text:
Emily of New Moon
By Lucy Maud Montgomery
Adapted for audio by Dave Carley and Beverley Cooper
Read by Megan Follows
L. M. Montgomery Design Sound Productions
The Emily Trilogy: Book 1
Category: Fiction/Classics
Audience: Young Adult (12–17)
Publisher: Design Sound Productions Publisher: Design Sound Productions Publisher: Design Sound Productions
A 2019 News BBC Pick of the 100 Most Influential Novels
Lucy Maud Montgomery, the Canadian author of the popular Anne of Green Gables series, introduces us to an endearing new heroine in Emily of New Moon. Like Anne Shirley, Emily Starr is a quick-witted and imaginative orphan who is sent to live with her two maiden aunts at New Moon Farm after her father dies. Though initially disheartened by her strict and conventional Aunt Elizabeth, Emily slowly grows to love her new family and New Moon Farm.
There she makes friends with Ilse Burnley, a tomboy with a blazing temper; quiet, artistic Teddy Kent; and Perry Miller, the hired boy, who Aunt Elizabeth looks down upon because he was born in the impoverished "Stovepipe Town."
Montgomery considered Emily to be a character much closer to her personality than Anne, and some of the events which occur in the Emily series happened to Montgomery herself. Emily is described as having black hair, purply violet eyes, elfin ears, pale skin, and a unique and enchanting "slow" smile.
This charming audio adaptation of Emily of New Moon is set against the backdrop of picturesque Prince Edward Island. A delightful story the whole family will enjoy!
"Actress Megan Follows is best known for her TV portrayal of L. M. Montgomery's more famous orphan character, Anne of Green Gables. Here, with terrific range, Follows narrates the first book in a separate series from the author…Follows uses a solemn, quiet tone as tough matters are discussed and emits a fierce 'no!' when adamant deathbed wishes are made. As Emily, Follows conveys vulnerability with a quiet and meek voice, but when Emily reaches her boiling point, she yells at classroom bullies exactly what she thinks of them." —AudioFile
"Emily's story is thought-provoking and inspirational for young readers. Highly recommended." —Canadian Book Review
Author Bio: L. M. Montgomery
Lucy Maud Montgomery was born on November 30th, 1874, in Clifton, Prince Edward Island, Canada. Although she lived during a time when few women received a higher education, Lucy attended Prince Wales College in Charlottestown, PEI, and then Dalhousie University in Halifax. At seventeen she went to Halifax, Nova Scotia, to write for a newspaper, the Halifax Chronicle, and for its evening edition, the Echo. But Lucy returned to live with her grandmother in Cavendish, PEI, where she taught and contributed stories to magazines. It was this experience, along with the lives of her farmer and fisherfolk neighbors, that came alive when she wrote her Anne books, beginning with Anne of Green Gables (1908). Anne of Green Gables brought her overnight success and international recognition. It was followed by eight other books about Anne and Avonlea, as well as a number of other delightful novels, including her Emily series, which began in 1923 with Emily of New Moon. But it is her delightful heroine Anne Shirley, praised by Mark Twain as "the most moving and delightful child of fiction since the immortal Alice," who remains a popular favorite throughout the world. She and her husband, the Rev. Ewen MacDonald, eventually moved to Ontario. Lucy Montgomery died in Toronto in 1942.


text:
Ways to Spot the Flood Cars They Will Try to Palm Off on You
A master mechanic told me that any inspection should now include putting a probe inside the door. Apparently that will show water damage. (Illinois Consumer Attorney Dan Daneen)
And consumer attorney extraordinaire Joanne Faulkner of New Haven, CT, reports:
"Consumer Reports has suggested tips for identifying cars that may have spent time underwater. A buyer or mechanic should look for these telltale signs:
Caked-on mud and a musty odor from the carpets. New carpets in an older vehicle may be another red flag.
A visible water line on the lens or reflector of the headlights.
Mud or debris trapped in difficult-to-clean places, such as gaps between panels in the trunk and under the hood.
Rusty exposed screws under the dashboard. Unpainted metal in flood cars will show signs of rust.
Rubber drain plugs under the car and on the bottom of doors that have been removed. That may have been done to drain floodwater.
Also keep in mind that parts from the scrapped cars could well end up in yours, as in a situation where a body shop cuts corners in a collision repair by using parts from a scrapped car instead of new parts. A fender or hood that spent time immersed in fresh water might not be a problem, but a transmission that took a salt water bath could well turn up with bearing or seal failure."
The Story of an Oregon Consumer Who Won a Battle Over a Flood-Damaged Car - most popular story on MoneyGeek.com (19-21 Sept.)
'Flood Cars' Sneaking Onto the Market After Hurricanes
Andrew Shawcroft was pleased with the new car he bought from an Oregon dealership in 2015: a 2004 Nissan Murano that he paid for with $12,000 in cash. What the 27-year-old high school teacher didn't realize was that it had all the signs of a "flood car" – a vehicle transported from the East Coast soon after Hurricane Sandy whose electrical system was so badly damaged a mechanic would later find it was in danger of exploding.
"The car only had about 65,000 miles on it so it seemed like a good deal," Shawcroft recalls. "During the test drive, it was fine. But during a five-hour trip soon afterward, the cruise control didn't work and the key fob didn't either. And two weeks later, it broke down completely."
Shawcroft, who won an arbitration hearing against the dealership, was one of hundreds of thousands of Americans hoodwinked into buying a flood car after hurricanes Katrina, Sandy, Rita, Andrew, and Hugo. Now, in the aftermath of the massive flooding that accompanied Harvey and Irma, federal officials are warning that a new wave of flood cars are likely coming, and that car buyers had best beware.
