text:
BARABTARLO.
December 18, 2009 by languagehat 94 Comments
One of the major Nabokov scholars these days is Gennady Barabtarlo, Professor of Russian at the University of Missouri, who studied Russian literature at Moscow University, got a PhD at the University of Illinois (his dissertation was on Pnin, which he has since translated into Russian), and has published poems and short stories alongside his articles on Nabokov; most recently, he has translated the posthumous semi-demi-novel The Original of Laura into Russian, in connection with which he was interviewed by Dmitri Bavilsky for Chastny Korrespondent. The most immediately striking thing about the interview (which was linked by Anatoly) is that Barabtarlo's portion of it is in the old, prerevolutionary orthography (see this LH post, and note that the reform was actually promulgated by the Provisional Government in the summer of 1917, not by the Bolsheviks, which makes Barabtarlo's position even odder than it would be anyway); he explains it thus (Russian below the cut):
It would help the rebirth not only of writing but of Russian civilization in general if there were an unconditional and decisive mass recoiling from everything produced by Soviet power, as people recoil with disgust from corruption [porcha] or infection, and this applies in the first place to speech in all its forms, including its written form (literary language is the last and least concern).
He has much more to say about translating in general and translating Nabokov, and I was greatly interested in his answer to the question "Which is closer to you, the Berlin Sirin [who wrote in Russian] or the American Nabokov, who wrote in English?" He begins by saying he doesn't know any Russian emigrant—including Nabokov's sister Elena, who knew English very well—who wouldn't prefer the Russian Nabokov, "which is natural enough," but goes on to say he himself believes the American Nabokov went farther artistically.
However, what concerns me at the moment is the name Barabtarlo: what is it from, and how is it pronounced? I say to myself /barab'tarlo/ (bah-rahb-TAR-low), but with very little confidence. The only thing I've found online is this brief Q&A, which says "On Ancestry.com, Barabtarlo turns up in listings as 'Bessarabia (now Moldova).' Many of them are identified as Jews." My wild guess would be that it is derived from a Hebrew abbreviation, as the family name Barabash is from Ben Rabbi-Bunim Shmul, but I'd love to have something besides a wild guess to go on.
Помочь общему возрожденію не только словесности, но и вообще русской цивилизаціи могло бы безусловное и массовое отшатываніе рѣшительно отъ всего, произведеннаго совѣтской властью, какъ отшатываются съ отвращеніемъ отъ порчи или заразы, и это едва ли не въ первую очередь относится къ рѣчи, во всѣхъ ея формахъ, въ томъ числѣ и письменной (литературный языкъ — послѣдняя и наименьшая забота).
vanya says
Apparently Internet Explorer can't reproduce "yat"s – I just get boxes. Anyone else have this problem?
Nijma says
Vanya, if you mean the Russian in the above post, I just looked at it with IE in both Windows XP and Vista and see nothing unusual.
Interesting—I opened it in IE and am getting boxes as well.
The second letter in this word should be a yat: рѣшительно. Are you seeing the letter or a box, Nij?
A letter. Screenshot in Vista.
bulbul says
I got a letter in FF, IE and Chrome (Vista 64-bit, XP). What's your setup, Vanya?
As for the name, if it is indeed Jewish, here's a wild guess:
bar = Aramaic for 'son'
ab = Aramaic / Hebrew for 'father'
tar = Aramaic t'r 'to notice, to understand'
And that -lo could be either "his, to him" or the Slavic suffix. But here my judgment is clouded by the immediate association with another professor, Amvrosiy Ambroisovich Vybegallo from Monday Begins on Saturday – not that I'm making a comparison, far from it.
You've left the URL out of your last link; I'll be glad to insert it if you'll tell me what it is.
Oy sorry, it's this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monday_Begins_on_Saturday.
Several Windows Service Pack updates have become available in the last several days.
I don't know enough Russian (or about Russian) to have a justified opinion, but based on the very little I do know, I'd say that on linguistic grounds (as opposed to political ones as far as the two can be clearly distinguishedm there! enough hedges yet?) the 'new' orthography is better than the old no matter who came up with it. If anything I think it could have gone farther.
But then as a fundamentally non-visually oriented person my preference is for writing and speech to go in roughly the same direction rather than in wildly different ones.
Dr. Weevil says
An ignorant question: is the resemblance of "the family name Barabash" to the name of the NT Barabbas purely coincidental?
MMcM says
I'll look in A dictionary of Jewish surnames from the Russian Empire when I'm at the public library this weekend; Google Books won't say more than that it's in there.
Thanks, all, for the advice, in Firefox I can see the ѣ just fine.
deadgod says
When I first read the name (in the post) I inwardly pronounced: bar AHB tar loh.
kishnevi says
I'd guess the name derives from a local language, or at most something Turkish, like most Jewish surnames in that area. My grandfather, for instance, was a Jew born near Kishinev in the mid 1890s; his family name was Smid (which eventually was turned into Smith once he reached the USA). A name constructed from Aramaic would very exotic (sorry Bulbul); although something based on Hebrew acronyms might be plausible. (My other grandfather's name was a acronym that is almost a word in its own right, Shatz (for shliach tzibbur, meaning the man who leads the congregational prayers in the absence of a formal cantor–which my grandfather often did, and apparently was something of a traditional function in his family.) Also remember that Jewish family names tended to be very fluid.
Kutsuwamushi says
I say to myself /barab'tarlo/ (bah-rahb-TAR-low), but with very little confidence.
I've never met him, but this is how I've heard it pronounced by people in his department. (I took Russian classes at MU.) Those were native English speakers, although some also spoke Russian very well.
In Russian it looks like a composite of Бараб- and Тарло. As a composite it would have two stresses (pitches): Bah-RAB-tahr-LO with the stronger pitch on O. But of course surnames often change pronounciation when they go from one language to another.
As for etymology, there is a well known Polish-Russian surname Tarlo, with Polish aristocrats linked to Marina Mnishek and a contemporary Russian lawyer. The word itself, I think, means 'manger'. Baraba (Barabinskoye) is a village in South Urals, a crossing point between Europe and Asia in the region called Barabinskaya steppe.
But isn't it better to ask the man himself? he has a page on the university web-site?
A.J.P. Megkoronáz says
Barbabietola is one of the few words of Italian I know, it means beetroot, or beets. It stuck in my mind, and has been of little or no use to me over the years.
something based on Hebrew acronyms might be plausible
There are a lot more than I would have dreamed before I acquired Unbegaun's book on surnames. A few more: Bash (Ben Shimeon), Katz (Kohen-Tzedek), Shats (Sheliah-Tsibbur), Barsak (Ben Rabbi Zalman Kalonimus), Magarshak (Morenu Ha-rab Rabbi Shelomo Kluger), Marshak (Morenu Rabbi Shelom Kluger).
I've never met him, but this is how I've heard it pronounced by people in his department.
Thanks very much! At least I know I'm in good company.
But isn't it better to ask the man himself?
Not a bad idea; if MMcM doesn't come up with the answer, maybe I'll do that.
Barabtarlo from the hyphenated surname Barab-Tarlo, which was found in Kiev. (Barbatarlo)
Bagrov BenHoRaV [Hebrew] son of rabbi. (Barav (Baraf), Bogorov, Bogrov, Barov, Bovov)
Tarlo from the townlet of Tarlo (Lubartów d[istrict] of Lublin gub[erniya]). (Tarle, Tarler, Tarlinskij, Terlo)
Excellent! So I was right about the Hebrew acronym, for the first part, and Sashura was right about the Polish-Russian surname Tarlo (though I don't know why he wants to stress the -o; Unbegaun gives the stress as TAR-lo, which of course is what it would be in Polish). So it's 'son of the Tarler rabbi.' I thank you, sir.
One final twist
I've been told (learned this when doing some genealogical research on my family) that the same Cyrillic letter was used to represent both the G and H sounds in Hebrew names–which is how the G would have gotten into "BenHaRav". Thus, my grandmother's family name was Hondleman (from the word "hondler", meaning someone who "hondles" or trades)=Gondelman. This grandmother, btw, is the one who married my grandfather Smid, and in fact she too was from Moldava, so Gondelman/Hondelman is yet another Jewish Moldavan surname.
why he wants to stress the -o
I suggested this, because, if unstressed, the 'o' at the end would turn into 'a'. But that's in Russian, in English the drawled 'o' would still be heard. But I think you are right, look at this famous remark by academician Evgeny Tarle at the height of Stalin's anti-semitic campaign: «…я не француз, а еврей, и моя фамилия произносится Тáрле». (I am not French, but Jewish, and my surname is pronounced TAR-leh).
I'll be glad to insert it if you'll tell me what it is
is it okay to use future after 'if'? my school English stops me from doing this, but in a freely flowing conversation I'd do it without thinking.
Yes, 'will' can follow 'if', but has a slightly different meaning, to me it indicates a kind of negotiation (or simple willingness on the part of the speaker) that's absent in the forms without will.
It's also more colloquial (and not usually taught to learners, since it makes the whole conditional mess in English even more difficult).
ah! thanks, I knew they were hiding something from us.
as far as his interview is concerned, I think using pre-reform orthography is crude posturing. It is general knowledge that the reform was prepared well before the revolution, but it was associated with the new regime. Bunin, for one, complained about the new bolshevik rules.
the same Cyrillic letter was used to represent both the G and H sounds in Hebrew names
Yes, there is no /h/ in Russian (except in some southern dialects bordering Ukrainian), so foreign h gets rendered either g (traditional) or kh (modern, as in Khemingvei).
I think using pre-reform orthography is crude posturing
Well, posturing maybe, but "crude" seems unfair—how crude can a yat' be?
marc says
I agree with Sashura. What's better about making people write ея for eё? Or ыя for ые? And all those i's and yats and whatever. As the Russians say, cauchemar!
(I knew one person in Russia who insisted on using the old orthography, a Serbian woman engagingly named Dragana Drakulić, whose social views were as reactionary as her orthographic ones.)
That said, Barabtarlo's main point is to reject all things Soviet, first and foremost, and rejection of orthography seems a natural corollary, however misguided it may be. He himself states that the written form of the language is the least of their worries, though, so why take the melodramatic step of using the old spelling? I think this is what Sashura means by crude — it's not the letters themselves that are crude, but Barabtarlo's (hopefully feigned) ignorance of the basic fact of language that writing systems are totally arbitrary. In other words, if the systems were reversed (with the yats et al. being associated with the Soviet Union) then he would be advocating the current system. That would at least have the saving grace of advocating a simpler system, but his proposal is a linguistic gesture on the level of a 15-year-old girl swearing never to wear purple again because the boyfriend who just dumped her gave her a purple scarf.
That's what's crude about it.
However, all of this is beside the point, since the country will never revert to the old spelling system, and Barabtarlo knows it perfectly well, making his gesture all the cruder for its emptiness.
yat can't be crude, shurly. are you pulling my leggings?
the interviewer asks: why do you insist on using pre-reform orthogrpahy? and Barabtarlo says: Russian orthography is as natural to me as Soviet is to you.
This is crude posturing to me. He can't be much older or younger than me, or Vladimir Yakovlev, the founder of КоммерсантЪ newspaper, which took Ъ (yer – hard mark, not used at the end of words ending with consonants since the reform) as their logo. That was widely seen as styeb or posturing. And it started the new fashion of using pre-reform orthogrpahy for all sorts of emphatic purposes.
I can't believe pre-reform Russian is more natural to Gennady Barabtarlo, a native speaker, than Soviet (which it isn't) orthogrpahy, much debated and continuously improved by the best brains in Russian (not Soviet) lingusitics before and after the revolution.
Jeff Blakeslee says
You can hear Ivan Tolstoy say /barapˈtarla/ a number of times beginning around 13:20 in this Radio Svoboda program. (In case that streaming link doesn't work here is the mp3). So there's another Russian speaker comfortable with the accent where you have it.
either g (traditional) or kh (modern)
Харпо Маркс ("Exapno Mapcase")
I remember someone saying, and I think it was Nabakov or someone writing about Nabakov, that the letter theta was eliminated from the new alphabet, in part because it was used in so many obscenities. My source even said that the word "thetiuk" was used as an insult.
Previous efforts have failed to confirm that this is true or even that it is a joke of Nabakov's. So maybe I dreamed all this, thoug if so, that was quite a dream.
Sorry, it was the literary language that he said is the least of their worries, and includes the written form of the language in the rejection of all that is putrid and infected.
Anyway, the guy comes off as a kind of a kook in the interview, e.g., "…но главная въ томъ, что всякій настоящій писатель знаетъ, или по крайней мѣрѣ чувствуетъ, тончайшую, но ненарушимую связь между образомъ выраженія (въ его высшихъ формахъ) и правой рукой съ писчимъ инструментомъ въ трехъ пальцахъ."
("… but the most important [reason Nabokov wouldn't have used computers or the internet] is that any real writer knows, or at least feels, an extremely fine but unbreakable link between the mode of expression (in its highest forms) and the right hand holding a writing instrument with three fingers.")
Uh-huh, right, yeah so "real" writers write by hand…
Maybe it's just me, but it's seems par for the course for a guy who uses spellings like "орѳографически" and "каѳедрѣ" which are about as self-consciously attention-grabbing as you can get (his self-conscious denial of being conscious of this aside…) to indulge in sloppy phrasing like "писатель знаетъ […] связь" ("a writer knows […] a link").
Full disclosre: I can't stand Nabokov's writing, so in a way Barabtalo might actually be the ideal translator of his books, since his (Nabokov's) writing rarely rises above superficial and self-regarding wordplay for me. (His stories are thin and his characters are one-dimensional.) A translator who reduces the entirety of the Russian language spoken today to "Soviet jargon" (from whose defiling clutches he's saving Nabokov's prelapsarian wordcraft) might possibly be exactly the kind of translator Nabokov would have wanted to translate his books.
Regarding H as Г or Х: you can find both Гемингвей and Хемингуэй, but I doubt Гитлер or Гамлет will ever be respelled.
But then again who knows. Language changes.
Panu says
Bunin, for one, complained about the new bolshevik rules.
My Russian is poorer than it should be, but I happen to be familiar with Bunin's Okayannye dni in the original language, and I'd like to have it recorded here how little this amazes me and how fully appropriate and in character I find this.
letter theta was eliminated
I think it was mostly because there was no distinct difference in pronounciation between Ф (F)
and Θ (F-Th). It's the obscene look of this letter, to those with dirty minds, (Dostoyevsky's name begins with it), rather than its use that embarassed some. One of the most famous references is in Gogol's 'Dead Souls'.
thetiyuk – фетюк just means dumbrain, dummy. It's rarely used these days.
As I remeber there was a lewd character resembling a theta in one of the ancient Chinese scripts.
maxim says
I second all of that, both the disbelief and the disagreement. That said, I can imagine how total immersion in the kind of die-hard nostalgic spirit that his specialty is steeped in can create this kind of bend in a sensitive soul… And someone who is a distinguished scholar of Nabokov just has to be original in some way, doesn't he?
the guy comes off as a kind of a kook in the interview
Oh, absolutely! But as maxim so eloquently says, "someone who is a distinguished scholar of Nabokov just has to be original in some way, doesn't he?" I find his quirks charming rather than repellent, sort of like Oscar Wilde's ostentatiously foppish manner of dress. Certainly less off-putting than, say, Solzhenitsyn's form of crankiness.
Another thing that strikes me in Barabtarlo (and the orthographic peculiarity has almost made me forget it) is this:
It would help the rebirth not only of writing but of Russian civilization in general…
Surely this — Russian civilization — sounds too much like the post-soviet patriotic press (unless he means "civilization in Russia", something the Russian original doesn't seem to support). Next thing to expect is "Russian logic" or "Russian truth"… I know that this view has a long tradition, it's just mildly surprising given whom it comes from; then again, maybe not.
is it okay to use future after 'if'?
Sure, but the future tense in the protasis (the 'if' or dependent clause) will give a particular kind of tone to the whole statement.
The "first conditional" often looks like this: If + [present tense], then + [future tense]. "If John comes, Bob will leave." (Understanding that the future action/state of being in the apodosis can be expressed in a variety of ways.)
Well, if you say, "If John will come, Bob will leave.", you could easily be understood to be expressing either certainty (in a smug way) or, perhaps more likely, irritation. If you will continue to nag me, I won't ever do it. – that kind of registering of information.
It's also important for learners – including those with native fluency! – to remember that conditional 'rules' are broken by native speakers for many reasons: creatively, ignorantly, tiredly, whyever.
I think it'll prove to be hard to find any language which isn't plastic in this way: both coherent ('ruled') and constantly re-forming coherence as 'rules' are, in the pressure of "the imperfect […] so hot in us", broken.
The imperfect is our paradise.
Note that, in this bitterness, delight,
Since the imperfect is so hot in us,
Lies in flawed words and stubborn sounds.
–Stevens, The Poems of Our Climate
Re: kookiness — de gustibus no disputamos, but I don't think it's colorful eccentricity that turns me off so much as stubborn disconnectedness. Wilde and Solzhenitsyn at least were realists. This guy belongs to the class of pedant who mistakes his own pedantry for some kind of purism. Such "purists" proclaim allegiance to ideals which are largely of their own imagining, and when they implement those ideals the result is … well, just imagine the comments in the editorial office when this guy's interview replies came back in the old spelling.
caffeind says
Sounds like recent discussion about the highly unlikely possibility of China changing from simplified back to traditional characters. It still wouldn't let you read the thousands of years of pre-20th century Classical Chinese literature, but somehow people still have the idea it would be classier.
Actually, the simplified characters are, for the most part, based on "cursive" (草書) stroke order, so traditional characters are generally understandable to modern mainland Chinese. It's the other way around (e.g., Taiwanese on the mainland) that problems arise. These days on the internet most sites can be converted between simplified and traditional with the click of a button, though, so I don't know how that will affect things. Wikipedia has several traditional options.
Solzhenitsyn's form of crankiness.
interesting you should mention Solzhenitsyn, because Gennady's interview reminded me exactly of that crankiness which is so off-putting in S. I feel a nasty, menacing streak in his comments, not at all charming…
Deadgood – thanks a lot for your essay on future.
"If John will come, Bob will leave.", you could easily be understood to be expressing either certainty (in a smug way) or, perhaps more likely, irritation. If you will continue to nag me, I won't ever do it. – that kind of registering of information.
In the above examples, "will" isn't used as future–the meaning is more like "insist on". If you want to write the above two phrases as future time clauses, you would write "If John comes, Bob will leave" and "If you nag me, I won't do it".
According to Azar,
"the simple present is used in a future time clause. Be going to and will are NOT used in a future time clause….When the meaning is future, the simple present (not be going to or will) is used in an "if-clause."
Example: Maybe it will rain tomorrow. If it rains tomorrow, I'm going to stay home. If + subject and verb = an "if clause".
If you want to see if "will" is being used for future tense here, try substituting be going to [ If John is going to come, Bob will leave.] and you find you have changed the meaning, and the sentence makes no sense. It's not being used as future.
Likewise with
I'll be glad to insert it if you'll tell me what it is.
"I'll be glad to" is not "will" as future, but more like "I would be happy to insert it" or "I can insert it". Again, substituting "I am going to be glad to insert it" makes no sense and tells you that "will" is not being used here as future, but probably more like meaning #1 here, "used to express desire, choice, willingness, consent".
The "I'll be glad to" construction doesn't sound strange to me at all; in fact, it's been immortalized in the phrase "I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today."
nij, from a linguistic point of view trying to say that will after if isn't a future tense is irrelevant. What's important is that it exists (and I can't help thinking that many analyses are simple wishes to explain it into non-existence).
With conditionals, it's important to remember that first and second etc conditionals are heuristic devices to help students and not necessarily any firm category in the language.
I do think there are restrictions on will after if. I found some of deadgod's examples to not work in my dialect:
"If John will come, Bob will leave."
Is at best marginal.
"If you will continue to nag me, I won't ever do it."
This is flat out ungrammatical in my dialect. On the other hand
"If you'll stop nagging me, I'll do it." is perfectly fine.
I think (without giving it too much thought) that the structure requires two conditions
1. the first person needs to be involved in the second part, it needs to be something that the speaker either has control of or can guarantee.
2. the first part has to be neutral or positive, some kind of good will offering or removal of an impediment. A negative stated condition blocks it for me.
Also, for some reason only the 'll form in the first part works for me, 'will' as a separate word seems to block the construction somehow.
If Sue'll come here, Bob will give her the book (implied: I'll see to it that he does).
If they'll just bring the report here, I'll sign it.
(counter examples will not exactly be welcomed, but will be grudgingly considered)
I found some of deadgod's examples to not work in my dialect
I had to parse them several times to get them to work; they work only in spoken English if you emphasize "will", i.e. "If John will come…", meaning "if John insists on coming…" "if you will wear your overshoes in the house" and indicates disapproval of the activity at the same time that it points out the willfulness of engaging in it. I would argue that it's an old usage.
"will" after "if"
The examples above all fall into the category of what Azar calls "polite questions".
People use would you, could you, will you, and can you to ask polite questions. The questions ask for someone's help or cooperation….Answers to polite questions are usually affirmative.
Would you please open the door?
Could you please open the door?
Will you please open the door?
Can you please open the door?
The Murphy purple breaks this down further:
Offering to do something
That bag looks heavy. I'll help you with it. (not I help)
Agreeing to do something
A:You know that book I lend you? Could I have it back if you're finished with it?
B: Of course. I'll give it to your this afternoon. (not I give)
Promising to do something
Thanks for lending me the money. I'll pay you back on Friday. (not I pay)
I won't tell anyone what happened. I promise.
Asking someone to do something (Will you…?)
Will you please be quiet? I'm trying to concentrate.
Will you shut the door, please?
for some reason only the 'll form in the first part works for me, 'will' as a separate word seems to block the construction somehow
Works either way for me.
A more natural construction for me would be "I'd be glad to…"(I would be glad to…). "I'll be glad…" sounds very formal, tux as opposed to suit, as was probably the intention.
You're welcome, Sashura.
If you've followed Nijma and Michael's posts, let me guide you through what I think of "If + [future tense], stimulated by them.
yes, I'm here and having read the explanations I can see why Hat's blog has Language in it.
"the highly unlikely possibility of China changing from simplified back to traditional characters"
What are you talking about? In the Republic of China they still use traditional characters. It's only in the rebellious provinces on the mainland that simplified characters are used.
Heh. Back when I was in Taiwan, in the '70s, they actually talked that way.
Japanese uses traditional characters too – no problem.
There is an aspect to this which has long interested me: pictographic vs phonetic languages. Young people of the communist utopian future in Yefremov's 'Andromeda' discuss the relative merits and disadavantages of the two types. Hierogliphs are understood by different people pronouncing them differently (Chinese vs Japanese) which is a great advantage. One disadvantage is that while you can understand characters (if you'd already learnt them), but you can't speak them. While as in phonetic languages you can reconstitute the meaning – and communicate – by being able to read words and phrases (e.g. Slavonic languages) – and speak them. Of course, there are faux amis, but in general it is true, or is it?
Not entirely Sashura. A lot of the Joyo Kanji (the 1,945 offical characters everyone has to know) have been simplified ("shinjitai" – but not always as simplified as the Mainland orthography, just to make it even more fun. For example, in Taiwan "country" is written 國 but in Japan and "Red China" it's 国.
