text:
2020 Events - Updated January 2020
April 11 10:00 am SHARP Leatherstocking Credit Union Easter Egg Hunt and visit by the Easter Bunny
Annual event sponsored by Leatherstocking Region Federal Credit Union with prizes – raffles – and a visit by the Easter Bunny! Free and open to the public. Rain or Shine!
May 9 12:00 to 3:00 pm Celebrate Mom! Tea Party
Give Mom a first look at the new carpet – curtains – and restored walls in the Dining Room. Treat her to tea and sweets in the library of our 200+ year old English Country mansion. See the magnificent Hyde Hall silver and other artifacts from our Collections. Free and open to the public.
May 15 10:30 am Upstairs/Downstairs
Join us for a 90-minute tour of Hyde Hall with a view to parts of the mansion utilized by both the Clarke family and their household staff. Check out rooms and parts of the Mansion not normally seen on our regular hourly tours. Cost: $20 per person. These tours involve 90 minutes of walking/standing and climbing stairs. Call 607-547-5098 – Ext. 4 for reservations.
May 22 7:30 pm Get Lit! Lighting Tour and Historic Cocktails
Details to Follow!
May 23 10:00 am Opening Day and Residents of Springfield Free Day
Tours are provided on the hour throughout the day beginning at 10am. Last tour of each day starts at 3pm.
May 23 through October 31 10am to 3pm Mansion open for Tours
$15 per adult; $12 for seniors – military – youth 13 to 17; Children under 13 free! Hourly; First Tour starts 10am; Last Tour starts 3pm.
June 13 6:30 pm Samuel Morse Specialty Themed Tour
July 8; 15; 22; 29 7:00-8:00pm Ghost Tours
Visit all the spooky places in the Mansion where ghostly manifestations have been reported for over 150 years;
August 5; 12; 19; 26 7:00-8:00pm Ghost Tours
Visit all the spooky places in the Mansion where ghostly manifestations have been reported for over 150 years; Seating is limited and reservations are recommended.
August 14; 15; 16 10:00am-9:00pm Civil War Weekend
Experience a Civil War-era encampment featuring soldiers in authentic uniforms drilling and performing tactical maneuvers and singing stirring period songs! Free and open to the public.
September 12 7:30 pm Get Lit! Lighting Tour and Historic Cocktails
September 13 7:30 pm Chatham Baroque Returns
October 3; 4; 10; 11; 17; 18; 24; 25 6:00; 6:30; 7:00; 7:30pm Hyde & Shriek! Candlelight Ghost Tours
Visit all the spooky places in the Mansion where ghostly manifestations have been reported for over 150 years – including those identified by Ghosthunters(c) in their Halloween special on the SyFy network. Reservations required; tickets will be available through the Hyde Hall online store at $20.00. These tours sell out fast so don't delay! Tricks and treats for Halloween!
October 31 7 to 10 pm Once in a Blue Moon: Halloween Costume Ball!
Details to Follow.
Sign Up for Enews:


text:
Script an Early Victory
Let me tell you about a practice of leadership I learned both from my grandfather and from one of my business mentors. It is a practice that has served me well.
First, the example of my grandfather. He was a soldier in World War II and, later, an advisor to General MacArthur in Japan. When he retired, he spent decades raising Samoyeds, the beautiful white lion-like dogs from Siberia.
I was with him once when a puppy jumped up on a chair. I thought my grandfather, a stern man, was going deal with the little guy harshly. Instead, he pushed the puppy off the chair and onto the floor. Then, he praised him. I asked why. My grandfather said, "When the puppy associates the floor with praise, he'll stop getting on the chair." He was right. A few more such lessons and the dog never got on the chair again.
Years later, I learned the same lesson again from a turnaround expert who is a friend of mine. He had led two universities through high-profile turn arounds and had consulted widely on turnaround strategies. We were having dinner one night when he taught me one of his secrets. He said that when he was trying to change the culture of a failing organization, he always tried to script an early victory.
He said that once when he was turning around a university that was in serious trouble, he engineered a situation in which the school built half a dorm. They wanted to build debt-free and initially they could only raise enough money to build half a dorm. So, they did, and it was a beautiful half a dorm.
Still, it was only half a dorm. Yet it didn't matter. It was a victory. The new dorm's presence signaled what was to come. It showed students, faculty, and parents what the possibilities were. Within years that school was re-made, but it all started with the signal victory of that half a dorm.
This is one of the vital arts of leadership. You want to lead from strength to strength, from victory to victory. You want each successful new step to radiate hope and promise into the whole organization. So, you have to script victories. You have to shoot for small successes, particularly in the early days. Then, your team starts to see what victories look like, which is all the more important if there haven't been any for a while. They get used to it. They like it. They want more. Each victory embeds a vision of the future. This is how you change a culture of defeat into one of victory.
Now, ask yourself this: How can you put this principle into practice? Even if you've been leading an organization for years, how can small victories—in a department, in a new branch, in the life of an unsteady executive—instill confidence, change a culture, and create a drive for yet more victories?
Stephen Mansfield2018-10-24T06:00:05-04:00October 24th, 2018|Leading Thoughts|

