"
Those that dare to take on the system never protest. They act wisely, cunningly and discretely, conjuring and deploying the most plausibly destructive, clandestine strategies against their foes. The "masses" great and only advantage is being "faceless", so anonymity is strength. Corporate order knows this well and that is why their hired trouble makers are always in plain clothes when all-too-rarely in focus. In fact the powers have manufactured invisibility in industrial quantities. How many unknown government agencies or outsourced third parties have contributed to the all-encompassing globalist agenda of Zionism? Thinking laterally, are those [Skype and] e-mail scammers (banking shams, cheap medications and other rip-offs) the coordinated product of a consolidated "op" dedicated to manufacturing "mistrust of strangers"? If so, that would satisfy the wider interests of Zionism which has three fundamental wishes.
Family members must be held perpetually accountable. Public opinion is designed to gravitate around mainstream views calculated by the architects of our governance systems. Parents are both exalted and threatened. Pro-system whistle blowers, snitches, eves droppers are encouraged. Per this tyranny, children are commodities with no rights or personalities. As arbitrary tokens of justice, sensationalising the removal of children from bad broods is used to keep borderline recalcitrant families in line. For their part, families must systemise children. Parental, administrative (schools and so forth) oversight is crucial to the Zionist objective. There are no exceptions to diktat. There is no way out. Government is to be respected, feared or both and, as such, is answerable only to itself.
Mischievously deceptive hyperbole dressed as paedophilia, terrorism and intoxication has been used to paint "the stranger" into a corner. Bad parts of families that aren't bad broods are rejects or black sheep. Estranged family members may as well be strangers. This all came about because "stranger" is used as a code word in the bible. The Hebrew word it replaces is "Goyim" (which really means "national" or "person of a nation"). Thus, fundamental populist ignorance must be the mindset of modern psychosis, because just about everyone follows the script like lambs to the slaughter.
The process does not stop with family programming. Systems (currently ad hoc Zionism, but that chic could rebrand) thrive on absolute control. They (the system architects) are attempting to regulate God. Ultimately God, the spiritual entity, cannot exist, because if He existed it would permit free thought and free thought does not work in programmed societies. Therefore the de facto science-atheist alliance (conspiracy?) that presumes authority is at constant loggerheads with nature. If nature is the cooperative essence of God, then regulation and proscribed order can only promote "chaos". True anarchy (prescient order), proto-Zionism, has etched the mindset of psychosis which is man, the automaton. Zionists do at least live up to their name, for the Pharisees were the original usurpers of order. "Jesus", it seems, died in vain.
Posted on May 11, 2016 by ozziethinker	in Rage against the machine	• Tagged 1967, alternative Medias, ambiguous, Anarchism, anarchy, anonymity, Belief systems, chutzpah, conspiracy theorists, core beliefs, corporate interests, corrupt mainstream Media, developmental stages, disgruntled news broadcaster, dogma, double agents, drug abuse, espionage, eves droppers, F bombs, faceless man, geniuses, globalism, golden cash calf, gossipers, Goyim, Hebrew, highest bidder, Howard Beale, human automaton, human condition, ignorance, insane, jesus, Jon Rappoport, lacking substance, mindset, must be spurious, Network (1976), neutral, open-minded, paedophilia, Peter Finch, Pharisees, plain clothed, populism, pro-system, programmed, prophets, psychosis, regulation, sane, science-atheism, serious copy, snitches, social programming, strangers, Sydney Lumet, tabloid smut, terrorism, tyranny, UFO, unknown sources, whistle blowers, Zionism • 20 Comments