Indian Oil has been branded this scheme as 'Fuel @ Doorstep'.
Residents of 38 more cities would soon be able to have diesel delivered at their doorstep as the three oil marketing companies (OMCs) plan to extend this service by March.
Indian Oil Corporation (IOC), Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd (BPCL) and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd (HPCL) are providing home delivery of diesel in nine cities — Pune, Delhi, Jaunpur, Chennai, Bengaluru, Aligarh, Rewari, Udaipur and Navi Mumbai.
"By the end of January, we will be having this facility in eight more cities and will extend it to 30 more cities by March 31," said an official close to the development.
Home delivery of diesel had kicked off in Pune on March 16 last year. Among the cities with this facility, Navi Mumbai has the largest sales of 150 kilo litre a month while sales in other cities are at an average 40-50 kl per month. "The move helps large fleets of commercial vehicles as it saves both time and money for the fleet owners," he added.
The customer should buy a minimum of 200 litres at a time. However, the petroleum and explosives safety organisation is yet to give clearance for the supply of petrol to homes, owing to its inflammable nature. Firms supply diesel to homes using small tankers that has been retrofitted with a fuel dispenser. Based on the existing norms, any customer ordering more than 2,500 litres will need a clearance from PESO for storage.
IndianOil has been branded this scheme as 'Fuel @ Doorstep'.
Based on data available with the Petroleum Planning and Analysis Cell (PPAC), diesel consumption increased 3.5 per cent in December 2018 and recorded sales of 7.4 million tonne as compared to 7.1 MT in December 2017. On a cumulative basis, a growth of 2.6 per cent was recorded for the April to December 2018 period as compared to the same period last year. Diesel sales saw a 6.6 per cent rise to 81.073 MT during 2017-18 against 76.027 MT in 2016-17. Production of petroleum products during December 2018 saw a de-growth of 4.8 per cent over December 2017.
A committee headed by economist Kirit Parikh is in the process of reviewing the current marketing guidelines to pave the way for more private participation in the fuel retail sector.
Though the idea of setting up the committee was to remove the entry barriers in the retail industry, sources indicate that it may also consider ideas related to innovative marketing models like selling petrol and diesel through the nearest hypermarket, similar to those in the UK and France.
Based on media reports, supermarket players including Tesco, Sainsbury, Asda and Morrison account for over 45 per cent of the total fuel sales in the UK. This idea, along with a series of innovative models in retail, will be under consideration of the panel.
Currently, India has around 64,050 fuel retail outlets, out of which 27,459 are run by IOC, 14,651 by BPCL and 15,357 by HPCL. Among private players, the major players are Nayara Energy with 5,033 outlets, Mukesh Ambani-led Reliance Industries running 1,400 outlets and Shell with 144. There are also minor players that have as little as six outlets.


text:
Boku Inc.
identity solutions
history & development
RNS & alerts
trading Boku shares
At Boku, we have four key values that guide our approach to business, as well as, each other.
We seek to develop an entrepreneurial and supportive culture across our business which means that these values are integral to everything we do.
We understand that Boku's success depends on its people and working together is key.
A mix of cultures, viewpoints and experiences are vital for a global company like ours and every person's contribution is valued.
Pick up the phone, walk across the office and share information openly. Welcome other's opinions and ideas. We are all on the same team and in most scenarios, over communication is preferred to radio silence!
Boku is committed to an empowering working environment and we consider communication our most powerful tool to organize ourselves, align expectations, and ensure meeting deadlines.
We often resolve issues under pressure as Boku's platform is used in the biggest digital marketplaces, but sometimes things go wrong. We believe in learning from our mistakes through an honest evaluation of what went wrong to ensure they are not repeated.
Assume Positive Intent
At Boku, being positive and open is crucial. Everyone comes to the table with their best intentions and we always think of the customer first! Being a team player means trusting and respecting each other and encouraging others to do the same.
We are dedicated to honesty and integrity when it comes to our clients, employees and other stakeholders. This is why our motto is "aim to make promises that you can keep and keep the promises that you make!"
Be Ambitious
We want to attract and retain the best entrepreneurial talent and we know that means having a culture our employees can be proud of.
Boku has a quarterly management and peer-review process and you are encouraged to display initiative and take an active role in defining your career path.
We are building a great big global payment network. Aim for (modest) world domination.
Boku Payments privacy notice
Boku Identity privacy notice
boku on twitter
boku on linked in
© 2021 Boku Inc.
THE MATERIALS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE NOT FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, TO U.S. PERSONS OR IN OR INTO THE UNITED STATES, AUSTRALIA, CANADA, THE REPUBLIC OF IRELAND, THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, JAPAN OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION WHERE TO DO SO WOULD CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF THE RELEVANT LAWS OR REGULATIONS OF SUCH JURISDICTION.
The materials do not constitute or form a part of any offer or solicitation to purchase or subscribe for securities in the United States, Australia, the Republic of Ireland, Canada, Japan, the Republic of South Africa or in any jurisdiction in which such offers or sales are unlawful (the "Excluded Territories"). Any securities issued in connection with an offering have not been and will not be registered under the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under any applicable securities laws of any state, province, territory, county or jurisdiction of the United States, Australia, the Republic of Ireland, Canada, Japan or the Republic of South Africa. Accordingly, unless an exemption under relevant securities laws applies, any such securities may not be offered, sold, resold, taken up, exercised, renounced, transferred, delivered or distributed, directly or indirectly, in or into an Excluded Territory or any other jurisdiction if to do so would constitute a violation of the relevant laws of, or require registration of such securities in, the relevant jurisdiction. There will be no offer of securities in the United States.
The materials are only addressed to and directed at persons: (i) in member states of the European Economic Area who are "qualified investors" within the meaning of Article 2(1)(e) of the Prospectus Directive (Directive 2003/71/EC, as amended (including amendments by Directive 2010/73/EU)) ("Qualified Investors"); (ii) in the United Kingdom to persons who are both: (a) "qualified investors" as defined in section 86 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 ("FSMA"); and (b) either (A) have professional experience in matters relating to investments falling within the definition of "investment professionals" in Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005, as amended (the "Order") or who are high net worth entities falling within Article 49 of the Order; or (B) fall within the exemption in Article 50 of the Order as a certified sophisticated investor (meaning they are individuals that have a certificate in writing from an authorised person to the effect that they are sufficiently knowledgeable to understand the risks associated with an investment in shares and have themselves signed a statement in the terms required under Article 50 of the Order); and (iii) otherwise, are persons to whom it may otherwise lawfully be communicated (all such persons together being referred to as "Relevant Persons"). Any investment or investment activity to which these materials relate is available only to Relevant Persons, and will only be engaged with such persons.
If you are not permitted to view materials on this website or are in any doubt as to whether you are permitted to view these materials, please exit this webpage. These materials must not be released or otherwise forwarded, distributed or sent in or into an Excluded Territory or any jurisdiction in which such offers or sales are unlawful. Persons receiving such documents (including custodians, nominees and trustees) must not distribute or send them in, into or from an Excluded Territory.
Persons in the United Kingdom: In relation to persons in the United Kingdom, the materials have not been approved by an authorised person for the purposes of section 21 of FSMA. The materials are exempt from the restriction against financial promotions on the basis that only Relevant Persons in the United Kingdom are entitled to access them. If you are unsure of your status as a Relevant Person you should refer to the relevant provisions of FSMA and the Order for their full terms and effect. Reliance on the materials for the purpose of engaging in any investment activity may expose you to a significant risk of losing all of the property invested or of incurring additional liability. If you are in any doubt about the contents of the materials or the action to be taken, you should consult a person authorised under FSMA who specialises in advising on the acquisition of shares.
Confirmation of understanding and acceptance of disclaimer
By clicking "I accept the disclaimer" below, you represent, warrant and agree that you (1) have read and understood the information set out above, (2) agree to be bound by its terms, (3) do not have a registered address in, and are not resident or located in, the United States, Australia, the Republic of Ireland, the Republic of South Africa, Canada or Japan, and are not a U.S. Person (as defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act), (4) are a Relevant Person, and (5) agree that you will not transmit or otherwise send any information contained in this website to any person in the United States or to publications with a general circulation in the United States.
Do you agree to the terms and conditions above:
This site uses cookies. If you consent to the use of these cookies, please click accept. Read more in our Privacy & Cookies Policy.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Large banks are making sweeter deals on their commercial business loans as they compete with one another to bring back loan growth, according to a report from the regulatory Office the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Commercial loan growth fell significantly during the Recession but had come back up to 12% by 2013. Then unexpectedly and without understandable cause, the annual growth rate tanked to just 1.3% by the end of 2017. Banks have been so impatient to restart their profits in that sector that they have been offering lower interest rates and friendlier loan terms and even lending to companies fresh out of bankruptcy, OCC regulators say. They have been making loans with initial interest-only periods and making loans that have worse loan-to-value ratios.
The development of looser standards was even named as one of the top risks in the banking industry right now. "The worst loans are often made in the best of times," Comptroller of the Currency Joseph Otting said. The OCC's report noted that it has issued many warnings to big banks during the past year. The number of these warnings – called Matters Requiring Attention (MRAs) – that involved problems with commercial loan underwriting standards jumped 24% in the first quarter of 2018 from the previous year. During that same time, the number of MRAs concerned with banks granting exceptions to their standard commercial loan policies skyrocketed 45%.
Of course "commercial loan delinquencies and losses are at or near historical lows," the OCC said in its report, but the regulator worries that rising interest rates could make it much more difficult for businesses to repay their loans, creating risk of default. Growing market rates "could affect affordability of current debt service requirements or refinance ability," the OCC warned.
Banks are seeing the results they desire though. As of mid-May, commercial loan growth had picked up to an annual rate of 3%.


Document Episode 390: Retro Texting Smart Watch of the Future!
Document Episode 390: Retro Texting Smart Watch of the Future! Episode 390: Retro Texting Smart Watch of the Future!
Blog Post Once a Robot Arm, Always a Robot Arm...Different Personality?
