text:
Modifying chess conflict rules
Looking at game design in terms of ways of introdu...
How many dice (to include with a game)?
Two Problems for Historical Game Designers
Six words about role-playing games
The economic production cycle in games
I set myself the task of modifying chess in just one of the nine fundamental sub-systems of games: interaction of assets/conflict. Chess has a very simple conflict system: the attacker always wins via "displacement capture". What happens if we change that?
The obvious change, to me, is to use a randomizer such as dice so that the attacker doesn't always win. When one piece attacks another, dice are rolled and a comparison determines which piece survives.
In the first method a different multi-sided die is assigned to each kind of piece. A pawn is a D4, a bishop or knight is a D6, a rook is a D8, and the Queen is a D12. Or if you really want a game where the Queen runs amok (I don't) make it a D20. The attacker adds one to his die roll. So if a pawn attacks a bishop we have an even fight, D4 +1 versus D6. If a rook attacks a pawn it's D8 +1 versus D4. What happens if it's a tie? If we give too much advantage to the defense, such as ties are won by the defense, the game could become very static. So I'm going to choose the more exciting alternative which is to reroll ties. (Another possibility: both are eliminated.) I'll get to the King in a moment.
The drawback of this method is that you need a collection of special polyhedral dice. So in the second method we just use regular D6s. A pawn rolls one D6, a Knight or Bishop rolls two D6s, a Rook rolls three and a Queen rolls four (or again if you want the Queen to run amok have her roll five). The attacker gets an extra die. Reroll ties.
Now in either case, what about the King? The first alternative is that the King is an exception to the rules, with infinite attacking strength and no defending strength. So the king always wins when he attacks, and the usual chess check and checkmate rules apply. In other words we haven't changed the standard chess rules for the King.
The second alternative is to treat the King as another part of the combat. In this case the King has a dice strength and participates in combat like any other piece, and a player is not obliged to call check when he threatens the King. The question is what dice to give the King. My first thought is the same as the bishop and the knight, enough so that the King can take chances and might actually survive an attack but not so much that he becomes impregnable.
Now we can go further by introducing "support" from nearby units into the conflict. For example, one way to do this would be to add one point to the die result for each piece of the rolling player that is in one of the eight squares adjacent to the conflict square. Another way would be to add one point for each piece of the rolling player that can move to the conflict square (although they don't actually move). One point is going to mean less in the dice method that uses several D6s, and some players might want to add an entire die for each supporting piece, but then the support becomes more important than the identity of pieces in actual conflict. Nonetheless this support rule should help prevent a raid by one strong piece that just wades into the massed ranks of the other player and hopes for decent luck. Imagine a rook or Queen just attacking one piece after another and accepting counterattacks while hoping that its superior dice carry the day. The support rule is going to discourage that.
Now as I write this I have not tried to play any version of this game with an actual board and pieces. I am trying to anticipate what might happen, that is, I am playing the game "in my mind's eye". I think this is much more efficient than not anticipating what might happen and simply playing the game. But that depends on your situation and on how you do things.
Alternative randomization
Another way to use a randomizer is to give each player some cards from a standard deck of cards. When there's a conflict, each player chooses a card from his hand and places it face down on the table, both then reveal their cards, and the strength of the cards is added to the strength of the pieces. A card once used cannot be reused. Each player gets an identical selection of cards, say four aces (1s), four 2s, and two 3s for a total of 10. When these 10 cards are used up they become the player's new hand.
What is the strength of the pieces? A pawn would be a 1, Bishop and Knight 2, Rook 3, and Queen 4 or 5. If the King were used as no ordinary piece rather than an exception that it might have a strength of 2.
The problem I see in my mind's eye is that players might simply play the largest cards first in order when the initial battles and hope that the consequent material superiority would carry them through even though the other player might have better cards later.
This card method could result in "card counting", that is, memorizing what cards have been used in order to know what's left in your opponent's hand. To avoid that memorization problem - memorization has nothing to do with chess and is generally not desirable in modern games - I'd say that all cards that have been used can be viewed by the opponent so he'll know what you have left.
This can be further varied by increasing the size of the deck but allowing the player only three or four cards in hand at a time. This introduces uncertainty and further requirement for hand management. If you happen to get really good cards to start with you had better use them well because you're going to get worse cards later on.
If you use the point values normally assigned to chess pieces and varied the cards much more, with higher numbered cards, that might work better.
Some people will prefer this method strongly to dice because they feel they can manage their cards, and there's an element of bluff and Yomi (reading the other player's intentions) that doesn't exist when you simply roll dice.
I would be unsurprised to find that other people have devised fairly similar chess variants over the years. These methods are original to *me*, but that doesn't mean they're original to the world. That's often the case with game mechanics.
Alternatives to displacement capture
Chess is a game of perfect information, with the only uncertainty coming from the other player's intentions, but a minimax player can maximize his minimum gain regardless of the intentions of the other player. What we're doing with the methods above is adding uncertainty to chess conflict.
Can we alter the chess combat system without changing its perfect information nature? In other words, can we avoid uncertainty in combat but change how combat takes place, change from displacement capture to something else. This has been done, more or less, in many variations of chess collectively called "fantasy chess". New kinds of pieces are devised with new movement and capture methods. For example some may capture by moving away from an opposing piece. Others may capture by forming a pattern around an opposing piece, for example the piece moves so that it and another piece of the same player are on opposite sides of the piece to be captured. There are all kinds of jumps and hops and oddball captures from a distance. I haven't looked into this for many years but there are chess variant web sites and there are certainly sites about fantasy chess that you can look at.
But how else can we alter the conflict system for all the pieces without changing the movement of the pieces and the perfect information nature of chess? A simple change would be, when a piece moves it attacks a piece in an adjacent square, perhaps only orthogonally (up down and sideways but not diagonally). So a piece cannot move into a square occupied by another piece, opposing or otherwise. An attacker could often have more than one potential target, but he would only be able to attack/take one of them.
Some variation on the support I mentioned above might work, but I'm afraid it would result in two great defensive masses of pieces and regular stalemates.
Another method would be, you move your piece to a square, then it attacks a piece that it could move to if it could move again. That might make the attack quite strong, and would certainly make for a chaotic game. Somehow I feel it might be better if combined with one of the dice methods.
Helping balance the game?
Could we find a conflict system that gives an advantage to the black player, who has much less chance to win than the white player in standard chess? That would need to be a very small advantage or we might find that black wins more than white.
Perhaps we could introduce an input randomizer as opposed to the output randomizers suggested in the methods above. (These are Geoff Englestein's terms: an input randomizer occurs and is known before players act and (frequently) all players are affected by it as they play; an output randomizer occurs after players have acted and then they get a result as modified by the randomizer. Most conflict methods in wargames are output randomizers.) Because the black player moves second perhaps we could find a way to use the input randomizer to give him the last choice.
Unfortunately, nothing has come to mind that would be sufficiently small to balance rather than overbalance the game. Perhaps someone else will think of something.
Posted by Lewis Pulsipher at 5:58 AM 3 comments:
Looking at game design in terms of ways of introducing asymmetry
In many "natural" games, such as sports, and in many traditional board and card games, every participant begins with an equal position and prospects to every other. This is symmetry. We can look at game design as devising interesting ways to break up symmetry, to introduce asymmetry. Some of these are achieved through player choice, some through randomness, some through uncertainty, and some through choice or caveat of the designer.
Asymmetric assets
The most obvious way to break up symmetry is to be asymmetric from the start. Give each player different assets, or a different position if it's a spatial/geographical game, or both. This is a characteristic of most two player wargames but much rarer in wargames for more than two. It's rare in Eurostyle games as well. In fact it's pretty rare generally because it's much more work for the game designer. The designer has to balance at least two different groups in order to make the game fair. In my experience Britannia-like games are a big pain in the rear because there are four sides that are asymmetric in both assets and locations. It is much easier to balance a game that's symmetric. Diplomacy and Diplomacy variants can be difficult to balance geographically but all sides usually have the same number of units to begin with (in the parent game, Russia is the exception, with four units rather than three).
Asymmetry through game setup
This occurs when players either choose their assets, often according to a point system, or they choose their locations. In Risk players either choose their locations during the setup or the territory cards are used to randomly distribute them about the board.
Sometimes the board/playing field itself changes from game to game as in Settlers of Catan or computer Civilization. Or a game may have an exploration component which means that as locations are explored you get a new and non-symmetric board every time.
Asymmetry through roles
Many Eurostyle tabletop games use the idea of roles, such as King's adviser or merchant, each belonging exclusively to one player in each round.
Vinci/Smallworld uses a kind of role in the Empire characteristics that a player can choose. The difference is that available roles in typical Eurostyle games are the same every round. InVinci/Smallworld the pairs of Empire characteristics are rarely repeated within a game, so once selected by one player, they aren't available to another.
Asymmetry through the roundel
Some tabletop games use a roundel or other means to limit the action choices a player has in his next turn. As the player "moves" around the roundel, each turn he has a different set of choices in front of him.
Asymmetry through turn order
In some turn-based games there is an advantage to playing first, or last, or some other place in the turn order, and there's a mechanism to enable players to compete for the most desirable place in the turn order, such as an auction.
Chess is asymmetric with respect to turn order, with white having a much better chance to win than black. This is accounted for in tournaments by having players play both black and white equally in the course of the tournament. Another way might be to let black move twice after white's first move.
(The above three amount to asymmetry through what a player can or cannot do in the sequence of his particular turn. There are other ways to do this as well.)
Asymmetry through different decks of cards
Collectible card games enable players to make up decks of cards that are different from other players' decks. Other games that supply defined decks of cards, such as Fantasy Flight Games' "Living Card Games", strictly limit the number of possible decks yet each deck is different from each other deck.
Asymmetry through event cards
Many boardgames include a deck of event cards. Each player is dealt a hand of cards, so each player has different capabilities. There are many computer equivalents of this with many names such as beginning skills, perks, etc.
Asymmetry through character classes, feats, skills, perks
In games where the player acts through an avatar, the game often provides alternatives in character class (profession), character ability numbers, skills and feats, and other ways, both functional and cosmetic, to customize the character and make it different from all other characters.
Asymmetry through uncertainty
There are many forms of uncertainty, some of them resulting from randomness, some from the uncertain intentions of other players, and some from hidden information. Typical games using normal playing cards rely on hidden information, usually combined with the randomization of hands dealt from a shuffled deck to introduce a great deal of asymmetry immediately.
Asymmetry through randomness
I'm sure you knew I would get here sooner or later, because randomness is a straightforward and easily designed way to introduce asymmetry to a game. That randomness can derive from dice or spinners, shuffled cards, chit draws, and other more esoteric methods.
This can be quite straightforward. In Britannia, the setup never varies. But as soon as the game begins, different players attack differently with the Romans; and dice rolls for combat result in even greater variety. So practically speaking the positions of the Romans, Belgae, and Welsh differ from game to game even though the setup is unvarying.
What may be most important about randomness is whether it occurs as what Geoff Engelstein calls input randomness or output randomness. Input randomness occurs before a player acts, and may affect all players equally. An example of this would be drawing a artwork token from a bag that all players will then bid for. Which painting comes out is random but all players are affected equally even though some may prefer a different painting than the one that came out. Output randomness occurs after the player acts, and usually affects only that player, as in the combat dice roll in so many wargames.
Output randomness can be accounted for up to a point, but modern hobby gamers tend to feel better about input randomness than output randomness.
Greg Costikyan has written a brilliantly explained discussion of how randomness can be used in games: http://playthisthing.com/randomness-blight-or-bane.
Those who like dice games are going to answer this question with "lots"! But game designers can't think that way. Every item added to a game increases the retail price of the game very roughly six times the actual cost. So if you put in some extra dice that cost $.15 altogether the price of the game rises by at least a dollar. If you add a dollars' worth of dice the price of the game increases by roughly six dollars.
Not surprisingly, then, it's the publisher who has the ultimate call about how many dice are included in a game. The designer can suggest, can try to justify, but in the end the publisher will decide.
The publisher will try to include the minimum number of dice that is not obviously inconvenient for the players. The designer is going to want "more dice than the players need". That's partly because the designer recognizes that anytime players must delay to find enough dice to roll then the game lasts longer than it should. And in these days when people want, or at least say they want, very short games, anything that unnecessarily makes the game longer is a Bad Thing.
Let's take some examples. Fantasy Flight Games included five dice in their edition of Britannia. But when the game is played at a tournament the players typically open up their sets and have at least five dice per player, sometimes color-coordinated. :) The tournament games would definitely take longer if there were only five dice in play. Yet you can justify inclusion of only five dice, because a typical battle in Britannia is unlikely to involve more than three attackers and two defenders. There's a stacking limit of three in clear terrain and two in difficult terrain, except that each nation is able to have one overstack, of unlimited size in clear and four in difficult. So a typical defending force in Britannia is one or two armies and a typical attacking force is two or three. Voila!, five dice. (By the way, roughly 800 dice are rolled in the course of a Britannia game, so dice are important and delays can add up.)
I have a "screwage" style pirate game prototype that includes dice rolling to resolve recruiting, pursuit, cannon fire, and boarding. Over the course of the game there can be quite a few dice rolls but no more than one die is needed by a player at any time. Yet most of these rolls are opposed, that is there's a roll for both pirate and non-pirate, so you need two dice at the time to avoid delay. The question is, how many dice should be included in the game? Because the game is otherwise relatively inexpensive - it has no board, consisting of cards, some markers, and some dice - my opinion is that six dice should be included. That will be enough for one per player in all but exceptional cases (the game can be played by 2 to 8).
A game that requires two dice to resolve an attack is going to be slightly more expensive than a game that requires one die. If only one player rolls the dice in a battle then you need fewer dice than when both players roll. But as long as you keep the number down to around four dice I don't think you should customize your design just to keep the number of dice to a minimum.
When you're playtesting a game you should be aware of how many dice are available because this may impact the length of the game and the attitudes of the players. If you always playtest the game with six dice and the published version has three dice then it's not quite the same game, probably for the worse. So a wise designer would include no more dice in playing of the prototype than he expects to be included with the published version.
I think most readers will understand that dice other than six sided are significantly more expensive and should be included in a game only when the additional expense is justified by gameplay that could not be achieved with six sided dice.
How did this esoteric question come to mind? I am testing the less-than-two-hour version of Britannia, which uses picture dice. Picture dice are more expensive than normal dice, and though normal dice could be used picture dice are regarded as much "cooler" by players. We started testing with six dice, but as you roll two dice per army that's only sufficient for a 2 to 1 battle. Too often, I thought, one player had to wait for the other to roll before he could get enough dice to roll. Following the rationale for five dice in the standard version of Britannia I should include 10 dice in this version. But we tried playing for a while with 11 dice as it happens, and that seemed to be one too few, so now we're playing with 12 dice. That's a lot of dice but the game can go a little faster, and a major objective of this version is to have a game that takes 90 to 120 minutes. So I will argue in favor of at least 10 and probably 12 dice, but once again the publisher has a lot to say about it, and I may change my mind when I find out how much more picture dice cost than ordinary six sided dice.
"How many dice" is a minor thing in the great scheme of tabletop game design, but lots of little things add up so you need to think about these constraints while you design commercial games.
Another time I'll talk about the virtues and "sins" of dice in games.
Posted by Lewis Pulsipher at 6:25 PM 2 comments:
Two military/political aspects of the ancient world hold a fascination for me, because I've not found or seen a really satisfactory way to represent them in games. These are the problems of "the bump" and of tribute.
The Bump
The first of these is what I call "the bump" or the push. This is the way that horse barbarians migrating out of Central Asia pushed other barbarians before them. Sometimes the pushing continued until ultimately some of them crossed over the borders of the civilized world. For example, the Huns pushed the Goths into the Roman Empire in the late fourth century A.D., and helped push the Vandals/Alans/Sueves/Allamanni/Franks as well.
In historical games that have the benefit (or curse) of hindsight/foresight often the player representing the Goths, knowing the Huns are coming, moves into the Roman Empire on his own. But in terms of causality that is backwards, a flaw that's a consequence of putting history into repeatable gameplay. Also there can be cases where the player is not certain that the Huns (or whoever) are coming, or are coming immediately (this turn). But there's rarely a mechanism in games to enable the Goths to react immediately according to what the Huns do.
If the nation is not allowed to vacate an area until actually attacked then some of the hindsight/foresight problem goes away. But if they're not allowed to flee and attack somebody farther up the line that we don't have a true bump.
I have tried various rules that allow horse units to withdraw from combat without fighting and move to another adjacent area to cause a fight there, more or less replicating the pushing action, the bump, on the steppe. But this can be complex and time-consuming whken there are multiple simultaneous bumps, and I've never found it satisfactory; and it doesn't reflect more subtle pushes that affect foot barbarians farther on (the other Germans).
Confederations and Submissions
Associated with this problem is the problem of shifting tribal confederations. Historians believe that the typical large tribal groups that attacked civilized areas were confederations made up of many tribes, including tribes of varying ethnicities. So the Huns were not all Mongols - or is it Turks, nobody's really sure - but some were Iranians (Sarmatians, Alans) and some were other peoples that they'd picked up in their travels. The Franks were a confederation of many tribes, although probably all German tribes. The Vandals famous for sacking Rome in 455 A.D. were actually much more complex, with two kinds of Vandals plus hangers-on from other tribes including even the Iranian Alans. Along with them into Iberia came the Suevi who were themselves a confederation of Marccomani and Quadi (IIRC), but again mostly Germans.
This also extends to the long-term submission of one barbarian tribe to another, as of the Germanic Gepids to the Huns. (A confederation including Gepids finally took down the Hun empire after the death of Attila. The Lombards and Avars later did away with the Gepids.) Yes, there are submission rules in Britannia, but those don't reflect the reality that tribes submitted to the Huns made up a considerable part of Attila's force that invaded Gaul in 451.
How do we represent the coming together (and sometimes coming apart) of these tribal confederations? How do we keep track of who is who? How do we decide when a tribe submits and when it unsubmits?
The second fascinating aspect of the ancient world is the interaction between tribute and control, especially in the ancient Near East. It seems that most warfare was not actually intended to conquer new land but only to raid adjacent nations into submission, both to gather loot and so that the victims would peaceably pay tribute in the future. The Assyrian empire especially was known for this, and only gradually did they take full control of areas they raided as their tributaries again and again reneged on their promises, especially when a new king came to power. Typically an Assyrian king went on campaign almost every year in order to chastise some opponent by raiding their lands. Sometimes the Assyrian kings raised stele that described in detail the loot they received in the tribute they extracted. And when the king died it was often necessary for his successor to go back and raid areas that had been tributary but stopped as soon as the strong King passed away. In most ancient Near Eastern empires the borders we see on maps represent tributary areas rather than a year-round control, though a few maps differentiate the two as best we can with limited knowledge.
In the Middle Ages, Charlemagne's Empire had some aspects of that tributary nature, but this often took the shape of feudal military obligations rather than actual payment of money and goods. And once the empire was no longer expanding, no longer collecting loot for the army, those obligations were more often not fulfilled. In contrast, in "modern" (post-Medieval) times in European warfare nations nibbled at the borders of their opponents, taking control of fortresses and small areas, or colonies overseas, and rarely resorted to tribute. Only occasionally as in the partitions of Poland did the attackers conquer large areas.
The Assyrians resorted to mass exportations of population to help gain control of new lands. In the end perhaps there just weren't enough Assyrians to control all that they had, and when there was a long fight over the succession after the death of a strong ruler such as Ashurbanipal, this could drag the Empire down, to the point that it was destroyed by its many enemies in the late seventh century BC. Thereafter there were still people around who called themselves Assyrians, and to this day there are people in Iraq and elsewhere in the region who call themselves Assyrians and proudly hearken back to the Assyrian Empire, but there's never been an Assyrian state of any note since 605 BC.
In an ancient Near Eastern game I'm working on I have a simple tribute mechanism, that armies can temporarily vacate an area (which is not normally allowed) in order to attack an adjacent area and extract tribute, afterward returning to the areas they came from. The owner of the raided area can decide to fight or can simply give up the tribute, which is one victory point to the attacker but no loss to the defender. It's the no loss to the defender that doesn't quite fit the historical situation, but in this game the economy is very simple and it's not worth trying to represent economically that the area was raided. The very long time scale - the game covers about 2,200 years in less than three hours for 3-5 players - makes it difficult to represent something that changed year-by-year in actual history.
For whatever reasons the ancients were not inclined to completely destroy enemy cities the way the Romans destroyed Carthage in 146 BC and Corinth in Greece in the same year (when he entered Corinth "Mummius put all the men to the sword and sold the women and children into slavery before he torched the city"). A common culture may have contributed to ancient reluctance; I think the Assyrians were more willing to destroy cities of enemies who were not part of the ancient Near Eastern culture dating back to old Babylonia and Sumeria. The Greeks may have had similar reasons not to destroy cities. The Spartans refused to destroy Athens at the end of the Peloponnesian War, but Alexander the Great - a Macedonian, which is somewhat different from a Greek though the Macedonians liked to think they were Greeks - razed Thebes to the ground after the Greeks rebelled at his accession. On the other hand, centuries earlier the Spartans had destroyed Messenia and enslaved the entire population, who nonetheless retained their identity as Messenians.
All of this can come into play in the great mystery of history, the extraordinary effect that good or bad leadership can have in ancient (and medieval) times. Assyria fell when a three-way succession struggle following the death of a strong leader went on too long, but it wasn't the first time Assyria had suffered because of doubtful succession. The Roman Empire's great problem was the succession, and I wonder if more Romans were killed by one another in succession struggles than were killed fighting barbarians. Again and again and again you see the vast difference between outstandingly good and outstandingly poor leadership. I have leaders in Britannia, but their effect is not massive on its own; the Major Invasions have a much greater effect, and those are sometimes a result of leadership. In the much-shorter version of Britannia that I intend to be one of the new editions, you can only move half your armies when you don't have a great leader, a stronger effect added to the leader's bonus in battle.
According to tweetdeck, one of the trending:worldwide topics on twitter not so long ago was 6 word stories. In the past few months I've asked people to say 6 words about game design, programming, wargames, stories in games, casual games, zombie games, chance/randomness in games, innovation and plagiarism in games, and game sequels.
This time the challenge is this: say six words about role-playing games.
If you need some inspiration, look at the contributions at: http://gamasutra.com/blogs/LewisPulsipher/20121105/180889/Six_words_about_roleplaying_games.php
This is a discussion of how some games include a cycle of converting resources through some means of production such as factories or agricultural facilities into assets that are usable to help succeed in the game. These assets are often physical things but can be capabilities or even victory points themselves.
In a recent blog post I talked about to kinds of economies in wargames that have economies, "maintenance" economies and "accumulation" economies. This led to a more general discussion about economic production in games, and I was pointed to a BoardGameGeek post about "means of production" (http://boardgamegeek.com/thread/822865/the-means-of-production-and-how-games-innovate ). The author of that post ("linoleum blownaparte") generalized too far when he or she said that the colored cards in Candyland were a means of production. I am going to use the term "means of production" to refer to the equipment that is used to convert raw materials into something useful within the game - in other words, factories, agricultural facilities, or the like. I'll use "the production cycle" to refer to the process that begins with resources and ends with some result of production. Not all games have a production cycle, of course, or only a rump of one (as in chess and checkers).
The accompanying table lists not only games that use the cycle I'm talking about but some games that do not to provide a comparison and contrast. Table for this article is at: http://pulsiphergames.com/presentation/productioncycle.htm
The economic production cycle works like this.
1) The source of the resources. There must be some resource(s) that can be converted into something else, and these must come from somewhere. The source is listed in the second column of the table, after the name of the game.
2) Resource Collection. Some resources must be gathered, harvested, mined - collected in some way. This may be explicit or it may be as simple as possession/ownership of territory, which is really all you need for the agriculture based economies that have dominated most of history - "land = wealth". Sometimes labor is explicitly involved, as in the workers/peons/peasants in Warcraft II and III and colonists in Puerto Rico.
I have included a separate column to indicate the actual resources that are used up when an asset is produced. Sometimes resources are not used up.
3) Means of Production. Some kind of equipment is used to convert the resources into usable items are capabilities. In the modern age this would be factories. There is usually labor involved, though that is rarely represented explicitly. In an agricultural age the means of production was as simple as plows, kilns, scythes, pottery, storage cellars, and grain silos or the equivalent. (Pottery is one of the great inventions of agriculture because it provides rat-proof storage.) The means of production often governs where new physical assets may appear, such as Industrial Centers in Axis & Allies, buildings in many real-time-strategy games, cities in computer Civilization.
4) Limits on Production. There are sometimes limits on production. The obvious and typical limit on production is the availability of resources; if you don't have enough gold and wood in WarCraft 2 or 3 you can't produce more units even though you have the buildings (factories) with available capacity. You are also limited by labor: if you don't have enough people to collect lots of gold and wood in Warcraft, then you won't have enough of the resources to "fuel" your factories (buildings). Another limit is the availability of the means of production such as factories, so you may have lots of resources but nowhere to convert them into assets.
The limit may also be the capacity of the land (overpopulation), pollution, limits of political organization, or other factors that prevent infinite production even when resources and means of production are available. (In a pure "accumulation" economy there are no such factors; in a "maintenance" economy there will be at least one such factor.)
A few games have a minimum production, e.g. in Risk you get three armies even if you hold as little as one territory (normally it's one army per three territories). Monopoly's "Pass Go get $200" is a kind of minimum production, as well.
5) Assets. I'm going to call the result of production "assets". This is usually a physical item but may be a capability or even victory points themselves in a game, or it may simply be money. In agricultural terms production results in edible goods that enable populations to expand without suffering severe famine. Populations support military units, which in pure agricultural economies amount to little more than armed farmers. In more modern terms production results in weapons and training for people to use those weapons, that is, it results in military units. Military units can be used both to destroy or take away an opponent's capabilities and to defend one's own economy and population.
But the cycle may result in some capability, for example greater mobility for one's assets or more Action Points to use each turn. Sometimes production is devoted to improving technology. Production can even result directly in victory points, or something that amounts to the equivalent of victory points (money is the victory points in Monopoly for example).
In some games there is only one asset (usually "armies"), in others there may be many assets with very different characteristics, e.g. units or technology research.
In the accompanying table I've listed these production cycle steps and include a column that shows victory conditions for the game in question. Normally the production cycle is a means to an end, the end being expressed in the victory condition.
Most of the time the assets are a means to an end (I've listed victory conditions), sometimes they are an end in itself closely related to the victory condition, such as victory points.
I welcome suggestions to improve the table.
Producing assets that increase resource collection or means of production, or both.
The key question in the economic production cycle is whether and how much you can produce something that increases your economic production capability, whether resource collection or means of production or both. In many video games you can produce buildings (factories) that enable you to produce more units, or whatever it is that you mostly produce. It's less often possible to produce something that increases your access to resources, such as additional mining equipment or the means to discover and colonization new planets, or better collection/extraction technology.
This is a key question because the more it is possible to increase your production through the assets you have produced, then the more likely the game will result in an "economic snowballing" effect. That is, the more likely it is that the player who best figures out the most efficient ways to improve their economic production - or who is luckiest in exploration and exploitation - will gradually pull far ahead of other players because of geometric expansion of his economic capability. In a wargame, sooner or later he turns assets into units that then overwhelm the opposition. In a 4X space wargame he also produces superior technology that makes both his economy and his military more formidable. In a purely economic game he simply produces more of whatever it is that causes you to win the game: money, victory points, or something else.
An "economic game" or "engine game" is typically dominated by this economic snowball effect. Most of the time in these games it is not possible to take production capability from another player, nor to destroy it. The players who have been less efficient in figuring out the production cycle have no means to arrest their doom. Yet at the end of the game they can see that they have improved their economic production and their own general situation quite a bit so they can feel positive about what has happened even though they lost the game. This is the central equation of many (certainly not all) Eurostyle games.
In a wargame on the other hand there is frequently little option to increase your economic production other than by taking it from another player. This is especially true in board and card wargames. On the other hand, in video wargames such as real-time strategy games it's possible to significantly outproduce the opponent by building up your resource collection and means of production. Furthermore, in most RTS you cannot take an opponent's production and use it for yourself, your only option is to destroy it. In other words some real-time strategy games are both economic snowballing games and wargames. At the very top class of real-time strategy, the professional sports leagues, all the players understand the economic efficiencies and we are back to wargame, with the caveat that players must be able to perform at 200 actions per minute in order to keep up with other opposition.
An appearance of a production cycle.
Some games involve acquisition of some asset, but the players have no way to alter the sequence. For me this isn't a production cycle. For example, in Go, Tic-Tac-Toe, and Scrabble players acquire pieces, play them onto the board, and then get more. But they have no way to alter the rules about how many they receive, no way to increase resource collection or production of assets, no way to gain advantage over opponents.
Chess and checkers have a minor production cycle in pawn promotion and kinging. The player has one way to control what happens, by reaching the far rank of the board. In both games the acquisition of a new asset can be important. In chess promotion rarely occurs, in checkers it's normal for kinging to occur.
"Maintenance" versus "accumulation".
In the many wargames where you're not able to use the assets you produce to increase your economic production, the limits on production make a big difference to how the game works. I've discussed this in a previous blog post in some detail. http://pulsiphergamedesign.blogspot.com/2012/10/maintenance-based-economies-vs.html Briefly, in a maintenance economy you must pay upkeep on ("supply") your existing assets before you can produce new assets. This limits the total number of assets you can have. In an accumulation economy there are no limits, or very broad limits such as the large number of pieces available, so you can continue to produce units no matter how many you already have.
The maintenance economy is a great discouragement to "turtling". Turtling is much more common with an accumulation economy. (In case you're not familiar with the term, a turtle is a player who "sits on the sidelines" and does not participate in conflict, using the production cycle to build up his assets while other players are losing theirs in fighting.)
In some sense a zero-sum game - a game where the only way to gain something is to cause someone else to lose it - is the extreme of a maintenance economy, as epitomized by the boardgame Diplomacy. But it is also possible to have a zero-sum game where there is no economic production at all.
Types of in-game economies.
Every game has "an economy", but many don't have a production cycle. "An economy" refers to assets coming into or going out of the game. The question is, over time is there an increase in assets in the game, a decrease, or stability? For example, in chess and checkers the number of pieces decreases as the game goes on, that is, it's a "negative economy". Even though you can gain capability by kinging or by promoting a pawn, the overall outlook is negative. Monopoly is close to a stable economy except for passing Go and collecting $200, and for the cards which can add or subtract money from the game. So it is a slightly positive economy. A great many Eurostyle games have positive economies because the purpose of the game is building up assets. In many wargames depicting battles that take a few days and consequently don't have economic production, we have negative economies because both sides lose units as time passes. In more strategic wargames with economic production you could have positive, stable, or negative economies. Traditional Risk tends to fluctuate, exacerbated by the card turn-ins as they result in more and more armies. Axis & Allies tends to be more or less stable, or a little positive, but that depends partly on how the players play. Britannia-like games fluctuate, and a lot depends on how the players play, but there's usually an overpopulation limit on production so that the games cannot have strongly positive economies.
Not all wargames for more than two sides involve economic production. The ancestor of Britannia, 4-player Ancient Conquest, is actually a "battle game" with no economic production, just an order of battle. History of the World is also a battle game, despite its world-wide scope. The order of battle comes from the empires you end up with.
Games with a maintenance economy tend to be stable unless there are lots of ways to acquire new resources, such as colonizing new planets in 4X games or building new cities in computer Civilization. Games with an accumulation economy tend to be positive.
Where does the production cycle end and something else begins?
That's hard to say. Games with negative economies are unlikely to have a production cycle, a major reason why they're negative. Moreover, the production cycle is generally associated with political states/nations/empires, or with corporations. Games where the player has an avatar that performs most of the action aren't likely to have typical production cycles. When deconstructing a game I look for the resource collection and means of production, as well as the resulting assets.
Race games and word games rarely have a production cycle. The same is true for puzzle-like video games such as Tetris and Bejeweled. Abstract games (such as Blokus) in general are unlikely to have production cycles, but I'm sure there are many exceptions.
Shooters, adventure games, action games, and RPGs have ways to pick up and store new items, but there are no resources or means of production, just assets. The closest we have to a production cycle in a shooter is the items "dropped" by defeated foes (defeated foe becomes both resource and means of production). The more you defeat, the more stuff drops. Some of the drops are money, which can be turned into other usable assets (you purchase weapons). In RPGs you may have merchants who buy your loot (those "drops") and sell you new stuff, and even help you convert or sacrifice items in order to make better ones. In some games the player characters can create or convert items, e.g. making potions. Your loot could be seen as resources you've collected, and the merchants as means of production, with the assets being magic items, weapons, and other personally-usable capabilities (improvements in training, skills, feats), and money if you sell the loot.
Tactical games of all kinds are unlikely to have production cycles, especially those that depict battles. For example, Gratuitous Space Battles involves designing and "building" a fleet to face a foe, but there are no resources or means of production, rather there's a ship value limit, and a pilot limit, on the size of your fleet, which otherwise magically comes into existence for each battle. Chess and checkers are quite tactical games, as well, and have only rump production.
Notes about the table:
This is a large spreadsheet table that does not mix well with most blog hosts. Consequently, it can be accessed through my Web site at http://pulsiphergames.com/presentation/productioncycle.htm .
I am not a Eurostyle game player. While I once knew how to play the games listed, I've forgotten more than I know, so I've had to depend on regular players, and on BGG/Wikipedia, for some details of production cycles that can be quite complex. Such complexity will not be surprising in "economic engine"/economic snowball games, though I don't want to imply that all the games I've listed involve such. I welcome corrections/additions.
Some of the video games I also have not played or investigated extensively, and others I have not played in many years.
My book "Game Design: How to Create Video and Tabletop Games, Start to Finish" is available from mcfarlandpub.com or Amazon. (Books-a-Million has an eBook version at http://bit.ly/PQQqh3.)
I am @lewpuls on Twitter. (I average much less than one post a day, almost always about games, not about other topics.)
Web: http://pulsiphergames.com/


