text:
Liking Biking
I have liked biking since the 1960's when my parents brought home my first "big" bike. It was a Schwinn of course, blue and white. I rode it so much, I wore out the seat after a couple of years and we replaced it with a yellow sparkling banana seat, which were all the rage back then. I wish I still had that bike and that seat. They were cool. Our bikes were our independence before we could drive. We rode about a half mile into town to the little store to buy ice cream or we rode to get books at the book mobile. The book mobile was like a little traveling library that stopped in all of the small towns, to allow people to check out books in the summer. It was a great concept. It is still around; I saw one recently when driving up north of Duluth.
Since those early days on my Schwinn, I have never had a time where I did not have a bike. I have never had anything fancy, just trail or road bikes, and I have never worn Lycra to ride my bike. In college, I biked to and from work in the summers, and once we had our kids, they always had trikes and bigger bikes as they got older. I once rode 50 miles with my kids on the Paul Bunyan trail by Brainerd MN, while all of us were dressed like pirates. It was a fundraising event for the Bar Association. They had prizes for the fastest time, largest group, and one prize for the best costumes. I told my kids ahead of time that we will never be fastest because there are a lot of Attorneys who wear lycra while riding bikes that cost them $3000, but I said they should come up with costumes, because that is an area where we can excel. The kids came up with the pirate costume idea and we won the prize! I think we were the last team to come in.
Bike Pirates
My kids were complaining about their legs and their bikes as we passed the miles away. Some had those three quarter size bikes as they were still pretty young and I had a nice trail bike. So when they would whine about their legs hurting or being tired, I would trade bikes with them. I should get an award for driving most of those 50 miles on a three quarter size kid's bikes with poor gearing. My paralegal, Carol, who I have worked with for over 25 years and who is a good sport for sure, came with us because Joe had to work. She also dressed like a pirate and we did have some fun!
We started biking the Minnesota and Wisconsin "rails to trails" (railroads turned into bike trails) when our kids were really young. My husband pulled a cart behind his bike and I had a carrier on mine. He sometimes pulled two kids and a small cooler in the cart at the same time and for a few of those years he had thighs like Thor. He also sometimes had to drive the trail with us and then drive the entire way back on the trail to go get the Yukon while we waited.
As the kids grew, we could do more miles and more trails. Those rails to trails were perfect for the kids, because they are all really flat. We could carry a small cooler with sandwiches and snacks on the cart and if the smallest kid got tired, we would duct tape their little bike to the cart and let them ride for a while. The kids would sometimes fall asleep in the cart and other times I could hear them singing to entertain themselves. They seemed to sing the Sponge Bob Square pants song a lot when biking. When our youngest Jenny was old enough to ride a tag-a-long behind Joe, we got rid of the cart and I had packs on my bike for the lunch or snacks. She and Joe could really move and make time when she was on that tag-a-long. They were always ahead of the rest of us and got to our destination the fastest.
We biked around Mackinaw Island with the two younger kids in the cart behind Joe, while Sara and I rode a bicycle built for two. She and I chatted the whole way around. It was so nice to spend the day together on a bike. She always enjoyed biking and was always upbeat and helpful as a little girl. That was a fun family vacation and we had perfect weather for it. Another year we rented bikes and drove around Yosemite National Park while on vacation in California. We did a lot of the trails in Minnesota and Wisconsin over the years. I always had a rule that they could not take me to a buffet on Mother's day until I was eighty years old. They had to take me on an adventure, so they took me biking different interesting trails that we had never tried before.
We sometimes had to problem solve. We biked in one area of Western Minnesota and one of my daughters who shall remain nameless ( Sara) complained that her underwear was bothering her and riding up. I suggested she go "Cowboy" as we called it in our house, so on our next rest stop she went cowboy (no underwear) for the rest of the ride and I heard no more complaining. Problem solved. We once ran out of water and had to stop at a gas station and we had to sometimes use an outhouse on some trails. We had one outhouse in Southern Minnesota that had two holes side by side. Jenny asked why they would do that and so I said it was so two of us could go at the same time and chit chat while on the pot. She was quite young at the time and she wanted to try that so we did. Girl talk and chit chat while peeing. It was nice.
One of our favorite trails was the Lanesboro trail in Southeastern Minnesota. We still enjoy it. It is flat as can be and runs through some of the most picturesque landscapes in Minnesota. There is a little town every 6 or 7 miles to stop and look around or rest, and it winds along small rivers and past sandstone cliffs. There are a lot of fun places to stay in Lanesboro including an apartment above an art gallery on Main Street and an old mill made into a hotel, with themed rooms. There are a lot of cool options for dinner too, which is nice after a day of biking. It is a romantic town set in a valley and is good for couples as well as family friendly. It is fun anytime, but it is particularly beautiful in the fall. The cooler temps are also a plus when biking.
We did the Lanesboro trail with my good friend from Law school and her family when our kids were all tweens. Her daughter Courtney was on a tag along behind her Mom and my Jenny was behind Joe on the tag along. The girls had Walkie Talkies (before cell phones for kids) and Courtney fell off the tag along trying to use the walkie talkie while driving. A first good lesson in driving and using phones, but luckily no damage was done, as we were just getting started and no one was driving very fast yet.
Another favorite was the Elroy-Sparta State trail in Wisconsin. It is 32 miles long and the best part of this trail is that it is an old railway bed (like the other rails to trails), but this one has three preserved train tunnels that you drive through with your bike. One is three quarter's of a mile long and the other two are about a half mile long. As you drive along the trail through the woods, you can feel the air becoming cooler and damp as you get closer to the tunnels. You can also smell the tunnels as you approach. It is really more like a cave then a tunnel. There is water dripping inside and it is pitch dark; you can only see the small lig ht at the end of the tunnel in the distance. The dark, cool, moist tunnels are a real treat when biking in the hot summer. It is like stepping into air conditioning. Most people walk their bikes through the tunnels holding flashlights. It would be difficult to make it through the tunnel without those flash lights. The first time through we actually taped flashlights to the kids' bikes which they really liked. The dark tunnels added to the adventure and the uniqueness of this trail. Just writing about it again makes me want to go back and do it again. It will never be as exciting as that first time, when the kids were young and so in awe of the tunnels. It was exciting for us too.
One year, we did this same ride with my brother, and my parents drove what we referred to as our chase vehicle. They dropped us off at the beginning and then they met us in a predetermined tow n for lunch. The kids were all late tween ages or early teens. After lunch my mom looked up at the sky and said "you guys may want to load the bikes back up, because it looked like it may storm." Well we were not about to have driven all the way to Wisconsin and not ride the entire trail. Besides, we thought the rain may never come. So off we went onto the trail. Within the hour, the clouds were opening up on us raining cats and dogs, but worst of all the thunder and lighting was spectacular. The thunder seemed louder than normal, as it bounced off the sandstone cliffs along the trail and it sounded like the lightening was right above our heads. We continued on as we had no choice. The chase vehicle could not get anywhere near us in the country side, so we continued and met up with them at the end, as planned. My mom had that, "I told you so" look on her face and a big smile for us as we looked like drowned rats. We were soaked and we had mud going up our backs, because this trail is not paved. It is called a crushed rock trail and normally on a dry day, it feels almost paved, because of the way it is made, but on this rainy day it blew up yellow mud onto all of our backs and we were almost too dirty to enter the vehicle.
I am always glad we did not quit just because the rain was coming. That would not have been memorable or a good story at all. Instead we raged against the rain to make sure we finished the entire trail. We have never laughed so hard and had a better experience. We were totally soaked and while on the trail, we must have repeated that line from the movie Cady Shack a hundred times—"I don't think the heavy stuff will come down for a while." The kids still talk about us getting rained on and our adventure on the Elroy trail, and I think that although we did not know it at the time, it was a good lesson for the kids in not quitting. It was also a lesson in raging against the rain and in finishing what you start. None of those things were said, but as they say, actions speak louder than words. There would be no story at all had we quit. We would have been back at the hotel sooner and sitting in the pool. Instead we came to the hotel laughing and having to clean up after an ordeal. A fun ordeal, but none the less an ordeal. We had finished all 32 miles despite the rain and the lightening and we were stronger for it.
We have been back on that trail with that same brother and his wife and we actually camped for the weekend at a campground on the trail called the Tunnel campground. Our rain and lightening story got told often that weekend and my kids still tell it.
N ow that we are empty nesters we have gone biking around Itasca State park with friends and stayed at a local Bed and Breakfast during the peak of the fall colors. That is a gorgeous ride. I would load my bike carrier with sandwiches and frozen water bottles (to keep them cool) and I would throw in a beer or two for our rest stop. When we biked around the entire park we would stop at Douglas lodge for real ice cream malts made by hand. It was something to look forward to. We did that Itasca trail with the kids and the cart when they were young as well. That one was a thigh killer, as it is anything but flat.
Our kids still like biking and so do we. I just recently had a hitch installed on my daughter Jenny's Jeep, so she can carry her bike. She had requested it because she and her friend love biking, but need a way to carry them to the trails. As she was talking about needing the hitch for the bike rack, I could not help but be brought back in time with her riding in that cart behind Joe's bike, and then later behind him on the tag-a-long. Even though she is now 20 years old and almost finished with college, I can see it clear as day, as if it were yesterday. It has been said often, but those years with the kids fly by. Make memories and teach fun. You will never regret the adventures you did together.
Posted in: Family Time, Reflecting | Tagged: biking, rails to trails, schwinn
Everyone Needs an Adventure Buddy
Puppies Everywhere