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Home » Forums » Religion and Irrationalities » Biblical Errancy
Things NOT to do when debating Jesus' existence or Christianity in general?
Topher
What should we not do when discussing issues such as the Jesus myth or Christianity or religion in general. By this, I don't mean fallacies since we should all be wise enough to know this, but rather, methods of argument… things that may not actually be useful in every circumstance, or even could be used against us.
For example, is it always a good mention dates of scripture? (Assuming it isn't a specific part of our argument.) Unless we are very knowable about issues such as dating, and since there are many different views, it could dig us into an unnecessary hole. Trying to say Nazareth didn't exist is another possible no-no.
The idea of this thread is just to discuss ideas and methods that will make us more aware.
"It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring" -- Carl Sagan
‹ The Bible Compliments History bible and dinosaurs ›
Posted on: August 7, 2007 - 10:42am #1
nonbobblehead
The oh-hum of it all . . .
First thing is don't take yourself and the "skeptic movement" too seriously at all. This subject has been argued about and over for far more than a thousand years. Realize that some people will decide that the evidence suits their particular feelings and others will decide that the evidence is OK for them. And like it or not, there are still educated people becoming Christians and dregs becoming Atheists. And vice-versa.
Celcus was a Roman that lived in the second century BC. His oposition to Christians live within Christianity to this day: http://members.aol.com/PS418/celsus.html
CELSUS ON CHRISTIANITY (178CE)
CELSUS (178ECE) Wrote"On the True DoctriSCRIPTURAL REDACTION
"It is clear to me that the writings of the christians are a lie, and that your fables are not well-enough constructed to conceal this monstrous fiction: I have heard that some of your interpreters...are on to the inconsistencies and, pen in hand, alter the originals writings, three, four and several more times over in order to be able to deny the contradictions in the face of criticism." (37).
"There is nothing new or impressive about their ethical teaching; indeed, when one compares it to other philosophies, their simplemindedness becomes apparent." (53).
"One ought first to follow reason as a guide before accepting any belief, since anyone who believes without testing a doctrine is certain to be deceived" (54).
"Let us imagine what a Jew- let alone a philosopher- might say to Jesus: 'Is it not true, good sir, that you fabricated the story of your birth from a virgin to quiet rumourss about the true and insavoury circumstances of your origins? Is it not the case that far from being born in the royal David's city of bethlehem, you were born in a poor country town, and of a woman who earned her living by spinning? Is it not the case that when her deceit was uncovered, to wit, that she was pregnant by a roman soldier called Panthera she was driven away by her husband- the carpenter- and convicted of adultery?" (57).
"I could continue along these lines, suggesting a good deal about the affairs of Jesus' life that does not appear in your own records. Indeed, what I know to be the case and what the disciples tell are two very different stories... [for example] the nonsensical idea that Jesus foresaw everything that was to happen to him (an obvious attempt to conceal the humiliating facts)." (62).
"The men who fabricated this geneaology [of Jesus] were insistent on on the point that Jesus was descended from the first man and from the king of the Jews [David]. The poor carpenter's wife seems not to have known she had such a distinguished bunch of ancestors." (64).
"What an absurdity! Clearly the christians have used the myths of Danae and the Melanippe, or of the Auge and the Antiope in fabricating the story of Jesus' virgin birth." (57).
"After all, the old myths of the greeks that attribute a divine birth to Perseus, Amphion, Aeacus and Minos are equally good evidence of their wondrous works on behalf of mankind- and are certainly no less lacking in plausibility than the stories of your followers." (59).
[SEE ALSO: ANALYSIS OF PROPHECY ]
"Now perhaps you will argue that we have the words of the holy prophets- that they bore witness concerning you. With due respect, I must ask why you are to be taken as the subject of these prophecies rather than the thousands of others who lived after the prophecy was uttered? What can be applied to you can surely be applied to others." (58).
"...they take as their defense the notion that the prophets of the jews foretold their christian god. But this is a very old ploy... anyone can prove anything from so-called prophecy." (106).
Speaking of prophets in his own time, Celsus says: "These habitually claim to to be more than prophets, and say such things as 'I am god,' or 'I am a son of god,' or even 'I am the holy spirit,' and 'I have come to bring life for the world is coming to an end as I speak. And the wicked will perish in the fire for their sins. I shall save you; you will yet see me, for I am coming again armed with the heavenly powers. So blessed is he that worships me now. Those who refuse, whole cities and nations, will be cast into the fiery pit... Those who hear and believe in me will be saved (from the fire.' This sort of thing is heard all over Judea by these most trivial of prophets." (107).
"You are fond of saying that in the old days this same most high god made these and greater promises to those who gave heed to his commandments and worshipped him. But at the risk of appearing unkind, I ask how much good has been done by those promises have done either the Jews before you or you in your present circumstances. And would you have us put out faith in such a god? Instead of being masters of the whole world, the jews today have no home of any kind." (125).
"...now with a view to the prophets who, so say the chrisitians, foretold the story of Jesus beforehand: 'These same prophecies could easily be applied to a thousand others besides Jesus, for our prophets say that the one who is to come will be a great prince... the leader of nations and armies." (64).
"Certainly the christians are not alone in claiming inspiration for the utterances they ascribe to their god through their prophets. I need hardly mention every case of prophecy that is said to have occurred among our own people-- prophets and prophetesses as well... claiming the power of oracular and inspired utterance." (120).
"In all of these beliefs you have been deceived; yet you persist doggedly to seek justification for the absurdities you have made doctrines." (65).
"Let's assume for a minute that he foretold his resurrection. Are you ignorant of the multitudes wh ohave invented similar tales to lead simple minded hearers astray? It is said that Zamolxis, Pythagoras' servant, convinced the Scythians that he had risen from the dead... and what about Pythagoras himself in Italy! -or Rhampssinitus in Egypt. The last of these, by the way, is said to have played dice with Demeter in Hades and to have received a golden napkin as a present from her. Now then, who else: What about Orpheus among the Odrysians, Protesiaus in Thessaly and above all Heracles and Theseus." (67).
[see also: PAROUSIA OR PARANOIA? ]
"They [christians] postulate, for example, that their messiah will return as a conqueror on the clouds, and that he will rain fire upon the earth in his battle with the princes of the air, and that the whole world, with the exception of believing christians, will be consumed in fire. An interesting idead-- and hardly an original one. The idea came from greeks and others-- namely, that after cycles of years and because of fortuitous conjunctions of certain stars there are conflagrations and floods, and that after the last flood, in the tiome of Deucalion, the cycle demands a conflagration in accordance with the alternating succession...This is responsible for the silly opinion of some christians that god will come down and rain fire upon the earth." (77).
"It is equally silly of these christians to suppose that when their god applies the fire (like a common cook!) all the rest of mankind will be thoroughly scorched, and that they alone will escape unscorched-- not just those alive at the time, mind you, but (they say) those long since dead will rise up from the earth possessing the same bodies as they did before. I ask you: Is this not the hope of worms? For what sort of human soul is it that has any use for a rotted corpse of a body? ...it is nothing less than nauseating and impossible."(86).
"In truth there is nothing at all unusual about what the christians believe, except that they believe it to the exclusion of more comprehensive truths about god. They believe in eternal punishment; well, so do the priests and initiates of the various religions. The christian threaten others with this punishment, just as they are themselves threatened." (121).
"God does not inflict correction on the world as if he were some unskilled laborer who is incapable of building something properly the first time around; God has no need to purify what he has built by means of a flood or a conflagration (as they teach)." (82).
"So too their fantastic story-- which they take from the Jews-- concerning the flood and the building of an enormous ark, and the business about the message being brought back to the survivors of the flood by a dove (or was it an old crow?). This is nothing more than a debased and nonsensical version of the myth of Deucalion, a fact I am sure they would not want to come light." (80).
UNORIGINALITY IN CHRISTIAN WRITINGS
"Many of the ideas of the christians have been expressed better-- and earlier-- by the greeks, who were however modest enough to refrain from saying that their ideas came from a god or a son of god. The ancients in their wisdom revealed certain truths to those able to understand: Plato, son of Ariston, points to the truth about the highest good when he says that it cannot be expressed in words, but rather comes from familiarity-- like a flash frpm the blue, imprinting itself upon the soul... But Plato, having said this, does not go on to record some myth to make his point (as do so many others), nor does he silence the inquirer who questions some of the truths he professes; Plato does not ask people to stop questioning, or to accept that god id like such and such...Rather, he tells us where his doctrines come from; there is, in short, a history to what he says, and he is happy to point to the sources of his knowledge, instead of asking us to believe that he speaks on his own authority..." (92-93).
"Not only do they misunderstand the words of the philosophers; they even stoop to assigning words of the philosophers to their Jesus. For example, we are told that Jesus judged the rich with the saying 'It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of god.' Yet we know that Plato expressed this very idea in a purer form when he said, 'It is impossible for an exceptionally good man to be exceptionally rich.'* Is one utterance more inspired than the other?" (94).
[*Plato, LAWS, 743A]
"You christians have a saying that goes something like this: 'Don't resist a man who insults you; even if he strikes you, offer your other cheek as well.' This is nothing new, and its been better said by others, especially by Plato, who ascribes the following to Socrates in the Crito...'ts never right to do wrong and never right to take revenge; nor is it right to give evil for evil, or in the case of one who has suffered some injury, to attempt to get even...'" (113).
"Christians, needless to say, utterly detest one another; they slander each other constantly with the vilest forms of abuse, and cannot come to any sort of agreement in their teaching. Each sect brands its own, fills the head of its own with deceitful nonsense...". (91).
"What do the christians say? They say, "First believe that the person who tells us these things is god's son... Now if these beleivers confess Jesus and others confess someone else, and if they all together have the slogan "Believe and be saved, or damn you," what is to happen to those who really do want to be saved? I mean, which path are they to follow, since advice of the same sort comes from all quarters? Are the ones who crave salvation to throw dice in order to find out where they should turn?" (93).
As for satan being cast down to earth, "Homer writes as follows of the words spoken by Hephaestus to Hera: 'Once when I was ready to defend you, he took my by the foot and cast me down from the heavenly places.' Zeus speaks to Hera as follows, 'Do you remember when you were hanging on high, when I attached anvils to his legs and cast unbroken chains of gold about your arms? You were hanging high in the ether of clouds. Then the gods struck...but I, seizing him, pitched him from the threshold of heaven, and he fell helplessly to earth.'" (100).
ON THE PROBLEM OF EVIL
"But if these [Eden, Adam and Eve] are Truly creator's works, can it be that god should make what is evil? How can he repent when they become ungrateful or wicked? How can he find fault with his own handiwork, or threaten to destroy his own offspring? Where is he to banish them, out of the world that he himself has made?" (102)
"I mean, if it is accepted that all of nature-- everything in the world-- operates accoeding to the will of god and that nothing works contrary to his purposes, then it must be also be accepted that the angels, the demons, heroes-- everything in the universe-- are subject to the rule of the great god who rules over all." (115).
{Edited for text color - red is extremely difficult to read}
0 x 0 = Atheism. Something from nothing? Ahhh no.
And Karl, religion is not the opiate of the people, opium is. Visit any modern city in the western world and see.
silentseba
Is it me or is that red text
Is it me or is that red text really hard to read? (feel free to delete this comment if you fix the color)
Posted on: August 7, 2007 - 12:03pm #3
nonbobblehead, the info on
nonbobblehead, the info on Celcus is good, but what are you suggesting we not do? Make the same arguments as him?
JeremiahSmith
Given the sort of person
Given the sort of person you're likely to debate with most often, I'd say the number one thing not to do is "bother in the first place". But perhaps I'm just being cynical.
Götter sind für Arten, die sich selbst verraten -- in den Glauben flüchten um sich hinzurichten. Menschen brauchen Götter um sich zu verletzen, um sich zu vernichten -- das sind wir.
Posted on: August 12, 2007 - 7:29pm #5
Genesis c22v12
People need the word of god
Don't attack christians.
todangst
Topher wrote:
He's implying that these arguments are old. He leaves out that they are unanswered.
"Hitler burned people like Anne Frank, for that we call him evil.
"God" burns Anne Frank eternally. For that, theists call him 'good.'