text:
Privacy Policy | MCAN Health
Last update has been made: September 06, 2018.
MCAN Health ("us", "we", or "our") operates the https://www.mcanhealth.com website (the "Service").
We use your data to provide and improve the Service. By using the Service, you agree to the collection and use of information in accordance with this policy. Unless otherwise defined in this Privacy Policy, terms used in this Privacy Policy have the same meanings as in our Terms and Conditions, accessible from https://www.mcanhealth.com
Here are the details that the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regards to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, known as General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) says we have to give you as a 'data controller':
Our website address is https://www.mcanhealth.com
Our company name is Mcan Sağlık Turizmi Asistans ve Danışmanlık A.Ş.
Our registered address is Tomtom Mah, Nuri Ziya sok, Nuri Ziya Ap, No 16, 34433 Beyoğlu, İstanbul, Turkey
All queries related to the privacy policy should be directed to our Digital Department via [email protected]
Information That May Be Collected And Used
Types of Data That May Be Collected
While using our Service, we may ask you to provide us with certain personally identifiable information that can be used to contact or identify you ("Personal Data"). Personally, identifiable information may include, but is not limited to:
-First name and last name
-Cookies and Usage Data
All Cookies used by and on our website are used in accordance with current English and EU Cookie Law.
This site uses cookies or similar technology to collect information about your access to the site. Cookies are pieces of information that include a unique reference code that a website transfers to your device to store and sometimes track information about you.
Most computer and some mobile web browsers automatically accept cookies but, if you prefer, you can change your browser to prevent that or to notify you each time a cookie is set. You can prevent the setting of cookies by adjusting the settings on your browser. Please note however, that by blocking or deleting cookies you may not be able to take full advantage of the site.
If you need more information about the cookies and how to disable them please examine the website: Google's Guide for Cookies
Our cookies will be used for:
-Making our website work as you'd expect
-Recognising when a user of the site has visited before allowing us to identify the number of unique users we receive to the site and make sure we have enough capacity for the number of users that we get
-Improving the speed & security of the site
-Continuously improving our website for you
-Collecting statistical information about how our users use the site so that we can improve the site and learn which parts are most popular to users.
-We may also log information from your computer including the existence of cookies, your IP address and information about your browser program in order to allow us to diagnose problems, administer and track your usage of our site.
MCAN Health uses the collected data for various purposes:
-To provide and maintain the Service
-To notify you about changes to our Service
-To allow you to participate in interactive features of our Service when you choose to do so
-To provide customer care and support
-To provide analysis or valuable information so that we can improve the Service
-To monitor the usage of the Service
-To detect, prevent and address technical issues
Your consent to MCAN Health's Privacy Policy followed by your submission of such information represents your agreement to that transfer.
MCAN Health will take all steps reasonably necessary to ensure that your data is treated securely and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and no transfer of your Personal Data will take place to an organization or a country unless there are adequate controls in place including the security of your data and other personal information.
MCAN Health may disclose your Personal Data in good intention that such action is necessary to:
-To comply with a legal obligation
-To protect and defend the rights or property of MCAN Health
-To prevent or investigate a potential wrong-doing in connection with the Service
-To protect the personal safety of users of the Service or the public
-To protect against legal liability
These third parties have access to your Personal Data only to perform these tasks on our behalf and are obligated not to disclose or use it for any other purpose in any case.
For the time being, the only third party we are using for tracking information, in anonymous terms, is Google's service called Google Analytics. Please read below for more information.
You have the absolute right to ask us not to use your data for marketing purposes. We can ensure you that immediate action will be taken if you claim such a demand to our end via [email protected]
Also please read the rights that the updated GDPR enables you to have:
-Request access to, deletion of or correction of, your personal data held by us at no cost to you;
-Request that your personal data be transferred to another person (data portability);
-Be informed of what data processing is taking place; • restrict processing;
-To object to processing of your personal data;
-Complain to a supervisory authority.
Our Service may contain links to other sites that are not operated by us. If you click on a third-party link, you will be directed to that third party's site. We strongly advise you to review the Privacy Policy of every site you visit.
We have no control over and assume no responsibility for the content, privacy policies or practices of any third-party sites or services.
We will let you know via email and/or a prominent notice on our Service, prior to the change becoming effective and update the "last update has been made" section at the top of this Privacy Policy.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Spanish paddleboarder crosses the Pacific Ocean
August 27, 2019 | Surfing
Antonio de la Rosa has become the first person to paddleboard across the Pacific Ocean.
The Spanish athlete completed a grueling solo journey in 76 days, five hours, and 22 minutes.
De La Rosa kicked off his paddleboarding adventure in San Francisco, California, on June 9, and concluded the epic challenge in Waikiki, Hawaii, on August 24.
The 50-year-old endurance sportsman paddled his board for 2,950 miles (4750 kilometers). But the last 24 hours were of concern and uncertainty.
"I was surprised by a strong wind that crossed the navigation channel between Molokai and Oahu. It put me in a dangerous situation, at night, near the rocky area of Koko Head," explained Antonio de la Rosa.
"Then came the part that particularly worried me - paddling from Diamond Head to the Waikiki harbor with side wind stepping on solid ground by my own means."
"This forced me to paddle close to the shore, which nearly got me into the pounding surf without even realizing it."
Surrounded by Water
De la Rosa slept two and a half months inside his 22-foot-long custom-made paddleboard. He had food reserves for 90 days.
Throughout the journey, the paddleboarder faced adverse weather conditions, including powerful winds and swells powered by Hurricane Flossie.
De la Rosa paddled the "Ocean Defender" at an average of nine hours per day. He lost 10 pounds during the Pacific Ocean crossing.
The Spanish athlete was all by himself during the solo odyssey.
His watercraft was equipped with a satellite communications device, GPS systems, and a computer that kept him in touch with the world.
Antonio says he ate well, mostly dehydrated and lyophilized products.
He drank water from a portable desalination kit that works with the solar panels and even allowed himself the luxury of eating some fish he was able to catch.
The stand-up paddleboarder from Valladolid, Spain, aims to raise awareness about protecting our oceans from human-made pollution.
ISA is the official governing body for SUP at Olympic level
Easy Eddy: the world's first collapsible hard SUP
The best stand-up paddleboarding spots in Austin
The disciplines of SUP and paddleboarding
5 reasons you need to try nighttime SUP