text:
Q: Native Wordpress Video Shortcode Not Working After Post is Loaded via Ajax I'm loading post content into a modal via ajax. Some of the post have video that is added via the wordpress native video shortcode. The video shows up in the post, but none of the mediaElement.js mark-up is being added, so the video is no longer responsive.
If the video is loaded on the page, and not via AJAX everything is working fine.
I can see that wp-mediaelement.js is loading on the page, and I have also added $('video,audio').mediaelementplayer(); to the AJAX success function, but I get the error "mediaelementplayer is not a function".
When the modal is visible I've tried adding $('video,audio').mediaelementplayer(); directly to the console and I get the same error.
This is the post I used to build the AJAX call, so my code is structured the same way, if that helps in troubleshooting.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Slash Ships Matter
by Angel Wilson	| Posted on May 31, 2014 March 12, 2016
If you have a Twitter account, you've probably noticed numerous slash related tags showing up in the US Trends list this week. Earlier in the week the Supernatural ship Destiel (Dean and Castiel) declared themselves a pirate ship and set sail on the open waters with the #USSDestiel tag. Then late Friday night the multi fandom tag #SlashShipsMatter (begun by the Swan Queen fandom) began and received over 10,000 tweets in just under 3 hours. Slash shipping has always been a phenomenon in fandom, but this recent uptick in activity came on the heals of a morale blow to Destiel shipper after the Jus in Bello convention in Rome. The show's two main actors made some comments that many took as a fatal blow to any chance of their ship becoming canon and, beyond that, came off as belittling to those who even ship it casually. Not everyone has taken their comments to be the death knell of the ship, but enough have interpreted it as such that morale across all of many social media communities has hit an all time low. These trending events have brought people together, boosted morale, and opened up the discussion about slash's place in media across numerous fandoms.
While the #USSDestiel tag was mostly a party zone and a place to celebrate one pairing, the #SlashShipsMatter tag has become a haven for serious discussion about slash pairings in general. Many people in the tag expressed their appreciation that slash fandom exists because it's allowed them a place to explore their own sexuality and find characters to identify with. In a world where most characters are straight until proven gay, queer readings of characters have become extraordinarily important for those trying to find an outlet to express themselves. For bisexuals, bi readings of characters have also become important as our sexuality is often defined by the outside world by who we are currently dating or expressing interest in at any given moment. Seeing characters as gay or bisexual makes them relatable on a different level and fills the representation void left by mass media.
Representation matters a great deal to marginalized groups. The vast majority of people that scoff at the idea of needing representation in the media often belong to groups that are already largely represented. When Whoopi Goldberg was a child, seeing a black woman on TV inspired her profoundly. At the moment, queer representation on TV usually comes in the form of rarely seen secondary characters or members of large ensemble casts. Even then, the numbers are quite low compared with the actual queer community. Shows that do have queer protagonists are largely produced outside of the US and are somewhat difficult to find on American TV. Queer representation on TV just isn't where it should be and slash fiction has provided an important safe space for many people.
The tags haven't been an outlet used by only members of the LGB+ community, but by everyone who feels that these ships have a place alongside heterosexual pairings in public spaces. Many have brought up the point that opposite-sex ships are not given the same scrutiny has same-sex ships. If you see a man and a woman in a show and feel that they should be in a relationship, it's a lot easier to express that idea and still have respect, whereas expressing and interest in two men or two women often has a heavy stigma attached. Slash shippers are told that a character "isn't gay," while completely ignoring the possibility of bisexuality or repressed homosexuality. Fans are told that that shipping should "stay in fandom" when heterosexual pairings are discussed openly at conventions, with creators, and in other public forums with hardly any repercussions. Worst of all is the extreme amount of homophobic and biphobic commentary that comes with defending that a slash ship or queer reading of a character is wrong. I've seen people state that a character is "too manly" or has "only dated chicks," therefore they could not possibly interested in being with another man. These type of double standards and queerphobic defenses hurt those who find acceptance in the slash community. It makes us feel like we're still outsiders and should be kept quiet.
Not all has been negative on the slash shipper front, though. The season finale of Hannibal essentially made Hannigram (Will Graham and Hannibal Lecter) canon. Hannibal planned on running away with Will and their defacto adopted daughter. He began intimately touching Will's face as he outlined their plans in a scene that could very easily be read as romantic. Of course, this romantic moment was cut short when Hannibal essentially gutted Will, but he did cradle him sweetly as he began to bleed out all over the floor. On the surface that doesn't sound very romantic, and indeed Hannigram is an extremely dark ship, but fans were given their ship in canon for a few good seconds before the extraordinarily dark narrative tore them apart. It's sad, yes, but that ship sailed for a few good seconds. That's more than what most slash ships get.
The creators and cast of Hannibal have always been extremely accepting of slash shippers, even politely answering questions at last year's Comic Con. They've always treated queer readings of their characters as a valid way to interpret things, culminating in a relationship that was just a kiss shy of being explicitly canon. Will and Hannibal's strong feelings for one another has been stated overtly both outside the narrative and within it, and now we have a scene that was so intimate that most people expected them to kiss on screen. They may have if Hannibal hadn't jammed a knife into Will's abdomen, but the point still stands that it's one of the most canon-without-kissing slash ships sailing on the open waters of the Internet at the moment. The creators, actors, and social media team all encourage shippers and talk to us with the same respect that heterosexual pairings receive on other shows. It's refreshing and incredibly unique.
While Hannibal has treated their slash shippers with a lot of respect, most other shows have failed to show an accepting attitude towards those who choose to pursue queer readings of their shows. The #SlashShipsMatter tag has been filled by mostly Destiel shippers and Swan Queen shippers (Regina and Emma from Once Upon a Time), who had a similar incident last December, but many other ships joined the discussion as well. Shippers from many fandoms began to realize it's the same thing happening all across the board and began to unite with the message that all ships should be treated equally in public discussions. Not everyone in the tag was hoping for their ships to go canon, but almost everyone hoped for at least respect and equal treatment from fellow fans, show creators, and actors. It's clear that most slash shippers aren't happy with being forced to treat their ships as something "weird" and would like to participate in discussions regardless of the orientation of their chosen ship. Will these trending events make a difference in the long run? It's hard to say, but it's certainly united people and given slash shippers a much needed morale boost. While I do hope these movements are noticed by show runners, I'm at least grateful that spirits have been lifted and serious discussion has been started on the topic.
Author: Angel Wilson
Angel is the admin of The Geekiary and a geek culture commentator. She earned a BA in Film & Digital Media from UC Santa Cruz. She's contributed to various podcasts and webcasts including An Englishman in San Diego, Free to Be Radio, and Genre TV for All. She's written for Friends of Comic Con and is a 2019 Hugo Award winner for contributing fanfic on AO3. She identifies as queer.
Geek Culture News Television TV Analysis
Angel is the admin of The Geekiary and a geek culture commentator. She earned a BA in Film & Digital Media from UC Santa Cruz. She's contributed to various podcasts and webcasts including An Englishman in San Diego, Free to Be Radio, and Genre TV for All. She's written for Friends of Comic Con and is a 2019 Hugo Award winner for contributing fanfic on AO3. She identifies as queer.
The Adventure Zone: Graduation Ep. 14 "Spirit Day" – Review
CBS Decides Against Nancy Drew Adaptation 'Cause It Tested "Too Female"
Destination: Comics at the Miami Book Fair
Alessis says:
Great article. First of all, I love how you write about Hannigram with such dry, dark humor. 🙂 It seems to fit the ship perfectly as far as I can tell, not being in that fandom myself. Thank you for taking it seriously what a blow the Destiel fandom received, while also seeing the bigger perspective about where slash shipping is going in general. The Twitter trending events seem to indicate that slash shippers are truly coming out of the closet and will no longer stand for being silenced and shamed. No one owes it to us to make our ships canon, but they do owe it to us to be able to discuss it in a civil way.
Angel K says:
They are my dark, dry, guilt ship. And I love them dearly. I'll ship them guiltily to the end of the earth. 😉
-Admin Angel
At the same time, it's worth noting that slash interpretations aren't the ONLY interpretations that exists in a show. People should absolutely not be belittled for interpreting a relationship as romance just because it's between two men – but casual accusations of homophobia towards the actors and other fans for having different interpretations of the characters is also rather unfair, and not conducive to the conversation. This unfortunately happens a lot in fandom discussions, and takes away from the argument significantly.
This feels exactly like when you're trying to talk about rape culture and you get the tired response "But not all men…". It feels like an attempt at derailing. The article isn't saying that slash interpretations are the only interpretations, nor mentioning or implying anything about homophobia. You're setting up straw men and attacking those, instead of discussing the actual article.
Absolutely, which is why nowhere did I state that slash interpretations are the only interpretations of these characters. I don't think anyone I know has actually made that argument. Not interpreting a character as queer does not make one homophobic, however your reasoning for not interpreting a character as queer certainly can. "He's slept with women" is a biphobic argument against a queer reading. I've slept with men. Does that mean that I'm straight? Absolutely not. "He's too manly." That's homophobic and sexist. I'm feminine, but I've been with women. Stating "I just don't read this character as queer" is not in and of itself homophobic or biphobic. It's your personal opinion. However backing it up with biphobic, homophobic, or sexist arguments is extremely problematic.
Oh, absolutely. I didn't mean to imply that you are calling alternative interpretations homophobic in your article, which you most certainly did not. I was referring to what is currently happening in fandom. This issue often gets so heated that a lot of the accusations flying around detracts from valid points being made. There are definitely people calling J2 homophobic for their interpretation of Dean and Cas' relationship (even though it is also a valid interpretation), and people calling other fans homophobic for "not seeing what is obviously onscreen in front of their eyes", and so on. I think this is contributing to a lot of the animosity towards shippers in fandom right now, which is unfortunate. It's a topic that needs to be approached with more sensitivity on both sides.
Sirantha Jaxx says:
It was profoundly comforting seeing such a wonderful response all over Twitter and Tumblr. While I feel that it is not always needed to force a character into a particular sexuality due to the need for equal representation (mostly I feel it comes off as insincere), it is incredibly important for viewers too see that they are not being taken advantage of or demonized for their viewpoints. As a deticated shipper of Slash pairings (not because of simple desire to see them as such, but because chemistry and plot made me ridiculously hard to ignore) I would love to see more writers and channels embrace their characters and the paths they could go down, instead of attaching further stigma to an already challenged fandom. As for the Destiel ship going down, J2 have a right to their opinions and are not subject to our ridicule as they are entitled to the same ideas as Shippers are. I'm sure it has been incredibly frustrating for them as well and we would all do more good respecting them for their beliefs and they do ours. In this way, all of us can share a truly more Profound Bond 🙂
Hopefully this hasn't been overly hard to read (go iPhone!).
LoveX Jaxx
Disagreeing specifically about Dean/Cas as a romantic pairing is not necessarily the same as being dismissive of all slash ships in general though. I personally think it would be wildly out of character for both characters – especially Dean. I'm well aware that others disagree, and I think both are valid interpretations, and NEITHER side should be demonized. The actors are in a difficult position, and I do feel kind of bad for them too. When Misha made pro-Destiel comments in the past, he was accused of queerbaiting. When Jensen/Jared said anti-Destiel things, they get accused of homophobia. How are they supposed to discuss this topic? I'm sure someone in the comment section will be able to come up with a good, diplomatic response – but I know that if I was put on the spot like that, I wouldn't be able to come up with one. I absolutely agree it should be discussed with more sensitivity by the actors, but I find it hard to blame them too much when I know I myself wouldn't be able to do it better. I don't envy them their jobs.
I don't think bringing up alternative viewpoints/context is "derailing" as some suggest, but mileage varies.
You are perfectly entitled to disagree about certain ships, but it's the mass dismissal of slash shipping in general that's the problem. It's the idea that it's something gross that should be kept quiet and not discussed that is hugely problematic.
As far as what actors and creators say on the topic, the Hannibal actors and creators reacted perfectly to the questions. Hugh Dancy said that he "didn't see it as romantic, but I'm not going to take that away from you." That is beautifully stated, truthful, and not hurtful to anyone. Perhaps they rehearsed their responses ahead of time, which is interesting because Hannibal was only around for one season at that point whereas Supernatural has been around for ten. I feel like they should have had a diplomatic response prepared. If Hannibal's cast and crew could respond diplomatically, why couldn't Supernatural's cast do the same? It's really unfortunate.
lj says:
"If Hannibal's cast and crew could respond diplomatically, why couldn't Supernatural's cast do the same? It's really unfortunate."
Exactly. Where the hell is the PR department for SPN? Do they even have one? They lack cohesion and it shows. People think I walked away because of my ship? Naw. I walked away because they've got no idea what they're doing. How can I trust a show like that? I used to work for the most screwed up corporation possible but at least they could handle pr and customer service. jesus this is just goddamn sad.
Supernatural has so many PR blunders it's really concerning. Especially on Twitter. I don't blame the network publicist, Suzanne Gomez, because she's always really responsive and kind to people, but someone on dropping the ball on PR.
I've got to disagree that Hannigram was made canon.
There have been a lot of mixed messages from the cast and crew of the series and the finale didn't really clear anything up except to make it look like fans have been repeatedly queerbaited.
Creatives telling fans it's okay to interpret their work any way they like is good, but hinting the potential for a slash pairing that will never actually happen (and not merely because one butchered the other) isn't.
In an April interview, Bryan Fuller stated: "I'm not sure about Hannibal. I think Hannibal is a very broadly spectrumed human being/fallen angel, who probably is capable and interested in everything humanity has to offer. Whereas Will Graham is very definitely heterosexual, but that does not necessarily prevent us from a homoerotic subtext. It's practically text in a couple of episodes just because we really want to explore the intimacy of these two men in an unexpected way without sexualizing them, but including a perception of sexuality that the cinema is actually portraying to the audience more than the characters are." – http://www.thebacklot.com/bryan-fuller-breaks-down-the-homoerotic-charge-of-hannibal/04/2014/
Essentially, in that interview Mr Fuller covered up queerbaiting tactics by saying that it's okay to show two heterosexual men having homoerotic tension to explore their unique friendship and that at least Hannibal isn't restricted to heterosexuality.
He made those statements on April 22.
As fans increased their questions about queerbaiting and/or Will and Hannibal being more, he backtracked on May 2nd and said he thought of both men as "clearly heterosexual." He said made that statement confusing by saying that he didn't want them to be gay "necessarily" and "they do terrible, terrible things to each other and I don't think that's a healthy role model for gay culture!"
He then went on: "But it's hard to deny the intimacy between these two men, and as the season progresses that gets really… not explicit, but clearer and clearer. We do things that are so suggestive of physical intimacy, but yet only suggestive. Because I think that's part of the draw, and part of my fascination with heterosexual male friendships – they have this element of brotherhood that is so intimate and so close, and yet it doesn't cross physical boundaries in terms of… I guess penetration! But there are a lot of brotherly hugs and acknowledgement of the closeness of this relationship, without necessarily crossing that line. – http://www.digitalspy.com/tv/s225/hannibal/interviews/a568139/bryan-fuller-qa-will-hannibal-subtext-is-like-cinematic-fellatio.html#~oFSp1GzC0xWBiy
As someone another person commented after the AV Club review of the finale: "All my best friendships have a heavy homoerotic subtext. That's how friendship works, right?"
After Mr. Fuller's statements in the Digital Spy article, he then discussed Alana, called the Will and Hannibal relationship a bromance and said that she is the woman between them.