"Flood cars are a huge problem," says Rosemary Shahan of Consumers for Auto Responsibility and Safety (CARS). "There's no way to make them safe. They're basically rotting from the inside out and are loaded with bacteria and other contaminants that can cause serious health issues. But they will soon be popping up all over the country, including dealerships that will sell some of them as 'new' cars."
Last week, the Department of Justice issued an advisory warning about auto fraud after hurricanes Harvey and Irma. In a September 14 memo, the agency said that it is anticipating "a high volume of flood-damaged automobiles" to be sold by unscrupulous dealers.
"After past hurricane events, authorities reported truckloads of flooded vehicles being taken out of the impact zone where they were dried out, cleaned and readied for sale to unsuspecting consumers in states that do not brand flood vehicles," the DOJ reported. "Due to Hurricane Harvey and Hurricane Irma, as many as 1 million flood-damaged automobiles could potentially be passed on to unsuspecting buyers in the coming weeks and months."
Flood damage from the hurricanes damaged thousands of vehicles, ruining their electrical systems and making airbag sensors prone to failure, the agency warned.
Consumers may buy flood cars labeled as "new" or "certified" — sometimes with factory warranties or extended service contracts — and think they are protected, Shahan said.
"They are in for a rude awakening," she said. "When problems arise, the manufacturers and extended service companies won't honor the warranties or service contracts, because the flood damage makes them void."
In many cases, Shahan says insurers, who should be scrapping the cars, instead arrange for them to be towed away and auctioned off to the highest bidder. That amounts to fraud, she said. "It's quite clear they will be resold fraudulently."
How to avoid buying a flood carThe Department of Justice advises consumers to find out about a vehicles' history before making any purchase decisions.
First, check for visible signs of a flood car – Consumer Reports advises looking for the smell of must or mildew (or a heavy detergent smell from someone trying to disguise it), a visible water line on headlights or tail lights, debris or caked-on mud in the engine or rusty unpainted screws under the dashboard.
Next, look up the car's Vehicle Identification Number, or VIN – its unique identifier – on the National Motor Vehicle Title Information System (NMVTIS). Run by the Bureau of Justice Assistance, the system is designed to prevent concealment of flood damage and other damage in the vehicles' history. Car insurance companies are required to report to NMVTIS about vehicles they have written off as total losses.
For a few dollars or less, consumers can use an approved provider such as VinSmart or VinAudit.com to check the DOJ's system to look up crucial information on the vehicle they're planning to buy, including its title, recent odometer reading and the history of its "brand" – a label used by states to identify a vehicle's current or past condition. Consumers can protect themselves by avoiding cars labeled "junk," "salvage," or "flood."
"If the car shows up [as a total loss] on the NMVTIS, you don't need to look further," says Shahan.
The NMVTIS database won't reveal all problems, however. It doesn't include vehicles with major damage below the threshold of "total loss." Lesser levels of damage, which can also affect safety, may be revealed on other databases like Carfax Inc., an online commercial service that supplies vehicles' service and repair history. Then again, Carfax may not reveal whether the car is damaged or even a total loss, unless an insurer has voluntarily reported it.
"Reporting to Carfax is voluntary, so insurance companies don't have to report the car's history to it," says Shahan. "All databases have gaps, so it's important to get an inspection from a good mechanic, too."
The Nissan that died in two weeksShawcroft is a case in point. Before he bought his Nissan Murano, he looked up the car's history on Carfax and had seen nothing to worry about. Then two weeks later, it died on Highway I-5 as he was driving it to Portland for a wedding. Stressed and overwhelmed, he ended up missing the rehearsal dinner.
A mechanic he'd known for a long time inspected the car and told him it had so many problems, he couldn't even give him an estimate for repairs.
Shawcroft contacted the dealership that sold him the car and the dealer offered to take the car back for $2,000 – a $10,000 loss to Shawcroft. Further investigation showed the car had been bought at auction, had its engine replaced and was full of exposed wires and broken tubing, giving it the potential to explode and catch on fire while in use.
Shawcroft's case went to arbitration, and he and his attorney, John Gear, prevailed in a hearing.
The dealership had to pay for the car, court fees and attorney's fees for a total of about $30,000.
Shawcroft feels like he had a narrow escape. Not everyone in his situation is so lucky, he says.
Diana Hembree is senior editorial director of MoneyGeek.com, specializing in insurance issues and a regular contributor to Forbes.com. Co-writer Steve Evans is a regular contributor to MoneyGeek whose work has appeared in Benzinga, Yahoo Finance, MSN Money, and other outlets.
What to do about the Equifax Hack that Puts You at High Risk of ID Theft
Where can you find unbiased, objective advice about ways to minimize the damage and risk from Equifax's outrageous computer security negligence and its lengthy cover-up afterwards?
Equifax's gross misconduct means that nearly every adult with a credit history is at risk of identity theft. In this free article, the National Consumer Law Center offers key advice for consumers, with specific steps that can be taken to minimize the risks-freezes, thaws, fraud alerts, credit monitoring, and more.
Key Steps to Minimize Risk After Equifax Data Breach
by National Consumer Law Center
Determining Whether the Client Has Been Affected
It is very likely that any client with a credit history is one of the 143 million adult Americans whose personal information was exposed in a data breach at Equifax, one of the three major nationwide credit reporting agencies. Equifax has stated that from mid-May through July hackers accessed people's names, Social Security numbers, birth dates, addresses, and in some instances, driver's license numbers.
While it is safest to assume that a client has been affected, one way to try to verify this is to go to the Equifax site, www.equifaxsecurity2017.com to see what Equifax says. The site is far from a model of clarity and there are media reports indicating the site is not working properly and questioning its reliability. To use the Equifax site, click on "Potential Impact" at the top of the page and enter the last six numbers of a Social Security number and last name. For most people, the site will respond: "Based on the information provided, we believe that your personal information may have been impacted by this incident."
