I, [2019-03-15T15:41:11.187985 #3391] INFO -- : $$$[end] "rm -f .revision.time" exit with 0.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:12.020009 #3391] INFO -- : $$$[end] "make update-download -j6" exit with 0.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:12.051367 #3391] INFO -- : make: Nothing to be done for 'update-rubyspec'.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:12.051764 #3391] INFO -- : $$$[end] "make update-rubyspec -j6" exit with 0.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:12.663004 #3391] INFO -- : At revision 67269.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:12.677747 #3391] INFO -- : $$$[end] "make update-src -j6" exit with 0.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:13.250630 #3391] INFO -- : make: Nothing to be done for 'srcs'.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:13.252306 #3391] INFO -- : $$$[end] "make after-update -j6" exit with 0.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:13.520805 #3391] INFO -- : $$$[end] "make miniruby -j6" exit with 0.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:13.800102 #3391] INFO -- : $$$[end] "make ruby -j6" exit with 0.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:14.381040 #3391] INFO -- : make: Nothing to be done for 'enc'.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:14.446860 #3391] INFO -- : make: Nothing to be done for 'srcs'.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:15.085443 #3391] INFO -- : make: Nothing to be done for '/tmp/ruby/src/trunk_clang_60/enc/trans'.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:15.291634 #3391] INFO -- : make: Nothing to be done for 'encs'.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:15.940988 #3391] INFO -- : Could not be configured. It will not be installed.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:15.942584 #3391] INFO -- : Check ext/dbm/mkmf.log for more details.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:15.979899 #3391] INFO -- : *** Fix the problems, then remove these directories and try again if you want.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:15.996923 #3391] INFO -- : $$$[end] "make all -j6" exit with 0.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:16.435061 #3391] INFO -- : make: Nothing to be done for 'enc'.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:16.488487 #3391] INFO -- : make: Nothing to be done for 'srcs'.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:17.054598 #3391] INFO -- : make: Nothing to be done for '/tmp/ruby/src/trunk_clang_60/enc/trans'.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:17.197304 #3391] INFO -- : make: Nothing to be done for 'encs'.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:18.113215 #3391] INFO -- : Could not be configured. It will not be installed.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:18.120900 #3391] INFO -- : Check ext/dbm/mkmf.log for more details.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:18.149536 #3391] INFO -- : *** Fix the problems, then remove these directories and try again if you want.
I, [2019-03-15T15:41:19.720204 #3391] INFO -- : $$$[end] "make install -j6" exit with 0.
I, [2019-03-15T15:42:14.307022 #3391] INFO -- : $$$[end] "make yes-btest TESTS='-j6'" exit with 0.
I, [2019-03-15T15:42:15.359929 #3391] INFO -- : $$$[end] "make yes-test-basic TESTS='-j6'" exit with 0.
I, [2019-03-15T15:45:27.899466 #3391] INFO -- : Finished tests in 192.004846s, 108.9504 tests/s, 27264.1139 assertions/s.
I, [2019-03-15T15:45:27.903861 #3391] INFO -- : $$$[end] "make yes-test-all TESTS='-j6'" exit with 0.
I, [2019-03-15T15:47:17.316338 #3391] INFO -- : $$$[end] "make yes-test-rubyspec TESTS='-j6'" exit with 0.


text:
By Hunter Church Posted on January 11, 2020 January 12, 2020
LCS 2020 Team Overview: Cloud9
When you talk about North American esports, the one team that has to come up every time is Cloud9. Whether it's League of Legends, CS:GO, or even Smash Bros., the organization always seems to find their way into the spotlight. If you turn to League of Legends specifically, you'll find the most consistent team in LCS history; making each World Championship since the team was created (I believe it's seven in a row now). This was true last year as well, as they came second place in the summer split and managed to be the second North American seed coming into the tournament. But all that said, they haven't reached the top of the league in quite some time. Despite finding their way into the playoff finals what seems like every year, they're always just short of success, and being able to hold the LCS trophy. Due to these failures, Cloud9 made more roster moves this offseason than they have in recent ones; swapping out jungle, bottom, and support. But will these changes be enough to push them past TL?
The first piece in the Cloud9 puzzle is Canadian top-laner, Licorice. Despite being in the league for only two years, Licorice has cemented himself beside Impact as one of the top two top-laners in North America. Entering as a rookie, he was once known only for his strong carry-champions like Kled and Fiora, but has gradually developed his ability to play better role-playing champions like Ornn. If you're looking at pure mechanical skill, he's got it, outplaying top-lane legends like Kiin in the 2018 World Championship, and even Wunder this past year. He's had his fair share of laughable games; like his meme-worthy loss as Lucian top against Huni, but generally speaking, he's the most dependable and versatile top-laner (in the regular season) that North America has. His achievements aren't top-of-the-world level, but attending the past two World Championships, winning Rookie of the Split in 2018 Spring, and being named to several All-Pro teams is good enough to show off his abilities.
Apparently-goofy top-laner Licorice.
Cloud9's jungler is another young, home-grown talent named Blaber. Blaber's experience and performance in his career is both weird and hard to judge. Though he's played many on-stage games, he's never actually held the starting role; sharing it with Svenskeren throughout the past two years. But in his limited stage-time, he's gained a reputation for unrelenting and sometimes ill-advised aggression. When it works, he looks like the best jungler in the league, but when it doesn't, he can end up as the opposite. His success has been as inconsistent as his play; most notably winning several big games in 2018, but his history in 2019, and more specifically the World Championship, was poor. He's known to be a solo-queue God mechanically, creating many highlight reels just on Doubelift's stream, so we know he has the potential. He just needs to play in a way where we can always see it.
Mid-laner Nisqy is the first non-resident mentioned so far, adding to the long list of European mids in North America. Prior to his placement on Cloud9, many saw him as a middle-of-the-road mid (haha) in Europe. He was a large carry on Splyce; a playoff team; but was nowhere near as mechanically gifted as Caps or Perkz, placing him at least a tier below the best. But since then, he's changed certain minds. His task of replacing All-Star Jensen this past season was something many thought he couldn't do, but by the end of the season, he was six votes away from overtaking his position as the number one All-Pro mid; showing that many people, including experts, believe him to be the best. Glancing at individual, on-on-one skill only, I'd still place him behind certain people like Bjergsen and maybe even Froggen, but taking a look at his overall team-play is what really puts him up there. Nisqy often sacrifices his own lane to take advantages in others, shoving his lane to duo-gank a lane with the jungler; and it results in great results for the team, while sacrificing his own statistics.
Happy Nisqy.
Joining his European brother Nisqy is now-Cloud9 bot-laner, Zven. He has been the main topic of conversation regarding the new C9 roster coming into 2020. If you asked someone a couple of years ago, they would've put Zven towards the top of best bot-laners in the world. But after his disappointing performance on TSM over 2018 and 2019, many don't know how good he is in comparison to other North American players. Back in Europe, in his time on G2 and Origen, everyone feared his potential as a carry. I remember even before that, people were discussing him and his highlights in European Challenger Series, as he was racking up pentakills on Kog'maw. This would only continue, dominating first domestically and even a bit internationally, winning several different splits, and earning the title of the best European bot-lane duo with Mithy. But TSM was a whole other story. Even though they've maintained a decent domestic team, TSM has not impressed overall. They've failed to make it to Worlds, they've failed to win a title, and Zven has taken most of the blame. Many bad pick-offs and misclicks sent the message he'd become washed up. Cloud9, however, believes differently. Head of Cloud9, Jack, has stated many times that TSM has become the "Talent Suppressing Machine," when taking Svenkseren a couple of years ago, and turning him into an MVP. And historically, Cloud9 has seen outstanding talent and made the best of them. So despite recent performances, I believe Zven has the capabilities to be the second best AD in North America.
The other addition to Cloud9 this offseason is support Vulcan. Vulcan is another young, North American talent; something Cloud9 seems to be full of this season. 2019 was his debut year, and he managed to impress. His initial success with Clutch Gaming was limited, finishing in ninth place on the year. But he was a part of their miracle-run from that ninth place, to an eventual third place and World Championship appearance. The main part of that success was the success of their bottom lane, and strong ability to teamfight; two things he was a big part of. In the lane itself, his ability to land thresh hooks and other engaging skill-shots was incredible. And carrying that outside of lane, his flanks and engages on champions like Leon were also wonderful. So being at the center of their random, but huge success brought Cloud9 to eventually pick him up. I don't think last season he was the best support in NA, but I think he probably has the most untapped potential out of any of the ones out there. And as stated earlier, C9 is notorious for getting that potential out of their players.
Vulcan on Clutch Gaming.
Synergy/Teamwork
Cloud9 is an organization known best for their ability to be a complete, and cohesive unit. At first, their bonds and Hai's shot-calling were all they relied on. After that, they've been known for creative drafts and team-based decision-making. Because of that consistent reputation, I don't see teamwork being an issue. Even though Blaber hasn't been the starting jungler recently, he has shared time with Sven, and knows the team very well. That means the entire top side of the map is familiar, and they only need to bring in the bottom lane as well. How Vulcan and Zven play together is going to determine a lot, but they've been duoing together for quite some time in the offseason, and I haven't heard anything negative. Both seem like nice guys, and I'm confident they'll work okay.
Coaching is perhaps even better and more guaranteed for the team. Head coach Reapered has been there for over two years now, and is often credited for their consistent success. Though his decision-making can be confusing at times, regarding players starting or not starting, they've always done well, so it's not concerning to me. Instead, the good things he manages to do include creative and smart drafting, and creating a friendly and fun environment for the players. Adding onto him is coach Reignover, whom I am in love with. His performance as a player dropped off significantly, but his mind in coaching specifically junglers is amazing, and a tool they're lucky to have.
Reignover, coach for Cloud9.
I may be a bit biased, but I think Cloud9 is stacked heading into 2020. That being said, I do think there are a couple of areas where things can go horribly wrong. If Blaber cannot get more consistent, or if Zven continues his poor performance, they will have large holes that'll need to be fixed. But assuming the top side performs to their standard of last year, they'll be fine. And assuming they can pull a Svenskeren-like trick with Zven, so will their bottom lane. At the very worst, they'll do poorer than last year, but there's no way they're out of the playoffs. I currently have them at number two, but could see them falling to third, fourth, or fifth, depending on other teams' performance, and their own weaknesses.
Categories: Esports, League of LegendsTags: 2020, Cloud9, Esports, League of Legends, NA LCS, Video Games
Previous Post Previous post:LCS 2020 Team Overview: CLG
Next Post LCS 2020 Team Overview: Team Liquid