text:
Facebook to Acquire Coinbase and Launch Its Own Crypto? – No Smoke Without Fire
Facebook initiates deep studies of Blockchain, lifts the crypto ads ban and maybe even mulling entering the crypto industry in a big way
In May 2018 Facebook reshuffled its management team to a great extent and also launched a research group to study the Blockchain technology from scratch. Apparently, this research is so important that the group reports directly to the Facebook CTO, Mike Schroepfer.
The research group is headed by David Marcus, who in the past was in charge of Facebook Messenger and, what is more important, is on the board of Coinbase– one of the largest crypto exchanges in the world.
Besides, just the other day Facebook allowed back crypto ads for pre-approved advertisers, except ICO and binary options.
Rumors spreading fast
Previously, the Economist already briefly reported about Facebook, allegedly, wishing to buy another startup– Coinbase, to be exact. As is well-known, Mark Zuckerberg has bought his promising competitors in the past– Instagram and WhatsApp. So this time, probably, Facebook is just thinking over entering the new industry with a huge potential.
Analysts and marketers believe that if Facebook conducts this plan, it would do the social networking giant nothing but good– boost its value, audience and would also make markets of digital assets more legitimate.
Some experts, though, doubt that the Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong would be happy about the purchase but they definitely think that Facebook might go for it.
And if you think about another 'rumor' that Facebook is studying Blockchain and lifted the crypto advert ban to launch its own coin, the intention to buy Coinbase starts looking even more logical.
Facebook coin– what are its chances?
Currently, the aforementioned exchange services around 10 mln customers and wishes to expand its active user base to one bln. Meanwhile, Facebook is used by two bln users.
If the social networking behemoth were to launch its own crypto, the coin would enjoy a two-bln user mass, which is a lot for cryptocurrency. This is much more than the most popular coins have now, even Bitcoin.
Besides, it would also serve as an actual currency for particular services offered by Facebook and not just a store of value or a doubtful investment tool. Besides, the reputation of the company may well immediately give the token a good market price at the start.
Neither Facebook, nor Coinbase reps commented the situation in any way. It is sounds, though, that Mark Zuckerberg is being torn between the necessity to cooperate with governmental authorities (some believe that initially the Facebook crypto ad ban was introduced after it was made clear that Facebook may have certain problems with operating unless it prohibits the ads) and a strong desire to support new technologies and decentralization that they bring along.
This is what he wrote in his January Facebook post:
"One of the most interesting questions in technology right now is about centralization vs decentralization. With the rise of a small number of big tech companies... many people now believe technology only centralizes power rather than decentralizes it.There are important counter-trends to this – like encryption and cryptocurrency – that take power from centralized systems and put it back into people's hands."
Perhaps, if heavy-weights, like Facebook, Twitter and Google, start entering the crypto industry, it would ensure much faster adoption of digital currencies around the world and their implementation in everyday life.
Yuri is a crypto journalist interested in technology and technical innovations. He has been in crypto since 2017. Believes that blockchain and cryptocurrencies have a potential to transform the world in the future in many of its aspects. 'Hodls' major cryptocurrencies and has written for multiple crypto media outlets.
His articles have been quoted by such crypto influencers as Tyler Winklevoss, John McAfee, CZ Binance, Max Keiser, etc.
Currently Yuri is a news writer at U.Today and can be contacted at yuri.molchan@u.today.