text:
Investigation underway after man injured in Raleigh shooting
A second stimulus check? Here's how much money you could get
by: CBS News
By now, most Americans have received the federal stimulus checks directed by the CARES Act in March to help consumers weather the economic downturn caused by the coronavirus pandemic. Three months later, the downturn has been declared an official recession and the official unemployment rate has soared into double digits, heightening calls for a second round of stimulus checks.
There's good news and bad news on the prospects for additional government assistance. The proposed $3 trillion Health and Economic Recovery Omnibus Emergency Solutions, or HEROES, Act would authorize another round of stimulus payments for most U.S. households. While the bill was passed by the Democrat-controlled House last month, it still must get through the Republican-controlled Senate.
Yet there are signs the White House may get behind additional stimulus funding, with the Wall Street Journal reporting that the administration is working on its own plan. During a press conference last week to discuss unemployment, President Donald Trump said his administration will be "asking for additional stimulus money," while his economic adviser Kevin Hassett told the Journal this week that the odds of another stimulus package "are very, very high."
To be sure, it's unclear whether the HEROES Act will pass Senate scrutiny, or what its final contents might be. But here's what Americans could be looking at if the bill passes.
How much money could I get with a second stimulus check?
The HEROES Act offers a larger stimulus payment than the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act. Under the new legislation each member of a household would receive $1,200, including children. The income thresholds would remain the same, meaning that single taxpayers earning less than $75,000 and married taxpayers earning a total of $150,000 would receive the full payments. For instance, a family of four whose parents earn less than $150,000 would receive $4,800.
HEROES would cap total payments at $6,000 per family. Under CARES, a family of four whose parents earn less than a combined $150,000 received $3,400, since that law directed $500 for each child under the age of 17.
To see how much you would receive under the HEROES Act, you can check this stimulus calculator from OmniCalculator.
Could older students get stimulus payments?
One criticism of the CARES Act stimulus payments is their restrictions on older teens and college students. Only dependents under 17 years old were eligible for the $500 payments, which excluded many high school juniors and seniors. The payments also excluded college students who were claimed as dependents on their parents' taxes.
HEROES broadens its scope to include all dependents, which means that older teens and college students would be eligible for the $1,200 per-person payments.
How about immigrants?
CARES also drew fire for its exclusion of many immigrants, including those who are in the U.S. legally. Only immigrants with Green Cards were allowed to receive stimulus money, which excludes millions of immigrants who pay taxes but haven't qualified for a Green Card. The law also excluded Americans who are married to immigrants without Green Cards, an exclusion that sparked lawsuits alleging discrimination against them as well as their American children denied payments.
HEROES would require only that a taxpayer have a "taxpayer identification number" — a number used by immigrants to pay taxes — rather than a Social Security number, as CARES required.
Some say Americans need even more help, while others believe it's best to wait to see if the economy picks up as businesses begin to reopen and rehire. Among those advocating for bigger payments is Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who with Democratic Senators Kamala Harris of California and Ed Markey of Massachusetts have introduced a bill to provide $2,000 per month for every U.S. resident until the coronavirus crisis ebbs.
In the meantime, it's clear that most households across the country have taken an economic hit from the pandemic. About 54% of consumers said their income has been affected by the COVID-19 crisis, according to a recent survey from Betterment.
Winning numbers drawn for $640 million Powerball
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) - Lottery players' second chance to win big - really big - this weekend comes with Saturday's drawing for a $640 million Powerball top prize, the eighth-largest jackpot ever.
The winning numbers are 67, 20, 65, 14, 39, and the Powerball is 02. The odds of winning are one in 292.2 million.
'Stay away from downtown': Raleigh's mayor issues warning ahead of potential inauguration protest