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Q: Get 2 elements per loop from N lengh array I have seen similar questions but I feel mine is different, I have a 2 column page which needs 2 users per row, issue is when I have an array that has an odd length, the last element does not come out here is my logic
<?php for($i = 0; $i < count($team); $i++){
      echo "Looping ".$i;
      ?>

             <?php for($z = $i; $z < 2; $z++){
              echo "inner Looping ".$z?>

                <img src="<?php echo  $team[$z]['image']; ?>" alt="<?php echo  $team[$z]['fname']. ' '.$team[$z]['lname']; ?>"/>

<?php echo  $team[$z]['fname']; ?><?php echo  $team[$z]['lname']; ?> <?php echo  $team[$z]['position']; ?>

          <?php $i = $z;} ?>

      <?php } ?>

A sample of the output of an array with 3 items

A: Use array_chunk() on $team with 2 as the chunk size parameter. Then you can use an outer foreach() to iterate the generated pairs and an inner foreach() to display the subarrays.
Assuming you don't need to write empty html elements for the missing 2nd element in odd-count scenarios, here is an implementation (there are a few ways to do this).
Code (Demo)
$team = [
    ['image' => 'A.jpg', 'fname' => 'B', 'lname' => 'C', 'position' => 'D'],
    ['image' => 'E.jpg', 'fname' => 'F', 'lname' => 'G', 'position' => 'H'],
    ['image' => 'I.jpg', 'fname' => 'J', 'lname' => 'K', 'position' => 'L']
];
$pairs = array_chunk($team, 2);
foreach ($pairs as $pair) {
    echo "
";
        foreach ($pair as $player) {
            echo "
";
                echo "
";
                    echo "";
                    echo "
";
                        echo "
{$player['fname']}{$player['lname']} {$player['position']}
";
                    echo "
";
                echo "
";
            echo "
";
        }
    echo "
";
}

Output:

BC D

FG H

JK L

If you require an empty (space-holding) portion of html when the "right-side" player is missing, please clarify your question / desired result.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Get the celeb look for Prom 2019 with our Davina Gown. It features a sweetheart neckline with padded cups, ruching on the hips and a mermaid train. The gown is fully lined to the hem with a long train. The satin has minimal stretch.


The sample pair were made after a kiwi mum asked me to make slippers for her little girl. The pattern is also available in baby/toddler & adult sizes.
Love these! I'm a new follower, btw!
Really cute! Where can I find the pattern?
where did you find it??? i cant...????
All my patterns are in my Etsy shop or my Ravelry store. See the sidebar on my blog.


1st ed. of "A ballad for Sallie".
Publisher: A Doubleday D western.
"A Doubleday D western" serie.
The Get Book Club service executes searching for the e-book "A ballad for Sallie" to provide you with the opportunity to download it for free. Click the appropriate button to start searching the book to get it in the format you are interested in.


text:
package org.elastic.elasticsearch.scala.driver.common

import org.elastic.elasticsearch.scala.driver.common.CommonModifiers.BulkManagementDeclaration
import org.elastic.elasticsearch.scala.driver.utils.BulkUtils
import org.elastic.rest.scala.driver.RestBase._
import org.elastic.rest.scala.driver.RestBaseImplicits.CustomTypedToString

/** Common data model types used by the resources
  */
trait DataModelCommon {

  /** The return type from '/', information about Elasticsearch
    *
    * @param name The name of the replying node within the cluster
    * @param cluster_name The name of the cluster
    * @param version Version info about the cluster build
    * @param tagline "You know, for search"
    */
  case class ElasticsearchInfo
    (name: String,
     cluster_name: String,
     version: ElasticsearchInfo.VersionInfo,
     tagline: String
    )

  /** Version within ElasticsearchInfo */
  object ElasticsearchInfo {

    /** Version info within the elasticsearch cluster
      *
      * @param number The elasticsearch version
      * @param build_hash Build hash
      * @param build_timestamp Build timestamp
      * @param build_snapshot Build snapshot info
      * @param lucene_version Underying Lucene version
      */
    case class VersionInfo
    (
      number: String,
      build_hash: String,
      build_timestamp: String,
      build_snapshot: Boolean,
      lucene_version: String
    )
  }

  /** List of index operations to apply as part of the bulk index operation
    *
    * @param ops The list of ES operations
    */
  case class BulkIndexOps(ops: List[BaseDriverOp with BulkManagementDeclaration]) extends CustomTypedToString {
    override def fromTyped: String = BulkUtils.buildBulkIndexOps(ops)
  }
}
object DataModelCommon extends DataModelCommon

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


The big brewers are feeling a bit of pressure to compete for the first time in decades as American drinkers are turning more to cocktails, wine, and craft beer rather than mindlessly chugging gallons of American light lagers. While the sales numbers for beers like Bud Light, Coors Light, and Miller lite are still astronomically large the major breweries have seen steady declines in sales while their smaller, craft beer competition has experienced explosive growth.
The real competition is from the rising popularity of hard liquor whose success has made the craft beer revolution seem restrained by comparison. Yet Budweiser as a beverage is competing at the tap with local, regional, and national craft beers. Thus wanting to reclaim some of their lost market share the major brewers are turning to acknowledging and attempting to outshine craft beer.
Shock Top has found some reasonable popularity with the non-craft beer geek drinkers. They have found a market that wants a beer with a bit more punch than Bud Light but haven't delved into craft beer enough to know that there is a whole world of great beer for them to drink. Shock Top, like Blue Moon, has found a popularity as being a better mass market beer that is marketed as being more craft than mass market. Many in the beer industry have taken to calling these types of beers "crafty" beers as they are marketed as craft without actually being so.
Shock Top has decided to go one further and actually challenge craft beer directly. In a new set of video advertisements they create a talking Shock Top tap handle that converses with customers at a carry out store and a bar. In a style that is reminiscent, but significantly less amusing, of Triumph the Insult Dog the Shock Top mascot "Wedgehead" acts like a bar regular ready to share a good night with patrons at the bar.
The new slogan for this campaign is "You know I'm a good beer, I know I'm a good beer, we don't have to talk about it lets chat about something else" while the phrase "It speaks for itself" is emblazoned on-screen.
The commercials are a refreshing change from the typical Bud Light campaign but they speak to the nature of what the Shock Top brand is attempting to create. This is again all style over substance. Unlike a Sam Adams commercial that shows a passionate owner and brewers that have a real passion and love of the beer they are creating Shock Top has decided to mock that enthusiasm, that craftsmanship to instead suggest beer is beer, get me because Shock Top is iconoclastic and fun.
If the campaign stopped there with "Wedgehead" teasing "customers" into buying Shock Top I would have found the campaign mostly tolerable if warranting being largely ignorable. Yet the commercial above takes a direct shock at craft beer.
I'm not one to be blind to the pretentiousness of craft beer but I think this is kind of ridiculous coming from the same company that sells a beer designed to get skunky for customers is decrying that craft beer brewers are too pretentious. We all need to settle down and drink a down to earth beer like Shock Top.
I found the commercials to be a bit forced and they missed the mark. While I'm all about laughing at beer and especially the nature of craft beer I found these videos a bit inauthentic and mean-spirited. I also found them to be highly ironic given that they are taking stabs at craft beer knowing they are attempting to sell a vastly inferior product and branding it as "cooler, more hip" than craft beer.


text:
Q: Auto Inject All Services in .net core AutoFac I have service base class and different subclasses inherit from it how I can inject all services implement this class
public abstract class AppService
{
 public string ServiceName {get;set;}
}

and I have other classes
public class CountryService:AppService
{
  public list<Countries> getCountryByName(string name){
return ......
}
}

 public class TestService:AppService
    {
      public void Test(){
    return ......
    }
    }

How I can auto inject any class inherit from AppService without need to add this class inside StartUp manually
Update*****************
I am using the following to register services in startUp
 services.Configure<ServiceConfig>(config =>
            {
                config.Services = new List<ServiceDescriptor>(services);
                config.Path = "/listservices";
            });

            ContainerSetup.InitializeWeb(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly(), services);

and in Services project here is the container Setup :
public static IServiceProvider InitializeWeb(Assembly webAssembly, IServiceCollection services) =>
            new AutofacServiceProvider(BaseAutofacInitialization(setupAction =>
            {
                setupAction.Populate(services);
                setupAction.RegisterAssemblyTypes(webAssembly).AsSelf();
            }));

        public static IContainer BaseAutofacInitialization(Action<ContainerBuilder> setupAction = null)
        {
            var builder = new ContainerBuilder();

            builder.RegisterAssemblyTypes(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly())
        .Where(t => t.BaseType == typeof(AppService))
        .AsSelf();

            setupAction?.Invoke(builder);
            return builder.Build();

        }

Still Getting the error
An unhandled exception occurred while processing the request.
InvalidOperationException: Unable to resolve service for type

A: You can use AutoFacs built in AssemblyScanning for this.
The following is an example that will register all classes that inherit from AppService as their concrete type.
builder.RegisterAssemblyTypes(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly())
       .Where(t => t.BaseType == typeof(AppService))
       .AsSelf();

This will allow you to resolve CountryService or TestService from container.


