Do you need How To Measure For Bifold Closet Doors recommendations which you can fill out an application to your dwelling? In that case this approach How To Measure For Bifold Closet Doors graphic stock will be your own answer. You will be given many designs choice with How To Measure For Bifold Closet Doors pic collection that you can reproduce. If you would like to generate a dwelling by means of harmonious circumstances, it is possible to use your brands of How To Measure For Bifold Closet Doors image collection you want. How To Measure For Bifold Closet Doors graphic collection will allow you to set up most of the fittings on your property to aid your private majority or simply have a people. Your comforting believe that supplies by the home impressed simply by How To Measure For Bifold Closet Doors pic gallery to help get their most effective peace. Just by mastering How To Measure For Bifold Closet Doors photo stock, you can actually transform your own usual home within the tranquil set of which most people needs. This particular How To Measure For Bifold Closet Doors photograph gallery is incredibly preferred method of obtaining recommendations because the device simply affords the perfect patterns. In addition to by applying this designs because of How To Measure For Bifold Closet Doors pic stock to your house, you can expect to have the feeling to be in a very dwelling this manufactured by skilled brands. As a result, How To Measure For Bifold Closet Doors picture gallery is the encouraged method of obtaining creative ideas for you.
But not only awesome types, the following How To Measure For Bifold Closet Doors snapshot gallery will provide graphics by using high quality. That How To Measure For Bifold Closet Doors picture collection for a useful resource if you would like obtain a property which includes a magnificent check. Many details of which mentioned by How To Measure For Bifold Closet Doors photo collection can be useful guidelines to decorate your private lackluster property. Although How To Measure For Bifold Closet Doors snapshot collection allow ideas with How To Measure For Bifold Closet Doors using a uncomplicated style and design, you can actually nonetheless get the stylish appear which your home a lot more inviting. There is no mistrust if perhaps How To Measure For Bifold Closet Doors picture gallery is mostly a fantastic supply of ideas since it can provide attractive variations in addition to hd graphics. You can copy your fashion or even get each and every photo within How To Measure For Bifold Closet Doors photo collection with no stressing about something. Satisfy appreciate your private query inside How To Measure For Bifold Closet Doors picture collection. We really hope you can discover the trend which you want in this How To Measure For Bifold Closet Doors image stock.
Superbe Measuring For A Bifold Door .
Charmant Bifold Doors Will Be Prefit For Standard Sized Openings. The Right Size Door For You Is The One With The Whole Number Measurements Closest (but Not Larger ... .
Beau Pictures Of Bifold Doors Measurements .
Delicieux 48 X 80 Exterior French Doors » Buy Bifold Closet Doors Rough Opening Size Garage Door .
Merveilleux Exquisite Bifold Closet Doors Custom Size | Custom Size Bifold Closet Doors .
Beau Man Measuring The Closet Opening .
Genial 23.5 In. X 80 In. Design Tech Glass Decorative 1/2 Lite .
Exceptionnel How To Measure For Bifold Doors | EHow .
Merveilleux How To Measure Bi Fold Doors HD Supply Facilities Maintenance .
Attrayant 24 In. X 80 In. Glass Over Panel Victorian 1/2 Lite .
Merveilleux Fresh Custom Bifold Closet Doors Home Depot In Bifol 11442 Throughout Designs 19 .
Superieur Custom Size Bifold Closet Doors Fresh Hang Mirrors On Your Bifold Closet Doors .
Etonnant Fun Bifold Closet Doors .
Modern Bi Fold Doors Interior Bifold Closet Doors Kitchen Bifold Closet Doors Opening Size .
Download Classic U2013 Bi Fold | Rough Opening Image .
Bifold Closet Door Hardware Installation For Wow Remodel Ideas 45 With Bifold Closet Door Hardware Installation .
Good Glass Closet Doors Home Depot Gallery Doors Design Modern | Home Depot Closet Doors .
Bifold Closet Door Custom Size Doors For Bedroom Ideas Of Modern House Fresh Hinges Oil Rubbed . Bifold Closet Door ... .
Bifold Closet Door Measurements U2022 Door Ideas Regarding Admirable Bifold Closet Doors Sizes Applied To Your .
Bifold Closet Doors Sizes Closet Doors Full Size Of Closet Doors Plus Closet Doors With Home . Bifold Closet Doors ... .
Custom Bifold Closet Door Medium Size Of Custom Closet Doors Decorations Wondrous Doors For Inspiring Home . Custom Bifold Closet Door ... .
Dazzling Design Ideas Custom Bifold Closet Doors With Glass Size .
Inspiring Bifold Closet Doors Custom Size Custom Size Closet Doors Picture .
Good Interior Bifold Closet Door Idea Of Folding Wood Design For Collection Five Brown And Glass .
Bifold Closet Doors With Glass Medium Size Of Steel Closet Doors Best Bi Fold Doors Ideas . Bifold Closet Doors ... .
51] Fresh Bifold Closet Door Hinges Designs Bifold Closet Door Track Hardware Bifold Mirrored Closet .
Bifold Closet Door Hardware Unique Closet Door Hardware Edmonton Full Size Swinging .
Replacing Bifold Closet Doors How ... .
Bifold Closet Doors Sizes Custom Sized Closet Doors Custom Size Closet Doors Closet Custom Size Closet . .
Custom Size Bifold Closet Doors Closet Doors Sizes Rough Opening For Closet Doors Interesting Door Sizes .
Bifold Closet Door Hardware Installation Medium Size Of Closet Door Pulls Wall Bi Fold Doors Hardware Cabinet Room Installing Interior .
Custom Size Bifold Closet Doors Ideas .
Alternatives To Bifold Closet Doors Medium Size Of Plus Replace Metal Alternative .
How To Measure Closet Doors Mirror Measure Bifold Closet Doors Measure Sliding Closet Doors .
Closet Door Pulls Sliding Closet Door Handles Closet Door Pulls Medium Size Of Installing Sliding Closet Doors Small White Sliding Closet Door Handles ... .
Custom Size Bifold Doors Custom Size Closet Doors Custom Size Closet Doors Custom Size Sliding Closet .
Best Home Ideas: Miraculous Custom Bifold Closet Doors Of Size Jeph Info Custom Bifold Closet .
Ikea Bifold Closet Doors Mirrored Closet Doors Mirror Interior Designs Medium Size Awesome Door .
36 Inch Bifold Door Shaker Style Fir Bifold Doors Shaker Style Fir Bifold Doors Open Finish . 36 Inch Bifold Door ... .
Louvered Bifold Closet Doors Custom Size Closet Doors Medium Size Of Custom Size Closet Doors Custom .
Menards Bifold Closet Doors Medium Size Of Closet Doors Internal Single Sliding Doors Folding Closet Doors . Menards Bifold Closet Doors ... .
Bi Fold Doors Sizes Closet Door Sizes Closet Door Sizes Standard Door Sizes Medium Size Of . Bi Fold Doors ... .
Wood Bifold Closet Doors Custom Size Door Co For Closet Doors Inspirations .
Rough Opening For Bifold Closet Doors To Bi Pass Closet Doors Rough Opening Rough Opening For . Rough Opening For Bifold Closet Doors ... .
Outstanding Custom Bifold Closet Doors E5790282 Custom Bifold Closet Doors Lowes . .
Bi Fold Doors Or Sliding Doors The Pros And Cons Dwl Within Dimensions 1467 X 689 .
Image Of: Wallpaper Bifold Closet Doors .
Good Interior Bifold Closet Door Accordion Gomble Folding Center Divinity With Glass French Insert Nz Shutter .
29 96 Bifold Closet Doors Essential 96 Bifold Closet Doors Clearance Together With Victoria Bc Ideas .
Custom Bifold Closet Doors Unique In Parable Custom Size Closet Doors Bifold Closet Doors Of Custom .
Bifold Closet Doors Installation Full Size Of Knob Placement On Hollow Core Doors How To Install Knobs On Bifold Door Installation Cost .
Custom Bifold Closet Doors Awesome Custom Size Mirror Bifold Closet Doors .
Frameless Mirrored Bifold Closet Doors Mirrored Closet Doors Mirrored Wardrobe Doors Medium Size Of Mirrored Closet Doors The Best .
Closet Folding Doors Custom Size Closet Doors Bifold Closet Door Hardware Menards .
Menards Bifold Closet Doors Closet Doors Custom Closet Doors Custom Size Closet Doors Custom Closet Doors .
Solid Wood Bifold Closet Doors | Wooden Thing Wood Bifold Closet Doors Design Ideas U0026 Decors : How To Measure .
Mirrored Bifold Closet Doors Full Size Of Closet Doors Mirror Home Depot Together With Mirror Closet Mirrored Bifold Closet Doors Menards .
Custom Mirror Bifold Closet Doors Mirror Doors Custom Mirror Closet Doors In Simple Decorating Home Ideas .
Bifold Closet Doors Sizes Closet Doors Full Size Of Sliding Closet Doors For Bedrooms Custom Closet . Bifold Closet Doors ... .
Alternatives To Bifold Closet Doors Photo 1 Of 9 Attractive Inch Door Full Size Alternative .
Custom Bifold Closet Doors Full Size Of Closet Doors Together With Custom Closet Doors Custom Bifold . .


text:
Big Ben (n.)
clock-bell in the Parliament tower in London, by 1861, generally said to have been named for Sir Benjamin Hall (1802-1867), first Chief Commissioner of Works, under whose supervision the bell was cast. The name later was extended to the clock itself and its tower.
trademark name (McDonald's Corp.) of a type of large hamburger sandwich; by 1968.
Big Dipper (n.)
American English name for the seven-star asterism (known in England as the plough; see Charles's Wain) in the constellation Ursa Major, 1845; attested 1833 as simply the Dipper (sometimes Great Dipper, its companion constellation always being the Little Dipper). See dipper.
the name means "big-mouth" in Italian, from boccaccia, augmentative of bocca "mouth" (see bouche).
originally the name of the river, from the French rendering of an Algonquian name (French missionaries first penetrated the river valley in its upper reaches) meaning "big river;" compare Ojibwa mshi- "big," ziibi "river." Organized as a U.S. territory 1798; admitted as a state 1817. Related: Mississippian (by 1775; as a geological period, by 1891).
territory of northwestern Canada, named for the river, from Athabaskan, perhaps Koyukon yookkene or Lower Tanana yookuna, said to mean "big river."
surname (and later male given name), attested by c. 1200, from the common pronunciation of Michael and from Middle English michel "big" (see mickle). In the earliest records it is not always possible to tell which.
Esalen
1966 in reference to an alternative philosophy and human potential movement, from Esalen Institute in Big Sur, California, U.S., from Esselen, name of an extinct Native American people of the California coast, for which Bright gives no etymology.
late 14c., orange bright star in the constellation Bootes (also used of the whole constellation), from Latin Arcturus, from Greek Arktouros, literally "guardian of the bear" (the bright star was anciently associated with nearby Ursa Major, the "Big Dipper," which it seems to follow across the sky). For first element see arctic; second element is Greek ouros "watcher, guardian, ward" (from PIE root *wer- (3) "perceive, watch out for"). It is fourth-brightest of the fixed stars. The double nature of the great bear/wagon (see Big Dipper) has given two different names to the constellation that follows it: Arktouros "bear-ward" and Bootes "the wagoner."
Arcturus in the Bible (Job ix.9 and xxxviii.32) is a mistranslation by Jerome (continued in KJV) of Hebrew 'Ayish, which refers to what we see as the "bowl" of the Big Dipper. In Israel and Arabia, the seven stars of the Great Bear seem to have been a bier (the "bowl") followed by three mourners. In the Septuagint it was translated as Pleiada, which is equally incorrect.
dreadnought (n.)
literally (one who or that which) "fears nothing," from the verbal phrase (drede ich nawiht is attested from c. 1200); see dread (v.) + nought (n.). As a synonym for "battleship" (1916) it is from a specific ship's name. Dreadnought is mentioned as the name of a ship in the Royal Navy as early as c. 1596, but the modern generic sense is from the name of the first of a new class of British battleships, based on the "all big-gun" principle (armed with 10 big guns rather than 4 large guns and a battery of smaller ones), launched Feb. 18, 1906.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