The site also mentions enrolling in "TrustedID Premier"—the client need not enroll. TrustedID Premier is a credit monitoring service that is only initially free and that does NOT fully protect a consumer. The site also initially had an arbitration clause, which has since been removed, but there has been significant confusion over the issue. The client can just exit the site.
Risks Implicit in the Data Breach
The hacker's access to this personal information raises various risks for clients. Perhaps the greatest risk is that an identity thief will take the consumer's Social Security number, name, address, and birth date, and use this data to open credit accounts in the consumer's name, sometimes called "new account" identity theft. While a consumer ultimately is not liable for the charges on such unauthorized accounts, resolution of the matter will not be pleasant.
The unpaid credit charges can damage the consumer's credit report and it may take significant effort to clean that up. The consumer could be subject to debt collection calls and even debt collection lawsuits. If the consumer defaults on such a lawsuit, wages and bank accounts can be garnished. The best measure to prevent new account identity theft is a credit freeze, discussed below.
Another risk is that unauthorized persons might gain access to certain of a consumer's existing accounts using the hacked information, and direct the business to take certain actions. As a result, consumers should pay careful attention to their existing accounts—reviewing statements, noticing if monthly statements do not arrive, and accessing their accounts online to watch for fraudulent transactions.
Another risk is an identity thief with the consumer's Social Security information may file a tax return in the name of the consumer, seeking a large refund, and directing that refund to a prepaid card held by the thief. The client filing the legitimate tax return as soon as possible may preempt a scam filing that is submitted later to the IRS. Clients in Florida, Georgia, and the District of Columbia, or who have been previously approved by the IRS, can obtained an Identity Protection PIN from the IRS.
A Credit Freeze Is Recommended to Prevent Identity Theft
The strongest measure a client can take to prevent an identity thief from opening a credit account in the client's name is to request a credit freeze A freeze prevents creditors from accessing the client's reporting file or credit score. Creditors that rely on a credit report or score in granting credit are likely to refuse to offer credit if they cannot obtain a report or score. However, a credit freeze does not prevent a thief from making charges on existing accounts. As discussed above, the client should pay close attention to those.
Because a creditor could seek a report from any of the three major national reporting agencies—Equifax, Trans Union, and Experian—the consumer must place a credit freeze with each of the three reporting agencies. Click on the below links to file online or call the below numbers to place the freeze:
• Equifax—1-800-349-9960 or 1-800-685-1111.
• Experian—1-888-397-3742
• TransUnion—1-888-909-8872 or 1-800-680-7289
Fees vary from $5 to $10 for each reporting agency, based on the client's state, but Equifax states it will waive such fees for now.
There have been reports of consumers having difficulty obtaining freezes due to technical issues with the credit reporting agency websites. Unfortunately, the only advice is for clients to keep trying.
Very Important:
The reporting agency will send a confirmation letter with a unique PIN or password. The client will need to retain the PIN or password in a safe place, because the client will need the PIN to lift the freeze temporarily or permanently.
A freeze does not affect a client's credit record or credit score, prevent the client from obtaining a free annual or other credit report, or prevent existing creditors or debt collectors from seeing the client's file. The freeze though will require the client to take an extra step before the client applies for new credit, a new job, an apartment rental, or new insurance.
This extra step is called "thawing" the freeze, either for a specific time or for a specific creditor or other business. Thawing or lifting the freeze usually costs $5 or $10 for each agency. The client will have to thaw the freeze for all three agencies unless the client knows which agency the creditor, employer, landlord or insurer will contact.
If the client takes no steps, the freeze can last forever (seven years in a few states). This may be a good thing, because there is no time limit for when an identity thief will use the client's Social Security number obtained from Equifax.
A Fraud Alert Is a Lesser Alternative
A fraud alert works somewhat like a freeze, but instead of freezing the account, the fraud alert requires a creditor obtaining the consumer's credit report or score to take steps to verify the consumer's identity, such as by calling the consumer. Fraud alerts rely on the creditor's vigilance, whereas freezes automatically deny access to the creditor, which is why freezes are considered stronger. Fraud alerts also apply not just to applications for new credit, but to requests to issue an additional credit card or increase the credit limit on an existing account.
Three types of fraud alerts are available. The below links provide more information on fraud alerts for each, including links to online forms and phone numbers to apply for fraud alerts with each of the three nationwide reporting agencies:
• Initial Fraud Alert that works only for 90 days and is renewable.
• Extended Fraud Alert that works for seven years and requires the client to first file an identity theft report.
• Active Duty Military Alert applies to those in the military and lasts for one year.
All three types of fraud alerts are free and the client only need contact one of the three nationwide credit reporting companies. That company is required to refer the fraud alert to the other two credit reporting companies.
Credit Monitoring Is Not the Best Option
Clients can purchase credit monitoring services, but these are costly (in response to the data breach, Equifax until November 21 is offering a monitoring service free for the first year). Moreover, credit monitoring alone is not as effective as a freeze. Credit monitoring is supposed to identify new accounts opened in the client's name or attempts to open an account, but it only does so after the fact and it does not always work successfully. In addition, like freezes and fraud alerts, creditor monitoring does not help to spot fraudulent charges on existing accounts—the client should be advised to carefully review statements on these existing accounts.
Instead of paying for credit monitoring, clients can do this themselves simply by obtaining for free and then reviewing their credit reports. The client has a right at annualcreditreport.com to obtain a free annual report from each of the three national reporting agencies. Stagger the requests every four months from a different agency, and the client can have a continual snapshot of the client's credit file. In some states and in some circumstances, additional free reports are available, allowing for even more frequent self-monitoring. Requesting a fraud alert also entitles the client to another free report.