Even without Paula Radcliffe and Mara Yamauchi, the Norwich Union Great Britain and Northern Ireland Senior Women's Team will head for the SPAR European Cross Country Championships in San Giorgio su Legnano, Italy, on Sunday 10 December determined to extend a proud record.
They have finished on the podium at each of the last six Championships – and Natalie Harvey (South London Harriers), Felicity Milton (Durham University), Jo Pavey (Exeter Harriers), Kate Reed (Bristol and West), Hayley Yelling (Windsor, Slough, Eton and Hounslow), Liz Yelling (Bedford and County) will be in seventh heaven if they can maintain the momentum this time.
The Yelling sisters-in-law – who have 14 European Cross Country Championships medals between them – plus Reed and Harvey clinched the Team Silver medals in Tilburg last winter. Hayley and Liz also joined forces with Radcliffe and Hayley Tullett to win Team Gold at the 2003 Championships in Edinburgh.
In between Hayley Yelling succeeded Radcliffe to the individual title in 2004, when Pavey took the individual Bronze medal.
Which leaves only Felicity Milton of this year's sextet empty-handed. And there's a good reason for that. The 19-year-old from Rutland last ran a track race aged 14 and hadn't even dreamt of taking up athletics until a few months ago. She merely ran to keep fit enough to hold her place in the university hockey team.
Coached by Brian McKay and Pete Coates, the engineering student was soon pushing the Durham males along in their training runs and scoring impressive victories in students' races.
Aged only 19 and an innocent at large among hardened endurance runners, she was second fastest to Hayley Yelling at the ECCA Relays to give the first real indication of her potential. And she finished second to the imperious Pavey in the trial race at the UK Cross Challenge at Liverpool on Saturday to earn automatic selection for her Norwich Union GB debut.
It's the same for her five team mates who have been there and done it before – eight times each and counting in the case of the Yellings.
Liz Yelling – whose six European medals are the 2000 team silver, 2001 team silver, 2002 team bronze, 2003 team gold, 2004 team silver and 2005 team silver – has not lost all hope of improving on her individual best position, fourth in 1999.
But, honest as ever after clock 2:31:39 in the ING Amsterdam Marathon on Sunday 15 October, she says: "I'm not fit enough yet. I had two weeks off after my marathon, which I needed to restore my confidence after I was forced to drop out of the Berlin Marathon.
"So I've been back for four weeks and in full training for only three. It's a bit of a battle against the clock but I always knew it was going to be. I've got two weeks to turn it around.
Hayley Yelling, who missed the trial after being pre-selected on the strength of her pedigree, endured a horror gale-blown flight and five-hour coach ride to northern Spain, where she finished seventh at the IAAF meeting at Llodio.
But the school teacher is nothing if not resilient. She is the only athlete to appear in every GB Senior Women's medal winning team at European Cross Country Championships – stretching back to 1996 – and won the individual title in 2004 to succeed UK No.1 Paula Radcliffe.
Radcliffe expects her first baby in January. Her successor as the UK's most successful endurance runner, Yamauchi, is recovering from her exertions over the past two years. Even so, GB expects its senior women to deliver – again – in Italy.
For the record, Norwich Union GB Senior Women's Team positions in European Cross Country Championships: 1994 ninth, 1995 seventh, 1996 second, 1997 sixth, 1998 fifth, 1999 fourth, 2000 second, 2001 second, 2002 third, 2003 first, 2004 second, 2005 second.