X-Watch watches with best price guarantee!
The X-Watch is the perfect entry-level model for a Smartwatch. You can use it to measure your blood pressure and heart rate. You can also use the pedometer function to check how many steps you have taken each day. The X-Watch includes a calorie counter function so you can easily watch your calorie intake. On some X-Watches, you can even receive push notifications of all incoming messages of WhatsApp, Facebook or more.
The free app for your smartphone makes it easy to sync your watch. You can also make phone calls on most models and remotely control your phone's camera. There is a wide range of categories and models for women and men.
If you have purchased an X-Watch watch from uhrzeit.org and within 100 days see it at a cheaper price at another retailer and you send us the link to this offer, you will be refunded the difference under our low price guarantee.


text:
Q: C# dll references produce a classnotfound exception I used IKVM to convert slf4j to dll's for use in a c# program. It's throwing me an exception. (NoClassDefFoundError was unhandled org.slf4j.LoggerFactory)
The code is as follows
acceptor = new SocketAcceptor();
connectionHandler = new ConnectionHandler();
serverlistenerPort = 32156;
SocketAcceptorConfig sac = new SocketAcceptorConfig();
sac.getSessionConfig().setTcpNoDelay(false);
sac.setReuseAddress(true);
sac.setBacklog(100);

//The following line is what seems to hate me.
acceptor.bind(new InetSocketAddress(serverlistenerPort), connectionHandler, sac);

Connection Handler is a class I have that overrides IoHandler(a mina class) I have triple checked that I have all the IKVM dll's referenced, and I've searched every possible combination of terms on Google for a solution, but when all the solutions are for Java and they just need to reference .jar files. I'm certain I have all the .dll's referenced (This works as a java program using jars)

A: I had the same issue. I used this command to get the dll compiled:
ikvmc -sharedclassloader file1.jar ...... file8.jar

should be OK for what I've read, shouldn't it?
And then used this to get the dll into the global cache:
C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.0A\Bin\x64> gacutil -i "C:\ikvm-7.1.4532.2\bin\IKVM.OpenJDK.Core.dll"

and same command to put all the partial libraries needed

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Q: Problem with chaining many small DMX cables In DMX cables (used for lights), all cables are daisy-chained.
In my band we are normally on small stages, but occasionally on bigger.
To prevent buying very long cables, I wonder if it is a good idea to buy multiple 5 m (or yard) cables and just connect them together (without a DMX device in between) in case we need longer length.
I assume it is not a problem, but just wondering.
There is some 'common' used maximum of like 10-15 fixtures, but does this count the number of DMX devices or the number of 'cable connections'?

A: There's a maximum rule of 32 devices and 1800 feet (548m) of cable in a single chain, though generally people seem to aim for about half that number of devices in practice. Each connector you add in will have an impact on the maximum length because of the resistance it adds in.
I doubt that you'll have any problem with multiple extensions unless you're talking about hundreds of metres. Even so, I'd be inclined to go with longer extensions (10m or even 25m) and less of them - there will be fewer connections to fail.


It is permissible to attend a funeral of a non-Muslim parent, relative, neighbour or colleague. However, it is not permissible to attend a religious funeral ceremony where they will be praying or singing hymns for the non-Muslim. This is because it is unlawful for Muslims to pray for non-Muslims.
In the text of Bahrur Raiq it says 'And one may follow their (non-Muslim) funeral from afar (p.205 v.2). From this text it is indicating that you can attend their funeral but you should not be taking an active part in it hence, it will be best to avoid carrying a non-Muslims coffin.


text:
Framing the Global is an initiative of Indiana University Press and the Indiana University Center for the Study of Global Change, funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.
Framing a new world
Founded in 2011, Framing the Global can already boast of many remarkable accomplishments. We:
Support a working group of scholars and practitioners who generate and apply new, integrative approaches to Global Studies and write essays and books.
Sponsored an international conference in 2013 that presented and assessed the working group's findings.
Offer a program of visiting scholars/lecturers who speak at Indiana University, meet with classes, and consult with the working group.
Held a culminating conference in 2018 that explored new analytical frameworks for global studies as well as innovative pedagogy for the field.
Publish the Global Research Studies book series with Indiana University Press.
Learn more about Framing the Global
Meet our guest scholars
Visit the IU Press website
Freshed Podcast
of Hilary Kahn talking about Framing the Global
FreshEd is weekly podcast, hosted by Will Brehn, that makes simple the complex concepts found in educational research. Listen as the Framing the Global Director, Hilary Kahn, talks more about the project.
Join the global dialogue on social media
Tweets by FramingGlobal
https://www.facebook.com/FramingGlobal/


text:
Luk — (ukr./ros. – Lюk) to ukraińska grupa muzyczna, która powstała wiosną 1999 roku. Wykonuje muzykę zainspirowaną hip hopem, acid-jazzem i funkiem i muzyką elektroniczną.

Skład
 Оlha Herasymowa (wokal)
 Ołeh Serdiuk (instrumenty klawiszowe)
 Serhij Belmas (bas)
 Wałentyn Paniuta (gitara)
 Ołeksandr Kratinow (bębny)

Dyskografia
 «Tourist zone» 2002 r.
 «Lemon» 2004 r.
 «Sex» 2005 r.
 «Мамина Юность» 2009 r.

Ukraińskie zespoły hip-hopowe
Zespoły acid-jazzowe

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Q: Convert multitype series containing rows of hex to ascii I have a Dataframe like below:
  type     value
  hex      "6d,79,20,6e,61,6d,65,20,69,73,20,6a,6f,68,6e,0a"
  name     john
  dynamic  12
  action   encroach
  hex_2    "4d,69,6e,65,20,69,73,20,73,61,75,6c,2c,20,6e,69,63,65,20,74,6f,20,6d,65,65,74,20,79,6f,75,2e,20"
  hex      "4d,79,20,6e,61,6d,65,20,69,73,20,4d,61,74,74"
  name     Matt
  dynamic  91
  action   penalty
  hex_2   "49,20,61,6d,20,61,6e,20,65,6e,63,6f,64,65,64,20,6d,65,73,73,61,67,65,20,74,68,61,74,20,49,20,68,61,76,65,20,74,6f,20,6b,65,65,70,20,69,6e,74,65,72,6e,61,6c,20,74,6f,20,6d,79,20,6f,72,67,61,6e,69,7a,61,74,69,6f,6e,2e,20"

How can I conditionally reformat the hex and hex_2 to ascii?
Current code is as follows to convert hex to ascii with function call:
def ascii_convert(char):
    value = int(char, 16)
    if 32 <= value < 128:
        return chr(value)
    else:
        return char

Current Failed attempt at converting:
print(df[df['type'].str.contains('hex|hex_2').apply(lambda x: ascii_convert(x)))

Expected Output:
  type     value
  hex      my name is john      # converted
  name     john                 # Untouched
  dynamic  12                   # Untouched
  action   encroach             # Untouched
  hex_2    Mine is saul, nice to meet you.  # converted
  hex      My name is Matt      # converted
  name     Matt                 # Untouched
  dynamic  91                   # Untouched
  action   penalty              # Untouched
  hex_2    I am an encoded message that I have to keep internal to my organization.   # converted

I know the conversion function works for the characters but am having trouble using the function within my specific criteria. My data type labels can have 5 or six different labels I would like to convert from hex to ascii such as the hex and hex_2.
Any help would be amazing. thank you.

A: The attempt is failing because with str.contains('hex|hex_2') you're trying to match the exact string 'hex|hex_2'. but no columns exist with that name.
Instead, since you confirmed that all the columns you want to convert have the string 'hex' in the name this should do.
 data["value"] = df.apply(lambda x: convert_ascii(x["value"]) \
 if 'hex' in x["type"] else x["value"], axis=1)

This selects the values of rows with 'hex' in type column and converts them, leaving the others columns untouched
here is an example:
  one  two labels
0  70  1      o
1  67  0      b
2  57  1      o
3  64  1      b
4  74  0      o
5  65  1      b
6  56  1      o
7  59  1      b
8  60  1      o
9  63  0      b

apply function and update the labels column:
data["type"] = data.apply(lambda x: x["labels"] *4 \
               if x["one"] >= 60 else x["labels"], axis=1)

   one  two labels
0   70    1   oooo
1   67    0   bbbb
2   57    1      o
3   64    1   bbbb
4   74    0   oooo
5   65    1   bbbb
6   56    1      o
7   59    1      b
8   60    1   oooo
9   63    0   bbbb