There's actually a good write up on Wikipedia – look up Shinjitai.
yes, I've just read the Wikipedia article on shinjitai, thanks.
is it not fascinating how the thrust of reforms in Japan was similar to what had been driving Russian language reform – making the language more comprehensible to wider public?
One of my friends there in 1983 denied that there existed such a country as Mengguguo (Mongolia).
In short, Nijma is wrong
Oh, my, I hope no one thinks I just made that up out of the clear blue sky. I was citing someone else. The indented blockquote sections are direct quotations.
Azar does not consider future and conditional to be the same thing. They are in separate chapters. The examples of "polite questions" are from a section titled "Asking for assistance: would you, could you, will you, can you" from the chapter on modal auxiliaries, again classified separately from both future and conditional.
Murphy's chapters are a bit more fluid about labeling, and I can appreciate here michael farris's observation that "from a linguistic point of view trying to say that will after if isn't a future tense is irrelevant." Murphy merely describes each word's usage, and notes things like present tenses being used with a future meaning ("Tomorrow is Wednesday.")
I don't think it's fair to say either author "makes rules" or "breaks rules". They are just categorizing actual usage in a way that non-native speakers can get a handle on it.
Deadgod's latest examples don't work at all for me, not even as colloquial, regional, or atypical examples. It's definitely not my dialect, or any dialect I'm familiar with.
I don't usually use the "first, second, and third conditional" analysis, but for anyone who does find it helpful, here is an analysis of conditional clauses that includes a discussion of if after will.
Nijma, I meant the (unindented) "I'll be glad to" discussion (after "Likewise with"), in which you (I think) write, "not 'will' as future" – which I'm pretty sure is wrong.
That is: I'm telling you now that tomorrow let's say I will be glad to do you that favor. The "will be [glad]" is a future tense indicating a future action / state of being.
If I'm wrong about you being wrong, my ego would be salved only by its familiarity with the circumstance.
The explanation / chart at that site is pretty useful. I'd definitely expand the EXCEPTION to the 'if + [future tense]' 'rule'.
I also think the "zero-degree condition" is actually a real "condition" – an expression of cause.
Sashura, the "zero condition" is that of a generality, physical fact, or anything which is always true:
If it's a Pinto, it's a dangerously crappy car.
When water is chilled below 32 degrees F, it turns to ice.
Whenever he sees her, his heart leaps.
You see the pattern, right?: "If + [present tense verb], then + [present tense verb]." There's as much a case of dependency, of 'conditionality', of the independent clause's action on the dependent clause's action as in any of the three 'numbered' conditions, as I see things.
deadgod, um, no, not really.
To make this as simple as possible, breaking down the original sentence:
[I'll be glad to insert it] [if you'll tell me what it is.]
the two sections (both using "will") have the following meanings:
[Offering to do something] [polite request for assistance]
So this is the answer to Sashura's question: is it okay to use future after 'if'?. You would ordinarily use "will" in what one grammarian calls "polite questions", that is, questions that use would you|could you|will you|can you to ask polite questions, or as the other grammarian says, "asking someone to do something." You can use "will" after "if" when the polite question comes after "if". Otherwise you do not use future ("will" or "going to") after "if".
As a side note, using the present tense (as in the textbook formula):
[I'll be glad to insert it] [if you tell me what it is.]
also sounds perfectly all right to me, but less formal.
You can go through a lot of convolutions trying to explain the grammar forms of [if you'll + (request)], but when it comes right down to it, you're looking at a formula phrase with a set meaning, regardless of the grammar forms it resembles. Think of the phrase "How do you do?" You can explain it in terms of the verb "do" used as a transitive, intransitive, or auxiliary verb, then go on to talk about "do" in questions and negatives, or you can just tell the students it means "hello." The second explanation is probably more accurate, and is certainly one they will understand more readily, especially if you can pair it with other formula "hello" phrases: "How are you?"–"Fine"; "Mucho gusto."–"El gusto es mío."
Nijma, Deadgood,
thanks again for these, even though you disagree between yourselves.
It also seems to confirm my thinking that, regardless of what grammar says, it always sounds more polite to use could/would instead of can/will?
My probable final words on 'if + will'
1. native speakers of English (unless they've been corrupted by ESL training) don't really think in categories of 1st, 2nd etc conditionals. Those are a heuristic device for teaching about conditional constructions. native usage is messier and more complicated (the same thing goes for sequence of tenses; the rules as given in even the most advanced ESL classes won't really allow you to predict or account for native usage).
2. the conjunction 'if' changes the meaning of tenses that occur in the clauses that it governs so that not all tenses naturally occur with it and those that do find their semantics changed to a lesser or greater degree.
3. Cross linguistically, courteous usage of irrealis forms are especially susceptible to pragmatic considersations. Although Polish normally doesn't distinguish 'If I did X' and 'If I had done X' it does distinguish can, could and 'was able to' and which should be used in a particular situation (and which is more polite in a particular situation) is subject to a lot of extra-linguistic factors that cannot be easily summed up in a set of rules. (and there's disagreement about some specifics among native speakers).
"regardless of what grammar says, it always sounds more polite to use could/would instead of can/will?"
Not necessarily. In a first person offer, can and will are much more polite (to me, others may disagree).
"I can give you a ride." (nice offer)
"I could offer you a ride." (sounds either grudging or actively hinting that the person should decline the offer).
"I'll give you a ride." (nice offer)
"I'd give you a ride." ????? not an offer, the listener is now primed for an excuse.
it always sounds more polite to use could/would instead of can/will?
Sashura, what michael says is true when the "offer" is phrased as a statement. If you make an offer in the form of a question – can/could you tell me . . .? – 'could' and 'would' are indeed more polite, because, in such a question, they are 'conditional' — that is, they depend more emphatically on the other person's decision.
"Always" is, or should be, pretty tough to be sure of in language matters . . .
What michael farris said.
I would add that "can" is sometimes associated with "ability". So if your boss says to you "Can you do X?" the question is probably not whether you want to do it (or to elicit cooperation) but whether you understand the expectation. One teacher's edition suggests that students who are concerned that requests with can/will are not as polite can add "please" to the sentence. But why choose a word like that in the first place if you are just going to try to soften it?
native speakers of English (unless they've been corrupted by ESL training) don't really think in categories of 1st, 2nd etc conditionals
lol, but in midwest universities at least, ESL training isn't like that at all. When educators talk about grammar at all it's usually mentioned at the end of a long list that includes workforce skills, civics, and critical thinking. (A typical statement that appears in training materials for adult educators: "Grammar is labeled 'Supporting Grammar" in order to emphasize the goal that adult educators integrate grammatical skill development throughout instruction, rather than focusing lessons on such skills completely.") As far as categories of conditionals, three current textbooks use the terms "present unreal conditional" and "real future conditional and unreal conditional," but the district "learning outcome" standards only call out "Models (sic) of past ability, possibility, advice, polite requests, and ability. (can, could, should, would, able to, supposed to)." I do teach grammar, usually as a 5 minute introduction to the lesson, because 1) if I don't, the students have a hard time grasping the textbook 2) I myself learn language better if I have the grammatical explanation, so I imagine that many of them will too.
um, no, not really
"Not really" what, Nijma?
In the "original sentence" – I'll be glad to insert it if you'll tell me what it is. -, "I'll be glad to" was denied to be "'will' as future" (this was at 5:03 am, Dec. 21).
It is "'will' as future"; that is, it's the apodosis of the dependent 'if' clause ("if you'll tell"), which other clause (the protasis of the "original sentence") does employ the 'if + [future tense verb]' that Azar rules out. No amount of making as simple as possible will make the "I'll be glad to" an 'if' clause in this case, nor will that simplification put the time of 'my being glad to do something' at any time other than the future.
("I" might be glad now to do it for "you" later, but the apodosis, in the "original sentence", is a promise that "I" will be glad to do something for "you" later. That's how "simple" that "original sentence" is!)
"You can use 'will' after 'if' when the polite question comes after 'if'." Now that we agree on what the protasis of the "original sentence" is, yes – that's one EXCEPTION (as that useful site you link us to has it) to the 'rule'-against-"'will' after 'if'" that Azar seems dogmatically to assert.
But it's an example of just one category of exceptions.
I'm not looking at a "formula phrase with a set meaning", nor am I going through "a lot of convolutions". People actually, in the pressure of a moment, say things like:
If you will be determined to be obtuse, then we'll have to agree to disagree.
Understanding the 'error' (as Azar and the 'books' have it) in this protasis to be intelligible – not really to be an 'error'! – is a matter, not of imposing a "formula", but rather of discovering a rational exception to a 'rule'.
Likewise with 'Howdy do!'; for myself, I try never (though I fail) to appeal to mysticism by resorting to saying, "It is what it is." Most expressions can be 'explained' – not 'away'!, but rather, the reasonableness (mostly) of speakers can be plumbed and made intelligible.
It's my (small) experience that students are enabled rather than harmed in their becoming capable speakers/listeners/readers/writers by this kind of pedantry. They can internalize set phrases rotely, but, at the same time, they can also understand English – and their own native languages – to be more amenable to their capacities than would be a murk that allows for direction only serendipitously.
Courses for horses?
native speakers of English […] don't really think in categories of 1st, 2nd etc conditionals
Of course not, michael. They also don't "think in categories" of subject/verb number agreement; they just have singular or plural regularity because that's what 'sounds right' in the pressure of a conversational moment.
But 'normal' accuracy doesn't 'sound right' – or wrong – randomly; the pattern embedded in everyday usage is actually a pattern of something, right, michael? Because otherwise, linguistics would be closer to astrology than it would be to astronomy.
I can't be sure if you mean a personal sneer by "corrupted by ESL training", because I never was 'trained' in teaching ESL, so I don't have first-hand experience with what you're talking about. (I simply took up the explication of grammar, in accordance with structures presented in the 'books', as I understood/understand (it's a process, not a product) grammar rules actually to indicate, but not to dictate, intelligibility.)
The pragmatism you espouse – subject to a lot of extra-linguistic factors that cannot be easily summed up in a set of rules – is perfectly "pragmatic" for someone who's already comfortable generally following the 'rules', even if she or he couldn't produce a schema (even in conversation) of those 'rules'. The conventionalism of 'whatever works' is a fine heuristic meta-device for a native speaker – until, of course, it doesn't work.
But in acquainting a group of people struggling with a mass of data – a language – with tools to make that data intelligible, useful, even beautiful, summary "sets of rules" are inevitable. And, carefully adumbrated with warnings about exceptional cases that arise from both linguistic and "extra-linguistic" pressures, these "sets of rules" have, in my (small) experience, been taken up and discarded by students as easily as, but, in their place, as indispensably as, training wheels.
Your "probable final words 2.", above, is a perfect indication of the limitations of how too-sweeping such a pragmatism would be in a classroom. Can you show more simply – more tellingly of the actually intelligible conditional sentences that people use – than the schema of four 'grades' of conditionality of 'if – then' sentences, just how the conjunction 'if' changes the meaning of tenses that occur in the clauses that it governs?
Try it, michael! Assume that Sashura is as clever as you are – you both seem smarter than I, enabling me, with no perfect methodological guarantee!, to make that assumption. Explain to Sashura whether, in what cases, and how an 'if' clause could be understood with its verb in the future tense.
It is "'will' as future"
Neither grammarian cited states that "will" used to make polite requests is the same as "will" used as future. "Will" is a modal auxiliary, and like many other words in English, has more than one usage.
People actually, in the pressure of a moment, say things like: If you will be determined to be obtuse, then we'll have to agree to disagree.
The usages you cite as being something that "people actually, in the pressure of a moment, say" are not agreed on or understood by other native speakers on this thread. In my dialect, they are not correct, they do not mean anything, and people do not actually say them.
Neither grammarian cited states that "will" used to make polite requests is the same as "will" used as future.
No, nor has anybody on this thread represented – or defended (or even suggested) the existence of – a "dialect" in which the word "will" has only "one usage". I'd be glad to was presented as a case of "not 'will' as future"; that assertion remains in error.
In my dialect, we follow, or indicate by conformity to convention, 'rules', whether we know them, and that we're following them, or, in either case, not – which conformity Nijma seems to recommend. We, in my dialect, are also somewhat pragmatic about accepting the intelligibility, even the explicability, of exceptions to those 'rules', which intelligibility michael seems to argue for.
Pardon me: I'll be glad to was presented as a case of "not 'will' as future".
which conformity Nijma seems to recommend
I would suggest that anyone who is that interested in ESL grammar look in the library for these authors — Azar should be easy enough to find in the U.S., while Murphy is more known in Europe and the Middle East– before condemning them out of hand.
In my experience, most adult educators recognize the need for textbooks that use realistic dialogues rather than texts with lengthy grammar explanations and examples that don't quite ring true but fit a poorly crafted model. At the same time you don't want to weigh students down with a lot of extraneous detail that is too far beyond their level. Idioms are particularly difficult. The end goal is for students to be able to communicate and be understood.
Nijma, here's an example of your recommending conformity to a 'rule':
Otherwise [than a "polite question" after 'if'] you do not use future ("will" or "going to") after "if".
What you both say makes perfectly good sense to me.
In primary school I learnt 'No future after if and when', which is fine because it emphasises, to a non-native student of English, the difference between tense usage in Russian and English.
Если он придет (future), я уйду – If he comes (present), I will go.
Then, some years later, if and when the student is comfortable in the second language, they will learn – academically or from colloquial interaction, that
Если он придет (собирается придти), то я уйду – If he will come (if is to come), I will go.
is also correct, but has additional meaning.
At secondary school level you'd get a nought for using future after if. But at higher school level, it is okay if it is used in a context that shows you understand the difference.
Did I get you right?
In any second language learning situation, especially in institutionalized and broadly aimed ones, what is taught is a very small subset of real usage that has been deemed acceptable by those in charge of the program. In mass learning situations, there's always a least common denominator factor (often with overly systematized 'rules' along for the ride too).
In Poland, even at a very high university level, my students are often surprised to find 'if' can sometimes be followed by 'will'. I think it's just one of those practical things (like informal quotatives and space fillers) that are left out of almost all instruction.
I also think there are good reasons for this. For one thing if + will is not the sort of thing you'll hear every day (or week or month). It exists, but it's not very common and can always be rephrased without 'will' with only a small loss in meaning.
Also, in the particular case of Slavic learners (at least Russian and Polish, probably others) there's probably concern that if you let students know that occasionally 'will' can follow 'if' that they'll start to use that all the time, since it's generally easier to just calque structures from one's own language rather than come to grips with different basic structures.
My experience with some other structures (like the past continuous that is so horribly overused by many Slavic learners) that is certainly a valid concern.
Wikipedia has several traditional options.
And there's an entire Wikipedia in Classical Chinese.
informal quotatives
Like "I was like"?
If he will come (if is to come), I will go.
…is not correct and has no meaning.
"If he will come, I will go." = 2 ghits (both from non-native speakers).
"If he comes, I will go." = 1,830,000 ghits
The html markup for the previous example should have been:
If he will come (if HE is to come), I will go?
(missed the 'he' bit, sorry)
if you let students know that occasionally 'will' can follow 'if'
Michael Farris, thanks for helping me out – your point illustrates exactly why I asked about future after 'if' in the first place.
And the other way round, when you teach Russian to West European students, here is a good way to introduce the notion of aspect (совершенный/несовершенный вид), when you have to explain the notion of perfect tense in future: Я пойду – I will go (definitely), я буду идти – I will be going, я уйду – I will have gone, я иду – I am going, I go.
marie-lucie says
Michael Farris: if + will is not the sort of thing you'll hear every day (or week or month). It exists, but it's not very common and can always be rephrased without 'will' with only a small loss in meaning.
– If you will.
Actually, those are usually in the present tense:
I'm like "I just can't be there by five," and he's all "you'd better if you still wanna be working here."
What kinds of structures fill that niche in German? Or is it extremely regionalized?
On Slavic aspect : that's another case where learning and applying all the rules won't let you account for or predict all native usage.
And in you're example, it looks to me like 'я уйду' and 'я пойду' are both perfective but that the coverb (po vs u) changes the lexical meaning. Would that be a fair description?
(and in Polish there are government issues as well as verbs don't always seem to govern the cases they're supposed to).
Three Dramaticules In Search Of a Prescriptive Ghit
-John shouldn't come; he knows that.
-He does what he wants to.
-Bah! Like every day this week! – [taunting] If he will come, he'll just be sorry.
-Is Mary coming?
-She's not sure; she doesn't want to have a scene with Sally at your party.
-[slightly exasperated] Well, if Mary will just come, I'm sure Sally and Bob will behave themselves.
-We need Tom; it won't work without him. But he doesn't have any way to get home after midnight.
-Ok; [bargaining] if Tom'll come, I'll drive him home.
Sashura — a detail I didn't fill in when I listed those four ways of expressing a future action above:
[to be] + [full infinitive]
Like (as you've got in your apodosis ('if' clause)): "He is to come.". This certainly expresses 'him coming' in the future – but in a particular interpretive context.
Imagine a participle between the finite 'to be' and the full infinitive (here: 'to come'). A good way to think of the interpretive context is the participle supposed: "He is supposed to come." You could also (imaginatively) interpolate expected: "He is expected to come."
[More dangerous would be to imagine going: "He is going to come." 'Dangerous' in the sense that {[to be going] + [full infinitive]} is a general future tense – at least in modern American usage – that can have the sub-coloring of supposition or expectation or intention.]
So: [to be + full infinitive] implies a plan, intention, anticipation — which, together, are a smaller subset of the general future action of [will + bare infinitive].
He will come. = sometime in the future, he'll arrive
He is to come. = He has the plan of arriving, or we expect him to arrive, sometime in the future, but, by saying "is to come", I'm indicating not his arrival in the future, but rather his plan now to arrive later, or my expectation now that he'll arrive later.
(Do you see how it's rational that present tense "to be"s can form the expression for a future action?)
He is to come. can also = a strong command; 'He has been ordered to come.' [to be + full infinitive] is often heard in the army: "You're to report to Sgt. Smith at 0600 hours – that's in the a m , Private."
Anyway, I mention all this because you used "is to come" as though it were equal to "will come", and, as I see things (always susceptible to contradiction-by-google), they mean different things.
What kinds of structures fill that niche in German?
None. If you want to make explicit that it's probably not a literal quotation, you have to say so in words, such as so ungefähr, or just use reported speech in the first place.
It's the same in French, isn't it?
m-l: – If you will.
…if it be Thy will, take this cup away from me; yet not my will but Thine be done
deadgod:Three Dramaticules In Search Of a Prescriptive Ghit
I can sort of see your second two examples (sorry, but the first one is opaque) if I squint and look at them out of the corner of my eye, but they're hedged with a lot of speaking directions, which should tell you the meaning doesn't come from the word structure. Also that it would be pretty hard to explain to a non-native speaker (or even someone from a different region) how to use it. I have an idea (maybe from a previous discussion about Joyce) that you like to play with English and stretch it. A native speaker will be able to follow you, at least some of the time, and understand the creative parts as well pick out the standard English parts, but I think a non-native speaker would find it difficult. Good luck with your googlehit project. My husband claimed to have invented the expression "screw the pooch" and was on a personal campaign to get it adopted into the language; every once in a while I do see it in a thread somewhere. While the two examples aren't as drop-dead, rimshot hilarious as m-l's "- If you will," the part with the "if" clause seems to describe an action that happens after the other action, that is, "will" helps to indicate the order of the actions.
I interpreted the part in parenthesis to be an explanation of the meaning, not part of the example.
Wirklich? I'm heartbroken or skeptical, not sure which. If you ask a Polish speaker they might tell you the same thing but they do exist in casual spoken Polish (usually collocations of pronouns with 'do PRO' as the reported addressee 'a ja do niego "quote"' with 'na to' for reactions 'a ona na to "quote").
How do you act out previous interactions in casual conversation with close friends?
bruessel says
If you mean what do people say when they report a conversation, in my experience it starts out with the full verb "und dann hab' ich gesagt:" "und er hat geantwortet:", alternatively also in the present tense "und dann sagt er doch zu mir:" and subsequently shortened to "und ich:" "und er:". I can't really think of another way.
Reported speech im Deutsch? Surely:
-Ich bin gleich . . . Und er ist gleich . . . Und ich bin gleich . . . Und —
you used "is to come" as though it were equal to "will come"
I see the difference, but your explanation is very good. The bit about command especially.
Michael Farris,
'я уйду' and 'я пойду' are both perfective?
yes, they are and the lexical meaning is different. But if you translate just the words back into English they turn out to be the same: 'I will go'. But it is 'I'll go away' in the first example and 'I'll go there' in the second. That's why many find aspect so difficult.
Reported speech auf Deutsch (oder im Deutschen): "Surely – Ich bin gleich …"
DG, I don't think that's right. I've never heard somebody say "Ich bin gleich" followed by a quote. Gleich just implies something that is about to happen or has happened immediately, as in "Ich bin gleich wieder da", "Ich bin gleich zur Post gegangen".
Actually a little googling turned up "(und) PRO so" as in "ich so 'quote'" or "und er so 'quote'".
bruessel is right both times.
"(und) PRO so" as in "ich so 'quote'" or "und er so 'quote'".
Yes, but that's very rare and/or regional, and I don't quite think it means what you think it means. Compare und er, so ganz cool, "exact quote".
"I don't quite think it means what you think it means."
The sources I could find, would indicate that it's very much like "And I'm all 'quote'" or "He's like 'quote'"
http://linguistlist.org/issues/13/13-3043.html#1
there's a mention that while people consciously think of it as teen-speak, it can be found in speakers up to 50 years of age (in 2002).
http://linguistlist.org/pubs/sums/summary-details.cfm?submissionid=8366
suggests "Er darauf 'quote'" is very much like Polish "a on na to 'quote'"- "and he's all / like 'quote'".
"Er darauf 'quote'"
Actually, I've encountered that one in print a couple of times. It must be some regional teenspeak from somewhere in Germany.
The way teenagers talk is strongly regionalized.