Getting your business book from drawer to done.
Sign up with your email address to receive news and updates and the strategy guide will be sent straight to your inbox.
Thank you! Please check your email and confirm that you would like to hear from me.
A book isn't just a marketing tool. It's a legacy.
Sure, it's great to give a talk and hand out your book at the end. To be able to lay out what you do, why you do it, and what makes you great at it -- all in a format that someone will devour from a comfy leather chair over the weekend, and put down only to call your office for an appointment.
To add to that, a book is an investment. (You know something about those.) Once it's published, it'll pay dividends for years to come.
It's a monument to your life's work.
It documents how you made the world a better place.
So...How soon would you like to hold yours in your hands?
If the answer is, "ASAP," you're in the right place.


text:
Collective or Class Actions and Claims Aggregation in Germany
Borbàla Dux-Wenzel, Anne Caroline Wegner and Florian Schulz
Luther Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH
Germany has a civilian legal system that is alien to collective or class actions and, in principle, any form of punitive or lump-sum damages compensation. Collective interests are traditionally defended by qualified associations, which can bring actions for injunction or the skimming of profits resulting from an infringement against commercial parties in specific areas of law, without, however, resulting in any individual compensation.
Regarding damages litigation, the German procedural landscape is characterised by a predominance of individual claims for compensation of individually incurred damages, which have to be substantiated and proven by the claimant in every single case. Nevertheless, in the past two decades, several major cases attracting the attention of the press and the claimant bar have developed into 'mass litigation', sometimes involving several tens of thousands of individual claims pending in all regional courts in Germany. This tendency began after the bursting of the 'dotcom bubble' and continued in the aftermath of the financial crisis of 2008–2009, with a focus on investor, mis-selling and capital market disputes. Over the past five years, several tens of thousands of individual claims were filed in German courts in the 'diesel' context. Both phenomena, capital market and mass consumer 'diesel litigation', have incentivised the German legislator to develop special instruments of aggregated or model actions. The model action developed for consumer claims covers all areas of law and would therefore theoretically also apply to follow-on competition litigation by consumers, a business field not yet explored by the German claimant bar. This chapter will analyse whether that instrument effectively responds to the specific requirements of consumer follow-on litigation.
In parallel, starting around the year 2005, a culture of business-to-business (B2B) follow-on competition litigation has steadily developed in Germany. These follow-on claims were mainly brought before the German courts in the form of individual lawsuits (filed against cartel members by companies at downstream market levels). In the absence of pressure or concrete initiatives from the EU legislator in the b2b context, the German procedural system does not provide special procedural instruments for these b2b claims. Nevertheless, with CDC Cartel Damage Claims as a pioneer claimant, follow-on claimants have developed some ingeniousness in aggregating several individual claims in one single lawsuit. Currently, individual and aggregated b2b claims are pending at the specialised antitrust chambers and senates of German courts against, among others, participants of the cement, sugar, railroad track and the truck cartels. It is highly disputed among courts as well as among scholars whether such aggregated claims are in conformity with German law. In June 2021, with effect from October 2021, the German legislator passed an act destined to provide some guidance on this issue, and, in July 2021, the Federal Supreme Court issued a judgment in this context. In this chapter, we will provide an overview of the existing procedural possibilities and hurdles involved with the different forms of aggregation of follow-on competition claims and provide an insight in the tendency to combine aggregated claims with litigation funding in this area.
German tradition of association claims in specific areas of law
Even though German civil procedural rules do not provide for US-style class actions or the collective proceedings that have been implemented in the procedural rules of England and Wales or even some continental European jurisdictions, there is a rather long tradition of association or interest group complaints in specific areas of law (association claims).
Association claims in enumerated areas of consumer protection law can be initiated under the Act on Applications for an Injunction. Further, the Unfair Competition Act (UWG) allows professional associations, as well as consumer associations, to bring claims to restrain unfair competitive behaviour. Professional associations have a long-standing right to bring claims for injunction against antitrust violations under the Act against Restraint of Competition (GWB), a right that has been extended to consumer associations in 2013. In 2004 and 2005 respectively, the German legislator introduced an association claim for the skimming of profits resulting from the violation of competition rules (as set out in the UWG and the GWB).
Association claims can only be initiated by organisations with legal capacity that meet specific criteria. Such claims do not provide for an opt-in or an opt-out for the consumers or professionals concerned. They do not halt the running of limitation periods that apply to individual damages claims resulting from the same violation. The judgments have no legally binding effect on such individual claims, but they will set a factual precedent in most cases. Even if successful, these claims do not lead to a monetary compensation of damages. They can achieve injunctions for the removal of abusive general contract terms or the termination of unlawful acts under all aspects of competition law.
While association claims for injunctions have a rather long tradition in Germany, the more recently introduced possibility of association claims for the skimming of profits resulting from the violation of competition rules remains negligible. This is understandable considering the different hurdles an association has to clear for such claims and the lack of financial incentives. The action for skimming of profits requires the proof of an intentional violation of unfair competition or antitrust laws, establishing that the defendant was positively aware of the illegality of its actions and not simply negligently in breach of the competition rules, which is very difficult to establish. The association also has to establish a causal link between the legal violation and the generated profits. Further, even though 'skimming of profits' might sound like an action for compensation, the profits will not be distributed to the claimant organisation (or even less to the stakeholders behind such organisation) but will be transferred to the German public treasury. Hence, while the association bears the burden of proof and the procedural risks of such a claim (including court costs and the defendants' legal fees in case of loss), it has no financial incentive to initiate such claims. Against this background, it does not come as a surprise that no claims for skimming of profits resulting from antitrust violations have been brought.
Cooperating with a litigation funder is not going to solve the dilemma of the consumer associations. The Federal Supreme Court has ruled that a funded claim of a consumer association was abusive and inadmissible because the funder was to receive a percentage of the skimmed-off profits in the event of success. This was despite prior consent having been given by the German Ministry of Justice that part of the profits could be distributed to the litigation funder instead of the public treasury.
Prominent cases of mass litigation triggering legislative reaction
As we have seen, Germany has a tradition of filing individual claims for damages (potentially amounting to mass litigation) and association claims for injunction that will not lead to a financial compensation of potential damages incurred. The German legislator's reluctance to provide for class or collective actions for monetary compensation has to be seen in the context of one of the fundamental principles of German delict law, namely the prohibition of enriching oneself in consequence of a damage incurred, meaning that a claimant cannot claim compensation that is higher than the individual damage he or she has suffered. This principle, leaving the burden of calculation and proof of damages with each single claimant, does not allow for any lump sum or standard compensation of damages across a class of individuals or entities. Therefore, even if model actions or aggregations of claims are, under some circumstances, acknowledged in German procedural law, they will in most cases only lead to a judgment on preliminary legal questions or to a declaration of responsibility for a damage still to be calculated.
In the past two decades, prominent cases of mass litigation have led the German legislator to add two new instruments to the claimant's procedural arsenal. In 2005, as a reaction to 17,000 pending claims by shareholders against Deutsche Telekom AG at the Regional Court of Frankfurt, the German legislator temporarily instituted a regime of master proceedings.[2] In 2018, as a reaction to several tens of thousands of pending individual claims against Volkswagen AG in the 'diesel' context, the German legislator enabled associations to initiate a declaratory model action to which individual consumers can opt in.[3] However, due to the principle that any damage has to be calculated individually, neither of these instruments result in monetary compensation to the individuals concerned.
Act on Model Proceedings in Disputes under Capital Markets Law
The Act on Model Proceedings in Disputes under Capital Markets Law (KapMuG) was introduced in 2005 as a merely temporary measure, which – owing to several extensions – will end on 31 December 2023. Prominent KapMuG proceedings are Deutsche Telecom AG (prospectus liability), Volkswagen AG (delayed ad hoc announcement) and various prospectus liability cases regarding closed-end funds. The KapMuG is limited to capital market litigation and cannot be used in areas of consumer protection, competition or antitrust law. However, it has been as a role model for certain aspects of the Act on Declaratory Model Actions (see below).
Under the KapMuG, on the application of 10 claimants to a regional court (or courts) to allow master proceedings, the competent higher regional court as a court of first instance will rule on specific factual and legal questions regarding the prerequisites of the underlying claims, with an appeal to the Federal Court of Justice. In the KapMuG master proceedings, the higher regional court chooses a lead claimant to argue the case on his or her own behalf and on behalf of all other claimants who have also applied for such proceedings, who then become intervening parties in the master proceedings. All pending cases before the regional courts brought by the lead claimant, the intervening parties and by any additional claimants who have filed similar claims in the period before the ruling in the master proceeding becomes final are suspended, and the limitation periods of their claims are halted.
The competent higher regional court's decision to allow master proceedings and the different procedural events are published online in a federal claim register: they are public and transparent. Up to six months after publication, further potential individual claims can be notified to the federal claim register with little cost and no procedural risk, resulting in the limitation period for that particular party being halted without that party bringing an actual claim. Except for the halt, such a simple notification does not have any other effect for the applicant (being no claimant at this stage).
The final decision on the factual and legal questions in the master proceedings will be binding on all claimants who have filed a similar claim before the ruling became final. Following the final decision, the respective regional courts will now apply the answers given in the master proceedings to all similar pending individual cases. Hence, the master proceedings will not result in damages or specific performance, which will be decided in the resumed regional court proceedings.
The model claimant and the defendant may settle the case in the course of the master proceedings after approval of the competent higher regional court. The intervening parties may opt out of the settlement within one month. If 30 per cent or more of the intervening parties have opted out of the settlement, it will not become binding at all.
Past experience has shown that the threat of publicity of the master proceedings and the possibility of halting the limitation period by simple notification for a vast number of potential claimants motivates some defendants to settle the case with the original applicants for a master proceeding at a very early stage. Thus, even though the KapMuG itself does not provide for monetary compensation, it might generate enough pressure on the defendant to make it enter an early settlement agreement.
However, not every defendant is willing to settle and the KapMuG procedure may take extremely long to be completed. In the master proceedings against Deutsche Telekom AG, which was the raison d'être of the KapMuG, the first master proceedings were filed in 2006, but even after more than 15 years, no final and binding decision as to damages has been rendered.
Declaratory model action
The second legal instrument that could be considered a type of collective redress procedure is the declaratory model action (DMA), which, in November 2018, was introduced into the German Civil Procedural Code. By introducing this new instrument, which is limited to consumer claims but without any restriction as to the areas of law, the legislator explicitly wanted to help consumers overcome their rational indifference regarding the pursuit of claims that are not considered financially viable if balanced against the financial and factual burdens involved with litigation. The DMA was introduced when tens of thousands of 'diesel claims' related to the alleged employment of 'defeat devices' in diesel vehicles were already pending in all regional courts in Germany, and was driven by the circumstance that the prescription of such claims was imminent. However, the high number of individual 'diesel claims' showed that the 'rational indifference' against bringing a claim that motivated the legislator was not really an issue in this context. In the area of consumer follow-on cartel damages claims, however, a rational indifference of consumers might very well be established. Resulting from anticompetitive behaviour, consumers might suffer indirect damages. These damages, however, are – when looked at individually – very often highly dispersed and of low value. The German beer cartel is a good example of such dispersed low value damages. It has led – according to the German Federal Cartel Office – to an overcharge of €1 per 20 bottles at consumer level.
The DMA combines elements of the classic German association claims with elements of the KapMuG master proceedings. In fact, a DMA can only be brought by large consumer associations with a legally defined minimum number of members. These associations must have been listed for at least four years in the list of associations qualified to bring an association claim under German law. This legal criterion is designed to prevent associations being created for the sole purpose of filing a DMA and exemplifies how careful the German legislator has been to prevent the evolution of a US-style claims industry in Germany. The DMA has to be filed directly with the higher regional court (thus giving the parties, at first instance, a forum experienced in the solution of difficult legal issues). Following the publication of the DMA in the claims register, at least 50 individual consumers must opt in to allow the DMA to proceed. Once a DMA is initiated, additional DMAs regarding the same facts will be inadmissible. Hence, in contrast to the KapMuG, under which the higher regional court chooses the appropriate model claimant at its discretion, the DMA operates under the 'first come, first served' basis. However, there is no guarantee that the law firm that is the fastest in filing the first DMA on a certain subject will have best prepared the facts or will use the best legal arguments. This aspect of the DMA has been subject to some criticism.