SKU: ab634ab72d03. Category: Designer Sterling Silver. Tag: one of a kind.
Here is a gorgeous lightweight pair of Amber Earrings from the Baltic. They feature very secure french clips. You will never lose these babies. Note how each Amber Stone is so unique.
These are one of a kind so snap them up quick before the are gone!


Before I left for South Africa, I was asked to contribute a sermon for Sermons That Work on the lessons for Proper 22. I've contributed quite a few sermons for them in the past so I just said yes without first looking at the scripture passages. It turns out, the Gospel lesson for that Sunday is Mark 10:2-16, which is primarily about Jesus' teaching on divorce. Ugghhhh! I should have looked before I leaped. No wonder it was one of the few Sundays still in need of a writer.
In any event, my sermon is due this weekend. Here's a draft. Love to know what you think.
Today may be a Sunday when the preacher and the congregation are of one heart and one mind: the preacher doesn't want to deliver a sermon on divorce and the congregation doesn't want to hear a sermon on divorce. I suspect many preachers have looked at our Gospel lesson from Mark, Jesus' teaching on divorce, and said to themselves "This would be a good Sunday to focus on the Epistle lesson." At least, I know I have. And, in my experience, this has gone pretty well. Except for the fact that when I am shaking hands with parishioners after the service there is always a person who says something like "Thank you for your sermon today. I found it helpful. But I was wondering about what Jesus said about divorce, because my daughter is going through this rough time …" And then you get a wrenching story of parents, spouses, children going through the heartbreak of divorce. A sermon on Jesus' prohibition of divorce in Mark's Gospel may not an easy thing for the preacher or the congregation. But the person who is struggling with divorce and genuinely wants to know what his or her faith has to say about it deserves to hear what Jesus has to say, even if it may not be easy.
In our Gospel lesson, Jesus is engaged in a debate with some Pharisees over the issue of divorce. They ask him, "Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife?" Now, there are indications that this wasn't a sincere question. Mark tells us they asked this question in order "to test" Jesus. Rather than seeking an answer to an honest question they were trying to set a trap because in the Judaism of Jesus' day the legality of a husband divorcing a wife wasn't in question. It was permitted. The debate centered around the conditions under which divorce was permitted; the more stringent side saying it was permitted only in cases of serious sexual misconduct and the less stringent side saying it was permitted even if the husband simply no longer found his wife pleasing. Therefore, in asking Jesus whether divorce was legal they were really trying to catch Jesus contradicting the law. Perhaps they had heard that Jesus taught that divorce was prohibited. If they could get him to say so publically, they could discredit him or at least disgrace him.
In good Jewish fashion, Jesus responds to the Pharisees' question with one of his own: "What did Moses command you?" The Pharisees in reply refer to Deuteronomy 24:1: "Moses allowed a man to write a certificate of dismissal and to divorce her." Jesus reveals their disingenuousness. They had this bible verse in their back pocket and were waiting to pounce on Jesus for contradicting the scriptures. And yet instead of just walking away from the Pharisees at this point, Jesus responds in two ways. First, he says it was because of your hardness of heart that Moses wrote this commandment for folks like you. Here, Jesus is saying permission for a man to divorce his wife was a regrettable allowance for certain people's spiritual blindness, with the strong implication being that it was for folks like the Pharisees and their spiritual ancestors. Second, Jesus trumps one piece of scripture (Deuteronomy 24:1) with other pieces of scripture saying: "from the beginning of creation 'God made them male and female' [Gen 1:27]. 'For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh' [Gen 2:24]." Jesus goes beyond the passage from Deuteronomy to God's original intentions for marriage in creation. He sees these passages as more directly applicable to the question at hand, and, in his view, as prohibiting divorce. Jesus, therefore, concludes his argument by saying, "So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate." The Pharisees, who tried to catch Jesus contradicting scripture, are shown to be hard-hearted, spiritually blind opponents who themselves fail to understand the scriptures. The proof-texting gambit with Jesus doesn't work out as planned.
Later, when Jesus is alone with his disciples they again ask Jesus about divorce. He tells them, "Whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery against her; and if she divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery." Here, Jesus does two interesting things. First, he extends the logic of his prohibition of divorce to say that if someone divorces and remarries they commit adultery. This follows because if the first marriage remains in effect then entering into a second marriage is adulterous. Second, he speaks of the scenario of a wife divorcing her husband. This really wasn't an option in the Judaism of Jesus' day (though there may have been some fringe exceptions to this). In Judaism it was really a question only about the legality of a husband divorcing a wife. To divorce or not was the prerogative of Jewish men not women. In Roman law, wives could divorce their husbands, so perhaps Jesus was offering a nod in the direction of gentiles in his prohibition of divorce.
The courageous preacher who has come thus far in his or her sermon on Jesus' prohibition of divorce usually, in my experience, tries to go on to soften the seeming harshness of Jesus' teaching. Yes, understanding the context of the passage in a bit more depth has helped some, but it still comes across as one of Jesus' so-called hard sayings. Perhaps the wisest thing would be to end here and to just allow the people of God to sit for a Sunday with the incongruity of a Jesus who doesn't always say things we like to hear. And yet, preachers are also pastors, and we no doubt know good and faithful parishioners, pillars of the church even, who happen to be divorced. We love them and we know that they did not divorce lightly but for very good reasons. They often grieve the end of their marriages, and yet also believe that their marriages needed to end. And many preachers, myself included, oftentimes agree. The Episcopal Church does too, in as much as it has allowed divorced parishioners to remarry (given certain conditions which have evolved over the last century or so). This is not intended to diminish the esteem in which we hold the ideal of lifelong commitment in marriage. But in our sinful and broken world, sometimes we recognize that marriages need to end, even if such endings are painful and tragic. So we try to say more.
Preachers who try to soften the seeming harshness of Jesus' prohibition of divorce usually take one of three approaches. The first approach, I'll call "Jesus protects the wellbeing of women." The idea here is that in the Judaism of Jesus' day, wives were, whether we like it or not, dependent on their marriages for their physical, economic and social wellbeing. Since divorce in Judaism was the sole prerogative of husbands this placed married women in a very precarious position. A divorced woman was very vulnerable in the first century Israel and if a husband had the right to divorce his wife, in some people's eyes even for rather trivial matters, a woman's wellbeing was quite dependent on the steadfastness or whims of her husband. Jesus' prohibition of divorce can therefore be seen as a way of protecting women.