Even if an attorney has the client's authorization to pull a credit report for the client, the client should always be present when applying for the report. The website for security reasons will ask personal information that the attorney is unlikely to know.
Some credit monitoring or identity theft prevention products also allow a consumer to "lock" their credit report. While a "lock" may share some features with a freeze, state laws provide consumers with the right to freeze their credit files, and in some states a violation of that state law is privately enforceable. It is unclear the legal status of a "lock" or even how the "lock" works.
REMEMBER, People! "Money never calls you on the phone"
Remember the rules to teach your clients, family, friends:
Money never calls you on the phone.
If you think you found an exception, see 1 above.
HUD has released the following statement:
"It has come to our attention that the Housing Discrimination Hotline has been getting calls from the public about a group using a scam that shows them calling from 1-800-669-9777 (the Discrimination Hotline). HUD has received over 30 calls from the public at this time. One scam tells the person to send $300 to them and that HUD will send them back $9000. If you receive a phone call related to this from the public, or if you receive such a message on the answering machine, you have been contacted fraudulently
Please report this to the FCC
Thank you for your assistance with this.
HUD appreciates your help in protecting the public from fraud.
HUD hopes that you will want to continue receiving information from HUD.
HUD safeguards our lists and do not rent, sell, or permit the use of our lists by others, at any time, for any reason."
Tell Congress Not to Sell You and All Americans Out to Credit Bureaus
In Oregon Just as in Florida -- Nursing Homes Use Forced Arbitration to Scurry Away from Accountability like Cockroaches from a Spotlight
OPINION: Florida seniors at risk in nursing homes
Another insidious trick the Florida Legislature has allowed nursing-home owners to unleash against elderly and vulnerable citizens is the mandatory arbitration clause. When a loved one is admitted into a nursing home, families are usually frightened and confused. They are handed a stack of papers upon admission. Most of the papers they sign discuss bed-hold policies, Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements, and other innocuous administrative issues. What most residents and their families don't realize is that almost every nursing home in Florida now makes residents sign away their constitutional rights to a jury trial in favor of mandatory arbitration. Many times the terms of the arbitration are secret and designed to protect the facility that wrote the agreement.
Florida law allows this. Brian Lee was Florida's long-term-care ombudsman for more than a decade. He had a reputation for protecting residents and making sure their families could gather transparent nursing-home financial and ownership information. When the nursing-home industry did not like what Lee was doing, Gov. Rick Scott fired him in 2011 and replaced him with a long string of short-timers the nursing-home industry liked. The fox is now guarding the henhouse. Unfathomable, indeed.
This is 99% of Estate Planning for Those of Us in The 99%
Every year, make a point to review your estate plans and especially your beneficiary designations on all your financial accounts.
These days, most of us in "the 99%" who have any estate at all have most or all of it invested or saved with a financial institution. All those institutions have a process where you can designate a list of beneficiaries who will receive the funds immediately upon your death -- meaning that the funds bypass probate and are rapidly accessible to the beneficiaries you name.
I suggest that you set a specific date each year that is meaningful for you -- maybe New Years, or your birthday, or your anniversary, or your retirement date, or some other very memorable day that rolls around every year and that will always remind you to spend an hour or two reviewing your estate plans and these beneficiary lists.
And note that you need to actually confirm what the financial institutions have -- it's not enough to just look at your list of who you think they have. With the internet, confirming your beneficiary designations is usually just a matter of logging onto the company website and calling up your beneficiary list. Do this for each bank or investment institution where you have funds.
Next, make sure your will or trust or durable power of attorney are still compatible with your wishes, and go over your advanced medical directive in case your wishes have changed there.
This annual estate planning review is one of the best ways to ensure that the estate you leave behind actually winds up getting where you want it to go with a minimum of fuss and expense.
Vital Knowledge for Auto Buyers in States WITHOUT big floods
After every major disaster involving flooding, the states not affected get a delayed reaction flood -- a huge second flood of ruined cars that have been superficially cleaned up and quickly moved out of the flood zone (where people are on the alert about it) and are being sent through the dealer auction network and pawned off on the low end, predatory car dealers who buy them so cheap that they can still make a big killing while offering them at very enticing prices.
Just one problem -- buying these cars is like buying an incurable venereal disease -- you will regret it forever.
For the next five years, every American in non-flood affected states needs to assume that any used car is a flooded car until you satisfy yourself that it's not by tracing its ownership history and having it inspected properly BEFORE you buy it.
Here's a good guide to how not to buy trouble when you next buy a used car:
How-to-avoid-being-scammed-by-a-flood-damaged-car
Like Being Helpless While Someone Spreads False, Damaging Information About You? Then You'll Love Congress's Latest Idea!
September 6, 2017 In Blog
Congress Should Reject Rep. Loudermilk's Bill to Gut Basic Privacy Rights
By Paul Bland, Public Justice Executive Director
Credit reporting agencies make a lot of mistakes. More consumers complain to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau about the Big Three credit reporting companies (Equifax, Experian and TransUnion) than almost all other financial companies in the U.S. (mostly about false information about consumer debts and financial information). And the problems are often particularly pronounced with agencies that do background checks on consumers for employers, or landlords, and that, in turn, decide whether many Americans can get a job or a place to live.
Sometimes these credit reporting companies have terrible systems, and falsely label hundreds or even thousands of consumers as criminals (or in one recent case, as terrorists or drug dealers). Currently, under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), if an agency that gathers information about people has willfully put in place insufficient procedures for assuring accuracy, they have to pay either the damages that the consumer actually suffered or a set amount (up to $1,000) to any consumer about whom they have provided incorrect information. For the latter "statutory damages," the consumer doesn't have to prove that they lost money or suffered a physical injury because of the false statement; Congress rightly concluded that it would be better for consumers to get a fair sum as rough justice for the injury. In doing so, Congress was also trying to discourage corporations from willfully making these kinds of mistakes.