A: Had some error handling and issues with the data. This ending up assiting with the removal of the null bytes and error handling from all my files if they didnt contain the proper data requirements.
def fn(foo):
    if "NONE" in foo:
        return foo
    else:
        try:
            x = foo.replace(' ', '')
            x = foo.replace('00', '')
            return "".join(binascii.unhexlify(x).decode())
        except:
            binascii.Error

df['Value'] = df['Value'].str.split(',')
df['Value'] = df[df['Type'].str.contains('hex')]['Value'].apply(lambda x: fn("".join(x)))


text:
Certified Old Guy
Charles P Pierce's Shorter Bòn Móts
Charles P Pierce's Longer Bòn Móts
Charles P. Pierce Bio
T.R. Pearson
Miss Pettigrew's Funeral by T.R. Pearson
T.R. Pearson bio
Clapton's Layla in videos from 1970 to 2011
Sir Thomas Browne: Urns, Fame, and Mortality
Sir Thomas Browne with his wife Lady Dorothy Browne
Sir Thomas Browne (1605-1682) was a medical doctor and writer who lived most of his life in Norwich, England. Despite his heavy case load, he became one of England's most famous authors of the seventeenth century. He influenced many later writers, among them Samuel Johnson, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Edgar Allan Poe, Virginia Woolf, Stephen Jay Gould, and Jorge Luis Borges.
Browne coined over 100 words that have become standard English vocabulary, including 'ambidextrous', 'analogous', 'approximate, 'ascetic', 'anomalous', 'carnivorous', 'coexistence' 'coma', 'compensate', 'computer', 'cryptography', 'cylindrical', 'disruption', 'electricity', 'exhaustion', 'ferocious', 'follicle', 'generator', 'gymnastic', 'herbaceous', 'insecurity', 'indigenous', 'jocularity', 'literary', 'locomotion', 'medical', 'migrant', 'mucous', 'prairie', 'prostate', 'polarity', 'precocious', 'pubescent', 'therapeutic', 'suicide', 'ulterior', 'ultimate' and 'veterinarian'.
Thomas Browne's Hydriotaphia, Urn Buriall, or a Discourse of the Sepulchral Urns lately found in Norfolk was published in 1658. It is an account of Roman burial urns found around 1650. He gives a detailed description of them, along with a brief account of burial customs through the ages.
However, the most famous part of this work – and one of the best-known of any of his many works – is the fifth chapter, where he muses on death, fame, and the human struggle against mortality. In all, it is an extended funerary meditation tinged with melancholia.
Following are my favorite quotations from the work (spelling has not been modernized):
…they fell by long and aged decay, yet wrapt up in the bundle of time
If we begin to die when we live, and long life be but a prolongation of death; our life is a sad composition; We live with death, and die not in a moment.
…the long habit of living indisposeth us for dying
But the most tedious being is that which can unwish it self, content to be nothing, or never to have been
Had they [those buried in the urns] made as good provision for their names, as they have done for their Reliques, they had not so grosly erred in the art of perpetuation. But to subsist in bones, and be but Pyramidally extant, is a fallacy in duration. Vain ashes, which in the oblivion of names, persons, times, and sexes, have found unto themselves, a fruitlesse continuation, and only arise unto late posterity, as Emblemes of mortall vanities; Antidotes against pride, vain-glory, and madding vices.
…which maketh Pyramids pillars of snow, and all that's past a moment.
Generations passe while some trees stand, and old Families last not three Oaks.
Oblivion is not to be hired: The greater part must be content to be as though they had not been, to be found in the Register of God, not in the record of man.
The night of time far surpasseth the day, and who knows when was the Æquinox? Every houre addes unto that current Arithmetique, which scarce stands one moment. …Since our longest Sunne sets at right descensions, and makes but winter arches, and therefore it cannot be long before we lie down in darknesse, and have our light in ashes.
Darknesse and light divide the course of time, and oblivion shares with memory, a great part even of our living beings; we slightly remember our felicities, and the smartest stroaks of affliction leave but short smart upon us. Sense endureth no extremities, and sorrows destroy us or themselves. To weep into stones are fables.
To be ignorant of evils to come, and forgetfull of evils past, is a mercifull provision in nature, whereby we digest the mixture of our few and evil dayes, and our delivered senses not relapsing into cutting remembrances, our sorrows are not kept raw by the edge of repetitions.
Others rather than be lost in the uncomfortable night of nothing, were content to recede into the common being, and make one particle of the publick soul of all things, which was no more then to return into their unknown and divine Originall again.
…all was vanity, feeding the winde
…man is a Noble Animal, splendid in ashes, and pompous in the grave, solemnizing Nativities and Deaths with equall lustre, nor omitting Ceremonies of bravery, in the infamy of his nature.
Life is a pure flame, and we live by an invisible Sun within us. A small fire sufficeth for life
To live indeed is to be again our selves, which being not only an hope buy and evidence in noble beleevers
Sir Thomas Browne's Hydreiotaphia is available online in the original printed version with all the s's printed as f's.
If that is too much for you, a modern print version can be found here.
Tagged as: Fame, Mortality, Sir Thomas Browne
Next post: You Speak Old English
Previous post: Kennedy's "Report to the American People on Civil Rights": Fifty Years Ago Today
You Speak Old English
Kennedy's "Report to the American People on Civil Rights": Fifty Years Ago Today
Attention and Generosity
Thinking in Words, Thinking in Pictures
Conundrum
Rusty Tracks – James Hayes Nichols' literary site. Poems and short prose in a variety of forms. Well worth your time!
William Throckmorton's is an academic psychologist with interests in worldwide public health and American History. Very interesting.
Copyright © 2013 by Michael L Nichols. All rights reserved.
Designed and developed by Mike Nichols using the Thesis WordPress Theme


text:
Amazon | iTunes
» Online Since: October 31, 2014
» Theme Version: Version 8: Judgment Day (Past Themes)
» Webmaster: Devin & David
» Webmiss: Kat
» Site Name: FinnBalor.com
» Hosted by: FansiteHost
» Contact Us: Email | Twitter
» Best Viewed In: Google Chrome
» Designed & Coded by: MauuZeta.Com
Follow @FinnBalorCOM
FinnBalor.com is an unofficial non-profit fansite dedicated to Fergal Devitt, known as Finn Bálor in WWE. We are no way affiliated with World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) or any other companies/organizations he has worked with. All of the HTML coding is property of this site. Fair Use Copyright Law 107. All logos and trademarks are copyrighted to their respectful owners. All photos, videos, media is sole property of their respective owners. All logos and trademarks are copyrighted to their respectful owners unless stated otherwise. FinnBalor.com is just a fansite showing support for Fergal Devitt.
Site is powered by WordPress & proudly hosted by FansiteHost.com
Visit the WWE Experience at the 2016 Arnold Sports Festival
Devin (0) Comments WWE.com
For action and entertainment, there's no better spot than the WWE Experience at this year's Arnold Sports Festival in Columbus, Ohio, taking place Saturday, March 5, and Sunday, March 6.
Enjoy live matches and meet-and-greets with the Superstars of WWE NXT during autograph signings, as well as guest appearances, Q&A sessions, giveaways and more.
Plus, you can see what it takes to become a WWE Superstar when you watch a live tryout. Will any of these recruits become the next breakout Superstar?
Better yet — will you? If you're serious about a future in sports-entertainment, stop by the WWE Experience recruiting booth.
The WWE Experience at the 2016 Arnold Sports Festival in takes place on Saturday, March 5, from 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., and Sunday, March 6, from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Check out the full schedule of events below:
*Schedule and talent are subject to change.
AUTOGRAPH SESSIONS
9:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
Asuka & Samoa Joe
Sami Zayn & Cesaro
11:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
King Konstantine & Tino Sabatelli
12:00 p.m. – 1:00 p.m.
Kishan Raftar & Dylan Miley
Eva Marie & Apollo Crews
Mandy Rose & Emma
Finn Bálor & Bayley
Alexa Bliss & The Vaudevillains
12:00 p.m. – 12:30 p.m
WWE TRYOUTS
11:00 a.m. –12:00 p.m.
Cesaro & Nia Jax
Baron Corbin & Tye Dillinger
Finn Bálor & American Alpha
Sami Zayn & Eva Marie
Johnny Gargano &Tommaso Ciampa / Apollo Crews
The Revival & Bayley
Other NXT Superstars appearing include at the WWE Experience include Billie Kay, Dan Matha, Peyton Royce, Riddick Moss, and Tom Kingdon.
Tickets for the 2016 Arnold Sports Festival are available now at Ticketmaster.com/Arnold. Get yours today so you don't miss out on the WWE Experience!
Click here to get Arnold Sports Festival tickets
Please note Superstar appearances are subject to change, check back soon for a full schedule of events.
A daily expo ticket is required for admission. One autograph per person. Autographs are first come, first served. Admission into the event does not guarantee an autograph. No posed photo opportunities are permitted.
FINNBALOR.COM 2022 HOSTED BY Fansite Host DESIGNED & CODED BY MAUUZETA.COM Powered By Wordpress


text:
using Newtonsoft.Json;
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;

namespace KGP.Serialization.Body
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Simple json serializer for body data
    /// </summary>
    public static class JsonSerializer
    {
        /// <summary>
        /// Converts a list of kinect body to Json format
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="bodies">Body list to serialize</param>
        /// <param name="formatting">Json formatting options</param>
        /// <returns>Json string</returns>
        public static string ToJson(IEnumerable<KinectBody> bodies, Formatting formatting = Formatting.Indented)
        {
            KinectBodyInternal[] data = bodies.Select(body => KinectBodyConverter.Convert(body)).ToArray();

            return JsonConvert.SerializeObject(data, formatting);
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Converts back a kinect body enumeration from a json string
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="json">Json string</param>
        /// <returns>Kinect body enumeration</returns>
        public static IEnumerable<KinectBody> FromJson(string json)
        {
            KinectBodyInternal[] data = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<KinectBodyInternal[]>(json);

            return data.Select(kbi => new KinectBody(kbi));
        }
    }
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