The second approach is related to the first. I'll call it "Jesus introduces reciprocity in marriage." The idea here is that Jesus criticized the patriarchal understanding of marriage found in the Judaism of his day and introduced a note of equality and reciprocity in marriage. We have already seen that the question in Judaism at the time of Jesus was about the rights of a husband to divorce his wife. A wife didn't have a reciprocal right and in fact were pretty much viewed as a husband's property. That's why technically speaking the Old Testament views adultery as a property violation against a husband, a form of stealing a man's property by taking his wife. By definition adultery could only be committed against a man because the husband was not regarded in any reciprocal sense as the property of the wife. Therefore, when Jesus says that a man who divorces his wife and remarries commits adultery against his wife Jesus introduces something new into the understanding of marriage. He is saying that a wife has equal and reciprocal rights to the sexual fidelity of her husband, as he does of her. Jesus' teaching on divorce and remarriage introduces a remarkable equality and reciprocity between husband and wife.
The third attempt to soften Jesus' prohibition of divorce I'll call the "We're all sinners" approach. The idea here is to point out the ways in which we have all failed to live up to Jesus' teachings in one way or another. Anybody here ever been angry with another member of the church or insulted them? Anybody holding on to unforgiveness? Divorce must be seen in the context of all the ways people fail to live up to the demands of the Gospel. The good news is that for all our failings God offers forgiveness. All of us have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God and all of us are dependent on God's free gift of grace by which we are made right with God. In this sense, divorced persons are no different from any body else. We're all sinners.
There is something to be said for each of these approaches. However, I would like to offer an additional way of looking at this text by viewing it in light of other New Testament passages about divorce. This will enable us, I hope, to see a certain development within the New Testament that can provide us with a scriptural warrant for the permissibility of divorce under certain conditions and for very good pastoral reasons.
There are only a handful of other passages in the New Testament dealing with divorce. In Luke there is only one verse, "Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and whoever marries a woman divorced from her husband commits adultery" (Luke 16:18), which basically reiterates the prohibition of divorce and remarriage that we find in Mark's Gospel. In Matthew's Gospel, however, we find a significant development. In Matthew's version of Jesus' debate with the Pharisees, Jesus says, "whoever divorces his wife, except for unchastity, and marries another commits adultery" (Matt 19:9). Here we see what people refer to as Matthew's "exception clause." It is repeated in Matt 5:32: "I say to you that anyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of unchastity, causes her to commit adultery." Scholars debate what the exact nature of this "unchastity" may or may not be, but for our purposes we need not delve into the details. The important point is that in the Gospel of Matthew we find passages which acknowledge an exception to the absolute prohibition of divorce that we find in Mark's Gospel.
The only other New Testament passage that deals directly with divorce comes from Paul's first letter to the Corinthians. In this passage, we also find Paul permitting divorce under certain circumstances. However, he does so in a highly significant way. Paul clearly knows of Jesus' prohibition of divorce. In 1 Cor 7:10 he says, "To the married I give this command—not I but the Lord—that the wife should not separate from her husband (but if she does separate let her remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband) and that the husband should not divorce his wife." Paul's phrase "not I but the Lord," shows he knows what Jesus taught about divorce and remarriage. And yet later in the passage Paul goes on to say that it is permissible for a Christian who is married to a non-Christian to separate from their non-believing spouse. Significantly, Paul prefaces these remarks by saying, "To the rest I say – I and not the Lord—if any believer has a wife who is a non-believer …" (1 Cor 7:12). With the phrase "I say—I and not the Lord" Paul acknowledges that he is going beyond what he knows Jesus to have said about divorce and remarriage. Nonetheless, Paul is confronted with a situation in which people who have become Christians are still married to their non-Christian spouses. Paul's counsel is that Christians with non-believing spouses who consent to remain married ought to remain married. But, if it is not possible for the non-believing spouse to remain married to his or her Christian spouse Paul says separation is permitted. Paul says, "If the unbelieving partner separates, let it be so; in such a case the brother or sister is not bound. It is to peace that God has called you" (1 Cor 7:15). Under these circumstances Paul permits a Christian to divorce. Paul is clear that it is he who is saying this not Jesus. And yet, given the circumstances, Paul believes it is permitted because God calls us to live in peace.
When Jesus' absolute prohibition of divorce in Mark is seen in the context of other New Testament passages, it seems as though the New Testament prohibition of divorce is not so absolute. It is clear that the New Testament is consistent in seeing the lifelong commitment between a husband and a wife as an extremely important aspect of Christian discipleship. Marriage is held up as a lifelong covenant that is to reflect God's faithfulness and God's love. And yet in Matthew we see an exception that permits divorce in cases of serious sexual impropriety and in Paul we see permission to divorce when an unbelieving spouse no longer wishes to remain married to a Christian. In the New Testament itself, therefore, we find a process of moral reflection and pastoral adaptation that allows for divorce under certain circumstances. Taken together, these New Testament passages suggest a scriptural basis for the ongoing moral reflection upon and pastoral adaptation of Jesus' teaching on divorce and remarriage. I am not suggesting that the church ought to simply accommodate itself to the prevailing cultural norms and assumptions about marriage and divorce. What I am saying is that the New Testament itself envisions a faithful moral and pastoral engagement with Jesus' prohibition of divorce in light of the ongoing demands of discipleship. In our day, for example, I think we have to say that in situations of violence and abuse divorce is permissible. Sometimes, tragically and regrettably, ending a marriage will be the right thing to do. We should be clear about the moral and pastoral reason why we think this is so. And we should, like Paul, be clear that it is we — and not Jesus — who is making this call. Nonetheless, I think the whole of the New Testament witness permits us to see this as a faithful response.
I'm not too sure how the preacher and the congregation will feel after such a sermon on divorce. I don't know any rousing divorce hymns to use for the recessional. And yet maybe some important conversations will ensue between the pastor and members of the congregation or amongst parishioners themselves. And maybe that person whose daughter is going through a rough time in her marriage will thank you for not running away from the Gospel lesson, but rather trying to deal with it as faithfully and fairly as you could even if it was sometimes hard to hear. A person who is struggling with divorce and sincerely wants to know what Jesus and the church have to say about it deserves at least that much.
* Matth. 5.32 is not exactly the same formulation as Matth. 19.9 and puzzles me. "…anyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of unchastity, causes HER to commit adultery; and…". Hmm. How is she culpable unless she remarries?
* Jesus's riff on (some) of the Ten Commandments in the Sermon on the Mount seems to raise the temperature considerably after the calm of the Beatitudes and employs a certain degree of hyperbole as a teaching device. Matth. 5. 27-30 is an example and can hardly be taken literally. As you note, opposition to the hypocrisy of the Pharisees colors all these passages.
All grow up thinking that their marriages will will be blessed, beautiful and full of the love of God and church. It does not always happen that way. God continues to love those who find they must separate. He gives those facing divorce the strength and courage to use their love of him to struggle through.