He added right after: "We've had dinner scenes where we shoot things so intimately then I'm like, 'OK, we are delivering the equivalent of cinematic fellatio, but they've got their clothes on, and they're sitting at a dinner table.' We definitely don't shy away from it, because I think it's fascinating and it's titillating, but we stop just short of kissing and penetration!"
A lot of people, myself included, have argued that this is queerbaiting at its finest.
It's masked in vague, contradictory and confusing statements and claims that any "homoerotic subtext" is reflective of art exploring human behavior and ideas of implied sexual intimacy without there being a sexual attraction.
Okay. What???
The fact that he went on record to say he thinks of both men as heterosexual means that Hannigram isn't canon no matter how it looked in the end unless he goes back on record and says otherwise. And really, as it stands, even though both men had sex with women, there's still confusion caused by the "homoerotic subtext." There's no indication of Will's preferences beyond his attraction to Alana (i.e. whether he might be open to bisexuality). He has sex with a lesbian while imagining?? both Hannibal and Alana. We have Hannibal who has sex with Alana and apparently appreciates her beauty along with that of Bedelia. Yet, viewers are also subjected to him clearly expressing onscreen an affection for Will that goes beyond a bromance and seems to go beyond his affection for either of the women he's shown interest in. Additionally, there is the comparison to Achilles and Patroclus who historically were thought of as lovers by many.
So, I don't want to dash the Hannigram hopes or the belief that the Hannibal creative team has been more understanding then the creative teams for Supernatural and Sherlock, BUT it could be argued that they've merely had plenty examples from SPN and Sherlock of how not to act and are better at playing the queerbaiting game so far beyond a few missteps as pointed out.
Angel_k says:
I completely respect that disagreement. It's why I don't categorize it as 100% canon, but essentially canon or the closest canon we have without a kiss. I have not read the interview where he refers to then as heterosexual. I have bad coverage at the moment but I will read it when I get into a better coverage zone. Discounting that particular interview I do stand by my careful phrasing, but I do see your viewpoint and respect that, especially given the interview I have not read.
Hi, and first off, excellent article! Everything about this is spot on in what I feel about slash ships in general. I was just wondering, is there any way to mention that the #slashshipsmatter idea was started in the swanqueen fandom? There's only one mention of us in the article, and seems kind of weird and out of place without that context. (I don't have access to the source on my phone, but can get it easily on my laptop if you want a link.)
A link would definitely be appreciated. As I'm not in the Swanqueen fandom and only follow Supernatural people, the people I saw first start tweeting it were Destiel shippers. When I began watching the tag, the vast majority of the tweets I saw were Destiel shippers and then it appeared as though Swanqueen joined in later, but I could very well be mistaken. My view on events could be skewed simply by who I follow and the volume of tweets from my fandom when I began watching the tag.
Sorry to make you dig out your laptop, but I do appreciate accuracy and would love to be able to correct this oversight with a source. Thank you so much for being willing to provide it for me!
paquada says:
This would be one of the links that started it.
http://swanqueenmovement.tumblr.com/post/87154642215/if-you-need-more-info-aimee-is-in-charge-of-this
Great article! 🙂 I would have loved to read more about the femslash part of "SlashShipsMetter" though (after all, femslashers started it!)…about the Swan Queen fandom, were people get bullied and threatend by the rest of their fandom on a daily basis… about Rizzoli and Isles with its blatant, unabashed queer baiting ….about Warehouse 13, where show runner Jack "this show is not about relationships" Kenny rather shoves the two het main characters together in the series' last couple of episodes than let the beautifully grown friendship/relationship of Bering and Wells evolve into something more.
I'm very happy this topic got covered by The Geekiary, but please don't forget about the the femslash, okay? 😉
I hope you guys don't think that was a slight against you guys. I was unaware of the movement until it showed up on my dashboard and I'm used to trending events being pretty spontaneous and difficult to source. It wasn't an intentional oversight. I looked at the tag, saw that it was mostly Destiel shippers, which is the ship that I have ties with, and went from there. So I do apologize for leaving you guys out. I hope you understand it wasn't an intentional snub on my part.
I'm sure it was unintentional :)(Swan Queen fans will chuckle though when they hear this word, because the show runners call the chemistry between our pairing "unintentional"). As I said, I'm very happy and grateful about your article because it's such an important matter in many fandoms!
The "don't forget about the femslash" was a more general plea – just keep it in mind for the next article. 😉
Thanks again though for writing this one! 🙂
Haha, woops! I'll avoid the word "unintentional" when discussing Swan Queen in the future ha. I'm very glad you enjoyed it and I'm happy your event was such a success.
Just found this on tumblr… I love statistics 🙂
http://flightcastiel.tumblr.com/post/87356455088
Megan_B says:
Warning: This is VERY long, probably not well-writen, and has spoilers for Hannibal s2x13 finale Mizumono
I want to thank you for the Hannibal portion of this article! While I disagree with the people who have called what Bryan has said "queerbaiting at it's finest", I suppose I can understand *why* they would see it, but I don't see it like that at all. I went into watching this show trying my hardest not to ship them (I should've known that would fail), because cannibalism has always squeaked me out more than anything else.
So I watched the show and I failed *spectacularly*. By this time, I had already heard how the series (book series, obviously) ended and even just *knowing* what the show was about, I didn't expect Hannigram to *actually* happen. And I'm okay with that. I really and truly am. It does not take away anything from their relationship in the slightest.
Also, while I'm on this point, I think what Hannigram is, while they are both supposedly completely "heterosexual" (though I imagine Hannibal less so, tbh), sexuality is a spectrum. We all *know* this. And by all the actors and Bryan, Hannibal and Will's relationship has been described as "love". Crazy, messed up, sick, and twisted love, but a love of sort nonetheless.
In fact, Bryan said it was almost as if Hannibal was "falling in love for the first time" with Will Graham and that's part of why Hannibal reacted so badly to Will's betrayal. Hugh has said he doesn't see their relationship as sexual, although I'm sure all three of them–Bryan, Mads, and Hugh–have called their relationship very "romantic" in some way. Hannibal and Will will always be obsessed with each other.
I do not feel like Bryan was queerbaiting us (and let's not even get started on the ridiculous notion that if lesbians have sex with a man, it somehow negates them being a lesbian), and I don't feel queerbaited in the least. I do not expect Hannibal and Will to ever be together like *that*. And I don't care. I don't need it. Hannigram is already canon.
And before someone says "they're not canon"–let me explain. No, they are not canon in the traditional sense. They are not canon that Blaine and Kurt of Glee, for instance, are canon. But at the same time, the two of them love each other. We can sit around and debate how they love each other, but is anyone really going to deny that they *do*? Is anyone going to try and deny that Hannibal was searching for someone who could understand him, really understand him, and not run away screaming, or try and kill him or get him arrested?
Will didn't run away screaming from him. He did try to kill him, but I think… the fantasies of killing Hannibal are one thing. The act of killing is so passionate, but I don't think he wanted Hannibal dead, at least not towards the end of season 2. ("You would take my life." "No…not your life," "My freedom then! You would take that from me.")
At the end, he still wasn't sure what he was going to do. He warned Hannibal and as Bryan said that could be for multiple reasons, but I firmly believe that at least a part of it was that he wanted Hannibal to run. As suggested by "You were supposed to *leave*…" "We couldn't leave without you,"
When Will said that, you can *feel* the pain in his voice. He wanted Hannibal gone at that moment, at least. He couldn't stand the idea of him being locked up in prison, but he couldn't go with him. He couldn't let himself fall even further than he already had.
Will had his gun. He could have shot Hannibal. After what he'd done to Jack, Alana, to Abigail, to *him*…he could have, and he'd be perfectly entitled to it. But he didn't. Because a part of him *loves* Hannibal and Hannibal loves him (again, the sort of "love" can be up for debate but it is *there*, no denying. I don't think its possible to deny that).
I feel like Hannigram is canon, even if not in the traditional sense. And I feel like Bryan, Mads, Hugh, *everyone* has handled the questions of Hannigram amazingly well. Hell, I don't think anyone ships Hannigram harder than Bryan, except perhaps Mads (have you read his interviews about Hannibal?).
This got quite long-winded and I'm sorry about that. No show, no fandom, has ever made me so passionate about something as the Hannibal fandom. We have the best people ever working on a show I love everything about. <3
I absolutely adore when people write respectful long winded novel length comments on my articles. Especially about topics I feel equally passionate about. I agree with you very much. Thanks for reading and dropping this lovely note <3
Hi Angel: Please note that I was referring to Megan as "you" in the beginning and not you.
No problem. Respectful disagreement is absolutely fine. I'm just happy people are talking openly about the issue. While I may not agree with all of your points, I'm happy that you can discuss them here. 🙂
Let me say that I respect everyone's right to their opinions, but since you repeatedly made references to my comment and made several assumptions about what I meant, I feel I have to respond — if only so I'm not thought of as some sort of entitled fan, or worse yet, someone who has this "ridiculous notion" that lesbians can't have sex with men (btw, that's not what I meant. I was pointing out the mixed messages in relation to what many have seen as queerbaiting).
As for my experience with this topic and television:
I don't go into viewing a show expecting a slash pairing. I certainly didn't go into viewing Hannibal expecting a slash relationship between Will and Hannibal. I personally was looking forward to Mr. Fuller getting the rights to Clarice Starling and didn't know anything about his interview statements about a Hannibal and Will love story, Hannibal's sexual openness (later retracted), et cetera. I didn't find out about these issues until I noticed a pattern of repeated and seemingly unnecessary homoerotic elements in Season 2 that matched the pattern of queerbaiting that I've seen in other shows. I then investigated and saw that other fans were frustrated, disappointed or confused by it as well and read mixed messages in interviews and social media.
During Season 1, I had actually disbelieved accusations of queerbaiting that were made by some fans and argued that it seemed like they were misinterpreting what they saw onscreen.
So, please don't anyone think for a moment that I go into a show hoping that the male or female leads will become lovers.
All of that said…
A writer over at the Daily Dot tried to define queerbaiting with the statement that "characters behave or interact in ways that make it seem as if they are canonically gay or bisexual."
The problem is that many people view homoerotic subtext with heterosexual characters (or characters we're later told are heterosexual) as separate from the queerbaiting issue because viewers are told up front or down the line that the characters will never have sex. The writer of the Daily Dot article also made it seem like behavior and interaction between the two characters are the only tactics used in a pattern of queerbaiting.
First, the sexuality doesn't have to be openly canon for queerbaiting to take place. Queerbaiting can take place even if a character's sexuality is never openly dealt with onscreen. Additionally, queerbaiting often includes portrayals of secondary characters seriously or humorously implying that the two characters are or could become more.
Queerbaiting is a pattern that involves teasing fans with homoerotic or broad sexualized elements via dialogue, action, lighting, music and/or off screen in social media to create anticipation of more and evoke the sense of sexuality (without there being a sexual relationship) between characters that the PTB never had any intention of making bisexual or anything else. It's a pattern of winks and nods followed often by mixed messages or statements of denial.
I personally didn't want to believe queerbaiting was taking place in Hannibal Season 2, BUT when that pattern revealed itself onscreen and off screen it was very hard for me to ignore.
To reiterate: queerbaiting can take place whether a fan expects to see an implied slash relationship become canon on screen. That's why it's called "baiting." Yes, certain types of fans are baited, but that doesn't mean all of those fans actually expect anything to happen. After all, in the case of many LGBTQI viewers, there has been such poor representation of their experience onscreen, why would many of them who have become repeatedly disappointed expect it?
Of course, that brings up the question: Why is queerbaiting even something that should be discussed in relation to SlashShipsMatter?
If there is no other positive LGBTQI representation in a show, baiting fans with homoerotic elements between characters that will never "go there" or who are extremely damaged or in a harmful relationship can actually make some LGBTQI viewers feel as if their experiences are worthless and they are somehow less than or wrong. The mass confusion caused by queerbaiting tactics used with characters who are massively screwed up can imply, unintentionally, that anyone who isn't heterosexual is somehow deviant.
Mr. Fuller stated that he couldn't think of Hannibal and Will as gay because, again, he didn't think that they would be a healthy role model for gay culture. By never completely clearing up the matter of each man's sexuality on screen after they both slept with women (i.e. increased the homoerotic elements so much onscreen that they appeared, as some here have viewed it, as essentially canon Hannigram), and offering up mixed messages in interviews and social posts, Mr. Fuller implied a slash pairing. Worse yet, he created a subconscious connection between slash pairing and unhealthy relationships.
It doesn't matter that he was merely portraying Hannibal Lecter as a crazy cannibal and serial killer or Will as a screwed up empath. He chose to associate homoerotic behavior to these two men. So, if his big concern was that he couldn't think of them as gay because he didn't want to make a negative comparison… well… here we are. If he was worried about poor LGBTQI representation… here we are.
So… queerbaiting is important to this topic because there is no reason to increasing use homoerotic elements to explore the love between two heterosexual men in a deep friendship or bromance unless to keep certain fans watching and draw interest.
I could just as easily have believed that Hannibal loved Will in a non-sexual yet deep devoted manner without ever seeing a comparison to Achilles and Patroklus, the teacup discussion that for those who read the books implies sexual interest on Hannibal's part, the use of the word courtship, the romantic tropes (I'll forgive everything if you run away with me right now… I'll save you even though you've done horrible things), romantic music during sensual moments, dining actions that reflect certain sexual actions, et cetera.
Recently, I read an article in which Bryan Fuller proclaimed that Hannibal and Will were murder husbands in that moment in which they were watching Mason Verger cut off his face. How can anyone deny mixed messages with this show when one moment Mr. Fuller describes the two characters as "clearly" heterosexual and then the next talks about them being murder husbands, which is a fan term that implies not simply a deep friendship or bromance, but a sexual relationship (or the future possibility of one)? Now, I'm sure someone will then argue that you can be married and not have sex, but… seriously?
The beauty of queerbaiting tactics is that those who use them know that they can, if/when caught, fall back on very broad interpretations of their works. Queerbaiting takes advantage of the fact that many people see things differently. Those who do it can go ahead and take two heterosexual men or women and add homoerotic elements again and again and again… and then say, "I was exploring the very edge of a specific type of relationship" or "It wasn't intentional" or "I said off screen that these characters aren't gay."
Mr. Fuller also mentioned in another interview that the show is doing very well in Asia. Well, queerbaiting is extremely popular in certain areas of Asia. In fact, the show has been somewhat marketed internationally with that in mind.
So, again, I understand that many people don't see a pattern of queerbaiting. All I can say to them is that doesn't mean that the many fans who do are only imagining it or blowing things out of proportion — especially when a similar pattern pops up across different shows.
I also find it interesting that so many people immediately have strong comments or misinterpret my statements about this topic when I use the word "queerbaiting."
Some people have argued that the term should be "slashbaiting."
Well, slashbaiting implies that only slash fiction writers and readers have seen this pattern of queerbaiting in Hannibal, Sherlock, Supernatural and other shows. It also diminishes just how harmful and harsh the practice is to certain viewers and to LGBTQI representation.
I can't even begin to count the many times since I became aware of the term queerbaiting and the pattern of it that I've read stories by fans of different shows who witnessed the pattern and stated that it hurt them because they saw what they initially thought was positive representation (bisexual, transsexual, questioning, etc), or ANY representation, and were joyful only to then watch as creatives pulled back and said, "No. You're misinterpreting our work. We never meant for our characters to be anything other than heterosexual" even as those same intelligent fans saw the same pattern popping up in other shows.
Then, of course, there's the horror of seeing this pattern pop up in a work that involves creatives who are gay. For some fans, watching creatives from the LGBTQI community add homoerotic elements, imply that more will happen in future episodes and/or perform actions/make statements that suggest representation and then retract and deny all of it… has completely shattered their expectations of ever being represented equally or positively in the TV entertainment industry.