Consumers can register online and cost-free to the DMA. Registry is possible until the day preceding the first hearing of the DMA and allows the individual consumers to halt the limitation period applicable to their potential claims against the defendant of the DMA (provided that the DMA has been duly filed in time before expiry of this limitation period). Once a consumer has registered to the DMA, he is legally prevented from filing an individual claim against the same defendant. Also, if a consumer with an already pending claim against the same defendant subsequently registers to the DMA (a potential scenario with the current volume of individual diesel claims), the individual pending case is suspended until the final and binding decision in the DMA (or until the claimant has opted out from the DMA). A consumer is free to choose not to register to the DMA but to file and pursue his or her claim individually and remains – in principle – unaffected by the outcome of the DMA. This might lead to the situation that individual proceedings – initiated years before the DMA – reach the Federal Supreme Court and create legal authority for the DMA even before the higher regional court has had time to render its judgment or even to hear the case.
Just like the model procedure under the KapMuG, the DMA, even if successful from the consumers' point of view, does not result in monetary compensation. The sole purpose of the DMA is the binding decision of preliminary legal or factual questions that are prerequisites of a consumer claim. Therefore, in principle, every single consumer who has registered to the DMA will have to file a follow-on lawsuit in which the individual prerequisites of his or her claim (such as the individual damage incurred, the lapsing of the individual knowledge based limitation-period, etc.) will be at issue. It is the legislator's expectation that merely the decision of the preliminary questions will incentivise the defendant to enter into a settlement with the consumers that have registered to the DMA. This hope might be too optimistic, however, particularly in areas of law such as follow-on competition litigation, where the calculation and proof of individual damage by claimants is challenging and involves a major investment of time and money on the claimants' side. In any event, the DMA rules provide for the possibility of aggregate settlement with binding effect for the registered consumers. The settlement has to be presented to and accepted by the court to be valid. Further, the validity of the settlement requires that less than 30 per cent of the registered consumers opt out of the settlement after they have been notified of its terms.
Contrary to the legislator's expected several hundred yearly filings of DMAs, since 2018, 15 DMAs were filed in German courts. The DMA in the 'diesel litigation', to which more than 400,000 actual and alleged consumers of diesel vehicles have registered, was filed by the Federal Association of Consumer Centres on 1 November 2018. In April 2020, the parties reached a settlement involving a payment to more than 200,000 consumers. As set out above, owing to the high relevance of dispersed low-value damages, a rational disinterest in litigation is particularly present in the area of follow-on consumer competition litigation. However, no antitrust follow-on claims were or are pending in the form of a DMA (or in other forms) in Germany and it does not seem that such DMAs are in preparation by the relevant claimant bar.
If one considers the hurdles that a consumer follow-on damages claim has to clear, the insufficiencies of the DMA for the final solution of such consumer claims are evident. Nevertheless, a DMA might be helpful to solve some of the preliminary questions of consumer damages claims, in particular in stand-alone damages claims where there is no binding decision of an antitrust authority on the antitrust infringement (e.g., in a commitment decision). It may also be helpful in halting prescription and thereby building up a certain pressure to settle.
However, consumers will mostly be at the final market level and can only claim that they have incurred damages that have been passed on to them by the upstream market levels (which could be highly individual and numerous, involving one or more wholesale dealer and dealers at retail level). Regarding those follow-on damages that have been incurred before 26 December 2016 (the major part if not all of the currently pending follow-on claims in Germany), consumers cannot invoke the legal presumption of damage and pass-on instituted under the EU cartel damages directive. Even though some German courts tend to apply a prima facie presumption that the acquisition of products affected by the cartel results in a damage, this presumption is not applied by all courts in cases of alleged damages that result from a pass-on to downstream market levels. Therefore, in many cases, consumers will have to prove that they have incurred a damage caused by the anticompetitive behaviour since the overcharge was passed-on to them through all market levels. They will have to calculate and prove the exact amount of this damage.
Since a pass-on of overcharges to the last market level depends on several individual factors that will in most cases be highly diverse depending on the distribution chain leading to the individual consumer, neither the existence nor the calculation of the individual damage will be a model question that could be easily dealt with once and for all for the entire group of consumers in a DMA. Since the potential defendants of a DMA will be aware of these difficulties, their willingness to settle in the course of a pending DMA might be limited. There may be, however, a certain room for uniform damages in cases of cartels on the retail level, abuse of dominance on the retail level or possibly retail price maintenance. This might, for example, also be the case for standard overcharges on credit card or electronic cash services.
However, even if an econometric market analysis shows that consumers might have suffered uniform damages, that the DMA itself will not result in the monetary compensation of consumers but only in an answer to preliminary legal questions could be a serious hurdle when looking for a litigation funder that would back the investment into the expensive econometric analysis required. In fact, some litigation funders have stated their reluctance to finance DMAs for the reason that they would mean a long-term investment without any immediate or even medium-term monetary return. However, all of this depends on the individual factors of the specific antitrust infringement and the relevant market. If defendants are willing to settle fast owing to the volume of aggregated claimants and the good chances of success of the claim, litigation investment may bring fast returns.
Claim aggregation under the existing rules in Germany
Regardless of the limited possibilities to aggregate claims in Germany via specifically created legal instruments, the claimant bar has shown a certain ingeniousness in using the traditional instruments provided by German law to aggregate claims. So far in the field of antitrust litigation this has, however, been in B2B claims, rather than on the consumer level.
Particularly in the area of follow-on competition litigation, an aggregation of several claimants is often important for the claim to be successful: regardless of the prima facie evidence of a damage applied by German courts in some cases, claimants will have to substantiate and prove the exact amount of damage incurred. Therefore, they will have to gather a sufficient amount of data for the econometric market analysis required to produce such an analysis. Large market players might have had enough transactions in the relevant period to produce their own market analysis, but smaller enterprises, and more so consumers, will depend on data gathered from an entire group of potential claimants.
Traditional possibilities to aggregate claims are the grouping of several claimants in one case or the assignment of claims of several claimants to a special purpose vehicle that will file the claim. Most claims by special purpose vehicles have been dismissed by German courts for violation of material law. However, the legislator as well as the Federal Supreme Court shows some sympathy towards such claims.
Joinder of several individual claimants in one case
From a procedural point of view, the least controversial possibility to file aggregated claims is the joinder of several claimants with similar or almost identical claims in one single claim. This occurs if several claimants file their individual claims jointly in one single court proceeding or if the court orders the joinder of different actions that have been brought separately. Evidently, the joinder of individual claimants in one proceeding will find its limits if the number of claimants is too extensive, since all claimants will have the same procedural rights in the pending litigation (e.g., the right to file individual briefs and to participate at the hearing). Since all claimants can freely decide to withdraw or change their claim, to settle their individual claim or to change counsel, aggregated action by a simple joinder of individual claimants requires a contract between the involved claimants that will guarantee and sanction some discipline in the joint and efficient pursuit of their claims.
In follow-on antitrust litigation, major customers that form a purchasing cooperative frequently file a single claim against cartel members, profiting from the possibilities an aggregated data pool gives them for the calculation and proof of their cartel damage. However, given the problems of claimant discipline set out above, the joinder of several individual claimants in one claim will only prove to be successful if the parties are acquainted with each other, have a history of professional cooperation or at least a bullet-proof agreement regulating the terms of their cooperation as joint claimants.
Assignment of claims to a claims vehicle backed by a litigation funder
A more controversial method of aggregating claims in German civil procedure is the assignment of a multitude of claims to a special purpose vehicle. The first vehicle of this kind was CDC Cartel Damage Claims (CDC), which, in 2005, filed a damages claim for an aggregated amount of €130 million against six members of the cement cartel. Several companies from the construction materials industry had assigned their follow-on damages claims to CDC. However, after 10 years of litigation, in 2015 the Higher Regional Court Düsseldorf ruled that the assignment of claims to CDC was null and void because it unethically disadvantaged the defendants. In fact, the court found that CDC, a Belgian company with limited liability and limited funds, substituted itself for the financially more powerful assignors, jeopardising the defendants' claim for reimbursement of procedural costs (in particular the defendants' legal and expert fees). In a second attempt – now backed by a litigation funder – CDC filed a new lawsuit against the cement cartel and settled the lawsuit in August 2019.
Claims aggregation consisting of a vehicle assignee of claims and a litigation funder responsible for the financials has since then been copied by others. For example, the affiliated companies MyRight and Financialright have aggregated more than 45,000 claims in the diesel litigation context, and have filed three aggregated claims involving a total of almost 10,000 claimants and more than 180,000 trucks against the truck cartel. In all proceedings, MyRight and Financialright are represented by the German office of the US law firm Hausfeld and are financially backed by a litigation funder, which – according to public information – invested €15 million into the diesel claim.
However, the admissibility of such litigation vehicle claims – even if backed by a litigation funder – is disputed. In fact, the Regional Court of Munich dismissed the first and most voluminous (almost €900 million) Financialright claim against the truck cartel owing to a violation of the German Act on Out-of-Court Legal Services (RDG). In the court's view, this act only provides for the possibility to assign claims to non-lawyers for the purpose of out-of-court debt collection and does not allow non-lawyers, such as Financialright, to aggregate claims for the sole purpose of litigation. Further grounds for the dismissal of the claim were the potential conflict between the assignors' and the litigation funders' interests and the fact that the different chances of success of the 85,000 aggregated claims could amount to an unfair litigation outcome for those assignors with more promising claims. This judgment of February 2020, which was subject to prominent media coverage in Germany, can be read as a clear statement against the attempts by Financialright and similar companies to introduce some sort of class action in German courts. Other regional courts have followed the reasoning and have dismissed aggregated claims against the sugar cartel and in the diesel context. However, some regional courts have indicated that they see no violation of German ethical rules by the claimant vehicles.
In a judgment of 13 July 2021, the Federal Supreme Court held that the aggregation of claims in the context of insolvency of the airline Air Berlin for the purpose of litigation does not violate the RDG. Even though this judgment does not relate to the specific issues raised in the context of follow-on litigation, it might also pave the way for vehicle claims in this context. Owing to a change in legislation as of October 2021, the administration will have to control whether the business model offered by operators of claim vehicles (such as MyRight or Financialright) is in conformity with the RDG before issuing a licence for operation. Once the licence is granted, civil courts should not be able to rule that claim assignments under the business model were illegal. Hereby, the German legislator wants to avoid that courts decide – many years after the assignment of claims to the vehicle – that claims have run into prescription owing to the invalidity of their assignment to a claimant vehicle. Both recent developments have the potential to serve as a booster for follow-on damage claims in Germany.
Regardless of the absence of class or collective actions in Germany, and notwithstanding the strict substantive requirements on the proof and calculation of follow-on damages, at the European level Germany still is, together with England and Wales, the Netherlands, Austria and Finland, one of the preferred forums for bringing private antitrust follow-on claims. The advantages of German proceedings are their relative rapidity (in comparison with other European domestic courts) and the significant experience the specialised competition chambers and senates of German courts have gathered in follow-on litigation in the past decade.
The nationality of the persons joining the model actions or the claim aggregation does not play a role. Whether a foreign national can join, depends on whether he or she could individually bring the claim against the specific defendant, based on the normal rules of determining whether there is a forum for that specific claim in Germany. This must be verified on a case-by-case basis. As a rule of thumb, this should in particular be the case, if either the infringing action took place in Germany or the potential defendant is seated in Germany, or if Germany is a forum for a jointly liable defendant.
Since the importance of the competition courts of England and Wales will potentially decrease after Brexit, it is likely that Germany will maintain and even strengthen its position as a preferred forum (provided that German courts also improve their IT to enable them to deal in a more efficient way with the aggregated claims and econometric data of several tens of thousands of claimants).
1 Borbála Dux-Wenzel, Anne Wegner and Florian Schulz are partners at Luther Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH.
2 See the discussion below on the Act on Model Proceedings in Disputes under Capital Markets Law.
3 See the discussion below on the declaratory model action.
Borbàla Dux-Wenzel
Anne Caroline Wegner
Nicholas Heaton and Benjamin Holt
Part 1: Key Issues
Territorial Considerations: the EU and UK Perspective
Camilla Sanger and Olga Ladrowska
Slaughter and May
Collective or Class Actions and Claims Aggregation in the United States
Eva W Cole and Jeffrey J Amato
Collective or Class Actions and Claims Aggregation in the EU: the Claimant's Perspective
Till Schreiber and Martin Seegers
CDC Cartel Damage Claims Consulting
Collective or Class Actions and Claims Aggregation in the Netherlands
Kees E Schillemans, Emma M M Besselink, Eline M R H Vancraybex and Hannelore J Vanderveen
Allen & Overy LLP
Collective Actions and Claims Aggregation in Spain
María Pérez Carrillo, Esther de Félix Parrondo and Adrián Yuste Bonillo
Cuatrecasas
Collective or Class Actions and Claims Aggregation in the United Kingdom
Kim Dietzel, Stephen Wisking, James White, Andrew North and Ruth Allen
US Monopolisation Cases
Dee Bansal, Jacqueline Grise, Julia Brinton, David Burns and Richard Lee Hochstetler
Cooley LLP
Proving the Fix: Damages
Michelle M Burtis and Keler Marku
Charles River Associates
Brexit and its Impact on Competition Litigation in the UK
Edward Coulson and Ben Blacklock
Part 2: Overviews
Austria Q&A
Guenter Bauer and Robert Wagner
Wolf Theiss
China Overview
Jet (Zhisong) Deng and Ken Dai
Dentons
England & Wales Q&A
Nicholas Heaton and Paul Chaplin
Germany Q&A
Kim Lars Mehrbrey, Lisa Hofmeister and Sophia Jaeger
Japan Overview
Madoka Shimada, Kazumaro Kobayashi and Atsushi Kono
Nishimura & Asahi
Netherlands Q&A
Klaas Bisschop
Portugal Q&A
Gonçalo Machado Borges
Morais Leitão, Galvão Teles, Soares da Silva & Associados
Spain Q&A
María Pérez Carrillo, Esther de Félix Parrondo and María Martínez Fuentes
Sweden Q&A
Andrew Bullion, Mikael Treijner, Johan Karlsson and Trine Osen Bergqvist
Hausfeld & Co and Advokatfirman Vinge
United States Q&A
Benjamin Holt