The TAC's Community Integration Program (CIP) is an authorised agent of WorkSafe Victoria. The CIP pays for the medical and like services you need because of your work-related injuries.
The program capitalises on our expertise in delivering lifetime support services. This includes a strong focus on helping people get back into the community.
Injured workers will also have a 'managing agent'. This agent handles their weekly payments, common law processes and impairment benefits.


WhoseBill makes it easy to keep on top of money when you're sharing a house.
Just create a WhoseBill Pool to keep track of the finances and invite the other members of your household to join. Anyone in the house can add new bills and record payments they make that contribute to the house. WhoseBill keeps everyone informed so you can make sure those bills are paid on time!
WhoseBill calculates how far ahead or behind everyone is and makes a recommendation on who should pay the next bill. If some people are still paying too much, and others paying too little, WhoseBill organises the quickest way to settle up and reset the pool.!
WhoseBill can help take all the stress out of managing money for group holidays and travel.
By creating a WhoseBill Pool with the other people you are going away with, you can stop worrying about who pays for what before and during the holiday. Simply let WhoseBill keep track, and at the end of the holiday organise settling up in a couple of clicks!
Whenever someone pays for something such as a flight, hotel or dinner out, they can quickly log the bill in the local currency without having to think about exchange rates.
When you get home WhoseBill uses the current market rates to calculate who owes what in their home currency, and organise repayments in that currency. If you're not too worried about a few pence between friends, you can even choose to settle to the nearest £5 to make things even easier.
If you're part of a club or team that has regular match fees or subscriptions, and enjoys a few celebration/commiseration drinks, then WhoseBill can make keeping track of who is paying their way easy.
Just create a WhoseBill Pool for your team, and whenever someone 'forgets' to bring their subs, just record the IOU and over time you can see exactly who are the cheapskates! For those post-match drinks that end up with the same few people buying the large rounds, simply record it on WhoseBill and you might even find that those that don't pay their subs actually make up for it by buying the drinks!
At the end of the season, use WhoseBill to organise settling up and optionally fine the person who paid for the least and extra round of drinks!
Whenever you're out and about with friends or family, you inevitably lend each other money to cover drinks, dinner and other activities, and it can be a hassle trying to remember everything you have borrowed or loaned.
With WhoseBill, you can simply jot down the IOU and forget about it in the short-term, relying on WhoseBill to let you know how much you owe or are owed overall.
Don't worry about trying to repay the individual loan, as at some point in the future, there will likely be a situation where the roles are reversed and the debt can be 'repaid' as part of another purchase.
If you find that you're always lending money to a particular friend and getting nothing in return, you can use WhoseBill to settle up, and it will call in the debt for you.