text:
Ex Parte Goodbread
Ex Parte Infante
This distinction is critical because the Double Jeopardy Clause acts to prevent prosecution only for an…
Ex parte Castillo
"For double jeopardy purposes, the same offense means the identical criminal act, not the same offense by…
Full title:Ex Parte Walter Alvin GOODBREAD, Sr
Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En banc
Date published: Mar 25, 1998
967 S.W.2d 859 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998)
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En banc
holding that 15 separate sexual offenses committed between June 10, 1990 and April 1, 1994 were not one offense
Summary of this case from Hunt v. State
No. 1466-95
Appeal from the 337th District Court, Harris County, Jim L. Barr, J.
Tim Moran, Houston, for appellant.
Keli Pool Roper, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for State.
Before the court en banc.
OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
KELLER, Judge, delivered the opinion of the Court, in which McCORMICK, Presiding Judge, PRICE, HOLLAND, and WOMACK, Judges, joined.
The case at bar presents a double jeopardy issue. The State filed an initial indictment that alleged that appellant committed certain acts of unlawful sexual conduct "on or about" June 1, 1991. Under our precedent, "on or about" means within the statute of limitations and before the return of the indictment. See Sledge v. State, 953 S.W.2d 253 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997). At trial, the State offered the complainant's testimony concerning conduct occurring in June of 1991. Later, the State offered outcry witness testimony for an outcry occurring in April of 1991 — before the conduct to which the complainant had testified. The cause was subsequently dismissed on the State's motion. The State then obtained thirteen new indictments, with offense dates ranging from June 10, 1990 to April 1, 1994. Some of the new indictments describe offenses supported by language in the initial indictment, i.e. the same statutory offense, the same type of conduct, and dates within the statute of limitations. The question is whether prosecution upon the initial indictment creates a double jeopardy bar to prosecution upon the subsequent indictments merely because the subsequent indictments would support convictions for offenses that would also have been supported under the language of the initial indictment. We answer that question "no."
This was actually the second trial on the initial indictment. The first trial ended in a mistrial on appellant's motion and is, therefore, of no moment in our consideration of appellant's double jeopardy claim. See Oregon v. Kennedy, 456 U.S. 667, 676 102 S.Ct. 2083, 2089-90, 72 L.Ed.2d 416(1982) (a defendant's motion for mistrial constitutes a deliberate election on his part to forgo his valued right to have his guilt or innocence determined before the first trier of fact).
For Double Jeopardy purposes, "[t]he same offense means the identical criminal act, not the same offense by name." Luna v. State, 493 S.W.2d 854 (Tex.Crim.App. 1973). In Luna, we held that, when one cannot determine from the State's pleadings whether the offenses prosecuted are the same, the court must look to the proof offered at trial. Id. at 855. Luna involved prosecutions for sale of heroin. Id. The defendant in that case made two separate sales of heroin three months apart to the same individual. Id. He was tried for one of the sales and convicted. The State later prosecuted him for the other sale, and the defendant attempted to plead the prior conviction as a jeopardy bar to the second prosecution. Id. We rejected that contention despite the fact that the second offense could have been prosecuted under the first indictment:
The fact that the indictment in the first case would support a conviction for the sale of heroin in the present case, because both were within the statute of limitations of three years, does not prevent the prosecution in the instant case. The controlling factor is the proof that they were different offenses.
While Luna contemplated a single offense per indictment, we have also recognized the State's ability to place a defendant in jeopardy for multiple offenses by failing to elect after presenting proof of multiple instances of conduct that conform to the indictment:
If evidence of more than one offense is admitted and a conviction for either could be had under the indictment, and neither the State nor the court elects, a plea of former conviction is good upon a prosecution based upon one of said offenses, it being uncertain for which one the conviction was had.
Walker v. State, 473 S.W.2d 499, 500 (Tex.Crim.App. 1971). But, as Walker provides, Double Jeopardy bars only offenses for which proof was offered at trial.
Hence, under Luna and Walker, trial upon an indictment does not bar every offense that could be prosecuted under its language; instead, trial upon the indictment bars prosecution only for offenses for which proof was offered at trial. And even for the latter category, the State or the trial court can exclude an instance of conduct from the jeopardy bar through an election.
An "election" would generally be some action that excludes or limits the jury's consideration of an offense: for example, by instructing the jury to disregard the evidence or by limiting the purpose for which the evidence is offered.
When an indictment permits the State to obtain only one conviction, a defendant is not placed in jeopardy for more than one criminal act unless the State offers multiple instances of conduct in support of the indictment. Every instance of sexual assault is a separate crime and may be prosecuted in separate trials. Vernon v. State, 841 S.W.2d 407, 410 (Tex.Crim.App. 1992). Hence, in this case the Double Jeopardy bar applies only to the two instances of conduct offered by the State at trial: the conduct brought out in the complainant's testimony and the conduct brought out in the testimony of the outcry witness. There is no evidence in the record that the State will rely upon either of those instances of conduct in its prosecution upon the new indictments. See U.S. v. Register, 931 F.2d 308, 312 (5th Cir. 1991) (burden is on the defendant to establish the commonality of the offenses).
The State contends that only the offense in the complainant's testimony is barred. But the offense in the outcry testimony is also barred because the State failed to elect before obtaining a dismissal of the prosecution.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
OVERSTREET, J., dissents.
MANSFIELD, J., concurs in the result.
MEYERS, Judge, concurring.
The prevailing legal principle to be remembered in this context is that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not prohibit
. . . successive prosecutions or multiple punishments for repeated discrete violations of the same penal statute. Rather it prohibits successive prosecutions or multiple punishments for conduct which necessarily violates a penal statute only once or, presumably, for conduct which necessarily violates more than one penal statute at a time.
State v. Houth, 845 S.W.2d 853, 870-71 (Tex.Crim.App. 1992) (Benevides, J., concurring). This case involves "successive prosecutions . . . for repeated discreet violations of the same penal statute." The problem is, how can we ascertain that the separately alleged offenses are distinct from one another, given that the face of the subsequent indictments would support the same convictions that would also have been supported under the initial indictment. See Ex parte Coleman, 940 S.W.2d 96 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996).
For this reason, Judge Baird's analysis fails. Under his view of things, jeopardy would ultimately bar prosecution for a defendant's repeated but like offenses against the same victim, all occurring during the same statutory period. This is surely wrong.
The majority says we do so by looking to the proof offered at trial:
. . . trial upon an indictment does not bar every offense that could be prosecuted under its language; instead, trial upon the indictment bars prosecution only for offenses for which proof was offered at trial. And even for the latter category, the State or the trial court can exclude an instance of conduct from the jeopardy bar through an election.
Majority opinion at 860-61. But if we have to look to the proof at trial to determine what is jeopardy barred, then to what has jeopardy "attached" before proof is offered? After all, we know jeopardy attaches in a jury trial the moment the jury is empaneled and sworn. E.g., Crist v. Bretz, 437 U.S. 28 98 S.Ct. 2156, 57 L.Ed.2d 24 (1978); Ortiz v. State, 933 S.W.2d 102 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). Is the majority suggesting jeopardy does not attach until proof is offered? Certainly not, but we are not enlightened in this regard.
In my view, jeopardy most likely attaches to the indictment and all that can be known for certain from its face at the point at which the jury is empaneled and sworn. For instance, jeopardy attaches to the elements and factual matters pled in the indictment, but not to any specific date, since the State is not bound to prove the date alleged. See Sledge v. State, 953 S.W.2d 253, 256 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997). As trial proceeds, jeopardy attaches more specifically to those offenses that otherwise fit the indictment and for which proof is offered. Jeopardy may be further narrowed (or un-attached) by the State's election of a particular offense on which it will rely for conviction.
It might be more precisely stated that jeopardy had already attached in a broad sense, but the specific incident to which it attached becomes more clear upon proof at trial.
In other words, jeopardy "un-attaches" to those offenses which would otherwise fall within the terms of the indictment, but are designated as extraneous. It remains attached to the offense the State "elects" as the one upon which it will seek a conviction. The notion that jeopardy may attach and un-attach is not novel. The "un-attaching" of jeopardy should, however, remain largely within the control of the defendant except in extraordinary circumstances. Cf Brown v. State, 907 S.W.2d 835 (Tex.Crim.App. 1995) (jeopardy does not bar retrial when defendant essentially waives it by requesting mistrial or when there is manifest necessity). For this reason, it would seem that election should be a right to be asserted only by the defendant. In other words, the State can be forced to elect, and thus un-attach jeopardy, only upon objection (to evidence as extraneous) and/or request (for election) by the defendant. Cf Proctor v. State, 841 S.W.2d 1 (Tex.Crim.App. 1992) (criminal charge abandoned or dismissed on prosecution's motion after jeopardy attaches may not be retried); Ex parte Preston, 833 S.W.2d 515, 517 (Tex.Crim.App. 1992) (if State dismisses, waives, or abandons portion of indictment after jeopardy attaches, State is barred from later relitigating those allegations).
While I believe this explanation to be reasonable and logical, I fear I may be overlooking a tidier resolution of this problem. If there is one, however, the majority does not point to it.
I have previously suggested that jeopardy may attach to anything conceivably, but not certainly, within the terms of the indictment, but I now conclude this view is overly broad. See Proctor and Lemell, at 3-4 (Meyers, J., concurring) (suggesting that indictment alleging "on or about" places defendant in jeopardy for any such alleged offense within applicable statutory period).
Otherwise agreeing jeopardy attached in the instant case to the two instances of conduct offered by the State at the previous trial, and in the absence of evidence that those instances will be prosecuted under the new indictments, I concur in affirming the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
The Court of Appeals held the thirteen new indictments were not jeopardy barred "because they each refer to a separate occurrence and not to the occurrence made the subject of the dismissed trial." This conclusion is premature. It cannot be ascertained from the faces of the thirteen new indictments what specific occurrences are referred to. For this reason, appellant fails to prove a jeopardy bar. The majority does not mention the Court of Appeals' opinion, other than to say its judgment is "affirmed."
BAIRD, Judge, concurring and dissenting.
In this case, applicant seeks to have 13 indictments, all of which charge him with the offense of aggravated sexual assault, dismissed on jeopardy grounds. While I agree that the alleged sexual assaults by digital penetration are not jeopardy barred, I do believe the alleged sexual assaults by intercourse or oral sex are jeopardy barred. Therefore, I concur in part and dissent in part to the judgment of the Court.
I. The Facts
On January 27, 1995, appellant was indicted in a two-paragraph indictment for the offense of aggravated sexual assault in Cause No. 685297. The first paragraph alleged an unlawful act of sexual intercourse "on or about June 1, 1991." The second paragraph alleged an unlawful act of oral sex "on or about June 1, 1991."
The indictment also contained a third paragraph which was identical to the second paragraph.
Cause No. 685297 was then called for trial. The complainant testified that sometime in June of 1991, appellant committed the acts alleged in each paragraph of the indictment. However, the cause was dismissed on the State's motion when an outcry witness testified the outcry occurred several months before the acts the complainant testified to.
This was actually the second trial on Cause No. 685297. At the first trial, the complainant testified that on an unspecified date in June of 1991, the events alleged in the second paragraph of the indictment (oral sex) occurred. She did not, however, testify to the events alleged in the first paragraph (sexual intercourse). This trial ended in a mistrial on appellant's motion. Therefore, this first trial is of no moment in our consideration of appellant's double jeopardy claim. See, Oregon v. Kennedy, 456 U.S. 667, 676, 102 S.Ct. 2083, 2089 72 L.Ed.2d 416 (1982) (a defendant's motion for mistrial constitutes a deliberate election on his part to forego his valued right to have his guilty or innocence determined before the first trier of fact).
The Grand Jury then returned 13 "new" indictments against appellant alleging 13 acts of aggravated sexual assault, each alleging a date other than June 1, 1991, which was the date in the original indictment returned in Cause No. 685297. These indictments are as follows:
1. No. 688972 is a three-paragraph indictment alleging appellant committed the acts of oral sex, sexual intercourse, and digital penetration "on or about April 1, 1994".
Digital penetration is the penetration of the female sexual organ with a finger.
2. No. 688968 is a one-paragraph indictment alleging appellant committed the act of oral sex "on or about April 25, 1993".
3. No. 688967 is a three-paragraph indictment alleging appellant committed the acts of oral sex, sexual penetration, and digital penetration "on or about December 1, 1993".
4. No. 688966 is a three-paragraph indictment alleging appellant committed the acts of oral sex, sexual intercourse, and digital penetration "on or about December 1, 1992".
5. No. 688964 is a three-paragraph indictment which alleges the appellant committed the acts of oral sex, sexual intercourse, and digital penetration "on or about June 1, 1992".
8. No. 688957 is a two-paragraph indictment alleging appellant committed the acts of oral sex and digital penetration "on or about June 1, 1990".
9. No. 688956 is a one-paragraph indictment alleging appellant committed the act of oral sex "on or about September 1, 1990".
10. No. 688955 is a one-paragraph indictment alleging appellant committed the act of oral sex "on or about July 15, 1990".
11. No. 689227 is a three-paragraph indictment alleging appellant committed the acts of sexual intercourse, oral sex, and digital penetration "on or about July 5, 1991".
12. No. 689226 is a three paragraph indictment alleging appellant committed the acts of sexual intercourse, oral sex, and digital penetration "on or about July 1, 1991".
13. No. 689225 is a three-paragraph indictment alleging appellant committed the acts of sexual intercourse, oral sex, and digital penetration "on or about June 10, 1990".
Appellant then filed a pretrial application for a writ of habeas corpus contending the "new" prosecutions were jeopardy barred. The trial judge denied habeas relief and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Goodbread v. State, 912 S.W.2d 336 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1995). They reasoned that since the State only presented evidence of one criminal episode at the second trial, only that episode was jeopardy barred by the dismissal of Cause No. 685297. Therefore, the 13 "new" indictments were not jeopardy barred "because they each refer to a separate occurrence and not to the occurrence made the subject of the dismissed trial[.]" Id., at 339-340. Appellant's petition for discretionary review was granted to review the correctness of that decision.
II. Indictments
The first question to be answered is: What is a defendant charged with when an indictment alleges that an offense was committed "on or about" a particular date? Appellant contends that when an indictment alleges that an offense was committed "on or about" a certain date, a defendant is charged with any and all alleged offenses described in the indictment which are anterior to the presentment of that indictment and within the statutory period of limitations. I agree.
This question encompasses appellant's first and second grounds for review:
1. Whether an indictment must charge a specific act or omission which constitutes a criminal offense or whether it is sufficient if it simply alleges the elements of an offense in the abstract.
2. Whether a single indictment may serve as the charging instrument for trials involving two discrete allegations of statutory violations.
It is fundamental that an accused be tried for the offense with which he is charged and not for being a criminal generally. Owens v. State, 827 S.W.2d 911, 915 (Tex.Cr.App. 1992). Because of this, "[a]n indictment may not charge more than one offense[,]" Leal v. State, 782 S.W.2d 844, 846 (Tex.Cr.App. 1989), and the State must allege and prove a single, specific transaction. O'Neal v. State, 746 S.W.2d 769, 771 (Tex.Cr.App. 1988). However, the rule in this State has long been that an indictment need not allege, nor does the State need to prove, that the offense was committed on a specific date. See, Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 21.02(6) (Vernon 1989). Rather, the date alleged or proved only has to be anterior to the presentment of the indictment and within the period of limitations. See, Lemell v. State, 915 S.W.2d 486, 489 (Tex.Cr.App. 1995) ("the State need not prove the date alleged in the pleading so long as the proof at trial shows that the offense occurred within the applicable limitations period.") (emphasis in original); Scoggan v. State, 799 S.W.2d 679, 680, n. 3 (Tex.Cr.App. 1990) ("[t]he State is not bound by the date alleged in the indictment and may prove that an offense was committed before, on, or after [the] date alleged, so long as the date proved is a date anterior to the presentment of the indictment and the crime's occurrence is not so remote as to be barred by limitation"); Hill v. State, 544 S.W.2d 411, 413 (Tex.Cr.App. 1976) ("[t]he State is not bound by the date on or about which the offense is alleged to have been committed and a conviction may be had upon proof that the offense was committed at any time prior to the return of the indictment which is within the period of limitation."); Ellis v. State, 167 Tex.Crim. 87, 318 S.W.2d 655, 656 (1958) ("[t]he general rule is that the state is not bound by the allegation of `on or about' in an indictment as to the date of the commission of the offense, but may rely upon any date within the period of limitation.").
Most recently, we reaffirmed this long-standing rule in Sledge v. State, 953 S.W.2d 253 (Tex.Cr.App. 1997), where we held that when an indictment alleges that an offense was committed "on or about" a certain date, the State can rely upon an offense with a date other than the one specifically alleged. Id., at pg. 256. Again, the only requirements are that the date is anterior to the presentment of the indictment, within the statutory limitation period, and that the offense relied upon otherwise meets the description of the offense contained in the indictment. Id., at pp. 256-257.
Additionally, another recent decision of this Court also clearly answers this question. In Rankin v. State, 953 S.W.2d 740 (Tex.Cr.App. 1996), the defendant was charged with possession of cocaine. At trial, the State introduced evidence that a rock of crack cocaine was found in the back seat of the police car in which Rankin was transported after being arrested. Both Rankin and his wife then testified that while Rankin had possessed crack cocaine earlier in the day, he did not possess any at the time he was in the police car. Following his conviction, Rankin appealed, arguing that the jury could not find him guilty of the possession to which he admitted because it was an extraneous offense. Id., at pg. 741. We disagreed, holding that the possession to which Rankin admitted was not an extraneous offense because it was "shown in the charging papers." Id., at pg. 741. Hence, Rankin was subject to being convicted of any act or omission which constituted the offense alleged "in the charging papers." Thus, an indictment will support a conviction for any act which falls within its general description of the alleged offense, regardless of the date "on or about" it was committed.
This case is controlled by Sledge, Rankin and the long line of cases which preceded them. Therefore, because the State is not bound by the "on or about" date in an indictment, an indictment covers any and all offenses described in the indictment which are alleged to have been committed before the return of the indictment and within the limitations period. The statutory period of limitations for the offense of aggravated sexual assault is 10 years. See, Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 12.01(2)(D) and art. 12.03(d) (Vernon Supp. 1997). Thus, when an indictment, such as the one in this case, alleges an "on or about" date for the commission of the offense of aggravated sexual assault, the statutory period of limitations encompasses the ten year period prior to the presentment of the indictment.
Appellant's indictment in Cause No. 685297 was presented on January 27, 1995; thus the period of limitations for the alleged offense encompassed the ten year period prior to January 27, 1995. Therefore, in Cause No. 685297 appellant was charged with any and all of the offenses of aggravated sexual assault described in the indictment which occurred any time within that 10 year period.
III. Double Jeopardy
The second question is: What is a defendant is placed in jeopardy of when an indictment alleges that an offense was committed "on or about" a certain date? Appellant contends that because an indictment charges a defendant with any and all of the alleged offenses which occurred prior to the presentment of the indictment but within the limitations period, the defendant is therefore placed in jeopardy for any and all alleged offenses committed within that time period. I agree.
This question encompasses appellant's third ground for review:
Whether, when the trial court allows the State to place a defendant in jeopardy for any offense that can be charged by an indictment, that defendant is placed in jeopardy for all offenses that could be charged by the indictment.
(Emphasis in original.)
Both the United States and the Texas Constitutions protect an accused from a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal or conviction. See, U.S. Const. amend. V; Tex. Const. art. I, § 14; North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 717-19, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 2077 (1969); Ex parte Preston, 833 S.W.2d 515 (Tex.Cr.App. 1992). These protections are designed to prohibit the State, with all its power and resources, from repeatedly attempting to convict an individual for an offense. Proctor v. State, 841 S.W.2d 1, 3 (Tex.Cr.App. 1992). This is so because we do not wish the State to have the power to harass citizens, nor do we wish the State to gain any advantage from repeated attempts at prosecution. Id. Because of this, it has long been recognized in this State that any criminal charge dismissed by the State after jeopardy attaches may not be retried. Sanchez v. State, 845 S.W.2d 273, 276 (Tex.Cr.App. 1992). See also, Proctor v. State, supra; Ex parte Preston, 833 S.W.2d at 517; Garza v. State, 658 S.W.2d 152, 154-155 (Tex.Cr.App. 1982); McElwee v. State, 589 S.W.2d 455, 460 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979); Ex parte Scelles, 511 S.W.2d 300, 301 (Tex.Cr.App. 1974).
In this case the indictment in Cause No. 685297 alleged an unlawful act of sexual intercourse and an unlawful act of oral sex "on or about June 1, 1991." Under the previous discussion, therefore, the indictment charged appellant with any and all of the alleged offenses described in the indictment which occurred any time between January 25, 1995 (the date the indictment was returned) and January 25, 1985 (10 years from the date the indictment was returned). Therefore, when the State attempted to convict appellant for the offense of aggravated sexual assault, appellant was placed in jeopardy for any offense of aggravated sexual assault committed by either sexual intercourse or oral sex which occurred within that time period. Thus, I would hold the State is barred from further re-litigating the issue of whether appellant committed an unlawful act of sexual intercourse or an unlawful act of oral sex with the complainant in the period between January 27, 1985, and January 27, 1995.
IV. "New" Offenses
However, this does not end the inquiry. As noted in part I of this opinion, nine of the thirteen "new" indictments allege appellant committed the offense of aggravated sexual assault by digital penetration. These acts of digital penetration were not alleged in the original indictment in Cause No. 685297. Therefore, it must be determined whether the State will be permitted to prosecute appellant for the alleged offenses of digital penetration.
The first step in this analysis is to decide whether appellant should be prosecuted for the "same offense" if the State is allowed to proceed with the prosecution of appellant for the alleged acts of aggravated sexual assault by digital penetration. United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S. 688, 696, 113 S.Ct. 2849, 2855-2856 125 L.Ed.2d 556 (1993). The inquiry begins with the elements contained in the charging instruments, rather than the penal provisions. State v. Perez, 947 S.W.2d 268, 270-271 (Tex.Cr.App. 1997). Examination of the indictment in Cause No. 685297 and the nine "new" indictments which charge appellant with the offense of aggravated sexual assault by digital penetration reveal appellant has not been charged with the "same offense."
These indictments are Nos. 688972, 688967, 688966, 688964, 688963, 689227, 689226 and 689225.
The indictment in Cause No. 685297 alleged appellant penetrated the female sexual organ of the complainant with his own sexual organ (sexual intercourse) and appellant caused the female sexual organ of the complainant to contact the appellant's mouth (oral sex). However, the nine "new" allegations of digital penetration require the State to prove that appellant penetrated the female sexual organ of the complainant with appellant's finger (digital penetration). Therefore, the offenses of aggravated sexual assault by digital penetration require proof of an additional fact which is not required to prove either sexual intercourse or oral sex. Hence, those portions of the nine "new" indictments which allege appellant committed aggravated sexual assault by digital penetration are not jeopardy barred. See, Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct. 180 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932).
V. Conclusion
For these reasons, I concur in that portion of this Court's judgment which affirms the judgment of the Court of Appeals which held the alleged offenses of sexual assault by digital penetration were not jeopardy barred but I dissent to that portion of this Court's judgment which affirms the judgment of the Court of Appeals which held the alleged offenses of sexual assault by sexual intercourse and oral sex are not jeopardy barred.
Summary of this case from Villanueva v. State
affirming denial of pretrial habeas application based on double jeopardy because prosecution on initial indictment did not create double jeopardy bar to later prosecution upon new indictment
Summary of this case from Ex parte Leachman
In Goodbread, we cited as authority Vernon v. State, 841 S.W.2d 407, 410 (Tex.Crim.App. 1992), a case in which we determined that it is inaccurate to characterize a defendant's repeated acts of indecency with a child as a single continuing offense under Texas law. Goodbread, 967 S.W.2d at 861.
Summary of this case from Francis v. State
In Goodbread, we considered "whether prosecution upon the initial indictment creates a double jeopardy bar to prosecution upon the subsequent indictments [which include the same offense, same manner of commission, and dates within the same statute of limitations period] merely because the subsequent indictments would support convictions for offenses that would also have been supported under the language of the initial indictment."Goodbread, 967 S.W.2d at 860.
Summary of this case from Manrique v. State
In Ex parte Goodbread, 967 S.W.2d 859, 860 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998), the court held that, when a defendant was indicted for committing certain acts of unlawful sexual conduct on or about a specific date, the indictment did not create a double jeopardy bar to prosecution on subsequent indictments with different offense dates because they were separate offenses.
Summary of this case from Berg v. State