Blog Post Once a Robot Arm, Always a Robot Arm...Different Personality? Once a Robot Arm, Always a Robot Arm...Different Personality?
Thread Project14 | Volunteer to Judge the Electromagnetism Competition!
Thread Project14 | Volunteer to Judge the Electromagnetism Competition! Project14 | Volunteer to Judge the Electromagnetism Competition!
Document Episode 387: Rotocell - The Rotary Cell Phone of the Future!
Document Episode 387: Rotocell - The Rotary Cell Phone of the Future! Episode 387: Rotocell - The Rotary Cell Phone of the Future!
Document Project14 | Build Projects that Use Radio Waves to Communicate Through NFC or RFID!
Document Project14 | Build Projects that Use Radio Waves to Communicate Through NFC or RFID! Project14 | Build Projects that Use Radio Waves to Communicate Through NFC or RFID!
Poll Project14 | Poll to Decide the June '19 Competition!
Poll Project14 | Poll to Decide the June '19 Competition! Project14 | Poll to Decide the June '19 Competition!


Sometimes it is hard to collect what you are owed. We are experienced in filing suit on any outstanding debt, and following through to collect what is owed to you.
At Pearson & Paris, we have more than 22 years of legal experience litigating and resolving disputes. Our top litigator has successfully litigated and settled both simple and complex commercial disputes. Our attorneys have the knowledge and experience to protect your interests.
Our lawyers are experienced in pursuing collections. We know how to develop a collection strategy that produces maximum results. Often debtors ignore court dates, requiring a motion for default. In collection cases, the court requires specific documentation to be filed with the motion for default. We know how to navigate the default rules and other issues that arise in collections cases.
You need an attorney who is aggressive and persistent in going after your money. We will be relentless in pursuing collection cases. We will keep you informed every step of the way.


On December 18, President Obama signed into law the bipartisan Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015 (the "PATH Act"). It makes many popular tax breaks — including some highly valued by businesses — permanent, while extending others through 2016 or 2019. The PATH Act also enhances certain breaks and puts a moratorium on some of the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) controversial taxes.
Several provisions in particular may produce significant tax savings for businesses in 2015 and beyond.
Sec. 179 of the Internal Revenue Code ("IRC") allows businesses to elect to immediately deduct — or "expense" — the cost of certain tangible personal property acquired and placed in service during the tax year, instead of recovering the costs more slowly through depreciation deductions. However, the election can only offset net income; it can't reduce it below $0 to create a net operating loss.
The election is also subject to annual dollar limits. For 2014, businesses could expense up to $500,000 in qualified new or used assets, subject to a dollar-for-dollar phaseout once the cost of all qualifying property placed in service during the tax year exceeded $2 million. Without the PATH Act, the expensing limit and the phaseout amounts for 2015 would have sunk to $25,000 and $200,000, respectively.
The new law makes the 2014 limits permanent, indexing them for inflation beginning in 2016. It also makes permanent the ability to apply Sec. 179 expensing to qualified real property, reviving the 2014 limit of $250,000 on such property for 2015 but raising it to the full Sec. 179 limit beginning in 2016. Qualified real property includes qualified leasehold-improvement, restaurant and retail-improvement property.
If your business is eligible for full Sec. 179 expensing, you might obtain a greater benefit from it than from bonus depreciation (discussed below) because the expensing provision can allow you to deduct 100% of an asset acquisition's cost. Moreover, you can use Sec. 179 expensing for both new and used property.
The news is mixed on bonus depreciation, which allows businesses to recover the costs of depreciable property more quickly by claiming bonus first-year depreciation for qualified assets. It's been extended, but only through 2019, and with declining benefits in the later years. For property placed in service during 2015, 2016 and 2017, the bonus depreciation percentage is 50%. It drops to 40% for 2018 and 30% for 2019.
The provision continues to allow businesses to claim unused alternative minimum tax ("AMT") credits in lieu of bonus depreciation. Beginning in 2016, the amount of unused AMT credits that may be claimed increases.
Qualified assets include new tangible property with a recovery period of 20 years or less (such as office furniture and equipment), off-the-shelf computer software, water utility property and qualified leasehold-improvement property. Beginning in 2016, qualified improvement property doesn't have to be leased to be eligible for bonus depreciation.
Note that, if you qualify for Sec. 179 expensing, it could provide a greater tax benefit than bonus depreciation (see above). But bonus depreciation could benefit more taxpayers than Sec. 179 expensing, because it isn't subject to any asset purchase limit or net income requirement.
The PATH Act permanently extends the 15-year straight-line cost recovery period for qualified leasehold improvements (alterations in a building to suit the needs of a particular tenant), qualified restaurant property and qualified retail-improvement property. The provision exempts these expenditures from the normal 39-year depreciation period.
This is especially welcome news for restaurants and retailers, which typically remodel every five to seven years. If eligible, they may first apply Sec. 179 expensing and then enjoy this accelerated depreciation on qualified expenses in excess of the applicable Sec. 179 limit.
The research credit (commonly referred to as the "research and development" or "research and experimentation" credit) provides an incentive for businesses to increase their investments in research. But businesses have long complained that the annual threat of extinction to the credit deterred them from pursuing critical research into new products and technologies.
The PATH Act permanently extends the credit. Additionally, beginning in 2016, businesses with $50 million or less in gross receipts can claim the credit against AMT liability, and certain start-ups (in general, those with less than $5 million in gross receipts) that haven't yet incurred any income tax liability, can use the credit against their payroll tax.
While the credit is complicated to compute, the tax savings can prove significant.
The Work Opportunity credit for employers that hire individuals who are members of a "target group" has been extended through 2019. The PATH Act also expands the credit, beginning in 2016, to apply to employers that hire qualified individuals who have been unemployed for 27 weeks or more.
The amount of the tax credit depends on the target group of the individual hired, the wages paid to that individual and the number of hours that individual worked during the first year of employment. The maximum tax credit that can be earned for each member of a target group is generally $2,400 per adult employee. The credit can be as high as $9,600 per qualified veteran. Employers aren't subject to a limit on the number of eligible individuals they can hire. In other words, if there are ten individuals that qualify, the credit can be ten times the amount listed.
Bear in mind that you must obtain certification that an employee is a member of a target group from the appropriate State Workforce Agency before you can claim the credit. The certification must be requested within 28 days after the employee begins work. For 2015, the IRS may extend the deadline as it did for 2014, when legislation reviving the Work Opportunity credit for that year wasn't passed until late in the year -- meaning that the 28-day period had already expired for many of the covered employees hired in 2014.
The PATH Act makes permanent the enhanced deduction for contributions of food inventory for noncorporate business taxpayers. Under the enhanced deduction (which is already permanently available to C corporations), the lesser of basis plus one-half of the item's appreciation or two times basis can be deducted, rather than only the lesser of basis or fair market value.
Beginning in 2016, the limit on deductible contributions of such inventory increases from 10% to 15% of the business's adjusted gross income per year.
Generally this period is ten years, but, under the PATH Act, it's only five years, beginning on the first day of the first tax year for which the corporation was an S corporation.
The PATH Act makes permanent the provision that established equal limits for the amounts that could be excluded from an employee's wages for income and payroll tax purposes for parking fringe benefits and van-pooling / mass transit benefits. The limits for both types of benefits are now $250 per month for 2015. Without the extension of parity, the limit for van-pooling / mass transit would be only $130.
The new tax legislation has also gained attention for delaying some divisive provisions in the ACA. For example, it puts off the start of the so-called "Cadillac" tax on high-cost employer-provided health insurance from 2018 to 2020. The 40% tax would be applied to health coverage that costs more than $10,200 for individuals and $27,500 for families, with annual threshold increases based on inflation. The tax would be assessed on the difference between the total cost of health benefits for an employee in a year and the applicable threshold amount.
Additionally, the PATH Act halts the 2.3% excise tax on the sale of medical devices in 2016 and 2017.
The PATH Act's temporary and permanent extensions of numerous valuable tax breaks for businesses provide significant tax planning opportunities. We've only touched on some of the most popular here; the new law may include other extensions and enhancements that can benefit your business. We can help you identify the ones that will minimize your taxes for 2015 and chart the best course in future years.
Please stay tuned for more information on the PATH Act, and as always, your Friedman LLP advisor is available to answer any questions you may have.


What better time to thank the collaborative boss than Boss's Day? The holiday was last Tuesday in North America, but it's never too late to recognize the leaders that help keep the team running successfully. We're celebrating the collaborative manager with a collection of our favorite leadership articles this week. Read, learn, and be inspired!
Loyal employees have leadership behind them that address these five questions. Try one of them today and see your team's morale perk up!
Forbes: Your Employees are Engaged…REALLY?
It's no surprise that good bosses are better than bad ones. But dig a little deeper into this study and you'll find surprising lessons. Could you guess that it's better to pair the best bosses with the best employees instead of bringing the laggards up to speed? If not, don't worry. You're not alone.
Save money AND increase employee loyalty with making sure they have the best boss possible! For those managers who are facing raise season, try making the suggested improvements to your strategy and see happier team members.
It's not easy to let go, but the best bosses are boosted by the most empowered teams. Take them to the next level with these tips, time, and patience and you'll see exponential returns.
Sometimes being an amazing boss isn't enough. Ultimately your employees are there to fulfill their own dreams while working at your organization. Thinking about why you're at the company is a great place to start – and then help others reach for the stars.


text:
On book reviews
Regular readers of will have noticed that I frequently post book reviews on this blog. Sometimes the reviews have been written for "proper" publications like Protestant Truth or Evangelical Times and also posted here, but mostly the reviews have been specially written for the blog. The thing with being commissioned to write a review is that you don't usually get to choose the book under consideration. That can be a good thing as you could end up reading a helpful book that might not otherwise have caught your attention. On the other hand, having to read a book that doesn't much interest you is a bit of a pain when reading time is precious and you'd prefer to be reading something more beneficial. I'm getting a little tired of being asked to review books on the Reformed faith that are structured around the "Five Points of Calvinism". Not because I disagree with the "Five Points", but because the approach is formulaic and makes it seem that Calvinism is little more than a reaction to Arminian error. I propose that such books should be given a category all of their own, "Totally Unimaginative Low Interest Publications".