text:
Home News Macron says he intends to "continue dialogue" with Putin
Macron says he intends to "continue dialogue" with Putin
French President Emmanuel Macron said he would continue to continue dialogue with Russian President Vladimir Putin in order to avoid an escalation of the conflict in Ukraine and "achieve concrete things."
The French president is on an official visit to the United States from November 29 to December 2. On Thursday, he held talks with the American leader Joe Biden in the White House.
"I will continue to talk with President Putin. Today, we have already talked about this with Biden, because we have always strived to avoid escalation and achieve very specific things: for example, I will talk with him about the safety of the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant," Macron said at a press conference following the talks with Biden, broadcast by the Elysee Palace on Twitter.
Former press secretary of the President of Russia Dmitry Peskov said that Putin does not yet have a telephone conversation with Macron in his work plans.
intends
Previous article"What awaits Russian pensioners in 2023?"
Next articleThe head of the WB called the price of restoring Ukraine after the end of the conflict
SBU conducts searches in the house of Ukrainian oligarch Kolomoisky – source
In Kurgan, the police were called to close an underground casino in the city center. Photo, video
Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 343 | Russia-Ukraine war...
SBU conducts searches in the house of Ukrainian oligarch Kolomoisky –...
In Kurgan, the police were called to close an underground casino...
The Russian military hit the columns of the Armed Forces of...


Garage Door Installation Troy, MO. Soulard Garage Door and Fence Company has been operating for three years and has over a decade of shared expertise in the garage door installation industry among us. Our team is devoted to providing Troy residents with the best possible customer service experience while maintaining a 100% client satisfaction guarantee at all times. The installation specialists at Soulard Garage Door are available 24/7 to make sure that residents in Troy know that they can depend on us for their garage door installation needs. Soulard Garage Door can install any brand or model of garage door or garage door part! Find out for yourself why tons of Troy residents have labeled Soulard Garage Door and Fence Company the elite garage door installation company in St Louis!
Trying to install a garage door without help is not only frustrating but can easily become dangerous. Regardless of whether you're looking for spring repair, track repair, or anything else, you can know that our team of installation experts have the knowledge and resources to safely and accurately complete your Troy garage door installation needs. To learn more about our garage door installation services contact us by calling (314) 281-6989 or book your appointment with us today!