text:
Get Ready to Lose It Over This First Look at Season 2 of 'Bridgerton'
And yes, dear reader, it's that good.
Jaclyn Hendricks
Jaclyn Hendricks (she/her) is a sports entertainment reporter with NYPost.com and was formerly news editor for Shape where she wrote and edited daily content covering celebrities, health trends, workouts, beauty, social issues, and more. Jaclyn is from New Jersey and received her B.A. degree in sociology from Sacred Heart University in Connecticut.
Shape's editorial guidelines
First, some good news: The countdown to the second season of Bridgerton is officially underway. The bad news: You're going to have to wait until 2022 to catch new episodes of the global phenomenon, which premiered last year.
Over the weekend, however, Netflix treated Bridgerton fans to a sneak peek at the upcoming second season, which will focus on the budding romance between Anthony Bridgerton (Jonathan Bailey) and newbie Kate Sharma (Simone Ashley). And while the Duke of Hastings (Regé-Jean Page) will be missing in action this time around, based on Saturday's clip, it appears there will be no shortage of drama in the upcoming season. (
What 'Bridgerton' Gets Wrong About Sex and Why It Matters
"He's met someone who's really his match," said series star Nicola Coughlan (aka Penelope Featherington) of Anthony Bridgerton during Saturday's panel, according to Variety.
Coughlan, who has been part of the series since its 2020 debut, previously teased to Entertainment Tonight that Bridgerton's second season will be a "whole lot spicier." "When you do season 1, you don't know if you're gonna get a season 2, but we were like, 'I really hope we get a chance to tell that story because people love it so much.' And Kate is such a fiery character," said Coughlan to Entertainment Tonight at the time.
"She's like this strong, independent woman. We really wanted to get to that and the fact that we get to tell [it] is a real privilege. I think there's also the fun of a second season that you don't have to do the exposition in order to be like, 'This is the world of Bridgerton.' People get what Bridgerton is now, and it's become this phenomena, which is bonkers. But yeah, people know what they're heading into, but they are not ready," continued Coughlan.
Although it remains to be seen what Bridgerton fans will be treated to next year, the Regency-era drama will be sticking around for some time. In fact, Netflix has already renewed the series for seasons three and four. And that, dear readers, is something to celebrate.
Simone Ashley of 'Bridgerton' Tattooed Herself — Is That Safe?
Nicola Coughlan of Bridgerton Responded to Comments About Her Body
Barbie Ferreira Opened Up About the Pressure to 'Love Yourself' and the 'Backhanded Compliments' About Her Body
Zendaya Responded to D.A.R.E's Criticism of 'Euphoria'
What to Read, Watch, Listen to, and Learn from This Juneteenth
Taraji P. Henson Opened Up About Her Mental Health and Past Suicidal Thoughts
What the Netflix Series 'You' Can Teach You About Toxic Relationships
You'll Be Saying 'Yeah!' to Usher Joining Season 2 of Peloton's Dance Cardio Classes
How Morgan Simianer Has Dealt with the Wild Ride of Stardom Since 'Cheer' Premiered
The 6 Relationship Lessons You Can Learn from 'Bachelor In Paradise'
Lucy Hale Is Living Proof of the Power of Manifesting Your Future
December 2021's New Moon and Solar Eclipse Will Challenge You to Fully Embrace a New Reality
What You Can Learn from the Couples Therapy Scenes In Season 3 of 'You'
I Tried the Celebrity-Approved Face Mask Charged with Reiki Energy
What 'Love Is Blind' Can Teach You About Your Own Relationships IRL
Your November 2021 Horoscope for Health, Love, and Success