PD develops when certain nerve cells (neurons) in the brain die. These are neurons that produce a chemical called dopamine. Dopamine helps relay messages between areas of the brain that control body movement.
When these neurons die, abnormally low levels of dopamine are produced. This makes it difficult to control muscle tension and muscle movement.
PD usually occurs in middle age. It typically begins around age 60. A small number of patients have early onset PD. They are younger than 40 years old when symptoms begin.
Having a parent or sibling diagnosed with the disease at a younger age increases your risk of getting PD. The same is not true if the affected family member was older when diagnosed.
PD usually begins as a slight tremor or stiffness. It occurs in the arm or leg on one side of the body. The tremor is most obvious at rest. It is regular, typically occurring three to six times per second.
At first, PD may be evident only as a tremor involving the thumb and index finger. It looks as if the person is manipulating a small object.
As the illness worsens, tremors may become more widespread. They eventually affect limbs on both sides of the body. Handwriting may become small, shaky and eventually illegible.
PD often causes stiffness or rigidity in the arms or legs. In addition, there is a slowing of body movements, called bradykinesia.
Rigidity and bradykinesia can be the most disabling aspects of the disease. They can impair the person's ability to walk. They can make it difficult to perform daily activities. These may include washing, dressing or using utensils.
Problems with unsteady balance and posture may make it hard to sit down in a chair, or to rise from one. Walking is accomplished with small, shuffling steps and a stooped posture.
Bradykinesia can affect the facial muscles. It can decrease spontaneous facial expressions and normal eye blinking.
Your doctor will examine you. He or she will pay extra attention to the neurological examination.
There is no specific diagnostic procedure or laboratory test to establish a Parkinson's diagnosis. Doctors diagnose the disease based on the symptoms and physical and neurological exams.
If a patient's symptoms improve after taking PD medication, the diagnosis is probably correct.
PD is a chronic, often progressive illness.
Doctors are not sure what causes PD. There is no known way to prevent it.
There is no cure for PD. But its symptoms can be treated with several different types of medication.
When symptoms are not overly troublesome, medication may not be necessary. Early treatment may even increase the chance of developing side effects and other complications later.
The most commonly used medication for PD is levodopa. Levodopa is converted to dopamine in the brain.
Levodopa usually is prescribed in combination with another drug called carbidopa. The second drug increases the amount of active drug that reaches the brain. It also limits side effects. The two drugs, levodopa and carbidopa, are combined in one pill (Sinemet).
Nearly all patients with PD improve after they start taking levodopa. However, long-term use eventually causes side effects and complications. Doctors often need to adjust the frequency and dose of levodopa so the person can continue taking it.
Several medications can be used either alone or in combination with levodopa to treat symptoms.
For mild symptoms in early PD, amantadine (Symmetrel) helps release stored dopamine in the brain.
Anticholinergic medications also help relieve mild symptoms in early PD. There are several choices, including trihexyphenidyl (Artane, Trihexane, Trihexy), benztropine (Cogentin), biperiden(Akineton), or procyclidine(Kemadrin). Anticholinergic drugs are particularly effective against tremor. But they can cause side effects. These include confusion and hallucinations, especially in elderly patients.
Another treatment option for early PD is a monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibitor, such as selegiline (Carbex, Eldepryl) or rasagiline (Azilect). MAO-B inhibitors boost the effectiveness of the dopamine that the brain is still making. They may delay the need for stronger drugs. Eventually, though, people taking an MAO-B inhibitor will need a levodopa-containing drug.
Dopamine agonists mimic the effects of dopamine. Some of the commonly used dopamine agonists are bromocriptine (Parlodel), pramipexole (Mirapex) and ropinirole (Requip)—may be used alone to delay the need for levodopa. Or they may be used with levodopa to increase its effectiveness. This may reduce the amount of levodopa needed. Older patients can be especially sensitive to these drugs. They can cause confusion, hallucinations and weakness due to low blood pressure.
Drugs called COMT inhibitors also can be used in combination with levodopa. COMT inhibitors, such as entacapone (Comtan) and tolcapone (Tasmar), prolong the action of dopamine in the brain. They also increase the effectiveness of levodopa. When a COMT inhibitor is added, the doctor usually lowers the levodopa dose.
Depression is a fairly common problem among people with PD. Many patients can benefit from treatment with antidepressant medications.
Regular exercise and a balanced diet also may help to improve a patient's overall sense of well-being and body control.
Deep brain stimulation. The electrodes are placed after brain mapping.
Precise destruction of targeted areas in the brain. Destroyed areas are responsible for the most troubling symptoms.
Call your doctor if you develop any of the symptoms of PD.
There is no cure for PD. But a well-constructed treatment plan allows many patients to lead active lives.