A good review will offer information and assessment. A prospective reader of a book needs to know what the title is about and whether it is any good. The reviewer will try to be fair to the writer and not wilfully misrepresent his intentions and also fair to the potential reader so that if anyone should buy the book they know what they are getting. The reviewer will make it clear where he disagrees with the author without pedantic nitpicking. Serious omissions in the writer's handling of the subject should be flagged up. For example, I recently read and reviewed a book on biblical eschatology that did not give nearly enough attention to the resurrection of the body. This lacunae would give readers a distorted and underdeveloped picture of the Christian hope.
I tend to read quite quickly so there is a danger of books 'going down without touching the sides'. The discipline of posting reviews helps me to think more carefully and critically about what I've been reading, which can't be a bad thing.
Posted by Guy Davies at 9:47 am 8 comments:
Catholic and Reformed by Anthony Milton
Catholic and Reformed: The Roman and Protestant Churches
in English Protestant Thought 1600-1640,
by Anthony Milton, Cambridge University Press, 1995, 599pp
I came across this book in a footnote in John Owen: Reformed Catholic, Renaissance Man by Carl Trueman (p. 18 n. 44 - reviewed here). Trueman commended Milton's detailed study of Protestant attitudes towards Roman Catholicism in the period before Owen's public ministry. When invited to give a paper on Puritan Attitudes Towards Rome at this year's Westminster Conference I thought I had better get hold of Catholic and Reformed for some background reading. Some background reading! Milton has carefully researched the voluminous anti-Roman writings published in England during 1600-1640. Part I of the book is devoted to the controversy with Rome.
Anti-Catholicism was not the preserve of hot headed Puritan radicals. There was a broad consensus amongst English Protestant divines that the Roman Catholic Church was a corrupt church and that the Pope was the Antichrist. Establishment figures such as Archbishop Abbot were as virulently anti-Catholic as Puritans like William Perkins. However there were differences of nuance amongst Protestant polemicists and some issues required careful handling. Was the Roman Catholic Church in any sense a true Church? What was the status of the Roman Catholic Church prior to the Reformation? Was there enough residual truth in Roman Catholicism for at least some Catholics to be saved? Milton gives attention to all these matters and more.
The basic anti-Catholic consensus was shattered by Archbishop William Laud and those who agreed with his views. For Laud the main enemy was not so much Rome, as the 'enemy within' in the shape of the Puritans. Laudians acknowledged that there were serious errors in the Roman Catholic system, but they regarded Rome as a member of the true Catholic Church. Under Laud's tenure identification of the Pope as the Antichrist was discouraged and robust anti-Catholic polemics were suppressed in favour of a more irenic approach. Some Laudians such as Richard Montagu even hoped for reunion with Rome and worked towards that end.
In Part II Milton gives attention to the Reformed Churches, discussing the relationship between English and Continental Protestantism. While there was a good deal of confessional harmony between English Protestants and their European cousins, there were also tensions and difficulties. For a start Protestantism was divided between Lutherans and the Reformed, the two parties eyeing one another suspiciously. To make matters worse, Lutheran dislike of the Calvinistic doctrine of predestination seemed suspiciously similar to the Arminianism that was vexing the Reformed Churches in the early 1600's. The Church of England was moderately Calvinistic rather than Lutheran in its confession, but it differed from the European Reformed Churches on the issue of Presbyterianism. An earlier generation of Anglican leaders regarded episcopalian church government as a 'thing indifferent' that should not be allowed to disrupt harmonious relations between English and European Calvinists. But when Laud and his followers began to assert the 'divine right' of episcopacy, casting doubt on the validity of Presbyterian orders, the fragile united front began to break down. The Laudian doctrine of "No bishop, no church!" was hardly calculated to further the cause of Protestant unity. Indeed, with his rigid episcopalianism and dislike of Calvinistic theology, Laud actively distanced the Church of England from the European Reformed Churches. European Presbyterians seemed too much like those pesky homegrown Puritans for his liking.
What might be the relevance of all this for Evangelicals today? For one thing, Milton's work helps to provide a welcome historical perspective on current Evangelical engagement with Roman Catholicism under the auspices of Evangelicals and Catholics Together. Were our Protestant forefathers right to be so hostile to Roman Catholic teaching? Have the issues that divided Protestants and Roman Catholics in the sixteenth century such as papal authority, justification by faith alone, transubstantiation, and purgatory really been resolved? I think not. But that is not the only thing that strikes me. Another is the bitter divisions within Protestantism which left the movement badly fragmented and therefore weakened. Serious and irreconcilable differences emerged between Lutherans and the Reformed. The rise of Arminianism shattered the unity of the Reformed Churches. The divisive Laudian assertion of the 'divine right' of episcopacy is another case in point. Regrettably, even Protestants who were in basic agreement on theological issues managed to fall out over finer points of doctrine and church polity.
Now, I'm not trying to argue for the maintenance of pan-Evangelical Protestant unity at any price. The 'lowest common denominator' approach of modern day ecumenism is not one we should adopt at the expense of our Reformed confessional integrity. But still the challenge remains; how can we hold to our cherished distinctives as Reformed Baptists, Westminster Standard Presbyterians, Savoy Declaration Independents, or Calvinistic Episcopalians and yet give expression to our essential unity in the gospel? What more can be done to encourage confessionally Reformed Churches and Church groupings to affiliate and work together for the sake of the Kingdom? Yes, we still need to face up to enemies without such as Rome and theological liberalism. We also have to combat numerous enemies within what passes for Evangelicalism today. Take open theists and those who deny penal substitutionary atonement as a couple of examples. But in our tendency to fragment over secondary issues we don't exactly do ourselves any favours. We cantankerous Calvinists don't always have to be our own worst enemies, now do we?
Labels: Book Review, Protestantism, Reformed Evangelicalism, Roman Catholicism
Easter Expectations
We are approaching "Palm Sunday", the occcasion when Christians remember Jesus' "triumphal entry" into Jerusalem. It all seemed to be going so well. Crowds hailed Jesus as the King of Israel. He appeared to be riding the crest of a wave of public acclimation and popularity. But by the Friday of that week the people turned against him and demanded that he be crucified. You might think that Christians would rather like to keep quiet about what happened on that first Good Friday. It appears sad and embarrassing that the founder of the Christian faith went from conquering hero to absolute zero in the space of six days. What went wrong? The answer is that nothing went wrong. The reason why Christians look forward to Easter with eager anticipation is that we believe that Jesus' death on the cross was not a tragic accident of history. We believe that he died for our sins so that those who trust in him might be forgiven and put right with God.
Also, death was not the end for Jesus. On Easter Sunday morning God raised him from the dead. Easter is worth celebrating because Jesus is alive! His death and resurrection brought new hope to the world. There isn't a lot of hope around at the moment. News stories focus on our increasingly broken society, the current economic climate and gloomy predictions of environmental catastrophe. But the forces of selfishness, disorder and destruction will not be allowed to have the last word. In Jesus God's last word is "love". And where there is love there is hope. Easter means that all who follow Jesus have a lot to look forward to. How about you?
* Originally published in White Horse News and News & Views.
Posted by Guy Davies at 8:39 am No comments:
Labels: Christian faith, Easter
And the mystery theologian is...
It was Richard Gaffin who said,
"The central soteriological reality is union with the exalted Christ by Spirit-created faith. That is the nub, the essence of the way or order of salvation for Paul. The center of Paul's soteriology, at the center of his theology as a whole, then, is neither justification by faith nor sanctification, neither the imputation of Christ's righteousness nor the renewing work of the Spirit."
By Faith, Not By Sight: Paul and the Order of Salvation, Paternoster, 2006, p. 43.
Gary Benfold was the first to give the correct answer to Name that theologian #3. However, in a dramatic twist Gary disqualified himself from the competition and deleted his comment on the grounds that he knew the answer rather than simply having a guess. Very honest of him I'm sure, but it isn't cheating to actually know the answer. So, I pronounce the learned Gary Benfold winner of Name that theologian #3, with Martin Downes and Mantovani close runners up.
Labels: Name that theologian, Richard Gaffin
Name that theologian #3
Labels: Name that theologian
The Edinburgh Bavinck Conference
I really enjoyed reading Volume One of Herman Bavinck's Reformed Dogmatics and I've just started to dip into Volume Two. It is a great blessing that his magnum opus is now available in English translation. Reformed systematic theology at its very best.
James Eglinton is organising a conference devoted to the Dutch dogmatician. Following the pattern of Bavinck's work, the conference will first explore issues related to Bavinck's theology before examining wider cultural and ethical applications of this doctrine.
The event will take place in New College 1-2nd September 2010.
Follow this link for more info.
Labels: Conferences, Herman Bavinck, Systematic Theology
Evangelical unity: 1966 and today
It is not often that one single address has the power to shape the direction of Evangelicalism for a generation. Such a distinction must go to D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones' 1966 message, Evangelical Unity: An Appeal. Much ink has been spilt in discussing exactly what Lloyd-Jones hoped to achieve in that address. What is certain is that his appeal for unity left the Evangelical movement more divided and fragmented than ever before. The issues he raised exacerbated divisions over how Evangelicals should relate to theologically mixed denominations. Lloyd-Jones argued that Evangelicals should separate from the denominations and come together in church-based affiliation. On the other hand John Stott, who chaired the Evangelical Alliance meeting at which Lloyd-Jones spoke feared his address would trigger a mass exodus of impressionable Evangelical Anglican clergy. Stott used his position to publicly dissociate himself from what the preacher had said. He favoured an integrationist stance where were Evangelicals were encouraged to be more actively involved in the Church of England. This policy was formally adopted by Evangelical Anglicans at the watershed Keele Conference in 1967.