You have entered Toyota Fleet Management Novated Online as an authorised user. As an authorised user you will be liable for all value transactions initiated and will be responsible for any other transactions conducted within Toyota Fleet Management Novated Online.
Any transactions effected within Toyota Fleet Management Novated Online will be governed by the terms and conditions set out in the relevant novated lease agreement or any other agreement between you and Toyota Fleet Management.
Toyota Fleet Management Novated Online is a service to Toyota Fleet Management fleet customers provided by Toyota Fleet Management, a division of Toyota Finance Australia Limited ABN 48 002 435 181.
They are responsible for the accuracy of the data entered or provided to Toyota Fleet Management.
Toyota Fleet Management is not responsible for the accuracy of data entered or reported to it by the User.


These apartments are located in the beautiful Mediterranean settlement of Podstrana. The property is 250 m from the sea and the beautiful beach, and from cafes, bars and local restaurants. It lies 8 km southeast of the city centre of Split.This lovely apartment complex is a perfect place to spend a pleasant holiday, enjoying the beautiful sun and clear Mediterranean Sea. The 4 apartments are set in a newly built, family-owned house. Guests can leave their cars in the private car park, and facilities available to them include a barbecue area in the garden.The apartments are all furnished in a modern style and come with a private bathroom with a shower. They offer a double bed and in-room amenities include a satellite TV and wireless Internet access. There is a kitchenette and a terrace overlooking the sea. The kitchenettes are equipped with all the necessary kitchenware, utensils and fittings including a fridge and a cooker, and every apartment has individually regulated air conditioning.


text:
'I Feel Like I'm Going to Die'- Sean O'Malley Says He Faced a Lot of Issues During Weight Cut
Published 01/10/2022, 7:30 AM EST
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA – MARCH 07: Sean O'Malley prepares to fight Jose Quinonez during the UFC 248 event at T-Mobile Arena on March 07, 2020 in Las Vegas, Nevada. (Photo by Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC)
By Pranit Punjabi
Sean O'Malley is one of the hottest prospects in the UFC right now. Every time he is a part of a pay-per-view, we can expect it to do well in numbers. The fighter has had an incredible year in 2021, and he surely ended it with a bang.
As of January 2022, Sean O'Malley stands twelfth in the UFC's bantamweight rankings. He is an absolute entertainer and a complete knock-out artist.
Recently, O'Malley appeared in an interview with the UFC legend, Michael Bisping. 'Sugar' opened up about his experience in his weight cut before his recent fight last year on the Michael Bisping Podcast.
O'Malley said," that last fight camp I was walking around two-three pounds under the previous four or five camps and it was so nice. Because I was getting to a point where, like damn, I might have to go to 45. I feel like I'm going to die at weigh-ins. This last camp I was like two pounds less like the whole camp and it was really nice. I got, made weight, felt great."
The fighter is talking about the training camp he had ahead of his fight against Raulian Paiva at UFC 269 in December. O'Malley defeated the Brazilian by an outstanding first-round knockout.
Sean O'Malley on how much time he needs for a fight
Every fighter needs some time to mentally and physically prepare themself before an MMA fight. Most fights are booked months in advance so that fighters have sufficient time to train and to cut weight.
O'Malley revealed how much time he actually needs to prepare for a fight on the Michael Bisping Podcast.
He said," realistically, I need eight weeks, you know. I would take a short-notice fight. I remember when Petr (Yan), or Aljo (Sterling) pulled out the first time, I think it was like four weeks. And I was trying to get that fight. Did I think I'd get it? No, was I serious about taking that fight on four weeks' notice? Yes."
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA – MARCH 27: Sean O'Malley reacts after his knockout victory over Thomas Almeida of Brazil in their bantamweight fight during the UFC 260 event at UFC APEX on March 27, 2021 in Las Vegas, Nevada. (Photo by Chris Unger/Zuffa LLC)| Credit: Getty Images
O'Malley is coming off his 15th career win, and he is likely to fight someone higher in the rankings next. Who do you want to see Sean O'Malley fight in his next bout? Please let us know in the comments section below.
Pranit Punjabi
Pranit Punjabi is a UFC author at EssentiallySports. A third-year psychology major, this Khabib Nurmagomedov fan merged his interest in psychology with his deep passion for MMA and was intrigued by this new angle to help him get closer to the action. Pranit aims to look through the violence and chaos, into what makes MMA truly beautiful, the deep and rich psychological aspect of the game.


text:
San Isidro High School is a public high school located in the unincorporated community of San Isidro, Texas, USA and classified as a 1A school by the UIL.  It is a part of the San Isidro Independent School District located in extreme northeastern Starr County. In 2015, the school was rated "Met Standard" by the Texas Education Agency.