text:
An initiative of the Indic Academy, Indictoday is a digital platform to promote the works of various academics, activists, authors and artists in order to showcase their activities and events.
Editor-in-chief: Dr. Yogini Deshpande is a practicing Civil Engineer by profession.
She has degrees from Mumbai University & Purdue University & diverse experience in academia, research & consulting. She has been associated with Indic Academy since it's inception & is it's Mumbai Chapter coordinator. She is an avid reader, Indian Classical Music aficionado & keen political observer.
Assistant Editor: Rajarshi Nandy is an Electrical Engineer by education.
He has worked as as information developer in the IT sector for over a decade and eventually shifted to freelance writing and editing. He has worked briefly as a editor for IndiaFacts, and as a contributory editor with SirfNews. His primary interests are spiritual traditions of Sanatana Dharma.
Sumedha Verma Ojha is an author, columnist and speaker, was born in Patna and educated in Delhi, graduating in Economics (Lady Sriram College) and post-graduating in Sociology (Delhi School of economics). After 15 years in the Indian Revenue Service she switched careers to research and write a book set in the Mauryan period based on the Arthashastra of Chanakya. 'Urnabhih' then expanded into a book series on the Mauryan Empire.
Sumedha works in the area of translating and explaining the epics and bringing ancient Sanskrit/Prakrit literature to the English speaking Indian as also in the area of a gendered analysis of ancient India. She lives with her husband near Geneva and has two children both studying in the US.
Makarand R Paranjape has been Professor of English at Jawaharlal Nehru University since 1999. He got his B.A. (Hons.) in English from St. Stephen's College, and MA & PhD from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (USA).
His recent books include Debating the Post Condition in India: Critical Vernaculars, Unauthorized Modernities, Post-Colonial Contentions (Routledge, 2018), Cultural Politics in Modern India (Routledge, 2016),The Death and Afterlife of Mahatma Gandhi (Penguin Random House, 2015), and Transit Passenger/Passageiro em Transito (University of Sao Paolo, 2016), an Indo-Brazilian book of poems. Makarand is currently a columnist for Swarajya, DNA, and Mail Today.
Ramesh N. Rao is a professor in the Department of Communication at Columbus State University. He has taught for more than 30 years in the United States. He arrived as a graduate student in September 1985 in Hattiesburg, MS, where he earned an MS in Mass Communication at the University of Southern Mississippi, moved to East Lansing, MI, to earn a PhD in Communication from Michigan State University (where he began teaching). Ramesh has taught at Truman State University, in Kirksville, MO, and at Longwood University, Farmville, VA. He now teaches at Columbus State University where he has been since May 2013.
Ramesh has written/co-authored/edited about six books on Indian politics, culture, and society, and has co-authored a textbook on Intercultural Communication. He has taught a wide variety of communication courses: from public speaking to mass media law, and from persuasion to intercultural communication. Teaching online (almost exclusively) over the past five years he has understood the demands and challenges of offering online education, and basks in the gratitude and thanks that students offer him when all systems are go, and when the daily email that he sends them, every weekday, tickles their fancy.
Ramesh Rao loves to listen to Indian classical music, and when his knees and ankles allow him, to play some tennis. He lives with his wife, Sujaya, and son, Sudhanva, in Fortson, GA.
Nithin Sridhar has a degree in Civil Engineering, and having worked in construction field, Nithin passionately writes about various issues from development, politics, and social issues, to religion, spirituality and ecology.
He is Editor of IndiaFacts & Advaita Academy and is based in Mysore, India. His latest book "Musings On Hinduism" provides an overview of various aspects of Hindu philosophy and society.
Abhinav Agarwal is a technology professional with over twenty years of experience working in India, Canada, and the US in business intelligence, analytics, big data, Warehouse Management systems, e-commerce applications and more.
He is the technical editor of a McGraw-Hill book, runs a blog with two-million page views, and has delivered guest lectures at management institutes on analytics and governance. He has spoken at conferences across four continents and also delvers workshops on technology, career planning, and management practices. Abhinav is a post-graduate from the Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore, and holds a bachelor's degree in Computer Engineering.
Sunanda Vashisht is a Health care professional in Houston, Texas. She is passionate about reading, writing and dreaming, likes to introduce herself as an explorer.
Deeply interested in Politics, Current affairs, Foreign policy and Strategic affairs, Sunanda has been blogging and writing columns for many years now. She is co-founder of myind.net and she enjoys nothing more than solitary walk in desolate woods.
Srinivas Udumudi is the director of Indic Academy, founded by well-known philanthropist thinker Harikiran Vadlamani. Indic Academy strives to bring to forefront and create conditions for blossoming of ancient Indian thought that has universal relevance and thus to the modern world. Indic Academy supports scholars and institutions which specialize in traditional Indian thought and are able to critique established intellectual architecture that underpins modern academic, political and social institutions today. Srinivas Udumudi works with various organizations and scholars in designing courses and workshops on various aspects of Indian thought.
Srinivas is also the Hyderabad chapter coordinator for Indic Book Club, a sister orgaization of Indic Academy which has emerged as the sole goto organization worldwide which supports writers who write on subjects based on Indic civilizational thought and values. Srinivas Udumudi heads India's premier genetics and genomics research and services organization based out of Hyderabad. Srinivas did his B.Tech in Computer Science from REC Warangal (now NIT) and Masters in CS (Artificial Intelligence) in the US, and has over 25 years of industry experience. He has deep interest in carnatic music, Indian philosophy, Western continental philosophy, and intellectual history of India and the world.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
GRIZZLY BEAR PREMIERE "YET AGAIN," NEW SINGLE FROM FORTHCOMING LP 'SHIELDS'
Thursday 23rd August 2012
|By FAULT contributor
Grizzly Bear have recently revealed their new single, 'Yet Again', which featured as Huw Stephens' 'Hottest Record in the World'. The track is taken from their new album entitled 'Shields' which will be released on September 7th. The band is also set to perform the song on leading US satirical show, 'The Colbert Report' this month as part of StePhest Colbchella RocktAugustfest, taking place aboard the USS Intrepid.
'Shields' is the band's follow up album to their 2009 release of 'Veckatimest', which sold over 30,000 copies in its first week and debuted within the top ten of the US Billboard 200.
Grizzly Bear are are set to headline End of the Road Festival in Dorset on September 1st before kicking off an international tour on September 16th, which will see the band also headline at the Brixton Academy on October 22nd which is a massive and well deserved achievement for the band.
Keep an eye out for more on Grizzly Bear in FAULT Fall…
For full UK tour dates please visit Grizzly Bear's Official Site
Grizzly Bear on the Web:
Album Brixton Academy grizzly bear shields veckatimest yet again