If you are sitting in your room right now looking for distractions to give you an excuse to procrastinate, I have the perfect one. Food!
A cute cafe full of bagels? Say no more.
This is the place to go if you want real Southern food up North.
If you are craving sushi but also want to listen to jazz music, Thelonious Monkfish is the place to go.
If you are craving authentic Chinese food and looking to get off campus and explore the Cambridge side of the Charles River, Sumiao is the place you need to go!
WTF (Where's The Food?) -- Sol Azteca: The Best Authentic Mexican Food in Boston!
Next time your parents visit, or your significant other or friend wants to take you out for a semi-pricey dinner, go to Sol Azteca. You won't be disappointed.
WTF (Where's the Food?) -- Go Nuts for Donuts!
If you love donuts, you need to try this place.
WTF (Where's The Food?) -- I'm Coco-nuts About Coconuts!
There is a common misconception that vegan food is dull and flavorless. But I am here to tell you, as someone who isn't vegan, that is completely false.
WTF (Where's The Food?) -- A little pizza my heart!
Need good pizza on a budget? We've got you covered.
WTF (Where's the Food?) - Its Nacho Problem, It's Your Blessing!
Because if you don't love nachos, you're wrong.
WTF (Where's The Food?): Guac On!
Are you sitting at your desk right now craving avocado toast and mint lemonade? If yes, I have the perfect place for you!


text:
Q: Help Identifying/Decoding Ceramic Capacitor I am having a difficult time identifying a high voltage, ceramic capacitor that I need to replace. I've tried at length to research this myself to no avail. I am hoping that someone out there can help me with this. Apart from the first line on the capacitor which I am reading as 220pF ±10%, I don't know how to interpret the rest. I cannot find a meaning for the symbol at the bottom that is a half circle with a bowtie in the middle of it and what does the tilde mean in this context? Cannot determine the voltage etc Thanks!