A healthy heart and a better quality of life go hand in hand. Depend on our specialists to bring deep knowledge and proven skill to every cardiovascular condition.
Treating everything from sun damage to life-threatening illnesses, our specialists provide solutions to a variety of problems related to skin, hair and nails.


-Wash & pat dry chicken pieces & set aside.
-In frying pan,add coriander seeds,button red chilies,cumin seeds,cloves,green cardamom,cinnamon stick,nutmeg,mace,kashmiri red chilies and roast until fragrant.
-In spice mixer,add roasted spices and grind to make a fine powder.
-Add onion,ginger,lukewarm water and grind to make a paste & set aside.
-In bowl,add chicken,yogurt,red chili powder,salt,turmeric powder,fried onion,ginger garlic paste,mix well & marinate for to 1 hour.
-In pot,add sufi cooking oil,prepared grinded paste,mix well and cook for 4-5 minutes.
-Now add marinated chicken,mix well and cook on high flame for 5 minutes.
-Cover and cook on low flame for 20 minutes or until tender then cook on high flame until oil separates.
-Sprinkle fresh coriander & serve!
-Chicken pieces ko dho ker pat dry ker lein & side per rakh dein.
-Frying pan mein dhania,sabut lal mirch,zeera,laung,hari elaichi,darchini,jaifil,javatri aur kashmiri lal mirch dal dein aur khushbu anay tak roast ker lein.
-Spice mixer mein roasted spices dal dein aur grind ker ka powder tayyar ker lein.
-Pyaz,adrak aur neem garam pani dal dein aur grind ker ka paste tayyar ker lein & side per rakh dein.
-Bowl mein chicken,dahi,lal mirch powder,namak,haldee powder,fried pyaz aur adrak lehsan paste dal ker ache tarhan mix karein aur 1 hour kliya marinte ker lein.
-Pot mein sufi cooking oil aur tayyar grinded mixture dal ker ache tarhan mix karein aur 4-5 minutes kliya paka lein.
-Ab marinated chicken dal ker ache tarhan mix karein aur tez ancch per 5 minutes kliya paka lein.
-Dhak dein aur halki ancch per 20 minutes ya gul janay tak paka lein phir tez ancch per oil alag hunay tak paka lein.
-Hara dhania dal ker serve karein!


text:
AG Barr plays the bagpipes at US Attorneys' National Conference
John SextonPosted at 8:41 pm on June 26, 2019
This was actually more fun than I thought it would be when I first saw this clip floating around earlier today. Attorney General Barr was on stage for the US Attorneys' National Conference. To start the proceedings the NYPD's Emerald Society Pipe Band marched out and played a song, followed by a presentation of the flag and the national anthem.
After the Anthem the pipe band began to play another song. When it ended, AG Barr walked off stage behind a curtain and returned with his own set of pipes. He played along with the band for an entire song until the band marched out.
After putting away his instrument, Barr came to the podium and said he wanted to explain how this had come about. Pointing to the other people on the stage he said, "Jessie and Rob and Zach thought they were going to surprise me by having the Emerald Society Pipe Band come down from New York." Then he added, "But as you know I'm very proficient at, dare I say the word, spying." This brought a laugh from the crowd.
CBS News reports that Barr was a serious piper before his first stint as Attorney General:
According to Pipes and Drums Magazine, Barr takes the bagpipe very seriously — he's been playing since before his legal career began. Barr was a member of the now defunct U.S.-based Grade 2 Denny & Dunipace Pipe Band – which later evolved into the Scottish & Irish Imports and City of Washington – from the early-1980s until the early-1990s. Barr played with the band in a number of competitions, including the World Championships.
After all the fun, Barr gave a wide-ranging speech about the DOJ's focus on everything from violent crime to theft of intellectual property by foreign governments. Here's the clip already queued up to the moment Barr went backstage to grab his pipes.
Tags: Attorney General Barr Department of Justice