Meanwhile in 1970 J. I. Packer co-authored Growing into Union together with Anglo-Catholic theologians, minimising doctrinal differences in order to make common cause against theological Liberalism. His actions led to the disbandment of the Puritan Conference in which Packer had played a prominent role along with Lloyd-Jones. A fissure had opened up between Lloyd-Jones and those who followed his his separatist line and integrationist Evangelical Anglicans like Stott and Packer.
It isn't always easy to separate issues from personalities when it comes from deciding who was right and wrong in church history. This is especially the case when it comes to considering very recent history. But our aim in discussing 1966 and its relevance for the contemporary scene should not be the vindication of Lloyd-Jones or the vilification of Stott/Packer, or visa versa. It is the issues not the personalities that matter.
In this case the nub of the matter is whether Evangelicals ought to withdraw from theologically mixed denominations and come together on a church-based level? Should loyalty to one's denomination be placed before ecclesal fellowship with other Evangelicals, especially when the possibility of reforming the denomination is remote? Should we opt for separation or integration? If, as I've argued elsewhere, Lloyd-Jones was basically right to urge Evangelicals to separate and come together, then we need to ask how we might apply this principle to today's situation? Here are some proposals:
1) Separation from the theologically mixed denominations is still a live issue that needs to be faced. Evangelicals cannot be content simply with being a tolerated "wing" of a denomination where serious heresy is allowed to remain unchecked. Such a stance relativises the gospel.
2) Evangelicals should endeavor to unite in church-based fellowship. Co-operation at the para-church level while remaining in mixed denominations won't do.
3) How Evangelical churches come together as an expression of unity in the gospel isn't easy to figure out given that Evangelicals differ over ecclesiology, baptism etc. We need a little dose of realpolitik, or realecclesiastik here. All Reformed Evangelicals are not suddenly going to become convinced Presbyterians, Congregationalists, Grace Baptists or Calvinistic Episcopalians. But this does not mean we should be indifferent to the biblical doctrine of the church. Evangelicals need to give fresh and urgent attention to this matter. For my money a form of interdependent independency would amount to a pretty good expression of the New Testament's teaching. But given the current lack of consensus amongst Reformed Evangelicals on church government and baptism, perhaps an affiliation of individual Evangelical churches and church groupings is the best we could hope right now. How can Affinity be made to fulfil this role more effectively?
4) Separated Evangelical Churches will want to support Evangelicals in the mixed denominations who are fighting for reform rather rather than seeking integration. (Gospel Partnerships anyone?)
5) Should the grouping of Evangelical churches (under the umbrella of Affinity or whatever) be distinctly Reformed or merely Evangelical? I think we should work towards a fellowship of confessional Reformed Churches that is generous enough to allow for differences on ecclesiology, baptism etc. This does not amount to "doctrinal indifferentism" as the affiliation would be clearly Reformed in its agreed confession.
Labels: Jim Packer, John Stott, Lloyd-Jones, Reformed Evangelicalism
Ratzinger's Faith: The Theology of Pope Benedict XVI by Tracey Rowland
Ratzinger's Faith: The Theology of Pope Benedict XVI,
Tracey Rowland, Oxford University Press, 2009, 214pp
Regular readers of this blog won't be surprised to learn that I disagree with quite a few aspects of Ratzinger's theology. I mean, is the pope a Catholic? And hey, many members of the Roman Catholic Church aren't exactly enthusiastic about the stance taken by the current pope. He is often depicted as a brutalist reactionary bent on undoing the more 'enlightened and open' policies of Vatican II. When Ratzinger succeeded Pope John Paul II one American Roman Catholic complained, it "is like electing Rumsfeld after George Bush" (see here). With that in mind you might think that a sympathetic treatment of Ratzinger's theology would be hard to find. But this is exactly what Tracey Rowland attempts to offer in this book, where she gives an insightful account of some of the key themes in pope Benedict XVI's teaching.
She begins by situating Ratzinger among contemporary Roman Catholic theologians. According to one reading of the pope's theological trajectory he set out as something of a radical, but horrified by the changes instigated by Vatican II he became an increasingly reactionary and authoritarian figure. Rowland argues that this is an overly simplistic reading of Ratzinger's theological development. What he has sought is not in fact a return to the 'glory days' of pre-conciliar Catholicism. Ratzinger was critical of the 'Baroque Thomism' that characterised the thinking of many Roman Catholic theologians in the first half of the 20th century. He especially disliked their dualistic understanding of the relationship between nature and grace, arguing that they had bought into the Kantian dichotomy between the spiritual and the natural worlds. Influenced by Henri de Lubac and Hans Urs von Balthasar, Ratzinger preferred a more more Augustinian model in which nature is perfected by grace. It is this basic Augustinian stance that separates him from radicals like Hans Kung and Karl Rahner. In Rahner's thought grace is virtually collapsed into nature to the extent that a person may be an 'anonymous Christian' simply by the light of nature without ever having encountered the gracious revelation of God in Christ.
Ratzinger has devoted the whole of his career to one main aim. Both in his previous role as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and now as pope he has sought to to stop the Roman Catholic Church accommodating itself to the modern world with its rationalistic mindset. This is what makes him wary of the changes implemented in the wake of Vatican II. He argues that adopting the agenda of the Enlightenment is destructive of the Christian faith, "if the Church were to accommodate herself to the world in any way that would entail a turning from the Cross, that would not lead to a renewal of the Church, but only to her death." His predecessor pope John Paul II endeavoured to forge points of contact with the modern world, attending pop concerts and investing the Enlightenment slogans like "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity" with fresh Christian meaning. But Ratzinger is having none of it, preferring the purity of the Latin Mass over liturgical innovations in the name of 'relevance'.
This critique of Enlightenment rationalism does not entail a rejection of reason itself and the fruits of reason in the scientific process. But human reason on its own is not sufficient. Ratzinger argues that reason needs to be enlightened by the logos of God, Jesus Christ if it is not to descend into the nihilistic atheism and mindless consumerism that features so strongly in contemporary European society. Evangelical Protestant will agree with with many of the points made in the chapter on Modernity and the Politics of the West. Further thoughtful reflections on modernity and the Church are found in the two appendices with which the book concludes, The Subiaco Address and the infamous Regensburg Address, which sparked off riots in the Muslim world.
However, before we get too exited, Ratzinger's solution to the problem of rampant secularism in the West is not a recovery of biblical gospel. He commends the example of Benedict of Norcia who fled from the wicked world to found a monastery at Monte Casino (p. 165). So, the current pope's prescription for the church in the face of the challenge of modernity is akin to Hamlet's advice to Ophelia, "get thee to a nunnery". I can't see how that might help. The Church has been not been called to withdraw from the world but to proclaim the good news of Jesus to the nations. Doing so entails faithfulness to the gospel revealed in Holy Scripture and meaningful engagement with the contemporary world. Which is why the Reformers translated the Bible into the language of the people and worshipped God in the vernacular. At its best Evangelical Protestantism has succeeded in being both gospel-centred and missional. Also, Evangelicals such as William Wilberforce and Lord Shatesbury have been at the forefront of social reform, bringing Christian values to bear upon public life.
Rowland is more interested in placing Ratzinger's faith in the context of Roman Catholic teaching than in entering into dialogue with Evangelical Protestant theology. References to Protestant thought are brief and rather dismissive. The scholar is quick to distance Ratzinger's appreciation of Augustine from the Calvinistic understanding of the great Church Father. However, it seems that Ratzinger is sensitive to the Protestant charge that Roman Catholic theology is often far too philosophical and distanced from Holy Scripture. He offers a rich, trinitarian account of revelation in which revelation is not so much about information as the transformation of the person in the life of the Trinity (p. 51). So far so good. But this does not mean that the current pope has jettisoned papal infallibility for the sake of sola scriptura. Roman Catholic Tradition remains on a par with the Bible and the faithful are still subject to the authoritative Magisterium of the Church.
Once more along Augustinian lines, Ratzinger wishes to shift Roman Catholic piety away from an overwhelming emphasis on duty and meritorious good works. He rightly sees this as little more than Pelagian moralism. Instead he proposes a renewed focus on the grace of God communicated to the sinner in a personal encounter with Jesus Christ. Ratzinger insists that the antidote to 'Christian Pharisaism' is found in 1 John 4:16. This sounds like music to the Calvinist's ears, until we read that the Benedict XVI's prescription for moving beyond moralism to the love and grace of God is a rekindling of devotion to the cult of the Sacred Heart. Isn't this the problem with the Roman Catholic Church? We agree on so much, the Trinity, the Person of Christ, pro-marriage and pro-life biblical ethics, but where did all this other stuff come from? We cannot swallow the Roman Catholic additions to the biblical account of salvation in Christ that end up negating the gospel of sovereign grace. We reject Roman Catholic devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus for the sake of devotion to our risen Lord himself.
The current pope is intent on not allowing the Church he leads to sell its birthright for a mess of Enlightenment pottage. But what the Roman Catholic Church needs to do is not simply react against the modern world, but reform its doctrines and practices in the light of Scripture. Peter Jones of Westminster Seminary California met Ratzinger at the Vatican when he was Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. He gave him the gift of a specially bound copy of the Institutes of the Christian Religion by John Calvin (see here). Calvin was a consistent Augustinian in a way that Ratzinger is not. His was utterly gripped by the Church Father's biblical vision of salvation by grace alone in Christ alone for the glory of God alone. I don't know whether Ratzinger has ever taken the time to read the Institutes, but if he did and took the Reformer's words to heart, it would have a powerful and transforming effect on his faith. In other words, Benedict XVI's theology could do with a good dose of Calvinism.