THAT is why SlashShipsMatter. THAT is why "queerbaiting" is the right term.
Note: Someone may ask also why I'm so passionate about this topic.
Beyond the fact that I simply don't enjoy being teased this way, I was attacked repeatedly online recently for suggesting that queerbaiting happened in Hannibal and for using term "queerbaiting." I have been cursed at and called names. I've had my words twisted to make it seem like I'm putting all the blame at the feet of one or two creatives or that I wouldn't be this passionate if the issue involved baiting about a heterosexual relationship that goes nowhere (Of course, that too was wrong. I've actually dropped shows that repeatedly implied the possibility of a heterosexual relationship and then didn't follow through).
That's the other very important reason why #SlashShipsMatter and why #queerbaiting needs to be talked about instead of excused away with claims of "fan entitlement," "misinterpretation" and "It's just homoerotic subtext."
Correction to the above:
"He chose to associate homoerotic 'elements' to these two men."
I saw your comment and your remark of "queerbaiting at it's finest" and did use that in my post, although I want you to know I wasn't really meaning you in specificness, but when I saw you write that, I remembered seeing a couple of others saying it (though not many. I'm not sure, but every time I look through the Hannibal-related tags on anything, I find mostly only positive things to be said about Bryan and Hannibal. I've been lucky to not come across anything negative for the most part).
I see you mentioned being attacked for using that term and I think that's purely *wrong*. Nobody should be attacked for something they believe, on either side of the debate. And I used "ridiculous notion" to describe the backlash of Margot having sex with Will, perhaps that was harsh wording, but watching through the episode, I understood automatically what Margot was trying to do. I can see why people would be upset about it, but this is first and foremost a television show. It's a story meant for entertainment. If it was trying to be politically correct or tackle issues like Glee often does, then it would just be *awful*.
I like that it's being written as it should be. As a story in which the plot comes first. It made perfect sense to me everything that Bryan and the other writers have done thus far.
I think "queerbaiting" is all perception. Because I've come across a few who think it and most who don't. Either way, I don't think Bryan is intentionally queerbaiting. I think he's just telling the story as he sees it. He called Hannigram "Murder husbands" because that's what the *fans* call Hannibal and dark!Will and we all realize just how very involved everyone on the Hannibal team is with the Hannibal fandom.
They interact with us on twitter, on tumblr, they follow our fanart. I love it. I suppose it just depends on the person. I don't feel its queerbaiting because I've not ever once thought it could possibly happen and I've always been okay with that. I'm perfectly fine with the *wonderful* fanfiction people write (and I have to say this, the Hannibal fandom as far as fanworks go has got to be one of the fandoms that reign supreme. Everything is beautiful, the art, the writings, the videos, *everything*.
I don't know. I just get a different feel from the Hannibal production team (especially Bryan) than I do for say, the Supernatural production team which is something I don't want to get into (though I don't feel nearly as queerbaited as most Destiel fans seem to. Probably because, again, I never actually believed Destiel even had the slightest chance of happening…although, those last two episodes made me believe it somewhat. I will say that I do think that if Cas or Dean were a girl…it probably most definitely would've happened by now).
I do see your points, although I still don't believe it was ever Bryan's intentions to queerbait in anyway. I think Bryan's passion for the project he's working on and Mads and Hugh's *perfect chemistry* seep into all of this. I love Hannibal and I love Bryan Fuller for what he's done with it, for Hannibal and Will's relationship. Everything I read about what he says about them just makes me love them more.
Still, I think its all perspective. Everything is all perspective. To be honest, we have no idea what Bryan is thinking. That's okay, I want to be surprised. But I respect your opinions and hope you can respect mine. =) And I'm glad this is a pleasant debate (I'm not sure what else I can call it). I've been in the middle of some wars before, though I try not to be, and its so stressful, I hate it.
It'd be so much simpler and better if people could just… respectful of everyone else. Fandom drama has got to be some of the worst drama ever. All I want to do is obsess over a brilliant show, read fanfiction (and perhaps write some–more–myself), and talk to people about how much we love this *thing*. I mean, is that really so much to ask?
I agree that there is a lot of fandom drama and that some of it is unnecessary.
Yet, in regards to queerbaiting, I've come to see it as more than merely a fan wish fulfillment issue or fandom drama. If only a small group of people saw this pattern, I might think it was actually because a group was so desperate for a pair to hook up that they went overboard. BUT, this pattern that I've mentioned… it's being seen by people who didn't expect, and in a lot of cases, didn't even want it.
I usually comment after articles or tweet when I'm upset about this topic, but after the attacks I posted more about the pattern of queerbaiting and my thoughts in a followup (link in the OP notes) here: http://jherara.tumblr.com/post/86938561158/queerbaiting-denials-and-the-obvious-pattern-the#note-container
Although I would like creatives to always be able to present their stories as they see fit (and believe they can if they go the crowdfunding rather than traditional project route), I understand how the TV industry works and I know that no one creative who follows the traditional TV production path is in complete control of the final outcome on screen or in the marketing. At the same time, because creatives choose the traditional TV production route and some are responsible for their interview responses and social posts, I can't just sit back and say that they're not complicit when the pattern emerges.
I also sincerely don't want to force political correctness down the throats of creatives. In fact, one of the people who attacked me kept saying that I was trying to do exactly that. Honestly, I was just stating my opinion about why I didn't completely enjoy the Hannibal finale.
But since those attacks happened, I've really had to think about why all of this upsets me so much. I'm now very much of the opinion that it's absolutely necessary in the entertainment industry for something to change in regards to using homoerotic elements to enhance heterosexual relationships for the purpose of teasing fans. Call it a political agenda or not. It's my personal feeling about this topic.
Many of the rights we enjoy today resulted because of people dealing head on with social issues and representation on television.
I think about African American and women's rights and how television was critical in changing how people treat both groups and continues to be very important when it comes to their rights. I think about the popular use of black face in entertainment years ago.
How many African Americans today would be fine if the practice of white men dressed in black face came back in entertainment? It's happened a little, but nothing like the "black face" caricatures of the past.
If African Americans today complained would they be considered crazy or delusional? Would they be told to just get over it and enjoy the show?
Yet, here we are with a similar issue on television — an entire group of people being represented as either a joke, something to be mocked or so unimportant that their experience is portrayed by heterosexual actors or in part as homoerotic elements woven into the stories of heterosexual characters.
To me, the issue isn't only about fans feeling lied to (ALTHOUGH that IS a big part of the issue), but about abusing or twisting the LGBTQI experience to generate buzz and $$$.
I can understand those who don't see it. After all, it's a matter of experiences, perspective and exposure.
On the other hand, as I explored this further I did begin to find more fans who were complaining than I initially thought existed.
I was also hit really in the gut by another pattern I noticed: Over time, I realized that people who upvoted my comments about this subject were almost always "Guests" on Disqus or elsewhere — especially if my comments were being attacked.
What does it say about the world in which we live if someone who agrees with you only feels they can do so by remaining anonymous? Is it because they're scared of also being attacked? Is it because they're worried about what people will think of them for agreeing?
You mentioned that if either Dean or Cas were a girl then it probably would have happened by now. That really is another aspect of this issue. Would the PTB tell fans who saw great chemistry between Dean and a girl Cas onscreen that they're seeing things or delusional?
Yes. In SOME cases.
BUT, how many times did fans love onscreen chemistry between het male and female friends, voiced their opinion loudly and the PTB took it all the way? Isn't that an example of "fan entitlement"??? Apparently not since that very situation has created some of the greatest, most-loved relationships on screen. For example: Booth and Bones and Castle and Kate…
How many times has someone voiced frustration about baiting involving a het m/f friendship and received overwhelming online support? Yet, when it's this vague hetero uncertainty situation that queerbaiting tactics create… there's almost immediately a backlash against those who feel frustrated.
I read a recap on BuddyTV abou the The Penny Dreadful kiss last night between Ethan and Dorian. Following it was a poll asking for viewer opinions about the two. 42 percent of responded "No, just no." about them. I would love to know just how many of the respondents were people who feel the kiss/situation didn't make sense for the plot and how many were against it because it was a gay kiss???
As I told someone else, I'm actually happy to a degree for those who don't see any pattern of queerbaiting — it means they can enjoy these shows without cringing, without frustration and without feeling marginalized.
I've reached a point where I can't anymore. I saw it with Supernatural. I saw it with Sherlock. Now, S2 of Hannibal.
So, as much as I don't want to force some sort of political correctness down the throats of creatives, I also don't feel that I or anyone else should accept living in a world where this particular form of discrimination in entertainment should be the status quo — especially if it means that I can't even comment about the topic in one or two sentences in passing as an opinion (referring to what happened previously) without being attacked.
Anywho, I'm really hopeful that I won't have to go through this with any future seasons of shows I still watch or new shows. Fingers crossed. As I mentioned elsewhere, the only solution for me might be to not read interviews or social posts at all and binge watch a season and judge it on it's own merits.
Sadly, even doing that, I probably would have still dumped SPN after S8 and Sherlock after S2 because the queerbaiting was fairly obvious and distracting to me by then.
As much as I love Hannibal… I don't know. I guess I can only hope that by this time next year I won't still feel so tired and disgusted because of the whole the experience and I'll be willing to give Mr. Fuller and his crew's vision a second chance.
Also sorry, I feel like I explain myself so awfully! My thoughts are jumbled usually so I just type down whatever comes to mind. Thankfully my fics are much more coherent (I think).
It's fine. You're explanation is very clear.
CF73 says:
"Many have brought up the point that opposite-sex ships are not given the same scrutiny has same-sex ships."
^ This.
When people ship straight characters that aren't canon, it's usually accepted by the fans/actors/writers/etc as just an alternative ship to canon. But make it two dudes or two chicks and suddenly you get comments about how it's "ruining the show" or how it's "making the show about something it's not" or how it's a "twisted" way of looking at things and we're "watching [the show] for the wrong reasons" (cough Poseygate).
The worst part is, arguments against slash pairings are usually SO hypocritical!
One of the arguments I've seen with Sterek is the age factor, which is sort of valid because even though we don't know Derek's age, Stiles is technically underage in CA. Fine. And yet that issue rarely comes up in the Pretty Little Liars fandom, for example, despite one of the main characters – who is in high school – being in a CANON relationship with her TEACHER. Plus Allison who is linked to all sorts of older guys as a middle schooler. Likewise we have Dany/Jorah & Dany/Khal (she's 15 y'all), Sailor Moon had several middle/high school girls with college or post-college boys…then you've got the "ancient" or immortal characters like in Twilight and Doctor Who (I mean are you kidding me)?
If you ship Cora/Stiles, Cora/Isaac, or Lydia/Isaac? No issues. But ship Sterek and suddenly you're "delusional" – despite the fact that they have had significantly more interaction than the other three pairings. Stiles and Derek "barely know each other" and yet we're expected to ship Stalia/Dennifer/Dethan/Skira by the creators? Oh, I see – it's okay if it's het. (No hate meant to those ships or shippers, just the hypocritical way they're handled by the writers and some fans.) Stiles and Derek "hate each other" and yet Stydia and Stalia are widely accepted, despite Malia admitting she hated the gang and Lydia expressing quite clearly in seasons 1 and 2 (and presumably pre-s1) that she doesn't not give a single hoot about Stiles at all.
Ellery says:
Thank you Angel K and commenters for demonstrating that this topic can be discussed with respect. Sometimes the double-standard applied as regards het ships and slash ships depresses me.
I'm tired of hearing that fans of slash pairings are the reason certain shows have gone downhill. I'm tired of the fact that I'm not allowed to voice a legitimate criticism of any character without being accused of bias because of the pairing I ship, while shippers of het pairings are allowed to be vocal with no similar challenges. I'm tired of being made to feel as if I should apologize for shipping a slash pairing.
The occasional article like this one reminds me that there are people who can approach the subject without being offensive. I'm grateful for that.
"I'm tired of the fact that I'm not allowed to voice a legitimate criticism of any character without being accused of bias because of the pairing I ship, while shippers of het pairings are allowed to be vocal with no similar challenges."
Your comment made me tear up a bit because that's exactly what I was aiming for. I want this topic to be discussed openly and without shaming. I'm glad that I gave you a bit of hope on that front. 🙂
Pingback: #SlashShipsMatter…To Whom, Exactly? | The Daily Geekette
Herself-nyc says:
Enjoyed this post. I've been away from slash for few years (used to be very involved in Buffy fandom), since before the advent of Twitter, and was interested to see that slash fandom is "coming out".
Will read the rest of the comments, but want to express my appreciation for your piece.
I was just catching up with June news for Hannibal and read this June 4th DigitalSpy article: http://www.digitalspy.com/tv/s225/hannibal/news/a575402/bryan-fuller-on-hannibal-homoeroticism-will-grahams-heterosexual.html#~oIoeoHto4YZALD
It's official…until Bryan Fuller changes his mind again…
– Will Graham was never intended to be anything other than entirely heterosexual
– Hannibal was intended to be fluid and turned on by anything
– The sexual undertones were "absolutely intentional"
… as was the queerbaiting …
"'If you could've heard me cackling in the editing room, you would take it with the naughty wink with which it was intended for a certain portion of the audience," he said."
Now, some people who ship Hannibal and Will might be pleased with the "naughty wink" as some sort of insider joke or fan service.
Personally, I don't find it funny — especially given the lack of LGBTQI representation on TV or the recent uptick of slash shipper mocking by entertainment creatives.
I find the fact that he has backtracked yet again more proof that he's playing the same games as the creatives of Supernatural, Sherlock, Rizzoli and Isles, etc.
In the space of a little over a month, he went from:
1. Potentially fluid Hannibal and het Will
to …
2. "clearly heterosexual" Hannibal and Will and interpretative art
3. Definitely fluid Hannibal who would be "turned on by anything alive" and het Will…
Of course, if any of you are Supernatural fans, this last one fits the pattern of queerbaiting tactics used by that show… in which Dean possessed by a heterosexual dog and attracted to a female poodle was considered better than being bisexual. The same excuse is used in Sherlock — his unique view transcends a sexual definition…which just so happens to leave his feelings about John open to interpretation.
BF says that he did it for a "certain portion of the audience."
Well, we live in a time in which creatives can give us homosexual characters. Yet, the only openly homosexual character in Hannibal was a token lesbian abused by her brother who then had sex with a het character to get pregnant. Again, I'm not denying that it happens, but given that BF is himself gay, you think he would realize that many fans would be insulted by that act AND by his "naughty wink."
After all, he essentially left it open enough so that fans who believe in heteronormativity can still stay strong in the belief that gay people are gay by choice and/or because of abuse (Margot) or mental illness (Hannibal).
This is yet another example of the PTB in the entertainment industry wanting to keep their cake and eat it too.
He knowingly edited to give the fans who believe in heteronormativity what they wanted (which is apparently the most important thing — I say sarcastically) while merely winking and nodding, poorly, at shippers and members of the LGBTQI community.
He should have been clear about what he was doing from the very start.
BUT… again, use of mixed messages IS a queerbaiting tactic.
As is toying with the editing to make scenes more sexualized when he had no intention to offer fans two-sided "Hannigram" or clearly one-sided Hannigram as canon. After all, if Hannibal is attracted to "anything" then he isn't bisexual either.
Of course, bisexuality appears to be the most taboo of topics in mainstream TV today.
Thanks so much for all you've brought to the comments section and for educating me on interviews I hadn't seen before. I still feel like Hannibal is "better" than Supernatural in this regard simply for how they talk and engage fans, but my opinion is a bit different than when I wrote the article. I definitely understand your perspective, though, and again thanks so much for all the discussion and links. I love when my readers are as passionate about a topic as I am!
On the topic of bisexual characters on TV, I'm hoping Constantine does't disappoint. He's canonically bisexual in the comics and I hope that they keep him that way on the show.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