Academics

State Titles
UIL Academic Meet Champions -
1991(1A)
UIL Calculator Applications -
1992(1A), 2008(1A)
UIL Number Sense -
1991(1A)
UIL Social Studies -
2008(1A), 2010(1A)
UIL Spelling & Vocabulary -
1993(1A), 1994(1A), 1996(1A)
UIL Journalism -
2017 (2A), 2019 (2A)

Athletics
The San Isidro Tigers compete in these sports -

Basketball, Cross Country, Track & Field, and Volleyball

References

External links
San Isidro ISD website

Public high schools in Texas
Schools in Starr County, Texas

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
September 25, 2019 August 26, 2020 maheshdan
Atal Incubation Centres: Apply and strengthen your innovation, startups ideas, and entrepreneurship
Source: AIM
Atal Innovation Mission (AIM) is a Government of India's flagship initiative to promote a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship in the country.
For incubation and funding support more than 550 Startups have been mentored, 2,20,000 registrations have been achieved and over one lakh queries have been handled by the Startup India Hub as of June 2018. At present, more than 360 start-ups have been incubated in the Atal Incubation Centres and Established Incubation Centres, established by the Atal Innovation Mission.
Statement Minister of State of Commerce and Industry, C. R. Chaudhary in the Lok Sabha.
AIM's goal is to develop new programs and strategies for promoting innovation in diverse sectors of the Indian economy, provide platform and collaboration opportunities for different stakeholders create consciousness and build an umbrella structure to manage the innovation ecosystem of the country.
The main 5 initiatives taken in the 1st year of establishing AIM
Atal Tinkering Labs: Established in schools to create a problem-solving mindset in students.
Atal Incubation Centres: To encourage creating global-level startups and an advanced level incubator model in India.
Atal New India Challenges: To encourage innovative product development and aligning with the related sector and government ministries.
Mentor India Campaign: A national Mentor network in collaboration with the public sector, corporate, and institutions, to support all the initiatives of the startup mission.
Atal Community Innovation Centre: To stimulate the community-centric approach in innovations in the underdeveloped areas within the country, including Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities of the country.
Atal Incubation Centre (AIC)
To date, 28 Atal Incubators have been selected and operational for the startups incubation and target of 50+ Centres countrywide.
Over 550 startups mentored for incubation and funding support
142 Startups have received funding under FFS with catalysed investment of Rs. 602.60 crores.
Rs. 500 crore has been released to SIDBI in FY16 and Rs. 100 crore in FY 17 out of Fund of Funds for Startups of Rs. 10,000 crore.
2,20,000 registrations have been achieved and over one lakh queries have been handled by the Startup India Hub as of June, 2018.
The main aim of the AICs is to develop world-class incubation facilities for early-stage startups across the country. All basic infrastructure facilities, seed financial support, mentoring support, expert's guideline, business planning, etc are provided in the well-structured premises to promote the innovative startups.
Atal Innovation Mission (AIM) is created many new incubation centres for startups called Atal Incubation Centres (AICs), these centres will nurture innovative idea based startups and scale them to be a well-structured enterprise level.
These AICs are concentrating on sector-specific models to address the basic problems of the industry and country including, health, education, agriculture, water and sanitation, manufacturing, transport, energy, etc. The sectors are the heart of the Indian economy.
Entities such as higher educational institutions, R&D institutes, corporate sector, and alternative investment funds registered with SEBI, business accelerators, groups of individuals, and individuals are eligible to apply.
AIM will provide a grant-in-aid of up to Rs. 10 crores for a maximum period of 5 years to cover the capital and operational expenditures to establish the AIC.
The applicant would have to provide at least 10,000 sq. ft. of ready-to-use, built-up space, for the exclusive use of the AIC.
25 Main Atal Incubation Centres Across India
1. AIC-NIFT TEA:
AIC-NIFTTEA is the sector specific Incubation Centre for Textiles and Apparel supported by Atal Innovation Mission, NITI Aayog, Govt. of India to create an ecosystem in fostering Innovation and Knowledge based entrepreneurship and to the overall economic and social development at Local & National level with Job creation.
Phone no.: 0421 2219900
Email: ceo@aicnifttea.org
Address: East of TEKIC, Mudalipalayam, Tirupur – 641606
INCUBATEE SELECTION CRITERIA AND PROCESS- Click on link
The total duration would be 0-18/24 months based on the stages of incubates.
An innovator may be incubated at three different stages namely ideation, Validation and Early Traction. Details are in the image.
The incubator team provides necessary supports such as innovation assessment, prototype development, business plan elaboration, business modelling, mentoring, start-up recognition, funding access and technology commercialisation to the incubates.
Incubatee Selection Process
Pre Application Questionnaire (PAQ)
Evaluation of project feasibility (including technical business and financial viability)
Declaration from innovators/entrepreneurs that they are the creators/owners of the innovation
Screening and Presentation in front of a panel of experts (incubatee selection committee)
Selection by the panel of experts (incubatee selection committee) for incubation
2. AIC-RNTU: AIC-RNTU (Atal Incubation Centre, Rabindranath Tagore University supported by NITI Aayog)
The aims of incubator centre is to encourage and promote the culture of entrepreneurship in India. Rabindranath Tagore University was selected as the Atal Incubation Centre by Niti Aayog amongst the 1200 second round applicants. It promises to be the pillar of support for the booming startups in every possible way.
Objective of AIC-RNTU is to create a startup ecosystem and familiarize the visionary brains with the business aspects of an idea and provide them a platform with necessary resources, culture, opportunities, and amenities – to grow their startup units into high growth business enterprises. AIC-RNTU by playing the role of both startup incubator and accelerator, aims at training and mentoring young entrepreneurs to fuel their inner drive to innovate.
Services Offered in the AIC:
Access To Labs
Legal & Accounting Support
HR/Intern Support
Marketing Advisory
StartUps associated: Aristi Cyber Tech Private Limited, VIAS Group, Amrutulya Farms, ZingalBox, EZ Loading Services, MyTutor247, INFIAMP, Gadi Repair, Germanium Instruments, VijayBahadur Info Solutions.
Click to Incubation program apply > APPLY NOW
Address: AIC-RNTU Foundation (supported by NITI Aayog), Rabindranath Tagore University (RNTU) Campus, Mendua, Post: Bhojpur, Near Bangrasiya Chouraha, Bhopal-Chiklod Road, Raisen, Madhya Pradesh 464993
Email: info@aicrntu.com
Phone number : +91 755 270 0485
3. AIC-Sangam:
India's first dedicated CleanTech & AgriTech incubator supported by NITI Aayog and Atal Innovation Mission. The incubator is focused on nurturing and accelerating early-stage CleanTech companies that enable inclusive development and support climate adaptation or mitigation. AIC-Sangam is supported by the Shell Foundation, Doen Foundation and Tata Trusts' Social Alpha.
PRE-INCUBATION Click to apply > APPLY NOW
INCUBATION Click to apply> APPLY NOW
ACCELERATION Click to apply > APPLY NOW
Email: info@aic-sangam.org
Address: CLC Tower, Plot #146, Sector 44 Rd, Sector 44, Gurugram, Haryana 122003
4. AIC-CCMB, Hyderabad:
The Atal Incubation Centre- Centre for Cellular & Molecular Biology (AIC-CCMB): is a premier technology incubator supporting deep science startups. Established at CSIR-CCMB, Hyderabad under the Atal Innovation Mission of NITI Aayog, GoI in 2017, this incubation centre has become a hub for life-sciences and biotechnology startups and MSME's from all over Telangana and the country in a very short time.
Currently support 19 startups from different domains like bio-pharma, industrial biotechnology, medtech and animal health.
Focus Areas of AIC-CCMB, Hyderabad The AIC-CCMB has been set up in the area of 'Biotechnology and MedTech' to support startups carry out quality R&D in frontier areas of healthcare for diagnostics and biopharmaceuticals for cancer, infectious diseases etc. with the aim for development of diagnostic kits, bio-pharmaceuticals and medical devices.
Address: Atal Incubation Centre – CCMB
3rd Floor, Medical Biotechnology Complex,
CCMB Annex 2, Genpact Road,
IDA Uppal, Habsiguda, Hyderabad – 500039.
Telangana. INDIA
Email: aic@ccmb.res.in
Phone No.: 040 2516 5609
Download Application Form in PDF
REGISTRATION FOR ACCELERATION / INCUBATION PROGRAM: APPLY NOW
Startups or business involved in the development of transformative or social impact technologies or products
New point of care technologies for diagnostics
Companies developing alternative therapeutics or biosimilars
Spin-off from University or R&D Centre
Technocrats/ scientists/ innovators with early stages technologies
Submit the application (Download Application Form)
Initial screening by the AIC Incubation team
Evaluation by expert members
Detailed scrutiny including market and technical due diligence by experts
Applicants are invited to make a presentation on their proposal to Advisory Board.
Selected applicant will be on boarded
Periodic review of business
Transformative, disruptive, incremental or alternative
Socially relevant and affordable solution for mass market
Attainable and Implementable
Commercially Viable
Committed Individual/Team
5. ATAL INCUBATION CENTRE, BANASTHALI VIDYAPITH:
AIC at Banasthali is one of its kinds Incubation Centre in India solely focusing on women-led startups providing 360-degree support, world-class infrastructure and a conducive environment for women startups to grow. The AIC with the vision to build "National Centre for Women Entrepreneurship" offers state of the art infrastructure, modern equipment & operating facilities, highly customized solutions, sectoral experts, huge industry networks, access to funding and a safe ecosystem for women startups.
The AIC at Banasthali Vidyapith has also collaborated with Startup Oasis, CIIE – IIM Ahmedabad, TiE Rajasthan, GIZ and State Bank of India for jointly promoting women entrepreneurship in the country.
Apply Now –REGISTRATION FOR ACCELERATION / INCUBATION PROGRAM
Address: Atal Incubation Centre, Banasthali Vidyapith, P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith, Rajasthan – 304022
Email: aic@banasthali.in
6. AIC-NMIMS Incubation Centre:
Located at the state-of-the-art NMIMS School of Business Management campus in Mumbai, the Incubation Centre has access to Institutes' wifi-enabled infrastructure including training rooms with LCD projectors, technical labs, seminar halls, conference rooms, board rooms, computer labs, library, cafeteria, vehicle parking, and other facilities.
Currently, AIC-NMIMS is supporting around 25 startups focusing on health-tech, IT/IoT, edtech, fintech, social media, Ecotech, and FMCG products. These entrepreneurs were chosen from a pool of 634 applications through a rigorous process of evaluation.
For AIC-NMIMS Incubation program > APPLY NOW
Selection Process of startups Incubation
Entrepreneur/Start-up can submit an application through the online portal. The selection process will be performed in 3 stages as described:
1. Online submission and Screening
2. Boot Camp and Business Pitch Presentation
3. Selection and Incubation Offer
Finalists will be invited to discuss the terms of Incubation Agreement. Incubation will commence after execution of Incubation Agreement.
7. AIC-MIT ADT
With an intent to promote and create a 'social fabric of Entrepreneurship' by leveraging Technology, it's main objective is to build the ecosystem of Entrepreneurship.
By engaging the power of various schools at MIT ADT University, AIC-MIT ADT will incubate the potential founders and support them by building a 'Learning Culture'. It aims to build a community that nurtures the IDEA (Innovation, Design Thinking, Entrepreneurship, Arts) among the Next Generation of Entrepreneurs.
Submit your proposal in the form of a PowerPoint presentation having the following details on each slide
Project Title, Name of the innovator/s, Name of School, Faculty Mentor
Brief description about the Idea
Sketches / 2D CAD image / 3D CAD image
How is it different from whatever is available in the market today?
What will be required to convert the idea into a proof of concept? Technology, Infrastructure, Funds, Duration, Experts
Any other information which you might want to add – video, reference projects etc
Video Application (not more than 5-7 min) should briefly cover:
Founder's profile (brief professional background and relevant experience)
Co-founders/Team (reflecting the skills that co-founders bring to the venture)
Key Thrust Area (why did you choose to work in this area?)
Problem Statement (brief about the problem that your start-up want to solve)
Suggested Solution (have you worked on any potential solution?)
What Support from Incubator are you looking for (Infra, Mentor, Prototype, Market, Parnters, Tech, Legal, Funding etc)
There is no language restriciton for recording the video. Record subtitles in English if the video is not in English / Hindi
Trust Areas are BioTech, AgriTech, Social Innovation and Information Technology.
Video Application: Apply Now
Address: Railway station, Solapur Highway, Near Bharat Petrol Pump, Loni Kalbhor, Maharashtra 412201
Phone Number: +91 – 9927055354
Email Address: ceo.aic@mituniversity.edu
8. Atal Incubation Centre- Rambhau Mhalgi Prabodhini (RMP) Foundation:
The focus is on job creation through entrepreneurship in the domains of Agriculture, Education & ICT. It also aims to create & support sustainable business models at a grassroots level including social enterprises.
Motivate youngsters and entrepreneurs to innovate, to build and run successful working (business) models and to use information communication technology to support and strengthen self help groups, cooperatives, agriculture sector, education sector and social sector.
JOIN AIC-RMP > APPLY NOW
Preferred Sectors: 1. Agriculture 2.Education 3.Information, Communication & Technology.
Address: Atal Incubation Centre-Rambhau Mhalgi Prabodhini, Keshav Srushti, Uttan,
Essel World Road, Bhayander (West), Thane – 401106, Maharashtra, India.
Email: contact@aic-rmp.org
Phone: +91 22- 28450109/10
9. Atal Incubation Centre- BIMTECH:
Atal Incubation Centre- BIMTECH is an incubation centre supported by Atal Innovation Mission, NITI Aayog, Government of India and Birla Institute of Management Technology, a leading business school in India. The objective of AIC-BIMTECH is to create high-class incubation facilities with suitable physical infrastructure in terms of capital equipment and operating facilities, coupled with the availability of industry experts for mentoring the start-ups, so that innovators and start-ups can become successful entrepreneurs and enterprises.
Click to APPLY NOW
Address: Plot Number 5, Knowledge Park 2, NCR, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201306
Telephone: 01206843000-10, Ext. No.: 516
Email: aic.bimtech@bimtech.ac.in
10. AIC-ADT BARAMATI FOUNDATION Agricultural Development Trust, Baramati
The Centre aims to be a common platform for the students and faculties of the educational institutes and its underneath sister institutes, individuals and established entrepreneurs to hone the necessary skills of market research, study of economic demands and accordingly shape the ideas to a marketable product; essentially, to the people of rural communities and farmers. Area of Focus: AIC-ADT BARAMATI FOUNDATION is sector agnostic with regards to the incubation of entrepreneurs.
AIC-ADT BARAMATI FOUNDATION is sector agnostic with regards to incubation of entrepreneurs. But considering the high quality R&D infrastructure and expert faculty in areas of Agriculture, Engineering, Pharmacy, Science and Business Management available at ADT Baramati, AIC-ADT BARAMATI FOUNDATION Incubation Centre will focus on supporting entrepreneurs and Start-ups in the following domains in the early stages of establishment:
APPLY NOW – new startups
APPLY NOW – Existing Startups
OTHER AREAS OF SOCIAL & NATIONAL IMPORTANCE