Labels: Book Review, Roman Catholicism
Fearless Pilgrim: The life and times of John Bunyan by Faith Cook
Fearless Pilgrim: The life and times of John Bunyan,
by Faith Cook, Evangelical Press, 2008, 528pp
For many years I sensed that there was something missing in my Christian life. I had been converted and discovering Reformed Theology added new depth and stability to my faith. I had started reading some of the great works of the Reformed tradition, devouring Jonathan Edwards' The Religious Affections, dipping into the Works of John Owen and plodding through Berkhof's Systematic Theology. I'd even read lots of stuff by Lloyd-Jones, but still I had a sense that something was amiss. Training for the ministry at London Theological Seminary was immencely helpful, but the nagging ache at the back of my mind remained. "What's wrong with me?" I wondered. Then it struck me like a thunderbolt. I had been a Christian for many years, studied theology and always had a book or three on the go, but I hadn't yet read The Pilgrim's Progress by John Bunyan. What I fool I had been! I quickly got hold of a copy and was instantly captivated by the Bedford preacher's great allegory with its wonderfully vibrant heroes, Christian, Faithful, Evangelist and terrifying villains, Giant Despair, Lord Hategood and Apollyon. That is what I'd been missing, Bunyan's remarkably innovative repository of authentic Puritan spirituality, jam packed full with countless biblical allusions. Now I understood why Spurgeon said of the Puritan writer, "Wherever you prick him his blood is bibline". Of course I was well aware of The Pilgrim's Progress and its famous author, but was it one of those must read books that I'd never quite got around to reading.
When it comes to Bunyan's life, I had a smattering of knowledge from sources as diverse as the preacher D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones and the old commie historian, Christopher Hill. The basic facts of his story are well known, his lowly social status and work as a "tinker", his dramatic conversion and imprisonment for refusing to stop preaching the gospel. Bunyan's autobiographical Grace Abounding to the Chief of Sinners is readily available online. But while the internet is good for skim reading stuff like blogs, its difficult (at least for me) to study a lengthy piece of work in that format. Therefore after a few attempts at getting to grips with Grace Abounding I gave up. However, I noticed that Faith Cook had written Fearless Pilgrim, a full-length biography of John Bunyan. I enjoyed her earlier work, William Grimshaw of Haworth, (Banner of Truth Trust, 1997) and had my eye on her latest title. A friend kindly bought it for me as a birthday present and I've just finished reading it.
Come Sunday evenings I usually feel a little tired and weary after a full days preaching. It's probably my age. In that state I couldn't read anything too heavy or hard going. Faith Cook's Bunyan biog was therefore just the thing for Sunday evening reading. She has written a fascinating account of the author and preacher, setting his life against the backdrop of the tumultuous years of the English Civil War. Cook is a discerning interpreter of Bunyan's spiritual experiences and a sympathetic analyst of his theology. She writes appreciatively, although not uncritically of of his literary output. Bunyan's family life, preaching labours and periods in prison are brought to life in this richly detailed study. Highly recommended for anyone who wants to get to know the fearless pilgrim who wrote The Pilgrim's Progress. Oh, and if you haven't yet read John Bunyan's greatest work, then tolle lege, take and read. It's probably what you've been missing all these years. Believe me, I speak from experience. Order from PTS Christian Bookshop - here.
Labels: Book Review, Faith Cook, John Bunyan
Remythologizing Theology: An interview with Kevin Vanhoozer
GD: Hello Kevin Vanhoozer and welcome back to Exiled Preacher.
KV: Seems like I was just here. I like what you've done with the place.
GD: Thanks. Your new book is entitled Remythologizing Theology: Divine Action, Passion and Authorship (Cambridge University Press, 2010, 560pp, UK here, US here). In personal correspondence you described Remythologizing Theology as your first real work of theology. What does that say about your earlier writings?
KV: It says that I've spent an inordinate amount of time dealing with questions pertaining to theological method and hermeneutics. While it may have been necessary, that work was merely a warm-up: an overture to the real opera. I don't want to exaggerate. I have written "real" theology here and there, though this is my first book to talk primarily about God rather than about talk of God.
GD: What is your main aim in this book?
KV: For years I've felt that the doctrine of God was a relatively weak spot in evangelical theology. Then open theism happened and my suspicions were confirmed. One major aim, then, is to provide a retooling of classical theism that takes into account the concerns of open theists – in particular, the integrity of God's loving relationship to the world – while simultaneously maintaining what I take to be the correct Reformed emphasis on divine sovereignty. Another aim is to scrutinize the oft-heard claim in contemporary theology that God's love entails divine suffering.
GD: What do you mean by "remythologizing theology"?'
KV: I don't mean "mythologizing again"! "Remythologizing" pertains first and foremost not to myth but "mythos," Aristotle's term for dramatic plot. I'm using "remythologizing" as a contrast term to Bultmann's demythologizing. Where Bultmann fails to take seriously either the Bible's depictions of God's acts or the Bible as the product of God's authorship, remythologizing starts: with God as one who speaks and acts, the latter often by way of speaking.
Remythologizing is a proposal for "first theology," a way of thinking God and Scripture together. Specifically, it views God's being on the basis of God's acts, especially his communicative acts. God is as God does, and God does as God says. Remythologizing theology is all about speaking well of God on the basis of God's own speech. To remythologize theology is to set forth the ontology of the one who speaks in Scripture, the one whom Scripture is also about.
GD: What is the status of Holy Scripture in "remythologized" theology?
KV: My doctrine of Scripture remains much as it has been: the Bible is triune discourse, a product of divine authorship and hence a form of divine action. What sets remythologizing apart from some other approaches is that it seeks to take into account the significance of the Bible's literary forms, each of which is a distinct form of God's communicative action.
Think of remythologizing as a form of biblical reasoning, a way of thinking about the subject matter of Scripture along the grain of the various forms of biblical discourse that present it. This means attending not only to the content, but also to the way in which the divine author employs a number of different human voices and forms of discourse to communicate it.
GD: In some treatments of the doctrine of God, the doctrine of the Trinity is tagged onto the end after extensive discussion of the divine being and attributes. What place does the doctrine of the Trinity have in the present work?
KV: The central place, both literally and symbolically. Chapter five is right in the middle of the book and is entitled "God in three persons: the one who lights and lives in love." I argue that God is everywhere and at all times fully himself. The triune life – communicative activity oriented to communion – is fully realized in the immanent Trinity before it is actualized in the economic Trinity. God in time corresponds to who God is in eternity. I'm not, of course, the first to argue this. However, what is new is the focus on the Father, Son, and Spirit as distinct communicative agents who nevertheless share a common communicative agency.
GD: Barth famously taught that God's being is in his act. Here you set out the elements of a new "theodramatic metaphysic" where God's being is in his communicative act. Please explain.
KV: Theodramatic metaphysics is the attempt to formulate a comprehensive set of categories (i.e., metaphysics) for understanding what God has said and done (i.e., theodrama) to create and renew all things in Christ through the Spirit. Because God is real and not merely a story, biblical interpreters who would speak well of God must go beyond exegesis to ontology. If we are to understand who, and what, we are talking about when we use the term "God," we have to say something about God's being. For God is a real being. What is real makes a difference in the world because it can act on its own. Only God can act on his own for only God has life in himself; everything else depends upon God's sustaining word and breath to remain in existence.
Remythologizing speaks of God on the basis of God's own speech and action, the stuff of theodrama. What we can, and must, say of God is that he is the one who creates, commands, consoles, etc. by speaking. God makes himself known and shares his life largely through speech acts like promising, instructing, forgiving, and exhorting, as well as through his corporeal discourse – the Word made flesh – Jesus Christ. If we let Scripture guide our thinking, then we must say that God's triune being is in his communicative activity. We derive our understanding of the divine attributes not by analyzing the idea of infinite perfection but by describing and detailing the predicates and perfections of God's communicative activity.
GD: Traditional theism has often described God's relationship to the world in terms of causality, with God as the First Cause or the Unmoved Mover. However, you propose that God's interaction with the world is best understood in terms of divine communicative action. Why the shift in emphasis?
KV: At this point in our time and culture, modern science has pretty much co-opted the language of causality. Consequently, even theologians who should know better sometimes speak of God's causality as if it were on the same level as other creaturely causes. This is not how Thomas Aquinas, Calvin, or others in the tradition would have understood it. Nevertheless, open theists and panentheists have used this confusion to their advantage to attack classical theism. How, they wonder, can God be in a genuine loving relationship with creatures if he causes all things, including the motions of people's hearts? Further, if God causes all things, must he not be responsible for evil as well as good?
I use the term "communicate" in a very broad sense, not merely in the sense "to transmit information," but "to make common" or "share." The most important thing that God communicates is himself: his light (truth), life (energy), and love (relationship). Whereas the end of causation is coercion, the end of communication is communion. The category of communicative action opens up new possibilities for theism and adheres more closely to the categories of Scripture itself.
GD: Where does your theodramatic approach leave the oft discussed relationship between divine sovereignty and human freedom?
KV: Von Balthasar depicts theodrama as the interaction of infinite and finite freedom. My contribution is to think through this interaction in communicative terms. God is not like other communicative agents, of course. For God is the "Author" of the world who retains his authorial rights even as he enters into the story as a character. God's sovereign interventions are in fact often interjections – calls, for example – that are efficacious but nor coercive. Here the paradigm is Calvin's notion of the effectual call: God does not manipulate but sovereignly – which is to say, authorially – consummates his characters without manipulating them. On the contrary, the divine Author works according to our natures, via word and Spirit.
God authors answerable agents. Divine authorship thus names an asymmetrical communicative relation: a dialogical (i.e., covenantal) unity within an even greater dialogical difference (i.e., creation ex nihilo). I devote an important section to reworking the doctrine of providence, and Austin Farrer's idea of the "causal joint," in properly communicative terms. God's speech is efficacious and brings about change in the world precisely by non-coercively bringing about understandings in human hearts and minds. What happened to Lydia is paradigmatic: "The Lord opened her heart to pay attention to what was said by Paul" (Acts 16:14).
GD: What do the words of the subtitle, Divine Action, Passion and Authorship, say about your attitude towards the impassibility of God? Isn't he a being "without body, parts or passions"?
KV: The sub-title alone does not make a statement but announces a theme. The question of God's suffering – that is, his ability to be affected by human creatures – is a red thread that runs throughout the book. If Nicholas Wolterstorff is right in comparing classical theism to a seamless garment where one loose thread spells the unraveling of the whole, then divine impassibility makes for an excellent case study.