If you would like to ask a question about our fun filled family activities at the Hahndorf Farm Barn please complete our on-line request or send an email to visit@farmbarn.com.au. We do check our e-mail every day, but if you are in a hurry for an answer it might be better to give us a call. Either way, we would love to hear from you! Please let us know if you have any special needs at all that we can assist you with at the time of your booking.
Our office hours are 9am to 5pm Monday to Friday for all bookings and general enquiries. We are available by phone on weekends between 10am to 4pm during our farm open times for questions relating to your visit on the day, however if we are not able to take your call due to assisting customers or being on another call, there is a very detailed voice message with heaps of the information you might require including how to find us if you are lost!


ever since 16 models were introduced after. The best vpn for iphone 4 first version of the. Please wait. Samsung Electronics. No votes yet. Samsung Galaxy Tab is a line of high end tablets developed by. Samsung Galaxy Tab was introduced into the market in September 2010.once this is done install in best vpn for iphone 4 the normal way kerio vpn client x64 by going to. VPN Manager Install and Configuration 1. Locate where the file is and select it. The repo will now be installed. System Add-ons Install from ZIP file.
How to Set Up A OpenVPN VPN on Windows XP.
man kann das Sortiment beispielsweise in einem Werkzeugkasten oder best vpn for iphone 4 Werkstattwagen lagern. Der Hazet Steckschlüsselsatz 854 wird z. B. Bei der Besorgung eines Steckschlüsselsatzes existieren ebenso Unterscheidungsmerkmale in der Unterbringung, was wiederum ein wichtiger Aspekt für die Langlebigkeit des Sortiments ist.
fREE SOCKS LIST Proxies in Papua best vpn for iphone 4 New Guinea - domain.PG.thats why they invented Stealth VPN technology. A stealth VPN can disguise/scramble your VPN traffic so its either not identifiable as VPN traffic, vPN providers are sophos utm vpn verbindung aware best vpn for iphone 4 that some ISPs/networks are blocking VPN traffic.
nella versione Plus possibile selezionare il paese del server VPN ed elimina ogni fonte pubblicitaria best vpn for iphone 4 a soli 9,99 dollari allanno. ProXPN: ProXPN per gli account gratuiti offre solo server Americani, un limite della banda passante a 300Kb/s e un filtro sul traffico Torrent,connect to the Internet with an IP address in India. Access India-only sites and services from anywhere in the world. As if you are physically there. Our best vpn for iphone 4 strategically located VPN server in India allows you to connect to local sites and applications, indian VPN. In addition,in this case 0:4:e was the MAC of the firewall's best vpn for iphone 4 eth0 NIC while 0:c0:a8:50:b2:57 was the MAC address of the system on the lower left. In other words,general Authentication Thin Client Clientless SSO Client Based SSO. It authenticates users with. IPSec VPN SSL best vpn for iphone 4 VPN Client Cyberoam s General Authentication Client Cyberoam s General Authentication Client is the standalone application for. Cyberoam Identity-based UTM appliances.
a more realistic example would use the other methods of java thenticator proxy web anonimo to get more information about the HTTP request that needs best vpn for iphone 4 to be authenticated.
download 18 Hideman Ltd. Inc. Download 1 Chimera Computing Ltd 24 Freeware It provides a quick netgear vpn lite client software and easy way to test whether a VPN link is active. Download 4 GSM Kazakhstan/Kcell 1,792 Freeware Kcell Connect quick and reliable access to Internet via best vpn for iphone 4 wireless USB modem. Download 8 Spyproof 10 Commercial Spyproof VPN allows you to connect to the Internet anonymously. Non-reviewed Download BVS Performance Systems 5 Download eCopy, 5,990 Shareware Connect through a VPN to protect your privacy and bypass restrictions.