text:
Feb. 27, 2003 / 11:48 AM
Interview of the week: Christopher Walken
By KAREN BUTLER, United Press International
NEW YORK, Feb. 27 (UPI) -- When casting romantic leads, the command producers don't usually bark: "Get me Christopher Walken!"
But the veteran of some 100-odd films says he doesn't know why that is.
"I actually wanted to be more romantic," confesses the 59-year-old "Deer Hunter" and "Pulp Fiction" star. "I could sort of see myself on a horse with a hat, sort of a cowboy, romantic."
An accomplished dancer and charming comic actor, the Oscar-nominated actor is better known for his portrayal of quirky, sinister characters, usually in crime or war dramas. However, his halting speech and serious facial expressions have fueled his image as a scary individual in real life, as well.
Asked if he is aware that some folks are actually afraid of him, Walken dismisses the question, noting," I hear that, you know, but I think that if that's true that it has to do with the movies that I've done."
And the nutty characters he has played?
"Yeah, you know, I've had guns and things," he remarks.
Reporters talking to Walken in Manhattan recently were surprised to hear that the big-screen tough guy hopes some day to engage in such warm and fuzzy activities as hosting a TV cooking show and appearing in a movie musical.
Nathalie Baye, the French actress who plays Walken's wife in the new film, "Catch Me If You Can," even admits she was initially nervous about working with the actor. But says she quickly realized she had misjudged him.
"Christopher Walken is a star," Baye emphasizes. "I was very excited to meet him because he's very famous, and French people like him very much, and everyone is a little scared of him. It's like, 'That guy is a strange guy who came from another planet.' He's going to be my husband. I was a little afraid, and when I met him, he's a very sweet man. He was scared, like I was, the first day of shooting, and very anxious and has a big sense of humor and loves cats, like me. There were cats on the set, and he was talking to the cats all the time."
"Catch Me If You Can" is the mostly true story of Frank Abagnale Jr., a 1960s con man who posed as a doctor, lawyer, college professor and airline pilot and cashed more than $2.5 million in fraudulent checks by the time he turned 21. Leonardo DiCaprio portrays Abagnale in the comedy drama, while Walken and Baye play his divorced parents. His performance earned him an Oscar nomination for supporting actor earlier this month.
Describing the Steven Spielberg film as "wonderful," Walken says he is pleased to hear a touching scene between DiCaprio and himself moved some audience members to tears.
"Oh, that's nice," he remarks. "It's so human, people relate."
In the film, the globe-trotting Abagnale is estranged from his somewhat shady father when he dies, but Walken says his bond with his own dad bares no resemblance to the Abaganales'.
"It was good, good," Walken says. "My father was really not at all like that. My father was very law-abiding, and he worked very hard. He worked seven days a week. It was all he really liked to do. He was a baker. ... He came from Europe, and ... he was very well-behaved.
"Not like this Frank Sr., in this movie; he really has a lot of nerve. Look, when I was growing up, people used to read books like 'How To Get Rich' or 'How To Become A Millionaire By the Time Your Forty', 'How To Win Friends and Influence People', and I think that he's like that. He believes that there is some little trick and then, everything is great."
Walken says he enjoyed playing the "Titanic" star's father.
"It was great," he explains. "You know, Steven hired me to play his father, and I figured that he knew exactly why, and I never asked anyone anything. But also, when Leo and I stand together, we could be related."
One of the major themes of the film is the effect divorce has on a family. While Spielberg and co-stars DiCaprio and Tom Hanks are all products of broken homes, Walken is not, but the actor says he knows enough people who have survived it to know that family life is not as it is depicted in sanitized sit-coms like "Ozzie and Harriet."
"This was a family that had no problems and everyone loved it," Walken says of the classic 1950s TV show. "I used to watch it all the time... and everyone always looked clean and no one had any problems, but I don't know that I have ever met anyone whose family wasn't a little bit (odd.) Everyone has some crazy uncle or something."
Walken also differs from Spielberg and Hanks in that he himself has never been divorced.
"I've been married for almost 35 years," notes the actor, adding that teamwork is the key to his happy union. "So, I don't know (much about divorce), but a lot of people that I know are divorced. I do wonder many times, I see people who are very intelligent people get married and I think, 'Why?'"
"Catch Me if You Can" is in theaters now. Walken is currently filming the horror movie, "Helldorado."
Odd News // 7 hours ago
Jan. 18 (UPI) -- A South Carolina man said he left a fast food drive-through line without placing an order when he discovered he had won a $300,000 lottery prize.
New York woman's lost dog turns up 5 years later, 1,000 miles from home
Jan. 18 (UPI) -- A New York woman whose dog went missing five years ago was reunited with the canine when the pet turned up at a shelter 1,000 miles away in Tennessee.
Minnesota parents use multicolored ice blocks to build front yard igloo
Jan. 18 (UPI) -- A Minnesota family's home is grabbing the attention of passers-by with an unusual new feature in their front yard: a more than 6-foot-tall igloo featuring multicolored blocks of ice.
Jan. 18 (UPI) -- An auction house said a Marvel Comics page featuring the first appearance of Spider-Man's iconic black costume sold for a record-breaking $3.36 million.
$20 million Missouri mansion includes Ferris wheel, bowling alley
Jan. 18 (UPI) -- A mansion listed for $20 million in Missouri comes with some unusual amenities, including a Ferris wheel, bowling alley and water park.
Odd News // 10 hours ago
Retired Staten Island Ferry boat up for auction
Jan. 18 (UPI) -- A former Staten Island Ferry boat is up for auction at a reduced price after being retired in the summer because of mechanical issues.
Escaped hermit crab found down the street three months later
Jan. 18 (UPI) -- A hermit crab that escaped from its owners' Houston home was found three months later when a neighbor spotted the crustacean wandering next to a sidewalk.
Florida troopers block 12-foot alligator from trying to cross highway
Jan. 18 (UPI) -- The Florida Highway Patrol said troopers were summoned to the side of a busy highway to prevent a 12-foot alligator from wandering into traffic.
Odd News // 3 days ago
Two men sentenced after trying to smuggle drugs in baked bean cans
Jan. 15 (UPI) -- Two men who tried to smuggle cocaine into Britain in cans disguised as baked beans and condensed coconut milk have been sentenced to a total of 15 years in prison, authorities say.
$1 million jackpot is Pennsylvania man's fourth major lottery prize
Jan. 14 (UPI) -- A Pennsylvania man won a $1 million prize from a scratch off lottery ticket -- marking his fourth major lottery jackpot since 1999.
'World's largest' cast-iron skillet travels down Tennessee highway
Indian artist breaks Guinness World Record with massive drawing