Remytholgizing Theology is a minority opposition report on the "new orthodoxy" of divine suffering. While I want to take the biblical depictions of God's dialogical interaction with human beings seriously, I don't want to pull God down to the creaturely level. The challenge, then, is to specify to what the biblical descriptions of God's emotions actually refer. There is not much on the meaning of divine emotions in the history of theology. Classical theists tend to take this language as anthropomorphic; open theists tend to take it literally. I had to resist the temptation simply to choose one side rather than the other. The prior question is: what is a divine emotion? I do provide an answer, but the water in that pool is a bit too deep to dive into here.
GD: In The Drama of Doctrine, you suggest that the task of the theologian is to act as a "dramaturge" who will help pastors to faithfully interpret and teach the biblical script to the people of God. How might pastors benefit from Remythologizing Theology?
KV: The first responsibility of pastors and theologians is to speak well of God. This means, minimally, avoiding idolatry. It also means speaking in a way that corresponds to Scripture and yields understanding, including understanding about God's being, identity, and reality. My book helps answer the all-important question question: what must God be if God speaks and acts as the Bible depicts him as doing?
To understand God as a triune communicative agent has implications for understanding oneself, the Christian life, and the church as well. God calls us into being and communicates his light, life, and love so that we can communicate them to others. The pastor is a minister of God's word – which means the whole panoply of God's communicative acts – thereby helping the church to become answerable to God, able to communicate in all that we say and do what the Father is saying and doing in the Son through the Spirit. Theology assists pastors to know God so that they in turn may communicate the light, life, and love of God poured out for the world in Jesus Christ.
GD: Remythologizing Theology is published by Cambridge University Press and is currently only available in hardback. When will a more affordable paperback edition be published?
KV: I'm very sorry a paperback edition was not printed simultaneously. I did ask (and complain)! If all goes well – by which I mean, if enough people save their pennies and purchase the hardback – a paperback should appear in eighteen months, sometime in the summer of 2011. If I have indeed spoken well of God, it should still be worth reading even then.
GD: Thanks for dropping by for this conversation. I'm still saving my pennies!
Labels: Biblical Theology, Books, interviews, Kevin Vanhoozer
Everybody's got something to hide except me and my monkey
I appreciate that more recent readers of this blog may find this a bit random and confusing, but every now and again I like to give a little update on the adventures of my pet monkey, failed theology blogger David Sky. Last time I reported on his daring escape from the Taffia don Dai Corleone (see here). But what has he been up to since then? The truth is nothing much. At least that's what I thought. I should have known that he'd been up to something because he's been smiling a bit lately and that's not normal for someone who has to spend most of his life in a dusty corner of my study. Anyway, it transpires that he's only gone and fallen in love. Yes, you did read that right. It wasn't a typo. David Sky has fallen in love. Here's how I got to find out:
GD: What are you looking so happy for?
DS: I'm not looking happy.
GD: Yes you are.
DS: Am I?
GD: Yes.
DS: Doesn't mean that I am.
GD: Something's up isn't it?
DS: Like what?
GD: I dunno, but you must be up to something.
DS: Who, me?
GD: Who else?
DS: I haven't been naughty, honest.
GD: Why else would you be so cheerful?
DS: Well, it isn't that.
GD: What is it then?
DS: Can't say.
GD: Got something to hide have you?
DS: Of course not.
GD: Tell me!
DS: No!
GD: I'm not interested anyway.
DS: Oh.
Five rather awkward and silent minutes later...
GD: C'mon, you can tell me. We're mates aren't we?
DS: Yes...but...
GD: But what?
DS: Well, it's like this. Promise not to laugh now.
GD: I'm a trained pastor. You know that whatever you tell me, however embarrassing, I promise not to laugh.
DS: I'm in love.
GD: What? You're "in love"? Ha, ha, ha, ha! Who's the unfortunate female?
DS: You said you wouldn't laugh!
GD: Yes, but I didn't know that you'd come up with something like that.
DS: No, really, I'm in love.
GD: OK. Who is she. How did you meet?
DS: Well, we kind of bumped into each other a few weeks ago when I was stocking up on tea bags at the local CO-OP shop. Now we contrive to meet in the tea aisle almost every day.
GD: I was wondering why we had so many packets of tea bags in the cupboard. What's her name?
DS: Bathsheba Earth
GD: Interesting name. I didn't know that there were any other talking monkeys around these parts, let alone a female.
DS: Nor did I. I couldn't believe my little monkey eyes when I first saw her. It was love at first sight.
GD: Does she feel the same?
DS: I think so.
GD: This could be serious. Hang on a minute. Did you really just say that it was love at first sight for her too.
DS: Yes, why?
GD: Looked at yourself in the mirror lately?
DS: What's that supposed to mean?
GD: Look, this might not be all that it seems. Bathsheba might be working for Dai Corleone. This could be a honey trap.
DS: What? You think she's going to lure me into the honey isle at CO-OP and pour that horrible sticky stuff all over me so that my fur will get glued to the floor?
GD: No. What I mean is that Dai Corleone could be using her to get to you. He wants you to follow her and then he'll nab you and you'll end up making tea for the Taffia again.
DS: That sounds a bit far fetched.
GD: And you think meeting up with a talking monkey girl who instantly falls in love with you is well within the realms of credibility?
DS: Stranger things have happened. Someone married you didn't they?
GD: Alright, alright. I hope you are right and this is genuine. But be careful, your girl could could be a Taffia femme fatale.
DS: What does that mean?
GD: It's French for "fatal female".
DS: But she isn't French.
GD: You're probably alright then.
But is he? You'll just have to wait and see....
Labels: David Sky, Taffia
Carl Trueman responds to Iain Murray on Packer and Lloyd-Jones
In the March edition of the Banner Magazine Iain Murray takes Carl Trueman to task for his contribution to J. I. Packer and the Evangelical Future: The Impact of his Life and Thought, (Baker Academic, 2009). Murray, Lloyd-Jones' official biographer charges Trueman with supporting slander against "the Doctor". Over at Reformation 21, Trueman responds to Murray's strictures, here.
Lloyd-Jones was one of the towering figures in 20th century Evangelicalism and his ministry did much to stimulate the recovery of Reformed doctrine in the UK and beyond. His writings had a massive effect on my own theological development. I believe that he was right to force Evangelicals to face up to the issue of ecumenical integration in 1966. But he was no infallible oracle whose every utterance may be quoted to end all argument almost 30 years after his death. One task that faces us is the critical appropriation of Lloyd-Jones' legacy. We need to learn what we can from him and press on to face the challenges of the present time. If the discussion between Murray and Trueman helps us to do that, all well and good.
Labels: Carl Trueman, Iain H. Murray, Lloyd-Jones, Reformed Evangelicalism
John Owen's anti-Roman writings
John Owen's anti-Roman writings may be found in Volume 14 of his Works. The majority of that volume is taken up with Admanidversions on Fiat Lux and its sequel, Vindication of the Admanidversions on Fiat Lux. Also there is a shorter piece, The Church of Rome no Safe Guide. In the Admanidversions Owen engages in controversy with John Vincent Cane, a Franciscan Friar. In 1661 Cane published his Fiat Lux. It was an attempt to take advantage of the recent upheavals in Protestant Britain in order to try and win the country back to Rome. His argument ran something like this: "Just look at what has happened to your once peaceful land since leaving the Roman Catholic fold. Protestant Christians have divided into mutually hostile camps. The nation has been torn apart by religious unrest, civil war, revolution and regicide. Come back to Rome and all will be well. You know it makes sense."
The restoration of the monarchy, with Charles II returning to England in 1660 did not succeed in healing old wounds. In the aftermath of the Civil War there were bitter recriminations for the Puritans whose political ambitions died with Oliver Cromwell. The newly installed pro-king, pro-Church of England authorities set about mercilessly persecuting their Puritan fellow Protestants. Cane chose his time well. The opportunity seemed right for his Roman propaganda.
In a sense, Cane's Fiat Lux was the British equivalent to Cardinal Sadoleto's Letter to Geneva. Sadoleto sought to exploit the troubles and tensions in Geneva that led to banishment of Calvin to woo the city back to Rome. Famously the exiled Calvin answered the Cardinal on behalf of Protestant Geneva (see here). But who was to answer John Vincent Cane? That is where John Owen comes in. Somewhat ironically the Restoration authorities appealed to a man from the vanquished Puritan Party to help combat the Franciscan Friar's propaganda. Owen was leader of the Independents, chaplain to Oliver Cromwell and former Vice-Chancellor of Oxford University during the Commonwealth period. The virulently anti-Puritan Lord Chancellor Lord Clarendon sent Owen a copy of Cane's Fiat Lux, requesting that he answer it on behalf of Protestant Britain.
Owen manfully rose to the challenge. Having said that, the veteran Puritan minister was no unthinking anti-Roman bigot. In his interaction with Cane, Owen does not adopt the stance of an angry "hot Prot" polemicist, gleefully exposing Romish errors almost for the fun of it. His tone is calm and reasoned as he scrutinises Roman doctrine in the light of Scripture. On occasion the great divine even permits himself a little ironic humour. Remarking on this William Goold, editor of Owen's Works writes in a Prefatory Note to the Vindication, "he reminds us in his humour of the cumbrous gambols of the whale." (p. 175).
If you will forgive the mixed metaphors, in his dealings with Cane, Owen resembles an indulgent cat toying with an overconfident mouse. But this "cat" has sharp teeth and pointed claws. When roused the old Puritan could be devastatingly incisive in dealing with his opponent's weak arguments. For example, he mocks the claim that the Rome has always been doctrinally consistent, never once falling into error, summarising Cane as saying, "The Roman church did never at any time adhere to any opinion, but what the Roman church at the time adhered to". Well that's alright then!