text:
Beer, TX
Brewery bill moves to committee
By Ronnie Crocker on February 21, 2011 at 10:38 AM
Will this be the year Texas amends its liquor laws to help small brewers?
HB602, the bill that would allow Saint Arnold and Real Ale and other Texas brewers to distribute a limited amount of beer following tours — making the experience similar to that enjoyed by winery tourists already, and greatly improving the breweries' marketing — is now in the Licensing & Administrative Procedures Committee.
This was expected, and it now gives interested Texans a focal point to contact the representatives who will decide whether the bill moves on for further consideration.
You can find contact information for all members here. (UPDATE: I've switched the link to the committee site on the Texas House website, which gives faster access to the lawmakers' e-mail accounts.)
My newspaper editorialized in favor of HB 602.
Also, note that Saint Arnold will hold a rally for the bill with a Friday evening tour. The brewery will be open from 5:30-7:30 p.m. Feb. 25, for $10 per person. All money raised will go toward supporting the bill.
Finally, a story last week in the Texas Tribune on HB660, the brewpub measure that is being pushed by Freetail owner Scott Metzger in San Antonio, included an infographic suggests the key role money plays in this ongoing effort:
Top 10 Texas Beer Lobby Donations
Politician (Donations since 2001) Office
Perry, Rick ($143,874) Governor
Straus, Joe ($72,002) Texas House Speaker
Craddick, Tom ($63,000) Former House Speaker
Combs, Susan ($57,711) Texas Comptroller
Dewhurst, David ($55,500) Lieutenant Governor
Abbott, Greg ($51,493) Attorney General
Whitmire, John ($42,500) State Senator
Carona, John ($38,500) State Senator
Jackson, Jim ($36,721) State Representative
Gallegos, Mario ($34,158) State Senator
Source: Texas Ethics Commission
It is interesting to note — this year, as well as in previous efforts — that there is no organized moral opposition to bills that would help Texas brewers.
Change will be difficult because of lobbying. Could your voice influence the voting in Austin? There is only one way to find out.
Join Beer, TX on Facebook at facebook.com/rcrocker.beertx or follow me on Twitter: @rcrocker
Ronnie Crocker | Assistant Business Editor
Archives Select Month November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009