A: Its a murata cap, made in Thailand. Here is a link to the PDF
Has a value of 220pf
Probably one of these at digikey

A: See this document
Page 38:

*

*221K: Nominal capacitance: 221, K: Capacitance tolerance, K: +/- 10%

*KX: Type designation KX,

*X1Y1:   See Features, item 8:

*

*Rated Voltage: X1: AC440V(r.m.s.), Y1: AC250V(r.m.s.) or

*X1: AC440V(r.m.s.), Y1: AC300V (r.m.s.)

*22: Manufactured date class

*M15: Company Name Code: M15: Made in Thailand

A: This is marked '221K' which commonly means 220 pF,10% tolerance,
in an EIA standard marking.   The '250~' indicates
that it is rated for 250VAC.   Beyond that, the 'X1Y1' string
probably indicates that this component is safety-rated for direct
line connection (and would be considered a safety-critical component).
The color and the lower string probably indicate the manufacturer and
possibly even the factory of origin.
This reference may help with similar questions: wikihow

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


One topic that I've often heard in wedding circles is the benefit of whether your wedding photographer has shot at your venue before. I would suggest that most couples prefer this, and I know close friends of mine who chose their wedding photographer on Waiheke Island specifically because she had years of experience at the venue they were booking. (They couldn't book me, I was the best man!) Logically, it sounds like a great thing to have that venue experience on your side. But is it possible to photograph a wedding venue too many times?
Personally I love the challenge of photographing a wedding at a brand new venue. It allows me to be both completely creative and to shoot the best scene with the light that I have in front of me, instead of some pre-conceived idea about the scene.
It also allows me the feelling of staying fresh because I don't want to just re-produce the same weddings and photos over and over again. Personally that's a really important part of being an artist and enjoying what I'm doing.
This of course is just my own personal opinion on staying creative. Wellington only has so many great venues so it's only a matter of time before I'll have to come up with new and exciting ways to keep it fresh or start shooting nationwide and overseas. I'm quite looking forward to that challenge though.
So I'm dying to know, are you married and was it a factor for you? Are you planning your wedding and looking for someone that has that venue experience? Or do you sit on the fence and just want great wedding photos regardless? I'm keen to hear your feedback in the comments below.


This entry was posted on Friday, August 13th, 2010 at 4:14 am	and is filed under Featured. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.


text:
Baz Dreisinger
Professor, journalist, film and radio producer
Dr. Baz Dreisinger is: professor, journalist, justice worker, film and radio producer, cultural critic and prison-rights activist. A Professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York, she is the founder and Academic Director of the Prison-to-College Pipeline program, which she is now working to replicate internationally. Her book "Incarceration Nations: A Journey to Justice in Prisons Around the World," a first-person odyssey through prisons in nine countries, offers a radical rethinking of one of America's most devastating exports: the modern prison system. As a journalist and critic, Dr. Dreisinger writes about Caribbean culture, race-related issues and pop culture for such outlets as the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and ForbesLife, and produces on-air segments about music and global culture for National Public Radio (NPR); her first book is "Near Black: White-to-Black Passing in American Culture." She is a 2017-2018 Global Fulbright Scholar for her work in the realm of international justice.
All events with Baz Dreisinger
Discussion: Crime and punishment
Old Fire Station
Workshop: Making your case
1st Floor Seminar Room
Voices From Inside
Frederick Street, Port of Spain


text:
Our favorite articles from 2022
We don't know about you, but we can't believe 2022 is almost over. Whatever else we might say about it, it was certainly an interesting year. The focus in health and pharma news shifted from Covid-19-related stories to a myriad of other issues, including some surprises. And language and translation, naturally, continued to evolve. As the year comes to an end, we'd like to spotlight some of the articles we most enjoyed working on in 2022. If you missed them when they were first published, we hope you enjoy discovering them. And if you're a regular reader of our blog, we hope you enjoy looking back with us. - Should health and pharma ads be funny? Back in January, we looked at a new trend in marketing and awareness campaigns: using humor to deal with serious situations. Younger generations tend to prefer humor over false gravity or a lack of sincerity. Of course, using humor can be tricky when it comes to health issues, so we included some strategies as well. - Why is Wordle so popular - and can it be used in healthcare marketing? Our most popular article of the year was about…the most popular free online game of the year: Wordle. Taking a look at what made it go viral and how its fame could be used for marketing and awareness campaigns was a challenge almost as fun as our daily dose of Wordle itself. - The truth about why it's hard to put medical writing in plain language Sometimes, we like to investigate a longstanding problem in the healthcare and pharma community. When we dug into what's really challenging about putting medical writing into plain language, we discovered some troubling truths. - In the telehealth revolution, disabled patients face major medical care barriers The pandemic has changed our world in many ways. One of these is the rise of telemedicine. While telehealth is a convenient change for many patients, it's left others behind. In one of our favorite articles of the year, we examined a CNN Health report about the barriers to care that disabled people still face. - Three unexpected ways celebrities raised health awareness this March From the notorious moment Will Smith slapped Chris Rock for making a joke about his wife's alopecia, to Bruce Willis's heartbreaking aphasia diagnosis, March was a month in which -- whether they planned to or not -- stars made the world pay attention to several often underrepresented health conditions. We looked at three examples, as well as takeaways for health providers and organizations who also want to spread awareness. - Healthcare professionals, it's time to take TikTok seriously. Though we also paid attention to the drawbacks, we had fun looking at how TikTok has become an important way for healthcare professionals and advocates to communicate with a potential 1 billion users. - How brands and awareness campaigns can do Pride Month right In June, we shared experts' advice on how companies and organizations can celebrate Pride Month with sincerity and respect towards the LGBTQI+ community. -Why events and conferences need interpreters We were surprised to learn how few conferences organized in the US and UK hire interpreters, even though a majority are multilingual events. - How Pantene's new campaign ticks all the boxes for modern health and wellness advertising We were thrilled to find the perfect example of a wellness campaign: Pantene's Miracles Silky & Glowing hair care line, which embraced inclusivity, connection, and sincerity - not to mention actually collaborated with and did something to help the blind and visually impaired community, a group targeted by the campaign's creators. - Can AI localize and transcreate content? Some claim that AI can replace real translators and transcreators when it comes to localizing content. We took an in-depth look, and came away with a clear picture of the strengths and weaknesses of machine translation today. - Why was that major colonoscopy study so badly misinterpreted? In October, the results of a study on colonoscopy effectiveness made headlines for all the wrong reasons - misleading language has led to a misunderstanding that could put patients' lives at risk. Like many of our colleagues in the press, we hope that our article will help identify where reporting went wrong and share what the study really found. -Six fascinating facts revealed by this major telehealth study - The previous article on our list was about wrongly reported study results. On the other hand, we were impressed by the scope of The Chartis Group and Kythera Labs' two-year study of telehealth habits. Instead of using a relatively small pool of respondents, researchers examined a whopping 400 million insurance claims related to telehealth filed from 2020-2022. The results were fascinating. Over the course of this often unpredictable year, one constant for us has been our satisfaction in sharing healthcare and pharma translation news with you. Thanks for reading!
All of us at aiaTranslations wish you a 2023 filled with happiness and good health!


Data center managers sometimes ignore the value of developing strong personal relationships with key individuals outside their own departments. These external individuals vary from shop to shop, but usually include the managers and foremen of the company's facilities department and representatives of government inspection agencies. IT managers responsible for data center facilities don't always view relationship building as an integral part of their job, focusing instead on the more technical, non-human aspects of their work.
This fallacy can become fatal if data center facility managers alienate these key external individuals to such an extent that they delay critical physical expansions or upgrades required to sustain a stable operating environment.


Hey Future St. Volodymyr Campers!
The St. Volodymyr Camp Committee has been working hard to make sure our camp is an EXPERIENCE OF A LIFE TIME! But we need your help! These are all the things we need from YOU, our campers, to make this camp the most amazing one ever!
Don't be shy, make new friends.
Be Brave, try new things.
Include everyone, don't leave anyone out.
Love the cooks! Say please and thank you always.
Dance like no one is watching and sing your heart out.
Stay clean, brush your teeth and have a shower every day.
Tell us what you think! What activities do you enjoy more and less?
Stay healthy, eat well, drink a lot of water and get lots of sleep.
Participate in cleaning groups and keep your sleep area clean and tidy.
Be prepared, wear the correct shoes and clothes depending on the activity. Don't forget bug spray and sun screen.
Be safe in the water: Know your limits, do not dunk your friends underwater.
If you have a problem talk to a counselor that you trust.