Owen's Admanidversions and the Vindication do not take the form of an orderly and systematic critique of Roman Catholic teaching. Rather, Owen let his opponent set the agenda and responded to Cane's points as they occurred in the Fait Lux. But his works are no less valuable for all that. Contemporary Evangelical can sometimes be a little naive when it comes to dialogue with Roman Catholics. Witness the ground conceded in the Evangelicals and Catholics Together joint-declarations, (see here for the latest statement on Mary). We could benefit from Owen's acute theological analysis of the differences between Evangelical Protestantism and the Roman Catholic Church.
Labels: John Owen, Protestantism, Roman Catholicism
The prize (not that there is a prize) goes to Pastor Zach. As the man said, the "Name that theologian" quote was from Holiness (SCM Press) by John Webster.
Labels: John Webster, Name that theologian
Ratzinger's Faith: The Theology of Pope Benedict X...
Fearless Pilgrim: The life and times of John Bunya...
Remythologizing Theology: An interview with Kevin ...
Everybody's got something to hide except me and my...
Carl Trueman responds to Iain Murray on Packer and...


text:
CARI Captures 473: ASEAN manufacturing's operating conditions deteriorate again in September
Home / News & Views / CARI Captures 473: ASEAN manufacturing's operating conditions deteriorate again in September
ASEAN manufacturing's operating conditions deteriorate again in September
(1 October 2020) ASEAN's headline manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) posted a modest deterioration to 48.3 in September 2020 after having stabilised at 49.0 in August. Firms continued cutting their staffing levels for the sixteenth month running, after seeing a slight easing of job shedding in August. The 12-month sentiment outlook, however, reached an eight-month high as companies had a more confident outlook of economic recovery. Among the seven ASEAN countries covered, Myanmar recorded the largest deterioration; its headline figure fell to a near-record low of 35.9 in September, marking a weakened performance of the sector amid stricter lockdown measures. Indonesia also saw a renewed contraction, following slightly improved conditions in August. Further contractions were recorded in Singapore (48.0) and Malaysia (49.0). Vietnam's manufacturing sector saw the first improvement in operating conditions for three months during September. Its headline index (52.2) was the highest since July 2019 and signalled a modest improvement in conditions.
New ASEAN regional centre to address the future of work
(29 September 2020) Singapore launched the Regional Centre for the Future of Work on 29 September 2020. The new regional centre will help ASEAN member states prepare for the future of work and will be advised by ASEAN Secretary-General Dato Lim Jock Hoi and relevant international experts. Speaking after launching the centre, Minister for Manpower Josephine Teo said the initiative is especially timely during the COVID-19 pandemic. The idea for the new centre was first presented as a regional initiative to ASEAN leaders and International Labour Organization (ILO) representatives last year at the 2019 Singapore Conference on the Future of Work. The centre will advocate the adoption of technology for inclusive growth, workplace safety and health, and tripartite relations. The centre will also be organising more conferences over the next few years, in collaboration with the National Trades Union Congress and the Singapore National Employers Federation.
Singapore ranked second most digitally competitive economy in the world
(1 October 2020) Singapore was ranked second in the world in digital competitiveness in the latest edition of the IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking. The ranking measures the capacity of 63 nations to use digital technologies to drive economic transformation in business, government and wider society, and is currently in its fourth year. Singapore excelled in areas including knowledge, technology, and employee training, but continued to trail in future e-readiness due to a lower adaptability to technological change and a drop in business agility. Other ASEAN countries covered in the ranking included Malaysia (26th), Thailand (39th), Indonesia (56th) and the Philippines (57th). The US took the top spot, with Singapore, Denmark, Sweden and Hong Kong rounding up the top five spots.
World Bank revises Malaysia's GDP contraction for 2020 to 4.9%
(29 September 2020) The World Bank has recently revised its 2020 economic growth forecast for Malaysia to 4.9%, from the previously estimated 3.1% decline. This was after the larger than expected contraction of 17.1% in the second quarter of 2020 due to the imposition of the movement control order (MCO), as well as weak external conditions. The revised projection reflected the heightened uncertainty over the speed of the global recovery from COVID-19, as well as the elevated unemployment rate and labour market weaknesses. Malaysia's central bank projects that the country will experience a contraction of between 3.5% and 5.5% in 2020.
Central bank to cease issuance of 10,000-Brunei-dollar currency notes
(1 October 2020) Brunei's central bank, Autoriti Monetari Brunei Darussalam stated on 1 October 2020, that its issuance and circulation of the 10,000-Brunei-dollar currency notes will cease effective 2 November 2020. The 10,000 Brunei-dollar notes is the country's biggest denomination currency. However, the bank stated that the notes will remain legal tender and retain full face value. The decision to stop the circulation of the notes was to reduce the risks of financial crimes such as money laundering and counterfeiting. The public was also encouraged to use alternative payment methods such as debit or credit cards for high-value transactions.
Cambodia wins rice battle in EU court
(29 September 2020) The European General Court has rejected the European Commission's (EC) request to reject a complaint submitted by Cambodia and the Cambodian Rice Federation (CRF) regarding the EU's reintroduction of tariffs on Indica rice exports from Cambodia. In April 2019, Cambodia and the CRF took the EC to court for the commission's decision to reintroduce import duties for Indica rice from Cambodia for three years. The court said that temporarily reintroducing the Common Customs Tariff duties on imports of the product is tantamount to limiting the access of certain entities to the EU market, including that of Cambodia. It said the contested regulation caused significant economic damage for Cambodia. "It follows from all the foregoing that the plea of inadmissibility must be rejected," the court said.
Household debt in Q2 2020 jumps to 83.8% of GDP as economy shrinks
(30 September 2020) Thailand's household debt level to GDP jumped to 83.8% in the second quarter of 2020, the highest since 2003, data from the Bank of Thailand showed on 30 September, as the COVID-19 pandemic hammered the economy. The kingdom suffered its largest contraction in 22 years in the second quarter and may shrink to a record 7.8% in 2020, according to the central bank's projections. As of June 2020, household debt increased to US$429.11 billion (13.59 trillion baht), from US$427.75 billion (13.50 trillion baht) at end-March, equal to a revised 80.2% of GDP, already among the highest in Asia. Bank of Thailand director Don Nakornthab said in a statement that the debt ratio was driven by an economic contraction, while the amount rose at a slower pace. Kasikornbank's research centre projects that the debt to GDP ratio may surge to 88%-90% at the end of 2020.
Philippines Airlines to cut more than a third of its workforce
(1 October 2020) Philippines Airlines started a major job-cutting programme on 1 October 2020 that could cut its workforce by more than a third, reflecting the deepening impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the resultant travel restrictions across Asia. The first phase of the programme will see the airline seeking voluntary resignations, after which compulsory resignations will be made. The move is expected to run through early December 2020, and staff were informed in early September 2020 that the airline was considering a 21% to 38% reduction of its workforce. Philippines Airlines is considering cutting around 35% of jobs across all departments. The airline and its budget affiliate employ around 7,800 workers. The airline's listed parent, PAL Holdings, which is partly owned by Japan's ANA Holdings, saw its revenue plunge 88.8% to US$97 million during the April-June quarter, which covered the most intense period of lockdown in the Philippines.
Founders of PT Lion Mentari Airlines planning on starting new airline
(1 October 2020) The founders of Indonesia's PT Lion Mentari Airlines are planning on starting a new airline in the country, as the airline seeks to move beyond a 2018 crash. The transport ministry has confirmed it is processing one application for an air operator certificate but did not confirm for which airline. Air travel in Indonesia in July 2020 measured at 1.46 million people, a significant decline from 7.14 million in the same month in 2019. If the new airline goes ahead, an independent aviation analyst argued it may allow Lion's founders to grab a bigger share of Indonesia's aviation market once air travel rebounds.
Vietnam sets out to achieve 17 sustainable development goals by 2030
(29 September 2020) The Vietnamese government has set 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) to achieve by 2030 in a recently-issued decree, Decree No 136/NQ-CP. The goals aim to reduce poverty and inclusivity and develop the country in a sustainable and responsible manner. The country will strive for a peaceful, democratic, just, equal, civilised society; build effective institutions with good accountability and promote global partnership towards sustainable development. The decree outlines tasks and solutions to realise the goals, with focus on completing institutions and policies, enhancing communications, promoting the role of and participation by relevant parties, mobilising and arranging financial resources, and intensifying international co-operation. Specific measures have also been assigned to ministries and sectors.


text:
Theiapolis > Cinema > Titles > T... > Th... > The... >
The Big Year2011
| Forum | Gallery | Quotes || The Big Year: DVD | Blu-Ray | Collectibles
Written by Mark Obmascik (book), "The Big Year" (also known as "The Big Year: A Tale of Man, Nature and Fowl Obsession") is a Comedy film, released on October 14 of 2011 in the USA , starring Steve Martin, Jack Black, Owen Wilson, Rashida Jones, Jim Parsons and Rosamund Pike.
What was the release date of "The Big Year":
The Big Year was initally released in the United States on Friday, October 14, 2011. Other films released on Friday, October 14, 2011 are The Three Musketeers (dir. Paul W.S. Anderson), The Thing, The Ides of March, Fireflies in the Garden (dir. Dennis Lee), and Footloose. This was seven (7) years ago.
It has been released on Friday, November 11, 2011 in the United Kingdom; Wednesday, March 21, 2012 in France and on Thursday, March 22, 2012 in Germany.
What is the cast of "The Big Year":
At the casting of The Big Year we find Steve Martin, previously seen in It's Complicated (2009) and The Pink Panther (2006); Jack Black (Bernie (2011), Kung Fu Panda 2 (2011)); Owen Wilson (Cars 2 (2011), Midnight in Paris (2011)) [ more... ]
Owen Wilson and Anjelica Huston have both also be seen in The Royal Tenenbaums, released in 2001.
Tim Blake Nelson and Owen Wilson also appeared together in Meet the Fockers, released in 2004.
Owen Wilson and Jack Black also appeared in The Cable Guy, released in 1996.
Anjelica Huston and Owen Wilson can be seen in The Darjeeling Limited, released in 2007.