text:
import json

from blinkpy.common.memoized import memoized
from blinkpy.web_tests.layout_package import json_results_generator

class WebTestResult(object):
    def __init__(self, test_name, result_dict):
        self._test_name = test_name
        self._result_dict = result_dict

    def __repr__(self):
        return "WebTestResult(test_name=%s, result_dict=%s)" % \
            (repr(self._test_name), repr(self._result_dict))

    def suffixes_for_test_result(self):
        suffixes = set()
        artifact_names = self._result_dict.get('artifacts', {}).keys()
        # Add extensions for mismatches.
        if 'actual_text' in artifact_names:
            suffixes.add('txt')
        if 'actual_image' in artifact_names:
            suffixes.add('png')
        if 'actual_audio' in artifact_names:
            suffixes.add('wav')
        # Add extensions for missing baselines.
        if self.is_missing_text():
            suffixes.add('txt')
        if self.is_missing_image():
            suffixes.add('png')
        if self.is_missing_audio():
            suffixes.add('wav')
        return suffixes

    def result_dict(self):
        return self._result_dict

    def test_name(self):
        return self._test_name

    def did_pass_or_run_as_expected(self):
        return self.did_pass() or self.did_run_as_expected()

    def did_pass(self):
        return 'PASS' in self.actual_results()

    def did_run_as_expected(self):
        return not self._result_dict.get('is_unexpected', False)

    def is_missing_image(self):
        return self._result_dict.get('is_missing_image', False)

    def is_missing_text(self):
        return self._result_dict.get('is_missing_text', False)

    def is_missing_audio(self):
        return self._result_dict.get('is_missing_audio', False)

    def actual_results(self):
        return self._result_dict['actual']

    def expected_results(self):
        return self._result_dict['expected']

    def last_retry_result(self):
        return self.actual_results().split()[-1]

    def has_non_reftest_mismatch(self):
        """Returns true if a test without reference failed due to mismatch.

        This happens when the actual output of a non-reftest does not match the
        baseline, including an implicit all-PASS testharness baseline (i.e. a
        previously all-PASS testharness test starts to fail)."""
        actual_results = self.actual_results().split(' ')
        artifact_names = self._result_dict.get('artifacts', {}).keys()
        return ('FAIL' in actual_results and any(
            artifact_name.startswith('actual')
            for artifact_name in artifact_names)
                and 'reference_file_mismatch' not in artifact_names
                and 'reference_file_match' not in artifact_names)

    def is_missing_baseline(self):
        return (self.is_missing_image() or self.is_missing_text()
                or self.is_missing_audio())

# FIXME: This should be unified with ResultsSummary or other NRWT web tests code
# in the web_tests package.
# This doesn't belong in common.net, but we don't have a better place for it yet.
class WebTestResults(object):
    @classmethod
    def results_from_string(cls, string, step_name=None):
        """Creates a WebTestResults object from a test result JSON string.

        Args:
            string: JSON string containing web test result.
        """

        if not string:
            return None

        content_string = json_results_generator.strip_json_wrapper(string)
        json_dict = json.loads(content_string)
        if not json_dict:
            return None

        return cls(json_dict, step_name=step_name)

    @classmethod
    def results_from_resultdb(cls, rv, step_name=None):
        """Creates a WebTestResults object from a resultDB RPC response data.