Must not be older than 7 years from the date of registration/ company incorporation (Biotechnology-related Start-ups must not be older than 10 years from the date of registration/ company incorporation).
Its annual turnover (as defined in the Companies Act, 2013) in any preceding financial year must not exceed INR. 25 crore.
Must not be formed by splitting up, or reconstruction, of a business already in existence.
Must be working towards development of innovative products/ processes/services and must have a scalable business model with a high potential of employment generation or wealth creation.
11. AIC@36Inc
The Chhattisgarh state-run integrated incubation centre is located in the heart of the city and is operating out of a mall. The centre has been set up in an area of 30,000 square feet and is sector agnostic. It is well equipped with high-end technologies in its lab that will help the startups to make rapid prototypes while learning in a co-working space. Apart from support in mentoring, workshops and prototyping, AIC@36Inc also helps them in establishing market linkages within the country and globally. It is also providing funds to startups in the form of both equity and debt.
INCUBATION REGISTRATION Apply Now
To catalyze entrepreneurship, Government of Chhattisgarh is providing funding support for development and growth of innovation-driven enterprises in various forms. On behalf of state government, AIC@36Inc manages two funds:
Debt Fund (LoFR- Leap of Faith Revolving Fund)
2. Equity Fund (36 Angel Fund).
FUNDING REGISTRATION: APPLY NOW
Address: AIC@36Inc, Third Floor, City Centre Mall, Raipur Chhattisgarh
Email: info@36inc.in
Portfolio: Total 67 startups incubating at the centre including, Easy Nirman, GimBooks , Nearfit , Shared Machine, Smart Yatri, Aaho , EasyLR, TechLogistics, FINANCIALPOWER , Finology.in, RaipurBazar.com, Applop, BlueBanyan, City Console, Codenicely, SmileBots, Trackoplus, Alfadesk, Ascent Edutech, Buddy4Study.
12. Atal Incubation Centre Manipal University Jaipur I F
The incubator Centre has been awarded by NITI Aayog with the initiative taken by the Government of India, to promote the culture of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Rajasthan among the young students. AIC MUJ I F is providing support to all the Startups which include necessary guidance, tech support, infrastructure, networking, and other necessary resources. AIC MUJ I F Startups are working in various sectors such as Waste Management, Media Marketing, Health Sector, Education Sector, E-commerce, Agriculture Sector, I.T. Services, and Social media platform.
Address: ATAL INCUBATION CENTRE, Manipal University Jaipur
Jaipur, Rajashthan, India
Tel. no. +91-141-3999100 ext(852)
eMail: contact@aicmuj.com
13. Jyothy Institute of Technology Foundation (AIC-JITF):
AIC-JITF has access to network of eminent professionals, academicians, bankers, venture capitalists and businessmen, who can extend support to new ventures.
AIC-JITF focuses on the following thrust areas.
Devices and Sensors
Address: AIC-Jyothy Institute of Technology Foundation
Off Kanakapura Main Road, Thataguni Bangalore -560082
Mobile No : 944 821 4404
Tel: 080 – 28435717
Email: anantha.prasad@jyothyit.ac.in , savitha.prakash@jyothyit.ac.in
14. Atal Incubation Centre – Pondicherry Engineering College Foundation (AIC-PECF):
AIC-PECF was initiated to provide a platform to assist and enable young entrepreneurs to initiate startups for the commercial exploitation of technologies developed by them. The incubation facility at AIC-PECF is spread over an area of 10,000 sq.ft to accommodate start-ups, main focus areas:
AIC-PECF provides technical services that include R & D activities, Product development, Re-engineering, Calibration and testing facilities, Quality assurance and Market Research to the entrepreneurs. The entrepreneurs can also utilize the various Centres of Excellence of Pondicherry Engineering College.
Electronics Design and Manufacturing(EDM)
Advanced Robotics (AR)
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)
Register NOW For Incubation program
The services provided by AIC-PECF include:
Innovation Support
Rapid Prototype Development
Dr.R.Sundaramurthy.,M.E.,Ph.D.,
AIC-Pondicherry Engineering College Foundation,
Pondicherry Engineering College,
Puducherry – 605014.
Email : aicpecf@gmail.com
15. AIC-LMCP Foundation by L. M. College of Pharmacy (governed by Ahmedabad Education Society, Ahmedabad)
Domain expertise in Drug Discovery and Development, Drug Delivery Technology, Manufacturing, Preclinical (safety), Clinical, Hospital and Community Pharmacy, Business Development and Post-marketing, Quality and Regulatory Sciences for Pharmaceuticals, Nutraceuticals, Phytopharmaceuticals, Medical Devices and Diagnostics for specific diseases.
Novel drug delivery systems/ technology
Novel APIs/ Excipients, Phytopharmaceuticals, Nutraceuticals
Tailor-made equipments/technologies, Packaging
Novel testing tools, Medical Devices and Diagnostics for specific diseases
Healthcare tools and solutions – medicines
Contract research services – custom synthesis (SIL standards, related substances), safety-efficacy evaluation
Address: L. M. College of Pharmacy,Navrangpura, Ahmedabad – 380 009.
Email: admin@aiclmcp.org
16. AIC-JKLU Foundation is a not for profit startup incubator supported by JK Lakshmipat University:
Atal Incubation Centre (AIC) is an initiative of Atal Innovation Mission, NITI Aayog to promote a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship. The AIC serves as a platform for nurturing innovative ideas, promoting entrepreneurship, supporting innovators, mentoring youth in general and women in particular. Incubation support includes business and technical advice, mentoring support, access to expert networks and facilitation of seed and early stage funding.
Address: JK Lakshmipat University Near Mahindra SEZ, Mahapura Ajmer Road, Jaipur – 302 026 (Rajasthan) India
Email: info@jklu.edu.in
17. AIC-Pinnacle Entrepreneurship Forum (AIC-Pinnacle) Pune:
The official Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) incubator for western India. Established as a Section 8 – Not-for-Profit entity to support innovation, entrepreneurship, and employment generation, our goal is to incubate, accelerate and fund high-impact manufacturing and product start-ups that promote and support Smart Mobility, Agri-Tech, Smart City and Social Innovation. AIC-Pinnacle is integrating global startup ecosystem, have Indo-Israel and Indo-US collaborative programs.
Pre-Incubation: For students and young entrepreneurs seeking idea validation and mentoring.
Incubation: Physical and Virtual for Early stage startups seeking technology validation, business resources and funding support. Bottom of Form
You can apply by filling out the form APPLY NOW
Address1: 9th Floor, Panchshil Tech Park One, Near Pride Hotel, Shivaji Nagar, Pune-411005
Address2: 302, Sector 7 Road, MIDC Sector 2 Industrial Area, MIDC, Bhosrari, Pimpri- Chinchwad, Maharashtra-411026
E-mail: contact@aic-pinnacle.org
18. The AIC-Great Lakes Balachandran Incubator (AGBI):
The AIC-Great Lakes Balachandran Incubator (AGBI) is supported by Atal Innovation Mission, Niti Aayog, and Great Lakes Institute of Management, Chennai – an International business school renowned for it's MBA and Data Science programs.
AGBI envisions fostering disruptive innovation in the domains of Financial Technology, Educational Technology, Health Technology, Agricultural Technology, and Energy/Ecology Technology. It would encourage nascent entrepreneurs to leverage emerging technologies such as Augmented/Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things, Machine Learning, Algorithmic Analytics and Blockchain to lead platform-revolution.
19. AIC-Mahamana Foundation for Innovation & Entrepreneurship, IM-BHU, Varanasi:
This incubation program will provide a platform for entrepreneurs to innovate by overcoming the barriers of technology including lack of training in the area of entrepreneurship. This can be eliminated by incorporating an extensive training program and support system in the existing ecosystem. By exhaustive risk elimination, innovation and the rapid commercialization process will create successful startups.
The major focus areas would be Agriculture and Allied Fields, Green Infrastructure, Public Health Care, Waste Management, Education, Technology, Finance and Water Management.
List of Start-ups selected for Incubation at AIC-MFIE-IM-BHU (As on May 2019): Divyan,
Click: How to Apply Now
Regd Office: Institute of Management Studies (Faculty of Management Studies), Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005
Email: aic-imbhu@fmsbhu.ac.in
Contact No:+91 542 2369332
20. Atal Incubation Centre – Goa Institute of Management (AIC-GIM):
The mission is to aid startups, stimulate their growth and facilitate their success through a holistic support system for entrepreneurs by providing them opportunities to access mentors who are experts in their field of business, investment support, access to industries and networking with growing startup ecosystems.
Incubator programs
1.Mainspring: In this workshop we will discuss about lean startup methodology, stakeholder mapping, customer segmentation, customer survey and hypothesis testing.
Who should attend: Startups at an idea stage or very early stage
Outcome: De-mystifying the concept of startups, Introduction of some basic tools to ensure correct path towards your venture.
Duration : 4 – 6 hours – 1 day. Click to Apply Now
2. Instigate : Instigate is a 6 week program focused on building a working prototype or an MVP. The program is a mix of group sessions, workshops and on-on-one mentoring sessions. The program will walk through the practical aspects of lean model canvas ( LMC ), Value proposition, Unit economics, competition analysis and basics of go-to-market. The workshop will focus on a rapid prototyping technique to get real market and customer insights which will be the key inputs for building the final product.
Who should attend: Startup at a post idea-validation stage, prototype/MVP stage
Outcome: Working prototype/ MVP for market testing and acquiring early customers.
Duration: 6 Weeks. Click To Apply now
3.Hardway Program:
Who should attend: Startups at a post revenue stage looking for scaling up and early stage investments.
Duration: 10 Weeks, Click to Apply now
Address: GIM Campus, Sanquelim
Email: info@aicgim.in
Phone: 0832 -2366700
21. Atal Incubation Centre at Gujarat Technological University:
Atal Incubation Centre at Gujarat Technological University invites innovative ideas in field of Biotech, Biomedical devices, ICT health & other allied areas looking for Mentoring, and Infrastructure access & Funding support for Prototype/MVP / Product development. AIC welcomes startups for incubation, irrespective of being part of the university as student or faculty.
At the opening level, applicants for admission to the GTU Incubator will be required to submit an application in a Form, which can be availed from the S4 office or can be downloaded from here.
How To Get Incubated
At the opening level, applicants for admission to the GTU Incubator will be required to submit an application in a Form, which can be availed from the S4 office or can be downloaded from website.
The application will be scrutinized by S4 team and will be forwarded to GTU Incubator panel for the selection process.
While submitting the application, applicants will have to disclose information on executive involvement of the promoters/ founders in other companies or commercial entities.
Based on the initial scrutiny of the application and affirmative assessment, applicants will be asked to submit a formal application for admission to TBI along with a detailed proposal comprising of the following documents:
1. Business Plan. (Prescribed format) BMC Available here
2. Details of IP/ technology based on which a company is proposed to be promoted/ founded. In case the IP/ technology is developed at GTU, a copy of letter of approval from GTU for transfer of / licensing of/ permission to use IP in favour of prospective incubatee companies.
Innovator Application Form Link: Application Form for Innovators'/Startups'
22. Atal Incubation Centre – Shiv Nadar University:
Currently, AIC has incubated 13 start-ups under the incubation program. AIC, as business incubator is highly flexible and has a unique combination of business development processes, infrastructure and people designed to nurture new and small businesses by helping them to survive and grow through the difficult and vulnerable early stages of development.
For 2 years Incubator program: Apply Now
Address: SNU AIC Shiv Nadar University Gautam Budhdha Nagar Utter Pradesh
Phone: +91-120 304 100
Email : contact.AIC@snu.edu.in
23. AIC- PRESTIGE INSPIRE FOUNDATION, Indore:
AIC-Prestige Inspire Foundation (AIC- PIF) is a state of the art incubation centre established in Indore, the business capital of Madhya Pradesh, India. The first Incubate Inducted on September 18, 2018, currently 12 startups ideas are working at AIC-PIF.
CORE FOCUS AND OBJECTIVES
Experiential and Hands-on Learning, training, mentoring for innovation, research and entrepreneurship.
Only industry backed agri-preneur incubator in the state of Madhya Pradesh.
Ecosystem for agribusiness and agro processing sector
Low cost mechanized and techno based agribusiness model
Strengthen the agri-based state to be pioneer in food production, mechanization, and processing through innovation and technology inputs.
Leverage primary and secondary sector to be the leading exporter in all food based sectors
Address:Scheme No.74-C, Prestige Vihar, III Floor PIMR DoL Campus, Opp: LCH Indore 452010 (M.P)
eMAIL: aicprestigeinspire@gmail.com
Phone no. : +919329885198
24. AIC-SMU Technology Business Incubation Foundation Sikkim:
In line with the pursuits of Government of India towards Make in India & Start-Up India, the Technology & Business Incubation Centre at SMIT started as a Satellite Centre of Manipal University of Technology & Business Incubator, Manipal with an MOU from January 2015. The Centre incubates and nurtures early-stage entrepreneurial ventures based on Technology and Innovation by providing infrastructure, consultancy, and seed grants to promising young entrepreneurs to pursue their dreams of starting their own firm. The centre has persistently encouraged young entrepreneurs to hone their skills in generating Values Human Resources rather than the traditional Man Power that feeds the needs of the industry. The incubation centre admits young entrepreneurs with innovative ideas that have market potential and guides them to become employers rather than being employees until they graduate from this centre after a gestation period of approximately 3 years.
Address: SMIT, Rangpo, Sikkim
Email: contact@smutbi.com
Incubatees portfolio: 1. AfterGlow Tech Pvt. Ltd., Works in smart street lights and 2.Untapped Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Untapped is working on solving the problem that ambulances get stuck in traffic.
25. AIC – Aartech:
It intends to be a unique platform for enabling and supporting the entrepreneurial ecosystem in Central India and to co-create the next generation of successful state-of-the-art innovation-driven enterprises. The host Institution, Aartech Solonics Limited, Bhopal is a 30+-year-old company working in the field of selected and specialized energy applications. The centre is in Central India's prominent Industrial Area of Mandideep, Dist. Raisen (20 km from Bhopal, capital of the state of Madhya Pradesh) in a 10,000 sqft facility consisting of several unique facilities for startups such as a maker space, co-working space, mentoring support and variety of value-added services for startups.
Click to- Apply to AIC-AARTECH Incubation Program
Address: Main Incubation Centre: 35-A/36 Sector-B, Industrial Area, Mandideep, District Raisen, Madhya Pradesh
Email: hello@aic-aartech.in
Atal Incubation Centre
Atal Innovation Mission
Indian Incubator
Niti Ayog
Previous Weekly Funding Roundup: Indian startups raised $319.20M
Next Apply and get funds from Winter 2019 Cohort Accelerator program
Startups Accelerators vs. Incubators: where to sign up – 2startups Storyteller says:
[…] The government of India had established 28 Atal Incubation Centres in different geographical areas and each one provides sector-specific technology and expert support to boost the startups initiatives in India. Many private bodies and VC funds build their own focused area incubator centers in India. […]
Startups India Success Top 7 Factors – 2startups says:
[…] Atal Innovation Mission (AIM) is a Government of India's flagship initiative to promote a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship in the country. […]