"HP Has to be In the Game" When it Comes to Smartphones; Android Phones to Come From HP in Future?
HP and the mobile market have had a rocky relationship to say the least, from old Windows Mobile handsets to the purchase of the ailing Palm, it's never quite clicked for HP. Of course, axing the WebOS division months after purchasing it probably didn't help much when you think about it. Recently, HP began their march back into the mobile market with a new Android tablet, the Slate 7 as well as upcoming hardware featuring the elusive Tegra 4 CPU from Nvidia. The Slate 7 was a disappointing offering from HP and featured last-year specs at an unattractive price, but will they have more luck with smartphones?
"The answer is yes but I cannot give a timetable. It would be silly if we say no. HP has to be in the game."
"Being late you have to create a different set of proposition[s]. There are still things that can be done. It's not late. When HP has a smartphone, it will give a differentiated experience."
While these are optimistic words from HP - or at least one exec within the company - it's not easy to break into the smartphone game, especially with so many heavily entrenched players and the insane marketing machine that is Samsung. If they want to succeed they'd have to break into the US and that's even more difficult than it is on an international level. With the carriers still holding all the keys to the market, we're not sure even HP can get the right people on board at this late stage.
Competition is always good though, and we'd like to ask what you think HP could bring to the table?


Women's share of the workforce is hovering around 50 percent, and it probably won't grow much more. But that's not a bad thing.
The story of women's employment is not dominance, flipping, or tipping points—it's convergence towards equality.
In the first period of the recession, employment rates fell faster for men than for women. And for a moment at the end of 2009, women crossed the 49 percent threshold in their share of one measure of the labor force: the "B-5 series," or nonfarm payrolls, from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. It excludes farmworkers and self-employed people, who are mostly men, so it leans more female.
At a time when the world is short of causes for celebration, here is a candidate: within the next few months women will cross the 50% threshold and become the majority of the American workforce.
Across the developed world, a combination of the effects of birth control, social change, political progress and economic necessity has produced a tipping point: numerically, women now match or overtake men in the work force and in education. ... this year, women will become the majority of the American work force.
a major tipping point in our nation's social and economic history: the emergence of working women as primary breadwinners for millions of families at the same time that their presence on America's payrolls grew to comprise fully half the nation's workforce.
Ever since The Tipping Point, no one in the American media wants to miss the next big tipping point. For some reason reporting on demographic trends has been especially susceptible, even though they rarely fit the epidemic model the Malcolm Gladwell laid out -- in which small innovations explode out into major trends for unpredictable reasons.
The long-run news is the huge increase in women's share of this labor pool. The medium-run news is the 15 years of stall from 1992 to 2007. The latest news is the increase since 2007, which moderated as women's job losses partially caught up with men's. That moment was not a triumphant entry into a new era, but rather a dramatic illustration of the hit men took at the start of the crisis.
In my last post I showed that underlying economic pressure toward women's employment has cooled since the 1970s. The data give us very little reason to expect a sweeping economic shift that privileges women's jobs in the near future.
Women have increased their share in every country. But no country has crossed the 50 percent threshold, and most show tapering or slowing progress as they approach it. Some exceptional countries—especially Spain, Ireland, and Italy—continue to rise quickly, but they were catching up from a low point in 1970. Maybe in next decade or so some of these countries will cross 50 percent, but from the slowing pace of change it doesn't look like it will be a stampede over the line. In fact, the most dramatic thing about this figure may be the convergence between 45 percent and 50 percent, where 13 of the 18 countries now lie.
Maybe it's the winner-take-all, 50 percent+1 nature of the American discourse that creates this unhealthy focus on dominance, as if that can be captured by a single indicator passing a 50/50 threshold. 51 percent isn't an on-switch for social dominance. If we could get out from under these 51 percent-take-all narratives we might be able to appreciate the progress that we have made toward gender equality, and focus on the obstacles that impede further movement in that direction.


Experience one of the conveniences that comes with living in the modern world by applying for approval and receiving the car loan you're after! No need for lengthy conversations or visiting our office to put you on the path to finding the car loan that will get you on the road in the car you know you deserve. When you work with DreamCatcher Financing you receive the care and the consideration that comes from a team of car loan specialists who understand how to navigate the legalese and find you the loan that makes sense for your specific situation to get that no credit check car loans.
At DreamCatcher Financing you are not just a number. You deserve the quality of service backed by a commitment that goes above and beyond the call every step of the way. Now, it is important to note that no credit car loans may seem a little misleading as, of course, there will be credit assessments during your application process. What we want you to know and to feel is that you will not be persecuted or condemned because of your financial history. With DreamCatcher Financing we do all the heavy lifting and put you back on track to getting the car you know you deserve. Our 24/7 processing procedure it doesn't matter when you apply – we're going to get to work for you and put you back on the track to getting the car loan that we're sure will make your life better.
We're here for you every step of the way. Whether you want to discuss your situation with one of our experts or you simply want to learn more about what we can do for you, the team at DreamCatcher Financing is ready to find the results that make a difference. After all, that's how we measure our success – by your success.
Work with us because we want to see you get back on the road in the vehicle that you've always wanted. We want you to be able to tell your friends and family members that there was a better place to get your car loan and that you found what you were after with the DreamCatcher Financing team. It sounds simple because it can and should be simple. At least, that's what we aspire to – and with confidence that comes from a long list of customers that have found what they were after thanks to our superior service and attention to details.
Wondering How do I Apply?
This will be one of the easiest application processes you've ever had to do. Not only that, but the availability of applying online adds to the convenience factor that we hope makes your life easier in ways that you had not considered before. At the end of this experience we want you to rest assured that you made the right choice – because we're here to make certain it all works in your favor.
Apply simply with just your full name, phone number, and email address you'll be well on your way to getting approved for the car loan that will see you planning your next adventure or vacation in the vehicle you've dreamt of driving. Our customers have enjoyed our elevated service and appreciate that among our many services that we are prepared to work with those with bad credit, poor credit, good credit, or even no credit! We often reply in as little as 48 hours, meaning that you will be approved and on your way to driving home your next car in practically no time! No long waits. No hassles. All results! The DreamCatcher Financing way!