text:
After Years of Inaction, the Fed Could Clean Up Subprime Market, Say Advocates
Submitted by: Center for Responsible Lending, The
Categories: Community Development, Corporate Social Responsibility
Posted: Jun 14, 2007 – 08:06 AM EST
Jun. 14 /CSRwire/ - ASHINGTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 14, 2007--This morning the Federal Reserve Board will hold a hearing on abusive lending that, with the right outcome, could mark a key turning point for American families with subprime home loans. According to consumer groups, for 13 years the Board has largely ignored Congress's mandate to take strong action against abusive, unfair or deceptive mortgage lending practices, but today's hearing signals an opportunity for meaningful change.
Organizations representing millions of members across the nation are urging the Board to act swiftly to require common-sense protections on subprime mortgages. It is time for the Board to use its authority to stop mortgage lending practices that place homeowners at a high risk of foreclosure.
Among those testifying at the hearing are Janis Bowdler of the National Council of La Raza, Alys Cohen of the National Consumer Law Center, Ira Rheingold of the National Association of Consumer Advocates and Martin Eakes of the Center for Responsible Lending. In addition, several state officials will discuss the impact of mortgages abuses on their home state, including Attorneys Generals from Iowa and Minnesota and Banking regulators from Arizona, Massachusetts, and North Carolina.
In the past, the Federal Reserve Board, along with other banking regulators, has issued guidance for banks and their affiliates aimed at the safety and soundness of issuing subprime home loans, including general statements in 1999 and 2001 recommending that lenders consider a borrower's ability to repay before approving loans. Subprime lenders became increasingly bold in ignoring the spirit of this guidance, turning to dangerous loan products and looser underwriting. The result is today's rash of subprime foreclosures, which is expected to rise to one out of five subprime loans made in recent years. It is clear that more specific bright-line rules are needed.
The Federal Reserve Board has asked participants in this week's hearing to comment on certain dangerous features that typically have been included in subprime mortgages in recent years: prepayment penalties, lack of escrows for taxes and hazard insurance, stated income and low-documentation and loans made without adequate consideration of the borrower's ability to repay.
Some observers have said that no regulatory action is necessary because of market corrections, but in spite of the alarming rate of foreclosures, subprime lenders are continuing to make loans packed with risky features, and Wall Street is continuing to accept these loans. Based on a review of five mortgage-backed securities offered in the first quarter of this year, CRL found that loans containing characteristics shown to increase the risk of foreclosure continue to constitute a large portion of subprime offerings. The risky characteristics--seldom found in the lower-priced prime market--include a high portion of loans with adjustable interest rates, prepayment penalties and unverified income.
The most common type of mortgage issued in recent years has been dangerous hybrid mortgages, which begin with a fixed-rate, but shift to a much higher adjustable-rate with multiple interest rate increases. Lenders have been aggressively marketing these loans to debt-strapped families and approving the loans based on the initial interest rate rather than considering long-term affordability.
Consumer advocates and civil rights leaders all over the nation have expressed deep concerns about the financial harm resulting from typical subprime loans. Brief statements from a number of groups
"Our neighborhoods are being torn apart by predatory lending and foreclosures. American homeowners shouldn't have to wait for Congress to pass new legislation. How many more families have to lose their homes before the Federal Reserve will use its power and do something to stop this problem? The time for them to act is now." Maude Hurd, ACORN National President
"We applaud the Federal Reserve for holding this hearing. The Fed is empowered under HOEPA to act, and it must do so now. The foreclosures we're seeing today have effects very much like Hurricane Katrina, except in this case homeowners all over the country are going under water. The Fed must protect future homeowners from unscrupulous lenders marketing defective products." Wade Henderson, President and CEO - Leadership Conference on Civil Rights
"The Federal Reserve must act decisively under its authority to protect families from bad lending practices, predatory mortgage loans and deliberate fraud and abuse. Families make many sacrifices to become homeowners--the Fed should have no tolerance for irresponsible mortgage practices which make it difficult if not impossible for many families to keep the homes they have worked so hard to buy. Access to fair home loans is vital--but it should not come at the expense of a family's financial stability." Linda Sherry, Director of National Priorities - Consumer Action
"Irresponsible subprime lending practices have put millions of households at risk of losing their homes and are having a corrosive effect on other parts of the home loan market. Congress has directed the Federal Reserve to write rules to put a stop to unfair and deceptive mortgage practices that would apply to all mortgage lenders. Consumer Federation of America urges Chairman Bernanke and the other Fed governors to move quickly and decisively to put a halt to mortgage lending that place homeowners at high risk of foreclosure." Allen Fishbein, Director Housing and Credit Policy - Consumer Federation of America
"Because predatory lenders have long targeted African Americans, other racial and ethnic minorities, women and the elderly, Americans of color and the communities in which we live stand to lose the most from the foreclosure boom. The Federal Reserve has the ability, as well as the moral obligation, to exercise its authority under HOEPA and help stem the tide of predatory mortgage abuses. We need clear and concise rules that require lenders to responsibly underwrite loans, including considering borrowers' repayment ability. As long as abuses are legal, mandatory disclosures and increased financial literacy will not be enough." Hilary Shelton, Director, NAACP Washington Bureau
"Abusive lending is devastating American communities. The Board must take bold steps to address this problem by issuing rules that require affordable loans with verified income, access to loss mitigation, and protection from other unfair practices. The cost of not acting will be the continued explosion in foreclosures and the destruction of wealth for working people." Alys Cohen, Staff Attorney
- National Consumer Law Center
"It is imperative that the Federal Reserve use its rulemaking authority to curb abusive lending practices in the home mortgage market. Until then, homeowners and neighborhoods across America, especially integrated neighborhoods and communities of color, will continue to bear the costs and consequences of irresponsible lending.
By taking action, the Federal Reserve will also send a message to Wall Street about its responsibility not to pay higher premiums for ARMs that have a discriminatory and adverse impact on those protected under the Fair Housing Act." Shanna L. Smith, President/CEO - National Fair Housing Alliance
"It is possible and profitable to lend responsibly for home purchases and refinancing without resorting to predatory practices, loans, and fees. Responsible mortgage lending benefits everyone, while abusive lending benefits greedy predators. We need a prudent policy response that puts an end to predatory lending, a prudent financial response that preserves the assets of homeowners at risk due to predatory lending, and a responsible market strategy that demonstrates that low-income and low-wealth people are good borrowers and good homeowners. The Federal Reserve needs to take this opportunity to act now." Mark Pinsky, President & CEO of Opportunity Finance Network and Former Chairman of the Federal Reserve's Consumer Advisory Council
"There is an urgent need to address the epidemic of foreclosures in the subprime market today. The Federal Reserve has a responsibility to prohibit abusive, unfair or deceptive lending acts, as mandated by Congress, and we hope they will take action soon." Martin Eakes, CEO - Self-Help and the Center for Responsible Lending
"Federal bank regulators have long failed to require basic standards of decent lending, especially for debt-strapped families and communities of color targeted by subprime lenders. We expect that the entire country will suffer adverse effects from the massive wave of subprime foreclosures--foreclosures that could have been prevented if the Board and other agencies had not ignored rampant predatory activity in the marketplace." Ed Mierzwinski, Consumer Program Director - U.S. PIRG
Carol Hammerstein Center for Responsible Lending
Sharon Reuss Center for Responsible Lending


The ACLU represented community activists in Uniontown, Alabama who were sued for defamation when they expressed opposition to the dumping of hazardous coal ash in a landfill in their town. The landfill operator, Green Group Holdings, sued the residents for $30 million. In February 2017, the parties reached a settlement in which the company dropped the SLAPP.


Due to so many disadvantages of the traditional advertising way, people turn to find LED Display to improve their business effect. But how to choose a high quality LED display is also an important issue for most buyers.
1. LED display flatness: LED display of the surface flatness to within 1mm, to ensure the display image is not distorted, partial results raised or recessed LED display's viewing angle appears dead. The quality of roughness determined mainly by the production process.
2.LED display's brightness and viewing angle: indoor full color LED display's brightness to 800cd/m2 above, outdoor LED display's brightness to 1500cd/m2 above, in order to ensure the normal operation of LED displays, or because of the brightness is too low and can not see the displayed image. The size of the brightness from the LED display the die is good or bad decision.
Viewing angle directly depends on the size of the audience how many LED displays, therefore the bigger the better. The size of viewing angle of the packages from the die to decide.
3.LED display white balance effect: white balance effect is one of the most important indicators display. Three primary colors red, green and blue color science taken the ratio of the time the show will 1:4.6:0.16 pure white, if the actual proportion of the white balance a little deviation deviation occurs, the general should pay attention to whether there is bluish white, partial yellow-green phenomenon. The quality of the white balance control system mainly by the display determined the reduction of color die is also affected.
4.LED displays color reduction: LED display color reduction is LED displays of color reduction, which is displayed in color LED display and playback source to maintain a high degree of color consistency, so as to ensure realistic images.
5.LED displays whether the Mosaic: Mosaic is the phenomenon of dead appear on the screen Always or often a small four black boxes, both modules necrosis, the main reason for the LED display connectors used in the quality, but off.
LED display dead is Always or often appear on a single point of black, mainly by the number of dead die is good or bad to decide.
6.LED displays without color: color is more obvious between the adjacent modules of the color, the color of the transition to the module as a unit, the phenomenon is caused by color LED display control system by the poor, gray grade is not high, due to lower frequency scan.


Veneta Plastica was born in 1958 and it quickly became the leader company in the working of plastics, especially in the production of machinery for the chemical and the galvanic industry. The point of reference for many Italian companies of the field.
In 1989 Veneta Plastica, with the support of an important municipalized company working in the waste sector, develops its first battery container called TUBE.
1996 is the year of the rebirth for Veneta Plastica thanks to the new ownership. The goal here is to develop innovative but environment-friendly products: unique for their quality, functionality and design.
In January 2008, after 50 years of hard work, Veneta Plastica changes its structure and becomes LAB23.
LAB23 offers a varied range of products – benches, bus or car canopies, bins, bollards, planters, bike racks, tree grates – for a total of about 200 products meant for both public and private clients. All products are characterized by a contemporary design combining rigid, essential shapes with soft and sinuous ones and high-quality, high-resistant materials that require very little maintenance costs. To achieve this, LAB23 chooses materials like galvanized steel, stainless steel, corten steel and hardwood.
The Venetian company boasts collaborations with internationally renowned designers like Zaha Hadid, Stéphane Chapelet, Roberto Semprini, Fuksas and Karim Rashid and offers the skills of many other qualified designers in order to create customized products. Each product is carefully studied, from the conceptualization to the execution, from the assembly to the installation, by our technical department, which vouches for the quality of the final product.
LAB23 supports designers and architects in every step of their work, from the conceptualization to the installation, including the design and the execution of the product through the most advanced technologies and the expertise of our staff.
We are the people you're looking for to turn your projects into a reality.
YOU HAVE A PROJECT? WE MAKE IT HAPPEN.


A dual purpose hop with 8-11% alpha acids, designated VGXP01 cv, which in practice is most often used as a late kettle or dry hop imparting its floral and orange citrusy notes to American Pale Ales. Cascade and Centennial are possible substitutes.
Unusually, Amarillo hops are actually privately owned by Virgil Gamache Farms who also hold a trademark for the name having discovered the variety. As well as Pale Ales and IPAs, you may also find Amarillo being used in Porters, for example.