One upshot of this rule is that sometimes, when a group of consumers can prove that a corporation had a terrible system that led to widespread errors, and willfully continued to make those errors after the problem was evident, they can join together and bring a class action lawsuit. There have been some cases where this was a very important means of winning recoveries for injured consumers and changing abusive corporate practices.
But now, the FCRA is under attack. H.R. 2359, introduced by Rep. Loudermilk and euphemistically titled the "FCRA Liability Harmonization Act," is a blatant effort to gut the existing protections that consumers have against false statements by credit reporting agencies. Among other things, H.R. 2359 would put an artificial cap of $500,000 on the amount consumers could recover in a class action, whether it be the damages they actually suffered or statutory damages. So, without knowing how many consumers have been injured by a credit reporting agency's mistakes, and without knowing anything about the nature of the injury the consumers suffered or the strength of the evidence that the company acted willfully, H.R. 2359 nonetheless sharply limits what can be recovered.
H.R. 2359 also bars consumers from receiving punitive damages, even in cases where there are extreme facts showing that the credit reporting agency had extensive actual knowledge that its statements about a consumer were dramatically false (there have been cases where the agencies have gotten numerous notices and ignored them, among other situations), and even where the consumer's life was dramatically damaged. The bill undermines the laws protecting consumers' privacy on two dramatic levels, in ways that are extremely harmful.
Here's an example of a successful class action that H.R. 2359 would have gutted and made impossible, harming thousands of consumers and letting a corporation lie about consumers' supposed criminal records: Intellicorp Records, Inc. is a consumer reporting agency that sold an "instant" employment background report called the "Criminal SuperSearch," over the internet. Companies considering whether to hire a new employee would pay Intellicorp, and get a report saying whether the prospective hire had a criminal record or not. But the problem was, the Criminal SuperSearch results were riddled with inaccuracies. Thousands of people were falsely labelled sex offenders or drug criminals when they were not. Under the FCRA, Intellicorp should have told job applicants about the reports sent to the employer and the employer should have told the applicants they were not being hired based on the reports, but these legal requirements were widely ignored by Intellicorp and employers.
Given Intellicorp and the vast majority of employers ignoring the notice requirements to consumers, consumers generally had no way of knowing that Intellicorp was saying such false things about them. All most consumers ever learned was that she or he applied for a job and was turned down. Employers were telling people "hey, we paid this company $30 and they say you're a criminal." They would just say "we aren't hiring you."
But a couple of consumers did get wind of the problem, through luck and circumstance. And a class action was filed, Roe v. Intellicorp. After fierce litigation in which a lot of damning documents came to light, the case was settled for more than $18 million, with checks going to thousands of consumers who'd been falsely labeled criminals. In addition, Intellicorp also made a variety of changes to make its product far more accurate. The settlement was approved by a federal judge in Cleveland. This is a perfect example of how a class action can help consumers: a whole bunch of injured people got a substantial recovery, and a corporate bad actor cleaned up its act.
But Rep. Loudermilk, strongly supported by the credit reporting industry, would make a case like Roe v. Intellicorp impossible. Instead of recovering $18 million for thousands of cheated consumers, H.R. 2359 would have limited the class's recovery to $500,000. With that kind of limited liability, it's likely that it would have been impossible for the consumers to bring a case (where they would have to prove that the defendant knew what the law is and broke it anyway, and where they would need complicated expert testimony to set out why Intellicorp's system was poor, and in order to go through its complex computer system to identify the injured consumers).
In what world does it make sense to say that consumers would be better off letting a corporation like Intellicorp say false things about them, and make it impossible for people to get jobs because the agency was telling employers that they were criminals when they were not? The answer is simple: it makes no sense for those who were wronged. It only makes sense for the credit reporting agency, which would rather not have consumers hold it accountable when it breaks the law.
In the end, the only "harmonization" this wrong-headed bill would bring about is between lobbyists for the credit reporting industry and the lawmakers, like Rep. Loudermilk, who pocketed their campaign contributions while ignoring the impact their proposals will have on workers and consumers. Indeed, it would virtually wipe away the "Fair" part of the "Fair Credit Reporting Act," and Congress should never let it see the light of day.
Support the Troops or the Banks? Senate must choose one or the other.
When Gary Childress of Raleigh, North Carolina learned in July 2008 that he was being deployed to Iraq as part of his Army National Guard service, one of the things he did before reporting for duty was to contact Bank of America, where he and his wife Anne had a credit card account. He wanted to let the bank know that he was on active-duty status because under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act or SCRA, a law passed by Congress in 2003 to reduce burdens on military families, all interest rates on debts that servicemembers owed before going on active status must be reduced to 6%. This interest rate protection was significant to the Childresses, who owed over $5000 on their Bank of America credit card with an interest rate of around 27% when Gary left for Iraq.
Bank of America began sending Anne Childress monthly statements suggesting that the interest rate on the account had been reduced to 6% as the SCRA requires. But according to a lawsuit the bank just settled in federal court in North Carolina, these statements were deceptive. In fact, the bank was actually continuing to charge a much higher interest rate. And the Childresses were not alone; the bank's own internal audits, as well as an investigation conducted by the Office Of the Comptroller of the Currency, revealed that nearly 130,000 servicemembers and their families were affected by Bank of America's illegal and deceptive practices, which went on for over a decade.