Sir I would like to inform you that govt employees are illegally renting out their flats to people.Even the union houses are also being rented house which are not allowed for staying. These people staying on rent do lot of drinking and noise. Please take corrective action.


You're looking for the perfect wedding venue. It must be memorable, romantic, versatile and yet still affordable. You've searched but can't seem to find the perfect fit, the one that gives you butterflies, that special wedding venue you just know is right for you.
Imagine how it would feel to find the perfect place. A wedding venue with miles of sandy beaches, close to world-class golf courses, set on a perfectly manicured estate complete with cottages for you and your guests and a 15th-century Gothic church for your wedding ceremony. While you're here there are woodland walks to discover, historic towns to visit and plenty of wildlife to spot.
They have a highly experienced in-house team who can guide you through the whole process from planning your wedding day to planning the menu, and everything in between. They also offer an extensive list of handpicked suppliers, like Narcissus, Jonathon Fowler Photography, Liggy's Cakes or even your very own makeup artist. And don't forget the abundance of fresh seasonal food straight from East Lothian's larder.
Call now and ask about our Spring 2016 Wedding Offer for just £9,000.


Just a short, level stroll to Highlands' Main Street with its shopping and restaurants, this R-2 zoned property is quietly tucked away from the hustle and bustle. It is one house down from Harris Lake -- enjoy fishing or feeding the ducks! -- and just a short walk to the Nature Center, Botanical Gardens and the gorgeous view from Sunset Rock. You can't beat the location! If you prefer to stay home and enjoy the private backyard, summer afternoons and evenings on the screen porch are perfect. In cooler months, sitting in front of the wood burning fireplace is the perfect place to be With both a den and a living room, this cozy three-bedroom home gives a family room to spread out. Garage is a plus on rainy days!