text:
+48 74 664 91 64invest@invest-park.com.pl
Search in service
Wałbrzych Special Economic Zone
For the investors
What is WSEZ
Tax exemptions (Public Aid)
Examples of calculating the public aid
Calculate your aid
Who is qualified?
Sizes of Enterprise
Accumulation of public aid
Investment Lands
Find your investment land
Halls and offices
Companies in the zone
WSEZ
Structure of the company
Companies' Boards
Inclusion of territory into the zone
INVEST-PARK DEVELOPMENT
Holliday Resort
WSEZ Sponsoring
WSEZ Tenders
Company's Board
Investor's Service Department
Communication and Marketing Department
Organisational and Law Department
Investment Department
Finance and Control Department
Office Agencies
Tenders / permits
For zone companies
New jobs in the Wałbrzych zone
You are here: Start / News / New jobs in the Wałbrzych zone
posted by Jacek Serdeczny
Over 400 jobs will be generated by 16 entrepreneurs who have decided to invest in the Wałbrzych zone in the first half-year of 2016. The ceremony of granting the permits to conduct business activity, accompanied by an official banquet, was held at the Książ Castle. The event was attended by Deputy Minister of Development Tadeusz Kościński, Lower Silesian authorities and representatives of self-governments.
"We want the Polish economy not to be oriented at cheap production, but to enter the phase of innovativeness. It makes us happy that the new investment projects to be carried out in the Wałbrzych zone are also connected with the new technologies," emphasised Mr. Kościński, Undersecretary of State at the Ministry of Development.
During the gala, entrepreneurs were presented with the permits to conduct business activity in the Wałbrzych zone by Mr. Kościński, President of the Wałbrzych Special Economic Zone Maciej Badora, and Deputy President Michał Szukała.
Eleven out of sixteen permits are connected with investments in Dolnośląskie Province. The Wałbrzych zone covers 2,060 ha of land in 26 subzones in this province; almost half of it remains at the disposal of entrepreneurs.
"I am convinced that you have decided to d business in one of the most attractive destinations in Europe," Kamil Zieliński, Deputy Governor of Dolnośląskie Province, told the entrepreneurs attending the event. "The presence of central government representatives at this ceremony means that we will do our best to help you to constantly develop," he added.
Two new investment projects will be carried out in the Wrocław subzone. There are currently 17 tenants functioning there, who have incurred PLN 1.8 billion of capital expenditure and employ over 8,300 people.
In Wrocław, BSH Sprzęt Gospodarstwa Domowego, a manufacturer of home appliances, will expand its facility. At a cost of PLN 76 million, the company will increase the number of employees by at least 150 people. It has already been the second permit received by the German producer; the company's total capital expenditure has exceeded PLN 152 million and it employs 450 people.
The second permit to conduct business activity was also issued to HSV Polska, a Dutch company planning to expand its facility in order to increase production volumes. The plant produces packaging, technical components and Styrofoam insulation of domestic appliances. At least five jobs will be generated as a result of the expansion, while the cost of the project will exceed PLN 1 million.
In Dzierżoniów, BROEN S.A. will carry out another investment project intended to expand its production floor. The new plant will increase the production volumes of valves used in heating, air conditioning, gas and other industrial installations. The cost of the investment will exceed PLN 12 million and 10 new employees will be taken on.
"I am an inhabitant of Dzierżoniów and a local patriot. We have decided to invest in the town again in order to make it more difficult for our shareholders to leave it," jokingly said Ryszard Krzyśków, President of the Board.
In Bielawa, Jamtex will erect a facility for production of bed linen, tablecloths, towels and curtains. The Polish company will employ at least 25 people and incur capital expenditure exceeding PLN 2 million.
Two investments will be carried out in Kłodzko. Wessel-Poliamid will construct a factory producing components for vacuum cleaners, especially nozzles and pipes. The Polish-German firm will invest over PLN 25 million and generate minimum 100 jobs.
"I believe it won't be our last word and last permit to operate in the zone," said Marcin Depczyk, President of the Board.
Also in Kłodzko, a new plant will be built by TechPlast, a Polish producer of plastic elements used in the home appliance industry. The microcompany will employ at least 10 people and invest more than PLN 4.5 million.
The PCC Group, which has five subsidiaries in Brzeg Dolny, has decided to start another investment project. PCC Exol, a producer of substances used in home and cosmetic chemicals, will expand its facility in order to increase production volumes. The investment is estimated to cost over PLN 15 million, and eight new employees will be hired.
The Polish company Pebek will build a plant in Świdnica, where at least eight people will be employed. The factory will produce paving blocks, concrete slabs and tiles. The cost of the investment will exceed PLN 5.4 million.
Elektros will expand the existing facility in Bolesławiec. The new project is connected with the construction of a new production floor where electrical appliances will be made. The company will also offer warehousing services. The investment will cost PLN 2.5 million and lead to the creation of five new jobs.
The Italian company Inoxveneta, which provides metal processing services, will conduct another investment project at a cost of PLN 4.3 million. Five new employees will be employed at the new production floor.
"We have decided to reinvest here because we feel good in the Strzelin subzone. We are counting on future growth and innovative solutions," Bartosz Dreszer, Key Account Manager at Inoxveneta, emphasised during the ceremony.
GKN Driveline, a British company owning two plants in Oleśnica, has decided to carry out a third project. The company will spend PLN 138 million to expand its factory and purchase production lines. The plant produces innovative driveline components. At present, almost 1,000 employees work for the company.
Four new investments will be carried out in the WSEZ territories in Opolskie Province. The Italian company Moretto will expand its facility in Prudnik and increase production volumes. The cost of the investment includes the purchase of machines and installations to be used in the production of components for ventilation hoods and pumps used in the home appliances industry as well as components for the automotive industry. The entrepreneur has declared a willingness to invest at least PLN 3.7 million and employ 11 new workers.
ALSECCO has decided to conduct its fourth investment project in Nysa. The Polish manufacturer of window and door frames is going to expand the existing facility. The company will invest PLN 9 million, and thanks to it at least 15 people will find jobs at the factory.
"I have been observing Alsecco for almost 20 years," said Marek Rymarz, Deputy Mayor of Nysa. "A company that started in the proverbial garage has become the pride of our town. This titan of business is constantly growing and exploring new opportunities."
In Opole, Ladrob will conduct R&D and production activities connected with making feeds and preparations for farm animals. The microcompany with Polish capital will incur capital expenditure of at least PLN 1.1 million and employ three new people.
A second company has decided to invest in Leszno, Wielkopolskie Province. Robinsons Polska, a British company specializing in metal processing services, will build a plant where gates, barriers and other steel constructions will be made. The investor has undertaken to spend PLN 1.5 million and hire at least eight people.
"Each new permit that we issue makes us happy. Eight new tenants have joined us, while another eight companies have decided to expand their existing facilities. It confirms that they feel good in the zone and are going to further develop," said Maciej Badora, President of the Wałbrzych SEZ.
The Wałbrzych Special Economic Zone "INVEST-PARK" is currently the largest of 14 SEZs functioning in Poland. It covers 3,344 ha of land in 49 subzones. 190 companies are conducting business activity within the zone. They have invested almost PLN 22 billion and employ almost 45,000 people.
Wałbrzych Special Economic Zone "INVEST-PARK" Sp. z o.o.
ul. Uczniowska Street 16
The Brand of Polish Economy
BIP Site
Development: netkoncept.com
Our site uses cookies. Read our Privacy Policy


text:
Robert W Snyder Funeral Home
327 Easton Rd
Riegelsville, PA 18077
305 Delaware Rd.
Riegelsville, PA
More Obituaries for Ross Stokes
Dr. Ross V. Stokes
Dr. Ross V. Stokes, 82, formerly of Riegelsville and Wind Gap, PA, passed away Tuesday, Jan. 7, 2020, in Moravian Hall Square, Nazareth, PA.
He was born Sept. 17, 1937, in Ashland, PA, a son of the late Charles and Carolyn Beck Stokes.
Ross was a 1955 graduate of Easton High School and served as a Crew Served Quad Fifty Caliber Anti-Aircraft Gunner in the United State Marine Corps. He was a graduate of East Stroudsburg University and a 1960 graduate of Palmer College of Chiropractic. Ross operated, with the help of his wife June, his chiropractic practice in Riegelsville from 1963 until his retirement in 1986. During this time, he and June raised their family.
Ross served as president of the Upper Bucks Jaycees and Silver Lake Preserve. He was a life-time member of the President's Club of Palmer College of Chiropractic and was a Webelo scout master. Even as a child, Ross loved nature and being outdoors. He was an avid fisherman and hunter. He traveled on Safari to Africa and Alaska. He, along with his friends, founded the Easton Rod and Gun Club. He also enjoyed genealogy and was a big fan of car racing.
He is survived by his wife, Donna Meisel-Stokes; his children, Dr. Gregory Stokes (Peggy) and Wendy Stokes (Troy); three grandchildren, Nathan Stokes (Kiera), Chase Stokes (Eileen) and Kathryn Cannata (Christopher); four great- grandchildren; many nieces and nephews and brothers and sisters-in-law. In addition to his first wife, June, he was preceded in death by his second wife, Brenda.
Funeral services will be held Saturday, Jan. 11, 2020, at 1 p.m. in St. Peter's Lutheran Church, 305 Delaware Rd., Riegelsville, PA. Interment is in Fairview Cemetery, Plainfield Twp., PA. Friends may call Saturday at the church from 11 a.m. until the time of the service.
Memorial contributions may be made to the Wheelchair Foundation of America, 3820 Blackhawk St., Danville, CA 94506-4617. Dad loved this organization and the good they did throughout the world.
Arrangements by the Robert W. Snyder Funeral Home, Riegelsville, PA.
Robert W. Snyder Funeral
327 Easton Rd.
"I love you Great Uncle Ross! You were one of my idols and I..."
-Allison Pensyl
"My sympathy to your family. Sending prayers. Jerry Kunsman"
-Gerald Kunsman
View all messages 4
Inform family & friends of Ross's passing.