        Args:
            rv: resultDB RPC response json containing web test result.
        """
        if not rv:
            return None

        return cls(rv, step_name=step_name)

    def __init__(self, parsed_json, chromium_revision=None, step_name=None):
        self._results = parsed_json
        self._chromium_revision = chromium_revision
        self._step_name = step_name

    def step_name(self):
        return self._step_name

    def run_was_interrupted(self):
        return self._results['interrupted']

    def builder_name(self):
        return self._results['builder_name']

    @memoized
    def chromium_revision(self, git=None):
        """Returns the revision of the results in commit position number format."""
        revision = self._chromium_revision or self._results['chromium_revision']
        if not revision.isdigit():
            assert git, 'git is required if the original revision is a git hash.'
            revision = git.commit_position_from_git_commit(revision)
        return int(revision)

    def result_for_test(self, test):
        parts = test.split('/')
        tree = self._test_result_tree()
        for part in parts:
            if part not in tree:
                return None
            tree = tree[part]
        return WebTestResult(test, tree)

    def for_each_test(self, handler):
        WebTestResults._for_each_test(self._test_result_tree(), handler, '')

    @staticmethod
    def _for_each_test(tree, handler, prefix=''):
        for key in tree:
            new_prefix = (prefix + '/' + key) if prefix else key
            if 'actual' not in tree[key]:
                WebTestResults._for_each_test(tree[key], handler, new_prefix)
            else:
                handler(WebTestResult(new_prefix, tree[key]))

    def _test_result_tree(self):
        return self._results['tests']

    def _filter_tests(self, result_filter):
        """Returns WebTestResult objects for tests which pass the given filter."""
        results = []

        def add_if_passes(result):
            if result_filter(result):
                results.append(result)

        WebTestResults._for_each_test(self._test_result_tree(), add_if_passes)
        return sorted(results, key=lambda r: r.test_name())

    def didnt_run_as_expected_results(self):
        return self._filter_tests(lambda r: not r.did_run_as_expected())

    # Returns non flaky failing results
    def failed_unexpected_resultdb(self):
        results = []
        prev = None
        flaky = False
        for result in self._results:
            if not prev:
                prev = result
            elif result[u'testId'] != prev[u'testId']:
                if not flaky:
                    results.append(prev)
                prev = result
                flaky = False
            elif result[u'status'] != prev[u'status']:
                flaky = True
        if not flaky:
            results.append(prev)
        failed_results = []
        for result in results:
            if result[u'status'] == u"FAIL":
                failed_results.append(result)
        return failed_results

    def fail_result_exists_resultdb(self, test):
        for result in self._results:
            if test in result[u'testId'] and result[u'status'] == u"FAIL":
                return True

    def test_results_resultdb(self):
        return self._results

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


The Michel Serres Institute for resources and public goods is tackling (as a follow up of the last week notes on demography, land and soil issues), the problem of food and hunger. Food considered as a primary resource and commons.
At the time the big political agendas are invariably thinking climate (see the upcoming COOP21, Paris 2015), we focus the attention on socio-ecosystemic urgencies as foundation for coherent and credible solutions to climate change.
Two recent interviews, with Olivier Assouly and François Collart Dutilleul in the French press are questioning the political incapacity to provide acceptable answers to accessing food for too many human beings.
Olivier Assouly (Liberation, february 2014, by Jacky Durand), is philosophy professor in Paris, and published recently "L'organisation criminelle de la faim"(The criminal organization of hunger ; Actes sud, 2013). He explains that food instrumentation has always been used for military and economic design, because "hunger has more constraining power than the law".Industrial agriculture, land grabbing, agro-raw material speculation, and rules of international trade are among the main levers of this organization.
François Collart Dutilleul, (in Liberation,March 2014 by Catherine Calvet and Beatrice Vallaeys) law professor at the Université de Nantes, directs the LASCAUX Program on food security and resource law as a contribution to the Michel Serres Institute legal studies.
For him, food "is not just about saving people's life, it is also about saving humanity".
The right to food, as human right, is today in too strong competition with the right to property. The research considers issues such as "food exception" (with reference to and mirroring the "cultural exception" agreement, arguing that "what is true for the mind, should also be true for the body"), food sovereignty and food democracy. This brings us to a much broader articulation between people and resources, in order to imagine "a law on the adjustment of accessible natural resources with social needs, a necessary complement to the law of the offer and demand".
In his turn, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Food, Olivier De Schutter, and his research team, note that food, from a local resource, has become a trans-national commodity.
Olivier De Schutter in his Final Report : The transformative potential of the right to food, submitted to the Human Rights Council in accordance with its resolution 22/9 in January 2014 the 24, draws the conclusions from his mandate, showing the connections between his various contributions.
We conclude that whatever the agendas, crises, conflicts, and controversies today, the access and re-adjustment of natural resources remains the cornerstone condition in the search for political solutions for most of the global challenges we are confronted with.


One of my favourite brands, J Crew, showcased their Spring/Summer 2016 range at NYFW last night. Last season wasn't one of J Crew's greatest and, in fact, the fashion house reported a slump in profit, maybe partly to do with a change in creative direction.
However, the latest collection saw a return to the original preppy style with stripes, gingham, bold necklaces and nautical/seaside vibes. Lots of green in the new collection, one of my favourite colours but my favourite has to be the yellow skirt and pastel blue top (first photo).


Businessman Phil Hagerman and Flint City Administrator Steve Branch look on during the announcement on Wednesday of the new team name.
FLINT, Michigan — Flint's new semi-pro soccer team's new name honors the franchise's successful past and also its new home. After more than 1,000 entries were received in the franchise's "name the team" contest, the former Mid-Michigan Bucks will now be known as the Flint City Bucks.
The name, logo, uniforms, and color scheme were unveiled during a media event at the Ferris Wheel downtown Flint on January 30, 2019.
Part of the selection process included residents of the Whaley Children's Center. After team officials narrowed down submissions to their top choices, Whaley staff and residents were able to provide input and help select a winner.
Papista also announced that residents of Whaley Children's Center will receive free admission to all games.
Gold is in honor of Kettering University, owners of the team's home field at Atwood Stadium.
In addition to these colors, the new logo also features an arrowhead, long used in graphics and logos for Flint organizations and honoring the Chippewa Native Americans who first resided in the area. Papista noted that Gary Fisher from the Flint Historical Society provided input into the historical elements the team incorporated into its redesigned look.
The contest closed December 15. Since, team officials have worked with a range of designers and artists to create the revamped look, logo, and website. The Flint City Bucks season begins on May 11, and the full season schedule is available on their website at www.FlintCityBucks.com.
The team hopes to add to Flint's proud athletic history while also bringing a new entertainment option to the city and its residents.
"We think all of the Flintstones are going to be very proud of the heritage we have incorporated into the new logo and colors," said Dan Duggan, Flint City Bucks chairman.


'The Fencer' has been awarded the Jury Award for Best Feature Film at Stony Brook Film Festival. The festival takes place in Long Island, where producer Kai Nordberg accepted the award. 'The Fencer' has been a success in United States and earlier this year was nominated for a Golden Globe and shortlisted for the Oscars.
Making Movies concentrates on quality stories. "We believe that the best stories from Finland should travel across the world and be seen by foreign audiences. The success of `The Fencer´ is a good example of how far you can go with a quality movie and good marketing," says Nordberg.
"We produce high quality movies and are planning to distribute to the US. ´The Fencer´ has opened up opportunities and allowed us to create important networks," concludes Nordberg.
Earlier this year ´The Fencer' won the Jussi prize for Best Film of the Year. The movie is directed by Klaus Härö and scripted by Anna Heinämaa.


Our first impressions of Ori and the Blind Forest was that it was a cute platform game with amazing graphics that would give me and my boyfriend a smooth feel-good story to play.
Ori is a white little guardian spirit that you control in a open 2D world. It's a platform game with RPG elements. The prologue is very emotional but we will not spoil everything for you guys that perhaps haven't had the chance to play this amazing game yet. The first thing that strike us is the beautiful hand-painted graphics and animations, it's magical! Also the music, sounds and voices are really well done.
The story starts a stormy evening when Ori falls from the Spirit Tree in Nibel Forest. He is found by a creature named Naru that adopts him. A cataclysmic event soon makes the forest and its food supply wither. Ori starts to explore the forest and later meets Sein, a spirit-light who guides Ori on his adventure. In order to restore the forest, Ori needs to recover the light of three main elements supporting the balance of Nibel: Waters, Winds and Warmth.
The following main story gives you both puzzles to solve and fast-paced platform action that challenges your gamepad-skills! The puzzles are fun and innovative, giving us natural breaks in the game. Me and my boyfriend took turns to play, and that was good, because there were several moments when we both screamed with frustration, when we for the thirtieth time failed Ori on a fast paced escape-or-die sequence! It's hard, I mean REALLY HARD sometimes, and you have to do the same sequence over and over again until you would be able to master it in your sleep. Still the game kept us interested and we didn't want anything more than to get Ori out of there, and move forward in the game's story.
The map system reminded us of Super Metroid with it's gridded appearance. The map also featured classic shaded areas where we hadn't visited making it easy to explore. But besides the map, several hidden rooms are accessible via walk-through-walls and levers, where you can find special items. These are NOT displayed on the map! So make sure to scout every corner of the world if you're a completionist 😉 The player helps Ori collect health shards, energy shards, new abilities, and upgrades. The ability setup also reminded us of Super Metroid when giving us access to new areas through new abilities. Yes, you needed to back-track but it never took so much time and we were still eager to find out what was hidden in those locked areas. Be careful though, for 100% map completion (which also carries an achievement) you need to unlock some parts of the map when you are there, some areas get closed so you can't go back (like for example the Forlorn Ruins).
In addition to save points scattered around the world you can create soul links at any time by using special blue shards collected during the game. Saving didn't actually work as it should for us…. 😦 Two times we started up the game realising that the last 30 minutes we played wasn't saved. I don't know what happened, but I guess that my Xbox profile logged out or something, even though I use cable and not wifi for my Xbox One? Annoying!
The game was ridiculously hard sometimes, but overall it was a really good adventure platform game with likeable characters, fun gameplay and beautiful graphics. Thumbs up!
Posted in #Awesome, Computer, GAMING, XboxTagged #Awesome, 2015, Adventure, Easter Eggs, game, Game Review, Games, GAMING, Geeky Gals, MissDeluxeGaming, Ori, Ori & The Blind Forest, Ori and the Blind Forest, Ori and the Blind Forest review, Platform, Review, RPG, Video Game Review, Xbox OneBookmark the permalink.
Geeky Gals Mixtape #1 – Retro gaming classics!!