text:
Home » Location » Taxonomy » Term » 32114
Mirna Hosni reveals details of her meeting with Popewith Pope Tawāḍrūs II
Date of source: Saturday, September 7, 2019
Mirna Hosni, a student at the Faculty of Pharmacy, British University, who won the first place in the world in the "Clinical Skills" competition, revealed details of her meeting and honoring by His Holiness Pope Tùwadrus II, Pope of Alexandria and Patriarch of the See of Saint Mark, at the...
The Church begins teaching "Arab Christian heritage" at the Institute of Coptic Studies
Date of source: Sunday, September 8, 2019
The Coptic Orthodox Church announced today that it will open a new section in the Institute of Coptic Studies to teach «Arab Christian heritage», for the first time, at the beginning of the new academic year 2019/2020, which sparked widespread controversy among Copts on social networking sites...
Church sources reveal the itinerary of Pope Tawāḍrūs during the Holy Week
Date of source: Tuesday, April 23, 2019
Well-informed ecclesiastical sources revealed the itinerary of Pope of Alexandria and Patriarch of the See of St. Mark, during the Holy week, which began Sunday with the "Palm Sunday," to end next Sunday, by the glorious Easter.
Pope Tawāḍrūs delivers his weekly sermon at the Church of Our Virgin Lady
His Holiness Pope Tawāḍrūs II, Pope of Alexandria, Patriarch of the See of St. Mark, delivered his weekly sermon at the Church of the Virgin Mary and St. Bishoy in St Mark's Cathedral in 'Abbāssiyya.
46- al-Ahrām, also reports on the million-participant gathering to pray for peace in Egypt in the attendance of Pope Tawadrus II
Date of source: Saturday, December 15, 2012
State-owned daily newspaper, al-Ahrām, also reports on the million-participant gathering to pray for peace in Egypt. "Save our country, Lord, save it from terrorism and evil and fill it with your grace!" It is with these words of praise that masses of Egyptian Christians gathered in Saint Simon...
4. Applause and trills of joy inside churches are now forbidden by order of the Holy Synod
Date of source: Sunday, November 25, 2012
In its first meeting during the papacy of Ṭawāḍrūs yesterday, the Holy Synod made a decision that prohibits applause or trills of joy inside churches in order to respect the sacrality of these places. The new Coptic Orthodox Pope is planning to set up a media office and reshuffle the secretariat...
51-The Saint Mark Cathedral finalizes preparations and procedures of the Altar Lot process to pick the 118th pope of the Coptic Orthodox Church
The Saint Mark Cathedral in the Cairo district of al-'Abbāssīyah on Friday (November 2) finalized preparations and procedures of the Altar Lot process to pick the 118th pope of the Coptic Orthodox Church in succession of Pope Shenouda III, who passed away on March 17, 2012.
35- A meeting held between the Minister of Interior and Bishop Bula in preparations for securing the papal elections
Date of source: Saturday, October 26, 2013
Bishop Bula of Tantā, the official spokesman for the committee overseeing the papal elections, said he had contacts with Minister of Interior Ahmad Jamāl al-Dīn on securing the elections, adding the minister will give instructions to deploy some fire engines and ambulances inside the Saint Mark...
2-Bishop Bula says the church has not so far extended an invitation to President Muhammad Mursī to attend the enthronement of the 118th pope of the chair of Saint Mark
Date of source: Sunday, October 21, 2012
Bishop Bula, the spokesman for the Coptic Orthodox Church, said the church has not so far extended an invitation to President Muhammad Mursī to attend the enthronement of the 118th pope of the chair of Saint Mark in succession of Pope Shenouda III, who passed away on March 17, 2012.
46-A lawsuit filed against Field Marshal Muhammad Husayn Tantāwī, accusing him of killing protesters in the incidents at Maspero,
Date of source: Thursday, August 23, 2012
'Āsim, an attorney, filed the first lawsuit against Field Marshal Muhammad Husayn Tantāwī, former Minister of Defense, accusing him of killing protesters in the incidents at Maspero, Muhammad Mahmūd, the Cabinet building, and the massacres in Port Said and al-'Abbāsīyah.


text:
<title>Member List - OGRE Documentation</title> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="doxygen.css">
<link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="tabs.css">

Main Page

Related Pages

Modules

Namespaces

Classes

Files

Directories

Class List

Class Index

Class Hierarchy

Class Members

Ogre

D3D11HLSLProgram

ShaderVarWithPosInBuf

Ogre::D3D11HLSLProgram::ShaderVarWithPosInBuf Member List

This is the complete list of members for Ogre::D3D11HLSLProgram::ShaderVarWithPosInBuf, including all inherited members.

isFloat	Ogre::D3D11HLSLProgram::ShaderVarWithPosInBuf

name	Ogre::D3D11HLSLProgram::ShaderVarWithPosInBuf

physicalIndex	Ogre::D3D11HLSLProgram::ShaderVarWithPosInBuf

src	Ogre::D3D11HLSLProgram::ShaderVarWithPosInBuf

var	Ogre::D3D11HLSLProgram::ShaderVarWithPosInBuf

wasInit	Ogre::D3D11HLSLProgram::ShaderVarWithPosInBuf

Copyright © 2012 Torus Knot Software Ltd

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Last modified Sun Sep 2 2012 07:27:46

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


text:
Tag Archives: Pink tour
REVIEW: P!nk Launches Into World Tour in an Unforgettable Performance at Talking Stick Arena 3-1-18
March 3, 2018 Katie Silverman	Leave a comment
PHOENIX — P!nk kicked off her Beautiful Trauma World Tour in an unreal musical experience that rocked the Valley of the Sun. Following the release of her seventh studio album, aptly named Beautiful Trauma , came the announcement that she would hit the road once again to share her exquisite sound with the world. With anticipation of her first album release in five years, it came as no surprise that the Phoenix show was completely sold out. Fans flooded Talking Stick Arena, sporting the artist's color in everything from bedazzled wigs to homemade jumpsuits. Inside the arena KidCutUp could be heard spinning his usual mashup of hip hop and party songs in order to rouse the crowd before the main act.
Photography: Katherine Amy Vega © Kataklizmic Design. All Rights Reserved
From start to finish, P!nk put on a show that left the crowd wanting more, even after a 21-song setlist. Her energy is tangible as soon as she appears before the crowd, launching into the show with one of her biggest hits of all time "Get the Party Started." What was seen as the curtain dropped at the start of the song could only be described as unbelievable. Breathtaking acrobatics featuring her in a full body sequined jumpsuit paired with incredible dance numbers involving an array of mobile props on stage and back-up dancers. It made for a mind-blowing start to what would be a truly unforgettable set.
Paying ode to her newest album release, P!nk segued straight into "Beautiful Trauma," serenading the audience with her haunting lyrics before taking them right back in time with old favorites like "Just Like a Pill" and "Who Knew?"
"Hello!", she shouted into the mic, taking a moment to address the audience, "I can't believe tonight's finally here! Just like you guys, I have no idea what's going to happen!" Her excitement rang through the arena, the frenzied crowd cheering the whole time. That energy remained, with those on stage and those in the crowd, for the entire performance. She played several more songs off of her new album such as "Revenge", "Barbies", and "I Am Here", while also including additional top hits "Try" and "Just Like Fire." Whether old fan or new, everyone in the arena was able to sing along.
P!nk collaborated with artists such as Eminem and Phoenix's own Nate Ruess, who both made appearances in creative ways. A video of Ruess was displayed on a screen, while Eminem was made into an enormous inflatable puppet that was guided across the stage by her dancers as P!nk sang along beside it.
One thing that makes P!nk stand out as a performer amongst others is that each song is, in and of itself, like a unique mini concert. From the band to the dancers and backup vocals, there was a passion that could be felt from all of them. Beautiful costumes were accompanied by expert dance sequences and enormous, detailed props were used on and off the stage to help create a multi-level experience. With each new song came a sense of wonder as to what magic would take over the stage next.
Another thing that makes her stand out as an artist is her fierce dedication to being herself and her love for people. Throughout the show, she takes time to shed light on important messages and reminds everyone about things like love and unity, connecting with her fans on a level unlike many other music artists.
As the show neared its end, she amped the energy up to the maximum level and brought the crowd to its feet once again with her smash hits "Raise Your Glass" "Blow Me (One Last Kiss)" and "So What." She spent a majority of that time soaring far and wide throughout the arena sporting her same sequined jumpsuit. Lights flashed in every direction as confetti shot from mini cannons on stage. Fans watched in wonder as she flipped through the air past all of the sections. "Thank you all, remember to love one another," she said as she was lowered to the ground for the final time.
Concertgoers left amazed with the show they had just witnessed, although it was clear that they would have stayed all night if they could. P!nk puts on a performance unlike any other artist in today's music scene, and that is partially due to the immense love she has for her fans and a driving desire to make a difference in the world. She truly is the beauty and strength that resonates in her music, and she uses that as a driving force to give her beloved fans an unforgettable experience.
P!NK – Talking Stick Resort Arena 3-1-18
Beautiful TraumaBeautiful Trauma tourP!NKP!nk PhotosPinkPink PhoenixPink PhotosPink reviewPink tourworld tour