As President Donald J. Trump and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi fight over whether or not to fund the keystone of Trump's 2016 campaign –the border wall –policy makers should also be prepared to address the issues that bring immigrants to this country illegally in the first place.
Chief among those draws is access to welfare and other taxpayer funded handouts.
Studies show that Texas ranks with California and other southern border states in the 70% of illegal immigrants receiving taxpayer funded welfare.
In Texas, 54 percent of legal immigrants and 70 percent of illegal immigrants receive welfare assistance, with illegal immigrants generally receiving benefits on behalf of their U.S.-born children, according to the study, written by a think tank that favors reducing immigration into the U.S.
The welfare programs analyzed include Supplemental Security Income for low income elderly and disabled, Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Women, Infants and Children food program, free/reduced school lunch,food stamps, Medicaid, public housing and rent subsidies. In fiscal year 2008, these programs totaled $517 billion. But these programs are also partially funded by individual state governments, especially Medicaid.
Illegal immigrants with children primarily use food assistance programs and Medicaid, with little or no cash or housing assistance. In contrast, legal immigrants have high usage rates for every type of program.
The Federation for Immigration Reform (FAIR) sets the national price tag for welfare given to illegal immigrants at $113 billion, a substantial net-loss compared to the tax revenue paid by some small segments of illegal aliens.
More from their 2017 study can be found here.
New Jersey became the 10th state to offer financial aid to illegal immigrants. Along with other states like California, Texas, and Connecticut, illegal immigrants in New Jersey can now receive in-state tuition as well as taxpayer funded scholarships.
This legislation is expected to cost New Jersey taxpayers $5 million annually,and could dramatically exceed that figure in the years to come. Additionally, it will serve as further encouragement for more people to come to this country illegally.
Securing our southern border is a matter of national security. A key element of that security is cutting off the incentives that bring immigrants to this country illegally in the first place.
The Texas Legislature should start by no longer providing in-state tuition to illegal immigrants.
For communication from TLN staff about Second Amendment issues in Texas.


We have some more information about Big Brother 20 from our reliable Reddit source! Are you ready to find out who the HOH put on the block? If you missed out Big Brother spoilers on who won the HOH this week on BB20, you can get the information here!
We have unconfirmed, but reliable information about what's been going on inside the Big Brother 20 house. We know that the HOH comp happened and we also know that the first BB20 HOH has picked their nominees. If you don't want to know who was nominated, please don't read ahead!
According to our source, Tyler may have nominated Sam and Steve! With these nominations in place, I'm wondering if Steve went in and let everyone know he used to be an undercover police officer. Sam's plan was to lay low in the house, but she wanted to win the first HOH, so I'm wondering if she showed the rest of the house that she could be a physical threat.
Remember, this is just reported information, not confirmed so make sure you come back for the season premiere of Big Brother 20 this Wednesday night starting at 8/7c to see if the information that we have gotten pans out!
Are you excited for the BB20 premiere? I know I am! Make sure you stick around all season for all your Big Brother 20 spoiler needs! If you haven't signed up for the Big Brother live feeds, it isn't too late to take advantage of the one week free deal. Make sure you use the link below to sign up and help support our site!
Click here to sign up with the Big Brother live feeds and support out site!


text:
Chiny:
 Serba – miejscowość

Etiopia:
 Serba – miejscowość

Indonezja:
 Serba – miejscowość

Niemcy:
 Serba – gmina w kraju związkowym Turyngia, w powiecie Saale-Holzland


Landa Designs has been manufacturing and designing prom dresses and evening dresses since 1987. Looking for a Landa Splash Sale Prom Dress? Henri's Cloud Nine was a large selection of Landa Sale Dresses in stock. We definitely will have your perfect prom gown! We also carry plus size prom dresses and short prom dresses. Free Shipping on Landa Splash Sale prom dresses over $100.


text:
/***************
 * NAME:				colbutt.cpp
 * PROJECT:			Scenario
 * VERSION:			0.1 30.08.1996
 * DESCRIPTION:	color button control dialog
 * AUTHORS:			Mike Hesser
 * HISTORY:			DATE			NAME	COMMENT
 *						07.09.1996	mh		comment
 *						18.09.1997	mh		color manipulator
 ***************/

#include "colbutt.h"
#include "afxdlgs.h"

BEGIN_MESSAGE_MAP(CColorButton, CButton)
	ON_WM_LBUTTONDOWN()
	ON_WM_LBUTTONUP()
//	ON_WM_MOUSEMOVE()
	ON_MESSAGE(WM_DESTROYME, OnDestroyManip)
END_MESSAGE_MAP()

CColorManip dlg;
BOOL bD = FALSE, bDestroyMe = FALSE, bEntered = FALSE;;

/*************
 * DESCRIPTION:	draw button
 * INPUT:			system
 * OUTPUT:			-
 *************/
void CColorButton::Draw(BOOL bState)
{
	HBRUSH hOldBrush;
	HPEN hOldPen;
	COLORREF c;
	CRect rect;
	CDC *pDC;
	int nState;

	nState = DFCS_BUTTONPUSH | DFCS_ADJUSTRECT;
	if (bState)
		nState |= DFCS_PUSHED;

	GetClientRect(rect);

	pDC = GetDC();
	if (pDC)
	{
		pDC->DrawFrameControl(rect, DFC_BUTTON, nState);
		c = RGB(BYTE(col.r*255), BYTE(col.g*255), BYTE(col.b*255));
		hOldBrush = (HBRUSH)pDC->SelectObject(CreateSolidBrush(c));
		hOldPen = (HPEN)pDC->SelectObject(CreatePen(PS_SOLID, 1, c));
		pDC->Rectangle(rect.left, rect.top, rect.right, rect.bottom);
		pDC->SelectObject(hOldBrush);
		pDC->SelectObject(hOldPen);
		ReleaseDC(pDC);
	}
}

/*************
 * DESCRIPTION:	draw button on system request
 * INPUT:			system
 * OUTPUT:			-
 *************/
void CColorButton::DrawItem(LPDRAWITEMSTRUCT)
{
	Draw(FALSE);
}

/*************
 * DESCRIPTION:	show color requester
 * INPUT:			system
 * OUTPUT:			-
 *************/
void CColorButton::OnLButtonDown(UINT, CPoint)
{
	if (bD)
	{
		bD = FALSE;
		dlg.DestroyWindow();
		ReleaseCapture();
	}
	Draw(TRUE);
}

/*************
 * DESCRIPTION:	show color requester
 * INPUT:			system
 * OUTPUT:			-
 *************/
void CColorButton::OnLButtonUp(UINT, CPoint)
{
	CColorDialog dialog(RGB(BYTE(col.r*255), BYTE(col.g*255), BYTE(col.b*255)), CC_FULLOPEN);
	COLORREF res;

	Draw(FALSE);

	if (dialog.DoModal() == IDOK)
	{
		res = dialog.GetColor();
		col.r = float((BYTE)(res)) / 255;
		col.g = float((BYTE)(res >> 8)) / 255;
		col.b = float((BYTE)(res >> 16)) / 255;
		Invalidate(FALSE);
		GetParent()->SendMessage(WM_COLORCHANGED, 0, 0L);
	}
}

/*************
 * DESCRIPTION:	handle mouse movement over color button (show color manipulation box)
 * INPUT:			system
 * OUTPUT:			-
 *************/
void CColorButton::OnMouseMove(UINT nFlags, CPoint point)
{
	CRect rect;

	dlg.pCol = &col;

	GetClientRect(rect);

	if (!rect.PtInRect(point))
	{
		dlg.DestroyWindow();
		ReleaseCapture();
		bD = FALSE;
	}
	else
	{
		if (!bD)
		{
			bD = TRUE;
			SetCapture();
			dlg.pParent = this;
			dlg.Create(IDD_COLORMANIP, this);
		}
	}

	/*
	if (bD && !bEntered)
	{
	bEntered = FALSE;
		if (point.y > rect.bottom)
		{
			ReleaseCapture();
			dlg.SetCapture();
			bEntered = TRUE;
		}
		return;
	}*/
}

LRESULT CColorButton::OnDestroyManip(WPARAM, LPARAM)
{
	dlg.DestroyWindow();
	bD = FALSE;

	return 0;
}

// Color manipulator
BEGIN_MESSAGE_MAP(CColorManip, CDialog)
	ON_WM_VSCROLL()
	ON_WM_MOUSEMOVE()
END_MESSAGE_MAP()

/*************
 * DESCRIPTION:	constructor
 * INPUT:			-
 * OUTPUT:			-
 *************/
CColorManip::CColorManip(CWnd* pPnt)
    : CDialog(CColorManip::IDD, pPnt)
{
	bExit = FALSE;
	pParent = pPnt;
}

/*************
 * DESCRIPTION:	center window in middle of screen
 * INPUT:			(system related)
 * OUTPUT:			-
 *************/
BOOL CColorManip::OnInitDialog()
{
	CRect rectParent, rectOwn;

	CDialog::OnInitDialog();

	pParent->GetWindowRect(rectParent);
	GetClientRect(rectOwn);
	MoveWindow(rectParent.left, rectParent.top + rectParent.Height(), rectOwn.Width(), rectOwn.Height());

	VERIFY(m_sldRed.SubclassDlgItem(IDC_COLMANIP_R, this));
	VERIFY(m_sldGreen.SubclassDlgItem(IDC_COLMANIP_G, this));
	VERIFY(m_sldBlue.SubclassDlgItem(IDC_COLMANIP_B, this));

	m_sldRed.SetRange(0,255);
	m_sldGreen.SetRange(0,255);
	m_sldBlue.SetRange(0,255);

	m_sldRed.SetPageSize(10);
	m_sldGreen.SetPageSize(10);
	m_sldBlue.SetPageSize(10);

	m_sldRed.SetPos(int(pCol->r*255));
	m_sldGreen.SetPos(int(pCol->g*255));
	m_sldBlue.SetPos(int(pCol->b*255));

	return TRUE;
}

/*************
 * DESCRIPTION:	process V-Scroll messages of the sliders
 * INPUT:			(system related)
 * OUTPUT:			-
 *************/
void CColorManip::OnVScroll(UINT nSBCode, UINT nPos, CScrollBar* pScrollBar)
{
	float value;

	if (pScrollBar)
	{
		value = float(((CSliderCtrl*)pScrollBar)->GetPos())/255.0f;
		switch (pScrollBar->GetDlgCtrlID())
		{
			case IDC_COLMANIP_R : pCol->r = value; break;
			case IDC_COLMANIP_G : pCol->g = value; break;
			case IDC_COLMANIP_B : pCol->b = value; break;
		}
		pParent->Invalidate(FALSE);
		pParent->GetParent()->SendMessage(WM_COLORCHANGED, 0, 0L);
	}
	CDialog::OnHScroll(nSBCode, nPos, pScrollBar);
}

/*************
 * DESCRIPTION:	handle mouse movement over color button (show color manipulation box)
 * INPUT:			system
 * OUTPUT:			-
 *************/
void CColorManip::OnMouseMove(UINT nFlags, CPoint point)
{
	CRect rect;

	GetClientRect(rect);
	if (!rect.PtInRect(point))
	{
		ReleaseCapture();
		pParent->SendMessage(WM_DESTROYME, 0, 0L);
	}

	CDialog::OnMouseMove(nFlags, point);
}