One of the other families affected was Jackie and Raymond Love of Garrett, Indiana, who had a mortgage with Bank of America with an interest rate of 7% when Raymond was deployed to Iraq in 2004. Like the Childresses, the Loves asked Bank of America to reduce their monthly payments to 6% in accordance with the SCRA, and Bank of America began issuing monthly statements suggesting that it had complied, but later investigations showed that the Loves' mortgage rate was not in fact reduced. What's worse, the formula Bank of America used to make it appear that the Loves' rate had been reduced to 6%, known as interest subsidization, caused the Loves' mortgage payments to be recorded as late even when they paid on time, which in turn damaged their credit score. The Loves filed for bankruptcy in 2011, and their house was sold at auction.
In 2015, the Childresses and others fiiled a class action lawsuit. And in July of 2017, they reached a settlement with Bank of America that will award nearly $30 million, after fees and expenses, to the approximately 130,000 military families who were overcharged and deceived by the bank. The cheated servicemembers will not need to file claims in order to receive compensation under the settlement; the amount owed to each class member will be calculated based on Bank of America's records, and checks will be sent out automatically. If any class members can't be found or their checks go uncashed, the remaining funds will be donated to nonprofits that provide assistance to servicemebers and veterans.
This class action lawsuit was possible because Bank of America does not force its credit card customers to enter into arbitration provisions that ban class actions. But most banks do. In fact, in a comprehensive report to Congress in 2015, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) found that over half of credit card contracts include provisions requiring customers to settle disputes in private arbitration rather than in court, and nearly all of those provisions ban class actions. Moreover, the CFPB's study found that large banks were far more likely than small banks and credit unions to include forced arbitration provisions and class action bans in their account agreements.The CFPB study found that where bank arbitration clauses ban class actions, only an infinitesimal number of consumers ever go to arbitration; more than 99.9% of cases just disappear and no consumers receive anything.
So if another large bank systematically overcharged servicemembers interest in violation of the SCRA and lied about it like Bank of America did, those affected would not have been able to join together in a class action lawsuit like the Childresses and Loves. Instead, they would each be forced to go up against the bank by themselves in a secretive arbitration proceeding, where confidentiality rules would prevent each servicemember from sharing information with others. Given the many demands on military families' time, most people affected by such a scheme would never even find out that their rights had been violated, let alone pursue in arbitration the money they were owed. And instead of paying nearly $30 million to around 130,000 military families as Bank of America did, a bank with an arbitration provision banning class actions would have paid nothing, or at most might only have to pay out a few thousand dollars to a handful of servicemembers if any went forward with arbitration.
Now, the Senate will soon be asked to decide whether it is better if Americans can enforce consumer protection laws, as the servicemembers in these cases did, or if it's better to let banks pocket millions of dollars in illegal profits at the expense of those who defend our nation.
That's because, on July 19, 2017, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau issued its long-awaited rule that prohibits banks and payday lenders from using forced arbitration clauses to strip consumers of their ability to bring class actions against them. If that rule is permitted to go into effect, all military families, and all American consumers, will be able to join together in a class action lawsuit like the Childresses and others did if they were harmed by widespread illegal conduct in the financial sector, no matter who their lender happens to be. Unfortunately, on July 25, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to repeal the CFPB's rule under the Congressional Review Act, a law that allows Congress to throw out any federal regulation issued within the last sixty days. Big banks want the Senate to follow suit, and pundits suggest that the vote will be close.
So it's time for Senators to decide whose side they're on: big Wall street banks who don't want consumers to be able to hold them accountable in court for their actions, or military families and other everyday Americans who want to be able to join forces and fight back when banks rip them off. America is watching.
Paul Bland, Contributor Executive Director, Public Justice
This post was co-authored by Karla Gilbride, Cartwright-Baron Staff Attorney at Public Justice

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


The Howard Stern Show host Howard Stern is a popular radio and television personality, producer and actor. The Howard Stern Show, which gained popularity as nationality syndicated show on terrestrial radio from 1986-2005. It has been broadcasting on Sirius XM Radio since 2006. Stern began his first radio jobs when he was at Boston University. His two books Private Parts (1993) and Miss America (1995) became the New York best-selling books of its releasing year. From 2012-15, he served as a judge on America's Got Talent. He is one of the richest TV personalities in the world who has $600 million net worth.
Stern has been married twice and has three daughters too.
Howard Stern was born on January 12, 1954, in Queens, United States of America. Stern is the second son of Ray Stern and Ben Stern. He has an elder brother named Ellen Stern. His parents are Jewish. Stern is of Austrian, Hungarian and Polish descent.
Howard's mother was an office clerk before became a homemaker and father served in the U.S. Army in Long Island and California during the war.
Stern's family moved to Roosevelt, New York on Long Island when he was eleven. There he attended Washington-Rose Elementary School and later Roosevelt Junior-Senior High School.
Stern was interested in radio when he was 5 years old. He was an infrequent radio audience during his youth.
In June 1969, his family moved to nearby Rockville Center and transferred him to South Side High School when he was fifteen. He earned a Communications degree from Elmira College at Boston University.
Howard Stern's first experience working in the radio was with WTBU, Boston University's radio station. There he played records, hosted interview programs and read the news.
Stern built his on-air personality through morning shows at WRNW in New York, WCCC in Connecticut, WWWW in Michigan and WWDC in Washington D.C from 1976-82. He worked at WNBC in NYC for afternoon shows from 1982 till 1985 when he was fired.
The show was developed in 1979 gained popularity from 1986 when it entered syndication. At its peak, the show aired in 60 different markets attracting 20 million listeners.
Howard's blasphemous content and outrageous ways made the show notorious. The FCC (Federal Communications Commission) issued fines totaling $2.5 million for the indecent content of the show making him the most fined radio host.
Howard Stern received Nationally Syndicated Air Personality of the Year award from Billboard 8 consecutive years. In 2004 Stern was one of the highest paid radio hosts.