Aquarium Drunkard » Radio Cramps :: The Purple Knif Show: "Lux Interior : inter-dimensional, pan-sexual, time-traveling rock & roll alien. And radio host. As Halloween draws nigh we're revving up for our annual airing of The Purple Knif Show, the one-off radio program hosted by Lux in 1984 deep in the bowels of Hollywood. As master of ceremonies, Lux runs through his personal archives spinning the weird ranging from rockabilly and garage to early punk, campy novelty and exotica. His bag of tricks was the best. So go ahead, "get out your magic decoder rings, boys and girls…" Trick or treat."


Target is our projectile intended for practicing. The projectile is significantly cheaper than our other models, but at the same time also unfit for hunting anything but smaller fur animals.
Like both Semihunt and Hunt, Target has a series of ribs on the portion of the projectile that is in contact with the inside of the barrel. These ribs result in a significantly reduced contact area between the projectile and the inside of the barrel, while retaining a tight fit sealing the propellant gasses behind it. The result is less friction, which means an increased velocity relative to the amount of gunpowder, while also reducing tearing in the barrel. The reduced contact area also results in a significantly reduced deposition within the barrel.


DermUs Skin Care is a specialized skin care shop in Spencer, Iowa. We are located downtown, and enjoy teaching our customers to look for active ingredients that will help their skin care routine, as well as helping them choose products. If you have questions about any of our products, or just want to visit about your skin care, please contact us.
We enjoy teaching our customers to look for active ingredients that will help their skin care routine, as well as helping them choose products.


text:
Home ENTERTAINMENT 'StarCraft' news: ESports legend retires at 23
'StarCraft' news: ESports legend retires at 23
jeremy-yap
ESports athelete Lee "Flash" Young-ho has retired from professional gaming at the age of 23.
He has been dominating competition in the widely popular space strategy video game "StarCraft" since he was 14 years old. Lee is recognized as the greatest player of all-time during his eight-year career. He was the number one ranked player for most of 2010 and from July 2011 to July 2012. In 15 total "StarCraft" tournaments, Lee won first place 10 times and finished runner-up five times.
In an interview with Korean eSports site PGR21 (via MCVUK), Lee expressed that he'll always love playing.
"As a pro gamer, I've got so much more than I deserve. It's been a long 8 years, and I won't forget the love that my fans gave me. From now on, I'd like to travel or rest a while, thinking about the future. However I would say I won't put down my keyboard and mouse," Lee said during the announcement of his retirement on Dec. 1.
According to official records, Lee has a winning percentage of 71.04 in "StarCraft: Brood War" and 63.50 percent in "StarCraft II."
As for his plans within the next three years, Lee is joining the South Korean military male citizens between the ages of 18 and 35 are required to carry out national service.
However, he made it clear that he'll be back in the gaming scene after his military stint.
"In the end, I want to do my best to give back what I've received from the eSports scene. My ultimate goal is to become a head coach of KT Rolsters, making it the mightiest team of the world," Lee added.
"StarCraft" is South Korea's national eSport and professional gamers in the country are treated as traditional athletes. They are celebrities and their games are broadcast to a national audience. Professional gamers have TV contracts, sponsorships and dedicated fan clubs.
Lee "Flash" Young-ho
Previous article'Rambo' news: From big screen to television series
Next articleHarrison Ford news: Star promises 'great' 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens'
Ellen DeGeneres opens up about the death of her girlfriend 40 years ago
Chrissy Metz says 'This Is Us' season finale is 'new start for Kate'
Beyonce and Jay-Z announce On The Run II tour
'Dragon Ball Super' episode 100 spoilers: Caulifla attempts to perform a...
'Hunger Games Mockingjay' part 2 plot: will it be President Snow...


Welcome to Citibank FSB - Coral Gables (Banks) on 1190 S Dixie Hwy in Miami, Florida. This bank is listed on Bank Map under Banks - All - Banks. You can reach us on phone number (305) 669-5550, fax number or email address . Our office is located on 1190 S Dixie Hwy, Miami, FL.
Not sure where Citibank FSB - Coral Gables on 1190 S Dixie Hwy is? The following places (sorted by popularity) are located nearby. We've also included the estimated walking distance.
Citibank FSB - Coral Gables Miami routing numbers are listed on this site along with more information about how to find your routing number. Call Citibank FSB - Coral Gables for more information about routing numbers.
Routing numbers to Citibank FSB - Coral Gables in Miami are collected manually from the banks official website or provided by the Federal Reserve Financial Services Database.
Open positions for Citibank FSB - Coral Gables in Miami.
These are the bank hours for Citibank FSB - Coral Gables. Call (305) 669-5550 to learn more about office hours. Please note that these bank hours are general and other hours of operation may apply on certain holidays.
There's currently no additional information available about fees or rates for Citibank FSB - Coral Gables.
We'd love to hear about your experience with Citibank FSB - Coral Gables. Did you suffer through long waiting times, unprofessional staff or high fees or were you treated with great customer service, the business hours you were expecting and a great overall experience? This is your chance to share your thoughts about this branch and help other consumers get the best banking experience in Miami.
Citibank FSB - Coral Gables is listed under Banks in Miami, Florida .