RCScrapyard ► Iconic Vintage Radio Controlled (RC) Model Car Archive ► HPI Wheely King 4x4.
Introduced by HPI (Hobby Products International) in 2007, the 4WD Wheely King 4x4 Monster Truck / Rock Crawler, was available with a number of bodyshell options: # 10830 / # 10831 / # 10832 - MINI GT-1 and in 2009 three new bodyshell options were made available: # 102291 / # 102294 / # 102297 - BOUNTY HUNTER, # 102292 / # 102298 - IRON OUTLAW, # 102293 / # 102299 - SCARLET BANDIT, were RTR with a 27T 540 Motor, ESC, battery, charger and HPI TF-1 radio system. An assembled Wheely King 4x4 without electrics - # 10836 - was also released in 2009.
In 2013, the Wheely King 4x4 - # 106173 - was upgraded, with a black chassis, new GT-1 bodyshell, an SC-15WP waterproof ESC and 2.4Ghz radio system.
The HPI Racing model is shaft driven, on a TVP vertical frame chassis, with a sliding universal joint and bevel gear drive system, coil spring over oil filled dampers and a full set of ball bearings.


text:
I Don't Know How She Does It (2011)
As an employee at a Boston-based financial firm, Kate Reddy (Sarah Jessica Parker) struggles daily to balance the demands of her high-powered career with the needs of her husband (Greg Kinnear) and children. When she gets an account that requires frequent trips to New York and her husband gets a new job, Kate finds herself spread even thinner. Complicating Kate's life even more is new business associate Jack Abelhammer (Pierce Brosnan), who throws temptation into the mix.
metacriticBased on 31 Critics
Release Date: September 16th, 2011
DVD Release Date: January 3rd, 2012
PG-13 |1 hr 31 min
Follow the movie on Facebook and Twitter
Cast: Sarah Jessica Parker, Pierce Brosnan, Greg Kinnear, Christina Hendricks, Kelsey Grammer, Seth Meyers, Olivia Munn, Jane Curtin
Director: Douglas McGrath
Production Co: Weinstein Company
Distributors: Weinstein Co.
Keywords: Sacrifice, School, Husband, Best friend, Amusing, Love, Daughter, Office, New York City, 2010s, Marriage, Family
More on Wikipedia
Purchase (HD+) $7.99, Purchase (SD) $5.99
Rental (SD) $3.99, Purchase (SD) $5.99, Purchase (HD) $7.99, Rental (HD) $3.99
Rental (HD) $3.99, Rental (SD) $3.99, Purchase (SD) $5.99, Purchase (HD) $7.99
Subscription (HD)
Free (SD), Free (HD)
Joe MorgensternWall Street Journal
Long after lice from her children's school infested Kate's scalp, I was scratching my head about why a 91-minute movie seemed so long. The answer came from reframing the question. Why was a string of sitcom problems stretched to 91 minutes? show more
Michael RechtshaffenThe Hollywood Reporter
Amusing, but formulaic, romantic comedy. show more
After a while, you stop hoping she'll tell her family to suck it up and watch some TV and then drink a bottle of rosé all by herself, and instead settle for wishing she'd develop a smidgen of self worth. show more
See all critic reviews on metacritic.com
Raising Helen


It's Friday Night Sew In again tomorrow night.
So join the sew in with us on Friday night and work on some of your unfinished projects. I know I've still got a few I'm going to be working on! 'See' you then!
My little boy turned 5!


text:
import { createBrowserLocalStorageCache } from '@algolia/cache-browser-local-storage';
import { createFallbackableCache } from '@algolia/cache-common';
import { createInMemoryCache } from '@algolia/cache-in-memory';
import { createAnalyticsClient, addABTest, getABTest, getABTests, stopABTest, deleteABTest } from '@algolia/client-analytics';
import { version } from '@algolia/client-common';
import { createRecommendationClient, getPersonalizationStrategy, setPersonalizationStrategy } from '@algolia/client-recommendation';
import { createSearchClient, multipleQueries, multipleSearchForFacetValues, multipleBatch, multipleGetObjects, copyIndex, copySettings, copySynonyms, moveIndex, listIndices, getLogs, listClusters, getApiKey, addApiKey, listApiKeys, updateApiKey, deleteApiKey, restoreApiKey, initIndex, batch, deleteIndex, getObject, getObjects, saveObject, saveObjects, search, searchForFacetValues, waitTask, setSettings, getSettings, partialUpdateObject, partialUpdateObjects, deleteObject, deleteObjects, deleteBy, clearObjects, browseObjects, getObjectPosition, findObject, exists, saveSynonym, saveSynonyms, getSynonym, searchSynonyms, browseSynonyms, deleteSynonym, clearSynonyms, replaceAllObjects, replaceAllSynonyms, searchRules, getRule, deleteRule, saveRule, saveRules, replaceAllRules, browseRules, clearRules } from '@algolia/client-search';
import { LogLevelEnum } from '@algolia/logger-common';
import { createConsoleLogger } from '@algolia/logger-console';
import { createBrowserXhrRequester } from '@algolia/requester-browser-xhr';
import { createUserAgent } from '@algolia/transporter';

function algoliasearch(appId, apiKey, options = {}) {
    const logger = createConsoleLogger(options.logLevel || LogLevelEnum.Error);
    const clientOptions = {
        appId,
        apiKey,
        timeouts: {
            connect: 1,
            read: 2,
            write: 30,
        },
        requester: createBrowserXhrRequester(),
        logger,
        responsesCache: createInMemoryCache(),
        requestsCache: createInMemoryCache({ serializable: false }),
        hostsCache: createFallbackableCache({
            caches: [
                createBrowserLocalStorageCache({ key: `${version}-${appId}` }),
                createInMemoryCache(),
            ],
        }),
        userAgent: createUserAgent(version).add({ segment: 'Browser' }),
    };
    return createSearchClient({
        ...clientOptions,
        methods: {
            search: multipleQueries,
            searchForFacetValues: multipleSearchForFacetValues,
            multipleBatch,
            multipleGetObjects,
            multipleQueries,
            copyIndex,
            copySettings,
            copySynonyms,
            moveIndex,
            listIndices,
            getLogs,
            listClusters,
            multipleSearchForFacetValues,
            getApiKey,
            addApiKey,
            listApiKeys,
            updateApiKey,
            deleteApiKey,
            restoreApiKey,
            initIndex: base => (indexName) => {
                return initIndex(base)(indexName, {
                    methods: {
                        batch,
                        delete: deleteIndex,
                        getObject,
                        getObjects,
                        saveObject,
                        saveObjects,
                        search,
                        searchForFacetValues,
                        waitTask,
                        setSettings,
                        getSettings,
                        partialUpdateObject,
                        partialUpdateObjects,
                        deleteObject,
                        deleteObjects,
                        deleteBy,
                        clearObjects,
                        browseObjects,
                        getObjectPosition,
                        findObject,
                        exists,
                        saveSynonym,
                        saveSynonyms,
                        getSynonym,
                        searchSynonyms,
                        browseSynonyms,
                        deleteSynonym,
                        clearSynonyms,
                        replaceAllObjects,
                        replaceAllSynonyms,
                        searchRules,
                        getRule,
                        deleteRule,
                        saveRule,
                        saveRules,
                        replaceAllRules,
                        browseRules,
                        clearRules,
                    },
                });
            },
            initAnalytics: () => (region) => {
                return createAnalyticsClient({
                    ...clientOptions,
                    region,
                    methods: {
                        addABTest,
                        getABTest,
                        getABTests,
                        stopABTest,
                        deleteABTest,
                    },
                });
            },
            initRecommendation: () => (region) => {
                return createRecommendationClient({
                    ...clientOptions,
                    region,
                    methods: {
                        getPersonalizationStrategy,
                        setPersonalizationStrategy,
                    },
                });
            },
        },
    });
}

export default algoliasearch;

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


text:
Amazon to take team-wise approach on remote work policy
11 October 2021, 11:29 pm. 9 minutes
By Chavi Mehta
The logo of Amazon in Lauwin-Planque, northern France, February 20, 2017. REUTERS/Pascal Rossignol/File Photo
(Reuters) – Amazon.com Inc will let individual teams decide for how many days corporate employees would be expected to work from office in a week, Chief Executive Officer Andy Jassy said in a message to employees on Monday.
Earlier, Amazon's policy required for employees to return to office from Jan. 3 for at least three days a week.
In his message that was posted on Amazon's blog, Jassy said https://bit.ly/3aq7l6P the company's corporate employees will be permitted to work up to four weeks per year fully remotely from any location within the country of employment.
Amazon, one of the largest private employers in the Unites States, would also require its employees to be close enough to their teams to be able to make it to meetings at a day's notice.
The company, which started on-site vaccinations for its frontline employees in the United States in March, has taken to a flexible approach to reopening like tech peer Microsoft Corp, which said it would take a site-by-site approach to U.S. office reopenings.
License and download content
The text, photographs, video, graphics, metadata, quotes, data, information, and all protectable intellectual property available through the this website is the property of Reuters and its licensors. It is provided by Reuters and its licensors to you for your personal use and information only. You may not use the Content or Service for any commercial purpose. You acknowledge that by accessing and using this the service, you agree to be legally bound by and hereby consent to these terms of use and the privacy policy. Learn more in https://www.reutersagency.com/en/about/brand-attribution-guidelines/
Content Types: PicturesText
Topics: Business & FinanceTechnology
Sectors: BusinessTechnology
Platforms: Reuters ConnectReuters.com PlatformWorld News Express
Regions & Locations: AmericasGlobal
Media Types: PicturesText
Satellite images capture moment Tonga volcano erupts
Reuters Connect is a fast, intelligent and intuitive way to source videos, pictures, text and more, instantly. Access millions of rights-cleared assets from Reuters and 70+ world-class media partners through our platform and start creating exciting and inspiring content to grow your audience.
The definitive destination for professionals providing the global intelligence they need to make smart decisions. Reuters.com is designed to provide deeper value to our professional audience who are looking for trusted, real-time information to make informed decisions in their business and person...
World News Express supports the delivery of Reuters Video and lives over satellite, fibre or IP straight into your production systems as soon as it is created, along with detailed shot lists, scripts and metadata to enrich coverage.
Get instant access to Reuters Connect
Our award-winning platform, providing you with accurate information when, where and how you need it, to make smarter decisions. Complete the form below for free instant access.
Job Role *
Job Level *
Audience Size *
--Please Select-- Up to 1,000 1,001 to 10,000 10,001 to 50,000 50,001 to 100,000 100,001 to 500,000 500,001 to 1 million 1 to 5 million 5 to 20 million 20 to 50 million 50 to 100 million Over 100 million
--Please Select--NoYes
Reuters Video
Reuters Pictures
Reuters Audio
Reuters Text
Reuters Graphics