What is the Storyline of "The Big Year":
Steve Martin, Jack Black and Owen Wilson are at a crossroads -- one is experiencing a mid-life crisis, another a late-life crisis, and the third, a far from ordinary no-life crisis. From David Frankel, the director of The Devil Wears Prada and Marley & Me, comes a sophisticated comedy about three friendly rivals who, tired of being ruled by obligations and responsibilities, dedicate a year of their lives to following their dreams. Their big year takes them on a cross-country journey of wild and life-changing adventures.
New photos for "The Big Year", a film by David Frankel
no reply yet - Starring Steve Martin, Jack Black, Owen Wilson, Rashida Jones, Jim Parsons and Rosamund Pike, «The Big Year» is a Comedy film directed by...
Five new clips from "The Big Year", starring Steve Martin, Jack Black, and Owen Wilson!
no reply yet - Three men, at different points in their own lives, decide to compete with each other at an annual bird-watching competition. "The Big Year"...
"The Big Year" trailer is here! Steve Martin, Jack Black, Owen Wilson!
The Big Year ➤ Message Board
The Big Year ➤ Cast
Owen Wilson as "Kenny Bostick"
Jack Black as "Brad Harris"
Steve Martin as "Stu"
Jack Black ("Brad Harris") and Steve Martin ("Stu")
Jack Black ("Brad Harris") and Owen Wilson ("Kenny Bostick")
Steve Martin ("Stu") and Jack Black ("Brad Harris")
Jack Black ("Brad Harris"), Steve Martin ("Stu"), and Owen Wilson ("Kenny Bostick")
Steve Martin ("Stu"), Jack Black ("Brad Harris"), and Owen Wilson ("Kenny Bostick")
Owen Wilson ("Kenny Bostick") and Steve Martin ("Stu")
Film Poster
Photos of Jack Black from "The Big Year", a film by David Frankel
1 message - Directed by David Frankel, and written by Howard Franklin and Mark Obmascik, «The Big Year» is a Comedy film, released in the USA on...
The Fate of the Crippled Cub
73 messages - To the Jouberts:...
( 1965 )The Big Job
Directed by: G. Thomas, starring S. James, S. Syms, D. Emery, J. Sims...
( 1972 )The Big Bird Cage
Directed by: J. Hill, starring P. Grier, A. Ford, C. Roman, T. Bracci...
( 2010 )The Big Picture
Directed by: E. Lartigau, starring R. Duris, M. Foïs, N. Arestrup, B. Katic...
Resources: Deuce Three Productions, DreamWorks SKG, Red Hour Films, Wikipedia and contributions from movie fans. Anyone can submit additionnal information and corrections, you can post a message into the forum, or you can contact me by e-mail. Information and materials are submitted by users and thus may not always contain up-to-date and correct information, so do not hesite to report mistakes, and submit corrections.Thank you!. Direct editing is no longer available, sorry.


text:
Why emotions matter when it comes to branding.
Richard Hytner
Why emotions matter when it comes to branding. Richard Hytner, Deputy Chairman of Saatchi & Saatchi Worldwide and London Business School (LBS) Adjunct Professor of Marketing, talks about brands that command Loyalty Beyond Reason™.
People act on emotion. They reason with conclusions, but they act on emotions. To really succeed in the Age of Now, you have to move people with the heart.
At Saatchi & Saatchi, we have a point of view about brands called Lovemarks, those brands that command Loyalty Beyond Reason™, the kind of products, services, places and people that earn our irrational loyalty. Our relationships with them are steeped in some kind of deep emotional connection.
According to our research, brands like Apple, Google, Disney, Pampers and Singapore Airlines and, in the B2B world, UPS, CISCO and Reuters, they're built on foundations of respect. No respect means no love, so it's important that these products and services, to build and maintain our trust, do what they say they're going to do.
But on top of that they build an emotional connection through feelings of intimacy, a sense that these brands belong uniquely to you in some way; through playing to all five senses like Nespresso; and by preserving some mystery, through their iconography, history and storytelling; those elusive qualities that in a human to human relationship drive a much deeper emotional relationship.
Filling the world with Lovemarks
Kevin Roberts, Executive Chairman of Saatchi & Saatchi, previously CEO worldwide for 17 years, created the Lovemarks idea his book, Lovemarks: The Future Beyond Brands. The book is a seminal piece of business thinking and Kevin hoped that, by giving everybody at Saatchi & Saatchi a copy of the book when it first published, all 5000 Saatchi practitioners would go forth and fill the world with Lovemarks. After three years running Saatchi & Saatchi EMEA for Kevin, I concluded that our people needed more than a book, so Kevin Roberts appointed me to a staff role to drive take-up of Lovemarks thinking across our Network. The work I've been leading for the last eight years has been to create the process, embed the practises, run the learning and development programmes and instigate signature experiences to actually deliver on the promise of filling our clients' worlds with Lovemarks. The work our global Strategy team does is designed to inspire and energise our people to adopt the kind of inspirational idea that Roberts wrote about and to use it to help our for clients transform their businesses.
The breakthrough in driving take-up of the proprietary process and practices was the invitation to clients actively to participate in our proprietary , immersive programme 2 day L&D programme we call the Lovemarks Academy. We only really began to get sustainable change within our own business when we brought our clients in and said, 'this is how we work, we want you to know intimately the process we pursue to develop ideas on your behalf, and we want you collaborating with us on the same platform.' In bringing them into our process, we cemented far stronger relationships between our clients and our local agencies.
Love on the inside
The concept of Lovemarks is not just relevant to external marketing, it works right across the business. We worked recently with the Global Assurance leadership team of PwC, one of the Big Four professional services networks.
Most auditors, asked that common dinner party conversation question, 'what do you do for a living?' typically engage in a little bit of shoe shuffling. Their perception of themselves is nothing like as positive as it should – and deserves- to be. Because, when you think of the real benefit auditors provide and the confidence they deliver to the capital markets, they fulfil a very important role.
Using the power of emotion, we co-created a Purpose with PwC Assurance's leaders about building a movement of trust in business and beyond. The Purpose provides those doing the daily work of auditors something to which they can aspire, something to feel good about. The idea of providing confidence at the fingertips of their clients is already building a greater sense of self-esteem and self-worth.
The Purpose was not marketed externally but, as a result of the work we did with them and the efforts their leaders have made to live the new Purpose, the vast majority of people within the 80,000 Assurance network in PwC are intimately familiar with it.
No love please, we're British
One of the interesting aspects of Lovemarks is the variation in the local embrace of the concept. Working in Latin America, China, India – everyone fell in love with the idea immediately. It plays to the heart, there was no inhibition or awkwardness about the use of love to build better business. They adore it; you go to their offices and there are hearts all over the place, it's beautiful.
You go to North America or to our spiritual home in London and there is a coyness about the use of the actual word, Lovemarks. In these markets, we see a far greater desire to interpret Lovemarks in a way that the talent that works finds more natural to them. So if you walk the corridors of 80 Charlotte Street, the iconic headquarters of Saatchi and Saatchi close to London Business School, you will hear more the phrase 'Loyalty Beyond Reason' the commercial idea that underpins to Lovemarks than Lovemarks itself because, let's face it, we know how squeamish the Brits are about the 'Love' word!
But the fundamental idea of Lovemarks and, importantly, the thinking and practices that fuel them, have travelled everywhere.
Why Apple should ignore the financial markets
Why Google's restructure will bring scrutiny, not satisfaction
Getting from A to B
From Behavioural Insights to Business Growth Build your brand through customers insights to drive profits with our short course.


On behalf of my wife and I, we would like to share a few closing thoughts as we say goodbye to Visitation Academy. We are so thankful that Mossimo was able to spend his last three years at VA because it has made such a difference in his life. When Mossimo entered sixth grade as a new student, there was plenty of anxiety and many rough mornings with tears involved and second guessing going on. We were so concerned about his transition and the tough time that he was having, but the faculty, staff and students not only accepted him, but welcomed him and made him feel like he had always been part of the Visitation family. Mossimo found such caring and encouraging teachers as well as wonderful and supportive friends. We have watched him grow both personally and spiritually and blossom in ways we could not have imagined, and for that we are truly grateful. The entire VA community has played such an important role in our lives. It has helped Mossimo excel academically and socially and also provided us with experiences and relationships that we will always hold dear to our hearts. Attending Visitation Academy has touched him in such a positive way and inspired him to do great things. Visitation has changed his life and because of that he is a better person. We thank you from the bottom of our hearts for proving to us that our decision to come to Visitation was definitely the best decision we could have made.
I am Sr. Asteria, a student teacher from Felician University in Lodi. Time flies! This semester is coming to an end, so is my student teaching experience here at Visitation Academy.
At Felician University, each student who studies in the Teacher Education program is provided an excellent opportunity to experience the real classroom situation starting from the second semester of the freshmen year. I am no exception. As my study at Felician comes to an end, I have to say that Visitation Academy is the best school that I had ever been placed in. From the moment that I walked into the school, I felt I was welcomed by everyone, including the parents. This is exactly what happens in the Gospel when Mary visits her cousin, Elizabeth. From this perspective, I would say that the community of the Visitation Academy really lives up to its name.
We know that student achievement not only depends on the school and the teachers, but the parents as well. My experience at VA tells me that these parties are really the paramount element for students' high achievements. I have seen how the teachers are dedicated to teaching; how the teachers' passion for teaching drives student learning. Every creative idea that comes from each teacher every day is a driving force for the students. I have seen how parents are involved in the various school activities; how parents have been supportive in their children's learning and school life. I am sure that parental involvement gives the students a sense of belonging and a sense of community here at VA. Such a wonderful school community truly makes me feel at home, and I have definitely become a part of it.
As the time goes by at VA, I realize that all good things come to an end, yet, I know in my heart that each of you I have met here has touched my heart and my life so much. You have been the second inspiration of my teacher dream here in the United States. I will keep you all in my heart and in my prayers wherever I go. May our Blessed Mother, Mary, always be your guardian and protector!