The show is now broadcasted on Sirius satellite radio. Its debut on Sirius on 9th January 2006.
Howard Stern's popularity gained new heights soon after the release of his autobiography Private Parts a detailed, funny look at his life, that came out in 1993. The autobiography was put on the silver screen as a movie in 1997.
He released his second book Miss America in 1995. The book was originally titled Getting Away with Murder had donned a cover photo that was him and O.J Simpson in Donald Trump's wedding. At the time of its release, the book was the fastest selling book in publishing history. Howard Stern replaced Piers Morgan as a judge on America's Got Talent for its 7th season.
Howard Stern is one of the prominent faces in the field of acting and has also earned a decent amount of money from his prolific career. He has an estimated net worth of around $650 million, according to Celebrity net worth. And as per the same source, his annual salary is $90 million. He is one of the richest television personalities listed by Forbes Magazine. In 2017, he made $90 million from his career.
Initially, he used to earn $12K annual salary and in 1982 he signed a five-year, $1 million contract with NBC which directly increased his salary these days. From 2012-15, he received $15 million in a year as a judge on the hit NBC reality show America's Got Talent.
In 2015, Stern bought a house for $52 million in Palm Beach, Florida. The mansion has a grand total of 39,094 square feet of living space and also boasts five bedrooms. A renowned TV personality made an agreement signing a $1 million advance contract to publish his first biographical book, Private Parts with Simon & Schuster in 1993. The book was released on October 7, 1993.
In December 2010, Stern signed a five years contract for $400 million with Sirius-XM. It was reported that he earned an annual revenue amounting to $302 million in the between 2006 and 06.
Stern also owns a private jet to travel around anywhere.
The renowned TV personality has also played a major role in movies like Private Parts which became the quite hit at the box office racking up over $41 million worldwide.
Howard Stern was first married to Alison Stern on 4th June 1978, at Temple Ohabei Shalom in Brookline, Massachusetts. They first met at Boston University. He used to study social work whereas Howard was pursuing his degree in Communications at that time. After some time, the two started dating.
Alison Burns is an American homemaker and former actress. The couple has three daughters, Emily Beth, Debra Jennifer, and Ashely Jade.
Howard and Alison separated in 1999 and divorced in 2001. They divorced because of his alcoholic ways Alison is now married to David Simon. At the time of their divorce, their daughter Ashley was just 6.
Stern later dated Angie Everhart and Robin Givens before romantically involved in a relationship with Beth Ostrosky. Beth and Howard Stern got married on 3rd October 2008. His second wife Beth is also an actress, model, and animal rights activist.
Howard Stern's age: as of 2019, he is aged 65 years.
Stern's height: he has an incredible height of 6' 5" (1.96 m).
Birth Name: Howard Allan Stern.


Bacchus Capital Advisers is a new independent corporate finance and M&A platform, bringing together senior investment banking professionals and senior executives from industry.
Led by Peter Bacchus, former Global Head of Mining and Metals at Morgan Stanley, our team has more than a century of combined experience navigating some of the most challenging strategic and tactical situations and a proven track record of delivering value to our clients.
Comprising a fully supported executive team and senior advisory board, we have representation in the UK, US, Asia and Australia.
Our team has led some of the market's most transformational transactions, particularly in the natural resources sector, including the bid defence for Rio Tinto, the post financial crisis recapitalisation of Anglo American, and the defence and sale of WMC Resources. We provide the very highest levels of expertise in dealing with complex tactical situations, moments of strategic or financial stress, and public market M&A - in particular contested M&A and defence.
Our key point of differentiation is the breadth of our senior team, incorporating highly credentialed global investment bankers and senior industry executives, with experience across all global markets, who together have executed transactions in more than 50 countries.


USA Network has greenlit a six-episode, half-hour unscripted family sitcom centered on the honest and unfiltered Melissa Radke and her loud and proud Southern family. Watch, as Radke shares the good news with Megyn Kelly during a segment on TODAY.
With big hair and an even bigger personality, Melissa is ready to take the world by storm with her sharp wit and candid opinions. After leaving her music dreams behind in Nashville, Melissa moved back to her hometown of Lufkin, TX with her husband David and two children Remi, 12, and Rocco, 9. She began sharing parenting and family videos online as a hobby, but her larger-than-life persona and relatable topics quickly caught fire. Her videos collectively garnered over 40 million views worldwide, and in no time, Melissa became the often unspoken voice that people connected with.
Now an author on her first book Eat Cake, Be Brave, Melissa is funny, charming, and the life of every party. Both she and her husband live life unapologetically and love their two children unconditionally. Together they use their sense of humor and honesty to reflect their values of faith, family, and community in a raw and refreshing way.
This series will be the newest addition to USA's slate of unscripted programming which includes the hit reality series Chrisley Knows Best, which just celebrated its 100th episode milestone, the all-new docu-series Miz & Mrs –- premiering Tuesday, July 24 at 10/9c – following the lives of WWE Superstars (and married couple) The Miz and Maryse, The Cromarties featuring former NFL star Antonio Cromartie and his family, action competition series American Ninja Warrior: Ninja Vs. Ninja and the highly anticipated country music showcase series Real Country starring Shania Twain, Jake Owen, and Travis Tritt.


This research is about the recent novels of three famous female writers, Buchi Emecheta (Nigeria), Ama Ata Aidoo (Ghana) and new on the literature scene Amma Darko from Ghana.
The theoretical approach developed in this work tries to show that a new definition of the term African Feminism in literature is necessary.
This can't be done by white feminists like in the past but only in a dialogue between African Writers and their critics and in a second step it can be discussed in an intercultural dialogue with western feminists.