text:
The idea caught on and soon the tradition of sending holiday
One of the prime developmental tasks of early childhood (besides not dying if you're reading this, congrats) is to form attachments to people, both real and imagined. Identification is key to healthy development and strong role models, psychologists know, stay with us. For millions of millennials, these role models came in the form of Disney princesses, then never quite disappeared."Children form strong (often passionate) attachments to the characters and it's not surprising that these attachments persist for many of us into adulthood.
Replica Bags But as a wide receiver he is used to getting tackled maybe 10 times a game at most, and most of those tackles are by smaller players like corners and safeties. It's a totally different feeling to run between the tackles and get smashed 15 times a game by defensive linemen and linebackers. Think of it this way: If you weighed the same as Eddie Lacy and both of you got 15 carries yesterday, I think you'd be a little worse for wear than Lacy, whose body is accustomed to taking lots of hits each week. Replica Bags
Designer Replica Bags As long ago as 2005, MPs on the international development select committee found that India to have become increasingly tired of being cast in the role of aid recipient. In their most recent report on the programme, last year, they said that British aid to the country should fundamentally, with different sources of funding. The report praised a number of DFID projects, but questioned others.. Designer Replica Bags
replica handbags online Any international shipping is paid in part to Pitney Bowes Inc. Learn More opens in a https://www.designerreplicabags.com new window or tabWe accept exchanges and returns within 30 days of original delivery date. All returns must be in original condition, the product MUST NOT be worn. I found this practicality attractive. I liked how Preppers were given to debate (bear spray or baseball bats? Water purification or water filtration?) and how they were versed in esoteric areas of knowledge (fish antibiotics, New York City knife laws). I was especially enamored of the jargon: (Get Out of Dodge) or (The End of the World as We Know It). replica handbags online
Fake Designer Bags Cole and an artist friend thought of the idea of a single image that you could High Quality replica Bags send to friends and family during the holidays to save time instead of hand writing individual letters. They came up and printed the first Christmas card. The idea caught on and soon the tradition of sending holiday cards had spread to the United States and beyond. By the Fourth Shinobi World War arc Sai is Demoted to Extra and is Put on a Bus. However Sasuke returns as a Sixth Ranger (out of necessity) and the Part I Team 7 is reborn with group dynamics mostly intact. Honorary True Companions who stayed for an arc or two include The Strategist Shikamaru, Boisterous Bruiser Might Guy, and Soul Brotha Killer Bee. Fake Designer Bags
Replica Designer Handbags Flynt would eventually make his way to Auburn University as the chair of the History Department in 1977. He remained there for the rest of his teaching career before retiring in 2005 as a Distinguished University Professor. Most of Flynt's literary work talks about the economic, political and social situations of Alabama through the state's history.. Replica Designer Handbags
Replica Handbags They pushed the brand's repute worldwide. Professional athletes the world over sought them out.By the 1960s a remarkable 17million people in the GDR were wearing Zeha sports shoes. The GDR's population was roughly 19million. The woman, who is not identified by the Enquirer because she is the alleged victim of sexual assault, testified last week that she went with Wimberly and Martin to get money for the gun she was selling. As they were when Martin stopped the car and Wimberly attacked her in the backseat of the car as Martin held her arms. Wimberly threatened to kill her before she was released.. Replica Handbags
aaa replica designer handbags She'll create her own eco system and learn about the life cycle of plants with her habitat, which will begin to grow in as little as 3 4 days. At the same time, she can express her artistic skills, decorating her terrarium's jar with awesome glow in the dark stickers. This cool kit includes: a plastic mason style jar, decorative lid, potting mix, organic chia and wheat grass seeds, craft accessories and a plant mister to keep her terrarium watered. aaa replica designer handbags
wholesale replica designer handbags Getting this wrong can cost serious money. My wife and I struggled mightily to get our workers' comp account set up through the entity that the state of New York forces you to use. It didn't happen until weeks after our baby sitter started working. My daughter told me, "Mom, don't worry. Serene is good with little babies. You will be their love of loves when they are older and it really counts wholesale replica designer handbags.
« This means that one can exploit the new wireless charging • "With it being a law enforcement officer involved always an »


Project was designed and built by Schonsheck, Inc. The project includes over 60,000 S.F. of R&D and manufacturing space, along with 16,000 S.F. of office space. The two story office component masks the presence of the manufacturing space to the rear. The masonry facade steps down from the office space to an 8' wainscot around the manufacturing floor to gently transition to the more economical and energy efficient insulated metal foam panels used to clad the manufacturing space.


Community Regional Medical Center is home to the region's only Level 1 Trauma Center and participates in Safe Kids USA – a nationwide network of organizations working to prevent unintentional childhood injury. Members of Safe Kids Central Valley received a grant from Safe Kids USA to bring enhanced traffic engineering to some Fresno area elementary schools. This video is a reminder to slow down and pay attention at all times, whether you are a driver or a pedestrian.


2. Complete the usual information fields, including the date of purchase under the 'Date added to system' field.
3. At the bottom of the pop-up screen, choose which 'Cash Tracking Account' was used to purchase the asset in question. If necessary, create a new Cash Tracker on the fly, if the relevant one is not already on the system.


Looking For Engraving Supplies & Equipment?
Assured Laser Solutions, Engraving Supplies & Equipment, listed under "Engraving Supplies & Equipment" category, is located at 6/ 95 Riverside Pl Morningside QLD, 4170, Australia and can be reached by 0739097888 phone number. Assured Laser Solutions has currently 0 reviews.
Browse all Engraving Supplies & Equipment in Morningside QLD.


text:
Q: looping through an array of objects and getting the average I am looking to to loop through an array of objects in my prototype function. After I loop I want to get the average of the gpa array and then console log the name, address, gpa and average gpa. I am able to do all but the average. I want this to all run together within the testing function. Thanks for all the help.
var students = [{
    name: "Walker",
    address: {
        street: "123 South Drive",
        city: 'Sarasota',
        state: 'FL'
    },
    gpa: [3.0, 3.4, 3.8]
}, {
    name: "Christian",
    address: {
        street: "5601 Pebble Beach Ln",
        city: 'Sacromento',
        state: 'CA'
    },
    gpa: [2.5, 3.6, 3.8]
}];

var stud = Students(students);

stud.testing();

constuctor.js:
var Students = function (students) {
    return new Students.prototype.init(students);
}

Students.prototype = {
    init: function (students) {
        this.students = students;
    },
    testing: function () {

        for (i = 0; i < this.students.length; i++) {
            i = i % this.students.length;

            for (j = 0; j < this.students.length; j++) {

                this.gpa1 = this.students[j].gpa;
                this.len = this.students[j].gpa.length;

                //console.log(this.gpa1);

                this.average = this.gpa1[0] + this.gpa1[1] + this.gpa1[2];
                this.res = this.average / this.len;
                console.log(this.res);
            }

            console.log("Name: " + this.students[i].name);
            console.log("Address: " + this.students[i].address.street + ' ' + this.students[i].address.city + ' ' + this.students[i].address.state);
            console.log("GPA: " + this.students[i].gpa);
            console.log("Average: " + this.gpa1);

        }
    },
    addData: function (student3) {
        this.students.push(student3);
    }

A: You have a starting-point to get the average, however, it looks like you're leaving it as the "total" instead:
this.average = this.gpa1[0] + this.gpa1[1] + this.gpa1[2];

Now, assuming that there will only ever be three grades, we could make just a small change:
this.average = (this.gpa1[0] + this.gpa1[1] + this.gpa1[2]) / 3.0;

If you want a more dynamic average, though it's probably not going to be the case, you could perform the calculations in a loop:
for (var avg = 0; avg < this.gpa1.length; avg++) {
    this.average += this.gpa1[avg];
}
this.average = this.average / this.gpa1.length;

Both of my solutions above are for calculating the average for each individual student; if you need to calculate a total average for all students, adjustments to the loop above should suffice but for a more precise example check out @MattBurland's answer.

A: This should be easy, loop over the students, then loop over their GPA score, add them up and divide by the total number of points:
testing: function () {
    var total = 0;
    var numPoints = 0;
    for (var i = 0; i < this.students.length; i++) {
        var thisStudentsTotal = 0;
        for (var j = 0; j < this.students[i].gpa.length; j++) {
            total += this.students[i].gpa[j];
            thisStudentsTotal += this.students[i].gpa[j];
            numPoints++;
        }
        // This is the average for just this student
        this.students[i].myAvg = thisStudentsTotal / this.students[i].gpa.length;
    }
    // This is the average for every student
    var theAverage = total / numPoints;
}

A: I would be inclined to add the GPA average to the object before you loop over it. That way you can reuse it in other parts of the program without duplicating code.
Here I've used the Array.map and Array.reduce methods to add the average (to two decimal places) to each student object, simply because I think it's neater.
this.students.map(function (el) {
  el.avg = (el.gpa.reduce(function (p, c) {
    return p + c;
  }) / el.gpa.length).toFixed(2);
  return el;
});

And now you just loop over the objects.
for (var i = 0, l = this.students.length; i < l; i++) {
  var student = this.students[i];
  console.log("Name: " + student.name);
  // etc
}

I've added a fiddle which includes your code, corrected slightly where I've seen an error. I've separated the getAverageGpa code into a new function.


Our non-agency loan programs are designed to appeal to a broad range of homebuyers. They are the perfect solution to help you expand your client base and provide solutions to an underserved market.
Whether you are looking to provide financing to wealthy retirees, clients with recent credit problems, upwardly mobile professionals with limited savings, real estate investors, or even foreign investors, we have a loan program for you—with payments your borrowers can afford.