Only female African Writers can define what is important for an African Woman in their lives and put themselves in a relationship to men. What might be problematic to articulate in science and day to day live is easier to express in fiction. That's why more and more African Women express their experiences in literature. They are the progressive force to break stereotypes of African Women in the past created by men.
It's the double decolonisation of European rule and the rule of men which makes it so hard for African Women.
But the three authors presented in this book are showing three ways to handle the problem.


text:
working to prevent conflict worldwide – in many languages
… The International Crisis Group is now generally recognised as the world's leading independent, non-partisan, source of analysis and advice to governments, and intergovernmental bodies like the United Nations, European Union and World Bank, on the prevention and resolution of deadly conflict … (full text, about 1/2).
Homepage und latest publications;
crisiswatch;
crisiswatch database;
research resources and links;
speeches;
current positions/vacancies;
Download the Annual Report 2008, 52 pages – download previous reports on the same page
contact: advocacy and Field Offices.
(About 2/2):
… Crisis Group was founded in 1995 as an international non-governmental organisation on the initiative of a group of well known transatlantic figures who despaired at the international community's failure to anticipate and respond effectively to the tragedies in the early 1990s of Somalia, Rwanda and Bosnia.
They were led by Morton Abramowitz (former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and Thailand, then President of the Carnegie Endowment for Peace), Mark Malloch Brown (later head of the UNDP, Deputy Secretary-General of the UN and UK Minister for Africa, Asia and the UN), and its first Chairman, Senator George Mitchell. The idea was to create a new organisation – unlike any other – with a highly professional staff acting as the world's eyes and ears for impending conflicts, and with a highly influential board that could mobilise effective action from the world's policy-makers …
… We are generally seen as playing a major role in six main ways:
ringing early warning alarm bells, in the monthly CrisisWatch bulletin, and in specific 'crisis alerts', eg in Ethiopia-Eritrea, Darfur, Somalia and Pakistan;
contributing, on both process and substance, behind the scenes support and advice to critical peace negotiations, eg in Sudan, Burundi, Northern Uganda, Aceh, Nepal and Kenya;
producing highly detailed analysis and advice on specific policy issues in scores of conflict or potential conflict situations around the world, helping policymakers in the UN Security Council, regional organisations, donor countries and others with major influence, and in the countries at risk themselves, do better in preventing, managing and resolving conflict, and in rebuilding after it: recent examples include Cote d'Ivoire, the DRC, Haiti, Afghanistan and Southern Thailand;
providing detailed information unobtainable elsewhere on developments regarding conflict, mass violence and terrorism of particular utility to policymakers, eg on the Jemaah Islamiyah in Indonesia and Islamic Courts in Somalia;
offering new strategic thinking on some of the world's most intractable conflicts and crises, challenging or refining prevailing wisdom, eg on the Iran nuclear issue, the role of Islamism worldwide, the Arab-Israeli conflict, and the way forward in Kosovo, Iraq and the Western Sahara;
strongly supporting a rules-based, rather than force-based, international order, in particular significantly influencing UN resolutions and institutional structures in relation to the new international norm of the 'responsibility to protect'.


text:
Home / News / Comings & Goings / Eileen Davidson Returning To 'Y&R' As Contract Player
Eileen Davidson Returning To 'Y&R' As Contract Player
After appearing on CBS' "The Young and the Restless" for the past couple of years in a somewhat recurring capacity, actress Eileen Davidson has signed a contract with the Sony Pictures Television produced soap, which guarantees fans will be seeing a lot more of Ashley Abbott on a more consistent basis.
Tuesday, June 17, 2014 12:09 PM
Paul Skipper/JPI Studios
After appearing on CBS' "The Young and the Restless" for the past couple of years in a somewhat recurring capacity, actress Eileen Davidson has signed a contract with the Sony Pictures Television produced soap, which guarantees fans will be seeing a lot more of Ashley Abbott on a more consistent basis.
"They has [sic] been reaching out for quite a while and wondering what I wanted, so the deal we made suits my life very well," Davidson told Soap Opera Digest of her signing on. "I'm really happy. I've put in a lot of years in this medium, which I don't take for granted, so I'm very grateful."
Sean Smith/JPI Studios
Per the publication, Davidson will begin appearing as a contract player on "Y&R" starting in early September, while simultaneously appearing on the Sony Pictures Television produced "Days of our Lives" as Kristen DiMera, the role in which she is currently Daytime Emmy Award nominated for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series.
Davidson got her start in daytime playing Ashley Abbott in 1982. She portrayed the character until 1988. She went on to appear on NBC's "Santa Barbara" from 1991 to 1993. She subsequently joined the "DAYS" cast in 1993 and remained with the soap until 1998. She would later return to "Y&R" in 1999 and portray Ashley Abbott on the soap along with its sister series, "The Bold and the Beautiful," over the 15 years that followed. Davidson returned to "DAYS" for a year-long stint from 2012-2013.
'B&B' Launches Watch and Win Sweepstakes; Win an Exclusive Tour of Locations Soap Has Filmed
DAYTIME EMMYS: 'B&B's' Kim Matula Celebrates First Nomination; Amps Up Sexiness for Red Carpet
'The Longest Days of our Lives' Chapter 3 Brings It With Soap Legends, Including Susan Lucci, Maurice Benard and Mary Beth Evans
UPDATE: 'DAYS' Wins Parade Magazine's Soap Opera Showdown
THIS WEEK: 'The Locher Room' is Open With Guests Carolyn Hennesy and Writers Richard and Carolyn Culliton
Soap Opera Ratings Report for the Week March 7-11, 2022
Melissa Claire Egan Lands Primetime Gig!
Thom Bierdz and Ian Buchanan Appear in New Episode of 'Old Dogs & New Tricks'